241
NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE AND CURRENT OBSERVATIONS AT THE COLUMBIA RIVER ENTRANCE, 10-13 SEPTEMBER 1981 F. I. Gonzalez M. R. Mulhern E. D. Coke1et T. C. Kaiser Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory J. F. R. Gower J. Wallace Institute of Ocean Sciences Sidney, B.C. Canada V8L 4B2 Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory Seattle, Washington December 1984 .. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE M.lcalm B.ldrl... S.crlllry NAnONAl OCEANIC AND. ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION Environmental Research laboratories Vernon E. Derr Director

NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59

WAVE AND CURRENT OBSERVATIONS AT THE COLUMBIA

RIVER ENTRANCE, 10-13 SEPTEMBER 1981

F. I. GonzalezM. R. MulhernE. D. Coke1etT. C. Kaiser

Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory

J. F. R. GowerJ. Wallace

Institute of Ocean SciencesSidney, B.C.Canada V8L 4B2

Pacific Marine Environmental LaboratorySeattle, WashingtonDecember 1984

..(~~

•UNITED STATESDEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

M.lcalm B.ldrl...S.crlllry

NAnONAl OCEANIC AND.ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION

Environmental Researchlaboratories

Vernon E. DerrDirector

Page 2: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

NOTICE

Mention of a commercial company or product does not constitutean endorsement by NOAA Environmental Research Laboratories.Use for publicity or advertising purposes of information fromthis publication concerning proprietary products or the testsof such products is not authorized.

ii

Page 3: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

CONTENTS

2. OBSERVATION METHODS

1. INTRODUCTION

3. DATA SUMMARY . . . .

7. REFERENCES .

, Page

1

3

4

8

8

81212

16

1616

162022

25

252525

26

2626

49

49

56

5658

73

. . . . 74

747575

76

4.2.1 The Observations .4.2.2 Comparison with Linear, 1-D Theory

2.3.1 NOS Meteorological Station2.3.2 NDBC Buoy 460102.3.3 Clatsop County Airport

3.1 Regional Data3.2 Local Data . .

ABSTRACT ...

Surface Drifter DeploymentsCape Disappointment Radar TrackingJettg A Radar Tracking

2.2.1 NOS Subsurface Current Meters2.2.2 Surface Drifter Program

2.1.1 Wave rider2.1.2 NDBC Buoys2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR)

2.1 Surface Wave Data

2.2 Current Data

2.3 Surface Wind

4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8

4.2 Wave-Current Interaction Seaward of Buoy 8

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

6.1 Real-time, Long-term Monitoring.6.2 Theory and Numerical Modeling6.3 Field Experiments

O. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

4. PRELIMINARY DATA ANALYSIS

6. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

5.

iii

Page 4: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

APPENDIX. INTENSIVE OBSERVATION PERIODS DATA SUMMARY

Flood of 10 September 1981

Jiaverider Log, Tracks, and SpectraCape Disappointment Radar Log and Surface Drifter TracksJetty A Radar Log and Surface Drifter Tracks

79

85

Ebb of 10 September 1981 · . . . . . . . . . . . 101

Jiaverider Log, Tracks, and SpectraCape Disappointment Radar Log and Surface Drifter TracksJetty A Radar Log and Surface Drifter TracksSLAR Imagery

Slack of 11 September 1981 · . . . . . . . . . . . 119

Jiaverider Log, Tracks, and SpectraCape Disappointment Radar Log and Surface Drifter TracksJetty A Radar Log and Surface Drifter TracksSLAR Imagery

Ebb of 11 September 1981 · . . . . . . . . . . . 137

Jiaverider Log, Tracks, and SpectraCape Disappointment Radar Log and Surface Drifter TracksJetty A Radar Log and Surface Drifter TracksSLAR Imagery

Flood of 12 September 1981 · . . . . . . . . . . . 149

Jiaverider Log, Tracks, and SpectraCape Disappointment Radar Log and Surface Drifter TracksJetty A Radar Log and Surface Drifter TracksSLAR Imagery

Ebb of 12 September 1981 · . . . . . . . . . . . 171

Jiaverider Log, Tracks, and SpectraCape Disappointment Radar Log and Surface Drifter TracksJetty A Radar Log and Surface Drifter TracksSLAR Imagery

Flood of 13 September 1981 · . . . . . . . . . . . 187

Jiaverider Log, Tracks, and SpectraCape Disappointment Radar Log and Surface Drifter TracksJetty A Radar Log and Surface Drifter TracksSLAR Imagery

iv

--------

Page 5: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

Ebb of 13 September 1981

Waverider Log, Tracks, and SpectraCape Disappointment Radar Log and Surface Drifter TracksJetty A Radar Log and Surface Drifter TracksSLAR Imagery

v

211

Page 6: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8(a).

Figure 8 (b) .

Figure 8(c).

Figure 8(d).

Figure 8(e).

Figure 8(f).

Figure 9(a).

LIST OF FIGURES

Map of U.S. West Coast, showing location ofColumbia River entrance relative to varioussources of environmental observations. SOWKlocations refer to positions of grid pointsfor which the Fleet Numerical OceanographicCenter (FNOC) provides wave spectrum nowcastsand forecasts computed by the FNOC SpectralOcean Wave Model (SOWK) .

Reference map of Columbia River entrance.

PMEL Waverider 67135 predeployment calibrationcurve.....

NOAA data buoy 46010 at dockside in Astoria,Oregon. . • . . . .

Oregon Army National Guard Mohawk on areconnaissance flight of Mount St. Helens,Oregon. The SLAR antenna can be seen mountedunder the cockpit. . . . .

Nominal Mohawk SLAR flight lines 1 to 8.Circled numbers indicate the start of eachflight line and coverage extends 25 km to theright of each track. . . . . . . . . .

Sketch of surface drifter buoy equipped with radarcorner reflector. . .....

Surface pressure analysis for 1800Z, 8 September1981 . .

Surface pressure analysis for 1800Z, 9 September1981 . .

Surface pressure analysis for 1800Z, 10 September1981. . . . . · . · · . . · · .

Surface pressure analysis for 1800Z, 11 September1981. . . . . · . · · . . · · .Surface pressure analysis for 1800Z, 12 September1981. . . . . . . · · · . · · . .Surface pressure analysis for 1800Z, 13 September1981 . . . . . .

Wind and wave observations at NDBC 46002 for period7-13 Sept .

vi

5

6

9

11

14

15

19

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

Page 7: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

Figure 9(b) .

Figure 9(c).

Figure 9(d).

Figure 9(e).

Figure 10.

Page

Wind and wave observations at NDBC 46004 for period7-13 Sept. · · · · · · . . · · . . 34

Wind and wave observations at NDBC 46005 for period7-13 Sept. · · · · · . · . · · · 35

Wind and wave observations at NDBC 46006 for period7-13 Sept. · · · · · . · . · · . 36

Wind and wave observations at NDBC 46010 for period7-13 Sept. · . · . . · · 37

Wind observations at Clatsop County Airport forperiod 9-14 Sept. 1981. . . 38

Figure 11.

Figure 12.

Figure 13a.

Figure 13b.

Figure Be.

Figure 13d.

Figure 14.

NOS current meter observations for stations C1 atdepths 5, 25, and 35 feet from the bottom for theperiod 10-13 September. . .

Waverider and NDBC 46010 intercomparison spectra.

Waverider significant wave height estimates as afunction of distance east of buoy 8 for 10 Sept.1981. .

Waverider significant wave height estimates as afunction of distance east of buoy 8 for 11 Sept.1981. .

Waverider significant wave height estimates as afunction of distance east of buoy 8 for 12 Sept.1981 . .

Waverider significant wave height estimates as afunction of distance east of buoy 8 for 13 Sept.1981. .

Drifter derived surface current vectors near thetime of peak ebb. (a) 10 Sept. 1981. (b) 11 Sept.1981. (c) 12 Sept. 1981. (d) 13 Sept. 1981.

vii

39

48

50

51

52

53

55

Page 8: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

Table 1.

Table 2.

Table 3.

LIST OF TABLES

Predeployment calibration of Waverider 67135.

Characteristics of Motorola APS-94E SLAR.

NOS Data Station summary.

10

13

17

Table 4.

Table 5.

Table 6.

Table 7.

Table 8.

Table 9.

Table 10.

Table 11.

Table 12.

Table 13.

Table 14.

Specifications for Aanderaa Recording CurrentMeter Model 4. . . . . . . . . . 18

Characteristics of Corps of Engineers Wave ImagingRadar. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

Daily Jetty A Radar fixes for determination of vanorientation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

Daytime slack, peak ebb, or peak flood predictionsfor intensive observation periods. 40

Summary of Waverider deployments. 41

Summary of Cape Disappointment Radar observationperiods. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42

Summary of Jetty A Radar observation periods. 43

Summary of Mohawk SLAR observation periods. 44

Summary of selected surface drifter speed andWaverider significant wave height observations. 45

Drifter information for current vectors presentedin Figure 14. 54

Summary of observed wave and current characteristics andcomputed transfer function, T, during the intensiveobservation periods. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

Table 15a. Wave height amplification T CEq. 3) for d = 10 m,e = 0°. . · · · · · · · · · · · · ·0

Table 15b. Wave height amplification T CEq. 3) for d = 10 m,e = 30°. · . · · · · · . · · · · · · · ·0

Table 15c. Wave height amplification T CEq. 3) for d = 10 m,e = 60°. · · . · · · . · · · · · · · · ·0

Table 15d. Wave height amplification T CEq. 3) for d = 15 m,e = 0°. . · . · · . · · · · · · · · · ·0

60

61

62

63

viii

Page 9: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

Table 15f.

Table 15g.

Table ISh.

Table lSi.

8 = 30°.o

Wave height amplification T (Eq. 3) for d = 15 m,8 = 60°. .o

Wave height amplification T (Eq. 3) for d = 20 m,8 = 0°. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .o

Wave height amplification T (Eq. 3) for d = 20 m,8 = 30°. .

o

Wave height amplification T (Eq. 3) for d = 20 m,8 = 60°. .

o

ix

64

65

66

67

68

Page 10: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2
Page 11: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

O. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

It is a pleasure to acknowledge here the numerous organizations andindividuals which contributed to the success of this field experiment.

The cooperation and assistance of the U.S. Coast Guard is gratefullyacknowledged, particularly that of the USCG Search and Rescue Station atCape Disappointment, commanded by LCDR J. Sprague. Coast Guard ET-l K.Stokes provided able and valuable assistance in tracking radar reflectorsas part of the surface current measurement program.

The National Marine Fisheries Service provided surface vessel supportduring the September experiment. Our sincere thanks to the crews of theEGRET, N. Zorich, R. Pettit, and W. Muir, and the NERKA, L. Davis, M.Laird, and E. Keller, for their cheerful assistance in frequently unpleasantconditions.

We are grateful to R. Patchen of the National Ocean Survey for permittingaccess to the important subsurface current meter data, to CDR o. Stephen,Commanding Officer of the NOAA Ship McARTHUR, for his enthusiastic cooperationand support, and to Lt. A. Snella for timely provision of the data in auseful format.

Much of the meteorological data was provided by R. Anderson, W.Burton, and K. Short of the National Weather Service, Seattle Ocean ServicesUnit, and by C. Krepke, R. Storey, and R. Tomes of the NWS Astoria fieldoffice. The valuable sea state and meteorological data collected by NOAAdata buoys were provided by G. Hamilton, F. Abbell, and A. Johnson of theNOAA Data Buoy Center Data Systems Division of the National Space TechnologyLaboratories (NSTL) Station in Mississippi. .

M. Stapp of PMEL ably solved numerous problems associated with theWaverider data transmission during the experiment. D. Zopf and C. Creechof Oregon State University provided seismic wavemeter records, and wereassisted by W. Watkins of NWS, Astoria.

We appreciate the contributions of S. Noble of the Portland DistrictCorps of Engineers, who provided valuable assistance and expertise, whoarranged for deployment of the Corps wave imaging radar, and who made theresulting radar data available to us. Similarly, we are grateful to G.Arnott of EPSCO, who arranged the loan of a demonstration radar van forour use in tracking surface current drifters.

The spectacular side-looking airborne radar (SLAR) imagery was providedby the l042nd MICAS unit of the Oregon Army National Guard. The consistentlyexcellent quality of this imagery testifies to the high professionalismand technical competence of the entire organization--aircraft and sensormaintenance and support crews, technical observers and pilots. Especiallyappreciated is the cooperation and support of the Commanding Officer,Major S. Hammons, the invaluable advice and assistance of Capt. C. Rosenfeld(who pioneered the use of SLAR at the Columbia River Bar), and SFC R.Hartmann, who bore the primary responsibility for scheduling and coordinatingall flights.

Page 12: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

The assistance of the Office of Naval Research (ONR) is also verygratefully acknowledged. The field experiment was partially funded by anONR grant overseen by H. Do1eza1ek of the ONR Coastal Sciences Program.

Finally, we acknowledge the support of the Ocean Services Division ofthe National Ocean Service, which provided partial support for this pre­liminary analysis.

2

Page 13: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

Wave and Current Observations at the Columbia

River Entrance, 10-13 September 1981.

F. I. GonzalezM. R. MulhernE. D. CokeletT. C. KaiserJ. F. R. GowerJ. Wallace

ABSTRACT. This technical memorandum presents the results of a joint exerciseundertaken by PMEL and lOS to measure waves and currents at the Columbia RiverBar during 10-13 September 1981. The waves were measured in situ with avertical accelerometer buoy (Waverider) and observed aloft with Side LookingAirborne Radar (SLAR). Drifters tracked by an independent radar systemprovided surface-current velocities within the river mouth.

Wave refraction occurs in this area owing to depth and current gradients.Upriver of Buoy 8 waves decay on ebb and flood currents due to depthrefraction away from the channel axis. During strong ebbs wave decay maybe enhanced by breaking within the channel itself. Seaward of Buoy 8waves amplify during peak ebbs and attenuate during peak floods. Most ofthe time the amplification and decay factors are predicted to within 20%by linear, one-dimensional theory. However, during one extreme ebb eventthe wave height was underpredicted by up to 50%. This was likely due tothe crossing of wave crests produced by the current jet. The accurateprediction of such an event awaits the application of a two-dimensionaltheory for both the currents and the waves.

Predictions of hazardous sea state on the Columbia River Bar could certainlybe improved by implementing recent analytical and numerical advances in waverefraction-diffraction theory. This should be complemented by Bar wave-heightobservations made available in real-time. These would provide accurate now­casts and short-term forecasts and improve the intuition of forecasters andmariners. The observations would also provide a data base to tune thetheoretical models and verify forecasts.

Contribution Number 717 from the Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory.

3

Page 14: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

1. INTRODUCTION

The entrance to the Columbia River (Figs. 1 and 2) is one of the mosthazardous navigational regions in the world. Hundreds of search andrescue missions are run yearly by the Coast Guard facility at Cape Disappointmentand the Coast Guard Air Station at Astoria. Nonetheless, tragic loss oflife continues to occur; 22 were lost in Fiscal Year 1982 alone, duringwhich the Coast Guard performed 400 search and rescue missions (saving 21lives in the process).

Briefly stated, the physical processes which lead to dangerous seastate conditions are the interactions of incident swell and wind waveenergy at the entrance with local bathymetry and opposing surface tidalcurrents. Peak ebb velocities of 6 knots and more can double the significantwave height on the bar within a few hours. The process of wave steepeningand amplification is dependent not only on the tidal stage, but also onthe period and direction of the incident wave energy.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is responsiblefor forecasting sea state conditions at the Columbia River entrance, aswell as a number of other potentially dangerous sites on the United Statescoasts. Thus, NOAA's National Weather Service (NWS) has supported researchwhich resulted in a semi-automated procedure for predicting sea stateconditions on the Columbia River Bar (Enfield, 1973). This investigation,though comprehensive, was nonetheless hampered by a lack of direct environmentalmeasurements at the river entrance, especially with regard to wave direction.

Some sea state observations at the river entrance were obtained byNOAA for the U.S. Corps of Engineers Coastal Engineering Research Center(CERC) for short periods during 1979 and 1980. In addition, the Corpsdeployed the CERC wave imaging radar, which provided wavelength and directionestimates out to a distance of about 3 nm from Cape Disappointment. InFebruary of 1980, an intensive three-week field experiment was organizedand conducted by NOAA, during which airborne remote sensing data wasgathered to supplement the in-situ observations. In particular, units ofthe Oregon Army National Guard provided side-looking airborne radar (SLAR)imagery of nearshore and deep water swell wavelength and direction. Theuse of such imagery at the Columbia River entrance had been pioneered byRosenfeld and Bell (1978).

A major field variable which was not directly measured in the February1980 experiment was the tidal current velocity. In September of 1981, anopportunity arose to gather in-situ and remotely sensed wave data coincidentwith the deployment of a number of subsurface current meters near theriver entrance by the National Ocean Service. To supplement these subsurfacemeasurements, a modest surface current measurement program was also implemented,which involved tracking surface drifters with two shore based radar units.This technique was developed by the Canadian Department of Fisheries andOceans and was successfully employed in an earlier effort to map surfacecurrents in the Strait of Georgia near the mouth of the Fraser River. Theresulting environmental information collected at the Columbia River entranceduring the 4-day period 10-13 September comprises the bulk of this report.

4

Page 15: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

46004.

2010

46005.

46006•40°

2020

46002.

• NOAA DATA BUOY

~ WAVERIDER BUOY

o SOWM GRID POINT

2030

2180

--- -

Figure 1. Map of U.S. West Coast, showing location of Columbia Riverentrance relative to various sources of environmental observations.SOWM locations refer to positions of grid points for which the FleetNumerical Oceanographic Center (FNOC) provides wave spectrum nowcastsand forecasts computed by the FNOC Spectral Ocean Wave Model (SOWM).

5

Page 16: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

'-....-

"

551

C"">

,,::~:;..

'

.<-~

....

'.....

_::'.::~::.':"..:~~~~

f~.~

...._.--.~

,.....::

--',.....

1/2

0

,----'-

t",.:-_

......

.; -"-""\

,p

"'-\~.

:~"

COLU

MBI

ARI

VER

ENTR

AN

CE

BA

TH

YM

ET

RY

"M

ET

ER

S.

EN

TR

AN

CE

CH

AN

NE

LN

OliI

INA

llY16

mD

EE

P15

64

2F

RO

'"N

OS

CH

AR

T18~ZI.

)JA

N81

'~j'\;:,

;,~~~rf~~:

'~\jJi~

",If!

'::i",

A./~

."_'

;",:;{

:'~~:'

t:Jf'~

~~.-._

,-

" "

, "....

... \

, ,

.....\ \ I " '

'', 1 I \ 20

"\, ... ,

\\ \

,

ii :I 1; :/

, I , I

I I ,I

I ..-.-

7i

OS'

I24°

00'W

Ref

eren

cem

apo

fC

olum

bia

Riv

eren

tran

ce.

..-~~v.

),-C

'-'+-

\~~~

J2

Fig

ure

2.

! , J I J,I

/ i I I I I I i i I , II

I I II

//

/ .- ,I

II

I/ , .­

/ , / i I i , I i \ \ \ I \ \ ,Ii

\, "

'OU

TE

R"

...B

AR

*...,'-

­ '"-,

.... i -\ \ \...

,,,

---'"

'-.....

..........

" ",",

, ... ,"

10'

\

\, ,

, ...."­

...."

\, ....

"CR

""

~~

ND

BC46

010

\(R

EP

LAC

ED

CO

LUM

BIA

LIG

HT

SH

IPIN

~OV

.•19

79)

\\

\\ 6

0

IS'

10'0

' :-=J~)~~~~

i)

iIL

46

°20

'N

0\

Page 17: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

This report is organized in the following way. In §2 we discuss themethods for observing and recording surface waves, currents and windvelocities. Section 3 is a summary of the data collected on both theregional and local scales. In §4 we analyze and interpret the data interms of wave-current-bathymetry interaction at the Columbia River Entrance.Section 5 contains a summary, and §6 has recommendations for furtherresearch. One of the primary purposes of this report is to amalgamate theinformation gathered from various instruments and sources, to organize iton an event-by-event basis and to place it in one reference. The Appendixserves that purpose.

7

Page 18: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

2. OBSERVATION METHODS

In this section, we describe the instrumentation and techniquesemployed to obtain estimates of surface waves, current speed and direction,and surface winds.

2.1 Surface Wave Data

Three sources of surface wave information are presented in thisreport: a Waverider buoy was deployed nearshore and inside of the entranceduring eight separate intensive observation periods; NOAA Data Buoy Center(NDBC) buoys acquired data 5 om southwest of the entrance every hour (NDBC46010) and about 300 om due west of the entrance every three hours (NDBC46005) (see Fig. 1); Side Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) imagery was obtainedcoincident with each Waverider deployment on approximately eight separateflight lines.

Details of the instruments and their deployment are given below.

2.1.1 Waverider

This instrument is manufactured by the Datawell Corporation, and wascalibrated at the NOAA Ocean Wave Instrument facility just prior to itsuse in this experiment. A new modulator printed circuit board was alsoinstalled as recommended by Datawell; the board is designed to correctmeasurements for water temperature variations from the 22.4° C at whichthe buoy was calibrated. The calibration results are given in Table 1 andin Figure 3. The buoy sampling rate was 2 Hertz, and the data was telemeteredto shore and recorded both on a continuous strip chart and on a digitalmagnetic tape.

The buoy was deployed from a surface vessel on the end of a 300 foottether line attached to a 3-point buoy bridle. Stationary and driftingmodes of deployment were used. In the stationary mode, the launch waskept on station by steaming against the current, so that the Waveriderstreamed out behind the boat. Usually, this maneuver was performed near achannel marker buoy, which served as a reference point. In the driftingmode, the vessel was allowed to drift with the current in such a mannerthat the Wave rider tether remained slack.

During each intensive observation period, a typical observationprofile would consist of alternating 20-minute drifting and stationaryrecords. Sextant fixes were taken periodically on a number of landmarks.The surface vessel used for the deployment was a 43-foot National MarineFisheries Service (NMFS) vessel, the EGRET. During the observation periods,the EGRET was assigned the call sign "Waverider" for all field communicationsand log entries. In the Appendix, the logs, plotted tracks, and wavespectra for each of the observational periods are presented.

Each Waverider spectrum was obtained by subjecting a 17.07 minuterecord (2048 data points taken at 0.5 second sampling interval) to de­trending, a 10% cosine bell filter, fast Fourier transform, and 11 point

8

Page 19: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

.05

z.0

0I

----------.~DATAWELL

SPEC

IFIC

ATI

ON

0 I--

0::

0 0.-

-.05

0 0::

0.- ~

0::

IC

ALI

BR

ATI

ON

-ER

RO

RC

UR

VEFI

T0

-.10

0::

0::

I\0

W•

CA

LIB

RA

TIO

NPO

INTS

w 0 =>-.1

5I-

----

l0.

-~ «

-.20 -25

I•Iii

iI

o5

1015

PER

IOD

)SEC

ON

DS

20

25

Fig

ure

3.

PMEL

Wav

erid

er67

135

pre

dep

loy

men

tcali

bra

tio

ncu

rve.

Page 20: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABLE 1. Predeployment Calibration of Waverider 67135.Performed on August 25, 1981.

Y Actual X Actual ErrorProportion Seconds Proportion

-0.0023 4.33 0.004

0.0040 5.37 -0.006

-0.0066 6.38 0.002

-0.0078 7.54 0.001

-0.0113 8.71 0.001

-0.0110 10.03 -0.002

-0.0118 11.85 -0.004

-0.0201 13.80 0.002

-0.0211 16.02 0.001

-0.0229 18.48 0.002

-0.0191 22.17 -0.001

Residual Standard Error is =0.003 Proportion

Second Order Regression is for Waverider Calibration Minus Datawell Prediction Error.

Y is Waverider

Term

o

1

2

X is Period

Coefficient

1.6046E-02

-3.8403E-03

9.8909E-05

10

Degree Fit = 2

Page 21: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

Figure 4. NOAA data buoy 46010 at dockside in Astoria, Oregon.

11

Page 22: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

smoothing in the frequency domain. Because a running mean was employed,successive spectral estimates are not independent.· Those which are 11frequency bands apart are independent, however, and characterized by 22degrees of freedom. For a Chi-square distribution, there is 90% confidencethat the true spectral density is between 0.65 and 1.78 of the computedvalue.

2.1.2 NDBC Buoys

Hourly wave spectral estimates were provided by buoy 46010, locatedabout 5 nm southwest of the entrance in 200 feet of water (see Figs. 2 and4). The wave data analyzer (WDA) , consisting of an axial linear acceler­ometer, provided spectral estimates with a resolution of .01 Hz over arange of 1.01 to 0.05 Hz, with 48 degrees of freedom and 80% confidencethat the true value lies between 0.788 and 1.335 of the estimated value.This value must then be corrected for system noise and the power transferfunction of the buoy as described by Steele and Earle (1979). Similardata buoys have been compared with a 0.9 meter diameter Waverider buoy;the average percentage error in significant wave height estimates wasfound to be about 7%. It is believed that the performance of NDBC46010 is comparable or better. Examples of such spectral estimates arepresented in Section 3 and the Appendix. Figure 4 is a photo of NDBC46010 at dockside in Astoria, Oregon.

Similar spectral estimates were provided hourly at locations 46002,46004, 46005, and 46006 (Fig. 1). Summaries of the spectra from thesebuoys for the experimental period are also presented in Section 3.

2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR)

SLAR imagery was acquired during seven of the eight intensive observationperiods and on two additional days when nO'Waverider or surface driftermeasurements were made. The radar units are Motorola APS-94E models withthe characteristics listed in Table 2. These radar units are mounted onGrumman OV-1 Mohawk aircraft (Fig. 5), flown by the Oregon Army NationalGuard from the Army Aviation Support Facility in Salem, Oregon.

Eight flight lines were flown on each mission, which was timed to becoincident with Waverider and surface current drifter data acquisition.The nominal flight lines and extent of the SLAR coverage are presented inFigure 6. The aircraft were flown at approximately 1000 m, and the swathsextended from nadir to the right of the aircraft for a distance of 25 km.

One of the best of the eight scenes acquired during each mission waschosen as an example, and these are presented in the Appendix. The primarySLAR information of interest in this experiment is the direction andlength of swell which are evident in most scenes, and in the refractiondue to bathymetry and currents which is obvious near shore. Wavelength anddirection estimates can be obtained from this imagery by means of two-dimensionaldigital Fourier transforms.

12

Page 23: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABLE 2. Characteristics of Motorola APS-94E SLAR

Frequency: 9100 to 9400 MHz (Variable)

Wavelength: 3.3 to 3.2 cm

Range: 25, 50, or 100 km

Offset from nadir:

Modulation:

Pulse Width:

Pulse repetition frequency:

Resolution:

13

o to 60 km in 10 km steps

Pulse

0.2 ± 0.025 microsecond

750 pps

30 meters in range0.45 degrees beamwidth in azimuth

Page 24: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

~ .l:'

Fig

ure

5.

Ore

go

nA

rmy

Nati

on

al

Gua

rdM

ohaw

kon

are

co

nn

ais

san

ce

flig

ht

of

Mou

ntS

t.H

elen

s,O

reg

on

.T

heSL

AR

ante

nn

aca

nb

ese

enm

ount

edu

nd

erth

eco

ck

pit

.

Page 25: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

30' ...,----'---,.---...J..----L----,----I---r-.......L,_,..........."--....l...---:=-_---,,J.- L.-____+_

25'

15'

10'

5'

25' 20' 15' 10' 5' 124°00' 55' 50' 45'

Figure 6. Nominal Mohawk SLAR flight lines 1 to 8. Circled numbersindicate the start of each flight line and coverage extends 25 km tothe right of each track.

15

Page 26: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

2.2 Current Data

There were two coordinated programs to obtain estimates of currentsnear the Columbia River entrance: the National Ocean Service (NOS)current meter moorings, and the PMEL/IOS surface drifter program.

2.2.1 NOS Subsurface Current Meters

As part of a larger scale Columbia River circulation survey, NOSdeployed 19 subsurface current meters at a total of 8 separate moorings.The location of the five stations nearest the river entrance are shown inFigure 2. Table 3 lists the current meter depths, additional instrumenta­tion at each mooring and other NOS stations occupied during the experiment.Unfortunately, the wave pressure gage at location C2 and the near-surfacecurrent meter at C3 were lost.

The instruments used were Aanderaa recording current meters Model 4,with temperature, conductivity and pressure sensors. The current meterspecifications are given in Table 4, and examples of the output arepresented in the Appendix. It should be noted here that the data presentedin this report is raw field data quality, is unedited, and is uncorrectedfor errors due to effects of such things as sensor tilting.

Mulhern (1982) provides a detailed analysis of the data collected atstations C1, C3, C4 and C8, located at river mile 5 (RM 5).

2.2.2 Surface Drifter Program

As a supplement to the NOS subsurface current meter data, a modestsurface drifter program was implemented. Two shore-based radar were usedto track surface drifters equipped with 16-inch corner reflectors on8-foot masts (Fig. 7). This technique was developed and used successfullyby the Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans in a previous study ofsurface currents in the Strait of Georgia near the mouth of the FraserRiver. During that study the drifters were tracked over ranges out to 20nautical miles using the fixed observing stations of the Canadian CoastGuard's Vessel Traffic Management System. Tracking and position recordingmade use of the large display screens and positioning cursors of thissystem, and also benefitted from a computerized predictor system linked tothe cursor. Tracking used here was greatly simplified to make use ofavailable equipment. Several of the problems listed below could be avoidedwith a more sophisticated system. The drifter tracks are presented in theAppendix.

Surface Drifter Deployments.

The surface drifters were deployed from the 43 foot NMFS vesselNERKA. Four men were required: a helmsman, two persons to deploy andrecover drifters, and a fourth person to communicate by radio with theradar operators on shore. Good radio communication was a critical part ofthe operation. Sea clutter and small craft would frequently obscure the

16

Page 27: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABLE 3. NOS Data Station Summary

St.ation Bottom Current Meter OtherNo. Depth Depth Instrumentation Location

(Ft. below MLLW) (Ft. above bottom)

Cl 50 5, 25, 35 CTD RM5

C2 50 20 Pressure RMl

C3 70 5, 43, 53 CTD RM5

C4 49 5, 21, 31 CTD RM5

C5 35 5 CTD, Tidal Height RM5

C8 36 5, 18 CTD, Tidal Height RM5

Cl7 34 5, 20 CTD, Tidal Height RM6.5

C18 38 5, 18, 25 CTD, Tidal Height RM6.5

M1 Wind Speed, RM12.5Direction, Air (PilingsTemperature, on DesdemonaPressure Sands)

0572 Tidal Height Jetty A

0573 Tidal Height Chinook, WA

9008 Tidal Height Ft. Steven, OR

0512 Tidal Height Oak Point, WA

9040 Tidal Height Astoria, OR

17

Page 28: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABLE 4. Specifications for Aanderaa recording current meter Model 4.

CURRENT SPEED

Sensor:

Range:Accuracy:Starting velocity:

CURRENT DIRECTION

A rotor with magnetic coupling through the instrument case.Electronic counter registers the number of rotationsduring the period between two samplings.2.5 to 250 cm/sec± 1 cm/sec or ± 2% of actual speed, whichever is greater2.0 cm/sec

Sensor:Resolution:Accuracy:

Magnetic compass with needle clamped onto potentiometer ring0.35°± 7.5° for speeds of 2.5 to 5 cm/sec or 100 to 200 cm/sec± 5° for speeds of 5 to 100 cm/sec

Maximum Compass Tilt: 12° from horizontal

TEMPERATURE

Sensor:Range:Accuracy:Resolution:63% Response Time:

CONDUCTIVITY

Sensor:Range:Resolution:

PRESSURE

Sensor:Range:Accuracy:Resolution:

Thermistor (Fenwal GB32JM19)-2.46°C to 21.48°C± 0.15°C0.02°C12 seconds

Inductive cello to 70 mmho/cm0.07 mmho/cm

Bourdon tube driving a potentiometer0-100 PSI± 1 PSI± 0.1 PSI

18

Page 29: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

8-CORr\IER RADAR REFLECTOR6 CORNERS HORIZONTAL2 CORNERS VERTICALLONG EDGE OF EACH CORNER IS14 INCHES LONG

81

SHACKLES

/ /

1611

FLOAT

/

WATER LEVEL

10 FOOT LONGCROSS BAR

CONCRETE REINFORCEMENTBAR FOR BALLAST

/

POLYETHYLENE DROGUE"V 10 FEET WIDE BY 6 FEET LONG

'"'"

/

SHACKLES

Figure 7. Sketch of surface drifter buoy equipped with radar cornerreflector.

19

Page 30: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

target or confuse the radar operator. When a maximum of four drifters hadbeen deployed, the strategy called for the surface vessel to keep as manydrifters in sight as possible, and make frequent visits to each drifter inturn, pulling alongside, then proceeding to the next, all the while keepingthe radar operators advised of the vessel's position. In this way, theradar operators could make frequent checks on the validity of their targetidentification and tracking. If an operator was uncertain of a driftertarget or had lost its signal on the radar scope, he would request thatthe NERKA pull alongside that drifter momentarily for positive identification.

Cape Disappointment Radar Tracking.

The Portland Dis~rict of the Corps of Engineers deployed an X-bandimaging radar near the Cape Disappointment lighthouse at an elevation of220 feet above mean sea level. The system was designed to obtain wavelengthand direction information out to a range of 3 nautical miles. Table 5lists the specific design characteristics of this unit. An earlier,similar system is described by Mattie and Harris (1979).

The drifter buoys were tracked from Cape Disappointment using thisradar, which was equipped with a variable range marker with a resolutionin nautical miles to the second decimal place. All bearings taken wererelative to the radar orientation which was referenced to charted features.

Once a buoy was deployed by the surface vessel, that fact was communicatedby radio to the radar operator, and the target was identified on thescreen. Thereafter, until buoy recovery, range, relative bearing, andlocal time were taken at nominal five minute intervals. Fixes were takenmore frequently if the buoys moved at high speed. The observations andany appropriate comments were logged by an assistant.

Sea clutter and small craft drifting in the current created problemsin correctly identifying the drifting buoys. This problem was substantiallyeliminated by requesting the deployment vessel to run between the buoysand identify them as the vessel paused alongside. The deployment vesselmoved at high speed between buoys, and this made it an easy target for theradar operator to identify.

Another minor problem was the existence of dead sectors, or areaswhere the radar signal was blocked due to buildings, land masses, etc. Ingeneral, however, dead sectors were not a significant portion of the areaof interest; furthermore, the dead sectors of the Cape Disappointment andJetty A radars were different, so that a drifter fix could usually betaken by the unblocked radar.

Calibration fixes were taken to a few known fixed targets in thefield of view. These showed good accuracy when compared to charteddistances and bearings, and excellent repeatability from day to day.

The drifter tracks obtained in this manner were then plotted, and arepresented in the Appendix.

20

Page 31: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABLE 5. Characteristics of Corps of Engineers Wave Imaging Radar

Model: Raytheon RM 1650j12XR

Frequency: 9375 ± 30 MHz (X-band)

Wavelength: 3.2 cm

Pulse width: 0.06 microsecond for .75 to 3 nm ranges0.5 microseconds for greater ranges

Range resolution:

Vertical beam width:

Horizontal beam width:

Antenna length:

Power:

Rotation rate:

Display scope:

Scope camera:

20 yards or 1% of range, whicheveris greater

22 degrees

0.65 degrees at 3 decibels

12 feet

50 kilowatts

27 rpm

16 inch diameter plan position indicator(PPI) cathode ray and tube, with fastdecay phosphor.

Bolex 16mm reflex

21

Page 32: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

Jettv A Radar Tracking

In this section we describe how a mobile radar van was used to trackthe drifters. This radar system provided independent check on the positionsof the drifters as determined from the Cape Disappointment radar and itprovided the opportunity to evaluate the concept of using such a mobileradar unit for future drifter studies.

The radar van was on loan from Epsco Marine, 1030 Industry Drive,Seattle, WA. The vehicle was a Ford van of the type normally used forprivate transportation. It was equipped with an Epsco model S14 radarwhich operates at 10KW of peak power on an X-band frequency of 9275 MHzcorresponding to an electromagnetic wavelength of 3.23 em. The radar hadan optional 6 foot scanning antenna and a variable range marker (VRM).The latter is an illuminated ring which appears on the 7" radar scope andwhose diameter can be adjusted by the operator. The ring is expanded tointersect a specific target on the scope, and the range to that target isdisplayed on a digital meter. The bearing to a target can be ascertainedby aligning a radial line through the target and reading the bearing froma bearing ring graduated in degrees at the outer edge of the display.

The radar can operate on one of the following ranges: \,~, 1~, 3,6, 12, 34 and 50 nm. A short pulse length of 0.08~-sec. characterizes the\ to 1~ nm range settings, and a longer pulse length of 0.8 ~-sec. is usedfor the 6 to 50 nm settings. At the 3 nm setting, however, either pulselength is permitted. For the entire experiment the 3 nm-short pulsesetting was used. At this setting the drifting buoy images subtended anangle of 2° and were 0.02 nm in radial width when at a typical operatingrange of 1 to 1~ nm. Epsco sales literature advertises a bearing accuracyof 2° or better and a range resolution of less than 30 yards. Thesevalues are not at variance with what we observed. During operation a radarfix was taken by placing the radial bearing line through the center of thetarget and the range ring on the nearside of the target.

The radar range and bearing to a target gives the position of thetarget relative to the radar. In order to find the absolute location ofthe target the position and orientation of the radar must be determined.For each day of the experiment the radar van was positioned within 3 m ofthe same location. This location was determined from the following horizontalsextant fixes, in which the numbers in parenthesis refer to the objectslisted in Table Al of the Appendix.

left target:left angle: 44° 47'

center target:

right angle: 114° 20'right target:

right check angle: 37° 37'right check target:

(3) Large Sand Island Obs. Tower

(5) Jetty A light, "F1 4 sec. 31 ft.10 M"

(2) Cape Disappointment lighthouse,"Alt. F1 R&W 30. sec. 220 ft.18 M"

(18) Light on S tip large SandIsland, "F1 G 4 sec.15 ft. 'I'"

22

Page 33: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

This position is on the landward end of Jetty A at 124° 02' 26" W, 46° 16'33" N according to NOAA chart 18521, 51st Ed., Jan. 3, 1981. The van wasoriented in such a way that 0° bearing on the radar corresponded to 0° ±1° True. This was achieved by aligning the van visually with a pair ofDayglo-orange signal cloth markers placed on the ground at distances fromthe van of approximately 10 and 20 m. On most occasions a final determina­tion of the orientation of the van was obtained by taking radar fixes toknown landmarks. These fixes are given in Table 6. Those to the ClatsopSpit lookout tower are best since the localized steel structure gave astrong radar echo. The radar range recorded for this tower could be usedto calibrate the remaining radar fixes. This has not been done for thedrifter fixes reported here, but in general observed ranges should bemultiplied by a factor of actual distance/observed distance =3.18/3.13 =1.02.

The technique of tracking the drifters on the radar scope was refinedduring the course of the experiment. On the first two days, 10 and 11September, a hood and magnifier were attached to the scope. Although thishad the advantage of giving good picture contrast and an enlarged image,there was no convenient way for the operator to follow individual targetsexcept by simply keeping a watch on them. It proved impossible to followmore than 2 drifters by this approach since the radar scope was oftencluttered with too many other returns from as many as 30 to 40 smallfishing boats in the area. On 12 and 13 September, the hood and magnifierwere removed, and clear plastic overlays were placed directly on thescope. The track of each drifter was marked on the plastic with a greasepencil. For each drifter this gave the radar operator a reference line towhich he could return if his attention were diverted. Individual drifterfixes were taken every 2 minutes or as often as possible. The operatorwould set the variable range ring and bearing line on the target image andcallout the readings to an assistant who would log them. Time was recordedto the nearest minute, with the actual fix usually occurring within ± 15seconds of this time.

The radar operator used a portable FM radio transceiver to exchangeinformation on drifter deployment and location with the NERKA and with theCape Disappointment radar operator. When a drifter location was in doubt,verification was obtained by requesting that the deployment vessel rapidlyapproach, and then move away from, the drifter. The concommitant mergingand separating of the two radar blips then enabled the radar operator toidentify the drifter target.

Tracking the surface drifter corner reflectors with the Epsco radarand the Corps radar was a success. It appears that useful surface currentestimates can be obtained in this manner. However, eye strain and fatiguewere severe in the case of the Epsco radar operation. This would bealleviated with a larger radar screen, on the order of at least 12 inchesin diameter. Even better would be the projection of the image onto alarge television screen equipped with a light pen for the automatic loggingof range and bearing to target. Such systems are presently on the market.

Notwithstanding the inherent difficulty of gathering these data andthe necessary caveats regarding their quality, these field efforts arenecessary if we are to gain sufficient understanding of the physicalprocesses involved to improve the accuracy of Bar forecasting procedures.

23

Page 34: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABLE 6. Daily Jetty A Radar Fixes to determine radar van orientation.

