Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Noise Feasibility Study
Proposed Mixed-Use/Residential Development
55 Kerr Street,
Cambridge, Ontario
Prepared for:
50 Shade Street Investments Inc. 425 Alness Street,
Toronto, Ontario M3J 2t8
Prepared by
Yvonne Lo, BASc, PEng
Reviewed by
Sheeba Paul, MEng, PEng
June 14, 2019
Project Number: 01800816
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
2 Site Description & Noise Sources................................................................................................... 2
3 Noise Level Criteria ........................................................................................................................ 3
3.1 Road Traffic ............................................................................................................................. 3
4 Assessment of Road Traffic Noise on the Proposed Building, Methods & Results ....................... 4
4.1 Road Traffic ............................................................................................................................. 4 4.2 Road Traffic Noise Predictions ............................................................................................... 5
5 Discussion & Recommendations .................................................................................................... 6
5.1 Outdoor Living Areas .............................................................................................................. 6 5.2 Indoor Living Areas & Ventilation Requirements .................................................................. 7 5.3 Building Façade Constructions ................................................................................................ 7 5.4 Warning Clauses ...................................................................................................................... 7
6 Stationary Noise Sources ................................................................................................................ 8
6.1 Criteria for Stationary Sources of Sound ................................................................................. 8 6.2 Assessment of Existing Stationary Noise Sources and their Impact on Proposed Sensitive Receptors ............................................................................................................................................ 9 6.3 Assessment of Proposed Stationary Noise Sources and their Impact on Adjacent Sensitive Receptors ............................................................................................................................................ 9 6.4 Impact of the Development on Itself ..................................................................................... 10
7 Summary of Recommendations .................................................................................................... 10
8 Implementation ............................................................................................................................. 12
Figure 1 – Key Plan Figure 2 – Site Plan Showing Prediction Locations Figure 3 – Existing Noise Source Locations Figure 4 – Predicted Daytime Sound Level Contours from Existing Stationary Noise Sources, dBA Figure 5 – Predicted Nighttime Sound Level Contours from Existing Stationary Noise Sources, dBA Figure 6 – Proposed Noise Source Locations Appendix A – Road Traffic Data Appendix B – Sample STAMSON 5.04 Output Appendix C – Consultant Statutory Declaration
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Mixed-Use/Residential Development Page 1 55 Kerr Street, Cambridge, Ontario June 14, 2019
1 Introduction
HGC Engineering was retained by 50 Shade Street Investments Inc. to conduct a noise feasibility
study for a mixed-use development to be located at 55 Kerr Street in the City of Cambridge,
Ontario. The proposed development is to include one 24-storey residential building and one
30-storey mixed-use building with one shared level of underground parking. This study has been
prepared as part of the approvals process as required by the Regional Municipality of Waterloo
(RMOW).
The primary noise sources impacting the site are road traffic on Beverly Street, Shade Street and
Kerr Street with lesser contributions from Main Street. Projected road traffic volume data was
obtained from the RMOW. The data was used to estimate future sound levels (LEQ) at the
façades of the proposed mixed-use/residential buildings. The estimated sound levels were
compared to the guidelines of the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP)
and the RMOW.
The results of this study indicate that with suitable noise control measures integrated into the
design of the buildings, it is feasible to achieve the indoor MECP guideline sound levels from
road traffic sources. The recommended noise control measures include appropriate wall and
window glazing assemblies, and an alternative means of ventilation to open windows. Warning
clauses will need to be included in the property, tenancy and rental agreements to warn
occupants of potentially audible transportation noise levels and of the nearby
commercial/institutional uses.
An analysis was also conducted to determine the potential impact of noise from rooftop units at
the adjacent commercial/institutional building to the southwest of the subject site on the
proposed buildings in addition to the impact of rooftop mechanical equipment at the proposed
buildings on existing residences. The analysis was based on a review of the latest site plan
prepared by Jonathan Weizel Architect, dated June 6, 2019, aerial photos and a site visit.
Reasonable estimates of the size and tonnage of the existing and proposed rooftop mechanical
units have been used based on experience with similar projects. Manufacturer’s sound power
data was used in the analysis to estimate sound levels associated with the existing commercial
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Mixed-Use/Residential Development Page 2 55 Kerr Street, Cambridge, Ontario June 14, 2019 building on the proposed dwelling units and sound levels associated with the proposed buildings
on existing dwelling units.
A 3D computer model of the area was created, using acoustic modelling software, in order to
predict the sound levels at the locations of the proposed buildings and the existing dwelling units.
The results indicate that the sound emissions from the existing commercial/institutional building
on proposed residential receptors as well as the sound emissions from the proposed building on
existing residential receptors will be below the MECP minimum exclusionary sound level limits.
Further, physical mitigation measures are not required for the stationary noise sources associated
with the existing and proposed buildings.
2 Site Description & Noise Sources
The site is situated on the west side of Shade Street, south of Kerr Street, specifically at 55 Kerr
Street, in the City of Cambridge, Ontario. Figure 1 shows a key plan of the subject site. A site
plan prepared by Jonathan Weizel Architect, dated June 6, 2019, is shown in Figure 2. Figure 2
also indicates the sound level prediction locations. The proposed development will consist of one
30-storey building and one 24-storey building each with podiums of 8-storeys, 6-storeys and 4-
storey and one shared level of underground parking.
HGC Engineering visited the site in January 2019 to investigate the site and the surrounding land
uses. The acoustical environment surrounding the site is urban. The subject site is currently
vacant. The surrounding lands consist mainly of residential and commercial/institutional uses.
The site visit concluded that the significant noise source impacting the study area are road traffic
noise on Shade Street, Kerr Street and Beverly Street with lesser contributions from Main Street.
There is an existing BB gas station to the north with garage repair uses facing east and Werner’s
Auto Sales & Services to the further east, but there are residential uses closer to these uses than
the subject site. Sounds from the commercial uses in the area were not discernible over road
traffic during the site visit, nevertheless, a noise warning clause is recommended to inform the
future occupants of the development of the proximity to existing and future commercial uses and
that sounds may be audible, as included in Section 5.4.
