Nonlinear quantum Rabi model in trapped ions

Xiao-Hang Cheng,1, 2 Inigo Arrazola,2 Julen S. Pedernales,2, 3 Lucas Lamata,2 Xi Chen,1 and Enrique Solano1, 2, 4

1Department of Physics, Shanghai University, 200444 Shanghai, People’s Republic of China2Department of Physical Chemistry, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Apartado 644, 48080 Bilbao, Spain

3Institute for Theoretical Physics and IQST, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, Universitat Ulm, D-89069 Ulm, Germany4IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Maria Diaz de Haro 3, 48013 Bilbao, Spain

We study the nonlinear dynamics of trapped-ion models far away from the Lamb-Dicke regime.This nonlinearity induces a blockade on the propagation of quantum information along the Hilbertspace of the Jaynes-Cummings and quantum Rabi models. We propose to use this blockade as aresource for the dissipative generation of high-number Fock states. Also, we compare the linear andnonlinear cases of the quantum Rabi model in the ultrastrong and deep strong coupling regimes.Moreover, we propose a scheme to simulate the nonlinear quantum Rabi model in all couplingregimes. This can be done via off-resonant nonlinear red and blue sideband interactions in a singletrapped ion, yielding applications as a dynamical quantum filter.

PACS numbers: 03.67.Ac, 03.67.Lx, 37.10.Ty, 42.50.Ct, 37.10.Vz

I. INTRODUCTION

Proposed in 1936 by I. I. Rabi [1], the most fundamen-tal interaction between a two-level atom and a classicallight field, the semiclassical Rabi model, has played animportant role in both physics and mathematics [2, 3].Under the rotating wave approximation (RWA), its fullyquantized form, the quantum Rabi model (QRM), canbe reduced into the Jaynes-Cummings model (JCM) [4],which is analytically solvable [5]. This model describesthe basic interaction in trapped ions [6], superconduct-ing circuits [7], and cavity quantum electrodynamics [8],when the systems are in the regime where the ratio of cou-pling strength g and mode frequency ν is approximatelysmaller than 0.1 [9]. On the other hand, in the ultra-strong coupling (USC) regime, g/ν ∈ (0.1, 1) [10, 11],and deep strong coupling (DSC) regime (g/ν > 1) [12–14], we have to take the counter rotating term that isneglected in the JCM into account. The QRM is a fruit-ful physical model with applications in condensed mat-ter, quantum optics, and quantum information process-ing. In fact, the QRM has been investigated in manycontexts, such as quantum phase transitions [15–17], dis-sipative QRM [18], generalized QRM [19–22], multipar-ticle QRM [23–26], and quantum thermodynamics [27],among others. Furthermore, proposals and experimen-tal realizations of the QRM in different quantum simu-lators as optical lattices [28], circuit QED [29], as wellas trapped ions [30–33] have been put forward. Refer-ence [30] introduced an analog method for the simulationof different regimes of the QRM, otherwise inaccessible toexperimentation from first principles. These ideas havebeen recently demonstrated in the lab [31].

As one of the most controllable quantum systems,trapped ions play an important role in diverse proposalsfor quantum simulations [30, 31, 34–47]. However, mostof these works are based on the condition for the systemto be in the Lamb-Dicke (LD) regime. In this regime,the size of the motional wavepacket of the ion is muchsmaller than the wavelength of the external laser driv-

ing, such that the effective coupling between the internaland the vibrational degrees of freedom, generated by thelaser field, can be approximated to first order [6]. This

condition can also be expressed as η√〈(a+ a†)2〉 1,

where a†(a) is the creation (annihilation) operator asso-ciated to the quantum vibrational mode of the ion ona certain direction x and η = k

√~/2Mν is the LD pa-

rameter in this direction, with k the wave number of theexternal laser field, M the mass of the ion and ν thefrequency of the harmonic potential.

In this article, we study the nonlinear behaviour ofa single trapped ion when it is far away from the LDregime. In the past, research beyond the LD regime wasmainly focussed on the nonlinear JCM [48–51], but hasalso been studied for its implications in laser cooling [52–54] or for its possible applications to simulate Frack-Condon physics [55]. To set up the stage for a subsequentanalysis, we first briefly review the JCM and take this as areference to show the difference with the nonlinear JCM.The appearance of nonlinear terms in the Hamiltoniansuppresses the collapses and revivals for a coherent stateevolution typical from linear cases. Later on, we inves-tigate how the nonlinear anti-Jaynes-Cummings model,which appears as the counterpart of nonlinear JCM, canbe combined with controlled depolarizing noise, to gener-ate arbitrary n-phonon Fock states. Moreover, the lattercould in principle be done without a precise control ofpulse duration or shape, and without the requirementof a previous high-fidelity preparation of the motionalground state. Furthermore, we propose the quantum sim-ulation of the nonlinear quantum Rabi model by simulta-neous off-resonant nonlinear Jaynes-Cummings and anti-Jaynes-Cummings interactions. Finally, we also pointout the possibility for the quantum Rabi model to act asa motional state filter.

arX

iv:1

709.

