Upload
ipo
View
42
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
North Dakota Research Accomplishments with EPSCoR/IDeA Support a presentation by Jim Hoehn Senior Associate │ EPSCoR/IDeA Foundation Washington, DC September 29, 2006. 1987. 2001. Idaho Louisiana Mississippi South Dakota. 1985. Hawaii New Mexico. Alabama Kentucky Nevada - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
North Dakota Research Accomplishments with EPSCoR/IDeA Support
a presentation by
Jim HoehnSenior Associate │ EPSCoR/IDeA Foundation
Washington, DCSeptember 29, 2006
ArkansasMaine
MontanaSouth CarolinaWest Virginia
1980AlabamaKentuckyNevada
North DakotaOklahoma
Puerto RicoVermontWyoming
1985
HawaiiNew Mexico
2001
U.S. Virgin Islands
2002
DelawareRhode Island
New Hampshire
2003
1992
KansasNebraska
Alaska
2000
1987
IdahoLouisiana
MississippiSouth Dakota
Eligible JurisdictionsBy Year of Program Entrance
Program Jurisdictions and Funding
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
$100
'80 '82 '84 '86 '88 '90 '92 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06
Number of States
Funding, millions
Characteristics of EPSCoR Jurisdictions Collectively
─ Population: 20% of nation
─ Scientists and Engineers: 18%
─ Doctoral/Research Universities: 25%
─ NSF R&D Funding: 10% of total
─ NAEP Performance: 8 of the top 10 States are EPSCoR States
─ Scholars and Fellows: 22% of Goldwater Scholars; 6% of NSF Graduate Fellows
0
5
10
15
20
25
Population
Scientists
Doc Univ's
NSF Funding
Average Annual Salary• Number of EPSCoR
States in the Top 10 -- 1 (Delaware is #7)
• Number of EPSCoR States in the Bottom 10 -- 10;
– the bottom 12 are EPSCoR States
– Puerto Rico last
• Employees in EPSCoR states are paid 81% of employees in non-EPSCoR states
Source: The Dynamics of Technology-Based Economic Development 2004$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000 $50,000
Puerto RicoMontana
South DakotaNorth Dakota
MississippiArkansas
IdahoWest Virginia
OklahomaWyomingNebraska
New MexicoMaineIowa
LouisanaSouth Carolina
KentuckyUtah
AlabamaKansas
VermontHawaii
TennesseeFlorida
WisconsinIndiana
North CarolinaMissouriNevadaOregon
OhioArizona
Rhode IslandPennsylvania
GeorgiaNew
TexasAlaska
MinnesotaVirginia
MichiganWashington
ColoradoMarylandDelaware
IlliniosCalifornia
New J erseyMassachusetts
New YorkConnecticut
Stat
e
U.S. Average - $32,890
Bachelors Degrees in the Workforce• EPSCoR States
have 90% of the Bachelors Degree holders in their workforces compared to the Nation
• EPSCoR States are a net provider of Bachelor degree holders to other states
• This is called the “demographic death spiral”
Source: NSF Science and Engineering Indicators 2006
1994 1999 2004
1994 1999 2004
- 1,000.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 4,000.00 5,000.00 6,000.00 7,000.00 8,000.00
WyomingAlaska
North DakotaSouth Dakota
VermontDelawareMontana
District ofWest VirginiaRhode Island
IdahoMaineHawaii
NebraskaNew Hampshire
New MexicoArkansas
NevadaMississippi
UtahIowa
OklahomaKansas
KentuckyLouisiana
OregonAlabama
South CarolinaConnecticut
IndianaWisconsinTennessee
ArizonaColoradoMissouri
MinnesotaWashington
North CarolinaMaryland
GeorgiaMichigan
MassachusettsVirginia
OhioNew Jersey
PennsylvaniaIllinoisFloridaTexas
New YorkCalifornia
Consistent Themes Throughout the Life of the EPSCoR Program
• State-based
• State steering committee
• State commitment
• Competitive awards with national review
• Development within state context
• Scientific infrastructure development
• Highly focused scientifically
Agents of Change
Agents of Change
Accomplishments of North Dakota EPSCoR’s Washington, DC Agents:
– The EPSCoR/IDeA Coalition
– The EPSCoR/IDeA Foundation
EPSCoR/IDeA Foundation Board
• Senior University Officials
• Diverse
• Agency Expertise
• Aggressive Agenda
EPSCoR/IDeA Priorities for FY 2007
• Grow NASA EPSCoR and DEPSCoR• Develop a 15-20 year vision for NSF EPSCoR• Maintain a strong NIH IDeA Program• Better coordinate EPSCoR/IDeA Coalition and
Foundation, while preserving separate identity• Increase interaction among various
EPSCoR/IDeA constituencies
EPSCoR/IDeA Funding Goals (in millions of dollars)
FY 2006 Enacted
FY 2007 Goal
NSF $99.0 $125.0
DOE $7.2 $12.5
