3
Intraplan BVU Beratergruppe Consult GmbH Wirtschaft + Verkehr GmbH Orleansplatz 5a Wentzingerstr. 19 81667 München 79106 Freiburg Tel: +49 (0) 89 45911-0 Tel: +49 (0) 761 21 77 23 40 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Fehmarn Belt Forecast 2014 - Update of the FTC-Study of 2002 - Treatment of Great Belt in the Forecast (Passenger Traffic) - for Femern A/S 2015

Notat fra Intraplan og BVU om trafikoverflytning fra Storebælt

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The traffic function of the Great Belt Fixed Link (GBFL) is mainly the connection between East-ern and Western Denmark. At the same time however, it provides an important international connection between Eastern Denmark/the Scandinavian peninsula and Germany/the continent (“North-South traffic”).

Citation preview

  • Intraplan BVU Beratergruppe Consult GmbH Wirtschaft + Verkehr GmbH Orleansplatz 5a Wentzingerstr. 19 81667 Mnchen 79106 Freiburg Tel: +49 (0) 89 45911-0 Tel: +49 (0) 761 21 77 23 40 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected]

    Fehmarn Belt Forecast 2014 - Update of the FTC-Study of 2002

    - Treatment of Great Belt in the Forecast (Passenger Traffic) -

    for

    Femern A/S

    2015

  • 1

    1 ROLE OF GREAT BELT IN THE NORTH-SOUTH TRAFFIC

    The traffic function of the Great Belt Fixed Link (GBFL) is mainly the connection between East-

    ern and Western Denmark.

    At the same time however, it provides an important international connection between Eastern

    Denmark/the Scandinavian peninsula and Germany/the continent (North-South traffic),

    Therefore the Great Belt had to be considered in the FTC-study

    (1) To be able to capture the total market of the North-South traffic

    (2) To be able to measure the existing market share of this connection and the possible

    shift to the FBFL when in operation

    Indeed, the results of the FTC-study indicate that a considerable share of the traffic jump

    caused by the FBFL is related to shifts from Great Belt to FBFL (around 55 % of the 1,3 million

    cars/year).

    Although the route via the GBFL is 140 kilometers longer compared to the route via Rdby-

    Puttgarden for most traffic flows, it is a very attractive route:

    Considering waiting times and times for access and egress for the ferries the travel times

    are approximately the same between the route via GB and via the Rdby Puttgarden fer-

    ry-line

    However the passage via the Rdby-Puttgarden ferry-line is considerably more expensive

    (around 65 per car) than the toll on Great Belt (33 per car) even if taking additional fuel

    costs on the GB route into consideration.

    And due to rising fares on the ferry compared to stable toll rates on GBFL the attractivity of the

    ferry-line is decreasing. This is the main reason for the stagnating car transports on the ferry-

    line and vice versa is one reason for the strong growth of the GBFL transport figures.

  • 2

    2 TREATMENT OF GREAT BELT IN THE FTC-STUDY

    From different sources in Germany (Bundesverkehrswegeplanung, tourism surveys and others)

    and Denmark (national transport model, passenger surveys) a reliable database of the traffic

    between Germany and Scandinavia could be created for the study, including main traffic flows

    (origins and destinations) and modal split. To be able to capture the traffic totals in the North-

    South traffic reliable road and railway counts and ferry statistics (not only for Rdby-

    Puttgarden but for all other relevant lines) have been used. Among that for GBFL the traffic per

    vehicle category is reported regularly and reliably on monthly basis.

    Samples of plate counts in summer indicate a share of 5 to 6 % of foreign cars on GBFL. For-

    eigners use the GBFL mainly on North-South traffic. In winter the share is lower, 2 to 3 %, which

    is logical as in winter the price differences between GBFL (no seasonal or daytime variation of

    toll rates) and the ferry line Rdby-Puttgarden (much higher prices in peak periods) is lower than

    in summer.

    Assuming a similar number of Danish cars using GBFL in north-south traffic instead of domestic

    traffic between east and west Denmark, in total a share of 8 % of the GBFL traffic can be as-

    signed to international resp. north-south traffic on GB. This is a quite reliable figure for 2011.

    In 2014/15 this share should be higher due to a growing price gap between GBFL (stable toll

    rates and decreasing fuel costs for longer distance) and Rdby-Puttgarden (raising prices).

    The numbers for the GB transports in the north-south traffic (713.000 cars in 2011) have been

    added to the transports on the relevant ferry lines (around 2.9 million cars per year in 2011) to

    get the totals of north-south traffic. At the same time it has been used in the same way as the

    ferry statistics: to calibrate the route choice model for the forecasting.

    3 EFFECTS OF THE FBFL

    With FBFL some advantages of the GBFL compared to the existing Rdby-Puttgarden connec-

    tion will cease to exist: the FBFL toll will stay roughly the same as the ferry line but the FBFL will

    be approximately one hour faster. That means it is also one hour faster than the GB route for

    most relations. Therefore a big share of traffic will divert from GBFL to FBFL, which is partly a

    re-diversion due to the fact that, today, raising prices on the Rdby-Puttgarden ferry line is in-

    creasingly pushing traffic from the Rdby-Puttgarden connection to the GB route.