0737

8v3

[qu

ant-

ph]

18

May

201

8

2

II. JAYNES-CUMMINGS MODELS INTRAPPED IONS

The Hamiltonian describing a laser-cooled two-levelion trapped in a harmonic potential and driven by amonochromatic laser field can be expressed as (~ = 1)

H =ω0

2σz + νa†a+

Ω

2σx[ei(η(a+a

†)−ωt+φ) + H.c.], (1)

where ω0 is the two-level transition frequency, σz, σx are

Pauli matrices associated to this two-level system, Ω isthe Rabi frequency, ω is the driving laser frequency, andφ is the phase of the laser field.

In the Lamb-Dicke regime, moving to an interactionpicture with respect to H0 = ω0

2 σz + νa†a, and after theapplication of the so-called optical RWA, the Hamilto-nian in Eq.(1) can be written as [6]

HLDint =

Ω

2σ+[1 + iη(ae−iνt + a†eiνt)]ei(φ−δt) + H.c., (2)

where δ = ω − ω0 is the laser detuning and the con-dition η 1 allows to keep only zero and first or-der terms in the expansion of exp [iη(a+ a†)]. Whenδ = −ν and Ω ν, after applying the vibrational RWA,the dynamics of such a system is described by Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian, HJC = ig(σ+a − σ−a†), whereg = ηΩ/2 and φ = 0. This JCM is analytically solv-able and generates population exchange between states|↓, n〉 ↔ |↑, n−1〉 with rate Ωn,n−1 = ηΩ

√n. On the

other hand, when the detuning is chosen to be δ = ν,the effective model is instead described by the anti-JCM HaJC = ig(σ+a† − σ−a), which generates popu-lation transfer between states |↓, n〉 ↔ |↑, n+1〉 with rateΩn,n+1 = ηΩ

√n+ 1.

When the trapped-ion system is beyond the Lamb-Dicke regime, the simplification of the exponential termdescribed above is not justified and Eq.(2) reads

Hint =Ω

2σ+eiη(a

+eiνt+ae−iνt)−i(δt−φ) + H.c.. (3)

When δ = −ν and Ω ν, after applying the vibrationalRWA, the effective Hamiltonian describing the systemis given by the nonlinear Jaynes-Cummings model [48],which can be expressed as

HnJC = ig[σ+f1(n)a− σ−a†f1(n)], (4)

where the nonlinear function f1 [48] is given by

f1(n) = e−η2/2

∞∑l=0

(−η2)l

l!(l + 1)!a†lal, (5)

with a†lal = n!/(n− l)!. The dynamics of this model canalso be solved analytically, and as the linear JCM, yieldsto population exchange between states |↓, n〉 ↔ |↑, n−1〉,but in this case with a rate Ωn,n−1 = |f1(n−1)|Ωn,n−1 =ηΩ√n|f1(n−1)|, where f1(n) corresponds to the value of

n0 20 40 60 80

η

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0.1

0.3

0.5

0.7

0.9

Fock state0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

f(n)

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1Nonlinear Function evaluated in N

806040200

n

806040200

-0.2

0.2

0.6

1.0

hf1in = 0.5

(a)

(b)

ln(|hf1(n)i|)

FIG. 1: (color online) (a) Logarithm of the absolute value ofthe operator f1(n) evaluated for different Fock states |n〉 andLD parameters η. Dark (blue) regions represent cases wheref1(n)|n〉 ≈ 0. (b) Nonlinear function f1(n) for a fixed valueof the LD parameter η = 0.5 (oscillating blue curve). Zerovalue (horizontal orange line)

the diagonal operator f1 evaluated on the Fock state |n〉,i.e. f1(n) ≡ 〈f1(n)〉n. If the detuning in Eq.(3) is chosento be δ = ν, and Ω ν, then the application of thevibrational RWA yields the nonlinear anti-JCM,

HnaJC = ig[σ+a†f1(n)− σ−f1(n)a], (6)

which, as the linear anti-JCM, generates populationexchange between states |↓, n〉 ↔ |↑, n+1〉 with rate

Ωn,n+1 = |f1(n)|Ωn,n+1 = ηΩ√n+ 1|f1(n)|. The non-

linear function f1 depends on the LD parameter η andon the Fock state |n〉 on which it is acting. The LDregime is then recovered when η

√n 1. In this regime,

|f1(n)| ≈ 1, and thus the dynamics are the ones thatcorrespond to the linear models.

Beyond the LD regime the nonlinear function f1, whichhas an oscillatory behaviour both in n ∈ N and η ∈ R,needs to be taken into account. In Fig. 1a, we plot thelogarithm of the absolute value of f1(n, η) for differentvalues of n and η, where the green regions represent lowervalues of log (|f1(n, η)|), i.e, values for which f1 ≈ 0. Thisoscillatory behaviour can also be seen in Fig. 1b wherewe plot the value of f1 as a function of the Fock statenumber n for η = 0.5. For this specific case, we cansee that the function is close to zero around n = 14 andn = 48, meaning that for η = 0.5, the rate of populationexchange between |↓, 15〉 ↔ |↑, 14〉 and |↓, 49〉 ↔ |↑, 48〉states on the nonlinear JCM will vanish. The same willhappen to the exchange rate between |↓, 14〉 ↔ |↑, 15〉and |↓, 48〉 ↔ |↑, 49〉 states for the nonlinear anti-JCM.