Range RadarDate & Tidal Stage Landmark (run) Bearing (0)

10 September Flood (19) Clatsop Spit lookout tower 3.14 157.5

(20) Bend in South Jetty 2.46 180

10 September Slack (19) Clatsop Spit lookout tower 3.14 157

(20) Bend in South Jetty 2.46 179

(21) Light on S tip of line of 2.73 114piles on S central side ofsmall Sand Island

(22) Seaward end of North Jetty 2.11 248

12 September Flood (19) Clatsop Spit lookout tower 3.13 156

(20) Bend in South Jetty 2.44 181

(18) Light on S tip of line 1.61 122of piles near SE corner oflarge Sand Island

12 September Ebb (Van orientation unchangedfrom Flood)

13 September Flood (Van orientation not logged)

13 September Ebb (19) Clatsop Spit lookout tower 3.12 157

(20) Bend in South Jetty 2.45 181

(18) Light on S tip of line 1.61 123of piles near SE end oflarge Sand Island

24

Page 35: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

2.3 Surface Wind

Observations of surface wind speed and direction were made at threelocations: a meteorological station deployed by NOS, NOAA data buoy46010, and the NWS station at the Clatsop County airport.

2.3.1 NOS meteorological station.

The National Ocean Service meteorological station was located about 2miles northwest of the Port of Astoria, at river mile 12.5, on pilings atDesdemona Sands, at 46°12'38" North latitude and 123°52'30" West longtitude.The meteorological package is manufactured by Aanderaa. Wind direction isan instantaneous measurement, and wind speed is a 10 minute average recordedevery 10 minutes.

2.3.2 NDBC buoy 46010

NOAA data buoy 46010 consists of a Coast Guard large navigation buoy(LNB) outfitted with a General Service Buoy Payload (GSBP) manufactured byMagnavox. Wind speed and maximum wind gust estimates are obtained bymeans of a vortex shedder; one second samples are averaged for 8.5 minutesto get average wind speed, while the highest 8 second average in thatrecord is retained as the maximum gust. A vane and fluxgate compass alsosamples wind direction every second to provide an 8.5 minute average.

2.3.3 Clatsop County Airport.

The National Weather Service (NWS) maintains a standard F420C windsensor at the Clatsop County Airport, about 20 nm southeast of the ColumbiaRiver entrance. The sensor is manufactured by Electric Speed IndicatorCompany, and is mounted at an elevation of 10 meters. Both speed anddirection are instantaneous and continuous measurements. The outputs aredisplayed in the NWS office on needle guages, which are read and loggedevery hour by the NWS personnel on watch.

25

Page 36: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

3. DATA SUMMARY

3.1 Regional Data

In this section, we present a general overview of the regionalmeteorology and wave conditions for the period 8-13 September. Figures 8a-fpresent the 1800Z (1100 PDT) surface pressure analyses for the period 8-13September, and Figures 9a-e summarize the wind and wave conditions at NOAAdata buoys 46002, 46004, 46005, 46006, and 46010 for the period 7-13September. Figure 10 presents the wind speed and direction measured atClatsop County airport from 9 to 13 September. Figure 11 presents theNOS current meter measurements for station Cl at depths 5, 25, and 35 feetfrom the bottom, for the period 10-13 September.

The timing of the experimental period, 10-13 September, was fortuitous.From 8-10 September, the low pressure systems shown in Figures 8a-c dominatedthe Northeast Pacific. As a result, significant wave height in deep wateroff the Washington-Oregon coast rose from a value of 1 m on 7 September to2.5 m on 10 September (Figs. 9a,c). Even higher waves were produced westof Vancouver Island; on 10 September, heights of 4 m were observed at0000 PDT (Fig. 9b), as the southeast storm sector, characterized by 50 knotwinds, made landfall on the Canadian coast (Figs. 8b,c).

Similarly, at the Columbia River entrance, significant wave heightrose steadily from a minimum of 1 m on 7 September to a peak value of 3 mat 0000 PDT on 12 September (Fig. ge). Substantial swell energy from thelow pressure systems was therefore present during the four-day experimentalperiod. Furthermore, in contrast to the previous three days, an offshorehigh pressure system dominated the Northwest's coast on 11-13 September,bringing northerly winds of up to 10 mls and adding significant local windwave energy to that of the swell already present (Fig. ge).

3.2 Local Data

During the four days (10-13 September) of the experiment, there were8 periods of a few hours each of intensive data collection. The intentionwas to collect data at predicted times of slack current, peak ebb current,or peak flood current. These times and the predicted tidal current speedsfor NOS Station 695 are presented in Table 7. Table 8 summarizes thetimes and modes of deployment for the Waverider. Tables 9 and 10 summarizethe periods during which surface drifters were tracked by the shore-basedradar units at Cape Disappointment and Jetty A, and Table 11 summarizesthe periods during which SLAR imagery was acquired by OANG Mohawks. Thedata for these intensive observation periods are collected together andpresented in the Appendix.

Table 12 summarizes the significant waveheight estimates derived fromWaverider observations obtained during the eight intensive observationperiods. The table also provides surface current estimates near the timeof Waverider deployments; these estimates are derived from two sources-­surface drifter speeds, and the NOS algorithm for current speed at station 695.In addition, the SLAR image for each observation period is indicated inthe last column. The Waverider records are of varying length because the

26

Page 37: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

/\

!,

I}

"0

.D'~

~"','

>;r..

."

j'I

b)

i/!(.y

.T

/,,-,,'/-R"'h~1

---.._-~

1tI.,-

..-s

~:

..//

/j'~y

"

N ....

~/'\~~,

l~ / I

-'»'~

]~

,9,

\\<

.\

,,~~~,

A));\/

r.......

...

NA

TIO

NA

LW

EATH

ERSE

RVI

CE

SE

ATT

LEO

CEA

NS

ER

VIC

ES

UN

ITSU

RFA

CE

PRES

SUR

EA

NA

LYSI

S18

00r

8SE

P81

'\'\~/

\,,-

),

t't~'\.-,

O./

fl/>

I'0

-1t

>''b

\Q

..,d

,.,

,,''\

"~.c~

.~Q_

.--"'.

>('18.

\-,O

q'l:

j.

.',,

,,<>"

~",,

\\

.0"

.\

\''6

\-~

S~'~

~\ \

"S

~'6"" ..,-

;;..~

.\

~-

......0"'/5

,CJ),

l""\ \~

,...,

,­.-

/\-

~g,

...,i

"~'

~"....

~.,/.~

'1/­

$''I

t,'

) ·~s

llJ> "5

~r.

L1

,.~

t==:-=

==:Jf

"i:

/7

'..

..

,.~.

-,,

"'-

....'J

r~"

t.'

ISO

'I

155

---

16

0

-~l

''::0

Fig

ure

8(a

).S

urf

ace

pre

ssu

rean

aly

sis

for

1800

Z,

8S

epte

mb

er1

98

1.

Page 38: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

Noo00.....

._.' ! --r---

~~~~".t

! !im~-<'"(6

~.

/ ~-'-

i.0 .

28

Page 39: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

i<l

.....

S'c

'~c.

<:.1,

"5 12

0

'- .~

, -, \

,0 '3

«J/

....t>....,

,11,~\

<60

",'\

'

/"<"8

\-

,0'"

o\

Q

\

<'0

\.

Q,

\

~- NA

TIO

NA

LW

EATH

ERSE

RVI

CE

SE

ATT

LEO

CEA

NS

ER

VIC

ES

UN

IT

h:)~b_

Au\

V~

..........

.

SUR

FAC

EPR

ESSU

RE

AN

ALY

SIS

1800~

10SE

P81

14

0"

I~

,./>-"

"_0

"as

...

I..oi,

~if

...~".

14

5'

~T_

..\' S

urf

ace

pre

ssu

rean

aly

sis

for

1800

Z,

10S

epte

mb

er1

98

1.

,,(...-

Fig

ure

8C

c).

16

5"0

-.~

""~ r-

'-:-'.,*,I

,/:~,~~

'

,-

........

.

IH'"

/~

f\,)

10

Page 40: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

\ \

'"6

''6.

"'§,

'c;

~"

\'9.

"'6\ \ \

R,_'

C;-

-\-

,~

---

o~'--:~~Jr---~ q,

.,.)

/~~

1.',

1'

.~~

.og,

'C;

",.'

,\ ':q\-

,~.

\ \

,~.

\19

~j

~~~O

"",/

,1'

12

5

\'~

.\~

~~.~

dl!!

'\

Y--

.......

NA

TIO

NA

LW

EATH

ERSE

RVI

CE

,,"co

SE

ATT

LEO

CEA

NS

ER

VIC

ES

UN

ITSU

RFA

CE

PR

ES

SU

RE

AN

ALY

SIS

1800

l'II

SEP

81

..:»

fi"s

,,$~;..,

14

0"

14

00

15

0"

14

50

01/"

.t--.

1)'.....,..'"

'J,l:

i~r-

.,III

.

11

7.''

''...

..

Su

rfac

ep

ress

ure

an

aly

sis

for

1800

2,11

Sep

tem

ber

19

81

.F

igu

re8C

d).

I I~t: fv

0.

I17

0J.

..'

Jg: / ib~

"0

'65~

w o

Page 41: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

\~c.

, "

\

s' l!O

~y

~=--

,"':

;3

''6

~~,

~()

/,0 9, \;;,

ot)-

~\_

~~ol

----

\....,

0\

~-\

if!~

lt

NA

TIO

NA

LW

EATH

ERSE

RVI

CE

'\.-\

,S

EA

TTLE

OC

EAN

SE

RV

ICE

SU

NIT

SUR

FAC

EPR

ESSU

RE

AN

ALY

SIS

18

00

l12

SEP

81_...

\""""""-------~----;---\~

----,~g~\'-,......---

......J:

!o

-Ii

./~

'.~

'0

'R0\

/~(;

\,~s

,~.

?,\

:_~~~.

~u\.

'~\.

,

Su

rfac

ep

ress

ure

an

aly

sis

for

1800

Z,

12S

epte

mb

er1

98

1.

Fig

ure

8(e

).

I / f~'!o

-6"

.5,'1

'·'·-

11...

.

.'-

....

•~

-',\

.

16

5'>0

C:~''c

'_~-/

ft,....~

...--

-----

---..-

"~---

--

"'_

.~

rr-

..,_

.--

--/-

-.

..

.....

\.,/":£

-=

-'....

-r::.;t

,"'=

=:J

ISO

'"'"

.~..=

'It

I\~

",

,.J.

_..'

t~

"/

14

.''-

--I-

--..

-_~-

~--'

I/ft..

..1

50

0,,--

16

0.•

*"

.. ~ -,.. ~

w ....

Page 42: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

---<

~.--~------- ~

:...~

~~

w••

I}O

N

Fig

ure

8(f

).

\'\

_.\.

~?~-

:--/

fff

\.

::::

:;....

........

.N

ATI

ON

AL

WE

ATH

ER

SE

RV

ICE

SE

ATT

LEO

CE

AN

SE

RV

ICE

SU

NIT

SU

RFA

CE

PR

ES

SU

RE

AN

ALY

SIS

18

00

l13

SE

P81

Su

rfac

ep

ress

ure

an

aly

sis

for

1800

2,13

Sep

tem

ber

1981

.

~"'o \

Page 43: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

NO

AA

DA

TA

BU

OY

46

00

20

7S

EP

T81

08

09

10I

112

13S

EP

T81

00

120

012

00

120

012

00

120

012

00

120

.4I,

II

II

I,

,,

II

,,

I,

,I

I,

,I

,I

,,

II

II

0.4

WA

VE

EN

ER

GY

SP

EC

TR

UM

E(f

,tl,

(m2/H

zl

03~

0.1

0.3

N ;:s0

.2~

-0

.2

...:0

0A

"--

'"""'-

00]:001~

.10

102

0do

tOI

::::~ffi~~eJ~~

:5:=:

,,:",

I0.

01,

II

,I

II

0,01

~:~

:jSIG

NIF

ICA

NT

WA

VE

HE

IGH

TH

S.(

m)

-:1:

°,

,,,~

,,

,,::

:,,:

,,::::

,::

,:,

~I:~

:::d

l :~

°I:::

:=:":=

",°

36

0..

,~

r36

0W

IND

DIR

EC

TIO

Na~

~1

80

](d

egre

estr

ue

)r1

80

l::JI

_r

oIiiiiii

II

Ii

II

II

II

iI

I7""

'If"=iiiiii

~'

00

012

07

SE

PT

810

00

812

00

120

012

00

120

910

II

t,(P

AC

IFIC

DA

YLI

GH

TT

IME

)

00 12

120

012

13S

EP

T81

Fig

ure

9(a

).W

ind

and

wav

eo

bse

rvat

ion

sat

NDBC

4600

2fo

rp

eri

od

7-1

3S

ep

t.

Page 44: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

NO

AA

DA

TA

BU

OY

46

00

4

0.3

0.2

13S

EP

T81

00

12

o.l

iI

0.1~

LQ20~

s;o6~o.a:d4~~

OO~

10.1

07

SE

PT

810

80

910

III2

o4

'0,

0,

IF,

0.0

,IF

,0,

0I

1,2,

0.0

IIF

,0,

0,

1,2I

0,0

,If

,,

II

I0

.4•

IW

AV

EE

NE

RG

YS

PE

CTR

UM

E{f

,t),

(m2 /

Hz)

___

0.1

___

~0

.20.3

..:

0.01

'.I

II

II

II

IIIii

IIiii

II

IIiii

Iii

10

.01

wE

~

U,I ~ E ::::>

]SIG~'

F'~A~

~AV~H

~'GH,TH

~'I~),

,,

,:::::

,,

,,

,,

,,d:

20

]W

IND

SP

EE

DU

,Im

/,)

~20

'~~,

,,-:-,,

,::,::

,=::

,.

~O36

0...,

WIN

DD

IRE

CT

ION

a,(

degr

ees

true

)r

36

0

0>

~1

80

18

0C

l

0',

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

It

II

II

IIIii

iI

10

00

120

7S

EP

T81

00

08

120

012

00

120

012

09

10II

t,(P

AC

IFIC

DA

YL

IGH

TT

IME

)

00 12

120

012

13S

EP

T81

Fig

ure

9(b

).W

ind

and

wav

eo

bse

rvat

ion

sat

NDBC

4600

4fo

rp

eri

od

7-1

3S

ept.

Page 45: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

NO

AA

DA

TAB

UO

Y4

60

05

13S

EP

T81

00

1212

12 00

12I

I0

00

7S

EP

T81

08

09

100

012

00

120

0I?

[)[)

12I

IO

4I

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

Ii

0.4

.I

WA

VE

EN

ER

GY

SP

EC

TR

UM

E(f

,tl,

(m2 /

Hz)

0.3

0.2

O,I--~

~--

-~\

£;<Z~6:r::>~

>O:::

>c{'q

:.lJU

OiO,

10,

1

0,3

N ~0

.2- 0

.01

',I

II

II

Ii

II

iI

II

II

II

II

II

II

iI

II

10

.01

18

0

00

1213

SE

PT

8112

00 12

120

012

00

120

012

09

10II

t,(P

AC

IFIC

DA

YLI

GH

TT

IME

)

00

08

00

120

7S

EP

T81

4]

SIG

NIF

ICA

NT

WA

VE

HE

IGH

TH

s,(m

)d

4

~;=,

,,

,,-:=

:::,,,

,,,:

,::=:

,::,"

~'~

W~D.

EE~;

o~

II

I0

36

0..

,W

IND

DIR

EC

TIO

Na

,(d

egre

estr

ue

)__

13

60

- e:t

J::;:

::::::

Io

II

II

II

II

II

JI

II

II

II

IIiiiii

Ii

0

E~

If)

I ~ :J~ ~ E 0\

~1

80

W lJ1

Fig

ure

9(e

).W

ind

and

wav

eo

bse

rvat

ion

sat

NDBC

4600

5fo

rp

erio

d7

-13

Sep

t.

Page 46: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

NO

AA

DA

TA

BU

OY

46

00

60

7S

EP

T81

08

09

00

120

012

00

Ifop

120

012

T-,

IT

II

0.4

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

!I

II

0.4

WA

VE

EN

ER

GY

SP

EC

TR

UM

E(f

,t),

(m2 /

Hz)

0,3.

..]~

~~0.3

- Nf-

0.2

~0.

21~

~2010

10-l

20

5()'

65:-o

0.1-

1

------

=-1<

0&5=8f?6c:ao~~d1~)O

J-O

.I

0.\

O.O

IJLo

.ol

:;:

EO;

41SIG

NIF

ICA

NT

WA

VE

HE

IGH

TH

s,(m

)~4

I~,

,;=

;::::

,==,,

,,,:=

:,:,

,,,,~

~2

0j

WIN

DS

PE

ED

U,

(m/s

)~

20

!_I:

~",~,

~"

~"~,,I:

360~

WIN

DD

IRE

CT

ION

a,

/r

36

0g'

(de

gre

es

tru

e)~

"C~

18

0~

--

118

0t:l

0',

II

II

II

II

II

II"'

II

II

Ir

II

II

Ii

II

II

00

012

07

SE

PT

810

00

812

00

120

012

00

120

910

II

t,(P

AC

IFIC

DA

YL

IGH

TT

IME

)

00 12

120

012

13S

EP

T81

Fig

ure

9(d

).W

ind

and

wav

eo

bse

rvati

on

sat

NDBC

4600

6fo

rp

eri

od

7-1

3S

ept.

Page 47: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

NO

AA

DA

TA

BU

OY

46

0I0

07

SE

PT

810

80

910

II

1213

SE

PT

810

012

00

120

012

00

120

012

00

120

012

0.4

"I

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

I0

.4W

AV

EE

NE

RG

YS

PE

CT

RU

ME

(f,t

l,(m

2 /H

zl

0.3

l~~

~~

[0.3

0.1~

lO.2

~0

.21~

---.

...J 60

-I

./

5--.

....

510

5

0],

,~::

:~~

a~~,((~

~Oi:

~,00

1i

II

II

II

iI

I

~f

:~S

IGN

IFIC

AN

TW

AV

EH

EIG

HT

H"l

m)

,-

f:°

-;',

,,

,,

,,

,,

,,

,,

,,:=

,,==

:,,,:

,°!':j~~'(~"

,=:::=~~=E

~3

60

,W

IND

DIR

EC

TIO

Na,

Ideg

"e,'"

e)~

--.-

36

0

~18

0~~

f-1

80

l:l

o'i

II

Iii'

II

II

II

II

II

II

rI

I~

Ii

.--.

10

00

120

7S

EP

T81

00

08

120

012

00

120

012

09

10II

t,(P

AC

IFIC

DA

YL

IGH

TT

IME

)

00 12

120

012

13

SE

PT

81

Fig

ure

9(e

).W

ind

and

wav

eo

bse

rvati

on

sat

NDBC

4601

0fo

rp

eri

od

7-1

3S

ep

t.

Page 48: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

CLA

TSO

PC

OU

NTY

AIR

POR

T(W

SO

-AS

TOR

IA,O

REG

ON

)

10

~ E15

::J

0w

36

00

0

<.9

27

0w 0

180

-~

90 0

00

120

012

00

120

012

00

120

0I

1-

II

11

9S

EP

8110

II12

13S

EP

8114

PAC

IFIC

DA

YLI

GH

TT

IME

Fig

ure

10

.W

ind

ob

serv

ati

on

sat

Cla

tso

pC

ou

nty

Air

po

rtfo

rp

eri

od

9-1

4S

ep

t.1

98

1.

Page 49: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

CU

RR

ENT

SPEE

D

(kts

)5.

61

(cm

!s)

28

6

II

II

i

10SE

PII

SEP

12SE

P13

SEP

00

0612

1800

0612

1800

0612

180'0

0612

1800

PDT

Fig

ure

11

.N

OS

cu

rren

tm

eter

ob

serv

ati

on

sfo

rst

ati

on

sC

lat

dep

ths

5,

25

,an

d35

feet

from

the

bo

tto

mfo

rth

ep

eri

od

10

-13

Sep

tem

ber

.F

rom

Mu

lher

n(1

98

2).

Page 50: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABLE 7. Daytime slack, peak ebb, or peak flood current predictions forintensive observation periods. Predictions refer to NOS station 695.

Day Date Predicted Tidal CurrentTime Speed Stage(PDT) (m/s)

Thursday 10 September 1015 1.3 FLOOD

Thursday 10 September 1545 -1.4 EBB

Friday 11 September 1330 0.0 SLACK

Friday 11 September 1630 -1.7 EBB

Saturday 12 September 1115 1.8 FLOOD

Saturday 12 September 1715 -2.1 EBB

Sunday 13 September 1145 2.0 FLOOD

Sunday 13 September 1745 -2.4 EBB

40

Page 51: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABLE 8. Summary of Waverider deployments. Entries under stationary anddrifting columns refer to buoys.

Date Tidal Stage Time Period Deployment Mode(PDT) Stationary Drifting

10 September FLOOD 1030-1055 81055-1120 8~10

1131-1157 101157-1221 10~12

EBB 1444-1506 101506-1528 1O~8

1528-1555 81555-1629 8~1

11 September SLACK 1348-1409 101409-1447 1O~8

EBB 1548-1610 12~10

1612-1633 10

12 September FLOOD 0921-0955 460101041-1101 41127-1148 81200-1234 101248-1300 81300-1318 8~10

EBB 1644-1704 12~10

1758-1822 12

13 September FLOOD 1117-1137 81139-1202 8~10

1223-1245 81245-1310 8~10

EBB 1658-1724 19~11

1724-1746 111746-1808 11~9

1825-1856 10

41

Page 52: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABLE 9. Summary of Cape Disappointment Radar observation periods.

Date Tidal Stage Time Period(PDT)

10 September FLOOD 1050-1225

10 September EBB 1450-1625

11 September SLACK 1301-1450

11 September EBB 1605-1628

12 September FLOOD 1041-1315

12 September EBB 1639-1833

13 September FLOOD 1130-1307

13 September EBB 1704-1830

42

Page 53: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABLE 10. Summary of Jetty A Radar observation periods.

Date Tidal Stage Time Period(PDT)

10 September FLOOD 1050-1202

10 September EBB No Data

11 September SLACK 1307-1426

11 September EBB No Data

12 September FLOOD 1040-1314

12 September EBB 1640-1833

13 September FLOOD 1112-1304

13 September EBB 1703-1846

43

Page 54: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABLE 11. Summary of Mohawk SLAR observation periods

Date

10 September

10 September

11 September

11 September

12 September

12 September

13 September

13 September

Tidal Stage

FLOOD

.EBB

SLACK

EBB

FLOOD

EBB

FLOOD

EBB

Time Period

1519-1731

1232-1345

1610-1736

1110-1227

1645-1748

1115-1300

1710-1835

44

Conunents

No flight.

A/C 925: Kaufman/Coursey.ADAS and log agree. Highaltitude test runs at 5100feet yielded no return.Flight line #1 (1519-1526)printed for report.

A/C 925: Rolfness/Coursey.ADAS and log time agree towithin 15 minutes. ADAS andlog time agree to within 15minutes. ADAS date is incorrect(10 Sept.). Flight line #1(1311-1319) printed for report.

AC/925: 7 / Anderson. ADASand log date incorrect (10 Sept.'81). Print line #1 (1628-1636).

A/C 957: Rux/Fough. ADAS andlog agree. Print line #1(1110-1123) .

A/C 957: Burns/Fogg. ADASincorrect.

A/C 957: Evans/Lakawsi. ADAStimes incorrect. Print line #3(1138-7) .

A/C 957: Dwyer/Galvin. ADAS andlog agree.

Page 55: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABLE 12. SWlllllary of Selected Surface Drifter Speed and Waverider Significant Wave Height Observations.

Date Start End Hid Position Drifter Drift Drifter Drifter NOS Speed Waverider H SLARTime Time Time (Itm east ID Distance Time Speed (SU. 695) Rec. Length s

Image(PDT) (PDT) (PDT) of Buoy 8) (Fig/Buoy) (m) (min) (m/s) (m/s) (sec) (m) (Fig. )

10 Sep 1030 1047 1038 0.0 1.3 1024 1.510 Sep 1050 1058 1054 1.6 A8/1 640 8 1.3 1.210 Sep 1050 1059 1055 1.8 A7/l 640 9 1.2 1.210 Sep 1056 1104 1100 0.3 1.2 512 1.410 Sep 1104 1113 1108 0.8 1.2 512 1.510 Sep 1113 1120 1116 1.4 1.1 429 1.210 Sep 1131 1148 1139 1.9 1.0 1024 0.810 Sep 1157 1204 1200 2.1 0.6 443 0.910 Sep 1204 1213 1208 2.3 0.4 512 0.810 Sep 1213 1221 1217 2.8 0.2 478 0.8

10 Sep 1444 1501 1452 1.7 -1.2 1024 1.310 Sep 1506 1511 1509 1.4 -1. 3 324 1.610 Sep 1511 1520 1516 0.8 -1.3 512 1.910 Sep 1520 1528 1524 0.0 -1. 4 478 2.110 Sep 1523 1530 1527 3.0 A16/5 1110 7 -2.6 -1.4 A1810 Sep 1527 1535 1531 2.1 A16/4 825 8 -1.7 -1.4 A1810 Sep 1528 1545 1536 -0.3 -1.4 1024 2.210 Sep 1541 1550 1546 1.3 A16/2 1090 8 -2.3 -1.4 A1810 Sep 1537 1545 1546 1.7 AI6/3 1040 9 -1.9 -1.4 A1810 Sep 1555 1603 1559 -0.7 -1.4 473 2.410 Sep 1603 1611 1607 -1.4 -1.4 512 2.110 Sep 1611 1620 1616 -2.1 -1.4 512 2.410 Sep 1620 1629 1625 -2.7 -1.3 512 2.4

11 Sep 1315 1330 1323 2.2 A26/3 350 15 -0.4 0.1 A2811 Sep 1315 1330 1323 1.1 A26/4 250 15 -0.3 0.1 A2811 Sep 1348 1405 1356 1.7 -0.5 512 1.511 Sep 1400 1410 1405 0.1 A26/4 400 10 -0.7 -0.611 Sep 1409 1416 1413 1.6 -0.8 431 1.911 Sep 1410 1420 1415 -0.3 A26/4 490 10 -0.8 -0.811 Sep 1416 1425 1421 1.4 -0.9 512 2.011 Sep 1420 1430 1425 -0.7 A26/4 525 10 -0.9 -0.911 Sep 1425 1433 1429 1.1 -0.9 512 2.311 Sep 1430 1440 1435 -1. 2 A26/4 640 10 -1.1 -1.011 Sep 1433 1442 1437 0.7 -1.0 512 2.911 Sep 1442 1447 1443 0.3 -1.1 302 2.611 Sep 1440 1450 1445 -1.8 A26/4 750 10 -1.3 -1.1

11 Sep 1552 1601 1556 2.9 -1.7 512 1.511 Sep 1601 1609 1605 2.3 -1.7 512 2.411 Sep 1610 1618 1614 2.6 A34/3 900 8 -1.9 -1. 7 A3511 Sep 1615 1623 1619 1.3 A34/2 950 8 -2.0 -1.7 A3511 Sep 1620 1628 1624 1.2 A34/l 950 8 -2.0 -1.7 A3511 Sep 1612 1629 1620 1.8 -1.7 1024 3.4

12 Sep 1110 1120 1115 2.6 A45/3 890 10 1.5 1.8 A4712 Sep 1110 1124 1117 3.4 A45/l 1275 14 1.5 1.8 A4712 Sep 1120 1130 1125 3.4 A46/3 850 10 1.4 1.8 A4712 Sep 1127 1144 1135 0.1 1.8 1024 1.612 Sep 1155 1205 1200 0.9 A45/5 1040 10 1.7 1.712 Sep 1200 1210 1205 1.0 A45/6 1090 10 1.8 1.712 Sep 1200 1217 1208 2.0 1.6 1024 0.912 Sep 1206 1220 1213 0.2 A45/4 675 14 0.8 1.6

12 Sep 1640 1644 1642 2.3 A55/l 525 4 -2.2 -2.0 A5612 Sep 1642 1648 1645 1.9 A55/2 675 6 -1. 9 -2.0 A5612 Sep 1639 1651 1645 A54/1 1525 12 -2.1 -2.0 A5612 Sep 1645 1651 1647 1.7 A54/2 750 6 -2.1 -2.0 A5612 Sep 1644 1650 1648 3.2 -2.0 386 1.7 A5612 Sep 1646 1700 1653 0.8 A55/1 1900 14 -2.3 -2.0 A5612 Sep 1651 1657 1654 0.7 A54/1 750 6 -2.1 -2.0 A5612 Sep 1650 1659 1654 2.4 -2.0 512 2.2 A5612 Sep 1659 1704 1702 1.4 -2.0 297 3.9 A5612 Sep 1758 1815 1806 3.4 -1.9 1024 2.4

45

Page 56: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABLE 12. (Continued)

Date Start End Hid Position Drifter Drift Drifter Drifter HOS Speed Waverider H SLARTime Tille Tille (lui east ID Distance Tille Speed (sta. 695) Rec. Length s ll1age(PDT) (PDT) (PDT) of Buoy 8) (Fig/Buoy) (II) (ain) (a/s) (a/s) (sec) (II) (Fig.)

13 Sep 1115 1130 1123 -0.5 A65/2 1225 15 1.4 2.0 A6913 Sep 1117 1134 1125 -0.4 2.0 1024 1.5 A6913 Sep 1117 1135 1126 -1.1 A65/3 1190 18 1.1 2.0 A6913 Sep 1121 1135 1128 0.0 A67/2 1300 14 1.6 2.0 A6913 Sep 1125 1136 1130 1.0 A67/1 1300 11 2.0 2.0 A6913 Sep 1125 1140 1133 -1.3 A65/4 820 15 0.9 2.0 A6913 Sep 1127 1140 1134 -1.2 A67/4 650 13 0.8 2.0 A6913 Sep 1133 1141 1137 -0.3 A67/3 725 8 1.5 2.0 A6913 Sep 1130 1145 1138 1.9 A65/1 1700 15 1.9 2.0 A6913 Sep 1139 1144 1142 0.2 2.0 273 1.4 A6913 Sep 1140 1151 1146 2.8 A67/1 1180 11 1.8 2.0 A6913 Sep 1143 1150 1147 0.6 A67/3 790 7 1.9 2.0 A6913 Sep 1143 1150 1147 -0.3 A67/4 560 7 1.3 2.0 A6913 Sep 1144 1152 1148 0.6 2.0 512 1.313 Sep 1146 1155 1151 2.4 A67/2 830 9 1.5 2.013 Sep 1152 1201 1156 1.3 2.0 512 0.913 Sep 1215 1227 1221 0.5 A66/5 1075 12 1.5 2.013 Sep 1220 1230 1225 0.5 A66/6 900 10 1.5 2.013 Sep 1222 1230 1226 -0.1 A66/7 700 8 1.5 2.0

13 Sep 1658 1702 1700 6.7 -2.2 226 0.713 Sep 1702 1710 1706 6.0 -2.2 512 0.713 Sep 1710 1719 1714 5.2 -2.3 512 0.713 Sep 1710 1720 1715 5.1 A76/1 1000 10 -1.7 -2.313 Sep 1710 1720 1715 5.4 A76/2 1275 10 -2.1 -2.313 Sep 1710 1720 1715 5.4 A76/3 1350 10 -2.3 -2.313 Sep 1709 1721 1715 5.4 A78/1 1425 12 -2.0 -2.313 Sep 1709 1722 1715 5.5 A78/2 1475 13 -1.9 -2.313 Sep 1710 1720 1715 5.5 A78/3 1250 10 -2.1 -2.3 ABO13 Sep 1719 1724 1722 4.2 -2.3 304 0.8 A8013 Sep 1720 1730 1725 4.1 A76/1 1250 10 -2.1 -2.3 A8013 Sep 1720 1730 1725 4.2 A76/2 1275 10 -2.1 -2.3 A8013 Sep 1720 1730 1725 4.2 A76/3 1410 10 -2.4 -2.3 A8013 Sep 1721 1731 1726 4.1 A78/l 1150 10 -1.9 -2.3 A8013 Sep 1722 1731 1726 4.3 A78/2 1300 9 -2.4 -2.3 A8013 Sep 1720 1732 1726 4.3 A78/3 1650 12 -2.3 -2.3 A8013 Sep 1724 1741 1732 4.0 -2.3 512 1.0 A8013 Sep 1735 1741 1738 2.6 A78/2 750 6 -2.1 -2.313 Sep 1735 1745 1740 1.9 A76/1 1475 10 -2.5 -2.313 Sep 1737 1744 1741 1.9 A78/1 1160 7 -2.8 -2.313 Sep 1746 1753 1750 3.5 -2.4 436 1.013 Sep 1753 1802 1757 2.7 -2.4 512 1.313 Sep 1802 1808 1805 1.4 -2.4 367 1.213 Sep 1803 1814 1809 3.9 A77/5 1525 11 -2.3 -2.313 Sep 1803 1814 1809 3.9 A79/5 1525 11 -2.3 -2.313 Sep 1805 1815 1810 4.2 A77/6 1475 10 -2.5 -2.313 Sep 1805 1817 1811 4.0 A79/6 1700 12 -2.4 -2.313 Sep 1814 1824 1819 2.4 A79/5 1525 10 -2.5 -2.313 Sep 1815 1825 1820 2.2 A77/5 1490 10 -2.5 -2.313 Sep 1820 1830 1825 2.0 A77/6 1550 10 -2.6 -2.213 Sep 1821 1830 1826 2.0 A79/6 1260 9 -2.3 -2.213 Sep 1825 1842 1833 1.7 -2.2 512 2.2

46

Page 57: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

electronics was set to acquire individual records of length 512 seconds,with a I-second gap between them. In some cases, two records were combinedto form a 1024-second record; these were processed to a power spectrum, asdescribed above, and plots of these spectra are presented in the Appendix.In other cases, the Waverider was deployed after the start of a new record,so that the first portion of that record was discarded, leaving a recordshorter than 512 seconds. The significant wave height for these recordsof length 512 seconds or shorter was then computed as H =4a, where a isthe square root of the record variance. s

The river entrance is an extremely hostile environment. Large wavesand strong currents frequently stress in-situ instrumentation and mooringsto failure and, if the instrument survives these natural forces, there isstill a high likelihood that it will succumb to the heavy commercial andrecreational vessel traffic in that region. The technique of tethering aWaverider to a surface vessel was used primarily to avoid the risk ofinstrument loss, but while observations made this way are preferable to acomplete lack of data, the procedure does have potentially serious short­comings. There is a question of how the currents, which frequently exceed5 knots, and the tether and bridle arrangement affect the response of theWaverider. Beyond this question of data interpretation, there is theconsiderable expense incurred in vessel support, and the inconvenience andpotential hazard involved in collection of the data in this manner.

On the morning of 12 September, a Waverider deployment was made at alocation within 100 yards of NDBC buoy 46010. The purpose was to checkthe method of Wave rider deployment using the tether arrangement describedabove. Figure 12 displays the resulting Waverider spectra and the twoNDBC 46010 spectra which bracket the time of the Waverider deployment.The Waverider spectra has been subjected to II-point frequency band averaging,so that the resulting frequency resolution of 0.0107 Hz is comparable tothe 0.01 Hz resolution of buoy 46010. As can be seen, there is goodagreement in significant wave height, and in the qualitative features ofthe individual spectra. Thus, although there were no currents presentduring this intercomparison (unlike deployments in the river entrance),this result does give some confidence in the accuracy of the rest of theWaverider observations.

47

Page 58: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

00 12 SEP 10 PDT.• NOaC BUOY .6010

1981 JO 255 17 Z0 SIG HT .. 2.7 H(TERS0 U • 1. S HIS.,; WIND SPEE:D = 5.7 HIS,... WIND DIRN • 8. DEGS

N:r::'-0NO7C •..,I&J

00

N

g

-=b. 00 0.0. 0.011 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.211 0.'2 0.16 0••0F (HZ)

g 12 SEP 0925 PDT.,; LIliWTSWIP 1981 JD 255 16125 Ii"T WS • 2.78 " U • 1.28 "IS

00..,...

N:r::'-NoEo-'.•ClIenQ.

00

N

gi.oo 0.0. 0.011 0.12 0.16 O.ZO O.Z. O.ZII 0.'2 O.S' 0.•0

FREQUENCY (HZ)

00

00..

,...N:r::'-0NOE •..,I&J

00

N

00

.0

" 0.0. 0.011

Figure 12.

12 SEP 09 PDTNDBC BUO{ .60101981 JD 255 16 ZSIG HT. 2.8 HE:TERSU. 1. 0 HISWIND SPEE:D • 5.3 HISWIND DIRN • 1•• DEGS

0.12 0.16 0.20 0.2. 0.2S 0.'1 0.S6F (HZ)

Waverider and NDBe 46010 intercomparison spectra.

0.•0

48

Page 59: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

4. PRELIMINARY DATA ANALYSIS

We hypothesize that Buoy 8 roughly represents the boundary betweentwo wave regions. Landward of this site the waves decay due to bathymetricrefraction away from the main axis of the navigation channel, where thedepth is maintained at ~15m, toward the shallower regions to the north andsouth. Seaward of this site waves grow or decay along their propagationpath due both to wave-current interaction with ebb or flood currents andto shoaling.

4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8

Evidence for wave decay landward of Buoy 8 is presented in Figures 13a-d.The significant wave height, H , is plotted as a function of the distance,x, upriver of Buoy 8. These m~asurements were obtained from the tetheredwaverider deployments. Notice that during both ebb and flood conditionsthe waves decay upriver. The bending of the waves toward the shoals oneither side of the navigation channel can be seen in most of the SLARimagery, but it is clearest during the slack-to-ebb tide of 11 September(Figs. A28 and A29) when the current plays a lesser role. We conjecturethat depth refraction is the primary source of the wave decay. Diffractionfrom the tips of the jetties may also contribute.

Linear least squares fits have been made to the data of Figure 13 foro ~ x ~ 5 km. Each line, its equation, and the correlation coefficient ofeach fit are shown in the figure. The fact that the absolute values ofthe correlations are near unity indicates that the linear fit is a goodapproximation. The slopes range in value from -0.3 m/km on the firstflood (Figure 13a) to -1.7 m/km on the second ebb (Figure 13b).

The ebbs have larger upriver decay rates than the floods. This seemsstrange at first because an ebb current should refract the waves towardits axis hence mitigating the effects of bathymetric refraction toward theshoals. A flood current, on the other hand, should enhance the refractionaway from the channel axis.

One possible explanation for the behavior observed here is that themid-channel current magnitude decreases upriver from the vicinity of thejetty tips near Buoy 8 at x=O. If this happens on an ebb current thegradient would cause waves to refract away from the channel axis henceenhancing the decay rate, and vice versa on flood. This agrees qualitativelywith the observations. The converging jetty tips were designed to acceleratethe current to scour the channel. We might expect another current-speedmaximum upriver between Jetty A and Clatsop Spit.

Confirmation of the current gradients awaits a complete analysis ofthe drifter tracks and perhaps further observations. However, a preliminaryanalysis has been conducted near the time of peak ebb during four of theintensive observation periods. Tabulated results of the drift-distanceover periods of a few minutes are presented in Table 13. The inferredsurface-current vectors are shown in Figure 14. The ebb currents weremostly in excess of 2 m/s. Figure 14a shows some divergence just upriverof the jetty tips.

49

Page 60: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

10SE

PT19

8114

44-

1629

PDT

(EB

B)

o o ·... ­ ::J:o ....

.,0 ·

Nen :J

:

++

++

+HS

=2

.2-

0.5

XR

=-0

.96

U't o

o o cil

II

II

II

II

II

-3.0

0-2

.00

~1.00

0.0

01

.00

2.0

03

.00

•.00

5.0

06

.00

7.0

0X

.K

ILO

MET

ERS

EAST

OFBU

OY8

10SE

PT19

8110

30-1

221

PDT

(FLO

OD

)o o ·... ­::J:o ..

...,

0 ·N

en :J: o o

HS

=1

.5-

0.3

XR

=-0

.94

-..

I+ ~---t +

I.:

t-

-2.0

0-1

.00

0.0

01

.00

2.0

03

.00

•.00

X.

KIL

OM

ETER

SEA

STOF

BUOY

85

.00

6.0

0

Fig

ure

13

a.W

aver

ider

sig

nif

ican

tw

ave

heig

ht

est

imate

sas

afu

ncti

on

of

dis

tan

ce

east

of

bu

oy

8fo

r10

Sep

t.1

98

1.

Page 61: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

11SE

PT'

1981

1552

-162

9PO

T(E

BB

)o o · ..

.......

2:0

---.

.0 ·..

Nen ::

I:

o o

HS=

6.5

-1

.7X

R=

-1.0

U1 .....

0'

II

II

II

II

II

-3.0

0-2

.00

-1.0

00

.00

1.0

02

.00

3.0

04

.00

5.0

06

.00

1.0

0X

.K

ILO

MET

ERS

EAST

OFBU

OY8

11SE

PT19

8113

48-1

447

POT

(SLA

CK

-EB

B)

o o ·.......

..:E

o--

-..0 N

(f)

:::I:

HS=

3.1

-0

.8X

R=

-0.8

9

o o 0'

II

I,

II

II

II

-3.0

0-2

.00

-1.0

00

.00

1.0

02

.00

3.0

04

.00

5.0

06

.00

1.0

0X.

KIL

OM

ETER

SEA

STOF

BUOY

8

Fig

ure

13

b.

