NOTICE OF MEETING · Agenda Items 5. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES Ordinary Meeting of 20/02/18 9. NOTICES OF MOTION/NOTICES OF RESCISSION Notice of Rescission A 10. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT

NOTICE OF MEETING

1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY

2. OPENING PRAYER

3. LEAVE OF ABSENCE/APOLOGIES

4. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS

5. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

6. DEPUTATIONS

7. MAYORAL MINUTE

8. STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS

9. NOTICES OF MOTION/NOTICES OF RESCISSION

10. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT & SUPPLEMENTARY MATTERS

11.1 DIRECTOR CORPORATE SERVICES REPORT & SUPPLEMENTARY MATTERS

11.2 DIRECTOR ENGINEERING REPORT & SUPPLEMENTARY MATTERS

11.3 DIRECTOR PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REPORT & SUPPLEMENTARY MATTERS

12. QUESTIONS ON NOTICE

13. CORRESPONDENCE REPORT

14. SUNDRY DELEGATES REPORT

15. BIRTHS AND CONDOLENCES

Page - 2

Agenda - Ordinary Meeting of Council - March 2018

16. CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS

Section 10A (1) of the Local Government Act 1993 (the 'Act') provides as follows:

A council or a committee of the council of which all the members are councillors, may close to the public so much of its meeting as comprises:

(a)the discussion of any of the matters listed in subclause (2), or

(b) the receipt or discussion of any of the information so listed.

In accordance with the Act and the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, in the opinion of the General Manager, the business contained in the Confidential Reports listed in this Agenda is of a kind as referred to in Section 10A (2) of the Act and should be dealt with in a part of the meeting closed to the public.

On balance, the public interest in protecting confidential information outweighs the public interest in ensuring accountability through open meetings.

16.3 DIRECTOR ENGINEERING CONFIDENTIAL REPORT & SUPPLEMENTARY MATTERS

16.4 DIRECTOR PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONFIDENTIAL REPORT & SUPPLEMENTARY MATTERS

17. NOTICE OF URGENT BUSINESS

18. CLOSE OF MEETING

Page - 3


Agenda Items5. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES Ordinary Meeting of 20/02/18

9. NOTICES OF MOTION/NOTICES OF RESCISSION Notice of Rescission A

10. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT & SUPPLEMENTARY MATTERS CLAUSE 1. Murray River Council - Draft Community Strategic Plan 2018-2028

CLAUSE 2. Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission

CLAUSE 3. Requests for Sponsorship - C4EM

CLAUSE 4. Murray River Council Internal Audit Committee

CLAUSE 5. 2018 ANZAC Day Services

CLAUSE 6. Request for Sponsorship - 2018 NAIDOC Week School Initiatives

11.1 DIRECTOR CORPORATE SERVICES REPORT & SUPPLEMENTARY MATTERS CLAUSE 1. Financial Statements and Investments - 28 February 2018

CLAUSE 2. Annual Financial Statements - 30 June 2017

CLAUSE 3. Murray River Council 2018/2019 Budget

CLAUSE 4. Information Technology - Fibre Optic

CLAUSE 5. Sponsorship Request - Echuca & District Poultry Club

CLAUSE 6. Sponsorship Request - Border Tall & All Game Group

CLAUSE 7. Sponsorship Request - Moama Local Aboriginal Land Council

CLAUSE 8. Sponsorship Request - Moama Public School

CLAUSE 9. Sponsorship Request - Good Friday Appeal Twilight Market Fundraiser

CLAUSE 10. S355 Committee Dollar-for-Dollar Grant - Barham Recreation Reserve Committee

CLAUSE 11. Information Technology - Council Meeting Agendas

CLAUSE 12. Sponsorship Request - Mathoura Events Committee

CLAUSE 13. Discharge of Mortgage - Lot 8, DP1012116

11.2 DIRECTOR ENGINEERING REPORT & SUPPLEMENTARY MATTERS CLAUSE 1. Capital Works Progress Report

CLAUSE 2. Moama Mid West Drainage Investigation

CLAUSE 3. Development Engineer - Budget Allocation

CLAUSE 4. Barham Filtered and Raw Water Reservoir Repainting

CLAUSE 5. Echuca Moama Torrumbarry Flood Study Reference Committee - Appointment of Second Councillor Delegate

Page - 4


CLAUSE 6. Moulamein Floodplain Risk Management Committee

CLAUSE 7. Barham Floodplain Risk Management Committee

CLAUSE 8. Council Contributions to Projects Funded under NSW Floodplain Management Program

11.3 DIRECTOR PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REPORT & SUPPLEMENTARY MATTERS CLAUSE 1. Environmental Services Report

CLAUSE 2. Fruit Fly

CLAUSE 3. Changes to Crown Reserve Management under the Crown Land Management Act 2016

CLAUSE 4. Changes to the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016

CLAUSE 5. Amendment to Murray LEP - Additional Permitted Use Schedule 1 - Lot 261 DP 728943, Perricoota Road, Moama

CLAUSE 6. Changes to the Wakool Development Control Plan 2013. Clause A.4.5 River Structures and Boating Facilities

CLAUSE 7. Moama Markets Lease

CLAUSE 8. Temporary Minor Events - Riverside Park Barham, Barham Boardwalk & Barham Reception Centre

13. CORRESPONDENCE REPORT Correspondence Report

14. SUNDRY DELEGATES REPORT Mayor, Councillor CR Bilkey

Deputy Mayor, Councillor GS Campbell

Councillor A Aquino

Councillor NF Cohen

Councillor A Crowe

Councillor NH Gorey

Councillor AM Mathers

Councillor TE Weyrich

Councillor GW Wise

16.3 DIRECTOR ENGINEERING CONFIDENTIAL REPORT & SUPPLEMENTARY MATTERS CLAUSE 1. Picnic Point Caravan Park - Renovation of Manager's Residence and Kiosk

16.4 DIRECTOR PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONFIDENTIAL REPORT & SUPPLEMENTARY MATTERS

CLAUSE 1. Water and Sewage Treatment Plant - Deep Creek, Lot 13 and 40 in Neighbourhood Plan 285882

Page - 5


Ordinary Meeting of 20/02/18

REPORT PREPARED BY:

MANAGER OFFICE OF THE GENERAL MANAGER - Kerri Keogh

RECOMMENDATION:

That the minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of Murray River Council held on 20 February 2018 be confirmed as a true and correct record.

BACKGROUND:

Murray River Council held its Ordinary Meeting of Council on Tuesday 20 February 2018, commencing at 1:00pm in the Meeting Room (Ground Floor), Moama Sports Club, Perricoota Road, Moama.

A copy of the draft minutes are attached for ratification by the Council at this meeting.

Attachment

# Attachment Type

1 MINUTES ORDINARY 200218draft PDF File

Page - 6


Notice of Rescission A

REPORT PREPARED BY:


RECOMMENDATION:

RECOMMENDED that Council rescind motion number 180218 as adopted at the Ordinary Meeting of Murray River Council of 20 February 2018 (per Director Corporate Services Report, Clause 4), as follows:

RESOLVED (Crs AM Mathers/GW Wise) that the Council provide rates relief for the property at 2/15 Mellool Street, Barham, by providing a contribution equal to the general, water and sewerage annual charges, subject to confirmation of the not for profit status of the organisation and meeting the advertising requirements of s356 of the Local Govenrment Act 1993.

FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Murray River Council provide no rates relief, which includes the general, water and sewerage annual charges, for the property at 2/15 Mellool Street, Barham.

BACKGROUND:

Councillors GS Campbell, TE Weyrich and A Aquino move to rescind motion number 180218 of 20 FEBRUARY 2018 (Director Corporate Services Report, Clause 4), ORDINARY MEETING of MURRAY RIVER COUNCIL, which reads:

RESOLVED (Crs AM Mathers/GW Wise) that the Council provide rates relief for the property at 2/15 Mellool Street, Barham, by providing a contribution equal to the general, water and sewerage annual charges, subject to confirmation of the not for profit status of the organisation and meeting the advertising requirements of s356 of the Local Government Act 1993.

And propose to move the following:

That Murray River Council provide no rates relief, which includes the general, water and sewerage annual charges, for the property at 2/15 Mellool Street, Barham.

The Notice of Rescission is attached.

Attachment

# Attachment Type

1 RESCISSION MOTION A 200318 SIGNED PDF File

Page - 7


CLAUSE 1. Murray River Council - Draft Community Strategic Plan 2018-2028

REPORT GROUPaaaaGENERAL MANAGERaaaaREPORT PREPARED BY

GENERAL MANAGER - Des Bilske

RECOMMENDATIONaaaa

1. That Council adopt the Draft Murray River Council Community Strategic Plan 2018-2028 and that same be placed on public exhibition for a period of 28 days to allow for public comments/submissions.

2. That all comments/submissions received to the Draft Murray River Council Community Strategic Plan 2018-2028 be considered, and subsequently adopted, at the next scheduled meeting of the Council following the close of the public exhibition period.

aaaaBACKGROUND

On 12 May 2016, the Premier of NSW, The Hon Mike Baird MP, made the Local Government (Council Amalgamations) Proclamation 2016 under the Local Government Act 1993, whereby Murray Shire Council and Wakool Shire Council were amalgamated to constitute the new area to be known as Murray River Council, effective immediately. An Administrator was appointed to oversee the implementation period of the new Council, up until the election of the new council in September 2017.

The Community Strategic Plan (CSP) represents the highest level of strategic planning undertaken by a local council. All other plans developed by the council as part of the Integrated Planning and Reporting (IP&R) framework must reflect and support the implementation of the CSP. The CSP should identify the main priorities and aspirations of the community, providing a clear set of strategies to achieve this vision of the future.

Since the amalgamation in May 2016, Murray River Council has undertaken appropriate prepatory work to ensure the newly elected Council could meet its statutory planning and reporting responsibilities under the IP&R framework and successfully complete the transition process.

In late 2016 and early 2017, The Regional Development Company (RDC) was appointed to undertake a community consultation process for the Murray River Council to develop the vision and mission, and to obtain input into the development of the Community Engagement Framework and the CSP.

Six consultation processes were used, including:

• Eight facilitated community consultation sessions were held between 13 February and 3 March 2017 (120 attendees);

• One facilitated meeting held with the Murray River Council Local Representation Committee (LRC);

• Staff consultation sessions (five focus groups, online survey and office based ‘graffiti walls’ for ideas);

• Community Advisory Committees of Council consultation sessions;• Seniors Week consultation (42 responses); and• Online and hard copy surveys (86 responses).

At each of the community consultation sessions, participants were asked about:

• preferences for the ways in which Council can best inform and consult;• what they would most like to see achieved by 2021; and• ideas/preferences for Council vision and purpose.

At the Staff consultation sessions and Community Advisory Committees of Council consultation sessions, participants were asked about:

Page - 8


• key issues, challenges, strengths, opportunities, risks, ideas and vision.

The online survey also covered:

• key issues, challenges, strengths, opportunities, risks, ideas and vision;• Murray River Council future direction; and• consultation and information preferences.

Over 300 people were involved in the extensive consultation, expressing their views and aspirations for the Murray River Council area. Further consultation developed the Vision for the community, and established the Mission Statement and expectations of Council, which was subsequently adopted at the Ordinary Meeting of Council of 16 May 2017; and developed the Council’s Community Engagement Framework, consisting of four documents, including the Community Engagement Strategy and Community Engagement Policy, which was subsequently adopted at the Extraordinary Meeting of Council of 29 June 2017.

Another round of consultation on the Draft CSP occurred during July 2017. The information from all community consultation sessions forms the basis of the current Draft CSP as it incorporates community feedback truly reflecting the community’s long-term goals.

DISCUSSION

A new Council, comprising of nine (9) elected Councillors, commenced their civic duty at the Ordinary Meeting of the Council on 26 September 2017.

The newly elected Council is responsible for commencing its first cycle of IP&R, including:

• Finalisation of the 2016/17 Annual Report (done);• Development of the Council’s first Community Strategic Plan (CSP) by 30 June 2018;• Adoption of the suite of IP&R documents (ie the CSP, Delivery Program, Operational Plan and

Resourcing Strategy) by 30 June 2018; and• Development of the Council’s first Long-Term Financial Plan (LTFP).

In mid-November 2017, the newly elected Council attended a workshop with the RDC whereby the Draft CSP was presented and finalised as the current Draft document (enclosed with the Business Paper).

The CSP – Our Region, Our Future – outlines the community’s aspiration and long-term vision of the communities of the Murray River Council. It is a 10-year plan based on extensive community consultation, and is effectively the ‘road map’ to guide shorter term planning, actions and investment. This CSP is a collaboration between community and Council, and the responsibility for shaping and meeting the desired outcomes between government agencies, community groups, and Council. Once adopted, the CSP will become the guiding document for the new Council.

There are four sections to the CSP:

1. How the Community Strategic Plan works;2. Who we are, our challenges and our aspirations;3. Our vision, goals and strategies;4. Keeping the Plan alive.

aaaaSTRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS

Murray River Council Operational Plan 2017/18:

Strategic Theme: Leadership and Governance

Strategy: Sound Governance and Advocacy

Activity: Develop and maintain a robust governance framework that ensures ethical and professional decision making

Page - 9




Activity: Provide accurate and timely strategic information, professional advice and support to ensure Councillors statutory and governance requirements are met


Strategy: Financial Sustainability

Activity: Provide Council with sound financial management and advice, in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act 1993, relevant Codes of Practice, Regulations and Australian Accounting Standards

BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS

Nil.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil.

LEGISLATIVE IMPLICATIONSaaaa• Local Government Act 1993• Local Government (General) Regulation 2005

aaaaRISK ANALYSIS

Nil.

CONCLUSION

The newly elected Council is responsible for commencing its first cycle of IP&R, including the development of the Council’s first Community Strategic Plan (CSP) by 30 June 2018; adoption of the suite of IP&R documents (ie the CSP, Delivery Program, Operational Plan and Resourcing Strategy) by 30 June 2018; and development of the Council’s first Long-Term Financial Plan (LTFP).

The Draft CSP – Our Region, Our Future – outlines the community’s aspiration and long-term vision of the communities of the Murray River Council. It is a 10-year plan based on extensive community consultation, and is effectively the ‘road map’ to guide shorter term planning, actions and investment. This CSP is a collaboration between community and Council, and the responsibility for shaping and meeting the desired outcomes between government agencies, community groups, and Council. Once adopted, the CSP will become the guiding document for the new Council.

Page - 10


CLAUSE 2. Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission



RECOMMENDATIONaaaa

1. That the Council consider the Terms of Reference for the Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission.

2. That the Council (or Councillors) make comments for inclusion in a detailed submission to the Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission to meet the close of submissions by 30 April 2018.

aaaaBACKGROUND

The Murray–Darling Basin is a complex, diverse and dynamic system. Its characteristics are constantly changing in response to the influences of people, the climate and the way water is used — for production, communities and the environment. The aim of the Basin Plan is to ensure that water is shared between all users, including the environment, in a sustainable way. It does this by managing the basin as one system. This will enable the river systems to continue to support communities and industries in the long term as they adapt to changes, including a changing climate. The Basin Plan legislation guides governments, regional authorities and communities to sustainably manage and use the waters of the Murray–Darling Basin. The Plan came into effect in November 2012, and it will be reviewed and revised throughout a seven year implementation phase.

The Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission was established by His Excellency the Honourable Hieu Van Le AC, Governor of South Australia on 23 January 2018. Bret Walker, SC, was appointed to lead the Commission.

The purpose of the Royal Commission is to investigate the operations and effectiveness of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan.

Terms of Reference were established for the Commission.

Individuals or groups with information related to the Terms of Reference are invited to make a submission to the Commission.

As well as taking public submissions, the Commission will stage regional consultations across the Basin to hear from communities. Public hearings will also be conducted, with a schedule to be posted on the website https://www.mdbrc.sa.gov.au.

