Upload
ella-pollard
View
220
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Non-Insulin Therapies for the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes
Irl B. Hirsch, MD
University of Washington School of Medicine
Initial Comments: Thinking Back
Thinking back for the past 47 years, and looking at the history of diabetes for the past 90 years, do I see the future of diabetes as a glass half full or half empty?
Answer: I see it as half full but I’m not sure the FDA will allow me to put water in my glass
Yes, I’m Frustrated
But I WON’T Surrender to Science or Common Sense
Which brings me to Therapy #1
Therapy #1
An extremely important non-insulin therapy Is not covered by insurance BUT is not very expensive Is good for everyone, even FDA officials
What is it?
Exercise!
What We Know
Improves diabetes control-makes one more sensitive to insulin
Great for the entire cardiovascular system Helps maintain body weight You feel better! Reduces systemic inflammation
Why is this important?
Inflammation in Type 1 DM
The autoimmune attack of type 1 diabetes IS an inflammatory process on the beta-cells in the pancreas that make insulin
Both small vessel (eyes/kidneys) and large vessel (heart, arteries to the head and leg) disease (blockage) is initiated by inflammatory activation
So if exercises reduces inflammation, could there be any benefits with beta-cell preservation or complications?
But What If You Are Not A Mouse?
Exp Diabetes Res 2011: epub Sept 2011
We Don’t Know…BUT
Several research presentations (not published to my knowledge) showing more active children had longer beta-cell function
My anecdotal experience is exercise prolongs the “honeymoon period”
Case Presentation
I started following a 40 year-old man in 1991 who was diagnosed with diabetic kidney disease, with serum creatinine of 2.0 mg/dL (about 50% of normal function)
Besides starting a pump and improving his control (A1C 5.9-6.2%), he started a RIGOROUS exercise program-mountain climbing, riding his bike to work, etc
In 2011, 20 years later, his creatinine is 2.0 mg/dL
OMG
That’s not supposed to happen!
My Belief Glucose control, exercise, healthy diet-all
contributed to his lack of progression of his kidney disease
My advice: start the exercise programs early…stay active!
Therapy #2
AMYLIN A hormone co-secreted with insulin from
the beta-cells in the pancreas For those who make a little insulin, they
make a little amylin For those who make no insulin, they make
no amylin
What Does Amylin Do?
1. It slows the movement of food from the stomach to the rest of the gut
2. It “turns off” glucagon, usually high in type 1 diabetes, and not needed when you eat Glucagon: causes the liver to make glucose (and
suppresses the liver from storing glucose) Can also worsen resistance at the muscle
In many, amylin reduces appetite
Does Amylin Work in Type 1 Diabetes?
YES Generic name = pramlintide Trade name = Symlin® As expected: “Symlin has not been
evaluated for pediatric patients” (package insert)
Pramlintide Improves Postprandial GlucosePramlintide Improves Postprandial Glucose
Evaluable; Mean (SE); Pramlintide + Lispro insulin, n = 20; Pramlintide + Regular insulin, n = 18; Weyer C, et al. Diabetes Care 2003; 26:3074-3079; Pramlintide Acetate Prescribing Information, 2005
100
150
200
250
300
0 60 120 180 240
Time Relative to Meal and Pramlintide (min)
Pla
sma
Glu
cose
(
mg
/dL
)
100
150
200
250
300
0 60 120 180 240
Pla
sma
Glu
cose
(mg
/dL
)Lispro Insulin
Pramlintide 60 g + Lispro Insulin
Regular InsulinPramlintide 60 g + Regular Insulin
Type 1 DiabetesType 1 Diabetes
No Symlin dose titration during initiation (fixed dose) No insulin dose reduction at Symlin initiation
Placebo Pramlintide
Type 1 Diabetes Combined PivotalsType 1 Diabetes Combined Pivotals
Symlin® Clinical EffectsSymlin® Clinical EffectsPlacebo
PramlintideType 1 Diabetes Combined PivotalsType 1 Diabetes Combined Pivotals
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
2 4 8 13 20 26Weeks
-10
-5
0
5
10
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
2 4 8 13 20 26
Weeks
Insulin Use (%) A1C (%) Weight (kg)
Short-Acting
Long-Acting
** P <0.01; †P <0.0001 for changes from baseline; Hermann K, et al. Presented at ADA, 71st Scientific Sessions; 2011; San Diego, CA (1065-P)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
-0.3%
**
Month
A
1C
(%
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6-4
-3
-2
-1
0
-3.2 kg(-3.8%)
†
Month
B
od
y W
eig
ht
(kg
)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6-40
-30
-20
-10
0
-27.5%
†
Month
M
eal
tim
e I
nsu
lin
Use (
%)
125
135
145
155
165
175
185
195Baseline
Month 6
Breakfast Lunch Dinner Bedtime
**
Blo
od
Glu
co
se (
mg
/dL
)
A1C 7-Point Glucose
Body Weight Mealtime Insulin
Does Symlin® Work in Insulin Pump-Treated Patients in a “Real-Life” Clinical Practice Study?
