Upload
simon-brasseur
View
222
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
O metodě konečných prvkůLect_14.ppt
M. Okrouhlík
Ústav termomechaniky, AV ČR, Praha
Plzeň, 2010
Finite element analysisTransient tasks
Numerical solutions in detail
www.it.cas.cz
E:\edu_mkp_liberec_2\pdf_jpg_my_old_texts\
Numerical_methods_in_computational_mechanics\Num_methods_in_CM.pdf
Metoda centrálních diferencí
function [disn,veln,accn]=cedif(dis,diss,vel,acc,xm,xmt,xk,xc,p,h)% central difference method
% dis,vel,acc ............... displacements, velocities, accelerations% at the begining of time step ... at time t% diss ...................... displacements at time t - h% disn,veln,accn ...........corresponding quantities at the end % of time step ... at tine t + h% xm ........................ mass matrix% xmt ....................... effective mass matrix% xk ........................ stiffness matrix% xc ........................ damping matrix% p ......................... loading vector at the end of time step% h ......................... time step
% constantsa0=1/(h*h);a1=1/(2*h);a2=2*a0;a3=1/a2;
% effective loading vectorr=p-(xk-a2*xm)*dis-(a0*xm-a1*xc)*diss;% solve system of equations for displacements using lu decomposition of xmt disn=xmt\r;
% new velocities and accelerationsaccn=a0*(diss - 2*dis + disn);veln=a1*(-diss + disn);% end of cedif
SUBROUTINE CEDIF(XM,XM1,XK,DISS,DIS,DISN,VEL,ACC,P,R, 1 IMAX,NBAND,NDIM,H,EPS,IER,A0,A1,A2,A3,IMORE)C : : : : : : : DIMENSION XM(NDIM,NBAND),XM1(NDIM,NBAND),XK(NDIM,NBAND), 1 DISS(IMAX),DIS(IMAX),DISN(IMAX),VEL(IMAX),ACC(IMAX), 2 P(IMAX),R(IMAX)CC *** CASOVA INTEGRACE METODOU CENTRALNICH DIFERENCI ***CC SYSTEMU POHYBOVYCH ROVNIC TVARUC [M]{ACC}+[K]{DIS}={P} (TJ. SYSTEM BEZ TLUMENI)C SYMETRICKE PASOVE MATICE(MATICE HMOTNOSTI(POZITIVNE DEFINITNI),C REDUKOVANA EFEKTIVNI MATICE HMOTNOSTI,MATICE TUHOSTI)C JSOU usporne ULOZENYC V OBDELNIKOVYCH POLICH XM,XM1,XK O DIMENZICH NDIM*NBAND.C V PAMETI JE ULOZENA JEN HORNI POLOVINA PASU (VCETNE DIAG.).CC POZADOVANE PODPROGRAMY:C MAVBA ... NASOBENI SYMETRICKE PASOVE MATICEC VEKTOREM ZPRAVAC GRE ... RESENI SOUSTAVY LIN. ALGEBRAICKYCH ROVNICC (GAUSSOVA ELIMINACE)CC PARAMETRY PROCEDURY:CC XM(NDIM,NBAND) ...... HORNI POLOVINA PASU MATICE HMOTNOSTIC XM1(NDIM,NBAND) ..... HORNI POLOVINA PASU REDUKOVANEC EFEKTIVNI MATICE HMOTNOSTIC XK(NDIM,NBAND) ...... HORNI POLOVINA PASU MATICE TUHOSTIC DISS(IMAX) .......... POSUVY V CASE T-HC DIS (IMAX) POSUVY V CASE TC DISN(IMAX) .......... POSUVY V CASE T+HC VEL(IMAX) ........... RYCHLOSTI V CASE TC ACC(IMAX) ........... ZRYCHLENI V CASE TC P(IMAX) ............. VEKTOR ZATEZUJICICH SIL (V CASE T)C R(IMAX) ............. VEKTOR EFEKTIVNICH ZATEZUJICICH SILC IMAX ................ POCET NEZNAMYCHC NBAND ............... POLOVICNI SIRKA PASU (VCETNE DIAG.)C NDIM ................ RADKOVY ROZMER MATIC V HLAVNIM PROGRAMUC H ................... INTEGRACNI KROKC EPS ................. TOLERANCE (VIZ PROCEDURA GRE)C IER ................. CHYBOVY PARAMETR (VIZ PROCEDURA GRE)C A0,A1,A2,A3 ......... KONSTANTY METODY CENTRALNICH DIFERENCIC IMORE ............... = 0 POCITA POUZE POSUVY V CASE T+HC = JINA HODNOTA POCITA TAKE RYCHLOSTIC A ZRYCHLENI V CASE T+HCC **************************************************************
