1
ground-water recharge (inches/year) 20-22 15-19 10-14 1-9 0 not calculated (all recharge rounded to nearest integer) N e w J e r s e y G e o l o g i c a l S u r v e y 1 8 3 5 Ground-Water-Recharge Rates and Land Owned by the Federal and State Government and Water Purveyors in the Upper Passaic, Rockaway and Whippany Watersheds, New Jersey by Jeffrey L. Hoffman and Mark A. French 1999 Ground-Water-Recharge Rates and Land Owned by the Federal and State Government and Water Purveyors in the Upper Passaic, Rockaway and Whippany Watersheds, New Jersey Open-File Map OFM-29 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Science, Research and Technology New Jersey Geological Survey ABSTRACT Ground-water recharge in the Upper Passaic, Rockaway and Whippany watersheds in northeastern New Jersey was calculated using a methodology developed by the New Jersey Geological Survey. This methodology requires knowledge of the soil type, land use, climate and basin calibration factor. The results are applicable to land parcels as as small 5 acres. In the study area recharge ranged from 0 inches/year to 22 inches/year. Recharge from wetlands, hydric soils and surface- water bodies is not calculated. The map also shows land owned by the Federal and State governments and by water purveyors. The purpose of this map is to show those areas which are important to ground-water recharge but which are not protected from possible reductions in recharge caused by future development. INTRODUCTION The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection has a goal of protecting 1 million more acres of open space by the year 2008 (NJDEP, 1999). Prioritizing land parcels for open-space preservation requires an evaluation process.One factor that should enter this process is ground-water recharge. Land-use changes which reduce recharge will decrease the volume of water available to nearby water-supply wells and may decrease baseflow in nearby streams. Preservation of open space can help prevent these reductions. METHODOLOGY Ground-water recharge in the map at left is based on a methodology developed by Charles and others (1993). It requires knowing the soil type, land use/land cover and climate. The results are applicable to land parcels as small as 5 acres. Recharge under wetlands, hydric soils and surface-water bodies is not calculated. This map was created using a geographical information system (GIS). A more detailed description of the process by which this methodology is applied in New Jersey is shown on the map of recharge in Middlesex County (French, 1996). A detailed map of recharge in Morris County showing the GIS input data layers is in preparation. In the study area recharge ranged from 0 inches/year to 22 inches/year. A brief description of ground-water recharge in the study area is shown in NJDEP, 1998. Note that in NJDEP, 1998, a basin calibration factor of 1.3 (as recommended by Charles and others, 1993) was used to calculate ground-water recharge. Further investigation has shown that a basin calibration factor of 1.0 results in a net ground-water-recharge volume that better matches stream baseflow in the area (Hoffman, in press). The map at left uses the corrected basin calibration factor. This correction has reduced estimated recharge rates by about a third from the values reported in NJDEP, 1998. MAP LIMITATIONS The underlying calculation of ground-water recharge makes numerous assumptions which impose some limitations to the method. See Charles and others, 1993, for a thorough description of the assumptions made and the subsequent limitations. A brief description of the major ones follows. During this analysis all recharge rates were rounded to the nearest inch. Thus recharge rates are displayed in the map at left as integer values. Ground-water recharge in Essex County has not been calculated because there are no current soil maps available although work on them is currently underway. Ground-water recharge to and from wetlands and surface-water bodies cannot be determined using the methodology as these areas may be discharge or recharge areas, or neither. Site specific studies are needed to determine the recharge potential of individual wetlands. This map does not show land owned by the counties or municipalities because a GIS coverage is not currently available. The map shows ground-water recharge. This is water which has migrated downwards to below the root zone. The map does not indicate where aquifers are nor how productive they are. A more detailed analysis (after French, 1996) is needed to produce a map of aquifer recharge. REFERENCES Charles, E.G., Behroozi, Cyrus, Schooley, Jack and Hoffman, J.L., 1993, A method for evaluating ground-water-recharge areas in New Jersey: NJ Geological Survey Report GSR-32, 95p. French, M.A., 1996, Ground-water recharge and aquifer recharge potential for Middlesex County, New Jersey: NJ Geological Survey Open-File Map OFM 21, 1 sheet. Hoffman, J.L, in press, Basin factor calibration for ground-water recharge estimation: NJ Geological Survey Technical Memorandum TM99-1, 2 p. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 1998, Initial watershed characterization and assessment of the Upper Passaic Whippany and Rockaway Watersheds, Chapter 3, Section 3.2, Water Quantity Issues: Division of Watershed Management, Trenton, 60p. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 1999, NJDEP Stragetic Plan 1998-2001: Office of the Commissioner, Trenton, 36p. 78 78 287 202 24 124 10 280 10 202 80 80 46 46 287 15 53 Area of Detail 1:125,000 0 2 4 6 8 10 miles NJ Great Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, multiple parcels Newark City Water Department's watershed, multiple parcels Great Piece Meadows, multiple parcels (NJ Parks & Forestry) Grover Cleveland's Birthplace National Park major road municipal boundary stream lake or reservoir Federally- and State-owned land purveyor-owned reservoir watersheds East Orange Water Department's watershed McEnvoy Tract (NJ Green Acres) Canoe Brook reservoirs #1 & #2 & watershed (New Jersey-American Water Company) Primrose Brook (NJ Natural Lands Trust) Mahlon Dickenson (NJ Green Acres) Picatinny Arsenal (US Army) Boonton reservoir & watershed (Jersey City Water Department) Clyde Potts reservoir & watershed (Southeast Morris County MUA) Washington Valley watershed (Southeast Morris County MUA) Splitrock reservoir & watershed (Jersey City Water Department) Canoe Brook reservoir #3 & watershed (New Jersey-American Water Company) Morristown National Historic District Washington's HQ Jockey Hollow Fort Nonsense Taylortown reservoir & watershed (Boonton Water Departmnet) Farney, multiple parcels (NJ Parks & Forestry) Wildlife Management Areas (NJ Fish, Game & Wildlife) Wildcat Ridge (multiple parcels) Rockaway River Berkshire Valley 280