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Mixed-Use/Residential Development Page 3 55 Kerr Street, Cambridge, Ontario June 14, 2019 The sources of sound of greatest potential impact on the proposed buildings are the rooftop units
at the existing commercial/institution building located to the southwest of the proposed
development. The specific models of the mechanical equipment are not known. Reasonable
estimates were used in the analysis along with manufacturer’s sound level data contained in
HGC Engineering project files. Figure 3 shows the location of the existing rooftop mechanical
units, as used in the calculations.
3 Noise Level Criteria
3.1 Road Traffic
Guidelines for acceptable levels of road traffic noise impacting residential developments are
given in the MECP publication NPC-300, “Environmental Noise Guideline Stationary and
Transportation Sources – Approval and Planning”, release date October 21, 2013, and are listed
in Table I below. The values in Table I are energy equivalent (average) sound levels [LEQ] in
units of A-weighted decibels [dBA].
Table I: MECP Road Traffic Noise Criteria (dBA)
Area Daytime LEQ (16 hour)
Road Nighttime LEQ(8 hour)
Road
Outdoor Living Area 55 dBA --
Inside Living/Dining Room 45 dBA 45 dBA
Inside Bedroom 45 dBA 40 dBA
Daytime refers to the period between 07:00 and 23:00. Nighttime refers to the time period
between 23:00 and 07:00. The term “outdoor living area” (OLA) is used in reference to an
outdoor patio, a backyard, a terrace, or other area where passive recreation is expected to occur.
The MECP and Regional Municipality of Waterloo (RMOW) guidelines allow the daytime
sound levels in an Outdoor Living Area to be exceeded by up to 5 dBA, without mitigation, if
warning clauses are placed in the purchase and rental agreements to the property. Where OLA
sound levels exceed 60 dBA, physical mitigation is recommended to reduce the OLA sound level
to below 60 dBA and as close to 55 dBA as technically, economically and administratively
feasible. Note that not all OLA’s necessarily require protection, if there are other protected
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Mixed-Use/Residential Development Page 4 55 Kerr Street, Cambridge, Ontario June 14, 2019 outdoor areas accessible to the residents.
MECP and RMOW guidelines require central air conditioning or other ventilation system to be
installed prior to occupancy as an alternative means of ventilation to open windows for dwellings
where nighttime sound levels outside bedroom or living/dining room windows exceed 60 dBA or
daytime sound levels outside bedroom or living/dining room windows exceed 65 dBA. Provision
for air conditioning is required when nighttime sound levels at bedroom or living/dining room
windows are in the range of 51 to 60 dBA or daytime sound levels at bedroom or living/dining
rooms are in the range of 56 dBA to 65 dBA. Building components such as walls, windows and
doors must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria when the plane of window
nighttime sound level is greater than 60 dBA or the daytime sound level is greater than 65 dBA
due to road traffic noise.
Warning clauses to notify future residents of possible excesses are also required when nighttime
sound levels exceed 50 dBA at the plane of the bedroom or living/dining room window and
daytime sound levels exceed 55 dBA in the outdoor living area and at the plane of the bedroom
or living/dining room window due to road traffic.
4 Assessment of Road Traffic Noise on the Proposed
Building, Methods & Results
4.1 Road Traffic
Projected traffic data for Main Street, Kerr Street, Beverly Street, and Shade Street were
obtained from the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. The data is in the form of Average Annual
Daily Traffic (AADT) values, and is provided in Appendix A. A forecasted AADT of 7,100
vehicles per day was applied to Main Street, along with commercial vehicle percentages of 1.5%
for medium trucks and 2.5% for heavy trucks were used. A forecasted AADT of 3,500 vehicles
per day was applied to Kerr Street, along with commercial vehicle percentages of 1.2% for
medium trucks and 1.1% for heavy trucks was used. A forecasted AADT of 9,400 vehicles per
day was applied to Beverly Street, along with commercial vehicle percentages of 1.2% for
medium trucks and 2.1% for heavy trucks were used. A forecasted AADT of 2,400 vehicles per
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Mixed-Use/Residential Development Page 5 55 Kerr Street, Cambridge, Ontario June 14, 2019 day was applied to Shade Street, along with commercial vehicle percentages of 2.1% for medium
trucks and 1.7% for heavy trucks were used.
Posted speed limits of 50 km/h were used for all the roadways in the analysis in conjunction with
a 90/10 day/night volume split. The traffic volumes used in the analysis are provided in Table II.
Table II: Forecasted Road Traffic Data
Road Name Cars Medium Trucks
Heavy Trucks
Total
Main Street Daytime 6 134 96 160 6 390 Nighttime 682 11 18 710 Total 6 816 107 178 7 100
Kerr Street Daytime 3 078 38 35 3 150 Nighttime 342 4 4 350 Total 3 420 42 39 3 500
Beverly Street
Daytime 8 181 102 178 8 460 Nighttime 909 11 20 940 Total 9 090 113 197 9 400
Shade Street Daytime 2 078 45 37 2 160 Nighttime 231 5 4 240 Total 2 309 50 41 2 400
4.2 Road Traffic Noise Predictions
To assess the levels of road traffic noise which will impact the subject site in the future, sound
level predictions were made using STAMSON version 5.04, a computer algorithm developed by
the MECP. Sample STAMSON output is included in Appendix B.
Predictions of the traffic sound levels were made at various façades with exposure to the road
traffic noise sources, as shown in Figure 2. The results of these predictions are summarized in
Table III. The acoustic recommendations will be subject to modifications if the building
envelopes or heights are changed significantly. The worst case prediction locations were chosen
at the top floors of the proposed buildings, to investigate ventilation and building façade
construction requirements and in the outdoor amenity areas to investigate acoustic barrier
requirements.
