Upload
editor-rekha-saraswat
View
226
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Â
Citation preview
Founder Editor: M.N. Roy
499
THE RADICAL HUMANISTOCTOBER 2011 Rs. 20 / monthVol. 75 No 7
(Since April 1949)
Formerly : Independent India (April 1937- March 1949)
Dashrathlal Thakar 1911-1979Birth Centenary Year
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
Roy’s Group (1942)
1st. Row Fromleft Mr. Mansuri, Dasharathlal Thaker, Champaklal Bhatt, Chandrakant
Daru, 2nd. Row left Mr. Durgashankar Trivedi, Bhupendrakumar Shelat
Dashrathlal Thaker(1911-1979)
Birth Centenary Year
Glowing compliments to a Humanist!
(These tributes have been written on the occasion
of the centenary year of Dashrathlal Thaker. Mr.
Dashrathlal was a veteran Royist and was the
General Secretary of Gujarat RDP & Secretary
of IRHA in the seventies.)
Mentor of all
—by Gopal Bhatt
The topic of ‘Royism in Gujarat’ is capable
of being a subject matter of a thesis for
Ph.D. because the staunch disciple and loyal friend,
Mr. Taiyab Shaikh had once upon a time
established a camp and formed a Royist Group
here. Socialist ideology of Roy was distinctly
different from that of the communists and of the
socialists followed by Congress. Chandrakant Daru
and Dasharathlal Thaker had remained life-long
supporters of Royism. The impression of Royist
ideology was clearly visible in the thoughts and
conduct of both these co-workers, who were
mutually different friends. Many freedom fighters
had emerged from the village Borsad from Kheda
district which was also Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel’s
field of activities. In the freedom movement
spearheaded by Gandhiji, contribution of three
young students – Thakorprasad, Dashrathlal,
Champaklal has indeed been unforgettable. All the
three young students became Royist later on.
Dashrathlal Mohanlal Thaker was born on 2nd
October 1911. In Dashrathlal’s personality, I found
a distinguished friend and a perennially flowing
fountainhead of knowledge and, therefore, during
my college days I always preferred to stay in his
company. I indeed felt a sense of honour and
privilege to have enjoyed the companionship of
such a valiant, brilliant and visionary person. Also,
I had the opportunity of frequently meeting
Dashrathlal’s co-workers and eminent personalities
personally. Hence, to-day, I wish to recall my fond
memories about him from this platform.
Dashrathlal was brilliant right from his childhood.
He had unparalleled command on Mathematics,
Sanskrit and English language. He had expert
knowledge of labour laws and of fundamental
rights. He took severe pains in shaping his physical
stature. Doing physical exercises regularly by
visiting the gymnasium was his daily chore.
Basically being a teacher, Dashrathlal rode the
bicycle all the way from Ahmedabad to Jetalpur (20
Kms.) in those days of unpaved and dusty roads, for
giving tuitions to the students.
Inherently possessed with inborn virtues like
revolutionary thoughts, regularity and unflinching
perseverance, Dashrathlal willingly joined in the
then prevalent Gandhian movement of Gujarat
College headed by Acharya J. B. Kripalani. Not
only that, even by ignoring the numbing cold of
winter or similar adverse circumstances, he was in
the forefront to remain present at 6 O’clock in the
morning and never abstained even for a single day.
Moreover, even in the teeth of opposition from the
family members, he persisted participating in the
morning rounds, agitation, picketing and the like
activities after enrolling himself as a soldier in the
mainstream battle of salt agitation. When he was
arrested along with Champaklal Bhatt, at that time
the judge happened to be friend of Dashrathlal’s
father, who conveyed that he would release him
only if the boy tenders apology or gives written
undertaking that he will not participate in the
agitation. However, in defiance of this proposition,
Dashrathlal shouted ‘Vande Mataram’ within the
court premises and agreed to court imprisonment.
During the battle of 1932, he courted arrest from
Jambusar and was imprisoned in Visapur jail.
There he came in close contacts with revolutionary
1
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
intellectuals of Gujarat, Maharashtra and
Karnataka. Lots of books containing various and
yet best ideologies used to be received there. These
knowledge seekers were broadening their mental
horizons of political outlook. Due to this and also
because of an inborn perception and outlook
Dashrathlal gained greater clarity, depth and
foresight gradually. During imprisonment, his
experiences had really been exciting and
memorable. Some of them are produced below:
The inmates in the prison were offered loafs of
bread containing pebbles mixed with flour in the
jail’s kitchen so as to demoralize them. Although
having to eat such inedible bread, Dashrathlal never
became perturbed. On the contrary, he offered
courage to other inmates saying that “We want
freedom; hence we have to endure such small or big
troubles.” In jail, all prisoners’ hair used to be cut to
too short. During that time, one person (Comrade
Harry) having curly, long hair had been newly
sentenced to jail. To him, having to trim his hair too
short was painful just like having his head sheared
off. When his turn came and seeing him weeping,
Dashrathlal consolingly told him “Brother, don’t be
so sad. As soon as independence will be attained,
new hair will also grow which will be as curly as
now.” On hearing this, every one present there
burst out into laughter and the tense atmosphere
changed to a light and relaxed one.
When the freedom movement was in progress, a
meeting of Youth Congress was convened at
Nadiad in the year 1936. The trio of Thakor
Pandya, Champaklal Bhatt and Dashrathlal Thaker
was famous in those days for their hot-headed
temperament. These three leaders intended to hand
over a memorandum to Pandit Nehru about Youth
Congress. When Sardar Patel came to know that the
three friends have come together, he cautiously told
Nehru, “Let us now go as it is quite late and it is also
time for you to take bath and snacks”. Since Nehru
went for bath, the trio, at that point of time
suppressed their anger. What else to do? Sardar
Patel was a Gujarati and that too a native of Kheda
district. They could not afford to displease him too?
When now-a-days co-operative movement is
advocated with much fanfare, to-day’s youth must
remember that the foundation for co-operative
movement was laid in Gujarat way back in 1940s
by the Roy Group. India’s great revolutionary
thinker Manavendra Nath Roy had laid foundation
for a humanist philosophy in which a strong
rational thinking process was inculcated on the
national level for the communist ideology. In those
days very few people could discern the difference
between communism and Roy’s ideology and
among them one was Dashrathlal and another was
his inmate during the jail term, Mr. V.B. Karnik.
Dashrathlal Thaker made all out efforts to explain
M.N. Roy’s writings on political revolution in
China and on the new aspects of nationalism and
humanism in that period of colonialism and
imperialism. He had especially decided to have a
philosophical approach of remaining a life-long
activist to strive for the betterment of the deprived
masses of society and for humanist social reforms.
Only occasionally could people come across such
individuals as Dashrathlal who stood steadfast as a
pillar in support of Royist ideology in his group in
Gujarat.
To make notes of Dashrathlal’s contributions in the
area of Trade Union will require composing an
entire book. To prepare a Charter of Demand based
on careful calculation of salary and allowances
drawn by large number of employees of Govt.,
Semi-Govt. and private institutions, to hand it over
to the competent authority, to fight a legal battle or
confrontation and ultimately to find a solution in
the best interests of the workers. He remained
constantly engrossed in such highly tiresome tasks.
He was preparing briefs very carefully even for
cases of very small men. One such case he fought
on behalf of some of the gardeners against the mill
owners even up to the Supreme Court and finally
won the case. Not only that, he, never in his life,
was pretentious nor did he yearn for any kind of
publicity.
Dashrathlal spent his entire life to safe guard the
rights of textile mills workers of Ahmedabad and of
2
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
miscellaneous factory workers. He never took
financial benefit for his services from the Union.
He was working as a teacher and felt satisfied with
that income. In spite of insistence from the workers,
he had never taken a single paisa for his work. Even
when during financial crisis, there was no laxity in
his selfless services. He ritually followed the rule of
coming to the office ahead of all and was last to
leave the office. While talking to someone on this
point, Dashrathlal selflessly admitted that it is my
good luck that these people offer me opportunity to
work on their behalf. I enjoy doing work for them.
He often told that he is indebted to these workers. It
would appear as a dream to-day if any trade
unionist indeed possessed such noble feelings.
Earlier, the employees of the Gujarat Chamber of
Commerce and Industry were receiving very less
salary. For that he sat with the delegation of the mill
owners and pleaded that such less pay scale was not
acceptable. Simultaneously he collected
information of salary offered by the Chambers of
Commerce at Delhi, Bombay, Calcutta and
Madras. Upon receiving the reply from the
representatives that ‘This is not possible’,
Dashrathlal produced all the information he had
already collected beforehand. On seeing it, the mill
owners immediately agreed to increase the salaries.
Further, he also cleverly persuaded them to draw up
a Charter of Demands. In true sense, this was in the
interest of the workers. After a long time, the
mill-owners’ representatives realized that although
they themselves were shrewd businessmen, they
were in fact outsmarted by an honest trade unionist.
Further, upon the argument by the then Director,
Dr. Vanikar of Gulabbai General Hospital about
less salary and allowances that “this is a public
service institution”, Dashrathlal had replied that
“facilities provided in the public service
institutions are for the benefit of the people,
whereas Ward Boy, Nurse and other staff must be
given enough compensation. Thus, after going
deep in to the case and presenting logical and
coherent arguments he finally triumphed. This
could be possible only by the diligent efforts of
Dashrathlal.
When the then Minister of Gujarat Govt.,
Thakorbhai Desai took a decision that English will
be taught in the schools of Gujarat from 8th
standard, Roy’s Group filed a writ petition in the
High Court by making Thakorbhai Thakor,
Principal of Dewan Ballubhai High School, a party.
His demand was that English should be taught right
from 5th standard. The entire Roy Group believed
that it is the prerogative of the parents to decide
from which standard and in which medium their
wards should be given education. Needless to say,
the interest of Gujarat got the upper hand.
Contribution of Dashrathlal in this matter shall
always be cherished for centuries to come.
The duo of Dashrathlal and Chandrakant Daru was
world famous. As was the position of Shri
Mahadevbhai Desai as P.A., in the life of Mahatma
Gandhiji, so was the position of Dashrathlal in the
life of Chandrakant Daru. Nirubhai Desai who
remained with these friends during the Freedom
Movement has written a very nice article about
these two friends in his column ‘Vasarika’
published in Gujarat Samachar whose title was
quite apt and meaningful ‘Daru would have been a
nobody without Dashrathlal’. It is worthy to note
that upon insistence from Dashrathlal Shri Daru
was persuaded to accept the ‘Sanad’ for practicing
law.
When the Mahagujarat Movement of 1956 was
going on, at that time, the strength of Labour Union
of Roy Group had almost reached to one lac even
then he never criticized or passed comments about
Majoor Mahajan (founded by Mahatma Gandhi) or
its office-bearers like Khandubhai Desai, Somnath
Dave, Arivindbhai Buch or Navinchandra Barot.
At that time, if he would have thought, he could
have easily got the Majoor Mahajan premises
situated at Lal Darwaja. But he had never harbored
such trivial temptations. Having stayed in a rented
house at Madalpur for many years, he gave back
vacant possession to the original owner and shifted
3
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
to some other residence. In Mirzapur, Labour Union’s
office was functional in a two storey building. When the
Land Lord was in need of ground floor, he immediately
returned it in spite of displeasure of some of the
colleagues and said “we are indebted to this land lord;
we have used his steps lacs of times. Now when a tenant
is eager to illegally take over land lord’s house, in that
situation, Dashrathlal’s sense of renunciation was
indeed exemplary.
Dashrathlal was equally aware of his own rights
and was an expert of laws and legal matters. In the
initial years, Office of the Radical Democratic
Party was situated in Nava Vas of Gol Limda. In
view of certain disagreements with the ideologies
of Delhi based Head Office, Shri V.M. Tarkunde
came for taking back possession of the office space
but on seeing the hot temperament of Dashrathlal,
he quietly went away.
During the agitation of 1942, Dashrathlal was
handling the newspaper of Independent India. His
performance both as a Reporter and as an Editor
was praiseworthy. His handling of bulletins and
periodicals like Manav Samaj and Chetan was
equally noteworthy. When Indiraji imposed
emergency in the entire country in 1975, Daru
Saheb was in jail and at that time, Dashrathlal took
over the dual and extra responsibility. When not
very ruthless write-ups were in circulation against
the emergency at that time, he composed a
sensational article ‘Resistance is the only way’ in
Manav Samaj and published it. This article became
the best example of his fearlessness and intuitive
inherent powers. It did not come to the knowledge
of police during the emergency that ‘most wanted’
George Fernandez and Karpuri Thakur were in the
hide-out of otherwise peaceful and serene person
like Dashrathlal. But even to-day hardly few people
may know that the responsibility for giving shelter
to Shri Fernandez in Ahmedabad was also
shouldered by Dashrathlal, in addition to
Prasannadas Patwari.
After declaration of emergency, All India
Conference of All India Radical Humanists was
convened. At that time, when Maniben Kara and
Karnik Saheb in their address appealed to overlook
the dictatorship triggered by Indiraji, and when it
was said “You should not push the cat in the
corner”, then Dashrathlal to the surprise of the
audience, spoke aloud, “Friends is Indira a tigress
that you are advocating to overlook her
dictatorship? How can she ban the entire country’s
freedom? He further added that in a democracy,
only freedom and liberty are the most important
aspects. Dashrathlal possessing such strong will
power motivated lacs of people and we can proudly
say that only such acts of bravery, could force the
dictatorship of Indiraji to come to an end.
Revered Dashrathlal was a man to be cherished as
an affectionate stalwart, sincere friend and a loving
father. Dashrathlal had made special efforts in
helping one of his neighbours in Madalpur, named,
Manu Patel in pursuing studies of B.A., and B. Ed.
He had also helped another ordinary person Safi
Mohammad Baluch in becoming a successful
advocate. To-day, family members of both these
persons gratefully remember Dashrathlal. He also
carefully nurtured his sons and daughters and
provided them a backing as long as he lived. In
spite of his weak economic condition and both the
daughters mentally ill, Dashrathlal did not accept
the Freedom Fighter’s pension offered by the Govt.
He never hankered after popularity for his noble
deeds. He also did not apply for Copper Plate
offered by the Govt.
He suffered a heart attack during the last week of
his life but before getting admitted in the I.C.U.
ward of Civil Hospital in the evening he called the
Executive Committee of Workers Union at his
house; ignoring breathlessness and chest pain he
kept giving them advice and directions as a dutiful
leader. Like Daru, he also had suffered from lungs
cancer and Daru also insisted for taking him along
to U.S.A. But he was not prepared to go along with
him saying, “It is not a question of money, but if I
come by leaving these workers’ jobs unfinished it
may amount to a breach of trust.” And thereafter
also, it never became possible because, after the
demise of Daru at U.S.A. he continued to shoulder
4
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
the burden of many such tasks.
He had taken a solemn promise from his son
Gautambhai never to recover any pending dues
from many of the trade unions.
On 19th May 1979 the blazing lamp extinguished its
light. His motto was to do the maximum work, to
remain at the rear and to speak the least. His loss
will be felt by the labour workers to the utmost. A
leader giving right guidance by himself remaining
completely desireless and selfless is really difficult
to find. In the to-day’s crowd of corrupt and power
greedy politicians, impartial, unattached and
unwavering personality of Dashrathlal Thaker will
emerge as a lighthouse or lamp post. ‘Big’ or
‘Mota’ was his nick name. I feel he was really
possessing ‘bigness’ and hence, he became popular
as ‘Big’ or ‘Mota’.
