NYSED reports 2011-2012: Riverhead Central School District- school report card, accountability report, fiscal supplement

7/30/2019 NYSED reports 2011-2012: Riverhead Central School District- school report card, accountability report, fiscal suppl

1/29

h 25, 2013 Pag

The New York StateReport Card

201112

The New York State Report Card is an

important part of the Board of Regents effort toraise learning standards for all students. It

provides information to the public on

school/district enrollment and staff, studentperformance, and other measures of school and

district performance. Knowledge gained from

the report card on a schools or districts

strengths and weaknesses can be used to

improve instruction and services to students.

State assessments are designed to help ensure

that all students reach high learning standards.

They show whether students are getting theknowledge and skills they need to succeed at the

elementary, middle, and commencement levels

and beyond. The State requires that students

who are not making appropriate progress toward

the standards receive academic supports.

This report includes:1 Profile

This section shows

comprehensive data relevant tothis schools or districtslearning environment, includinginformation about enrollment,attendance and suspensions,and staff.

2Student PerformanceThis section shows studentperformance on standardizedassessments at the elementary,

middle, and commencementlevels.

3Student OutcomesThis section shows outcomesfor graduates and non-completers, including post-graduation plans of completers.

For more information:Office of Information and Reporting ServicesNew York State Education DepartmentRoom 863 EBA

Albany, NY 12234Email: [email protected]

District RIVERHEAD CENTRAL SCHOOL

DISTRICT

District ID 58-06-02-04-0000

Superintendent NANCY CARNEY

Telephone (631) 369-6717

Grades PK-12, UE, US

Need/ResourceCapacity Category Average Need Districts


2/29

h 25, 2013 Pag

1 Profile

Enrollment

re-K

Kindergarten

Grade 1

Grade 2

Grade 3

Grade 4

Grade 5

Grade 6

ngraded Elementary

Grade 7

Grade 8

Grade 9

Grade 10

Grade 11

Grade 12

ngraded Secondary

otal K12

Average Class Size

Common Branch

Grade 8

nglish

Mathematics

cience

ocial Studies

Grade 10

nglish

Mathematics

cience

ocial Studies

Enrollment InformationEnrollmentcounts are as of Basic EducatioData System (BEDS) day, which is typicallthe first Wednesday of October of the schoyear. Students who attend BOCES programon a part-time basis are included in a schoand district's enrollment. Students who atteBOCES on a full-time basis or who are plafull time by the district in an out-of-districtplacement are not included in a schools ordistrict's enrollment. The state publicenrollment includes public school districts,charter schools, and NYSED-operatedprograms. Students classified by districts a"pre-first" are included in first grade counts

Kindergarten and Pre-K counts include haland full-day students.

Average Class SizeInformation

Average Class Size is the total registrationspecified classes divided by the number ofthose classes with registration. CommonBranch refers to self-contained classes inGrades 16.

District RIVERHEAD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT District ID 58-06-02-04-0000

200910 201011 201112

256

417

363

410

365

346

335

349

0

345

354

468

389

315

360

0

4816

256

422

416

368

406

367

345

344

0

356

349

470

372

336

347

0

4898

271

432

431

414

365

411

369

335

9

357

355

423

381

308

391

29

5010

200910 201011 201112

22

26

27

23

27

23

25

18

20

23

30

25

21

24

26

26

26

23

25

28

29

23

26

25

23

15

24


3/29

h 25, 2013 Pag

1 Profile

Demographic Factors

# % # % # %

ligible for Free Lunch

Reduced Price Lunch

imited English Proficient

Racial/Ethnic Origin

American Indian or Alaska Native

lack or African American

ispanic or Latino

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Otheracific Islander

White

Multiracial

Attendance and Suspensions

# % # % # %

Annual Attendance Rate

tudent Suspensions

Demographic FactorsInformationEligible for Free Lunch and Reduced-Price

Lunch percentages are determined bydividing the number of approved lunchapplicants by the Basic Educational DataSystem (BEDS) enrollment in full-dayKindergarten through Grade 12.

Attendance andSuspensions Information

Annual Attendance Rate is determined bydividing the schools (or district's) total actuattendance by the total possible attendancfor a school year. A schools (or district's)

actual attendance is the sum of the numbeof students in attendance on each day theschool (or district's schools) was open durthe school year. Possible attendance is thesum of the number of enrolled students whshould have been in attendance on each dthe school (or schools) was open during thschool year. The statesAnnual AttendancRate is a weighted average of all district-level attendance rates.

Student Suspension rate is determined bydividing the number of students who were

suspended from school (not including in-school suspensions) for one full day orlonger anytime during the school year by tBasic Educational Data System (BEDS) daenrollments for that school year. A studentcounted only once, regardless of whetherthe student was suspended one or moretimes during the school year.


200910 201011 201112

1432

409

503

22

987

1036

49

2705

17

30%

8%

10%

0%

20%

22%

1%

56%

0%

1833

336

541

23

974

1193

63

2620

25

37%

7%

11%

0%

20%

24%

1%

53%

1%

2021

357

596

27

907

1384

70

2585

37

40%

7%

12%

1%

18%

28%

1%

52%

1%

200809 200910 201011

227

94%

5% 254

93%

5% 243

94%

5%


4/29

h 25, 2013 Pag

1 Profile

Teacher Qualifications

otal Number of Teachers

ercent with No Valid TeachingCertificate

ercent Teaching Out of Certification

ercent with Fewer than Three Years ofxperience

ercentage with Masters Degree Plus0 Hours or Doctorate

otal Number of Core Classes

ercent Not Taught by Highly Qualifiedeachers in This School*

ercent Not Taught by Highly Qualifiedeachers in This District**

ercent Not Taught by Highly Qualifiedeachers in High-Poverty Schoolstatewide

ercent Not Taught by Highly Qualifiedeachers in Low-Poverty Schoolstatewide

otal Number of Classes

ercent Taught by Teachers WithoutAppropriate Certification

Not available at the district or statewide level.Not available for charter schools or at the statewide level.