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Mixed-Use/Residential Development Page 6 55 Kerr Street, Cambridge, Ontario June 14, 2019
Table III: Predicted Future Sound Levels, [dBA]
Prediction Location
Building Description Daytime – at Façade/OLA
LEQ(16)
Nighttime – at Façade
LEQ(8)
A
A
West Façade 58 51
B North Façade 59 53
C East Façade 59 53
D South Façade 57 51
E
B
West Façade 56 50
F North Façade 55 <50
G East Façade 58 52
H South Façade 57 50
I A G/F Amenity Space <55 --
J B Rooftop Garden <55 --
K B G/F Amenity Space <55 --
5 Discussion & Recommendations
The following discussion outlines preliminary recommendations for building façade
constructions, ventilation requirements, and noise warning clauses to achieve the noise criteria
stated in Table I.
5.1 Outdoor Living Areas
An outdoor amenity area is indicated on the site plan south of Building A at ground level
(Prediction Location [I]). Building B also has outdoor amenity areas indicated on the 4th floor
(Prediction Location [J]) and on the south side of the ground floor (Prediction Location [K]). The
predicted sound level in these areas will be less than 55 dBA.
The dwelling units within the proposed development may have balconies and patios that are less
than 4 m in depth. These areas are not considered to be outdoor amenity areas under MECP
guidelines, and are therefore exempt from traffic noise assessment.
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Mixed-Use/Residential Development Page 7 55 Kerr Street, Cambridge, Ontario June 14, 2019 5.2 Indoor Living Areas & Ventilation Requirements
Provision for the Future Installation of Air Conditioning
The predicted sound levels at the façades of both towers will be between 56 and 65 dBA during
the daytime and between 51 and 60 dBA during the nighttime. The proposed buildings will
require an alternative means of ventilation to open windows. The use of central air conditioning
will exceed this requirement. The guidelines also recommend warning clauses for these dwelling
units.
In general, window or through-the-wall air conditioning units are not recommended because of
the noise they produce and because the units penetrate through the exterior wall which degrades
the overall sound insulating properties of the envelope. Acceptable units are those that are
housed in their own closet with an access door for maintenance. Any outdoor air conditioning
unit or rooftop mechanical unit should be located, installed, and selected with an appropriate
sound emission rating to comply with MECP guidelines NPC-300.
5.3 Building Façade Constructions
Since future road traffic sound levels at the plane of window for the façades of the proposed
buildings will be less than 65 dBA during the daytime and 60 dBA during the nighttime, any
exterior wall, and double glazed window construction meeting the minimum requirements of the
Ontario Building Code (OBC) will provide adequate sound insulation for all dwelling units in
this development.
5.4 Warning Clauses
MECP guidelines recommend that appropriate warning clauses be used in the Development
Agreements and in purchase, sale and lease agreements (typically by reference to the
Development Agreements), to inform future owners and occupants about noise concerns
from transportation sources in the area. The following clauses are recommended:
(a) Purchasers/tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing road traffic may on occasion interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the sound level limits of the City and the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks.
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Mixed-Use/Residential Development Page 8 55 Kerr Street, Cambridge, Ontario June 14, 2019
(b) This dwelling unit has been fitted with a forced air heating system and the ducting etc., was sized to accommodate central air conditioning. Installation of central air conditioning will allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the Municipality’s and the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks’ noise criteria. (Note: The location and installation of the outdoor air conditioning device should be done so as to minimize the noise impacts and comply with criteria of MECP publication NPC-300.)
(c) Purchasers/tenants are advised of the proximity of nearby commercial, institutional, retail and office facilities, the sound from which may at times be audible.
These sample clauses are provided by the MECP as examples and can be modified by the
Municipality as required.
6 Stationary Noise Sources
6.1 Criteria for Stationary Sources of Sound
Stationary sources of noise are defined as all sources that emit noise within a commercial or
industrial facility boundary. The existing rooftop mechanical equipment on the roof of the
adjacent commercial building located to the southwest of the subject site can be classified as
stationary sources of sound. It is understood that the proposed building will be serviced by roof
mounted make up air units which are also classified as stationary sources of sound.
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) provides guidelines for the
assessment of stationary noise sources. NPC-300 “Environment Noise Guideline Stationary and
Transportation sources – Approval and Planning” referenced with regard to traffic noise is also
intended for use in the planning of noise sensitive land uses adjacent to residential buildings.
The criteria is based on the background sound level at sensitive points of reception (which are
typically residences) in the quietest hour that the source can be in operation. Background sound
includes sound from road traffic and natural sounds, but excludes the sources under assessment.
For relatively quiet areas where background sound may fall to low levels during some hours,
NPC-300 stipulates various minimum limits. In class 1 areas, these limits are 50 dBA for
daytime periods (07:00 to 23:00) and 45 dBA at night (23:00 to 07:00).
Sources sound levels for typical rooftop mechanical units and assumed operational information
(outlined below) were used as input to a predictive computer model (Cadna-A version 2019
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Mixed-Use/Residential Development Page 9 55 Kerr Street, Cambridge, Ontario June 14, 2019 (32 bit) : build 167.4905), in order to estimate the sound levels from the existing
commercial/institutional building at the proposed development. The computer model is based on
the methods from ISO Standard 9613-2.2, “Acoustic – Attenuation of Sound During Propagation
Outdoors”, which accounts for reduction in sound level with distance due to geometrical
spreading, air absorption, ground attenuation and acoustical shielding by intervening structures.
Assumptions regarding the operating duty cycles of the equipment (100% during the daytime,
and 50% during the night-time) were included based on our experience with other projects.