Wav

erid

ersi

gn

ific

an

tw

ave

heig

ht

est

imate

sas

afu

ncti

on

of

dis

tan

ce

east

of

bu

oy

8fo

r11

Sep

t.1

98

1.

Page 62: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

12SE

PT19

8116

44-1

815

PDT

(EB

B)

o o .' ­ :1:0 -.0

·N

(f) :::I:

+

=4

.8-

0.9

X=

-0.8

4

c.n N

o o 0"

II

II

II

II

II

-3.0

0-2

.00

-1.0

00

.00

1100

2.0

03

.00

•.00

5.0

06

.00

7.0

0X.

KIL

OM

ETER

SEA

STOF

BUOY

8

12SE

PT19

8111

27-1

217

PDT

(FLO

OD

)o o · • ­ :1:0 -

.0·

N(f) :::I:

o o

HS=

1.6

-0

.4X

R=

-1.0

-2.0

0-1

.00

0.0

01

.00

2.0

03

.00

•.00

X.K

ILO

MET

ERS

EAST

OFBU

OY8

5.0

06

.00

Fig

ure

13

c.W

aver

ider

sig

nif

ican

tw

ave

heig

ht

est

imate

sas

afu

ncti

on

of

dis

tan

ce

east

of

bu

oy

8fo

r12

Sep

t.19

81.

Page 63: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

VI

W

13SE

PT19

8116

58-1

842

PDT

(EB

B)

0 0

·.. -HS

=2

.9-

0.5

X~o

R=

-0.9

5-e

-+

·N

en :I:

I~

++

+0 0

·0

-3

. 00

-l.O

O-1

.00

0.0

01

.00

l.OO

3.0

0•.

005

.00

6.0

07

.00

X.K

ILO

MET

ERS

ERST

OFBU

OY8

13SE

PT19

8111

17-1

202

PDT

(FLO

OD

)o o ·.. - ~o -e ·N

en :J: o o

+~

HS=

1.4

-0

.4X

R=

-0.9

5

01

I1

II

II

II

1I

-3.0

0-l

.OO

-1.0

00

.00

1.0

0l.O

O3

.00

•.00

5.0

06

.00

7.0

0X.

KIL

OM

ETER

SER

STOF

BUOY

8

Fig

ure

13d.

Wav

erid

ersi

gn

ific

an

tw

ave

heig

ht

est

imate

sas

afu

nct

ion

of

dis

tan

ce

east

of

buoy

8fo

r13

Sep

t.19

81.

Page 64: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABLE 13. Drifter Information for Current Vectors Presentedin Figure 14.

Date Start End Drifter Drift Drift DriftTime Time ID Distance Time Speed(PDT) (PDT) (Fig./Buoy) (m) (min) m/s

10 Sep 1540 1600 A16/2 2225 20 1.9

10 Sep 1550 1610 A16/3 2100 20 1.8

10 Sep 1540 1600 A16/5 2025 20 1.7

11 Sep 1610 1618 A34/1 975 8 2.0

11 Sep 1610 1618 A34/2 1150 8 2.4

11 Sep 1610 1618 A34/3 925 8 1.9

12 Sep 1642 1651 A54/1 1250 9 2.3

12 Sep 1642 1651 A54/2 1110 9 2.1

13 Sep 1735 1741 A76/1 925 6 2.6

13 Sep 1735 1741 A76/2 850 6 2.4

13 Sep 1735 1739 A76/3 475 4 2.0

13 Sep 1727 1734 A76/4 850 7 2.0

54

Page 65: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

•--

----

-~-'

v.:

-;;'-

,,""

'_---

-"')

----O~

",

\

---""'

,~-

",-"',

,/-

.,.~

~F

----::-

'loo,,;,

",'

_---"

'1:~

,~.-

."',

""

/-

\.'-

'~'",

//'

""-,;

:".

/,-

.":,

//"~",,

/,-

.',',

//1

,,,

•_

..,

/'~"

\,sr

···.

.,

,'-

',

,/ "

(b)

......._

,'"\ \ \ '...

..........

....,....

....---

-""

,I

SUR

F.lC

(DR

IfTE

RlIl

AC

",, , ,

...._.

_."..,

,.. ,f,,~------------~

'.'.

....,.",.

//--

----

,,-:

~=~~

"~::'::

}'"/"

/'1

.-F

:--"

',-)

,",/./

--..:-

,,',

\

//.r~'"

'lIo.

"'

"/'

\.I'"

'.",:

.','

""

(A.

,;I.

-;''~;-

-".

",,-

-.,-'

_-",

-~0•

/'\

----'

.""

,//

,,-r

----

';'

""~::

-".,

, ",'

....I

"\'... .,,~,

(a)

-........_, , i \ \ \

I

....-_

."....

......".

.......

, ,

(d)

_---

--------!J.."'~~~~--

..,"

';----

---2.1

----:-_=

-'_

:--_

_':

-"\

/$~

F'.

.__::-~

_,

//

/,---

---

....

,-.,

'-._

~~\-

//

."'0

-./

/-""

//

:',,>

,/

/-:'

------:~-

..,"

,'\.

1.,--

,,

'-.....

.'

,,

""-........

_,....

, i \ \ ,I

•, ,

~---

------

------

--"~:~:'-"-'~')

"..-

-~-

-;-.

:-=-

-;.-

:---

-,-'

,\

"'l

.')~

=-.-

F'-

_•.

:-::

-,\

'---"\~

-'.",

"

//<

-"'

--:'

~:~•

,/

",.-"~

"',

'/

,-~,,

"I

/'''

''~.--

..'.

.''-',

/,-

\_.

.,,-:

',

",

-"

",;

'....

"

(c)

I1_-......._

,'" \ \ \ \."

.....,

'---

_."

,......

........,..

U'1

U'1

Fig

ure

14.

Dri

fter

der

ived

surf

ace

cu

rren

tv

ecto

rsn

ear

the

tim

eo

fp

eak

ebb

.(b

)11

Sep

t.19

81.

(c)

12S

ept.

1981

.(d

)13

Sep

t.19

81.

(a)

10S

ep

t.19

81.

Page 66: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

The enhanced wave decay rate on ebb may be due in part to wave breaking.The instance of greatest decay is on the ebb of 11 September, when breakingswell were observed visually. It is possible to estimate the wave steepnessnear Buoy 8 and compare this with maximum values limited by breaking. Fora wave spectrum we take the characteristic steepness to be \H k. Thewavenumber, k, can be estimated (rather inappropriately) fromslineartheory applied to slowly varying waves. Details are given in §4.2.2. His extrapolated from Figure 13. The characteristic steepness is given i~column 10 of Table 14 for each of the ebb and flood events observed. Forregular, periodic waves the theoretical maximum steepness is givenapproximately by (Miche, 1944)

(ak) =0.44 tanh kd.max(1)

where a is the wave amplitude and d is the depth. Due to the inherentunsteadiness of a real sea and the existence of wave groups, significantsporadic breaking can occur if the characteristic steepness is somewhatlower than this. For random waves in deltaic regions Battjes (1982)suggests the following empirical formula

(\H k) "" 0.2 tanh kd.s max ""(2)

For the full ebb on 11 September at 1615 the extrapolated characteristicsteepness exceeded this value. This points to wave breaking as being acause of the enhanced decay rate. SLAR images on this date (Figs. A35 andA36) show numerous highly radar-reflective regions in the channel entrancewhich are similar in size and shape to surf on nearby beaches. Thisprovides further evidence for mid-channel breaking, but it must be cautionedthat similar images occur in other locations and other scenes where breakingcould not be occurring. Thus there is not a unique correspondence betweenbreaking waves and such images.

4.2 Wave-Current Interaction Seaward of Buoy 8

Due to logistical and safety considerations we did not often measurewave heights in the vicinity of the channel entrance seaward of Buoy 8.Therefore to test the hypothesis that the waves grow or decay along theirpropagation path due to ebb or flood currents, respectively, we mustcontent ourselves with a comparison between two point measurements, oneoffshore and one at Buoy 8. The offshore wave measurements are those fromNDBC Buoy 46010.

4.2.1 The Observations

For each of the eight intensive observation periods the measurementsare summarized in Table 14 which is divided horizontally into two portionscorresponding to ebb and flood conditions. (Actually nine rows are shownsince at 1127 on 12 September the offshore spectrum had two peaks; hencethese are analyzed as two independent wave systems.) Columns 1 and 2 givethe date and time of the offshore and channel-entrance comparisons.

56

Page 67: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABLE 14. Summary of Observed Wave and Current Characteristics and ComputedTransfer Function, T, During the Intensive Observation Periods

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Date Time Buoy 46010 1 Buoy 8 Current T = T T /T

0 c o cf Hs46 Hs8 Speed2

Hs8/Hs46 Eq. (1) Steepnessp

(PDT) (H ) (m) (m) (m/s) 8 =0 0 8 =00

0 0z

(8 =300 ) (8 =30 0 ) \H k0 0 s8

EBB

10 Sept 1528 0.09. 1.7 2.2 -2.1 1.3 1.4 0.9 0.07(1. 3) (1. 0)

11 Sept 1445 0.07 2.7 3.1 -1.3 1.1 1.3 0.8 0.07(1. 2) (0.9)

11 Sept 1615 0.07 2.9 5.2 4 -6.5 -2.0 1.84 -2.2 1.5 1.24 -1.5 0.124 -0.16(1.4) (1.3 4 -1.6)

12 Sept 1700 0.08 2.8 4.83 -2.2 1.7 1.5 1.1 0.14(1. 4) (1. 2)

13 Sept 1825 0.09 1.9 2.9 3 -2.3 1.5 1.5 1.0 0.10(1. 4) ( 1.1)

FLOOD

10 Sept 1030 0.08 1.8 1.5 1.3 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.03(0.9) (0.9)

12 Sept 1127 0.08 1.4 1.0 1.5 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.02(0.9) (0.8)

12 Sept 1127 0.11 2.4 1.2 1.5 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.03(0.8) (0.6)

13 Sept 1117 0.09 2.1 1.5 1.4 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.03(0.8) (0.9)

1 H and peak frequency f were interpolated from observationss p

bracketing the time of Waverider observations.

2 From drifter speed estimates in Table 12. Ebb currents arenegative, flood are positive.

3 From least square fit to data presented in Figs. 13b-d.

4 Lower value corresponds to limiting breaking height givenby Equation (2).

57

Page 68: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

Columns 3 and 4 give the frequency of the offshore spectral peak, f , andp

the significant wave height at Buoy 46010, Hs46 . The significant wave

height at Buoy 8, H 8' is presented in column 5. Directly measuredvalues were used wh~n available, and when not, the linear least-squaresextrapolations from upriver of Buoy 8 were used. Figure 13a shows thatthese fits represent the data well when a comparison is possible. Thecurrent-speed estimates at Buoy 8 based on the drifter data of Table 12are shown in column 6. Finally, column 7 lists the observed wave heighttransfer function from offshore to onshore, i.e., the ratio of the significantwave heights, To = Hs8/Hs46·

Column 7 of Table 14 shows that for all ebb currents the waves wereamplified (T >1) from offshore to the channel entrance, and for all floodcurrents the~ decayed (T <1). Thus our hypothesis that wave-currentinteraction is reponsiblg for wave height changes seaward of Buoy 8 isconfirmed qualitatively, at least during maximum ebb and flood conditions.The amplification reached values as high as 2.2 on ebb (or perhaps 1.8 ifthe waves at Buoy 8 were indeed limited by the empirical breaking criterionof (2)) with an attenuation of up to 0.5 on flood.

4.2.2 Comparison with Linear, 1-D Theory

In a previous study, Gonzalez (1984) compared existing linear, one­dimensional wave-current interaction theory with Waverider observationstaken hourly over ten tidal cycles at an offshore location and near Buoy 8.A theoretical amplification factor or transfer function, T, based on conservationof wave action density, A = E/a, is given by (see, for example, Phillips, §2.7,1977)

aao

= (uo + cgo coseo)\(~)\U + C cose ao

g(3)

where unscripted parameters refer to the river entrance and the subscript"0" indicates initial conditions, or offshore (deep water) values, andwhere

E = spectral energy density values,

a =wave height amplitude,

U = surface current velocity,

C =wave group velocity,g

e = relative wave-current direction

a = intrinsic wave frequency,

w = observed wave frequency,

d =water depth.

This expression accounts for shoaling, radiation stress (momentum transferfrom currents to waves), and offshore wave direction. It does not account

58

Page 69: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

for 2-dimensional effects which produce convergence or divergence of waverays by features such as bathymetric headlands and current jets. Furthermore,the physical assumptions are that wave motion is purely periodic, thatwave amplitude is small compared to wavelength and depth, that wave andcurrent properties vary slowly over scales of many wavelengths, that waveperiods are small compared to tidal periods, that all quantities vary onlyalong the main axis of the current (no lateral variations), and that thereis no lateral current component across the main axis.

The theory also provides the following relations between the parametersin (3)

w = a + kUcose

a = (gk tanh kd)\ (4)

C 2kd a= \(1 + sinh 2kd) kg

where k is the wave number, and where an analogous set of equations can bewritten for the subscripted variables. A final relationship

k sine = ko sineo (5)

closes the system of transcendental equations which can be solved iterativelyto compute values of T as given by equation (3). For convenience, we havehere computed Tables 15a-i, which present T as a function of f(= w/2n) andU. Each of these nine tables correspond to specific values for the pair(d, eo), where the river entrance depth d takes on the values d = 10, 15,and 20 meters, and the offshore wave direction relative to the current'smain axis takes on the values eo = 0, 30, and 60 degrees. All tablesassume that the offshore current Uo = 0 and that the offshore depth do = 60 m(corresponding to the buoy 46010 location).

Strictly speaking, equations (3)-(5) apply to monochromatic waves. Torelate the predicted amplifications in Table 15 to the observed waves weapproximate the spectrum with a monochromatic wave whose frequency is thatat the spectral peak, f , and whose height is the significant wave height, H .

p s

The theoretically computed wave height transfer function, T , atBuoy 8 in 15 m of water is given in column 8 of Table 14 for each of theintensive observation periods. Values without parentheses refer to incidentangles of 0° and values with parentheses refer to 30° incidence. Qualitatively,the theory predicts wave amplification during ebbs and wave decay duringfloods just as has been observed. The change of the assumed angle ofincidence from 0° to 30° lowers the predicted amplification on ebb byabout 10% and does not affect the flood values in the first decimal place.

For convenience, the ratio of observed to computed wave amplificationsis presented in column 9. For all but one ebb the ratio is within 20% ofunity. There is no clear preference for one offshore incident angle overthe other. However for the ebb of 11 September at 1615 hours the waveheight was underpredicted by up to 50% at 0° incidence. It is for this

59

Page 70: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TAB

LE1

5a.

Wav

eh

eig

ht

am

pli

ficati

on

TC

Eq.

3)

for

d=

10m

,6

0=

0°.

DTH

ETA

ODO

UO1

0.0

O.

06

0.0

0.0

CURR

ENT

SPEE

DF

T-2

.50-2.25-~00-1.75-1.5

0-1

.25

-1.

00

-.7

5-.

SO-.2

50

.00

.25

.50

.75

1.0

01

.25

1.5

01

.75

2.0

02

.25

2.5

0

.05

02

0.0

1.9

21

.84

1.7

71

.71

1.6

51

.60

1.5

51

.50

1.4

61

.41

1.3

81

.34

1.3

01

.27

1.2

41

.21

1.

18

1.

16

1.

13

1.

11

1.

08

.05

51

8.2

1.

89

1.

81

1.

74

1.

67

1.6

11

.~6

1.

51

1.4

61

.4

21.~8

1.3

41

.30

1.2

71

.24

1.2

11

.1

81

.1

51

.1

21

.1

01

.0

71.

05

.06

01

6.7

1.

85

1.

77

1.7

01

.6

31.

57

1.

52

1.

47

1.4

21

.3

81

.3

41

.3

01

.2

61

.2

31

.2

01

.1

71.

14

1.

11

1.0

91

.06

1.0

41

.02

·0

65

15

.41

.8

21

.7

41

.6

61

.5

91

.5

31.

48

1.4

31

.3

81

.34

1.

30

1.2

61

.22

1.

19

1.

16

1.

13

1.

10

1.

08

1.

05

1.

03

1.0

0.9

8.0

70

14

.31

.7

91.

70

1.

62

1.

55

1.

49

1.

44

1.

39

1.

34

1.

30

1.

25

1.

22

1.1

81

.1

51

.1

21

.0

91

.0

61

.0

41

.0

1.9

9.9

7.9

5.0

75

13

.31

.75

1.6

61

58

1.5

11

.45

1.4

01

.34

1.3

01

.25

1.2

11

.1

81

.1

41

.1

11

.08

1.0

51

.02

1.0

0.9

8.9

5.9

3.9

1.0

80

12

.51

.73

1.6

31

.55

1.4

81

.41

1.3

61

.30

1.2

61

.21

1.1

71

.14

1.1

01

.07

1.0

41

.01

.99

.96

.94

.92

.90

.88

.08

51

1.8

1.

70

1.

60

1.

52

1.

44

1.

38

1.3

21

.2

71.

22

1.

18

1.

14

1.

10

1.

07

1.

04

1.

01

.98

.95

.93

.91

.88

.86

.84

·0

90

11

.1

1.6

91

.58

1.4

91

.41

1.

35

1.

29

1.

23

1.1

91

.1

41

.1

01

.0

71

.0

31

.0

0.9

7.9

.5.9

2.9

0.8

7.8

5.8

3.8

1.0

95

10

51

.69

1.5

71

.47

1.3

91

.32

1.2

61

.21

1.

16

1.

111

.0

71

.0

41

.0

0.9

7.9

4.9

2.8

9.8

7.8

5.8

3.8

1.7

91

00

10

.01

.6

91

.5

61

.4

61

.3

71

.3

01

.2

41

.1

81.

13

1.0

91

.0

51

.0

1.9

8.9

5.9

2.8

9.8

7.8

4.8

2.8

0.7

8.7

10

59

.5

1.

71

1.5

71

.4

61

.3

61

.2

91

.2

21

.1

61

.1

11

.0

71

.0

3.9

9.9

6.9

2.9

0.8

7.8

4.8

2.8

0.7

8.7

6.7

11

09

.1

1.7

51

.58

1.4

61

.36

1.2

81

.21

1.

15

1.

10

1.

05

1.

01

.97

.94

.91

.88

.85

.83

.80

.78

.76

.74

.72

0\

·1

15

8.

71

.8

01

.6

11

.4

71

.3

61

.2

81

.2

01

.1

41

.0

91

.0

4.9

9.9

6.9

2.8

9.8

6.8

3.8

1.7

9.7

6.7

4.7

3.7

10

.12

08

.3

1.

87

1.

65

1.

49

1.

37

1.

28

1.

20

1.

13

1.

08

1.

03

.98

.94

.91

.88

.85

.82

.80

.77

.75

.73

.71

.69

·1

25

8.

01

.9

61

.7

01

.5

21

.3

91

.2

91.

20

1.

13

1.0

71

.0

2.9

8.9

4.9

0.8

7.8

4.8

1.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.1

30

7.

72

.09

1.7

61

.56

1.4

11

.3

01

.2

11

.1

31

.0

71

.0

2.9

7.9

3.8

9.8

6.8

3.8

0.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

71

35

7.

42

.27

1.8

51

.60

1.4

41

.31

1.2

21

.14

1.0

71

.01

;9

7.9

2.8

8.8

5.8

2.7

9.7

7.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

61

40

7.

12

.52

1.

95

1.

66

1.4

71

.3

31

.2

31

.1

41

.0

71

.0

1.9

6.9

2.8

8.8

4.8

1.7

8.7

6.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

7.6

51

45

6.9

2.9

12

.09

1.7

31

.51

1.

35

1.

24

1.

15

1.

08

1.

01

.96

.92

.88

.84

.81

.78

.75

.73

.70

.68

.66

.65

15

06

.7

3.

65

2.

27

1.

81

1.

55

1.

38

1.

26

1.

16

1.

08

1.

02

.96

.91

.87

.84

.80

.77

.75

.72

.70

.68

.66

.64

15

56

.5

6.

71

2.

51

1.

91

1.

61

1.

41

1.

28

1.

17

1.

09

1.0

2.9

6.9

1.8

7.8

3.8

0.7

7.7

4.7

2.6

9.6

7.6

5.6

31

60

6.3

****

2.8

52

.03

1.

67

1.

45

1.3

01

.1

91

.1

01

.0

2.9

6.9

1.8

7.8

3.7

9.7

6.7

4.7

1.6

9.6

7.6

5.6

31

65

6.

1**

**3

.41

2.1

81

.7

41

.4

91

.3

21

.2

01

.1

11

.0

3.9

7.9

1.8

7.8

3.7

9.7

6.7

3.7

1.6

8.6

6.6

4.6

2.1

70

5.

9**

**4

.67

2.3

61

.82

1.5

41

.35

1.2

21

.12

1.0

4.9

7.9

2.8

7.8

3.7

9.7

6.7

3.7

0.6

8.6

5.6

3.6

17

55

.7

****

****

2.6

01

.91

1.

59

1.

38

1.

24

1.1

31

.0

4.9

8.9

2.8

7.8

3.7

9.7

5.7

2.7

0.6

7.6

5.6

3.6

1.1

80

5.6

****

****

2.9

22

.02

1.6

41

.41

1.

26

1.

14

1.

05

.98

.92

.87

.82

.79

.75

.72

.69

.67

.65

.63

.61

·1

85

5.

4**

****

**3

.3

92

.1

41

.7

01

.4

51

.2

81.

16

1.

06

.99

.92

.87

.82

.78

.75

.72

.69

.67

.64

.62

.60

.19

05

.3

****

****

4.3

02

.28

1.7

61

.48

1.3

01

.17

1.0

7.9

9.9

3.8

7.8

2.7

8.7

5.7

2.6

9.6

6.6

4.6

2.6

19

55

.1

****

****

8.4

22

.45

1.8

31

.52

1.3

31

.19

1.0

81

.00

.93

.87

.83

.78

.75

.71

.69

.66

.64

.61

.59

.20

05

.0

****

****

****

2.6

51

.91

1.5

61

.35

1.2

01

.09

1.0

0.9

3.8

8.8

3.7

8.7

5.7

1.6

8.6

6.6

3.6

1.5

9.2

05

4.

9**

****

****

**2

.9

21

.9

91.

60

1.

38

1.

22

1.1

01

.0

1.9

4.8

8.8

3.7

8.7

5.7

1.6

8.6

5.6

3.6

1.5

9.2

10

4.8

****

****

****

3.2

92

.08

1.6

51

.40

1.2

31

.11

1.

02

.94

.88

.83

.78

.74

.71

.68

.65

.63

.61

.58

.21

54

.7

****

****

****

3.8

92

.17

1.6

91

.43

1.2

51

.12

1.0

3.9

5.8

8.8

3.7

8.

'74

.71

.68

.65

.63

.60

.58

.22

04

.5

****

****

****

5.3

62

.28

1.7

41

.45

1.2

71

.13

1.0

3.9

5.8

9.8

3.7

8.7

4.7

1.6

8.6

5.6

2.6

0.5

8.2

25

4.4

****

****

****

****

2.

41

1.

79

1.

48

1.2

81

.1

41

.0

4.9

6.8

9.8

3.7

8.7

4.7

1.6

8.6

5.6

2.6

0.5

8.2

30

4.3

****

****

****

****

2.5

61

.84

1.5

01

.30

1.1

51

.05

.96

.89

.83

.79

.74

.71

.67

.64

.62

.60

.57

.23

54

.3

****

****

****

****

2.7

41

.89

1.5

31

.31

1.

16

1.0

5.9

7.8

9.8

4.7

9.7

4.7

1.6

7.6

4.6

2.5

9.5

7.2

40

4.2

****

****

****

****

2.9

71

.94

1.5

61

.33

1.1

71

.06

.97

.90

.B

4.7

9.7

4.7

0.6

7.6

4.6

2.5

9.5

7.2

45

4.

1**

****

****

****

**3

.29

2.0

01

.5B

1.3

41

.IB

1.0

6.9

7.9

0.8

4.7

9.7

4.7

0.6

7.6

4.6

1.5

9.5

7.2

50

4.0

****

****

****

****

3.7

B2

.07

1.6

11

.3

61

.1

91

.0

7.9

8.9

0.8

4.7

9.7

4.7

0.6

7.6

4.6

1.5

9.5

7

Page 71: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TAB

LEIS

b.

Wav

eh

eig

ht

am

pli

ficati

on

T(E

q.

3)

for

d=

10m

,e

=3

0°.

0

0T

HE

TA

OD

OU

O1

0.0

30

.0

60

.00

.0

CU

RR

EN

TS

PE

ED

FT

-2

.50

-2

.25

-2

.00

-1

.75

-1

.50

-1

.25

-1

.00

-.7

5-.5

0-.2

50

.00

.25

.50

.75

1.0

01

.25

1.5

01

.75

2.0

02

.25

2.5

0

.05

02

0.0

1.8

01

.73

1.6

61

.61

1.5

51

.50

1.4

51

.41

1.

37

1.

33

1.

30

1.

26

1.

23

1.

20

1.

17

1.

15

1.

12

1.

10

1.

07

1.

05

1.

03

.05

51

8.2

1.7

71

.7

01

.6

31

.5

71

.5

21

.4

71

.4

21

.3

81

.3

41

.3

01

.2

61.

23

1.

20

1.

17

1.

14

1.

11

1.0

91

.06

1.0

41

.02

1.0

0.0

60

16

.71

.7

41

.6

61.

60

1.

53

1.

48

1.

43

1.

38

1.

34

1.

30

1.

26

1.

23

1.

19

1.

16

1.

13

1.

11

1.0

81

.05

1.0

31

.01

.99

.97

.06

51

5.4

1.

70

1.6

31.

56

1.

50

1.

44

1.

39

1.

34

1.

30

1.

26

1.

22

1.

19

1.

16

1.

13

1.'

10

1.

07

1.

04

1.

02

1.

00

.98

.96

.94

.07

01

4.3

1.

67

1.

59

1.

52

1.

46

1.

40

1.

35

1.

30

1.

26

1.2

21

.1

91

.1

51

.1

21

.0

91

.0

61

.0

31

.0

1.9

9.9

6.9

4.9

2.9

0.0

75

13

.31

.64

1.5

61

.49

1.4

21

.37

1.3

11

.2

71

.2

21

.1

81

.1

51.

11

1.0

81

.05

1.0

21

.00

.97

.95

.93

.91

.89

.87

.OB

O1

2.

51

.6

21.

53

1.

45

1.

39

1.

33

1.

28

1.

23

1.

19

1.

1~

1.

11

1.

08

1.

05

1.

02

.99

.96

.94

.92

.90

.88

.86

.84

.OB

51

1.8

1.6

01

.50

1.4

31

.36

1.3

01

.24

1.2

01

.15

1.1

11

.0

81

.0

41

.0

1.9

8.9

6.9

3.9

1.8

9.8

7.8

5.8

3.8

1.0

90

11

.1

1.~B

1.4

81

.40

1.3

31

.27

1.2

11

.1

71

.1

21

.0

81

.0

51

.0

1.9

8.9

5.9

3.9

0.8

B.8

6.8

4.8

2.8

0.7

8.0

95

10

.51

.5

81.

47

1.

38

1.

31

1.

25

1.

19

1.

14

1.

10

1.

06

1.

02

.99

.96

.93

.90

.88

.85

.83

.81

.79

.78

.76

·1

00

10

.01

.5

81

.4

71

.3

71

.2

91

.2

31

.1

71

.1

21

.0

71

.0

31

.0

0.9

6.9

3.9

0.8

8.8

5.8

3.8

1.7

9.7

7.7

6.7

10

59

.5

1.6

01

.47

1.3

71

.29

1.2

11

.15

1.1

01

.06

1.0

1.9

8.9

4.9

1.8

9.8

6.8

4.8

1.7

9.7

7.7

5.7

4.7

11

09

.1

1.6

31

.48

1.3

71

.28

1.2

11

.1

41

.0

91

.0

41

.0

0.9

6.9

3.9

0.8

7.8

4.8

2.8

0.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

10

11

58

.7

1.

68

1.

51

1.

38

1.

29

1.

21

1.

14

1.

08

1.

03

.99

.95

.92

.89

.86

.83

.81

.78

.76

.74

.73

.71

.69

.....·

12

08

.3

1.

74

1.

54

1.

40

1.

29

1.

21

1.

14

1.

08

1.

03

.98

.94

.91

.88

.85

.82

.80

.77

.75

.73

.72

.70

.68

·1

25

8.

01

.82

1.5

91

.43

1.3

11

.2

21

.1

41

.0

81

.0

2.9

8.9

4.9

0.8

7.8

4.8

1.7

9.7

7.7

4.7

2.7

1.6

9.6

7.1

30

7.

71

.9

31

.6

41

.4

61

.3

31

.2

31

.1

51

.0

81

.0

2.9

8.9

3.9

0.8

6.8

3.8

1.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

13

57

.4

2.0

91

.72

1.5

01

.35

1.2

41

.15

1.0

81

.02

.97

.93

•.8

9.8

6.8

3.8

0.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

8.6

14

07

.1

2.3

01

.8

11

.5

51

.3

81

.2

61

.1

71.

09

1.

03

.9B

.93

.89

.86

.82

.80

.77

.75

.73

.71

.69

.67

.66

·1

45

6.9

2.6

21

.93

1.6

11

.4

21

.2

81

.1

81

.1

01

.0

3.9

8.9

3.8

9.8

5.8

2.7

9.7

7.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

7.6

15

06

.7

3.1

92

.08

1.6

91

.46

1.3

11

.2

01

.1

11

.04

.98

.93

.89

.85

.82

.79

.76

.74

.72

.70

.68

.66

.65

·1

55

6.

54

.77

2.2

91

.77

1.5

11

.3

41

.2

11

.1

21

.0

5.9

9.9

3.8

9.8

5.8

2.7

9.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

6.6

16

06

.3

****

2.

57

1.

88

1.

56

1.

37

1.

24

1.

13

1.

06

.99

.94

.89

.85

.82

.79

.76

.74

.71

.69

.67

.66

.64

·1

65

6.

1**

**3

.02

2.0

11

.63

1.

41

1.

26

1.

15

1.

07

1.

00

.94

.89

.35

.82

.79

.76

.73

.71

.69

.67

.65

.64

·1

70

5.

9**

**3

.89

2.1

71

.70

1.4

51

.28

1.1

71

.08

1.0

1.9

5.9

0.8

6.8

2.7

9.7

6.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

7.6

5.6

17

5~.

7**

****

**2

.37

1.7

81

.49

1.3

11

.1

91

.0

91

.0

1.9

5.9

0.8

6.8

2.7

9.7

6.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

7.6

5.6

18

05

.6**

****

**2

.64

1.8

81

.54

1.3

41

.20

1.1

01

.02

.96

.91

.86

.82

.79

.76

.73

.71

.69

.67

.65

.63

·1

85

5.

4**

****

**3

.02

1.9

81

.60

1.3

71

.23

1.1

21

.03

.97

.91

.86

.82

.79

.76

.73

.71

.69

.67

.65

.63

·1

90

5.

3**

****

**3

.68

2.1

11

.6

61

.4

11

.2

51

.1

31

.0

4.9

7.9

1.8

7.8

3.7

9.7

6.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

7.6

5.6

19

55

.1

****

****

5.7

32

.25

1.7

21

.44

1.2

71

.15

1.0

5.9

8.9

2.8

7.8

3.7

9.7

6.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

7.6

5.6

3.2

00

5.

0**

****

****

**2

.43

1.7

91

.48

1.2

91

.16

1.0

6.9

9.9

3.8

7.8

3.7

9.7

6.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

6.6

5.6

3.2

05

4.9

****

****

****

2.6

51

.86

1.5

21

.32

1.l

B1

.07

.99

.93

.88

.83

.80

.76

.73

.71

.69

.66

.65

.63

.21

04

.8

****

****

****

2.

95

1.

94

1.

56

1.

34

1.

19

1.

09

1.

00

.94

.88

.84

.80

.76

.73

.71

.69

.66

.65

.63

.21

54

.7

****

****

****

3.4

12

.02

1.6

01

36

1.2

11

.10

1.0

1.9

4.8

9.8

4.8

0.7

7.7

4.7

1.6

9.6

6.6

5.6

3.2

20

4.

5**

****

****

**4

.31

2.

12

1.

64

1.

39

1.

22

1.

11

1.

02

.95

.89

.84

.80

.77

.74

.71

.69

.66

.65

.63

.22

54

.4**

****

****

****

**2

.23

1.6

81

.41

1.

24

1.

12

1.

02

.95

.89

.84

.80

.77

.74

.71

.69

.67

.65

.63

.23

04

.3

****

****

****

****

2.3

61

.73

1.4

41

.25

1.1

31

.03

.96

.90

.85

.81

.77

.74

.71

.69

.67

.65

.63

.23

54

.3**

****

****

****

**2

.5

11

.78

1.4

61

.27

1.

14

1.0

4.9

6.9

0.8

5.8

1.7

7.7

4.7

1.6

9.6

7.6

5.6

3.2

40

4.

2**

****

****

****

**2

.7

11

.8

31

.4

81

.2

81

.1~

1.

04

.97

.90

.85

.81

.77

.74

.71

.69

.67

.65

.63

.24

54

.1

****

****

****

****

2.9

61

.88

1.5

11

.3

01

.1

51

.0

5.9

7.9

1.8

5.8

1.7

7.7

4.7

1.6

9.6

7.6

5.6

3.2

50

4.0

****

****

****

****

3.3

31

.94

1.5

31

.31

1.

16

1.

06

.97

.91

.86

.81

.77

.74

.71

.69

.66

.64

.63

Page 72: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABL

ElS

c.W

ave

heig

ht

am

pli

ficati

on

TC

Eq.

3)

for

d=

10m

,e

=6

0°.

0

DTH

ETA

OD

OU

O1

0.0

60

.06

0.0

0.0

CU

RR

ENT

SPE

ED

FT

-2

.50

-2

.25

-2

.00

-1

.75

-1

.50

-1

.25

-1

.00

-.7

5-.5

0-.2

50

.00

.25

.50

.75

1.0

01

.25

1.5

01.

75

2.0

02

.25

2.5

0

.05

02

0.0

1.

39

1.

33

1.

29

1.

24

1.

20

1.1

61.

13

1.

10

1.

07

1.

04

1.

01

.99

.96

.94

.92

.90

.88

.86

.85

.83

.82

.05

51

8.2

1.3

61

.3

11

.2

61

.2

21

.1

81

.1

41

.1

01

.0

71

.0

41.

01

.99

.96

.94

.92

.90

.88

.86

.84

.83

.81

.79

.06

01

6.7

1.

34

1.

28

1.

23

1.

19

1.

15

1.

11

1.

08

1.

04

1.0

1.9

9.9

6.9

4.9

1.8

9.8

7.8

5.8

3.8

2.8

0.7

9.7

7.0

65

15

.41

.3

11

.2

61.

21

1.1

61.

12

1.

08

1.

05

1.0

2.9

9.9

6.9

3.9

1.8

9.8

7.8

5.8

3.8

1.7

9.7

8.7

6.7

5.0

70

14

.31

.2

91

.2

31.

18

1.1

31

.0

91.

05

1.

02

.99

.96

.93

.91

.88

.86

.84

.82

.80

.78

.77

.75

.74

.72

.07

51

3.3

1.

27

1.2

11

.15

1.1

11

.0

61

.0

2.9

9.9

6.9

3.9

0.8

8.8

5.8

3.8

1.7

9.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

3.7

1.7

0.0

80

12

.5

1.

25

1.

18

1.

13

1.

08

1.0

41

.0

0.9

6.9

3.9

0.8

8.8

5.8

3.8

1.7

9.7

7.7

5.7

4.7

2.7

1.6

9.6

8.0

85

11

.8

1.2

31.

16

1.11

1.

06

1.0

1.9

7.9

4.9

1.8

8.8

5.8

3.8

1.7

8.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

1.7

0.6

9.6

7.6

6.0

90

11

.1

1.

22

1.

15

1.0

91

.0

4.9

9.9

5.9

2.8

9.8

6.8

3.8

1.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

8.6

7.6

5.6

4.0

95

10

.51

.2

21

.1

41.

08

1.0

2.9

8.9

4.9

0.8

7.8

4.8

1.7

9.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

8.6

6.6

5.6

4.6

10

01

0.

01

.22

1.1

41

.07

1.0

1.9

6.9

2.8

9.8

5.8

2.8

0.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

1.7

0.6

8.6

6.6

5.6

4.6

2.6

10

59

.5

1.2

31

.14

1.0

71

.01

.96

.91

.88

.84

.81

.79

.76

.74

.72

.70

.68

.67

.65

.64

.63

.62

.60

·1

10

9.

11

.2

61

.1

51.

07

1.

01

.95

.91

.87

.84

.81

.78

.75

.73

.71

.69

.68

.66

.65

.63

.62

.61

.60

0-

11

58

.7

1.

29

1.

17

1.0

81

.0

1.9

5.9

1.8

7.8

3.8

0.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

7.6

6.6

4.6

3.6

1.6

0.5

9N

12

08

.31

.3

31

.1

91.

09

1.0

2.9

6.9

1.8

7.8

3.8

0.7

7.7

5.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

7.6

5.6

4.6

2.6

1.6

0.5

91

25

8.0

1.3

91.

23

1.1

11

.0

3.9

7.9

1.8

7.8

3.8

0.7

7.7

5.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

7.6

5.6

4.6

2.6

1.6

0.5

91

30

7.

71

.4

61

.2

71

.1

41.

05

.98

.92

.87

.84

.80

.77

.75

.72

.70

.68

.67

.65

.64

.62

.61

.60

.59

13

57

.4

1.

56

1.3

21

.1

71

.0

7.9

9.9

3.8

8.8

4.8

1.7

8.7

5.7

3.7

0.6

9.6

7.6

5.6

4.6

2.6

1.6

0.5

14

07

.1

1.

69

1.

38

1.

21

1.

09

1.

01

.94

.89

.85

.81

.78

.75

.73

.71

.69

.67

.66

.64

.63

_6

2.6

0.5

91

45

6.

91

.88

1.4

61

.25

1.1

21

.03

.96

.90

.86

.82

.79

.76

.73

.71

.69

.68

.66

.64

.63

.62

.61

.60

15

06

.7

2.

18

1.

56

1.3

01.

15

1.

05

.97

.91

.87

.83

.79

.76

.74

.72

.70

.68

.66

.65

.64

.62

.61

.60

15

56

.5

2.

78

1.

69

1.

36

1.

19

1.

07

.99

.93

.88

.84

.80

.77

.75

.72

.70

.69

.67

.65

.64

.63

.62

.60

16

06

.3**

**1

.86

1.4

31

.23

1.1

01

.01

.94

.89

.85

.81

.78

.75

.73

.71

.69

.68

.66

.65

.63

.62

.61

16

56

.1

****

2.

11

1.5

21

.2

71.

13

1.0

3.9

6.9

0.8

6.8

2.7

9.7

6.7

4:7

2.7

0.6

8.6

7.6

5.6

4.6

3.6

17

05

.9

****

2.5

21

.62

1.3

31

.16

1.0

5.9

7.9

2.8

7.8

3.8

0.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

7.6

6.6

5.6

3.6

17

55

.7

****

3.4

81

.75

1.3

81

.20

1.0

8.9

9.9

3.8

8.8

4.8

1.7

8.7

6.7

3.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

7.6

5.6

4.6

18

05

.6

****

7.3

11

.92

1.4

51

.23

1.1

01

.01

.95

.89

.85

.82

.79

.77

.74

.72

.71

.69

.67

.66

.65

.63

18

55

.4

****

6.1

02

.14

1.5

31

.2

71.

13

1.0

3.9

6.9

1.8

7.8

3.8

0.7

8.7

5.7

3.7

1.7

0.6

8.6

7.6

5.6

19

05

.3

****

****

2.4

71

.61

1.

32

1.

16

1.0

5.9

8.9

2.8

8.8

4.8

1.7

9.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

1.6

9.6

7.6

6.6

19

55

.1

****

****

3.0

81

.71

1.

36

1.1

91

.0

7.9

9.9

4.8

9.8

5.8

2.8

0.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

1.7

0.6

8.6

7.6

5.2

00

5.

0**

****

**7

.15

1.8

21

.41

1.2

21

.0

91

.0

1.9

5.9

0.8

6.8

3.8

1.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

9.6

7.6

6.2

05

4.

9**

****

****

**1

.9

61

.4

71

.2

51

.1

21

.0

3.9

6.9

2.8

8.8

4.8

2.7

9.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

8.6

6.2

10

4.8

*«.*

***

****

**2

.1

41

.5

21

.2

81.

14

1.

04

.98

.93

.89

.85

.83

.80

.78

.76

.73

.72

.70

.68

.66

.21

54

.7

****

****

****

2.3

81

.59

1.3

11.

16

1.0

6.9

9.9

4.9

0.8

6.8

4.8

1.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

7.2

20

4.

5**

****

****

**2

.75

1.6

51

.34

1.1

81

.08

1.0

0.9

5.9

1.8

7.8

4.8

2.7

9.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

7.2

25

4.4

****

****

****

****

1.7

21

.37

1.2

01

.09

1.0

2.9

6.9

2.8

8.8

5.8

2.8

0.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

7.2

30

4.3

****

****

****

****

1.8

11

.4

11

.2

21

.1

11

.0

3.9

7.9

3.8

9.8

6.8

3_

81

.78

.76

.73

.71

.69

.67

.23

54

.3

****

****

****

****

1.9

01.

