Upload
jyotiraj-thakuria
View
226
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Object, Memory and Perception Project
1/13
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
ROPAR
HUL 211 Objects, Memory and Perception Project Report
On
Effect of Happy Mood and Happy Mood Congruent Words on
Short Term Memory
Submitted by
Jyotiraj Thakuria (P2009ME1025)
Under the supervision of
Dr. Snehlata Jaswal
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences
7/31/2019 Object, Memory and Perception Project
2/13
ABSTRACT
Neuroimaging has identified an overlapping network of brain regions whose activity is
modulated by mood and cognition. Studies of depressed individuals have shown changes in
perception and memory. This suggests that mood has a pervasive effect on cognition and
memory. Direct evidence of the effect of happy mood on memory is surprisingly limited,however. This work is concentrated to study the effect of happy mood on mood congruent
memory. In this study, happy mood was induced, enabling the effects of mood to be assessed
for short term memory.
Participants in the happy condition viewed a funny video of several laughing babies while those
in the neutral condition viewed a video that showed a stage show on shadow art. The
participants gave a memory test before and after each video respectively.
The major result as one would expect to be that short term memory on happy mood congruent
words will be enhanced by happy mood was not significant. In fact, the result was opposite to
what was expected. There is a decrease in performance of the total words (both neutral andhappy words) as well as mood congruent words remembered after viewing the videos both for
the happy and the neutral case, but the decrease in performance for total words remembered
for the happy video case was 50 percent less than the decrease in the neutral video case.
The major outcome is that there is no significant effect of happy mood and happy mood
congruent words on short term memory.
7/31/2019 Object, Memory and Perception Project
3/13
7/31/2019 Object, Memory and Perception Project
4/13
AIM
To study the effect of happy mood and happy mood congruent words on short term memory
INTRODUCTION
Research dating back at least to shows that a persons mood at any given time has a strong
influence on which aspects of the environment seem most salient, on what is remembered
about the past, and on what is encoded about the present episode. The phenomenon in which
emotional material is remembered more reliably in moods that match the emotional content of
the memories. Remembering all of the happy events of our past lives when happy is an
example of mood congruence. Studies of the interaction between mood and memory have
traditionally been limited to the behavioral domain, with little or nothing known about the
neural processes underlying the effect. However, recent neuroimaging studies examining the
influence of emotional context on encoding and retrieval have produced data relevant to thisquestion.
HYPOTHESIS
The expected result for this survey was that the emotional material is remembered more
reliably in mood that matches the emotional content of the memories. In the recall task, the
participants in the happy mood induction group will recall more happy words and fewer neutral
words compared to the recall responses of the neutral mood induction group. The false alarms
produced in the free recall task will also exhibit a mood congruent bias.
METHOD
Participants
NUMBER: 20
AGE: 20-21 years old
GENDER: Males
SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS: College students from different parts of India. The students
belonged to different classes of families.
All participants know English and had normal or corrected to normal vision and hearing.
Stimuli UsedFunny video of several babies laughing, Shadow art video of a stage show.
Software usedMS Excel, MS PowerPoint, SPSS
7/31/2019 Object, Memory and Perception Project
5/13
DESIGN
The recall task designed composed of a practice block and a test block. The practice block
included 2 happy words, 2 neutral words. The test block included 6 happy words and 6 neutral
words. Each word was presented in black, 40-point, Calibri font, and was written in all capital
letters. All 12 words were presented all at a time, in the center of a white screen for 20 s.Following each trial the participant wrote down as many words as he could remember in any
order on a piece of paper. The time allowed was limited to 2 min in the test trial. Word
responses were scored leniently; words that were spelled incorrectly but could be identified as
being from the presentation of the test list were scored as correct.
The video selected for the happy mood was taken from YouTube showing babies doing funny
things followed by their laughing whereas the video selected for the neutral mood was that of a
stage show in US showing different objects, structures and animals made by shadows of people.
Both the videos were of 3 min each.