6.2 Assessment of Existing Stationary Noise Sources and their
Impact on Proposed Sensitive Receptors
Sound power levels from the existing rooftop mechanical equipment were estimated based on
manufacturer’s data for mechanical equipment used in similar past projects with locations shown
in Figure 3. Rooftop units on the existing commercial/institutional building with sound power
ratings of 72 dBA were assumed in the analysis. The results of this assessment indicate a
maximum impact of 30 dBA during the daytime and 27 dBA during nighttime at the closest
sensitive receptors as shown in Figures 4 and 5. These predicted sound levels are less than the
MECP minimum exclusionary limit of 50 dBA during the daytime hours and 45 dBA during the
nighttime hours, based on a typical worst-case operating scenario.
It is concluded that sounds from the existing rooftop mechanical equipment associated with the
adjacent commercial/institutional building are anticipated to comply with the MECP guidelines
at the proposed buildings and physical mitigation is not required.
6.3 Assessment of Proposed Stationary Noise Sources and their
Impact on Adjacent Sensitive Receptors
Sound power levels from the proposed rooftop mechanical equipment were estimated based on
manufacturer’s data for mechanical equipment used in similar past projects. Two make-up air
units each were assumed at Buildings A and B. Roof mounted make-up air units at the proposed
buildings with sound power ratings of 86 dBA were assumed in the analysis with locations
shown in Figure 6. The results of this assessment indicate a maximum impact less than 30 dBA
during the daytime and less than 25 dBA during nighttime. These predicted sound levels are less
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Mixed-Use/Residential Development Page 10 55 Kerr Street, Cambridge, Ontario June 14, 2019 than the MECP minimum exclusionary limit of 50 dBA during the daytime hours and 45 dBA
during the nighttime hours, based on a typical worst-case operating scenario.
It is concluded that sounds from the proposed rooftop mechanical equipment associated with the
proposed building are anticipated to comply with the MECP guidelines at the existing sensitive
receptors and physical mitigation is not required.
6.4 Impact of the Development on Itself
Section 5.9.1 of the Ontario Building Code (OBC) specifies the minimum required sound
insulation characteristics for demising partitions, in terms of Sound Transmission Class (STC)
values. In order to maintain adequate acoustical privacy between separate suites in a multi-
tenant building, inter-suite walls should meet or exceed STC-50. Walls separating a suite from a
noisy space such as a refuse chute, or elevator shaft, should meet or exceed STC-55. In addition,
it is recommended that the floor/ceiling constructions separating suites from any amenity or
commercial spaces also meet or exceed STC-55. Tables 1 and 2 in Section SB-3 of the
Supplementary Guideline to the OBC provide a comprehensive list of constructions that will
meet the above requirements.
Tarion’s Builder Bulletin B19R requires the internal design of condominium projects to integrate
suitable acoustic features to insulate the suites from noise from each other and amenities in
accordance with the OBC, and limit the potential intrusions of mechanical and electrical services
of the buildings on its residents. If B19R certification is needed, an acoustical consultant is
required to review the mechanical and electrical drawings and details of demising constructions
and mechanical/electrical equipment, when available, to help ensure that the noise impact of the
development on itself is maintained within acceptable levels.
7 Summary of Recommendations
Sound levels due to road traffic will exceed MECP guidelines at the proposed mixed-use
buildings. The following recommendations are provided with regard to noise mitigation.
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Mixed-Use/Residential Development Page 11 55 Kerr Street, Cambridge, Ontario June 14, 2019 For transportation noise sources
1. An alternative means of ventilation to open windows should be implemented with a warning
clause for the proposed mixed-use/residential buildings. The use of central air conditioning
will exceed this requirement.
2. Warning clauses should be used to inform future owners of the road traffic noise issues and
the presence of nearby commercial/institutional facilities.
Table IV: Summary of Noise Control Requirements and Noise Warning Clauses
Prediction Location
Building Description Ventilation
Requirements* Warning Clause
Upgraded Building Constructions +
A
A
North Façade
Forced Air A, B, C OBC
B East Façade C South Façade D West Façade E
B
North Façade F East Façade G South Façade H West Façade
Notes: -- no specific requirement * The location, installation and sound rating of the air conditioning condensers must be compliant with MECP Guideline NPC-300, as applicable. OBC – Ontario Building Code
For stationary noise sources
1. The predicted sound levels from proposed and existing rooftop mechanical equipment will be
well below the MECP minimum exclusionary limit. Physical mitigation will not be required
for the proposed and existing rooftop mechanical equipment.
2. Tarion Builder’s Bulletin B19R requires that the internal design of condominium projects
integrates suitable acoustic features to insulate the suites from noise from each other and
amenities in accordance with the OBC, and limit the potential intrusions of mechanical and
electrical services of the buildings on its residents. If B19R certification is needed, an
acoustical consultant is required to review the mechanical and electrical drawings and details
of demising constructions and mechanical/electrical equipment, when available, to help
ensure that the noise impact of the development on itself are maintained within acceptable
Noise Feasibility Study, Proposed Mixed-Use/Residential Development Page 12 55 Kerr Street, Cambridge, Ontario June 14, 2019
levels. Outdoor sound emissions should also be checked to ensure compliance with the City
of Waterloo noise by-law.
8 Implementation
To ensure that the noise control recommendations outlined above are properly included in the
building design and properly implemented in the final construction, it is recommended that:
1) Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for this development, the Municipality’s
building inspector or a Professional Engineer qualified to provide acoustical engineering
services in the Province of Ontario to certify that the noise control measures for the
buildings have been properly incorporated, installed and constructed.
2) When detailed rooftop equipment models and locations are known for the proposed
buildings, a detailed noise study should be conducted by a Professional Engineer
qualified to perform acoustical engineering services in the Province of Ontario to confirm
that sound emitted by the building mechanical systems will not exceed the MECP limits
at neighbouring residences and provide any additional recommendations which may be
required in that regard.
3) The mechanical roof top units should be similar to those assumed in the current analysis.
If alternate rooftop units are chosen or the location of the mechanical units are modified,
an acoustical engineer should verify that the source sound level does not exceed current
analysis, and the locations for the HVAC units conform to the assumptions made in this
report, and that acceptable sound levels will result at all offsite residential receptors.
