NH-DES emails related to Kinder Morgan / Tennessee Gas

NH-DES / KM-TGP NED related Emails -1-

NH-DES emails related to Kinder Morgan / Tennessee Gas Pipeline NED Projectreleased in response to Right to Know request from Municipal Pipeline Coalitionas of March 31, 2016

FORMAT & ORGANIZATION:

363 emails provided, dates ranging from 2013_09_30 to 2016_02_29

Orginal email files were all .MSG (Microsoft Outlook) Can be read IF running on Microsoft Windows platform AND have Outlook Not readable on Macintosh platforms original file dates not preserved during copy to DVD at NHDES .MSG files stored in EM_MSG folder/directory Converted under Mac OS X 10.9 to .EML format using MSG Viewerfor Outlook v3.75 (http://msgviewerforoutlook.com/) used same file name, substituting .eml for .msg extension but added date prefix in yyyy_mm_dd format based on internal dates .EML files stored in EM_EML folder/directory

Converted to text format (.TXT) using Microsoft Entourage 2008 for Mac (12.3.6) Save As...Text, same file name except .TXT instead of .EML extension .TXT files stored in EM_TXT folder/directory Attachments were saved separately in sub-folders within EM_TXT folder name = source file name minus the .TXT extension

Listing format: see first entry below: =================================== file name with date prefix and .TXT extension =================================== optionally - name of sub-folder created to hold attachments name of the attached file(s) text of emails, blank lines removed note: some unicode characters displayed incorrectly

===========================================================================2013_09_30 KKKK Test Protocol -Tennesee Gas Pipeline.TXT

=========================================================================== 2013_09_30 KKKK Test Protocol -Tennesee Gas Pipeline: 2013 NOx -KKKK - Test Protocol.pdfSubject: KKKK Test Protocol -Tennesee Gas Pipeline Date: Monday, September 30, 2013 2:55 PMFrom: Planchet, Claude </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CLAUDE.B.PLANCHET>To: “Looney, Michael” <[email protected]>Cc: “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>Conversation: KKKK Test Protocol -Tennesee Gas Pipeline Hi Mike-I work with Mike O’Brien at NH DESMike O’Brien wanted me to let you know that Tennessee Gas Pipeline is planning to perform NOx testing on


their Natural Gas turbine at their Pelham, NH site during the week of November 4. Mike asked me to send to you a copy of the Test Protocol they submitted for this upcoming test (attached) as well as a copy of the com-ments you provided on previous Test Protocols (pasted below in this e-mail).It appears that many of your comments from previous protocols were not incorporated into the protocol for this upcoming test.Feel free to call me if you have any questions.Claude Planchet(603) 271-1376 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------From: [email protected]: Monday, October 17, 2011 2:32 PMTo: Bernauer, JacobCc: O’Brien, Mike; [email protected]: Tennessee Gas, Pelham, NH facilityJacob, It was good talking with you earlier. I have read through the El Paso / TGP protocol for the proposed test at Sta-tion #270 in Pelham, NH. They had submitted a similar protocol in 2009 for a performance test. That protocol was rejected and resubmitted after addressing issues that I had with the protocol. The following is a list of deficiencies from the 2009 protocol: Upon initial review of the protocol that you have submitted to EPA, dated October 30, 2009, the following defi-ciencies need to be addressed and approved before testing of the gas turbine at TGP Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH can commence. 1) Applicable permit information should be summarized and stated in the protocol. A detailed test plan ma-trix with applicable emission parameters, limits and test methods with descriptions should be included in table form. 2) Stack sample locations, diagrams and descriptions are required. Stack diameter and sample port location, relative to any flow disturbances should be included. 3) Site and sample location access and safety needs to be addressed. 4) A detailed source description is required: � When was the unit installed? � What is the unit’s power rating? � What is the maximum exhaust flow rate and at what it the exhaust temperature? � What is the maximum fuel firing rate and maximum heat input? 5) An engineering cut sheet for the turbine to be tested. 6) A site plan of the facility. 7) The protocol needs to state that the turbine will maintain loading of at least 75% of maximum load while testing, as stated by 40 CFR 60 Subpart KKKK and also how this data will be measured and recorded. 8) Protocol should contain table with proposed test schedule. (e.g., day 1-setup, day 2-test, day 3-contingi-ency) 9) Expected pollutant concentrations and calibration gas ranges should be documented in the protocol. 10) The determination of stratification procedure outlined on page one of the protocol is insufficient. EPA guideline documentation is provided in this email to address this. 11) Sample calibration documentation and sample field data worksheets should be included. 12) The protocol needs state how the facility will meet the emission limits for SO2 as stated in 40 CFR 60 Subpart KKKK. The goal of addressing these issues is to ensure that a complete and representative stack test is conducted, to minimize potential problems during the test, to avoid potential errors in the final report, and to prevent a retest. An updated protocol addressing these issues needs to be submitted and approved. Please note that our office will not schedule testing until we have an EPA approved protocol. If you have additional comments I can include them in a new email to El Paso /TGP to get us an acceptable


protocol. Let me know. Mike Michael Looney, Environmental EngineerUS EPA New EnglandOEME, Investigations and Analysis Unit11 Technology DriveN. Chelmsford, MA 01863T: 617-918-8665F: 617-918-8565Claude PlanchetCEM/Stack Test EngineerAir Resources Division NH Department of Environmental Services29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03302Telephone (603) [email protected]

===========================================================================2013_09_30 RE KKKK Test Protocol -Tennesee Gas Pipeline.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: KKKK Test Protocol -Tennesee Gas Pipeline Date: Monday, September 30, 2013 3:44 PMFrom: O’Brien, Mike </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOBRIEN>To: “Planchet, Claude” <[email protected]>, “Looney, Michael” <[email protected]>Conversation: KKKK Test Protocol -Tennesee Gas Pipeline Hi Mike Claude is going to ask them to update the protocol to include your comments and any other comments we have to this protocol so that in two years we do not run into this same issue. Thanks,MikeMike O’Brien Testing and Monitoring SupervisorNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095(603) 271-6546 (phone)(603) 271-7053 (fax)Michael.O’[email protected] <mailto:Michael.O’[email protected]> (email)-----Original Message-----From: Planchet, Claude Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 2:55 PMTo: Looney, MichaelCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: KKKK Test Protocol -Tennesee Gas Pipeline Hi Mike-I work with Mike O’Brien at NH DESMike O’Brien wanted me to let you know that Tennessee Gas Pipeline is planning to perform NOx testing on their Natural Gas turbine at their Pelham, NH site during the week of November 4. Mike asked me to send to you a copy of the Test Protocol they submitted for this upcoming test (attached) as well as a copy of the com-


ments you provided on previous Test Protocols (pasted below in this e-mail).It appears that many of your comments from previous protocols were not incorporated into the protocol for this upcoming test.Feel free to call me if you have any questions.Claude Planchet(603) 271-1376 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------From: [email protected]: Monday, October 17, 2011 2:32 PMTo: Bernauer, JacobCc: O’Brien, Mike; [email protected]: Tennessee Gas, Pelham, NH facilityJacob, It was good talking with you earlier. I have read through the El Paso / TGP protocol for the proposed test at Sta-tion #270 in Pelham, NH. They had submitted a similar protocol in 2009 for a performance test. That protocol was rejected and resubmitted after addressing issues that I had with the protocol. The following is a list of deficiencies from the 2009 protocol: Upon initial review of the protocol that you have submitted to EPA, dated October 30, 2009, the following defi-ciencies need to be addressed and approved before testing of the gas turbine at TGP Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH can commence. 1) Applicable permit information should be summarized and stated in the protocol. A detailed test plan ma-trix with applicable emission parameters, limits and test methods with descriptions should be included in table form. 2) Stack sample locations, diagrams and descriptions are required. Stack diameter and sample port location, relative to any flow disturbances should be included. 3) Site and sample location access and safety needs to be addressed. 4) A detailed source description is required: � When was the unit installed? � What is the unit’s power rating? � What is the maximum exhaust flow rate and at what it the exhaust temperature? � What is the maximum fuel firing rate and maximum heat input? 5) An engineering cut sheet for the turbine to be tested. 6) A site plan of the facility. 7) The protocol needs to state that the turbine will maintain loading of at least 75% of maximum load while testing, as stated by 40 CFR 60 Subpart KKKK and also how this data will be measured and recorded. 8) Protocol should contain table with proposed test schedule. (e.g., day 1-setup, day 2-test, day 3-contingi-ency) 9) Expected pollutant concentrations and calibration gas ranges should be documented in the protocol. 10) The determination of stratification procedure outlined on page one of the protocol is insufficient. EPA guideline documentation is provided in this email to address this. 11) Sample calibration documentation and sample field data worksheets should be included. 12) The protocol needs state how the facility will meet the emission limits for SO2 as stated in 40 CFR 60 Subpart KKKK. The goal of addressing these issues is to ensure that a complete and representative stack test is conducted, to minimize potential problems during the test, to avoid potential errors in the final report, and to prevent a retest. An updated protocol addressing these issues needs to be submitted and approved. Please note that our office will not schedule testing until we have an EPA approved protocol. If you have additional comments I can include them in a new email to El Paso /TGP to get us an acceptable protocol. Let me know. Mike


Michael Looney, Environmental EngineerUS EPA New EnglandOEME, Investigations and Analysis Unit11 Technology DriveN. Chelmsford, MA 01863T: 617-918-8665F: 617-918-8565Claude PlanchetCEM/Stack Test EngineerAir Resources Division NH Department of Environmental Services29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03302Telephone (603) [email protected]

===========================================================================2013_10_04 Automatic reply Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test Protocol.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Automatic reply: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolDate: Friday, October 4, 2013 3:30 PMFrom: Looney, Michael <[email protected]>To: “Planchet, Claude” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolDue to the government shutdown, I will be out of the office on temporary furlough. I will reply to your mes-sage upon my return.

===========================================================================2013_10_08 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test Protocol.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolDate: Friday, October 4, 2013 3:30 PMFrom: Planchet, Claude </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CLAUDE.B.PLANCHET>To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>Cc: “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>, “Michael Looney ([email protected])” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-NH DES has received the Test Protocol that you submitted for performing the NSPS Subpart KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH. We have the following comments on the Test Protocol submitted:1. Please provide the manufacturers’ names and model numbers for the test analyzers and DAS.2. Figure 1 includes a THC analyzer, please confirm if this analyzer will be employed for November test.3. It is not clear in figure 1 what lines will be used to perform analyzer and system calibrations. Please provide an explanation how those calibrations will be accomplished.4. DES requests that that Kinder Morgan also measure CO and CO2 as was done in 2009 and 2011.5. Page 5, substantial deviations from the protocol must be discussed with NH DES in lieu of Louisiana Depart-ment of Environmental Quality for this test.6. Per section 8.2.4 of Method 7E, please conduct a NOX Converter Efficiency check before departing the test site or provide NHDES the results of the next efficiency test done subsequently on the NOX analyzer used for the test.


7. Page 6 System Bias Check - Method 7E, Section 13.2 indicates that system bias must be within 5% of the calibration span.8. Please identify which ASTM Method will be used to analyze the gas sample, how the sample will be col-lected and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.9. Please confirm that only 1 engine will be tested. Modify Compliance Test Runs Section (3rd paragraph), page 7, which addresses sampling the exhaust gases “for each engine” 11. Please modify Protocol to direct a 12 point stratification check as required by US EPA for previous similar tests on this engine.12. Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from up-stream and downstream flow disturbances.12. Please identify the specific process data (engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.13. DES requests test run durations of 60 vs. 30 minutes. 60 minute test runs were accomplished both in 2009 and 2011.Please note that many of the above comments were provided on the Test Protocols submitted for the 2009 and 2011 tests and were incorporated into subsequent revisions of those documents. DES requests that Kinder Morgan retain a copy of the revised Test Protocol incorporating these comments for use in submittal of similar Protocols in the future.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me if you have any questions on these comments.Claude PlanchetCEM/Stack Test EngineerAir Resources Division NH Department of Environmental Services29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03302Telephone (603) [email protected]

===========================================================================2013_10_21 FW Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test Protocol (12).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolDate: Monday, October 21, 2013 3:12 PMFrom: Planchet, Claude </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CLAUDE.B.PLANCHET>To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>Cc: “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-Please provide us a date when you expect to submit a revised Test Protocol for the Subpart KKKK test which is currently scheduled for November 4/5.Thanks,Claude Planchet-----Original Message-----From: Planchet, Claude Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:30 PMTo: ‘[email protected]’Cc: O’Brien, Mike; ‘Michael Looney ([email protected])’Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-NH DES has received the Test Protocol that you submitted for performing the NSPS Subpart KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH. We


have the following comments on the Test Protocol submitted:1. Please provide the manufacturers’ names and model numbers for the test analyzers and DAS.2. Figure 1 includes a THC analyzer, please confirm if this analyzer will be employed for November test.3. It is not clear in figure 1 what lines will be used to perform analyzer and system calibrations. Please provide an explanation how those calibrations will be accomplished.4. DES requests that that Kinder Morgan also measure CO and CO2 as was done in 2009 and 2011.5. Page 5, substantial deviations from the protocol must be discussed with NH DES in lieu of Louisiana Depart-ment of Environmental Quality for this test.6. Per section 8.2.4 of Method 7E, please conduct a NOX Converter Efficiency check before departing the test site or provide NHDES the results of the next efficiency test done subsequently on the NOX analyzer used for the test.7. Page 6 System Bias Check - Method 7E, Section 13.2 indicates that system bias must be within 5% of the calibration span.8. Please identify which ASTM Method will be used to analyze the gas sample, how the sample will be col-lected and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.9. Please confirm that only 1 engine will be tested. Modify Compliance Test Runs Section (3rd paragraph), page 7, which addresses sampling the exhaust gases “for each engine” 11. Please modify Protocol to direct a 12 point stratification check as required by US EPA for previous similar tests on this engine.12. Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from up-stream and downstream flow disturbances.12. Please identify the specific process data (engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.13. DES requests test run durations of 60 vs. 30 minutes. 60 minute test runs were accomplished both in 2009 and 2011.Please note that many of the above comments were provided on the Test Protocols submitted for the 2009 and 2011 tests and were incorporated into subsequent revisions of those documents. DES requests that Kinder Morgan retain a copy of the revised Test Protocol incorporating these comments for use in submittal of similar Protocols in the future.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me if you have any questions on these comments.Claude PlanchetCEM/Stack Test EngineerAir Resources Division NH Department of Environmental Services29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03302Telephone (603) [email protected]