Does Symlin® Work in Insulin Pump-Treated Patients in a “Real-Life” Clinical Practice Study?
My Thinking About Symlin® Therapy
Amylin is co-secreted with insulin We currently administer Symlin® as a
prandial hormone only What would happen if pramlintide was
administered in a “basal-bolus” fashion?
Amylin is co-secreted with insulin We currently administer Symlin® as a
prandial hormone only What would happen if pramlintide was
administered in a “basal-bolus” fashion?
Continuous Subcutaneous Pramlintide Infusion =
CSPI
CSPI: Proof of Concept 13 type 1 adolescent patients (age = 17 years,
BMI = 22 kg/m2, HbA1c = 7.4%) Cross-over study
CSII with “dual-wave bolus” of insulin CSII + CSPI with “dual-wave bolus” of insulin
and pram Results: 20% reduction of insulin dose, 26%
reduction in postprandial glucose, reduction in glucagon levels
13 type 1 adolescent patients (age = 17 years, BMI = 22 kg/m2, HbA1c = 7.4%)
Cross-over study CSII with “dual-wave bolus” of insulin CSII + CSPI with “dual-wave bolus” of insulin
and pram Results: 20% reduction of insulin dose, 26%
reduction in postprandial glucose, reduction in glucagon levels
JCEM 2009:94, 1608
CSPI: Proof of Concept
JCEM 2009:94, 1608
“Simultaneous continuous sc pramlintide and insulin infusion has the
potential of improving glucose concentration by way of physiological
replacement”
So Why Can’t We Infuse Symlin® in an Insulin Pump?
THE GOOD NEWS
JDRF and Amylin Partner to Investigate Co-Formulating Two Hormones for Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes
May 10, 2011
PRESS RELEASE
http://www.jdrf.org/index.cfm?page_id=115726
THERAPY #3
Incretin hormones Hormones from the gut which are secreted
in response to oral but not intravenous glucose
Responsible for reducing blood glucose spikes
GLP-1 = Glucagon-like Peptide-1
GLP-1 Modes of Action in Man GLP-1 Modes of Action in Man
GLP-1 is secretedfrom the L-cells
in the jejunumand ileum
GLP-1 is secretedfrom the L-cells
in the jejunumand ileum
This in turn…This in turn…
• Stimulates insulin secretion• Stimulates insulin secretion
• Suppresses glucagon secretion• Suppresses glucagon secretion
• Slows gastric emptying• Slows gastric emptying
Long term effectsdemonstrated in animals…Long term effectsdemonstrated in animals…
• Increases beta-cell cell mass and maintains beta-cell efficiency• Increases beta-cell cell mass and maintains beta-cell efficiency
• Reduces food intake• Reduces food intake
Upon ingestion of food…Upon ingestion of food…
Drucker DJ. Curr Pharm Des 2001; 7:1399-1412Drucker DJ. Mol Endocrinol 2003; 17:161-171
Drucker DJ. Curr Pharm Des 2001; 7:1399-1412Drucker DJ. Mol Endocrinol 2003; 17:161-171
Why Would This Be Helpful In Type 1 Diabetes?
Could GLP-1 analogues, with similar mechanisms as amylin (other than insulin secretion), help A1C in type 1 DM?
Could GLP-1 analogues improve beta cell function in newly diagnosed type 1 DM?
As of today, we have two GLP-1 analogues Byetta, injected twice daily Victoza, injected once daily (Bydureon, awaiting FDA approval)
Byetta and Type 1 DM
Minimal literature My guess: tried “off label” Beta cell preservation
One trial-didn’t help
Victoza and Type 1 DM
Immediate reports of improvements in A1C and weight.
THIS is what we are all seeing around the world with Victoza
Eur J Endocrinol 2011;165:77-84
OBERVATIONAL STUDY: Minimal scientific rigor
What About A “Controlled Study”?
