Upload
jody-perkins
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Nice 03/12/2008
THE HELIOSEISMOLOGY
PROGRAM OF PICARD
T. Corbard, O.C.A.
T. Appourchaux, I.A.S.
P. Boumier, I.A.S.
B. Gelly, THEMIS
R.A. Garcia, S.J. Jiménez-Reyes, J. Provost, T. Toutain, S. Turck-Chièze, et al
Nice 03/12/2008
1. Why? Scientific objectives
2. How? Helioseismic measurements with PICARD
3. Specifications (SODISM performances)
Heliosismology with PICARD
Nice 03/12/2008
Why? Scientific objectives
1. Structure and dynamic of the nuclear core(limb helioseismology and integrated irradiance data )
2. The solar Dynamo, tachocline and torsional oscillations (Intensity Medium-l program or "Macro Pixels" program)
3. Fundamental (f) modes and the solar radius
Nice 03/12/2008
Scientific objective 1 : Structure and dynamics of the nuclear core
The main interest of this part of the spectra is that these modes are more sensitive to the deepest layers that remain poorly known both in terms of their structure and their dynamic.
The knowledge of the solar core properties is crucial to understand the dynamical evolution of the Sun and Stars and to set new constraints on neutrino physics.
All the measurements that will be obtained by PICARD for helioseismology are for improving our knowledge of the low frequency domain of the solar oscillation spectra (low and intermediate degree modes).
Nice 03/12/2008
Garcia et al, 2007: core rotation up to 3-5 times that of the radiative region ?
Tracking Solar Gravity Modes
Talks from T. Appourchaux, D. Salabert / R. Garcia, G. Grec
Nice 03/12/2008
How? g-modes search with PICARD: take advantage of limb-amplification
Toner et al. 1999
• This limb amplification is understood theoretically (Toutain et al. (1999)) and it has been observed for p-modes using MDI images and LOI guiding pixels.(Appourchaux et al. 96)
• PICARD will have a resolution and a stability allowing us to use this amplification factor for searching low frequency modes.
22 pixels PICARD
Talk from J. Provost / T. Toutain
Nice 03/12/2008
limb-amplification
Toner, Jefferies & Toutain 1999
Seismic Radius and f-modes: Talks from H.M Antia and S. Lefebvre
Leaks problem: Talk from M.C. Rabello-Soares
Nice 03/12/2008
Scientific objective 2 : Solar dynamo, tachocline and torsional oscillations
One of the major challenges in solar physics is to understand the origin of the magnetic activity cycle of the Sun.
Helioseismology does not give direct access to the internal magnetic field strength but it is a very powerful tool to infer the internal rotation rate, and some useful information on the magnetic field can also be deduced from its predicted interaction with the observed velocity field.
Nice 03/12/2008
The internal Rotation Inverse Problem
angular degree, l
Fre
quen
cy,
mH
z
drdθθ)Ω(r,θ)(r,Km
ωωnlm
nlmm-nl
Nice 03/12/2008
Tachocline
Corbard, 1998
The tachocline is a thin shear layer at the interface between the convection zone and the radiative interior, in which it is likely that a strong magnetic field is built as a result of the dynamo Ω-effect
From the study of the tachocline properties (structure, extent, precise location and latitudinal shape) we can derive not only the precise profile of the rotational shear but also get some hints on the shape and strength of the magnetic field at this depth
The tachocline is sensed mostly by p modes with degrees 20 < l < 60 but higher modes are also needed for inversion.
Tachocline
Nice 03/12/2008
Torsional Oscillations in the convection zone
When compared to the time averaged profile, angular velocity shows bands of enhanced rotation rate that migrate toward the equator during the increasing phase of activity
It is very likely that we have here a direct observation of the back reaction of the dynamo magnetic field on the rotational profile, from which the toroidal field originates within the tachocline
Allows us to constrain our models of the interplay between magnetic field and convection
Nice 03/12/2008
Scientific objective 2 : Solar dynamo, tachocline and torsional oscillations
Detecting modes up to l=250 and measuring frequencies and splittings should allow us to probe the tachocline and most of the convection zone.
All these objectives are also major objectives for SDO.
In this field SDO is expected to provide much better data with more resolution, better signal to noise ratio (in velocity)…
It is however interesting to have both Intensity and velocity signals and to have measurements from two different instruments
Talk of T. Straus
Nice 03/12/2008
2. How? Helioseismic measurements with PICARD
InstrumentData Filter
[band]Cadence Exposure time
SODISM 22" wide rings of 1" pixels across the limb.
535.7 nm [0.5]
2 mn 8 s
SODISM 256x256 Images of 8" macro- pixels
535.7 nm[0.5]
1 mn 8 s
PREMOS SpectralIrradiance
215 nm[7]
0.1s 0.1s
PREMOS SpectralIrradiance
268 nm[7]
10s 10s
PREMOS SpectralIrradiance
535.7 nm[0.5]
10s 10s
PREMOS SpectralIrradiance
607.2 nm[0.8]
10s 10s
PREMOS SpectralIrradiance
782.3 nm[1.7]
10s 10s
SOVAP BolometricMeasurements
NA 10s 10s
SOVAP Total Irradiance
NA 3 mn 10s
PREMOS TotalIrradiance
NA 2 mn 20s
HelioseismologyWith Irradiance data: Talk of W. Finsterle
Nice 03/12/2008
Intensity Medium ℓ program of PICARD
Images 256x256 (8"x8" Macro Pixels) with non destructive compression and no Gaussian mask. 1mn Cadence. 77% DC expected. (very demanding for available TM. Higher resolution was favored against the possibility of Gaussian masking )
The pipeline is under development in collaboration with Sebastian Jimenez-Reyes based on the pipeline he developed for LOWL.