[Mr. Gopal Bhatt Retired as Senior Manager of
State Bank of India, Ahmedabad. He is closely
associated with the Radical Humanist Movement
since 1970. He may be contacted at 6 - Punam
Appartment, Bhudarpura, Ambawadi,
Ahmedabad-15. Phone: 079-26465315]
A True Follower of the RadicalHumanist Movement and a
True Royist
—by Dhirubhai Chhotalal Bhatt
When I was asked to recount my
memories about Dashrathlal,
immediately, in my mind flashed a picture of his
positive and proactive personality, possessing
inspirational virtues of an untiring and great
visionary. Due to him I had a chance of personally
meeting M.N. Roy during the freedom movement.
Dashrathlal lived a detached life and never imposed
on others his thoughts or ideologies. He patiently
and attentively listened to everybody and thereafter
gave his considered views. He remained unattached
whether in trouble or happiness and never
grumbled but quietly endured what was inevitable
or incurable. He lived truth, lived for truth and
finally bid adieu from the world of truth.
Strengthening of Democracy asmission of life
—by Hasmukh Patel
In the wake of Navnirman Movement
emanating from Gujarat (1974), a massive
wave of change emerged all over the country. The
agitation based on limited ills of price-rise and
corruption got transformed into a cyclonic storm of
change, thanks to the involvement of Lok Nayak
Jay Prakashji. Gujarat became the epicenter for
arousing political and people’s resistance which
gave rise to active involvement of non-political
organizations and formation of non-congress
‘Janata’ government. The ideology of total
revolution took its roots which brought closer
together the Sarvodayi, Gandhian and Radical
Humanist groups.
The torch-bearers of the Radical Humanist
Movement at Gujarat level, Chandrakant Daru,
Dasharathlal and his co-workers’ contribution was
significant and many of them were sentenced to
jail. With the initiative of Chandrakant Daru, two
congregations were organized in Gujarat aiming at
preserving sanctity of constitution which strongly
challenged Indiraji’s regime. As a young soldier of
J.P. Movement, I got opportunity of participating
with these leaders and also got the jail term.
Daru saheb was soft-spoken but possessed
child-like candidness. I am well aware of the
ideological convictions of Shri Daru’s colleagues
who were all averse and immune to the evils of
hunger for power and publicity. Fortunately, new
generation’s activists like Gautam Thaker are
striving to march ahead bearing the blazing torch of
5
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
democratic values. Attempts of Gautam Thaker and
the like minded to unite secular forces for political
and social wellbeing deserve special mention at this
moment of overall turmoil in the country as a
whole.
[Hasmukh Patel is a Gandhian & Sarvodaya
leader.]
Labour Union’s ‘Big Brother’:Dashrathlal Thaker
—by Ramesh Korade
Dashrathbhai had never attempted to be a
great man but lived his life as a good
man. His friends and relatives called him ‘Mota’ or
‘Dashubhai’.
He was an iron man possessing strong will power.
On first impression, one might have thought that he
was devoid of any feelings or sentiments but on
knowing him more and more, one found him to be a
very kind and affectionate person. All through his
life, he struggled to instill the values of freedom,
equality and brotherhood among the people. He
was kind, truth loving and courageous. He had the
patience to listen to the opponents and never felt
shy of mending his ways if he realized their point.
He believed that man alone can bring change in the
society and mould his future. He expressed any
new idea with his original intelligence and did not
bother about narrow minded and conventional
society which could not recognize him. It is easy to
pay tributes to him but difficult to follow, adhere
and to emulate his work and life.
He started his public career in 1930. He willingly
joined in the agitation of Gujarat College and
participated in the morning rounds, picketing and
protest marches. During his jail term he had chance
of reading books containing radical ideologies,
which broadened his perception, and was
impressed with socialist ideology especially
advocated by M.N. Roy, who was in favor of giving
organizational turn to the national movement. At
Bhatt Saheb’s place Dashrathbhai came in close
contacts with Mr. Daru and on knowing each
other’s views and concerns they became fast
friends and remained close workers till death and
both had expired around the same time.
Daru and Dashrathbhai were bosom friends and
engrossed in all activities like close co-workers so
much that it was difficult to identify who is the
lamp and who the light. Daru told that he was lucky
to have Dashrathlal as his friend and that without
him he was a ‘nobody’ and could not have done
anything at all without Dashrathlal.
During the war between Britain and Hitler the then
Govt. of India obviously declared war against
Hitler. At that time, Dashrathlal was an active
worker of League of Radicals whereas M.N. Roy
was the main organizer, who was in favor of
supporting Britain in the hope that if Britain wins
then India will get independence, and hence parted
his ways from Congress party and established
Radical Democratic Party where Dashrathlal
became Secretary of Gujarat Region.
During the war, his group published a daily called
(Independent India) and worked for many long
hours. During the emergency imposed by Indira, he
helped Daru a lot. He and Daru were together in
forming Ahmedabad Textile Workers’ Union and
secured many benefits in favor of mill workers.
Dashrathlal spoke very less but worked very hard.
In the Royist Group of Gujarat, Dashrathlal was a
pillar and also handled labour activities. In spite of
weak economic condition, he did not take any
financial benefit unlike other Trade Union leaders
and worked for labourers till his death.
Dashrathlal did not hanker after publicity nor
applied for Freedom Fighters’ Pension. His life is a
lamp post to those disillusioned by to-day’s politics
of power and self-interest.
6
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
7
The Radical Humanist
Monthly journal of the Indian Renaissance
Institute
Devoted to the development of the Renaissance
Movement; and for promotion of human rights,
scientific-temper, rational thinking and a humanist
view of life.
Founder Editor:
M.N. Roy
Editor:
Dr. Rekha Saraswat
Contributory Editors:
Prof. A.F. Salahuddin Ahmed, Dr. R.M. Pal, Professor
Rama Kundu
Publisher:
Mr. N.D. Pancholi
Printer:
Mr. N.D. Pancholi
Send articles to: Dr. Rekha Saraswat, C-8, Defence
Colony, Meerut, 250001, U.P., India, Ph.
91-121-2620690, 09719333011,
E-mail articles at: [email protected]
Send Subscription / Donation Cheques in favour of
‘The Radical Humanist’to:
Mr. Narottam Vyas (Advocate), Chamber Number
111 (Near Post Office), Supreme Court of India, New
Delhi, 110001, India [email protected]
Ph. 91-11-22712434, 91-11-23782836, 09811944600
Please Note: Authors will bear sole accountability
for corroborating the facts that they give in their
write-ups. Neither IRI / the Publisher nor the Editor
of this journal will be responsible for testing the
validity and authenticity of statements &
information cited by the authors. Also, sometimes
some articles published in this journal may carry
opinions not similar to the Radical Humanist
philosophy; but they would be entertained here if the
need is felt to debate and discuss upon them.
—Rekha Saraswat
Vol. 75 Number 7 October 2011
Download and read the journal at
www.theradicalhumanist.com
- Contents -Dashrathlal Thaker: Birth Centenary Year
Glowing compliments to a Humanist! 1-6
1. From the Editor’s Desk:
The Cataclysm of Contrasts
—Rekha Saraswat 8
2. From the Writings of Laxmanshastri Joshi:
Spiritual Materialism: A case for Atheism 10
3. Guests’ Section:
Social Media Revolutions
—Uday Dandavate 14
Crises of Credibility:
Management Analysis of Anna Hazare Agitation
—Sharu S. Rangnekar 18
Materialism in India: A Synoptic View
—Ramkrishna Bhattacharya 20
4. Current Affairs:
Electoral reform:
Will the Central Govt. Redeem itself?
—Rajindar Sachar 25
5. IRI / IRHA Members’ Section:
Unique Radical Humanists from A.P.
—N. Innaiah 27
PUCL’s History of Struggle
—Mahipal Singh 30
6. Teachers’ & Research Scholars’ Section:
Right To Education Bill:
Provisions And Shortcomings
—Surendra Bhaskar 32
7. Book Review Section:
A Human Portraiture
—Dipavali Sen 35
8. Humanist News Section
I. Minutes of IRI General Body Meeting 37
II. Radicals at Kerala Rationalists’ Meet 39
From the Editor’s Desk:
The Cataclysm of Contrasts
Tell me who is continuously concerned
about values and ideals?
The philosopher?
Who bothers about what form of government is
good?
The academician?
Who is worried about the economic policies?
The businessman?
Who is engrossed in the nitty-gritty of
power-politics?
The politician?
Who is obsessed about ranks and positions?
The bureaucrat?
Who is gripped with the ego of social status?
The educated & prosperous middle-class?
Who decides about the ‘rights’ and the ‘wrongs’ in
life?
The priest?
And what do ‘we’ the commoners do?
We ‘BELIEVE!
We believe upon the philosopher and try to pursue
his values and ideals, most of the times, neither
knowing the meaning nor the need to follow his
philosophy; may be, sometimes just to appear great
or sometimes to simply follow a cult!
We believe upon the academician and try to support
the particular form of government promoted by him
with an expectation that it would best serve as a
panacea to all our problems and help us meet our
basic needs.
We believe upon the businessman’s promise of
customer-service on its face-value, very rarely
mustering courage to protest against the
sub-standard services and products supplied by
him; forgetting that his only motive to continue to
interfere in the formation of national economic
policies is his personal profit and nothing else.
We believe upon the politician and see in him our
mentor who will work for our welfare and
happiness without seeking his personal
aggrandizement. Each time, before the election
process starts, he promises to deliver us everything
on earth, and each time we believe in him with a
renewed vigour. Hoping against hope is human
nature!!
We believe upon the bureaucrat every time a new
officer comes to our village/town/city/district that
this one would be fair to us, that this one will give
us a patient hearing, that this one will implement
the public policy in all sincerity and to our benefit.
We believe upon the educated & prosperous
middle-class and try to emulate it to reach up to its
standards of success and prosperity but it is always
beyond us and it never seems to hear our call for
help.
We believe upon the priest and try to live up to the
religious norms set by him to get a better deal in the
next life not knowing that he himself is entangled in
the present life’s uncertainties and complexities.
We believe upon all those things which keep us
busy in the rigmaroles of life in the desire to make it
better each day!
The fact is that the philosopher is the most alienated
person in the society. He thinks, he contemplates,
he imagines and he writes for his own satisfaction.
His purpose is over, the moment he gives words to
his conception. It is the later generations who try to
find meanings in what he wrote and why he wrote;
to form ideals, principles and values from his
documents and manuscripts!
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
8
Rekha Saraswat
The reality is that the academician is a theoretician
who keeps brushing up his scholastic traits in his
lectures, discussions, debates, seminars and
conferences; most of the times not abreast with the
practical realities of his canvassing; living in his
self-esteem and egotistic contentment of his
over-pouring knowledge!
The truth is that the businessman neither cares
about our welfare nor about our satisfaction. These
can only come to us as the bi-products of his open
competition with other businessmen in his
desperate efforts to maximize his profit!
The actual fact is that the politician takes his
assignment like any other professional. He is not a
social worker. He has to continue in his job as long
as he can; as well as get maximum incentives and
promotions as soon as possible to make up for the
future uncertainty of his service-tenure!
The verity is that the bureaucrat has chosen his
vocation because he has aspired to be included in
the top echelons of the society. He is interested in
living near power and in using authority as a means
of enhancing or exaggerating his own importance,
power, or reputation. So he follows the dictates of
the politicians and simultaneously, uses his
executive authority upon us in the most estranged
manner.
The bottom line of the educated & prosperous
middle class is ‘me and mine alone’. With the vast
majority and ocean full of ‘commoners’ around, it
is always gripped with the fear of being cheated and
deceived by them. It wants to remain at the top,
even if lonely!
And when, as a last resort, we, in our desolation,
rush to our religious leader, the priest, trying to
cling to him as our helmsman, to help us make a
better life for ourselves in this world and beyond,
he begins to threaten and warn us through the
doctrine of ‘fate’ and ‘karma’ to remember and
follow most rigidly, the ‘rights’ and ‘wrongs’
preached by him lest the lord too leaves us alone to
our plight!!
What a cataclysm of contrasts in our expectations
with this oligarchic world and its protagonists!!
9
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
Please register yourself on the RH Website http://www.theradicalhumanist.com
¨Please log in to it to give your comments on the articles and humanist news which are uploaded
from the world over on the Website almost daily.
¨You may also send in news and write-ups from your part of the land for uploading on the Website.
¨Please send in your views and participate on the topics of debate given in the debate section. You
yourself may also begin a debate on any topic of your choice in this section.
¨Please suggest themes for the coming issues of The Radical Humanist, discuss them in the Themes
Section of the Website; the content of which may be later published in the RH journal.
¨It is your own inter-active portal formed with a purpose of social interaction amongst all Radical
Humanists as well as Rationalists and Humanists from different forums also.
¨Do make it a practice to click on the RH Website http://www.theradicalhumanist.com URL daily,
ceremoniously.
¨Please utilise the RH Website to come closer for the common cause of ushering in a renaissance in our
country. —Rekha Saraswat, (Editor & Administrator RH Website)
From The Writings of Laxmanshastri Joshi:
Spiritual Materialism – A casefor Atheism
Translated by —Arundhati Khandkar
[The book Spiritual Materialism – A case for
Atheism, A New Interpretation of the
Philosophy of Materialism written by
Tarkateertha Laxmanshastri Joshi has been
translated by his daughter, Arundhati
Khandkar, who was formerly Professor of
Philosophy at S.I.E.S. College, University of
Mumbai, India. He passed away many decades
ago but his contribution in building up the
philosophical base of Radical Humanism has
been no less. Roy acknowledged it in his life time
and the followers of the philosophy continue to do
so. I had requested Ms. Khandkar to translate her
father’s major works from to Marathi to English
for the benefit of the contemporary readers of RH.
And to our pleasant surprise she informed that
there is already the above mentioned book in
English done by her. It is being serialised in The
Radical Humanist June 2010 onwards. She has
also promised to send us in English, gradually,
more of his Marathi literature.
Laxmanshastri wrote this essay with the title
Materialism or Atheism in 1941. How
meaningful and necessary it is, even now, 70
years later, can be understood by the following
paragraph given on the cover page of the book.
—Rekha Saraswat]
“That religion more often than not tends to
perpetuate the existing social structure rather than
being reformist and that it benefits the upper
classes. They perpetrate the illusions and are used
for impressing the weaker sections of the society.
Many taboos which might have had some
beneficial effects are given a permanent sanction
and these put a fetter on further progress. The
argument that religion promotes social stability and
social harmony is examined and rejected. Without
the dubious benefit of religion various secular
worldly values have been developed and they have
benefited mankind more than the vaunted religious
values. With no sops of religion men have laboured
hard and the finest admirable qualities of men’s
spirit have been developed inspite of religious
influence – the scientists and the reformers are
examples. The humility that should force itself in
the presence of the infinite and the unknown is
more to be seen with the scientist, the philosopher
than the religious leaders and often this drives them
to fathom the depths of thought in the quest for
truth. Rarely does religion explain the how and
why. These have become the preoccupations of
people in secular fields. With a sense of
self-reliance and self-confidence guiding him, man
has dropped the earlier props of religion. In India
too, the social order was seen as embodying moral
values.”
Contd. from the previous issue............
Nature and Structure of Substance: Four
Principles of Materialism
While searching for the meaning of the plan of the
universe, materialists have decided upon the
following four principles which reveal its nature.
1) First principle: The knower and the knowable, in
fact all existing things or real things are continually
transformable. The positions of the object shifts, so
its composition alters and with it, its qualities
undergo change. This earth is shifting its position
every moment. This is being taught to man
continuously by the circadian rotation of the earth
and its seasonal cycle. The history of the earth and
10
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
Laxman S. Joshi
geology inform us that the earth has passed through
three stages viz. gaseous, liquid and solid. There
were no plants before; they grew; there were no
animals; they were born later; there was no man; he
descended. Man has transformed this world
considerably. Domesticated animals are no more in
their original natural state. Man has induced
transition in their natural state. Most of the grains,
fruits and other plant products being used by man
are no more in their natural form. Man has
broughtnto effect substantial changes in them.
