39
Nick Brestoff, M.S., J.D. inventor, founder & CEO

Nick Brestoff, M.S., J.D. inventor, founder & CEOliblog.law.stanford.edu/.../06/Intraspexion-What-We-Do-CodeX-Final.pdf · suicidal, terrifying, Titanic, unstable, widow-maker, words

  • Upload
    dongoc

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Nick Brestoff, M.S., J.D.inventor, founder & CEO

What’s the pain?

U.S. Commercial Tort Costs = about

$160 billion per year

Towers Watson [NYSE: TW] 2001-2010

Even if an enterprise settles or wins

… it loses!

$350,000-$400,000 per case

So the only winning move is …

not to play

What’s the wrong way to play?Create a word “rug” = alternative facts

Example:

Without an early warning of the risks,

GM’s attorneys advised GM’s engineers:

• Instead of “defect,” write “does not meet specifications”

• And sent a PPT: “Some examples of words or phrases that are to be avoided” are: …

Say!

Don’t

“Always, annihilate, apocalyptic, asphyxiating, bad,

Band-Aid, big time, brakes like an X car,

cataclysmic, catastrophic, Challenger, chaotic,

Cobain, condemns, Corvair-like, crippling,

critical, dangerous, deathtrap, debilitating,

decapitating, defect, defective, detonate,

disemboweling, enfeebling, evil, eviscerated,

explode, failed, flawed, genocide, ghastly,

grenade-like, grisly, gruesome, Hindenburg,

Hobbling, Horrific, impaling, inferno,

Kevorkianesque, lacerating, life-threatening ….”

maiming, malicious, mangling, maniacal,

mutilating, never, potentially disfiguring, powder

keg, problem, rolling sarcophagus (tomb or

coffin), safety, safety related, serious,

spontaneous combustion, startling, suffocating,

suicidal, terrifying, Titanic, unstable, widow-

maker, words or phrases with a biblical

connotation, [and] you’re toast.”

—Tom Gara, “The 69 Words You Can’t Use at GM,”

The Wall Street Journal Blog

May 17, 2014

Is there a better way? YESIntraspexion’s solution uses

Deep Learning

“Deep Learning is the new electricity.”Stanford’s Andrew Ngin Fortune Magazine September 28, 2016

Who’s in the race to monetize Deep Learning?

Apple – Amazon – Baidu -- Facebook –Google – IBM - Intel –

Microsoft – NVIDIA --SalesForce&

Companies making self-driving cars &

We use Deep Learningin our patented (No. 9,552,548) system

to identify Litigation Riskand Provide Early Warning

Deep Learning learns by example -- from external data --

We train our system for a case-type, e.g., discrimination,

using previous discrimination lawsuits

“Learning by example” means:

No key words -- No lists No expert rules

No ontologies – No taxonomies Concept search (LSI or PLSI)? No

Predictive Coding? No

No programming for you to do

And there are many case-types –think PACER and nearly

160 Nature of Suit codes

We trained our system with examples

With examples from lawsuits, the system “understands” discrimination

NOS 160 – Stockholders’ SuitsNOS 190 – Contracts

NOS 370 – FraudNOS 410 – Antitrust

NOS 710 – Fair Labor Standards Act

Using PACER, we can train a multiplicity of “filters”

Then you monitor enterprise emails-- internal data --to surface those

risky needles in the haystackSo, as a user, what would you see?

Screen 1 shows the high scoringenterprise emails to you (Enron here)

the riskiest mails to you

Accuracy Scores

43210.5%

With Screen 2 select the emails to read This augments your intelligence

“My employment with Enron

is to be terminated, …”

Then you can access a risky emailin its native (.pst) state

“My employment with Enron

is to be terminated, …”

& start an investigation using yourexisting case management system

“My employment with Enron

is to be terminated, …”

10 Nodes

50 Nodes

Indico Data Sys. ROC-AUC = 0.967

ROC fold 0, area = 0.967--- random

Intraspexion ROC-AUC = 0.998

To sum upYou install our system

& monitor enterprise emails-- per policy, i.e.,

no reasonable expectation of privacy --& get an Early Warning

of the risky ones

When you’re on the “alert,” you decide which emails to investigate

After investigating, you can advise your client

Notice we’ve preserved the applicability of the attorney

work-product doctrine and the attorney-client privilege

So head litigation off at the pass

Nip it in the bud

Bottom lineCorporate counsel are closest to the risky data but are blind to the risks -

With this new power, now they can seeDon’t manage lawsuits; avoid them

To get started, see our Demo page

Nick Brestoff, M.S., J.D.inventor, founder & CEO

[email protected]

© 2017 Intraspexion Inc.