DISCUSSION

Submissions are invited for the Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission until close of business on 30 April 2018.

Make a Submission: https://www.mdbrc.sa.gov.au/lodge-submission

It is suggested that Council prepare a detailed submission to the Royal Commission on this matter.

STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS


Strategic Theme: Natural Environment

Strategy: Emergency Management, Flood Mitigation and Noxious Weeds

Page - 11


https://www.mdbrc.sa.gov.au/terms-reference

https://www.mdbrc.sa.gov.au/

https://www.mdbrc.sa.gov.au/lodge-submission

Activity: Maintain an active and influential role in flood and river quality management within the Murray River Council area


Strategy: Environmental Protection and Enhancement – Murray River and National Parks

Activity: Meet community expectations and legislative requirements for environmental protection and enhancement, through the development and implementation of programs addressing the impacts of soil and water management, reserve planning and air, water and noise pollution


Strategy: Environmental Protection and Enhancement – Murray River and National Parks

Activity: Protect environmental values of the Murray River and its environs


Nil.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil.

LEGISLATIVE IMPLICATIONS

Nil.

RISK ANALYSIS

Nil.

CONCLUSION

The Murray-Darling Basin Plan ensures that water is shared between all users, including the environment, in a sustainable way. The Basin Plan legislation guides governments, regional authorities and communities to sustainably manage and use the waters of the Murray–Darling Basin. The Plan came into effect in November 2012.

The Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission was established on 23 January 2018 to investigate the operations and effectiveness of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan. It is suggested that the Council, or a group of Councillors, have a special meeting to prepare information for a Council submission to the Royal Commission by 30 April 2018.

Page - 12


CLAUSE 3. Requests for Sponsorship - C4EM



RECOMMENDATIONaaaa

1. That Council supports C4EM with sponsorship in the amount of $500 for the C4EM and Central Victorian Agribusiness Forum Horizon360 Agribusiness Conference to be held on 23 March 2018 in Moama.

2. That Council supports C4EM with sponsorship in the amount of $500 for the Echuca Moama Biz Hub Pilot Program being held in March, April and May 2018 at the BendigoTAFE Echuca Campus.

aaaaBACKGROUND

Council has received two requests from C4EM (Committee for Echuca Moama) seeking Council’s support for the following two events:

• C4EM and Central Victorian Agribusiness Forum Horizon360 Agribusiness Conference to be held on 23 March 2018 in Moama; and

• Echuca Moama Biz Hub Pilot Program being held in March, April and May 2018 at the BendigoTAFE Echuca Campus.

As Council has previously provided support to this organisation for similar activities and a decision needed to be made to ensure inclusion in advertising material, the General Manager has committed an amount of $500 to each Program.

Formed in July 2011, C4EM is a member-based, self-funding, independent and apolitical organisation that brings together the broad cross-section of the area's private, public and not-for profit organisations (across all sectors) to advocate for the issues and initiatives that will make Echuca Moama a better place to live, work and play. C4EM works with all levels of government, and develops partnerships with key stakeholder groups. Membership of C4EM means that local businesses, organisations and individuals can have a say in identifying and shaping the issues, projects and initiatives that are important to the future of Echuca Moama. C4EM's structure and purpose is based on the extremely successful 'Committee for' model in other cities and regional centres across Australia.

DISCUSSION

An outline of the two events, of which C4EM has sought Council’s financial support, are as follows:

Horizon 360 Agribusiness Conference – 23 March 2018, 8:30am – 3:30pm, Moama Bowling Club

• Event Scope: To explore the new horizon of agribusiness and how agribusiness success is all interconnected. It includes smart farming systems, product marketing and consumer expectations, education, PPP (paddock to plate to paddock), ag research and innovations, industry insights and updates.

• Acknowledgement of Council’s sponsorship includes promotion as co-sponsor for the event, two tickets to the VIP Dinner on 22 March and five tickets to the Day Conference on 23 March.

Echuca Moama Biz Hub Pilot Program – 9am–5pm Mon, Tues, Thurs & Fri from 1 March to 31 May 2018, BendigoTAFE Echuca Campus

• Event Scope: Free hot-desk office space for satellite-workers, start-ups, entrepreneurs, working-from-home professionals and transitioning students.

• Acknowledgement of Council’s sponsorship includes promotion as co-sponsor of the program.

Page - 13




Strategic Theme: Economic Growth

Strategy: Event Attraction/Tourism Promotion

Activity: Establish Murray River Council as a major venue for local, state and national events, including conferences


Strategy: Event Attraction/Tourism Promotion

Activity: Support tourism partnerships with industry, funding bodies and stakeholders


Strategy: Business development – a stronger and more diverse local economy

Activity: Identify and develop partnerships with business service providers and state government agencies


Strategy: Community Partnership

Activity: Promote community awareness of Council activities


The $500 Sponsorship for each of the abovementioned events is to come from the Council’s Promotion vote.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

This request is minor and could be covered by delegations if the Council had a comprehensive Community Assistance Grants Policy. This policy will be developed in the coming months and tied in with Economic Development.


Nil.

RISK ANALYSIS

Nil.

CONCLUSION

Council has received two requests from C4EM (Committee for Echuca Moama) seeking Council’s support for the C4EM and Central Victorian Agribusiness Forum Horizon360 Agribusiness Conference to be held on 23 March 2018 in Moama; and Echuca Moama Biz Hub Pilot Program being held in March, April and May 2018 at the BendigoTAFE Echuca Campus. It is appropriate for Council to support these two events, as they provide benefits in the areas of business support, social and economic activity in our community.

Page - 14


CLAUSE 4. Murray River Council Internal Audit Committee


ACTING DIRECTOR CORPORATE SERVICES - Phil Higgins

RECOMMENDATIONaaaa

1. That the Council appoint the Chairperson and two independent members to the Murray River Council Internal Audit Committee;

2. That the Council establish the remuneration fee for the Independent Chairperson of the Audit Committee at $1,500 per meeting, which includes reading and preparation time;

3. That the Council establish the remuneration fee for the Independent Members of the Audit Committee at $1,000 per meeting, which includes reading and preparation time;

4. That the location of the Internal Audit Committee meetings be in Moama; and5. That the Internal Audit Committee meet on a quarterly basis.

aaaaBACKGROUND

The closing date for applications for the position of Independent Chairperson and two Independent Members of the Council’s Internal Audit Committee closed on 23 February 2018.

The committee to review the applications will meet on Thursday 15 March 2018. The committee comprises the Mayor, the two Council representatives on the committee, being Cr Campbell and Cr Crowe, the General Manager and Acting Director Corporate Services.

It is intended to place a recommendation to this meeting on the appointments. This may mean that Council may have to go into committee to discuss the issue.

In addition to the appointment, the Council should establish remuneration fees for the Independent Chairperson and the Independent Committee Members.

The current Guidelines on the Office Local Government (OLG) website date back to 2010. Advice from OLG is that they are revising the guidelines and are suggesting that the sitting fees for the audit committee be aligned to the public sector rates. This will come up for discussion when the issues papers are released.

Contact with a neighbouring council has been made and it is suggested that a sitting fee for the Chairperson be $1,500 per meeting and the fee for the Independent members be $1,000 per meeting. This cost includes reading and preparation costs.

Council should also establish a meeting schedule and the location of the meetings for the committee. It is suggested that the committee meet quarterly and that the location be in Moama. The committee may need to alter this program to tie in with the completion of key information, such as the completion of the Annual Financial Statements.

DISCUSSION

As above.


Leadership and Governance – Sound Governance and Advocacy – Develop and maintain a robust governance framework.


Page - 15


The above figures would equate to $14,000 from the Internal Audit budget.of $44,648. The additional cost would need to be allocated to the Internal Auditor to undertake audits. There would also be costs associated with running the committee.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

N/A

LEGISLATIVE IMPLICATIONSaaaa• Section 355 of the Local Government Act 1993• Clauses 260 and 261 of the Local Government Regulations

aaaaRISK ANALYSIS

The Internal Audit Committee is a risk control measure to reduce risks.

CONCLUSION

The appointment of the committee members will allow the Internal Audit Committee to commence operations and improve the Council’s Governance framework.

Page - 16


CLAUSE 5. 2018 ANZAC Day Services



RECOMMENDATION

That the Mayor, or his representative, attends the ANZAC Day Services in the towns of Barham/Koondrook, Mathoura, Moama, Moulamein, Piangil/Tooleybuc and Wakool on Wednesday 25 April 2018, and lay a wreath on behalf of the Murray River Council community.

BACKGROUND

Anzac Day, 25 April, is one of Australia’s most important national occasions. It marks the anniversary of the first major military action fought by Australian and New Zealand forces during the First World War. Australians recognise 25 April as a day of national remembrance, which takes two forms. Commemorative services are held across the nation at dawn – the time of the original landing, while later in the day, former servicemen and servicewomen meet to take part in marches through the country’s major cities and in many smaller centres. Commemorative ceremonies are more formal, and are held at war memorials around the country. In these ways, Anzac Day is a time at which Australians reflect on the many different meanings of war.

It has been common practice for a Council representative, namely the Mayor and Councillors, to attend each of the local ANZAC Day Services within the Council area and lay a wreath on behalf of the Murray River Council community in memory of returned and fallen servicemen and servicewomen.

DISCUSSION

ANZAC Day falls on Wednesday 25 April this year. The following services will be held within the Murray River Council area:

BARHAM (organised by Barham RSL Sub Branch):

• Dawn Service (6AM) at Barham Cenotaph (Corner Murray & Noorong Streets), followed by a Breakfast at cluBarham

• 10:30AM Bus departs Barham Post Office to Koondrook RSL for short wreath laying ceremony followed by march to Barham Cenotaph

• Approx 11:30AM Commemorative Service* at Barham Cenotaph (Corner Murray & Noorong Streets)

MATHOURA (organised by Mathoura RSL Sub Branch):

• Dawn Service (6AM) at the Mathoura Cenotaph, Soldier’s Memorial Gardens• 11AM Commemorative Service* at Murray Shire Hall (Conargo Street) and afterwards a march to

the Soldiers Memorial Gardens for a further short wreath laying ceremony

MOAMA (organised by Moama RSL Sub Branch):

• Dawn Service (6AM) at Moama Cenotaph, Kerrabee Soundshell, followed by a Gunfire Breakfast at Moama RSL (6:20AM)

• 9AM Commemorative Service* at Moama Cenotaph, Kerrabee Soundshell

MOULAMEIN:

• Dawn Service (6:15AM) at The Triangle Park (Brougham Street)• 10:45AM March (assemble at Business Centre by 10.30am)

Page - 17


• 11AM Commemorative Service* at The Triangle Park (Brougham Street)

PIANGIL/TOOLEYBUC (organised by Piangil RSL Sub Branch):

• 9:30AM Commemorative Service* at Piangil Cenotaph, Memorial Park (Hall Street)

WAKOOL:

• 3:00PM March (Assemble at Wakool Memorial Hall)• 3:15PM Commemorative Service* at Wakool Cenotaph

*An invitation has been extended to the Mayor, or a representative, to attend this service and lay a wreath on behalf of the citizens of Murray River Council.

As was the custom of the former Wakool Shire Council, Council will be donating books relating to the war/ANZAC Day to all school libraries in the new Council area.




Strategy: Community Partnership

Activity: Promote community awareness of Council activities



Activity: Ensure Councillors are supported in their role as civic leaders


The Moama RSL Sub-Branch has requested Council to supply access to power and seating for 200 for the ANZAC Day Service at the at the Moama Cenotaph.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil.


Nil.

RISK ANALYSIS

Nil.

CONCLUSION

ANZAC Day falls on Wednesday 25 April this year. There are a number of Dawn and Commemorative Services being held throughout the Murray River Council area. The Mayor, or a representative, have been invited to attend Commemoration Services and lay a wreath on behalf of the citizens of Murray River Council.

Page - 18


CLAUSE 6. Request for Sponsorship - 2018 NAIDOC Week School Initiatives


ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICER - Beck Hayward

RECOMMENDATION

That Council supports the 2018 NAIDOC Week School Initiatives with a $450 contribution based on the sponsorship proposal, as attached to the report.

BACKGROUND

Koori Kids is a community organisation that engages young people in a range of school initiatives to promote education and awareness of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture.

As part of National NAIDOC Week celebrations Koori Kids coordinates, with the support of various government departments and local councils an educational component to provide a link of cultural diversity to kids, with the NAIDOC Week School Initiative Competitions. These competitions have been a successful part of NAIDOC Week and to date have seen over 2,224,910 entries, in the sections of colouring-in, short story, creative writing and essay writing.

Koori Kids is seeking a contribution of $450 from Council, to help cover the printing and distribution costs of the entry forms for the 2018 initiative. This initiative was supported by Murray River Council last year and by the former Murray and Wakool Shires in the previous years. In 2016 there were 882 entries submitted from seven participating schools within the Murray River Council LGA.

Council will be acknowledged through logo inclusion as an associate partner on information packs sent to schools throughout councils LGA. If there is a winner from a school within the council LGA, a representative will be invited to attend the school, along with the Executive Director of NAIDOC Week Initiatives, Director Social Wellbeing and other dignitaries to make a special presentation of the NAIDOC Medal of Excellence and the student's prize. Media release for the winning school will be prepared in consultation with council's media officer. Council is also forwarded a final report and a special NAIDOC plaque.

DISCUSSION

N/A


N/A


The $450 sponsorship is to come from the Council Promotion vote.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

N/A


N/A

RISK ANALYSIS

N/A

Page - 19


CONCLUSION

It is appropriate for Council to support this initiative, as it provides students in the Murray River Council with an educational component to NAIDOC Week and Indigenous culture and heritage.

Attachment

# Attachment Type

1 AAA NAIDOC School Initiatives Proposal 2018 - NSW 1 PDF File

2 NAIDOC Week School Initiative s 2018 Entry Forms - NSW PDF File

3 Murray River

Page - 20


CLAUSE 1. Financial Statements and Investments - 28 February 2018

REPORT GROUPaaaaDIRECTOR CORPORATE SERVICESaaaaREPORT PREPARED BY

MANAGER FINANCE - Anwarul Abedin

RECOMMENDATIONaaaa

1. That the report detailing Council’s cashbook balance of $57,506,574.67 as at 28 February 2018 is received by the Council.

2. That the report detailing Council’s investment balance of $54,483,391.69 as at 28 February 2018 is received by the Council.

aaaaBACKGROUND

Page - 21


Page - 22


Page - 23


DISCUSSION

Council needs to note that this month’s review has adjusted last month’s figures as the Cash Book Balance in the previous two months accounts were overstated.

Council needs to note that the Moulamein Retirement Fund account shows a balance due to Council of $225,912.93.


Leadership and Governance – Financial Sustainability – provide Council with sound financial management.


Current low interest rates may reduce the expected interest revenue.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Investments have been made in accordance with the Murray River Council Investment Policy (POL203), which was adopted by the Council on 17 October 2017.

Page - 24


LEGISLATIVE IMPLICATIONSaaaa• Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993• Regulation 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulations 2005• Trustees Act 1925 Section 14

aaaaRISK ANALYSIS

Under the Council’s Investment Policy (POL203), investments are made with a range of banks or financial institutions, with Council’s funds invested with a single institution have not gone above the maximum amount as specified in the Policy.

CONCLUSION

Murray River Council’s liquidity is in a satisfactory position as at 28 February 2018.

Page - 25


CLAUSE 2. Annual Financial Statements - 30 June 2017



RECOMMENDATION

That the information be received and noted by the Council.

BACKGROUND

The Council’s Annual Financial Statements to 30 June 2017 have been completed and sent to the Office of Local Government (OLG) on 23 February 2018, as per the approved extension by the OLG.

The Statements are on public exhibition until 27 March 2018. Any submissions received will be considered by the Council and the Audit Office, after 27 March 2018.