Nature and the social organisation of men have
undergone lots of changes. Huge transformations
have frequently occurred in their ideologies,
upbringing and feelings. Such continuous series of
transformation coming in the range of sight is a
stream of change which is ceaseless. In the science
of astronomy, one obtains corroborative testimony
for the extensive dynamic nature of the universe
outside the earth. The Sun emits light and heat
continuously. As a result, its structure and
attributes are undergoing alteration.
2) Second principle:28 Real object is not annihilated
totally and from total non existence no object is
created. This principle is consistent (p.96) with the
Latin Proverb- Ex nihilo nihil fit- quoted by Max
Planck, which in English means ‘from nothing,
nothing is produced.’ This is also consistent with
the Bhagavat Geeta, ‘A real thing is born out of
only another real thing; it is also made of real thing
only; any real object if destroyed, therein is
produced another real object; and this routine
succession continues ceaselessly.’ Cotton becomes
cloth; clay becomes a pot; stones, bricks, wood and
other things make a house. From seed, fertiliser,
and water, a plant is born. Molecules of oxygen and
hydrogen are formed out of their atoms and
electrons, and electrons are energetic matter. Ex
nihilo nihil fit! If this would not have been the case,
beggars would have become rich by simply riding
the imaginary chariots. New world is born from the
old one! The thing from which another thing is
born, is called substance. That thing from which
another thing is born possesses qualities. The thing
possessing qualities is the substance. The universe
is a collection of substances and qualities.
The universe is an unbroken series of causes and
effects. Every thing is an effect of something and
cause of something. Every event is the effect of a
prior event. Every event is the link in the endless
series of cause-effect events without traceable
beginning. Each and every event is bound by a
specific law of cause and effect.
3) Third principle: every object does possess
inherent energy of motion and transformable
energy. The universe constructs itself out of atomic
substances: The motion received for atomic union
and division is the natural attribute of these atoms.
There exists no one else who moves these atoms,
who collects those atoms and who scatters these
atoms. In this universe, the driving force that exists,
the motion that endures, is produced from the
inherent nature of things. If a wheel in a machine is
turned, another rotates automatically and after the
first movement, the second movement is born of
itself. Just like that, all the wheels of the universe
are rotating from time with no traceable beginning.
In a man made machine, human driving force is a
necessity. This is not the case of the universe in the
form of a machine. There exists a successional
series of motions with incomprehensible
beginning. At the beginning, who created the
motion in this universe, is a wrong question. To
think, of the time when there was no motion, no
transformation of any kind, is beyond the range of
logical enquiry, because imagining such a time
when there was nothing is the same as
contemplating of zeroness or nothingness.
Thinking of some object that exists implies that the
object is governed by the laws of causality, and
therefore at that time, there has to be motion and
transformation. From the state of ‘all-zero’,
nothing can come into existence. Ex nihilo nihil fit.
An illiterate man not knowing how the rain falls
believes that someone brings it and drops it. That
ignorant man imagined god Indra as the rainmaker.
Exposure of the oceans to the sun’s rays and heat
11
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
creates the rainfall. After this realisation, there is no
need for god that brings clouds and rain. When the
causality of the important events in nature that
relate to human life was not understood, the
concept of deities came into being. When the
physical cause-effect relationship of the
phenomena such as sunrise and sunset, moon-rise
and moon-set, the seasonal rotation, the oceanic
low and high tide, the stellar motions and the other
regular events were not understood, human
imagination gave rise to the Vedic and the Avedic
deities. In modern times, having understood the
mechanics of the solar system and the theory of the
environment, science acting as a weapon incarnate,
has massacred all those deities.
The composition of every object changes in two
ways. Firstly, transformation inside an object
occurs naturally. Secondly, surrounding objects
affect a given object. In this manner, every object is
interlinked with another. This relationship of
interlinkage is three fold:
1) An object possesses relation with the
surrounding objects,
2) Cause-effect relation exists between an object
and the object from which it originated,
3) Within an event, exists another event within
which exists still another event.
If we understand all the above inter linkages among
objects or events connected with the objects, we
accept also the serious error involved in assuming
the necessity of the concept of Prime Mover for the
motion or the action of objects. No action is ever
first, each and every motion or action is preceded
by another motion or action!
Nature of this action is not confined only to the
movement of an object from place to place. Energy
of action does not mean its applicability only to
transference of motions or rotation of objects. A
seed grows into a seedling and the seedling grows
into a tree; atoms of oxygen and hydrogen combine
to form water; light becomes photonic particles or
waves; all this becoming and being are also actions.
Actions like these are the intrinsic nature of objects.
If it were not so, the Prime Mover also will not be
able to create motion in an object. The universe is
self propelled. It has no need for the external
mover. Self-propulsion is only its nature. No
individual pushes the universe. Water flows itself
down the slope; light travels itself away from the
lamp; floods of the rays of the sun themselves
spread and occupy the vast distances of the
universe with ultimate speed; the earth rotates
automatically around the sun with nobody helping
it spin; galaxies and stars circle in the sky-dome on
their own without someone spinning them; and
electric winds and storms similarly flow in infinite
directions in infinitesimal times. Physics and other
sciences do provide countless such examples of
intrinsic propulsion.
4) Fourth Principle: Self-Organisation in Nature
Structure, design, organisation, law-abidance or
consistency constitute the elemental nature of an
object. When we describe an object or a collection
of objects whatsoever, we are describing in fact, the
structure or the organisation of the object. When no
design organisation exists, it means the very object
is absent. When we portray the solar system, we are
truly outlining its design or organisation. If that
design or the organisation is not there, it is the same
thing as the non existence of the solar system.
Description of chemical compounds constitutes
chemistry. The major objective of every science is
to display relationships between quantitative
measurements and the corresponding attributes. If
these relationships between quantity are excluded,
what remains is zero. If we say an object exists, it
means that a specific type of implied design or
inherent organisation exists. Knowing the design of
an object is nothing but apprehending the object
itself.
No other ‘someone’ has introduced structure or
design in the universe. Burning is the property of
heat. It is a kind of design or plan. This design or
plan has not been established by someone in
particular. It is an aspect of the very existence of
heat. Water is organised in the form of an
12
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
elementary structure as H20. This is the true nature
of water. It is not imposed on water by someone
else. Various different forms, different smells and
colours associate with the geological or physical
substances. These different shapes, aromas or hues
are not the filled in substances by any artist. They
are the nature of the substances. Mathematical
organisation and abidance by the laws of causality
have not been externally superimposed. Number,
measure and cause-effect relation are the inherent
aspects of the nature of substance. We cannot
create numerical value in substance; it inheres truly
in the substance. The cause-effect relationships of
objects can be understood, but cannot be created. A
skilled farmer or a horticulturalist does the work of
understanding the causal relation between a seed
and a plant, but does not create the cause-effect
relation between the seed and the plant. One whom
we call the designer, manager or worker, works,
taking into account the plan and design inhering in
the substance. He creates neither its plan nor
design.
............................................to be continued.
Reference:
28- Dualists: Dwaitavadi, Vaishnava etc. in India.
13
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
Important Announcements
IRI Study camp at Murshidabad:
31ST December, 2011/1st January, 2012.
1) A Seminar will be held on behalf of Indian Renaissance Institute (IRI) on 31st December, 2011
and 1st January, 2012 at Murshidabad (West Bengal) on the following subject:
“STATUS OF DEMOCRATIC PROCESSES IN INDIA AT PRESENT: CRISIS AND HUMANIST APPROACH.”
2) A meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Indian Renaissance Institute (IRI) shall also be held
during this period.
—N.D. Pancholi, Secretary, Indian Renaissance, (IRI) Delhi
3) Meeting of the Indian Radical Humanist Association (IRHA) at Murshidabad
The Organizing Committee of the West Bengal unit of the Indian Radical Humanist Association has
called upon all the members of the Indian Radical Humanist Association to attend the Study camp at
Murshidabad organized by the Indian Renaissance Institute on 31st December, 2011 and 1st January,
2012. On this occasion West Bengal unit of the IRHA wishes to have a separate session of the members
of the Radical Humanist Association for 2/3 hours to discuss ways and means of reorganizing and
strengthening the activities and programmes of the IRHA at the state level and to make suggestions for
the national level. Organizing Committee of the West Bengal unit therefore appeals to all the members
of the Indian Radical Humanist Association to participate in the study camp at Murshidabad. Agenda of
the Study camp and other meetings shall follow in due course.
For booking of accommodation etc. please contact Shri Ajit Bhattacharya, Mobile No: 09433224517.
—Ajit Bhattacharyya, on behalf of the West Bengal Organizing Unit, IRHA
Guests’ Section:
[Mr. Uday Dandavate studies people, cultures and
trends worldwide and uses the understanding gained
from such studies to inspire people centered
innovation strategies. Uday Dandavate heads up a
design research consulting firm called SonicRim. He
frequently writes and speaks on topics related to
people centered design and innovation in international
journals and conferences. [email protected]]
Social Media Revolutions
The year 2011 marks sudden awakening of
popular sentiments against authoritarian
and corrupt regimes in Middle East and North
Africa. Protests have occurred throughout the
region, including Algeria, Bahrain, Djibouti,
Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Libya,
Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Palestinian
Territories, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria,
Tunisia, Western Sahara, Yemen and more recently
in India.
The role of social networks like Facebook and
Twitter in organization of recent uprisings against
corrupt and or authoritarian regimes has become a
matter of great interest amongst sociologists. Many
of these uprisings are being hailed as Facebook
revolutions or Twitter revolutions. Wael Ghonim, a
marketing manager for Google, played a key role in
organizing the January 25 protest at the Tahrir
Square in Egypt by reaching out to Egyptian youths
on Facebook. Speaking at the international One
Young World summit in Zurich he said, “My
prescription for a revolution driven by social
network is to make it leaderless. If you want to use
the Internet to change a problem you are facing or
create an opportunity for a lot of people, you have
to make sure that everyone is engaged. It’s not only
important that you have a cause, it’s important to
make sure that that cause is not centrally managed
by a small bunch of people.”
More recently In India, Anna Hazare’s youthful
followers have also proved themselves savvy in
using the social media space, including Twitter and
Facebook in their fight against corruption. Though
recent mass movement against corruption in India
is termed by the critics as a movement of urban
middle class, Team Anna has been able to generate
enormous political groundswell in small towns and
villages of India. It appears that activism on the
Internet, especially on the social networks is
igniting an inferno promising to take down corrupt
and autocratic regimes around the world.
Malcolm Gladwell, a Canadian journalist and a
bestselling author of books like “Tipping Point”,
“Blink”, and “Outliers”, has recently triggered a
passionate debate online by challenging the
enthusiastic claims of social scientists who
maintain that with the advent of social media the
traditional relationship between political authority
and popular will has been upended, making it easier
for the powerless to collaborate, coordinate, and
give voice to their concerns. Gladwell argues that
social media is not a revolution but just a starting
point for people to find information, learn and have
the opportunity to make a considered choice about
whether they should get involved in a cause. He
asserted his point of view while speaking at the
Ringling College Library Association Town Hall
lecture series, “Social media such as Facebook and
Twitter have create so-called “weak ties” —
acquaintanceship rather than deep personal
connections — that are more useful for job searches
than revolutions. Successful revolutions and
movements, he believes, have their roots in years of
deliberate planning and strategy among small
14
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
Uday Dandavate
groups of people united by the “strong ties” of trust
and deep knowledge of one another.
It is a fact that social networks have played a big
part in getting the youth to express their frustrations
and coordinate their actions. However, there is a
message for the revolutionary youth participating
in these protests in Malcolm Gladwell’s words of
caution. The euphoria and connectivity enabled by
the Social media will not serve well in building a
sustained movement of committed citizens who
share a vision of an alternative social or political
order.
Social Media revolutions may trigger mass protest,
which may also lead to displacement of
governments. However, the change sought by the
revolution will not materialize unless concurrently
public discussions about alternative visions for the
future take place and an organization is put in place
for implementation of the vision.
The current wave of protests in North Africa and
Middle East is a second wave of revolutions of
global significance since collapse of communism
in Europe between 1989 and 1992. After the
collapse of communism in Eastern Europe, though
European countries adopted varying forms of
market economy, and many Communist and
Socialist organizations in the West turned their
guiding principles over to social democracy,
Europe’s struggle for ideological clarity about a
sustainable model of governance continues. I
believe that post-recession world is ready to
question the globalized, liberalized and capitalistic
model of development. Current wave of mass
movements (and the recent riots in London) is
indicators of the failure of the capitalistic model
and widening chasm between classes.
Almantas Samalavicius, an associate professor in
the Department of Architectural Fundamentals and
Theory at the Vilnius Gediminas Technical
University in Lithuania refers to the breakdown of
old political structures and ideologies and the need
for reconstruction of aims and ideas of social
democracy in a post communist space in his blog,
“The present financial crisis of world capitalism,
with all its side effects, should lead us to a
reconsideration of recent neoliberal policies – and
also of the social practices that Europe has
experienced since the fall of the Iron Curtain…. No
one in Eastern Europe today, outside of a small
number of individuals, has any trust in social
democrats, who have proved to be corrupt, unjust,
and too willing to sell off the social state to the
powers of the global market…. the era of
traditional party-making and party politics might
be approaching its end, and that new ways of
pursuing policy and political decisions are slowly
emerging. If this guess is tight, it is a hint that
social-democratic parties all over Europe need to
be reconstructed, to become less rigid and more
fluid broad civic coalitions, capable of finding their
allies among numerous alternative grass-roots
movements and other civic initiatives, no matter
how small they seem to be at the moment.
…Perhaps the time has come to reconsider the
ideas and social criticism provided by such thinkers
as Ivan Illich, Lewis Mumford or E.F. Schumacher,
who once tried to make us understand the roots of
the failure of modern society and its institutions”.
Ivan Illich, introduced the concept of a convivial
society as a society that confers on individuals
freedom realized in personal interdependence and,
as such, an intrinsic ethical value. He believes
People need not only to obtain things (as in a
market driven society), they need above all the
freedom to make things among which they can live,
to give shape to them according to their own tastes,
and to put them to use in caring for and about
others.
I envision future societies to be comprised of
individual citizens driven by conscience, empathy
and creativity. Trust, reciprocity and strong
networks of interdependent relationships will
characterize a convivial society of the future. In this
background Malcolm Gladwell’s analysis of the
inherent weakness of online social networks needs
to be recognized and be compensated for through
direct action for building deep personal
15
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
connections. Just expressing dissent through
Facebook and Twitter, and merely organizing
public demonstrations will not help translate the
energy unleashed through initial bursts of protest in
the streets into a systemic framework for a new
society. The need of the hour is to harness the
enthusiasm and patriotism of the youth to cultivate
new mindsets, and to mobilize organizations and
communities for long-term transformation. As
suggested in Almantas Samalavicius’ blog, the new
structure would not be monolithic nor be driven by
a single ideology. Rather, it would be a “long tail”
of grass-root level movements.
The economic theory of “the Long Tail” is drawn
from the idea that our culture and economy is
increasingly shifting away from a focus on a
relatively small number of “hits” (mainstream
products and markets) at the head of the demand
curve and toward a huge number of niches in the
tail. As the costs of production and distribution fall,
especially online, there is now less need to lump
products and consumers into one-size-fits-all
containers. (Chris Anderson in Wired Magazine)
Long Tail economic model helps me foresee a new
framework of governance conducive to incubating
local ideas and institutions each catering to local
conditions replacing one-size fits all ideologies.
