1
Objective Data The outlined square marks the area of the study arranged in most cases in a coarse 24X24 grid. Data from the NASA Langley Research Center were used in the form of monthly averages from 1995-2000. Variables include air temperature, surface temperature, cloud cover, ozone content, pressure, elevation. Additional data on Stratospheric temperature and TOR were obtained from NASA’s Live Access Server. Elevation (feet) < 0.5 0.5 -500 500 -1000 1000 -1500 1500 -2000 2000 -2500 2500 -3000 3000 -3500 3500 -4000 > 4000 Abstract In this work, we investigate NASA Langley Research Center datasets containing primarily monthly geographic and atmospheric measures on a coarse grid covering Central America. Time series analyses was performed to check and adjust for serial correlation and identify important trends in atmospheric ozone concentration. Relationships between ozone and higher atmospheric temperature, pressure, and cloud cover were analyzed. Visualization techniques using ArcGIS and R showed there might be a inverse relationship between availability of total ozone and warming of the near-surface atmosphere. The short term effect due to the strong El Nino in 1997-1998 was evident. The graphs show that a spatio-temporal model including covariates like temperature, cloud cover, pressure would be required to model the data best. Additional data obtained from NASA Live Access Server showed indication that the ozone content is directly proportional to the temperature in the upper Stratosphere. Also Tropospheric Ozone Residue (TOR) increases during summer and is present in higher amount over the US. The concentration of ozone at a location is governed by a balance among ozone production, ozone loss, and ozone transport. These processes have shown to interact and alter the distribution of ozone over space and time. 1 Earth 1. O 2 molecules are photolyzed giving 2 O atoms. 2. Oxygen and ozone atoms are continuously being inter- converted. 3. Ozone is lost by a reaction of the oxygen atom or the oxygen molecule with each other or some other trace gas such as Chlorine. Sun O 2 O 3 O 2 3 O To investigate the potential causes of variation in Ozone content in the atmosphere and come up with different approaches to model ozone data . Schematic diagram of the life-cycle of an ozone atom Exploring Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Atmospheric Ozone Concentration Using Visualization Sudeshna Paul, Souleymane Fall, Dev Niyogi, Bruce A Craig, Purdue University. Time series approach Monthly ozone content was partitioned into and averaged over 4 regions. These regions covered (1) High North, (2) Mid North, (3) Equator region, & (4) Mid South latitudes. Each time series was decomposed into seasonal, trend and noise components. Jan’98 stands out as an outlier. One probable cause might be that the record breaking and long- lasting El Nino of 1997-98 which began in 1997. It contributed in establishing 1998 as world’s on of the warmest year on record. Year M o n th ly T em p in th e eq u ato r a fte r S easonalA d 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 297 298 299 300 301 302 Jan M ar M ay Jul S ep N ov 240 245 250 255 260 265 270 ‘98 98 ‘98 Year A verag e M o n th ly O zo n e in th e eq u ato r 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 -5 0 5 10 Jan ‘98 -110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 Time A vergae O zone C o n ten tafter S easonaladj 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 250 260 270 280 290 300 1 2 3 4 3 4 2 1 1997-98 El Nino Impact -110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 -0.05 0.00 0.05 -110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 -0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 -110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 10 20 30 40 50 -110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 20 40 60 80 100 120 Surface Temperature A plot of standardized differences in Surface Temperature between Jan 1998 and Jan 1997. Side by side comparison of Lower Cloud Coverage . Lower Cloud Coverage Jan,97 Jan,98 A plot of standardized differences in ozone Content between Jan, 1998 and Jan, 1997 Ozone Content Summary There are seasonal and annual fluctuations in the atmospheric ozone content. Atmospheric ozone content varies by latitude. The variations arise from the fact that ozone is created in the tropics and then undergoes an equator to pole circulation. Ozone loss rate increases with increasing near surface air temperature. This effect is strongest in Winter. However upper Stratospheric temperature has a positive relationship with total ozone content. Short term events such as the 1997-98 El Nino has caused large scale shifts in the lower Stratospheric temperature which in turn may affect the transport of ozone. The ozone hole over Antarctica is shrinking (NASA image) Long term trends in ozone can be estimated from observations by: Ozone = constant +Seasonal cycle+ Solar cycle + long term Trend+ residual. However only 6 years of observations may not be enough for forecasting purposes and estimating long term trends in the ozone content. Short term trends in ozone can be estimated using temporal models and including covariates to adjust for their spatial locations. Propose to develop a spatio-temporal model which would account for variations due to both space and time at the same time and also allow covariates. Conclusion Acknowledgements: Thanks to Indiana State Climate Office at Purdue University, West Lafayette, particularly Nate Hudson, for his assistance. Also special thanks to NASA for providing with the datasets and web resources on Ozone. Variations in Ozone Content Tem perature in D ec 1998 O zo n e 280 285 290 295 300 305 260 280 300 lat lat 280 285 290 295 300 305 lat lat 280 285 290 295 300 305 lat 260 280 300 lat 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 Lat S-N Long W- E Av g_ o zo n e ‘9 5 Time M onthly distribution ofO zone 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 Average yearly ozone increases from the equator towards the poles. There appears to be a higher amount of total O 3 in the northern compared to southern hemisphere. O 3 has a clear positive relationship with upper Stratospheric temperature. 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 240 260 280 300 320 S tratospheric Tem p in Jan,1997 T o ta lO zo n e C o n ten t in Jan,1997 -110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 -110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 20 25 30 35 40 O 3 loss varies across years and is seasonal; more loss occurs during late spring and summer. O 3 has inverse relationship with air temperature. This is shown for different regions based on latitude and observations taken at sea level elevation. TOR data show that tropospheric O 3 content increases during summer and is present in larger amounts over the U.S. Jan,98 Jul,98 36.2N 21.2S