44

1.2

41

.1

21

.0

4.9

8.9

4.9

0.8

7.8

4.8

1.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

1.6

9.6

7.2

40

4.2

****

****

****

****

2.0

21

.48

1.2

61

.13

1.0

5.9

9.9

5.9

1.8

7.8

4.8

2.7

9.7

6.7

4.7

2.6

9.6

7.2

45

41

****

****

****

****

2.

16

1.5

11.

28

1.1

41.

06

1.

00

.95

.91

.88

.85

.82

.79

.77

.74

.72

.69

.67

.25

04

.0***~

****

****

****

2.3

51

.55

1.2

91

.16

1.0

71

.01

.96

.92

.89

.85

.82

.79

.77

.74

.72

.69

.67

Page 73: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TAB

LE15

d.W

ave

heig

ht

am

pli

ficati

on

T(E

q.3

)fo

rd

=15

m,

e=

0°.

0

DT

HE

TA

OD

OU

O1

5.0

O.

06

0.0

0.0

CU

RR

EN

TS

PE

ED

FT

-2.5

0-2

.25

-2.0

0-1

.7

5-1

.50-1.2~-1.00

-.7

5-.5

0-.2

50

.00

.25

.50

.75

1.0

01

.25

1.5

01

.75

2.0

02

.25

2.5

0

.05

02

0.0

1.

66

1.6

11.

56

1.

51

1.

47

1.

43

1.

39

1.

35

1.

32

1.

29

1.

26

1.2

31

.2

01

.1

81

.1

51

.1

31

.1

11

.08

1.0

61

.04

1.0

2.0

55

18

.21

.6

41

.5

81

.5

31.

48

1.

44

1.

40

1.

36

1.3

21

.2

91

.2

61

.2

31

.2

01

.1

71.

15

1.

12

1.

10

1.

08

1.0

51

.0

31

.0

11

.0

06

01

6.7

1.6

21

.56

1.5

01

.46

1.4

11

.3

71

.3

31

.2

91

.2

61

.2

31

.2

01

.1

71

.1

41

.1

11

.09

1.0

71

.04

1.0

21

.00

.98

.97

.06

51

5.4

1.

59

1.

53

1.

48

1.

43

1.

38

1.

34

1.

30

1.

26

1.

22

1.

19

1.

16

1.

13

1.

11

1.0

81

.06

1.0

31

.01

.99

.97

.95

.93

.07

01

4.3

1.

57

1.

51

1.4

51

.40

1.

35

1.

30

1.

26

1.

23

1.

19

1.

16

1.

13

1.

10

1.

07

1.

05

1.

02

1.

00

.98

.96

.94

.92

.90

.07

51

3.3

1.

55

1.

48

1.4

21

.3

71

.3

21

.2

71

.2

31

.1

91

.1

61

.1

31

.09

1.

07

1.

04

1.0

1.9

9.9

7.9

5.9

3.9

1.8

9.8

7.0

80

12

.51.

54

1.4

71

.4

01.

34

1.

29

1.

24

1.

20

1.

16

1.

13

1.

09

1.

06

1.

03

1.

01

.98

.96

.94

.91

.89

.88

.86

.84

.08

51

1.

81.

53

1.4

51

.3

81

.3

21

.2

71

.2

21

.1

71

.1

31

.1

01

.0

61

.0

31

.0

0.9

8.9

5.9

3.9

1.8

8.8

6.8

5.8

3.8

09

01

1.

11.

53

1.

44

1.

37

1.

30

1.

25

1.

20

1.

15

1.1

11

.0

71

.0

41

.0

1.9

8.9

5.9

2.9

0.8

8.8

6.8

4.8

2.8

0.7

8.0

95

10

.51

.5

41

.4

41

.3

61

.2

91

.2

31

.1

81

.1

31

.0

91

.0

51

.0

1.9

8.9

5.9

2.9

0.8

8.8

5.8

3.8

1.7

9.7

8.7

6.1

00

10

.01

.5

61

.4

51.

36

1.

29

1.

22

1.1

61

.1

21.

07

1.

03

1.

00

.96

.93

.90

.88

.85

.83

.81

.79

.77

.76

.74

·1

05

9.

51

.6

01.

47

1.

37

1.

29

1.

22

1.

16

1.

11

1.

06

1.

02

.98

.95

.92

.89

.86

.84

.81

.79

.77

.75

.74

.72

·1

10

9.

11

.6

51

.5

01

.3

91

.3

01

.2

21

.1

61

.1

01

.0

51

.0

1.9

7.9

3.9

0.8

7.8

5.8

2.8

0.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

1Cl

"I·

11

58

.7

1.7

21

.5

51

.42

1.3

11

.2

31

.1

61

.1

01

.0

51

.0

0.9

6.9

3.8

9.8

6.8

4.8

1.7

9.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

1.6

9w

·1

20

8.

31

.8

21

.6

01

.4

51.

34

1.

24

1.

17

1.

10

1.

05

1.

00

.96

.92

.89

.86

.83

.80

.78

.76

.74

.72

.70

.68

·1

25

8.

01

.9

41.

67

1.5

01

.3

61

.2

61

.1

81

.1

11

.0

51

.0

0.9

6.9

2.8

8.8

5.8

2.7

9.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

7.1

30

7.

72

.1

01

.7

61

.5

51

.4

01

.2

91

.1

91

.1

21

.0

61

.0

0.9

6.9

1.8

8.8

5.8

2.7

9.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

13

57

.4

2.3

01

.87

1.6

21

.44

1.3

11

.2

11

.1

31

.0

61

.0

1.9

6.9

1.8

8.8

4.8

1.7

8.7

6.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

7.6

14

07

.1

2.

59

2.0

01.

69

1.

49

1.

35

1.2

31

.1

51

.0

71

.0

1.9

6.9

2.8

8.8

4.8

1.7

8.7

5.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

7.6

14

56

.9

3.

01

2.

16

1.

78

1.5

41

.3

81

.2

61

.1

61

.0

91

.0

2.9

7.9

2.8

8.8

4.8

1.7

8.7

5.7

3.7

0.6

8.6

6.6

15

06

.7

3.7

42

.35

1.8

81

.6

01

.4

21

.2

91

.1

81

.1

01

.0

3.9

7.9

2.8

8.8

4.8

1.7

8.7

5.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

6.6

41

55

6.

56

.59

2.6

11

.99

1.6

71

.46

1.3

11

.2

D1.

11

1.

04

.98

.93

.88

.84

.81

.77

.75

.72

.70

.67

.65

.64

.16

06

.3**

**2

.95

2.

12

1.7

41

.5

11.

34

1.

22

1.

13

1.

05

.99

.93

.88

.84

.81

.77

.74

.72

.69

.67

.65

.63

·1

65

6.

1**

**3

.49

2.2

71

.82

1.5

51

.38

1.2

51

.14

1.0

69

9.9

4.8

9.8

4.8

1.7

7.7

4.7

2.6

9.6

7.6

5.6

17

05

.9**

**4

.73

2.4

41

.90

1.6

01

.41

1.2

71

.1

61

.0

71

.0

0.9

4.8

9.8

5.8

1.7

7.7

4.7

1.6

9.6

7.6

4.6

17

55

.7

****

****

2.6

71

.99

1.6

51

.44

1.2

91

.17

1.0

81

.01

.95

.89

.85

.81

.77

.74

.71

.69

.66

.64

.62

.18

05

.6

****

****

2.9

72

.09

1.7

11

.4

71.

31

1.1

91

.0

91

.0

2.9

5.9

0.8

5.8

1.7

7.7

4.7

1.6

8.6

6.6

4.6

21

85

5.

4**

****

**3

.43

2.2

01

.76

1.5

11

.3

31

.2

11

.11

1.

03

.96

.90

.85

.81

.77

.74

.7

1.6

8.6

6.6

4.6

2.1

90

5.

3**

****

**4

.3

22

.3

31

.8

21

.5

41

.3

61

.2

21

.1

21

.0

3.9

6.9

0.8

5.8

1.7

7.7

4.7

1.6

8.6

6.6

3.6

19

55

.1

****

****

****

2.4

81

.88

1.5

71

.38

1.2

31

.13

1.0

4.9

7.9

1.8

6.8

1.7

7.7

4.7

1.6

8.6

6.6

3.6

1.2

00

5.

0**

****

****

**2

.68

1.9

51

.61

1.

40

1.

25

1.

14

1.

05

.97

.91

.86

.81

.77

.74

.71

.68

.65

.63

.61

.20

54

.9

****

****

****

2.9

32

.02

1.6

41

.42

1.2

61

.14

1.0

5.9

8.9

1.8

6.8

1.7

7.7

4.7

1.6

8.6

5.6

3.6

1.2

10

4.8

****

****

****

3.

29

2.

10

1.

68

1.4

41

.2

71

.1

51

.0

6.9

8.9

2.8

6.8

1.7

7.7

4.7

1.6

8.6

5.6

3.6

0.2

15

4.

7**

****

****

**3

.89

2.

19

1.7

21

.4

61

.29

1.

16

1.

06

.98

.92

.86

.82

.77

.74

.70

.67

.65

.62

.60

.22

04

.5

****

****

****

5.3

62

.29

1.7

61

.48

1.3

01

.17

1.0

7.9

9.9

2.8

6.8

2.7

7.7

4.7

0.6

7.6

5.6

2.6

0.2

25

4.

4**

****

****

****

**2

.42

1.8

01

.50

1.3

11

.1

81

.0

7.9

9.9

2.8

6.8

1.7

7.7

3.7

0.6

7.6

4.6

2.6

0.2

30

4.3

****

****

****

****

2.5

61

.85

1.5

21

.32

1.1

81

.08

.99

.92

.86

.81

.77

.73

.70

.67

.64

.62

.60

.23

54

.3**

****

****

****

**2

.7

41.

90

1.5

41

.3

31.

19

1.

08

.99

.92

.86

.81

.77

.73

.70

.67

.64

.62

.59

.24

04

.2**

****

****

****

**2

.98

1.9

51

.57

1.3

51

.19

1.0

8.9

9.9

2.8

6.8

1.7

7.7

3.7

0.6

7.6

4.6

1.5

9.2

45

4.

1**

****

****

****

**3

.29

2.0

11

.59

1.3

61

.20

1.0

91

.00

.92

.86

.81

.77

.73

.69

.66

.64

.61

.59

.25

04

.0**

****

****

****

**3

.78

2.0

71

.62

1.3

71

.21

1.

09

1.

00

.92

.86

.81

.77

.73

.69

.66

.63

.61

.59

Page 74: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TAB

LE1

5e.

Wav

eu

eig

ht

am

pli

ficati

on

TC

Eq.

3)

for

d=

15m

ta

=3

0°.

0

0TH

ETA

ODO

UO1

5.0

30

.06

0.0

0.0

CURR

ENT

SPEE

DF

T-2

.50

-2

.25

-2

.00

-1

.75

-1

.50

-1

.25

-1

.00

-.7

5-.5

0-.2

50

.00

.25

.50

.75

1.0

01

.25

1.5

01

.75

2.0

02

.25

2.5

0

.05

02

0.0

1.

56

1.5

11

.47

1.4

31

.39

1.3

51

.31

1.

28

1.

25

1.

22

1.

19

1.

17

1.

14

1.

12

1.

10

1.

08

1.

05

1.

04

1.

02

1.

00

.98

.05

51

8.2

1.

54

1.

49

1.4

41

.4

01

.3

61

.3

21

.2

91

.2

51

.2

21.

19

1.

17

1.

14

1.

11

1.0

91

.07

1.0

51

.03

1.0

1.9

9.9

7.9

5.0

60

16

.71

.5

21.

47

1.

42

1.

37

1.

33

1.

29

1.

26

1.

22

1.

19

1.1

61

.1

41

.1

11

.09

1.0

61

.04

1.0

21

.00

.98

.96

.94

.93

.06

51

5.4

1.

50

1.

44

1.

39

1.3

51

.3

01

.2

61.

23

1.

19

1.

16

1.

13

1.

11

1.0

81

.05

1.0

31

.01

.99

.97

.95

.93

.91

.90

.07

01

4.3

1.

48

1.4

21

.3

71

.3

21

.2

71

.2

31

.2

01

.1

61

.1

31.

10

1.

07

1.

05

1.

02

1.

00

.98

.96

.94

.92

.90

.89

.87

.07

51

3.3

1.4

61

.40

1.3

41

.29

12

51

.21

1.

17

1.

13

1.

10

1.

07

1.

04

1.

02

.99

.97

.95

.93

.91

.89

.87

.86

.84

.08

01

2.5

1.

45

1.

38

1.

32

1.

27

1.

22

1.

18

1.

14

1.

11

1.

07

1.

04

1.

01

.99

.96

.94

.92

.90

.88

.86

.85

.83

.81

.08

51

1.

81

.4

41.

37

1.

30

1.2

51.

20

1.

16

1.

12

1.0

81

.0

51.

02

.99

.96

.94

.91

.89

.87

.85

.84

.82

.80

.79

.09

01

1.

11

.4

41

.3

61.

29

1.

23

1.1

81

.1

41

.0

91

.0

61

.0

2.9

9.9

6.9

4.9

1.8

9.8

7.8

5.8

3.8

1.8

0.7

8.7

6.0

95

10

.51.

45

1.3

61

.2

91

.2

21

.1

71

.1

21.

08

1.

04

1.0

0.9

7.9

4.9

2.8

9.8

7.8

5.8

3.8

1.7

9.7

7.7

6.7

10

01

0.0

1.

47

1.3

71

.2

91

.2

21

.1

61

.1

11

.0

61

.0

2.9

9.9

6.9

3.9

0.8

7.8

5.8

3.8

1.7

9.7

7.7

6.7

4.7

3.1

05

9.

51

.5

01

.3

91.

30

1.

22

1.

16

1.

10

1.

06

1.

01

.98

.94

.91

.89

.86

.84

.81

.79

.78

.76

.74

.73

.71

.11

09

.1

1.5

51

.4

11

.3

11

.23

1.1

61

.10

1.0

51

.01

.97

.94

.90

.88

.85

.83

.80

.78

.76

.75

.73

.71

.70

0'\

.11

58

.7

1.

61

1.4

51.

34

1.2

41.

17

1.1

11.

05

1.

01

.97

.93

.90

.87

.84

.82

.79

.77

.76

.74

.72

.70

.69

~

·1

20

8.3

1.

69

1.

50

1.3

71

.2

71.

18

1.

11

1.

06

1.0

1.9

7.9

3.8

9.8

6.8

4.8

1.7

9.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

1.7

0.6

12

58

.0

1.8

01.

57

1.

41

1.

29

1.

20

1.

13

1.0

71

.0

1.9

7.9

3.8

9.8

6.8

3.8

1.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

1.6

9.6

13

07

.7

1.

94

1.6

51.

46

1.3

21.

22

1.1

41

.0

81.

02

.97

.93

.89

.86

.83

.81

.78

.76

.74

.72

.70

.69

.67

·1

35

7.

42

.1

21.

74

1.5

21

.3

61

.2

51

.1

61

.0

91

.0

3.9

8.9

3.9

0.8

6.8

3.8

0.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

14

07

.1

2.3

61

.86

1.5

81

.41

1.

28

1.

18

1.

10

1.

04

.99

.94

.90

.86

.83

.80

.78

.76

.74

.72

.70

.68

.67

·1

45

6.9

2.7

12

.00

1.6

61

.46

1.3

11

.2

01.

12

1.

05

.99

.95

.90

.87

.83

.81

.78

.76

.73

.72

.70

.68

.66

.15

06

.7

3.

29

2.

17

1.7

51.

51

1.3

51

.23

1.1

41

.06

1.0

0.9

5.9

1.8

7.8

4.8

1.7

8.7

6.7

3.7

1.7

0.6

8.6

15

56

.5

4.

81

2.

38

1.8

51.

57

1.

39

1.2

61.

It>1

.0

81

.0

1.9

6.9

1.8

8.8

4.8

1.7

8.7

6.7

3.7

1.7

0.6

8.6

61

60

6.

3**

**2

.67

1.9

71

.64

1.4

31

.29

1.1

81

.09

1.0

3.9

7.9

2.8

8.8

4.8

1.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

1.7

0.6

8.6

61

65

6.

1**

**3

.11

2.1

01

.7

01.

47

1.

32

1.2

01

.11

1.0

4.9

8.9

3.8

8.8

5.8

1.7

9.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

61

70

5.

9**

**3

.96

2.2

61

.78

1.5

21

.35

1.2

21

.13

1.0

5.9

9.9

3.8

9.8

5.8

2.7

9.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

61

75

5.

7**

****

**2

.45

1.8

61

.56

1.3

81

.24

1.1

41

.06

1.0

0.9

4.8

9.8

6.8

2.7

9.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

18

05

.6

****

****

2.7

01

.95

1.6

11

.4

11.

26

1.

16

1.0

71.

00

.95

.90

.86

.82

.79

.76

.74

.72

.70

.68

.66

·1

85

5.

4**

****

**3

.07

2.0

51

.66

1.4

41

.28

1.1

71

.08

1.0

1.9

5.9

0.8

6.8

3.7

9.7

7.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

19

05

.3

****

****

3.7

12

.16

1.7

21

.47

1.3

01

.19

1.0

91

.02

.96

.91

.87

.83

.80

.77

.74

.72

.70

.68

.66

·1

95

5.

1**

****

**5

.75

2.3

01

.77

1.5

01

.32

1.2

01

.10

1.0

3.9

7.9

1.8

7.8

3.8

0.7

7.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

6.2

00

5.

0**

****

****

**2

.46

1.8

31

.53

1.3

41

.21

1.1

11.

03

.97

.92

.87

.83

.80

.77

.74

.72

.70

.68

.66

.20

54

.9

****

****

****

2.6

71

.89

1.5

61

.36

1.2

21

.12

1.0

4.9

7.9

2.8

7.8

4.8

0.7

7.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

6.2

10

4.8

****

****

****

2.

96

1.

96

1.6

01.

38

1.

24

1.1

31.

05

.98

.92

.88

.84

.80

.77

.74

.72

.70

.68

.66

.21

54

.7

****

****

****

3.4

12

.04

1.6

31

.40

1.2

51

.14

1.0

5.9

8.9

3.8

8.8

4.8

0.7

7.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

6.2

20

4.

5**

****

****

**4

.31

2.1

31

.67

1.4

21

.26

1.1

41

.06

.99

.93

.88

.84

.80

.77

.74

.72

.70

.68

.66

.22

54

.4

****

****

****

8.

15

2.

24

1.7

01.

44

1.

27

1.1

51

.0

6.9

9.9

3.8

8.8

4.8

0.7

7.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

6.2

30

4.

3**

****

****

****

**2

.36

1.7

41

.46

1.2

81

.16

1.0

6.9

9.9

3.8

8.8

4.8

0.7

7.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

6.2

35

4.

3**

****

****

****

**2

.52

1.7

91

.48

1.2

91

.16

1.0

7.9

9.9

3.8

8.8

4.8

0.7

7.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

6.2

40

4.2

****

****

****

****

2.

71

1.8

31

.5

01

.3

01.

17

1.

07

.99

.93

.88

.84

.80

.77

.74

.72

.69

.67

.66

.24

54

.1

****

****

****

****

2.9

61

.89

1.5

21

.31

1.1

71.

07

1.

00

.93

.88

.84

.80

.77

.74

.71

.69

.67

.65

.25

04

.0

****

****

****

****

3.3

31

.94

1.5

41

.32

1.1

81

.08

1.0

0.9

3.8

8.8

4.8

0.7

7.7

4.7

1.6

9.6

7.6

5

Page 75: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABL

ElS

i.W

ave

heig

ht

am

pli

ficati

on

TC

Eq.

3)

for

d=

15m

,e

=6

0°.

0

0T

HE

TA

OD

OU

O1

5.0

60

.06

0.0

O.

0

CU

RR

EN

TS

PE

ED

FT

-2.5

0-2

.25

-2.0

0-1

.75

-1.5

0-1

.25

-1.0

0-

75

-.5

0-.2

50

.00

.25

.50

.75

1.0

01

.25

1.5

01

.75

2.0

02

.25

2.5

0

.05

02

0.0

1.2

21

.18

1.

15

1.1

21

.09

1.0

61

.03

1.0

1.9

9.9

7.9

5.9

3.9

1.8

9.8

8.8

6.8

5.8

3.8

2.8

1.7

05

51

8.

21

.20

1.1

61

.13

1.1

01

.07

1.0

41

.01

.99

.97

.95

.93

.91

.89

.87

.86

.84

.83

.81

.80

.79

.77

.06

01

6.7

1.

19

1.

15

1.

11

1.

08

1.

05

1.

02

.99

.97

.95

.93

.91

.89

.87

.85

.84

.82

.81

.79

.78

.77

.75

.06

51

5.4

1.

17

1.

13

1.

09

1.

06

1.0

31

.0

0.9

7.9

5.9

2.9

0.8

8.8

6.8

5.8

3.8

1.8

0.7

8.7

7.7

6.7

5.7

07

01

4.

31

.15

1.1

11

.0

71

.0

41

.0

1.9

8.9

5.9

3.9

0.8

8.8

6.8

4.8

2.8

1.7

9.7

8.7

6.7

5.7

4.7

3.7

1.0

75

13

.31

.14

1.1

01

.06

1.0

2.9

9.9

6.9

3.9

0.8

8.8

6.8

4.8

2.8

0.7

9.7

7.7

6.7

4.7

3.7

2.7

1.6

9.0

80

12

.51

.13

1.0

81

.04

1.0

0.9

7.9

4.9

1.8

8.8

6.8

4.8

2.8

0.7

8.7

7.7

5.7

4.7

2.7

1.7

0.6

9.6

08

51

1.

81.

13

1.

07

1.

03

.99

.95

.92

.89

.87

.84

.82

.80

.78

.77

.75

.73

.72

.71

.69

.68

.67

.66

·0

90

11

.1

1.

13

1.

07

1.

02

.98

.94

.91

.88

.85

.83

.81

.79

.77

.75

.73

.72

.71

.69

.68

.67

.66

.65

.09

51

0.5

1.

13

1.

07

1.

02

.97

.93

.90

.87

.84

.82

.79

.77

.76

.74

.72

.71

.69

.68

.67

.66

.65

.63

10

01

0.0

1.

15

1.

08

1.

02

.97

.93

.89

.86

.83

.81

.79

.77

.75

.73

.71

.70

.68

.67

.66

.65

.64

.63

10

59

.5

1.

17

1.

09

1.

03

.98

.9:

3.8

9.8

6.8

3.

81

.78

.76

.74

.72

.71

.69

.68

.67

.65

.64

.63

.62

11

09

.1

1.

20

1.

11

1.

04

.98

.94

.90

.86

.83

.81

.78

.76

.74

.72

.71

.69

.68

.66

.65

.64

.63

.62

0\

11

58

.7

1.

25

1.

14

1.

06

1.

00

.95

.90

.87

.84

.81

.78

.76

.74

.72

.71

.69

.68

.66

.65

.64

.63

.62

U1

·1

20

8.

31

.3

01

.1

81

.0

91

.0

2.9

6.9

1.8

8.8

4.8

1.7

9.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

8.6

7.6

5.6

4.6

3.6

12

58

.0

1.

38

1.

23

1.

12

1.0

4.9

8.9

3.8

9.8

5.8

2.8

0.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

2.7

0.6

9.6

7.6

6.6

5.6

4.6

3.1

30

7.

71

.4

71

.2

81

.1

61

.0

71

.0

0.9

5.9

0.8

6.8

3.8

0.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

1.6

9.6

8.6

7.6

5.6

4.6

13

57

.4

1.

59

1.

35

1.2

01.

10

1.

02

.96

.92

.88

.84

.82

.79

.77

.75

.73

.71

.70

.69

.67

.66

.65

.64

14

07

.1

1.

74

1.

43

1.

25

1.

13

1.

05

.99

.93

.89

.86

.83

.80

.78

.76

.74

.72

.7

1.6

9.6

8.6

7.6

6.6

51

45

6.

91

.9

61.

52

13

11.

17

1.

08

1.

01

.95

.91

.87

.84

.81

.79

.77

.75

.73

.72

.70

.69

.68

.67

.65

15

06

.7

2.2

81

.6

41

.3

71.

22

1.1

11

.0

3.9

7.9

3.8

9.8

6.8

3.8

0.7

8.7

6.7

5.7

3.7

1.7

0.6

9.6

7.6

15

56

.5

2.

87

1.

78

1.4

51

.2

61

.1

41

.0

61.

QO

.94

.90

.87

.84

.82

.79

.77

.76

.74

.72

.71

.70

.68

.67

·1

60

6.

37

.1

61

.97

1.

53

1.

31

1.

18

1.

09

1.

02

.96

.92

.89

.86

.83

.81

.79

.77

.75

.73

.72

.71

.69

.68

·1

65

6.

1**

**2

.2

11

.6

21.

36

1.2

11.

11

1.

04

.98

.94

.90

.87

.84

.82

.80

.78

.76

.75

.73

.71

.70

.69

·1

70

5.

9**

**2

.6

11.

73

1.

42

1.

25

1.

14

1.

06

1.0

0.9

5.9

2.8

8.8

6.8

3.8

1.7

9.7

7.7

5.7

4.7

2.7

1.6

17

55

.7

****

****

1.8

51

.48

1.2

91

.17

1.0

81

.02

.97

.93

.90

.87

.84

.82

.80

.78

.76

.75

.73

.71

.70

·1

80

5.6

****

****

2.0

01

.54

1.3

21

.19

1.1

01

.04

.98

.94

.91

.88

.86

.83

.81

.79

.77

.75

.74

.72

.70

·1

85

5.

4**

****

**2

.2

11

.6

11

.36

1.2

21

.12

1.0

51

.00

.96

.92

.89

.87

.84

.82

.80

.78

.76

.74

.72

.7

19

05

.3

****

****

2.5

21

.68

1.4

01

.24

1.1

41

.07

1.0

1.9

7.9

3.9

0.8

8.8

5.8

3.8

1.7

9.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

19

55

.1

*·It*

***

**3

.1

11

.7

71

.4

41

.2

71.

16

1.

08

1.0

2.9

8.9

4.9

1.8

8.8

6.8

3.8

1.7

9.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

1.2

00

5.

0**

It*

****

7.

13

1.

87

1.

48

1.

29

1.

17

1.

09

1.

03

.99

.95

.92

.89

.87

.84

.82

.79

.77

.75

.73

.71

.20

54

.9

****

****

****

2.0

01

.52

1.3

11

19

1.1

11

.0

41

.0

0.9

6.9

3.9

0.8

7.8

5.8

2.8

0.7

7.7

5.7

3.

71

.21

04

.8**

****

****

**2

.16

1.

57

1.

34

1.

20

1.

12

1.0

51

.0

1.9

7.9

3.9

0.8

8.8

5.8

2.8

0.7

8.7

5.7

3.7

1.2

15

4.

7**

****

****

**2

.39

1.6

21

.36

1.2

21

.13

1.0

61

.01

.97

.94

.9

1.8

8.3

5.8

3.8

0.7

8.7

5.7

3.7

1.2

20

4.

5**

****

****

**2

.76

1.6

81

.38

1.2

31

.13

1.0

71

.02

.98

.94

.91

.88

.85

.83

.80

.78

.75

.73

.71

.22

54

.4

****

****

****

****

1.7

41

.41

12

41

.1

41.

07

1.0

2.9

8.9

5.9

2.8

9.8

6.8

3.8

0.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

0.2

30

4.

3**

****

****

****

**1

.82

1.4

31

.26

1.1

51

.08

1.0

3.9

9.9

5.9

2.8

9.8

6.8

3.8

0.7

7.7

5.7

2.7

0.2

35

4.

3**

****

****

****

**1

.91

1.4

61

.27

1.1

61

.08

1.0

3.9

9.9

5.9

2.8

9.8

6.8

3.8

0.7

7.7

5.7

2.7

0.2

40

4.

2**

****

****

****

**2

.02

1.4

91

.28

1.1

61

.09

1.0

3.9

9.9

5.9

2.8

9.8

6.8

3.8

0.7

7.7

4.7

2.6

9.2

45

4.

1**

****

****

****

**2

.1

61

.52

1.2

91

.17

1.0

91

.04

.99

.96

.92

.89

.86

.82

.79

.77

.74

.7

1.6

9.2

50

4.

0**

****

****

****

**2

.35

1.5

61

.31

1.1

81

.1

01.

04

1.

00

.96

.92

.89

.85

.82

.79

.76

.74

.71

.69

Page 76: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TAB

LE15

g.W

ave

heig

ht

am

pli

ficati

on

T(E

q.

3)

for

d=

20m

,e

=0

°.0

DT

HE

TAO

DO

UO

20

.0

0.0

60

.0o

0

CU

RR

EN

TS

PE

ED

FT

-2.5

0-2

.25

-2.0

0-1

.75

-1.5

0-1

.25

-1.0

0-.7

5-.5

0-.2

50

.00

.25

.50

.75

1.0

01

.25

1.5

01

.75

2.0

02

.25

2.5

0

.05

02

0.0

1.5

21

.48

1.4

41

.40

1.3

61

.33

1.3

01

.27

1.2

41

.21

1.1

91

.16

1.1

41

.12

1.1

01

.08

1.0

61

.04

1.0

21

.00

.98

.05

51

8.2

1.

51

1.4

61

.42

1.3

81

.34

1.3

11

.2

71

.2

41

.2

11.

19

1.1

61

.1

41.

11

1.0

91

.07

1.0

51

.03

1.0

1.9

9.9

8.9

6.0

60

16

.71

.4

91.

44

1.4

01

.3

61

.3

21

.2

81

.2

51

.2

21.

19

1.

16

1.

13

1.

11

1.0

91

.06

1.0

41

.02

1.0

0.9

8.9

6.9

5.9

3.0

65

15

.41

.4

81.

43

1.

38

1.

33

1.

29

1.

26

1.2

21.

19

1.1

61

.1

31

.1

11

.08

1.0

61

.03

1.0

1.9

9.9

7.9

5.9

4.9

2.9

0.0

70

14

.31

.47

1.4

11

.3

61

.3

11

.2

71

.2

31.

20

1.

16

1.1

31

.1

01.

08

1.

05

1.

03

1.

00

.98

.96

.94

.92

.91

.89

.87

.07

51

3.3

1.4

61

.40

1.3

41

.29

1.2

51

.21

1.

17

1.1

41.

11

1.0

81

.05

1.0

21

.00

.98

.95

.93

.91

.90

.88

.86

.85

.08

01

2.5

1.4

51.

39

1.3

31

.2

81

.2

31

.1

91.

15

1.11

1.0

81

.05

1.0

21

.00

.97

.95

.93

.91

.89

.87

.85

.83

.82

.08

51

1.8

1.4

61

.38

1.3

21

.26

1.2

11

.1

71.

13

1.0

91

.0

61

.0

31

.0

0.9

7.9

5.9

2.9

0.8

8.8

6.8

4.8

2.8

1.7

9.0

90

11

.1

1.4

71.

39

1.

32

1.

26

1.2

01.

15

1.

111

.0

71

.0

41

.0

1.9

8.9

5.9

2.9

0.8

8.8

6.8

4.8

2.8

0.7

8.7

7.0

95

10

.51.

49

1.4

01

.3

21

.2

51.

20

1.1

41

.1

01

.0

61

.0

2.9

9.9

6.9

3.9

0.8

8.8

6.8

4.8

2.8

0.7

8.7

6.7

10

01

0.0

1.5

31

.4

21

.3

31.

26

1.

20

1.

14

1.0

91.

05

1.

01

.98

.94

.91

.89

.86

.84

.82

.80

.78

.76

.74

.73

·1

05

9.

51

.5

81

.4

61.

35

1.2

71

.2

01

.1

41

.0

91

.0

41.

00

.97

.93

.90

.87

.85

.83

.80

.78

.76

.75

.73

.71

.11

09

.1

1.6

51

.50

1.3

81

.29

1.2

11

.15

1.0

91

.04

1.0

0.9

6.9

3.8

9.8

6.8

4.8

1.7

9.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

2.7

0e-

.11

58

.7

1.

74

1.

56

1.4

21.

32

1.

23

1.

16

1.

10

1.0

51

.0

0.9

6.9

2.8

9.8

6.8

3.8

1.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

9e-

.12

08

.3

1.8

51

.63

1.4

71

.35

1.2

51

.17

1.1

11

.0

51

.0

0.9

6.9

2.8

9.8

5.8

3.8

0.7

8.7

5.7

3.7

1.7

0.6

12

58

.01

.9

91.

71

1.5

31

.3

91.

28

1.1

91

.1

21

.0

61

.0

1.9

6.9

2.8

8.8

5.8

2.8

0.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

7.1

30

7.

72

.1

61

.8

11

.5

91

.4

31.

31

1.

22

1.1

41

.0

71

.0

2.9

7.9

2.8

9.8

5.8

2.7

9.7

7.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

13

57

.4

2.

37

1.9

31

.6

61

.4

81

.3

51

.2

41

.1

61.

09

1.

03

.97

.93

.89

.85

.82

.79

.77

.74

.72

.70

.68

.66

.14

07

.1

2.6

52

.06

1.7

41

.54

1.3

81

.27

1.1

81

.10

1.0

4.9

8.9

3.8

9.8

5.8

2.7

9.7

6.7

4.7

2.6

9.6

7.6

14

56

.93

.06

2.2

21

.83

1.5

91

.42

1.3

01

.20

1.1

21

.05

.99

.94

.90

.86

.82

.79

.76

.74

.71

.69

.67

.65

15

06

.7

3.

78

2.

40

1.

93

1.

65

1.

46

1.

33

1.

22

1.1

31

.0

61

.0

0.9

5.9

0.8

6.8

2.7

9.7

6.7

4.7

1.6

9.6

7.6

15

56

.5

6.6

02

.64

2.0

31

.71

1.5

01.

35

1.2.

41

.1

51

.07

1.0

1.9

5.9

0.8

6.8

2.7

9.7

6.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

7.6

16

06

.3

****

2.9

72

.15

1.

78

1.

55

1.3

81.

26

1.1

61.

08

1.

02

.96

.91

.87

.83

.79

.76

.73

.71

.69

.66

.64

·1

65

6.

1**

**3

.51

2.2

91

.85

1.5

91

.41

1.

28

1.

18

1.

09

1.0

2.9

6.9

1.8

7.8

3.7

9.7

6.7

3.7

1.6

8.6

6.6

17

05

.9

****

4.7

32

.46

1.9

21

.63

1.4

41

.30

1.1

91

.10

1.0

3.9

7.9

2.8

7.8

3.7

9.7

6.7

3.7

1.6

8.6

6.6

17

55

.7

****

****

2.6

82

.01

1.

68

1.4

71

.3

21

.2

01.

11

1.0

4.9

7.9

2.8

7.8

3.7

9.7

6.7

3.7

1.6

8.6

6.6

4.1

80

5.6

****

****

2.9

82

.10

1.

72

1.5

01

.3

41.

22

1.

12

1.

04

.98

.92

.87

.83

.79

.76

.73

.70

.68

.66

.64

·1

85

5.4

****

****

3.4

32

.21

1.7

71

.5

21.

35

1.

23

1.

13

1.0

5.9

8.9

3.8

8.8

3.8

0.7

6.7

3.7

0.6

8.6

5.6

3.1

90

5.3

****

****

4.

32

2.

33

1.

83

1.

55

1.3

71

.2

41

.1

41

.0

6.9

9.9

3.8

8.8

3.7

9.7

6.7

3.7

0.6

8.6

5.6

19

55

.1

****

****

****

2.

49

1.

89

1.

58

1.3

91.

25

1.

15

1.

06

.99

.93

.88

.83

.79

.76

.73

.70

.67

.65

.63

.20

05

.0**

****

****

**2

.68

1.9

51

.62

1.4

11

.2

61

.1

51

.0

6.9

9.9

3.8

8.8

3.7

9.7

6.7

3.7

0.6

7.6

5.6

3.2

05

4.9

****

****

****

2.9

32

.02

1.6

51

.43

1.2

71

.16

1.0

7.9

9.9

3.8

8.8

3.7

9.7

6.7

2.7

0.6

7.6

5.6

2.2

10

4.8

****

****

****

3.2

92

.10

1.6

81

.44

1.2

81

.16

1.0

71

.00

.93

.88

.83

.79

.75

.72

.69

.67

.64

.62

.21

54

.7

****

****

****

3.

89

2.

19

1.

72

1.

46

1.2

91

.1

71.

07

1.

00

.93

.88

.83

.79

.75

.72

.69

.66

.64

.62

.22

04

.5

****

****

****

5.3

62

.29

1.7

61

.48

1.3

01

.18

1.0

81

.00

.93

.88

.83

.79

.75

.72

.69

.66

.64

.62

.22

54

.4

•••*

****

****

****

2.4

21

.80

1.5

01

.31

1.

18

1.

08

1.

00

.93

.88

.83

.79

.75

.72

.69

.66

.64

.61

.23

04

.3

****

*i1;

;M.....*

*.**

2.

56

1.

85

1.

52

1.

32

1.1

91.

08

1.

00

.93

.87

.83

.78

.75

.71

.68

.66

.63

.61

.23

54

.3

****

****

****

****

2.7

41

.90

1.5

51

.34

1.1

91

.08

1.0

0.9

3.8

7.8

2.7

8.7

4.7

1.6

8.6

5.6

3.6

1.2

40

4.

2**

****

****

****

**2

.98

1.9

51

.57

1.3

51

.20

1.0

91

.00

.93

.87

.82

.78

.74

.71

.68

.65

.63

.60

.24

54

.1

****

****

****

****

3.2

92

.01

1.5

91

.36

1.2

01

.09

1.0

0.9

3.8

7.8

2.7

8.7

4.7

0.6

7.6

5.6

2.6

0.2

50

4.0

****

****

****

****

3.7

82

.07

1.6

21

.37

1.2

11

.0

91

.0

0.9

3.8

7.8

2.7

7.7

3.7

0.6

7.6

4.6

2.6

0

Page 77: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TAB

LEIS

h.

Wav

eh

eig

ht

am

pli

ficati

on

T(E

q.

3)fo

rd

=20

m,

e=

30

°.0

0TH

ETA

OD

OU

O2

0.0

30

.06

0.0

0.0

CU

RR

ENT

SPE

ED

FT

-2

.50

-2

.25

-2

.00

-1

.75

-1

.50

-1

.25

-1

.00

-.7

5-.5

0-.2

50

.00

.25

.50

.75

1.0

01

.25

1.5

01

.75

2.0

02

.25

2.5

0

.05

02

0.0

1.4

41

.40

1.3

61

.32

1.2

91

.26

1.2

31

.21

1.

18

1.

16

1.

13

1.1

11

.09

1.0

71

.05

1.0

31

.01

1.

00

.98

.97

.95

.05

51

8.2

1.4

21

.38

1.3

41

.31

1.

27

1.

24

1.

21

1.1

81

.16

1.1

31

.11

1.0

91

.07

1.0

51

.03

1.0

1.9

9.9

7.9

6.9

4.9

3.0

60

16

.7

1.

41

1.

36

1.3

21

.2

91

.2

51

.2

21

.1

91

.1

61

.1

31

.1

11

.08

1.0

61

.04

1.0

21

.00

.98

.96

.95

.93

.92

.90

.06

51

5.4

1.

40

1.

35

1.3

11

.2

71

.2

31

.2

01

.1

61

.1

41

.1

11

.08

1.0

61

.04

1.0

1.9

9.9

7.9

6.9

4.9

2.9

1.8

9.8

8.0

70

14

.31

.38

1.3

31

.29

1.2

51

.21

1.

17

1.

14

1.

11

1.0

81

.06

1.0

31

.01

.99

.97

.95

.93

.91

.90

.88

.86

.85

.07

51

3.

31

.3

81

.3

21

.2

71

.2

31

.1

91

.1

51.

12

1.

09

1.

06

1.

03

1.

01

.98

.96

.94

.92

.90

.89

.87

.85

.84

.82

.08

01

2.5

1.3

71

.3

11

.2

61.

21

1.1

71

.13

1.1

01

.07

1.0

41

.01

.98

.96

.94

.92

.90

.88

.86

.84

.83

.81

.80

.08

51

1.

81.

38

1.

31

1.

25

1.

20

1.

16

1.

12

1.

08

1.

05

1.

02

.99

.96

.94

.92

.89

.87

.86

.84

.82

.81

.79

.78

.09

01

1.

11

.39

1.

31

1.2

51

.19

1.1

51

.10

1.0

61

.03

1.0

0.9

7.9

4.9

2.9

0.8

7.8

5.8

4.8

2.8

0.7

9.7

7.7

6.0

95

10

.51.

41

1.

32

1.

25

1.

19

1.

14

1.

09

1.

05

1.

02

.98

.95

.93

.90

.88

.86

.84

.82

.80

.78

.77

.75

.74

10

01

0.

01

.4

41

.3

41

.2

61

.2

01

.1

41

.0

91

.0

51

.0

1.9

8.9

4.9

2.8

9.8

7.8

4.8

2.8

0.7

9.7

7.7

5.7

4.7

21

05

9.