Teacher Turnover Rate

Staff Counts

Not available at the school level.

urnover Rate of Teachers withewer than Five Years of Experience

urnover Rate of All Teachers

otal Other Professional Staff

otal Paraprofessionals*

Assistant Principals

rincipals

Teacher Qualifications

InformationThe Percent Teaching Out of Certification forpublic schools is the percent doing so on mor

than an incidental basis; that is, the percentteaching for more than five periods per weekoutside certification.

Core Classes are primarily K6 common branEnglish, mathematics, science, social studiesart, music, and foreign languages. To be HighQualified, a teacher must have at least aBachelors degree, be certified to teach in thesubject area or otherwise in accordance withstate standards, and show subject mattercompetency.In public schools, a teacher who taught oneclass outside of the certification area(s) is

counted as Highly Qualifiedprovided that 1) thteacher had been determined by the school odistrict through the HOUSSE process or otherstate-accepted methods to have demonstrateacceptable subject knowledge and teachingskills and 2) the class in question was not thesole assignment reported. Credit for incidentateaching does not extend beyond a singleassignment. Independent ofHighly QualifiedTeacherstatus, any assignment for which ateacher did not hold a valid certificate stillregisters as teaching out of certification.

In charter schools, a teacher is counted asHighly Qualifiedif the teacher has at least a

Bachelors degree, is certified to teach, andshows subject matter competency. Enablinglegislation considers charter school teachers tbe certified if they hold any valid teachingcertificate. Enabling legislation also permits upto 30 percent (with a maximum of five) of charschool teachers to be without certification andbe considered Highly Qualifiedif they meet alremaining criteria.

High-povertyand low-povertyschools are thoschools in the upper and lower quartiles,respectively, for percentage of students eligibfor a free or reduced-price lunch.

Teacher Turnover RateInformationTeacher Turnover Rate for a specified schoolyear is the number of teachers in that schoolyear who were not teaching in the followingschool year divided by the number of teachersthe specified school year, expressed as apercentage.

Staff Counts InformationOther Professionals includes administrators,guidance counselors, school nurses,psychologists, and other professionals who

devote more than half of their time to non-teaching duties.


200910 201011 201112

3551%

1%

2%

72%

906

N/A

0%

6%

1%

1181

1%

3550%

1%

3%

74%

860

N/A

1%

5%

0%

1131

1%

3390%

0%

1%

78%

871

N/A

0%

7%

1%

1142

0%

200809 200910 201011

41%

19%

13%

14%

33%

15%

200910 201011 201112

52

111

8

7

46

113

8

7

49

104

7

7


5/29

h 25, 2013 Pag

2 Student Performance

This section contains annual assessment data for students at the elementary, middle, and commencement levelsas well as the performance of secondary-level cohorts on standardized achievement assessments.

New York State Testing Program (NYSTP) Assessments

The New York State Testing Program assessments are administered in English language arts (ELA) and mathematics ingrades 3 through 8. The Performance Level Descriptors for these assessments are provided below:

English Language ArtsLevel 1: Below StandardStudent performance does not demonstrate an understanding of the English language arts knowledge and skills expected at this gradelevel.

Level 2: Meets Basic StandardStudent performance demonstrates a partial understanding of the English language arts knowledge and skills expected at this grade level

Level 3: Meets Proficiency StandardStudent performance demonstrates an understanding of the English language arts knowledge and skills expected at this grade level.

Level 4: Exceeds Proficiency StandardStudent performance demonstrates a thorough understanding of the English language arts knowledge and skills expected at this gradelevel.

MathematicsLevel 1: Below StandardStudent performance does not demonstrate an understanding of the mathematics content expected at this grade level.

Level 2: Meets Basic StandardStudent performance demonstrates a partial understanding of the mathematics content expected at this grade level.

Level 3: Meets Proficiency StandardStudent performance demonstrates an understanding of the mathematics content expected at this grade level.

Level 4: Exceeds Proficiency StandardStudent performance demonstrates a thorough understanding of the mathematics content expected at this grade level.

New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA)

The New York State Alternate Assessments are administered in English language arts (ELA) and mathematics to ungradedstudents with severe cognitive disabilities whose ages are equivalent to graded students in grades 3 through 8 andsecondary level. They are administered in science to students with disabilities age equivalent to graded students in grades 48, and secondary level. And they are administered in social studies at the secondary level only.

New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Tests (NYSESLAT)

The New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Tests are administered in grades K through 12 to limitedEnglish proficient students.

Secondary-Level Cohorts

A secondary-level cohort consists of all students who first entered grade 9 anywhere or, in the case of ungraded studentswith disabilities, reached their seventeenth birthday in a particular year. The 2008 cohort consists of all students who firstentered grade 9 anywhere or, in the case of ungraded students with disabilities, reached their seventeenth birthday betweenJuly 1, 2008 and June 30, 2009. The 2007 cohort consists of all students who first entered grade 9 anywhere or, in the caseof ungraded students with disabilities, reached their seventeenth birthday between July 1, 2007 and June 30, 2008. For mordetailed information on cohort definitions, seeSecondary-Level Cohort Definitions at http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/sirs/.