Randomized to + or – Victoza A1c reduced in both groups
getting Victoza (6.6 to 6.4% and 7.5 to 7.0%). No change in non-Victoza group
2 of the 10 patients still making insulin could STOP their insulin on Victoza
“Honeymoon+Victoza”
No c-peptide+Victoza
70-180 70-180
70-180 70-180
70-180 70-180
No Victoza
> 180
< 70
Diabetes Care 2011;34:1463-1468
GLP-1: Where I Think This Is Going
A 41-year-old woman, 25 years with type 1 diabetes, BMI 36 kg/m2, A1C 7.9% on insulin pump therapy emails me about Victoza…
“Yo Doc, just an ‘Oh, wow!’ moment for you. Started the 1.2 dose. Had cereal for dinner. Way bad, I know. Normally, I would have gone over 200 for a few hours no matter how much insulin I bolused. I never went over 130. Never. Insurance covers it. Have a super-dee-duper weekend.”
Case Study: A 36-Year-Oldwith Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 diabetes for 1.5 years Started on metformin by the primary care
provider, then put on liraglutide (Victoza) in April 2010 with an A1C of 6.6%
Presents to me in September 2010
A1C = 5.2%
My Thoughts…
The longer GLP-1 agonists may do better with type 1 DM than the shorter-acting drugs More impact on both fasting and postprandial glucose Better tolerated than Symlin Most exciting is early data on beta-cell preservation Recall: obesity is a new problem for type 1 DM too-not so
20+ years ago What is needed: large clinical trials In the meantime: don’t expect insurance coverage in
Western Washington (poor coverage in type 2 diabetes!)
What about blocking the enzyme that
breaks down GLP-1?
Adapted from Deacon CF, et al. Diabetes. 1995;44:1126-1131.
GLP-1 Secretion and Inactivation
IntestinalGLP-1
release
GLP-1 (7-36)active
Mixed meal
GLP-1 (9-36)inactive
(>80% of pool)
DPP-4
t½ = 1 to 2 min
Inhibition of DPP-4 Increases Active GLP-1
GLP-1 (9-36)inactive
IntestinalGLP-1
release
Mixed meal
GLP-1 (7-36)active
DPP-4
Adapted from Rothenberg P, et al. Diabetes. 2000;49(suppl 1):A39.
DPP-4inhibitor
Several DPP-4s Available for Type 2 Diabetes
Sitagliptin = Januvia Saxagliptin = Onglyza Linagliptin = Tradjenta
What about a DPP-4 inhibitor for type 1 DM?
Therapy #4: Sitagliptin (Januvia)
20 patients, 8-week study Small but significant improvements in blood
glucose A1C decreased by 0.3% Time between 80-140 mg/dL increased No change in weight Larger, longer studies required
Diabetic Medicine 2011:28:1176-81
Therapy #5: What About Bile-Acid Sequestrants for the Treatment of Type 1 DM?
Bile acid sequestrants have been available for decades for the treatment of high cholesterol (hypercholesterolemia)
Cholestyramine (Questran); colestipol (Colestid); colesevelam (Welchol)
The newest of these drugs, Welchol, is also approved to treat type 2 DM-it lower A1C on average by 0.5%
Mechanism not known
What about a bile-acid sequestrant for type 1 DM?
Mean + (SEM) LDL in the Control and Colesevelam Treated Groups: N=40 Type 1 DM
≥ 10% drop in LDL in the Rx group @ 4, 8, and 12 Wks
P=0.02 P=0.01 P=0.003
128.6 128.0 125.4108.0 95.7 97.7 98.3128.870.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
110.0
120.0
130.0
140.0
Baseline 4 Weeks 8 Weeks 12 Weeks
Visit
LD
L-C
mg
/dL
Placebo Colesevelam
Garg et al, Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism, 2011
What About A1C?
After 12 weeks, no significant reduction in A1C
My take: study under-powered to show a reduction as the effect is real but small
Garg et al, Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism, 2011
How Might Bile Acid Sequestrants Lower Glucose?