51

.49

1.3

71

.28

1.2

11.

15

1.

09

1.

05

1.

01

.97

.94

.91

.88

.86

.83

.81

.79

.77

.76

.74

.73

.7

11

10

9.

11.

55

1.

41

1.

31

1.

23

1.

16

1.

10

1.

05

1.

01

.97

.93

.90

.87

.85

.83

.80

.78

.77

.75

.73

.72

.70

0\

11

58

.7

1.6

31

.4

71

.3

51

.2

51

.1

81

.1

11

.0

61

.0

1.9

7.9

3.9

0.8

7.8

5.8

2.8

0.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

3.7

1.7

0-.

.J1

20

8.

31

.7

31

.5

31.

39

1.2

81

.2

01

.1

31

.0

71

.0

2.9

8.9

4.9

0.8

7.8

4.8

2.8

0.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

1.6

91

25

8.

01.

85

1.

61

1.

44

1.3

21

.2

21

.1

51.

08

1.

03

.98

.94

.91

.87

.85

.82

.80

.77

.75

.74

.72

.70

.69

.13

07

.7

2.

00

1.

70

1.

50

1.

36

1.

25

1.

17

1.1

01

.0

4.9

9.9

5.9

1.8

8.8

5.8

2.8

0.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

2.7

0.6

13

57

.4

2.1

91

.80

1.5

71

.41

1.

29

1.

19

1.

12

1.

06

1.

00

.96

.92

.88

.85

.82

.80

.77

.75

.73

.72

.70

.68

.14

07

.1

2.

43

1.

92

1.

64

1.

46

1.3

21

.2

21

.1

41

.0

71

.0

1.9

7.9

2.8

9.8

5.8

3.8

0.7

8.7

5.7

3.7

2.7

0.6

14

56

.92

.77

2.0

61

.72

1.5

11.

36

1.

25

1.

16

1.

09

1.

03

.97

.93

.89

.86

.83

.80

.78

.76

.74

.72

.70

.68

.15

06

.7

3.

33

2.2

21

.8

11

.5

61

.4

01

.2

71

.1

81

.1

01

.0

4.9

8.9

4.9

0.8

6.8

3.8

0.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

15

56

.5

4.

83

2.

43

1.

90

1.

62

1.

43

1.

30

1.

20

1.1

21

.0

5.9

9.9

5.9

0.8

7.8

4.8

1.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.1

60

6.

3**

**2

.70

2.0

11

.6

81

.4

71

.3

31

.2

21

.1

31

.0

61.

00

.95

.91

.87

.84

.81

.78

.76

.74

.72

.70

.68

·1

65

6.

1**

**3

.1

32

.1

31

.7

41

.5

11

.3

61

.2

41

.1

51

.0

71

.0

1.9

6.9

2.8

8.8

4.8

1.7

9.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

9.1

70

5.

9**

**3

.97

2.2

81

.81

1.

55

1.

38

1.

26

1.

16

1.

08

1.0

2.9

7.9

2.8

8.8

5.8

2.7

9.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

17

55

.7

****

8.1

02

.46

1.8

81

.59

1.4

1I.

27

1.

17

1.

09

1.

03

.97

.93

.88

.85

.82

.79

.76

.74

.72

.70

.69

18

05

.6

****

****

2.

71

1.

96

1.

63

1.

43

1.

29

1.

19

1.

10

1.

03

.98

.93

.89

.85

.82

.79

.77

.74

.72

.70

.69

·1

85

5.

4**

****

**3

.07

2.0

61

.68

1.4

61

.31

1.2

01

.1

11

.0

4.9

8.9

3.8

9.8

5.8

2.7

9.7

7.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

19

05

.3

****

****

3.7

12

.17

1.7

31

.49

1.3

21

.21

1.

12

1.

05

.99

.94

.89

.85

.82

.79

.77

.74

.72

.70

.68

.19

55

.1

****

****

5.7

52

.30

1.7

81

.51

1.

34

1.

22

1.

12

1.

05

.99

.94

.89

.86

.82

.79

.77

.74

.72

.70

.68

.20

05

.0

****

****

****

2.4

61

.83

1.5

41

.36

1.2

31

.13

1.0

5.9

9.9

4.8

9.8

6.8

2.7

9.7

7.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.2

05

4.

9**

****

****

**2

.67

1.

90

1.

57

1.

37

1.

24

1.

14

1.

06

.99

.94

.89

.86

.82

.79

.76

.74

.72

.70

.68

.21

04

.8**

****

****

**2

.9

61

.9

71

.6

01

.3

91

.2

51

.1

41

.0

6.9

9.9

4.8

9.8

5.8

2.7

9.7

6.7

4.7

2.7

0.6

8.2

15

4.

7**

****

****

**3

.41

2.0

51

.63

1.4

11.

26

1.

15

1.

06

1.

00

.94

.89

.85

.82

.79

.76

.74

.72

.70

.68

.22

04

.5

****

****

****

4.3

12

.14

1.

67

1.

42

1.

27

1.

15

1.

07

1.

00

.94

.89

.85

.82

.79

.76

.74

.71

.69

.68

.22

54

.4

****

****

****

8.

15

2.

24

1.

70

1.

44

1.

27

1.

16

1.

07

1.0

0.9

4.8

9.8

5.8

2.7

9.7

6.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

7.2

30

4.

3**

****

****

****

**2

.3

61

.7

41

.4

61

.2

81.

16

1.

07

1.0

0.9

4.8

9.8

5.8

1.7

8.7

6.7

3.7

1.6

9.6

7.2

35

4.

3**

****

****

****

**2

.52

1.7

91

.48

1.2

91

.17

1.0

71

.00

.94

.89

.85

.81

.78

.75

.73

.71

.69

.67

.24

04

.2

****

****

****

****

2.

71

1.

84

1.5

01

.3

01

.1

71

.0

71

.0

0.9

4.8

9.8

5.8

1.7

8.7

5.7

3.7

0.6

8.6

7.2

45

4.

1**

****

****

****

**2

.96

1.8

91

.52

1.3

11.

18

1.0

81.

00

.94

.89

.84

.81

.78

.75

.72

.70

.68

.66

.25

04

.0

****

****

****

****

3.3

31

.94

1.5

41

.32

1.1

81

.08

1.0

0.9

4.8

9.8

4.8

1.7

7.7

5.7

2.7

0.6

8.6

6

Page 78: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABL

ElS

i.W

ave

heig

ht

am

pli

ficati

on

T(E

q.3

)fo

rd

=20

ffi,

e=

60

°.0

0TH

ETA

OD

OUO

20

.06

0.0

60

.00

.0

CU

RR

ENT

SP

EE

DF

T-2

.50

-2

.25

-2

.00

-1

.75

-1

.50

-1

.25

-1

.00

-.7

5-.5

0-.2

50

.00

.25

.50

.75

1.0

01

.25

1.5

01

.75

2.0

02

.25

2.5

0

.05

02

0.0

1.

13

1.

10

1.

08

1.

05

1.0

31

.0

1.9

9.9

7.9

5.9

3.9

1.9

0.8

8.8

7.8

5.8

4.8

3.8

2.8

1.7

9.7

8.0

55

18

.21.

12

1.

09

1.

06

1.

04

1.0

1.9

9.9

7.9

5.9

3.9

1.9

0.8

8.8

7.8

5.8

4.8

2.8

1.8

0.7

9.7

8.7

7.0

60

16

.71

.1

11

.08

1.0

51

.02

1.0

0.9

8.9

5.9

3.9

1.9

0.8

8.8

6.8

5.8

3.8

2.8

1.7

9.7

8.7

7.7

6.7

5:

06

51

5.4

1.

10

1.

07

1.

04

1.0

1.9

8.9

6.9

4.9

2.9

0.8

8.8

6.8

5.8

3.8

2.8

0.7

9.7

8.7

7.7

5.7

4.7

3.0

70

14

.31

.09

1.0

61

.03

1.0

0.9

7.9

4.9

2.9

0.8

8.8

6.8

4.8

3.8

1.8

0.7

8.7

7.7

6.7

5.7

4.7

3.7

2.0

75

13

.31

.0

91

.0

51.

01

.98

.96

.93

.91

.88

.86

.84

.83

.81

.80

.78

.77

.75

.74

.73

.72

.71

.70

.08

01

2.5

1.

09

1.

04

1.

01

.97

.94

.92

.89

.87

.85

.83

.81

.80

.78

.77

.75

.74

.73

.72

.70

.69

.68

·0

85

11

.8

1.

09

1.0

41.

00

.97

.94

.91

.88

.86

.84

.82

.80

.78

.77

.75

.74

.73

.71

.70

.69

.68

.67

.09

01

1.

11

.1

01.

05

1.0

0.9

6.9

3.9

0.8

7.8

5.8

3.8

1.7

9.7

7.7

6.7

4.7

3.7

2.7

0.6

9.6

8.6

7.6

6.0

95

10

.51.

11

1.

06

1.

01

.97

.93

.90

.87

.84

.82

.80

.78

.77

.75

.73

.72

.71

.70

.68

.67

.66

.65

10

01

0.0

1.

14

1.

07

1.0

2.9

7.9

3.9

0.8

7.8

4.8

2.8

0.7

8.7

6.7

5.7

3.7

2.7

0.6

9.6

8.6

7.6

6.6

51

05

95

1.

17

1.

10

1.0

3.9

8.9

4.9

1.8

8.8

5.8

2.8

0.7

8.7

6.7

5.7

3.7

2.7

0.6

9.6

8.6

7.6

6.6

51

10

9.

11.

22

1.1

31.

06

1.0

0.9

6.9

2.8

8.8

5.8

3.8

1.7

9.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

2.7

1.6

9.6

8.6

7.6

6.6

50

'\.1

15

8.

71

.2

71

.1

71

.0

91.

03

.97

.93

.90

.87

.84

.81

.79

.77

.76

.74

.73

.71

.70

.69

.68

.67

.66

(Xl

·1

20

8.3

1.

34

1.2

21.

12

1.0

51

.0

0.9

5.9

1.8

8.8

5.8

3.8

0.7

8.7

7.7

5.7

3.7

2.7

1.7

0.6

8.6

7.6

12

58

.0

1.4

31

.2

71.

16

1.0

81

.0

2.9

7.9

3.8

9.8

7.8

4.8

2.8

0.7

8.7

6.7

4.7

3.7

2.7

0.6

9.6

8.6

13

07

.7

1.

54

1.

34

1.2

11

.1

21

.0

5.9

9.9

5.9

1.8

8.8

5.8

3.8

1.7

9.7

7.7

6.7

4.7

3.7

2.7

0.6

9.6

13

57

.41

.6

61

.4

11

.2

61

.1

61

.0

81.

02

.97

.93

.90

.87

.85

.82

.80

.79

.77

.75

.74

.73

.71

.70

.69

·1

40

7.

11

.8

21.

50

1.3

21

.2

01

.1

11

.0

5.9

9.9

5.9

2.8

9.8

6.8

4.8

2.8

0.7

8.7

7.7

5.7

4.7

2.7

1.7

14

56

.92

03

1.6

01

.38

1.2

41

.14

1.0

71

.02

.97

.93

.90

.88

.85

.83

.81

.80

.78

.76

.75

.74

.72

.71

·1

50

6.

72

.33

1.7

11.

44

1.2

81.

18

1.1

01

.0

4.9

9.9

5.9

2.8

9.8

7.8

5.8

3.8

1.7

9.7

7.7

6.7

4.7

3.7

21

55

6.

52

.9

01

.8

41

.5

11.

33

1.2

11

.1

21

.O

b1.

01

.97

.94

.91

.88

.86

.84

.82

.80

.79

.77

.75

.74

.72

·1

60

6.

37

.1

32

.01

1.5

81

.37

1.2

41

.15

1.0

81

.03

.99

.95

.92

.90

.87

.85

.83

.81

.79

.78

.76

.75

.73

·1

65

6.

1**

**2

.2

41

66

1.

42

1.

27

1.

17

1.

10

1.

04

1.

00

.96

.93

.91

.88

.86

.84

.82

.80

.78

.77

.75

.73

17

05

.9**

**2

.63

1.

76

1.4

61.

30

1.

19

1.1

21.

06

1.

01

.98

.95

.92

.89

.87

.85

.83

.81

.79

.77

.75

.74

17

55

.7

****

****

1.8

71

.51

1.

33

1.2

11

.13

1.0

71

.03

.99

.96

.93

.90

.88

.86

.84

.81

.79

.78

.76

.74

18

05

.6

****

****

2.

02

1.

57

1.

36

1.

23

1.

15

1.

08

1.

04

1.0

0.9

6.9

4.9

1.8

9.8

6.8

4.8

2.8

0.7

8.7

6.7

41

85

5.

4**

****

**2

.22

1.6

31

.39

1.2

51

.16

1.1

01

.05

1.0

1.9

7.9

4.9

2.8

9.8

7.8

4.8

2.8

0.7

8.7

6.7

19

05

.3**

****

**2

.52

1.

70

1.4

21.

27

1.

17

1.

10

1.

05

1.0

1.9

8.9

5.9

2.8

9.8

7.8

5.8

2.8

0.7

8.7

6.7

19

55

.1

****

****

3.

111.

78

1.4

51

.2

91

.1

81.

11

1.

06

1.0

2.9

8.9

5.9

2.9

0.8

7.8

5.8

2.8

0.7

8.7

5.7

3.2

00

5.

0**

****

**7

.13

1.8

81

.49

1~1

1~(\

tt?

t0

71

.02

.99

.96

.93

.90

.87

.85

.82

.80

.77

.75

.73

.20

54

.9

****

****

****

2.0

01

.53

1.3

21

.21

1.

13

1.

07

1.

03

.99

.96

.93

.90

.87

.85

.82

.80

.77

.75

.73

.21

04

.8**

****

****

**2

.16

1.5

71

.34

1.2

21

.13

1.0

71

.03

.99

.96

.93

.90

.87

.85

.82

.79

.77

.75

.72

.21

54

.7

*-Il.

****

****

**2

.3

91

.6

21.

36

1.

23

1.1

41

.0

81.

03

.99

.96

.93

.90

.87

.84

.82

.79

.77

.74

.72

.22

04

.5

****

****

****

2.7

61

.68

1.3

91

.24

1.1

51

.08

1.0

31

.00

.96

.93

.90

.87

.84

.81

.79

.76

.74

.7;:

'.2

25

4.

4**

****

****

****

**1

.74

1.4

11

.2

51.

15

1.0

91

.0

41.

00

.96

.93

.90

.87

.84

.81

.78

.76

.73

.71

.23

04

.:J

*11'*

11'

II•

If*

****

****

1.8

21.

43

1.2

61

.1

61

.0

91.

04

1.0

0.9

6.9

3.9

0.8

7.8

4.8

1.7

8.7

5.7

3.7

1.2

35

4.

3**

****

****

****

**1

.91

1.

46

1.

27

1.1

61

.0

91

.0

41

.0

0.9

6.9

3.9

0.8

7.8

4.8

1.7

8.7

5.7

3.7

0.2

40

4.2

****

****

****

****

2.

02

1.

49

1.

28

1.1

71

.0

91

.0

41

.0

0.9

6.9

3.9

0.8

6.8

3.8

0.7

7.7

5.7

2.7

0.2

45

4.

1**

****

****

****

**2

.16

1.5

21

.30

1.1

71

.10

1.0

41

.00

.96

.93

.89

.86

.83

.80

.77

.74

.72

.69

.25

04

.0**

****

****

****

**2

.35

1.5

61

.31

1.

18

1.

10

1.

04

1.

00

.96

.93

.89

.86

.83

.80

.77

.74

.71

.69

Page 79: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

case that a linear extrapolation from measured wave heights upriver leadsto a wave height at Buoy 8 which exceeds the empirical breaking criteriaof (2). If we presume the waves are limited by breaking then the waveheight could be the lower value in this table entry, and the "observed"height would exceed the predicted by 20%. It appears that the ebb of11 September falls into the category of an "extreme event" such as thatobserved previously at the Columbia River Entrance on 18 October 1979 byGonzalez (1984) and for which the simple one-dimensional theory fails topredict accurately. For the rest of the October 1979 observations Gonzalezfound generally good agreement between theory and observation.

If for the moment we assume that the one-dimensional, linear theoryis applicable and that the current at Buoy 46010 is zero, then there arethree variables in Eq. (3) which should be examined in search of some significantdifference which characterizes the 11 September ebb relative to the other cases.These are the current speed U, the wave frequency w = a , and the incidentwave direction a. From Table 14, we see that the estigated surfacecurrents were cogparable for each peak ebb, ranging from 2.0 to 2.3 m/s.Figure ge also show~ that the peak frequency of the wave spectrum graduallyincreased from a 10"" of 0.07 Hz on the ebb of 11 September to a value of0.09 Hz on the ebb of 13 September. This frequency shift is the characteristicsignature of dispersive waves detected at a distant point after propagatingfrom a localized source. An examination of the weather maps of Figure 8suggests that the source was the well-defined fetch region in the south­to-southwest sector of the low pressure system dominating the central Gulfof Alaska on 10 September (Fig. 8c). An important implication of this isthat the direction of swell incident on the Columbia River entrance wasapproximately constant for the last three ebbs observed over the period 11to 13 September. It thus appears that both current speed and incidentwave direction were comparable on the last three ebbs, but that there wasa significant difference in wave frequency. However Table lSd, say, for0° incidence indicates that this frequency difference is not enough toaccount for an inferred amplification of 1.8 from offshore to Buoy 8.

Although less relevant for the sole prediction of hazardous waves, abetter test for the linear, one-dimensional theory is to compare observedand predicted wave heights at flood tides since nonlinear effects will beminimized due to reduced wave heights. Column 9 of Table 14 shows that theobserved values are consistently lower than the predicted ones for floodconditions. In one case their ratio is 0.6, but this was for one peak ofa two-peaked deep-water spectrum observed at 46010 (Fig. A44). At Buoy 8,three peaks were observed (Fig. A40); hence some uncertainty is associatedwith the interpretation of this case.

The most likely reason why the simple theory fails to the extent itdoes is due to two-dimensional effects. It is clear that within the entrancethe bathymetry varies markedly in a north-south direction, going from adredged channel to a shoal, to a jetty, to another shoal, to coastwise­Jarallel bottom contours. The currents must also vary laterally especially(,utside the entrance. On ebb the current most likely takes the form of aconfined jet with marked lateral shear at its edges. On flood it isprobably more like a sink flow at the edge of a long, straight boundarywith streamlines converging from a wider fan-shaped region. SLAR imageryon the slack-to-ebb of 11 September (Fig. A2B) shows more or less straight

69

Page 80: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

and parallel swell crests across the entrance. In contrast, 3 hours later atpeak ebb current (Fig. A35) the wave crests are strongly curved, and thedistinctive grid pattern of crossed waves is now apparent. Two-dimensionaleffects would explain why the wave heights are consistently overpredicted onfloods since wave ray divergence, not accounted for by the theory wouldlead to lower actual wave heights. The converse - that the theory shouldunderpredict wave heights on ebbs - need not be true. Bathymetric refractionover the deeper channel could mitigate the effects of wave focussing dueto currents. For the first two ebbs wave heights were overpredicted whileSLAR imagery showed little wave crossing. For the next two ebbs the waveheights were underpredicted when wave crossing was observed.

If wave crossing is known to occur then a rough correction to thepredicted transfer function can be made by assuming that, although theoffshore energy E remains constant, the energy E on the bar is double

othat predicted without wave crossing as if two independent wave systems

were present. Thus, from Eq. (3), T' = (iE)~ =~T, where T' implies two-o

dimensional refraction severe enough to induce crossing wave crests. Ifthis correction is applied to the entries for 11 September in Table 14, wethen obtain T'(6 =0°) =2.1 and T'(6 =30°) =2.0. The entries of column 9become c c

T /T'(6 =0°) =0.9 to 1.0 ando c

T /T'(6 = 30°) = 0.9 to 1.1, so that the agreement between observed andp~edtcted wave height amplification is thereby improved. The difficultywith this method is we still have to predict when wave crossing willoccur. This is probably best done with a proper two-dimensional theory;one for which the calculation just completed will be accounted for automatically.

On the basis of this result, let us assume that two-dimensional waverefraction and focusing by a current with jet-like lateral shear can be animportaqt mechanism for wave height amplification on the Columbia RiverBar. W~ have in mind here a physical setting similar to the wave/rip-currentinteraction problem examined by Arthur (1950), in which wave rays initiallyparallel to the main axis of a jet-like current were sufficiently refractedto induce crossing farther upstream. We should then ask what set ofparameters might control the magnitude of this effect on any particularebb. These include: (1) the incident wave frequency, f, (2) the relativeangle between the incident wave and the main axis of the current, 6 , and(3) the two-dimensional distribution of current shear at peak ebb. 0

The question is: Were any of these factors significantly differenton the ebb of 11 September, such that wave refraction and focusing wasintensified to the point that two-dimensional effects became important andthe simple one-dimensional theory of Eq. (1) therefore failed?

For a given incidence angle and current shear, two-dimensionalconvergence should be greater for higher frequency waves, since wave groupvelocity decreases with increasing frequency and the ratio U/C thereby

g

70

Page 81: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

increases, indicating the current U is more effective in inducing refraction.Since peak wave frequency increased from 0.07 Hz on 11 September to 0.09 Hzon 13 September, this effect would have made two-dimensional refractionmore important on the ebbs of 12 and 13 September. However, this may havebeen offset by a relative wave/current incidence angle 8 which was closer

oto 0° on 11 September than on 12 and 13 September. This is because bathymetriceffects are frequency dependent, and the crests of lower frequency wavestend to become aligned with bathymetry faster than higher frequency waves.Since the set of the current at the river entrance is more or less perpendicularto the depth contours offshore, this suggests that the waves on 11 Septemberwere more nearly in direct opposition to the current, thereby increasingthe importance of two-dimensional wave refraction effects.

Later analyses of the SLAR data will yield wave direction estimatesdirectly. However, we can make a rough estimate now of the frequency-dependentbathymetric effects on the incident wave direction at buoy 46010 by usingEqs. (4) and (5). As noted above, all swell arriving at the ColumbiaRiver entrance during the period 11 to 13 September appear to have beengenerated in the same well-defined fetch area evident in Figure 8c. If weassume for simplicity that waves arrived from the northwest and wereincident on a region with parallel bathymetric contours oriented north-south,then 8 in Eq. (5) is 45° and we can combine (4) and (5) to geto

8(f) =sin- 1(sin8 tanhkd)o

where k satisfies the second relation in (4) and d =60 m at buoy 46010.Using the observed peak frequency values on 11 and 13 September, we obtain

~8 =8(0.09 Hz) - 8(0.07 Hz) - 43.1° - 38.2° =4.9°

as an estimate of the change in incident wave direction from ebb to ebb.

Although wave ray convergence may be quite sensitive to incident wavedirection, it seems unlikely that a 5 degree difference in wave directioninduced by bathymetry would produce the dramatic differences in observedwave height amplification. Judgement on this factor must thus await theanalysis of the SLAR imagery for incident wave direction.

We must also consider the possibility that the surface current propertieschanged significantly from ebb to ebb. The direction of the main axis ofthe current and the degree of lateral shear might be influenced by thestage of the spring/neap tidal cycle, the amount of fresh water discharge,the wind induced surface drift, and the magnitude and direction of alongshorecurrents (either large-scale, seasonal, geostrophic phenomena, or local,short-term wind-induced effects).

Unfortunately, there is very little current drifter data availablewith which to assess these possibilities. Figure 14 displays selectedcurrent vectors corresponding to drifter tracks which were obtained nearthe time of each peak ebb. (The drifter information and current computationsare summarized in Table 13.) The data sparseness is painfully evident,and few conclusions could be drawn. Mean direction is approximately thesame on 11, 12, and 13 September. Jet-like lateral shear is evident on

71

Page 82: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

11 September, but the data are insufficient to draw conclusions onpresence or absence of similar shear structure on the other ebbs.the persistence of such structure downstream of these observationsthe region outside the entrance is unknown.

theFurthermore,and in

Nonlinear effects may play a role in the crossing wave patternsobserved at the Columbia River entrance as, for example, in the SLARimagery on 11 September (Fig. A35). In a series of wave tank experimentsSu (1982) has documented the evolution of similar patterns in steep, deepwater wavetrains through a process governed by nonlinear skew bifurcation.The initial steepness of these waves was in the range 0.16 ~ ak ~ 0.18.Using Eq. (4) with U =-2.0 mIs, W =2n(.07) s-l and d =15 m, we obtaink = 0.048. For a ~ 6.5/2 m = 3.3 m we then have an estimate of ak ~ 0.16for the wave steepness on 11 September. Su's experiments do not includethe effects of currents or finite depth, but it is conceivable that thesecould induce similar instabilities. Column 10 of Table 14 gives steepnessestimates for all the cases we observed, and there does seem to be acorrelation between estimated wave steepness and the presence of thegrid-like pattern in the SLAR imagery. Thus, on 10 September (ak ~ 0.07)the pattern is not clearly evident (Figs. A18 and A19), on 13 September(ak ~ 0.10) the pattern is not clearly evident (Figs. A80 and A81), on12 September (ak ~ 0.14) the pattern exists but somewhat indistinctly(Figs. A56 and A57), and on 11 September (ak ~ 0.16) the pattern is verydistinct (Figs. A35 and A36). However, we feel that wave-current-bathymetryinteraction, a zero-order effect, is the primary cause of wave amplification/attenuation at the Columbia River entrance. It is this effect that leadsprimarily to the steep waves and ultimately to wave crossing during extremeebb events.

72

Page 83: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Waves and currents have been observed with a unique mixture of instrumentsat the Columbia River entrance during the period 10-13 September 1981.Offshore wave spectra were calculated by NDBC Buoy 46010. Bar wave recordswere measured by a Waverider tethered in strong currents, and SLAR imagerygives a two-dimensional picture of the swell both offshore and in theentrance. The technique of tracking surface drifters at short range witha portable radar set rather than a large, fixed system was successful.

Navigational Buoy 8 in the river entrance is the approximate boundarybetween two wave regimes. Upriver of this site waves decay on both ebband flood tides. This is probably due to depth refraction away from themain channel axis toward the shoals on either side. Surprisingly, ebbsgive a larger decay rate perhaps because of a decrease in current speed asone moves upriver away from the converging jetty tips. Another possibilityis that the enhanced attenuation rate is due to wave breaking induced bythe strong adverse current. Sporadic breaking was observed visually andon SLAR images.

Seaward of Buoy 8 waves amplify during peak ebbs and attenuate duringpeak floods thus confirming the important effect of the current. With thecurrent specified, linear, one-dimensional theory can predict wave heightsto within 20% of observed values most of the time. Heights were consistentlyoverpredicted during flood tides while no consistent bias was observedduring ebbs. This is most likely due to two-dimensional effects.

During an extreme wave event on 11 September the waves were underpredictedby 50% on ebb. These were the highest and steepest waves observed duringthe experiment and were breaking sporadically. SLAR images indicate thatwave crests were crossing due to current refraction. An approximatecalculation suggests that the wave-height prediction should be increasedby a factor of ~ which would bring it closer to that observed. Forbetter wave predictions a two-dimensional theory which automaticallyaccounts for this factor should be applied.

It must be cautioned that strong ebb currents of up to 3.5 m/sec canoccur at the Columbia River entrance. Such currents, not encounteredduring this experimental period, can actually stop typical deep oceanswell, causing them to break for almost any initial, deep-water steepness.The linear, one-dimensional theory applied here becomes inappropriate nearthat limit, and we expect that prediction and observation will divergeradically.

73

Page 84: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

6. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

There is a clear need for a systematic effort to improve operationalcapabilities to monitor, nowcast, and forecast hazardous navigationalconditions at coastal tidal inlets of which the Columbia River entrance isan example. This effort should concentrate on:

(1) real-time, long-term monitoring,(2) theory and numerical modeling, and(3) field experiments.

6.1 Real-time, Long-term Monitoring

The essential parameters to be measured are:

(1) nondirectional wave spectra at the inlet entrance, and(2) directional wave spectra offshore.

The technology to attempt these measurements is available now. Timpe(1983) has described the successful use of 6-meter long, boat-shaped NavyOceanographic Meteorological Automatic Device (NOMAD) buoys in very severeenvironments, and such a system may be well-suited for service at coastalinlets. It is recommended that a buoy of this type be deployed on theColumbia River Bar.

Also, NDBC has developed directional wave data analyzers (DWDA)(Steele, 1983). A successful deployment was recently accomplished aboarda 10-meter discus hull off the California Coast (Steele, 1984). Such asystem would provide valuable directional wave data which can be used inconjunction with equation (3) to predict wave height as a function of deepwater wave direction.

Benefits from such a monitoring system are as follows:

(1) Accurate nowcasts would be available. Such real-time informationon inlet conditions is valuable to mariners. A decision to attempt a barcrossing could then be based on measurements, rather than on visualobservations which may be unreliable and are not available during fog anddarkness.

(2) Short-term forecasts would be improved. Influence of short-termmeteorological or other local effects resulting in under or over forecastof wave height would be apparent to the forecaster and could be adjustedfor.

(3) Forecasts could be verified. At present, there is no way to testthe accuracy of bar forecasts.

(4) The intuition of forecasters and local mariners would be improvedas measurements provide "corrective feed-back" to judgements regardingftture wave height on the bar.

(5) A data base would be available for research.

74

Page 85: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

6.2 Theory and Numerical Modeling

We have demonstrated at the Columbia River that two-dimensionaleffects should be accounted for if Bar forecasts are to be improved.Jet-like ebb currents contribute to unusually large waves on the Bar. Thedynamics of tidal jets should be investigated and modeled. A similaritysolution with a few parameters such as jet half-width and centerlinevelocity is one approach (Ozsoy and Unluata, 1982).

If the surface current field can be so specified, then along withefforts to better define the surface current field, recent analytical andnumerical techniques for computing the wave field should be investigated.Liu (1983) has re-examined the wave/rip current problem studied by Arthur(1950), and has derived a mild-slope equation which includes currents.This, combined with a parabolic approximation, leads to a computationallyefficient solution. The significant advantage of this approach is that,unlike wave-ray computations, the wave field is computed everywhere includingwhere caustics arise and ray theory fails.

This research will result in products to guide forecasters, such ast.ables, charts, nomograms, and computer algorithms.

6.3 Field Experiments

This experiment has provided a valuable data set for the study ofwave-current interaction. However it has several deficiencies. First,due to hazardous conditions, only limited observations were made at Buoy 8.Second, surface drifter measurements were not dense enough in space andtime to give good current estimates, nor were they available seaward ofBuoy 8. Third, while SLAR imagery can provide excellent information onlong swell, the resolution of the radar is too coarse to yield similardata on shorter, locally generated wind waves, which are an importantconsideration as a navigational hazard.

A comprehensive field experiment must therefore measure, as a minimum,

(1) nondirectional wave spectra on the Bar, near Buoy 8,(2) directional wave spectra offshore(3) surface current fields in the entrance and offshore.

In addition, these observations should be supplemented by SLAR overflightst) map out the two-dimensional wave field and by vertical salinity andtemperature profiles to determine the density structure which may play arole in the dynamics of the surface current especially during freshets.

Item (1) and (2), above, could be provided by the wave measurementtechnology mentioned earlier. Item (3) might be provided by a remotesensing technique such as the Coastal Ocean Dynamics Applications Radar(CODAR) developed by the NOAA/ERL Wave Propagation Laboratory (Barrick andLipa, 1979; Holbrook and Frisch, 1981). Ideally, an experiment would beat least a month long, and coincident wave/current observations could bemade at each peak ebb and at intervals of 1 to 3 hours between peak ebbs.A winter experiment and summer experiment would be desirable, since seasonalextremes in offshore wave energy and in fresh water runoff occur.

75

Page 86: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

7 . REFERENCES

Arthur, R. S., (1950): Refraction of shallow water waves: the combinedeffect of currents and underwater topography. Transactions, AmericanGeophgsical Union, 31, 4, 549-552.

Battjes, J .A. (1982): A case study of wave height variations due to currentsin a tidal entrance. Coastal Engineering, 6, 47-57.

Barrick, D. E., and B. J. Lipa (1979): Ocean surface features observed byHF coastal ground-wave radars: a progress review. In: Ocean WaveClimate, M.D. Earle and A. Malahoff (eds.), Plenum Press, New York,129-152.

Enfield, D. (1973): Prediction of Hazardous Columbia River Bar Conditions.Final Report, Dept. of Commerce Contract 1-35356, 204 pp.

Gonzalez, F. I. (1984): A case study of wave-current-bathymetry interactionsat the Columbia River entrance. J. Phgs. Ocean. (in press).

Gonzalez, F. I., and C. L. Rosenfeld (1984): SLAR and in-situ observationsof ocean swell modification due to currents and bathymetry at theColumbia River entrance. IEEE Trans. Geosc. and Remote Sensing (inreview).

Holbrook, J. R., and A. S. Frisch (1981): A comparison of near-surfaceCODAR and VACM measurements in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, August 1978.J. Geophgs. Res., 86, 10908-10912.

Liu, P. L-F. (1983): Wave-current interactions on a slowly varying topography.J. Geophgs. Res., 88, 4421-4426.

Mattie, M. G., and D. L. Harris (1979): A System for Using Radar toRecord Wave Direction. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Coastal EngineeringResearch Center Technical Report No. 79-1, 50 pp.

Miche, R,_(1944): Mouvements ondulatoires des mers en profondeur constanteou decroissante. Ann. des Ponts et Chaussees, pp. 25-78, 131-164,270-292, 369-406.

Mulhern, R. M. (1982): Current measurements in the Columbia River estuary.Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, Masters Report,60 pp.

Ozsoy, E. and U. Unluata (1982): Ebb-tidal flow characteristics nearinletf. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 14, 251-263.

Phillips, D.M. (1977): Dynamics of the Upper Ocean, Second edition, CambridgeUniversity Press, Cambridge, 336 pp.

Rosenfeld, C. L., and J. W. Bell (1978): Monitoring Ocean Wave RefractionUtilizing Side-Looking Airborne Radar. Presented at APCG 1978,Portland, Oregon.

76

Page 87: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

Steele, K. E. and M. D. Earle (1979):Wave Data Analyzer (WDA) Systems.Conference, 212-220.

The Status of Data Produced by NDBOIn: Proceeding of the Oceans '79

Steele, K. E. (1983): NDBC wave measurement activities and plans. In:Proceedings 1983 Symposium on Buoy Technology, Marine TechnologySociety, 182-188.

Steele, K. E. (1984): Personal communication.

Su, M.-Y., (1982): Three-dimensional deep-water waves. Part 1. Experimenalmeasurement of skew and sYmmetric wave patterns, J. Fluid Mech., 124,73-108.

Timpe, G. L. (1983): The use of NOMAD hulls as severe environment buoys.In: Proceedings 1983 symposium on Buoy Technology, Marine TechnologySociety, 72-78.

77

Page 88: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2
Page 89: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

APPENDIX

Intensive Observation Periods

DATA SUMMARY

79

Page 90: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2
Page 91: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

APPENDIX

Data for Individual Intensive Observations Periods

In this appendix, we present the data collected during each individualintensive observation period. The data is grouped by observation periodand consists of:

1. The Waverider (EGRET) positions, as plotted from the log.

2. Waverider Spectral estimates and time series.

3. NDBC 46010 Spectral estimates.

4. The Cape Disappointment surface drifter tracks, as plotted fromthe log.

5. The Jetty A surface drifter tracks, as plotted from the log.

6. Large scale print of the SLAR image judged to be the best ofthose collected during the observation period.

7. Small scale print of the SLAR image judged to be the best ofthose collected during the observation period.

8. The Waverider (Surface Vessel EGRET) log.

9. The Cape Disappointment radar log.

10. The Jetty A radar log.

In the logs of the EGRET, the following conventions have been used.Entries for vessel position through sextant fixes have the format

Sextant Fixes

Left angle

Right angleLeft or right check

angle (L~ or R~)

Objects

Left objectCenter objectRight objectLeft or right check

object (~ or R~)

All angles are measured left or right from the center object. Theidentification of all landmark objects was confirmed by check angles onindependent objects. Table Al lists the description given for each landmarkobject on the 1981 NOS chart 18521, shown in Figure AO.

In the Remarks column, the notations UW and WR imply "underway" and"Waverider." "Drift log" entries refer to current speed estimates obtainedby timing the drift of a small floater to the end of a 25 meter tether.Entries for ships heading are magnetic, referred to the compass on theEGRET, without correction for variation or deviation unless stated otherwise.From comparison of the compass with known directions, it appeared thatdeviation values were minimal and within the precision with which the

81

Page 92: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

compa~s could be read (about 10 degrees). The magnetic variation islisted on the 1981 NOS chart 18521 as 20°30' East.

Range and bearing corrections determined from radar fixes on thelandmarks have not been applied to the drifter tracks. Neither have thetracks from two independent radar systems been corrected. to coincide withone another. These corrections will be made in later analyses.

82

Page 93: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

, ,I

!

I •

. "

••

",

., .• • , .

";

83

..-tC'\It.n00..-t

-L()+J0 ~

l'tl.dl.J

en0:z;4-i0

c::0

'.-4+J~

0P-

c(

~QJ~

-0 ::l00

'.-4~

Page 94: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

TABLE AI. Description of sextant fix objects as given by 1981 NOS Chart 18521.

Object Number

1

2

3

4

5

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

Description

North Head Gp FI(2) 30 sec 194 ft 26M

Alt FI R & W 30 sec 220 ft IBM

OBS. TOWER

OBS. TOWER

FI 4 sec 31 ft 10M

TOWER

E Int 6 sec 61 ft

Qk FI

TOWER

TR

R "2" FI R 4 sec WHISTLE (Buoy 2)

R "4" FI 4 sec WHISTLE (Buoy 4)

Light on S. tip of large Sand Island,"FI G 4 sec. 15 ft. '1'"

Clatsop Spit "Lookout Tower"

E side of bend in South Jetty

Light on S. tip of line of piles oncentral S. Side of small Sand Island,"FI 4 sec '5'"

Seaward end of N. Jetty

84

Page 95: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

10 September 1981

FLOOD

85

Page 96: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2
Page 97: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

:.;".~::':

:

....

...

....

...

i~AN8~

.'.:

:..

BA

TH

YM

ET

RY

INF

EE

T

WAV

ERID

ER(E

GR

ET)T

RA

CK

S

o1/

2IN

M

-I

2km

FLO

OD

10S

EP

81

I,,:.:.:

:.;:

• Fig

ure

AI.

Wav

erid

er(E

GR

ET

)tr

ack

sfo

rfl

oo

dp

eri

od

of

10S

ep

t.1

98

1.

....

...

....

.-2

1.

----

---

-........

..~._'-.-

..,..

--

,,..

..,

'-._

.J

.,---

"I.

.J'-

......

.--

''\

---

,,,,,..

"--

57

)_

-_

__

_....

./

II_

_~

__

....

__

....,

,

/~()9..-

__

,,,

\

..J5

.......",

./

(10

30

-)--

06

1318

1221

F....._

_~'"

\/

~55

__

-"

,,

/--

--,,

/'O'~~..

",

,;,

/"O

O"'~

",?

..,.

'~""~'

<:;

-,',

')/

/..

",

//

::."

\I

/...

..':

:"',

>::

:"\

//

._

..:

....'.,,~,

'",

//

"~:.....,

"-/

/".

",

//

.'".'

"'",

//

:.'

."""

':",

'"'.'

,/

//

,'_

.,

,,":'

:'::',

\"'.:::

:.",

,,'/

~':'_'.

.''f

"..

...>

-,,

•/

/..,

.._

.,.

..::

'.,,

//

\.::_

..===~==="~",,

:......",

"/

/'''

'1--

-"

,/

I\.

\..~

//"~"

,I

/".

" "/ ...

J-....... .,

-., .....

."­ .~

\ \ \ \/.~.

.,/.

,.........,

........

.._.

_..'.

, "'\.

00~

Page 98: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oo

• BUOY 8 198110 SEPT. 10:30 POTJD 253 11.30 G"T HS • 1.45 " U· 1.28 "'S

oo.0.......

N:x:"No2:0'oJ ••oena..

ooN

oO+.-__.,..........c::=-_+-__-+---=_......:::l==::==:::p=__-==-.. +-__--.. +-__-t

9b.00 0.0. 0.01 O.IZ 0.16 O.ZO O.Z. O.ZI O.IZ 0.16 0••0FREQUENCY (HZ)

~

~

LLIo~o..... 0~.....J­a..2:a:

o0 0

~;I----Il~--_+l----II~---+I---_fl---_+I----+I---~I~--_+I----IIi-'0.00 100.00 ZOO. 00 100.00 .00.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 100.00 900.00 1000.00

TIME (SECS)

1000.00900.00100.00700.00.00.00 500.00 600.00TIME (SECS)

100.00200.00100.00

8.;+---~~--_+----+----of---_+---_+---+_--~I__--_+---_+_'0.00

...

8

::1001~...:.....

Figure A2. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1030 PDT, 10 Sept. 1981.

88

Page 99: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oo.; DRIfTING 1981

10 SEPT.JD 253

10:55 PDT17155 G"T HS • 1.41 " u • 1. 18 "IS

oo

......'"N:J:....No:Eo...,.

