occupation and work organisation

  • Upload
    rsqnet

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 occupation and work organisation

    1/12

    Work 40 (2011) 425435 425DOI 10.3233/WOR-2011-1254IOS Press

    Occupation, work organisation conditions and

    the development of chronic psychological

    distress

    Alain Marchanda,b, and Marie-Eve BlancbaSchool of Industrial Relations, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, CanadabInstitute of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

    Received 12 January 2010

    Accepted 4 April 2010

    Abstract. Objective: The contribution of occupation and work organisation conditions to the development of chronic psycholog-

    ical distress in the Canadian workforce was examined.

    Participants: Longitudinal data came from the first five cycles (Cycle 1 = 19941995, Cycle 5 = 20022003) of Statistics

    Canadas National Population Health Survey. A sample of 5,500 workers nested in 1,300 neighbourhoods and aged 15 to 55 years.

    Methods: Data had a hierarchical structure and were analysed using multilevel logistic regression models.

    Results: The results showed 46.4% of workers reported one episode of psychological distress, 23.5% more than one, and

    10.6% three or more. Psychological distress decreased over time and varied significantly between individuals and neighbour-

    hoods. Occupation was not significant, but psychological demands, job insecurity, and social support in the workplace wereimportant determinants. The results showed strong contributions of individual and outside work factors (family, social support,

    neighbourhood).

    Conclusions: Research in occupational mental health must expand theoretical and empirical frameworks in order to capture actual

    workplace dynamics and the effects on workers mental health. Interventions designed to reduce mental health problems should

    carefully evaluate not only the work environment itself, but also non-work factors and other individual characteristics.

    Keywords: Psychological, distress/chronicity/longitudinal, study/occupation/work, organisation, conditions

    1. Introduction

    Over the years, a host of studies have been devotedto mental health problems in the workforce that mani-

    fest as psychological distress, depression, and burnout.

    In 2008, the World Health Organization identified de-

    pression as the third leading cause of disability [1]

    and many workers can develop chronic mental health

    problems. However, the study of the development of

    Address for correspondence: Alain Marchand, School of In-dustrial Relations, University of Montreal, P.O. Box 6128, StationCentre-ville, Montreal (Que), H3C 3J7, Canada. Tel.: +1 514 3436111, ext. 1288; Fax: +1 514 343 5764; E-mail: [email protected].

    chronic mental problems has been largely neglected inthe scientific litterature, it has been estimated 19% of

    Canadian workers reported more than one episode ofpsychological distress over a six-year period [2]. The

    morbidity associated with mental health problems rep-

    resents a significant burden for both businesses and thewhole of society, given the costs associated with men-

    tal illness (absenteeism, lower productivity, indemni-ty payments, and health care). In Canada, for exam-

    ple, related expenses were estimated at $51 billion in2003 [3].

    We analysed the contribution of occupationand work

    organisation conditions to the development of chron-ic psychological distress. According to many stud-

    ies, type of occupation and work organisation condi-

    1051-9815/11/$27.50 2011 IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved

  • 7/29/2019 occupation and work organisation

    2/12

    426 A. Marchand and M. Blanc / The development of chronic psychological distress

    tions are important factors for explaining the gene-

    sis of mental health problems among individuals. Al-though studies have not specifically addressedthe prob-

    lem of chronic psychological distress, the literature has

    identified occupations at greater risk for mental health

    problems, like white- and blue-collar workers, semi-

    professionals, and supervisors [410]. Higher employ-

    ment grades were also associated with distress [1113].

    Mental health problems appeared widespread across

    the occupational structure and it was estimated that oc-

    cupational type accounted for 1 to 3% of the variance

    in psychological distress [2,6].

    Reviews of studies on work organisation conditions

    have identified factors related to skill utilisation, de-

    cision authority, psychological and physical demands,

    social support in the workplace, and gratifications from

    work [14,15]. The Job Demand-Control Model [16]

    hypothesises decision latitude (high levels of skill util-

    isation and decision authority) moderates psychologi-

    cal demands, while the Demand-Control-SupportMod-

    el [17] postulates low social support in the workplace

    leads to an increase in the effect of the interaction be-

    tween decision latitude and psychological demands.