Figure 1: Key Plan
55 Kerr Street Cambridge ON
217/14
Site Plan
A-01
Nov. 2017
Residential Development
ON A THA NE I Z E L
A RCH I TECT
THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECKAND VERIFY ALL DIMENSONS ANDREPORT ALL ERRORS AND OMISSIONSTO THE ARCHITECTDO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGSTHIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE USED FORCONSTRUCTION PURPOSES UNTIL SIGNED BYTHE ARCHITECT
RevisionsNo. Reference Date
Drawing Title
Project
Scale Date
Project Number Drawing Number
ON
TARIO
A S S OCIA TI O
N
OF
ARCHITECTS
JONATHAN R. WEIZELLICENCE
3237
36 JANESVILLE ROADThornhill, Ontario L4J 6Z9Telephone......................(905) 707-1996Facsimile.......................(905) 707-3474
1 Issued For Client Review Nov. 15, 20172345678
P r e l i m i n a r y
SK SOUTH Option 3
Project Name updated and Issued Jan. 24, 2018
Re-issued to consultants Mar. 21, 2019Issued to consultants Feb. 08, 2019
3D Views added April 15, 2019Loading spaces area revised May 01, 2019Issued For Client Review May 13, 2019Parking Revised & more stats Added May 28, 2019
9 Units' Area & type and Building-A (26th to29th) & Building-B (20th to 23) plans added
June 03, 20199 June 06, 2019More Info Added and Issued
274.6
6
274.6
327
4.65
274.6
5
274.6
127
4.71
274.6
627
4.96
275.2
4
275.5
9
275.8
827
6.30
276.5
7 276.71CB CB
CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONCRETE SIDEWALK
CB
MH
MH
MH
CBCB
P.I.N. 03818-0002(LT)
276.6
8
276.8
0
276.8
827
6.62
276.6
8
276.4
7
GV
WV
X
276.6
9
XXX276.65
276.4
4
276.73
CURB CUT
275.71
275.7
6
276.0
4
276.0
6
XXX
275.6
3
276.25
275.80
275.9
5
95.183
275.5
1
WV
275.2
3
274.6
9
WV
X275.08
274.8
527
5.00
SIGN F.H.
XXX
274.76
274.6
3
N56°04'25"W
274.7
8
275.66
XX
275.73
85.429
XXX
274.9
927
4.86
275.49
275.3
1
275.3
7
274.8
8
X
274.5
3
275.23274.87
CB
274.5
6
274.8
6
274.7
1
X
274.42
274.73
20.0
71
274.4
0274.3
7
274.3
2CONCRW
274.5
5
78.5
90
274.69
274.2
5
9.754
CURB CUT
274.6
4
275.0
0
02 274.7
6
PAR
T 3,
PLA
N 6
7R-1
953
274.2
0
N33
°16'
45"E
P.I.N
.
038
17-
0
025(
LT)
274.1
6
274.1
227
4.15
274.0
2
273.8
6
273.8
9
274.0
5
PAR
T 1
, PL
AN 5
8R -
132
63G
R A
V E
L
274.0
5 N23°10'10"E
273.6
8LOT
5
3
PAR
T 1,
P
LAN
6
7R
-
19
53
274.3
5
274.6
5
SIGN
XX
XX
275.8
4
276.8
627
6.72
275.9
3
WV
WV
276.5
7
276.5
8
F.H.
CL
XX
HP
276.7
9
CB
276.4
1
276.5
3
276.5
8
276.5
2 276.6
1
109.
579
275.7
3
XX
275.9
5
GW
275.8
8
EASEMENT, INST. # WS701039PART 1, PLAN 67R-2189
X
276.7
7276.7
8
276.5
7
WV
276.5
4
MH
276.5
0
SIGN
276.5
5
X
CB
276.2
6
276.3
8
XX
XX
276.6
1
276.4
5
276.1
3
276.2
4
276.3
6
WV
274.7
4
275.3
2
274.4
2
XX
XX
276.3
5
HP
276.0
4
275.4
827
5.51
274.5
8
LOT 2
275.5
0
276.3
027
6.33
276.1
1
275.6
8
XX
X
276.3
7
276.1
6
276.1
6
276.0
2
276.1
0
N30
°52'
20"E
275.9
4
276.0
2
276.0
8
X
276.0
3
275.8
4
XX
276.2
1
276.0
627
6.11
CB27
6.09
GUY
275.9
5
276.1
0
CB
HP
276.0
9
276.2
2
XX40.691
276.1
8
276.2
2
X
275.8
3
275.9
027
5.90
MH27
5.98
LOTS
WE
ST
OF
SH
ADE
STR
EET
A
ND
SO
UTH
OF
KER
R
STR
EET
274.2
3
274.1
2
273.7
527
3.85
82.393
274.7
4
274.6
2
274.0
2
LOT 60
TP O
F BA
NK
G R
A V
E L
273.9
6
273.7
7
N58°11'05"W
N31
