Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
North Dakota Rail Plan Sponsors • North Dakota Department of
Transportation (NDDOT) • North Dakota Public Service
Commission • North Dakota Department of
Commerce • North Dakota Department of
Emergency Services • North Dakota Pipeline
Authority • Upper Great Plains
Transportation Institute
Stakeholders • Railroads • Freight shippers • State agencies • Local agencies, MPOs,
economic development groups
• Tribal nations • Public • Others
Stakeholder and Public Participation
Outreach Activity • Website/On-line
survey • Listening Tour • Three regional
workshops • Three industry forums • Interest group
meetings • Industry interviews • Public meetings
Why Prepare A State Rail Plan
Required by 2008 Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act for certain categories of federal funding
Offers an opportunity for stakeholder and the public to influence the future of rail in the state
Identifies future rail service, infrastructure, and policy needs
Provides a road map for improving/expanding rail service and rail safety
Provides an education in rail transportation
North Dakota Rail Plan Elements
The role of rail in statewide transportation
North Dakota rail system and trends
Freight rail needs: infrastructure, service, policy, organization
Passenger rail needs: stations, routes, service
The State’s Rail Service and Investment Program
Goals and Objectives
•North Dakota’s multimodal transportation system is strategically developed and globally integrated
Vision
•Safe and secure transportation •Sustainable and reliable mobility •Diversified and sufficient funding •Communication and cooperation •Strong economic growth with consideration of environmental, cultural, and social impacts.
Goals
North Dakota Rail System North Dakota Railroads
Railroad Miles Operated in North Dakota BNSF 1,723 Canadian Pacific 484 Dakota Northern Railroad 51 Dakota, Missouri Valley, & Western 394 Northern Plains Railroad, Inc. 294 Red River Valley & Western Railroad 412
Class I Infrastructure Profile (Example)
DEVILS LAKE SUBDIVISION MAIN LINE
Rail Siding Locations and Lengths Emerado MP 12.3 7,380 ft. Michigan MP 50.3 8,575 ft. Lakota MP 60.7 8,695 ft. Devils Lake MP 85.3 10,530 ft. Churchs Ferry MP 104.2 4,361 ft. Leeds MP 115.7 8,115 ft. Rugby MP 142.4 6,160 ft. Towner MP 161.3 7,870 ft.
Devils Lake Subdivision The subdivision is a main line between the Devils Lake Switch in Grand Forks at MP 0.4 and Surrey for a length of 194.9 miles. The KO Subdivision connects with the Devils Lake Subdivision at Surrey. Maximum operating speed for freight less than 100 tons per car is 60 mph, and 45 mph for loads of 100 tons or more. The maximum operating speed for the Amtrak Empire Builder passenger line on the Devils Lake Subdivision is 79 mph.
Maximum gross weight per car is 286K over the entire 194.9 miles
Freight Rail Traffic Railroads have become increasingly important in the state’s commerce:
- 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Terminating Originating
North Dakota Rail Traffic Growth 2000-2015 (Mil. Tons)
• Crude Oil • Grain • Food • Chemicals
• Coal • Frac Sand • Petroleum Products
Role of Freight Rail
Transportation Modes
Inbound/Outbound/Within 2002 2015
Tons (000s) Mode Share Tons (000s) Mode Share Air 0 0.0% 16 0.0% Multiple Modes & Mail 152 0.1% 2,915 0.8% Other and Unknown 33,901 19.9% 11,340 3.2% Pipeline 18,994 11.1% 134,427 38.1% Rail 20,444 12.0% 73,573 20.8% Truck 97,143 56.9% 130,917 37.1%
Total 170,635 100.0% 353,187 100.0%
Type of Infrastructure Miles/Number Federal, State, County Roads 27,685 miles Primary Highway Freight System
461 miles
National Highway Freight Network
875 miles
Class I railroad trackage 2,180 miles Class III railroad trackage 1,151 miles Public use airports 8 certified for air carrier