Individuals in a convivial society of the future will
need to embrace a new mindset. Every individual
will need to learn from and be respectful of the laws
of nature and assume responsibility for collective
good. For a long time modern civilization has been
driven by cravings for superiority over other
species, over nature and over other classes of
people. Our selfish pursuit of wealth, power and
happiness has made us confrontational. In this
pursuit we have destroyed our environment,
escalated conflicts in the society and lost our ability
to experience harmony within us and with our
surroundings. Nature did not set human specie on a
confrontational course. We were designed to live in
harmony with our surroundings.
An interesting experience opened my eyes to some
of the innate harmonizing abilities human beings
are endowed with, but have lost track of. Over
twelve years go I was attending a workshop on
Aikido conducted by Wendy Palmer. One of the
exercises we did during the workshop left a
profound impression on me. Wendy asked the
workshop participants to stand in pairs facing each
other. She then asked one person from each pair to
push his/her partner. Some of us in the group
pushed back the persons pushing us. A few people
from the group stumbled back on the ground and a
small number of pairs continued to push each other
until Wendy asked them to stop. Then she
introduced a new rule. She said the person who is
being pushed should concentrate on maintaining
his/her balance. “When your partner pushes you, do
not push back, and make sure that you do not fall
back. Just try and stay balanced on your feet.” She
had us repeat the exercise. To our surprise,
regardless of how strong a person pushing the other
person was, all of us continued to stand straight and
balanced. After trying hard, the persons pushing the
partners gave up. Wendy explained. “It takes very
little energy to maintain one’s balance. Pushing
someone hard and pushing back involves a lot of
energy. That is why, when the focus was on
maintaining balance, even the strongest in the
workshop was not able to throw the weakest person
off his or her feet.” In this physical experience I
realized we waste a lot of energy pushing people
around or in being a push over.
This experience truly opened my mind to Aikido as
a physical metaphor for resolving conflicts in “real
life.” Aikido has been described as a “A martial art
for peace...” Morihei Ueshiba, Aikido’s founder
invented it as a way of achieving harmony with Ki.
Ki is an old Japanese word. It involves letting go of
the conflict we perceive in the relative world
around us and in us and becoming aware of the
infinite stillness of the absolute world where there
is no other. It involves developing capacity for
connecting to others in a compassionate, authentic
way that enriches life and nourishes the spirit. In
Aikido there is a belief that an attacker is no
16
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
different from the defender, who by following the
attack, entering in or turning around it, can guide
the aggressor into a fall, away from harm. In the
Aikido Journal, summer 1997 Mark Binder
explains the spirit of Aikido,
Most of us have been raised in a practical machine
age. Power is measured in megawatts, in
megabytes, in chip speed, and in bank balances. We
are only just beginning to understand the idea of
“hara,” of centering oneself regardless of the
circumstances. In the practice of Aikido you are
protecting yourself, but you are also protecting
your attacker. It is as if a favorite uncle has too
much to drink at a wedding, and gets into a fistfight.
No one wants to hurt the uncle, and no one wants
the uncle to hurt anyone else. So, the student of
Aikido steps in, and uses the least amount of force
to protect the Uncle from hurting himself, and
anyone else. He would envelop his attacker,
bringing the aggressor gently to the floor with
soothing words, “Are you ok? It looked for a
moment like you were going to fall.”
The philosophy behind Aikido resonates with my
curiosity for harnessing untapped human energy,
intuition and imagination. It makes me respect
those who continue to live closer to nature and draw
upon the native wisdom and their innate capacity
for resonance with nature. Thomas Edison, the
inventor of electric bulb, best expresses the
connection between non-violence and evolutionary
imperative “Non-violence leads to the highest
ethics which is the goal of all evolution. Until we
stop harming all other living beings, we are still
savages.” The path of non-violent transformation
followed by Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King,
Jr., Nelson Mandela, the revolutionaries in Egypt
and recently by Anna Hazare in India will
ultimately help us find a sustainable model of
development and help rid our system of corruption.
Revolutions may begin on Facebook or Twitter but
they will be sustained through participation of
people committing to work with each other in the
real world on the basis of shared values.
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
17
Letter to the Editor:
Dear Dr. Rekha Saraswat,
Greetings. I am one of the old Members, inducted by my uncle Advocate Mr. M. A. Rane, Mumbai,
while I was abroad on UN Assignments. Since then, I have been receiving regularly The Radical
Humanist and read the same with great interest.
It is indeed a pleasure reading this time your Editorial: “Systems vs the People”, which I find quite
interesting and feel that such message must reach to the Civil Society and to our Young India. Its high
time for all of us to come out from Three Monkey Gesture, and bring a change, if we really want to
achieve a Vision for the New Millennium : “INDIA 2020”, and offer a Better Living Place to Our Next
Generations.
Best regards.
Dr. Ganesh P. Rane
+919820215330
Former UN Staff Member & UN Consultant/Advisor
A/109, Ansa Indl. Estate, Saki-Vihar Road, Andheri East, Mumbai 400 072, India.
Tel.: +91-22-28471974 / 28471685 / 65865179; Fax: 66925178 ;
Website: www.rrrindustries.com
e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected];
Mr. Sharu S. Rangnekar is a Chemical Engineer
from Bombay with a Master of Business
Administration degree from the U.S.A. He carried
out research work in Mathematical Economics at
the Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh,
U.S.A. He had management training with
Imperial Chemical Industries, UK and computer
training with IBM and Union Carbide
Corporation, U.S.A.
He taught as Visiting Faculty at Tata Institute of
Social Sciences and Management Institutes
attached to Bombay University from 1979 to
1986.
He has been a popular lecturer and writer on
management topics. His books: “In the
Wonderland of Indian Managers” and “In the
World of Corporate Managers” have become
management classics.
His lectures on management topics have been
issued in audio-CD. He has featured in several
management development video-CDs. He has
participated as a faculty in nearly 5000
management development programmes in India
and abroad since 1966.
Rangnekar Associates, 31 Neelamber, 37 G.
Deshmukh Marg (Peddar Road) Mumbai
400026. Phone: (022) 6664 0030 Fax (022)2
352-1722 Mobile: 98200 53005
website: www.sharurangnekar.com
Crises of Credibility:Management Analysis of Anna
Hazare Agitation
Managing any situation requires “Power”.
Power is best defined by Sanskrit
phrase: “Kartum, Akartum, Anyatha Kartum Wa”
(To do, To undo or To do otherwise). Thirty five
hundred years ago Confucius gave the basic
sources of power which he called “Guns, Rice and
Faith”. Translated into management language it
means power comes from fear created by
possibility of damage, inducement through ability
of giving benefit and credibility which gives the
affinity amongst those involved. During Anna
Hazare Agitation the word “blackmailing” was
banded about as a bad word. In fact all means of
power involve blackmail by fear, temptation or
faith.
Anna Hazare made a significant statement during
his agitation that he is not only using Gandhiji, but
he also using Shivaji. Gandhiji’s approach was to
create faith through non-violent agitation. Shivaji’s
strategy was to use what was called in history as
“Ganimi Kawa” (guerilla tactics). It comprised of
having a force attacking suddenly and moving
away before it was dealt with - causing damage
without suffering much damage itself. With his
Ganimi Kawa attacks, Shivaji created terror in the
heart of the mighty Mogul army; once he attacked
even the tent of Aurangzeb and cut the summit of
his tent. These tactics demoralized the Mogul army
and ultimately led to their retreat.
Anna Hazare used the basic source of power:
Faith/Credibility. Everybody was talking against
corruption but most political party leaders were
suspected of being corrupt themselves and hence
did not have credibility. Anna Hazare used this to
his advantage. His agitation for the last 20 years did
not generate any assets for himself. He did not have
even his own house and stayed in a temple. This
created a high credibility for him.
Government on the other hand tried to fight this
credibility by using force. Force or temptations
tend to have a rebound effect. The Government
steps to imprison Anna Hazare and harass “Team
Anna” had this rebound effect. Government tactics
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
18
Sharu S. Rangnekar
did work in Baba Ramdev case because Baba
Ramdev having accumulated thousands of crores
of rupees did not have credibility in the eyes of the
common man - only his loyal followers believed
him. Anna did not create any direct followers. He
encouraged people to wear a cap saying “I am Anna
Hazare”. This created a sense of identity which is
the source of highest motivation. Consequently the
tactics that worked in the case of Baba Ramdev had
an opposite effect. As somebody put it, these were
instrumental in recruiting followers for Anna
Hazare. He insisted on non-violence causing no
damage to any public or private property. This
increased his credibility. The Government had no
antidote for this and even now is in confusion as
how to deal with this situation.
Historically we had experience of similar agitation
in 1930’s by Gandhiji and 1974 by Jayaprakash
Narayan. Gandhiji’s agitation along with the
economic and political upheavals of the Second
World War forced all colonial nations to give up
their colonies and Gandhiji was considered the
father of our independence.
In the case of Jayaprakash Narayan, the agitation
led to a change of regime and the opposition came
into power under the banner of “Janata Party”.
However, the credibility can be lost faster than it
can be acquired and the Janata Party lost its
credibility due to internal strife.
The internal strife diminished the credibility of
Janata Party and brought back Mrs. Indira Gandhi
into power.
The government is trying to create internal strife in
Team Anna and in the opposition parties which are
backing Anna Hazare. Only if the government is
successful in breaking the group through the
internal strife it has a chance to reduce the
credibility of Anna Hazare and rebuild its own
credibility. The steps required are:
1.Leadership which is relatively free from the
stigma of corruption.
2.Visible efforts to curb corruption and recovery of
black money.
3.Control of inflation. The rising prices are
affecting people daily and directly (even more than
corruption) and the government’s ability to control
the prices would build its credibility.
The traditional strategies using affinity groups of
caste, community, language, religion, state etc., to
create vote banks might not prove effective in the
onslaught of the Anna Hazare type of agitation.
Concrete and visible demonstration of steps taken
to improve the situation will be the only way the
agitation can be countered.
Particularly in the next step, Anna is likely to use
the Shivaji Strategy. He will get people to gherao
each of the Loksabha members to ensure voting for
Anna version of the bill. It will be again called
coercion and blackmailing, but as long as the “aam
public” is behind it, it will succeed. Anna cannot be
countered by force or inducements – because this is
a battle for credibility.
19
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
Letter to the Editor:
Dear Rekhaji,
I read your latest editorial “System vs. the People!” It is indeed well written.
I have myself written an article on this aspect under the title “Crises of Credibility: Management
Analysis of Anna Hazare Agitation”.
If you would like to publish this article in The Radical Humanist please do so.
With kind regards.
Yours sincerely,
Sharu S. Rangnekar
Materialism in India: ASynoptic View
—By Ramkrishna Bhattacharya
[Prof. Ramkrishna Bhattacharya taught English
at the University of Calcutta, Kolkata and was an
Emeritus Fellow of University Grants
Commission. He is now a Fellow of PAVLOV
Institute, Kolkata.
(Courtesy:http://en.krishna.deltoso.net/catego
ry/carvakalokayata/)
Many, if not most, people nowadays go
straight to the internet rather than look
up a book to know something about anything under
the sun. There are hundreds, if not thousands of
files on the Carvaka/Lokayata system of
philosophy there. Regrettably, many of them,
though well-intentioned, are ill-informed and
highly misleading. I am an old hand researching for
decades on the history of materialism in India (see
my Studies on the Carvaka/Lokayata, Firenze
(Florence): Società Editrice Fiorentina, 2009; New
Delhi: Manohar Books, 2010. A brief exposition
will be found in my essay, “Lokayata Darsana and a
Comparative Study with Greek materialism” in:
Materialism and Immaterialism in India and the
West: Varying Vistas, ed. Partha Ghose, New
Delhi: Centre for the Studies on Civilizations,
2010, pp. 21-34). I, therefore, find it necessary to
disabuse enquirers of several false notions.
1. Carvaka or Lokayata is not a “brand name” for
all sorts of materialist ideas that flourished in India
over the ages. There were several proto-materialist
thinkers in India right from the time of the Buddha
(sixth/fifth century BCE) or even earlier. The
system that came to be known finally as the
Carvaka/Lokayata did not flourish before the sixth
century CE or a bit later. It is only from the eighth
century CE that the name Carvaka is associated
with a materialist school (some later writers such as
Santaraksita and Sankara continued to call it
Lokayata). Both names, however, came to refer to
the same school of thought after the eighth century
CE. Neither of the two words occurs in Vedic
literature. Lokayata in Pali and Buddhist Sanskrit
works means ‘the science of disputation’, or in a
narrower sense, ‘point of dispute’, not materialism.
The word is ambiguous. There are reasons to
believe that the adherents of this materialist school
themselves called themselves Carvaka, using it as
a nickname. The word might have been chosen
from the Mahabharata but the demon in that work
has nothing to do with materialism.
2. The Carvaka/Lokayata is the only systematized
form of materialist philosophy in India that is
known to date. There were other pre-Carvaka
proto-materialist schools too that preached certain
materialist views but their views were not
systematically set down in the form of aphorisms as
the Carvaka-s did. Some of these pre-Carvaka
proto-materialist views are encountered in the
Upanisad-s, Pali and Prakrit canonical works (of
the Buddhists and the Jains respectively) and their
commentaries as well as in the Jabali episode in the
Ramayana, the Moksadharma-parvadhyaya in the
Mahabharata and some of the Purana-s
(particularly the Visnupurana and the
Padmapurana), and last but not least, in old Tamil
poems such as the Manimekalai. All of these are
not to be equated with the Carvaka/Lokayata. Some
of the views recorded in them are authentic
expositions of this or that proto-materialist view,
but some are of dubious authenticity. There is a
tendency in the Ramayana and some Purana-s to
treat the Buddhists, the Jains and the Carvaka-s as
representing a single school of nastika-s, that is,
defilers of the Vedas, and to ascribe the views of
one to the other quite inappropriately.
3.1. All the Carvaka/Lokayata works were lost
before the fourteenth century CE, so much so that
Sayana-Madhava, aka Madhavacarya and
Vidyaranya, or whoever was the author of the first
chapter of this digest of a compendium of
philosophies (Sarva-darsana-sangraha), could not
20
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
quote a single sentence from any Lokayata text nor
name a single authority other than the mythical
Brhaspati. Yet this book, first edited and published
by Iswarcandra Vidyasagara, better known as an
educationist and social reformer, in 1853-58 from
the Asiatic Society, Kolkata, has proved to be more
influential than any other work. However, it is
worth noticing that the reading of several lines of
some verses attributed to the Carvakas are willfully
distorted in this compendium. The original reading
of a line in a verse, for example, was as follows:
“Live happily as long as you live; nothing is beyond
the ken of death.” It is so found in all other works
(no fewer than thirteen). The last part of the line
was changed in this compendium to read: “eat ghee
(clarified butter) even by running into debts.” To
many educated Indians and maybe others abroad
this distorted reading is granted to be the epitome of
the Carvaka/Lokayata. It is amusing that the digest
itself quotes the original reading at the beginning of
the chapter but quotes the distorted reading at the
end of the same chapter.
3.2. However, from the available fragments found
quoted or paraphrased in the works of
anti-materialist philosophers it is evident that the
Carvaka/Lokayata system had developed along the
same lines as Mimamsa, Vedanta, Nyaya and
Vaisesika. This means:
(a) There was a base text, that is, a collection of
sutras or aphorisms, tersely phrased because they
were meant to be memorized, and
(b) Several commentaries (and probably
sub-commentaries) were written to explicate the
aphorisms,
(c) Besides the above sources, a number of verses
have traditionally been ascribed to the Carvakas.