GLP-1 mean (±SEM) AUCG
LP
-1 A
UC
(p
g/m
l x
min
)
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
0 60 120 180 240
Time (minutes)
p=0.13
p=0.01p=0.03
p=0.01
p=0.02Placebo Colesevelam
Garg et al, Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism, 2011
Bile Acid Sequestrants: What I See
With huge use of statins, we rarely use these agents
However, when statins not tolerated I see an obvious reduction in A1C levels in most patients
My take: more studies in type 1 DM needed Reasonable alternative for over 40 year old
patients who require statins and can tolerate the huge pills (or gritty powder)
Therapy #6
Raise you hand if you know what prolactin is Raise your hand if you know what
bromocriptine is
Bromocriptine
Prolactin is the hormone responsible for lactation and bromocriptine lowers prolactin levels
What in the world does this have to do with diabetes?
Bromocriptine and Diabetes
Mechanism isn’t clear, but bromocriptine (Cycloset) improves diabetes control in type 2 diabetes
A1C is generally reduced by 0.5% So what?
In the one 3000+ cardiovascular disease trial, bromocriptine lowered event rate
Therapy #7: Case 1
Case: 31 year-old man diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the age of 3 months. Frequent severe hypoglycemia for many years
Which non-insulin therapy should be considered?
Neonatal Diabetes
One of several gene mutations impairing normal insulin secretion
Infants usually quite ill, often DKA, always prior to 6 months of age, usually before 3 months of age
Gene mutations can be tested at Children’s Hospital
No need for insulin-treated with sulfonylureas
Case 2
21 year-old woman presents with type 1 DM diagnosed at age 14. Two brothers, a sister, and her mother and maternal aunt all were diagnosed with diabetes at the same time.
What should our patient be treated with?
Maturity Onset Diabetes of YouthMODY
Hepatic Nuclear Factor 1α MODY (MODY-3) Most common type of MODY (60%) Usually presents in adolescence or 20’s Most often confused with T1DM In first few years, can achieve good
control with sulfonylurea
Sulfonylureas
Stimulate insulin secretion Used for the treated of type 2 DM since the
1950s Glyburide, glipizide, glmeperide the most
common ones used
My Main Message Today: Don’t Over-React to Your Child’s A1C
First, it’s an imperfect test
5% 97 (76-120)
6% 126 (100-152)
7% 154 (123-185)
8% 183 (147-217)
9% 212 (170-249)
10% 249 (192-282)
11% 269 (217-314)
12% 298 (240-347)
Average Glucose vs. A1C A1C AG mg/dL (95% CI)
Diabetes Care 31:1473-1478, 2008
What this means is someone with an A1C
of 8% could have a lower mean glucose than someone else with an A1C of 7%!
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
24 24
20 20
16 16
12 12
8 8
4 4
00
Risk for Sustained DR in Conventional and Intensive
Treatment: How the Controversy Started
Conventional
Adapted from Diabetes 44:968-983, 1995
11%11%
Ra
t e P
er
Pa
tie
nt
Ye
ar
Ra
te P
er
Pa
tie
nt
Ye
ar 10%10%
9%9%
8%8%
7%7%
Time During Study (Years)Time During Study (Years)
Mean HbA1cMean HbA1c
Risk for Sustained DR in Subgroups of the DCCT
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Intensive
Ra
t e P
er
Pa
tie
nt
Ye
ar
Ra
te P
er
Pa
tie
nt
Ye
ar
9%9%8%8%7%7%
Time During Study (Years)Time During Study (Years)
24 24
20 20
16 16
12 12
8 8
4 4
00
Mean HbA1cMean HbA1c
But in 2008 we were told this analysis was a “statistical artifact”
Fast Forward: 2011
1604 adolescents stratified over 4 time periods
DR assessed with fundus photography
DOES THIS LOOK FAMILIAR?
Diabetes Care 2011;34:2368-73
DR, MDI/CSII, A1C in 4 Time Periods
Diabetes Care 2011;34:2368-73
DR for CSII vs MDI: OR = 0.52 (95% CI 0.26-1.06), p = 0.07
The Bottom Line
A1C is important, but not as important as many thought in the past
A1C only explains 11% of progression of diabetic retinopathy-few appreciate this fact
More data continue to suggest HOW the A1C got to be what it is may be important-not just the number itself!
Conclusions
There are many possible agents to be used in addition to insulin for the treatment of type 1 diabetes
These agents are rarely used in pediatrics (T1D Exchange data) Exercise is the big exception!
Mechanisms of these agents often are not clear, yet much excitement about “beta-cell health” with GLP-1 agonists
A1C is important, but perhaps “A1C quality” is important too
Conclusion
What goes through my mind with each patient:
Make sure it is type 1 DM!
Thank You