°48'
40"E
274.0
827
4.07
273.7
9
274.0
1 N06°19'15"E
10.513
273.9
4
274.0
2
273.7
3
273.6
3
274.1
1
274.0
3
273.4
8
25.803
11.680
94.073
GUARD RAIL
P A V E M E N T
273.3
7
N55°50'50"W
274.1
1
P A V E M E N T
273.9
527
3.83 27
3.87
273.7
6
273.9
1
273.9
627
3.93
273.9
3
273.8
427
3.93
273.9
3
273.8
3
273.9
3
PLAN 67R-1359PART 2
273.8
2
274.4
5
273.8
1
PLAN D-7
CHAINLINK FENCE ON WALLX X X X275.9
827
4.52
275.7
5
275.4
6
4.49
275.0
3
P A V E M E N T
N59°09'50"W
275.9
127
3.97
1.012N
26°05'50"E
273.8
9
32.976
273.9
6
273.9
1
274.8
2
P.I.N. 03817- 0026(LT)
275.9
7
275.1
8
275.5
4
PLAN
615
LOT 3
PART
1
,
PLA
N
67R-
20
92
X
BLOCK A
LOT
59
273.6
6
RT
2,
PL
AN
58R
-
8
969
276.7
9
276.7
9276.8
0
276.8
527
6.69
276.8
0
276.9
5
276.8
5
276.7
8276.7
4
276.6
9276.6
8
276.6
9
276.7
2
276.6
927
6.64
276.6
327
6.61
276.6
427
6.48
276.6
2 276.6
927
6.75
276.7
7
276.9
0
276.74
276.6
4
276.6
1
276.4
9
276.45
276.4
9
276.5
0
276.4
927
6.53
276.5
8
276.6
6
276.9
0
276.7
6
276.78
276.5
7
276.4
9
276.5
5
276.4
827
6.49
276.3
0
276.4
027
6.49
276.69
276.8
5
276.7
7
276.6
1
277.5
927
6.75
GV
CB
CB
SIGN
TV PED
TV PED
McNAUGHTONSTREET
DAYLIGHT
N56°04'25"W
N31
°48'
40"E
78.5
90
N33
°16'
45"E
20.0
71
N23
°10
'10"
E
N26°05'50"E
1.012
N59°09'50"WN55°50'50"W
32.976
82.3
93
N58°11'05"W 10.513
N06°19'15"E
25.803
40.691
95.183
N30
°52
'20"
E10
9.5
79
McNAUGHTONSTREET
1,233.74 m2
DN
DN DN
TRIANGLEN
276.6
9
276.6
9
276.4
4
276.0
4
275.7
6
275.3
1
274.8
5
274.6
3
274.6
4
274.5
8
275.9
4
276.0
2
276.1
3
276.2
6
276.3
6
276.4
1
276.5
2
276.6
2
276.6
8
275.9
5
274.5
527
4.32
274.0
527
3.89
273.6
827
3.63
273.7
3
273.6
6
273.7
7
274.0
5
274.2
527
4.42
273.3
7
273.8
3273.9
1
273.7
6
K E R R S T R E E T
S H A D
E S T R
E E T
12,000
12,0
00 6 ,0006,000
6,000
10,000 1,000
3,000300
6,500300600
2,900 2,900 3,400 2,000 3,400 3,400 2,300 5,500
12,000
4,500
4,500
4,500
4,50
0
5,50
01,
800
5,50
012
,910
10,0
003,
870
300
5,500 7,600 2,500 3,0001,800
34,000 15,625 3,800
1,20
03,
400
2,00
03,
400
2,40
02,
000
2,40
01,
200
1,8007,600
1,800
19,600
2,00
025
,800
3,51
01,
800
6,00
05,
500
7,00
05,
500
7,80
03,
510
25,8
001,
400
12,000
21,3
004,
500
7,600
6,000
9,000
55,525
4,42
520
,600
30,7
7520
,245
20,6
002,
400
3,96
0
19,600
7,620
7,620
71,843
37,020
12,000
2,900 2,900 3,400 2,000 3,400 3,400 2,300
2,092
506
600
1,20
0
R 9,000
R 9,000
R 15,000
R 15,00
0
R 107,600
R 100,000
R 9,000
R 15,000R 9,000
R 9,00
0R
15,0
00
R 6,
000
R 5,500
R 15,000
R 6,000
R 6
,000
R 6,000R 6,000
R 9,000
R 9,00
0
R 15,000
R 9,000
R 9,000
R 9,000R
9,0
00
R 6,000
1,956.64 m2
44.7 m2
354.99 m2
113.9 m2
LINE OF PARKADE BELOW
PROPERTY LINE
LINE OF PARKADE BELOW
LINE OF PARKADE BELOW
Fire departmentconnection
Fire departmentconnection
FLOOD PLAIN
FLOOD PLAIN
PRE-FINISHEDMETAL RAILING1070mm MIN.
PAINTED LINES (TYP.)
HYDRANT TO BE RE-LOCATED
HYDRO POLE TOBE RE-LOCATED
GLAZED 3RD.FLOOR BRIDGE
DROPPED CURB
DROPPED CURB WITHTACTILE STRIPS
WASTE LOADING AREA
PRE-FINISHEDMETAL RAILING1070mm MIN.
PAINTEDLINES (TYP.)
DROPPED CURB WITH TACTILE STRIPS
DROPPED CURB WITHTACTILE STRIPS
DROPPED CURB WITH TACTILE STRIPSDROPPED CURB WITH TACTILE STRIPS
PAINTEDLINES (TYP.)