Some of these epigrams make fun of the
performance of religious rites, particularly
sacrificial acts, and deny the existence of an
extracorporeal soul which can survive the death of
a person. Some other verses, however, might have
originated in the Buddhist and Jain circles. The
denunciation of ritual violence (killing of animals
in a Vedic sacrifice) and condemnation of
non-vegetarian diet accord better with the Buddhist
and the Jain teachings than with any other school.
There might have been some materialists who
renounced both marriage and eating of animal
flesh. In that case, the charge of promiscuity and
indulgence in flesh and wine brought against the
Carvakas by Gunaratna, a fifteenth-century Jain
writer, loses its force.
3.3. The Tattvopaplavasimha by Jayarasi Bhatta is
not a Carvaka/Lokayata work: it represents the
view of a totally different school that challenged
the very concept of pramana (means of
knowledge). The Carvakas did believe in pramana
and whatever else it entails (knowledge, the
knower, and the object to be known). Even those
who, like Eli Franco, prefer to call it the only
surviving Carvaka text do not claim that it is a
materialist text. So the work is quite irrelevant to
the study of materialism in India.
4. The basic plank of the Carvaka/Lokayata may be
summed up as: i) denial of rebirth and the other-
world (heaven and hell), and of the immortal soul,
ii) refusal to believe in the efficacy of performing
religious acts, iii) acceptance of the natural origin
of the universe, without any creator God or any
other supernatural agency, iv) belief in the primacy
of matter over consciousness, and hence of the
human body over the spirit (soul), and finally, v)
advocacy of the primacy of perception over all
other means of knowledge; inference, etc. are
secondary, and acceptable if and only if they are
based on perception, not on scriptures.
The first three refer to the ontology, and the rest to
the epistemology of the Carvaka/Lokayata. As to
ethics all that can be said is that the Carvakas did
not believe in practising asceticism and advised
seeking of pleasure in this world rather in the next,
for there is no such world. This teaching has been
misinterpreted as a recommendation for
unrestrained sensual enjoyment. Regarding their
social outlook it may be said that the Carvakas
were opposed to gender discrimination and caste
21
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
(varna) distinctions (see the Prabodha-candrodaya
by Krsnamisra, Act 2 verse 18 and the
Naisadha-carita by Sriharsa, Canto 17 verses 40,42,
58). They relied on human endeavour (purusakara),
not on fate (daiva), and rejected the concept of
adrsta or karman.
This is how materialism as a full-fledged
philosophical doctrine made its debut in ancient
India. It is evident that the issues are peculiarly
relevant to the Indian context (rebirth being the
most noteworthy). The Carvaka/Lokayata then
obviously had an indigenous origin.
5. There was no continuity in the Carvaka/Lokayata
tradition after the twelfth century CE or
thereabouts. Whatever is written on the
Carvaka/Lokayata after the twelfth century is based
on second-hand knowledge, learned from
preceptors to disciples, who in their turn could only
teach what they had heard from their preceptors,
not what they had actually studied. Some of their
knowledge correspond to what the
Carvaka/Lokayata philosophers had or might have
really said, but much of their accounts are biased
against materialism and are mere fabrications.
6. The Yogacara Buddhists, Jains, Advaita
Vedantins and Nyaya philosophers considered the
Carvaka/Lokayata as one of their chief opponents
and tried hard to refute materialist views. Such
refutations were made even after all the authentic
Carvaka/Lokayata texts had been lost. So, the
representation of the Carvaka/Lokayata in the
works of these schools are not always firmly
grounded on first-hand knowledge of the
Carvaka/Lokayata texts.
7. Because of this lack of acquaintance with
original sources, the opponents, and many modern
scholars, often confuse pre-Carvaka and Carvaka
views, considering them as one and the same. This
gives an impression that there were several kinds of
Carvaka-s while the fact is that there were several
kinds of materialists, but all of them were not
Carvaka-s. Some of them were definitely
pre-Carvaka and held different views. For example,
regarding the number of natural elements, the
Carvakas admitted four, namely, earth, air, fire and
water, while others spoke of five, adding ether or
space to the list.
8. We have no evidence of any post-Carvaka
materialist school in India, existing or flourishing
after the thirteenth century CE. What Abul Fadl
(Fazl) had gathered from the North Indian pundits
about the Carvaka system (most probably from a
Jain scholar) and recorded it in Persian in his Ain-i
Akbari, betrays the same lack of information as
evinced in his contemporary and later Sanskrit
digests of Indian philosophy. Only a few highlights
of the materialist system were known to all of them.
In addition to this a few verses attributed to the
Carvaka-s had been orally transmitted from one
generation to another. Their accounts therefore are
removed from the original sources and should be
taken with the customary pinch of salt.
9. Some Sanskrit poems and plays (particularly
Naisadha-carita,Prabodha-candrodaya,Agama-da
mbara and Vidvanmoda-tarangini) and one prose
work (Kadambari) contain representations of the
Carvakas. The evidence is dubious, for the authors
of these works were thoroughly opposed to
materialism and tried to portray the Carvaka in
unfavourable light. Hence whatever is written there
should not be accepted uncritically.
10. The commonest charge levelled against the
Carvaka-s is that they did not believe in any other
means of knowledge except perception. But there is
enough evidence to suggest that some of the
pre-Carvaka schools as well as the Carvaka-s
considered inference based on perception to be a
valid means of knowledge, although it is of
secondary importance. It was well known from the
eighth century CE.. Nevertheless, the opponents
continued to level the same charge almost in the
fashion of Goebbels (“Repeat a lie ten times and it
will sound like the truth.” Whether Goebbels had
actually said so or not is irrelevant, since such
strategy was followed by him in practice).
11. Another baseless charge made by the opponents
22
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
is the alleged heedless hedonism of the Carvakas.
Of course, there is enough evidence to show that
the Carvaka-s did not consider human life to be full
of misery but there is absolutely no evidence to
prove that they prescribed sensual enjoyment to be
the end of life. The case is similar to that of
Epicurus, the Greek philosopher. Although he used
to lead a very austere life, his name has been
maligned as a spokesperson of an ’eat, drink and be
merry’ view of life. Ajita Kesakambala, a senior
contemporary of the Buddha and one of the earliest
proto-materialists known to us, had in fact made a
cult of austerity. The Sa?khya doctrine too has been
satirized as one advocating sensual enjoyment. No
serious student of Samkhya has ever paid any heed
to this absurd charge. However, in case of the
Carvaka such a groundless allegation is repeated ad
nauseam by the present-day textbook writers of
Indian philosophy.
12. Yet another misconception circulated by many
authors past and present is that there were several
Carvaka schools, believing in the mind as the spirit,
life breaths as the spirit, the sense organs as the
spirit, etc. Such doctrines might have been
prevalent before the Common Era, for some of
them are mentioned in several Upanisads. Such
views, however, are not only pre-Carvaka but also
pre-philosophical. The Carvaka/Lokayata was
systematized much later and there is nothing to
show that its exponents drew anything from such
older sources. Only the doctrine of
bhutacaitanyavada or dehatmavada is the doctrine
of the Carvaka-s. It was a unitary school although
the commentary tradition is not uniform and the
commentators are not always unanimous in their
interpretation of certain aphorisms.
13. All the commentators of the Carvakasutra were
not Carvakas themselves. Some of them are known
to be adherents of Nyaya who, besides their works
on Nyaya, had also written commentaries on the
Carvakasutra. Quite naturally they had introduced a
number of sophisticated Nyaya terms, quite alien to
the original Carvaka tradition. Nevertheless what is
common to all the commentators is their firm
adherence to the basic doctrine of considering the
spirit to be nothing but consciousness in a living
body and the rejection of the view that inference
independent of perception and/or based on
scriptures should be accepted as a valid means of
knowledge.
14. In brief, then, the Carvaka/Lokayata system
emerged as the culmination of all previous
proto-materialist views which, however, had never
been systematized into the prevailing sutra-bhasya
(base text and commentary) style before the sixth
century CE. These views are mainly known to us as
floating ideas current among some freethinkers,
who were opposed to futile religious practices
sanctioned by the Vedas and refused to offer gifts to
Brahmin priests. The early materialists did not
believe in the existence of heaven and hell, and,
therefore, in the immortality of the spirit. That is all
there is to it in the pre-Carvaka/Lokayata tradition.
Ontological issues seem to have been their chief
preoccupation and this was their contribution to the
later Carvaka/Lokayata system which inherited and
assimilated all this. The epistemological issues
might have underlain in their teachings, but no such
formulation is met with in available evidence.
15. Whether the Carvaka-s had any affinity with the
Kapalika-s or some such obscure folk cults (such as
the Sahajiya-s, Baul-s, etc. in Bengal), is a vexed
question. It is probable that the these cults had
adopted some ideas from the pre-Carvaka and/or
the Carvaka teachings, such as, accepting
perception to be the only means of knowledge,
opposition to Vedism, caste system, gender
discrimination, etc. But it should be noted that these
cults are all guru-oriented, the adherents compose
songs in local dialects as the vehicle of expressing
their ideas (not write philosophical discourses), and
all of them consider themselves affiliated to one or
the other Saiva or Vaisnava or Sakti-worshipping
community. They constitute themselves as the
‘other’, belonging to the Little Tradition – similar
in some respects to the Great Tradition religious
communities but differing from them by virtue of
abjuring Brahminical priesthood, avoiding the
23
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
conventional places of pilgrimage, and setting up
their own meeting-spots in village fairs. The
Carvakas, on the other hand, belong to the Great
Tradition: they redacted a sutra work and
composed elaborate commentaries on it in Sanskrit,
not in any vernacular. In short, the two belong to
two different traditions – the Great and the Little –
and their ends are more often than not quite
different. While the Carvaka/Lokayata was
interested in true knowledge (tattva), the Little
Tradition cults aspire for liberation (mukti) alone.
The former studiedly rejected all rituals based
solely on faith but the latter had developed
elaborate systems of worship and religious practice
(sadhana-paddhati) as taught by their gurus. Thus
there is a fundamental incompatibility between the
two that cannot be resolved by juxtaposing them as
reflecting the same approach in two different ways.
It should, however, be borne in mind that the Little
Tradition cults were very much present in India
even in the Upanisadic times, as testified by the
Maitri (or Maitrayani or Maitrayaniya) Upanisad.
Most probably both the traditions had a common
source, but they diverged into two separate streams,
one thoroughly rational and atheistic; the other,
irrational and theistic. The Carvaka/Lokayata is a
system of philosophy but the anti-Brahminical folk
cults are nothing but religious coteries outside the
Brahminical (Vedist) fold. In spite of some
similarities in approach (such as, insistence on
sense perception, denial of the Vedas as
authoritative texts, and rejection of Brahminical
priesthood) they belong to two different domains.
Philosophy and religion are not to be treated on a
par with each other.
Grateful acknowledgements are made to Amitava
Bhattacharyya, Johannes Bronkhorst, Siddhartha
Dutta, Pradeep Gokhale, Ashish Lahiri, and
Krishna Del Toso for offering comments and
suggestions on the draft.
24
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
Indian Renaissance Institute
is organizing
M.N. ROY MEMORIAL LECTURE: 2011,
Subject: “DEMOCRATIC TRANSFORMATION : AN IMPASSE?”
By Prof. Ghanshyam Shah,
National fellow, Indian Institute of Advanced Study, Shimla,
4.30 PM, Thursday, the 29th September, 2011, at
Indian Law Institute, (In front of Supreme Court)
Bhagwan Dass Road, New Delhi-110001.
Shri Praful Bidwai, eminent journalist will preside.
All are invited to attend.
—N.D.Pancholi, Secretary, IRI
G-3, Plot 617, Shalimar Garden Extn. I, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad (UP) 201005.
Ph: 0120 -2648691, (M) 09811099532
Current Affairs:
[Justice Rajindar Sachar is Retd. Chief Justice of
High Court of Delhi, New Delhi. He is UN Special
Rapportuer on Housing, Ex. Member, U.N.
Sub-Commission on Prevention of
Discrimination and Protection of Minorities and
Ex-President, Peoples Union for Civil Liberties
(PUCL) India.]
Electoral reform – will theCentral Govt. Redeem itself?
Anna Hazare when he gave up his fast
announced that the next movement is for
electoral Reform and especially prioritized “Right
to Reject candidate” at the elections and the right to
recall a legislator earlier than the end of his term.
Central government is seeking to project itself as
responsive to public opinion. Here then is an
opportunity to do so. I say this because the public
demand for effectuating right to reject vote or more
clearly “None of the Above” (NOTA) is very easy
to effectuate. The Representation of People
Act.1951 and its rules provide a detailed
mechanism for standing and voting at elections.
Govt. of India has framed Conduct of Election
Rules 1961 to provide the manner how votes are to
be cast, and the precaution to maintain the secrecy
of voting which is absolutely necessary for a
healthy democracy.
Prior to the introduction of Electronic Voting
Machine (EVM), voting was by means of ballot
paper. Rule 49 M provides for maintaining of
secrecy and voting procedure by E.V.M., whereby
the voter presses the button against the name of the
candidate for whom he intends to vote.
Rule 49(o) further provides that if an elector
decides not to record his vote, a remark will be
made by presiding officer on Form 17, and
signature of the voter shall also be taken. But this
procedure is faulty and outdated, because it does
not take into account mode of change of voting to
EVM instead of by ballot paper. This procedure is
also illegal because by this the identity of the voter
who decides not to vote will be disclosed thus
violating the fundamental right of voting in
secrecy.
Realizing this anomaly and lacuna the Election
Commission of India as far back as 2001 and ever
since has been writing to the Central Government
to make necessary modification in the rules by
providing a slot of NOTA in E.V.M.
Finding the inaction of the Government, Peoples
Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL), filed a writ
petition in 2004 in the Supreme Court asking for
direction to the Central government to suitably
amend Rule 49 (0). The writ petition was heard by a
two judge Bench which referred it to a larger Bench
in 2009 – because of the congestion in the Supreme
Court, the matter has not yet come up for hearing.
But notwithstanding the pendency, in law there is
no prohibition to make the necessary change by
amending rule 49(o) by providing “NOTA”.
I believe that by introduction of NOTA in E.V.M. a
radical change will be brought about in political
arena. At present the voter is treated as dumb driven
cattle that must choose one, even if he finds all of
them to be thoroughly undesirable. A voter at
present has no role in selecting the candidate, as in
U.S.A. Primaries and even in Britain by
constituency members. Here selection of a
candidate is done by a small cabal of party leaders
and in some parties even by one or two so called
super leaders. The provision of NOTA voting will
make a sea change in the power equation in favour
25
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
Rajindar Sachar
of the small voter as against the monster of a big political
party. Such a provision will enable the voter to exercise
his right in secrecy and to send a message of his anger at
the unsuitability of contesting candidates and their
political mentors.
It is not as if at present many voters will not like to
record their disapprobation of the contesting
candidates but they are afraid to do so because of
the unholy alliance of mafia crowd with many of
the contesting candidates. But NOTA being
available in the voting machine, the voter will be
able to speak his mind without fear and thus defeat
politicalisation of criminals.
At the present, when voters feel disgusted at the
nomination of undesirable candidates, they just sit
at home and sulk, but are not able to convey their
resentment effectually. But in the changed position
the voter will be assured of secrecy and will
exercise his right which will send a strong message
to the smug political bosses against their
manipulation and force them to listen to the small
man/woman who in fact have the power with
his/her little finger on the button to decide the fate
of so called tallest of them.
Thus NOTA can be effectuated immediately by the
Central Government by amending the rule,
provided it is genuinely concerned with clean
polities. The principles justifying NOTA are self
evident, namely;
(A) All legitimate consent requires the ability to
withhold consent;
(B) Would end the farce where voters are often
forced to vote for the least unacceptable candidate,
the all too familiar “lesser evil.”