3

0 10 20 30 40-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

0 2 4 6 8-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

0 10 20 30 40-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

0 2 4 6 8-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

(a) (b)1.0

0.5

0.0

-0.5

-1.0

1.0

0.5

0.0

-0.5

-1.00 2 6 84

t (2/g)

hz(t

)i

0 10 30 4020t (2/g)

FIG. 2: (color online) Average value of σz operator versustime for a coherent initial state |α =

√30〉 after (a) linear JC

and (b) nonlinear JC evolution, both with the same couplingstrength g and η = 0.5 for the nonlinear case. As shownin (a), there exists an approximate collapse and subsequentrevival in the JCM dynamics, while for the nonlinear JCMthis is not the case.

We observe approximate collapses and revivals for aninitial coherent state with an average number of pho-tons of |α|2 = 30 by evolving with the JCM, as shownin Ref. [56], see Fig. 2a. Here, we plot 〈σz(t)〉 =〈ψ(t)|σz|ψ(t)〉 for a state that evolves according to theJCM. Comparing the same case for the nonlinear JCMwith η = 0.5, as depicted in Fig. 2b, we appreciate that inthe latter case the collapses and revivals vanish, and thedynamics is more irregular. This can seem natural giventhat the phenomenon of revival takes place whenever themost significant components of the quantum state, aftersome evolution time, turn out to oscillate in phase again,which may be more unlikely if the dynamics is nonlin-ear. Notice that we let the case of the nonlinear JCMevolve for a longer time, since the nonlinear function f1effectively slows down the evolution.

III. FOCK STATE GENERATION WITHDISSIPATIVE NONLINEAR ANTI-JCM

In this section we study the possibility of using thedynamics of the nonlinear anti-Jaynes-Cummings modelintroduced in the previous section to, along with depo-larizing noise, generate high-number Fock states in a dis-sipative manner. In particular, the depolarizing noisethat we consider corresponds to the spontaneous relax-ation of the internal two-level system of the ion. Such adissipative process, combined with the dynamics of theJCM in the LD regime (linear JCM), is routinely ex-ploited in trapped-ion setups for the implementation ofsideband cooling techniques. It is noteworthy to men-tion that the effect of nonlinearities on sideband coolingprotocols, which arise when outside the LD regime, havealso been a matter of study [? ? ].

Our method works as follows: we start in the groundstate of both the motional and the internal degrees offreedom |↓, 0〉 (as we will show later, our protocol worksas well when we are outside the motional ground state,as long as the population of Fock states higher than thetarget Fock state is negligible). Acting with the nonlin-ear anti-JC Hamiltonian we induce a population transfer

from state |↓, 0〉 to state |↑, 1〉, while at the same time,the depolarizing noise transfers population from |↑, 1〉 to|↓, 1〉. The simultaneous action of both processes will“heat” the motional state, progressively transferring thepopulation of the system from one Fock state to the nextone. Eventually, all the population will be accumulatedin state |↓, n〉, where a blockade of the propagation ofpopulation through the chain of Fock states occurs, iff1(n) = 0, as the transfer rate between states |↓, n〉 and

|↑, n + 1〉 vanishes, Ωn,n+1 = 0. We point out that thecondition f1(n) = 0 can always be achieved by tuning theLD parameter to a suitable value, i.e. for every Fock state|n〉, where n > 0 there exists a value of the LD parame-ter η for which f1(n, η) = 0. As an example, we choosethe LD parameter η = 0.4518, for which f1(17) = 0, andsimulate our protocol using the master equation

ρ = −i[HnaJC, ρ] + ΓmL(σ−)ρ, (7)

where Γm = 2g is the decay rate of the internalstate, and the Lindblad superoperator acts on ρ asL(X)ρ = (2XρX† − X†Xρ− ρX†X)/2.

Fock state0 5 10 15 20

f(n)

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1Nonlinear Function evaluated in N

Fock state0 5 10 15 20

Pn

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1Motional Initial State

g time/ 2π0 50 100

⟨ N

(t)⟩

0

5

10

15

20Average N evolution

Fock state0 5 10 15 20

Pn

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1Motional State at Tfinal (Spin traced out)

Fock state0 5 10 15 20

f(n)

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1Nonlinear Function evaluated in N

Fock state0 5 10 15 20

Pn

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1Motional Initial State

g time/ 2π0 50 100

⟨ N

(t)⟩

0

5

10

15

20Average N evolution

Fock state0 5 10 15 20

Pn

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1Motional State at Tfinal (Spin traced out)

Fock state0 5 10 15 20

f(n)

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1Nonlinear Function evaluated in N

