Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP2 PRODUCTION REPORTS
NSP2 Summary ReportThrough Third Quarter 2012
REHAB / NEW CONSTRUCTION COMPLETIONS BY UNIT TYPE PROJECTED* VS. ACTUAL
PROJECTED
ACTUAL
TOTAL NUMBER OF UNITS: 5,995
TOTAL ACQUISITION: 765
TOTAL CLEARANCE / DEMO: 2,092
TOTAL HOMEOWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE: 583
TOTAL REHAB / NEW CONSTRUCTION: 2,555
TOTAL COMPLETIONS BY ACTIVITY TYPE
ACQUISITION
CLEARANCE / DEMO
HOMEOWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE
REHAB / NEW CONSTRUCTION
COMPLETIONS BY ACTIVITY TYPE PROJECTED* VS. ACTUAL
PROJECTED
ACTUAL
ACQUISITION
CLEARANCE/ DEMO
HOME- OWNERSHIP ASSISTANCE
REHAB/NEW CONSTRUCTION
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Single FamilyMultifamily
1,028
11,1174,107
765
19,663
2,555
2,092
583
3,427
4,495
1,223
7,061
0 4000 8000 12000 16000 20000
Actual
Projected
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Single FamilyMultifamily
1,028
11,1174,107
765
19,663
2,555
2,092
583
3,427
4,495
1,223
7,061
0 4000 8000 12000 16000 20000
Actual
Projected
2,092
43%
35%
13%
2,555
583
765
10%
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Single FamilyMultifamily
1,028
11,1174,107
765
19,663
2,555
2,092
583
3,427
4,495
1,223
7,061
0 4000 8000 12000 16000 20000
Actual
ProjectedSingle-Family = 1–4 units; Multifamily = 4+ units* “Projected” refers to the total projected number of households (or properties for Clearance / Demo)
the Grantee anticipates to complete by the end of their NSP grant for each Activity Type.
NSP completed rehabilitation in Santa Ana, California
© C
ity o
f Sa
nta
Ana
2
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES
Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP2 Summary Report
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity
with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP2 PRODUCTION REPORTS
Alameda County, CA 24 0 24
LH25 0 0LMMI 24 0 24
Boston, MA 4 0 20 24
LH25 0 11 11LMMI 4 0 9 13
Camden Redevelopment Agency 0 0 33 33
LH25 0 33 33LMMI 0 0 0
Center for Community Self Help 0 65 65
LH25 0 15 15LMMI 0 50 50
Chicago, IL 0 1 0 1
LH25 0 0LMMI 0 1 0 1
Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc. 6 17 20 409 452
LH25 5 17 8 209 239LMMI 1 0 12 200 213
City of Little Rock 0 0 0 4 4
LH25 0 1 1LMMI 0 0 3 3
City of Reno Housing Authority 111 111
LH25 62 62LMMI 49 49
City of Sarasota 44 2 0 46
LH25 22 0 22LMMI 22 2 0 24
Columbus, OH 96 36 132
LH25 14 14LMMI 96 22 118
Cuyahoga County Land Reutilization Corporation 389 36 425
LH25 0 0LMMI 389 36 425
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP2 Summary Report
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP2 SUMMARY REPORT
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL3
Dayton, OH 967 1 55 1023
LH25 9 9LMMI 967 1 46 1014
Denver, CO 40 59 19 118
LH25 59 59LMMI 40 19 59
El Paso Collaborative 79 79
LH25 36 36LMMI 43 43
Evanston, IL 0 28 28
LH25 0 11 11LMMI 17 17
Habitat for Humanity International Inc 4 0 61 65
LH25 2 0 35 37LMMI 2 26 28
Hamilton County, OH 0 18 56 74
LH25 28 28LMMI 0 18 28 46
Healthy Neighborhoods Inc. 33 3 58 94
LH25 11 17 28LMMI 22 3 41 66
Housing Authority of Camden City 0 0 0
LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0 0
