24
1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails? ® Testimony, evidence and arguments are used to further each side’s claims ® Surveyors asked to provide testimony 0n measurement and analysis of property lines and other points, lines, planes and volumes on the surface of the earth 2 © 2018 J.V.R. Paiva

NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

1

JosephV.R.PaivaNSAPLS January2018

®  Courts,legalprofession,dealwithambiguities®  Bothsideshavefacts;whichsideprevails?®  Testimony,evidenceandargumentsareusedtofurthereachside’sclaims

®  Surveyorsaskedtoprovidetestimony0nmeasurementandanalysisofpropertylinesandotherpoints,lines,planesandvolumesonthesurfaceoftheearth

2©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 2: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

2

®  Evenifnolawsuitpending,surveyormustbepreparedtoanswerthesequestions…

®  Itiswhatwedo!

3©2018J.V.R.Paiva

®  Itisthesurveyor’sprofessionalresponsibilitytoconducthimorherselfasifitis

®  Thatis,factsmustbedocumented;decisionsmustberecordedwithunderlyingreasoningproperlylaidout

®  Therearemanyreasons“why”or“what”isaskedthatarenotconnectedwithalawsuitbutastotheproprietyofasurveyor’sprofessionalconduct

4©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 3: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

3

®  Testimony®  Dealingwiththeissue(thesamewayyoutackleanyotherproblem)

®  Ethicalresponsibility®  Surveyor’sreport®  Skillsdevelopment

5©2018J.V.R.Paiva

6©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 4: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

4

®  CaseA:Disputedevelopsafterthesurveyor’sworkiscompleted

®  CaseB:Disputedevelopsfirstandsurveyorishiredasexpert

7©2018J.V.R.Paiva

®  Ifsurveyorperformedworknotthinkingabouthowtodefendworkincourt,testimonycouldfaceobstaclestobeingadmitted

®  Inspiteofallthewarnings,howmanysurveyorsroutinelyperformtheirworkasiftheyhadbeenhiredasanexpert?

8©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 5: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

5

®  Clientisusuallyattorney®  Surveyorhastomakeitclearthathis/herworkisnotguaranteedtodevelopcaseonclient’sbehalf

®  Expert’sstatusisthatofanimpartialwitness;thusfindingsmustbethesameregardlessofwhichsidedoesthehiring

®  However,interpretationswithrespecttothelawmustbelefttothelawyers,butsurveyorscanadviseonprosandcons

®  Extracarefulprepandattentiontodetailisreq’d

9©2018J.V.R.Paiva

®  Whatdoestheexpertdo?®  Doestheaveragesurveyorknowwhatitentails?®  Isthelegalandjudicialprocessamystery?Ifso,thelikelihoodoffailureasanexpertishigh

®  Canthesurveyorspeak(andwrite)withauthority?

10©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 6: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

6

®  WhetherCaseAorCaseB,thiscourseofferstipson­  Howtobeabetterexpert­  Tounderstandwhatisexpected­  Howtobeatrueprofessionalinprovidingtheseservices

11©2018J.V.R.Paiva

®  Understanditfirst®  Figureouthowtotackleit®  Communicateoftenandwell®  (always!)

12©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 7: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

7

®  Onceaneedforanexperthasbeenidentifiedandthesurveyorhired,theproblemmustbewell-definedfirst

®  Developplanonhowtoattackit;outlinealternatepathsincaseprimaryisblocked

®  Dataiscollected®  Analysisdone®  Opinion(s)rendered®  Judgmentsformed

13©2018J.V.R.Paiva

®  Thesurveyormustbeginwithadiscussionwithclientastotheissues;readingreports,legaldocumentsfiled,perhapsotherexpertopinionsmustberead

®  Surveyordevelopsplanofattack®  Thentheplanmustbecommunicatedwithattorney

®  Agreed-uponschedulesmustbefollowed

14©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 8: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

8

®  Leavenostoneunturned®  Surveysarenottheonlymeansforgatheringdata®  Lookatsimilarcases®  Oppositeexperts’opinions;dataandanalysis®  Evenoppositeexpert’sofficeandfieldequipment®  Documentadnauseum(photographs,testimony,certifiedcopies,contactinformationofpartiesprovidinginformation,etc.)