6/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


100%

Results by

Student GroupPercentage scoring at level(s): Percentage scoring at level(s)

24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male


Black or African American

Hispanic or Latino

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander

White

MultiracialSmall Group Totals

General-Education Students

Students with Disabilities

English Proficient

Limited English Proficient

Economically Disadvantaged

Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant

Other

Assessments Number scoring at level(s): Number scoring at level(s):

24 34 4 24 34 4


Results in Grade 3 English Language Arts

Percentage scoring at level(s):2-4 3-4 4

NY State Public


This District

2012 Mean Score: 6602011 Mean Score: 662

*Range: 644780 663780 694780

82% 87%

48%55%

3% 1%

86% 87%

56% 56%

7% 5%

Number of Tested Students: 299 175 10349 221 5

201112

201011

201112 School Year 201011 School Year

TotalTested

TotalTested

365 82% 48% 3% 403 87% 55% 1%

192

173

2

54

91

6

210

210

328

37

316

49

145

220

8357

84%

79%

63%

63%

96%

70%

87%

35%

89%

39%

65%

93%

50%83%

51%

45%

13%

33%

64%

30%

52%

8%

54%

8%

23%

65%

25%48%

4%

2%

0%

0%

4%

10%

3%

0%

3%

0%

1%

4%

0%3%

213

190

86

105

6

205

17

350

53

352

51

179

224

6397

90%

83%

76%

79%

95%

100%

94%

36%

90%

61%

75%

96%

83%87%

62%

46%

35%

40%

71%

57%

61%

11%

61%

12%

35%

71%

17%55%

2%

1%

1%

1%

1%

0%

1%

0%

1%

0%

0%

2%

0%1%

NOTESThe symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than f ive students,data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.

* These ranges are for 201112 data only. Ranges for 201011 data are available in the 201011 Accountability and Overview Reports.


Total

Tested

Total

Tested

New York State Alternate Assessment

(NYSAA): Grade 3 Equivalent2 2

New York State English as a Second Language

Achievement Test (NYSESLAT): Grade 32 N/A N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A N/A

Total Total

Recently Arrived LEP Students NOT Tested on

the ELA NYSTP: Grade 3

2 N/A N/A N/A 5 N/A N/A N/A

These counts represent recently arrived LEP students who used the NYSESLAT to fulfill the English language arts participation requirement.


