12
The problem of reliable detection of coccolitophore blooms in the Black Sea from satellite ocean color data O. Kopelevich. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology RAS, Moscow

O. Kopelevich. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology RAS, Moscow

  • Upload
    theo

  • View
    72

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The problem of reliable detection of coccolitophore blooms in the Black Sea from satellite ocean color data. O. Kopelevich. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology RAS, Moscow. What is the coccolithophore bloom?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: O. Kopelevich. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology  RAS,  Moscow

The problem of reliable detection of coccolitophore blooms in the Black Sea from satellite ocean color data

O. Kopelevich.

Shirshov Institute of Oceanology RAS, Moscow

Page 2: O. Kopelevich. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology  RAS,  Moscow

What is the coccolithophore bloom?

Coccolithophoride is single-celled algae with spherical

cells surrounded by disk-shaped plates (coccoliths)

consisting of calcium carbonate, CaCO3.

From the optical point of view, coccolithophores stand out by their optical characteristics, having a strong light scattering, weakly selective. This makes it possible to detect the CB from satellite observation in the visible spectrum. Coccolithophoride is the most powerful producer of CaCO3 and coccolithophore blooms (CB) may have

a significant impact on the exchange of CO2 between

the ocean and atmosphere, the greenhouse effect and thus to global climate change.

Goal of the studies:

To assess a possibility of reliable identification of the coccolithophore blooms (CB) in the Black Sea from data of satellite ocean color sensors.

Page 3: O. Kopelevich. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology  RAS,  Moscow

Changeability of the monthly means of the particle backscattering coefficients bbp in different sub-regions of the Black Sea

2 – Danube area;6 – western deep part

7 – eastern deep part;8 – eastern shelf part.

Page 4: O. Kopelevich. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology  RAS,  Moscow

True color images with turbid inhomogeneities in the Black and the Barens seas

1 2

3

4

1. Danube river run-off. MODIS –Aqua. 20/05/ 2009.

2. The eastern psrt, SeaWiFS. 25/06/1998.

3. SeaWiFS. 11/06/2000.

4. The Barents Sea. MODIS-Aqua. 31/08/2010

Page 5: O. Kopelevich. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology  RAS,  Moscow

Existing algorithms used for the Black Sea SeaDAS algorithm (the merged 2- and 3-bands algorithms developed by Gordon, Balch 1999 and

Gordon et al. 2001) can derive calcite (CaCO3) concentration.

The algorithm is divided into two stages: first the backscattering coefficient bb is calculated, and

then calcite concentration via empirical relationship.

Calcite concentration was chosen as the parameter to be calculated because

the backscattering, normalized to calcite concentration (bb/Ca), showed significantly less variation

than the backscattering, normalized to coccolith concentration, and the calcite-specific backscatter

of the natural bloom fell between the bb/Ca for detached coccoliths and the bb/Ca for a mixture

of intact plated cells and detached coccoliths (Gordon, Balch 1999).

IORAS algorithm for retrieval of coccolithophoride concentration Ncoc from satellite data

on the particle backscattering bbp was created on basis of the data set on the sub-surface radiance

reflectance and coccolithophoride concentration concurrently measured in the eastern part of

the Black Sea in June 2004-2006 (Burenkov et al. 2001, 2007)

  Ncoc = 768 bbp1.55, n=48, r2=0.54,  

where n is number of pairs, r2 is coefficient of determination, Ncoc is coccolithophoride

concentration in 106 cells/l, bbp(550) in m-1.

Ncoc was chosen as the calculated parameter because it was available from measurements data,

whereas calcite concentration was not measured.

Page 6: O. Kopelevich. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology  RAS,  Moscow

The obvious drawback of the SeaDAS algorithm, mentioned by the authors themselves, is that all particulate backscatter is assumed to be calcite-related, and non-calcite related backscattering is not accounted for. This shortcoming is particularly significant for the Black Sea which is strongly influenced by river run-off, and concentration of the particulate matter brought by rivers is increased just in June after the maximum of river discharge in the second half of May. The current SIO RAS algorithm also cannot distinguished between casesof contributions arising from coccolithophore –related and non-coccolithophorebackscattering.