Fock state0 5 10 15 20

Pn

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1Motional Initial State

g time/ 2π0 50 100

⟨ N

(t)⟩

0

5

10

15

20Average N evolution

Fock state0 5 10 15 20

Pn

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1Motional State at Tfinal (Spin traced out)

0.2

0.4

Fock state0 5 10 15 20

f(n)

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1Nonlinear Function evaluated in N

Fock state0 5 10 15 20

Pn

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1Motional Initial State

g time/ 2π0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

⟨ N

(t)⟩

02468

101214161820

Average N evolution

Fock state0 5 10 15 20

Pn

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

1Motional State at Tfinal (Spin traced out)

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.00 5 15 20

n10

0.8

1.0

0.0

0 5 15 2010

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

0.0

Pn

0 50 100

0.2hf1in

-0.2

0.6

0.4

15

20

5

0

10hn(t)i

Pn

(a) (b)

(c) (d)n

n0 5 15 2010

t (2/g)

t = 0

t = 100 2/g

FIG. 3: (color online) (a) The nonlinear function f1 evaluatedat different Fock states n, for the case of η = 0.4518 (decreas-ing blue curve). Zero value (horizontal orange line). For thisvalue of the LD parameter, f1|17〉 = 0. (b) Phonon statisticsof the initial thermal state with 〈n〉 = 1 (c) Time evolutionof the average value of the number operator n starting fromthe state in (b) and following the evolution for the prepara-tion of Fock state |17〉, that is during a nonlinear anti-JCMwith spontaneous decay of the two-level system. (d) Phononstatistics at the end of the protocol, t = 100× 2π/g, with allthe population concentrated in Fock state |17〉.

In Fig. 3 we numerically show how our protocol is ableto generate the motional Fock state |17〉, starting from a

thermal state ρT =∑∞k=0

〈n〉k(〈n〉+1)k+1 |k〉〈k|, with 〈n〉 = 1.

In other words, one can obtain large final Fock states

4

starting from an imperfectly cooled motional state, bya suitable tunning of the LD parameter. As an advan-tage of our method compared to previous approaches [57],we do not need a fine control over the Rabi frequenciesor pulse durations, given that the whole wavefunction,for an arbitrary initial state with motional componentssmaller than n, will converge to the target Fock state|n〉. We want to point out that this protocol relies onlyon the precision to which the LD parameter can be set,which in turn depends on the precision to which the wavenumber k and the trap frequency ν can be controlled.These parameters enjoy a great stability in trapped-ionsetups [58], and therefore we deem the generation of high-number Fock states as a promising application of the non-linear anti-JCM dynamics.

IV. NONLINEAR QUANTUM RABI MODEL

Here we propose to implement the nonlinear quantumRabi model (NQRM) in all its parameter regimes viathe use of the Hamiltonian in Eq.(3). We consider off-resonant first-order red- and blue-sideband drivings withthe same coupling Ω and corresponding detunings δr,δb. The interaction Hamiltonian after the optical RWAreads [6, 30],

Hint =∑n=r,b

Ω

2σ+eiη(a

†eiνt+ae−iνt)e−i(δnt−φn) + H.c., (8)

where ωr = ω0 − ν + δr and ωb = ω0 + ν + δb, withδr, δb ν ω0 and Ω ν. We consider the systembeyond the Lamb-Dicke regime and set the laser fieldphases to φr,b = 0. If we invoke the vibrational RWA, i.e.neglect terms that rotate with frequencies in the order ofν, the remaining terms read

Hint = igσ+(f1ae

−iδrt + a†f1e−iδbt)+ H.c., (9)

where g = ηΩ/2 and f1 ≡ f1(n) was introduced inEq. (5). The latter corresponds to an interaction pic-ture Hamiltonian of the NQRM with respect to the freeHamiltonian H0 = 1

4 (δb + δr)σz + 12 (δb − δr)a†a. There-

fore, undoing the interaction picture transformation, wehave

HnQRM =ωR0

2σz+ωRa†a+ig(σ+−σ−)(f1a+a†f1), (10)

where ωR0 = − 1

2 (δr + δb) and ωR = 12 (δr − δb). Equa-

tion (10) represents the general form of the NQRM,where ωR

0 is the level splitting of the simulated two levelsystem, ωR is the frequency of the simulated bosonicmode and g is the coupling strength between them, whichin turn will be modulated by the nonlinear functionf1(n, η). The different regimes of the NQRM will becharacterized by the relation among these four param-eters. First, in the LD regime or η

√〈(a+ a†)2〉 1,

Eq. (10) can be approximated to the linear QRM [30].