CC VEKTOR EFEKTIVNICH ZATEZUJICICH SIL V CASE TC {R}={P}-[K]{DIS}+A2*[M]{DIS}-A0*[M]{DISS}C CALL MAVBA(XK,DIS,VEL,IMAX,NDIM,NBAND) CALL MAVBA(XM,DIS,ACC,IMAX,NDIM,NBAND) CALL MAVBA(XM,DISS, R ,IMAX,NDIM,NBAND)C DO 10 I=1,IMAX10 R(I)=P(I)-VEL(I)+A2*ACC(I)-A0*R(I)CC POSUVY V CASE T+HC CALL GRE(XM1,R,DISN,IMAX,NDIM,NBAND,DET,EPS,IER,2)C IF(IMORE .EQ. 0) GO TO 30CC VYPOCTI TAKE RYCHLOSTI A ZRYCHLENIC DO 20 I=1,IMAX VEL(I)=A1*(-DISS(I)+DISN(I))20 ACC(I)=A0*(DISS(I)-2.*DIS(I)+DISN(I))C30 DO 40 I=1,IMAX DISS(I)=DIS(I)40 DIS(I)=DISN(I) RETURN END
Metoda lineárního zrychlení
Newmark
function [disn,veln,accn]=newmd(beta,gama,dis,vel,acc,xm,xd,xk,p,h)
% Newmark integration method
%
% beta, gama ................ coefficients
% dis,vel,acc ............... displacements, velocities, accelerations
% at the begining of time step
% disn,veln,accn ............ corresponding quantities at the end
% of time step
% xm,xd ..................... mass and damping matrices
% xk ........................ effective rigidity matrix
% p ......................... loading vector at the end of time step
% h ......................... time step
%
% constants
a1=1/(beta*h*h);
a2=1/(beta*h);
a3=1/(2*beta)-1;
a4=(1-gama)*h;
a5=gama*h;
a1d=gama/(beta*h);
a2d=gama/beta-1;
a3d=0.5*h*(gama/beta-2);
% effective loading vector
r=p+xm*(a1*dis+a2*vel+a3*acc)+xd*(a1d*dis+a2d*vel+a3d*acc);
% solve system of equations for displacements using lu decomposition of xk
disn=xk\r;
% new velocities and accelerations
accn=a1*(disn-dis)-a2*vel-a3*acc;
veln=vel+a4*acc+a5*accn;
% end of newmd
SUBROUTINE NEWM2(BETA,GAMA,DIS,VEL,ACC,F,NF,CKR,CMR,NDIM,
1 NBAND,H,EPS,IER,DISS,VELS,ACCS,P,G)
C
DIMENSION DIS(NF),VEL(NF),ACC(NF),F(NF),CKR(NDIM,NBAND),
1 CMR(NDIM,NBAND),DISS(NF),VELS(NF),ACCS(NF),
2 P(NF),G(NF)
C
C ***DIMENZIE VEKTOROV DISS,VELS,ACCS,G,P SA ROVNAJU***
C ***(2*POCTU UZLOV) DISKRETIZOVANEJ OBLASTI ***
C
C ***TATO PROCEDURA INTEGRUJE SUSTAVU POHYBOVYCH ROVNIC***
C ***NEWMARKOVOU METODOU S PARAMETRAMI BETA,GAMA ***
C
C ***VYZNAM PARAMETROV:***
C BETA,GAMA.......... PARAMETRE NEWMARKOVEJ METODY
C DIS(NF) .......... NA VSTUPE-VEKTOR POSUVOV V CASE T
C NA VYSTUPE-VEKTOR POSUVOV V CASE T+H
C VEL(NF) .......... NA VSTUPE-VEKTOR RYCHLOSTI V CASE T
C NA VYSTUPE-VEKTOR RYCHLOSTI V CASE T+H
C ACC(NF) .......... NA VSTUPE-VEKTOR ZRYCHLENI V CASE T
C NA VYSTUPE-VEKTOR ZRYCHLENI V CASE T+H
C NF .......... POCET NEZNAMYCH JEDNEHO TYPU
C CKR(NF,NBAND) ..... OBDELNIKOVA MATICE,OBSAHUJICI HORNI
C TROJUHELNIKOVU CAST (VCETNE DIAGONALY)
C EFEKTIVNI REDUKOVANE MATICE TUHOSTI.