USDA 10% 10%
NIH $222.0 $250.0
DOD $12.3 $20.0
NASA $12.8 $15.0
EPA 0.0 $10.0
TOTAL $367 $442.5
EPSCoR/IDeA Foundation Accomplishments
• NSF EPSCoR Request: $94 million in FY 06 – first time since FY 2000 that NSF requested an increase in EPSCoR funding over the prior year’s congressional appropriation
• Workshop: NSF holds “EPSCoR 2020” visionary workshop
• Visibility: Foundation increases visibility of EPSCoR/IDeA with top federal officials
• NIH Budget: NIH budget holds at $222 million while overall NIH research funding growth ends; no reprogramming of IDeA funds
• Agency Interaction: Boards expanded to better interact with ALLALL EPSCoR/IDeA agencies
Federal R&D Budget Environment for North Dakota’s Researchers
-400
-350
-300
-250
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Spending in BillionsSource: Congressional Budget Office
Six-Year Deficit
FY 1990 Base
$8 million
FY 2006 Enacted
$367 million
FY 2007 Goal
$442 million
FY 1990-2006EPSCoR/IDeA Funding
How Congress and the Agencies View
EPSCoR/IDeA’s Results
Comparison of All Jurisdictions and NSF EPSCoR JurisdictionsPercent Change in NSF Research Directorates and Offices from 1996 to 2002
17.5% 20.2%
51.4%
21.5%
50.4%
73.4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Proposals CompetitiveAwards
Funding*
AllEPSCoR
EPSCoR states received 10% of NSF research awards, and 9% of research dollars in 2002.* Includes competitive award, supplements, and continuing grant increments.
Proposals and Awards Source: NSF Budget Internet Information System (BIIS) Funding Rate tables. Funding for All Actions Sources: BIIS Award and Summary tables. EPSCoR jurisdictions include those in program prior to 1996: AL, AR, ID, KY, LA, KS, ME, MT, MS, NE, NV, ND, OK, PR, SC, SD, VT, WV, WY
Pe
rcen
t C
han
ge
North Dakota EPSCoR Results
ND EPSCoR Achievements
Indications that EPSCoR is transforming the science and technology infrastructure of ND:
• Increases in the number of Ph.D-level scientists & engineers• Increased in the proposal submission rates for merit-based
grants and contracts• Increases in the proposal “success rate” for merit-based grants
and contracts• North Dakota EPSCoR increasingly influences AURA/STTAR
students’ choice of science and technology careers• Enhancing the productivity and profitability of North Dakota’s
existing technology based businesses• Facilitating the establishment of new high-technology
businesses
Examples of ND EPSCoR’s Achievements
• The state's overall investment of $24.3 million has resulted in over $169 million in external awards to EPSCoR-supported researchers since 1986
• The $100 million awarded to EPSCoR-supported researchers since 1986 has had over a $230 million total impact on the economy of North Dakota
Example of ND IDeA’s Achievements
20:1 Return on Investment
– NIH’s Centers of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) research cluster faculty supported by North Dakota EPSCoR and matching funds from the state of North Dakota have generated federal grant income over 20 times the initial investment.
Issues and Challenges
EPSCoR 2020: Expanding State Participation in Research in the 21st Century – A New Vision for the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research
EPSCoR 2020 Workshop
Date: June 15-16, 2006
PI: Jerry Odom
Location: Arlington, VA
Purpose: “…to look 10-20 years into the future and think strategically about investments that will be needed to create the national research capacity that [NSF] would like to achieve – a new vision for EPSCoR.”
Strategic Priorities
• Provide more Flexible RII awards– increase size and duration of RII grants
• Increase geographical dispersion of funding and participation– Relocate EPSCoR program to OIA
• Revitalize and extend other components of EPSCoR─ Co-funding─ Planning grants─ Outreach
• Restore “experimental” nature of EPSCoR─ Use program as testbed
• Develop state strategic S&T business plans
• Accountability– Create shared understanding and definition of success
Issues and Challenges
• Accountability
• Attribution
• Program Flexibility
• Linkage to Emerging Federal Priorities (ACI and Gathering Storm)
• Tight Budget Scenario
• State S&T plans and Investments in S/T