32 SPACES
5
4DN
BUILDING "B"24 STOREYS
BUILDING "A"30 STOREYS
DN
LOAD
ING
SPACE
FIRE ROUTE
FIRE ROUTE
LOA
DIN
G S
PAC
E
5
A
A
B
B
PRO
PO
SE
D C
UR
B C
UT
+274.87
+275.185
+276.40
SLO
PE
DO
WN
5 %
SLO
PE
7%
+276.25
+276.70
+276
.70
+276.60
+276.40
+276.60
+275.90
+276
.47
+276.62
+276.20+275.55
PROPOSED CURB CUT
13 5
FIRE RO
UTE
8 STOREYS
4 S
TOR
EYS
6 STOREYS
4 STOREYS
314 UNITS
278 UNITS
CAFE'S PATIO
OUTDOOR AMENITY SPACE
OUTDOOR AMENITY SPACE
PATIO
PATIOPATIO
PATIO
PATIO
PATIO
PATIO
PATI
O
ROOF GARDEN ON 4th FLOOR ROOF(722.36m2)
STAIR
ELEVATOR
1,233.74 m2
PATI
OPA
TIO
PATIO
PATIO
PATIO
PATIO
PATIOPATIOPATIO
+276.70
CAFE AT GROUNDFLOOR LEVEL
10 B
ICY
CL E
RAC
K10
BIC
YC
L E R
AC
K
HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT
+276.65
7.50%
15.00%
PATIO
AAA
AAA
34,000 15,350 7,650 3,000
INFORMATION ON THIS DRAWING WAS TAKEN FROM SURVEYPART OF LOTS 1 AND 2, WEST OF SHADE STREET AND SOUTH OF KERR STREETLOT 3 AND PART OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 4, NORTH OF KERR STREET AND WEST OF SHADE STREETLOTS 2, 3 AND BLOCK A AND PART OF LOT 4, WEST OF SHADE STREET AND SOUTH OF KERR STREETPLAN 615 AND LOT 60 AND PART OF LOT 59, PLAN D-7CITY OF CAMBRIDGE, REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WATERLOOBY MacDONALD TAMBLYN LORD SURVEYINGDATED : May 07, 2018SCALE: 1:2501 Site plan
SHADE STREET
KERR STREET
Preliminary Site StatisticsSite area 10,099.4m2
Building “A” Ground Floor Area 1,233.74.04m2Building “B” Ground Floor Area 1,956.64m2
Building's Total Ground Floor Area 3,190.38m2Building's Coverage 31.59%Asphalt Area 2,478.54m2Landscape Area 4,430.48m2Landscape Coverage 43.87%
Parking Spaces required 592 SpacesParking Spaces providedOn grade 32 SpacesP-1 Level 203 SpacesP-2 Level 203 SpacesP-3 Level 206 SpacesTotal 644 Spaces
55 KERR STREETSK SOUTH
50 KERR STREETSK NORTH
Building “A” 314 UNITSBuilding “B” 278 UNITS Building's Total 592 UNITS
Bicycle Parking Recommendedas per City of Kitchener DraftZoning By-law April 2018 296 SPACEBicycle Parking Provided +/-284 SPACE
17555850
17555850
17555900
17555900
17555950
17555950
17556000
17556000
17556050
17556050
17556100
1755610048
0090
0
4800
900
4800
950
4800
950
4801
000
4801
000
4801
050
4801
050
4801
100
4801
100
4801
150
4801
150
4801
200
4801
200
FRAME COORDINATES ARE UTM IN METRES
Figure 3 - Noise Source Locations
40
30
25
35
17555850
17555850
17555900
17555900
17555950
17555950
17556000
17556000
17556050
17556050
17556100
1755610048
0090
0
4800
900
4800
950
4800
950
4801
000
4801
000
4801
050
4801
050
4801
100
4801
100
4801
150
4801
150
4801
200
4801
200
FRAME COORDINATES ARE UTM IN METRES
Figure 4 – Predicted Daytime Sound Levels, dBA (Without Mitigation)
35
30
25
17555850
17555850
17555900
17555900
17555950
17555950
17556000
17556000
17556050
17556050
17556100
1755610048
0090
0
4800
900
4800
950
4800
950
4801
000
4801
000
4801
050
4801
050
4801
100
4801
100
4801
150
4801
150
4801
200
4801
200
FRAME COORDINATES ARE UTM IN METRES
Figure 5 – Predicted Nighttime Sound Levels, dBA (Without Mitigation)
19
17
19
19
17555850
17555850
17555900
17555900
17555950
17555950
17556000
17556000
17556050
17556050
17556100
1755610048
0090
0
4800
900
4800
950
4800
950
4801
000
4801
000
4801
050
4801
050
4801
100
4801
100
4801
150
4801
150
4801
200
4801
200
FRAME COORDINATES ARE UTM IN METRES
Figure 6 - Proposed Noise Source Locations
APPENDIX A
Road Traffic Information
Shade St @ Kerr St., Cambridge, ON
2028 AADT ForecastDecember 6, 2018
1. Development/Location
2. Current AADT (2018) 6,400
3. Forecast AADT (2028) 7,100
4. Commercial Vehicle Rates % Medium Trucks 1.5%
% Heavy Trucks 2.5%
5. Posted Speed Limit 50 km/h
6. Day/Night Splits
7. Expiry
8. Notes
Region of Waterloo AADT Forecast for Noise Studies
Regional Standard 90/10 Day/Night Split
Main Street (Wellington Street - Shade Street)
December 31st, 2020
This forecast is intended for the purpose of carrying out a
noise study only. The above AADTs represent the traffic
volumes on Main Street, between Wellington Street and
Shade Street, in Cambridge, ON. The City of Cambridge
should be contacted to confirm the validity of this forecast,
considering that Main Street Street falls within the City's
jurisdiction. This forecast remains valid up to the date
indicated above. The Region of Waterloo should be
contacted for an updated forecast if there are plans to use
this forecast beyond the above validity period.
DOCS #2882094 Prepared by: Michelle Pinto
Shade St @ Kerr St., Cambridge, ON
2028 AADT ForecastDecember 6, 2018
1. Development/Location
2. Current AADT (2018) 3,100
3. Forecast AADT (2028) 3,500
4. Commercial Vehicle Rates % Medium Trucks 1.2%
% Heavy Trucks 1.1%
5. Posted Speed Limit 50 km/h
6. Day/Night Splits
7. Expiry
8. Notes
Region of Waterloo AADT Forecast for Noise Studies
Regional Standard 90/10 Day/Night Split
Kerr Street (Beverly Street - Shade Street)
December 31st, 2019
This forecast is intended for the purpose of carrying out a
noise study only. The above AADTs represent the traffic
volumes on Kerr Street, between Beverly Street and Shade
Street, in Cambridge, ON. The City of Cambridge should be
contacted to confirm the validity of this forecast,
considering that Kerr Street falls within the City's
jurisdiction. This forecast remains valid up to the date
indicated above. The Region of Waterloo should be
contacted for an updated forecast if there are plans to use
this forecast beyond the above validity period.