Objective Data The outlined square marks the area of the study arranged in most cases in a coarse 24X24 grid. Data from the NASA Langley Research Center

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Objective Data  The outlined square marks the area of the study arranged in most cases in a coarse 24X24 grid.  Data from the NASA Langley Research Center

Objective

Data

The outlined square marks the area of the study arranged in most cases in a coarse 24X24 grid. Data from the NASA Langley Research Center were used in the form of monthly averages from 1995-2000.Variables include air temperature, surface temperature, cloud cover, ozone content, pressure, elevation.Additional data on Stratospheric temperature and TOR were obtained from NASA’s Live Access Server.

Elevation (feet)

< 0.5

0.5 - 500

500 - 1000

1000 - 1500

1500 - 2000

2000 - 2500

2500 - 3000

3000 - 3500

3500 - 4000

> 4000

Abstract

In this work, we investigate NASA Langley Research Center datasets containing primarily monthly geographic and atmospheric measures on a coarse grid covering Central America. Time series analyses was performed to check and adjust for serial correlation and identify important trends in atmospheric ozone concentration. Relationships between ozone and higher atmospheric temperature, pressure, and cloud cover were analyzed. Visualization techniques using ArcGIS and R showed there might be a inverse relationship between availability of total ozone and warming of the near-surface atmosphere. The short term effect due to the strong El Nino in 1997-1998 was evident.

The graphs show that a spatio-temporal model including covariates like temperature, cloud cover, pressure would be required to model the data best.

Additional data obtained from NASA Live Access Server showed indication that the ozone content is directly proportional to the temperature in the upper Stratosphere. Also Tropospheric Ozone Residue (TOR) increases during summer and is present in higher amount over the US.

The concentration of ozone at a location is governed by a balance among ozone production, ozone loss, and ozone transport. These processes have shown to interact and alter the distribution of ozone over space and time.

1

Earth

1. O2 molecules are photolyzed giving 2 O atoms.

2. Oxygen and ozone atoms are continuously being inter- converted.

3. Ozone is lost by a reaction of the oxygen atom or the oxygen molecule with each other or some other trace gas such as Chlorine.

Sun

O2

O3 O2

3

O

•To investigate the potential causes of variation in Ozone content in the atmosphere and come up with different approaches to model ozone data .

Schematic diagram of the life-cycle of an ozone atom

Exploring Spatial and Temporal Characteristics of Atmospheric Ozone Concentration Using Visualization

Sudeshna Paul, Souleymane Fall, Dev Niyogi, Bruce A Craig, Purdue University.