    While the contribution of the components (demand,

    control, social support) in these two models to work-

    ers mental health are well supported in longitudinal

    studies [18,19], the majority of empirical studies havefailed to support the interactions between demands and

    control, and between demand-control and social sup-

    port [5,1829]. Siegrists Effort-Reward Imbalance

    Model [30] posits the discrepancy between workplace

    demands and rewards leads to distress, and there is

    some evidence to support this hypothesis [27,2938].

    The multilevel theoretical model of mental health de-

    terminants in the workforce is an integrated model

    postulating the role of stress promoted by constraints-

    resources embedded in macrosocial structures (occu-

    pational structure), structures of daily life (workplace,

    family, social networks outside the workplace, neigh-

    bourhood) and agentpersonality(demographics, physi-

    cal health status, psychological traits, life habits, stress-

    ful childhood events). This is the more recent model

    and has received some support [2,15]. Since the impact

    is not limited to work factors, the multilevel model of

    mental health determinants in the workforce incorpo-

    rates and recognises the role of marital, parental, and

    family economic status; marital and parental strains;

    social support outside the workplace,gender, age, phys-

    ical health, self-esteem, locus of control and sense of

    cohesion; and physical activities, smoking, and life

    events occurring before the age of 18 years. All of

    these elements have been shown to be associated with

    mental health [14,15].Despite numerous studies on workers mentalhealth,

    the development of chronic psychological distress in

    the workforce and the extent to which occupation and

    work organisation conditions are related to this phe-

    nomenon have been neglected. Furthermore, the field

    of occupational mental health has encountered consid-

    erable difficulty integrating, both theoretically and em-

    pirically, the various elements that make up the so-

    cial environment (work, family, social networks, lo-

    cal community-neighbourhood) of workers to explain

    the contribution of occupation and work organization

    conditions to psychological distress [15,18]. Research

    designs have not included a broad range of workplace

    conditions to which individuals are subjected, as just

    as they have not been to take into account both occupa-

    tions and work organizationconditions. Most of the re-

    search reviewed for the present study looked at specific

    occupations, limiting generalization from these results.

    To better understand how work is related to the devel-

    opment of chronic psychological distress, the research

    used a large Canadian prospective cohort study to in-

    vestigate the role of occupation and work organisation

    conditions on repeated episodes of psychological dis-

    tress, using the multilevel theoretical model of mental

    health determinants in the workforce.

    2. Methods

    2.1. Data

    Eight years of longitudinal data were derived from

    the five cycles of Statistics Canadas National Popula-

    tion Health Survey (NPHS; Cycle 1: 1994-1995; Cycle

    2: 19961997; Cycle 3: 19981999; Cycle 4: 2000

    2001; Cycle 5: 20022003). The initial cohort includ-

    ed 17,276 subjects selected based on a two-stage sam-

    pling design. The first stage was a sample of indepen-

    dent clusters selected from homogeneous strata of the

    Canadian territory. In the second stage, a sample of

    households was selected within each cluster, and one

    member was sampled from each household. Telephone

    and face-to-face interviews yielded high response rates

    for each cycle (80.6%93.6%), for an overall attrition

    rate of 27.4%. For this study, all respondents aged

    15 to 55 years and working during Cycle 1 were se-

    lected (n = 7,338). After cases with missing valueswere deleted, the NPHS cohort analysed in this study

    comprised 5,500 workers nested in 1,300 neighbour-

  • 7/29/2019 occupation and work organisation

    3/12

    A. Marchand and M. Blanc / The development of chronic psychological distress 427

    hoods, with an average of 5.6 workers per neighbour-

    hood (unbalanced design). In urban areas, neighbour-hoods were defined according to Statistics Canada cen-sus tracts (CT). CTs are small geographic units hav-ing homogeneous socio-economic characteristics. CTs

    are found within census metropolitan areas and censusagglomerations with urban core populations of 50,000.In rural areas, census subdivisions (CSD) were used.The CSD is the general term applied to small townsand municipalities. In the analysis, data were weighted

    according to selection probabilities, non-responseratesfor each cycle, and distribution by gender, age, andprovince in the 1996 Canadian Census.