An invitation to address the Council has been given to the Audit Office, and it is anticipated that Mr John Mason from Adams Kenneally White Chartered Accountants, will address the Council at the meeting.

The Audit Report is an unmodified opinion.

A full copy of the statements has been provided to Councillors and the document is on Council's website and on display in the service centres. Attached are the following components of the accounts for further discussion:

• Key Financial Statements being - Income Statement; Statement of Comprehensive Income; Statement of Financial Position; Statement of Changes in Equity; and Statements of Cash Flows;

• Note 6c – this shows our Cash and how much is held in Restricted Assets;• Note 13a – this shows our key performance indicators;• Note 21 – dissects our Income Statement and Statement of Financial Position by fund;• Note 29 – shows the collation of the Statement of Financial Position on amalgamation;• Auditor’s Report on the Audit for the General Purpose and Special Purpose Financial Statements

and the Special Schedules.aaaaDISCUSSION

Page - 26


Page - 27



Leadership and Governance – Financial Sustainability – provide Council with sound financial management.


This report has no budgetary implications. The Annual Financial Statements presents the financial position of the Council as at 30 June 2017, and therefore details the funds available for projects.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil.

LEGISLATIVE IMPLICATIONSaaaa• Local Government Act 1993, s. 415-421

aaaaRISK ANALYSIS

The Audit certification is a risk reduction process.

CONCLUSION

Murray River Council's Financial Statements have been audited and an unmodified opinion has been provided.

Page - 28


Attachment

# Attachment Type

1 MRC Annual Statements 16.17 ( selected information) PDF File

Page - 29


CLAUSE 3. Murray River Council 2018/2019 Budget



RECOMMENDATION

That, for the preparation of Council's 2018/2019 budget, the budget timetable and the budget parameters, as attached to the report, be endorsed by the Council.

BACKGROUND

Attached is a timeline to complete Council's budget for 2018/19. The critical dates for Council are:

• Ordinary Meeting – 15 May 2018 – to consider the draft budget and place the document on public display;

• Ordinary Meeting – 26 June 2018 – to consider the submissions and adopt the budget.

The budget parameters for the calculation of the budget at this stage are presented below:

• General Prices – the CPI is running at 1.9% at the moment. The Local Government Cost Index (LGCI) has been calculated for 2018/19 at 2.3%. It is intended to use 2.3% as the index for most prices, fees and charge increases where ever a better calculation is not known;

• Wages and Salaries – the Local Government Award increase is indexed at 2.5% and this will be the estimate utilised. Provision will also be made for movement within the salary system where ever appropriate;

• Interest Rates – the Target Cash Interest Rate is 1.5% and the 90 day Bank Bill Swap Rate (BBSR) is 1.77%. Council obtains better rates than the BBSR, so the forecast will be on 2.2%;

• Insurance Premiums – this depends on the performance of the fund and at this stage the LGCI of 2.3% will be utilised;

• Rate Pegging – IPART has set the rate increase for 2018/19 at 2.3%.aaaaDISCUSSION

The Council may wish to give some direction on any particular items that they would like to see reviewed, costed and investigated.


Leadership and Governance – Financial Sustainability


The parameters indicated above determine funding that is available for projects.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil.


The Local Government Act 1993, s.403 details that in the Council’s Resourcing Strategy, there needs to be long term financial planning.

RISK ANALYSIS

Page - 30


The budget is one of the key financial processes and represents a significant financial risk exposure.

CONCLUSION

The Integrated Planning Framework sets the overall Strategic Planning Framework for Council. The budget is one component of this process, which coordinates and allocates resources to community projects.

Attachment

# Attachment Type

1 Budget Timetable 2018-19 PDF File

Page - 31


CLAUSE 4. Information Technology - Fibre Optic



RECOMMENDATION

That fibre optic be installed between Council's Mathoura Office and the Mathoura Visitor & Business Centre; and that the project be funded from the Office Equipment Restricted Asset.

BACKGROUND

Fibre Optic boring for the tube/pipe to contain the Fibre Optic has been undertaken between Council's Mathoura Office and the Mathoura Visitor & Business Centre (MVBC). Fibre Optic has been installed between the MVBC and the water tower. From the water tower to the Mathoura Office, it has been linked by microwave. There are still link issues between the water tower and the Mathoura Office. This is due to the media converters at both ends only providing 10mbps. Difficulty obtaining updated media converter technology prevents the tower to the Mathoura Office link being updated.

The direct Fibre Optic link down Morris Street (Mathoura) has not been completed. This was due to delays experienced in obtaining the necessary approvals to bore under the rail line. This has now been done about a year ago and it now needs the fibre to be run. To pull the Fibre Optic down Morris Street under the rail line to the Mathoura Office will cost $7K.

DISCUSSION

As above.


Leadership and Governance – Business Systems – Implement and maintain contemporary, effective and fit for purpose information and communication systems.


The Fibre Optic project was a partially completed project prior to amalgamation. There is funding in the Office Equipment Restricted Asset to fund this project.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil.


Nil.

RISK ANALYSIS

The contractor will need to comply with Council's risk controls.

CONCLUSION

Fibre Optic installation will provide an increase in speed from 10mbps to 1gbps.

Page - 32


CLAUSE 5. Sponsorship Request - Echuca & District Poultry Club



RECOMMENDATION

That Council supports the Echuca and District Poultry Club in holding the annual championship on 1 July 2018 at the Echuca Showground with a financial contribution of $50 based on the request, as attached to the report.

BACKGROUND

The Echuca and District Poultry Club is planning its annual championship show on 1 July 2018 in Echuca. The event attracts up to 40 exhibitors. There will be up to 1,000 birds on exhibition. The varieties on display are water fowl and soft and hard feathered fowl.

DISCUSSION

As above.


Economic Growth - Event Attraction.


The $50 sponsorship is to come from the Council's Promotion vote.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS



N/A.

RISK ANALYSIS

N/A.

CONCLUSION

It is appropriate for Council to support this event, as it provides benefits in the areas of social and economic activity.

Attachment

# Attachment Type

1 Echuca and District Poultry C lub Inc PDF File

Page - 33


CLAUSE 6. Sponsorship Request - Border Tall & All Game Group



RECOMMENDATION

That Council supports the Border Tall and All Game Group in holding the annual championship show on 3 June 2018 at the Echuca Showground with a financial contribution of $50 based on the request, as attached to the report.

BACKGROUND

The Annual Championship show for the Border Tall and All Game Group will be held on 3 June 2018 in Echuca. The event attracts around 20 exhibitions from interstate and local breeders. The event is for hard feathered fowls.

DISCUSSION

As above.




The $50 sponsorship is to come from the Council's Promotion vote.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS



N/A.

RISK ANALYSIS

N/A.

CONCLUSION

It is appropriate for Council to support this event, as it provides benefits in the areas of social and economic activity in the community.

Attachment

# Attachment Type

1 Border Tall and All Game Grou p Inc PDF File

Page - 34


CLAUSE 7. Sponsorship Request - Moama Local Aboriginal Land Council



RECOMMENDATION

That the Council supports the Moama Local Aboriginal Land Council in organising the positions for the ‘Academy of Global Business' Training by making a contribution of $200 toward the purchase of laptop computers, based on the request, as attached to the report.

BACKGROUND

The Moama Local Aboriginal Land Council (MLALC) have requested Council assistance for the purchase of 10 laptop computers for educational use, to assist people studying for the ‘Academy of Global Business’.

DISCUSSION

As above.


Social Wellbeing – Aboriginal Cooperation and Development.


The $200 sponsorship is to come from the Social Development Vote.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS



N/A

RISK ANALYSIS

N/A

CONCLUSION

The Council is contributing to the further education of Aboriginal People in our community. The total cost of funding all the computers, needs to be a holistic Government approach and not left to the Local Government on its own.

Attachment

# Attachment Type

1 MLALC - Donation Application Form PDF File

Page - 35


CLAUSE 8. Sponsorship Request - Moama Public School



RECOMMENDATION

That Council supports the Moama Public School in holding the Community Fete on 16 March 2018 at the Moama Public School, with a financial contribution of $200, based on the request, as attached to the report.

BACKGROUND

The Moama Public School Community Fete raises funds for the School and the stated fundraising goals are to enhance the School's buildings and student educational resources.

DISCUSSION

As above.


Social Wellbeing – Children and Youth – Encourage and facilitate education opportunites for residents.


The $200 sponsorship is to come from the Sundry Educational Expense Vote.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS



N/A

RISK ANALYSIS

N/A

CONCLUSION

It is appropriate for Council to support this event, as it provides benefits in the improvement of educational facilities for our community.

Attachment

# Attachment Type

1 Moama Public School - Funding Request PDF File

Page - 36


CLAUSE 9. Sponsorship Request - Good Friday Appeal Twilight Market Fundraiser



RECOMMENDATION

That Council supports Merool Holiday Park in holding the Good Friday Appeal Twilight Market Fundraiser on 30 March 2018, with a contribution of $671, which involves the waiver of the Development Application Fees ($285) and Traffic Control Plan Fee ($386), based on the request, as attached to the report.

BACKGROUND

The Good Friday Appeal raises funds for the Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne, Victoria. Merool Holiday Park have approval to raise funds for the Appeal by running the Merool Twilight Market.

DISCUSSION

As above.


Social Wellbeing – Medical and Health Services.


Council's $671 support to this event will involve a reduction in income.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS



N/A

RISK ANALYSIS

N/A

CONCLUSION

It is appropriate for Council to support this event, as it provides benefits in the area of health as people in our community utilise the Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne.

Attachment

# Attachment Type

1 Good Friday Appeal - Funding Request PDF File

Page - 37


CLAUSE 10. S355 Committee Dollar-for-Dollar Grant - Barham Recreation Reserve Committee



RECOMMENDATION

That the Council:

1. endorse the actions taken in approving the dollar for dollar grant application for the Barham Recreation Reserve painting project; and

2. approve the dollar for dollar grant for the Barham Recreation Reserve modernisation of electrical amenities project.

aaaaBACKGROUND

Painting Project

The Council received a request (attached) from the Barham Recreation Reserve Committee for dollar for dollar funding, for the painting of the property on the Recreation Reserve. The building has not been painted for 10 years and the property is currently vacant. Based on the available budget, existing delegations and the funds requested the works have been approved.

Electrical Amenities

A funding request (attached) for the removal of a power pole and to reinstate a power pole on the Barham Recreation Reserve has been received. The power is utilised by the toilet block and the cricket pavilion.

DISCUSSION

As above.


Social Wellbeing - Recreation Reserves/Parks and Gardens – Provide sporting fields, recreation grounds and facilities that can be utilised for a variety of sports.


The Council has $40,000 in the budget for these projects and year to date $11,056 has been spent. The approved request for the painting project is for $3,043 from the Council and is to be matched by the committee. The request for the electrical amenities power upgrade is for $2,977 from the Council and is to be matched by the committee.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

N/A


Section 355 of the Local Government Act 1993 delegates authority for the committee to manage components of the Recreation Reserve.

RISK ANALYSIS

Page - 38


The contractor will be required to undertake the works in accordance with the Council’s risk arrangements.

CONCLUSION

The work will assist in maintaining the Council’s assets to an acceptable standard.

Attachment

# Attachment Type

1 $ for $ Grant Application - P aint interior of rental prope rty PDF File

2 $ for $ Grant Application - M odernise electrical amenities PDF File

Page - 39


CLAUSE 11. Information Technology - Council Meeting Agendas



RECOMMENDATION

That the Council:

1. purchase the InfoCouncil product for the Council’s Agenda software;2. purchase the Local Government Hub product for the distribution of Council agendas and relevant

information between Council and Councillors; and3. the funding of the projects be provided by the Office Equipment Restricted Asset.

aaaaBACKGROUND

For the past five (5) months, Council's staff have been utilising a cloud based system for the management and distribution of the Council’s agenda for Council Meetings. There have been issues with the system in the inputting and collation of reports to put on the agenda. This has caused issues with the presentation of the agenda and providing all the relevant information to the Council.

Council's staff have explored other options for the electronic management and distribution of agenda for Council Meeting, with the preferred options detailed below:

• InfoCouncil is a software package that improves the preparation of the Council’s agendas and published meeting information. The following features are in the software: Agenda, Reports, Minutes, Action sheets and integration with the Records Management system. There are 76 NSW councils that utilise the software.

• LG Hub is a system that manages and distributes documents to mobile devices. It would be the medium for delivering business papers to Councillors. LG Hub integrates with InfoCouncil and is utilised by over 120 councils. The system allows for the annotation and bookmarking of documents, once received by remote devices.

aaaaDISCUSSION

As above.


Leadership and Governance – Business Systems – Implement and maintain contemporary, effective and fit for purpose information and communication systems.


InfoCouncil is estimated to cost $20,595 in the first year and $3,025 for the next year for maintenance costs.

LG Hub is estimated to cost $8,770 for 20 users or $10,540 for 25 users in the first year and $7,770 for the next year for maintenance costs.

There is funding in the Office Equipment Restricted Asset to fund this project.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

N/A

Page - 40



Section 9 and 360 of the Local Government Act 1993 details the requirements on meeting notice and requirements. This includes referral to the Regulations.

RISK ANALYSIS

The contractor will need to comply with Council's risk controls.

CONCLUSION

The new software will streamline Council's Agenda and Minute preparation processes.

Page - 41


CLAUSE 12. Sponsorship Request - Mathoura Events Committee



RECOMMENDATION

That Council supports the Mathoura Events Committee in holding the Mathoura Easter Fair Event at the Mathoura Memorial Park, with a financial contribution of $500, based on the request, as attached to the report.

BACKGROUND

The Mathoura Events Committee are a newly formed group, who have been registering as an Incorporated body to continue to run the Mathoura Easter Fair event.

The Easter event is a family event, which aims to bring attractions and activities for locals and visitors at Easter.

The event has previously been run by other entities and over the last month a group of community minded people have been working to keep the event going.

DISCUSSION

As above.




The $500 sponsorship is to come from the Promotion Vote.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS



N/A

RISK ANALYSIS

N/A

CONCLUSION

It is appropriate for Council to support this event, as it provides benefits for attracting people to the area. It also provides a social event for our community.

Page - 42


Attachment

# Attachment Type

1 Mathoura Events Committee Fun ding Request PDF File

Page - 43


CLAUSE 13. Discharge of Mortgage - Lot 8, DP1012116



RECOMMENDATION

That the Council approve of the affixing of the Common Seal of Council to all legal documents in relation to the Discharge of Mortgage on Lot 8, DP1012116.

BACKGROUND

Lot 8, DP1012116 is an Industrial Land block, whereby the Council provided partial finance for the purchase of the land and it was subject to a mortgage, held by the Council.

The loan to Council has been paid out several years ago.

Under the Contract of Sale, the purchaser is responsible for the discharge of mortgage costs.

DISCUSSION

As above.


Economic Growth – Entrepreneurial Activities – Implement land development projects that service gaps in local market supplies.


N/A

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

N/A


Conveyancing Act requirements, which will be dealt with by Council’s solicitor.

RISK ANALYSIS

Legal issues are identified and covered by Council’s solicitor.

CONCLUSION

The Discharge of the Mortgage gives the land owner more flexibility to deal with their land the way that they want to.

Page - 44


CLAUSE 1. Capital Works Progress Report

REPORT GROUPaaaaDIRECTOR ENGINEERING SERVICESaaaaREPORT PREPARED BY

DIRECTOR ENGINEERING - Johan Louw

RECOMMENDATION

That the Council's capital works progress report be received by the Council.

BACKGROUND

This report is provided as an update to the Council on the capital works currently being undertaken by Council.

DISCUSSION

The 2017-18 capital works program is about 40% completed. Although the percentage completed may appear low it should be noted that several major projects, such as flood restoration works and bridge construction, for which funding are allocated in 2017-18, would be completed by December 2018 in line with funding agreements.