7/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White




English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant

Other


24 34 4 24 34 4


Results in Grade 3 Mathematics


NY State Public


This District


*Range: 662770 684770 707770

89% 89%

62% 61%

12% 8%

91% 91%

61% 60%

13% 13%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

366 89% 62% 12% 407 89% 61% 8%

194

172

2

54

92

6

210

210

329

37

315

51

145

221

9357

89%

90%

78%

79%

98%

60%

93%

51%

93%

67%

80%

95%

67%90%

61%

63%

41%

46%

75%

40%

67%

16%

69%

20%

45%

73%

22%63%

13%

10%

6%

3%

17%

10%

13%

3%

14%

0%

5%

16%

11%12%

215

192

86

108

7

205

18

354

53

351

56

181

226

7400

89%

90%

86%

79%

97%

88%

95%

55%

94%

63%

82%

96%

71%90%

62%

59%

34%

46%

79%

75%

68%

11%

66%

25%

39%

78%

29%61%

9%

8%

2%

2%

14%

13%

10%

0%

10%

0%

2%

14%

0%9%




Total

Tested

Total

Tested




8/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White




English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant

Other


24 34 4 24 34 4




NY State Public


This District


*Range: 637775 671775 722775

86% 92%

59% 56%

4% 1%

91% 92%

59% 57%

5% 2%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

403 86% 59% 4% 370 92% 56% 1%

217

186

84

108

7

199

5

349

54

352

51

176

227

6397

91%

80%

75%

76%

86%

96%

80%

93%

39%

91%

51%

76%

94%

83%86%

67%

50%

42%

41%

71%

77%

20%

66%

11%

66%

10%

43%

72%

33%59%

5%

4%

0%

0%

0%

9%

0%

5%

2%

5%

0%

1%

7%

0%4%

183

187

2

67

95

5

199

29

340

30

334

36

151

219

3367

94%

89%

82%

88%

96%

100%

97%

33%

93%

75%

85%

96%

61%

52%

31%

45%

69%

78%

61%

3%

61%

14%

38%

69%

1%

2%

0%

0%

3%

0%

1%

0%

1%

0%

0%

2%




Total

Tested

Total

Tested





Total Total






9/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White




English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant

Other


24 34 4 24 34 4




NY State Public


This District


*Range: 636800 676800 707800

93% 95%

66% 72%

28% 29%

95% 94%

69% 67%

30% 27%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

402 93% 66% 28% 373 95% 72% 29%

215

187

84

107

7

199

5

348

54

351

51

174

228

6396

93%

92%

89%

86%

86%

98%

100%

97%

69%

96%

71%

87%

97%

83%93%

69%

63%

38%

52%

71%

85%

60%

74%

19%

72%

24%

45%

82%

33%67%

29%

27%

8%

14%

43%

44%

20%

32%

7%

32%

4%

12%

41%

17%29%

184

189

2

69

97

5

198

29

343

30

334

39

152

221

3370

97%

94%

88%

93%

98%

100%

98%

60%

96%

87%

91%

98%

71%

72%

54%

58%

84%

89%

77%

10%

78%

21%

57%

81%

28%

30%

9%

15%

42%

44%

31%

0%

32%

0%

14%

39%




Total

Tested

Total

Tested




10/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White




English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant

Other


24 34 4 24 34 4


Results in Grade 4 Science


NY State Public


This District


Range: 45100 65100 85100

94% 97%

81%89%

55% 57%

97% 98%89% 88%

57% 52%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

401 94% 81% 55% 367 97% 89% 57%

216

185

83

107

7

199

5

347

54

351

50

174

227

6395

95%

93%

90%

88%

86%

99%

100%

97%

80%

97%

74%

89%

98%

83%94%

84%

78%

71%

65%

86%

94%

80%

88%

39%

88%

32%

67%

93%

67%82%

61%

49%

24%

36%

57%

78%

60%

61%

19%

63%

4%

29%

75%

17%56%

183

184

2

65

97

5

196

29

343

24

328

39

147

220

3364

97%

96%

94%

94%

99%

100%

98%

79%

98%

85%

93%

99%

90%

89%

78%

81%

96%

100%

93%

33%

93%

56%

82%

94%

56%

57%

32%

42%

71%

67%

60%

4%

63%

8%

39%

69%



Total

Tested

Total

Tested




11/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White




English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant

Other


24 34 4 24 34 4




NY State Public


This District


*Range: 648795 668795 700795

90% 90%

59%48%

1% 1%

89% 89%

58% 54%

5% 4%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

365 90% 59% 1% 342 90% 48% 1%

186

179

2

60

99

5

196

35

337

28

334

31

154

211

3362

91%

88%

82%

85%

100%

95%

60%

94%

43%

93%

58%

83%

95%

66%

51%

43%

41%

60%

72%

60%

64%

4%

64%

3%

40%

73%

2%

1%

0%

1%

0%

2%

0%

1%

0%

1%

0%

0%

2%

155

187

1

72

78

1

190

74

307

35

312

30

148

194

3339

92%

89%

86%

94%

84%

95%

46%

91%

77%

86%

93%

50%

47%

35%

63%

26%

53%

9%

52%

10%

34%

59%

2%

1%

0%

2%

0%

1%

0%

1%

0%

0%

2%




Total

Tested

Total

Tested





Total Total






12/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White




English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant

Other


24 34 4 24 34 4




NY State Public


This District


*Range: 640780 676780 707780

93% 96%

69% 67%

29% 25%

93% 94%

67% 66%

28% 23%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

368 93% 69% 29% 343 96% 67% 25%

186

182

2

60

102

5

196

35

340

28

333

35

156

212

3365

95%

91%

83%

89%

100%

97%

100%

97%

43%

95%

71%

87%

98%

70%

69%

47%

57%

100%

82%

60%

74%

7%

75%

14%

53%

81%

28%

29%

13%

19%

40%

38%

20%

31%

0%

32%

0%

16%

38%

155

188

1

72

79

1

190

74

308

35

312

31

148

195

3340

96%

96%

95%

98%

91%

98%

80%

96%

94%

95%

96%

66%

69%

56%

83%

39%

72%

23%

71%

32%

53%

78%

26%

25%

11%

37%

9%

28%

0%

28%

0%

11%

36%




Total

Tested

Total

Tested




13/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White




English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant

Other


24 34 4 24 34 4




NY State Public


This District


*Range: 644785 662785 694785

91% 91%

54% 55%

1% 3%

89% 88%

56% 56%

2% 4%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

338 91% 54% 1% 339 91% 55% 3%

155

183

1

65

79

1

191

168

309

29

325

13

141

197

6332

95%

88%

89%

94%

85%

95%

48%

92%

62%

86%

95%

67%92%

61%

49%

39%

70%

29%

58%

14%

56%

15%

36%

68%

17%55%

2%

1%

0%

2%

0%

1%

0%

1%

0%

0%

2%

0%1%

161

178

2

62

83

2

189

15

305

34

318

21

150

189

3336

91%

90%

81%

81%

98%

100%

95%

53%

94%

33%

81%

98%

58%

52%

35%

34%

71%

40%

59%

21%

58%

0%

34%

71%

2%

3%

0%

2%

3%

20%

3%

0%

3%

0%

1%

4%




Total

Tested

Total

Tested


(NYSAA): Grade 6 Equivalent4 5 5 5 3



Total Total






14/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White




English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant

Other


24 34 4 24 34 4




NY State Public


This District


*Range: 640780 674780 700780

95% 92%

64% 66%

28% 26%

92% 92%

65% 63%

31% 26%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