operations
Traffic
Infrastructure Note: Pipeline tonnage may be overstated by the data source, FAF
Rail Traffic Profile (2014 Waybill Data) North Dakota Rail Traffic Directional Profile
North Dakota Through Rail Traffic Commodity Profile
Rail Traffic Profile (2014 Waybill Data)
North Dakota Inbound Rail Traffic Commodity Profile
North Dakota Outbound Rail Traffic Commodity Profile
Class I Rail Traffic (2015) BNSF Originated BNSF Terminated
Commodity Number of
Cars Number of
Tons Commodity Number of Cars
Number of Tons
Crude, Petroleum, Natural Gas
268,077 26,581,776 Nonmetallic Minerals
37,724 4,005,456
Grain 119,693 12,803,345 Coal 26,449 3,010,136 Coal 34,537 3,367,455 Chemicals and
Allied Products 13,788 1,332,332
Food and Kindred Products
30,917 2,887,520 Stone, Clay, Glass & Concrete Products
8,875 938,215
Petroleum and Coal Products
22,416 1,674,046 Farm Products 6,727 664,976
All Other 13,768 1,141,680 All Other 23,415 1,210,388 Total 489,408 48,455,822 Total 116,978 11,161,503
CP Originated CP Terminated
Commodity Number of
Cars Number of
Tons Commodity Number of
Cars Number of
Tons Grain 52,378 5,285,330 Nonmetallic
Minerals 7,682 842,899
Crude, Petroleum, Natural Gas
35,811 3,643,116 Stone, Clay, Glass & Concrete Products
3,909 427,713
Food and Kindred Products
8,179 817,299 Chemicals and Allied Products
4,655 407,825
Chemicals and Allied Products
5,017 474,288 Farm Products 2,207 216,022
Coal 2,898 289,899 Primary Metal Products
981 85,514
All Other 5,467 499,759 All Other 1,552 110,668 Total 109,750 11,009,691 Total 20,986 2,090,641
Rail Dependent Industries Outlook Petroleum • Bakken crude oil production is expected to increase • CBR is not expected to reach prior volumes again
New pipeline capacity Rail will be important in east and west coast markets
Agriculture • Unlikely that above-average growth in North Dakota rail shipments
will continue as major crop price increases are not expected in the long run
• North Dakota production which outpaced the country will track with U.S. production Wheat production is projected to grow 5.6 percent from
2014/15 to 2025/26 Corn is expected to grow 4.8 percent over the period shown Soybean production is expected to increase 3.5 percent
Rail Dependent Industries Outlook
Ethanol • Fuel prices have declined, which has lowered ethanol prices • USDA forecasts a moderate decline in ethanol production through
2025 and rail shipments – ND rail shipments will track the decline Coal • Double digit decreases in coal transported by rail – 12% in 2015, 19%
in 2016 • The outlook for coal is uncertain
Current administration is more favorable towards coal Low natural gas prices have triggered utility conversions
• Slight reduction in inbound coal • Coal passing through the state will remain at low volumes with
potential decrease
Other Rail Demand Considerations
• Potential increase in agriculture demand for containerized shipments
• Panama Canal expansion may shift some West Coast transcontinental port traffic to Gulf ports or the East Coast
• Railroads converting domestic truck traffic to intermodal
• Growing truck driver shortages
• Reshoring of manufacturing
• Adoption of new technologies – connected automated vehicle technology by trucking industry
Rail Dependent Industries Outlook • Rail recession since 2014 • In 2015, rail traffic excluding coal fell 2.4 percent; intermodal
increased 1,4 percent • In 2016, rail traffic excluding coal declined 1.5 percent; intermodal
also declined 1.5 percent • Starting to see a reversal – 1 percent quarter over quarter in 2017
North Dakota Rail Traffic Growth
0.0%
0.2%
0.4%
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
1.4%
1.6%
1.8%
2.0%
2015 - 2020 2020 - 2025 2025 - 2030 2030 - 2035 2035 - 2040 2040 - 2045
ND Terminating ND Originating U.S.