C T.J. [KRED]=[K]+A1*[M] PO PRUCHODU
C GAUSSOVOU PROCEUROU GRE S KEY=1
C CMR(NF,NBAND) ..... OBDLZNIKOVA MATICA,KTORA OBSAHUJE HORNU
C TROJUHOLNIKOVU CAST (VCITANE DIAGONALY)
C SYMETRICKEJ,PASOVEJ,POZIT. DEFINITNEJ
C MATICE HMOTNOSTI.
C NBAND .......... POLOVICNA SIRKA PASU VCITANE DIAGONALY
C NDIM .......... RIADKOVY ROZMER MATIC CKR,CMR,DEKLAROVANY
C V HLAVNOM PROGRAME.
C F(NF) .......... VEKTOR ZATAZENIA V CASE (T+H)
C H .......... INTEGRACNY KROK
C DISS(NF),VELS(NF),ACCS(NF) ..... HODNOTY Z PREDCHOZIHO KROKU
C P(NF),G(NF) ....... PRACOVNI VEKTORY
A1=1./(BETA*H*H)
A2=1./(BETA*H)
A3=1./(BETA*2.)-1.
A4=(1.-GAMA)*H
A5=GAMA*H
DO 10 I=1,NF
DISS(I)=DIS(I)
VELS(I)=VEL(I)
10 ACCS(I)=ACC(I)
DO 40 I=1,NF
40 G(I)=A1*DISS(I)+A2*VELS(I)+A3*ACCS(I)
C WRITE(1,900) A1,A2,A3,A4,A5
C900 FORMAT(" NEWM1 ",5G15.6)
C WRITE(6,9010) BETA,GAMA,H,EPS,NF,NBAND,NDIM,IER
C9010 FORMAT(" BETA,GAMA,H,EPS:",4G15.6/
C 1 " NF,NBAND,NDIM,IER:",4I6)
C WRITE(1,901) G
C901 FORMAT(" G PRED MAVBA"/(5G15.6))
CALL MAVBA(CMR,G,P,NF,NDIM,NBAND)
C DO 45 I=1,NF
C IF(P(I) .LT. 1.E-7) P(I)=0.
C45 CONTINUE
C WRITE(1,902) P
C902 FORMAT(" P PO MAVBA"/(5G15.6))
DO 50 I=1,NF
50 G(I)=F(I)+P(I)
C WRITE(1,903) G
C903 FORMAT(" VEKTOR G PRED GRE"/(5G15.6))
C WRITE(6,919)
C919 FORMAT(" CKR PRED GRE")
C DO 920 I=1,NF
C WRITE(6,904) I,(CKR(I,J),J=1,NBAND)
C904 FORMAT(I6/(5G15.6))
C920 CONTINUE
C
IER=0
DET=0.