15©2018J.V.R.Paiva

®  Bepainstakingintheanalysis®  Takeeverystepwiththoughtabouthowtodefendit

®  Beconstantlythinkingabouthowtocommunicatetheprocess,resultsandconclusions

®  Document

16©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 9: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

9

®  Oralincourt(i.e.fromthewitnessbox)supplementedwithexhibits,surveys,focusedsurveysand“cartoons”

®  Depositions—oral®  Interrogatories—written®  Allyournotesandrecords(fromeverysource)®  Surveyor’s(written)reportoropinions®  [Youcan’twriteaboutitifyoucan’ttalkaboutit]

17©2018J.V.R.Paiva

®  FormatandcontentMUSTbediscussedwithattorney

®  Followattorney’sinstructions,butdonothesitatetoexpressyouropinion

®  Beginreportwithwhatyouwilldoinitandhowyouwillreachyouropinions,usingwhatdataandinformation

®  Listbiographicalinformationestablishingyouasexpertinthismatter(includecompensationandstatethatitisnotdependentoncaseoutcome)

18©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 10: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

10

®  Listgroupsofinformationconsideredinformingopinions

®  Summaryofopinions®  Opinionsseparatedbycategories,togetherwithdetailedanalysis,explanations,illustrations,footnotes,citations,etc.

®  Closewithconclusionandsignature

19©2018J.V.R.Paiva

®  Whilewemakejudgmentsfromouranalysisandtheopinionsweform,attorneyandjudgesaren’talwaysreceptivetoussayingso

®  Bealwayssituationallyaware.Evenifyoumakejudgmentsdon’talwayscallthemthat.

20©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 11: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

11

®  “Ihavebeenretainedby…“®  “Ihavebeenaskedtoexpressopinions…on(a)basedon…;(b)basedon…;(c)basedon….“

®  Providefullc.v.asappendix;includefactspertinenttocaseinbodyofreport

®  “InformingmyopinionsIreliedprimarilyon…”®  “Itismyopinion,basedon…,that<claims>,<statements>,<conclusions>,<analysis>,<conclusions>…areincorrect”

21©2018J.V.R.Paiva

®  “Iwillfurtherdemonstratethat…is/areactually…,leadingtotheconclusionthatX’sclaimsareincorrect/premature/flawed/incomplete/inconsequential…”

®  Include“Iampreparedtotestifyastothesematters…”

®  Whendescribinganalysisandconclusions,explaineverywordorphrasethatisnotinthecommonU.S.Englishvernacular

22©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 12: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

12

®  Whenexplainingtermsquotefromwell-acceptedreferences(learnhowtoattributetobooks,articles,internetpages,speeches,interviews,catalogs,etc.)

®  Particularlypayattentiontothelawyer’sstandardstyleofformalwriting

®  Illustrateprofuselywithdiagrams,blowups,photographs,cartoons,similarsituations

®  Explainpurposeofeachcalculationandadjustment®  Indicatehowyourequipmentwasused,checkedandcalibratedoradjusted

23©2018J.V.R.Paiva

®  Quotefreelyfromtheappropriatedictionarytoexplainnon-standardandstandardwordsusedbyyouandothers

®  Donotbeshy®  Ifadetailbyoppositeexpertsisnotproperlydocumentedorexplained,attheveryleastsaythat“…Y’smethodissilentonthesubjectof…,andthusthereliabilityofhis/heropinionissuspect.”

24©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 13: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

13

®  SteveKenney&JohnBorking,TheValueofPrivacyEngineering,2002(1)J.Info.L.&Tech.,https://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/2002_1/kenny.