(C) Voters would decide the fate of the political
parties’ choices, instead of the parties deciding the
voters’ choices.
(D) Many voters and non voters, who now register
their disapproval of all candidates for an office by
not voting, could cast a meaningful vote.
(E) Improves checks and balances between voters
and political parties.
In any election when “NOTA” will be put on EVM,
the list of candidates would be followed by the
button of “NOTA”. If NOTA gets more votes than
any of the candidates, then no one is declared
elected, instead, a follow-up by-election with new
candidates, old being ineligible, would be held to
fill the seat, until a candidate wins a plurality of
votes among all other candidates including
“NOTA”.
NOTA have many thoughtful advocates in various
countries in the world including the most well
known Ralph Nader, the consumer activist. U.S.A.
Australia, Norway and other countries have a very
strong constituency favouring NOTA.
Of course legislation would need to be enacted to
provide that if NOTA votes exceed the maximum
cast for the highest vote getting candidate, the
election will be countermanded and a fresh election
ordered. This change will be warning to the
political parties that decision about the choice of
candidate is not the sole prerogative of a clique
within the party. It must involve the voters at the
initial stage of selection. A wrong choice will result
in fresh elections.
I feel the Central Government can redeem its self
damaging conduct during Anna Hazare Fast (as
even some of the Ministers have said it openly) by
immediately amending Rule 49(o), as demanded by
Election Commission since 2001 and by providing
a slot of NOTA in the voting machine straight away
for all future elections, thus recognizing the
supremacy of the voters.
26
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ARTICLES BEYOND 1500-2000 WORDS: Dear Friends, Also, inform me whether they have
been published elsewhere. And, please try to email them at [email protected] instead of sending them by post. You may
post them (only if email is not possible) at C-8 Defence Colony, Meerut, 250001, U.P., India. Do also email your passport
size photographs as separate attachments (in JPG format) as well as your small introduction, if you are contributing for the first
time. Please feel free to contact me at 91-9719333011 for any other querry.—Rekha Saraswat
IRHA/IRI Members’ Section:
I
Musini Narayana: UniqueRadical Humanist in Telengana
Under Nizam’s rule in former Hyderabad
state no freedom is allowed to citizens
until the formation of Andhra Pradesh in 1956.
While Radical Humanist movement was
vigorously campaigned for human values in
Andhra area, the neighboring Telengana area was
denied all such golden opportunities.
At such critical juncture Mr. Musini Narayana from
Telangana came into contact with Radical
Humanists in Andhra and particularly the writings
of M.N. Roy. He was deeply impressed with
Radical thought which he adopted his life mission.
Narayana Musini
Born (1929) in a weavers community family at
Janampet, Mahaboob Nagar district, Andhra
Pradesh. Narayana studied up to post graduation.
His father Mr. Sivaiah was Ayurveda practitioner
while his mother Venkamma was simple house
wife.
Mr. Narayana joined government service in
revenue department as Tahslidar.
Simultaneously Narayana came in touch with
Radical Humanist movement in Andhra and with
the literature of Radical Humanism, especially the
writings of M.N. Roy.
From the day he joined government duty, Narayana
started propagating the ideas of Radical Humanism
to villagers, teachers and students. He always
carried latest issue of Radical Humanist magazine
and monographs of Radical literature.
Narayana was mainly attracted to the ideas of
decentralization, power to people, recall of elected
representatives, and education as power and so on.
Narayana took the help of school teachers to spread
the Radical Humanist philosophy in a practical
way.
Mr. Narayana participated in several study camps,
meetings, conferences of Radical Humanism held
in Andhra area and thus came closer to Mr. Avula
Gopalakrishna Murthy, Mr. M.V. Ramamurthy,
Mr. Avula Sambasivarao, Mr. N. Innaiah and
others.
While doing government duty, Mr. Narayana
encountered several hurdles for his straightforward
approach and radical ideas.
He had an encounter with Jalagam Vengalarao for
the same reason.
As Block development officer in Kallur, Khamma
district where Mr. Jalagam Vengalarao was a
powerful local congress leader, Mr. Narayana was
appreciated very much. But when personal
favoritism came up, Vengalarao was angry since
Narayana did not favor any nepotism of
Vengalarao. His brother Kondalarao was local
leader who sought favour but Narayana did not
support. As a result Narayana was shunted to a
corner place in the state-Srikakulam district.
While facing higher authorities he again faced
similar kind of discrimination.
Mr. Nukala Ramachandra Reddy was revenue
minister in Andhra Pradesh who appointed Mr.
Narayana for enquiry into land grabbing cases. In
due course Mr. Narayana had to give notice to Mr.
M.T. Raju, who was then chief secretary of Andhra
Pradesh. Instead of appreciating the approach of
Narayana, he was again transferred!
Narayana did not budge.
He did service as Block development officer, as
revenue officer; as special officer in Printing press
in Kurnool; as training officer for village officers
27
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
called patwaris and Patels; and finally retired as
special deputy collector in Hyderabad revenue
board.
While participating in Radical Humanist meetings,
Narayana used to raise many doubts and put
legitimate questions for clarification. He was
friendly to poor and down trodden and helped them
as far as possible.
He raised his children in secular way. His daughter
Suvarna got married to Mr. Vijaya Kumar, bank
officer. The marriage was performed in secular way
where Mr. N. Innaiah participated as special guest.
Narayana named his last son after M.N. Roy. Now
Mr. Manavendra lives in Ottowa, Canada.
Mr. Ravi Prakash, another son followed the foot
steps of Narayana in developing the Junior college
teachers association. He is now living in Atlanta,
USA.
Dr. Raghuramulu, the brother in law of Narayana
retired from Nutrition labs in Hyderabad who
followed the scientific approach of Mr. Narayana.
Mr. Raghuramulu ceremoniously participated in
secular training camps.
Narayan died in 2003. He always lived a simple but
honest radical humanist life.
The specialty of Narayana was his rise as a Radical
Humanist in Telengana, which is a historical and
memorable feat.
II
Remembering a VeteranRadical Humanist - Guttikonda
Narahari profile (1920-1986)
Guttikonda Narahari was born in
Yelavarru, Tenali Tq, Guntur district,
Andhra Pradesh, India. His parents were Mr.
Anjaneyulu and Ms. Raghavamma. He had his
elementary education in Turumella School under
Dakshinamurthy, Head Master. Yelavarthi Rosaiah
and Mallampati Madhusudhana Prasad were his
colleagues.
He married Sarojini (1944-45 April) who hailed
from Gudavalli, Repalle Tq. It was a registered
wedding which was in vogue during pre
independence days.
He completed graduation from Andhra Christian
College, Guntur. Later in 1930s he worked as P.A.
to Professor N.G. Ranga and traveled along with
him to Burma.
1940 onwards he worked in Radical Democratic
Party, and remained its state secretary for some
years. He was a virulent propagandist for M.N.
Roy’s Humanist ideas. He acted as teacher in study
camps and training classes of Radical Democratic
Party.
He attacked Congress and Communist parties and
their ideology during 1940s. During 1946 elections
he was election campaigner for RDP and he toured
the entire state. Mr. Tripuraneni Gopichand, Mr.
P.V. Subbarao toured along with him. He pleaded
that youth should resign and jump into freedom
fight.
He was a pamphleteer and a good draftsman.
He participated in study camps conducted at all
India level by M.N. Roy and Ellen Roy in
Dehradun, Kolkata, Mussorie, and Delhi. He
continued to attend the camps even after the death
of Roy until his last days.
He was a close friend of Kotta Raghuramaiah in
early 1950s. He started tobacco business, and lost
heavily. While indulging in tobacco business he
was active in tours abroad to get orders for tobacco.
He covered Far East, European countries and got
orders of tobacco export. That included Soviet
Union, Japan, China, Czechoslovakia, Britain etc.
These tours took place during 1954-1964. While
28
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
organizing conferences of tobacco merchants, Mr.
Narahari gave speeches and contributed articles in
the souvenirs on tobacco industry.
During 1952 first general elections, he started a
political party called Kshatra Dharma Parishad.
He contested from Guntur to Lok Sabha but lost the
elections and his party is gone.
Later he studied law and enrolled in Andhra
Pradesh High Court, and practiced for sometime in
High Court at Hyderabad. He was associated with
Mr. N.K. Acharya, another rationalist advocate in
Hyderabad.
Mr. Narahari was a close friend of Mr. Avula
Gopalakrishna Murty, Mr. Alapati Ravindranath,
Mr. Koganti Radhakrishna Murty, Mr. M.V.
Ramamurthy, Bachina Subbarao, Mr. N.V.
Brahmam, Mr. Ravipudi Venkatadri, Mr. Koganti
Radhakrishna Murty, and Mr. Subrahmanyam
Koganti.
On the request of late Narla Venkateswararao,
Editor Andhra Prabha, he sent the literature of
M.N. Roy to him in 1955.
He was a powerful speaker in English and Telugu.
He was a close friend of Mr. T.S. Paulus, Principal
of Andhra Christian College, Guntur. He
campaigned for him during elections in favor of
Paulus.
He died on 27 March, 1986 in Hyderabad. During
last days stayed with his brother Lakshminarayana
for sometime in Repalle.
Narahari used to argue that Man is not only
essentially rational but also have other essential
qualities. He was influenced by Roy’s Philosophy
and Science.
Sent by —Innaiah Narisetti
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
29
Stop Forced Amputations, Now!
The Institute for Science and Human Values, founded by Prof Paul Kurtz, joins with the Nigerian
Humanist Movement in condemning a Nigerian sharia (Islamic law) court’s ruling that two young men
are to be punished with amputation.
A Muslim court in the northern Nigerian state of Zamfara has ruled that Auwalu Abubaka, 23, and
Lawalli Musa 22, must have their right wrists cut off in public for stealing a bull. The punishment is
scheduled to be carried out on October 8, 2011. However, the two men have the right to appeal the
sentence.
Amputation is cruel and unusual punishment. Even judges in sharia courts in Nigeria and other nations
are reluctant to impose it. The international community rightfully expresses horror and disdain
whenever this kind of punishment is proposed.
There is a tendency on the part of many to retreat into cultural relativism, or the notion that each culture
has the right to its own practices, no matter how detrimental they might be to individuals and societies.
However, most national governments today, at least in theory, recognize the need to defend human
rights for all citizens of the world.
Though Nigeria has a secular constitution, there are 12 sharia states in the northern, predominantly
Muslim, part of the country. Recognition of these states by the national government continues to be a
major challenge to national unity and human rights.
Freedom loving people of conscience must oppose the merging of religion and state. A great first step in
doing so is to oppose the sentence of amputation for these two Nigerian men. It is time to sweep cruel
and unusual punishment into the dustbin of human history.
http://www.instituteforscienceandhumanvalues.net/articles/Forced_Amputations.htm
PUCL: Its History of Struggle inFighting the Structures
Continued from the previous issue.........
The PUCL Bulletin and Fact-finding
Reports: The PUCL also started
publication of the ‘PUCL Bulletin’ in 1980, which
publishes fact-finding reports on custodial deaths,
fake encounters, and atrocities on Scheduled
Castes/Tribes, communal violence and cases of
gross human rights violation received from the
State Branches, the most prominent among them
being the fact finding reports on the anti-Sikh riots
of 1984 (During October 31 to November 3, 1984
there were large scale killings of Sikhs in the wake
of assassination of the then Prime Minister Indira
Gandhi. In Delhi a joint team of People’s Union for
Civil Liberties and People’s Union of Democratic
Rights published a report titled ‘Who are the
guilty?’ after detailed investigation and collection
of evidence.), on the anti-Sikh flare up in Bidar,
Karnataka, on communal riots in Hashimpura,
Meerut in May 1987 by a PUCL team consisting of
Justice Rajinder Sachar, I. K. Gujaral, A.M.
Khusro, and Dalip Swami, a comprehensive report
on the situation in Kashmir by Justice V.M.
Tarkunde, Justice Rajindar Sachar, Prof. Amrik
Singh, Inder Mohan, N.D. Pancholi, and others.
The demolition of Babri masjid in 1992 and the
subsequent anti-Muslim violence at a number of
places including Mumbai, State sponsored
anti-Muslim Gujarat riots of 2002 and the
anti-Christian riots of Kandhmal perpetrated by the
Hindutva forces engaged the attention of the PUCL
and various fact-finding reports on these riots were
published in the Bulletin. It published a detailed
report on the Hindutva Parivar’s war against the
Christian minority entitled ‘Crossed and Crucified’
by PUCL Bhubneshwar & Kashipur Solidarity
Group, Delhi. The Bulletin also carries press
statements on incidents of human rights violation,
which happen all over the country. Articles on
various human rights issues by prominent writers
and leaders of human rights movement are also
published in it. Because of the authentic material
published in the Bulletin, research scholars make
use of its material for their research work.
Editorials written by (Justice) V.M. Tarkunde, Dr.
Y.P. Chhibbar, (Justice) Rajindar Sachar, Dr. R.M.
Pal, K.G. Kannabiran, Dr. George Mathew, Prof.
Prabhakar Sinha and others have been providing
insight into various issues of human rights and
democratic governance and clarifying the stand of
the PUCL on these issues. The PUCL had instituted
an annual ‘Human Rights Journalist award of the
year’ for the best work done by a journalist for the
promotion and protection of civil liberties and
human rights, which carried a citation, and a cash
award of Rs. 20,000/-. It has however been
discontinued for paucity of funds. An annual JP
Memorial Lecture on March 23rd by a prominent
speaker continues to be the organization’s regular
feature. An annual lecture in memory of Justice
V.M. Tarkunde has also been started in
collaboration with The Tarkunde Memorial
Foundation on 3rd September. The text of both the
lectures is published in the PUCL Bulletin.
Besides, many law students from Law Institutes
from all over the country come to the PUCL office
every year as interns to get their first experience in
research work. Some of their best research papers
are published in the Bulletin. In July 1994 PUCL
was awarded the first M.A. Thomas Human Rights
Award instituted by the Vigil India movement for
its extraordinary work for the propagation and
protection of civil liberties and human rights of the
people.
PUCL and the role of the Radical Humanists:
The PUCL has been led by leading radical
30
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
Mahi Pal Singh
humanists from its very inception. Being the
followers of M.N. Roy, the revolutionary freedom
fighter, philosopher and intellectual, who was a
strong votary of the democratic freedoms of the
individual and participatory grassroots democracy
for the empowerment and emancipation of the
people whom he considered the sole source of the
sovereign power of the State, the PUCL in its
attempt to fight against the dictatorial Emergency
regime of Indira Gandhi in order to defend the civil
liberties of the people was the fraternal and natural
ally of the radical humanists. That was the reason
why Jayaprakash Narayan asked Justice V.M.
Tarkunde, the leading light among the radical
humanists committed to the defense of democratic
freedoms, to head the PUCLDR in 1976 and he was
the natural choice as the President of the PUCL
when it was formed in 1980. Besides him, there
were hundreds of radical humanists who joined the
PUCL and many have played an important role in
the organization. C.R. Dalvi has been active in
Mumbai. M.A. Rane not only filed many Habeas
Corpus petitions in the Bombay High Court for the
release of those detained during the Emergency, but
also served the Mumbai Branch of the PUCL for a
long time and was its Secretary till his death on 24
July 2008 apart from being the President of the
Mumbai Branch of the Indian Radical Humanist
Association. Apart from being the Secretary of the
Indian Renaissance Institute, which was founded
primarily as a research and publication institute
with the purpose of development of the
Renaissance Movement and is the parent body of
the Indian Radical Humanist Association, N.D.
Pancholi has been a founding member of the
organization and has participated in many
important fact-finding enquiries. He has also been a
Vice-President of the Delhi PUCL along with Fr.