CALL GRE(CKR,G,DIS,NF,NDIM,NBAND,DET,EPS,IER,2)
C WRITE(6,906) DIS
C906 FORMAT(" DIS PO GRE"/(5G15.6))
C
DO 60 I=1,NF
60 ACC(I)=A1*(DIS(I)-DISS(I))-A2*VELS(I)-A3*ACCS(I)
C
DO 70 I=1,NF
70 VEL(I)=VELS(I)+A4*ACCS(I)+A5*ACC(I)
RETURN
END
Houbolt method
FINITE ELEMENT PROCEDURES
Klaus-Jürgen Bathe
Professor of Mechanical Engineering
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1996 by Prentice-Hall, Inc.
A Simon & Schuster Company
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632
ISBN 0-13-301458-4
Houbolt procedure in Matlabfunction [disn,veln,accn] = ...
houbolt(dis,vel,acc, diss,vels,accs, disss, velss, accss, xm, xd, xkh, p, h);
% Houbolt integration method
% disn, veln, accn new displacement, velocities, acceleration at t+h
% dis, vel, acc displacement, velocities, acceleration at t
% diss, vels, accs displacement, velocities, acceleration at t-h
% disss, velss, accss displacement, velocities, acceleration at t-2*h
% xm, xd mass and damping matrices
% xkh Houbolt effective stiffness matrix
% p loading vector at time t+h
% h integration step
% effective loading vector
r=p+xm*(5*dis-4*diss+disss)/h^2+xd*(3*dis-1.5*diss+disss/3)/h;
% new displacements
disn = xkh\r;
% new velocities and accelerations
veln = (11*disn/6 - 3*dis + 3*diss/2 - disss/3)/h;
accn = (2*disn - 5*dis + 4*diss - disss)/h^2;
% end of houbolt
Let’s recall dispersion
1D continuum is a non-dispersivemedium, it has infinite number of frequencies, phase velocity is constantregardless of frequency.
Discretized model is dispersive,it has finite number of frequencies,velocity depends on frequency, spectrum is bounded,there are cut-offs.
overestimated consistentFrequency (velocity) is with mass matrix.
underestimated diagonal
L1 element
Dispersive properties of a uniform mesh(plane stress) assembled of equilateral elements, full integrationconsistent and diagonal mass matrices
wavenumberHow many elements to a wavelenght
Direction of wave propagation
Dispersion effects depend alsoon the direction of wave propagation
Artificial (false) anisotropy
Time space discretization errors
Correct determination of time step
lmin … length of the smallest elementc … speed of propagationtmin = lmin/c … time through the smallest elementhmts … how many time steps to go through the smallest elementh = tmin/hmts … suitable time step
hmts < 1 … high frequency components are filtered out, implicit domainhmts = 1 … stability limit for explicit methods … 2/omegamax,
where omegamax = max(eig(M,K))hmts = 2 … my choicehmts > 2 … the high frequency components, which are wrong, due to time
and space dispersion, are integrated ‘correctly’
LS Dyna usesh = 0.9*tmin as a default
Newmark and central differences vs. analytical solution
Rázové zatížení tenké tyče
Newmark vs. Houbolt _1
0 0.5 1-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5eps t = 1.6
0 0.5 10.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4dis
0 0.5 1-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5vel
L1 cons 100 elem Houbolt (red)0 0.5 1
-100
-50
0
50
100acc
Newmark (green), h= 0.005, gamma=0.5
Newmark vs. Houbolt _2
0 100 200 300 400-0.01
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
history of displacement (in time steps)
Newmark (green), h= 0.005, gamma=0.5
0 100 200 300 400-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
history of velocity (in time steps)0 100 200 300 400
-100
-50
0
50
100
history of acceleration (in time steps)
0 100 200 300 400-3
-2
-1
0
1node = 101 L1 cons 100 elem Houbolt (red)
history of strains (in time steps)
Newmark vs. Houbolt _3
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 3500
100
200
300L1 cons 100 elem Houbolt (red) Newmark (green), h= 0.005, gamma=0.5
kine
tic e
nerg
y
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 3500
100
200
pote
ntia
l ene
rgy
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 3500
200
400
sum
of e
nerg
ies
J:\edu_mkp_liberec_2\tele_bk_2009_09_15_education_cd_jaderna_2005\11_computational aspects\A simple 1D study in Matlab_3.doc
part 1 part 2
S
L = length of rod
P(t)1 2 kmax
A simple 1D study in Matlab
To clarify the basic ideas of finite element (FE) computation, the relations between mechanical quantities and to show the behaviour of elastic stress waves in rods a simple FE program, utilizing 1D rod elements, was concieved. The program is based on assumptions of small displacement theory and linear elastic material response.