The first memory test was followed by any of the two video followed by the second memory
test on the first day of the experiment. On the following day, the other video is shown which is
preceded by the third memory test and succeeded by the fourth memory test.
Counterbalancing
Counter balancing is done by showing the first 10 participants the funny video on the first day
followed by the neutral video on the next day, while the remaining 10 participants were shown
the neutral video on the first day followed by the funny video on the next day.
The four slides shown were also permuted among the participants for counterbalancing.
The happy and neutral words were almost similar in structure among the four test slides.
PROCEDURE
The whole experiment was conducted on a simple DELL STUDIO laptop. The sequence of the
experiment is as follows:
The participants were first given the memory test. They were explained about the memory test
that they should study the words because they would later be asked to write the words on apiece of paper in any order that they choose. The participants were told how many minutes
would be allowed for output at the end of the learning phase. A practice block proceeded the
test block and the participant was encouraged to treat the practice block as if it were the test
block but that their responses on these words would not be scored. The test block shown a
slide containing 12 words out of which 6 were happy words and the rest 6 were neutral words
for 20 seconds. The experimenter remained in the room for this task in order to control the
output time allowed. After a 10 minutes interval, the participants were shown a funny video of
7/31/2019 Object, Memory and Perception Project
6/13
several babies laughing for 3 minutes in the Dell laptop. Just following this the participants were
given another memory test similar to the first test but with different words. This sequence of
experiment were repeated in the next day but now the participants were shown a neutral
video displaying shadow art at a stage show instead of the happy video and the test words on
the slides were also different from the previous slides. This completes the experiment.
PRECAUTIONS
During the survey, the participants should be made free from any type of distraction. The test words used in each of the four slides should be similar in structure and almost
all should be nouns.
All the test words used should be easy to visualize, so that the participants can easilymake a mental picture of the words shown.
10 minutes interval should be given between the video and the pretest to preventinterference of words between the pretest and posttest.
The other potential participants should not be allowed to view the words in advancefrom the current participants test.
The test should be taken at the same time of the day for all the participants.
RESULTS
Our main aim was to study the effect of happy mood on the short term memory. We started
with the main hypothesis that the participants in the happy mood induction group will recall
more happy words and fewer neutral words compared to the recall responses of the neutral
mood induction group. The whole procedure of obtaining the results in the end consisted of
many tables and graphs which are shown on the following pages.
The results obtained do not support the hypothesis. The effect of happy mood congruent words
has no significant effect on the short term memory. In fact, there was a decrease in the
percentage of words remembered after watching the videos both for the happy video as well as
for the neutral video. But the decrease in performance in memory for the happy video case was
50 percent less than the decrease in performance in memory for the neutral video case.
7/31/2019 Object, Memory and Perception Project