×-

(π/)

>

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100

(2/g)t

P |0,gi

(2/g)

0 5 100

1

Pn

0 5 100

1

0 5 100

1

0 5 100

1

Pn

n

0 5 100

1

n

0 5 100

1

n

t =

gt =

2

g

t =3

gt =

3.4

gt =

4

g

t = 0

t = 1.7 × 2π

gt = 2 × 2π

g

t = 0.5 × 2π

g

t = 1.5 × 2π

g

0

1

P

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10t(2π/g)b

a

FIG. 4: (color online) (a) Fidelity with respect to the ini-tial state P (t) = |〈ψ0|ψ(t)〉|2 versus time. As initial statewe choose |0, g〉 and the evolution occurs under the NQRMwith LD parameter η = 0.67898, where f1|7〉 = 0, g/ωR = 4and ωR

0 = 0. (b) Phonon statistics at different times for theNQRM evolved from the initial state |0, g〉. The propagationof population through Fock states stops at |n = 7〉, with Fockstates of n > 7 never getting populated.

Beyond the LD regime, in a parameter regime where|ωR − ωR

0 | g |ωR + ωR0 |, the RWA can be ap-

plied. This would imply neglecting terms that rotateat frequency ωR + ωR

0 in an interaction picture with re-spect to H0, leading to the nonlinear JCM studied pre-viously in this article. On the other hand, the non-linear anti-JCM would be recovered in a regime where|ωR + ωR

0 | g |ωR − ωR0 |. It is worth mentioning

that the latter is only possible if the frequency of thetwo-level system and the frequency of the mode have op-posite sign. The USC and DSC regimes are defined as0.1 . g/ωR . 1 and g/ωR & 1 respectively, and in theseregimes the RWA does not hold anymore.

As an example, here we investigate the NQRM in theDSC regime with initial Fock state |0, g〉, where |0〉 isthe ground-state of the bosonic mode, and |g〉 standsfor the ground state of the effective two-level system.In Fig. 4, we study the case for η = 0.67898, wheref1|7〉 = 0, g/ωR = 4 and ωR

0 = 0. More specifically,a quantum simulation of the model in this regime canbe achieved with the following detunings and Rabi fre-quency: δr = 2π × 11.31kHz, δb = −2π × 11.31kHz,g = 2π×45.24kHz and Ω = 2π×133.26kHz. In Ref. [12],it was shown that the linear QRM shows collapses and re-vivals and a round trip of the phonon-number wavepacketalong the chain of Fock states, when in the DSC regime.Here, we observe that in the nonlinear case, Fig. 4, col-lapses and revivals do not present the same clear struc-ture, having a more irregular evolution. Most interest-

5

(π/)

00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10(2/g)

0

1

P

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10t(2π/g)

t =

gt =

2

g

t =3

gt =

3.4

gt =

4

g

t = 0

0 5 10 15

0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15

0 5 10 15 0 5 10 150.0

0.4

0.0

0.4

0.0

0.4

0.0

0.4

0.0

0.4

0.0

0.4

Pn

Pn

n n n

t = 1.7 × 2π

gt = 2 × 2π

g

t = 0.5 × 2π

g

t = 1.5 × 2π

g

a

b

FIG. 5: (color online) (a) Overlap of the instantaneous statewith the initial state P (t) = |〈ψ0|ψ(t)〉|2 versus time, for a co-herent initial state |α=1, g〉 evolving under the linear QRM.Collapses and revivals are observed, as expected in the DSCregime of the linear QRM. (b) Phonon statistics at differ-ent times, where we see the round trip of a phonon numberwavepacket.

ingly, the system dynamics never surpasses Fock state|n〉, for which f1(n) = 0. Regarding the simulated regimeof the nonlinear QRM, we point out that the nonlinearterm also contributes to the coupling strength. There-fore, to keep the NQRM in the DSC regime, the ratiog/ωR should be larger than that for the linear QRMsince f1(n) < 1 always. Summarizing, our result illus-trates that the Hilbert space is effectively divided intotwo subspaces by the NQRM, namely those spanned byFock states below and above Fock state |n〉. We denotethe Fock number n, where f1|n〉 = 0, as “the barrier”of the NQRM. To benchmark the effect of the barrier,we also provide simulations starting from an initial co-herent state with α = 1 whose average phonon num-ber is 〈n〉 = |α|2 = 1, and make the comparison be-tween the QRM and the NQRM in the DSC regime. Forthe parameter regime g/ωR = 2 and ωR

0 = 0, the fi-delity with respect to the initial coherent state in thelinear QRM performs periodic collapses and full revivalsas it can be seen in Fig. 5(a). In Fig. 5(b), we observea round trip of the phonon-number wave packet, simi-larly to what was shown in Ref. [12] for the case of thelinear QRM starting from a Fock state. The NQRM,on the other hand, has an associated dynamics that isaperiodic and more irregular, as shown in Fig. 6, andnever crosses the motional barrier produced by the cor-responding f1(n) = 0. Therefore, it can be employedas a motional filter, which is determined by the locationof the barrier with respect to the initial state distribu-

(π/)