11
11, **
0
kkkl
ES
21
12,
6**0 mmm
Slq1
element length
q2
local matrices 2 by 2
global matrix imax by imax
imax = kmax + 1
Compare central differences vs. Newmark
J:\edu_mkp_liberec_2\mtl_prog\matlab_prog_2010\mtlstep\barl1nc% barl1nc is a matlab program calculating the propagation of a strees
% wave in a bar. The previous version is linbadh.m
% Newmark and central difference methods are compared
% strains, displacements, velocities and accelerations
% along the bar are ploted for a given time
%
% time history of displacements, velocities and accelerations
% of a chosen mode is recorded
%
% main variables
% xm, xk, xd.............. global mass, rigidity and damping matrices
% xme,xke ................ local mass and rigidity matrices
% imax ................... number of generalized displacements
% lmax ................... number of local degrees of freedom
% kmax ................... number of elements
% h ...................... step of integration
% ityp ................... type of loading
% = 1 .... Heaviside pulse
% = 2 .... rectangular pulse
% = 3 .... sine pulse
% timp ................... length of pulse
% delta .................. type of mass matrix
% = 2/3 .... consistent
% = 1 ...... diagonal
% = 0.8 .... improved
% gama ................... Newmark artificial damping parametr
% tinc ................... time increment for plotting
% tmax ................... maximum time
% ck, cm ................. damping coeficients
kmax=100 %input('number of elements=? (max 100) ');
if kmax>200 , disp('linbad err. kmax>100'); break; end
h=0.005; %input('integration step=? ');
timp=0.25; %input('length of pulse=? ');
delta= 1; %input('mass matrix'(2/3-cons) or (1-diag) or (0.8-improved)');
ityp=menu('Type of loading','heavi','rect','sin');
gama=0.5; %input('gama for Newmark ');
ck=0; %input('damping coef. for rigidity matrix ');
cm=0; %input('damping coef. for mass matrix ');
tinc=0.1; %input('time increment for plotting ');
tmax=0.5; %input('tmax=? ');
Play with
mass matrix formulation,
time step
number of elements
conditional and unconditional stability
numerical dumping
Compare Houbolt vs. Newmark
J:\edu_mkp_liberec_2\mtl_prog\matlab_prog_2010\mtlstep\barl1nhe4.m
% barl1nhe
% semantics: BAR - L1 1D elements - Newmark - Houbolt - Energy
%
% This is a matlab program calculating the propagation
% of stress waves in a bar modelled by L1 elements
% for three types of loading pulse.
% Different types of right-hand side constraint are assumed.
% Strains, displacements, velocities and accelerations
% along the bar are ploted for a given time.
% Strains, displacements, velocities and accelerations
% for a given node are ploted as a function of time.
%
% Newmark and Houbolt methods are compared.
%
% Also potential kinetic and total energies are computed
% at each time step and plotted at the end.
%
% main variables
% xm, xk, xd.............. global mass, rigidity and damping matrices
% xme,xke ................ local mass and rigidity matrices
% imax ................... number of generalized displacements
% lmax ................... number of local degrees of freedom
% kmax ................... number of elements
% h ...................... step of integration
% ityp ................... type of loading
% = 1 .... Heaviside pulse
% = 2 .... rectangular pulse
% = 3 .... sine pulse
% timp ................... length of pulse
% delta .................. type of mass matrix
% = 2/3 .... consistent
% = 1 ...... diagonal
% = 0.8 .... improved
% gama ................... Newmark artificial damping parametr
% tinc ................... time increment for plotting
% tmax ................... maximum time
% ck, cm ................. damping coeficients
Play with
mass matrix formulation,
time step
number of elements
conditional and unconditional stability
numerical dumping