27
October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

  • Upload
    mricky

  • View
    327

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

October 2002

Operating and Financial Review

Page 2: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

Summary

This report presents the findings of research into non-financial reporting conducted among communications and marketing directors of FTSE 1000 companies

The research took the form of a postal self-completion survey

Of 500 directors contacted, 85 responded

MORI also conducted 5 in-depth interviews with communications directors

Fieldwork took place in 12 August - 2 September 2002

Page 3: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

Summary

Respondents recognise the growing importance of non-financial reporting to their businesses:

– over nine out of ten respondents believe that it enhances corporate reputation

– most see it as a practice that will increase, as 85% say that stakeholders are ever more interested in corporate reporting on non-financial issues

– it is seen to aid financial transparency, as nearly three-quarters feel that it makes it easier for investors to understand how well companies are performing

– three quarters say it already plays an important role in influencing management decisions

The qualitative research also indicates that communications professionals in large businesses perceive non-financial reporting positively, primarily because it encourages a broader, more holistic view of the company. It also confirms that the trend towards increased non-financial reporting is driven at least partly by stakeholder expectations, as in the words of one, there has been a “sea change among investors and consumers”

Page 4: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

The majority of respondents (84%) report on non-financial issues; these reports are commonly integrated into their company’s Annual Report (45%), although over a third produce a separate report instead

The majority of reports are available online (72%), but only around a third of reports are externally validated

Responsibility for taking an overview of the measurement and reporting of non-financial issues falls within the remit of Communications/PR/CSR/marketing for two-thirds of companies

Over half of our sample identifies a lack of clear guidelines as a major obstacle to non-financial reporting. A further obstacle is the difficulty of establishing objective measurements. Indeed, as evidenced by the qualitative in-depth interviews, while financial measures are deemed easy to understand and deliver, elements of non-financial reporting are, in contrast, less tangible, more difficult to identify and measure, and relatively ‘new’ to companies and staff

Summary

Page 5: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

There is some resistance to the idea of making non-financial reporting mandatory; over half our sample (53%) are against such legislation, while only a quarter are supportive

However, this does not seem to represent outright opposition to any form of Government involvement. For instance, two-thirds agree that there is a need for one set of guidelines to simplify reporting. Furthermore, a clear majority (79%) reject the idea that non-financial reporting is an unnecessary burden on companies. Therefore a set of guidelines that simplified or clarified reporting on non-financial issues would probably be welcomed

The qualitative research implies that legislation on non-financial reporting may be better received if it is set at a broad minimum level, applies internationally and comes with market incentives such as tax differentiation based upon environmental performance

Summary

Page 6: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

Though three-quarters of respondents have heard of the OFR requirements, less than a third claim to know a ‘great deal’ or a ‘fair amount’ about them

Some directors recognise that legislation could help companies overcome several of the obstacles to non-financial reporting, in particular by increasing senior management support (56%), and unifying reporting practices (51%)

A slim majority also believe that legislation would have a positive effect on their overall corporate reputation and their reputation among stakeholders

However, on balance, respondents remain to be convinced of the bottom-line benefits of the OFR. While nearly half agree that it may lead to improvements in non-financial performance, only 28% believe the guidelines will have a positive impact on making company shares more attractive, and fewer still (16%) believe they will help improve commercial performance

Summary

Page 7: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

Non-Financial Reporting

Page 8: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

Non-Financial Reporting: Legislation

20%Unsure

53%Do not Introduce

legislation tomake it compulsory for larger companies

26%Introduce legislation tomake it compulsory for

larger companies

Base: All respondents (85)

Page 9: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

93

85

75

72

26

879

53

13

7

6

5

Non-Financial Reporting

Base: All respondents (85)

% Agree

Q How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements about non-financial reporting?

% Disagree

Enhances a company’s reputation

Is unnecessary burdenon companies

Make easier for investors to understand how well companies are performing

Stakeholders are increasingly interested

Is important for business management decisions

Introduce legislation to make it compulsory for larger co’s

Page 10: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

72

62

56

56

25

28

39

33

5

5

1

Measuring Non-Financial Factors (1)

Base: All respondents (85)

% To a great extent % To some extent % Not at all

Q To what extent if at all does your company measure or monitor each of the following non-financial factors?

Business objectives, strategy and drivers of performance

Corporate governance

Fair review of the development of the business

Policies and performance on issues

Page 11: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

55

48

41

33

39

42

28

51

5

12

5

1

Measuring Non-Financial Factors (2)

Base: All respondents (85)

% To a great extent % To some extent % Not at all

Q To what extent if at all does your company measure or monitor each of the following non-financial factors?

Events, trends anduncertainties that may affect futureperformance

Account of key relationships with stakeholders

Receipts from and returns to shareholders

Other factors that mayimpact on corporatereputation

Page 12: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

Reporting Non-Financial Factors (1)

Base: All respondents (85)

Q To what extent if at all does your company report publicly each of the following non-financial factors?