===========================================================================2013_10_21 FW Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test Protocol.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolDate: Monday, October 21, 2013 3:41 PMFrom: Planchet, Claude </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CLAUDE.B.PLANCHET>To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>Cc: “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,The email I sent on October 4 with NH DES’s comments (below) on the proposed Protocol for the KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH may


not have reached you due to an error in the spelling of your last name in the email address. Please confirm your receipt of this email and also provide an estimated date for when you will submit a revised protocol.Thanks, Johndunn-----Original Message-----From: Planchet, Claude Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:30 PMTo: ‘[email protected]’Cc: O’Brien, Mike; ‘Michael Looney ([email protected])’Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-NH DES has received the Test Protocol that you submitted for performing the NSPS Subpart KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH. We have the following comments on the Test Protocol submitted:1. Please provide the manufacturers’ names and model numbers for the test analyzers and DAS.2. Figure 1 includes a THC analyzer, please confirm if this analyzer will be employed for November test.3. It is not clear in figure 1 what lines will be used to perform analyzer and system calibrations. Please provide an explanation how those calibrations will be accomplished.4. DES requests that that Kinder Morgan also measure CO and CO2 as was done in 2009 and 2011.5. Page 5, substantial deviations from the protocol must be discussed with NH DES in lieu of Louisiana Depart-ment of Environmental Quality for this test.6. Per section 8.2.4 of Method 7E, please conduct a NOX Converter Efficiency check before departing the test site or provide NHDES the results of the next efficiency test done subsequently on the NOX analyzer used for the test.7. Page 6 System Bias Check - Method 7E, Section 13.2 indicates that system bias must be within 5% of the calibration span.8. Please identify which ASTM Method will be used to analyze the gas sample, how the sample will be col-lected and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.9. Please confirm that only 1 engine will be tested. Modify Compliance Test Runs Section (3rd paragraph), page 7, which addresses sampling the exhaust gases “for each engine” 11. Please modify Protocol to direct a 12 point stratification check as required by US EPA for previous similar tests on this engine.12. Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from up-stream and downstream flow disturbances.12. Please identify the specific process data (engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.13. DES requests test run durations of 60 vs. 30 minutes. 60 minute test runs were accomplished both in 2009 and 2011.Please note that many of the above comments were provided on the Test Protocols submitted for the 2009 and 2011 tests and were incorporated into subsequent revisions of those documents. DES requests that Kinder Morgan retain a copy of the revised Test Protocol incorporating these comments for use in submittal of similar Protocols in the future.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me if you have any questions on these comments.Claude PlanchetCEM/Stack Test EngineerAir Resources Division NH Department of Environmental Services29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03302Telephone (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================2013_10_22 RE Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test Protocol (10).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolDate: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:36 AMFrom: Planchet, Claude </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CLAUDE.B.PLANCHET>To: “Johnston, Johndunn B” <[email protected]>Cc: “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-Subpart KKKK requires the stratification check to be completed in accordance with 40 CFR 75, which speci-fies that 12 points are measured. Please update the protocol to include a 12 point stratification check (may be concurrent with first run).November 5th is still a “go” provided you can supply us with a revised test protocol to support that date.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me with any questions,Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 6:37 AMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolMr. Planchet,I asked Michael Zeilstra last week if he had heard from y’all, I should have been more proactive and tried to contact your office. I’ll update the Protocol to the new format and a few questions.1. Method 7E allows an alternate three point stratification test will that be allowed?2. I will know today if our last CO2 analyzer is working properly. We normally do not sample for CO2, this has a potential to add additional cost to the testing to rent on or have it repaired.3. Are we still on track for testing Nov. 5th with this communication delay?Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:42 PMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: FW: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,The email I sent on October 4 with NH DES’s comments (below) on the proposed Protocol for the KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH may not have reached you due to an error in the spelling of your last name in the email address. Please confirm your receipt of this email and also provide an estimated date for when you will submit a revised protocol.Thanks, Johndunn-----Original Message-----From: Planchet, Claude Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:30 PMTo: ‘[email protected]’Cc: O’Brien, Mike; ‘Michael Looney ([email protected])’


Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-NH DES has received the Test Protocol that you submitted for performing the NSPS Subpart KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH. We have the following comments on the Test Protocol submitted:1. Please provide the manufacturers’ names and model numbers for the test analyzers and DAS.2. Figure 1 includes a THC analyzer, please confirm if this analyzer will be employed for November test.3. It is not clear in figure 1 what lines will be used to perform analyzer and system calibrations. Please provide an explanation how those calibrations will be accomplished.4. DES requests that that Kinder Morgan also measure CO and CO2 as was done in 2009 and 2011.5. Page 5, substantial deviations from the protocol must be discussed with NH DES in lieu of Louisiana Depart-ment of Environmental Quality for this test.6. Per section 8.2.4 of Method 7E, please conduct a NOX Converter Efficiency check before departing the test site or provide NHDES the results of the next efficiency test done subsequently on the NOX analyzer used for the test.7. Page 6 System Bias Check - Method 7E, Section 13.2 indicates that system bias must be within 5% of the calibration span.8. Please identify which ASTM Method will be used to analyze the gas sample, how the sample will be col-lected and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.9. Please confirm that only 1 engine will be tested. Modify Compliance Test Runs Section (3rd paragraph), page 7, which addresses sampling the exhaust gases “for each engine” 11. Please modify Protocol to direct a 12 point stratification check as required by US EPA for previous similar tests on this engine.12. Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from up-stream and downstream flow disturbances.12. Please identify the specific process data (engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.13. DES requests test run durations of 60 vs. 30 minutes. 60 minute test runs were accomplished both in 2009 and 2011.Please note that many of the above comments were provided on the Test Protocols submitted for the 2009 and 2011 tests and were incorporated into subsequent revisions of those documents. DES requests that Kinder Morgan retain a copy of the revised Test Protocol incorporating these comments for use in submittal of similar Protocols in the future.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me if you have any questions on these comments.Claude PlanchetCEM/Stack Test EngineerAir Resources Division NH Department of Environmental Services29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03302Telephone (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolDate: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 6:36 AMFrom: Johnston, Johndunn B <[email protected]>To: “’Planchet, Claude’” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test Protocol


Mr. Planchet,I asked Michael Zeilstra last week if he had heard from y’all, I should have been more proactive and tried to contact your office. I’ll update the Protocol to the new format and a few questions.1. Method 7E allows an alternate three point stratification test will that be allowed?2. I will know today if our last CO2 analyzer is working properly. We normally do not sample for CO2, this has a potential to add additional cost to the testing to rent on or have it repaired.3. Are we still on track for testing Nov. 5th with this communication delay?Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:42 PMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: FW: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,The email I sent on October 4 with NH DES’s comments (below) on the proposed Protocol for the KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH may not have reached you due to an error in the spelling of your last name in the email address. Please confirm your receipt of this email and also provide an estimated date for when you will submit a revised protocol.Thanks, Johndunn-----Original Message-----From: Planchet, Claude Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:30 PMTo: ‘[email protected]’Cc: O’Brien, Mike; ‘Michael Looney ([email protected])’Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-NH DES has received the Test Protocol that you submitted for performing the NSPS Subpart KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH. We have the following comments on the Test Protocol submitted:1. Please provide the manufacturers’ names and model numbers for the test analyzers and DAS.2. Figure 1 includes a THC analyzer, please confirm if this analyzer will be employed for November test.3. It is not clear in figure 1 what lines will be used to perform analyzer and system calibrations. Please provide an explanation how those calibrations will be accomplished.4. DES requests that that Kinder Morgan also measure CO and CO2 as was done in 2009 and 2011.5. Page 5, substantial deviations from the protocol must be discussed with NH DES in lieu of Louisiana Depart-ment of Environmental Quality for this test.6. Per section 8.2.4 of Method 7E, please conduct a NOX Converter Efficiency check before departing the test site or provide NHDES the results of the next efficiency test done subsequently on the NOX analyzer used for the test.7. Page 6 System Bias Check - Method 7E, Section 13.2 indicates that system bias must be within 5% of the calibration span.8. Please identify which ASTM Method will be used to analyze the gas sample, how the sample will be col-lected and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.9. Please confirm that only 1 engine will be tested. Modify Compliance Test Runs Section (3rd paragraph), page 7, which addresses sampling the exhaust gases “for each engine”


11. Please modify Protocol to direct a 12 point stratification check as required by US EPA for previous similar tests on this engine.12. Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from up-stream and downstream flow disturbances.12. Please identify the specific process data (engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.13. DES requests test run durations of 60 vs. 30 minutes. 60 minute test runs were accomplished both in 2009 and 2011.Please note that many of the above comments were provided on the Test Protocols submitted for the 2009 and 2011 tests and were incorporated into subsequent revisions of those documents. DES requests that Kinder Morgan retain a copy of the revised Test Protocol incorporating these comments for use in submittal of similar Protocols in the future.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me if you have any questions on these comments.Claude PlanchetCEM/Stack Test EngineerAir Resources Division NH Department of Environmental Services29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03302Telephone (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolDate: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 10:06 PMFrom: Johnston, Johndunn B <[email protected]>To: “’Planchet, Claude’” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,We currently do not have a working CO2 analyzer. We can rent one or use our FTIR to measure CO2. Would the NHDEP allow CO2 to be measured by an FTIR, we would follow ASTM 6348-12?I have also attached a draft copy of the Protocol in the new format. I currently do not have any FTIR proce-dures in protocol but will updated them if NHDEP allows CO2 to be tested using out FTIR.I will need to send the protocol to Michael Zeilstra of our environmental group once we complete who will then forward to you.Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 8:36 AMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-Subpart KKKK requires the stratification check to be completed in accordance with 40 CFR 75, which speci-fies that 12 points are measured. Please update the protocol to include a 12 point stratification check (may be


concurrent with first run).November 5th is still a “go” provided you can supply us with a revised test protocol to support that date.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me with any questions,Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 6:37 AMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolMr. Planchet,I asked Michael Zeilstra last week if he had heard from y’all, I should have been more proactive and tried to contact your office. I’ll update the Protocol to the new format and a few questions.1. Method 7E allows an alternate three point stratification test will that be allowed?2. I will know today if our last CO2 analyzer is working properly. We normally do not sample for CO2, this has a potential to add additional cost to the testing to rent on or have it repaired.3. Are we still on track for testing Nov. 5th with this communication delay?Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:42 PMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: FW: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,The email I sent on October 4 with NH DES’s comments (below) on the proposed Protocol for the KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH may not have reached you due to an error in the spelling of your last name in the email address. Please confirm your receipt of this email and also provide an estimated date for when you will submit a revised protocol.Thanks, Johndunn-----Original Message-----From: Planchet, Claude Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:30 PMTo: ‘[email protected]’Cc: O’Brien, Mike; ‘Michael Looney ([email protected])’Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-NH DES has received the Test Protocol that you submitted for performing the NSPS Subpart KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH. We have the following comments on the Test Protocol submitted:1. Please provide the manufacturers’ names and model numbers for the test analyzers and DAS.2. Figure 1 includes a THC analyzer, please confirm if this analyzer will be employed for November test.3. It is not clear in figure 1 what lines will be used to perform analyzer and system calibrations. Please provide an explanation how those calibrations will be accomplished.4. DES requests that that Kinder Morgan also measure CO and CO2 as was done in 2009 and 2011.5. Page 5, substantial deviations from the protocol must be discussed with NH DES in lieu of Louisiana Depart-ment of Environmental Quality for this test.