337 95% 64% 28% 342 92% 66% 26%

155

182

1

65

81

1

188

168

308

29

322

15

142

195

6331

97%

93%

94%

98%

88%

97%

72%

96%

80%

92%

97%

83%95%

65%

64%

54%

78%

40%

68%

24%

66%

20%

47%

77%

33%65%

28%

27%

15%

40%

10%

31%

0%

29%

0%

12%

39%

17%28%

163

179

2

64

84

2

189

15

306

36

320

22

152

190

3339

95%

89%

86%

81%

98%

100%

95%

61%

95%

41%

83%

99%

67%

65%

34%

57%

81%

40%

72%

17%

69%

18%

46%

82%

24%

28%

13%

18%

35%

0%

29%

3%

28%

0%

13%

36%




Total

Tested

Total

Tested




15/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White




English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant

Other


24 34 4 24 34 4




NY State Public


This District


*Range: 642790 665790 698790

93% 92%

45% 39%

1% 1%

92% 91%

52% 48%

4% 4%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

347 93% 45% 1% 353 92% 39% 1%

166

181

2

64

90

2

186

37

313

34

329

18

158

189

4343

95%

92%

84%

90%

98%

86%

95%

79%

95%

61%

87%

98%

51%

39%

30%

24%

59%

57%

48%

12%

47%

0%

25%

61%

2%

1%

2%

0%

2%

14%

2%

0%

2%

0%

0%

3%

163

190

4

65

90

6

185

37

322

31

334

19

148

205

4349

94%

90%

88%

86%

100%

97%

86%

95%

58%

95%

37%

84%

98%

39%

38%

14%

21%

83%

56%

14%

42%

6%

41%

5%

19%

53%

1%

1%

0%

1%

0%

2%

0%

1%

0%

1%

0%

1%

1%




Total

Tested

Total

Tested





Total Total






16/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White




English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant

Other


24 34 4 24 34 4




NY State Public


This District


*Range: 639800 670800 694800

96% 97%

75% 74%

40%32%

91% 92%

65% 65%

31% 30%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

350 96% 75% 40% 359 97% 74% 32%

168

182

2

65

90

2

188

37

315

35

330

20

159

191

4346

97%

95%

92%

94%

98%

100%

97%

89%

97%

75%

94%

98%

77%

73%

55%

68%

85%

86%

79%

34%

77%

35%

64%

84%

42%

37%

22%

22%

54%

57%

43%

6%

42%

0%

20%

56%

166

193

4

66

95

6

185

37

328

31

335

24

151

208

4355

98%

96%

98%

96%

100%

97%

86%

98%

81%

98%

88%

97%

97%

75%

74%

61%

62%

83%

86%

57%

79%

29%

78%

29%

62%

84%

28%

36%

8%

18%

67%

48%

29%

35%

0%

34%

8%

15%

45%




Total

Tested

Total

Tested




17/29


18/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White




English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant

Other


24 34 4 24 34 4




NY State Public


This District


*Range: 639775 674775 704775

96% 94%

61% 61%

16% 15%

93% 91%

61% 60%

20% 18%


201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

347 96% 61% 16% 343 94% 61% 15%

157

190

4

59

90

5

184

59

313

34

323

24

158

189

8339

97%

95%

98%

94%

97%

80%100%

98%

82%

96%

96%

97%

96%

88%96%

61%

61%

42%

49%

73%

60%44%

65%

21%

63%

38%

44%

75%

50%61%

11%

19%

5%

4%

24%

0%33%

18%

0%

17%

0%

7%

23%

13%16%

161

182

3

67

69

6

198

9

305

38

330

13

127

216

2341

98%

90%

90%

87%

97%

100%

95%

82%

95%

62%

89%

97%

68%

54%

40%

46%

72%

89%

65%

29%

63%

15%

43%

72%

18%

13%

1%

12%

19%

56%

17%

0%

16%

0%

6%

20%




Total

Tested

Total

Tested




19/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino


White




English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant

Other


24 34 4 24 34 4


Results in Grade 8 Science


NY State Public


This District

97%

79%

26%

94%

72%

28%

Number of Tested Students: 326 264 86

201112

201011


TotalTested

TotalTested

344 94% 72% 27% 335 97% 79% 26%

158

186

4

62

89

5

180

48

312

32

322

22

158

186

8336

95%

94%

90%

89%

100%

98%

100%

95%

91%

96%

64%

91%

97%

88%94%

68%

76%

47%

53%

100%

90%

63%

74%

56%

76%

18%

55%

87%

13%74%

23%

31%

5%

13%

40%

42%

13%

30%

3%

29%

0%

12%

40%

13%28%

160

175

2

63

65

6

199

8

302

33

323

12

119

216

2333

97%

98%

95%

94%

99%

100%

98%

94%

98%

75%

94%

99%

81%

77%

65%

60%

88%

100%

81%

55%

81%

8%

65%

87%

27%

25%

11%

12%

34%

50%

27%

9%

27%

0%

13%

32%



Total

Tested

Total

Tested



Regents Science 1 0


20/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


Statewide 201011 Results on theNational Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

% Below Basic % Basic % Proficient % Advanced

Grade 4 Reading

Grade 8 Reading

Grade 4 Mathematics

Grade 8 Mathematics

NOTES

*Reporting standards not met.**Rounds to 0.

Statewide 201011 NAEP Participation Ratesfor LEP Students and Students with Disabilities

Participation Rate

Grade 4 Reading



Grade 8 Reading



Grade 4 Mathematics



Grade 8 Mathematics



NOTE

The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), developed in 1969, is a nationally representative assessment of the performance ofUnited States students in mathematics, reading, science, writing, the arts, civics, economics, geography, and U.S. history.The NAEP assessment is administered to a sampling of schools across New York State. Teachers, principals, parents, policymakers,

and researchers use NAEP results to assess progress and develop ways to improve education in the United States. As part of a federal requirement,NYSED is publishing these statewide results on NAEP. There are no consequences for schools, teachers, or students based on NAEP results.


32%

24%

20%

30%

33%

41%

44%

40%

26%

31%

31%

23%

9%

4%

5%

7%

84%

85%

77%

84%

91%

90%

92%

91%


21/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific IslanderWhite

Multiracial

Small Group Totals



English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant

NOTES


Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level English LanguageArts after Four Years of Instruction

This District

Percentage scoring at level(s):

2-4 3-4 4

NY State Public


2-4 3-4 4

82% 84% 81% 82%

39% 36%

84% 83% 82% 80%

38% 35%2008 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort 2007 Cohort

Number

of Students

Number

of Students

421 82% 81% 39% 384 84% 82% 36%

210

211

2

89

85

4

240

1

7358

63396

25

139

282

5416

86%

79%

75%

73%

88%

100%88%

51%84%

56%

77%

85%

60%83%

85%

77%

72%

72%

87%

100%87%

44%83%

52%

74%

84%

60%81%

48%

31%

24%

19%

53%

29%46%

3%41%

8%

25%

46%

0%40%

173

211

1

98

62

3

218

2

6327

57364

20

132

252

2382

86%

83%

77%

73%

90%

100%91%

42%86%

55%

80%

87%

84%

79%

70%

69%

89%

100%89%

39%83%

50%

73%

86%

40%

33%

18%

13%

50%

50%42%

4%38%

0%

16%

46%

The symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than f ive students,

data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.