    2.2. Measures

    2.2.1. Psychological distress

    Psychological distress was measured with the K6questionnaire[39] based on the Composite Internation-

    al Diagnostic Interview [40], which yielded diagnosesaccording to criteria from the DSM-III-R and the 10thedition of the International Classification of Diseases(ICD-10). Respondents were to indicate, on a 5-pointLikert scale (never/all the time), the frequency of sixsymptoms over the preceding month: feel so sad that

    nothing could cheer youup; nervous; restless orfidgety;hopeless; worthless; everything was an effort. Thepsychological distress score was distributed between

    0 and 24 (Cronbachs alpha = 0.77). The scale wasfurther dichotomised to identify the presence/absenceof psychological distress. Based on prior internationalstudies [4145], the cut-off point ( 5) was set to cor-respond to the last quintile of the distribution of psy-

    chological distress in the general Canadian populationin 1994-1995 [2]. Overall, taking repeated measure-ments of psychological distress in this study allowed

    us to analyse more precisely how individual patternsof psychological distress changed over time, therebycapturing the development of a chronic state.

    2.2.2. Occupation

    Occupations were categorised according to the four-digit codes of Statistics Canadas 1991 Standard Oc-cupational Classification (SOC-1991) [46]. Overall,

    471 occupations were first merged into the 16 cate-gories of the Pineo, Porter and McRobert classificationof occupation [47]. To take care of the large number ofcategories and previous research showing greater riskfor mental health problems in specific occupations, the16 categories were further mergedinto six large groups:

    senior managers, managers, supervisors, professionals,white-collar workers, and blue-collar workers.

    2.2.3. Workplace

    Skill utilisation, decision authority, physical andpsychological demands, social support at work and

    job insecurity were derived from Statistics Canada

    brief version of the Karasek Job Content Question-

    naire (JCQ) [48], which was based on a five-point Lik-

    ert scale (completely disagree/completely agree). Skill

    utilisation included three items (your job requires that

    you learn new things, your job requires a high level of

    skills, your job requires that you do thingsover and over

    [reversed coding]), and decision authority two items

    (your job allows you freedom to decide how you do

    your job, you have a lot to say about what happens in

    your job). Physical demands included one item (your

    job requires a lot of physical effort) and psychologi-

    cal demands were based on two indicators (your job

    is very hectic, you are free from conflicting demands

    that others make (reversed coding). Job insecurity in-

    cluded one item (your job security is good) and social

    support included three items (you are exposed to hos-

    tility or conflict from people you work with (reversed

    coding); your supervisor is helpful in getting the job

    done, the people you work with are helpful in getting

    the job done). Repeated measurements of these scales

    gave acceptable reliabilities, ranging from 0.68 to 0.86,

    and indicated that concept meanings were not changing

    over time [49]. Further, reliabilities of the mean of skillutilization, decision authority, physical and psycholog-

    ical demands across the 471 occupations of SOC-1991

    were 0.88, 0.77, 0.88 and 0.56 respectively, which are

    quite similar to reliabilities of the complete version of

    the JCQ [50]. As for the other variables, hours worked

    were evaluated by summing the number of hours devot-

    ed to the main job and to other jobs (where applicable).

    Irregular work schedules was a dichotomous variable

    where 0 = normal shift and 1 = rotating, split, on call,other.

    2.2.4. Family and social network

    Marital status distinguished between people living

    together as a couple (coded 1) and those with other

    marital situations (coded 0). Parental status was mea-

    sured by the presence of children who lived with the

    respondent, grouped into three age categories: 5 years

    old and under, 611 years old, 1224years old. House-

    hold income was determined using a five-point ordinal

    scale (low/high) from Statistics Canada, which mea-

    sured the level of income in relation to household size.