Page 7: O. Kopelevich. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology  RAS,  Moscow

The bbp distributions and spectral radiance reflectance in selected points

Page 8: O. Kopelevich. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology  RAS,  Moscow

Spatial distributions of the particle backscattering coefficient (top)and the sub-surface spectral radiance reflectance () (bottom)In the Black and the Barents seas

Black Sea_12/06/2004 Black Sea_13.06.2006 Barents Sea 19.08.2009

Page 9: O. Kopelevich. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology  RAS,  Moscow

Points Date Lat., N Long.,E bbp, m-1 (488)/(443)Ncoc,

106cell/l Modis

Ncoc, 106cell/l in situ

Black Sea_2004

1 11.06.2004 44.54 37.96 0.014 1.50 1.04 0.4

2 11.06.2004 44.20 37.49 0.0225 1.23 2.14 1.2

3 15.06.2004 43.40 39.77 0.034 1.29 4,12 3

Black Sea_2006

1 10.06.2006 43.50 36.29 0.0315 1.17 3.62 7

2 11.06.2006 44.12 37.50 0.011 1.10 0.71 1.4

3 13.06.2006 44.11 38.91 0.022 1.30 2.06 1.8

Barents Sea_2009

1 19.08.2009 70.27 32.32 0.009 1.04 - 0.048

3 19.08.2009 70.62 36.67 0.036 1.09 - 1.94

Values of bbp, m-1, ratio of (488)/(443), the coccolithophoride cell

concentration Ncoc,106cell/l derived from MODIS data (in the Black Sea)

and in situ measured (L.A. Pautova, V.A. Silkin)

Page 10: O. Kopelevich. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology  RAS,  Moscow

St. Date Lat.,N Long.,E Z, m Secchi depth, m

Chl, mg m-3

TSM, mg/l

Cocco,106, cell/l

3 12.06 44034’,82 38001’,70 5.5 5 0.65 0.92 -

5 12.06 44034’ ,49 37058’,84 5 >5 0.25 0.72 -

7 13.06 44034’,45 37058’,765 8 7 0.23 0.63 -

8 13.06 44034’ ,82 37057’,85 8 7.5 0.36 0.46 5.6

13 14.06 44032’ ,145 37056’,58 74 11 0.20 0.31 11.2

Stations in June 2010, its depth and measured parameters (Sechhi depth, m, chlorophyll concentration (Chl), mg m-3, total suspended matter concentration (TSM), mg/l

Some results of field studies in coastal zone of the easternpart of the Black Sea in June 2010

.

Optical studies included measurements of spectral radiance reflectance just beneath the sea surface by a floating spectroradiometer. Water samples were taken for laboratory determination of biological and biogeochemical characteristics (phytoplankton - diatoms, peridinium, coccolithophorides and coccolithes, small flagellates, picoplankton, biomass, concentrations of suspended matter, chlorophyll and pheophytin, organic and carbonate carbon, Al, Si, Ph.

Page 11: O. Kopelevich. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology  RAS,  Moscow

1. In the Black Sea the contributions to bbp arising from “not coccolithophore”

particles should be considered. In June, when CВ are observed, an origin of “not coccolithophore” particles is mainly river run-off. An indicator of the river run-off effect may be the slope of the ( spectrum at short wavelength region, depending on the yellow substance absorption. Additional information about the sources of terrigenous runoff, transport and transformatioт of suspended and color dissolved organic matter may be also helpful.

2. Using data on () at the short wavelength region will require a greater accuracy of atmospheric correction. Apparently, there is also a need to develop regional algorithms, as it was done for the Barents Sea and for the Caspian Sea (Kopelevich et al. 2003, 2009).

3. Calcite concentration should be used as a parameter to be determined, as it is done in the SeaDAS algorithm.

4. The river run-off in the Black Sea plays an important role in the observed phenomenon, as a direct (growing turbid due to terrigenous particles brought

by rivers) and indirect (supplying nutrients stimulating coccolithophore blooms).

Conclusion

Page 12: O. Kopelevich. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology  RAS,  Moscow

Acknowledgement

The presented study have been performed by specialists from the Ocean

Optics Laboratory SIO RAS V.A. Artemiev, V.I. Burenkov, A.V. Grigoriev,

S.V. Sheberstov, S.V. Vazyulya.

Our sincere gratitude to L.A. Pautova and V.A. Silkin for the data

on phytoplankton, including coccolithophoride and coccolite concentration.