N

oenCL

oo-g~--.......,I~---+-----+-~~;::::~:::::==t==:::::':'=to===-.o::="'--""'--_I-----t9b.00 0.0. 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.2. 0.28 0.S2 0.S6 0••0

FREQUENCY (HZ)

1000.00900.00800.00700.00.00.00 500.00 600.00TIME (SECS)

SOO.OO200.00100.00

wo~o~o-.-1-CL:Ea:

o0 0

w":a: Iw~

-I-0~~

"'+-------.I-----+----+----+-------ll-----+----+----t-----+----l-­'0.00

oo

"'+-------....----+I-----1II-----+I---....I----+-1----+1---...,11-----+'-----111-'0.00 100.00 200.00 SOD. 00 400.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 800.00 900.00 1000.00

TIME (SECS)

Figure A3. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1055 PDT, 10 Sept. 1981.

89

Page 100: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

o•o BUOY 10 1981

10 SEPT.JD 253

11: 31 PDT18.31 G"T HS • .83 " U • .88 "IS

o•o.....

N%

"Nox.-'.oQenCl.

oN

o'

0.01 O.IZ 0.16 O.ZO O.Z.FREQUENCY (HZ)

O.ZI O.SZ 0.56

1000.00900.00100.00700.00.00.00 500.00 600.00TIME (SECS)

SOD. 00200.00100.00

LUQ;::)0..... 0~ ...J­Cl.xa:

o0 0LU":a: ILU.......J~o

~~

"'+-----lr------+----+----+-----lr------+----+----+-----+----+-­'0.00

oo.........x-LUo00:::»..:'.....~

..J

Cl.o PM~~M#MMI\4l~~

~;L I.0 ----IIf-----+·----lIf-----+I----II----f-1----11----+1----+1-'0.00 100.00 ZOO. 00 SOO.OO .00.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 100.00 900.00 1000.00

TIME (SECS)

Figure A4. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensi _y for 1131 PDT, 10 Sept. 1981.

90

Page 101: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

o•o

DRIfTING 98110 SEPT.JO 253

11:57 PDT18.57 GMT HS • .83 M u • .55 MIS

oIf)Q.

oN

o

gl---~~----lf-----+----+---+-_":"::!;::::~~+===~:::::~~:::=-=====1I=====~cb.OO 0.04 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.21 0.S2 0.S6 0.40

FREQUENCY (HZ)

,....g~

LIJo::::)0~o-....J-Q.

::r:a:

o0 0

L1J";a:'LIJto-...J~'o

u..~

"'+---~f-----+----+----+-__-"""'- ---i-__-::---""'-__-""""'"t-__--+-__--+-'0.00 100.00 200.00 SOO.OO 400.00 SOO.OO 600.00 700.00 100.00 900.00 1000.00TIME (SECS)

oo-t-:II:

...."

...J

a·o N"'ftW~~~

~;L---+I---....I----+-l----+l----ilf-----+I---....l,..----+I----+i-'0.00 100.00 200.00 SOO.OO 400.00 500.00 600.00 100. DO 100.00 900.00 1000.00

TIME (SEeS)

Figure AS. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1157 PDT, 10 Sept. 1981.

91

Page 102: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

00 10 SEPT. 12 PDT.;

NDBC BUOY .60101981 JD 253 19 Z

0 SIG HT .. 1.7 METERS0 U II .5 MIS.. WIND SPEED .. 5.9 HIS,.... WIND DIRN ..352. DEGS

N::J:......0NOE.-L&J

00

N

00

~.OO 0.0. 0.08 O.IZ 0.16 O.ZO O.U 0.Z8 O.'Z 0.36 0••0F (HZ)

00 10 SEPT. 11 PDT..

NDBC BUOY .60101981 JD 253 18 Z

0 SIG HT .. 1.8 METERS0 U II 1. 2 MIS00 WIND SPEED .... 6 MIS,.... WIND DIRN =356. DEGS

N::J:......0NOE.-L&J

00

N

00

~.OO 0.0. 0.08 O.IZ 0.16 O.ZO O.U 0.Z8 O.'Z 0.36 0••0F (HZ)

00 10 SEPT• 10 PDT..

NDBC BUOY .60101981 JD 253 17 Z

0 SIG HT .. 1.9 METERS0 U - I. 3 MIS00 WIND SPEED .. 3.3 MIS,.... WIND DIRN -359. DEGS

N::J:......0NOE.-L&J

00

N

00

~.OO 0.0. 0.08 O.IZ 0.16 O.ZO O.U 0.Z8 O.'Z 0.36 0••0F (HZ)

Figure A6. NDBC 46010 power spectral density for 1000, 1100, and 1200 PDT,10 Sept. 1981.

92

Page 103: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

':::

:;'..

··.i;:

·~,i.

':-.

0;:

',

1/2

INM

I2k

m

'f·..:::\

.i.

\.... .,.

, ....... , .I , \ ""

, ,, ).r

·

BA

TH

YM

ET

RY

INF

EE

T

~.::.~;..

SU

RFA

CE

DR

IFTE

RTR

AC

KS

o

CAP

ED

ISA

PP

OIN

TME

NT

RAD

ARDA

TAFL

OO

D10

SE

P81

,"('

:....:

:...:

.:~...

,.

.....

........

co,::

.....

......

......

..

=-=-

:a':7

'......

......'

.l

i@

11

I5,..

------

-./

/'1

@II

IO

/

//

//

//

/

/(.,.

,."/,

"//

\._

._.-..

.......

///

·\·,

~r==

==~.

,===

~,,;

=_·_

··'::.'..

...-

"=-

....

.....".

J

.....

....

....

i:' ,

,i.....

Fig

ure

A7.

Su

rfac

ed

rift

er

track

sfo

rC

ape

Dis

app

oin

tmen

tra

dar

dat

aco

llecte

dd

uri

ng

flo

od

of

10S

ep

t.19

81.

-.~

\"'"

......., > \ "\ \

./

........

"./'

,..........

......

........_._

."

, \

\

~I

Page 104: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

.....

.'.:'.;.

~~:.:.

<;!!;i~\i

.:.:;:

:..

....~

'.':

.....

\>.

..

--. \ .I I "

"\" '-. '-.

.....')

!".

.~...::

.,

1/2

INM

I2k

mB

AT

HY

ME

TR

YIN

FE

ET

....

~.:::.;..

SUR

FAC

ED

RIF

TER

TRA

CK

S

o

';:f::~

.

JETT

YP

A"R

AD

AR

DAT

AFL

OO

D\0

SE

P81

..........

..:.:>

.;..

.:;

.

.....

".

. ...

".

"-.....C'.:

:

.....

.....

.............

.....

...

track

sfo

rJett

yA

rad

ar

data

co

llecte

dd

uri

ng

flo

od

of

10S

ep

t.1

98

1.

.~

'::.:::::

-

_::

,. ....

....

£

.....

,'.,

.

....

.....

..'

/

.:./

j

.....

.....

". Fig

ure

AB

.S

urf

ace

dri

fter

J-....... \..

..,.....

...".'

\ \ "\ \/.~.

......./

,........

........

--.-.

-.....

. '-.\\.

\0 ~

Page 105: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

10 September 1981

FLOOD

Wave rider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time Hdg. Sextant Fixes Objects Remarks

0930 UW from Hammond Basin

1018 WR in water holding station100 yards north of Buoy 8

(Drift log 25 m. 17, 18, 19sec. 1.4 m/sec.)

1030 Begin record holding station.

1032 36°10' 1 100 yards north of No. 82 1~ m. wave,

35°12' 3 12 second period.

1043 260 36°18' 1 5 foot wave from2 echo sounder

35°14' 3R,J 24°05' 5

llOO 34°15' 1 Begin drift at 1055.2 WR '" 100 yards

38°57' 3 down-current from boat

ll03 33°23' 12

40°46' 3

ll06 32°08' 12

42°55' 3

1109 30°38' 12

45°23' 3 WR ~ 50 yards NW of boatR,J 12°13' R,J 12

ll12 29°01' 12

48°02' 3

1115 27°34' 1 ~~ ~ 50 yards NW of boat2

50°10' 3

95

Page 106: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

10 September 1981

FLOOD

Waverider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time Hdg. Sextant Fixes Objects Remarks

1120 24° 39' 1 Stop drifting with2 WR. underway, towing WR.

54° 12' 330° 30' R.j 5

1131 24° 44' 1 On station.2 100 yds. N. Buoy 10.

64° 44' 339° 39' R.j 5

1153 25° 27' 1 On station.2

65° 07' 340° 22' R.j 5

1157 Begin drifting from100 yds. N. of Buoy 10.WR ~ 250 ft. downcurrent from EGRET.

1200 24° 14' 12

67° 00' 3

l203 19° 53' 12

69° 34' 3

1206 18° 12' 1 WR ~ 100 ft. NW2 of EGRET

71° 13' 3

1209 51° 48' 15

36° 52' 335° 20' L.j 2

1213 47° 37' 15

40° 37' 3

96

Page 107: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

10 September 1981

FLOOD

Waverider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time Hdg. Sextant Fixes Objects Remarks

1215 45° 05' 1 WR ~ 100 ft. NW5 of EGRET.

42° 20 3

1218 41° 55' 15

44° 39' 3

1221 27° 06' 2 End drift.5 Underway for Buoy 14.

47° 01 ' 3

1232 WR aboard. Underwayto Hammond Basin.

97

Page 108: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

10 September 1981

FLOOD

CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (nm. ) (deg. ) Remarks

1 1050 1.13 3351055 1.05 3251059 1.03 317 Retrieved Buoy #1

2 1115 1.47 3351120 1.48 3281125 1.45 3201130 1.50 3131135 1.56 3071140 1.67 3021150 1.81 2931153 1.87 290 Pick up Buoy #2

3 1122 1.56 3221125 1.58 3171130 1.64 3111135 1.71 3051140 1. 79 3001145 1.87 2961149 1.90 293 Pick up Buoy #3

4 1130 1.20 3251135 1.19 3171140 1.21 3101145 1.24 3021150 1.30 2951155 1.37 2891200 1.47 2851205 1.58 2831210 1.69 2801215 1. 79 2791218 1.84 279 Pick up Buoy #4

5 1205 1.19 2811210 1.27 2801215 1. 31 2791220 1.33 2781225 1.36 278 Pick up Buoy #5

98

Page 109: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

10 September 1981

FLOOD

CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (um. ) (deg. ) Remarks

6 1110 1.64 3351115 1.61 3291120 1.61 3221125 1.64 3151130 1.71 3081135 1. 78 3031140 1.85 2991145 1. 91 294

99

Page 110: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

J10 September 1981

FLOOD

JETTY A RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (run. ) (deg.) Remarks

1 104945 1.30 2191 105605 1.13 2091 105815 1.09 207 Buoy #1 picked up

2 111650 1.57 213 Drifters difficult to2 112030 1.53 208 see and follow.2 113950 1.52 182 If

2 114300 1.54 178 '12 115250 1.65 169 If

2 115550 1.65 167 If

3 112210 1.60 202 11

3 114525 1.69 174 11

4 113025 1.29 208 "4 113430 1.23 204 "4 113700 1.20 200 "4 115745 1. 21 169 "4 120150 1.25 165 "

5 122623 0.64 153 II

6 111210 1. 75 212 fI

6 111445 1. 71 208 II

6 114715 1.73 171 II

100

Page 111: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

10 September 1981

EBB

101

Page 112: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2
Page 113: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

I

<••.•.

{,\

.....

.~~NPI;~

BA

TH

YM

ET

RY

INF

EE

T

o1/

2IN

M

~I

2km

(:.;<:'"

.:./ /,i,,((f

~

£

....

)1

----

........~

---

--.....

.'-

'-'-

:'.,

--

......

.""

"':

-'-

.._

J'.

--

......

l.oJ

,--

",

---

,.....,

-(1

44

4-

'.

,,-

1506

)~

----~--__"

.I"

--

_.-

--

"-..

-......,

I"(I528-~

....._

_i"

....

....

....

...,

\"1

55

5)

_10

1506

(6...

......

._

:--"

""

"~1528

--1

915

'.'

""-

"5

9

1555

..3

.'":'

"~',.

1'1

60

5.,

...

......."

,

/~..

..<:.

••.::~~,

'")

/'.

......

..•~,

\/-\...

....,

.....•..~,"

\/

'...

.\."

\,

//">

\;\'i:,:·.:

:2~..~>,

~.~-,.

..'

..,....:

....

.'.,,

../

\_~~~::~";i::=~==:

'''''>~>,'

/.\

-..,"

"".'

,/".

..,,

/'-,'.,

/..

--'

'"

',

'" --

". 16

29

.---

---

09 "/ " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " '"

Fig

ure

A9.

Wav

erid

er(E

GR

ET)

track

sfo

reb

bp

eri

od

on10

Sep

t.19

81.

1..

.', .....

....,."

\ "\ \/

.......

.......

./

,.......,

---

, '" \\.

J

-.~,

.... o w

Page 114: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

ooN BUOY 10 1981

10 SEPT.JD 253

14:44 PDT21144 6"T I-4S • 1.27 " U • -1.30 "IS

olit

olit

o

o0.j....__q==--_-+-__---l,..-__-t-__......,I-_----:::;:===;:-....c:==-.... .....__...~.OO 0.0. 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 O.U O,U 0.'2 0.16 0.•0

FREQUENCY (HZ)

oU'I£1.

........N:J:"­No2:0....., ....

.....g~~

o~o..... 0........J'"£1.2:0::

o0 0~..:0::'~........J.... 0u..~

"'+------l...----+---+----i-----I-----+----.......---+----+----+_'0.00 100.00 200.00 '00.00 .00.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 100.00 fOO.OO 1000.00

TIME (SECS)

oo.,;.....

2:.....,~O00~..:...........J£1.

02:00::.

x~'0::a:

oo

"'+-----il----+----+----f----+---+----.......----+----+-~-_i_'0.00 100.00 200.00 '00.00 .00.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 100.00 900.'0 1000.00

TIME (SEeS)

Figure A10. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1444 PDT, 10 Sept. 1981.

104

Page 115: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oo.; DRIFTING 1981

10 SEPT. 15:06 PDTJD 253 22. 6 GMT HS • 1.80 M U • -1.41 MIS

oo........

N:::I:"-~~........;o(I)Q.

g~""::=~::::::::::~---i---+----+-----+---:;:"'~:::~:=:==+~--'---'"Cb.oo 0.0. 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.2. 0.21 0.S2 0.S6 0.40FREQUENCY (HZ)

UJo:::Jo~o-...J-Q.:Ea:

o0 0

UJ':a: IUJ~

..J"'0~~

':'O+.-OO-----ll01-0-.-00--2+0-0.-0-0----lS01-0-.-00--.+00-.-0-0--5...OO-.00---6....00-.-00--7-+0-0-.00---.""00-.-00--90+-0-.0-0--10....0-0.00

TIME (SECS)

ooiii.....

z:.......

oo

':'0....-00-----101-0-.-00--2+0-0-.OO---1S01-0-.-00--.+0-0.-OO---15001--.00---6+00-.-0-0--7-+00-.0-0--.....00-.-00--900+--.00---10....0-0.00

TIME (SECS)

Figure All. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1506 PDT, 10 Sept. 1981.

105

Page 116: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oo.; BUOY 8 1981

10 SEPT. 15:28 PDTJO 253 22,28 6"T HS • 2.18 " U • -1.48 "IS

oo-oo~__....L __t--__-+-__----i +-__-+~::::::==i====-_.....__~.--_---t

91.00 ,.0. 0.0' 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.2. 0.2' 0.S2 O.Sf 0••0FREQUENCY (HZ)

oIJ')

a..

oo~,.....

N::t.....~g-'N

UJo:::1

0....0-.-.oJ-a..x~

o0 0UJ";0:'UJ....-.oJ-0"'-~.,4-------lI-----+---+------.I----+---+---t-----+----+----+_'0.00 100.00 200.00 SOO.OO .00.00 500.00 600.00 100.00 fOO.OO 900.00 1000.00

TIME (SECS)

oo..,.....x-

oo

..+---.........I-----+---+-----II----+---+----I----+----+----f--'0.00 100.00 200.00 SOO.OO .00.00 500.00 600.00 100.00 800.00 900.00 1000.00

TIME (SECS)

Figure A12. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1528 PDT, 10 Sept. 1981.

106

Page 117: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oo.. DRIfTING 1981

10 SEPT. 15:55 PDTJD Z53 ZZI55 &"1 US • Z.Z3 "

0••00.160.120.210.16 0.20 O.Z.FREQUENCY (HZ)

0.120.010.0.

o0.J,.....__-+_.L_r-__-+-__---l~--_+_--_+--~;:::::~~=t=~==--~-........~.OO

Clen0..

ooN

oo

•.....N:r.....l'Jor.o.... "..;

UJo~g- ...J-0..Xa:

o0 0UJ':a:'UJ~

..J-0LI.~

"'......----il----+----i----+----+----+----+------t----+---+_'0.00 100.00 200.00 SOO.OO .00.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 100.00 900.00 1000.00

TIME (SECS)

ootit.....

X-UJo00:::::l':~.....J0..0x oa:.::J:la:a:

1000.00900.00100.00700.00.00.00 500.00 600.00TIME (SECS)

SOl. 00200.00100.00

ooft+-----.I----+----i----+----+----+----+-----1----+---+_'0.00

Figure A13. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1555 PDT, 10 Sept. 1981.

107

Page 118: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

00

10 SEPT • 15 PDT.;NDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 253 22 Z

0 SIG HT = 1.7 HETERS0 U = -1.4 HIS.0 WIND SPEED = 6.2 HIS- WIND DIRN =343. DEGS

N:x......0NOX ..'-"

~

00

N

00

9).00 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.28 0.S2 0.56 0.40F (HZ)

00

10 SEPT• 14 PDT.;NDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 253 21 Z

0 SIG HT = 1.4 HETERS0 U = -1.0 HIS.. WIND SPEED = 6.5 HIS- WIND DIRN =350. DEGS

N:x......0NOX ..'-"

~

00

N

00

9).00 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.28 0.S2 0.56 0.40F (HZ)

00 10 SEPT. 13 PDT.;

NDBC BUOY 4601019B1 JD 253 20 Z

0 SIG HT = 1.5 HETERS0 U = -.4 HIS.. WIND SPEED = 6.1 HIS- WIND DIRN =345. DEGS

N:x......0NOX ..'-"

~

00

'"

00

9).00 0.04 o.oe 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.28 0.S2 0.56 0.40F (HZ)

Figure A14. NDBC 46010 power spectral density for 1300, 1400, and 1500 PDT,10 Sept. 1981.

108

Page 119: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

00

• 10 SEPT. 18 PDTNDBC BUOY 4601019B1 ..10 254 1 Z

0 SIG HT = 2. 1 METERS0 U = -.3 MIS.0 WIND SPEED = 9.2 MIS- WIND DIRN =340. DEGSN

:J:......0NOr.......,~

00

N

00

~.OO 0.0. 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.2. 0.28 0.32 0.36 0••0F (HZ)

00

10 SEPT. 17 PDTlD

NDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 254 o Z

0 SIG HT = 2.0 METERS0 U·-1.1 MIS.0 WIND SPEED = 7.5 MIS- WIND DIRN =340. DEGS

N:J:...... 0NOr. ......,~

00

N

00

~.OO 0.0. 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.28 0.32 0.36 0••0F (HZ)

00

lD 10 SEPT. 16 PDTNDBC BUOY 460101981 ..10 253 23 Z

0 SIG IH .. 1.7 METERS0 U .. -1. 5 MIS-0 WIND SPEED = 7.1 MIS- WIND DIRN =342. DEGS

N:J:...... 0NOr.......,~

00

N

00

~.OO 0.0. 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.28 0.32 0.36 0••0F (HZ)

Figure A15. NDBC 46010 power spectral density for 1600, 1700, and 1800 PDT,10 Sept. 1981.

109

Page 120: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

......

.. j~AEg~

.'0

::

BA

THY

ME

TRY

INFE

ET

SUR

FAC

ED

RIF

TER

TRA

CK

S

o1/

2IN

M

-I

2km

fur

Cap

eD

isa

pp

oin

tmen

tra

dar

da

taco

llecte

dd

uri

ng

ebb

of

10S

ept.

19

81

.

:-:.

;;.:

..'.

;..';,iii:!

;{;

./

j

....

Su

rfa

ced

rif

ter

tra

cks

..'

".

····1

·,

...----"-~

'-.

'45

-""

__

_,_

J,

'4'''

50

,4

0..

....

-'"

""~

_"

()_

'_,_

",

-~-,

"-

,~~$

OOj

_,

,

..•

59

,..-

45

40

1537

-----

.......

I5

5

__

....._

0600

--

"41

--C

>--_

_,

I

--.:

----

--.-

---"

"-'.

~/

-,-

'-""

-«~C

C~--.

..50

""

/_

--

,S,'"'

",",,~

1450®

\/

---'-',

2,

/5

025

'''''~

"'"

/,,,,,,,,

'""

,l

/'''"

,""

,",

/,",

"',

\/

,,'

>~,"

\,

/-,

,I/",

,/

'0'"

,

/<

',,

/,

,/",

./

06

00

".

""

".

/0

6"

/'.

""

"""

"/

~~'--,

","

",

////

\'::

;:,;;,

,,==,,

,,,,~;

,,:.",'>~

//

""i--"

/

/'.~'

.

/",

//

//

/ ...

Fig

ure

A16

.

J-.....

.... ......,

........"

'" \ "'\ \",

.,.....

..'-

../,.,

........

'-.._

.-

" .'. \\,

.... .... o

Page 121: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

.....·11

.:,11

'/:'::::

"

..,i't;\C

':.~O::'

.....

"':"

,~;~

§~~

...~--,.:::':

BA

TH

YM

ET

RY

INF

EE

T

~.:....

SUR

FAC

ED

RIF

TER

TRA

CK

S

o1/

2IN

M

~I

2km

JET

TY

~A"

RA

DA

RD

ATA

EB

B10

SE

P81

....

..,,':

':"..

....~

...•.

....:

..

.····.

1::::

..,

..••.

track

sfo

rJett

yA

rad

ar

data

coll~cted

du

rin

geb

bo

f10

Sep

t.1

98

1.

\{

....

.........

......

.....~

~~:;

:.,.

.... £

.....

2i_

__

J_.

--

-....

.----

--,

-._

.-:-

:;..

-._

._..

.-i'.

,-

IJ

'.--

®e1

53

8....

....

.......

...

---

""'

--

'j

-------'.

/i

---.-

.-.-.,

.--',

I-..-,

--"',

./'

--::

:,--

-~~""

\--

...........-

.......

"\.

/--

-'-'~,

,

// --.....

....

..........

\. Fig

ure

A17

.S

urf

ace

dri

fter

J

-'-

"'....

.,''''''

', > .\ "\ ,

/.-.

....

....../'

'-.....

...""'.

-.-.

-'. , \

'\

- - -

Page 122: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

>-'

>-'

N

Fig

ure

A18

.

-.. -.

SLA

Rim

age

of

Co

lum

bia

Riv

eren

tran

ce

ob

tain

ed

onth

eeb

bat

1520

PDT

,10

Sep

t.1

98

1.

Page 123: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

• -

----

-.. -..,----­•

113

Page 124: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

10 September 1981

EBB

Waverider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time Hdg. Sextant Fixes

1444 060(into current)

1457 065 27° 38'

60° 38'38° 31'

Objects

123

5 R~

Remarks

Holding station.WR deployed100 yds. N ofBuoy 10. - 100 mline out.- 8 sec. 5-8 ft.(current 11, 12sec./25 m. driftlog).Holding station.

1501

1506

]510

1515

1519

152330

27° 53'

60° 17'

27° 27'

60° 04'

30° 37'

54° 00'

33° 30'

47° 48'

36° 33'

37° 44'

123

123

123

123

123

123

114

Begin drift fromon station. WR 100yds. down current.

Boat maneuveringto hold WR - 200ft. down currentfrom boat with slackin "towing" cableat all times.

Buoy streamingto leeward - 75 m.

---------

Page 125: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

10 September 1981

EBB

Waverider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time Hdg. Sextant Fixes Objects Remarks

152730 36° 34' 12

34° 30' 3

1528 55- Holding position60° ~ 100 yds. NW ofMAG Buoy 8.

Drifted exactly intoposition. Wave ridersubmerges with topeven with water linebut follows the wavepattern very well.

1534 37° 33' 1 In position -2 referenced to

33° 00' 3 Buoy 8.

1542 36° 43' 1 8-10 ft. seas and2 8 sec. by visual

36° 32' 12 and stopwatch.36° 10 13R,J good

(drift log 10 sec. and10 sec. for 25 m.)

1555 36° 18' 1 Began drifting from2 in position N of

36° OS' 12 Buoy 8.

1559 35° 55' 1 EGRET maneuvering2 to stay ~ 150 to

32° 51' 12 200 ft. up currentfrom WR with slackin cable at alltimes.

1605 35° 11' 12

26° 03' 14

115

Page 126: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

10 September 1981

EBB

Waverider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time Hdg. Sextant Fixes Objects Remarks

160930 340 10' 12

27 0 30' 12240 03' 14 Good

1614 330 06' 12

25 0 13' 12

1619 31 0 53' 12

20 0 IS' 14 .J Good

1629 End drift with WR.Underway for Buoy 4towing WR.

1653 720 OS' 117 (/14 buoy)

580 50' 16 (/12 buoy)51 0 06' 2

1655 72 0 OS' 1 Picked up drifter buoy17 (1/4 buoy) 5 min ago at about

57 0 50' 16 (112 buoy) 1650.52 0 12' 2 Cancel plans for

record at Buoy 4 dueto approach ofdarkness. Underwayfor Hammond.

116

Page 127: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

10 September 1981

EBB

CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (nm. ) (deg. ) Remarks

2 1450 2.4 2641537 1.01 3181540 1.05 3281545 1.16 3491550 1.30 0001555 1.49 0051600 1.72 010

3 1450 2.4 2621541 1.21 3061545 1.36 3171550 1.53 3261555 1. 70 3321600 1.93 3381605 2.14 3441610 2.39 3481615 2.57 3521620 2.80 3551625 2.96 357

4 1527 0.96 2951530 0.94 3051535 0.92 3221540 1.00 3411545 1.15 0011550 1.30 0061555 1.49 0141600 1.65 015

5 1523 1. 70 2811525 1.61 2921530 1.59 3021535 1.63 3121540 1. 74 3211545 1.84 3301550 2.04 3351555 2.28 3401600 2.45 344

117

Page 128: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

BuoyNo.

2

Time(PDT)

153815

Range(nm. )

1.08

10 September 1981

EBB

JETTY A RADAR DATA

Bearing(deg.) Remarks

208 Drifters impossible to follow.

118

Page 129: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

11 September 1981

SLACK

119

Page 130: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2
Page 131: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

·.·..·:"r\;

;••.·

.::"

.::',

.~~~

p:~~

1/2

INM

I2k

mB

AT

HY

ME

TR

YIN

FE

ET

:';:

'

WAV

ERID

ER(E

GR

ET)

TRAC

KS

o

SLA

CK

IIS

EP

81

\.

....

~....

.

,i

j

,,'

Fig

ure

A20

.W

aver

ider

(EG

RE

T)

track

sfo

rsl

ack

peri

od

on

11S

ep

t.1

98

1.

"'.

""

"..

"".

......

-2'-

.--

----

----

.-._.

-.-.,

-,,..

..,

'-.-

.~.

--'l.

oJ"

----

(1"'-

"~,

--

K0

9'

"--

1411

.....

.

/-2

2.

_---

~--.

,..

..',

,/

.---

-'-

,,

/---

~--

J-,.

,,,,

\-

.--~'"

./

"-,

,/

-",

-....,

,//

/·f..

..........

................./....??~"

')/

/,••

,...•

•..<

:--'

,\

//

....

...

•..~,

"\

///

......

\::.•~

,'-Z

."/

/'.

\..'

,/

/..

.'

"-','

,//'."

./

/:

.""

,,~

/~'~

-'"'.,,.

//

"'--_.~._----~~=....

..~"

//

\=~~;;=;;-----

-"

'..>~

//

.\

'./

'-'

-..

,/.

,/

/..

" " " --....

.,'--'

, ',\ \ "\ \

/.~.

......

../

,.........-.

--.-.

-",

"J

-.~.

.... N ....

Page 132: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oN.. BUOY 10 1981

11 SEPT. 13:48 PDTJD 254 20.48 GMT HS • 1.51 M U. -.119 "IS

oV)

CLoeo

g!--""O=:::=~:...-_-t-----+-----t--=:...-..;.::==~=+==::::~~~:!:=:::;:=====lF==~~.oo 0.0. 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 O.Z. 0.28 0.'2 0.'6 0 ••0

FREQUENCY (HZ)

,....g5w>UJo;:)0~o-...J-CLxa:

o

~~I'a: ,

~~ ----III-----+I----iI,_..---+1----+I----III-----+I----iI.......---+1---+1 -'0.00 100.00 200.00 '00.00 tOO. 00 500.00 600.00 700.00 800.00 '00.00 10 MI.OO

TIME (SECS)

oo..

'"'x......UJo00;:).

~-~.

oo

':'o+.-oo----l,01-0-.0-0--2+-00-.-0-0--'-+0-0-.O-O---i.O.....O-.-OO--S+O-O.-O-O--,-iO-O-.0-0--7"'00-.-0-0--'-+0-0-.O-O---l'OOI-.-00--1+-000-.00

TIME (SECS)

Figure A2l. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1348 PDT, 11 Sept. 1981.

122

Page 133: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oo

• DRIfTING 198111 SEPT. 14:09 PDTJD 254 21. 9 G"T US • 1.99 " U· -.80 "IS

O.tO0.160.S20.280.16 0.20 0.2tFREQUENCY (HZ)

0.120.08O.Ot

oo~__~~---+----+---_+-_=:=-t_:::::::=""'F=-==-""""__--l~-==_""''''''__'''~.oo

ooN

oen0..

oo

•-N:I:.......NO%:0.........

1000.00900.00800.00

wo:::1

0~o~.....J­0..2:a:

o0 0w":0:1w~

...J-'0Ll..0

.;-t----~f-----+---_+_---+_--_+---_+---+_--___l,.....--__f_---+_'0.00 100.00 200.00 SOO.OO tOO. 00 500.00 600.00 700.00

TIME (SECS)

1000.00900.00800.00700.00tOO. 00 500.00 600.00TIME (SECS)

SOO.OO200.00100.00

oo"+---~f-----+---+----+_--_+----+----+------i---_+---+­'0.00

Wo00:::I":~

...J0.. 0

~~-::E'0:a:

g..-2:......

Figure A22. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1409 PDT, 11 Sept. 1981.

123

Page 134: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oo..- DRIFTING 1981

11 SEPT. 14:26 PDTJD 254 21.26 6"T HS • 2.68 " U • -1.01 "/5

ooN.........

N~

"No::1:0.......•o«n0..

oo•o

0.L-~"d..-----:+---+--:":+::::::::::=+=::::=:::~--="f-"'--t-----+----t~.OO 0.0' 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.2' 0.28 0.S2 0.S6 0.'0

FREQUENCY (HZ)

1000.00900.00100.00700.00

L&Jo~o~o........J"0..::I:a:

o0 0L&J':a: IL&J~

...J....0

L&..~ft~__----'~__-+ -+- +-__"""' -+- +- I--__-+ -+--~.OO 100.00 200.00 SOO.OO '00.00 500.00 600.00

TIME (SECS)

ooft.......

::I:......

oo

':"0+.-00------.10f-0-.-00--2+00-.-0-0--s-i00,....-.0-0--.....00-.-0-0--s-+0-0-.0-0--60t-0-.-00--7-+0-0-.0-0-----.aof-0-.-00--,+00-.-0-0--+1000.00

TIME (SECS)

Figure A23. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1426 PDT, 11 Sept. 1981.

124

Page 135: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

00 11 SEPT. 13 PDT.;

NDBC BUOY ~60101981 JD 2S~ 20 Z

0 SIG HT .. 2.~ METERS0 U .. .3 MIS.. WIND SPEED .. 8.6 MIS- WIND DIRN ..3~3. DEGS

N:x:...... 0NOr..;.....U.I

00

N

00

91.00 0.0. 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.28 0.S2 0.36 0••0F (HZ)

00 11 SEPT• 12 PDT.;

NDBC BUOY ~60101981 JD 2S~ 19 Z

0 SIG HT .. 2.2 METERS0 U .. 1. 2 MIS00 WIND SPEED .. 9.1 MIS- WIND DIRN ..3~9. DEGS

N:x:...... 0NOr..;.....U.I

00

N

00

91.00 0.0. 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.28 0.S2 0.36 0••0F (HZ)

00 11 SEPT• 11 PDT•

NDBC BUOY ~60101981 JD 25~ 18 Z

0 SIG HT .. 2.2 METERS0 U .. 1. 5 MIS00 WIND SPEED .. 8.2 MIS- WIND DIRN ..357. DEGS

N:x:......0NOr..;.....U.I

00

N

00

c:b.OO 0.0. 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.28 0.S2 0.36 0••0F (HZ)

Figure A24. NDBC 46010 power spectral density for 1100, 1200, and 1300 PDT,11 Sept. 1981.

125

Page 136: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

00.; 11 SEPT• 16 PDT

NDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 254 23 Z

0 SIG HT = 2.9 HETERS0 U = -1. 8 11/5... WIND SPEED = 9.5 HIS- WIND DIRN =345. DEGS

N%.......0NOX';-11.1

00

eli

00

Cb.oo 0.0' 0.01 0.12 0.16 O.ZO O.Z' O.ZI O.SZ 0.56 0.'0F (HZ)

00 11 SEPT. 15 PDT•

NDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 254 22 Z

0 SIG HT = 2.8 HETERS0 U = -1. 4 11/5.. WIND SPEED = 9.9 HIS- WIND DIRN -342. DEGS

N%.......0NOX';-11.1

00

N

00

Cb.oo 0.0' 0.01 O.IZ 0.16 O.ZO O.U O.ZI O.SZ 0.56 0.'0F (HZ)

00

11 SEPT. 14 PDT.;NDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 254 21 Z

0 SIG HT - 2.6 HETERS0 U = -.7 HIS.. WIND SPEED = 9.3 HIS- WIND DIRN =339. DEGS

N%.......0NOX';-11.1

00

N

00

Cb.oo 0.0' 0.01 O.IZ """"0.16 0.20 O.Z' O.ZI 0.52 0.56 0.'0F (HZ)

Figure A25. NDBC 46010 power spectral density for 1400, 1500, and 1600 PDT,11 Sept. 1981.

126

--- ---

Page 137: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

.-:-:'

.

"..'

..'

,.:::

.;..

SUR

FAC

ED

RIF

TER

TRA

CK

S

1/2

INM

I2

k--

4:'

::::

'.....

....~

m."

::'.::

':::':

t·.

BA

TH

YM

ET

RY

INF

EE

T::.

::::':'

:-.:":

'-:.:

..,/:......•,

,!:)

.........

.

....

..

...•.

....

::

for

Cap

eD

isap

po

intm

ent

rad

ar

data

co

llecte

dd

uri

ng

slack

of

11S

ep

t.19

81.

:'::

.

....

j

..,'

Su

rfac

ed

rift

er

track

s

"'.

,

.....

////----

,-,::.:;

~~'~.~

,,~~;<"~

:J;\'>.;

\:'.if

'·"'A'····

'··,··,··

······,·

···\';···

····

//

30

25

1015

10"'_

---

,_~~-=

:.::::

=-",-_

"~'_

.J

",,'

:...•::>

:.:.::.:..

....".,,

~::",>~

,3

5/

..

,,5

O3

5Cw

.v".-'

.,'

,•.

./'0

/'

""

ER

IOE

R)

,f"--

',"

,/

._

.,'

I

~5/"

.....

.....

..,,0

'"

/...

..CD

-I

.'

///

"..

....'

I.•~.

.",

\/

"5

0/'

''

,0.:..-"

\/

/"

......

....

,.,.

...J.

.....:<

>::',

'"

//~.~.

_.'.

..":'

2"2

.'<.""

'' :',

.....:-.

'.-':'-"

'",,

,"....," '..."

"...."" .~

..........

.

Fig

ure

A26

.

J

_.--

. \'...,

''-',."" \ \ \ \

/.-.

...

'-../

,........".

......._

.-"""'

" \ "

.... N -....J

Page 138: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

.....

.....

....

"':./N~;'i

":;;

,~#'

N8t!

1~

::.-

........~.

,.,. .,.......

'--., .i , \. \\

. , ".

...... )

.r·

BA

TH

YM

ET

RY

INF

EE

T

.Y:

SURF

ACE

DR'I';;;~T

RACK~::-::"~\;}::I

'V

:JE

TT

Y'A

"R

AD

AR

DAT

A):'1

SLA

CK

IIS

EP8

1:

o1/

2IN

M

I2k

m

.....

.'

....

.....

.....

...............

.....C.::

.....

......

.......

~//

/------

/

///

///////

//

//

.....

".

....

.f

Fig

ure

A27

.S

urf

ace

dri

fter

track

sfo

rJett

yA

rad

ar

data

co

llecte

dd

uri

ng

slack

of

11S

ep

t.1

98

1.

-........

\...,

........,

'\

\ "'\\

~....

....""'

.......

.'...,

...-._

.'/'

"\,

.,....

..... .....

...'\

"'\

.... N 00

Page 139: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

.... N ~

COLU

MBI

ARI

VER

ENTR

ANCE

11SE

PT19

81SL

ACK

CURR

ENT

X-B

AN

DS

LAR

BY

OREG

ONAR

MY

NA

TIO

NA

LGU

ARD

lo42

ND

MIC

AS

UN

ITSA

LEM

,OR

EGON

,:

ii

Fig

ure

A28

.SL

AR

imag

eo

fC

olum

bia

Riv

eren

tran

ce

ob

tain

edon

the

slack

at

1315

PDT,

11S

ept.

1981

.

Page 140: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

.... w o

Fig

ure

A29

.B

low

upo

fF

igu

reA

28,

cen

tere

don

the

riv

er

en

tran

ce.

Page 141: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

11 September 1981

SLACK

Waverider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time Hdg. Sextant Fixes Objects Remarks

1240 Recorder not on.

1315 WR deployed.

1320 Holding station Nof Buoy 10 ~ 100 yds.

Current nearly slack.

~ 15 kt. NW wind.Drift of buoy almostnegligible by visualobservation.

1329 22° 01 ' 12

05° 41 ' 3

1337 20° 30' 1 Recorder not on2 for above.

63° 55' 3 Data logger turnedon. (At 1342.)

1355 28° 01' 1 Holding position NW2 of Buoy 10 very

62° 30' 3 difficult due toopposed wind/current.Buoy 10 ~ 100 yds.

1358 Ebb increasing rapidly.One engine in gearreq'd 50% of time tohold position.

1400 27° 46' 1 WR bears ~ 245 Mag.2

62° 53' 3

1408 28° 15' 1 WR bears ~ 245 Mag.2

62°39' 3

131

Page 142: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

11 September 1981

SLACK

Waverider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time Hdg. Sextant Fixes Objects Remarks

1409 Begin drift.

1411 28° 30' 1 Wave height2 1. 4 - 2 m.

61° 43' 3 ~13 sec.

1417 30° OS' 1 Free drift very2 difficult due to

58° 25' 3 wind.

1422 31° 18' 1 EGRET may be2 putting drag on WR

54° 26' 3 periodically.

1430 32° 53' 1 Buoy bears 350T.2

49° 42' 3

1432 32° 58' 1 Buoy bears 350T.2

47° 48' 3

1440 32° 50' 1 8 sec. 3 m.2

41° 28 3

1445 32° 28' 1 WR Buoy bears ~ 3402 250 ft.

