NSP Software Summit: Enabling Next Generation Services… · NSP Software Summit: Enabling Next Generation Services ... Juniper Networks. ... TDM Metro Ethernet On-demand Computing

© 2004 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.The information contained herein is subject to change without notice

NSP Software Summit:

Enabling Next Generation Services

Tony ScarfoVP Partner Management, Juniper Networks

2Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential www.juniper.net

Traffic Growth

18%10%8%

22%19%20%

59%62%73%

56%

75%

111%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

Ave

rage

Per

cent

Frame relay ATM IP or IP/MPLS EthernetNetwork Types

2003 2004 2005

source: Infonetics Research


IP Traffic Growth Drivers

4%

73%

46%

38%

31%

12%

8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

Frame relay andATM

2G/3G mobiledata

Broadcast IPvideo

Metro Ethernet

VoIP

IP VPNs

BroadbandInternet

IP T

raffi

c G

row

th D

river

s

Percent of Respondents Rating 6 or 7 source: Infonetics Research


IP Revenue Growth vs Legacy Decline

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

IP TotalFR/ATM (Legacy) Total

IP Total 2877 2985 3259 3373 3559 3833 4140 4483FR/ATM (Legacy)Total

2406 2080 2041 2064 1932 1817 1710 1608

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

source: RHK

US $ Millions


Content Services Today:Dealing with Internet-Based Constraints

Content Providers

Film/TV

Music

Books (Print)

Finance

Health

Network Service ProvidersEnd Customers

Internet

Residential

Business

Unpredictable Experience

Fluctuating Bandwidth

Inaccessible Information

Limited/Static Service Options

Limited Content Quality

Multiple Content Transactions

Revenues on Connectivity Service/Internet Access Only

More Facilities Expense for Increased Content Access

Manual Service Activation and Provisioning

No Control over Bandwidth Use

Expensive “Accommodations”to Create Service Quality- Local Caching- CPE Buffering- User Configurations- More Servers/Facilities

Limited User Reach Due to Inconsistent Bandwidth


How can we deal with these Constraints?

The network just delivers what it does

Content or Services get what they can get

What if we brought these two together to control the experience for specific sessions?

VV

II

DD

EE

OO

G

A

M

I

N

G

VOIP

Best Effort

Enhanced Delivery

Assured Experience

For some: Best Effort — No Guarantee’s

For some: Preferred — Enhanced Service

For some: Assured — Guaranteed Service


What if the Network was Intelligent ?

The network would no longer be oblivious to the applications or customers using it—it is responsiveThe network would be able to respond to the needs of :• The customer• The application

Deliver the proper experience and security at the proper time

Also address and support billing for delivering this responsiveness


The Industry Has Two OptionsContinue growing service-specific private networks & a commoditized

Internet…

…OR migrate to a single infrastructure that delivers quality,

security & reach

Public Internet

TDM

IP/MPLS

Private IP/ VPNs FR/ATM

TDM Metro Ethernet

On-demand ComputingGaming

Single NetworkSegregated, uniquely managed virtual

networks

Assured end-to-end experience

Per-service options increase revenues/ customer

Control over security, quality…

Expensive

No inter-carrier connectivity

Global connectivity

Low cost

No control over security, quality…

Private Networks

FR/ATMPrivate IP/ VPNs


Industry Conclusions• All applications are/have converged onto IP

• Service Providers require a Core Network that can meet the Transport, Management, and Quality of Service (QOS) requirements of all these networks

• MPLS meets these requirements - Everything will connect to and run over a common IP/MPLS backbone.

•It’s too expensive to build a network for each service

•MPLS is universally accepted by Industry and Standards committees


Internet

Private IP VPN

FR/ATM

On-demand Computing Services

Gaming

Grid Services

Infranets - Best Attributes Of Public and Private Networking

Internet

Private IP VPN

FR/ATM

On-demand Computing Services

Gaming

Grid Services

InfranetSingle Network (IP/MPLS)

• Robust environment for legacy customers on a consolidated network

• Combines economics and reach of IP with assurance and security of private networks

• Geographic extension for international customers through standard inter-carrier connections (future)

Vision


Enterprise Enterprise

The Infranet Initiative Beyond the Internet

Provider Domain

The Situation TodayProviders presently support interconnection of enterprise networks within their own network/domain. However Inter-domain connections are either non existent or piecemeal in their deployment. Also applications also have no means to signal for network requirements. Presently packets can be marked for coarse gain CoS with no guarantees…