00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10(2/g)

t =

gt =

2

g

t =3

gt =

3.4

gt =

4

g

t = 0

0.0

0.4

0.0

0.4

0.0

0.4

0.0

0.4

0.0

0.4

0.0

0.4

Pn

Pn

n n n

0 5 10 15

0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15

0 5 10 15 0 5 10 15

t = 1.7 × 2π

gt = 2 × 2π

g

t = 0.5 × 2π

g

t = 1.5 × 2π

g

0

1

P

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10t(2π/g)

a

b

FIG. 6: (color online) (a) Overlap with the initial stateP (t) = |〈ψ0|ψ(t)〉|2 versus time, for initial state |α=1, g〉evolving under the NQRM with LD parameter η = 0.57838,where f1|10〉 = 0, g/ωR = 3.7 and ωR

0 = 0. (b) Phonon statis-tics at different times for the NQRM evolved from the initialstate |α=1, g〉. The Fock state |10〉 is never surpassed becausef1|10〉 = 0.

tion. Here, by filter we mean that the population of Fockstates above a given threshold can be prevented. For thesimulation we choose the LD parameter η = 0.57838 forwhich f1|10〉 = 0, which is far from the center of the dis-tribution of the initial coherent state, as well as most ofits width. The simulated parameter regime correspondsto the DSC regime with g/ωR = 3.7 and ωR

0 = 0. Thiscase could also be simulated with trapped ions with de-tunings of δr = 2π×11.31kHz and δb = −2π×11.31kHz,and a Rabi frequency of Ω = 2π× 133.26kHz. As for thecorresponding case with initial Fock state |0, g〉, the evo-lution of the NQRM in the coherent state case, depictedin Fig. 6, never exceeds the barrier.

V. CONCLUSIONS

We have proposed the implementation of nonlinearQRMs in arbitrary coupling regimes, with trapped-ionanalog quantum simulators. The nonlinear term thatappears in our model is characteristic of the region be-yond the Lamb-Dicke regime. This nonlinear term causesthe blockade of motional propagation at |n〉, wheneverf1(n)|n〉 = 0. In order to compare our models with stan-dard linear quantum Rabi models, we have plotted theevolution of the population of the internal degrees of free-dom of the ion evolving under the linear JCM and thenonlinear JCM, and observe that for the latter the col-lapses and revivals disappear. Also, we have proposed amethod for generating large Fock states in a dissipative

6

manner, making use of the nonlinear anti-JCM and thespontaneous decay of the two-level system. Finally, wehave studied the dynamics of the linear and nonlinear fullQRM on the DSC regime and notice that the nonlinearcase can act as a motional filter. Our work sheds light onthe field of nonlinear QRMs implemented with trappedions, and suggests plausible applications.

Acknowledgements.—The authors acknowledge sup-port from NSFC (11474193), the Shuguang Program(14SG35), the Program for Eastern Scholar, the BasqueGovernment with PhD grant PRE-2015-1-0394 andgrant IT986-16, Ramon y Cajal Grant RYC-2012-11391,MINECO/FEDER FIS2015-69983-P, and Chinese Schol-arship Council (201506890077).

[1] I. I. Rabi, “On the process of space quantization”, Phys.Rev. 49, 324 (1936).

[2] D. Braak, Q.-H. Chen, M. T. Batchelor, and E. Solano,“Semi-classical and quantum Rabi models: in celebrationof 80 years”, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 49, 300301 (2016).

[3] D. Braak, “Integrability of the Rabi Model”, Phys. Rev.Lett. 107, 100401 (2011).

[4] E. T. Jaynes and F. W. Cummings, “Comparison ofquantum and semi-classical radiation theories with ap-plication to beam maser”, Proc. IEEE 51, 89 (1963).

[5] W. P. Schleich, “Quantum Optics in Phase Space”, Wiley(2001).

[6] D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, and D. Wineland,“Quantum Dynamics of Single Trapped Ions”, Rev. Mod.Phys. 75, 281 (2003).

[7] A. A. Houck, H. E. Tureci, and J. Koch, “On-chip Quan-tum Simulation with Superconducting Circuits”, Nat.Phys. 8, 292 (2012).

[8] J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Haroche, “Manipulat-ing quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in acavity”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 565 (2001).

[9] A. Moroz, “A hidden analytic structure of the Rabimodel”, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 340, 252 (2014).

[10] T. Niemczyk, F. Deppe, H. Huebl, E. P. Menzel, F.Hocke, M. J. Schwarz, J. J. Garcıa-Ripoll, D. Zueco, T.Hummer, E. Solano, A. Marx, and R. Gross, “Circuitquantum electrodynamics in the ultrastrong-couplingregime”, Nat. Phys. 6, 772 (2010).

[11] P. Forn-Dıaz, J. Lisenfeld, D. Marcos, J. J. Garcıa-Ripoll,E. Solano, C. J. P. M. Harmans, and J. E. Mooij, “Ob-servation of the Bloch-Siegert Shift in a Qubit-OscillatorSystem in the Ultrastrong Coupling Regime”, Phys. Rev.Lett. 105, 237001 (2010).

[12] J. Casanova, G. Romero, I. Lizuain, J. J. Garcıa-Ripoll,and E. Solano, “Deep Strong Coupling Regime of theJaynes-Cummings Model”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 263603(2010).

[13] S. De Liberato, “Light-Matter Decoupling in the DeepStrong Coupling Regime: The Breakdown of the PurcellEffect”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 016401 (2014).