Regional Roads

• The reseal program is 69% complete.• Roads and Maritime Services' approved funding for the construction of a section of the Deniliquin

- Barham Road. Sealing work will be undertaken after construction of this road.

Rural Roads

• The rural roads program is 30% complete.• Gravel resheeting is 80% complete with Lower Thule Road to be completed by early April.

Resheeting of roads in the Greater Murray Ward is programmed to commence in April. Reseal and heavy patching works are77% completed.

• Rural drainage works are also underway with completion projected in late May.• Roads to Recovery funded works are 62% completed with outstanding sections of Noorong Road,

Murrabit Road and East Barham Road to be completed by late April.• The contact for the flood restoration works has been awarded. Works are scheduled for

completion by the end of 2018.• Off-site works for bridge replacement/restoration (Fountains Road/Merryn Creek and Colenso

Park Road/Barbers Creek) have commenced while off-site works for the replacement of Waugorah Road/Pee Vee Creek bridge, Waugorah Road/Deadmans Creek bridge and Waugorah Road/Waugorah Creek bridge are progressing. All bridge replacement/restoration works are scheduled to be completed by the end of 2018. The tender evaluation for the Merryn Creek Bridge repairs is in progress, with a request for further information sent to the tenderer. A report will be brought to a later Council meeting once evaluation is completed.

Urban Infrastructure - Roads

• The urban roads program is 40% complete.• Roadworks on Hollandra Drive commenced. Urban reseal work in Moama and Mathoura will

commence later in March when it is cooler to eliminate bleeding and allow bitumen time to settle.• Footpath works in the Greater Murray and Moama wards have not commenced. It is anticipated at

this stage that works may be carried over to 2018-19. Construction of footbridges in Mathoura is to commence later in March.

Urban Infrastructure - Drainage

Page - 45


• The urban drainage program is 16% complete.• Kerb and gutter works commenced on Blair Street and Simms Street, Moama. Works on the

stormwater drainage pump station and rising mains in Greater Wakool Ward commenced. Drainage works are generally undertaken during the wetter months and works are programmed to be completed in June.

Parks, Gardens and Recreation Reserves

• The playground equipment at Riverside Park, Barham has been replaced and quotes for the shading structure(s) are currently being sought.

• Moama Cricket Club received funding to upgrade the cricket nets from the NSW Club Grants infrastructure program. Upgrade of the cricket nets is programmed for late March.

Plant

• Light vehicles, heavy vehicles and minor plant are being replaced as programmed.

Buildings and Other Structures

• Council is currently seeking tenders for building works at the Picnic Point caravan park.• The rebound wall at the Mathoura Recreation Reserve is 90% complete with painting to be

completed by the end of March.

Water and Sewerage Supply

• Water supply works is 32% complete.• Raw water reservoir to be inspected in May when it is programed to be cleaned. Any works to

follow would be subject to the outcomes of the inspection.• Survey work commenced for the replacement of 300m of raw water mains along Kinsey Street,

Moama. Replacement is programmed to commence later in March. Filtered mains along Perricoota Road, 24 Lane and Tatalia Roads will be surveyed later in March, then designed and costed. Francis Street water mains are currently being surveyed and designed, with construction to follow later in March.

• Construction of filtered water mains in Mathoura is programmed to commence in late March/early April. Upgrade of raw water mains are not required.

• Replacement of launders in the clarifier and troughs in the filters at the Mathoura filtration plant is to be undertaken in late April.

• An online chlorination meter is to be installed at the Moama plant.• Council officers are currently seeking quotes for works to filtration plants in Mathoura, Tooleybuc,

Wakool and Koraleigh.• Tenders are currently being sought for the refurbishment of reservoirs in Barham.


Draft Community Strategic Plan 2017-2027

Strategic Theme 1: Built/Physical Environment

1.1 Improve and maintain our built environments

1.2 Improve and maintain our road and transport network

1.3 Improve and maintain our community infrastructure

1.4 Effectively plan for, improve and maintain water, sewer and waste


Works are funded through the Annual Operational Plan and Budget 2017-18.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Page - 46


Nil.


Nil.

RISK ANALYSIS

There are no risks associated with this matter.

CONCLUSION

Works are well underway with road reseal and resheeting programs nearing completion. Most drainage works would be completed during the wetter months.

Page - 47


CLAUSE 2. Moama Mid West Drainage Investigation



RECOMMENDATION

That Council approves $28,100 in the 2017/18 budget to engage a suitably qualified consultant to undertake the Moama Mid West Drainage investigation.

BACKGROUND

Murray River Council is responsible for the planning, operation and management of water supply, sewerage and stormwater within the Council area. Moama West is developing from primarily agriculture to a mix of viticulture, recreation and residential uses. Without intervention, local stormwater run-off rates will increase, retention capacity will decrease and flow patterns will be altered. This can lead to increased erosion, reduced water quality and increased inundation which in turn can resultant in property damage.

DISCUSSION

It is proposed to undertake an investigation and develop a strategy for the Moama Mid West drainage catchment area. The strategy is to be prepared in accordance best practice principles.

The scope of work includes:

1. assessment of potential yields/volumes and variability2. run-off modelling3. assessment of catchment characteristics, including watercourses, land uses, vegetation, soil and

other characteristics4. risk assessments, including potential contamination of stormwater5. assessment of storage volumes required and potential sites6. identification of potential water quality issues7. assessment of treatment requirements and locations8. assessment of applicable irrigation systems 9. determination of developer contributions.

Following approval by Council of recommendations, it is proposed to develop a preliminary design of a stormwater management system for the Mid West Moama drainage catchment area as well as the associated cost estimates for all elements of the system.


Operational Plan 2017/18

• Strategy: Integrated Water Cycle Management• Activity: Provide environmentally sensitive and effective stormwater collection and discharge

systems appropriate to community needs. aaaaBUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS

There is no allocation in the 2017/18 budget to undertake the Moama Mid West drainage investigation. Funding can be allocated from Council's Section 94 fund earmarked for "Drainage Study".

Quotes have been sought from specialised consultants to undertake the investigation. It is proposed that $28,100 be allocated from Council's Section 94 fund and included in the 2017/18 budget to undertake

Page - 48


the Moama Mid West drainage investigation.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil.


Nil.

RISK ANALYSIS

The main risks associated with not undertaking the investigation and development of a strategy:

1. local stormwater rates may increase, retention capacity may decrease and flow patterns may be altered;

2. water quality may reduce;3. potential increased erosion; and, 4. potential increase in inundation that could result in property damage.

aaaaCONCLUSION

An investigation of the Moama Mid West drainage catchment is required due to the volume and complex nature of development and the requirement for a consolidated approach to drainage in the area.S94 developer contributions collected allows for a drainage investigation.

Page - 49


CLAUSE 3. Development Engineer - Budget Allocation



RECOMMENDATION

That the Council approves $139,177 per year to appoint a Development Engineer to the Council's organisational structure.

BACKGROUND

Over the past years Moama has experienced a significant increase in development. This has placed significant pressure on current planning resources to process development applications within the required statutory timeframes.Key components of the development assessment process include determining infrastructure requirements of developments, determining infrastructure conditions associated with developments and ensuring that the infrastructure conditions are met.

DISCUSSION

Page - 50



Operational Plan 2017-18

Strategic Theme: Built/Physical Environment

Strategy: Planning and Building

Activity: To provide an efficient and effective development assessment approval process.


The total cost to appoint a full time Development Engineer is $126,378-$139,177 including salary, superannuation, vehicle and other on-costs. This cost could be offset via an additional plan checking fee built into the developer contributions.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil


Nil

Page - 51


RISK ANALYSIS

Key risks include:

• Development applications not processed within statutory timeframes. • Development finalised without development conditions being met, potentially resulting in

additional infrastructure costs to Council.• Manager Engineering Operations and Manager Engineering Services not spending sufficient time

to manage operations, potentially resulting in project budgets and timeframes not being met, and maintenance activities not be delivered timely, cost effectively and to a high standard.

• Potential for omissions or errors in application conditions and monitoring due to workload and timeframes.

• Potential loss of existing, highly qualified staff due to workload.aaaaCONCLUSION

In order to encourage development within the Murray River Council area it is important that the organisation provide sufficient resources to allow for an efficient and effective development assessment approval process. The allocation of funding to appoint a qualified Development Engineer will contribute to achieving an efficient and effective development assessment approval process.

Page - 52


CLAUSE 4. Barham Filtered and Raw Water Reservoir Repainting


MANAGER ENGINEERING SERVICES - Malcolm France

RECOMMENDATION

That the Council approves the reallocation of remaining funds from the Barham Mains Replacement/Renewal ($111,429) and Wakool Ward Filtration Plant Online Monitoring Systems projects ($100,000), being a total of $211,429, to the Barham Filtered and Raw Water Reservoirs Repainting/Upgrade.

BACKGROUND

The Barham water reservoirs are in need of refurbishment. $260,000 is included in the 2017/18 budget for the painting/refurbishment of the filtered water reservoir in Barham. A specialist consultant inspected the raw water reservoir and recommended that both reservoirs in Barham are in urgent need of repainting/refurbishment. The consultant estimated the total cost at approximately $200,000 per reservoir.

DISCUSSION

Delaying the refurbishment works may result in one or both reservoirs failing. Refurbishment of the reservoirs will substantially reduce any required future operational expenditure.

Tenders were initially issued for the refurbishment of the Barham filtered water reservoir. At the mandatory site meeting on 27 February the contractors were asked to submit tender responses for both reservoirs in Barham. Tenders closed on 7 March. A further report will be brought to Council for acceptance of the preferred tenderer.


Annual Operating Plan 2017-18

Strategy: Integrated Water Cycle Management

Activity: Provide assets and systems appropriate for the needs of the Murray River community ensuring the provision of adequate water supply and sewerage collection and treatment services


Page - 53


POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil


Nil

RISK ANALYSIS

Both reservoirs in Barham were recommended for urgent refurbishment by a specialist consultant. Delay of the proposed refurbishment works could result in failure of one or both reservoirs as a result of corrosion.

CONCLUSION

Both the filtered and raw water reservoirs in Barham need urgent refurbishment works. Funding has been allocated in the 2017/18 budget to refurbish the filtered water reservoir in Barham. Reallocation of funding from the Barham mains replacement and Wakool Ward filtration online monitoring systems programs will allow for both reservoirs to be refurbished. Delaying the refurbishment works may result in one or both reservoirs failing. Refurbishment of the reservoirs will substantially reduce any required future operational expenditure.

Page - 54


CLAUSE 5. Echuca Moama Torrumbarry Flood Study Reference Committee - Appointment of Second Councillor Delegate


MANAGER DESIGN, CAPITAL WORKS & PROJECTS - Onisimo Mukodi

RECOMMENDATIONaaaa

1. That Council supports Campaspe Shire Council’s request that Councillor representatives for Campaspe Shire Council and Murray River Council on the Echuca Moama Torrumbarry Flood Study Reference Committee be increased from one each to two each;

2. That Council approves that the Terms of Reference for Echuca Moama Torrumbarry Flood Study be amended accordingly;

3. That Council appoints a second Councillor delegate to the Echuca Moama Torrumbarry Flood Study Reference Committee.

aaaaBACKGROUND

Murray River Council, Campaspe Shire Council and the Victoria North Central Catchment Management Authority Council are jointly delivering the Echuca Moama Torrumbarry Flood Study (EMTFS).

DISCUSSION

The Terms of Reference for EMTFS have provision for a Flood Study Reference Committee (FSRC), an advisory body, which provides a forum for discussion of technical, social, economic and ecological issues and to ensure all important aspects of the study are given due consideration. The Terms of Reference currently provides for one Councillor representative each for Campaspe Shire Council and Murray River Council on the FSRC. Campaspe Shire Council has requested that the representatives for Campaspe Shire Council and Murray River Council be increased to two each and the Terms of Reference for EMTFS be amended accordingly.


Operational Plan 2017/18 - Strategic Theme: Emergency Management, Flood Mitigation

• Activity: Develop and maintain a prompt and efficient service to meet the needs of persons affected, or threatened by, disaster in the Murray River Council area.

• Activity: Maintain an active and influential role in flood and river quality management within the Murray River Council area.

aaaaBUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS

Nil

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil


Nil

RISK ANALYSIS

Council stands to benefit immensely from the cross-border collaboration for delivery of the EMTFS. Increased Councillor participation will enhance the FSRC’s capacity in delivering its role in floodplain

Page - 55


risk management.

CONCLUSION

It is considered appropriate to amend the Terms of Reference for the FSRC to increase the number of Councillors who sit on the committee.

Page - 56


CLAUSE 6. Moulamein Floodplain Risk Management Committee



RECOMMENDATION

That Council:

1. Appoints Councillor delegate(s) to the Moulamein Floodplain Risk Management Committee.2. Approves that an expression of interest be run for nominations from the community to the

Moulamein Floodplain Risk Management Committee.aaaaBACKGROUND

Murray River Council was allocated funding by the NSW state government under the Flood Management Program for the Moulamein Flood Study and Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan (FS and FRMS&P). The FS and FRMS&P will be carried out under the framework in the Floodplain Development Manual (2005) and the NSW State Government Flood Policy. The intention at the completion of this study is to have updated and sufficient flood information that is capable of being used by a variety of stakeholders including authorities and community for land use planning, flood management planning, emergency response and flooding education. Tenders have been invited for consultants to carry out the FS and FRMS&P. Once the contract has been awarded the FS and FRMS&P will be underway.

The establishment by Council of a Floodplain Risk Management Committee (FRMC) is the first formal step in the floodplain risk management process. To kick start the process, Council is requested to nominate its delegate(s) to the Moulamein FRMC and that an expression of interest be run for nominations from the community to the FRMC. Upon conclusion of the nominations, Council will then appoint representatives to the FRMC.

The FRMC will act as both a focus and a forum for the discussion of technical, social, economic, ecological and cultural issues and for the distillation of possibly differing viewpoints relating to the floodplain risk management plan. It will achieve this by ensuring that all stakeholders (often with competing desires) are equally represented. As such, the composition and roles of committee members are matters of key importance.

DISCUSSION

Need for a Committee:

The development of a Floodplain Risk Management Plan, will take into consideration a number of diverse issues which include:

• flooding behaviour, including the risk, danger to personal safety and property damage imposed on existing land uses

• the impact of flooding on potential future land uses and occupants and the impact of these potential future land uses on flooding

• continuing flood risk and methods of management • the ecological impact of existing and possible future developments and floodplain risk

management measures

• the broad scale catchment issues such as water quality, riverine and floodplain enhancement and land management

• environmental impact both upstream and downstream as a result of changes in hydrology or other

Page - 57


factors• the potential economic cost and benefits to both the private and public sectors in the occupation of

the floodplain• the potential economic benefits of proposed risk management measures• potential intangible flood costs, including physical and psychological effects of flooding• social factors, including the needs and aspirations of the local community, both existing and in the

future• local and regional planning options and restrictions, including special zonings and planning

controls, opportunities• the protection of Aboriginal sites and places and European heritage.

The expertise necessary to address these issues needs to be drawn from a variety of sources, including:

• Council itself (both elected representatives and Council staff);• the local community;• industry groups;• environmental interest groups;• the Catchment Management Authority;• State and Commonwealth Government agencies; and• specialist consultants, as engaged.

Given the complexity and range of issues to be addressed in the process as outlined above, the FRMC needs to be able to coordinate and disseminate the interests, advice and expertise available from State and Commonwealth Government agencies and the local community.

Role of the Committee:

The FRMC does not have any formal powers. Rather, it has an advisory role. The principal objective of the committee is to assist the Council in the development and implementation of a floodplain risk management plan for the area.