22/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


100%

Results by


24 34 4 24 34 4

All Students

Female

Male



Hispanic or Latino

Asian or Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific IslanderWhite

Multiracial

Small Group Totals



English Proficient



Not Disadvantaged

Migrant

Not Migrant

NOTES


Total Cohort Results in Secondary-Level Mathematics afterFour Years of Instruction

This District


2-4 3-4 4

NY State Public


2-4 3-4 4

88% 90% 84% 84%

19%26%

87% 86% 82% 81%

22% 25%2008 Cohort

2007 Cohort

2008 Cohort 2007 Cohort

Number

of Students

Number

of Students

421 88% 84% 19% 384 90% 84% 26%

210

211

2

89

85

4

240

1

7358

63396

25

139

282

5416

90%

86%

78%

86%

92%

100%94%

52%88%

84%

84%

90%

80%88%

86%

82%

72%

79%

90%

100%92%

40%85%

68%

79%

86%

60%84%

19%

18%

4%

8%

28%

29%22%

2%20%

0%

11%

23%

0%19%

173

211

1

98

62

3

218

2

6327

57364

20

132

252

2382

92%

89%

83%

87%

94%

100%97%

49%91%

80%

87%

92%

86%

82%

73%

74%

91%

100%92%

35%85%

60%

77%

87%

26%

25%

11%

6%

38%

17%30%

2%27%

0%

11%

33%

The symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than f ive students,

data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.


23/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


2008 Total Cohort Results in Secondary-LevelGlobal History and Geography, U.S. History and Government,

and Science after Four Years of InstructionAll Students General-Education Students Students with Disabilities

Cohort

Enrollment

Percentage of studentsscoring: C

ohort

Enrollment

Percentage of studentsscoring: C

ohort

Enrollment

Percentage of studentsscoring:

55-64 65-84 85-100 55-64 65-84 85-100 55-64 65-84 85-100

Global History andGeography

U.S. History andGovernment

Science

New York State Alternate Assessments (NYSAA) 2011-12

All Students

TotalTested

Number of students

scoring at Level:

Secondary Level 1 2 3 4

English Language Arts

Mathematics

Social Studies

Science

NOTES

The symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) aresuppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.


421

421

421

5%

4%

4%

43%

38%

48%

36%

38%

32%

358

358

358

3%

2%

1%

44%

40%

52%

42%

43%

37%

63

63

63

14%

14%

16%

37%

27%

27%

2%

5%

6%

99

9

9

60

0

0

06

1

0

11

1

1

22

7

8


24/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


Regents ExamsAll Students General-Education Students Students with Disabilities

Total

Tested

Percentage of students

scoring at or above:

Total

Tested

Percentage of students


Total

Tested

Percentage of studen


55 65 85 55 65 85 55 65

Comprehensive English

Integrated Algebra

Geometry

Algebra 2/Trigonometry

Global History and Geography

U.S. History and Government

Living Environment

Physical Setting/Earth Science

Physical Setting/Chemistry

Physical Setting/Physics

NOTEThe symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than fivestudents, data for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.


201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

379

397

354

437

425

461

373

394

419

182

201

193

404

391

431

378

355

357

369

402

369

252

271

339

178

191

206

97

121

84

93%

94%

89%

87%

91%

86%

79%

81%

84%

88%

89%

81%

83%

90%

89%

88%

94%

96%

93%

87%

88%

88%

92%

82%

96%

97%

93%

87%

88%

86%

88%

89%

84%

74%

81%

76%

61%

64%

66%

71%

79%

69%

71%

78%

79%

83%

87%

91%

83%

78%

80%

71%

79%

75%

75%

85%

75%

74%

73%

83%

42%

41%

39%

16%

19%

13%

13%

12%

10%

21%

24%

28%

23%

32%

34%

44%

43%

57%

34%

24%

36%

19%

27%

31%

16%

24%

19%

31%

23%

15%

340

357

313

394

391

401

349

368

394

176

198

185

354

358

375

336

324

321

324

349

321

234

253

304

175

189

204

97

119

83

96%

96%

91%

90%

93%

90%

80%

83%

84%

89%

83%

86%

92%

93%

91%

95%

98%

97%

93%

92%

88%

92%

85%

87%

92%

91%

87%

79%

83%

80%

63%

67%

69%

72%

71%

77%

82%

83%

87%

89%

94%

87%

85%

85%

72%

80%

79%

74%

46%

45%

43%

18%

21%

15%

13%

13%

11%

22%

30%

25%

34%

39%

48%

46%

60%

38%

28%

40%

20%

29%

34%

31%

39

40

41

43

34

60

24

26

25

6

3

8

50

33

56

42

31

36

45

53

48

18

18

35

3

2

2

0

2

1

72%

78%

71%

60%

71%

65%

54%

62%

72%

50%

25%

62%

64%

64%

64%

87%

83%

69%

49%

65%

78%

89%

57%

54%

68%

63%

30%

56%

45%

38%

35%

28%

50%

25%

32%

39%

52%

55%

65%

69%

51%

32%

48%

50%

67%

43%

1

1

1

3

1


25/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


Regents Competency TestsAll Students General-Education Students Students with Disabilities

Total

Tested Percent Passing:

Total


Total


Mathematics

Science

Reading

Writing

Global Studies

U.S. History and Government

NOTE

The symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that groupand the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.