[14] D. Z. Rossatto, C. J. Villas-Boas, M. Sanz, and E. Solano,“Spectral classification of coupling regimes in the quan-tum Rabi model”, Phys. Rev. A 96, 013849 (2017).

[15] M.-.J. Hwang, R. Puebla, and M. B. Plenio, “QuantumPhase Transition and Universal Dynamics in the RabiModel”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180404 (2015).

[16] Z.-J. Ying, M.-X. Liu, H.-G. Luo, H.-Q. Lin, and J. Q.You, “Ground-state phase diagram of the quantum Rabimodel”, Phys. Rev. A 92, 053823 (2015).

[17] R. Puebla, M.-J. Hwang, and M. B. Plenio, “Excited-state quantum phase transition in the Rabi model”, Phys.Rev. A 94, 023835 (2016).

[18] L. Henriet, Z. Ristivojevic, P. P. Orth, and K. Le Hur,“Quantum dynamics of the driven and dissipative Rabimodel”, Phys. Rev. A 90, 023820 (2014).

[19] L.-H. Du, X.-F. Zhou, Z.-W. Zhou, X.-X. Zhou, andG.-C. Guo, “Generalized Rabi model in quantum-information processing including the ~A2 term”, Phys.Rev. A 86, 014303 (2012).

[20] Q.-T. Xie, S. Cui, J.-P. Cao, L. Amico, and H. Fan,“Anisotropic Rabi model”, Phys. Rev. X 4, 021046(2014).

[21] A. Moroz, “Generalized Rabi models: diagonalizationin the spin subspace and differential operators of Dunkltype”, Europhys. Lett. 113, 50004 (2016).

[22] J. Casanova, R. Puebla, H. Moya-Cessa, and M. B. Ple-nio, “Equivalence Among Generalized nth Order Quan-tum Rabi Models”, arXiv:1709.02714.

[23] S. A. Chilingaryan and B. M. Rodrıguez-Lara, “Thequantum Rabi model for two qubits”, J. Phys. A: Math.Theor. 46, 335301 (2013).

[24] L. Lamata, “Digital-analog quantum simulation of gener-alized Dicke models with superconducting circuits”, Sci.Rep. 7, 43768 (2017).

[25] L. Garbe, I. L. Egusquiza, E. Solano, C. Ciuti, T.Coudreau, P. Milman, and S. Felicetti, “Superradiantphase transition in the ultrastrong coupling regime ofthe two-photon Dicke model”, Phys. Rev. A 95, 053854(2017).

[26] D. Barberena, L. Lamata, and E. Solano, “DispersiveRegimes of the Dicke Model”, Sci. Rep. 7, 8774 (2017).

[27] F. Altintas, A. U. C. Hardal, and O. E. Mustecaplıoglu,“Rabi model as a quantum coherent heat engine: Fromquantum biology to superconducting circuits”, Phys.Rev. A 91, 023816 (2015).

[28] S. Felicetti, E. Rico, C. Sabin, T. Ockenfels, J. Koch, M.Leder, C. Grossert, M. Weitz, and E. Solano, “QuantumRabi model in the Brillouin zone with ultracold atoms”,Phys. Rev. A 95, 013827 (2017).

[29] A. Mezzacapo, U. Las Heras, J. S. Pedernales, L. Di-Carlo, E. Solano, and L. Lamata, “Digital QuantumRabi and Dicke Models in Superconducting Circuits”,Sci. Rep. 4, 7482 (2014).

[30] J. S. Pedernales, I. Lizuain, S. Felicetti, G. Romero, L.Lamata, and E. Solano, “Quantum Rabi Model withTrapped Ions”, Sci. Rep. 5, 15472 (2015).

[31] D.-S. Lv, S.-M. An, Z.-Y. Liu, J.-N. Zhang, J. S. Ped-ernales, L. Lamata, E. Solano, and K. Kim, “Quantumsimulation of the quantum Rabi model in a trapped ion”,arXiv:1711.00582.

[32] C. Huerta Alderete and B. M. Rodrıguez-Lara, “Cross-cavity quantum Rabi model”, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.49, 414001 (2016).

[33] R. Puebla, J. Casanova, and M. B. Plenio, “A robust

7

scheme for the implementation of the quantum Rabimodel in trapped ions”, New J. Phys. 18, 113039 (2016).

[34] R. Blatt and C. F. Roos, “Quantum Simulations withTrapped Ions”, Nat. Phys. 8, 277 (2012).

[35] K. Kim, M.-S. Chang, S. Korenblit, R. Islam, E.E. Ed-wards, J. K. Freericks, G.-D. Lin, L.-M. Duan, and C.Monroe, “Quantum Simulation of Frustrated Ising Spinswith Trapped Ions”, Nature 465, 590 (2010).

[36] J. Casanova, L. Lamata, I. L. Egusquiza, R. Gerritsma,C. F. Roos, J. J. Garcıa-Ripoll, and E. Solano, “QuantumSimulation of Quantum Field Theories in Trapped Ions”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 260501 (2011).