The FRMC also assists in:

• formulating objectives (in accordance with ecologically sustainable development principles), strategies and outcomes sought in the local floodplain risk management process;

• providing a link between the local community and Council;• considering appropriate development controls for use until the management plan is completed,

approved and implemented. The FRMC will make recommendations to Council in this regard for consideration;

• supervising the collection of necessary data and supervising and monitoring the progress and findings of studies being undertaken in the various stages of the management plan;

• identifying strategies for the implementation of the floodplain risk management plan;• monitoring and assessing the effectiveness of the floodplain risk management plan after its

implementation;• coordinating and monitoring the public education programs essential to the long term viability of

the floodplain risk management plan; and• coordination with catchment management authority, emergency management planning and other

advisory bodies.

Membership of the Committee:

The membership of the FRMC needs to be a balanced representation of stakeholders such as agencies, groups and/or individuals effecting, affected by or coordinating floodplain risk management. Membership will be flexible to ensure the right mix of interests are represented.

Membership will include:

• elected members of Council;• Council staff from engineering, planning and environmental disciplines;

Page - 58


• an appropriate number of representatives of the local community (for example, local flooded landholders, industry and commerce, environmental groups);

• representative of the local catchment management authority to facilitate a whole-of catchment approach;

• representatives of relevant industry bodies;• officers from the Office of Environment and Heritage;• officers from the Catchment Authority;• representative(s) from the State Emergency Service;• representative(s) from Indigenous Group(s);• representative from Bureau of Meteorology; and• a specialist consultant.

Role of Committee Members:

The primary role and responsibility of the various members on the FRMC are described below, it being noted that this outline does not aim to limit the contributions made by members, but rather attempts to ensure that all important aspects are given due consideration. It should also be noted that the committee will be tasked with seeking solutions to the existing, future and continuing flood risk issues, not solely on addressing the past.

Elected Members of Council:

Elected members of Council are the leaders of this process and will assess the community, political, and policy implications of any actions contemplated with the objective of producing an equitable result for the local government area served.

Council Staff:

Council staff will involve a mix of engineering, planning, environment and health and building representatives. They will provide specialist advice and coordinate:

• input from Council, the local community and other committee members;• the production and presentation of agendas and reports;• the management of consultants (including preparation of study briefs); and• formulate draft recommendations to the committee.

Local Community Representatives:

Local community representatives will:

• form a link between the committee and the local population in the flood prone area;• provide historical advice on local problems and perceived solutions;• consider in detail implications of matters which may impact on the local community; and• facilitate formal representations to the committee on behalf of members of the public.

The Catchment Management Authority Representative:

The catchment management authority representative will provide a broad whole- of-catchment framework for the consideration of proposed local management measures. This may include the need to consider the consistency of proposed management measures with activities elsewhere in the catchment.

Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) Representative:

The OEH representative will provide technical expertise and steering advice to ensure that a floodplain risk management plan is prepared in accordance with the stated principles of the New South Wales Government's Flood Prone Land Policy. The representative will also monitor the progress of the Flood Study and Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan, particularly as it relates to current and future government funding programs. The representative will also provide technical advice, to both Council staff and the FRMC, as required during progress of these studies.

Page - 59


The Bureau of Meteorology:

The Bureau of Meteorology will provide advice with respect to flood forecasting and warning, as appropriate.

The State Emergency Service (SES) Representative:

The SES representative will consider the implications of any actions contemplated in regard to risk assessment, flood warning and response plans for the management and evacuation of flood-prone areas, and with regard to the State Emergency Service Act 1989. The SES representative will also provide input from the emergency management viewpoint, and ensure that the floodplain risk management plan is developed parallel to and complementary to the local flood plan (prepared under the guidance of the SES).

Representative(s) of Local Indigenous Group(s):

Representative(s) of Local Indigenous Groups(s) will provide advice regarding impact of the proposed floodplain risk management plan on indigenous heritage.

Community Consultation:

The local community, both those flood prone and otherwise, will have a key role to play in the development, implementation and success of a floodplain risk management plan. If the management plan is to be accepted and successful, it is essential that clear and concise communications flow between the committee and the community so that affected individuals and community groups can `have their say' and learn of their roles and responsibilities.

The following format is suggested for establishing and maintaining communication between the FRMC and the local community. Council will arrange to:

• involve and inform the community (through media releases, newsletters and public meetings), of the role and responsibilities of the FRMC, its intention to instigate a study or studies for preparation of a floodplain risk management plan, the work Council is undertaking for the flood study, and progress on the floodplain risk management study and plan. Also, affected residents will be informed of the length of time expected to elapse until finalisation of the management plan and implementation of floodplain risk management measures, and of the nature of development controls, pending completion of the management plan;

• define clear goals for each study and estimate the time to complete each investigation and when direct consultation and feedback with the community is proposed;

• call for representatives of the general community and action groups to self-nominate for the committee, clearly stating the expected role of committee members at this time;

• use established local community groups, where they exist, and encourage representation of these groups on the committee;

• make one or two contact people known to the community, usually staff members of council, who can be contacted regarding questions relating to floodplain risk management, both during the development and implementation of the management plan, as well as after the management plan has been adopted;

• release information to the community and members of the committee at regular intervals, rather than waiting until the completion of one of the formal stages of the management plan, or associated formal meetings of the committee

• when disseminating information, ensure that simple, clear messages are used to explain the situation in uncomplicated language and relate any implications to property owners and potential development applicants;

• formally adopt the management plan at the completion of the preparation and consideration process; and

• consider changes to the local floodplain risk management policy and Council's strategic planning instruments and associated development controls during the implementation phase, where strategies result in altered flood behaviour.


Page - 60






Nil

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil


Nil

RISK ANALYSIS

The FRMS&P will identify both structural and non-structural mitigation measures that can improve the management of flood risk for Moulamein town.

CONCLUSION

It is considered appropriate that the establishment of the Moulamein FRMC be kick started with the appointment of the Councillor(s) to sit on the committee and that the expression of interest for community representatives get under way.

Page - 61


CLAUSE 7. Barham Floodplain Risk Management Committee



RECOMMENDATION

That Council:

1. Dissolves the Floodplain Risk Management Committee which was set up to deliver the Barham Flood Study and Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan; Tooleybuc Flood Study and Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan; and the Murray Downs Flood Study and Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan.

2. Approves the establishment of Barham Floodplain Risk Management Committee. 3. Appoints Councillor delegate(s) to the Barham Floodplain Risk Management Committee. 4. Approves that an expression of interest be run for nominations from the community to the Barham

Floodplain Risk Management Committee.aaaaBACKGROUND

Council adopted Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plans (FRMS&P’s) for Barham, Murray Downs and Tooleybuc in December 2016. The Murray Downs and Tooleybuc FRMS&P’s concluded that no further action was required from the studies regarding the mitigation measures.

However, the Barham FRMS&P report identified that the existing levee has a freeboard of 0.3 to 0.6 m below the standard typically adopted in the region. The FRMS&P also noted that a levee breach could result in flooding, with significant impact on the town of Barham. According to the report, there is currently uncertainty regarding the condition of the Barham town levee, as well as the safe operating level for the levee, which has implications for emergency flood management.

Murray River Council was allocated funding by the NSW state government under the Flood Management Program to assess the condition of the levee, determine the safe operating level, and provide sufficient information to assess the need for, and the benefit/cost associated with a levee upgrade. The project will involve a structural integrity audit and options assessment (SIAOA) for the existing Barham levee. The Barham levee was constructed in stages, mostly in response to past floods, such as the 1956 flood event. Past audits (1992 and 2007) have noted issues with the construction and condition of the levee, and recommended detailed investigations to confirm the structural integrity of the levee.

The SIAOA will be delivered in consultation with the proposed Barham Floodplain Risk Management Committee (FRMC) and its recommendations will be referred to the local community for comments. It is recommended that the Barham FRMC be set up as a standard FRMC not only to deal with the SIAOA but matters to relating to floodplain management including future Flood Studies and FRMS&P. Request for quotations have been issued to consultants to carry out the SIAOA. Once the contract has been awarded the SIAOA will be underway.

Council needs to have the Barham FRMC in place by the time of commencement of the SIAOA. To kick start the process, Council is requested to nominate its delegate(s) to the Barham FRMC and that an expression of interest be run for nominations from the community to sit on the FRMC. Upon conclusion of the nominations, Council will then appoint representatives to the FRMC.

The FRMC will act as both a focus and a forum for the discussion of technical, social, economic, ecological and cultural issues and for the distillation of possibly differing viewpoints relating to the SIAOA and floodplain risk management planning. It will achieve this by ensuring that all stakeholders (often with competing desires) are equally represented. As such, the composition and roles of committee members are matters of key importance.

Page - 62


DISCUSSION

Need for a Committee:

The SIAOA and floodplain risk management planning, will take into consideration a number of diverse issues which include:

• flooding behaviour, including the risk, danger to personal safety and property damage imposed on existing land uses

• the impact of flooding on potential future land uses and occupants and the impact of these potential future land uses on flooding

• continuing flood risk and methods of management • the ecological impact of existing and possible future developments and floodplain risk

management measures

• the broad scale catchment issues such as water quality, riverine and floodplain enhancement and land management

• environmental impact both upstream and downstream as a result of changes in hydrology or other factors

• the potential economic cost and benefits to both the private and public sectors in the occupation of the floodplain

• the potential economic benefits of proposed risk management measures• potential intangible flood costs, including physical and psychological effects of flooding• social factors, including the needs and aspirations of the local community, both existing and in the

future• local and regional planning options and restrictions, including special zonings and planning

controls, opportunities• the protection of Aboriginal sites and places and European heritage.

The expertise necessary to address these issues needs to be drawn from a variety of sources, including:

• Council itself (both elected representatives and Council staff);• the local community;• industry groups;• environmental interest groups;• the Catchment Management Authority;• State and Commonwealth Government agencies; and• specialist consultants, as engaged.

Given the complexity and range of issues to be addressed in the process as outlined above, the FRMC needs to be able to coordinate and disseminate the interests, advice and expertise available from State and Commonwealth Government agencies and the local community.

Role of the Committee:

The FRMC does not have any formal powers. Rather, it has an advisory role. The principal objective of the committee is to assist the Council in the development and implementation of a floodplain risk management plan for the area.

The FRMC also assists in:

• formulating objectives (in accordance with ecologically sustainable development principles), strategies and outcomes sought in the local floodplain risk management process;

• providing a link between the local community and Council;• considering appropriate development controls for use until the management plan is completed,

approved and implemented. The FRMC will make recommendations to Council in this regard for consideration;

• supervising the collection of necessary data and supervising and monitoring the progress and

Page - 63


findings of studies being undertaken in the various stages of the management plan;• identifying strategies for the implementation of the floodplain risk management plan;• monitoring and assessing the effectiveness of the floodplain risk management plan after its

implementation;• coordinating and monitoring the public education programs essential to the long term viability of

the floodplain risk management plan; and• coordination with catchment management authority, emergency management planning and other

advisory bodies.

Membership of the Committee:

The membership of the FRMC needs to be a balanced representation of stakeholders such as agencies, groups and/or individuals effecting, affected by or coordinating floodplain risk management. Membership will be flexible to ensure the right mix of interests are represented.

Membership will include:

• elected members of Council;• Council staff from engineering, planning and environmental disciplines;• an appropriate number of representatives of the local community (for example, local flooded

landholders, industry and commerce, environmental groups);• representative of the local catchment management authority to facilitate a whole-of catchment

approach;• representatives of relevant industry bodies;• officers from the Office of Environment and Heritage;• officers from the Catchment Authority;• representative(s) from the State Emergency Service;• representative(s) from Indigenous Group(s);• representative from Bureau of Meteorology; and• a specialist consultant.

Role of Committee Members:

The primary role and responsibility of the various members on the FRMC are described below, it being noted that this outline does not aim to limit the contributions made by members, but rather attempts to ensure that all important aspects are given due consideration. It should also be noted that the committee will be tasked with seeking solutions to the existing, future and continuing flood risk issues, not solely on addressing the past.

Elected Members of Council:

Elected members of Council are the leaders of this process and will assess the community, political, and policy implications of any actions contemplated with the objective of producing an equitable result for the local government area served.

Council Staff:

Council staff will involve a mix of engineering, planning, environment and health and building representatives. They will provide specialist advice and coordinate:

• input from Council, the local community and other committee members;• the production and presentation of agendas and reports;• the management of consultants (including preparation of study briefs); and• formulate draft recommendations to the committee.

Local Community Representatives:

Local community representatives will:

• form a link between the committee and the local population in the flood prone area;• provide historical advice on local problems and perceived solutions;

Page - 64


• consider in detail implications of matters which may impact on the local community; and• facilitate formal representations to the committee on behalf of members of the public.

The Catchment Management Authority Representative:

The catchment management authority representative will provide a broad whole- of-catchment framework for the consideration of proposed local management measures. This may include the need to consider the consistency of proposed management measures with activities elsewhere in the catchment.

Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) Representative:

The OEH representative will provide technical expertise and steering advice to ensure that a floodplain risk management plan is prepared in accordance with the stated principles of the New South Wales Government's Flood Prone Land Policy. The representative will also monitor the progress of the SIAOA and floodplain risk management planning, particularly as it relates to current and future government funding programs. The representative will also provide technical advice, to both Council staff and the FRMC, as required during progress of these studies.

The Bureau of Meteorology:

The Bureau of Meteorology will provide advice with respect to flood forecasting and warning, as appropriate.

The State Emergency Service (SES) Representative:

The SES representative will consider the implications of any actions contemplated in regard to risk assessment, flood warning and response plans for the management and evacuation of flood-prone areas, and with regard to the State Emergency Service Act 1989. The SES representative will also provide input from the emergency management viewpoint, and ensure that the SIAOA and floodplain risk management planning is developed parallel to and complementary to the local flood plan (prepared under the guidance of the SES).

Representative(s) of Local Indigenous Group(s):

Representative(s) of Local Indigenous Groups(s) will provide advice regarding impact of the proposed floodplain risk management plan on indigenous heritage.

Community Consultation:

The local community, both those flood prone and otherwise, will have a key role to play in the development, implementation and success of SIAOA and floodplain risk management planning. If the management plan is to be accepted and successful, it is essential that clear and concise communications flow between the committee and the community so that affected individuals and community groups can `have their say' and learn of their roles and responsibilities.

The following format is suggested for establishing and maintaining communication between the FRMC and the local community. Council will arrange to:

• involve and inform the community (through media releases, newsletters and public meetings), of the role and responsibilities of the FRMC, its intention to instigate the SIAOA and floodplain risk management planning, and review progress on floodplain risk management and planning. Also, affected residents will be informed of the length of time expected to elapse until finalisation of the SIAOA and implementation of floodplain risk management measures, and of the nature of development controls, pending completion of the management plan;

• define clear goals for each study and estimate the time to complete each investigation and when direct consultation and feedback with the community is proposed;

• call for representatives of the general community and action groups to self-nominate for the committee, clearly stating the expected role of committee members at this time;

• use established local community groups, where they exist, and encourage representation of these groups on the committee;

• make one or two contact people known to the community, usually staff members of council, who

Page - 65


can be contacted regarding questions relating to floodplain risk management, both during the development and implementation of the management plan, as well as after the management plan has been adopted;

• release information to the community and members of the committee at regular intervals, rather than waiting until the completion of one of the formal stages of the management plan, or associated formal meetings of the committee

• when disseminating information, ensure that simple, clear messages are used to explain the situation in uncomplicated language and relate any implications to property owners and potential development applicants;

• formally adopt the management plan at the completion of the preparation and consideration process; and

• consider changes to the local floodplain risk management policy and Council's strategic planning instruments and associated development controls during the implementation phase, where strategies result in altered flood behaviour.






Nil

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil


Nil

RISK ANALYSIS

The SIAOA will help evaluate the structural integrity of the Barham town levee and help ascertain realistically the flood risk for the town. This will help Council formulate and implement effective risk mitigation measures for the town.