6. Per section 8.2.4 of Method 7E, please conduct a NOX Converter Efficiency check before departing the test site or provide NHDES the results of the next efficiency test done subsequently on the NOX analyzer used for the test.7. Page 6 System Bias Check - Method 7E, Section 13.2 indicates that system bias must be within 5% of the calibration span.8. Please identify which ASTM Method will be used to analyze the gas sample, how the sample will be col-lected and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.9. Please confirm that only 1 engine will be tested. Modify Compliance Test Runs Section (3rd paragraph), page 7, which addresses sampling the exhaust gases “for each engine” 11. Please modify Protocol to direct a 12 point stratification check as required by US EPA for previous similar tests on this engine.12. Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from up-stream and downstream flow disturbances.12. Please identify the specific process data (engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.13. DES requests test run durations of 60 vs. 30 minutes. 60 minute test runs were accomplished both in 2009 and 2011.Please note that many of the above comments were provided on the Test Protocols submitted for the 2009 and 2011 tests and were incorporated into subsequent revisions of those documents. DES requests that Kinder Morgan retain a copy of the revised Test Protocol incorporating these comments for use in submittal of similar Protocols in the future.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me if you have any questions on these comments.Claude PlanchetCEM/Stack Test EngineerAir Resources Division NH Department of Environmental Services29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03302Telephone (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolDate: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:21 AMFrom: Planchet, Claude </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CLAUDE.B.PLANCHET>To: “Johnston, Johndunn B” <[email protected]>Cc: “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,It would be acceptable to measure CO2 by FTIR.My quick scan of your resubmitted draft protocol indicates that you have incorporated most of our comments, however, I did not see where you addressed comment #8 for the gas sample.Also, if the test program does not include a NOx converter efficiency check at the conclusion of testing, DES would require that the final report include the results of the next efficiency test performed on the NOx analyzer used for this test (comment #6).Thanks, JohndunnClaude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]]


Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 10:06 PMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,We currently do not have a working CO2 analyzer. We can rent one or use our FTIR to measure CO2. Would the NHDEP allow CO2 to be measured by an FTIR, we would follow ASTM 6348-12?I have also attached a draft copy of the Protocol in the new format. I currently do not have any FTIR proce-dures in protocol but will updated them if NHDEP allows CO2 to be tested using out FTIR.I will need to send the protocol to Michael Zeilstra of our environmental group once we complete who will then forward to you.Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 8:36 AMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-Subpart KKKK requires the stratification check to be completed in accordance with 40 CFR 75, which speci-fies that 12 points are measured. Please update the protocol to include a 12 point stratification check (may be concurrent with first run).November 5th is still a “go” provided you can supply us with a revised test protocol to support that date.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me with any questions,Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 6:37 AMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolMr. Planchet,I asked Michael Zeilstra last week if he had heard from y’all, I should have been more proactive and tried to contact your office. I’ll update the Protocol to the new format and a few questions.1. Method 7E allows an alternate three point stratification test will that be allowed?2. I will know today if our last CO2 analyzer is working properly. We normally do not sample for CO2, this has a potential to add additional cost to the testing to rent on or have it repaired.3. Are we still on track for testing Nov. 5th with this communication delay?Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:42 PMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, Mike


Subject: FW: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,The email I sent on October 4 with NH DES’s comments (below) on the proposed Protocol for the KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH may not have reached you due to an error in the spelling of your last name in the email address. Please confirm your receipt of this email and also provide an estimated date for when you will submit a revised protocol.Thanks, Johndunn-----Original Message-----From: Planchet, Claude Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:30 PMTo: ‘[email protected]’Cc: O’Brien, Mike; ‘Michael Looney ([email protected])’Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-NH DES has received the Test Protocol that you submitted for performing the NSPS Subpart KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH. We have the following comments on the Test Protocol submitted:1. Please provide the manufacturers’ names and model numbers for the test analyzers and DAS.2. Figure 1 includes a THC analyzer, please confirm if this analyzer will be employed for November test.3. It is not clear in figure 1 what lines will be used to perform analyzer and system calibrations. Please provide an explanation how those calibrations will be accomplished.4. DES requests that that Kinder Morgan also measure CO and CO2 as was done in 2009 and 2011.5. Page 5, substantial deviations from the protocol must be discussed with NH DES in lieu of Louisiana Depart-ment of Environmental Quality for this test.6. Per section 8.2.4 of Method 7E, please conduct a NOX Converter Efficiency check before departing the test site or provide NHDES the results of the next efficiency test done subsequently on the NOX analyzer used for the test.7. Page 6 System Bias Check - Method 7E, Section 13.2 indicates that system bias must be within 5% of the calibration span.8. Please identify which ASTM Method will be used to analyze the gas sample, how the sample will be col-lected and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.9. Please confirm that only 1 engine will be tested. Modify Compliance Test Runs Section (3rd paragraph), page 7, which addresses sampling the exhaust gases “for each engine” 11. Please modify Protocol to direct a 12 point stratification check as required by US EPA for previous similar tests on this engine.12. Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from up-stream and downstream flow disturbances.12. Please identify the specific process data (engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.13. DES requests test run durations of 60 vs. 30 minutes. 60 minute test runs were accomplished both in 2009 and 2011.Please note that many of the above comments were provided on the Test Protocols submitted for the 2009 and 2011 tests and were incorporated into subsequent revisions of those documents. DES requests that Kinder Morgan retain a copy of the revised Test Protocol incorporating these comments for use in submittal of similar Protocols in the future.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me if you have any questions on these comments.Claude PlanchetCEM/Stack Test EngineerAir Resources Division NH Department of Environmental Services


29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03302Telephone (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolDate: Thursday, October 24, 2013 3:33 PMFrom: Johnston, Johndunn B <[email protected]>To: “’Planchet, Claude’” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolYes, I will need to update the protocol. I will copy you on it and let Michael Zeilstra send it to y’all as well.Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:27 PMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolThanks, Johndunn. Will you be revising the test protocol to incorporate the post test NOx converter efficiency check and the results of the upstream gc analysis?Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 3:05 PMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,I will be glad to do a pre and post NOx Converter Efficiency. Our fuel gas analysis is performed by an online gas chromatogram (gc) upstream of the station. TGP uses its own pipeline quality natural gas to fire the turbine. The gc are used to verify the we stay in FREC and Tariff compliance. I have asked our Measurement Group to provide some more information on this.Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 9:21 AMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,It would be acceptable to measure CO2 by FTIR.My quick scan of your resubmitted draft protocol indicates that you have incorporated most of our comments, however, I did not see where you addressed comment #8 for the gas sample.


Also, if the test program does not include a NOx converter efficiency check at the conclusion of testing, DES would require that the final report include the results of the next efficiency test performed on the NOx analyzer used for this test (comment #6).Thanks, JohndunnClaude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 10:06 PMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,We currently do not have a working CO2 analyzer. We can rent one or use our FTIR to measure CO2. Would the NHDEP allow CO2 to be measured by an FTIR, we would follow ASTM 6348-12?I have also attached a draft copy of the Protocol in the new format. I currently do not have any FTIR proce-dures in protocol but will updated them if NHDEP allows CO2 to be tested using out FTIR.I will need to send the protocol to Michael Zeilstra of our environmental group once we complete who will then forward to you.Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 8:36 AMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-Subpart KKKK requires the stratification check to be completed in accordance with 40 CFR 75, which speci-fies that 12 points are measured. Please update the protocol to include a 12 point stratification check (may be concurrent with first run).November 5th is still a “go” provided you can supply us with a revised test protocol to support that date.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me with any questions,Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 6:37 AMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolMr. Planchet,I asked Michael Zeilstra last week if he had heard from y’all, I should have been more proactive and tried to contact your office. I’ll update the Protocol to the new format and a few questions.1. Method 7E allows an alternate three point stratification test will that be allowed?2. I will know today if our last CO2 analyzer is working properly. We normally do not sample for CO2, this has a potential to add additional cost to the testing to rent on or have it repaired.3. Are we still on track for testing Nov. 5th with this communication delay?Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder Morgan


Technical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:42 PMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: FW: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,The email I sent on October 4 with NH DES’s comments (below) on the proposed Protocol for the KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH may not have reached you due to an error in the spelling of your last name in the email address. Please confirm your receipt of this email and also provide an estimated date for when you will submit a revised protocol.Thanks, Johndunn-----Original Message-----From: Planchet, Claude Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:30 PMTo: ‘[email protected]’Cc: O’Brien, Mike; ‘Michael Looney ([email protected])’Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-NH DES has received the Test Protocol that you submitted for performing the NSPS Subpart KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH. We have the following comments on the Test Protocol submitted:1. Please provide the manufacturers’ names and model numbers for the test analyzers and DAS.2. Figure 1 includes a THC analyzer, please confirm if this analyzer will be employed for November test.3. It is not clear in figure 1 what lines will be used to perform analyzer and system calibrations. Please provide an explanation how those calibrations will be accomplished.4. DES requests that that Kinder Morgan also measure CO and CO2 as was done in 2009 and 2011.5. Page 5, substantial deviations from the protocol must be discussed with NH DES in lieu of Louisiana Depart-ment of Environmental Quality for this test.6. Per section 8.2.4 of Method 7E, please conduct a NOX Converter Efficiency check before departing the test site or provide NHDES the results of the next efficiency test done subsequently on the NOX analyzer used for the test.7. Page 6 System Bias Check - Method 7E, Section 13.2 indicates that system bias must be within 5% of the calibration span.8. Please identify which ASTM Method will be used to analyze the gas sample, how the sample will be col-lected and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.9. Please confirm that only 1 engine will be tested. Modify Compliance Test Runs Section (3rd paragraph), page 7, which addresses sampling the exhaust gases “for each engine” 11. Please modify Protocol to direct a 12 point stratification check as required by US EPA for previous similar tests on this engine.12. Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from up-stream and downstream flow disturbances.12. Please identify the specific process data (engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.13. DES requests test run durations of 60 vs. 30 minutes. 60 minute test runs were accomplished both in 2009 and 2011.Please note that many of the above comments were provided on the Test Protocols submitted for the 2009 and 2011 tests and were incorporated into subsequent revisions of those documents. DES requests that Kinder


Morgan retain a copy of the revised Test Protocol incorporating these comments for use in submittal of similar Protocols in the future.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me if you have any questions on these comments.Claude PlanchetCEM/Stack Test EngineerAir Resources Division NH Department of Environmental Services29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03302Telephone (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolDate: Thursday, October 24, 2013 3:27 PMFrom: Planchet, Claude </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CLAUDE.B.PLANCHET>To: “Johnston, Johndunn B” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolThanks, Johndunn. Will you be revising the test protocol to incorporate the post test NOx converter efficiency check and the results of the upstream gc analysis?Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 3:05 PMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,I will be glad to do a pre and post NOx Converter Efficiency. Our fuel gas analysis is performed by an online gas chromatogram (gc) upstream of the station. TGP uses its own pipeline quality natural gas to fire the turbine. The gc are used to verify the we stay in FREC and Tariff compliance. I have asked our Measurement Group to provide some more information on this.Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 9:21 AMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,It would be acceptable to measure CO2 by FTIR.My quick scan of your resubmitted draft protocol indicates that you have incorporated most of our comments, however, I did not see where you addressed comment #8 for the gas sample.Also, if the test program does not include a NOx converter efficiency check at the conclusion of testing, DES would require that the final report include the results of the next efficiency test performed on the NOx analyzer used for this test (comment #6).


Thanks, JohndunnClaude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 10:06 PMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,We currently do not have a working CO2 analyzer. We can rent one or use our FTIR to measure CO2. Would the NHDEP allow CO2 to be measured by an FTIR, we would follow ASTM 6348-12?I have also attached a draft copy of the Protocol in the new format. I currently do not have any FTIR proce-dures in protocol but will updated them if NHDEP allows CO2 to be tested using out FTIR.I will need to send the protocol to Michael Zeilstra of our environmental group once we complete who will then forward to you.Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 8:36 AMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-Subpart KKKK requires the stratification check to be completed in accordance with 40 CFR 75, which speci-fies that 12 points are measured. Please update the protocol to include a 12 point stratification check (may be concurrent with first run).November 5th is still a “go” provided you can supply us with a revised test protocol to support that date.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me with any questions,Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 6:37 AMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolMr. Planchet,I asked Michael Zeilstra last week if he had heard from y’all, I should have been more proactive and tried to contact your office. I’ll update the Protocol to the new format and a few questions.1. Method 7E allows an alternate three point stratification test will that be allowed?2. I will know today if our last CO2 analyzer is working properly. We normally do not sample for CO2, this has a potential to add additional cost to the testing to rent on or have it repaired.3. Are we still on track for testing Nov. 5th with this communication delay?Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510


From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:42 PMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: FW: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,The email I sent on October 4 with NH DES’s comments (below) on the proposed Protocol for the KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH may not have reached you due to an error in the spelling of your last name in the email address. Please confirm your receipt of this email and also provide an estimated date for when you will submit a revised protocol.Thanks, Johndunn-----Original Message-----From: Planchet, Claude Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:30 PMTo: ‘[email protected]’Cc: O’Brien, Mike; ‘Michael Looney ([email protected])’Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-NH DES has received the Test Protocol that you submitted for performing the NSPS Subpart KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH. We have the following comments on the Test Protocol submitted:1. Please provide the manufacturers’ names and model numbers for the test analyzers and DAS.2. Figure 1 includes a THC analyzer, please confirm if this analyzer will be employed for November test.3. It is not clear in figure 1 what lines will be used to perform analyzer and system calibrations. Please provide an explanation how those calibrations will be accomplished.4. DES requests that that Kinder Morgan also measure CO and CO2 as was done in 2009 and 2011.5. Page 5, substantial deviations from the protocol must be discussed with NH DES in lieu of Louisiana Depart-ment of Environmental Quality for this test.6. Per section 8.2.4 of Method 7E, please conduct a NOX Converter Efficiency check before departing the test site or provide NHDES the results of the next efficiency test done subsequently on the NOX analyzer used for the test.7. Page 6 System Bias Check - Method 7E, Section 13.2 indicates that system bias must be within 5% of the calibration span.8. Please identify which ASTM Method will be used to analyze the gas sample, how the sample will be col-lected and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.9. Please confirm that only 1 engine will be tested. Modify Compliance Test Runs Section (3rd paragraph), page 7, which addresses sampling the exhaust gases “for each engine” 11. Please modify Protocol to direct a 12 point stratification check as required by US EPA for previous similar tests on this engine.12. Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from up-stream and downstream flow disturbances.12. Please identify the specific process data (engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.13. DES requests test run durations of 60 vs. 30 minutes. 60 minute test runs were accomplished both in 2009 and 2011.Please note that many of the above comments were provided on the Test Protocols submitted for the 2009 and 2011 tests and were incorporated into subsequent revisions of those documents. DES requests that Kinder Morgan retain a copy of the revised Test Protocol incorporating these comments for use in submittal of similar Protocols in the future.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me if you have any questions on these comments.