®  AmericanBarAssociation,SectiononLegalEducationandAdmissionstotheBar,Statistics,http://www.americanbar.org/groups/legal_education/resources/statistics.html(lastvisitedDec.14,2017).

©2018J.V.R.Paiva 25

®  HenryJulianAbraham,Justices,Presidents,andSenators290-95(5thed.2008).

®  WayneR.LaFave&AustinW.Scott,CriminalLaw§5.4(2ded.1986).

©2018J.V.R.Paiva 26

Page 14: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

14

®  Fullydocumentallsiteconditionsincludingweather(sky,temp,barometricpressure,humidity,precipitation)atvariouspartsoftheday

®  Rememberthatyouarediscussingfacts;ifyougethypothetical,beveryclearthatyouareanalyzingandopiningonahypotheticalsituation

®  Recordandreportotherenvironmentalandsitedata;e.g.trainsgobythissite…thescheduleis…

27©2018J.V.R.Paiva

®  Thejudge,jury,ifthere’sone,lawyers,arealllaypeoplewhenitcomestosurveying,ifyouarenotsurehe/she/theyunderstandit,breakitdownforthem…explainit.

®  Usetextbooklanguage;avoidcommoninformalterms(gun,pin,peg,stake,PK,MH,CL,FL,etc.)

®  Donottrytobeeconomicalwithtimeorspaceonpaperorexhibits…gettingyourpointacrossisprime!

28©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 15: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

15

®  Havesomeonewithaneditor’seyereadandedityourwrittenstatements

®  Sometimeseditorsspecializeindifferenttypesofservices(readabilityvs.copyediting),soselectcarefullyandknowingly

®  Brevityisnotadesirableattributewhenimportantinformationisleftout…justdon’tmakeitsocomplicatedtheydon’tunderstand!

29©2018J.V.R.Paiva

®  Detailedrecordsofwhodidwhat®  Onlykeepwhatispertinenttowhatyoudid®  Alwaysreviewformaterialthatcanbemisinterpreted

®  Learntoexamineyourdocumentationandotherworkasifbeingcross-examined

®  Especiallydocumentqualityassurancetechniques(field,officeandelsewhere)

30©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 16: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

16

Tape Length 0.01 Temperature 15o F Tension (pull) 5.4 lbs Sag 7.5” at center Alignment 1.4 ft at one end or 7.5” at center Tape Not Level 1.4 ft diff in elevation Plumbing 0.01 Marking 0.01 Interpolation 0.01

31©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Source Error (ft.) Error2 Tape Length Known 0.000000 Temp (10o F error) 0.006 0.000036 Tension (5 lb error) 0.009 0.000081 Alignment (0.05 ft) 0.000 0.000000 Tape Not Level (0.5 ft) 0.001 0.000001 Plumbing 0.005 0.000025 Marking 0.001 0.000001 Interpolation 0.001 0.000001 SUM 0.023 0.000145

Sq Rt of Sum of Errors2 = 0.012 ft

1: 8,000 OR 120 PPM 32

©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 17: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

17

Source Error (ft.) Error2 Length Known 0.000000 Temp (10o F error) 5 PPM = 0.0005 0.00000025 Pressure (1” Hg) 5 PPM = 0.0005 0.00000025 Centering with pole 0.03 0.0009 Centering w/O.P. 0.005 0.000025 Mfr’s error constant 0.003 0.000009 Mfr’s error scale 3 PPM = 0.0003 0.00000009 SUM 0.0393 0.000093459

Sq Rt of Sum of Errors2 = 0.0306 ft

1: 3,000 OR 306 PPM 33©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Source Error (ft.) Error2 Length Known 0.000000 Temp (10o F error) 5 PPM = 0.025 0.000625 Pressure (1” Hg) 5 PPM = 0.025 0.000625 Centering w/O.P. 0.005 0.000025 Centering w/O.P. 0.005 0.000025 Mfr’s error constant 0.003 0.000009 Mfr’s error scale 3 PPM = 0.015 0.000225 SUM 0.078 0.001534