[37] J. Casanova, A. Mezzacapo, L. Lamata, and E. Solano,“Quantum Simulation of Interacting Fermion LatticeModels in Trapped Ions”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 190502(2012).

[38] A. Mezzacapo, J. Casanova, L. Lamata, and E. Solano,“Digital Quantum Simulation of the Holstein Model inTrapped Ions”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 200501 (2012).

[39] L. Lamata, A. Mezzacapo, J. Casanova, and E. Solano,“Efficient Quantum Simulation of Fermionic and BosonicModels in Trapped Ions”, EPJ Quantum Technology 1,9 (2014).

[40] L. Lamata, J. Leon, T. Schatz, and E. Solano, “DiracEquation and Quantum Relativistic Effects in a SingleTrapped Ion”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 253005 (2007).

[41] R. Gerritsma, G. Kirchmair, F. Zahringer, E. Solano, R.Blatt, and C. F. Roos, “Quantum Simulation of the DiracEquation”, Nature 463, 68 (2010).

[42] R. Gerritsma, B. P. Lanyon, G. Kirchmair, F. Zahringer,C. Hempel, J. Casanova, J. J. Garcıa-Ripoll, E. Solano,R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, “Quantum Simulation of theKlein Paradox with Trapped Ions”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106,060503 (2011).

[43] J. Casanova, C. Sabın, J. Leon, I. L. Egusquiza, R. Ger-ritsma, C. F. Roos, J. J. Garcıa-Ripoll, and E. Solano,“Quantum Simulation of the Majorana Equation and Un-physical Operations”, Phys. Rev. X 1, 021018 (2011).

[44] X. Zhang, Y. Shen, J. Zhang, J. Casanova, L. Lamata,E. Solano, M.-H. Yung, J.-N. Zhang, and K. Kim, “TimeReversal and Charge Conjugation in an EmbeddingQuantum Simulator”, Nat. Commun. 6, 7917 (2015).

[45] X.-H. Cheng, U. Alvarez-Rodriguez, L. Lamata, X. Chen,and E. Solano, “Time and spatial parity operations withtrapped ions”, Phys. Rev. A 92, 022344 (2015).

[46] I. Arrazola, J. S. Pedernales, L. Lamata, and E. Solano,“Digital-Analog Quantum Simulation of Spin Models inTrapped Ions”, Sci. Rep. 6, 30534 (2016).

[47] X.-H. Cheng, I. Arrazola, J. S Pedernales, L. Lamata, X.Chen, and E. Solano “Switchable Particle Statistics withan Embedding Quantum Simulator”, Phys. Rev. A 95,022305 (2017).

[48] W. Vogel and R. L. de Matos Filho, “Nonlinear Jaynes-Cummings dynamics of a trapped ion”, Phys. Rev. A 52,4214 (1995).

[49] R. L. de Matos Filho and W. Vogel, “Nonlinear coherentstates”, Phys. Rev. A 54, 4560 (1996).

[50] R. L. de Matos Filho and W. Vogel, “Quantum Nondemo-lition Measurement of the Motional Energy of a TrappedAtom”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4520 (1996).

[51] D. Stevens, J. Brochard, and A. M. Steane, “Simpleexperimental methods for trapped-ion quantum proces-sors”, Phys. Rev. A 58, 2750 (1998).

[52] G. Morigi, J. I. Cirac, M. Lewenstein, and P. Zoller,“Ground-state laser cooling beyond the Lamb-Dickelimit”, Europhys. Lett. 39, 13 (1997).

[53] G. Morigi, J. Eschner, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Lasercooling of two trapped ions: Sideband cooling beyond theLamb-Dicke limit”, Phys. Rev. A 59, 3797 (1999).

[54] L. Forster, M. Karski, J.-M. Choi, A. Steffen, W. Alt,D. Meschede, A. Widera, E. Montano, J.-H. Lee, W.Rakreungdet, and P. S. Jessen, “Microwave Control ofAtomic Motion in Optical Lattices”, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 233001 (2009).

[55] Y.-M. Hu, W.-L. Yang, Y.-Y. Xu, F. Zhou, L. Chen, K.-L Gao, M. Feng, and C. Lee, “Franck-Condon physics ina single trapped ion”, New J. Phys. 13, 053037 (2011).

[56] M. Fleischhauer and W. P. Schleich, “Revivals made sim-ple: Poisson summation formula as a key to the revivalsin the Jaynes-Cummings model”, Phys. Rev. A 47, 4258(1993).

[57] D. M. Meekhof, C. Monroe, B. E. King, W. M. Itano, andD. J. Wineland, “Generation of Nonclassical MotionalStates of a Trapped Atom” Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 1796(1996).

[58] K. G. Johnson, J. D. Wong-Campos, A. Restelli, K. A.Landsman, B. Neyenhuis, J. Mizrahi, C. Monroe, “Activestabilization of ion trap radiofrequency potentials” Rev.Sci. Instru. 87 (5), 053110 (2016).