1
Naked Buildings: You see them in the news after a severe wind event - sheet metal deck flapping and flying off buildings to find a tree or pole. One could be excused for thinking that severe winds find sheet metal clad buildings the way that tornadoes find trailer parks. In reality, sheet metal cladding and deck panels have inherent strength that can be properly utilized in de- sign to prevent your building from becom- ing the eye-candy of the disaster news story. After the storm, looking for the respon- sible party is too little too late for an owner. The specification clearly identified the pro- prietary cladding product on the drawing. Perhaps the specification also included compliance to FM, UL or ASTM standards (e.g. FM 4450 Class 1, UL 580, ASTM E1592) and CSSBI guidelines. An installa- tion subcontractor bid the project with this material quoted from the manufacturer. If we break this down, we start to see holes in the process. The Canadian Sheet Steel Building In- stitute (CSSBI) is an industry-sponsored or- ganization which provides important research and manufacturer supported infor- mation to assist in design, specification, handling and installation. Although they provide sample specifications and design procedures, they do not provide design/per- formance standards or standard of care ex- pectations (e.g. not written in mandatory contract or building code language). Both UL and FM provide test based compliance standards that play a significant role in ensuring that the product and instal- lation meet performance expectations. At the least, the owner/consultant can avoid testing each assembly for every condition. Cladding manufacturers invest heavily in testing and proudly publish reports. The fine print always advises that the tests may not be sufficient compliance to any condi- tion or building code. With some exceptions, most cladding/deck manufacturers sell commod- ity component products at efficient prices. They usually supply a full range of parts, as a service convenience, but don’t sell cladding “systems” or structural engineer- ing services (e.g. select thickness, grades, fasteners or spacing). They may provide load tables and suggested assembly details for the consultant’s design convenience and inclusion in project drawings. Only the project consultants can deter- mine the suitability of any prod- uct or assembly. Some cladding manufacturers retain their proprietary technol- ogy and testing information but they can provide signed/sealed drawings as part of the supply price to the sub-contractor, when requested in advance. The supply/install subcontractor makes a submission based on guidance in the spec- ification and presumed compliance by a supplier, whose product may be explicitly defined in the specification. Ultimately, the consultant requires signed/sealed shop drawings from the supplier, who looks to the manufacturer, who doesn’t provide en- gineering services. This service probably wasn’t included as a line item in the sub’s bid price, wasn’t confirmed in bid qualifi- cation and may not be easily available. A new team member, a steel building system consultant, can improve project specifications and component selections and ensure compliance of cladding supplier submissions. The steel building consultant also supports the supply/install subcontrac- tor with services required to comply with submission and installation. Avoid the naked building scenario in your project portfolio by including a steel building ex- pert on the project team. Paul Ransom, P.Eng. has been actively involved in the steel building industry for more than 25 years, is a member of CSA A660 committee and the founder of Steel Building Experts – specialists in providing innovative services to maxi- mize the quality, sustainabil- ity and safety of metal building projects. For more information go to www.steel- buildingexperts.ca or call (905) 617-2729. PAGE OCR B6 – MARCH 2014 – The Ontario Construction Report NORTH AMERICAN STEEL CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE PAUL RANSOM, P.ENG Guest Columnist — The GTA Construction Report Exposing the truth behind Naked Buildings INNOVATE YOUR STEEL Design Reactions Value Consultant Multi-purpose Building Multi-province Pre-engineered Off-spec Peer Review Structures Remediate Self-framing Specialized CISC Cladding Connections Hybrid Design/Build Bulk-storage Municipal Energy Oilsands Plan Safety Install Pre-assembly Site Review Complete Manufacturer Deck Skid Fabricator Truss Cold Formed Owner Partner Aviation Cogen Field-house Gold Hydro Industrial Potash Fall Lift Experienced Co-ordination Components Options Early Optimize Building Science Renovation Repurpose Diaphragm Rack Tapered Condition Report Arena Warehouse Material Handling Erect Crane Rigging Compliance Supply R&D Load table CSA FM SDI LSF Product Development CSSBI CFSEI MHI S16 S136 S157 Paul Ransom Engineering 905-617-2729 steelbuildingexperts.ca 905-639-9628 paulransom.ca

NORTH AMERICAN STEEL CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE …

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: NORTH AMERICAN STEEL CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE …

Naked Buildings: You see them in thenews after a severe wind event - sheet metaldeck flapping and flying off buildings tofind a tree or pole. One could be excusedfor thinking that severe winds find sheetmetal clad buildings the way that tornadoesfind trailer parks. In reality, sheet metalcladding and deck panels have inherentstrength that can be properly utilized in de-sign to prevent your building from becom-ing the eye-candy of the disaster news story.