7/13
TABLE 1
RESPONSES OF 10 DIFFERENT SUBJECTS AFTER 4 TESTS TO WHOM NEUTRALVIDEO WAS SHOWN FIRT FOLLOWED BY HAPPY VIDEO
Serial Subject Test 1
totalwords
Test 1
happywords
Test 2
totalwords
Test 2
happywords
Test 3
totalwords
Test 3
happywords
Test 4
totalwords
Test 4
happywords
1 Shiv 7 3 7 4 8 4 7 2
2 Jay Jain 9 5 5 3 8 5 10 6
3 Aditya 7 3 3 2 7 5 4 2
4 AnujJain
7 2 9 4 7 2 10 4
5 Ankit 8 3 8 4 9 5 8 4
6 Mudit 7 5 4 1 9 4 7 3
7 SumitNimiwal
9 3 9 4 7 5 6 4
8 Saurabh 4 3 5 3 11 5 6 2
9 Manish 5 3 6 3 6 3 3 3
10 Sashwat 7 2 5 2 9 5 8 5
7/31/2019 Object, Memory and Perception Project
8/13
TABLE 2
RESPONSES OF 10 DIFFERENT SUBJECTS AFTER 4 TESTS TO WHOM HAPPY VIDEOWAS SHOWN FIRT FOLLOWED BY NEUTRALVIDEO
Serial Subject Test 1
totalwords
Test 1
happywords
Test 2
totalwords
Test 2
happywords
Test 3
totalwords
Test 3
happywords
Test 4
totalwords
Test 4
happywords
1 Rajesh
Kumar
5 3 3 2 9 4 5 3
2 Vikas
Yadav
7 2 7 4 7 3 6 3
3 Sajeed. 6 2 7 3 7 2 6 3
4 Shashank 6 3 6 3 9 4 6 3
5 Siddhartha 9 4 8 4 6 3 6 2
6 Sreeraj PJ 7 4 7 3 7 5 7 4
7 Navneet 6 5 4 3 9 3 7 3
8 VikasJawaria
6 4 6 2 5 3 4 3
9 Lal Singh 7 4 6 4 5 3 6 4
10 Mithlesh 4 3 6 3 5 4 3 3
7/31/2019 Object, Memory and Perception Project
9/13
TABLE 3
COEFFICIENT OF INCREASE OF THE TOTAL WORDS AND HAPPY WORDSREMEMBERED AFTER NEUTRAL VIDEO AS WELL AS AFTER HAPPY VIDEO
Neutral Video Happy Video
Serial No. Coefficient of
Increase of
total words
Coefficient of
Increase of
happy words
Coefficient of
Increase of total
words
Coefficient of
Increase of
happy words
1 -44.444444 -25 -40 -33.333333
2 -14.285714 0 0 100
3 -14.285714 50 16.66666667 50
4 -33.333333 -25 0 0
5 0 -20 0 -33.333333
6 -22.222222 0 -11.11111111 0
7 -20 0 0 -25
8 20 33.3333333 -33.33333333 -40
9 -40 -25 0 -50
10 0 33.3333333 -14.28571429 0
11 -44.444444 -40 50 0
12 -57.142857 -33.333333 -12.5 -50
13 28.571429 100 25 20
14 0 33.3333333 -42.85714286 -60
15 -42.857143 -80 42.85714286 100
16 -22.222222 -25 -11.11111111 -20
17 0 33.3333333 -45.45454545 -60
18 25 0 -50 0
19 20 0 -11.11111111 020 -28.571429 0 -14.28571429 -20
Average Coefficient
of Increase
-14.511905 0.5 -7.223171565 -6.0833333
7/31/2019 Object, Memory and Perception Project
10/13
TABLE 4
SPSS ANALYSIS OF THE DATA OF THE ABOVE FOUR PARAMETERSTests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: MEASURE_1
Source F Sig.
Video Sphericity Assumed .001 .977
Greenhouse-Geisser .001 .977
Huynh-Feldt .001 .977
Lower-bound .001 .977
Error(Video) Sphericity Assumed
Greenhouse-Geisser
Huynh-Feldt
Lower-bound
Words Sphericity Assumed 2.598 .124
Greenhouse-Geisser 2.598 .124
Huynh-Feldt 2.598 .124
Lower-bound 2.598 .124
Error(Words) Sphericity Assumed
Greenhouse-Geisser
Huynh-Feldt
Lower-bound
Video * Words Sphericity Assumed 1.152 .297
Greenhouse-Geisser 1.152 .297
Huynh-Feldt 1.152 .297
Lower-bound 1.152 .297
Error(Video*Words) Sphericity Assumed
Greenhouse-Geisser
Huynh-Feldt
Lower-bound
7/31/2019 Object, Memory and Perception Project
11/13
GRAPH 1
Subjects response of total words and happy words for the 4 sets of experiments.
GRAPH 2
SPSS graph for getting the significance between the variables.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Before Neutral Video After Neutral Video Before Happy Video After Happy Video
Total words
Happy words
7/31/2019 Object, Memory and Perception Project
12/13
DISCUSSIONS
The present work was concentrated to find the effect of happy mood congruent words on short
term memory. But, the recall task showed no significant tendency towards mood congruency,
whereas in prior research a mood congruent effect was found. Of the literature reviewed, two
studies (Knight et al., 2002; Ruiz-Caballero & Gonzlez, 1994) found a significant moodcongruent effect while three did not (Ellis et al., 1995; Ellwart et al., 2003; Gayle, 1997).
