Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Nutrient Management in Crops through Micro Irrigation
Presented to National Seminar on Fertigation
September 15th 2017, Vadodara
Presentation Structure
• Nagarjuna group
• Stagnating Yields in India
• Nutrient management in Crops though micro irrigation –definition of fertigation
• Nutrient Management in Crops through Fertigation- results
• Policy Changes and NFCL innovation in area of Fertigation
• Fertigation adoption - Impediments & Solutions
NAGARJUNA GROUP• One of the most successful integrated agricultural brand in India• Largest Private sector Urea manufacturer in India producing over 14
lakh MT annually• One of the largest bulk fertilizer companies in India; 10% market share in
Urea and significant market share in specialty fertilizers and significantpresence in Agrochemicals.
• Pioneered the concept of Customized Fertilizer, soil, crop & stagespecific products, for major crops in all agriculturally important states inIndia.
• Amongst Top Micro Irrigation companies in India.• GOI partner in development and implementation of E NAM project for
farmers.
• R & D plays a significant role in Nagarjuna' strategy.
Stagnating Yields in India
• Poor and degrading soil health and Imbalanced/Inadequate nutrition application effecting crop growth across the life cycle from seed to fruiting
• Increasing biotic and abiotic stresses due to changing
weather patterns, diseases and increased use of
chemicals
• Outdated practices, recommendations, products and
services
Fertigation – An Opportunity for Innovation & Enhancement
Nutrient management in Crops through Micro Irrigation i.e.Fertigation has been defined as a tool to supply the plant with it’s daily demand of water and nutrients as required by specific growth stage throughout it’s development to achieve maximum efficiency of the fertilizer applied
• Synergistic use of water and nutrients through fertigation is one of the key factors for improving crop productivity• Not novel, in use since 20 years• Various stakeholders proved the benefits through multiple trials
Nutrient Management in Fertigation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Nitrogen Phosphorous Potassium
Fertilizer use efficiency (%) Soil application
Fertilizer use efficiency (%) Fertigation
Source: TNAU
Nutrient use efficiency in fertigation is higher than conventional methods , and is one of the critical factors to soil fertility and provide for optimal nutrition as per crop requirements.
S.No Parameter Fertigation Flood + basal
1 No. of plants / ha 2470 2470
2 Planting to harvest (days) 300 - 330 330 - 430
3 Average plant ht. (ft.) 6.5 5.8 - 6.0
4 Plants harvested 99% 90%
5 Ave. weight of bunch (kg) 45 (55) 40 (45)
6 No. of hands/ bunch 11 14
7 No. fruits /hand 220 240
8 Cost of cultivation per plt.( Rs.) 67.4 70.9
9 Harvest ( m. t / ha.) 110 89
10 Cost of production (Rs / kg) 1.5 1.77
11 Benefit per ha (Rs) 915324 695734
NFCL trial data (Banana)Tissue Culture Plantlet – G9
Water saving & productivity gain under drip irrigation
Establish a yield target: the crop’stotal nutritional
needs at each stage of crop
Effectively use of existing nutrients
Fill deficit between total needs and indigenous supply
Balanced Crop Nutrition Solution
Yield enhancement
Ecological Balance
Increase Net Profit
Soil health
Customized nutrition including customized WSF’s in ready to use form delivers superior yield at affordable cost.
Site Specific Nutrient Management
Customized Nutrition and Policy Changes
True label policy by the Govt. of India in 2014: Enabled key players, especially Nagarjuna to offer innovative Crop and Stage specific water soluble fertilizers
NFCL has developed advanced WSF and MI technologies
Zetol Sure - Crop Stage Specific advanced WSF
Zetol Select - Crop Specific, Stage Specific advanced drip fertilizers
Zetol Strom - Crop Specific, Stage Specific foliar fertilizers
Superline Root Guard -World Class Technology for Subsurface Drip Irrigation (SDI) systems- Prevents Root Intrusion- Offers protection against mechanical damages
Trial Results of Customized Nutrition in Tomato
Treatments
Plant
ht (cm)
@
66
DAT
Fruit count Fruit
diameter
(cm)
Harvested
fruits per
plant
Fruit yield
%
small
fruit 70
DAT
106
DAT
kg /
plant
T /
ac
T1 – Zetol select
100% dose 77.8 80.7 33 5.52 99.7 5.21 32.00 30.60
T2 – Industrial
recommendation 77.0 58.1 28.2 5.48 78.6 4.23 24.98 22.99
T3 – Farmer
practice 74.7 38.8 16.3 5.38 56.8 3.03 17.10 29.23
• Nearly 61.8 Million hectares potential for micro irrigation• Actual area under micro irrigation is estimated at 8.5
million hectares• Positive results of fertigation trial resultsBut as per estimates, only 10% of the drip area is underfertigation
What can be the missing link in higher adoption rate of
fertigation?
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Theoretical Potential Covered Area
Micro Irrigation Opportunity in India
(acreage in million hectares)
GAP IN CONSUMPTION VS POTENTIAL
Impediments for fertigation adoption
High fertilizer costs
Lack of technical know how by
farmers
In comparison to conventional fertilizers, WSF is more expensive (1:6), and the farmer is reluctant to use in
non-commercial crops because of low CBR.Farmers tend to generally use Urea, White Potash and
Acids in Fertigation
Most of the farmers lack technical know how on fertilizer scheduling and drip management
Recommendations
• Subsidy. Rationalization of subsidy on conventional Fertilizers.• Indigenous manufacturing. Policy to increase and improve
indigenous manufacturing including use of subsidized raw materials and tax benefits on imported raw materials
• National Policy on Fertigation including micro irrigation and water soluble fertilizers.
• Training of farmers and Model demonstration farms on fertigation at block level with experts in fertigation who can solve the problems of farmers on spot, including availability of spares and servicing
• Setting up a body including all the stakeholders ( govt.depts., universities, industry) for effective spreading of fertigation.
• Setting up a fertigation hotline by the govt. for farmer support
Thank you