Passenger Rail
Station 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Devils Lake 6,860 5,740 6,148 4,569 5,505 5,142 3,555 3,512 4,223 Fargo 24,142 21,514 21,286 16,968 20,304 22,497 23,314 22,829 21,495 Grand Forks 21,942 17,928 19,641 16,935 20,028 19,141 13,976 12,131 13,882 Minot 41,754 38,418 39,585 28,217 36,285 40,595 34,834 31,827 29,424 Rugby 7,048 5,906 6,409 6,106 7,057 5,637 4,053 4,254 4,161 Stanley 3,694 3,921 4,549 6,146 10,234 9,411 7,036 6,514 5,133 Williston 23,619 21,793 24,586 29,920 54,324 51,076 44,013 38,477 27,845
Total 131,067 117,229 124,214 110,872 155,749 155,512 132,795 119,544 106,163
• Significant ridership decreases since 2013 – 50,000 trip decrease in annual ridership
• Across the board decrease – Williston biggest reduction
North Dakota Amtrak Ridership
Grade Crossings (2016)
Type of Crossing Control Device
Type of Road Not Recorded Private Public Total
At-Grade No sign or signal 15 968 67 1,050 At-Grade Other signs or
signals 1 1
At-Grade Crossbucks 1 178 2,806 2,985 At-Grade Stop signs 93 57 150 At-Grade Flashing lights 1 20 21 At-Grade Gates 5 585 590 Railroad Under Not Applicable 3 1 75 79 Railroad Over Not Applicable 2 18 81 101
Total 22 1,264 3,691 4,977
Type of Crossing Control Device ND MN ID MT All US At-Grade No sign or signal 21.1% 22.1% 32.3% 39.2% 23.9% At-Grade Other signs or signals 0.0% 0.3% 0.2% 0.4% 0.8% At-Grade Crossbucks 60.0% 19.6% 19.0% 27.3% 21.6% At-Grade Stop signs 3.0% 25.2% 26.0% 6.6% 7.8% At-Grade Flashing lights 0.4% 4.1% 7.6% 5.3% 8.3% At-Grade Gates 11.9% 17.9% 7.6% 10.1% 20.6% Railroad Under Not Applicable 1.6% 4.5% 3.6% 6.3% 8.1% Railroad Over Not Applicable 2.0% 6.3% 3.7% 4.8% 9.0%
North Dakota Crossing Profile
Northern Tier Crossing Comparison
Grade Crossings (2016)
Type of Crossing Control Device
Type of Road Not Recorded Private Public Total
At-Grade No sign or signal 15 968 67 1,050 At-Grade Other signs or
signals 1 1
At-Grade Crossbucks 1 178 2,806 2,985 At-Grade Stop signs 93 57 150 At-Grade Flashing lights 1 20 21 At-Grade Gates 5 585 590 Railroad Under Not Applicable 3 1 75 79 Railroad Over Not Applicable 2 18 81 101
Total 22 1,264 3,691 4,977
North Dakota Crossing Profile
Crossing Comparison
Type of Control ND SD MN MT ID All US At-Grade No sign or signal 21.1% 28.4% 22.1% 39.2% 32.3% 23.9% At-Grade Other signs or signals 0.0% 0.1% 0.3% 0.4% 0.2% 0.8% At-Grade Crossbucks 60.0% 48.6% 19.6% 27.3% 19.0% 21.6% At-Grade Stop signs 3.0% 2.9% 25.2% 6.6% 26.0% 7.8% At-Grade Flashing lights 0.4% 7.1% 4.1% 5.3% 7.6% 8.3% At-Grade Gates 11.9% 2.4% 17.9% 10.1% 7.6% 20.6% Railroad Under Not Applicable 1.6% 2.9% 4.5% 6.3% 3.6% 8.1% Railroad Over Not Applicable 2.0% 2.9% 6.3% 4.8% 3.7% 9.0%
Rail Needs-Short Lines
• Short line railroad track condition 41 percent of track miles has speed limit of 10 mph 5 percent of track miles has maximum speeds less than 10 mph 50 percent of track miles cannot handle standard capacity rail cars 37 percent of bridges cannot handle standard capacity rail cars
Other short line issues Crossings Railcar availability Connecting service with major railroads Poor track condition/<286,000 pound track limitations Trespassers Funding
Rail Needs-Customers
• Uncertain empty railcar availability
• Railroad detention charges on railcars
• Inconsistent service
• Poor communications from railroads – notifications to shippers
• Inadequate switching frequency
The plan includes more than $300 million in projects of interest by a cross-section of stakeholders
Rail Service and Investment Program Number of
Projects Estimated
Cost
Major Railroads 1 NA
Short Line Railroads 32 $105 Million
Industrial Access 11 NA
Local Agencies 17 $192 Million
NDDOT STIP 8 $21 Million
In the last five years, major railroads have invested $1.2 billion in ND infrastructure
Rail Improvement Initiatives
Improved coordination and communications among state agencies, railroads, local authorities, shippers and the public
Continuation of the state rail inspection program
Rail performance measurement and enhanced planning
Improved safety of rail transportation
Leveraging the benefits of rail transportation
Complementing the investments are initiatives to improve performance directed towards
Rail Improvement Initiatives
Initiative Actions
Coordination with railroads: leverage NDPSC information to be more proactive in identifying rail issues
• Review NDPSC railroad information
• Periodically review the railroad annual report content
Review annual report content to ensure information is adequate for regulatory purposes
• To be conducted in conjunction with #1