After the storm, looking for the respon-sible party is too little too late for an owner.The specification clearly identified the pro-prietary cladding product on the drawing.Perhaps the specification also includedcompliance to FM, UL or ASTM standards(e.g. FM 4450 Class 1, UL 580, ASTME1592) and CSSBI guidelines. An installa-tion subcontractor bid the project with thismaterial quoted from the manufacturer. Ifwe break this down, we start to see holes inthe process.

The Canadian Sheet Steel Building In-stitute (CSSBI) is an industry-sponsored or-ganization which provides importantresearch and manufacturer supported infor-

mation to assist in design, specification,handling and installation. Although theyprovide sample specifications and designprocedures, they do not provide design/per-formance standards or standard of care ex-pectations (e.g. not written in mandatorycontract or building code language).

Both UL and FM provide test basedcompliance standards that play a significantrole in ensuring that the product and instal-lation meet performance expectations. Atthe least, the owner/consultant can avoidtesting each assembly for every condition.Cladding manufacturers invest heavily intesting and proudly publish reports. Thefine print always advises that the tests maynot be sufficient compliance to any condi-tion or building code.

With some exceptions, mostcladding/deck manufacturers sell commod-ity component products at efficient prices.They usually supply a full range of parts, asa service convenience, but don’t sellcladding “systems” or structural engineer-ing services (e.g. select thickness, grades,fasteners or spacing). They may provideload tables and suggested assembly detailsfor the consultant’s design convenience andinclusion in project drawings. Only theproject consultants can deter-mine the suitability of any prod-uct or assembly.

Some cladding manufacturersretain their proprietary technol-ogy and testing information butthey can provide signed/sealeddrawings as part of the supplyprice to the sub-contractor, whenrequested in advance.

The supply/install subcontractor makesa submission based on guidance in the spec-ification and presumed compliance by asupplier, whose product may be explicitlydefined in the specification. Ultimately, theconsultant requires signed/sealed shopdrawings from the supplier, who looks tothe manufacturer, who doesn’t provide en-gineering services. This service probablywasn’t included as a line item in the sub’sbid price, wasn’t confirmed in bid qualifi-cation and may not be easily available.

A new team member, a steel buildingsystem consultant, can improve projectspecifications and component selectionsand ensure compliance of cladding suppliersubmissions. The steel building consultantalso supports the supply/install subcontrac-tor with services required to comply withsubmission and installation. Avoid thenaked building scenario in your projectportfolio by including a steel building ex-pert on the project team.

Paul Ransom, P.Eng. has been activelyinvolved in the steel building industry formore than 25 years, is a member of CSAA660 committee and the founder of Steel

Building Experts – specialists in providinginnovative services to maxi-

mize the quality, sustainabil-ity and safety of metal

building projects. For moreinformation go to www.steel-

buildingexperts.ca or call(905) 617-2729.

PAGE OCR B6 – MARCH 2014 – The Ontario Construction Report

NORTH AMERICAN STEEL CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE

PAUL RANSOM, P.ENGGuest Columnist — The GTA Construction Report

Exposing the truth behind Naked Buildings

INNOVATE YOUR STEEL

DesignReactions

Valu

eCo

nsul

tant

Multi-purposeBuild

ing

Multi-province

Pre-engineered

Off-specPeer ReviewStructures

Rem

edia

te

Self-framing

Spec

ializ

ed

CISC

Cladding ConnectionsHybrid

Desi

gn/B

uild

Bulk

-sto

rage

Municipal

EnergyOilsands

Plan

Safety Inst

all

Pre-assembly

Site Review

Com

plet

e

Manufacturer

Deck

Skid

Fabricator

Truss

Cold Formed

Owne

r

Partner

Aviation Coge

n

Field-house

Gold

Hydr

oIndustrial PotashFall

Lift

Experienced

Co-ordinationCom

pone

nts

Options

Early

Optim

ize

Building Science

Renovation

Repu

rpos

e

Diap

hrag

m

RackTapered

Cond

ition

Rep

ort

Arena

Warehouse

Material Handling

Erect

Crane

Rigg

ing

Com

plia

nce

Supp

ly

R&D

Load table

CSA

FM

SDI

LSF

Product Development

CSSB

I

CFSEI

MHI

S16

S136

S157

Paul Ransom Engineering

905-617-2729steelbuildingexperts.ca

905-639-9628paulransom.ca