DOCS #2882094 Prepared by: Michelle Pinto
Shade St @ Kerr St., Cambridge, ON
2028 AADT ForecastDecember 6, 2018
1. Development/Location
2. Current AADT (2018) 8,500
3. Forecast AADT (2028) 9,400
4. Commercial Vehicle Rates % Medium Trucks 1.2%
% Heavy Trucks 2.1%
5. Posted Speed Limit 50 km/h
6. Day/Night Splits
7. Expiry
8. Notes
Region of Waterloo AADT Forecast for Noise Studies
Regional Standard 90/10 Day/Night Split
Beverly Street (Kerr Street - Dundas Street N)
December 31st, 2019
This forecast is intended for the purpose of carrying out a
noise study only. The above AADTs represent the traffic
volumes on Beverly Street, between Kerr Street and Dundas
Street N, in Cambridge, ON. The City of Cambridge should be
contacted to confirm the validity of this forecast, considering
that Beverly Street falls within the City's jurisdiction. This
forecast remains valid up to the date indicated above. The
Region of Waterloo should be contacted for an updated
forecast if there are plans to use this forecast beyond the
above validity period.
DOCS #2882094 Prepared by: Michelle Pinto
Shade St @ Kerr St., Cambridge, ON
2028 AADT ForecastDecember 6, 2018
1. Development/Location
2. Current AADT (2018) 2,100
3. Forecast AADT (2028) 2,400
4. Commercial Vehicle Rates % Medium Trucks 2.1%
% Heavy Trucks 1.7%
5. Posted Speed Limit 50 km/h
6. Day/Night Splits
7. Expiry
8. Notes
Region of Waterloo AADT Forecast for Noise Studies
Shade Street (Kerr Street - Main Street)
Regional Standard 90/10 Day/Night Split
December 31st, 2019
This forecast is intended for the purpose of carrying out a
noise study only. The above AADTs represent the traffic
volumes on Shade Street, between Kerr Street and Main
Street, in Cambridge, ON. The City of Cambridge should be
contacted to confirm the validity of this forecast,
considering that Shade Street falls within the City's
jurisdiction. This forecast remains valid up to the date
indicated above. The Region of Waterloo should be
contacted for an updated forecast if there are plans to use
this forecast beyond the above validity period.
DOCS #2882094 Prepared by: Michelle Pinto
APPENDIX B
Sample STAMSON 5.04 Output
Page 1 of 4 Prediction Location [A] STAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 13-06-2019 09:24:38 MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT Filename: a.te Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hours Description: Predicted future daytime and nighttime sound levels at the west façade of Building A, Prediction Location [A]. Road data, segment # 1: Main (day/night) ---------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 6134/682 veh/TimePeriod * Medium truck volume : 96/11 veh/TimePeriod * Heavy truck volume : 160/18 veh/TimePeriod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 7100 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 1.50 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 2.50 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 90.00 Data for Segment # 1: Main (day/night) -------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 0.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 230.00 / 230.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 3 (Elevated; no barrier) Elevation : 87.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Road data, segment # 2: Kerr (day/night) ---------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 3078/342 veh/TimePeriod * Medium truck volume : 38/4 veh/TimePeriod * Heavy truck volume : 35/4 veh/TimePeriod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 3500 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 1.20 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 1.10 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 90.00
Page 2 of 4 Prediction Location [A] Data for Segment # 2: Kerr (day/night) -------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : 0.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 19.00 / 19.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 3 (Elevated; no barrier) Elevation : 87.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Road data, segment # 3: Beverly (day/night) ------------------------------------------- Car traffic volume : 8181/909 veh/TimePeriod * Medium truck volume : 102/11 veh/TimePeriod * Heavy truck volume : 178/20 veh/TimePeriod * Posted speed limit : 50 km/h Road gradient : 0 % Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete) * Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input: 24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 9400 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 1.20 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 2.10 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 90.00 Data for Segment # 3: Beverly (day/night) ----------------------------------------- Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 deg Wood depth : 0 (No woods.) No of house rows : 0 / 0 Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface) Receiver source distance : 100.00 / 100.00 m Receiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 m Topography : 3 (Elevated; no barrier) Elevation : 87.00 m Reference angle : 0.00 Results segment # 1: Main (day) ------------------------------- Source height = 1.26 m ROAD (0.00 + 47.64 + 0.00) = 47.64 dBA Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3 of 4 Prediction Location [A] -90 0 0.00 62.50 0.00 -11.86 -3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.64 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment Leq : 47.64 dBA Results segment # 2: Kerr (day) ------------------------------- Source height = 1.03 m ROAD (0.00 + 53.68 + 0.00) = 53.68 dBA Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 90 0.00 57.71 0.00 -1.03 -3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.68 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment Leq : 53.68 dBA Results segment # 3: Beverly (day) ---------------------------------- Source height = 1.20 m ROAD (0.00 + 55.01 + 0.00) = 55.01 dBA Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.00 63.24 0.00 -8.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.01 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment Leq : 55.01 dBA Total Leq All Segments: 57.84 dBA Results segment # 1: Main (night) --------------------------------- Source height = 1.26 m ROAD (0.00 + 41.15 + 0.00) = 41.15 dBA Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4 of 4 Prediction Location [A] -90 0 0.00 56.02 0.00 -11.86 -3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 41.15 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment Leq : 41.15 dBA Results segment # 2: Kerr (night) --------------------------------- Source height = 1.03 m ROAD (0.00 + 47.17 + 0.00) = 47.17 dBA Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 90 0.00 51.21 0.00 -1.03 -3.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 47.17 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment Leq : 47.17 dBA Results segment # 3: Beverly (night) ------------------------------------ Source height = 1.21 m ROAD (0.00 + 48.49 + 0.00) = 48.49 dBA Angle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.00 56.73 0.00 -8.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48.49 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Segment Leq : 48.49 dBA Total Leq All Segments: 51.33 dBA TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 57.84 (NIGHT): 51.33
APPENDIX C
Consultant Statutory Declaration