NJDEP - New JerseyWashington Valley watershed (Southeast Morris County MUA) Splitrock reservoir & watershed (Jersey City Water Department) Canoe Brook reservoir #3 & watershed (New

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

ground-water recharge(inches/year)

20-22

15-19

10-14

1-9

0

not calculated

(all

rech

arge

rou

nded

to n

eare

st in

tege

r)

New

Jersey Geological Survey

1835

Ground-Water-Recharge Rates and LandOwned by the Federal and State Government andWater Purveyors in the Upper Passaic, Rockaway

and Whippany Watersheds, New Jersey

byJeffrey L. Hoffman and Mark A. French

1999

Ground-Water-Recharge Rates and Land Owned by the Federal and State Government and Water Purveyors in the

Upper Passaic, Rockaway and Whippany Watersheds, New JerseyOpen-File Map OFM-29

New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionDivision of Science, Research and TechnologyNew Jersey Geological Survey

ABSTRACTGround-water recharge in the Upper Passaic, Rockaway and Whippany watersheds in northeastern New Jersey was calculated using a methodology developed by the New Jersey Geological Survey. This methodology requires knowledge of the soil type, land use, climate and basin calibration factor. The results are applicable to land parcels as as small 5 acres. In the study area recharge ranged from 0 inches/year to 22 inches/year. Recharge from wetlands, hydric soils and surface-water bodies is not calculated.The map also shows land owned by the Federal and State governments and by water purveyors. The purpose of this map is to show those areas which are important to ground-water recharge but which are not protected from possible reductions in recharge caused by future development.

INTRODUCTION

The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection has a goal of protecting 1 million more acres of open space by the year 2008 (NJDEP, 1999). Prioritizing land parcels for open-space preservation requires an evaluation process.One factor that should enter this process is ground-water recharge. Land-use changes which reduce recharge will decrease the volume of water available to nearby water-supply wells and may decrease baseflow in nearby streams. Preservation of open space can help prevent these reductions.

METHODOLOGY

Ground-water recharge in the map at left is based on a methodology developed by Charles and others (1993). It requires knowing the soil type, land use/land cover and climate. The results are applicable to land parcels as small as 5 acres. Recharge under wetlands, hydric soils and surface-water bodies is not calculated. This map was created using a geographical information system (GIS). A more detailed description of the process by which this methodology is applied in New Jersey is shown on the map of recharge in Middlesex County (French, 1996). A detailed map of recharge in Morris County showing the GIS input data layers is in preparation. In the study area recharge ranged from 0 inches/year to 22 inches/year. A brief description of ground-water recharge in the study area is shown in NJDEP, 1998. Note that in NJDEP, 1998, a basin calibration factor of 1.3 (as recommended by Charles and others, 1993) was used to calculate ground-water recharge. Further investigation has shown that a basin calibration factor of 1.0 results in a net ground-water-recharge volume that better matches stream baseflow in the area (Hoffman, in press). The map at left uses the corrected basin calibration factor. This correction has reduced estimated recharge rates by about a third from the values reported in NJDEP, 1998.

MAP LIMITATIONSThe underlying calculation of ground-water recharge makes numerous assumptions which impose some limitations to the method. See Charles and others, 1993, for a thorough description of the assumptions made and the subsequent limitations. A brief description of the major ones follows.During this analysis all recharge rates were rounded to the nearest inch. Thus recharge rates are displayed in the map at left as integer values.Ground-water recharge in Essex County has not been calculated because there are no current soil maps available although work on them is currently underway.Ground-water recharge to and from wetlands and surface-water bodies cannot be determined using the methodology as these areas may be discharge or recharge areas, or neither. Site specific studies are needed to determine the recharge potential of individual wetlands.This map does not show land owned by the counties or municipalities because a GIS coverage is not currently available. The map shows ground-water recharge. This is water which has migrated downwards to below the root zone. The map does not indicate where aquifers are nor how productive they are. A more detailed analysis (after French, 1996) is needed to produce a map of aquifer recharge.

REFERENCESCharles, E.G., Behroozi, Cyrus, Schooley, Jack and Hoffman,

J.L., 1993, A method for evaluating ground-water-recharge areas in New Jersey: NJ Geological Survey Report GSR-32, 95p.

French, M.A., 1996, Ground-water recharge and aquifer

recharge potential for Middlesex County, New Jersey: NJ Geological Survey Open-File Map OFM 21, 1 sheet.

Hoffman, J.L, in press, Basin factor calibration for ground-water

recharge estimation: NJ Geological Survey Technical Memorandum TM99-1, 2 p.

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 1998,

Initial watershed characterization and assessment of the Upper Passaic Whippany and Rockaway Watersheds, Chapter 3, Section 3.2, Water Quantity Issues: Division of Watershed Management, Trenton, 60p.

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 1999, NJDEP Stragetic Plan 1998-2001: Office of the Commissioner, Trenton, 36p.

7878

287

202

24

124

10

280

10202

80

80

4646

287

15

53

Area of Detail

1:125,000

0 2 4 6 8 10 miles

NJ

Great Swamp National Wildlife Refuge,

multiple parcels

Newark City WaterDepartment's watershed,

multiple parcels

Great Piece Meadows,multiple parcels

(NJ Parks & Forestry)

Grover Cleveland's Birthplace National Park

major road

municipal boundary

stream

lake or reservoir

Federally- and State-owned land

purveyor-ownedreservoir watersheds

East Orange Water Department'swatershed

McEnvoy Tract (NJ Green Acres)

Canoe Brook reservoirs #1 & #2 & watershed(New Jersey-American Water Company)

Primrose Brook(NJ Natural Lands Trust)

Mahlon Dickenson(NJ Green Acres)

Picatinny Arsenal(US Army)

Boonton reservoir & watershed(Jersey City Water Department)

Clyde Potts reservoir& watershed

(Southeast Morris County MUA)

Washington Valleywatershed

(Southeast Morris County MUA)

Splitrock reservoir & watershed(Jersey City Water Department)

Canoe Brook reservoir #3 & watershed(New Jersey-American Water Company)

Morristown NationalHistoric District

Washington's HQJockey HollowFort Nonsense

Taylortown reservoir & watershed(Boonton Water Departmnet)

Farney,multiple parcels

(NJ Parks & Forestry)

Wildlife Management Areas(NJ Fish, Game & Wildlife)

Wildcat Ridge (multiple parcels)Rockaway RiverBerkshire Valley

280