18
”Non-participation and witdrawal from online self-help groups” TTeC 12.06.06 [email protected]

”Non-participation and witdrawal from online self-help groups” TTeC 12.06.06 [email protected] [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

”Non-participation and witdrawal from

online self-help groups”

TTeC [email protected]

Background

• Online SHGs one of the most promising aspects of e-health

• Lay supplement to professional health care (National plan for self-help)

• Subject of considerable research interest

• High drop-out rates in studies which is scarcely considered

The study

• PhD-work• Action oriented study of potential

benefits of online SHGs• Included establishment of an online

service for Norwegian breast cancer patients (nov 03- feb 05)

• Non-participation and withdrawal emerged as an essential feature

Aim of paper

To explore non-participation and withdrawal

from online self-help groups

Methods

- Recruitment through self-selection

- Material: Questionary

Participant observation

Qualitative interviews

Participants and participation• 40 participants (38 included in analysis)

• Age 32 to 63

• Well educated

• Comfortable with the Internet

• 1114 postings, 2.2 postings each day

Non-participation and withdrawal• 12 women defined as active users

Continious and/or engaged presence

7 had experienced recurrence of the cancer• 26 women defined as drop-outs:

9 without any messages

18 with one or more messages • 25 interviews (8 /17)

Reasons

1. Too many painful details about cancer

2. Not being ”ill enough”

3. Not finding a legitimate position in the group

4. The duties of everyday life

1. Painful details

“I discovered a lot of nasty things in the group” (M, newly diagnosed, 38 years)

“I was just diagnosed with this myself. To hear about all the problems and all

recurrences got too much. I had to quit and find information other places”

(S, newly diagnosed,56 years).

Comment

- the crucial role of remaining in the hope for recovery

- the ”power of the example”

- Is it useful to address ”all” women who are diagnosed with breast cancer?

2. Not being ill enough

”So, for me, my cancer illness, it was just a small part of my life - there are so

many other things.” (Å, 53 years)

“It would have been easier for me to participate if more women could talk

about prosthesis (E, 46 years).

Comment

• Further challenges of including ”all” breast cancer diagnosed women

• Directs attention to the need for similarity in self-help groups

3 Not finding a legitimate position in the group

“ if I had been one of these girls, I would’ve thought that ‘ oh yes, so she finds something or other to complain about’” (B, 51years).

“if you are trying to mention that you are struggling mentally, you do not get any

response. They say that “of course, everybody feels like that once in a

while”. Of course they do!! But in a way, you feel they say that “Ok…but we do

not want this”” (A, 51 years)

Comment

• Conventional interaction patterns

• Leadership of the group

The duties of everyday life

”It is simply lack of time. I do give priority to the group, but I have been so stressed

lately” (G, 36 years)

Comment

• Requires time

• Personal fulfillment vs activism

Conclusions

Non-participation and withdrawal from this

online self-help group call for more attention

paid to organisational issues (who is addressed, leadership).

However, it also indicates a need for more

knowledge about the experience of breast

cancer and how breast cancer patients adopt

the active and involved patient role