27
Not all empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju Kim (Monmouth University School of Social Work) Workshop in Multidisciplinary Philanthropic Studies April 23, 2013

Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Not all empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving

Xiaonan Kou

(Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy)

Sung-Ju Kim

(Monmouth University School of Social Work)

Workshop in Multidisciplinary Philanthropic Studies

April 23, 2013

Page 2: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Presentation Overview

• Background and research question

• Data and methodologies

• Findings

• Discussion

Page 3: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

What Is Empathy • Definitions

– “Affective reaction to another’s emotional experience”

or

– “Sharing the perceived emotion of another” (Unger & Thumuluri, 1997)

Page 4: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Dimensions of Empathy

Component Characteristic Motive

Empathic Concern Affective Altruistic

Perspective Taking Cognitive Altruistic

Personal Distress Affective Egoistic

Interpersonal Reactivity Index (Davis, 1980, 1983)

Page 5: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Empathic Concern

o “I often have tender, concerned feelings for people less fortunate than me.”

o “I am often quite touched by things that I see happen.”

o “I would describe myself as a pretty soft-hearted person.”

Components Characteristic Motive

Empathic Concern Affective Altruistic

Page 6: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Perspective Taking

o “When I'm upset at someone, I usually try to "put myself in their shoes" for a while.”

o “I sometimes try to understand my friends better by imagining how things look from their perspective.”

o “I try to look at everybody’s side of a disagreement before I make a decision.”

Components Characteristic Motive

Perspective Taking Cognitive Altruistic

Page 7: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Personal Distress

o “When I see someone who badly needs help in an emergency, I go to pieces.”

o “Being in a tense emotional situation scares me.”

o “I tend to lose control during emergencies.”

Components Characteristic Motive

Personal Distress Affective Egoistic

Page 8: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Research Question

What roles do different dimensions of empathy

play in charitable giving?

Empathic Concern

Pers

pect

ive

Taki

ng

Page 9: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Conceptual Framework

Charitable Giving

Empathy

Decision to Give

Amount Given

Empathic Concern

Perspective Taking

Personal Distress

Other Influencing Factors

Socio-demographics

Principle of Care

Principle of care: E.g. “People should be willing to help others who are less fortunate.”

Page 10: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Hypotheses • H1: Higher empathic concern increases both the

likelihood and the amount of charitable giving.

• H2: Higher perspective taking increases both the likelihood and the amount of charitable giving.

• H3: Higher personal distress increases the likelihood of charitable giving, but does not influence the amount donated to charities.

Page 11: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Data

• Data: 22nd wave of the 2008-2009 American National Election Studies (ANES) Panel Study

• Survey questions include: – Charitable giving

– Empathy

– Principle of care

– Religious similarity and giving

• Sample: 2,266 respondents aged 18+

Page 12: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Methodology • Analyses:

– Factor analysis

– Probit regression

– Tobit regression

• Dependent variables: – Charitable giving: % of giving, $ donated

• Independent variables: – Empathic concern

– Perspective taking

– Personal distress

Page 13: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Methodology

• Control variables: – Gender, Age

– Ethnicity

– Religious affiliation and attendance

– Education, Marital status

– Household income, Home ownership

– Principle of care

Page 14: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Descriptive Statistics

Charitable Giving

Probability % 87%

Average $ (if > $0) $1,667

Median $ (if > $0) $700

Respondent Profile (N=2,266)

Female 59% Married 54%

Religious 83% White 86%

College graduate or above

55% HH income

($50K - $100K) 53%

Page 15: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Empathy and Total Giving

Notes:

Marginal effects are estimated with conditional marginal effect. Tobit regressions are examined with donors only. Outliers for total giving were excluded.

Probit N = 2,034; Tobit N = 1,849.

Significance levels:

*** P<0.01, ** P<0.05, * P<0.10.

0.039

-0.034

0.024

Empathic concern Perspective taking Personal distress

Probability of Giving ***

***

**

163.903

74.214

-211.631

Empathic concern Perspective taking Personal distress

Dollar Amount Given

***

*

Page 16: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Research Question

Does the impact of empathy on giving vary

across different types of nonprofits?

Page 17: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Empathy and Giving to Basic Needs

Notes:

Marginal effects are estimated with conditional marginal effect. Tobit regressions are examined with donors only. Outliers for total giving were excluded.

Probit N = 2,034; Tobit N = 1,849.