38° 00' 3

1447 Underway to midchannel.End drift.

1507 WR aboard.

132

Page 143: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

11 September 1981

SLACK

CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (nm. ) (deg.) Remarks

1 1301 2.11 2711305 2.16 2681310 2.15 2671315 2.19 2671320 2.23 2661325 2.21 2661330 2.23 2661335 2.26 2671340 2.26 2691345 2.25 2681350 2.25 2691355 2.22 2701400 2.19 2721405 2.18 2741410 2.19 2771415 2.23 2781420 2.31 2771425 2.39 276, Pick up Buoy #1 at 1428

2 1304 1.57 2631305 1.58 2621310 1.58 2591315 1.57 259 Lost Buoy #2 in blind spot

3 1315 1.17 3041320 1. 19 3071325 1.20 3101330 1.21 3131335 1.21 3161340 1.21 3221345 1.28 322 Waverider track starts1350 1.26 3221355 1.24 3231400 1.23 3231405 1.25 3231410 1.24 3241415 1.27 3261420 1.33 3291425 1.37 3321430 1.46 3361435 1. 61 340

133

Page 144: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

11 September 1981

SLACK

CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (om. ) (deg.) Remarks

1~40 1. 78 3431445 1.93 3451450 1.90 346 Pick up Buoy #3

4 1315 1.23 3341320 1.27 3361325 1.32 3371330 1.33 3381335 1.38 3401340 1.42 3411345 1.45 3431350 1.50 3441355 1.56 3461400 1.64 3481405 1. 70 3511410 1.81 3531415 1.92 3551420 2.05 3571425 2.18 3581430 2.30 0001435 2.44 0011440 2.63 0021445 2.85 0021450 3.04 002

134

Page 145: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

11 September 1981

SLACK

JETTY A RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (nm. ) (deg.) Remarks

1 1307 1. 79 1411319 1.85 1381330 1.85 1371335 1. 91 1401341 1.90 1411345 1.89 1401351 1.90 142135530 1.87 143140130 1.86 147140555 1.87 149140945 1.90 150141603 1.96 152142020 2.02 151142620 2.07 149

2 1306 1.22 1361319 1.18 1331326 1.20 1311330 1. 21 1321335 1.19 1321341 1.13 1351345 1.10 1371351 1.05 138135600 0.99 140140155 0.94 142140620 0.92 145141015 0.91 148141628 0.92 153142032 0.94 157

"Waverider" (Vessel EGRET) positions from 140635 to 142755:

140635 1. 31 206 Most likely "Waverider"141045 1. 30 207141647 1.36 209 Other targets nearby142112 1.44 211142755 1.54 214

4 1320 1.42 2171326 1.46 2181331 1.50 2181336 1.56 218

135

Page 146: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

11 September 1981

SLACK

JETTY A RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (nm. ) (deg.) Remarks

4 1341 1.60 2201346 1.64 2211352 1. 74 221135700 1. 78 223140230 1.87 224140710 1.90 225

136

Page 147: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

11 September 1981

EBB

137

Page 148: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2
Page 149: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

-'::\((i

:

"':

'.:'.:):\

F·.:·i:~

:·:·:··

~AN~Jy~

::~:~~':

1/2

INM

I2k

mB

AT

HY

ME

TR

YIN

FE

ET

WAV

ERID

ER(E

GRET

)TRA

CKS

EB

BII

SE

P81

:'f i,~jrC'i~;,,:

_=;0

:;.7

'..

....

.... £

....

....

\.

Fig

ure

A30

.W

aver

ider

(EG

RET

)tr

ack

sfo

reb

bp

eri

od

on11

Sep

t.19

81.

WiJ

---~~

--

........

.....

---

........

......,

....-

.~.

-._.

_.j

'.,

-.....

.\..

.......

---'-".,

---

50

53

1548

.......

.---

1633

<0

<----_

_,

I/

+"0

9_

--'-

'.-_

',

I/

"--_

.--".

-"\

,/.

......._.

r..

....

....

..."

.--(1

61

2-

•....

.....

.._

...

....

.."

\./

---

1633

'_

".

",

,/

--......

--....

,

//'1

;..

'.<

.;•.

;.'.

__

....

",

,/ ,//,/

,///\\

-"':::

~:;;''

';;.~~

;''~~;

',.

.><'

"/

.'i---.

.,,

//

\.,.~.

".

'..~

I/

'.""

/.

',

,/ ...

J-...... \"

'-" .....

.." ~\ \ \ \

/....'

\...

......

../

........

........

......

..._.

-.....

.., \\.

.... W \0

Page 150: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oo

• DRIfTING 198111 SEPT. 15:52 PDTJD 254 22152 GMT HS • 1.93 M U • -1.72 MIS

oo

•.....N:I:......No:Co...., ...oVIQ.

ooN

oO~__......._~_+-__-+ -+-~_.....::.__~::t=:::::::::::::~;::-===.....__-t~__..~.OO 0.0' 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.1' 0.28 0.S2 0." 0.'0

FREQUENCY (HZ)

1000.00900.00800.00100.00'00.00 500.00 600.00TIME (SEeS)

SOD. 00200.00100.00

......g~

~

o::Jo.... 0......-I"Q.:cex

o0 0

~.;ex I

~....-I.....0

Ii.~...+----..---......----+----+-----+----+----..-----t----+----+--'0.00

oo........

:c....,

oo

..+-----..., ----1,-----+,----'..-----tI----+I----I'..-----tI----+1----Ilfo-'0.00 100.00 200.00 SOD. 00 400.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 800.00 900.00 1000.00

TIME (SEeS)

Figure A31. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1552 PDT, 11 Sept. 1981.

140

Page 151: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oo.:: BUOY 10 1981

11 SEPT. 16:12 PDTJD 25_ 23.12 GMT WS • 3.39 " U • -1.79 "IS

oo.~-N

::x:'0NOz:.~

oenQ.

0.'00.560.520.210.16 0.20 o.nfREQUENCY (HZ)

0.010.0'

8i--~~-+-----::+--~+====-""--"",,,--+----.,r----+----t

oo

UJo=»0....0- .....­Q.z:a:

o0 0UJ':a: ,UJ........-0u.,o

ft+---~I-----+---+----+-----+----+---+-------ll-----+---+-'0.00 100.00 200.00 500.00 '00.00 SOO.OO 600.00 700.00 100.00 900.00 1000.00

TIME (SECS)

ooft-z:-

ooft+---~I-----+---+----+-----+----+---"------l,----+---+-'0.00 100.00 200.00 sao. 00 '00.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 100.00 toO.OO 1000.00

TIME (SECS)

Figure A32. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1612 PDT, 11 Sept. 1981.

141

Page 152: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

00

• 11 SEPT• 19 PDTNDBC BUOY 460101981 JD Z55 Z Z

0 SIG HT = Z.8 METERS0 U = -.Z MIS.. WIND SPEED = 7.3 MIS- WIND DIRN =356. DEGS

N:::r....... 0NOEo.-~

00

N

00

91.00 0.0' o.oe 0.12 0.16 0.20 o.u 0.2e 0.32 0.36 0.'0F (HZ)

00

11 SEPT. 18 PDTOIl

NDBC BUOY 460101981 JD Z55 1 Z

0 SIG HT = Z.5 METERS0 U = -1. 1 MIS.. WIND SPEED = 8.1 MIS- WIND DIRN -35Z. DEGS

N:::r.......0NOEo.-~

00

N

00

91.00 0.0' o.oe 0.12 0.16 0.20 o.u 0.2e 0.32 0.36 0.'0F (HZ)

00

• 11 SEPT. 17 PDTNDBC BUOY 460101981 JD Z55 o Z

0 SIG HT = Z.8 METERS0 U .. -1.7 MIS.. WIND SPEED = 8.4 MIS- WIND DIRN ..34Z. DEGS

N:::r.......0NOEo.-W

00

N

00

91.00 0.0' o.oe 0.12 0.16 0.20 O.U 0.21 0.32 0.36 0.'0F (HZ)

Figure A33. NDBC 46010 power spectral density for 1700, 1800, and 1900 PDT,11 Sept. 1981. 142

- -----

Page 153: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

.....

·::··~

:u::::

..

":':

"'1

.~:'

:':;

':

<!;·~;

t();

'::-0

::',

.....

"':....

.....

..

:...:.~

:::

::

"':t:

'

....~

.....~

1/2

INM

I2k

mB

AT

HY

ME

TR

YIN

FE

ET

~.::.::..

SUR

FAC

ED

RIF

TER

TRA

CK

S

'.:..

.

....

..•..

for

Cap

eD

isap

po

intm

ent

rad

ar

dat

aco

llecte

dd

uri

ng

ebb

of

11S

ept.

1981

.

·f .....~~"!':~:

,

.....

...•. ,

.....

....

Su

rfac

ed

rift

er

track

s

....'

·····1..

----'.

......

:::.:'

.)I

0'.':

'.f

..:.:

.,--

---;

.:JJ_

w,...

./....

.---

1605

"....

........

...,.

__.~

.-._

._..

.J\,.,

--

10....

...\..

)"

---

'606

@"

_',

----

',!

--

23

"_

..._

',

I/

26

...-

_..

-...

..@

.......

......

......

..."

\/

..20.

-".~._.-1

610

J'.....

........

....

..."

"/

"2

8_

-"

•_

_'<

::'"'

\/

_--

'm.

"......

.__"

"

/,

'~

, , .......

.......•..

,

.....

Fig

ure

A34

.

J-....... \..

.,.

''-'''>

\ \ \ "/

.......

"../

.,.,

..........

-.-.

-,"'\

\.

~ ~ tJ,)

Page 154: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

..... .po.~

COLU

MBI

ARI

VER

ENTR

ANCE

11SE

PT19

81EB

BCU

RREN

TX-

BAND

SLA

RBY

OREG

ONAR

MY

NA

TIO

NA

LGU

ARD

1042

ND

MIC

AS

UN

ITSA

LEM

,OR

EGON

Fig

ure

A35

.SL

AR

imag

eo

fC

olum

bia

Riv

eren

tran

ce

ob

tain

ed

onth

eeb

bat

1630

PDT

,11

Sep

t.19

81.

Page 155: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

.... .po

U1

Fig

ure

A36

.B

low

upo

fF

igu

reA

35,

cen

tere

don

the

riv

er

en

tran

ce.

t•

,:. I

I, ,

• \.

Page 156: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

11 September 1981

EBB

Wave rider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time Hdg. Sextant Fixes Objects Remarks

1545 WR in water NE ofBuoy 12.

1548 79 0 39' 5 Begin drift.3 (1.5 m, 12 sec.)

19 0 50' 12 WR buoy W 200 ft.

1553 70 0 43' 53

130 51 ' 12

1559 35 0 18' 2 WR buoy NW 200 ft.5

500 08' 3

1604 400 27' 25

340 52' 3

1609 39 0 37' 25

26 0 01 ' 3

1610 Stop drift, maneuverto holding station.

1612 280 30' 1 On station.2 (8 sec. 2 m.)

39 0 40' 5

1625 29 0 OS' 1 (drift log2 13, 12, 12 sec.

61 0 53' 3 for 25 m.)

1633 29 0 24' 1 End holding sta.2

61 0 29' 3

1640 WR aboard.

146

Page 157: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

11 September 1981

EBB

CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (nm. ) (deg. ) Remarks

1 1605 1.12 2831610 1.10 2961615 1.08 3111618 1.14 3231620 1.17 3301623 1.26 3371626 1.39 3441628 1.48 348 Picked up Buoy #1

2 1606 1.29 2871610 1.29 2961615 1.23 3151618 1.31 3231620 1.37 3281623 1.47 335 Picked up Buoy #2

3 1610 1.45 299l615 1.47 311L618 1.51 318 Picked up 113

Targets impossible to follow.

\47

Page 158: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

11 September 1981

EBB

JETTY A RADAR DATA

BuoyNo.

Time(PDT)

Range(nm. )

148

Bearing(deg. ) Remarks

Targets impossibleto follow.

Page 159: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

12 September 1981

FLOOD

149

Page 160: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2
Page 161: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

.":;

~:.

.

....

....

..

~AN8~

BA

TH

YM

ET

RY

INF

EE

T

WAV

ERID

ER(E

GR

ET)T

RA

CK

S

o1/

2IN

M

~I

2km

FLO

OD

12SE

P81

.....

£

Fig

ure

A37

.W

aver

ider

(EG

RET

)tr

ack

sfo

rfl

oo

dp

eri

od

onlZ

Sep

t.19

81.

..'

I'"~

....

.----

.)

j---

-~-

--------

---.

........

.......

.....---

-.....

....""

.-._.

-.--..

...

__

------

"\'

,)'-._

...

J'-

.,-

,.

",

'-"

1--

---

""

/----

-----.."

."

1318

_---

~_

_---

'....

.-

__

',

l"

¥_--

(12

00

-j'

.,..

....

."I

"(1

24

8-

/--

1234

)•

'-""

,._

""

\"

13

00

)(1

127-

,~,_"

\"

,.~,

."

,,1

14

8)

..,..:

......~"

\"

",

'""

",,/

"':'

:':'::

:'»~""

')"

"...

...•~,

\."/'"

....,,

."

".\'

,\

",

,i"

""/';

"""

,,~.:..t......'.'

....~

,"

".'

""',

.'.'.

"''\.

,"

,,\

'-'-'-

'-.

..,..

..."

"\

__"

":i:-

-.:..

....

,"

,,"

,,"

'\.:=(~=;=---------::..

.........-

':,'

,...

""

..........

....,,

,"

....,,

"""

..;4.,.

.'-:::

:.::":"

':,',

+(1

04

1-

':

~.,

.,~:~~:·r

.~

1101

).

'.(.

'::,,

:~';

";i.

x<::

~.:.

'.."

J

-.~

\_.,

........., ',

,\

\ \ \ \./

''''''

,......

./

.......--

-..--

.._

.-'-..

', "'\

~ VI~

Page 162: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oo

• LIGHTSHIP 198112 SEPT.JD 255

09:25 PDT16125 G"T HS • 2.78 " u • t.Z8 M/S

oo

•-N:z:......~g-.;oenno

ooN

g.1-----.-L~I____+_-----+-~~~==F=__.....-~...........9».00 0.04 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.21 0.'2 0.36 0• .\0

FREQUENCY (HZ)

1000.00900.00100.00700.00400.00 500.00 600.00TIME (SEeS)

'00.00200.00100.00

.....g~

UJo::;)0.... 0-. ....J"0­Xe:c

o0 0

UJ':a: I

UJ.......J-'0LL.~

n+------lf----_+---+------,~--_+---_+_---r_--_+---_+_---.....'0.00

oo.,;-z:-

1000.00900.00700.00 100.00'00.00 500.00 600.00TIME (SEeS)

soo.oo200.00100.00

oo

(O)+------l~--_+---+_-----.~--_+---+_--__i~--_+---+_---~'0.00

Figure A38. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectlaldensity for 0925 PDT, 12 Sept. 1981.

152

Page 163: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oo..- BUOY 4 1981

12 SEPT. 10:41 PDTJD 255 17.41 GMT HS • 2.65 M U. 1. 71 MIS

ooN--N

:::c......No2:0-'•oenQ.

oo..

g.p.--......L~--+---~-~~:::::~=+:~:::::::::::::::j;=-- ...--.....--.....----t0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 O.U

FREQUENCY (HZ)0.21 0.S2 0.56

.....g~LIJo~o""0.......J­Q.z:a::

o0 0

LIJ":a:: I

LIJ......J....01&.0

"'+----i----+----+-----jr---.........----t-----jf----+__---+-__--..1-'0.00 100.00 200.00 SOO.OO 400.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 100.00 900.00 1000.00

TIME (SEeS)

If)-z:-

oo

"'+-.---i""----+I---+I----IIf----+1---....I----IIr----+1---+I----IIf--'0.00 100.00 ZOO.OO SOO.OO 400.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 100.00 900.00 1000.00

TIME (SECS)

l'igure A39. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1041 PDT, 12 Sept. 1981.

153

Page 164: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oN.. BUOY 8 1981

12 SEPT. 11:27 PDTJD 255 18127 SHT HS • 1.59 H U. 1.73 H/S

oenQ.

o•o

oo~_L-+-__--+ of--__-+-__-+--=::=::::::jp====:;:::=:::::oa"""'=F=""'_""'__-"Cb.oo 0.04 0.01 O.il O.t' 0.20 0.l4 O.ll O.'l 0." 0.40

FREQUENCY (HZ)

1000.00100.00700.00400.00 500.00 600.00TIME (5EC5)

SOD. 00200.00100.00

wo~o~o.......J­Q.:Ea:

o0 0w..;a: ILI.I~

..J

....0u..~

..+-----t~--_+_---+_--___lf__--_+_---_+_--__.,f__--_+---+_---t__'0.00

oo..-:E.....,

LI.Io00~..;~......JQ. o:Eoa: .-X'a:a:

oo

';10+.-00----t10,....0-.o-o--z"'oo-.-o-o--soo+--.OO---i.OI-O-.-00--5-1-00-.-0-0 --''''0-0-.OO---i701-0-.-00--.-I-OO-.-O-O--''''0-0-.O-O-~I~1-0-0. 00

TIME (5EC5)

Figure A40. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1127 PDT, 12 Sept. 1981.

154

Page 165: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

BUOY 10 .'8112 SEPT. 12:00 PDTJD Z55 I'. 0 6MT HS. .,. M U· 1.63 "IS

--N:x:.......NoX.-'ooen0-

oor,;

g~~:"";"--+-----i~--+----=:""'--'::'~~~+:::::=:::::~~~=-=tcb.OO 0.04 0.01 O.IZ 0.16 O.ZO O.Z' O.ZI 0.12 0.36 0.'0

FREQUENCY (HZ)

&000.00toO. 00100.00700.00

wo~o....0-.....J-0­Xa:

oCOw.:a: IW........J-01&.0

--+-----i----+---+-----lf-----+---+---~I__--_+---_+_---.....'0.00 100.00 200.00 '00.00 '00.00 500.00 60.00

TIME (SECS

oo.;­X-

&000.00100.00 900.00'00.00 500.00 00.00 700.00TIME (SECS

SOD. 00200.00100.00

oo--+-----i----+----+-----l...----+---'if-----lf-----+---+----...1-­'0.00

Figure A41. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1200 PDT, 12 Sept. 1981.

155

Page 166: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oo.... DRIfTING 1981

12 SEPT. 13:00 PDTJD 255 20. 0 GMT HS • 2.04 " U· 1.05 "IS

ooN..-N

~.....~g""";oen0-

oo•oo+--__--+.L.__-+-__---l..-_~::;::====~~--..---+_--_+---+_--.....cb.OO 0.04 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.21 o.sr 0.S6 0.40

FREQUENCY (HZ)

UJo~o~o.....~..0­Xa:

o0 0

UJ":a: ,UJI-~

....0~~ft+------.,I-----+----+----~--_+---_+_-:__-+-_:_-__t- -_+___--+_'0.00 100.00 roo. 00 SOO.OO 400.00 500.00 600.00 100.00 100.00 900.00 1000.00

TIME (SECS)

ooft-X

""

oo

..;+-----i~---_+I----+1---....,11-----+1---...1----+1---+1---...1----+1-'0.00 100.00 200.00 SOD. 00 400.00 500.00 600.00 100.00 100.00 900.00 1000.00

TIME (SECS)

Figure A42. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1300 PDT, 12 Sept. 1981.

156

Page 167: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

00 12 SEPT• 10 PDT.-

NDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 255 17 Z

0 SIG HT • 2.7 HETERS0

U • 1. 5 HIS.. WIND SPEED = 5.1 HIS- WIND DIRN = 8. DEGSN::I:-""'0NOS;•.....,IU

00

III

00

cb.OO 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.28 0.'2 0.36 0.40F (HZ)

00 12 SEPT. 09 PDTII»

NDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 255 16 Z

0 SIG HT = 2.8 HHERS0 U • 1. 0 HIS.. WIND SPEED = 5.3 HIS- WIND DIRN • U. DEGS

N::I:-""'0NOS;•.....,IU

00

N

00

91.00 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.28 0.'2 0.36 0.40F (HZ)

g12 SEPT. 08 PDTII»

NDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 255 15 Z

0 SIG HT • 2.8 HETERS0 U • .1 HIS.. WIND SPEED = 6.5 HIS- WIND DIRN • 10. DEGS

Nx-""'0NOS;•.....,IU

00

N

00

91.00 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.28 0.'2 0.36 0.40F (HZ)

Figure A43. NDBC 46010 power spectral density for 0800, 0900, .Ind 1000 PDT,12 Sept. 1981.

157

Page 168: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

00

• 12 SEPT. 13 PDTNDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 255 20 Z

0 SIG HT • 2.9 "ETERS0

U • 1.1 HIS.. WIND SPEED .. 6.1 "IS..... WIND DIRN .343. OEGS'"l:...... 0NO:r=.-w

00

N

00

~.OO 0.0' 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.2' 0.21 0.S2 0.36 0"0F (HZ)

00 12 SEPT. 12 PDT•

NDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 255 19 Z

0 SIG HT • 2.8 "ETERS0 U .. 1. 6 "IS.. WINO SPEED = 5.3 MIS- WIND DIRN "358. DEGS

N:::E:....... 0NO:r=.-w

00

N

00

~.OO 0.0' 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.21 0.S2 0.36 0.'0F (HZ)

00 12 SEPT. 11 PDT• NDBC BUOY 46010

1981 JD 255 18 Z0 SIG HT .. 2.8 METERS0 U .. 1. 7 MIS.. WIND SPEED .. 6.5 "IS- WIND DIRN • 7. DEGS

N:::E:.......0NO:r=.-w

00

N

00

'\.00 0.0' 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.21 0.S2 0.36 0.'0F (HZ)

Figure A44. NDBC 46010 power spectral density for HOOt 1200, and 1300 PDT,12 Sept. 1981.

158

--_._- -- .- ---

Page 169: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

...;-).~./

.....

-":'

.

':::/~':~.

\\::)::.;'

.":;

.:.....:

..

...... , .I I \ "'"

, ',. ........

) .,..'

~.:

1/2

INM

I2k

mB

ATH

YM

ETR

YIN

FEE

T

~.::

',:..

SUR

FAC

ED

RIF

TER

TRA

CK

S

o

CA

PED

ISA

PP

Oii\

jTM

EN

TR

AD

AR

DATA

FLO

OD

12SE

P81

,......·-·_·~·-·_._._i

........

..;

""

"

......

.

c<:::

::....,,:...

.:....:::..

......>:.........

.:..

......

....

.:.::..

.;..

......!~.Q...

.,

.....'"

''......

....

.....

.....

......

......

..

".

for

Cap

eD

isap

po

intm

ent

rad

ar

dat

aco

llecte

dd

uri

ng

flo

od

of

12S

ept.

1981

.

:~Cii!i,"i;

e,

=-=-

:="-

:;.7.

"."

.....

.... £

.......

..

Su

rfac

ed

rift

er

track

s

(j)

1255

/""

"//

,,/

/"/

-(.(....

...".

'......

."

.\

./

''-.

_._

._..

....

./

\_

.'-

//.\,

~j==

==~-

5.=..

,.i=

=c·

·:<·.

....

/--

~/ ...

,.'

".

Fig

ure

A45

.

:~:

,/

/

J-....... '\

...,

'-"",',,

\ '" \ "\ \/

........

'-./'

,..........

.......

-._.-

........

"-\

\.

1-4 VI

\0

Page 170: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

....

·::··\

\~·t·>.

....<.::

::

.....

....';;[K1;'!j,(

~

...."'::

"

':.:~:-.

....:-..

...

:":

.~...,,:

.....

1/2

INM

I2k

m

!"'~

\.;

BA

TH

YM

ET

RY

INF

EE

T

:.;:

".;.

,

SURF~E

DR

IFTE

RTR

AC

KS

o

:;.:_~

:.:.~

"

.JE

TTY

-A-R

AD

AR

DAT

AFL

OO

D12

SEP

81

\.

......

.

..:~.:

:

::i..

···

.....

.........

.....

1220

..........

.....

.....

.....

......

...

'.

track

sfo

rJett

yA

rad

ard

ata

co

llecte

dd

uri

ng

flo

od

of

12S

ept.

1981

.

..../

//

//

//

/

/0

.~.:

.._~

_..

.....

....

....

.•..

..---

/.,

,._.-

~'-'

....

.'.

/,

-===

'==::::

;;.:7=

:::..

......_..

.....

"',/

\-:;~=:-

/'\

.-\

/"-

.....;

// ,-

,- ,- --

..-

&

....

/"

J:

....,

.....

..'

....

Fig

ure

A46

.S

urf

ace

dri

fter

J-....... \..

.,''''''',

\ > \ \ \ \/

.........

'-../

."""

'-._

.-.....

..,. \\

­0\ o

Page 171: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

..... 0\ .....

Fig

ure

A47

.SL

AR

imag

eo

fC

olum

bia

Riv

eren

tran

ce

ob

tain

ed

onth

efl

oo

dat

1115

PDT

,12

Sep

t.1

98

1.

Page 172: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

- -..If

--...~.

-

-

162

........'-.... -

.,.

..

...

"

Page 173: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

12 September 1981

FLOOD

Waverider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time

""'0918

(0921)

0925

0950

0955

~1003

1037

1041

1041

Hdg. Sextant Fixes Objects Remarks

WR deployed.

(Data logger turned on.)

On station 100 yds.from Buoy CR holdingstation.(7 . 5 sec. 2 m.)

Little surfacecurrent apparent.WR cable alternatesbetween slack and alittle tension.Wind 8-10 kts.

Wave pattern"'" 1.5 m.superimposed on longswell, but wave patternnot very distinct.

Stop holding station.

Underway for B40Y 2.WR aboard.Fog.

On station Buoy 4.Fog.

Begin record. Buoy 4bears 270, 150 ft.

Bouy 4 bears NW 100ft. and Waveriderbears E magneticfrom EGRET, 100 m.Steady relationshipthroughout record.

163

Page 174: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

12 September 1981

FLOOD

Waverider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time

1041

1101

1104

1124

1127

1148

1151

1158

1200

Hdg.

250

250

Sextant Fixes Objects

164

Remarks

Light pull on towline.Drift log (20 m)takes greater than2 minutes (surfacecurrent indefinite)WR position indicatesslight flood to NE.

Complete station,begin WR recovery.

WR aboard.

Fog.

WR deployed adjacentBuoy 8.

Begin record.

Buoy 8 bears 250,100 ft (into current).Steady throughoutstation.(drift log17, 15.8, 16, 17.8,18.2 sec for 25 m)Approx. 1 m waveheight.

Complete station.

WR aboard. Underway.

WR deployed.

On station Buoy 10,EGRET 100 ft. down­current of buoy.

---------

Page 175: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

12 September 1981

FLOOD

Waverider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time

1210

1220

1234

1237

1248

1250

1300

1318

Hdg. Sextant Fixes Objects

253

165

Remarks

Begin record.

250 mag: intocurrent.

Clear visibility.

Steady conditions.Conat. range andbearing to buoy.(drift log16.20, 16.07, 16.08sec. per 25 m.)

End sta.

WR aboard.

Fog at Buoy 8.WR deployed.On station a beamBuoy 8. CG Cut­ter SEDGE anchoredon Buoy 8 and re­placing buoy.(NOTE: Buoy 8later removed byCoast Guard.)

Buoy 8 posit. bearsS 100 yds.100 m. cable to WR.

Begin drift.

End sta.

Page 176: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

12 September 1981

FLOOD

CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo (PDT) (nm. ) (deg. ) Remarks

1 1041 1.52 3571046 1.37 3481050 1.29 3411055 1.24 3301100 1.26 3181106 1.36 3051110 1.43 2981115 1.57 2901120 1.72 2821124 1.84 278 Picked up #1 at 1123 (fix

on boat)

2 1046 1.46 0091050 1.34 0071055 1.20 0041100 1.08 0001106 0.96 3561110 0.91 3531115 0.83 3461120 0.78 3401125 0.74 3321130 0.72 3251135 0.71 312 Picked up #2

3 1100 1.10 3371106 1.0 3221110 1.0 3131115 1.03 2981120 1.12 288 Picked up #3 1123

4 1206 1.58 0031210 1.53 3591215 1.45 3551220 1.41 3501225 1.39 3461230 1.36 3421235 1.36 3371240 1.36 3321245 1.36 3281250 1.36 3241255 1.37 3191300 1.41 315

166

----~-~ ------ ------ ---- ------- -

Page 177: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

12 September 1981

FLOOD

CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (om. ) (deg.) Remarks

1305 1.44 3111310 1.48 3081315 1.51 305 Picked up /14

4 1155 1.57 3491200 1.48 3391205 1.40 3281210 1.39 3171215 1.46 3081220 1.54 2991225 1.64 2911230 1.77 285 Picked up /15

6 1200 1.83 3421205 1.80 3331210 1. 79 3231215 1.82 3141220 1.88 306 Picked up /16

7 1255 1.89 3521300 1.88 3461305 1.85 340 Picked up /17

167

Page 178: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

12 September 1981

FLOOD

JETTY A RADAR DATA•

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (run. ) (deg. ) Remarks

1 1040 1. 78 2341042 1.71 2331045 1.60 2291047 1.53 2271050 1.45 2211052 1.41 2191054 1.38 2151056 1.33 2101058 1.31 208

2 1045 1.84 2441047 1.72 2431050 1.66 2441052 1.56 2431054 1.52 2431056 1.48 2421058 1.42 2411100 1.38 241110230 1.32 2401106 1.24 2391108 1.21 2381110 1.14 2381112 1.13 2371114 1.06 2361116 1.05 2331118 0.99 2321120 0.95 2311122 0.94 2291124 0.91 2281126 0.86 226Jl28 0.85 2241130 0.82 2211132 0.78 2211134 0.78 2171136 0.76 216

3 1102255 1.17 2201106 1.08 2121108 1.04 2081110 1.01 2051112 0.96 1981114 0.93 194

168

Page 179: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

12 September 1981

FLOOD

JETTY A RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (om. ) (deg.) Remarks

1116 0.92 1861118 0.92 1811120 0.93 1751122 0.94 1701128 1.11 154 Position confirmed as Nerka

approached1130 1.16 152 Drifter picked up

4 1250 1.40 2061254 1.40 2031256 1.40 2011258 1.40 1991300 1.40 1981302 1.40 1961304 1.39 1951306 1.41 1931308 1.41 1911310 1.41 1901312 1.41 1891314 1.41 188

5 1154 1.80 2271156 1.72 2241158 1.66 2221200 1.61 2191202 1.56 2161204 1.51 2121206 1.45 2101208 1.42 2061210 1.42 2011212 1.39 1991214 1.38 1921216 1.38 1891218 1.40 1851220 1.40 1811222 1.40 1781224 1.44 1741226 1.45 1701228 1.49 1661230 1.55 163 Drifter retrieved

169

Page 180: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

12 September 1981

FLOOD

JETTY A RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (om. ) (deg.) Remarks

6 1200 1.99 2191202 1.93 2161204 1.93 2131206 1.86 2091208 1.86 2071210 1.83 2031212 1.80 1991214 1.80 1961216 1.77 1921218 1.77 1891220 1. 78 186 Drifter retrieved

7 1256 2.08 2261258 2.08 2241300 2.04 223 Buoy 7?1302 2.04 2201304 2.01 2191306 2.00 217

170

Page 181: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

12 September 1981

EBB

171

Page 182: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2
Page 183: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

'::.

.--....

'..

.:~..:~

~.~(-..

........

<)w;t;

r!~

':.::'~:-.

...:.'.

'"....

."'~"""

••••

t

·/:'~:::

..:.::

....

1/2

INM

I2k

mB

AT

HY

ME

TR

YIN

FE

ET

:.::

•.;.,

WAV

ERID

ER(E

GR

ET)

TRAC

KS

o

EB

B12

SE

P81

......

...

'\"

"

...t.···

·..·..

~::

..;:'

;

./.f

~/

.=::=~::":

l

.i

£

."

....

....

....

..

......,.

,

".....~~----

.:.u.._

____

_.,

-,...

..,

'-.-

.~"

--

48

,I.

.;"

----

52'W

I",

_,

---

"0

0"i

--

---.=

---:----".

/1

70

4.

__

......

.'.

_......."

!/

.-_.-

-..'"

\/

--

-._

-+

F'-

'"\

/----

(17

58

-)-_

~.~,

-""'

/---""'

..'.'''''',

///////1

/.'

.......•...

..'

..•...••...:(~

,)C,."

~~?S~~

~0~~;~

~/

/'.

'-..'

•.....

.'-...~:--

;-,/

/:

".

',"

';/

~.~-.,

.'-.

'.."...

":-,,

"/

//

\,:::

;:;;'~~~

=i;,:;o=

'-.",

'".',

?:,;;

,;{,

~;~"

//

\','.

".~:'

".';,

~/

/'-..

.~.-x"""'.,

//

....,

.'

,, , --

Fig

ure

A49

.W

aver

ider

(EG

RET

)tr

ack

sfo

reb

bp

eri

od

on12

Sep

t.19

81.

J-....... .

~"

........,.

" \ "\ \/

.......

"./.

,..........

.......

'-._

.-",

\\

l-'

-.,J w

Page 184: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

8.• DRlfTI"& 198112 SEPT. 16:44 PDTJD ZSS Z3. __ &"T HS • Z.06 " U • -Z.08 "IS

oo..­N

:J:.....NoS:O-'..oen0..

oo

tV

o

0.w----t-......c~_I_--_1---_+_--___lt__--_+~==F=====-....---....--..."\.00 0.0' 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 O.U 0.2' 0.52 0." 0.'0

FREQUENCY (HZ)

l00U.OO'00.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 100.00 900.00TIME (SECS)

'00.00200.00100.00

UJo::3

0~o.....oJ­0..s:a::

o0 0

UJ":a: IUJ~oJ....0~~

........-----ll-----+----+------,I----+----+----t-----+----+----+_'0.00

oo.;­s:-

1000.00700.00 100.00 fOO.OO.00.00 500.00 600.00TIME (SECS)

'00.00200.00100.00

oo

........----ll-----+---+------II----+----+------,I----+----+----I­'0.00

Figure ASO. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1644 PDT, 12 Sept. 1981.

174

Page 185: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oo.... 8UOY 12 198112 SEPT.JD 256

17:58 PDT0.58 &"T HS • 2.39 "

ooN..­N

X......NO:Eo-'•o(/)0.

oo

oo+-__~""':::::""--i~__-+-__-+_~:::::=:=F====_""__--i~__-+-__-+__--l

cb.OO 0.0' 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 O.U 0.21 0.32 0.56 0.'0fREQUENCY (HZ)

LUo:::)0

""0-.....­0.:Ea:

co0 0LU':a:'LU,.......-04.0

"'+----4----+---+1---...,11-----+1----41---...,11-----+1---...1----111--'0.00 100.00 200.00 SOO.OO '00.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 100.00 900.00 1000.00

TIME (SECS)

g...-:E-

X'a:a:

g..+----4.-----+1---+1----41----+1---+1----41----11-----+1----41-'0.00 100.00 200.00 '00.00 '00.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 100.00 900.00 1000.00

TIME (SECS)

Figure A5I. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1758 PDT, 12 Sept. 1981.

175

Page 186: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

00.. 12 SEPT• 16 PDT

NDBe BUOY 460101981 JD 255 23 Z

0 SIG HT • 2.2 HETERS0 U • -1. 8 MIS.. WIND SPEED = 8.4 MIS- WIND DIRN ·339. DEGSN

:r:'-0NOE.-&&.I

00

N

00

~.oo 0.0' 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.2' 0.21 0.'2 0.36 0.'0F (HZ)

00 12 SEPT• 15 PDT•

NDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 255 22 Z

0 SIG HT • 2.4 METERS0 U .. -1.1 MIS"j HIND SPEED = 7.9 MIS- HIND DIRN =337. DEGS

N:r:'-0NOE.-&&.I

00.N

00

~.oo 0.0' 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.21 0.'2 0.36 0.'0F (HZ)

00 14 PDT• 12 SEPT•

NDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 255 21 Z

0 SIG HT • 2.5 METERS0

U • -.0 HIS.. HIND SPEED. 6.8 MIS- WIND DIRN =337. DEGSN:r:'-0NOE.-&&.I

00

N

00

~.oo 0.0' 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.2' 0.21 0.'2 0.36 0.'0F (HZ)

Figure A52. NDBC 46010 power spectral density for 1400, 1500, and 1600 PDT,12 Sept. 1981.

176

Page 187: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

00

• 12 SEPT. 19 PDTNDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 256 2 Z

0 SIG HT • 2.5 I1ETERS0 U • -1.1 11/5.. WIND SPEED. 8.0 11/5- WIND DIRN .352. DEGS

N:::J:......0NOE';-&&.I

00

N

00

-=b. 00 O.Ot o.oe 0.12 0.16 0.20 o.u 0.2e 0.32 0.16 o.uF (HZ)

00 12 SEPT. 18 PDT• NDBC BUOY 46010

1981 JD 256 1 Z0 SIG HT • 2.3 I1ETERS0 U • -1. 9 11/5... WIND SPEED. 1.6 11/5

...... WIND DIRN 01353. DEGsN:J:......0NOE';....,&&.I

00

N

00

~.oo o.Ot 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.2t 0.2e 0.32 0.36 O.tOF (HZ)

00 12 SEPT. 17 PDT• NDBC BUOY 46010

1981 JD 256 o Z0 sIG HT a 2.8 I1ETERs0 U • -2.1 11/5.. WIND SPEED • 1.8 11/5- WIND DIRN 01345. DEGs

N:::J:......0NOE';-&&.I

00

N

001

~.OO O.Ot o.oe 0.12 0.16 O.ZO O.Zt o.ze 0.3Z 0.16 O.tOF (HZ)

Figure A53. NDBC 46010 power spectral density for 1700, 1800, and 1900 PDT,12 Sept. 198!.

177

Page 188: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

for

Cap

eD

isap

po

intm

ent

rad

ar

data

co

llecte

dd

uri

ng

ebb

of

12S

ep

t.19

81.

'"

'::'.:

:~~::"

.....

.....:...

.

.:.::

'~:'.

...

....

.

.;;.,.,jtW

"i,;~:

..

. /:.~:

~.::

::':

'.'.

~

...... , / I \ "\

. .........., )

:....

....

\~\

..:..

...::.~;

...-

SURF

ACE

DR

IFTE

RTR

AC

KS

.....

".

.....

..,:"::.;-

::

......

........

.........

......

~.

.....

.....

515

4

......

......

...

.l~.:

::::}

=-=, ..

..

£

Su

rfac

ed

rift

er

track

s

CD16

57_

--"@

i65

1

­./

/"'1

//

//

//

/

/\~-~,

--~=~~

~~=~:=

"......

:.~:.,..'

=-

/\.

::9;~=--

/\.

/.....

.........

//

//

/ --.....

.....

.....".

Fig

ure

A54

......

.//'

.::

/

J

-.-.

,.\.

..--- .....

...\....

... \ "'\ \./

'""'.

"..

/.,....

..........

.......

.._.-

,. " '\ \.

.... .... 0Cl

Page 189: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

.....

";;::'0

......

'~':':~:'.

":

.

·:·..·,JI

·~:·:::~:l

;iU;;"){

t;\~

..

INM

....:..:

::::'-

:':

...... \ .I I \. \. , ,

',. ...... ') .,.'

\/2

't...:~:\

;.

:'::.~.

SU

RFA

CE

DR

IFTE

RTR

AC

KS

o

JET

TY

"A"R

ADAR

DAT

AEB

B12

SEP

81

::.:::

.:.~.....

:'.

".

.....

....

.....".

......

..../:··::·

r

.....

..........

.....

.~'"

.....

".

".

..... ....

.....

.

.....()...

......

:.

.....

.....

.....

.........

.

track

sfo

rJett

yA

rad

ar

data

coll~cted

du

rin

geb

bo

f12

Sep

t.19

81.

,

i

,i....'

.' .....

Su

rfac

ed

rift

er

~

........

../

... ......

.....

..........

\. Fig

ure

ASS

.

J

-.-

.,\"

".....

..,."" \ \ \ \

",

.........

'-.

.",'

,.........

.......

........_.

-.....

"'\\.

.... ..... \0

Page 190: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

.... 00 o

~-,

'"''---

-'

Fig

ure

A56

.SL

AR

imag

eo

fC

olum

bia

Riv

eren

tran

ce

ob

tain

edon

the

ebb

at

1645

PDT

,12

Sep

t.19

81.

Page 191: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2
Page 192: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

12 September 1981

EBB

Waverider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time Hdg. Sextant Fixes Objects

1641

1644 16° 48' 25

82° 56' 3

1648 32° 40' 25

64° 42' 3

1652 46° 20' 25

42° 20' 3

1656 47° 23' 25

29° 12' 3

29° 34' 12

42° 48' 5

1704 34° 50' 12

37° 15' 5

.....1745

1758

1811

182

Remarks

WR deployed.

Begin recorddrifting.WR bears 270150 ft.

WR bears 270 150 ft.(8 sec., 2 m.vis. obs.)

End drift.Wave leading edgesvery steep. Waves 4to 5 more wavelengthsoffshore appear tobe beginning to break.Towing WR to Buoy 10.Continue towing up­stream.

WR aboard .

WR deployed 100yds. on channelside of Buoy 12.

On station, record.(10.6, 11.6, 11.6/25 m.)

Page 193: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

12 September 1981

EBB

Waverider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time Hdg. Sextant Fixes Objects Remarks

1822 19° 54' 2 End station.5 Position steady

58° 35' 3 throughout station.

1828 72 End station.

1832 WR aboard.

183

Page 194: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

12 September 1981

EBB

CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (nm. ) (deg. ) Remarks

1 1639 1.10 2961642 1.09 307]645 1.21 3161648 1.26 3261651 1.36 3361654 1.44 3431657 1.60 349 Picked up #1

2 1642 1.20 3071645 1.21 3161648 1.33 325] 651 1.44 331 Picked up #2

3 1815 1. 91 2651818 1. 78 2671821 1.63 2681824 1.55 2701827 1.37 2741830 1.25 2781833 1.19 282 Picked up #3

4 1818 1.63 2621821 1.46 2641824 1.33 2651827 1.12 270 Picked up #4

184

--------

Page 195: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

12 September 1981

EBB

JETTY A RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (run. ) (deg.) Remarks

1 1640 0.97 1861642 1.06 1931644 1.08 2011646 1.25 2041648 1.32 2091651 1.47 2171652 1.57 2201654 1.61 2221656 1. 74 2251657 1.84 2271700 2.00 230

2 1642 1.14 1941644 1.16 2001646 1.28 2041648 1.32 209 Buoy retrieved

3 1815 1.54 1401816 1.49 1411818 1.40 1421820 1.34 1441822 1.26 1471824 1.19 1491826 1.09 1531828 1.04 1561830 0.98 1611833 0.94 167

4 1820 1.16 1391822 1.04 1411824 0.94 1471826 0.86 1491828 0.77 156

Buoy in radar shadow.

