Upload
fynn
View
31
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
NRL's coupled ice-ocean forecast system: Current capabilities and future plans. Robert C. Rhodes, Ruth H. Preller, Pamela G. Posey, Alan J. Wallcraft, E. Joseph Metzger and Lucy F. Smedstad Naval Research Laborary Stennis Space Center, MS 39529 [email protected] - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
NRL's coupled ice-ocean forecast system: Current capabilities and future plans
Robert C. Rhodes, Ruth H. Preller, Pamela G. Posey, Alan J. Wallcraft, E. Joseph Metzger
and Lucy F. Smedstad
Naval Research Laborary Stennis Space Center, MS 39529
2005 Layered Ocean Model Workshop
Jan 26- 28, 2005
University of Miami/RSMAS
6.2 ONR CICE Validation for PIPS upgrade
PIPS 2.0 Upgrades
Operational Systems at NAVO
PIPS 3.0 in NCOM
PIPS 3.0 in HYCOM
6.4 SPAWAR CICE/NCOM/HYCOM Coupling
6.2 NOPP HYCOM GODAE CICE/HYCOM Coupling
Polar Ice Prediction System – 2.0
Currently run at NAVO on the SV1 clusters Using 4 CPU’s, 40 MW memory and takes~ 9 minutes per day.
Grid resolution (~27 km, 15 vertical levels)Hibler Ice Model / Bryan-Cox Ocean Model
Daily 5 day forecast
Daily products sent to National Ice Center:1. Ice Thickness 2. Ice Concentration3. Ice Displacement
PIPS2.0 uses 3 hourly NOGAPS 0.50 forcing
PIPS 2.0
PIPS2.0 Operational Products for June 2, 2004
Ice Thickness (m)Ice Concentration (%)
Ice Displacement (km/day)
Hibler Ice Model
Cox Ocean Model
Atmospheric ForcingNOGAPS
Polar Ice Prediction System 2.0
Model Output Ice Drift Ice Thickness Ice Concentration Ice conv/div Ocean Currents Ocean Temps Ocean Salinity
Forecast Restart(ice-ocean)
orOcean Analysis/
SSMI Ice Concentration
24-hour Forecastfor Ice-Ocean
Restart
Global NCOMModel
CICE Model
Polar Ice Prediction System 3.0
CICE – LANL Sea Ice Model
• EVP (efficient, improved response to forcing)• Energy conserving Bitz and Lipscomb (1999)
thermodynamics• Multi-category, linearly remapped ice thickness• Energy-based ice ridging• Other improvements to physics parameterizations• Improves the capability to predict areas of lead
opening/closing for the warfighter, ice edge location, ice thickness and ice drift.
• Mainly tested on O3K (ERDC)
PIPS 3.0 Grid
~ 9 km resolution
CICE has 5 ice thickness categories (meters):
Category 1 0.000 – 0.644Category 2 0.645 – 1.391Category 3 1.392 – 2.470Category 4 2.471 – 4.567Category 5 4.568 – 9.333
March
March
Global Modeling, Balancing Resources and Capabilities
NRL Layered Ocean Model (NLOM)1/16°, 6 vertical layers, restricted to depths >200m
Global Navy Coastal Ocean Model (NCOM)1/8°, 40 vertical layers
Global NRL Layered Ocean Model (NLOM)1/32°, 6 vertical layers, restricted to depths >200m
Global Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) 1/12°, 40 vertical coordinates
Ope
ratio
nal
FY
08O
pera
tiona
lT
rans
ition
Tra
nsiti
on
Lin
ked
41 sigma-z levels in the vertical
20 sigma/1m deep-water upper level thickness
• Depth of sigma-Z interface is 139 m
assimilation of SST, SSS, 3-d T&S from MODAS using 1/16° NLOM SSH
NOGAPS wind stress, radiation, heat flux
generic grid extraction capability
1/8° Global Navy Coastal Ocean Model (NCOM)
The figures at left indicate the sigma-z vertical coordinate in NCOM: - sigma levels over z levels
The global NCOM grid produces a global overlap by transforming the northern hemisphere around poles over land in Canada and Russia. The 1/8° grid resolution refers to an average midlatitude spacing of the 2048x1280 grid.
Global NCOM coupling with CICE
• NCOM Arctic resolution ~10 km however bi-polar grid causes aspect ratios over arctic to be not optimal to run CICE on NCOM grid
• CICE will run on PIPS grid which will ease transition to PIPS 3.0 for operations
• Coupling will be done as separate runs with coupling at the file level possibly with PIPS 3.0 running during the 12Z watch
• Sensitivity runs currently underway for validation • Scheduled for transition to NAVOCEANO in
early FY06
Arctic Grid Resolution for PIPS 3.0 Grid
Grid Resolution (DX) Grid Resolution (DY)
Grid Aspect Ratio DX/DY
Arctic Grid Resolution for Global NCOM Grid
Grid Resolution (DX) Grid Resolution (DY)
Grid Aspect Ratio DX/DY
Global HYCOM coupling with CICE
• CICE will run on HYCOM grid which will ease coupling between ocean and ice models
• Sensitivity runs are currently underway for validation at coarser resolution (~35 km)
• Coupling will be done in fully-coupled mode using ESMF (coordinated with BEI institute)
• HYCOM Arctic grid resolution ~3.5 km (for 1/12 degree global HYCOM planned for FY07 transition to NAVOCEANO)
Arctic Grid Resolution for Global HYCOM 0.720 Grid
Grid Resolution (DX) Grid Resolution (DY)
Grid Aspect Ratio DX/DY
Grid Resolution (DX) Grid Resolution (DY)
Grid Aspect Ratio DX/DY
Arctic Grid Resolution for Global HYCOM .080 Grid
Ice Concentration – Mean Error0.72° Arctic Cap HYCOM vs. NOAA OI SST v2
Energy-loan ice model1999 20012000
HYCOM with 1999-2003 6 hourly FNMOC NOGAPS wind and thermal forcing
CICE/HYCOM grid ~35 km CICE/PIPS3 grid ~9 km
Ice concentration (%)
Ice thickness (m)
Jan 1999
Jan 1999
Ice Assimilation• PIPS 2.0 currently assimilates SSMI ice concentration
using non-optimal scheme• Navy also performs daily ice OI analysis for both poles
using NCODA system (assimilates SSMI ice concentration)
• Plan for PIPS 3.0 (CICE/NCOM) will initially emulate PIPS 2.0 assimilation
• Upgrades will include cycling PIPS 3.0 / NCODA system for HYCOM (will include both poles)
• Navy currently planning for NPOESS which will include additional ice parameters (ice age, sea ice temperature) for assimilation
The End