T.K. John, Dr. Anup Saraya etc. and he was elected
as the President of the Delhi PUCL in December
2010. A close associate of M.N. Roy and
well-known Royist ideologue and thinker, Dr.
R.M. Pal has been a President of the Delhi PUCL.
He also edited the PUCL Bulletin for a long time
from March 1984 to September 2010. He has led
the movement for free and compulsory education
as a Fundamental Right through his editorials
besides writing very strongly against
communalism and societal violation of human
rights of the Dalits. Among the younger generation,
Gautam Thaker, General Secretary, Gujarat PUCL,
has been amongst the leaders of the civil liberties
movement in the State besides being the President
of the Gujarat Branch of the Radical Humanist
Association and Mahipal Singh, also the President
of the Delhi Branch of the IRHA, served the Delhi
PUCL first as its Treasurer and for more than five
years as its General Secretary. He was elected as
the PUCL’s National Secretary at its Ranchi
Convention in 2009. He is also the Editor of the
PUCL Bulletin. Contd.......................
31
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
Letter to the Editor: About Name Change
Dear Rekhaji,
This is in reference to the letter dated 23.8.2011 of Mr.Vishu Bhai of Baroda, published in the RH of
September 2011. He has suggested that in the present scenario of global life time it is better to change
the name of ‘Radical Humanist’ to ‘Rational Humanist’. I respectfully beg to differ. The word ‘Radical’
has a definite meaning for the movement. Trying to bring about revolutionary changes at the root, that
is, in the minds of the people; in their ideas and thinking process. It stands for a materialistic philosphy
and for giving a major role to man as the maker of his destiny. One can dwell upon the topic in a full
fleged article. I will therefore request Mr Vishu Bhai to reconsider his suggestion. With Regards.
BD Sharma (Chairman, IRI)
Teachers’ & Research Scholars’ Section:
Right To Education Bill:Provisions And Shortcomings
Man is the wisest of the entire animal on
the earth by his mental abilities. Thus
forth basic need of a human being apart from food,
shelter and clothing is education. As the modern
world is completely propelled by the knowledge
acquired by all means, education has become the
main agenda of all the countries. Education in the
largest sense is any act or experience that has a
formative effect on the mind, character or physical
ability of an individual. In its technical sense,
education is the process by which society
deliberately transmits its accumulated knowledge,
skill and value from one generation to another.
According to an estimate at present there are 19
million children in the age group of 6-14 years of
age out of that 8 million do not go to school and
dropout rate by class is 25 percent. Illiteracy has
been identified as the basic root of all the social
evils prevailed in the society. No country develops
fully without providing education to its citizen. By
keeping this in mind, government made some
constitutional provisions to ensure education for
all. This historic landmark came in the existence
from April 1, 2010.
India has always suffered by the exploitation of
foreign rulers and result of this they remained poor
and illiterate. Education was the main point for
development and empowerment of the society
before the Independent India. Finally, after 60
years of independence our country has formally
committed to provide free and compulsory
education to all its children aged 6 to 14 years of
age. The right of children to Free and Compulsory
Education Bill, 2009 is passed in 2010 by an Act in
Parliament. Though it was already mentioned in
our Constitution to provide education to its entire
citizen but it is legally bounded for state. Article
21-A of the constitution has been amended by 86th
amendment in constitution which now says “The
state shall provide free and compulsory education
to all children of the age of six to fourteen in such a
manner as the state may, by law, determine.” The
salient features of the Free and Compulsory
Education Bill are as follow-
1.The Bill makes it incumbent on all the states to
provide free and compulsory elementary education
to children of the age of six to fourteen.
2.For elementary education from class one to fifth
school should be situated within a walking distance
of one kilometer.
3.No child can be put through any kind of
examination. Means all students will clear their
class every year in the specified age group.
4.There will be no entrance exams for children and
screening of parents for admission. Nobody will be
denied for admission and even no birth certificate
and transfer certificate is required for this process.
5.No child can be expelled from school and
harassed either. This Bill makes corporal
punishment unlawful.
6.No capitation fee can be charged from the
students. If State gets the complaint of such a fine
up to ten times the amount collected will be attract.
The Bill also provides the legal authority to
withdraw the recognition if school fails to fulfill all
laid down norms.
7.All the school will have to adhere to some
common minimum standards such as the facilities
of drinking water, play grounds, library and toilets.
8.For the first time teacher – student ratio is more
32
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
Surendra Bhaskar
emphasized which made 1:40. The Bill also assures
that no non-teaching work should be given to them.
Schools have to recruit trained teacher and all
untrained teachers have to upgrade themselves in
next five years. This Bill also states that no teacher
shall engage himself in private teaching.
9.Quality of the school also ensured in which they
have to provide basic facilities, School
management committee to have fifty percent of
women members and minimum 75 percent parents
will constitute management committees.
10. 25 per cent of seats in every private school will
be reserved for poor and disadvantaged group of
people.
11. The Bill mandates that it shall be the duty of
every parent to admit his child to a neighborhood
school.
12. This Bill clearly says that the National and State
Commissions for the Protection of Child right
would monitor the effective implementation of the
measures in the Act and inquire into complaints.
13. The provisions of the Bill also say that the
Center and State Government would have
concurrent responsibility for providing funds for its
legislation.
14. It is expected that the implementation of this
Bill will cost 12,000 crore annually and Rs.2 lakh
crore over the next five years.
This bill has covered many things which are as of
now not discussed at any suitable platform. But
ground realities are still far away from what we
actually see in papers. Hardly any private school
accepted it in true sense. Following are some
shortcomings of the Bill:-
1.This Bill is only cover the children group of six to
fourteen years of age leaving away the cold
children aged fourteen to eighteen who are also
minor.
2.This Bill not defines the word ‘free education’.
What does it mean? Free books, uniform or any
other things.
3.Bill is also silent on the children below six years
of age who are the primary target of the private
school for play classes. It does not mention any age
limit for the admission of class one.
4.The Bill is not able to describe which is
neighboring school a government or a private in
case where both are situated.
5.It is also putting a doubt on minority institutions
which are not exempted from reservation.
6.In a big lacuna this bill kept mum on the fate of
children on reaching of fifteen year of age when
they face examination system all of sudden.
7.In another big hole this Bill does not state the
legal consequence of parents not following their
duty nor does it address or even touch the issues due
to which parents fail to admit their children to
school.
8.This plan is short of the funds. It admitted by
HRD Ministry that estimated shortfall is about
60,000 crore for the first five years. The
government estimates that it will require Rs. 1.71
lakh crore for implementation of the RTE Act over
the next five years. The Financial Commission has
released Rs. 13,000 crore to the states to kick start
the implementation process, and the ministry is in
process of getting a 65:35/75:25 Centre- state fund.
9.In a countrywide estimate drawn up by the
ministry of HRM show that of 13.3 new teachers
who need to be inducted over the next three years to
provide education to every child between the ages
of six to fourteen years.UP has to take at least 3.9
lakh followed by Bihar and west Bengal 2.2 and
one lakh respectively. These states are also lacking
in required class rooms for the students. They have
not given due attention to education over the years.
The negligence has led to a pile-up of teacher
vacancies and worsened schools infrastructures. In
contrast, states like Tamilnadu, Maharastra and
AndhraPradesh are more educationally enlightened
Conclusion:
The enforcement of this right has a very symbolic
and historic value, because it is a step ahead in the
country-long struggle for universalizing the
33
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
elementary education. This Act will definitely
prove the success if it is implemented properly. It is
law that can change country’s future provided it is
implemented in letters and spirit by one of all.
Government needs to launch a massive awareness
campaign programme. The parents of the children
must be made aware of the Act and advantage of it.
As far fund is concerned, government expects that
8-8.5 percent growth in 2011 will take care of its
financial resources to a larger extent.
Dr. Surendra Bhaskar hails from Sikar district of
Rajasthan. He is Ph.D. in Sociology from Jai
Narayan Vyas University Jodhpur. He is a social
worker and providing service to rural area through
a NGO named ‘Saviour Education Welfare &
Awareness Samiti’.
34
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
Appeal to Parliament to Abolish Death Penalty
In the wake of ongoing controversy on the justification of death penalty, it is high time that Parliament
takes appropriate steps to abolish such provision from our statue books. The provision of Death Penalty
had been introduced by the British in the Indian Penal Code in 1860 but the same has itself been
abolished by the British from their own statue books- being incompatible with the values of a civilized
society, as done by large number of other countries.
Judgments of the courts are not always correct. Supreme Court itself has stated that its judgments are
correct not because they always may be correct but because they are final. Recognizing ‘the fallibility
of human judgment being undeniable even in the most trained mind’ the five judges bench of the
Supreme Court in the matter of ‘Kehar Singh & another Vs. Union of India and others’ as reported in
AIR 1989 SC 653, while examining powers of the President and Governors under article 72 and 161 of
the Constitution of India, has quoted with approval the following classic exposition of law stated in Ex
parte Philip Grossman (1924) 267 US 87: 69 Law ed 527:-
“Executive clemency exists to afford relief from undue harshness or evident mistake in the operation or
the enforcement of the criminal law. The administration of justice by the courts is not necessarily
always wise or certainly considerate of circumstances which may properly mitigate guilt. To afford a
remedy, it has always been thought essential in popular governments, as well as in monarchies, to vest
in some other authority than the courts power to ameliorate or avoid particular criminal
judgments…….”
Thus in a situation where Supreme Court itself has given due consideration to the fact that courts
judgments may not necessarily be always correct, to deprive a person of his life would be nothing short
of a barbarous act.
The people of India, including the Government of India, have appealed to Pakistan on humanitarian
grounds to commute death sentence of an Indian, namely Sarabjit Singh, facing the death penalty in that
country. Can we make such an appeal when we are blind to such appeals within our own country?
We, therefore, on behalf of PUCL appeal to the members of Parliament to take immediate appropriate
steps to abolish the provisions of death penalty from our statue books.
N.D. Pancholi,
President,
PUCL (Delhi unit)
Book Review Section:
[Ms. Dipavali Sen has been a student of Delhi
School of Economics and Gokhale Institute of
Politics and Economics (Pune). She has taught at
Visva Bharati University, Santiniketan, and
various colleges of Delhi University. She is, at
present, teaching at Sri Guru Gobind Singh
College of Commerce, Delhi University. She is a
prolific writer and has written creative pieces and
articles for children as well as adults, both in
English and Bengali. [email protected]]
A Human Portraiture
[Indira Priyadarshini, by Manorama Jafa,
illustrated by Bodhraj, published by Khaas Kitab
Foundation, 2011, paperback, pp 60, price Rs 99]
When I was a child of about eight or nine,
‘Chacha’ Nehru was a living, moving
figure, appearing on the daily newspapers and
addressing the nation occasionally on the radio. His
daughter’s figure too was familiar but as a thin
shadow of his. By the time I was emerging out of
my teens, it was Emergency and Indira Gandhi had
become a single potent force in the entire country.
In between I had grown and so had Indira Gandhi’s
stature.
But there was no book available to me – or the
children growing up in those times – about her
process of growing up. Children in those times did
not get to know her.
So I was delighted to lay my hands on this slim but
informative book telling the children of today what
Indira Priyadarshini was like.
Indira was born in November 1917, soon after the
October Revolution and the birth of the U.S.S.R. It
was Motilal Nehru who named her Indira after his
own mother and Jawaharlal Nehru who named her
Priyadarshini.
The book provides bits of information that make
her come across as a very human figure. One gets to
know various lively details. Some instances:
‘Indu’ as a child was fond of sweets. So her
grandmother, whom she called ‘Dolima’, kept a
separate cupboard of sweets, just for her.
One day ‘Dadu’, that is, Motilal Nehru announced
that all foreign-made clothes in the household
should be collected on the terrace of Anand
Bhavan, Allahabad. Indu found a lovely, soft pile
and rolled on them playfully. Next morning she
went to do the same and found a pile of ashes.
Sometime later, the police came and took Motilal
and Jawaharlal away to prison. Indu cried. Another
day, the police came and took carpets and other
expensive things away. This time Indu caught hold
of one of the policemen and tried to bite him!
At six, Indu started going to school. A teacher gave
her a beating that she felt was only because her
father was a freedom-fighter. Indu stopped going to
school.
At the age of eight, Indu had a brother, but lost him
within two days. Then came her mother’s illness
and hospitalization in Geneva, and her own visit to
Europe.
…..and so the details go on … to Feroze Gandhi
bringing her sweets, and she getting him guavas,
Rajiv and Sanjay having bears and tigers as pets at
Teen Murti House, Jawaharlal Nehru’s aging, and
later and better-known phases of Indira’s own life
– ending climatically on 31 October 1984.
35
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
Dipavali Sen
Thus this book provides lots of information that
would capture children’s interest. Some of it has
been gleaned from original material preserved in
the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, New
Delhi. What is more, the information is presented in
clear and unpretentious language.
Indira Gandhi had a very unusual life. To
summarize it without loss of nuances is next to
impossible, and yet this book does it.
But then it is Mrs Manorama Jafa who is its author.
Mrs Jafa is an internationally acclaimed children’s
writer and the author of about eighty books and
over eight hundred stories for children. She has
held several workshops for aspiring writers, in and
abroad. She has built up a unique organization, the
Association of Writers and Illustrators, and
presides over another; the Khaas Kitaab
Foundation dedicated to the publishing of books for
children with special needs. It is not often that
creative talent combines with administrative. But it
does so in Mrs Jafa.
The creation of her magic pen has been enhanced
by the deft pencil sketches of illustrator Bodhraj.
Reproducing photographs (some of them
well-known to the public) faithfully, right down to
the facial expressions, he supplements the text
superbly.
The AWIC has a system of evaluating children’s
books through children themselves. This book has
won that AWIC Children’s Choice Award.
Children have chosen it to be a book they
appreciate.
For, this book portrays Indira Gandhi as a person
rather than a phenomenon, a human being rather
than a political leader. It may create in children a
new, understanding of political leaders, so that they
learn to perceive the human face of those in (and
out) of power.
36
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
Humanist News Section:
I
Minutes of IRI General BodyMeeting Held on 20th & 21st
August 2011(A)
Meetings of the General Body of Indian
Renaissance Institute were held on 20th
& 21st August 2011 at Gandhi Peace Foundation,
New Delhi.
Following members participated in the same:
Shri. B.D. Sharma—Chairman
Shri. N.D. Pancholi—Secretary
Shri. Narottam Vyas—Treasurer
Shri. Gautam Thakkar—Life Trustee
Smt. Rekha Saraswat—Life Trustee
Shri. Vinod Jain—Life Trustee
Shri. Vikramjeet—Co-opted Trustee
Shri. Subhankar Ray—Member
Mohd. Nazimuddin—Member
Shri. Deepak Kumar—Member
Shri. Mahipal Singh—Member
Smt. Deepshikha Bhartya—Member
Smt. Amita Sharma—Member
Shri. Abdus Samad Gayen—Member
Shri. Kishan Kumar—Member
Shri. Bhaskar Sur—Member
Shri B.D. Sharma presided over the meeting.
At the start of the meeting, members observed a
two minutes’ silence in condolence for the
following departed members:
· Prof. Amlan Dutta
· Shri. G.R. Dalvi
· Shri. Ugam Raj Mohnot
Agenda:
Item 1 - Confirmation of the minutes of the
meeting of the last General Body Meeting of the
Indian Renaissance Institute held on 27th June,
2010.
Shri. N.D. Pancholi, Secretary, read out the minutes
of the last General Body Meeting of IRI held on 27th
June 2010 at Delhi. The same were confirmed.
Item 2 - Presentation and consideration of the
Secretary’s report.