Claude PlanchetCEM/Stack Test EngineerAir Resources Division NH Department of Environmental Services29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03302Telephone (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolDate: Thursday, October 24, 2013 3:04 PMFrom: Johnston, Johndunn B <[email protected]>To: “’Planchet, Claude’” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,I will be glad to do a pre and post NOx Converter Efficiency. Our fuel gas analysis is performed by an online gas chromatogram (gc) upstream of the station. TGP uses its own pipeline quality natural gas to fire the turbine. The gc are used to verify the we stay in FREC and Tariff compliance. I have asked our Measurement Group to provide some more information on this.Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 9:21 AMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,It would be acceptable to measure CO2 by FTIR.My quick scan of your resubmitted draft protocol indicates that you have incorporated most of our comments, however, I did not see where you addressed comment #8 for the gas sample.Also, if the test program does not include a NOx converter efficiency check at the conclusion of testing, DES would require that the final report include the results of the next efficiency test performed on the NOx analyzer used for this test (comment #6).Thanks, JohndunnClaude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 10:06 PMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,We currently do not have a working CO2 analyzer. We can rent one or use our FTIR to measure CO2. Would the NHDEP allow CO2 to be measured by an FTIR, we would follow ASTM 6348-12?I have also attached a draft copy of the Protocol in the new format. I currently do not have any FTIR proce-dures in protocol but will updated them if NHDEP allows CO2 to be tested using out FTIR.


I will need to send the protocol to Michael Zeilstra of our environmental group once we complete who will then forward to you.Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 8:36 AMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-Subpart KKKK requires the stratification check to be completed in accordance with 40 CFR 75, which speci-fies that 12 points are measured. Please update the protocol to include a 12 point stratification check (may be concurrent with first run).November 5th is still a “go” provided you can supply us with a revised test protocol to support that date.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me with any questions,Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 6:37 AMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolMr. Planchet,I asked Michael Zeilstra last week if he had heard from y’all, I should have been more proactive and tried to contact your office. I’ll update the Protocol to the new format and a few questions.1. Method 7E allows an alternate three point stratification test will that be allowed?2. I will know today if our last CO2 analyzer is working properly. We normally do not sample for CO2, this has a potential to add additional cost to the testing to rent on or have it repaired.3. Are we still on track for testing Nov. 5th with this communication delay?Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:42 PMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: FW: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,The email I sent on October 4 with NH DES’s comments (below) on the proposed Protocol for the KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH may not have reached you due to an error in the spelling of your last name in the email address. Please confirm your receipt of this email and also provide an estimated date for when you will submit a revised protocol.Thanks, Johndunn-----Original Message-----


From: Planchet, Claude Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:30 PMTo: ‘[email protected]’Cc: O’Brien, Mike; ‘Michael Looney ([email protected])’Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-NH DES has received the Test Protocol that you submitted for performing the NSPS Subpart KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH. We have the following comments on the Test Protocol submitted:1. Please provide the manufacturers’ names and model numbers for the test analyzers and DAS.2. Figure 1 includes a THC analyzer, please confirm if this analyzer will be employed for November test.3. It is not clear in figure 1 what lines will be used to perform analyzer and system calibrations. Please provide an explanation how those calibrations will be accomplished.4. DES requests that that Kinder Morgan also measure CO and CO2 as was done in 2009 and 2011.5. Page 5, substantial deviations from the protocol must be discussed with NH DES in lieu of Louisiana Depart-ment of Environmental Quality for this test.6. Per section 8.2.4 of Method 7E, please conduct a NOX Converter Efficiency check before departing the test site or provide NHDES the results of the next efficiency test done subsequently on the NOX analyzer used for the test.7. Page 6 System Bias Check - Method 7E, Section 13.2 indicates that system bias must be within 5% of the calibration span.8. Please identify which ASTM Method will be used to analyze the gas sample, how the sample will be col-lected and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.9. Please confirm that only 1 engine will be tested. Modify Compliance Test Runs Section (3rd paragraph), page 7, which addresses sampling the exhaust gases “for each engine” 11. Please modify Protocol to direct a 12 point stratification check as required by US EPA for previous similar tests on this engine.12. Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from up-stream and downstream flow disturbances.12. Please identify the specific process data (engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.13. DES requests test run durations of 60 vs. 30 minutes. 60 minute test runs were accomplished both in 2009 and 2011.Please note that many of the above comments were provided on the Test Protocols submitted for the 2009 and 2011 tests and were incorporated into subsequent revisions of those documents. DES requests that Kinder Morgan retain a copy of the revised Test Protocol incorporating these comments for use in submittal of similar Protocols in the future.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me if you have any questions on these comments.Claude PlanchetCEM/Stack Test EngineerAir Resources Division NH Department of Environmental Services29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03302Telephone (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test Protocol


Date: Monday, October 28, 2013 9:24 AMFrom: Johnston, Johndunn B <[email protected]>To: “’Planchet, Claude’” <[email protected]>Cc: “Zeilstra, Michael” <[email protected]>, “’O’Brien, Mike’” <Michael.O’[email protected]>, “Zenon, Kenneth J” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,We will be on site at 7:30 AM and should start calibrating by 7:45 AM. I’m having two cylinders (mid O2 and NOx) shipped to the station since the current ones are low on pressure. I’m not anticipating delays and will inform you if any occur. Ken and I are looking forward to seeing y’all. We will have ETV2 out there, not sure if you have seen it be-fore?Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 8:07 AMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: Zeilstra, Michael; O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,It appears that this most recent submittal of the test protocol has incorporated all outstanding DES comments.Please provide us a hard copy as well as this electronic version.I intend to be on site at the Pelham NH station on Tuesday, November 5 to witness the testing and the pre-test calibrations. What time do you anticipate that the testing team will start their calibrations?Regards,Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 7:42 AMTo: Planchet, ClaudeCc: Zeilstra, Michael; Johnston, Johndunn BSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,Attached is the updated Protocol for TGP 270B. I have included Michael Zeilstra on this email; please let us know if he needs to send a new hard copy to you?Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:27 PMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolThanks, Johndunn. Will you be revising the test protocol to incorporate the post test NOx converter efficiency check and the results


of the upstream gc analysis?Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 3:05 PMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,I will be glad to do a pre and post NOx Converter Efficiency. Our fuel gas analysis is performed by an online gas chromatogram (gc) upstream of the station. TGP uses its own pipeline quality natural gas to fire the turbine. The gc are used to verify the we stay in FREC and Tariff compliance. I have asked our Measurement Group to provide some more information on this.Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 9:21 AMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,It would be acceptable to measure CO2 by FTIR.My quick scan of your resubmitted draft protocol indicates that you have incorporated most of our comments, however, I did not see where you addressed comment #8 for the gas sample.Also, if the test program does not include a NOx converter efficiency check at the conclusion of testing, DES would require that the final report include the results of the next efficiency test performed on the NOx analyzer used for this test (comment #6).Thanks, JohndunnClaude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 10:06 PMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,We currently do not have a working CO2 analyzer. We can rent one or use our FTIR to measure CO2. Would the NHDEP allow CO2 to be measured by an FTIR, we would follow ASTM 6348-12?I have also attached a draft copy of the Protocol in the new format. I currently do not have any FTIR proce-dures in protocol but will updated them if NHDEP allows CO2 to be tested using out FTIR.I will need to send the protocol to Michael Zeilstra of our environmental group once we complete who will then forward to you.Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]]


Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 8:36 AMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-Subpart KKKK requires the stratification check to be completed in accordance with 40 CFR 75, which speci-fies that 12 points are measured. Please update the protocol to include a 12 point stratification check (may be concurrent with first run).November 5th is still a “go” provided you can supply us with a revised test protocol to support that date.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me with any questions,Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 6:37 AMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolMr. Planchet,I asked Michael Zeilstra last week if he had heard from y’all, I should have been more proactive and tried to contact your office. I’ll update the Protocol to the new format and a few questions.1. Method 7E allows an alternate three point stratification test will that be allowed?2. I will know today if our last CO2 analyzer is working properly. We normally do not sample for CO2, this has a potential to add additional cost to the testing to rent on or have it repaired.3. Are we still on track for testing Nov. 5th with this communication delay?Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:42 PMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: FW: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,The email I sent on October 4 with NH DES’s comments (below) on the proposed Protocol for the KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH may not have reached you due to an error in the spelling of your last name in the email address. Please confirm your receipt of this email and also provide an estimated date for when you will submit a revised protocol.Thanks, Johndunn-----Original Message-----From: Planchet, Claude Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:30 PMTo: ‘[email protected]’Cc: O’Brien, Mike; ‘Michael Looney ([email protected])’Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-NH DES has received the Test Protocol that you submitted for performing the NSPS Subpart KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH. We have the following comments on the Test Protocol submitted:


1. Please provide the manufacturers’ names and model numbers for the test analyzers and DAS.2. Figure 1 includes a THC analyzer, please confirm if this analyzer will be employed for November test.3. It is not clear in figure 1 what lines will be used to perform analyzer and system calibrations. Please provide an explanation how those calibrations will be accomplished.4. DES requests that that Kinder Morgan also measure CO and CO2 as was done in 2009 and 2011.5. Page 5, substantial deviations from the protocol must be discussed with NH DES in lieu of Louisiana Depart-ment of Environmental Quality for this test.6. Per section 8.2.4 of Method 7E, please conduct a NOX Converter Efficiency check before departing the test site or provide NHDES the results of the next efficiency test done subsequently on the NOX analyzer used for the test.7. Page 6 System Bias Check - Method 7E, Section 13.2 indicates that system bias must be within 5% of the calibration span.8. Please identify which ASTM Method will be used to analyze the gas sample, how the sample will be col-lected and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.9. Please confirm that only 1 engine will be tested. Modify Compliance Test Runs Section (3rd paragraph), page 7, which addresses sampling the exhaust gases “for each engine” 11. Please modify Protocol to direct a 12 point stratification check as required by US EPA for previous similar tests on this engine.12. Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from up-stream and downstream flow disturbances.12. Please identify the specific process data (engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.13. DES requests test run durations of 60 vs. 30 minutes. 60 minute test runs were accomplished both in 2009 and 2011.Please note that many of the above comments were provided on the Test Protocols submitted for the 2009 and 2011 tests and were incorporated into subsequent revisions of those documents. DES requests that Kinder Morgan retain a copy of the revised Test Protocol incorporating these comments for use in submittal of similar Protocols in the future.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me if you have any questions on these comments.Claude PlanchetCEM/Stack Test EngineerAir Resources Division NH Department of Environmental Services29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03302Telephone (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolDate: Monday, October 28, 2013 9:06 AMFrom: Planchet, Claude </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CLAUDE.B.PLANCHET>To: “Johnston, Johndunn B” <[email protected]>Cc: “Zeilstra, Michael” <[email protected]>, “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,It appears that this most recent submittal of the test protocol has incorporated all outstanding DES comments.Please provide us a hard copy as well as this electronic version.


I intend to be on site at the Pelham NH station on Tuesday, November 5 to witness the testing and the pre-test calibrations. What time do you anticipate that the testing team will start their calibrations?Regards,Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 7:42 AMTo: Planchet, ClaudeCc: Zeilstra, Michael; Johnston, Johndunn BSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,Attached is the updated Protocol for TGP 270B. I have included Michael Zeilstra on this email; please let us know if he needs to send a new hard copy to you?Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:27 PMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolThanks, Johndunn. Will you be revising the test protocol to incorporate the post test NOx converter efficiency check and the results of the upstream gc analysis?Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 3:05 PMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,I will be glad to do a pre and post NOx Converter Efficiency. Our fuel gas analysis is performed by an online gas chromatogram (gc) upstream of the station. TGP uses its own pipeline quality natural gas to fire the turbine. The gc are used to verify the we stay in FREC and Tariff compliance. I have asked our Measurement Group to provide some more information on this.Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 9:21 AMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,It would be acceptable to measure CO2 by FTIR.My quick scan of your resubmitted draft protocol indicates that you have incorporated most of our comments, however, I did not see where you addressed comment #8 for the gas sample.


Also, if the test program does not include a NOx converter efficiency check at the conclusion of testing, DES would require that the final report include the results of the next efficiency test performed on the NOx analyzer used for this test (comment #6).Thanks, JohndunnClaude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 10:06 PMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,We currently do not have a working CO2 analyzer. We can rent one or use our FTIR to measure CO2. Would the NHDEP allow CO2 to be measured by an FTIR, we would follow ASTM 6348-12?I have also attached a draft copy of the Protocol in the new format. I currently do not have any FTIR proce-dures in protocol but will updated them if NHDEP allows CO2 to be tested using out FTIR.I will need to send the protocol to Michael Zeilstra of our environmental group once we complete who will then forward to you.Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 8:36 AMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-Subpart KKKK requires the stratification check to be completed in accordance with 40 CFR 75, which speci-fies that 12 points are measured. Please update the protocol to include a 12 point stratification check (may be concurrent with first run).November 5th is still a “go” provided you can supply us with a revised test protocol to support that date.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me with any questions,Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 6:37 AMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolMr. Planchet,I asked Michael Zeilstra last week if he had heard from y’all, I should have been more proactive and tried to contact your office. I’ll update the Protocol to the new format and a few questions.1. Method 7E allows an alternate three point stratification test will that be allowed?2. I will know today if our last CO2 analyzer is working properly. We normally do not sample for CO2, this has a potential to add additional cost to the testing to rent on or have it repaired.3. Are we still on track for testing Nov. 5th with this communication delay?Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder Morgan