The Situation TodayProviders presently support interconnection of enterprise networks within their own network/domain. However Inter-domain connections are either non existent or piecemeal in their deployment. Also applications also have no means to signal for network requirements. Presently packets can be marked for coarse gain CoS with no guarantees…

Provider Domain

Provider Domain

Enterprise

Enterprise

Enterprise

User-Network Interface (UNI)Applications need to be network aware and able to signal the provider domain for network requirements such as bandwidth and QoS…

User-Network Interface (UNI)Applications need to be network aware and able to signal the provider domain for network requirements such as bandwidth and QoS…

VPN

VPN

Inter-Carrier Interface (ICI)Providers need to ensure that enterprise application network requirements are honoured between provider domains. There also needs to be a mechanism for cross billing between providers for these connections.

Inter-Carrier Interface (ICI)Providers need to ensure that enterprise application network requirements are honoured between provider domains. There also needs to be a mechanism for cross billing between providers for these connections.

Juniper is working with industry partners to

define these solutions

Juniper is working with industry partners to

define these solutions

VPN


Current IIC Membership



MPLS Market AcceptanceMPLS is now accepted as the key technology for deploying resilient multi-service IP networks

Key Juniper customers have either deployed MPLS or have announced plans to do so

50+ MPLS VPN Customers Deployed

Represents 40+% of worlds top 25 providers


MPLS – what problem does it solveReduce complexity in core network nodes

Introduce flexible new routing services in the network

New services or applications implemented in the edge without modifying the core

Some of the new services that use MPLS

• Virtual private networks (VPN)—many customers securely over a shared core network

• Legacy transports over a common network

• Differentiated service levels

• Traffic engineering—ability to direct where traffic goes


MPLS – what problem does it create

Provisioning can be complex

Hard to map from network problems to the customer

Network performance needs to be mapped to customer or service (Monitor SLA)

Differentiated class of service introduce the need to monitor service levels


Multiservice MPLS Foundation

Scale existing network infrastructure to support enhanced servicesincluding VPN services in addition to new IP enabled services

Reduce costs by minimizing CapEx investments

Preserve ATM QoS and SLAs across existing and new services

Interwork ATM to MPLS networks seamlessly

Minimize OpEx with End-to-end operations integration and simplification – Operational Expenses 60-70% of Cost


MPLS Manageability

Configuration and provisioning, through features like flexible implementation of traffic engineering (TE) and resource reservation protocol (RSVP)

Network visibility and monitoring, through interface accounting, packet sampling, real time MPLS path monitoring and others

Operation, administration, and maintenance (OAM), thanks to features like LSP ping, path verification, and traceback

Enforcement of service-level agreements (SLAs), with features like Diffserv TE and MPLS fast reroute

Easing rollout of value-added services like Layer 2 VPNs, Layer 3 VPNs, and virtual private LAN services (VPLS


Juniper SolutionsSingle Software Image across J, M & T- Series Products (Junos)

Flexible support for FR, ATM, PPP, HDLC, and Ethernet over MPLS

Leading VPLS implementation for Multipoint Ethernet over MPLS

Interworking between L2 services

Flexible QoS Mapping

Per-class bandwidth reservation similar to ATM

XML – API (Junoscript) to our MIBS

Proven High Availability

Graceful restart, multiple FRR approaches supported

In service Software Upgrades

Device Protection – Device, Control Plane, Architecture, User Data


Joint HP / Juniper Solution

Allows for the management of larger, more complex networks of Juniper networking products.

Provides multi-layered network management and correlation which is critical in accelerating faster migration to MPLS from legacy ATM/Frame networks over SONET/SDH infrastructure.

Provides real time root cause and correlation capability for theService control layer in Routing networks

• QoS , ACL , Multiple class of Services etc…

Allows for more complete ‘managed’ solutions for the enablement of high end content delivery, service control support and Service level agreements.


Solution Synergies

Leader in IP Routing & Security

Leader in IP Management

Leader in OSS

Leader in IP VPN- MPLS BGP/VPN, VPLS…

Integrated Service Management for MPLS & IP-VPN

Rich Set of Hardware Enablers for IP Value Added Services

Flexible IP Service Activation & Assurance

Strong partnerships / alliances:Siemens, Ericsson…

Multi-Vendor, Multi-Technology Service Activation & Management

Juniper HP


KnowTate # 77

Thank You

http://www.juniper.net/partners/

Documents

NSP Software Summit: Enabling Next Generation Services… · NSP Software Summit: Enabling Next Generation Services ... Juniper Networks. ... TDM Metro Ethernet On-demand Computing