18
Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts and Fisheries Christina M Comfort, M.Sc. Candidate University of Hawaii at Manoa Department of Oceanography Hawaii Natural Energy Institute

Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    7

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts and Fisheries

Christina M Comfort, M.Sc. Candidate

University of Hawaii at Manoa

Department of Oceanography

Hawaii Natural Energy Institute

Page 2: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC)

• Renewable energy – ocean thermal gradient

• Large water flux – Intakes at 20m and 1000m

– 320-420 cubic meters /sec

– >6 million cubic meters per day!

• Environmental impacts

*Coastal Response Resarch Center Report, 2010

Page 3: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

OTEC development on Oahu

OTEC Plants Intakes: 20 and 1000m Discharge 70—100m 5-10 km from shore

SWAC Intakes: 500m Discharge: 50m

100MW

10MW

Page 4: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

OTEC Environmental Impact

OTEC

Warm Water Intake: •Entrainment •Impingement

Cold water intake: •Entrainment

Operational Noise

Discharge Plume: •Redistribution of nutrients •Secondary entrainment

Biota attraction or avoidance

Release of biocides

Page 5: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

Importance to fisheries

• Entrainment and impingement – Mortality of eggs and larvae – Mortality of food source for pelagic

fisheries? – Mechanical shear, cold shock

• Plume

– Changes in local conditions – Aquaculture? – FAD effects + enhanced productivity?

Page 6: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

Assessing risk for entrainment and impingement

• Plankton and micronekton

– Species present

– 3-D distributions

– Densities

– Seasonal variability

• Example:

– Mesopelagic boundary community

Benoit-Bird et al., 2006. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 319:1-14.

Seafloor

Seafloor

Entrainment risk: MBC at daytime residence depth

OTEC

Night

Day

Page 7: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

MOCNESS surveys on leeward Oahu: Scombrids

• Entrainment risk:

– T. albacares more abundant nearshore

– K.pelamis more abundant offshore

• Calculation:

• Alarming at first glance!

• Consider tuna reproductive biology

Boehlert and Mundy 1994. Mar Ecol. Prog. Ser. 107:1-13

1-4.4 million larvae entrained per month for both skipjack and YFT

1-2 km offshore

5-15 km offshore

Tuna larvae offshore of Oahu

Page 8: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

Yellowfin Reproductive Biology

• Spawning frequency – Hawaii: 1.02-1.24 days

• Batch fecundity – 2-10 million (Hawaii)

• Seasonality – June-August

Itano, JIMAR Contribution 00-328

YFT Fish Weight vs. Batch Fecundity - Hawaii

Page 9: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

Yellowfin Reproductive Biology

Suzuki, 1991. FAO Technical Paper, after Nishikawa et al., 1985.

Larval YFT in Pacific Ocean

Page 10: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

MOCNESS results: other species • Mahimahi, swordfish, billfish

– Rare in NMFS, Miller and Leis studies – Sampled from neuston off Kona

• Ono

– Collection of larvae rare in HI

• Reef fish – Mostly inshore – Offshore families:

• Labridae, Parapercidae, Serranidae, Gobiidae, and Carangidae • Smaller spatial scale for population

Boehlert and Mundy, 1986. NOAA Technical Report NMFS Hyde et al., 2005. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 286:269-277. Clarke, 1991. NOAA Technical Report NMFS.

http://nationalgeographicstock.com

Page 11: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

Distribution of Reef/Oceanic larvae

Offshore OTEC

Leis and Miller, 1976. Marine Biology. 36:359-367

Page 12: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

OTEC

Discharge Plume: •Higher nutrients •Lower temperature •Lower salinity

Plume: alteration of local conditions Additional productivity? Aggregation of fish downstream?

Page 13: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

Plume Modeling: Makai Engineering

Nitrate: 150m after 7d operation Based on 100m outflow Internal waves?

Makai Engineering, 2010. Optimizing OTEC Sustainability Using a Hydrodynamic Modeling Tool

Page 14: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

Plume and enhanced productivity • “Next generation fisheries”

• Aquaculture based on upwelled nutrients

Golman et al., 2005. WREC.

Page 15: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

Challenges and Gaps in Knowledge: OTEC and Fisheries

• Fishing and protected species management: OTEC as a FAD

• Ecosystem level impacts of entrainment/impingement – Numbers of entrained organisms can be calculated

– Recruitment, spawning area, mixing and retention…

– Effects on populations?

• Artificially upwelled deep water – Enough nutrients for effective aquaculture at sea?

– Would it have significant ecosystem impacts in higher trophic levels?

Page 16: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

Conclusions

• OTEC’s operation will unavoidably affect pelagic fish… – Noise and water pollution – FAD effects – Entrainment and Impingement – Effects of altered stratification and nutrient concentrations

• Significance?

– Aggregation, upwelling nutrients • Pilot plant: 5-10MW test facility, 1-2 years operation

– Monitor rigorously – Experiment to look at potential ecosystem effects

Page 17: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

Thank you!

Questions?

Page 18: Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion: Potential Environmental Impacts

Entrainment: Cold Water Pipe

21

62

30

18

Informal monitoring: NELHA deep water pipe

2 months, 2009

Fish

Crustaceans

Cnidarians

Other Invertebrates

West Hawai’i Explorations Academy

Flow rate of 0.8m3/s Compare to pilot plant: 25m3/s and commercial plant: 320m3/s