CONCLUSION

It is considered appropriate that the establishment of the Barham FRMC be kick started with the appointment of the Councillor(s) to sit on the committee and that the expression of interest for community representatives get under way.

Page - 66


CLAUSE 8. Council Contributions to Projects Funded under NSW Floodplain Management Program



RECOMMENDATION

That Council approves $73,571.57 to fund Council’s contributions to the projects which received grant funding under the New South Wales Floodplain Management Program, namely the Moama Food Study and Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan; Moulamein Food Study and Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan; and Barham Levee Structural Integrity Audit and Options Assessment.

BACKGROUND

Council secured grant funding under the New South Wales Floodplain Management Program (NSW FMP) for the Moama Food Study and Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan (Moama FS and FRMS&P); Moulamein Food Study and Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan (Moulamein FS and FRMS&P); and Barham Levee Structural Integrity Audit and Options Assessment (Barham SIAOA). The grant conditions require a contribution by Council to the projects.

DISCUSSION

A sum of $185,000 was approved under NSW FMP for the Moama FS and FRMS&P comprising of $158,571.43 grant and $26,428.57 Council contribution. $230,000 was approved for Moulamein FS and FRMS&P ($197,143 grant, $32,857 Council contribution). $100,000 was approved for Barham SIAOA ($85,714 grant, $14,286 Council contribution). The total funding approved under NSW FMP is $515,000 comprising of $441,428.43 grant and $73,571.57 Council contribution.

The Moama FS and FRMS&P is being delivered in collaboration with Campaspe Shire Council and Victoria North Central Catchment Management Authority as the Echuca Moama Torrumbarry Flood Study.






$73,571.57 required to fund Council's contributions to projects which received grants under the NSW Floodplain Management Program.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil


Nil

RISK ANALYSIS

Page - 67


The Moama FS and FRMS&P, Moulamein FS and FRMS&P, and the Barham SIAOA will help Council deliver its role for floodplain risk management.

CONCLUSION

Council is required to allocate $73,571.57 to fund its contributions to the projects which received grant funding under the New South Wales Floodplain Management Program.

Page - 68


CLAUSE 1. Environmental Services Report

REPORT PREPARED BY:

DIRECTOR PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - Simon Arkinstall

RECOMMENDATION:

That Council note the information in the Environmental Services Report.

BACKGROUND:

Page - 69


Page - 70


Page - 71


Page - 72


Page - 73


Page - 74


Page - 75


CLAUSE 2. Fruit Fly

REPORT GROUPaaaaDIRECTOR PLANNING, ENVIRONMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTaaaaREPORT PREPARED BY


RECOMMENDATION

That Council allocate the required funds in the 2018/19 financial year to assist in the monitoring and management of fruit fly in the communities of Barham, Murray Downs and Tooleybuc.

BACKGROUND

INTRODUCTION

Council at a previous meeting requested that staff investigate the management of fruit fly within the Council boundaries by resolving:

RESOLVED that Council:

1. Acquire and distribute appropriate control mechanisms for the control of

fruit fly.

2. Continues to advocate on behalf of the farming communities for greater

control of fruit fly.

3. Provide education to the community on fruit fly across the Council area.

BACKGROUND

Fruit fly can cause economic damage to a wide range of fruit and fruiting vegetables and Council requested that staff investigate whether assistance could be provided in the control of fruit fly within our region. The aim was to enable Council to consider its options across all communities within Murray River Council.

DISCUSSION

Page - 76


Page - 77



Nil implications.


Based on which option Council elected to introduce, and in which communities, Council would be required to allocate specific funds towards this project. It is estimated that if spraying were implemented this would potentially result in a full time position, based on the requirement to spray weekly across all communities within the Council. Council would also be required to allocated funds for a vehicle, pesticides and similar.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil implications.


Council will be implementing and funding works that are not its core responsibility. Fruit Fly is a responsibility of the NSW State Government.

RISK ANALYSIS

What can happen?

Fruit fly infestation.

How can it happen?

State Government not implementing fruit fly management procedures.

What are the consequences of the event happening?

Compensation.

What is the likelihood of the event happening?

Medium.

Adequacy of existing controls?

N.A.

Treatment options to mitigate the risk?

Monitoring program and education.

CONCLUSION

The management of fruit fly is not a core responsibility of Council, however the Council has requested

Page - 78


that Staff investigate the management of fruit fly. An initial suggestion by Council was to introduce the spraying of trees, however advice indicates that this would potentially be both costly and ineffective.

It is suggested that Council investigate engaging the services of Greater Sunraysia Pest Free Area to assist in implementing a fruit fly management program.

Page - 79


CLAUSE 3. Changes to Crown Reserve Management under the Crown Land Management Act 2016



RECOMMENDATION

That the information be noted

BACKGROUND

INTRODUCTION

The Office of Local Government is partnering with the Department of Industry – Crown Land to ensure councils are prepared for the commencement of the Crown Land Management Act 2016.

This report provides an overview of the proposed changes and the impact for Council.

BACKGROUND

The NSW Government has been working to improve the management of the state’s vast Crown land by implementing consolidated, modern and new legislation in 2018.

This has been achieved through the Crown Land Management Act 2016, which implements reforms identified through the comprehensive review of Crown land management and follows over four years of engagement with the community on the future of Crown land.

The new framework ensures that the Crown Estate continues to support and generate significant social, environmental and cultural benefits to the people of NSW. Complexity and duplication will be reduced and community involvement in Crown land improved.

The new Act will:

• reduce red tape and improve certainty and clarity about legal requirements• ensure decision making around Crown land encompasses environmental, social, cultural heritage

and economic considerations• facilitate enhanced community engagement in decisions about Crown land• recognise and facilitate Aboriginal involvement in the management of Crown land, including

recognition of Aboriginal land rights, native title rights and interests and the spiritual, social, cultural and economic importance of Crown land to Aboriginal people

• streamline management arrangements for Crown reserves and improve governance whilst continuing to strengthen community involvement

• allow local councils to manage Crown land consistently with land owned by councils• boost compliance and enforcement powers to protect and address issues on Crown land• encourage economic growth in the Western Division of NSW by converting leases to freehold and

allowing more activities on leased land• improve equity through consistency in tenures and rents and standardising lease and licence

arrangements• support social and community use of Crown land through access to rebates and waivers of rent• require an overarching strategy for Crown land.

DISCUSSION

The Act has introduced changes to the way Crown reserves are managed by councils. As a result of these changes, the Office of Local Government is developing guidance materials and training programs to support councils though the transition.

Page - 80


https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/

The manner in which council manages the Crown lands under its control will change, with the potential changes being summarised as follows:

Plans of Management

The majority of Crown managed reserves will be classified as community land, meaning that council will be required to have plans of management .This will require Council to allocate additional resources and funding to enable the existing plan of management to be updated. In addition, Council may require site specific plans of management to be developed for specific sites.

In order to make implementation straightforward the following controls will be implemented;

◦ The development of plans of management will be phased in over a three year period;◦ Councils can amend their existing plans of management;◦ Financial assistance will be made available to help with the implementation of the plans of

management.

Native Title

Council will be required to employ or engage trained native title managers who will be responsible for providing advice on certain dealings for land that may be affected by native title.

Land Negotiation Program

The Act includes provisions for the transfer of specified local lands to councils under the Land Negotiation Program. All transfers of local lands to councils will be voluntary and there will be no forced transfers.


Council will be required to fund and develop a new plan of management for community lands.


Council will be required to fund the development of the Plans of Management and the additional resources associated with the new native title components.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil implications.


Nil implications.

RISK ANALYSIS

What can happen?

Not complete the required actions under the new legislation.

How can it happen?

Lack of funding and staff.


Non-compliance with State legislation and in turn, potential litigation.


High.

Page - 81



Low.


Allocate funding and resources.

CONCLUSION

The NSW State Government has reviewed and developed the Crown Land Management Act 2016, which proposes a number of changes to how Crown reserves are currently managed. These changes will have an impact upon Council due to the large number of Crown reserves that it currently has care, control and management responsibilities for.

Council has a legal obligation to comply with the new legislative requirements and will need to consider the impact of these changes on funding allocations and resources.

Page - 82


CLAUSE 4. Changes to the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016



RECOMMENDATION

That the information on the NSW Biodiversity Conservation and Land Management Reform effective from 25 August 2017 be noted.

BACKGROUND

INTRODUCTION

The NSW biodiversity conservation and land management reforms took effect on 25 August 2017, with the commencement of:

• the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016;• the Local Land Services Act 2013 (LLS Act) as amended by the Local Land Services Amendment

Act 2016;• the Biodiversity Conservation Regulation 2017; and • the Biodiversity Conservation (Savings and Transitional) Regulation 2017.

This legislative package replaces a wide range of biodiversity related legislation, including the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (TSC Act), the biodiversity related parts of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, the Native Vegetation Act 2003 and parts of the Fisheries Management Act 1994.

The reform process began with an Independent Biodiversity Legislation Review in 2014, which proposed a major overhaul of biodiversity laws in NSW, and included an extensive three-year consultation period with key stakeholders and the wider community.

BACKGROUND

The following provides an overview of the changes to the legislation that is deemed to have a significant impact on the developer and Council.

• Biodiversity Offsets Scheme

One of the most significant changes is the establishment of a Biodiversity Offsets Scheme, for the impacts on biodiversity values of many kinds of development under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (Planning Act).

The Scheme is similar to the biobanking offsets scheme under the former TSC Act. Offset requirements and offset outcomes under both schemes are measured in terms of biodiversity credits.

The kinds of development covered by the Scheme include:

• local development with impacts above the Scheme Threshold (i.e. development which needs development consent under Part 4 of the Planning Act, except for and State significant development (SSD));

• SSD and State significant infrastructure proposals, unless there is not likely to be a significant impact on biodiversity values;

• clearing proposals above the Scheme Threshold as regulated by the State Environmental Planning Policy (Vegetation in Non-Rural Areas) 2017 or agricultural clearing proposals under the LLS Act;

Page - 83


• biodiversity certification proposals; and• development which is assessed under Part 5 of the Planning Act (because it does not need

development consent), if the proponent opts-in to the Scheme.

The Scheme adopts a new Biodiversity Assessment Method (BAM) to assess biodiversity values and calculate any biodiversity losses due to development and gains from land conversation. The losses are measured in terms of a specified number and types of biodiversity credits. Only accredited assessors will be allowed to undertake BAM assessments.

• Private land conservation

The Biodiversity Act introduces three tiers of private land conservation agreements:

• (tier 1) biodiversity stewardship agreements (BSAs);• (tier 2) conservation agreements; and• (tier 3) wildlife refuge agreements.

BSAs are now the primary method for creating biodiversity credits under the Scheme, and are similar to biobanking agreements under the former TSC Act biobanking scheme.

BSAs are voluntary, in-perpetuity agreements with the NSW Environment Minister or Biodiversity Conservation Trust (Trust). They establish a biodiversity stewardship site on which biodiversity credits are generated in accordance with the BSA.

Other forms of conservation agreement have other features which are useful in different situations, but they do not generate biodiversity credits.

• Biodiversity certification

Biodiversity certification allows offsetting across an entire land release area, usually at the rezoning stage, instead of offsetting on a site-by-site basis, to encourage planning authorities and landowners to avoid and minimise biodiversity impacts where possible.

Standard biodiversity certifications are available to planning authorities and landowners, with "strategic" proposals (as determined by the Environment Minister) available only to planning authorities.

Biodiversity certification proposals will be assessed under the BAM. Offsets obligations:

• for standard proposals may be satisfied through the retirement of biodiversity credits or payment into the Fund; and

• for strategic proposals may also be satisfied through reserving land under relevant statutory schemes, adopting development controls under the Planning Act or other measures as determined by the Environment Minister.

DISCUSSION

Page - 84



Council has the opportunity to review the land and associated vegetation to protect same for future generations.


There is an opportunity for Council to obtain upfront and ongoing funds for the management of its current nature reserves.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil implications.

Page - 85



The requirements of the changes are required to be enforced by Council.

RISK ANALYSIS

What can happen?

Council not assess development applications in accordance with legislative requirements

How can it happen?

Council not requiring applicant to provide required assessment.


Invalid consent / litigation.


Low.


Low.


Enforce legislation / education.

CONCLUSION

The NSW State Government has reviewed and developed the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016, which proposes a number of changes to how biodiversity is to be managed and, in turn, creating additional information to be submitted as part of the development application process where applicable.

Council has a legal obligation to comply with the new legislative requirements and will need to consider the impact of these changes on funding allocations and resources.

Page - 86


CLAUSE 5. Amendment to Murray LEP - Additional Permitted Use Schedule 1 - Lot 261 DP 728943, Perricoota Road, Moama



RECOMMENDATION

1. That the Council endorses the development of a Planning Proposal in accordance with Section 55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 for the inclusion of an additional permitted use of ‘public offices’ on land at Lot 261 DP728943 Perricoota Road, Moama under the Murray Local Environmental Plan 2011.

2. That Council, on completion of the Planning Proposal refer same to the Department of Planning for Gateway Determination under Section 56 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

3. That the Council receives a report, subject to the Gateway Determination, at the conclusion of the notification period to enable consideration of submissions to the proposed amendment the Murray Local Environmental Plans 2011.

BACKGROUND

INTRODUCTION

Staff have reviewed the Murray LEP 2011, and determined that to provide greater flexibility it permit with consent an additional land use on land at the Moama Recreation Reserve, Perricoota Road, Moama. The Planning Proposal will seek to include the land use, public offices in Schedule 1 Additional permitted uses of Murray Local Environmental Plan 2011 (MLEP 2011) on Lot 261, DP728943 at Perricoota Road, Moama. The intent is to allow for an additional use to be permitted, thus providing greater flexibility and opportunities.

If supported by Council a planning proposal will be required to be developed.

The purpose of this report is to inform the Council of the proposal and for the Council to determine whether to proceed to include public offices in Schedule 1 Additional Permitted Use of MLEP 2011, for Lot 261 DP728943 Perricoota Road, Moama

BACKGROUND

The report describes the subject land and explains the justification and intended outcome of the proposed amendment.

DISCUSSION

Page - 87


Page - 88



This would provide an additional permitted land use within the MLEP2011.


Nil implications

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil implications.


The requirements for amending the MLEP 2011 will be completed in accordance with the legislative requirements.

RISK ANALYSIS

What can happen?

Land use not permitted.

How can it happen?

Department not supporting the planning proposal


Page - 89


Restricted permitted uses


Low


Medium.


Complete the planning proposal.

CONCLUSION

This report recommends that the Council resolve to commence the process to amend the MLEP 2011 by including the land use, public offices, in Schedule 1 – Additional permitted uses for Lot 261 DP 728943, Perricoota Road, Moama

This application to include the land use public offices as an Additional Permitted Use is deemed the most appropriate mechanism to achieve the planning intent, and will not result in any foreseeable adverse environmental, social or economic impacts. A planning proposal will be required to be developed by a consultant, in accordance with section 55 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. On completion, this report will be required to be referred onto the Departments Gateway process.

The Planning Proposal will also be accompanied by a request that the proposal be considered to be low impact, and the Council will also seek delegations for this proposal.

Page - 90


CLAUSE 6. Changes to the Wakool Development Control Plan 2013. Clause A.4.5 River Structures and Boating Facilities



RECOMMENDATION

That Council resolve to amend the Wakool Development Control Plan 2013 to permit Council owned public infrastructure within the mooring exclusion zones within Barham, Tooleybuc and Moulamein where attached to land owned or managed by Council.

BACKGROUND

INTRODUCTION

The Wakool Development Control Plan 2013 (WDCP2013) requires a minor amendment in order to ensure that council owned public river structures and boating facilities can be installed in the exclusion zones located within the communities of Barham, Tooleybuc and Moulamein.