Sq Rt of Sum of Errors2 = 0.03917 ft

1: 127,000 OR 8 PPM 34©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 18: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

18

Source Error (ft.) Error2 Length Known 0.000000 Tropospheric delays 0.0025 m = 0.008 ft 0.000067 Centering w/O.P. 0.005 0.000025 Centering w/O.P. 0.005 0.000025 Mfr’s error constant 0.01 m = 0.03281 0.001076 Mfr’s error scale 2 PPM = 0.005 0.000025 SUM 0.05581 0.001218

Sq Rt of Errors2 = 0.0349 ft

1:72,000 OR 14 PPM

35©2018J.V.R.Paiva

36©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 19: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

19

®  Fromthebeginning,ifwarranted,thesurveyormuststressthathisorheropinionontheessentialfactsmaycausethecasetocollapse

®  Theclientmustbeprepared;ifanattorney,theyshouldunderstand

®  Thisrequiresahighstandardofcommunicationfromthesurveyor—fortransmittinginformation,andforreceivingit

37©2018J.V.R.Paiva

®  Ateverystepoftheway,thesurveyormustbeevaluatingtheclient’slikelihoodforsuccess

®  Factsandopinionsadversetotheclient’scasemustbecommunicated,assoonaspracticable,withfulldisclosure

®  Surveyormustbeinapositionofcompetenceandstatustoinfluencedecisions,includingwhethertocontinueprosecutionofthecase

38©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 20: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

20

®  Easytoviolatesimplybybeingcareless®  Justdon’ttalkaboutthecaseuntilcompletelyconcluded

39©2018J.V.R.Paiva

®  Self-assess®  Askthirdparties®  Findyourstrengthsandweaknesses®  Workonhowtoneutralizetheweaknesses

40©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 21: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

21

®  Booksandarticlesonevidence,especiallyiftheyrelatetotechnicalissues

®  Storiesaboutsurveyor’sexperiencesasexpertwitnesses

®  SurveyingtheCourtroom,JohnBriscoe®  TheExpertWitnessHandbook,DanPoynter

41©2018J.V.R.Paiva

©2018J.V.R.Paiva 42

Page 22: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

22

®  Anexpertwitnessisconsideredespeciallylearned

®  Butanyprofessionalwhoisofalearnedprofession,assurveyingis,issupposedtoatleastbe“ordinarily”learned

®  Havinganextensivelibraryandbeingwellreadonscienceandliteratureofthepast,presentandcuttingedgeisallrequiredtobeproperlysuccessful

43©2018J.V.R.Paiva

®  Ifyouareweakinthisarea,developgoodwritinghabitsonyourown,throughcourses,etc.

®  Readgoodliterature®  Havegoodreferencesonhowtowrite,howtocite,etc.

®  Technicalwritingisdifferentfromliterarywriting.Butknowledgeofonegreatlyimprovesone’schancesatdoingwellattheother.

44©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 23: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

23

®  Talktolawyers,othersurveyors,evenifyouarenotinvolvedinalawsuit

®  Donotacceptasingleopinionor“fact”asrepresentingthetruthaboutwhatyouwillencounter

®  Developyourownskillsforassessingsituations,understandingambiguitiesandarrivingatconclusions

®  Don’thesitatetoaskforadvicefrom,orhiresomeone,toadvisewhohasmoreexperience

45©2018J.V.R.Paiva

®  Self-evaluatehow…®  Youcommunicateideas®  Explaintechnicalthingstonon-technicalpeople®  Simplify,useanalogies,toincreaseclarity,butnotleaveoutimportantinformation

46©2018J.V.R.Paiva

Page 24: NSAPLS Joseph V.R. Paiva · 2018-04-03 · 1 Joseph V.R. Paiva NSAPLS January 2018 ® Courts, legal profession, deal with ambiguities ® Both sides have facts; which side prevails?

24

47©2018J.V.R.Paiva

48

?©2018J.V.R.Paiva