42

41

39

35

41

40

45

47

13

9

13

12Business objectives, strategy and drivers of performance

Corporate governance

Fair review of the development of the business

Policies and performance on issues

% To a great extent % To some extent % Not at all

Page 13: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

Reporting Non-Financial Factors (2)

Base: All respondents (85)

Q To what extent if at all does your company report publicly each of the following non-financial factors?

31

24

14

14

29

49

65

58

21

15

15

20

Events, trends anduncertainties that may affect futureperformance

Account of key relationships with stakeholders

Receipts from and returns to shareholders

Other factors that mayimpact on corporatereputation

% To a great extent % To some extent % Not at all

Page 14: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

39%

45%

16%

Reporting on Non-Financial Issues

Yes - separate report

Yes- integrated with the annual report

Base: All respondents (85)

Q Does your company publish a report on non-financial issues (e.g. a social or environmental report), either as a separate document or as part of its annual report?

No - do not currently produce a report on non-financial issues

Page 15: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

36%

33%

31%

72%

7%

21%

Reporting

Base: All respondents (85)

Yes

Available online?

Externally validated?

Q If a report is produced, is the report…?

No

Don’t know

Yes

No

Don’t know

Page 16: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

40%

36%

16%

14%

5%

4%

Standards, Guidelines and Models

Base: All respondents (85)

FTSE4Good

Q Which of the following standards, guidelines and models, if any, does your company’s non-financial reporting adhere to?

Association of British Insurers Guidelines

Global Reporting Initiative

London Benchmarking Group

AA 1000

SA6000

Page 17: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

67%

20%

13%

Guidelines for Reporting

Yes

Base: All respondents (85)

Q Do you think there is a need for one set of guidelines to simplify the reporting of non-financial information?

Don’t know

No

Page 18: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

54%

8%

6%

4%

2%

1%

Responsibility for Non-Financial Factors

Base: All respondents (85)

Communications/PR

Q Which functional area has the responsibility for taking an overview of the measurement and/or reporting of non-financial factors?

CSR

Marketing

Finance

Environment

HR

Page 19: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

Responsibilities

Base: All respondents (85)

% Yes % No % Don’t know

Q Does your company currently have any of the following?

67

49

14

25

38

68

13

18

8Someone responsible for NFR to stakeholders

A director with specificresponsibility for NFR

A non-executive director with specificresponsibility for NFR

Page 20: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

54%

48%

47%

35%

34%

33%

32%

Major Obstacles (1)

Base: All respondents (85)

Lack of clear guidelines

Q Which, if any, of the following factors would you say are major obstacles to reporting non-financial information in your company?

Difficult to identify objective measurements

More pressing priorities

Too many guidelines

Lack of resources

Lack of senior management conviction re benefits

Concern - expose commercially sensitive info

Page 21: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

29%

28%

28%

19%

19%

12%

Major Obstacles (2)

Base: All respondents (85)

Lack of cross-functionalco-operation

Q Which, if any, of the following factors would you say are major obstacles to reporting non-financial information in your company?

Lack of expertise in NFR

Concern- expose companyweaknesses

Lack of clear responsibility for NFR

Lack of board interest/support

Concern - expose companyto criticism

Page 22: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

Stakeholders

Informal feedback

Q Does your organisation currently evaluate the effectiveness of its communication of non-financial information to internal and external stakeholder audiences and if so by what means?

65%

52%

47%

31%

22%

11%

69%

41%

44%

35%

35%

7%

Informal evaluation - internal

External stakeholdersInternal stakeholders

Base: All respondents (85)

Media evaluation - internal

Formal evaluation by agency

Media evaluation - external agency

Do not evaluate effectiveness

Page 23: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

75

39

2535

54

2

External Services for Non-Financial Reporting

Base: All respondents (85)

% Agree

Q Please indicate whether you agree or disagree with each of the following statements

% Disagree

The amount of non-financial information thatmy company reports will increase in the future

My company uses external serviceproviders for non-financial measurement and reporting

The number of external service providers that my company uses for non-financialmeasurement and reporting will increasein the future

Page 24: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

OFR Requirements

Page 25: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

9%

21%

21%

22%

21%

Knowledge of OFR Requirements

A littleBase: All respondents (85)

Q How much do you feel you know about the likely requirements of the OFR?

Never heard of until I received this questionnaire

A great deal

A fair amount

Heard of OFR but know nothing about requirements

Page 26: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

Introduction of the OFR (1)

Base: All respondents (85)

% Positive % Neither/nor % Negative

Q How positive or negative an impact do you think the introduction of the OFR would have on each of the following aspects of your business?

56

56

51

51

28

26

33

28

3

3

6

746 34

2

Enhancing reputation

Unifying report practices

Improving reputation

Increasing seniormngt focus on NFR

Improving non-financial performanceof company

Page 27: October 2002 Operating and Financial Review

Introduction of the OFR (2)

Base: All respondents (85)

% Positive % Neither/nor % Negative

Q How positive or negative an impact do you think the introduction of the OFR would have on each of the following aspects of your business?

38

33

28

22

40

46

34

48

6

8

8

1016 58

6

Increasing employeesatisfaction

Making company shares more attractive

Integrating departmentswithin your company

Improving commercialperformance

Building the standard of communications