7/15/2019 OBLICON Digest Compilation Assignments

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oblicon-digest-compilation-assignments 1/3

OBLIGATIONS and CONTRACTS DIGEST COMPILATION ASSIGNMENTS

ARCIDE

Sources of Obligations:

1. Sagrada Orden vs Nacoco, 91 Phi! 503 [G.R. No. L-3756]

2. Pelayo vs Lauron, 12 Phil. 44—or 4-93 [G.R. No. L-4089]

3. Leung Ben vs. O'Brien, 38 Phil. 182 [G.R. No. L-13602]

4. People's Car vs. Commando Security, 51 SCRA 40 [G.R. No. L-36840]5. Pichel vs Alonzo, 111 SCRA 341 [G.R. No. L-36902]

UY

6. Del Rio vs. Palanca, 83 Phil. 867 [G.R. No. L-1271]

7. People vs Ritter, 194 SCRA 690 [G.R. No. 88582]

8. Andamo vs. IAC, 191 SCRA 195 [G.R. No. 74761]

10. Brinas vs. The People, G.R. No. L-30309. November 25, 1983

11. Tan vs. Nitafan, G.R. No. 76965. March 11, 1994

12. People vs. Abungan, G.R. No. 136843. September 28, 2000

PORCINA

Obligation to GIVE a Determinate Thing 

13. Equatorial vs Mayfair. G R. No. 106063. November 21. 1996

14. De Leon vs. Soriano. [G R No. L-2724 August 24 1950

Obligation to GIVE a Generic Thing 

15. Norkis vs CA, G. .R No 91029, February 7, 1991

16. Phil. Long Distance Co. vs. Jeturian, 97 Phil. 78

DE VILLA

Effect of Loss

17. Bunge Corp. vs. Cannenforte , G P. No L-4440 August 29, 195218. Occena vs Jabson. 73 SCRA 637

Obligation to DO 

19. Hahn vs. CA G. No L-55372. May 31, 1989

20. Chaves vs. Gonzales, 32 SCRA 547

JAUGAN

21. Woodhouse vs. Halili, 93 Phil. 526

18. Occena vs Jabson. 73 SCRA 637

Delay in Performance 

22. Villaruel vs. Manila Motor, 104 Phil. 92623. Lopez vs Tan Tioco, 8 Phil. 926

24. Dela Rosa vs. BPI, 51 Phil. 926

CABIJE

25. Lizares vs. Hernaez, 40 Phil. 981 [G.R. No. 14977]

26. Bachrach Motor Co. vs. Lee Tay, 90 Phil 540 [G.R. No. L-3885]

27. Lawyers Coop. Pub. vs. Tabora, 13 SCRA 762 [G.R. No. L-21263]

28. Co vs. CA, GR 124922, June 22, 1998

29. Aerospace vs. CA, GR 108129, Sept. 23, 1999

LENTORIO

Non-fulfillment 

30. Telefast vs. Castro. 158 SCRA 445 [G.R. No. 73867]

31. Tanguiling Vs. CA, GR 117190, Jan. 2, 1997

32. Perez vs. CA, GR No 107737, Oct. 1, 1999

Fraud 

33. Board of Liquidators vs Heirs of Maximo Kalaw 20 SCRA 987, G.R. No. L-

18805

34. lCB vs. Gueco, GR 141968, Feb. 12, 2001

DIANA

Negligence 

35. Necessito vs Paras, GR L 10605-06, June 30, 1958

Convention of the tenor of the obligation 

36. Arrieta vs. Noric, 10 SCRA 79, G.R. No. L-15645

37. Chavez vs. Gonzales, 32 SCRA 547, [2008-G.R. No. 168338]

Effect of fortuitous event

35. Necessito vs Paras, GR L 10605-06, June 30, 1958

DONGGAY

38. Ampang vs. Guinoo, 92 Phil 1085 [April 30, 1953]

39. Victorias Planters vs. Victorian Milling, 97 Phi! 18, [G.R. No. L-6648]

40. La Mallorca vs. De Jesus, 17 SCRA 23 [G.R. No. L-21486]

Nakpil vs. CA, 144 SCRA 696 [G.R. No. L-47851]

41. Austria vs. CA, 39 SCRA 527

CATACUTAN

42. Vasquez vs. CA, 138 SCRA 553

Usurious Transactions

7/15/2019 OBLICON Digest Compilation Assignments

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oblicon-digest-compilation-assignments 2/3