Technical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:42 PMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: FW: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,The email I sent on October 4 with NH DES’s comments (below) on the proposed Protocol for the KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH may not have reached you due to an error in the spelling of your last name in the email address. Please confirm your receipt of this email and also provide an estimated date for when you will submit a revised protocol.Thanks, Johndunn-----Original Message-----From: Planchet, Claude Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:30 PMTo: ‘[email protected]’Cc: O’Brien, Mike; ‘Michael Looney ([email protected])’Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-NH DES has received the Test Protocol that you submitted for performing the NSPS Subpart KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH. We have the following comments on the Test Protocol submitted:1. Please provide the manufacturers’ names and model numbers for the test analyzers and DAS.2. Figure 1 includes a THC analyzer, please confirm if this analyzer will be employed for November test.3. It is not clear in figure 1 what lines will be used to perform analyzer and system calibrations. Please provide an explanation how those calibrations will be accomplished.4. DES requests that that Kinder Morgan also measure CO and CO2 as was done in 2009 and 2011.5. Page 5, substantial deviations from the protocol must be discussed with NH DES in lieu of Louisiana Depart-ment of Environmental Quality for this test.6. Per section 8.2.4 of Method 7E, please conduct a NOX Converter Efficiency check before departing the test site or provide NHDES the results of the next efficiency test done subsequently on the NOX analyzer used for the test.7. Page 6 System Bias Check - Method 7E, Section 13.2 indicates that system bias must be within 5% of the calibration span.8. Please identify which ASTM Method will be used to analyze the gas sample, how the sample will be col-lected and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.9. Please confirm that only 1 engine will be tested. Modify Compliance Test Runs Section (3rd paragraph), page 7, which addresses sampling the exhaust gases “for each engine” 11. Please modify Protocol to direct a 12 point stratification check as required by US EPA for previous similar tests on this engine.12. Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from up-stream and downstream flow disturbances.12. Please identify the specific process data (engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.13. DES requests test run durations of 60 vs. 30 minutes. 60 minute test runs were accomplished both in 2009 and 2011.Please note that many of the above comments were provided on the Test Protocols submitted for the 2009 and 2011 tests and were incorporated into subsequent revisions of those documents. DES requests that Kinder


Morgan retain a copy of the revised Test Protocol incorporating these comments for use in submittal of similar Protocols in the future.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me if you have any questions on these comments.Claude PlanchetCEM/Stack Test EngineerAir Resources Division NH Department of Environmental Services29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03302Telephone (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolDate: Monday, October 28, 2013 7:41 AMFrom: Johnston, Johndunn B <[email protected]>To: “’Planchet, Claude’” <[email protected]>Cc: “Zeilstra, Michael” <[email protected]>, “Johnston, Johndunn B” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,Attached is the updated Protocol for TGP 270B. I have included Michael Zeilstra on this email; please let us know if he needs to send a new hard copy to you?Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:27 PMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolThanks, Johndunn. Will you be revising the test protocol to incorporate the post test NOx converter efficiency check and the results of the upstream gc analysis?Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 3:05 PMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,I will be glad to do a pre and post NOx Converter Efficiency. Our fuel gas analysis is performed by an online gas chromatogram (gc) upstream of the station. TGP uses its own pipeline quality natural gas to fire the turbine. The gc are used to verify the we stay in FREC and Tariff compliance. I have asked our Measurement Group to provide some more information on this.Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-Emissions


Office: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 9:21 AMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,It would be acceptable to measure CO2 by FTIR.My quick scan of your resubmitted draft protocol indicates that you have incorporated most of our comments, however, I did not see where you addressed comment #8 for the gas sample.Also, if the test program does not include a NOx converter efficiency check at the conclusion of testing, DES would require that the final report include the results of the next efficiency test performed on the NOx analyzer used for this test (comment #6).Thanks, JohndunnClaude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 10:06 PMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,We currently do not have a working CO2 analyzer. We can rent one or use our FTIR to measure CO2. Would the NHDEP allow CO2 to be measured by an FTIR, we would follow ASTM 6348-12?I have also attached a draft copy of the Protocol in the new format. I currently do not have any FTIR proce-dures in protocol but will updated them if NHDEP allows CO2 to be tested using out FTIR.I will need to send the protocol to Michael Zeilstra of our environmental group once we complete who will then forward to you.Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 8:36 AMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-Subpart KKKK requires the stratification check to be completed in accordance with 40 CFR 75, which speci-fies that 12 points are measured. Please update the protocol to include a 12 point stratification check (may be concurrent with first run).November 5th is still a “go” provided you can supply us with a revised test protocol to support that date.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me with any questions,Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 6:37 AMTo: Planchet, Claude


Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolMr. Planchet,I asked Michael Zeilstra last week if he had heard from y’all, I should have been more proactive and tried to contact your office. I’ll update the Protocol to the new format and a few questions.1. Method 7E allows an alternate three point stratification test will that be allowed?2. I will know today if our last CO2 analyzer is working properly. We normally do not sample for CO2, this has a potential to add additional cost to the testing to rent on or have it repaired.3. Are we still on track for testing Nov. 5th with this communication delay?Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:42 PMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: FW: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,The email I sent on October 4 with NH DES’s comments (below) on the proposed Protocol for the KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH may not have reached you due to an error in the spelling of your last name in the email address. Please confirm your receipt of this email and also provide an estimated date for when you will submit a revised protocol.Thanks, Johndunn-----Original Message-----From: Planchet, Claude Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:30 PMTo: ‘[email protected]’Cc: O’Brien, Mike; ‘Michael Looney ([email protected])’Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-NH DES has received the Test Protocol that you submitted for performing the NSPS Subpart KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH. We have the following comments on the Test Protocol submitted:1. Please provide the manufacturers’ names and model numbers for the test analyzers and DAS.2. Figure 1 includes a THC analyzer, please confirm if this analyzer will be employed for November test.3. It is not clear in figure 1 what lines will be used to perform analyzer and system calibrations. Please provide an explanation how those calibrations will be accomplished.4. DES requests that that Kinder Morgan also measure CO and CO2 as was done in 2009 and 2011.5. Page 5, substantial deviations from the protocol must be discussed with NH DES in lieu of Louisiana Depart-ment of Environmental Quality for this test.6. Per section 8.2.4 of Method 7E, please conduct a NOX Converter Efficiency check before departing the test site or provide NHDES the results of the next efficiency test done subsequently on the NOX analyzer used for the test.7. Page 6 System Bias Check - Method 7E, Section 13.2 indicates that system bias must be within 5% of the calibration span.8. Please identify which ASTM Method will be used to analyze the gas sample, how the sample will be col-lected and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.9. Please confirm that only 1 engine will be tested. Modify Compliance Test Runs Section (3rd paragraph), page


7, which addresses sampling the exhaust gases “for each engine” 11. Please modify Protocol to direct a 12 point stratification check as required by US EPA for previous similar tests on this engine.12. Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from up-stream and downstream flow disturbances.12. Please identify the specific process data (engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.13. DES requests test run durations of 60 vs. 30 minutes. 60 minute test runs were accomplished both in 2009 and 2011.Please note that many of the above comments were provided on the Test Protocols submitted for the 2009 and 2011 tests and were incorporated into subsequent revisions of those documents. DES requests that Kinder Morgan retain a copy of the revised Test Protocol incorporating these comments for use in submittal of similar Protocols in the future.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me if you have any questions on these comments.Claude PlanchetCEM/Stack Test EngineerAir Resources Division NH Department of Environmental Services29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03302Telephone (603) [email protected]

===========================================================================2013_10_28 RE Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test Protocol.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolDate: Monday, October 28, 2013 9:33 AMFrom: Planchet, Claude </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CLAUDE.B.PLANCHET>To: “Johnston, Johndunn B” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHi Johndunn-Thanks for the information on the start time. I plan to arrive by 7:30. This will be my first time seeing any of your environmental testing vehicles.Looking forward to meeting you and the rest of the test team on the 5th.Thanks,Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 9:24 AMTo: Planchet, ClaudeCc: Zeilstra, Michael; O’Brien, Mike; Zenon, Kenneth JSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,We will be on site at 7:30 AM and should start calibrating by 7:45 AM. I’m having two cylinders (mid O2 and NOx) shipped to the station since the current ones are low on pressure. I’m not anticipating delays and will inform you if any occur. Ken and I are looking forward to seeing y’all. We will have ETV2 out there, not sure if you have seen it be-fore?Thanks,Johndunn B. Johnston


Kinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 8:07 AMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: Zeilstra, Michael; O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,It appears that this most recent submittal of the test protocol has incorporated all outstanding DES comments.Please provide us a hard copy as well as this electronic version.I intend to be on site at the Pelham NH station on Tuesday, November 5 to witness the testing and the pre-test calibrations. What time do you anticipate that the testing team will start their calibrations?Regards,Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 7:42 AMTo: Planchet, ClaudeCc: Zeilstra, Michael; Johnston, Johndunn BSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,Attached is the updated Protocol for TGP 270B. I have included Michael Zeilstra on this email; please let us know if he needs to send a new hard copy to you?Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:27 PMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolThanks, Johndunn. Will you be revising the test protocol to incorporate the post test NOx converter efficiency check and the results of the upstream gc analysis?Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 3:05 PMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,I will be glad to do a pre and post NOx Converter Efficiency. Our fuel gas analysis is performed by an online gas chromatogram (gc) upstream of the station. TGP uses its own pipeline quality natural gas to fire the turbine. The gc are used to verify the we stay in FREC and Tariff compliance. I have asked our Measurement Group to provide some more information on this.Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder Morgan


Technical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 9:21 AMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,It would be acceptable to measure CO2 by FTIR.My quick scan of your resubmitted draft protocol indicates that you have incorporated most of our comments, however, I did not see where you addressed comment #8 for the gas sample.Also, if the test program does not include a NOx converter efficiency check at the conclusion of testing, DES would require that the final report include the results of the next efficiency test performed on the NOx analyzer used for this test (comment #6).Thanks, JohndunnClaude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 10:06 PMTo: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolClaude,We currently do not have a working CO2 analyzer. We can rent one or use our FTIR to measure CO2. Would the NHDEP allow CO2 to be measured by an FTIR, we would follow ASTM 6348-12?I have also attached a draft copy of the Protocol in the new format. I currently do not have any FTIR proce-dures in protocol but will updated them if NHDEP allows CO2 to be tested using out FTIR.I will need to send the protocol to Michael Zeilstra of our environmental group once we complete who will then forward to you.Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 8:36 AMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-Subpart KKKK requires the stratification check to be completed in accordance with 40 CFR 75, which speci-fies that 12 points are measured. Please update the protocol to include a 12 point stratification check (may be concurrent with first run).November 5th is still a “go” provided you can supply us with a revised test protocol to support that date.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me with any questions,Claude-----Original Message-----From: Johnston, Johndunn B [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 6:37 AM


To: Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolMr. Planchet,I asked Michael Zeilstra last week if he had heard from y�all, I should have been more proactive and tried to contact your office. I�ll update the Protocol to the new format and a few questions.1. Method 7E allows an alternate three point stratification test will that be allowed?2. I will know today if our last CO2 analyzer is working properly. We normally do not sample for CO2, this has a potential to add additional cost to the testing to rent on or have it repaired.3. Are we still on track for testing Nov. 5th with this communication delay?Thanks,Johndunn B. JohnstonKinder MorganTechnical Services-EmissionsOffice: 713/420-3350Cell: 832/291-7510From: Planchet, Claude [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:42 PMTo: Johnston, Johndunn BCc: O’Brien, MikeSubject: FW: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn,The email I sent on October 4 with NH DES’s comments (below) on the proposed Protocol for the KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH may not have reached you due to an error in the spelling of your last name in the email address. Please confirm your receipt of this email and also provide an estimated date for when you will submit a revised protocol.Thanks, Johndunn-----Original Message-----From: Planchet, Claude Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:30 PMTo: ‘[email protected]’Cc: O’Brien, Mike; ‘Michael Looney ([email protected])’Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Test ProtocolHello Johndunn-NH DES has received the Test Protocol that you submitted for performing the NSPS Subpart KKKK NOX Emissions testing on the Solar Centaur Gas Turbine located at Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH. We have the following comments on the Test Protocol submitted:1. Please provide the manufacturers’ names and model numbers for the test analyzers and DAS.2. Figure 1 includes a THC analyzer, please confirm if this analyzer will be employed for November test.3. It is not clear in figure 1 what lines will be used to perform analyzer and system calibrations. Please provide an explanation how those calibrations will be accomplished.4. DES requests that that Kinder Morgan also measure CO and CO2 as was done in 2009 and 2011.5. Page 5, substantial deviations from the protocol must be discussed with NH DES in lieu of Louisiana Depart-ment of Environmental Quality for this test.6. Per section 8.2.4 of Method 7E, please conduct a NOX Converter Efficiency check before departing the test site or provide NHDES the results of the next efficiency test done subsequently on the NOX analyzer used for the test.7. Page 6 System Bias Check - Method 7E, Section 13.2 indicates that system bias must be within 5% of the calibration span.8. Please identify which ASTM Method will be used to analyze the gas sample, how the sample will be col-lected and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.