201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

27

46

37

37

44

26

26

17

17

12

8

9

26

24

23

21

22

15

48%

37%

65%

57%

23%

31%

50%

47%

53%

100%

100%

100%

42%

17%

48%

48%

91%

47%

4

0

1

2

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

3

1

1

4

0

2

23

46

36

35

43

25

25

17

17

12

8

9

23

23

22

17

22

13

37%

47%

53%

100%

100%

100%

91%


26/29

h 25, 2013 Pag


New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test(NYSESLAT)

All Students General-Education Students Students with Disabilities

TotalTested

Percent of students scoring

in each performance level:TotalTested

Percent of students scoring

in each performance level:TotalTested

Percent of students scori

in each performance leve

Begin.

Interm.

Adv.

Prof.

Begin.

Interm.

Adv.

Prof.

Begin.

Interm.

Adv.

Listening andSpeaking

(Grades K1)

Reading andWriting

(Grades K1)


(Grades 24)

Reading andWriting

(Grades 24)


(Grades 56)

Reading andWriting

(Grades 56)


(Grades 78)

Reading andWriting

(Grades 78)


(Grades 912)

Reading andWriting

(Grades 912)

NOTE

The symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, data for that group andthe next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.


201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

223

223

181

223

223

181186

150

148

186

150

148

53

55

60

53

5560

43

39

37

43

39

37

98

93

84

98

93

84

4%

4%

3%

34%

26%

32%1%

3%

3%

15%

11%

15%

9%

4%

5%

15%

9%8%

2%

5%

3%

12%

23%

16%

11%

3%

10%

28%

13%

12%

16%

16%

23%

31%

32%

37%4%

5%

1%

39%

39%

26%

8%

5%

7%

11%

20%20%

5%

23%

24%

58%

33%

41%

35%

30%

31%

40%

49%

45%

43%

43%

41%

20%

24%

12%37%

35%

38%

37%

39%

40%

23%

36%

28%

36%

25%30%

35%

31%

32%

23%

28%

22%

18%

25%

20%

21%

30%

26%

36%

38%

33%

15%

17%

19%58%

57%

58%

9%

11%

20%

60%

55%

60%

38%

45%42%

58%

41%

41%

7%

15%

22%

36%

42%

39%

11%

8%

17%

197

197

157

197

197

157146

116

119

146

116

119

41

40

49

41

4049

32

31

31

32

31

31

91

86

78

91

86

78

4%

4%

3%

31%

23%

29%1%

3%

4%

10%

6%

10%

10%

3%

6%

17%

8%10%

3%

3%

3%

16%

26%

16%

12%

2%

9%

26%

13%

12%

15%

14%

20%

31%

32%

37%3%

3%

1%

38%

35%

21%

10%

8%

8%

5%

10%14%

6%

29%

26%

59%

29%

35%

35%

31%

32%

38%

49%

46%

42%

43%

40%

21%

26%

13%32%

30%

27%

40%

44%

46%

20%

33%

24%

32%

28%24%

38%

32%

26%

16%

26%

23%

18%

24%

22%

23%

30%

26%

39%

40%

36%

17%

19%

21%63%

64%

68%

11%

15%

23%

61%

58%

61%

46%

55%51%

53%

35%

45%

9%

19%

26%

35%

42%

37%

12%

8%

17%

26

26

24

26

26

2440

34

29

40

34

29

12

15

11

12

1511

11

8

6

11

8

6

7

7

6

7

7

6

8%

8%

4%

58%

46%

50%0%

3%

0%

33%

29%

34%

8%

7%

0%

8%

13%0%

0%

13%

0%

0%

13%

17%

0%

14%

17%

43%

14%

17%

23%

31%

38%

31%

35%

38%5%

9%

0%

40%

50%

45%

0%

0%

0%

33%

47%45%

0%

0%

17%

55%

50%

67%

29%

14%

17%

57%

57%

33%

54%

42%

46%

12%

12%

4%55%

53%

83%

25%

21%

14%

33%

47%

45%

50%

20%55%

27%

25%

67%

45%

38%

17%

29%

29%

0%

0%

29%

33%


27/29

h 25, 2013 Pag

3 Student Outcomes

High School Completers


Number ofStudents

Percentage ofGraduates

Number ofStudents


Number ofStudents


Total Graduates

Receiving a RegentsDiploma

Receiving a RegentsDiploma with AdvancedDesignation

Receiving anIndividualized EducationProgram (IEP) Diploma

NOTEStudents receiving Regents diplomas and Regents diplomas with advanced designation are considered graduates; recipients of IEP diplomas arenot.

High School Non-completers


Number ofStudents

Percentage ofStudents

Number ofStudents


Number ofStudents


Dropped Out

Entered Approved HighSchool Equivalency

Preparation Program

Total Non-completers

Post-secondary Plans of 201112 Completers


Number ofStudents


Number ofStudents


Number ofStudents


To 4-year College

To 2-year College

To Other Post-secondary

To the Military

To Employment

To Adult Services

To Other Known Plans

Plan Unknown


201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

328308328

299273282

135140149

8155

91%89%86%

41%45%45%

N/AN/AN/A

290276304

286259277

133139149

000

99%94%91%

46%50%49%

383224

13145

210

8155

34%44%21%

5%3%0%

N/AN/AN/A

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

201112

201011

200910

716164

00

0

716164

4%3%3%

0%0%

0%

4%3%3%

564551

00

0

564551

4%3%3%

0%0%

0%

4%3%3%

151613

00

0

151613

6%6%5%

0%0%

0%

6%6%5%

107

158

13

9

39

0

7

3

32%

47%

4%

3%

12%

0%

2%

1%

103

142

9

7

22

0

7

0

36%

49%

3%

2%

8%

0%

2%

0%

4

16

4

2

17

0

0

3

9%

35%

9%

4%

37%

0%

0%

7%


28/29

SDL: 5891 LEA: 580602040000

The New York State School Report CardFiscal Accountability Supplement

for

Riverhead Central School DistrictNew York State Education Law and the Commissioner's Regulations require the attachment of the NYS School

Report Card to the public school district budget proposal. The regulations require that certain expenditure ratios

for general education and special education students be reported and compared with ratios for similar districtsand all public schools. The required ratios for this district are reported below.