Tests are being performed using MDI intensity images corrected for limb distortion and provided by Cliff Toner
Heliosismology Quick look Software for the mission center have been devilered (Beta versions).
Talk of D. Salabert
Talk of C. Renaud
Nice 03/12/2008
l-nu diagram from 1-day MDI intensity
128x128
Nice 03/12/2008
l-nu diagram from 1-day MDI intensity
128x128
Nice 03/12/2008
l-nu diagram from 1-day MDI intensity
128x128
Nice 03/12/2008
l-nu diagram from 1-day MDI intensity
128x128
Nice 03/12/2008
l-nu diagram from 1-day MDI intensity
128x128
Nice 03/12/2008
l-nu diagram from 1-day MDI intensity
128x128
Nice 03/12/2008
170x170
Nice 03/12/2008
256x256
Nice 03/12/2008
l-nu diagram from 1-day MDI intensity
170x170 (no mask)
Nice 03/12/2008
170x170 (Gaussian mask)
Nice 03/12/2008
Final Choice: 256x256 (no mask)
Nice 03/12/2008
Relative differences between destructive and non destructive compression
Nice 03/12/2008
OPERATIONAL MODE
Nominal:
no satellite manoeuvres, no calibration phase, no physical events.
Limb: 1 image every 2 minutes; MP: 1 image per minute.
But:
MP: LCO (4%), diameter (10%), FFL + FCO (0.14%), loss (0.27%)
duty cycle (MP) ~ 85.5%.
(Limb loss estimated < 0.8%).
Nice 03/12/2008
NOMINAL MODE
Thanks to CNES
Nice 03/12/2008
CALIBRATION MODES
Optical distorsion:
- optics and CCD calibration; a 30 arsec-step roll of the satellite, once a month.
- duration: 937 minutes (JPM; 22/10/2007) loss of 2.2% of duty cycle
Stellar:
- angular/pixel relationship calibration; pointing toward the barycenter of 2 stars, 4 times per year.
- 94 minutes per operation: 0.07% loss.
Nice 03/12/2008
Absorption:
- line of sight crosses the Earth atmosphere at an altitude lower than 40 km; a several-day period twice a year (just before and after the night mode).
- 9 minutes at maximum, for each orbit, during which a single wavelength wide limb will be measured.
10 days 0.2%.
Night:
- eclipses (Sun hidden by Earth); 3 months once a year.
- 2 phases in the perturbation: night itself (maximum of 18 minutes per orbit for a 700-km altitude), and a thermal reequilibrium after the satellite left the shadow (14 minutes at maximum).
MODES CONSTRAINED BY THE EPHEMERIS
Nice 03/12/2008
700-km scenario
Limb: loss = 3.5 %MP : loss = 6.2 %
Nice 03/12/2008
Observational window
operating modes: nominal, eclipses, calibrations (stellar, distorsion, …)
Limbe Hélio : duty cycle = 93 %
Nice 03/12/2008
Macropixels : duty cycle = 78 %
50 mn aliases
Nice 03/12/2008
Macropixels : haute fréquence
In principle OK, but be careful in case of large excursions of the signal (from the mean)
Nice 03/12/2008
Specifications – instrumental noise
Sampling
3 years 10 nHz resolution
for a 100 μHz peak (limb): 100 ppm for a 3 mHz peak (MP): 3 ppm
maximum drift over the whole mission: ~ ppm
drift compensation of the on-board clock: once a week: < 80 ms
Nice 03/12/2008
simulations with systems input; a 1 ms jitter on the 1-minute sampling
+ 20 ms/week trend + systematic errors + margins.
Redistribution of the spectral energy of sinewaves < 10-3
Nice 03/12/2008
Specifications – instrumental noise
Sampling
3 years 10 nHz resolution
for a 100 μHz peak (limb): 100 ppm for a 3 mHz peak (MP): 3 ppm
maximum drift over the whole mission: ~ ppm
drift compensation of the on-board clock: once a week: 80 ms at maximum
Note: reference time is TUC, not TAI leap second possibleNo trouble for peak detection but, be careful in case of phase difference analysis and cross-correlation with contemporaneous data (SDO, SoHO).
Nice 03/12/2008
Photometry (Integration*gain)
A tenth of solar noise σI/I ~ 9 ppm
If only shutter noise: σt ~ 0.072 ms
Nice 03/12/2008
Integration time: simulations of a 50 s (sigma) shutter noise
White noise level: 2.5 10-3 ppm2/Hz, OK !If necessary, possibility of reducing this level by a factor 5 using the measure of the integration time
sinewaves amplitude: from 1 to 10 ppm
Nice 03/12/2008
Pointing
Modeling 0.1 stability during the integration time (fine pointing by SODISM)
Digitization
Modeling 14 digits are OK.
Nice 03/12/2008
Conclusion
Performances seem OK; many thanks to the project team (CNES + labs).
Algorithms strategy (gap filling for MP ?)
Modelling for scientific interpretation + inversion
Coordination of the collaboration with SDO
Working groups in charge of:- In flight performances validation- validation of each level of data
CO-I and G-I proposition to the CS