Time series approach Monthly ozone content was partitioned into and averaged over 4 regions. These regions covered (1) High North, (2) Mid North, (3) Equator region, & (4) Mid South latitudes. Each time series was decomposed into seasonal, trend and noise components.

Jan’98 stands out as an outlier. One probable cause might be that the record breaking and long-lasting El Nino of 1997-98 which began in 1997. It contributed in establishing 1998 as world’s on of the warmest year on record.

Year

Mo

nth

ly T

em

p in

th

e e

qu

ato

r a

fte

r S

ea

so

na

l A

dj

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

29

72

98

29

93

00

30

13

02

Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov

24

02

45

25

02

55

26

02

65

27

0

‘98‘98

‘98

Year

Av

era

ge

Mo

nth

ly O

zo

ne

in

th

e e

qu

ato

r

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

-50

51

0

Jan ‘98

-110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60

-20

-10

01

02

03

0

Time

Av

erg

ae

Ozo

ne

Co

nte

nt

aft

er

Se

as

on

al a

dj

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

25

02

60

27

02

80

29

03

00

1

2

3

4 3

4

2

1

1997-98 El Nino Impact

-110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60

-20

-10

01

02

03

0

-0.05

0.00

0.05

-110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60

-20

-10

01

02

03

0

-0.01

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

-110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60

-20

-10

01

02

03

0

10

20

30

40

50

-110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60

-20

-10

01

02

03

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Surface TemperatureA plot of standardized differences in Surface Temperature between Jan 1998 and Jan 1997.

Side by side comparison of Lower Cloud Coverage . Lower Cloud Coverage

Jan,97Jan,98

A plot of standardized differences in ozone Content between Jan, 1998 and Jan, 1997

Ozone Content

Summary

There are seasonal and annual fluctuations in the atmospheric ozone content.

Atmospheric ozone content varies by latitude. The variations arise from the fact that ozone is created in the tropics and then undergoes an equator to pole circulation.

Ozone loss rate increases with increasing near surface air temperature. This effect is strongest in Winter. However upper Stratospheric temperature has a positive relationship with total ozone content.

Short term events such as the 1997-98 El Nino has caused large scale shifts in the lower Stratospheric temperature which in turn may affect the transport of ozone.

The ozone hole over Antarctica is shrinking (NASA image)

Long term trends in ozone can be estimated from observations by:

Ozone = constant +Seasonal cycle+ Solar cycle + long term Trend+ residual.

However only 6 years of observations may not be enough for forecasting purposes and estimating long term trends in the ozone content.

Short term trends in ozone can be estimated using temporal models and including covariates to adjust for their spatial locations.

Propose to develop a spatio-temporal model which would account for variations due to both space and time at the same time and also allow covariates.

Conclusion

Acknowledgements:

Thanks to Indiana State Climate Office at Purdue University, West Lafayette, particularly Nate Hudson, for his assistance. Also special thanks to NASA for providing with the datasets and web resources on Ozone.

Variations in Ozone Content

Temperature in Dec 1998O

zo

ne

280 285 290 295 300 305

260

280

300

lat lat

280 285 290 295 300 305

lat

lat

280 285 290 295 300 305

lat

260

280

300

lat

250

260

270

280

290

300

310

Lat S-

N

Long W-E

Avg

_ozo

ne

‘95

Time

Mo

nth

ly d

istr

ibu

tio

n o

f O

zon

e

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

24

02

60

28

03

00

32

03

40

36

0

Average yearly ozone increases from the equator towards the poles. There appears to be a higher amount of total O3 in the northern compared to southern hemisphere.

O3 has a clear positive relationship with upper Stratospheric temperature.

203 204 205 206 207 208 209

24

02

60

28

03

00

32

0

Stratospheric Temp in Jan,1997

To

tal O

zo

ne

Co

nte

nt

in J

an

,19

97

-110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60

-20

-10

01

02

03

0

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

-110 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60

-20

-10

01

02

03

0

20

25

30

35

40

O3 loss varies across years and is seasonal; more loss occurs during late spring and summer.

O3 has inverse relationship with air temperature. This is shown for different regions based on latitude and observations taken at sea level elevation.

TOR data show that tropospheric O3 content increases during summer and is present in larger amounts over the U.S.

Jan,98 Jul,98

36.2N

21.2S