2010-2011 School Year General Education Special Education

This

School

District

Similar

District

Group

Similar District Group Description: Average Need/Resource Capacity

Instructional Expenditures

Pupils

Expenditures Per Pupil

$63,448,370

5,153

$12,313

$20,154,973

635

$31,740

$7,820,663,210

798,424

$9,795

$3,172,283,304

110,978

$28,585


Pupils



Pupils


$29,473,160,406

2,688,528

$10,963

$12,260,104,540

412,226

$29,741

Instructional Expenditures for General Education are K-12 expenditures for classroom instruction (excluding Special Education) plus a pro-ration of building level administrative and instructional support expenditures. These expenditures include amounts for instruction of stu-dents with disabilities in a general-education setting. District expenditures, such as transportation, debt service and district-wide adminis-tration are not included.

The pupil count for General Education is K-12 average daily membership plus K-12 pupils for whom the district pays tuition to anotherschool district. This number represents all pupils, including those classified as having disabilities and those not classified, excluding onlystudents with disabilities placed out of district. For districts in which a county jail is located, this number includes incarcerated youth towhom the district must provide an education program.

Instructional Expenditures for Special Education are K-12 expenditures for students with disabilities (including summer special educationexpenditures) plus a proration of building-level administrative and instructional support expenditures. District expenditures, such as trans-portation, debt service and district-wide administration are not included.

The pupil count for Special Education is a count of K-12 students with disabilities for the 2010-11 school year plus students for whom thedistrict receives tuition from another district plus students for whom the district pays tuition to another district. Students attending the Stateschools at Rome and Batavia, private placements and out-of-state placements are included.

Total of All

School

Districts in

NY State

Total of All School

Districts in NY State2010-2011 School Year

This School

District

Similar District

Group

Total Expenditures Per Pupil $20,652 $20,410$18,876

The numbers used to compute the statistics on this page were collected on the State Aid Form A, the State Aid Form F, the School DistrictAnnual Financial Report (ST-3), and from the Student Information Repository System (SIRS).

Instructional Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Instructional Expenditures to Pupils. The total cost of instruction for stu-dents with disabilities may include both general- and special-education expenditures. Special-education services provided in the general-education classroom may benefit students not classified as having disabilities.

Total Expenditures Per Pupil is the simple arithmetic ratio of Total Expenditures to Pupils. Total Expenditures include district expendituresfor classroom instruction, as well as expenditures for transportation, debt service, community service and district-wide administration thatare not included in the Instructional Expenditure values for General Education and Special Education. As such, the sum of General Educa-tion and Special Education Instructional Expenditures does not equal the Total Expenditures.


29/29

SDL: 5891 LEA: 580602040000

The New York State School Re ort Card

Information about Students with Disabilities

for

Riverhead Central School District

New York State Education Law and the Commissioner's Regulations require the attachment of the NYS School

Report Card to the public school district budget proposal. The regulations require reporting students with disabi-

lities by the percent of time they are in general education classrooms and the classification rate of students with

disabilities. These data are to be compared with percentages for similar districts and all public schools. The re-

quired percentages for this district are reported below.

Student Counts as of

October 4, 2011This School District

Total of All School

Districts in NY State

Student Placement --

Percent of Time Inside

Regular Classroom

Count of

Students with

Disabilities

Percentage of

Students with

Disabilities

Percentage of

Students with

Disabilities

80% or more

40% to 79%

Less than 40%

Separate Settings

346

96

107

23

56.2%

15.6%

17.4%

3.7%

57.3%

11.7%

22.1%

6.1%

The source data for the statistics in this table were reported through the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) andverified in Verification Report 5. The counts are numbers of students reported in the least restrictive environment categoriesfor school-age programs (ages 6-21) on October 4, 2011. The percentages represent the amount of time students withdisabilities are in general-education classrooms, regardless of the amount and cost of special education services they

receive. Rounding of percentage values may cause them to sum to a number slightly different from 100%.

School-age Students with Disabilities Classification Rate

2011-12 School Year This School

District

Total of All School

Districts in NY State

Special Ed Classification Rate 12.8%

This rate is a ratio of the count of school-age students with disabilities (ages 4-21) to the total enrollment of all school-agestudents in the school district, including students who are parentally placed in nonpublic schools located in the schooldistrict. The numerator includes all school-age students for whom a district has Committee on Special Education (CSE)responsibility to ensure the provision of special education services. The denominator includes all school-age students whoreside in the district. In the case of parentally placed students in nonpublic schools, it includes the number of students who

attend the nonpublic schools located in the school district. Source data are drawn from the SIRS and from the BasicEducation Data System (BEDS).

10.6%

Other Settings 44 7.1% 2.8%

Similar District

Group

Percentage of

Students with

Disabilities

Similar District

Group

12.1%

58.1%

18.8%

16.7%

4.1%

2.3%

Similar District Group Description: Average Need/Resource Capacity

Similar District Groups are identified according to the Need-to-Resource-Capacity Index. More information about thiscategorization is on the Internet at: http://www.p12.nysed.gov/irs/accountability/2011-12/NeedResourceCapacityIndex.pdf

Documents

NYSED reports 2011-2012: Riverhead Central School District- school report card, accountability report, fiscal supplement