Shri. N.D. Pancholi, Secretary IRI, presented his
report and the same was approved.
Item 3 - Status of Court Case regarding 13,
Mohini Road, pending at Dehradun and
Uttaranchal High Court.
Shri N.D. Pancholi, Secretary informed about the
status of the Court Case pending at Uttaranchal
High Court regarding 13, Mohini Road, Dehradun.
It was informed that Shri. Aseem Puri grandson of
Late Shri S.N. Puri, who had been substituted in
place of Shri. S.N. Puri, also died in the month of
June 2010 and thereafter none of his successors
filed any application for substitution in spite of
repeated adjournments. Ultimately on 8th March
2011 the case came up for hearing in the court but
nobody appeared on behalf of appellants and the
appeal of Late Shri. S.N. Puri was dismissed by the
court. Thereafter Shri Virender Kumar Puri S/o
Late Shri S.N. Puri has filed an application in the
month of May 2011 to implead himself in place of
his son late Shri Aseem Puri. Reply has been filed
on behalf of the Indian Renaissance Institute and
the said application is pending decision.
Item 4 - The publication of the Radical Humanist
and how to make it financially viable and
fruitful for the Radical Humanist movement.
It was decided that members would make efforts to
enroll more subscribers and would try to raise
donations for the Journal in order to make it
financially viable.
Item 5 - Publication of the Humanist literature
and M.N. Roy’s Selected Works, especially Vth
Volume of Selected Works.
i) Shri. N.D. Pancholi informed that manuscript of
the Vth Volume of the Selected Works had been
37
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
received by him from Kolkata. It was further
informed that large parts of the manuscript were
handwritten with many short notes. Many parts of
the same were manually typed with lot of
overwriting due to corrections and cuttings. He told
the house that the manuscript had six files
spreading over to around 1400 pages and required
prior arrangement before being given for electronic
typing. It was decided that Shri N.D. Pancholi
would get both these things done – proper
arrangement of the papers, and computer-typing of
the whole manuscript after making due corrections.
Shri N.D. Pancholi would also check the related
material and the footnotes to ensure that the work is
completed without any mistake.
Shri Gautam Thakar and Shri Vinod Jain suggested
that Shri Jayanti Patel may be approached to review
the manuscript and both would help Shri Jayanti
Patel in this regard. It was decided that Shri Gautam
Thakar would contact Shri Jayanti Patel to know
whether he would be able to undertake the task.
ii) It was decided that a complete list of books
written by M.N. Roy would be prepared and their
availability would also be ascertained. It was
decided that the members would submit necessary
information in this regard to the Secretary.
iii) It was further decided that a brochure
containing the formation, aims and objectives and
past activities of the Institute would be published. It
was decided that Shri Gautam Thakar would
prepare a draft of such a voucher which will be
finalized by the President and Secretary.
Item 6 - Transfer of account of IRI Mumbai
branch to Delhi.
It was decided that Mumbai office should be
approached in this regard i.e. to transfer funds of
IRI and RH to Delhi office. Shri Gautam Thakar
offered his assistance that he would visit Mumbai
office and would make efforts for transfer of the IRI
and RH funds to Delhi. His suggestion was
approved.
Item 7 - Other programs and activities of the
Indian Renaissance Institute.
i) It was decided that the year starting from 21st
March 2012 to 20th March 2013 should be
celebrated as the 125th Birth Anniversary Year of
M.N. Roy. Following names were suggested for
inviting eminent persons to deliver ‘M.N. Roy
Memorial Lecture – 2012’:
(a) Prof. Amartya Sen
(b) Lord Bhikhu Parekh
ii) It was further decided that seminars, study
camps and public meetings should be held during
this Birth Anniversary Year in various parts of
India.
iii) Accounts of the IRI for the year 31st March 2001
were presented and the same were approved.
Item 8 - Election of Trustees.
Following members were elected as elected
trustees:
1.Shri. Narottam Vyas
2.Shri. Ajit Bhattacharya
3. Shri. Manoj Datta
4.Shri. Niranjan Haldar
5.Shri. N. Innaiah
6.Shri. Ancha Bappa Rao
7.Shri. Bhaskar sur
No other issue was discussed. Meeting ended with
thanks to the chair.
(B)
Meeting of the newly elected trustees: 21st
August, 2011
Immediately after the General Body meeting, the
meeting of the trustees was held in which following
persons participated.
1.Shri B.D. Sharma ……. Life Trustee
2.Shri. N.D. Pancholi ……… Life Trustee
3.Dr. Rekha Sarswat ……….. Life Trustee
4.Shri. Gautam Thaker………… Life Trustee
5.Shri. Vinod Jain………………Life Trustee
6.Shri. Bhaskar Sur……………. Elected Trustee
7.Shri. Niranjan Haldar……… Elected Trustee
38
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
8.Shri. Narottam Vyas…… Elected Trustee
10. Shri. Subhankar Ray……… Invitee
11. Shri. Vikramjeet Sikand…… Invitee
Shri B.D. Sharma presided over the meeting.
Following decisions were taken:
(a) Shri Jayanti Patel and Shri Subhankar Ray were
elected as Life Trustees.
(b) Following Office bearers were elected:
(i) President: Shri. B.D. Sharma
(ii) Secretary: Shri. N.D. Pancholi
(iii) Treasurer: Shri. Narottam Vyas
(c) Following members were elected as co-opted
trustees:
(i) Shri Vikramjeet Sikand
(ii) Shri S.C. Jain
Meeting ended with thanks to the chair.
Humanist News II
Radical Humanists provide helpand support in Kerala
Rationalists’ Meet
Mr. Meduri Sathyanarayana, General
Secretary, Rationalist Association of
India inaugurated the two day annual conference of
Bharathiya Yukthivadi Samgham on14th August
2011 at Charvakapuri (Kollam Public Library Hall,
Quilon, Kerala). In his speech which got wide
publicity in the mainline media, he observed that
adherence to religious scriptures written centuries
back was retarding the society. Boundaries set by
the limited nature of knowledge contained in such
scriptures hamper the growth stifling the human
being. We have millions of believers in India.
Babas and Ammas are exploiting the believers
extorting their wealth. It is dangerous that political
parties extend help and support to these forces, he
warned. Man understands nature, events and
phenomena by the aid of science and technology.
The role and significance of rationalism are being
felt day by day. In order to bring about the
necessary transformation in society, the individual
has to undergo basic change. He added that certain
trends prevailing in our society are not conducive to
the welfare of human beings.
Mr. Abdul Ali K.K. (President, Bharathiya
Yukthivadi Samgham) presided over the session.
Mr. Sudan Jotting, Chief Guest of the session
delivered a short but beautiful speech. Other
speakers included Mr. Sreeni Pattathanam (Gen.
Sec., BYS), Dr. V. Nehru (President, Tamilnadu
Rationalist Forum), Mr. G. Veeranna (President,
Andhra Pradesh Rationalist Association), Mr. CLN
Gandhi (Treasurer, RAI), Mr. T. Parameswaran,
Mr. P.T. Varghese, and Mr. P. Sivan etc.
Mr. CLN Gandhi inaugurated the Seminar on
‘Resurgence of Casteism and Necessity of
Reservation for the Casteless. Mr. Sudan Jotting
inviting attention to the fact that the reservation
policies have strayed far away from the genuine
objectives, stated that the idea has to be done away
with.
Social activist Mrs. Nafeesa Syed Alavi
inaugurated the seminar on ‘Religious
Fundamentalism and Humanist Values’. She was
emphatic in suggesting that religions have always
obstructed endeavors aiming at women’s’ freedom.
Mr. Abdulla Meppayur presided. He briefly
touched upon rituals, fundamentalism and
terrorism and stressed the need to strengthen
rationalist activism. Mr. Syed Muhammad
Aanakkayam presented the theme of the session.
He drew attention to the Mappila rebellion of 1921
and pointed to the fact that even some Muslim
scholars could not approve the Khilafat movement.
Religions speak mostly about the other world and
not about the human individual or his problems on
this earth. They remain and act as anti-democratic
forces in the modern world. Mr. Vutla
Renganayakulu (Gen. Secretary, APRA) was a
prominent speaker in the seminar. Mr. Siddiq
Thodupuzha, Prof. Joseph Varghese, Mr.
P.V.Basheer and Mr. Raghu Lathoor were the
39
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
other speakers. Mr. Rajeev Memunda led the
‘Exposure of Miracles’ show.
On 15th August 2011 (Monday), Mr. Ravichandran
(University College, Trivandrum) conducted a
Study Class based on Richard Dawkins’ book, ’The
Greatest Show on Earth’.
The Study Class by Dr. Anil Kumar (Medical
College, Trivandrum) on superstitions, mental
health and Psychiatry shed light on superstitious
methods of treatment and modern psychiatric
approaches. He pointed to the change of life style
and stressed the need for giving more care and
attention to children by parents and guardians.
Recently, anxiety related ailments are widely
diagnosed in children which had, previously, been
limited to the older people, he observed. The class
attracted several queries from the audience to
which he provided necessary explanations.
The discussion on Non-Religious Literature was
chaired by Mr. Prabhakaran Elayavoor. The
famous Malayalam poet, Kureepuzha Sreekumar
inaugurated by reciting some poems of his own.
There was uneasiness and interruption from the
audience while some communists and
anti-modernists went on admonishing
rationalists. Mr. G.R. Indu Gopan, Mr. Nettiadan
(Ex- Marthoma priest) and Mr. Sasthamkotta Bhas
spoke. Mr. Siddique Thodupuzha helped to bring
the discussion to a proper direction and he wound
up in a manner that emphasized the rationalist
position.
Mr. Meduri Sathyanarayana was requested by the
Gen. Sec. of B.Y.S. to deliver a special speech. In
his instructive speech, he clarified the meaning and
intent of certain terms which were used to create
confusion among the Kerala Rationalists by certain
vested interests. The explanations given in simple
vocabulary were useful for activists as well as
sympathizers.
The following were elected as office bearers:
President: K.K. Abdul Ali, Kaappaad.
Vice Presidents: T. Parameswaran, Dr. P.
Raghavan, Johnson Ayiroor, Syed Mohamed
Aanakkayam, V.V. Prabhakaran, U.P. Abdul
Majeed, P.T. Varghese.
General Secretary: Sreeni Pattathanam.
Secretaries: R.K. Malayath, Casteless Junior, P.
Sivan, Mani Pezhakkappilli, C.V. Abdul Salam,
Bhaskaran Pekkadam.
Treasurer: Adv. Rajendran.
Resolutions:
The conference discussed the present state of a
petition which was filed by Adv. T.P. Sunder Rajan
Iyengar (who passed away recently) which led to
the revealing of treasure troves kept secretly in the
Padmanabha Swamy temple cellars. An experts’
panel has been appointed with directions to create
an inventory of the various items of the property.
The vested interests caused to conduct a
‘Devaprasnam’ by the seers which threatened
disaster if any ventured to open the vaults. The
conference, taking up the challenge of dire
consequences, passed a resolution announcing its
readiness to open the ‘B’ chamber (sixth cellar) of
the temple if the Supreme Court issues the
necessary permission. The court should not accept
the position taken by the temple authorities as the
astrologers were hoodwinking the public by
threatening with doom and disaster, it added.
Another resolution called for removal of caste
names from all records and prevention of activities
of Casteists and religious organizations. Profession
and not caste has to be the criterion for reservations,
it suggested.
A further resolution was against describing Kerala
as God’s Own Country in advertisements
sponsored by the Government departments and
agencies.
The attention and publicity by the mainstream
media added to the success of the conference.
—Report sent by
Abdul Majeed. U.P.
Vice President,
Bharathiya Yukthivadi Samgham
40
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
THE RADICAL HUMANIST OCTOBER 2011
—SUBSCRIPTION RATES—
In SAARC Countries: For one year-Rs. 200.00
For two years-Rs. 350.00
For three years-Rs. 500.00
Life subscription-Rs. 2000.00
(Life subscription is only for individual subscribers and not for institutions.)
Cheques should be in favor of The Radical Humanist.
For outstation cheques: Please add Rs. 25.00 to the total.
In other Countries: Annual subscription (Air Mail) $ 100.00; GBP 75.00
Note: Direct transfer of subscription amount from abroad may be sent to:
SWIFT CODE Number CNRBINBBAMHB in the Current Account Number 0349201821034 at
Canara Bank, Maharani Bagh, New Delhi, 1100014, India.
Cheques and money transfer details from abroad may be sent to: Mr. Narottam Vyas (Treasurer),
Chamber No. 111, (Near Post Office) Supreme Court of India, New Delhi-110001, Ph. (Chamber)
91-11-23782836, (Res.) 91-11-22712434, (Mobile) 09811944600
SUBSCRIPTION FORM
The Manager, The Radical Humanist
C/o Mr. Narottam Vyas (Treasurer)Chamber No. 111,(Near Post Office) Supreme Court of India,Delhi-110001
Dear Sir,
I/We wish to be enrolled as subscriber/s for The Radical Humanist for a period of oneyear/two years/three years/life.
Name...........................................................................................................Address........................................................................................................Phone No.....................................................................................................E-mail.........................................................................................................
Thanking you.
Yours faithfully,
Published and printed by Mr. N.D. Pancholi on behalf of Indian Renaissance Instituteat 1183, Chatta Madan Gopal Maliwada, Chandni Chawk, Delhi, 110006
Printed by Nageen Prakashan Pvt. Ltd., W. K. Road, Meerut, 250002Editor-Dr. Rekha Saraswat, C-8, Defence Colony, Meerut, 250001
RNI No. 43049/85
Post Office Regd. No. Meerut-146-2009-2011
at H.P.O. Meerut Cantt.
to be posted on 2nd. of every month
RENAISSANCE PUBLISHERS PRIVATE LIMITED
15, Bankim Chatterjee Street (2nd floor), Kolkata: 700 073,
Mobile: 9831261725
NEW FROM RENAISSANCE
By SIBNARAYAN RAY
Between Renaissance and Revolution-Selected Essays: Vol. I- H.C.350.00
In Freedom’s Quest: A Study of the Life and Works of M.N. Roy:
Vol.Ill H.C.250.00
Against the Current - H.C.350.00
By M.N. ROY
Science and Superstition - H.C.125.00
AWAITED OUTSTANDING PUBLICATIONS
By RABINDRANATH TAGORE & M.N. ROY
Nationalism - H.C.150.00
By M.N. ROY
The Intellectual Roots of Modern Civilization - H.C.150.00
The Russian Revolution - P.B.140.00
The Tragedy of Communism - H.C.180.00
From the Communist Manifesto - P.B.100.00
To Radical Humanism - H.C.140.00
Humanism, Revivalism and the Indian Heritage - P.B. 140.00
By SIVANATH SASTRI
A History of The Renaissance in Bengal
—Ramtanu Lahiri: Brahman & Reformer H.C.180.00
By SIBNARAYAN RAY
Gandhi, Gandhism and Our Times (Edited) - H.C.200.00
The Mask and The Face (Jointly Edited with Marian Maddern) - H.C.200.00
Sane Voices for a Disoriented Generation (Edited) - P.B. 140.00
From the Broken Nest to Visvabharati - P.B.120.00
The Spirit of the Renaissance - P.B.150.00
Ripeness is All - P.B. 125.00
By ELLEN ROY
From the Absurdity to Creative Rationalism - P.B. 90.00
By V. M. TARKUNDE
Voice of A Great Sentinel - H.C.175.00
By SWARAJ SENGUPTA
Reflections - H.C 150.00
Science, Society and Secular Humanism - H.C. 125.00
By DEBALINA BANDOPADHYAY
The Woman-Question and Victorian Novel - H.C. 150.00