The WDCP 2013 currently restricts the ability of Council to approve river structures within the nominated exclusion zones. Community groups have requested that Council consider the installation of river structures to permit vessels to moor on a temporary basis to assist in promoting the townships.

BACKGROUND

The former Wakool Shire Council had developed and adopted a policy that restricted / prohibited the installation of river related structures within specified exclusion zones located in Barham, Tooleybuc and Moulamein. In reviewing the policy it is suggested that the aim of same was to protect and preserve the river aesthetics and the aesthetics of each community.

In the development of the Wakool Development Control Plan 2013 (WDCO 2013) this policy was incorporated under Clause A.4.5, which reads as follows:

A.4.5 RIVER STRUCTURES & BOATING FACILITIES

Note: Proponents should also review and address the requirements of Part 6 of WLEP2012, particularly Clause 6.6 Riparian land & the Murray River and other watercourses and Clause 6.7 – Development on river bed and banks of the Murray River. Proponents should determine if the development application is classified as integrated development under Section 91 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and if a controlled activity approval is required.

1) Objective(s): To maintain the river corridor and waterway in its natural environment by restricting the use of the river for permanent moorings for houseboats and other commercially operated vessels in certain areas of key watercourses.

2) Regional Plan: Moorings, mooring pens, marinas, wharf or boating facilities, boat launching ramps, jetties, boat sheds, and water recreation structures require approval under the provision of Murray River Regional Environmental Plan No.2. Development may also require a River Application and/or Bed and/or Bank Application as required in Appendix 1.

3) Prohibited Areas: Council will not approve any applications for moorings, mooring pens, marinas, wharf or boating facilities, boat launching ramps, jetties, boat sheds, water recreation structures and/or ancillary works (including pump ashore facilities) in key watercourses designated on the Mooring Exclusion Map in Appendix 6 – Maps for Barham, Tooleybuc, and Moulamein (where it is incompatible with the appearance of the surrounding areas) UNLESS the uses listed are ancillary to an approved retail or commercial use and meet all other controls in WLEP2012 and this DCP.

Page - 91


The associated map will be tabled at the meeting.

Again, the implementation o this clause within the WDCP 2013 was aimed at protecting the scenic quality of the river, an to reduce th visual impact associated with permanent moorings.

DISCUSSION

During the Stronger Community Fund – Major Projects it was evident that both the Barham and Tooleybuc communities thought that the installation of a mooring structure on the river would be advantageous. It was suggested that such structures would permit vessels to moor on a temporary basis and access the facilities and businesses within each town.

It is suggested that the mooring of any vessel would only be on a temporary basis.

In investigating these proposals it was determined that the current WDCP 2013 was restrictive and would not permit Council to approve a mooring within these restricted zones.

If Council were to consider the potential installation of a mooring within these restricted zones it should first consider the aim of such clause. As stipulated in the WDCP 2013 the aim of Clause A.4.5 is as follows:


It is in the opinion of staff there are two main components of this objective, the first being to maintain the visual importance of the riverine environment and secondly achieving same by restricting permanent moorings.

Council could consider an area such as Victoria Park in Echuca as an example as to why the former Wakool Shire Council had adopted this clause within the WDCP 2013. At Victoria Park there is a proliferation of houseboats and similar that are permanently moored and as a result there has been a significant impact on the visual amenity of the riverine environment.

It is suggested that to maintain this objective, but also meet the expectation of specific community groups that the WDCP 2013 could be amended to incorporate the following;

• Only permit one public mooring structure within the exclusion zones; and• That the one public mooring must be attached to or be adjacent to land owned or managed by

Council; and• That the public mooring only permit temporary mooring of vessels; and• That the public mooring must be an asset of Council.

Staff therefore suggest that Clause A.4.5 of the WDCP 2013 be amended to read as follows:

A.4.5 RIVER STRUCTURES & BOATING FACILITIES

Note: Proponents should also review and address the requirements of Part 6 of WLEP2012, particularly Clause 6.6 Riparian land & the Murray River and other watercourses and Clause 6.7 – Development on river bed and banks of the Murray River. Proponents should determine if the development application is classified as integrated development under Section 91 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 and if a controlled activity approval is required.


2) Regional Plan: Moorings, mooring pens, marinas, wharf or boating facilities, boat launching ramps, jetties, boat sheds, and water recreation structures require approval under the provision of Murray River Regional Environmental Plan No.2. Development may also require a River Application and/or Bed and/or Bank Application as required in Appendix 1.

Page - 92


3) Prohibited Areas: Council will not approve any applications for moorings, mooring pens, marinas, wharf or boating facilities, boat launching ramps, jetties, boat sheds, water recreation structures and/or ancillary works (including pump ashore facilities) in key watercourses designated on the Mooring Exclusion Map in Appendix 6 – Maps for Barham, Tooleybuc, and Moulamein (where it is incompatible with the appearance of the surrounding areas) UNLESS;

• the uses listed are ancillary to an approved retail or commercial use and meet all other controls in WLEP2012 and this DCP; OR

• the river structure is a public facility under the control of Council and is attached to or adjacent to land that is owned and or managed by Council; and

• is the only structure located within the Mooring Exclusion Zone utilised to moor vessels; and• only permits the temporary mooring of vessels.


Council has the opportunity to review the WDCP 2013 and provide a level of flexibility, whilst also maintaining the objectives of same.


Nil implications.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Council has the opportunity to review the WDCP 2013 and provide a level of flexibility, whilst also maintaining the objectives of same.


If resolved to amend the WDCP 2013 such will be required to be completed in accordance with the requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, which shall include public notification.

RISK ANALYSIS

What can happen?

Not meeting expectations of the community

How can it happen?

Not amending the WDCP 2013


Public river structures utilised to moor vessels not permitted within exclusion zones


Low.


High.


Amend Clause A.4.5 of the WDCP 2013

CONCLUSION

Council has been approached by certain sectors of both the Barham and Tooleybuc communities requesting that Council investigate the opportunity for the installation of a river structure that permits the temporary mooring of vessels within the river front areas.

Page - 93


The correct WDCP 2013 controls limit the ability to permit such to occur, however this Plan can be amended to permit public mooring structures, whilst also maintaining the objective to preserve the riverine aesthetics.

Page - 94


CLAUSE 7. Moama Markets Lease



RECOMMENDATION

That Council offer an extension to the current Licensee of the Moama Markets, with a new expiry date being 1 March 2019, to allow for timely finalisation of issues and negotiations associated with a longer term lease arrangement.

BACKGROUND

Murray River Council has operated the Moama Markets at the Kerrabee Soundshell for approximately four (4) years. The markets are operated under a Licence that was issued by Council and same is due to expire in September 2017.

The Licensee initially challenged the licence requirements through legal advice and then Council resolved to retain the markets at the Kerrabee Soundshell, both which have drawn out the process. To assist in maintaining the markets and ensuring the correct procedure is implemented by Council, it is suggested that an offer be made to the Licensee to extend the current Licence.

DISCUSSION

The current Licence was advertised and awarded in 2013 to the current operator to operate a community market at the Kerrabee Soundshell. The Licence was awarded based on a two year period with an option to extend for an additional two year period. This option was awarded in 2015 with the current expiry date being in September 2017.

At its meeting held 18 October 2016 Council resolved to relocate the markets to the Moama Recreation Reserve in accordance with a report prepared by staff. This resulted in Council advertising an Expression of Interest to seek out interest to operate and manage the markets.

The current Licensee was advised of the changes and that an Expression of Interest was to be advertised, and that they were able to lodge a submission for consideration. It is suggested that the Licensee was not accepting of the advice provided and as a result obtained a legal opinion to question Council’s ability to advertise the Expression of Interest. Council had the legal opinion reviewed, with advice being that even though Council had options to proceed, a preferred option would be to mediate an outcome.

This process extended the time for Council to make a determination on the advertised Expression of Interest and to assist in resolving the conflict, an extension to the Licence period was granted by Council.

Council contacted NSW Crown Lands who advised that they could not foresee any concerns from their perspective if the Licence was to be extended for, say, an additional six (6) months.

Council subsequently resolved to retain the markets at the Kerrabee Sound Shell and as per Staff advice, the approval of both the local and State Land Councils were required to be obtained. Council is advised that the Moama Land Council has responded, however no response from the State Land Council has been received.

In addition, Council is required to forward on the responses once received to the NSW Department of Industries – Crown Land for consideration. The NSW Department of Industries – Crown Land will then provide advice on whether this proposal can proceed and the preferred path forward.

In discussions with NSW Department of Industries – Crown Land, a time frame for their approval could

Page - 95


not be provided

Based on the time taken to receive the responses from the respective Land Councils and the unknown time implications associated with NSW Department of Industries – Crown Land, it is suggested that a further extension be provided to ensure the market can continue to operate.


Nil implications


Nil implications

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Nil implications


As Council is aware, section 55 of the Local Government Act 1993 requires Council to invite tenders before entering into an agreement for the carrying out of work, or a service directed or authorised to be undertaken on behalf of Council.

There is no doubt that the Licence Agreement for the Moama Markets is a process that should fall under the requirements of section 55 of the Local Government Act 1993. However, the requirement to invite tenders does not apply, pursuant to section 55(3) of the Local Government Act 1993, where Council resolves that, because of extenuating circumstances, a satisfactory result would not be achieved by inviting tenders.

Council advertised the Expression of Interest prior to the expiry of the current licence arrangement, however due to the actions of the Licencee and the involvement of legal representation, the process has been drawn out.

As Council has resolved to retain the market at the Kerrabee Soundshell staff have had to obtain additional approvals or similar. This process in itself has also extended the time period for permit and new licenses to be advertised, if approval from Crown Lands is obtained.

Based on the abovementioned extenuating circumstances, it is suggested that the existing Licence Agreement be extended until 1 March 2019. NSW Crown Lands have indicated that they have no objection if an extension were to be provided.

RISK ANALYSIS

What can happen?

Market ceases to operate

How can it happen?

Licence expires.


Community perception / impact on tourist market.


Medium.


High.

Page - 96



Complete process as indicated in this report.

CONCLUSION

Council operates a community market at the Kerrabee Soundshell through a Licence arrangement, and as a result of the legislative requirements to permit the market to continue at the Kerrabee Soundshell, the current licence is required to be extended.

It is therefore suggested, to assist in the ongoing operation of the Moama Markets, that an extension be offered to the current Licensee.

Page - 97


CLAUSE 8. Temporary Minor Events - Riverside Park Barham, Barham Boardwalk & Barham Reception Centre


MANAGER PLANNING & BUILDING (WEST) - Adam Garland

RECOMMENDATION

1. That the Officer’s report be received and noted2. The Council Develop an Events Management Guide3. That in the interim Council accepts formal applications for the use of Riverside Park, Barham

Boardwalk and Barham Reception Centre for events and private functions where appropriate documentation has been received

4. That Council consider the use of short-term fencing for temporary minor eventsBACKGROUND

Page - 98


DISCUSSION

The reason for this report is threefold:

• the consumption of alcohol on Council owned land / facilities, and• the potential for liability, and• the placement of temporary fencing

The matter of consumption of alcohol in a public place is not an issue from both Council’s & NSW Police perspective as the Riverside Park is not an Alcohol-Free Zone. In addition, making alcohol available to guests at functions free of charge and by way of self-serve, i.e. to persons over the age of 18, does not require any liquor licence or current accredited Responsible Service of Alcohol (RSA) Certificate. Therefore, much of the proposed functions may well be considered acceptable by Council.

If alcohol were intended to be provided to guests directly for consumption without charge, i.e. served by an individual/s to guests, the person/s supplying the alcohol would need to hold a current RSA certificate. In the event a third party was to supply alcohol by way of sale, then they would need the relevant liquor licence issued by NSW Liquor & Gaming, an RSA certificate for the service of alcohol and in addition provide a defined area in which alcohol is to be sold and consumed. Council would also request the third party responsible for the sale of alcohol at any event to provide a copy of current Public Liability Insurance.

This leads to the second reason for this report - public liability.

Council staff have recently investigated the matter of public liability and sought advice as to whether or not Council’s public liability insurance covers Council for functions, e.g. weddings in the Reception Room and/or Riverside Park and Boardwalk, in the event of an accident.

Advice received confirmed that Murray River Council currently has in place a Policy titled: Casual & Regular Hirer – Public Liability which encompasses the following:

"Private Hirers of facilities owned by the Member being any person or group of persons (not being a sporting body, club, association, corporation or incorporated body), who hires a Council facility for non-commercial or non-profit making purposes".

Private individuals/groups using or hiring Council property (Buildings, Halls, Parks & Gardens) are

Page - 99


automatically covered, however For-Profit entities such as exhibitors, trade shows or entities involved in an entrepreneurial or commercial venture are not covered. Should this be the case Council’s normal Contractor Management protocols would involve the supply and validation of a Certificate of Currency for Public Liability and retained for Council records.

Previously, the events such as weddings have been limited to just the ceremony only with the reception being carried out at an alternate location. Council is now experiencing interest in not only the ability to hold a ceremony in the park, but also hold the reception within the same location. Some of the recent expressions of interest have included the use of the Boardwalk, Riverside Park and Reception Room for the entire activity. In addition, the placement of temporary fencing has been proposed, so to allow for a more private setting for the intended gathering.

The use of temporary fencing has an ability to create both positive and negatives consequences. From an event perspective, it can provide for a more private and intimate setting given the exclusiveness of the defined area for the intended activity. However, it also can segregate community land excluding the wider population from access to those desirable features situated within associated grounds.

Council should consider whether it is deemed appropriate for the temporary installation of fencing type barriers to be included as part of any short term minor event, or should general access remain unrestricted.

Note: As previously discussed in the report, if alcohol was served by way of sale, the area in which the alcohol was to be sold and consumed would require some level of delineation. This may well be by way of a temporary barrier / fencing.


In view of maintaining a consistent approach within Murray River Council’s LGA it may be considered necessary for Council to develop an Events Management Guide. Once developed and adopted, future events would be able to be assessed and determined for acceptability against the relevant development criteria.


Nil

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

Refer to Strategic Implications section detailed above.


Nil

RISK ANALYSIS

Nil – subject to proposed minor temporary events being carried out in accordance with submitted documentation and the manner assessed by Council.

CONCLUSION

Murray River Council is somewhat privileged to have many natural assets within its boundaries. These sites create general interest to not only our residents but also those tourists who travel and holiday in our region. It is imperative that Council consider what it deems to be an acceptable approach to the management of minor temporary events in its LGA.

It seems natural that people wish to utilise some of our locations for private events and activities. The development of an Events Management Guide and the ongoing support of Council would allow for continuation of such activities to be carried out in a sustainable and consistent manner.

Page - 100


Correspondence Report

REPORT PREPARED BY:


RECOMMENDATION:

That the Correspondence Report be received and the information be noted by the Council.

BACKGROUND:

01/03: Local Government NSW Weekly

Indices of General Circulars dated 16 February, 23 February, 2 March and 9 March 2018 have been forwarded to Councillors and Senior Staff via email.

02/03: Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) News

Newsletters dated 216 February, 23 February, 2 March and 9 March 2018 have been forwarded to Councillors and Senior Staff via email.

03/03: Barham High School

Forwarding a thank you letter dated 4 December 2017 in appreciation for Council's support of the School's Annual Presentation function. A copy of the letter is attached as Appendix 1.

04/03: Local Government NSW

Forwarding a Media Release dated 12 February 2018 advising that it is time for the state government to show local libraries some love. LGNSW President, Linda Scott said the 450 council-run public libraries in NSW received less state government funding than in any other state or territory in Australia. A copy of the Media Release is attached as Appendix 2.

05/03: Member for Murray, Austin Evans MP

Forwarding a Media Release dated 14 February 2018 announcing, along with Minister for Veterans Affairs David Elliott, the Memorial Walk Action Group at Wakool will receive NSW Government funding of $1,000 as part of a proud commitment to help the community project of a Wakool Soldier Settlers Memorial Walk Stage 2. A copy of the Media Release is attached as Appendix 3.