Coordination with Metropolitan Planning Organizations/local agencies: invite MPOs/local agencies to the NDPSC annual meetings with railroads
• Include MPOs, local agencies as participants
Coordination with other states and Canada: actively seek out opportunities to cooperate with states – GNCC participation
• Continue NDDOT role in GNCC
Rail loan program: examine the need to improve the program; evaluate realized benefits to recipient
• Consider including Class I railroads in the loan program
• Request that recipients provide traffic volume information over life of loan
Equipment and resource availability information: develop a centralized source of federal, state, and local emergency response equipment and resources
• Develop specifications for database
• Develop database
Ongoing
Rail Improvement Initiatives
Initiatives • Actions
Local government-railroad coordination: encourage railroads to provide track maintenance program information to towns and counties when the programs are developed
• NDPSC facilitate communications between railroads and local agencies
Local government-railroad coordination: request railroads to contact local officials in advance of performing track maintenance
• NDPSC facilitate communications between railroads and local agencies
State inspection program: continue communicating to shippers the rationale NDPSC uses to select locations to inspect through the NDPSC’s annual meeting with shippers and the railroads and other venues.
• NDPSC communications
Local hazardous material spill mitigation plans: include railroad risks
• Initiate statewide program to address railroad risk in local mitigation plans
Government and railroad industry leaders working relationships: encourage local agencies coordination with rail carriers in advance of incidents
• Facilitate the development of relationships between local authorities and railroads
Ongoing
Rail Improvement Initiatives
Initiative Actions
Coordination within state government: continue to ensure that ND Department of Commerce leverages NDDOT rail related economic development capabilities
• Establish cross-agency working group on rail-related economic development
Coordination with railroads: leverage NDPSC information to be more proactive in identifying rail issues
• Establish objectives of NDDOT-railroad relationship
• Review NDPSC railroad information in context of objective
Coordination with other states and Canada: actively seek out opportunities to cooperate with states – GNCC participation
• Encourage Canadian membership
Rail planning: monitor changes in rail demand, industry structure, and logistics trends
• Introduce rail planning activities in addition to FRA rail plan updates
• Monitor rail industry issues that affect North Dakota Improved information: updateNDPSC website to better explain and clarify the agency’s roles in regulating the railroads and provide contact information for railroads and other regulatory agencies.
• Revise NDPSC website outlining jurisdiction and functions of NDPSC
• Develop and provide directory of rail contacts
Near Term
Initiative Actions
Firefighting foam capabilities across the state for rail incident response improvement: establish a statewide standard for firefighting foam
• Facilitate establishment of statewide standard
Response planning effectiveness: develop multi-jurisdiction coordination strategies to improve regional emergency response planning and capabilities:
• Facilitate the development of coordination strategies
Rail Improvement Initiatives Near Term
Rail Improvement Initiatives
Initiatives Actions
Coordination with Metropolitan Planning Organizations/local agencies: ensure that MPOs and other local agencies are included in all statewide planning processes
• Establish railroad planning advisory committee: NDDOT, MPOs, local government agencies, EDAs, railroads
Coordination with Metropolitan Planning Organizations/local agencies: encourage MPO/local agency participation in GNCC
• Promote GNCC participation to local agencies
Rail planning: monitor changes in rail demand, industry structure, and logistics trends
• Implement performance measures – work with railroads to obtain required information
Local Emergency Planning Committee role in response planning: develop local incident specific response plans
• Develop incident response planning committee to guide local incident specific response plans
First responder effectiveness: improve first responder staffing and capabilities in rural areas through increased funding
• Identify and evaluate funding alternatives for improved capabilities
Facility improvement: hospitals should seek federal trauma care funding
• Identify funding sources
Long Term