43. Angel Jose Warehousing Co. vs. Chelda, 23 SCRA 119

44. Briones vs. Cammayo, 41 SCPA 404

Presumption of Interest and Installments 

45. Hill vs. Veloso, 31 Phil. 160

TALEON

46. Vda. De Ongsiako vs. Cabatuando, 105 Phil. 1262

Action Subrogation 47. Goldstar Mining vs. Lim Jimena, 25 SCRA 597

48. Estate of Hernandez vs. Luzon Surety, 100 Phil 388

CULMINAS

Kinds of Obligations: PURE 

49. Pay vs. Palance, 57 SCRA 618

Kinds of Obligations: CONDITIONAL - SUSPENSIVE AND RESOLUTORY 

50. Lichauco vs Figueras-Hermanos. 7 Phil 383

51. Wise & Co vs Kelly, G R No. L- 11073 February 21, 1918

52. Santiago vs. Millar, 68 Phil. 39

DAGPIN

53. Parks vs. Prov. of Tarlac, 49 Phil. 142

Kinds of Obligations: CONDITIONS - POTESTIVE 

54. Shotwell vs. Manila Motor, G.R. No. L-7637. December 29, 1956 ,

55. Smith Bell vs. Sotelo Matti, 44 Phil. 874

56. Trilliana vs. Quezon Colleges, 93 Phil. 383

ACAS

57. Osmena vs. Rama, 14 Phil. 99

58. Hermosa vs Longara. 93 Phil, 971Kinds of Obligations: CONDITIONS - IMPOSSIBLE AND ILLICIT 

59. Urdaneta Motor Co. vs. Abad, 67 Phil

Constructive Fulfilment

60. Taylor vs. Uy Tieng, 43 Phil. 760

BANQUERIGO

61. Herrera, vs. Leviste, G.R. No. 55744, February 28, 1985

62. Tayag vs. CA, G.R. No. 96053. March 3, 1993

Retroactivity of Obligation 

63. Padilla vs. Paterno, 3 SCRA 678

64. Coronel vs. CA, G.R. No. 103577. October 7, 1996

Rescission in Reciprocal Obligations 

65. llego vs. Interbank, 37 Phil. 631

CONCEPCION 

66. Albert vs. University Publishing, G.R. No. L-9300. April 18, 1958

67. UP vs. Delos Angeles, 33 SCRA 102

68. Roque vs. Lapuz, G.R. 32811, March 31, 1980

69. Fera vs. Leviste G.R. No. 55744. February 28, 1985

70. Zulueta vs. Mariano, 111 SCRA 206

GAMALLO

71. DeIta Motor Corp vs. Gentino, 170

Obligations with a period 

72. PNB vs Lopes Vito, 84 Phil. 542

55. Smith Bell vs. Sotelo Matti, 44 Phil. 874

73. Gaite vs. Fonacier, 2 SCRA 830

74. ___________ vs CA, 66 SCRA 523

MALCAMPO

75. Sarmiento vs. Villasenor, 43 Phil 880

76. Daguhoy Enterprises vs Ponce. 96 Phil 15

77. NPC vs EIR, Nov. 14, 1986

78. Lao Sok vs. Sabay, Aug. 9, 1985

YBIO

79. Arquero vs. RCPI, Dec. 20, 1988

80. BPI vs. Bullalia, Dec. 14, 2001

81. Naviera vs. CA, Dec. 14, 1987

82. Baliwag Trans vs. CA, Jan. 31, 1989

83. Adoracion Cruz vs CA, July 27, 1998

LIU

84. People vs. Lacap, Oct. 23, 2001

85. Bataan seedling vs RP july 2 200286. Rcpi vs ca aug 29 1986

7/15/2019 OBLICON Digest Compilation Assignments

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/oblicon-digest-compilation-assignments 3/3

87. LL and Company Dev vs Huang March 7 2002

88. FGU vs GP Sarmiento Aug 6 2002

DELOS SANTOS 

89. Villanueva vs Castaneda sept 21 1987

90. Leal vs IAC Nov 5 1987

91. Topwell Manufacturing vs ECED et al Sept 9 1985

92. UCPB vs Masagana April 4, 200293. San Miguel vs NLRC May 31 1988

94. Quano vs CA July 23 1992

GANIR

95. Siredy Ent vs CA sept 17 2002

96. House Intl. vs IAC June 13 1987

97. Liang vs CA Jan 13 1989

98. Associated Bank vs Sarmiento June 29 1998

99. Yu vs CA Jan 21 1993

100.  Malbarosa vs CA April 30 2003

FILIPINAS

101.  Batchelder case (circulars are not contracts)

102.  Que vs Arellano Univ (stipulation is void being contrary to public

policy as it violates the definition of scholarship, being given out of 

merit.)

103.  Saura vs Sandico (political rights are outside the commerce of men)

104.  Velasco vs CA (Art 1729, Accion Directa)

105.  Koffman vs PNP (Art 1311(2) Stipulation pour Atrui

106.  Sanchez vs Rigos