Significance levels:

*** P<0.01, ** P<0.05, * P<0.10.

0.043

-0.079

-0.021

Empathic concern Perspective taking Personal distress

Probability of Giving

***

-51.69

44.002

-153.331

Empathic concern Perspective taking Personal distress

Dollar Amount Given

***

**

**

Page 18: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Empathy and Giving to Education

Notes:

Marginal effects are estimated with conditional marginal effect. Tobit regressions are examined with donors only. Outliers for total giving were excluded.

Probit N = 2,034; Tobit N = 1,849.

Significance levels:

*** P<0.01, ** P<0.05, * P<0.10.

0.099

0.045

0.002

Empathic concern Perspective taking Personal distress

Probability of Giving

***

***

65.335 61.679

-0.842 Empathic concern Perspective taking Personal distress

Dollar Amount Given

*** ***

Page 19: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Empathy and Giving to Health

Notes:

Marginal effects are estimated with conditional marginal effect. Tobit regressions are examined with donors only. Outliers for total giving were excluded.

Probit N = 2,034; Tobit N = 1,849.

Significance levels:

*** P<0.01, ** P<0.05, * P<0.10.

0.108

-0.084

0.071

Empathic concern Perspective taking Personal distress

Probability of Giving

***

***

***

42.042

-33.312

-2.174 Empathic concern Perspective taking Personal distress

Dollar Amount Given

***

**

Page 20: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Empathy and Giving to Environment

Notes:

Marginal effects are estimated with conditional marginal effect. Tobit regressions are examined with donors only. Outliers for total giving were excluded.

Probit N = 2,034; Tobit N = 1,849.

Significance levels:

*** P<0.01, ** P<0.05, * P<0.10.

0.046

0.007

-0.022

Empathic concern Perspective taking Personal distress

Probability of Giving

***

***

149.495

28.423

-237.734

Empathic concern Perspective taking Personal distress

Dollar Amount Given ***

***

Page 21: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Empathy and Giving to Youth/Family

Notes:

Marginal effects are estimated with conditional marginal effect. Tobit regressions are examined with donors only. Outliers for total giving were excluded.

Probit N = 2,034; Tobit N = 1,849.

Significance levels:

*** P<0.01, ** P<0.05, * P<0.10.

0.087 0.075

-0.065

Empathic concern Perspective taking Personal distress

Probability of Giving ***

***

***

24.453

45.033

-20.568

Empathic concern Perspective taking Personal distress

Dollar Amount Given

**

***

***

Page 22: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Empathy and Giving to Arts

Notes:

Marginal effects are estimated with conditional marginal effect. Tobit regressions are examined with donors only. Outliers for total giving were excluded.

Probit N = 2,034; Tobit N = 1,849.

Significance levels:

*** P<0.01, ** P<0.05, * P<0.10.

0.055

-0.006

0.001

Empathic concern Perspective taking Personal distress

Probability of Giving ***

33.525

-5.619 -11.687

Empathic concern Perspective taking Personal distress

Dollar Amount Given ***

Page 23: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Empathy and Giving to International

Notes:

Marginal effects are estimated with conditional marginal effect. Tobit regressions are examined with donors only. Outliers for total giving were excluded.

Probit N = 2,034; Tobit N = 1,849.

Significance levels:

*** P<0.01, ** P<0.05, * P<0.10.

-0.003 -0.003

0.021

Empathic concern Perspective taking Personal distress

Probability of Giving ***

12.117

4.964

16.738

Empathic concern Perspective taking Personal distress

Dollar Amount Given

Page 24: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Empathy and Giving to Religion

Notes:

Marginal effects are estimated with conditional marginal effect. Tobit regressions are examined with donors only. Outliers for total giving were excluded.

Probit N = 2,034; Tobit N = 1,849.

Significance levels:

*** P<0.01, ** P<0.05, * P<0.10.

-0.039

-0.009

-0.14

Empathic concern Perspective taking Personal distress

Probability of Giving

***

-14.524 -6.224

-252.793

Empathic concern Perspective taking Personal distress

Dollar Amount Given

***

Page 25: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Summary of Key Findings

Not all empathy is equal

Page 26: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Discussion • Implications for fundraising

• Limitations: self-report survey data

Page 27: Not all empathy is equal · 2016. 12. 22. · Notall empathy is equal: How empathy affects charitable giving Xiaonan Kou (Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy) Sung-Ju

Thank you!

Questions and Comments?