    Marital, parental, and economic status were measured

    for all cycles of the NPHS. Couple-related strain was

    based on an additive scale of three items (true/false)

  • 7/29/2019 occupation and work organisation

    4/12

    428 A. Marchand and M. Blanc / The development of chronic psychological distress

    developed by Wheaton [51]. Child-related strain was

    measured with an additive scale that included two items(true/false), also developed by Wheaton [51]. A reli-

    ability of 0.86 was estimated from repeated measure-

    ments of both couple-related strain and child-related

    strain. Social support outside the workplace was mea-

    sured using an additive scale with four items that dealt

    with the presence of a confidant; of someone to count

    on in a crisis situation; of someone to count on when

    making personal decisions; and of someone who makes

    one feel loved and cared for. Given its marked asym-

    metry, the scale was divided into two categories: low

    support (0 = 0, 1, 2, 3) and high support (1 = 4).

    2.2.5. Personality of the agent

    Gender was a dichotomous variable coded 0 for men

    and 1 for women. Age was measured at the beginning

    of Cycle 1. Physical health status tallied the number of

    physical health problems affecting respondents using a

    list of 22 health problems (e.g., heart disease, cancer,

    arthritis). Self-esteem (alpha = 0.85) was measuredby six five-point items (disagreement/agreement) de-

    veloped by Rosenberg [52]. The (internal) center of

    control (alpha = 0.76) was derived from the scale de-veloped by Pearlin and Schooler [53], which included

    seven five-point items (agreement/disagreement). The

    sense of coherence (alpha = 0.83) was based on theAntonovsky scale [54], which included 13 seven-point

    items (multiple choice). Tobacco use was calculated

    based on the number of cigarettes smoked per week.

    Physical activity was measured by the monthly fre-

    quencywith which one or more physical activities were

    practiced for more than 15 minutes. Stressful child-

    hood events quantified how many of seven items de-

    veloped by Wheaton occurred before age 18 (e.g., two

    weeks or more spent in the hospital; parents divorcing;

    alcohol or drug abuse by parents) [51].

    Table 1 presents summary descriptive data for each

    NPHS Cycle for the overall sample.

    2.3. Analysis

    The data set had a hierarchical structure in which re-

    peated measurements (level 1, n = 14,399) were nest-ed in workers (level 2, n = 5,500), and workers werenested in their respective neighbourhoods (level 3, n =1,300). Because the dependent variable was binary,

    we used repeated measures logistic multilevel regres-

    sion models [55,56] to analyse the probability (risk)

    of developing repeated episodes of psychological dis-

    tress over the eight-year period. Estimation using these

    models does not require individuals be observed in each

    cycle of the survey. Assuming a random distributionof missing values, subjects not followed for all cycles

    afford less information for estimating the variation be-

    tween levels of the data structure. Therefore, psycho-

    logical distress is evaluated for individuals at work at

    each particular cycle of data. The general model used

    was of the form:

    Logit(ijk(t)) = (t) + p0Xpijk(t)

    +r0Xrjk + 00k + 0

    ijk(t) is the risk of a psychological distress episode

    i (level 1) for worker j (level 2) in neighbourhood k

    during the time interval t (t = 1..5). (t) represents

    model intercepts for each value oft (t = t1). p0are

    slopes for independent worker variables varying with

    time (Xpij(t)), and r0 are slopes for constant-time in-

    dependent worker variables (Xrjk ). 00k and 0j are

    error terms for neighbourhoodand workers, respective-

    ly. 00k and 0j are assumed to follow a normal dis-

    tribution with variances 2 and 2 estimated from the

    data. The model accounts for the non-independence of

    the observations generated from repeated episodes of

    psychological distress in workers as well as for the clus-

    tering of observations at the neighbourhood level. The

    complex sampling design is thus taken into account.

    Parameters were estimated using the method of pre-

    dictive quasi-likelihood (PQL) with a second-order

    Taylor expansion provided by the MlwiN 2.02 soft-

    ware [57]. Because data were weighted, robust sand-

    wich estimators for standard errors were comput-

    ed [56]. In all cases, the significance of individual re-

    gression coefficients was evaluated using a bilateral Z

    test, and the probability of rejection of the null hypoth-

    esis was set at P < 0.05. For random parameters (2,

    2) Wald tests were applied with halved p-values (P