9. Please confirm that only 1 engine will be tested. Modify Compliance Test Runs Section (3rd paragraph), page 7, which addresses sampling the exhaust gases “for each engine” 11. Please modify Protocol to direct a 12 point stratification check as required by US EPA for previous similar tests on this engine.12. Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from up-stream and downstream flow disturbances.12. Please identify the specific process data (engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.13. DES requests test run durations of 60 vs. 30 minutes. 60 minute test runs were accomplished both in 2009 and 2011.Please note that many of the above comments were provided on the Test Protocols submitted for the 2009 and 2011 tests and were incorporated into subsequent revisions of those documents. DES requests that Kinder Morgan retain a copy of the revised Test Protocol incorporating these comments for use in submittal of similar Protocols in the future.Thanks, Johndunn. Feel free to call me if you have any questions on these comments.Claude PlanchetCEM/Stack Test EngineerAir Resources Division NH Department of Environmental Services29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03302Telephone (603) [email protected]

===========================================================================2014_02_04 2013 Tennesee Gas Pipeline KKKK Compliance Test Report.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: 2013 Tennesee Gas Pipeline KKKK Compliance Test ReportDate: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 3:29 PMFrom: Planchet, Claude </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CLAUDE.B.PLANCHET>To: “Monroe, Pamela” <[email protected]>, “Walters, Raymond” <[email protected]>, “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>, “Strickland, Sonny” <[email protected]>, “Croce, Sarita” <[email protected]>Conversation: 2013 Tennesee Gas Pipeline KKKK Compliance Test ReportBelow is a link to the Final Summary for the JJJJ compliance test performed on the combustion turbine for the Tennessee Gas Pipeline compressor station in Pelham.H:\Testing and Monitoring\Stack Test Summaries\TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE-2013-NOX KKKK-SUM-MARY.xls <file:///\\hazdesfp2\aircomp\Testing%20and%20Monitoring\Stack%20Test%20Summaries\TENNESSEE%20GAS%20PIPELINE-2013-NOX%20KKKK-SUMMARY.xls> <file:///\\hazdesfp2\aircomp\Testing%20and%20Monitoring\Stack%20Test%20Summaries\TENNESSEE%20GAS%20PIPELINE-2013-NOX%20KKKK-SUMMARY.xls> If you have any questions please let me know.ThanksClaude PlanchetCEM/Stack Test EngineerAir Resources Division NH Department of Environmental Services29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03302Telephone (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================2014_09_22 TGP NED Project .TXT

===========================================================================Subject: TGP NED Project Date: Monday, September 22, 2014 10:21 AMFrom: David, Owen </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ODAVID>To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>Cc: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Conversation: TGP NED Project Hello Mike, Good talking to you last week about the TGP NED project. I also talked to Tim Drew who told me he had spoken with you. The Water Quality Certification Program at NHDES would like to participate in the FERC process for this project. Thanks. Owen DavidNew Hampshire Dept. of Environmental Services Water Quality Certification Program(603) [email protected] Quality Certification Web Page http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/section401/index.htm

===========================================================================2014_10_24 Kinder Morgan - Alternative Route Discussion - Pre-application Meeting.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder Morgan - Alternative Route Discussion - Pre-application MeetingDate: Friday, October 24, 2014 11:48 AMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TDREW>To: “Henderson, Carol” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Quiram, Vicki” <[email protected]>, “Howe, Dawn” <[email protected]>, “Hatfield, Meredith” <[email protected]>, “Mulholland, Evan” <[email protected]>, “Connors, Molly” <[email protected]>Cc: “Howe, Dawn” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan - Alternative Route Discussion - Pre-application MeetingGood morning, Folks, Kinder Morgan (Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company) has requested a pre-application meeting for 9:00 AM on Wednesday, October 29 here at DES Offices on Hazen Drive. I have included all of you as a first pass in terms of availability before I set the meeting. I will follow up later today with a formal meeting notice to all designated attendees via Outlook. I apologize for the lack of flexibility in terms of date and time, but that was the request from company officials. If you cannot attend, could you designate a substitute? Thank you.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen Drive


Concord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2014_10_28 FW Meeting tomorrow.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: Meeting tomorrowDate: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 1:12 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TDREW>To: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Conversation: Meeting tomorrowHi Collis, The folks listed below will attend tomorrow morning’s Kinder Morgan meeting. TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.From: Hatfield, Meredith [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 1:04 PMTo: Drew, TimCc: Connors, Molly; Walsh, PamelaSubject: FW: Meeting tomorrowHi Tim �Below is the list of attendees from Kinder Morgan and McLane. Thanks so much for your helping organizing the meeting, and for hosting.See you in the morning.-Meredith


From: Sigel, Richard [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 1:02 PMTo: Hatfield, MeredithSubject: RE: Meeting tomorrowMeredith �KM attendees are:* Allen Fore, Vice President, Public Affairs* Mark Hamarich, Project Manager* Jim Hartman, Sr. Right-of-way agent* Curtis Cole, Director, Business DevelopmentAs well as:Rich Sigel, McLane GPSJoel Maiola, McLane GPSThanks again,Rich

===========================================================================2015_01_30 Kinder MorganTennessee Gas Pipeline Company - Proposed Southern NH Project - State

Natural Resource Agency Discussion.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company - Proposed Southern NH Project - State Natural Resource Agency DiscussionDate: Friday, January 30, 2015 12:33 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TDREW>To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Stanwood, Sabrina” <[email protected]>, “Perry, Rhonda” <[email protected]>, “Henderson, Carol” <[email protected]>, “Rousseau, David” <[email protected]>, “Banach, Eileen” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Diers, Ted” <[email protected]>, “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, “Andrews, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Dorf-schmidt, Barbara” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company - Proposed Southern NH Project - State Natu-ral Resource Agency DiscussionGood morning, Everyone, This meeting has been requested by AECOM Environment from Providence, RI and Normandeau As-sociates, Inc. of Bedford, NH. The intent is to discuss the potential natural resource impacts of interest to State agencies that could be triggered by the Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company proposal for siting, constructing and operating a 36-inch natural gas pipeline. This new pipeline would transport natural gas from the Marcellus shale deposits in Pennsylvania through New York, Massachusetts and a portion of New Hamp-shire before terminating in Dracut, Massachusetts. It would enter the New Hampshire in Winchester and exit in the Pelham area. At some point midway across the NH ROW, a compressor station would also be constructed. The proposed pipeline would be co-located within an existing PSNH right-of-way for much of the 71-miles across the state, but about 8 miles would need to be sited along a new centerline off the PSNH ROW. To enable pre-meeting research, and if I receive from the consultants an electronic version of the proposal before the meet-ing, I will update the meeting arrangements with that attachment and notify all of you. This Doodle poll (see link below) is being provided so that I can collect your various availabilities and preferences in February and make a choice for a multi-disciplined meeting that the majority of you can attend. If I have invited the incorrect person, missed someone, or another agency designee should attend, please note that in your response to the poll by sharing with others. Thank you.


Tim Drewhttp://doodle.com/3migwkxm6pxinaddTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_03_09 Kinder Morgan PowerPoint Presentation - February 19 2015 Meeting.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_03_09 Kinder Morgan PowerPoint Presentation - February 19 2015 Meeting: 2 19 15 NHDES Meeting.pptxSubject: Kinder Morgan PowerPoint Presentation - February 19, 2015 MeetingDate: Monday, March 9, 2015 4:49 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TDREW>To: “Boisvert, Tracey” <[email protected]>, “Feighner, Edna” <[email protected]>, “Feld-baum, Eric” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Gegas, Vasilios (Bill)” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Rennie, Craig” <[email protected]>, “Rousseau, David” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Lyons, Johanna” <[email protected]>, Dijit Taylor <[email protected]>, “Rigrod, Pierce” <[email protected]>, “Kernen, Brandon” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan PowerPoint Presentation - February 19, 2015 MeetingPlease see attached. TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>


DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_03_23 Accepted Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands Wildlife Technical Discussion (2).

TXT===========================================================================

Subject: Accepted: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionDate: Monday, March 23, 2015 3:35 PMFrom: Benedict, Karl </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KARL.D.BENEDICT>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical Discussion

===========================================================================2015_03_23 Accepted Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands Wildlife Technical Discussion.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Accepted: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionDate: Monday, March 23, 2015 3:35 PMFrom: Benedict, Karl </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KARL.D.BENEDICT>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical Discussion

===========================================================================2015_03_23 Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands Wildlife Technical Discussion (5).TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_03_23 Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands Wildlife Technical Discussion (5): Aerial High Resolution Imaging Services.pdfSubject: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionDate: Monday, March 23, 2015 3:28 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TDREW>To: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, “Henderson, Carol” <[email protected]>, “Kern, Mark” <[email protected]>, “Keddell, David M NAE” <[email protected]>, “Tur, Maria” <[email protected]>, Robert Varney <[email protected]>, Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionFrom Adele Fiorillo, Normandeau Associates:� �We are particularly interested in agency input relative to our approach for surveys where we do not have full access to properties along the pipeline route.� The alternative is to use remote sensing using high resolution aerial photography with ground trothing and actual ground surveys where we do have access.� As we discussed, attached is a tear sheet that outlines the remote sensing capabili-ties.��



=========================================================================== 2015_03_23 Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands Wildlife Technical Discussion (7): Aerial High Resolution Imaging Services.pdfSubject: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionDate: Monday, March 23, 2015 3:28 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TDREW>To: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, “Henderson, Carol” <[email protected]>, “Kern, Mark” <[email protected]>, “Keddell, David M NAE” <[email protected]>, “Tur, Maria” <[email protected]>, Robert Varney <[email protected]>, Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionFrom Adele Fiorillo, Normandeau Associates:� �We are particularly interested in agency input relative to our approach for surveys where we do not have full access to properties along the pipeline route.� The alternative is to use remote sensing using high resolution aerial photography with ground trothing and actual ground surveys where we do have access.� As we discussed, attached is a tear sheet that outlines the remote sensing capabili-ties.��

===========================================================================2015_03_23 RE Kinder Morgan - Wetlands Wildlife Meeting (UNCLASSIFIED) (20).TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_03_23 RE Kinder Morgan - Wetlands Wildlife Meeting (UNCLASSIFIED) (20): Aerial High Resolution Imaging Services.pdfSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan - Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting (UNCLASSIFIED)Date: Monday, March 23, 2015 11:50 AMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TDREW>To: “Kern, Mark” <[email protected]>Cc: “Keddell, David M NAE” <[email protected]>, “Tur, Maria” <[email protected]>, “Henderson, Carol” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan - Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting (UNCLASSIFIED)Hi Mark, “We are particularly interested in agency input relative to our approach for surveys where we do not have full access to properties along the pipeline route. The alternative is to use remote sensing using high resolution aerial photography with ground-trothing and actual ground surveys where we do have access. As we discussed attached is a tear sheet that outlines the remote sensing capabilities. Hope this helps. Thank you for asking.” Adele Fiorillo, NAITimImportant Announcement from NHDES: From Noon on March 26 until 8 a.m. on March 30, NHDES will be without computer or email access due to a scheduled computer system upgrade.� We apologize for any incon-venience this may cause. �If you need to contact us during this time for any reason, please do so by telephone.Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen Drive


Concord, NH� 03302-0095�Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email:� [email protected] Website:� http://des.nh.gov/�This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use�by the person or persons to whom�they�are addressed.� The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule.� Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with�any accompanying�attachments or printed copies.-----Original Message-----From: Kern, Mark [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 11:02 AMTo: Keddell, David M NAE; Drew, Tim; Tur, Maria; [email protected]: Adams, Collis; Sommer, Lori; Tilton, Mary AnnSubject: RE: Kinder Morgran - Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting (UNCLASSIFIED)Hi Tim,I will be at NHDES for 2 meetings on 4/1 (10 - 11 and 1:30 - 3:30); so I could meet anytime from 11 - 1:30 that day. I could call in for the times Dave list below on the other days.What is this about? Vernal pools, mitigation, rare species?Thanks, Mark-----Original Message-----From: Keddell, David M NAE [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 10:57 AMTo: Drew, Tim; Tur, Maria; Kern, Mark; [email protected]: Adams, CollisSubject: RE: Kinder Morgran - Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting (UNCLASSIFIED)Classification: UNCLASSIFIEDCaveats: NONEHi Tim: I could meeting April 1 in the afternoon (have a meeting in the AM), from 8- 11 Thursday AM and from 9 - 1 Friday. Thanks-----Original Message-----From: Drew, Tim [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 10:51 AMTo: Tur, Maria; Kern, Mark; Keddell, David M NAE; Henderson, CarolCc: Adams, CollisSubject: [EXTERNAL] Kinder Morgran - Wetlands & Wildlife MeetingGood morning, All I have been asked to arrange a one-hour meeting with Kinder Morgan and Normandeau Associates representatives. This is a specific technical meeting focused on wetlands and wildlife only. The possible dates are the afternoon of April 1, or anytime on April 2 or 3. Could you let me know if your availability for those three dates? Thank you.TimImportant Announcement from NHDES: From Noon on March 26 until 8 a.m. on March 30, NHDES will be


without computer or email access due to a scheduled computer system upgrade. We apologize for any inconve-nience this may cause. If you need to contact us during this time for any reason, please do so by telephone.Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.Classification: UNCLASSIFIEDCaveats: NONE

===========================================================================2015_03_23 RE Kinder Morgan - Wetlands Wildlife Meeting (UNCLASSIFIED).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Kinder Morgan - Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting (UNCLASSIFIED)Date: Monday, March 23, 2015 3:34 PMFrom: Kern, Mark <[email protected]>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Cc: “Keddell, David M NAE” <[email protected]>, “Tur, Maria” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan - Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting (UNCLASSIFIED)Thanks Tim,Please let me know if you have a call-in number. I cannot be there in person on 4/3.Mark-----Original Message-----From: Drew, Tim [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 11:50 AMTo: Kern, MarkCc: Keddell, David M NAE; Tur, Maria; [email protected]; Adams, CollisSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan - Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting (UNCLASSIFIED)Hi Mark, “We are particularly interested in agency input relative to our approach for surveys where we do not have full access to properties along the pipeline route. The alternative is to use remote sensing using high resolution aerial photography with ground-trothing and actual ground surveys where we do have access. As we discussed attached is a tear sheet that outlines the remote sensing capabilities. Hope this helps. Thank you for asking.” Adele Fiorillo, NAI


TimImportant Announcement from NHDES: From Noon on March 26 until 8 a.m. on March 30, NHDES will be without computer or email access due to a scheduled computer system upgrade.� We apologize for any incon-venience this may cause. �If you need to contact us during this time for any reason, please do so by telephone.Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH� 03302-0095�Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email:� [email protected] Website:� http://des.nh.gov/�This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use�by the person or persons to whom�they�are addressed.� The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule.� Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with�any accompanying�attachments or printed copies.-----Original Message-----From: Kern, Mark [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 11:02 AMTo: Keddell, David M NAE; Drew, Tim; Tur, Maria; [email protected]: Adams, Collis; Sommer, Lori; Tilton, Mary AnnSubject: RE: Kinder Morgran - Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting (UNCLASSIFIED)Hi Tim,I will be at NHDES for 2 meetings on 4/1 (10 - 11 and 1:30 - 3:30); so I could meet anytime from 11 - 1:30 that day. I could call in for the times Dave list below on the other days.What is this about? Vernal pools, mitigation, rare species?Thanks, Mark-----Original Message-----From: Keddell, David M NAE [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 10:57 AMTo: Drew, Tim; Tur, Maria; Kern, Mark; [email protected]: Adams, CollisSubject: RE: Kinder Morgran - Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting (UNCLASSIFIED)Classification: UNCLASSIFIEDCaveats: NONEHi Tim: I could meeting April 1 in the afternoon (have a meeting in the AM), from 8- 11 Thursday AM and from 9 - 1 Friday. Thanks-----Original Message-----From: Drew, Tim [mailto:[email protected]]


Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 10:51 AMTo: Tur, Maria; Kern, Mark; Keddell, David M NAE; Henderson, CarolCc: Adams, CollisSubject: [EXTERNAL] Kinder Morgran - Wetlands & Wildlife MeetingGood morning, All I have been asked to arrange a one-hour meeting with Kinder Morgan and Normandeau Associates representatives. This is a specific technical meeting focused on wetlands and wildlife only. The possible dates are the afternoon of April 1, or anytime on April 2 or 3. Could you let me know if your availability for those three dates? Thank you.TimImportant Announcement from NHDES: From Noon on March 26 until 8 a.m. on March 30, NHDES will be without computer or email access due to a scheduled computer system upgrade. We apologize for any inconve-nience this may cause. If you need to contact us during this time for any reason, please do so by telephone.Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.Classification: UNCLASSIFIEDCaveats: NONE

===========================================================================2015_03_24 FW Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands Wildlife Technical Discussion (4).TXT===========================================================================

Subject: FW: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionDate: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 9:47 AMFrom: Benedict, Karl </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KARL.D.BENEDICT>To: “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionProposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline- Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionPre-App meeting scheduled for April 3, 10am, Rm 111-----Original Appointment-----From: Benedict, Karl Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 3:35 PMTo: Drew, TimSubject: Accepted: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical Discussion


When: Friday, April 03, 2015 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).Where: Conference Room 111, DES Headquarters, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH


Subject: FW: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionDate: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 9:47 AMFrom: Benedict, Karl </O=DES/OU=CONCORD/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KARL.D.BENEDICT>To: “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionProposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline- Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionPre-App meeting scheduled for April 3, 10am, Rm 111-----Original Appointment-----From: Benedict, Karl Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 3:35 PMTo: Drew, TimSubject: Accepted: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionWhen: Friday, April 03, 2015 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).Where: Conference Room 111, DES Headquarters, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH


2015_03_31 FW Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands Wildlife Technical Discussion (2): Aerial High Resolution Imaging Services.pdfSubject: FW: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionDate: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 8:55 AMFrom: Benedict, Karl </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BENEDICT>To: “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical Discussion-----Original Appointment-----From: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 3:28 PMTo: Drew, Tim; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; Adams, Collis; Sommer, Lori; Mauck, Ridge; ‘Henderson, Carol’; ‘Kern, Mark’; ‘Keddell, David M NAE’; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘Robert Varney’; ‘Adele Fiorillo’Subject: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionWhen: Friday, April 03, 2015 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).Where: Conference Room 111, DES Headquarters, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NHFrom Adele Fiorillo, Normandeau Associates:� �We are particularly interested in agency input relative to our approach for surveys where we do not have full access to properties along the pipeline route.� The alternative is to use remote sensing using high resolution aerial photography with ground trothing and actual ground surveys where we do have access.� As we discussed, attached is a tear sheet that outlines the remote sensing capabili-ties.��


===========================================================================2015_03_31 FW Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands Wildlife Technical Discussion.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_03_31 FW Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands Wildlife Technical Discussion: Aerial High Resolution Imaging Services.pdfSubject: FW: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionDate: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 8:55 AMFrom: Benedict, Karl </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BENEDICT>To: “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical Discussion-----Original Appointment-----From: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 3:28 PMTo: Drew, Tim; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; Adams, Collis; Sommer, Lori; Mauck, Ridge; ‘Henderson, Carol’; ‘Kern, Mark’; ‘Keddell, David M NAE’; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘Robert Varney’; ‘Adele Fiorillo’Subject: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionWhen: Friday, April 03, 2015 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).Where: Conference Room 111, DES Headquarters, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NHFrom Adele Fiorillo, Normandeau Associates:� �We are particularly interested in agency input relative to our approach for surveys where we do not have full access to properties along the pipeline route.� The alternative is to use remote sensing using high resolution aerial photography with ground trothing and actual ground surveys where we do have access.� As we discussed, attached is a tear sheet that outlines the remote sensing capabili-ties.��


=========================================================================== 2015_04_02 Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands Wildlife Technical Discussion (2): Aerial High Resolution Imaging Services.pdfSubject: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionDate: Thursday, April 2, 2015 2:15 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, “Henderson, Carol” <[email protected]>, “’Kern, Mark’” <[email protected]>, “’Keddell, David M NAE’” <[email protected]>, “’Tur, Maria’” <[email protected]>, ‘Robert Varney’ <[email protected]>, ‘Adele Fiorillo’ <[email protected]>Cc: “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionUpdate (4/2/15):� Kinder Morgan will be sending seven representatives to this meeting combined with out three attendees from DES, Dave Keddell from the Corps and Bob Varney and Adele Fiorillo from Normandeau Associates.� The Kinder Morgan folks, as well as Bob V. and Adele, will be setting up Room 111 with a Pow-erPoint presentation starting at 9:00 AM.� We at DES do not have to be there until the full meeting begins at 10:00 AM.� TimFrom Adele Fiorillo, Normandeau Associates:� �We are particularly interested in agency input relative to our approach for surveys where we do not have full access to properties along the pipeline route.� The alternative is


to use remote sensing using high resolution aerial photography with ground trothing and actual ground surveys where we do have access.� As we discussed, attached is a tear sheet that outlines the remote sensing capabili-ties.��Call in number:� 1 888 206-2266Moderator Code:� (You have to use this number a few minutes before the call to initiate it!):� 4251359#�Participants Pass Code:� 4114238#

===========================================================================2015_04_02 Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands Wildlife Technical Discussion.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_04_02 Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands Wildlife Technical Discussion: Aerial High Resolution Imaging Services.pdfSubject: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionDate: Thursday, April 2, 2015 2:15 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, “Henderson, Carol” <[email protected]>, “’Kern, Mark’” <[email protected]>, “’Keddell, David M NAE’” <[email protected]>, “’Tur, Maria’” <[email protected]>, ‘Robert Varney’ <[email protected]>, ‘Adele Fiorillo’ <[email protected]>Cc: “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionUpdate (4/2/15):� Kinder Morgan will be sending seven representatives to this meeting combined with out three attendees from DES, Dave Keddell from the Corps and Bob Varney and Adele Fiorillo from Normandeau Associates.� The Kinder Morgan folks, as well as Bob V. and Adele, will be setting up Room 111 with a Pow-erPoint presentation starting at 9:00 AM.� We at DES do not have to be there until the full meeting begins at 10:00 AM.� TimFrom Adele Fiorillo, Normandeau Associates:� �We are particularly interested in agency input relative to our approach for surveys where we do not have full access to properties along the pipeline route.� The alternative is to use remote sensing using high resolution aerial photography with ground trothing and actual ground surveys where we do have access.� As we discussed, attached is a tear sheet that outlines the remote sensing capabili-ties.��Call in number:� 1 888 206-2266Moderator Code:� (You have to use this number a few minutes before the call to initiate it!):� 4251359#�Participants Pass Code:� 4114238#

===========================================================================2015_04_02 RE Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands Wildlife Technical Discussion (2).TXT===========================================================================

Subject: RE: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionDate: Thursday, April 2, 2015 3:05 PMFrom: Kern, Mark <[email protected]>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Bene-dict, Karl” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “’Keddell, David M NAE’” <[email protected].


mil>, “’Tur, Maria’” <[email protected]>, ‘Robert Varney’ <[email protected]>, ‘Adele Fiorillo’ <[email protected]>Cc: “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionThanks Tim,I am calling in for this meeting, should I call in at 9 or 10?Thanks, Mark-----Original Appointment-----From: Drew, Tim [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 2:16 PMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; Adams, Collis; Sommer, Lori; Mauck, Ridge; [email protected]; Kern, Mark; ‘Keddell, David M NAE’; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘Robert Varney’; ‘Adele Fiorillo’Cc: Thomas, WilliamSubject: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionWhen: Friday, April 03, 2015 9:00 AM-11:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).Where: Conference Room 111, DES Headquarters, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NHUpdate (4/2/15): Kinder Morgan will be sending seven representatives to this meeting combined with out three attendees from DES, Dave Keddell from the Corps and Bob Varney and Adele Fiorillo from Normandeau Asso-ciates. The Kinder Morgan folks, as well as Bob V. and Adele, will be setting up Room 111 with a PowerPoint presentation starting at 9:00 AM. We at DES do not have to be there until the full meeting begins at 10:00 AM. TimFrom Adele Fiorillo, Normandeau Associates: �We are particularly interested in agency input relative to our approach for surveys where we do not have full access to properties along the pipeline route. The alternative is to use remote sensing using high resolution aerial photography with ground trothing and actual ground surveys where we do have access. As we discussed, attached is a tear sheet that outlines the remote sensing capabili-ties.�Call in number: 1 888 206-2266Moderator Code: (You have to use this number a few minutes before the call to initiate it!): 4251359# Participants Pass Code: 4114238# << File: Aerial High Resolution Imaging Services.pdf >>


Subject: RE: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionDate: Thursday, April 2, 2015 3:05 PMFrom: Kern, Mark <[email protected]>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Bene-dict, Karl” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “’Keddell, David M NAE’” <[email protected]>, “’Tur, Maria’” <[email protected]>, ‘Robert Varney’ <[email protected]>, ‘Adele Fiorillo’ <[email protected]>Cc: “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionThanks Tim,I am calling in for this meeting, should I call in at 9 or 10?Thanks, Mark-----Original Appointment-----From: Drew, Tim [mailto:[email protected]]


Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 2:16 PMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; Adams, Collis; Sommer, Lori; Mauck, Ridge; [email protected]; Kern, Mark; ‘Keddell, David M NAE’; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘Robert Varney’; ‘Adele Fiorillo’Cc: Thomas, WilliamSubject: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionWhen: Friday, April 03, 2015 9:00 AM-11:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).Where: Conference Room 111, DES Headquarters, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NHUpdate (4/2/15): Kinder Morgan will be sending seven representatives to this meeting combined with out three attendees from DES, Dave Keddell from the Corps and Bob Varney and Adele Fiorillo from Normandeau Asso-ciates. The Kinder Morgan folks, as well as Bob V. and Adele, will be setting up Room 111 with a PowerPoint presentation starting at 9:00 AM. We at DES do not have to be there until the full meeting begins at 10:00 AM. TimFrom Adele Fiorillo, Normandeau Associates: �We are particularly interested in agency input relative to our approach for surveys where we do not have full access to properties along the pipeline route. The alternative is to use remote sensing using high resolution aerial photography with ground trothing and actual ground surveys where we do have access. As we discussed, attached is a tear sheet that outlines the remote sensing capabili-ties.�Call in number: 1 888 206-2266Moderator Code: (You have to use this number a few minutes before the call to initiate it!): 4251359# Participants Pass Code: 4114238# << File: Aerial High Resolution Imaging Services.pdf >>


Subject: RE: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionDate: Thursday, April 2, 2015 3:05 PMFrom: Kern, Mark <[email protected]>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Bene-dict, Karl” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “’Keddell, David M NAE’” <[email protected]>, “’Tur, Maria’” <[email protected]>, ‘Robert Varney’ <[email protected]>, ‘Adele Fiorillo’ <[email protected]>Cc: “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionThanks Tim,I am calling in for this meeting, should I call in at 9 or 10?Thanks, Mark-----Original Appointment-----From: Drew, Tim [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 2:16 PMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; Adams, Collis; Sommer, Lori; Mauck, Ridge; [email protected]; Kern, Mark; ‘Keddell, David M NAE’; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘Robert Varney’; ‘Adele Fiorillo’Cc: Thomas, WilliamSubject: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionWhen: Friday, April 03, 2015 9:00 AM-11:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).Where: Conference Room 111, DES Headquarters, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NHUpdate (4/2/15): Kinder Morgan will be sending seven representatives to this meeting combined with out three attendees from DES, Dave Keddell from the Corps and Bob Varney and Adele Fiorillo from Normandeau Asso-


ciates. The Kinder Morgan folks, as well as Bob V. and Adele, will be setting up Room 111 with a PowerPoint presentation starting at 9:00 AM. We at DES do not have to be there until the full meeting begins at 10:00 AM. TimFrom Adele Fiorillo, Normandeau Associates: �We are particularly interested in agency input relative to our approach for surveys where we do not have full access to properties along the pipeline route. The alternative is to use remote sensing using high resolution aerial photography with ground trothing and actual ground surveys where we do have access. As we discussed, attached is a tear sheet that outlines the remote sensing capabili-ties.�Call in number: 1 888 206-2266Moderator Code: (You have to use this number a few minutes before the call to initiate it!): 4251359# Participants Pass Code: 4114238# << File: Aerial High Resolution Imaging Services.pdf >>