In fact in the present study, there was a decrease in the percentage of words remembered after
watching the videos both for the happy video as well as for the neutral video. But an interesting
fact came into light after the experiment that the decrease in performance in memory (total
words) for the happy video case was 50 percent less than the decrease in performance in
memory(total words) for the neutral video case. This may be due to the fact that the
participants get bored after the 1st
test and the attention level decreases, due to which the
performance in memory declines after watching the videos (both happy and the neutral one).
But the decrease in performance is less in case of the happy video, which can be attributed to
the fact that the participants attention somewhat increases due to laughing and thus hisperformance is comparatively better than neutral video case.
LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE MEASURES OF THE STUDYThe inconsistency between the present studies and previous studies could be due to several
factors.
1. The sense of humor of different participants differs from each other, due to which thehappy video shown may induce happiness among some participants while failing to for
the rest. This may be also a reason for mood incongruence.
2. The failure to find a MCM effect in the current research might have been due to the lowparticipant numbers. Indeed, the relatively low participant numbers is a major limitationof the present study.
3. The current work appears to ignore the potential between genders which might be alsoa reason of not finding significant tendency towards mood congruency while some
studies have found a MCM effect. It is rare for the number of female participants to
equal the number of male participants.
4. Failed to include all the three participant groups (sad, neutral, and happy) because itwas considered unethical in the institute to make the participant sad or depressed. If
this can be handled carefully then in the future, a more complete picture of the
phenomenon would be visible.
A final recommendation for future research is to include three participant groups where
possible (sad, neutral, and happy) to gain a more complete picture of the phenomenon under
study. With the suggested protocol amendments, it is possible that the debate over the
existence of a MCM effect could be resolved.
7/31/2019 Object, Memory and Perception Project
13/13
CONCLUSIONThe study as a whole presented a view that on voluntarily inducing happy mood to people, no
significant increase in memory or specifically mood congruent memory is observed. But, on
inducing happy mood, the attention increases comparatively to some extent, than on inducing
neutral mood.
REFERENCES Ellis, H. C., Seibert, P. S., & Varner, L. J. (1995). Emotion and memory: Effects of mood
states on immediate and unexpected delayed recall. Journal of Social Behavior and
Personality, 10, 349-362.
Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory.American Psychologist, 36, 129-148. Eich, E., &Macaulay, D. (2000). Are real moods required to reveal mood-congruent and mood-
dependent memory? Psychological Science, 11, 244-248.
Fox, L. S., Knight, B. G., & Zelinski, E. M. (1998). Mood induction with older adults: A toolfor investigating effects of depressed mood. Psychology and Aging, 13, 519-523.Retrieved March 23, 2005, from PsycINFO database.
Catherine Ilaria Gross (2006). Bachelor of Psychology thesis on Mood CongruentMemory.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mood-dependent_memory http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context-dependent_memory
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Word list
Happy Word list:
Jelly Honey Angel Butterfly Sparkle Chocolate Sunlight Vanilla Lollipop Sunshine Ice-Cream
Rainbow Flower Balloon Baby Stars Puppies Rose Cherry Holiday Music Song Family Garden
Neutral Word List
Range Rapid Rival Renew Storm Steam Story Sweat Tube Tree Truck Tire Unite Usage Upper
Vodka Vapor Virus Venom Worm Wheat Whale Wrist Actor Angel Angle Chair Clown Cloud
Clock Berry Belt Belly Beam Print Price Press Profit Return Reward Round Review Jewel JailJudge Jump Tiger Spade Book Stone Mouse Glove House Mint Rice Ring Flag Angel Chair
Worm Cloud
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mood-dependent_memoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mood-dependent_memoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context-dependent_memoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context-dependent_memoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context-dependent_memoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mood-dependent_memory