06/03: Murray Darling Association

Forwarding a Media Release dated 15 February 2018 advising that local government is calling on the Government and Opposition to reach agreement over the way forward after a vote in the Senate on 14/02/18 to disallow a key amendment which threatens to derail the Murray-Darling Basin Plan. A copy of the Media Release is attached as Appendix 4.


Forwarding a Media Release dated 16 February 2018 urging Planning Minister Anthony Roberts to rethink the mandatory imposition of new local planning panels known as Independent Hearing and Assessment Panels (IHAPs). A copy of the Media Release is attached as Appendix 5.


Forwarding a Media Release dated 18 February 2018 advising that more than 95,000 tourism operators and businesses in NSW are missing out on a potential windfall by not providing better information and services for people with a disability, older people and young families, according to a new report into the inclusive tourism market. A copy of the Media Release is attached as Appendix 6.

09/03: Telstra North West Victoria

Page - 101


Forwarding an update dated 19 February 2018 informing that the community of Niemur is now benefitting from state of the art mobile technology following the activation of a new Telstra mobile base station in the area under the Federal Government's Mobile Black Spot Program (MBSP). A copy of the Media Release is attached as Appendix 7.


Forwarding a Media Release dated 20 February 2018 encouraging organisers of new and second-year events to be held between July and December 2018 to apply for the NSW Government's 2018 Incubator Event Fund, which supports events held in rural and regional NSW. A copy of the Media Release is attached as Appendix 8.


Forwarding a Media Release dated 20 February 2018 advising that Murray Darling Association National President Cr David Thurley and Member for Farrer Sussan Ley met in Albury on 19/02/18 to discuss the electorate's position on the future of the Murray-Darling Basin Plan. A copy of the Media Release is attached as Appendix 9.


Forwarding a Media Release dated 23 February 2018 advising that Austin Evans has turned the first sod to mark the start of construction on the $20M Barham Multipurpose Service (MPS). A copy of the Media Release is attached as Appendix 10.


Forwarding a Media Release dated 23 February 2018 announcing that the Murray electorate has received $6.4M in funding to breathe life into local community projects as part of the NSW Government's $200M Stronger Country Communities Fund. A copy of the Media Release is attached as Appendix 11.


Forwarding a Media Release dated 28 February 2018 congratulating Michelle O'Sullivan from Mathoura Preschool on being awarded an Incentive Scholarship for early childhood teaching. A copy of the Media Release is attached as Appendix 12.


Forwarding a Media Release dated 1 March 2018 advising that new planning legislation which could increase the cost of development approvals, reduce accountability and potentially delay turnaround times has come into effect in Sydney and Wollongong from March 1. A copy of the Media Release is attached as Appendix 13.


Forwarding a Media Release dated 2 March 2018 encouraging heritage managers or owners in the region that protect unique local heritage to apply for the new round of grants under the NSW Government's Heritage Near Me Program. A copy of the Media Release is attached as Appendix 14.

17/03: Minister for Regional Development, Territories & Local Government, John McVeigh

Forwarding a Media Release dated 2 March 2018 advising that the Coalition Government's highly anticipated $272M Regional Growth Fund is officially open for applications from across regional Australia. A copy of the Media Release is attached as Appendix 15.

18/03: Swan Hill Guardian

Article included in 2 March 2018 edition on the 'Meet the Council' sessions currently taking place within the Murray River Council area. A copy of the Article is attached as Appendix 16.


Page - 102


Forwarding a Media Release dated 2 March 2018 announcing an additional $200M will be available for regional towns and cities across NSW, as part of Round Two of the Stronger Country Communities Fund. A copy of the Media Release is attached as Appendix 17.

20/03: Echuca Moama Cycling Club

Forwarding a thank you letter dated 1 February 2018 in appreciation for Council's support of the 2018 Junior Cycling Carnival. A copy of the letter is attached as Appendix 18.

21/03: Cooperative Legal Service Delivery Unit & Hume Riverina Community Legal Service

Forwarding a thank you letter dated 2 February 2018 in appreciation for Council's support to assist the organisation with the 2018 Border Roadshow. A copy of the letter is attached as Appendix 19.


Forwarding a Media Release dated 9 March 2018 advising that the peak body for local government in the Murray-Darling Basin has reappointed its leadership team for the year ahead. A copy of the Media Release is attached as Appendix 20.


Forwarding a Media Release dated 9 March 2018 advising that the local government's peak body in the Murray-Darling Basin welcomes the release of data by the Murray-Darling Basin Association showing the profound social and economic impacts of water recovery on Southern Basin communities. A copy of the Media Release is attached as Appendix 21.

Page - 103


Attachment

# Attachment Type

1 APPENDIX 1 - CORRO Barham HS Thank You PDF File

2 APPENDIX 2 - CORRO Love Your Library - Valentine's Day timely reminder for NSW Government

PDF File

3 APPENDIX 3 - CORRO NSW Government Funding for Veterans Projects - Wakool PDF File

4 APPENDIX 4 - CORRO MDA position on senate disallowance PDF File

5 APPENDIX 5 - CORRO Rethink mandatory IHAPS, says local government PDF File

6 APPENDIX 6 - CORRO New report urges action to capture surging Inclusive Tourism Market

PDF File

7 APPENDIX 7 - CORRO Mobile Black Spot Program Update Niemur PDF File

8 APPENDIX 8 - CORRO Incubator Event Fund Round 2 PDF File

9 APPENDIX 9 - CORRO MDA meeting with Member for Farrer Sussan Ley PDF File

10 APPENDIX 10 - CORRO Barham MPS sod turning PDF File

11 APPENDIX 11 - CORRO Stronger Communities Fund Murray River Council PDF File

12 APPENDIX 12 - CORRO Early childhood incentive scholarships Mathoura PDF File

13 APPENDIX 13 - CORRO Democratic representation in planning reduced from March 1

PDF File

14 APPENDIX 14 - CORRO Heritage Activation Grants Open PDF File

15 APPENDIX 15 - CORRO Regional- Growth-Fund-Initial-Applicati ons-Open PDF File

16 APPENDIX 16 - CORRO Ganawarra Times 2 March 2018 - Snagging a chat with new council

PDF File

17 APPENDIX 17 - CORRO Double header - $100M for Stronger Country Communities and $100M for regional sport

PDF File

18 APPENDIX 18 - CORRO Appreciat ion Support - 2018 Junior Cyc ling Carnival - Echuca Moama Cycling Club

PDF File

19 APPENDIX 19 - CORRO Thanking Council for support to assist 2018 Border ~ Hume Riverina Community Legal Service

PDF File

20 APPENDIX 20 - CORRO Media rel ease - MDA elections PDF File

21 APPENDIX 21 - CORRO Media rel ease - Social and economic im pacts in Southern Basin commu nities

PDF File

Page - 104


Mayor, Councillor CR Bilkey

REPORT PREPARED BY:


RECOMMENDATION:

That the Sundry Delegates Report of the Mayor, Councillor CR Bilkey be received by the Council and reasonable out of pocket expenses be met by Council.

BACKGROUND:

The Mayor, Councillor CR Bilkey reported on his attendance at the following meetings and functions:

• 20 Feb: Pre-Council Meeting Briefing – Moama• 20 Feb: Ordinary Meeting of Council – Moama• 22 Feb: Sod Turning Ceremony Barham Multi-purpose Service – Barham• 23 Feb: Murray Darling Basin Association Meeting – Barham• 27 Feb: Meeting with Department of Premier & Cabinet, in company with General Manager, Des

Bilske – Moama• 28 Feb: ‘Meet the Council’ Session – Murray Downs• 2 Mar: Country Mayor’s Association of NSW Meeting (minutes attached)– Sydney• 6 Mar: Councillor Workshop – Moama• 6 Mar: Official Opening of Tindarra Resort Apartments – Moama• 6 Mar: Echuca Moama Tourism Networking Night – Echuca• 7 Mar: Murray Business Network event – Moama• 14 Mar: ‘Meet the Council’ Session – Moulamein• 14 Mar: ‘Meet the Council’ Session – Wakool

aaaa

Attachment

# Attachment Type

1 CMA Minutes 2 March 2018 PDF File

Page - 105


Deputy Mayor, Councillor GS Campbell

REPORT PREPARED BY:


RECOMMENDATION:

That the Sundry Delegates Report of the Deputy Mayor, Councillor GS Campbell be received by the Council and reasonable out of pocket expenses be met by Council.

BACKGROUND:

The Deputy Mayor, Councillor GS Campbell reported on her attendance at the following meetings and functions:

• 20 Feb: Pre-Council Meeting Briefing – Moama• 20 Feb: Ordinary Meeting of Council – Moama• 21 Feb: Echuca Moama Tourism Board Meeting - Echuca• 22 Feb: Meeting with Environmentally Friendly Australia/EKOWASTE, in company with General

Manger, Des Bilske; and Councillors Wise and Weyrich - Moama• 22 Feb: Sod Turning Ceremony Barham Multi-purpose Service – Barham• 26 Feb: Riverine Herald Sportstar of the Year Awards - Moama Bowling Club• 28 Feb: New Years Eve Committee Debrief - Echuca• 2 Mar: Launch of Echuca Historical Society publication - Echuca• 5 Mar: Twisted Science Famil - Echuca• 6 Mar: Murray River Council International Women's Day Morning Tea - Moama• 6 Mar: Councillor Workshop – Moama• 6 Mar: Official Opening of Tindarra Resort Apartments – Moama• 6 Mar: Echuca Moama Tourism Networking Night – Echuca• 7 Mar: Murray Business Network event – Moama• 12-14 Mar: Local Government NSW Tourism Conference - Parkes• 15 Mar: Murray River Council Audit Committee Meeting - Moama

Page - 106


Councillor A Aquino

REPORT PREPARED BY:


RECOMMENDATION:

That the Sundry Delegates Report of Councillor A Aquino be received by the Council and reasonable out of pocket expenses be met by Council.

BACKGROUND:

Councillor A Aquino reported on his attendance at the following meetings and functions:

• 20 Feb: Pre-Council Meeting Briefing – Moama• 20 Feb: Ordinary Meeting of Council – Moama• 6 Mar: Councillor Workshop – Moama

aaaa

Page - 107


Councillor NF Cohen

REPORT PREPARED BY:


RECOMMENDATION:

That the Sundry Delegates Report of Councillor NF Cohen be received by the Council and reasonable out of pocket expenses be met by Council.

BACKGROUND:

Councillor NF Cohen reported on her attendance at the following meetings and functions:

• 20 Feb: Pre-Council Meeting Briefing – Moama• 20 Feb: Ordinary Meeting of Council – Moama• 27 Feb: Community Living & Respite Services 12th Annual Fundraising Dinner – Moama• 6 Mar: Murray River Council International Women's Day Morning Tea - Moama• 6 Mar: Councillor Workshop – Moama• 6 Mar: Official Opening of Tindarra Resort Apartments – Moama• 6 Mar: Echuca Moama Tourism Networking Night – Echuca• 7 Mar: Murray Business Network event – Moama• 12-14 Mar: Local Government NSW Tourism Conference - Parkes

aaaa

Page - 108


Councillor A Crowe

REPORT PREPARED BY:


RECOMMENDATION:

That the Sundry Delegates Report of Councillor A Crowe be received by the Council and reasonable out of pocket expenses be met by Council.

BACKGROUND:

Councillor A Crowe reported on her attendance at the following meetings and functions:

• 20 Feb: Pre-Council Meeting Briefing – Moama• 20 Feb: Ordinary Meeting of Council – Moama• 22 Feb: Murray Downs Advancement Group AGM & General Meeting• 28 Feb: 'Meet the Council' Session - Murray Downs• 28 Feb: 'Meet the Council' Session - Koraleigh• 5 Mar: Twisted Science Famil - Echuca• 6 Mar: Murray River Council International Women's Day Morning Tea - Moama• 6 Mar: Councillor Workshop – Moama• 12-14 Mar: Local Government NSW Tourism Conference - Parkes

Page - 109


Councillor NH Gorey

REPORT PREPARED BY:


RECOMMENDATION:

That the Sundry Delegates Report of Councillor NH Gorey be received by the Council and reasonable out of pocket expenses be met by Council.

BACKGROUND:

Councillor NH Gorey reported on his attendance at the following meetings and functions:

• 20 Feb: Pre-Council Meeting Briefing – Moama• 20 Feb: Ordinary Meeting of Council – Moama• 22 Feb: Sod Turning Ceremony Barham Multi-purpose Service – Barham• 23 Feb: Murray-Darling Basin Authority Meeting - Barham

aaaa

Page - 110


Councillor AM Mathers

REPORT PREPARED BY:


RECOMMENDATION:

That the Sundry Delegates Report of Councillor AM Mathers be received by the Council and reasonable out of pocket expenses be met by Council.

BACKGROUND:

Councillor AM Mathers reported on his attendance at the following meetings and functions:

• 20 Feb: Pre-Council Meeting Briefing – Moama• 20 Feb: Ordinary Meeting of Council – Moama• 22 Feb: Sod Turning Ceremony Barham Multi-purpose Service – Barham• 28 Feb: Local Health Medical Trust Meeting - Barham• 14 Mar: ‘Meet the Council’ Session – Moulamein• 14 Mar: ‘Meet the Council’ Session – Wakool• 19 Mar: Moulamein Recreation Reserve Management Committee Meeting - Moulamein

aaaa

Page - 111


Councillor TE Weyrich

REPORT PREPARED BY:


RECOMMENDATION:

That the Sundry Delegates Report of Councillor TE Weyrich be received by the Council and reasonable out of pocket expenses be met by Council.

BACKGROUND:

Councillor TE Weyrich reported on his attendance at the following meetings and functions:

• 20 Feb: Ordinary Meeting of Council – Moama• 6 Mar: Councillor Workshop – Moama• 12-14 Mar: Local Government NSW Tourism Conference - Parkes

aaaa

Page - 112


Councillor GW Wise

REPORT PREPARED BY:


RECOMMENDATION:

That the Sundry Delegates Report of Councillor GW Wise be received by the Council and reasonable out of pocket expenses be met by Council.

BACKGROUND:

Councillor GW Wise reported on his attendance at the following meetings and functions:

• 20 Feb: Pre-Council Meeting Briefing - Moama• 20 Feb: Ordinary Meeting of Council - Moama• 22 Feb: Meeting with Environmentally Friendly Australia/EKOWASTE, in company with General

Manger, Des Bilske; and Councillors Campbell and Weyrich - Moama• 6 Mar: Councillor Workshop - Moama• 6 Mar: Official Opening of Tindarra Resort Apartments - Moama• 14 Mar: 'Meet the Council' Session - Moulamein• 14 Mar: 'Meet the Council' Session - Wakool

aaaa

Page - 113


CLAUSE 1. Picnic Point Caravan Park - Renovation of Manager's Residence and Kiosk

CONFIDENTIALREASON FOR CONFIDENTIAL REPORT:

Local Government Act 1993 - Section 10A(2)(d)(iii): commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, reveal a trade secret

Attachment

# Attachment Type

1 APPENDIX 1 - Picnic Point Tender Evaluation Panel Report_Scoring Matrix 0318 PDF File

Page - 114


CLAUSE 1. Water and Sewage Treatment Plant - Deep Creek, Lot 13 and 40 in Neighbourhood Plan 285882

CONFIDENTIALREASON FOR CONFIDENTIAL REPORT:

Local Government Act 1993 - Section 10A(2)(c): information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business

Attachment

# Attachment Type

1 December Meeting Report - Water & Sewage Treatment Plant PDF File

Page - 115


Documents

NOTICE OF MEETING · Agenda Items 5. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES Ordinary Meeting of 20/02/18 9. NOTICES OF MOTION/NOTICES OF RESCISSION Notice of Rescission A 10. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT