Nigro Presentation

  • Upload
    cepa1

  • View
    224

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Evaluating PEMEX's Drilling Expansion to Combat Declining Oil ReservesNicholas NigroGoldman School of Public PolicyUniversity of California, BerkeleyA project partnering the University of

Citation preview

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Evaluating PEMEX's Drilling Expansion to Combat Declining Oil Reserves

    Nicholas NigroGoldman School of Public PolicyUniversity of California, Berkeley

    A project partnering the University of California at Berkeley and Global EESE, a globally collaborative, distributive foresight network initiated by the U.S. Department of Energy

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Presentation Overview

    PEMEX Overview

    ProblemGovernment dependency on PEMEX revenue

    Decline in oil reserves since mid 1980s

    Decline in oil production since 2004

    Analysis of Drilling Expansion Policy

    Final Recommendations

    Future Work

    Note: All data presented from PEMEX and U.S. EIA

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Acknowledgements

    Dan Milstein and Carol Dumaine, U.S. Department of EnergyDan Kammen, University of California-BerkeleyArmand Peschard, Center for Strategic and International StudiesMatthew Rodrigues, Natural gas trader from private sector

    UC-Berkeley faculty and colleagues: Candace Hamilton, Blas Perez Henriquez, Rucker Johnson, Steven Raphael, and Armando Salcedo

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    PEMEX Overview

    Latin Americas largest company

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    PEMEX Overview

    Mexicos national oil and gas company

    Nationalization of hydrocarbon sector in 1938

    Supports the entire production chain

    16th largest proven oil reserves in world

    3rd largest supplier of oil to U.S.

    High Federal taxes on revenue (not profits)

    Historically little autonomy

    Historically high profits (before tax) and low investment since oil was easy to extract

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    PEMEX Objective

    Maximize hydrocarbons and by-products economic value, contributing to the sustainable

    development of the country

    PEMEXs forecasts 100% reserve replacement rate by 2012

    PEMEX must address: labor relations and negotiations, transparency, efficiency, and financial stability

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Project Problem

    Government dependency on PEMEX revenue and diminishing oil reserves and production

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    An Imminent Energy Problem

    40% of government revenue is from taxes on PEMEX

    Oil reserves have been declining since the mid 1980s

    PEMEXs answer in 2000: Expand Drilling

    Oil production has fallen sharply since 2004

    Net importer of oil by 2020 according to U.S. EIA

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Federal Government Revenue

    36%30% 33%

    36%40%

    43%

    38% 42%

    0

    200000

    400000

    600000

    800000

    1000000

    1200000

    1400000

    1600000

    1800000

    2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

    Millio

    n P

    es

    os

    Non-PEMEX Tax Revenue Tax on Pemex

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Oil On The Decline

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    0

    10000

    20000

    30000

    40000

    50000

    60000

    1975 1978 1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008

    Oil p

    rod

    uc

    tio

    n (

    milli

    on

    ba

    rre

    ls)

    Oil r

    es

    erv

    es

    (m

    illi

    on

    ba

    rre

    ls)

    Oil reserves (million barrels) Oil production (million barrels)

    2008 production

    level is same as 1984

    but revenues are

    substantially higher

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Drilling Expansion Since 2000

    600

    650

    700

    750

    800

    850

    900

    950

    1000

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

    BO

    E p

    er

    day

    We

    lls

    Wells completed Oil production by well

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Drilling Expansion Policy Analysis

    Evaluate policy effectiveness to determine path forward

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Analysis Overview

    Drilling Expansion Policy Definition

    Policy Criteria

    Revisiting Moroney-Assad analysis

    Sustainability evaluation using econometric models

    Cost-benefit analysis of drilling expansion

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Drilling Policy Expansion

    Oil production increases mandated by President Vicente Fox in 2000; support continues with current President Calderon

    Huge increases in drilling for exploration and development since 2000

    Production losses at Cantarell have led to steep production declines since 2004

    New oil is not being found at a rate fast enough to replace extracted oil

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Policy Criteria

    PEMEXs Fiscal State

    Energy Reform in 2008

    Mexicos Energy Forecast

    U.S. Energy Policy Changes

    Political Barriers

    Economic Limitations

    Technological Limitations

    Historical Perspective

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    PEMEX Revenue Allocation

    62.7% 59.2% 61.0%61.1%

    61.3%

    62.5%54.9%

    59.6%

    58.1%

    -200000

    0

    200000

    400000

    600000

    800000

    1000000

    1200000

    1400000

    1600000

    1800000

    2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

    Millio

    n P

    es

    os

    Operating Costs Tax Costs Net Loss Note: % is percentageof revenue that is taxed

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Energy Reform In 2008

    Program for Growth and EmploymentUse nearly all funds from Stabilization Fund for Oil Income Investment to build a new refinery

    Petroleos Mexicanos LawPublic works and service contracts: allow for more partnershipsCitizen Bonds: finance debtDebt: greater autonomy for establishing debtBudget: PEMEX can make budget adjustments without approvalNational Suppliers: Preference for Mexican suppliers

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Moroney-Assad Analysis

    From Energy and Sustainable Development in Mexico from 2005

    Used data from 1975-2000

    Evaluated econometric models forExploration and Developmental Drilling

    Successful Exploration and Development

    Additions to Oil Reserves

    Oil Production

    Models revisited to include 2000-2008 data

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Model Summary through 2000

    Total Drilling

    Net Mexican oil export price predicts drilling

    Drilling Success Ratio

    More drilling increases success ratio

    OilReserves

    More drilling adds to reserves

    Oil Production

    Production depends on reserve levels

    Moroney-Assad Conclusions

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Model Summary through 2000

    Total Drilling

    Net Mexican oil export price predicts drilling

    Drilling Success Ratio

    More drilling increases success ratio

    OilReserves

    More drilling adds to reserves

    Oil Production

    Production depends on reserve levels

    Moroney-Assad Conclusions

    Model Summary through 2008 Still Significant

    Total Drilling

    Unable to reproduce original modelDebt financing funds 95% of drilling

    NO

    Drilling Success Ratio

    Developmental drilling reached plateauExploration drilling ratio still increasing

    YES

    OilReserves

    Drilling expansion only marginally successful

    NO

    Oil Production

    Oil reserves still accurately predict production levels

    YES

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Sustainability Evaluation

    Three areas of focusOil reserves

    Operational costs

    Marginal cost per barrel of oil

    Econometric models and correlations establish relationships with areas of focus

    Comparing 2000-2008 versus business-as-usual evaluates effectiveness of drilling expansion for oil reserves

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Oil Reserves And Wells Drilled

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    9000

    30000

    32000

    34000

    36000

    38000

    40000

    42000

    44000

    46000

    To

    tal S

    uc

    ce

    ssfu

    l W

    ells

    Dri

    lle

    d

    Oil r

    es

    erv

    es

    (m

    illio

    n b

    arr

    els

    )

    Total successful wells drilled Oil reserves (million barrels)

    Inverse Relationship: Correlation coefficient of -0.98 since 1993

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Oil Reserves And Employee Count

    30000

    32000

    34000

    36000

    38000

    40000

    42000

    44000

    46000

    48000

    50000

    30000

    32000

    34000

    36000

    38000

    40000

    42000

    44000

    1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

    Nu

    mb

    er

    of

    Em

    plo

    ye

    es

    Oil r

    es

    erv

    es

    (m

    illi

    on

    ba

    rre

    ls)

    Pemex-Exploration and Production Employee Count Oil reserves (million barrels)

    Strong Relationship: Correlation coefficient of -0.99 since 1996

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Marginal Cost And Employee Count

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    450

    500

    550

    30000

    32000

    34000

    36000

    38000

    40000

    42000

    44000

    46000

    48000

    50000

    1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

    Pe

    so

    s pe

    r b

    arr

    el o

    f o

    il

    Em

    plo

    ye

    e C

    ou

    nt

    Production and Exploration Employee Count Operating Cost Rate (pesos/barrel)

    Statistically significant correlation between employee count and operating cost rate

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Oil Reserves Evaluation

    -4.24%

    -5.67%-4.93% -1.59%

    -0.94%1.35% 5.17%

    25000.00

    27000.00

    29000.00

    31000.00

    33000.00

    35000.00

    37000.00

    39000.00

    41000.00

    2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

    Oil R

    es

    erv

    es

    (m

    illi

    on

    s o

    f b

    arr

    els

    )

    Oil Reserves (forecast) Oil Reserves (actual) R2 value of 0.68

    Net oil reserve gain of 2019 million barrels from 2000-2008

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Oil Production Evaluation

    R2 value of 0.45

    1.29%

    4.77%

    6.37%

    12.78%13.11%

    11.37%

    8.70%

    2.62%

    -6.92%1000.00

    1050.00

    1100.00

    1150.00

    1200.00

    1250.00

    1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

    Oil R

    es

    erv

    es

    (m

    illi

    on

    s o

    f b

    arr

    els

    )

    Oil Production (forecast) Oil Production (actual)

    Net gain of 733 million barrels from 2000-2008

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Sustainability Evaluation Summary

    Diminishing rate of return for each new well drilled

    Increasing marginal cost per barrel may prevent some oil from being extracted

    Marginal success for drilling expansion Rate of oil reserve decline has lessened since 2000

    Higher production than business-as-usual

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Cost-Benefit Analysis

    Use total sales for benefits and total operational costs for costs

    Using company-wide numbers accounts for benefits and costs in refining and other subsidiaries of PEMEX

    Project business as usual using data from 1990-1999

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Operational Costs

    0.59%0.68%

    -10.15%

    8.51%

    10.95%

    36.99%

    46.35%

    51.84%

    108.88%

    200000.00

    300000.00

    400000.00

    500000.00

    600000.00

    700000.00

    800000.00

    900000.00

    1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

    Op

    era

    tio

    na

    l C

    osts

    (m

    illi

    on

    s o

    f p

    es

    os

    )

    Total Operational Costs (forecast) Total Operational Costs (actual)

    Year

    Operational

    Costs(million pesos)

    2000 1,718.90

    2001 1,988.64

    2002 0.00

    2003 27,631.06

    2004 37,700.95

    2005 130,855.04

    2006 172,370.50

    2007 200,380.68

    2008 449,639.75

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Sales Benefits

    7.87%

    -6.02%-7.89%

    10.47%

    24.89%

    39.70%

    48.12%47.36%

    56.42%

    400000.00

    500000.00

    600000.00

    700000.00

    800000.00

    900000.00

    1000000.00

    1100000.00

    1200000.00

    1300000.00

    1400000.00

    1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

    To

    tal S

    ale

    s (

    mil

    lio

    ns

    o

    f p

    es

    os

    )

    Total Sales (forecast) Total Sales (actual)

    YearSales Benefit(million pesos)

    2000 54,067.92

    2001 0.00

    2002 0.00

    2003 79,863.32

    2004 225,916.43

    2005 411,319.54

    2006 552,012.89

    2007 558,300.70

    2008 749,770.63

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Cost-Benefit Summary

    Year Accumulated Benefit(million pesos)

    2000 687,004.86

    2001 599,625.62

    2002 620,922.21

    2003 763,133.92

    2004 907,783.10

    2005 1,035,970.21

    2006 1,147,093.83

    2007 1,178,750.95

    2008 1,328,950.00

    Drilling expansion provided millions of additional pesos in revenue for PEMEX

    Much of the additional revenue is due to high oil prices from 2004-2008

    Financial crisis of 2008 could lessen benefit significantly in 2010

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Final Recommendations

    Defining a path forward for drilling at PEMEX

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    1. Parntnerships to Change Political Will

    ProblemDeficient technological capabilityEconomically inefficient policies

    SolutionIncrease collaborations and communication with other national oil companies like Petrobras and StatoilHydroLearn implementation of effective policies that improve social welfare and productivity of national oil industry

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Parntnerships to Change Political Will (Cont.)

    PEMEX undertakes massive public advertising

    campaign highlighting partnerships with

    Petrobras and StatOilHydro

    Mexican government holds joint conference with Brazil

    and Norway to discuss public polices related to the hydrocarbon sector

    Assessment of political will for further reform of hydrocarbon sector

    including law changes to allow PEMEX to operate

    more efficiently

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    2. Continue Drilling Expansion

    ProblemDeclining oil reserves and production

    Increasing operational costs and marginal cost per barrel of oil

    SolutionContinue drilling expansion

    Use more contractors or part-time workers to limit full-time employment expansion

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Future Work

    Carrying this analysis forward

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    Future Work

    Highlight demand side opportunities in Mexico to help prevent the 2020 switchover to a net importer of oilInvestigate partnerships with universities in the U.S. to learn advanced drilling techniquesEvaluate ballooning retirement costs at PEMEX and its affect on long-term financial stabilityInvestigate potential for alternative energy infrastructure in Mexico to allow PEMEX to transition to an energy market without fossil fuels

  • A presentation by Nicholas Nigro from the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley

    PEMEX's Future

    16th largest proven oil reservesContinually decreasing reserves since 1984

    Increasing possible oil reserves since 1999Technology can turn possible into proven reserves

    Federal Government and PEMEX support reform and operational improvements

    Energy reform in 2008 is a good step

    Drilling expansion marginally successful since 2000

    More reform is necessary to reverse declining trends in oil production and oil reserves