Housing Authority of the City of Tampa 0 0 0
LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0 0
Housing Trust of Santa Clara County 51 79 130
LH25 6 51 57LMMI 45 28 73
Indio, CA 0 17 17
LH25 0 7 7LMMI 10 10
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP2 Summary Report
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP2 SUMMARY REPORT
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL4
Lake Worth Community Redevelopment Agency 0 0 0 41 41
LH25 0 0 23 23LMMI 0 0 0 18 18
Long Beach, CA 11 75 86
LH25 11 11LMMI 0 75 75
Los Angeles Neighborhood Housing Services Inc. 91 91
LH25 0 0LMMI 91 91
Los Angeles, CA 42 42
LH25 13 13LMMI 29 29
Massachusetts Housing Investment Corporation 27 184 211
LH25 60 60LMMI 27 124 151
Metropolitan Development and Housing Agency 197 6 32 235
LH25 192 5 197LMMI 5 6 27 38
Milwaukee, WI 115 10 1 126
LH25 3 1 4LMMI 115 7 0 122
Minneapolis, MN 0 44 0 44
LH25 5 0 5LMMI 0 39 0 39
Modesto, CA 45 45
LH25 5 5LMMI 40 40
National Housing Trust Community Development Fund 0 0
LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0
Neighborhood Housing Services of Orange County 30 30
LH25 15 15LMMI 15 15
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP2 Summary Report
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP2 SUMMARY REPORT
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL5
Neighborhood Housing Services of South Florida, Inc. 3 3
LH25 0 0LMMI 3 3
Neighborhood Lending Partners of West Florida, Inc. 141 23 3 0 167
LH25 26 0 26LMMI 115 23 3 0 141
New Orleans Redevelopment Authority 0 20 67 87
LH25 24 24LMMI 0 20 43 63
New York City, NY 0 0 0 0
LH25 0 0 0LMMI 0 0 0 0
Newark, NJ 0 0 0
LH25 0 0 0LMMI 0 0 0
North Little Rock, AR 26 0 19 45
LH25 14 14LMMI 26 0 5 31
Palm Beach County, FL 1 16 0 17
LH25 0 12 0 12LMMI 1 4 0 5
Philadelphia, PA 0 0 0
LH25 0 0LMMI 0 0 0
Phoenix, AZ 0 13 0 84 97
LH25 0 0 0LMMI 0 13 0 84 97
Pima County, AZ 18 124 102 244
LH25 33 39 72LMMI 18 91 63 172
Prichard Housing Authority 31 24 43 98
LH25 0 0LMMI 31 24 43 98
COMPLETED UNITS BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND NATIONAL OBJECTIVES (CONTINUED)
Through Third Quarter 2012 NSP2 Summary Report
LH25 = Low Income Set Aside (< 50% AMI); LMMI = Low, Moderate, Middle Income (51%–120% AMI); “0” indicates a projected activity with no reported completions; blank columns indicate an activity type which was not selected by the grantee
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT | NSP2 SUMMARY REPORT
HOME- REHAB/
CLEARANCE/ OWNERSHIP NEW
GRANTEE ACQUISITION DEMO ASSISTANCE CONSTRUCTION TOTAL6
Reading, PA 0 13 13
LH25 0 5 5LMMI 0 8 8
Rock Island Economic Growth Corporation 0 14 2 34 50
LH25 0 15 15LMMI 0 14 2 19 35
Santa Ana, CA 29 3 32
LH25 0 0LMMI 29 3 32
Springfield, OH 0 78 10 88
LH25 0 9 9LMMI 0 78 1 79
St Paul, MN 0 19 20 39
LH25 0 10 10LMMI 0 19 10 29
State of Delaware 0 4 23 27
LH25 3 7 10LMMI 0 1 16 17
State of Michigan 249 0 5 254
LH25 0 1 1LMMI 249 0 4 253
State of Ohio 3 17 20
LH25 5 5LMMI 3 12 15
State of Oregon 76 40 116
LH25 7 31 38LMMI 69 9 78
The Community Builders, Inc. 637 637
LH25 409 409LMMI 228 228
Toledo, OH 0 5 5
LH25 0 0LMMI 0 5 5
Washington, DC 0 44 16 60
LH25 0 44 16 60LMMI 0 0 0
Grand Total 765 2,092 583 2,555 5,995