185

Page 196: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2
Page 197: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

FLOOD

187

Page 198: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2
Page 199: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

.\~;::

.::-/:

.

....

.::.;.~.:...

"':.

"/iW

:;:,:

':.-':.:

:'...::

-:.':::~~:

.....

1/2

INM

I2k

m

\.....\..

'.

13SE

P81

,TH

YM

ETR

YIN

FEE

T

~.:::;..

WA

VER

IDER

(EG

RET

)TR

AC

KS

\0

TFL

OO

D

.....:;.

;:...:::

----

----

----

..l...

....

£

.....

:"

:."

/

./.....

.....

.... 001

\0

Fig

ure

AS8

.W

aver

ider

(EG

RET

)tr

ack

sfo

rfl

oo

dp

erio

don

13S

ept.

1981

.

J-.-.

. ......""'

\ ........., ',

,\

\ \ "\/

.......

"./'

,..........

......

........-.

-"'

. '\

\.

.........

.•..

......

Page 200: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oN

litBUOY 8 1981

13 SEPT. 11:17 PDTJD 256 18al1 &"T HS • 1.45 " U. 1.92 "IS

o•o

oo ........__-...tt:!....__+-__--+- I--__-+==-_--i:==:::::::::=+==::.....c::::;_-====~--....cb.oo 0.0' 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.2' 0.21 0.S2 0.36 0.'0

FREQUENCY (HZ)

oenCl.

1000.00900.00100.00700.00'00.00 500.00 600.00TIME (SECS)

300.00roo. 00100.00

UJo~o.... 0~ ....J­Cl.:Ea:

o0 0UJ":a:'UJ.......J~o

u.~

"'.....----1f------+----+----+------l,...-----1----+----+-----+----+­'0.00

oolit-:E-

oo

':'0+.-00----1101-0-.-00--2+0-0.-00--....300....-.00---'...00-.-00--'....00-.00---''''00-.-00--7-+00-.0-0--1OOf---.-00--'+00-.0-0---11000~.00

TIME (SECS)

Figure A59. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1117 PDT, 13 Sept. 1981.

190

Page 201: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oN

'"DRIFTING 1981

13 SEPT. 11~39 PDTJD 256 18.S' GMT HS • 1.27 M U. 1.'4 MIS

of1)0..

o•o

g~_-......L __+-__-+--=j:::=~::;::==~....::a:=:::::::=~==--..".:==-===-'f==--""~.OO 0.04 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.Z4 O.ZI O.SZ 0.S6 0.40

FREQUENCY (HZ)

.....o~o....0........J­0..2:a:

o0 0.......:a:'............J....0LL.~

"'+-----1I-----+----+----+------t----+----+------.I-----+---_+_'0.00 100.00 200.00 100.00 400.00 100.00 600.00 700.00 100.00 900.00 lOOO.OO

TIME (SECS)

g

'"-2:....,

oo

"'+-----1I-----+---+----I----+----+----+-----i----+---_+_'0.00 100.00 200.00 100.00 400.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 100.00 too. 00 1000.00

TIME (SECS)

Figure A60. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1139 PDT, 13 Sept. 1981.

191

Page 202: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oN

tilBUOY I 1911

13 SEPT. 12:23 PDTJD 256 19.23 &"T WS • 1.39 " U. 1.13 "IS

c

'"a..o•o

g.1---....~~-+----+---I----:;::::::::::~::::::::::::::~-F=:::=..=- .....---.....--.....~.OO 0.0. 0.0' O.IZ O.t, O.ZO O.Z. 0.2' 0.S2 0.56 0.'0

FREQUENCY (HZ)

tooo.OO900.00100.00700.00.ctO.OO 500.00 600.00TIME (SECS)

300.00ZOO. 00tOO.OO

lI.IC~o~o~ ....J'"a..2:a:

oCOlI.I":a:'lI.I~

...J~o

4.~

"'......-----ll-----+----+----+-----I----+---+----t----+----+--'0.00

g

'"-2:.....lI.Ioco~..:~~

...J0.. 02:0a: ....Xla:a:

oo

'?O+.-OO-----ltOl-O-.-OO--Z+oo-.-OO--SOO......-.00---....00-.-00--5...00-.0-0--'.-00-.-00--7-+00-.00---11001--.-00--900+-.-00---;aooor-. ooTIME (SECS)

Figure A61. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1223 PDT, 13 Sept. 1981.

192

Page 203: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

DRIfTING 198113 SEPT. 12:45 PDTJD 256 19.45 GNT HS • I.SS N U. 1. 71 "IS

g_..N::J:

"NoEo_.

N

CenQ.

g...

gJ---~rL.:"---+----+--""':::::::::f==:::::::=J===:lIF'---""--""l""=-==:::::=''''---''cb.OO 0.0. O.lZ 0.16 O.ZO O.Z. O.ZI O.SZ 0.16 0••0

FREQUENCY (HZ)

1000.00tOO. 00

,....g~

LIJC~of- o.....~..Q.EC%

oCOL1J':a:: ,LIJf­~....0l&.~

"+---~~--_+---+----r----+----+----+---~~--_+---+_'0.00 100.00 ZOO.OO SOO.OO .00.00 500.00 600.00 100.00 100.00

TIME (SECS)

giii-E-

1000.00tOO. 00100.00100.00400.00 500.00 600.00TIME (SECS)

100.00ZOO.OO100.00

g1Ii.....-- I-----+----+----+-----+----+---+---~f_--_+---+_'0.00

Figure A62. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1245 PDT, 13 Sept. 1981.

193

Page 204: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

00

13 SEPT• 13 PDT.•NDBC BUOY .60101981 JD 256 20 Z

0 SIG HT .. 2.0 METERS0 U .. 1. 6 MIS..,; WIND SPEED .... 2 MIS- WIND DIRN "337. DEGS

N:::t:...... 0NOX";'oJ

UJ

00

N

00

~.oo 0.0. 0.0' 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.2' 0.32 0.36 0••0F (HZ)

00

13 SEPT. 12 PDTiiiNDBC BUOY .60101981 JD 256 19 Z

0 SIG HT .. 1.9 METERS0 U .. 1. 9 MIS• WIND SPEED .. 5.1 MIS- WIND DIRN ..336. DESS

N:::t:......0NOX";'oJ

UJ

00

N

00

~.oo 0.0. 0.0' 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.2' 0.32 0.36 0••0F (HZ)

00 13 SEPT. 11 PDT•

NDBe BUOY .60101981 JD 256 18 Z

0 SIG HT .. 2.2 METERS0 U .. 1. 9 MIS• WIND SPEED .... 3 MIS- WIND DIRN "355. DEGS

N:::t:......0NOX";'oJ

UJ

00

N

00

~.oo 0.0. 0.0' 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.24 0.2' 0.32 0.36 0••0F (HZ)

Figure A63. NDBC 46010 power spectral density for 1100, 1200, and 1300 PDT,13 Sept. 1981.

194

Page 205: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

00 13 SEPT. 16 PDT.;

NDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 256 23 Z

0 SIG HT • 2.1 METERS0 U • -1.6 MIS.. WIND SPEED .. 4.1 MIS- WIND DIRN ..339. DEGS

N::J:......0NO~.-LLI

00.N

00

9J.OO 0.0. 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 O.U 0.21 0.'2 0.16 0••0F (HZ)

00 13 SEPT• 15 PDT•

NDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 256 22 Z

0 SIG HT • 1.9 METERS0

U • -.5 MIS.. WIND SPEED .. 4.8 MIS- WIND DIRN =321. DEGSN::J:......0NO~.-LLI

00

N

00

9J.00 0.0. 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 0.2. 0.21 0.'2 0.16 0••0F (HZ)

00 13 SEPT• 14 PDT• NDBC BUOY 46010

1981 JD 256 21 Z0 SIG HT • 2.0 METERS0 U = .1 MIS.. WIND SPEED .. 5.1 MIS- WIND DIRN =331. DEGS

N::J:......0NO~.-LLI

00

N

00

9J.00 0.0. 0.01 0.12 0.16 0.20 O.U 0.21 0.'2 0.16 0••0F (HZ)

Figure A64. NDBC 46010 power spectral density for 1400. 1500. and 1600 PDT.13 Sept. 1981.

195

- ---------

Page 206: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

···.1

.....

".:'.:

:~~:'

:"

.....:.:.

::...

....

".

':.--:'~

'..':

:~'"

'"~

.

......

S;';i;:/i'l!

r:~}:~

.....

INM

.....:.

.:::

:::=

:

....., / I \ \ '. '

. ,. ....... )

!".

1/2 L

···,.

\'"\

(.".:.

","'-

...,..

.....

~.::.~;

SUR

FAC

ED

RIF

TER

TRA

CK

S

o

.....\

.(::::CA

PED

ISA

PPO

INTM

ENT

RA

DA

RDA

TAFL

OO

D13

SE

P81

.....

..:;..

., ......

.::{

.

..........

'"

.~.

.....

.....

......

......

......

..

for

Cap

eD

isap

po

intm

ent

rad

ard

ata

roll

ecte

dd

uri

ng

flo

od

of

13S

ept.

1981

.

.::::~

:::.

•=~:.

Su

rfac

ed

rift

er

track

s

.....

.,..,,.~~

..@

11

I9""-"

1~,/

40

55

_2

45

,,::"

:::

@1

1I7

1

30

~.,."

•2

!y2

0/

//

//

//

;/

'./

\.I.:

.......

./-

'.,

......

.l..

;"".

//\

"'::

~=~~

==='

~'='

="'"

'':./

;..-.,/

'\::

:r--

--'

"..'"~

/\

"./

',~

./

/// ...

.....\..

//

,/@

11

I5

///

//

//

;/

//

//

/

Fig

ure

A65

.

.....

.....

..

'

;'/'

;.J.:/

.....

....

J

-.~

\........

......." > \ " " "

/.....

..'-

/'

,.....

.'-'

-'-'

......

'-.\\.

.... ID 0'1

Page 207: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

···.1

.....

.....

...:..~:~).;:.

..

;...

......

..,'.'~"

.:.::.::

.

'....

.....

.~""

;g;;,':;;;

~;;:;}

....

....

......

.:~.'::

-'::

:.::

INM

....., ! I \ \. '\

. "-'-

. .....')

~'

1/2

"\'" .,.

,

~.::.~:..

SUR

FAC

ED

RIF

TER

TRA

CK

S

o

..;:.:

_::.

;.~'....

".

"'"

......

CA

PE

DIS

AP

PO

INTM

EN

TR

ADAR

DAT

AFL

OO

D13

SEP

81

.....

..........

.

12

55

·':-'

,

..:./<'j

"

........

.....",

,J

4~

.....

1250

..

..........

.....

..••.

for

Cap

eD

isap

po

intm

ent

rad

ar

dat

aco

llecte

dd

uri

ng

flo

od

of

13S

ept.

1981

.

..l....

.~..:

-=;' ....

.....

. •

Su

rfac

ed

rift

er

track

s

.......'

\.

.....

.....

..,

...-.....

':':

'

:.•.

- - - - ---- - - -

/-

//

/

/@

1232

'M

,_

1250

.....

/1J)1222~~

//

..../

/.

.3

6/

/-~

/,,®1218~,..v~

-..

.."4

.//,

'~

//

~30:>r

//

-

//

®1~5

,....

//

/\""

''--'

-:':::;;''

'===~:=",.

:,::::::.

....

""'-

////

\.\.

:=;;~:

:;--

//

'-,-

,'/

//

/

//

/ ...

...=.f

Fig

ure

A66

.

J-.--\..

.",",

.......,,>

\ \ \ \/.

-...

.'-

../.

,..........

.....-.

-.-

, "\\.

.. \0 .....

Page 208: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

'::'.~

:~~:

:',

-:.-':':-

:',

.....

.:

.

."

.....

."':'"

'00 "

:'::.'::::::

....... \ / I \ \ .'. '. '

. '.)

!".

\.

.,.,

-:::.~;.

SUR

FAC

ED

RIF

TER

TRA

CK

S

_1/

2IN

M.-A

/./':.

\';\'/'~

~'N\;4"'

i:t~?

···.t

o

JET

TY

-A"R

AD

AR

DAT

AFL

OO

D13

SE

P81

'\.

...

.:·i<:·:·

F'

....

.....'~"

.....'..

.~......

....,... ()

.....

'-"

...

track

sfo

rJett

yA

rad

ar

dat

aco

llecte

dd

uri

ng

flo

od

of

13S

ept.

1981

.

.:./

(~)

_:;

- .....

.I,'"

.....

..... Su

rfac

ed

rift

er

........

.... @)1

I22

.....

.....

.........

\..

Fig

ure

A67

.

j

J

-.""", \...

, ._.">

\ "\ \"..

......

"-

.J'

\,

......

......

....'-

.._

.-.,.

"\. "\

\1

..... \0 00

Page 209: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

Fig

ure

A68

.S

urf

ace

dri

fter

track

sfo

rJett

yA

rad

ar

data

co

llecte

dd

uri

ng

flo

od

of

13S

ep

t.1

98

1.

".:.

.""';;"!:

,

'.':-:-::

:..

.' ..'~AN9~

, ,.....

'...., .I I \. \

"

, ',. ...... ')

.r"'

BA

TH

YM

ET

RY

INF

EE

T

:.::

."

SUR

FAC

ED

RIF

TER

TRA

CK

S

o1/

2IN

M

I2k

m

JET

TY

"A'R

AD

AR

DA

TAFL

OO

D13

SE

P81

.....

.:t..·

....

.....

....

.....

..••.

•".

",.

_------

"jI

r---

----

----~

/-

" ",,

"~

@12

323

43

5

/'

012

232

7,,

",,

""

3.1

-=

--':

:>

,,/

,,""

A21

,,""

®12

20,..

-.,:;.

...:;~

4---~~

~~~~:;

;:.~~

"/"

,,""

"/

/,(

J_®

'"'

"".

,""

,,\',

"".

'-'-

'-,

/\

-'

,//

'\.,

~j==

===~

==";

i,,,

~;c

.

"----

J

·....

..'

J.-:

-'-

"\..

.,...

.-,'\

'" \ \ \ \/

.......

"./'

,........"'.

.......-

.-....

.. "

'\\.

.... \0 \0

Page 210: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

N o o

• I

t"•

't

to'.

•1

.-"-

4.:

:.,~

.~~.

., ~'.'

;••

•~.~

••'

&.•

Fig

ure

A69

.SL

AR

imag

eo

fC

olum

bia

Riv

eren

tran

ce

ob

tain

edon

the

flo

od

at

1140

PDT,

13S

ept.

1981

.

Page 211: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

......

-

t.•

I.

,...

..

..•

J -•

.\.

#'

,;

*f"

.~

II,.

....,

.•

II.

..

..~.

Blo

wup

of

Fig

ure

A69

,cen

tere

do

nth

eri

ver

en

tran

ce.

Fig

ure

A70

.

."-~

t.:'

·~.

~~

.:j:

'".

.

......,-

,_2

".!

::I'

..;

..

...:c'

-* ;"!'

": •

N o ....

Page 212: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

FLOOD

Waverider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time Hdg. Sextant Fixes ObjE!cts Remarks

NOTE: Buoy 8 has beenremoved by the CoastGuard.

1117 WR deployed.Begin record.Approx. position ofBuoy 8.

1121 35° 36' 1 WR bears 060,2 100 yds.

23° 17' 15

1125 35° 57' 12

24° 30' 15

1129 36° 41' 1 (7-8 sec, \ to 1 m)2

25° 42' 15

1134 38° 06' 12

26° 23' 15

1137 Underway for vessel traffic.End record.

1139 Begin drift, beginrecord.

1141 39° 52' 1 WR bears 060,2 100-150 ft

26° 30' 15

1145 38° 55' 1 Drifter buoy 200 ft2 south of WR.

29° 57' 15

1151 35° 06' 12

34° 55' 15

202

Page 213: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

FLOOD

Waverider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time Hdg. Sextant Fixes Objects Remarks

1154 320 24' 1 Drift buoy ~ 2002 yds S of WR.

360 58' 15350 28' 5

1158 27 0 01 ' 12

390 40' 15

1200 Buoy 8 100 ft South.

1202 21 0 45' 1 End drift.2

400 07 1 15

1204 WR aboard.

~1218 WR deployed.

1223 380 18' 1 On station.2 Begin record.

23 0 28' 15

1230 360 39' 1 10.5 sec.2

230 02' 15

WR bears E 090100 m, steady.

(drift log 25 m16.4, 16.4, 19.2sec.)

1238 37 0 45' 1 (12.5 seC., 1.5 m)2

230 21 ' 15

1243 380 12' 12

230 25' 15

1245 End station, begindrift station.

203

Page 214: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

FLOOD

Waverider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time Hdg. Sextant Fixes Objects Remarks

1248 37 0 21' 1 WR 200 ft. bears E.2

240 20' 15

1253 360 01' 1 WR bears E 100 ft.2

260 16' 15

1258 330 40' 12

29 0 05' 15

12 sec -.J \ m.

1304 300 00' 12

300 25' 15

1310 260 16' 1 End drift.2

320 12' 15

1312 WR aboard.

204

Page 215: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

FLOOD

CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (nm. ) (deg.) Remarks

1 1130 1. 70 3341135 1.60 3241140 1.50 3131145 1.52 3011151 1.65 288 Picked up //1

2 1115 2.38 2581120 2.21 3571125 2.05 3541130 1.80 3491135 1.63 3421140 1.48 3331145 1.36 3211151 1.39 3041155 1.47 ·298 Picked up //2

3 1117 2.48 0081125 2.31 0051130 2.15 0021135 1.97 3581140 1. 78 3551145 1.57 3491151 1.42 3361155 1.34 3311159 1.40 312 Picked up #3

4 1119 2.59 0131125 2.43 0121130 2.31 0101135 2.20 0081140 2.07 0051145 1. 91 0021151 1. 71 3551155 1.60 3491159 1.50 3411200 1.46 3381202 1.46 333 Picked up //4

5 1215 2.51 3411220 2.38 3371227 2.20 3291230 2.16 327

205

-_._--- ------

Page 216: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

FLOOD

CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (run. ) (deg.) Remarks

1233 2.11 3231236 2.06 3191240 2.03 3151245 2.03 309125530 2.03 299 Picked up tiS

6 1218 2.27 3481220 2.26 3461227 2.03 3371230 1.99 3351233 1.90 3291236 1.85 3241240 1.81 3171245 1. 78 3091250 1.82 3001300 2.00 287 Pic~ed up tl6

7 1222 2.06 3571230 1.83 3481233 1.77 3431236 1. 74 3371240 1.71 3301245 1.69 3201250 1. 74 3111302 /17 picked up

8 1232 1.91 3571233 1.87 3541236 1.84 3501240 1.77 3431245 1. 70 3341250 1.69 3251307 tl8 picked up

206

Page 217: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

FLOOD

JETTY A RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (mo. ) (deg.) Remarks

1 111240 2.61 224111410 2.55 224111600 2.47 224111840 2.36 223112020 2.30 222112340 2.15 220112440 2.10 219112620 2.00 217113020 1.84 212113235 1.72 209113420 1.64 206113610 1.59 203113810 1.52 199114020 1.46 194114200 1.45 190114400 1.43 184114550 1.41 180114800 1.41 175115040 1.46 168 1 retrieved

2 111430 2.65 231111620 2.58 231111830 2.51 230112030 2.45 230112320 2.33 229112640 2.21 227112840 2.10 226113030 2.01 225113250 1.91 223113440 1.81 221113630 1.72 220113830 1.63 215114040 1.54 213114410 1.43 206114610 1.37 202114910 1.31 195115123 1.30 190115440 1.34 182 2 retrieved

207

Page 218: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

FLOOD

JETTY A RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (nm. ) (deg.) Remarks

3 111640 2.79 238111820 2.75 238112110 2.68 238112250 2.64 238112520 2.58 237112710 2.53 236112920 2.45 235113100 2.39 235113320 2.31 235113500 2.24 234113710 2.16 233113850 2.07 231114100 1.99 229114230 1.91 229114430 1.80 227114640 1.72 224114930 1.60 220115140 1.56 216115530 1.46 208115710 1.43 204115810 1.41 202 3 retrieved

4 112220 2.83 244112540 2.71 243112720 2.69 242112940 2.65 242113120 2.61 242113350 2.55 240113530 2.49 240113720 2.44 239113930 2.37 239114120 2.31 237114250 2.27 236114510 2.20 236114650 2.11 234114950 1.99 232115210 1.91 229115650 1. 75 222115840 1.65 220120000 1.63 219120150 1.57 214 4 retrieved

208

Page 219: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

FLOOD

JETTY A RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (run. ) (deg. ) Remarks

5 121640 2.63 215121810 2.56 213122020 2.49 212122210 2.43 210122440 2.34 209122800 2.27 206123040 2.19 202123240 2.14 201123410 2.10 199123600 2.08 198123810 2.05 194124020 2.01 192124230 1.98 189124410 1.95 188124540 1.95 186124800 1.93 184124940 1.93 183125210 1.91 180125450 1.89 177125640 1.89 176 5 retrieved

6 121930 2.45 221122030 2.40 221122230 2.34 219122500 2.25 216122810 2.15 214123110 2.04 210123310 1.99 207123430 1.93 205123620 1.90 203123830 1.82 199124040 1. 79 196124250 1. 74 192124430 1. 73 191124600 1.71 188124810 1.68 184125000 1.69 180125230 1. 71 176125500 1. 73 172125720 1.77 169125910 1. 78 166 6 retrieved

209

Page 220: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

FLOOD

JETTY A RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (run. ) (deg.) Remarks

7 122250 2.28 230122620 2.16 228122830 2.07 226123130 2.00 222123320 1.95 220123450 1.90 218123630 1.85 215123900 1.81 211124100 1. 76 208124300 1. 74 205124450 1.71 201124620 1.71 199124830 1.68 195125020 1.65 192125250 1.67 187125530 1.67 183125740 1.69 180130010 1. 73 176130140 1.72 173 7 retrieved

8 123210 2.13 230123340 2.10 229123510 2.08 227123650 2.05 225123920 1.98 221124120 1.92 219124320 1.86 216124500 1.84 214124630 1. 79 212124840 1. 76 207125050 1. 74 204125320 1.71 200125550 1. 70 195125800 1.69 192130030 1.69 188130230 1.69 185130430 1.72 182 8 retrieved

210

Page 221: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

EBB

211

Page 222: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2
Page 223: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

···.1

.....

':.::<

:-.

...,

"'~"

1658

....:-.:

:::.

;;"

13SE

P81

1/2

INM

.~'-'t

,:1;:·

::::::'

I2k

m..

:-:,<

::::.

---.~

:~\-:-.

_.----

';,c.iY

'U't

:;j;

"'::-'"

.

~'::

.t;

."-

WAV

ERID

ER(E

GR

ET)

TRA

CK

S

EBB

...':...

';::'

:..:,

,:.

....:::

.;

..,

..••.

l.'

....

j

/.....

.....

.....

...'" £....•....

.:/

.'

......' •....

\., .'

Fig

ure

A7

l.W

aver

ider

(EG

RE

T)

track

sfo

reb

bp

eri

od

on

13

Sep

t.1

98

1.

/']

j/C

,./

.--

----

..J.

1808

17~.

_..

.0,.

.2.7

--18

0217

5856

52

1750

174

~2

0""\8

'-'_

'''''

".

---

(17

24

-'-

13....

...---

1746

)""

------,

/.

---'-

.--

,/

---..

.-..

-'.....

........

-.......

"-/

---

"'-

'-'-

L'..

......

......

........

"\.

/---

+0

82

5-

•.....

......

.._.~.",

\./

---

1856

)....

....~,

\.

"~.~

.-.,

..'.

,.

""".

//,

.,._._.-

:::.':?=

=;,£=

.......

..""

'--"~

',"

""\

--~~

---

'..

..'"

......

:',,

""',

=,,--

"".'.'.

',/

"'-'.,

.~

/

-.

...

,.

"--

"t

..,..:':

.....

w•

..",.

~

J_....... \"

". '-,'~

\ \ \ \/.

-...

.'-

.J"

,.,

......

....

-._.-

......., \

\.

N .... W

Page 224: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

ooN

BUOY 12 198113 SEPT.JD 257

12:24 PDT0.24 GMT HS • 1.02 M U • -2.39 MIS

oIII--N

:::c......NO:Eo'"'" .-oenA.

oIII

o

o

o~---t-_::::::::"'-+------1I-----+----+--=--~=F---....----t----+-----f~.OO 0.0' 0.01 0.12 0.16 O.ZO O.Z' 0.21 O.S! 0.56 0.40

FREQUENCY (HZ)

1000.00100.00 ZOO.OO 500.00 400.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 100.00 NO.OOTIME (SECS)

wo:::;)01-0.........­A.:Ea:

o0 0w..:a:lWI-........0~o

.;+------t----+------1I-----+----+----+---+------t----+------1~'0.00

&000.00100.00 200.00 SOO.OO '00.00 500.00 600.00 700.00 100.00 NO.OOTIME (SECS)

8"'+------t----+------1I-----+----+----+---+----+---+------1.....'0.00

oo

'"-:E'"'"

Figure A72. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1724 PDT, 13 Sept. 1981.

214

Page 225: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

o•.-o..

DRIFTING 198113 SEPT.JD 257

17:46 PDT0••, GMT HS • 1.18 M

1000.00

--N%"­Noz::.-'ocenG.

o•o

o0.t-__.....fIIf:!:::.~+-__+-__+-__+-__+-:..:.-~+=::::::::::::"J=~=~=::::::.,..

cb.OO 0.0' 0.01 0.12 0.1' 0.20 0.2' 0.2' 0.S2 0.16 0.'1FREQUENCY (HZ)

wC:::::Jo"'-0......4­G.z::a::

oCOw..:a:: ,w...-.4....0u,.o

..+---......----+------,..----+---+----+---+-------.,...----+----..-'0.00 100.00 200.00 SOD.OO '01.00 SOO.OO 600.00 100.00 100.00 too.oo

TIME (SECS)

8..­z::-

oo

..+---......----+------...----+---+----+---+---......----+----t--'0.00 100.00 200.00 500.00 '01.00 100.00 600.00 100.00 100.00 too.OO 1000.00

TIME (SEeS)

Figure A73. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1746 PDT, 13 Sept. 1981.

215

Page 226: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

oo

• BUOY 10 198113 SEPT.JD 257

18:25 PDT1.25 '"T HS • 2.21 " U • -2.32 "'5

g..­NX......NoEo_...

gN

g+---...c::;~---+---+---+-_'::=:r=====--..--......--.......---+------t

0.0. 0.08 0.12 0.1' 0.20 0.2.fREQUENCY (HZ)

O.ZI 0.52 0.16 0 ••0

1&.1o~o....0........J­Q..Ea::

oCOW..:IXI1&.1.......J....0II.~"'.....--......----+---......r-__--+---+-__---+":"""" -+ ---lr-__--f.----+__

10•00 100.00 ZOO.OO SOI.OO ....00 100.00 ....00 700.00 "'.00 "'.00 1000.00TIHE (SECS)

g..-E-1&.1000~..:...........JQ..oEoIX •..:zla::IX

oo

'1'0+.-00---1-+0-0-.00--2-100",,-.OO--""SOOr-.-OO--...I--.-OO--500+-.-00--",+-.-00--7-+00-.00--...-+--.00---1,..1--.00---10001--.00TIHE (SECS)

Figure A74. Waverider raw amplitude, filtered amplitude, and power spectraldensity for 1825 PDT, 13 Sept. 1981.

216

Page 227: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

00

• 13 SEPT. 19 PDTNDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 257 2 Z

0 SIG HT - 1.8 METERS0 U - -2.0 MIS.. WIND SPEED - 4.1 MIS- WIND DIRN - I. DEGS

N:I:......0NO~.;-lU

00

N

00

~.OO 0.0' 0.01 O.IZ 0.16 O.ZO O.Z' O.ZI O.SZ 0.36 0.'0F (HZ)

00 13 SEPT• 18 PDT•

NDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 257 1 Z

0 SIG HT - 1.9 METERS0 U - -2.4 MIS.. WIND SPEED. 4.8 MIS- WIND DIRN -355. DEGS

N:I:...... 0NO~.;-lU

00

N

00

~.OO 0.0' 0.01 O.IZ 0.16 O.ZO O.Z' O.ZI O.SZ 0.36 0.'0F (HZ)

00

13 SEPT• 17 PDT..NDBC BUOY 460101981 JD 257 o Z

0 SIG HT - 1.8 METERS0 U - -2.3 MIS.. WIND SPEED c 4.3 MIS- WIND DIRN -347. DEGS

N:I:......0No~.;-lU

00

N

00

~.OO 0.0' 0.01 O.IZ 0.16 0.20 O.Z' O.ZI 0.S2 0.36 0.'0F (HZ)

Figure A7S. NDBC 46010 power spectral density for 1700, 1800, and 1900 PDT,13 Sept. 1981.

217

Page 228: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

Fig

ure

A76

.S

urf

ace

dri

fter

track

sfo

rC

ape

Dis

app

oin

tmen

tra

dar

data

co

llecte

dd

uri

ng

ebb

of

13S

ept.

1981

.

......

.

.....

.. «}:ji:

>····::

::·::·.i

):;::

.....

"':"

1704

CD

....:.

::":

'.,..

'.

:...::

..>.~\ .<;~:~~~

1/2

INM

I2k

m

. ...:

\.... .,..

......

BA

TH

YM

ET

RY

INF

EE

T

SUR

FAC

ED

RIF

TER

TRA

CK

S

....

...

.....

....

'..:

.....

'.

::/

:11=-

:"-::

;'''''

....

..

j

....

...

.........

...··1

__------------

.....

------

-~."

/--

-,,'

"4

5"

35-'"

"~,.-.-

25,,-

".,7

4.....~24'"

.--_

.J

/_-

----

---.

::r=

:--~

~:~~

"..--",.~..-/.

~-,

,,_,

"'4-

//

///

//

//

//

///

//

//

/...//

/~

..,.....,

//

\.,.

///"

_._

.-.,

//.

_./',

,'\.

,:y=

====

<'.=

=.""

=;;'

~:~....~....."",...~.

.~~..l:

:;'~~~~=

--.

J

-.-..,

.... '-

., .'-.

, '\

\ \ \ \/

........

......

../

,.........

.......

........

.._.-

...... ., " \

N .... 00

Page 229: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

Fig

ure

A77

.S

urf

ace

dri

fter

track

sfo

rC

ape

Dis

app

oin

tmen

tra

dar

data

co

llecte

dd

uri

ng

ebb

of

13S

ept.

1981

.

:/.:/

......:~..

......

....

"'-.~:-.

......

......

~.. ....

..",

'..':'::

-'::

_";:

1/2

INM

:.::

•.:...-

SUR

FAC

ED

RIF

TER

TRA

CK

S

-._

...1

\.... .,.

,18

07<V

-') ! I \ "'". '. ,

., ').r

·

o

.;:.;:

:...~'.-

..

\"CAP

ED

ISA

PP

OIN

TME

NT

RAD

ARD

ATAY

EBB

13S

EP

81

".

.:./:~::::

.:p':

....

........

......

".

..

".

.....

.....

......

:...

.....

.....()

....

1825

.....

.i.........

.....

\.

{~~?

-=.0.'.....

....

j

.....

..' .....'"

.........

..,

.....

....'

/

....

/'

-....... \...

, '-','" \ \ \ \ .

,........

~..

....

.,..

',..

"'-.

._._

-.....

...."'" "',

"'

N .... \C

Page 230: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

track

sfo

rJett

yA

rad

ar

dat

aco

llecte

dd

uri

ng

ebb

of

13S

ept.

1981

.

'i/f;",C

·

.~:::-;-:..

'"...

.."'~"

'.

..

. ...~

.:":'.

:.':..

:;~'

~...,:

.....

\:....~\

:" "<:"

..~....

:~

BA

TH

YM

ET

RY

INF

EE

T

~.:::.;..

SUR

FAC

ED

RIF

TER

TRA

CK

S

o1/

2IN

M

-I

2km

JET

TY

'"A"R

ADAR

DAT

AEB

B13

SEP

81

.;:.:.

::.:~

','..

...."..:"

""

:.....

.;.

......

....

,.'

.':'\

....:..

..;..

.::

.

",.....

..........

.....

.....

.....

{)

..'

..---

.........

.....

..

/;' :

/.....

.....

..... j Su

rfac

ed

rift

er

....

/'

l3

---------.~~-~

",.

,.~--._.-.

/'1

/

//

//

//

,//

,/~.

:......

/.,

......

/\

',./

"_._

.-......

,/'

_.'

/\

::;;

~::;

~~='

=~-_

:.

//

~.---"''''".,

::.:

::

>

-'

=

....

..........

".: .' Fig

ure

A78

.

----

----

----

/4

34

0/

1744

3837

35

/--

/--

---

/..

..

///

//

///

////

//

,//

J-....... \...

""" '-',> \ \ \ \

",.....

...'-

",.

',....

...,'-'

-'-'

".

'. \\.

!'oJ

!'oJ o

Page 231: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

.......:.

:.:---

......

..... ....

.:.-.:.

~:.

INM

/.<:

-".,

\ \. '. '-. '-.

....... )

.".

....:-.:

::::

~:':

1/2

SUR

FAC

ED

RIF

TER

TRA

CK

S

o

JET

TY

"A"R

ADAR

DAT

AE

BB

13S

EP

81

...•.

()

.....

.....".":'/':'::~:f

"

.....

"~

..........

......~......

..........

.....

......'

29"if~"

-...

.~1

83

0-'

.....

./

......"

/

......-

.

for

Jett

yA

rad

ar

data

co

llecte

dd

uri

ng

ebb

of

13S

ept.

1981

.

".

:l

dri

fter

track

s

"....

.

£

Su

rfac

e

--;.

t--

,._---

---,_4

·<.::1.

-.1\

-//

1~~

/

//

//

//

//

/~.

.~....

.'.

/\

......

.I

/,.

./

\_._

._......

\.

,,//

'\,~

j.~~

~~<i

==.{

,"ii

::..·c

...•)

.../

--

'-"--

.....

....

..........•.1 .•...

.....

.....

..,

.....

....

-----

----

--/-

//

///

//

///

//

///

//

//

//

///

/:' ,

••...

/".

.....

Fig

ure

A79

.

J-...... \...

.... ''-', > \ \ \ "

,..-..

."

.,..,.....

..........

..'-._

.-"""

". \\

N ....

Page 232: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

N N N

,r

[ ~. ll'

t~"'il'

.{.

tf-IJ

~.#

•.~I'

i,

:.1"

,.,~

..

,1'

~~"

•-

t'l'

'1.,t.

;.....1.

I•.'~ , ..j

"

,:.

'l~

';''(

.;

~.~I "

I· •

',,-

;..

..1

.

~,:

"

I:':;.:

Ii!}

",~

.~; I.

I':

•I

.".

.,..t

.'!'

;I.

4i

I'~

,~;;.

~~~

'''',

\~ "

Fig

ure

A80

.SL

AR

imag

eo

fC

olum

bia

Riv

eren

tran

ce

ob

tain

ed

onth

eeb

bat

1730

PDT

,13

Sep

t.19

81.

Page 233: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

Blo

wup

of

Fig

ure

A80

,cen

tere

don

the

riv

er

en

tran

ce.

tv tv W

I f •

, !t

!

. f ."j'

. ." .. ......

t ~t;

;",.

• .: 4

,. j" ,t"

".

, • 'c~

Fig

ure

A81

.

....

;;;

.' 'T~

.,...:. ""

.-

,: ..,. ,

.-

~ .'

Page 234: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

EBB

Wave rider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time Hdg. Sextant Fixes Objects Remarks

1656 WR deployed.

1658 60° 01 ' 2 Begin drift.4

20° 30' 1244° 00' r..J 3

1659 McArthur eM Station.200 ft N.

WR bears W 200 ft.

1703 21° 47' 23

73° 32 12

1708 32° 23' 2 WR bears NW 150 ft.3

76° 11' 12

1713 53° 18' 2 WR bears NW 150 ft.3

65° 15' 12

1718 82° 03' 23

48° 14' 11

1720 92° 03' 23

31° 26' 12

1724 End drift. Holdingstation.

1726 107° 25' 2 Steady on station.3 WR bears W 100 m.

15° 08' 12

1730 108° 15' 23

14° 34' 12

224

Page 235: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

EBB

Waverider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time Hdg. Sextant Fixes Objects Remarks

1734 Apparent currentincrease.

1736 1000 09' 23

180 15' 12

1744 Drift log 25 m.11.0, 4.7, 10.7 sec.

1746 1070 27' 2 Begin drift from3 station.

150 06' 12

1750 160 30' 25

950 50' 3

1752 330 53' 25

770 18' 3

1753 100 ft. S of Buoy 11.

1756 550 53' 25

460 01 ' 3

1757 WR bears SW 100 ft.

175830 620 32' 2 WR bears SW 100 ft.5

29 0 27' 3

1802 29 0 57' 12

580 55' 5

1807 430 18' 12

45 0 56' 5

1808 End drift. Underway.Move to position nearBuoy 10.

225

Page 236: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

EBB

Waverider LOG (Surface Vessel EGRET)

Time Hdg. Sextant Fixes Objects Remarks

1825 On sta. 100 ft. Wof Buoy 10.Begin record.2 m., approx. 8and 12 sec.WR bears W 100 m.

Drift log10.4, 9.7, 10.8

1843 26 0 50' 12

360 56' 5

1856 End station, endproject.

226

Page 237: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

EBB

CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (nm. ) (deg.) Remarks

1 1704 2.96 2581710 2.56 2611715 2.22 2621720 1.90 2621725 1.62 2671730 1.33 2721735 1.15 2931741 1.10 3201745 1.19 335 Picked up III

2 1705 3.18 2631710 2.8 2631715 2.46 2631720 2.09 2651725 1. 76 2681730 1.49 2781735 1.31 2931741 1.32 314 Picked up #2 after 1741 fix

3 1708 3.05 2671710 2.94 2661715 2.54 2651720 2.18 2661725 1.84 2701730 1.51 2791735 1.37 2941739 1.38 305 Picked up 1/3

4 1724 1.48 2801727 1.36 2921734 1.47 311 Picked up //4

5 1803 2.14 2731811 1.62 2831814 1.49 2891815 1.43 2931820 1.37 3091825 1.49 325 Pick up //5

6 1805 2.09 2681810 1.73 2711815 1.43 280

227

---.---_.- ---- --- ---.-_._ .._- -----

Page 238: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

EBB

CAPE DISAPPOINTMENT RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (nm. ) (deg.) Remarks

1820 1.22 2951825 1.16 3151830 1.26 334 Pick up f/6

7 1807 2.12 2601817 1.44 2641820 1.21 2681825 1.01 269 Pick up f/3

228

Page 239: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

EBB

JETTY A RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (om. ) (deg. ) Remarks

1 1703 2.60 129170440 2.50 129170620 2.38 130170900 2.21 130171140 2.06 132171330 1.93 132171650 1. 71 134172100 1.45 137172320 1.32 140172530 1.22 145172830 1.10 152173100 1.05 159173220 1.00 167173510 0.98 178173700 0.99 186173830 1.03 193174020 1.07 203174250 1.20 211174410 1.28 216 1 picked up

2 170520 2.73 132170640 2.64 133170920 2.44 133171150 2.28 134171350 2.15 133171830 1.84 136172140 1.63 138172340 1.50 141172550 1.37 145172850 1.23 152173120 1.18 160173250 1.14 167173520 1.14 176173720 1.16 183173850 1.21 189174050 1.27 195 2 picked up

3 170740 2.69 135170940 2.57 136171210 2.39 136

229

Page 240: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

EBB

JETTY A RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (run. ) (deg.) Remarks

171420 2.23 136 ?171950 1.88 138 Found buoy 3. Previous fix

in error?172200 1. 70 140172410 1.55 143172610 1.43 147172910 1.28 154173140 1.21 161173320 1.21 168 3 lost radar reflector

after this173940 1.29 190 3 picked up

4 172250 1.25 155172800 1.20 173

5 180310 1.84 146180500 1. 70 148180650 1.58 151180900 1.46 155181340 1.29 169181510 1.27 175181820 1.27 186182030 1.32 193182340 1.45 204

6 180440 1.72 140180710 1.55 142180920 1.44 146181130 1.32 150181300 1.24 154181640 1.10 169181840 1.06 176182050 1.06 184182400 1.13 196182640 1.20 205182830 1.28 209183020 1.36 214 6 picked up

7 180750 1.66 131180940 1.54 133181200 1.38 135

230

--.- ------- --_._---

Page 241: NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-59 WAVE …2.1.3 Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR) 2.1 Surface Wave Data 2.2 Current Data 2.3 Surface Wind 4.1 Wave Decay Upriver of Buoy 8 4.2

13 September 1981

EBB

JETTY A RADAR DATA

Buoy Time Range BearingNo. (PDT) (run. ) (deg.) Remarks

181400 1.26 137181700 1.07 142181900 0.94 146182110 0.82 152

8 181050 1.63 129181210 1.53 130181420 1.40 132181720 1. 18 136181920 1.04 140182130 0.89 144182440 0.73 154184600 0.42 193

231