===========================================================================2015_04_03 FW Northeast Energy Direct - Meeting update - Eastern Agencies.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: Northeast Energy Direct - Meeting & update - Eastern AgenciesDate: Friday, April 3, 2015 12:14 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>, “Richard-son, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>Conversation: Northeast Energy Direct - Meeting & update - Eastern AgenciesPlease see below. Distribute to others at DES who should also participate or listen. TimFrom: Henderson, Carol Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 2:47 PMTo: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Northeast Energy Direct - Meeting & update - Eastern AgenciesHi Tim:Here is the contact for getting in on the bi-monthly conference calls regarding the TN pipeline. Please let all those that may be interested know. Thanks, CarolFrom: Eric Tomasi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 12:56 PMTo: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Hender-son, Carol; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Elaine P. Baum; S. Xiah Kragie; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]: Howard, Margaret (DPU); Ferrer, Ashley M (DPU); Dan MaraSubject: Re: Northeast Energy Direct - Meeting & update - Eastern AgenciesAgenda for today’s Northeast Energy Direct Agency Conference Call.� 2:00 PM ET, Thursday, April 2 � Call in Number: (877)228-3100 Passcode: 745828#


� Introduction� Resource Report review status� Meetingso Open houseso Scoping meetingso Agency/tribal meetings� Tennessee Gas updateo Agency coordinationo Landowner coordinationo Survey status� Schedule for next call� Questions---Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerOffice (202) 502-8097From: Eric TomasiSent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 2:23 PMTo: Eric Tomasi; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Elaine P. Baum; S. Xiah Kragie; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]: Howard, Margaret (DPU); Ferrer, Ashley M (DPU); Dan MaraSubject: Northeast Energy Direct - Meeting & update - Eastern AgenciesWhen: Thursday, April 2, 2015 2:00 PM-3:00 PM.Where: Call in Number: (877)228-3100 Passcode: 745828# Hello,We are postponing this weeks Northeast Energy Direct Agency meeting until next week, April 2nd. Reminder, this is for the Eastern Portion of the pipeline (CT, MA, NH, RI). Tennessee filed the draft resource reports on March 13, 2015. Link here: http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/Doc_Family.asp?document_id=14312347 <http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/Doc_Family.asp?document_id=14312347> Therefore the next meeting will be:� 2:00 PM ET, Thursday, April 2 � Call in Number: (877)228-3100 Passcode: 745828#Please email me if you have any specific question(s) you want to discuss. I hope to talk to you then.*************************************Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionOffice: (202) 502-8097*************************************


===========================================================================2015_04_03 Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands Wildlife Meeting - 4315 (2).TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_04_03 Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands Wildlife Meeting - 4315 (2): DOC_20150404154718.pdfSubject: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Date: Friday, April 3, 2015 4:40 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: ‘Robert Varney’ <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, ‘Adele Fiorillo’ <[email protected]>, “’Gardella, Mark’” <[email protected]>, “’Hamarich, Mark A’” <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, “’Kern, Mark’” <[email protected]>, “’Letson, Michael A (Mike)’” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, ‘Lucas Meyer’ <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>, “’Tur, Maria’” <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “’Bonilla, Ser-gio’” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Good afternoon, Everyone, As promised, please find attached the list of attendees for today�s meeting here at DES. The only email addresses that weren�t supplied by the roster were those for Theresa Albanese and Doug Gibbons from HMM. If someone could forward the attachment to them, it will fulfill the list of participants. Best wishes to you all.Tim Drew Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.


=========================================================================== 2015_04_03 Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands Wildlife Meeting - 4315 (4):


DOC_20150404154718.pdfSubject: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Date: Friday, April 3, 2015 4:40 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: ‘Robert Varney’ <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, ‘Adele Fiorillo’ <[email protected]>, “’Gardella, Mark’” <[email protected]>, “’Hamarich, Mark A’” <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, “’Kern, Mark’” <[email protected]>, “’Letson, Michael A (Mike)’” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, ‘Lucas Meyer’ <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>, “’Tur, Maria’” <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “’Bonilla, Ser-gio’” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Good afternoon, Everyone, As promised, please find attached the list of attendees for today�s meeting here at DES. The only email addresses that weren�t supplied by the roster were those for Theresa Albanese and Doug Gibbons from HMM. If someone could forward the attachment to them, it will fulfill the list of participants. Best wishes to you all.Tim Drew Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_04_03 RE Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands Wildlife Technical Discussion.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionDate: Friday, April 3, 2015 10:03 AMFrom: Sommer, Lori </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SOMMER>To: “Kern, Mark” <[email protected]>, “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Col-


lis” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, “Henderson, Carol” <[email protected]>, “’Keddell, David M NAE’” <[email protected]>, “’Tur, Maria’” <[email protected]>, ‘Robert Varney’ <[email protected]>, ‘Adele Fiorillo’ <[email protected]>Cc: “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionI’ve called and am only getting music?...LoriFrom: Kern, Mark [[email protected]]Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 3:05 PMTo: Drew, Tim; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; Adams, Collis; Sommer, Lori; Mauck, Ridge; Henderson, Carol; ‘Keddell, David M NAE’; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘Robert Varney’; ‘Adele Fiorillo’Cc: Thomas, WilliamSubject: RE: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionThanks Tim,I am calling in for this meeting, should I call in at 9 or 10?Thanks, Mark-----Original Appointment-----From: Drew, Tim [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 2:16 PMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; Adams, Collis; Sommer, Lori; Mauck, Ridge; [email protected]; Kern, Mark; ‘Keddell, David M NAE’; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘Robert Varney’; ‘Adele Fiorillo’Cc: Thomas, WilliamSubject: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionWhen: Friday, April 03, 2015 9:00 AM-11:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).Where: Conference Room 111, DES Headquarters, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NHUpdate (4/2/15): Kinder Morgan will be sending seven representatives to this meeting combined with out three attendees from DES, Dave Keddell from the Corps and Bob Varney and Adele Fiorillo from Normandeau Asso-ciates. The Kinder Morgan folks, as well as Bob V. and Adele, will be setting up Room 111 with a PowerPoint presentation starting at 9:00 AM. We at DES do not have to be there until the full meeting begins at 10:00 AM. TimFrom Adele Fiorillo, Normandeau Associates: �We are particularly interested in agency input relative to our approach for surveys where we do not have full access to properties along the pipeline route. The alternative is to use remote sensing using high resolution aerial photography with ground trothing and actual ground surveys where we do have access. As we discussed, attached is a tear sheet that outlines the remote sensing capabili-ties.�Call in number: 1 888 206-2266Moderator Code: (You have to use this number a few minutes before the call to initiate it!): 4251359# Participants Pass Code: 4114238# << File: Aerial High Resolution Imaging Services.pdf >>

===========================================================================2015_04_06 Re Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands Wildlife Meeting - 4315 (1).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Re: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Date: Monday, April 6, 2015 10:53 AMFrom: Kern, Mark <[email protected]>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>, ‘Robert Varney’ <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, ‘Adele Fiorillo’ <[email protected]>, “’Gardella, Mark’” <[email protected]>, “’Hamarich, Mark A’” <Mark_Hamarich@kindermorgan.


com>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, “’Letson, Michael A (Mike)’” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, ‘Lucas Meyer’ <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>, “’Tur, Maria’” <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “’Bonilla, Sergio’” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Thanks Tim,Adele, I had some quick questions.1) Roughly, what % of sites will be looked at in the field vs estimated using remote methods, when you apply for a permit?2) How will you handle vernal pools? a) again, what % will you look in the field vs using remote methods? b) how well can you id. VPs using remote methods? If results are so-so, how will you estimate VP impacts? c) will you do egg mass counts or do you plan to treat them all the same as potential VPs? d) what distance from cleared land will you use for your VP survey?thanks, MarkFrom: Drew, Tim <[email protected]>Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 4:40 PMTo: ‘Robert Varney’; ‘[email protected]’; ‘Adele Fiorillo’; ‘Gardella, Mark’; ‘Hamarich, Mark A’; ‘[email protected]’; Kern, Mark; ‘Letson, Michael A (Mike)’; Mauck, Ridge; ‘Lucas Meyer’; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘[email protected]’; Sommer, Lori; ‘Bonilla, Sergio’Subject: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15 Good afternoon, Everyone, As promised, please find attached the list of attendees for today�s meeting here at DES. The only email addresses that weren�t supplied by the roster were those for Theresa Albanese and Doug Gibbons from HMM. If someone could forward the attachment to them, it will fulfill the list of participants. Best wishes to you all.Tim Drew Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.


===========================================================================2015_04_06 Re Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands Wildlife Meeting - 4315 (3).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Re: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Date: Monday, April 6, 2015 10:53 AMFrom: Kern, Mark <[email protected]>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>, ‘Robert Varney’ <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, ‘Adele Fiorillo’ <[email protected]>, “’Gardella, Mark’” <[email protected]>, “’Hamarich, Mark A’” <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, “’Letson, Michael A (Mike)’” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, ‘Lucas Meyer’ <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>, “’Tur, Maria’” <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “’Bonilla, Sergio’” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Thanks Tim,Adele, I had some quick questions.1) Roughly, what % of sites will be looked at in the field vs estimated using remote methods, when you apply for a permit?2) How will you handle vernal pools? a) again, what % will you look in the field vs using remote methods? b) how well can you id. VPs using remote methods? If results are so-so, how will you estimate VP impacts? c) will you do egg mass counts or do you plan to treat them all the same as potential VPs? d) what distance from cleared land will you use for your VP survey?thanks, MarkFrom: Drew, Tim <[email protected]>Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 4:40 PMTo: ‘Robert Varney’; ‘[email protected]’; ‘Adele Fiorillo’; ‘Gardella, Mark’; ‘Hamarich, Mark A’; ‘[email protected]’; Kern, Mark; ‘Letson, Michael A (Mike)’; Mauck, Ridge; ‘Lucas Meyer’; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘[email protected]’; Sommer, Lori; ‘Bonilla, Sergio’Subject: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15 Good afternoon, Everyone, As promised, please find attached the list of attendees for today�s meeting here at DES. The only email addresses that weren�t supplied by the roster were those for Theresa Albanese and Doug Gibbons from HMM. If someone could forward the attachment to them, it will fulfill the list of participants. Best wishes to you all.Tim Drew Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123


Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_04_08 RE Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands Wildlife Meeting - 4315 (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 9:51 AMFrom: Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>To: “Kern, Mark” <[email protected]>, “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>, Robert Var-ney <[email protected]>, Kerrie Diers <[email protected]>, “’Gardella, Mark’” <[email protected]>, “’Hamarich, Mark A’” <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, “’Letson, Michael A (Mike)’” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, ‘Lucas Meyer’ <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>, “’Tur, Maria’” <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “’Bonilla, Ser-gio’” <[email protected]>Cc: Curt Thalken <[email protected]>, Tory Fletcher <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Hello Mark: Thanks for listening in on the call last week. Below are responses to your questions (in blue) as best as can be answered at this point in the project. I have replied all to your email so everyone from the meet-ing receives this information. Happy to answer any other questions you may have. Sincerely, AdeleADELE FIORILLO 603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: Kern, Mark [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 10:53 AMTo: Drew, Tim; Robert Varney; Kerrie Diers; Adele Fiorillo; ‘Gardella, Mark’; ‘Hamarich, Mark A’; ‘[email protected]’; ‘Letson, Michael A (Mike)’; Mauck, Ridge; ‘Lucas Meyer’; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘[email protected]’; Sommer, Lori; ‘Bonilla, Sergio’Subject: Re: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Thanks Tim,Adele, I had some quick questions.1) Roughly, what % of sites will be looked at in the field vs estimated using remote methods, when you apply for a permit? At this time access agreements are in place for 50% of the landowners along the entire alignment. In New Hampshire we have access to approximately 20%. We cannot predict how much more access we will obtain between now and the end of the field season/filing but our goal will be to complete field surveys in all areas that we have access as long as it is the appropriate season. Therefore it is safe to say that we will have at least 20% access.2) How will you handle vernal pools?


a) again, what % will you look in the field vs using remote methods? We will be performing VP surveys this spring for any sites we have access to. The entire alignment will be flown and ground-truthing will occur on the access parcels, including vernal pool assessment. Crews will utilize the NHFG document for Identification and Documentation of Vernal Pools in New Hampshire and the Federal forms US Army Corps of Engineers - New England District Vernal Pool Valuation Score Form, US Army Corps of Engineers - New England District Ver-nal Pool Characterization Form and the recent Federal guidelines Proposed Revision of New England District Compensatory Mitigation Guidance, dated March 3, 2015. b) how well can you id. VPs using remote methods? If results are so-so, how will you estimate VP impacts? We cannot confirm VP�s using remote imagery. Even though we have 5 cm resolution we need 4 pixels to get image detail (this translates to ~100 cm2). Therefore, we will have to assume any potential VP is a VP and asses impacts that way. Federal and state applications will be filed and field-verified/ground-truthed data will be pro-vided with updated permitting implications as that data from no-access parcels is obtained either prior to and/or following FERC Certificate. c) will you do egg mass counts or do you plan to treat them all the same as potential VPs? We will do egg mass counts in the field but not from the imagery. As access is granted or a FERC Certificate is issued, Potential Vernal Pools will be confirmed and verified as Vernal Pools or not using the above referenced characterization and valuation forms and guideline documents. d) what distance from cleared land will you use for your VP survey? The aerial interpretation will cover a survey width of 1500 feet (750 to either side of centerline). Field surveys cover a survey width of 250 when adjacent to powerlines and 400 feet in greenfield areas (not adjacent to powerlines).thanks, MarkPlease consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2015_04_08 RE Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands Wildlife Meeting - 4315.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 9:51 AMFrom: Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>To: “Kern, Mark” <[email protected]>, “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>, Robert Var-ney <[email protected]>, Kerrie Diers <[email protected]>, “’Gardella, Mark’” <[email protected]>, “’Hamarich, Mark A’” <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, “’Letson, Michael A (Mike)’” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, ‘Lucas Meyer’ <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>, “’Tur, Maria’” <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “’Bonilla, Ser-gio’” <[email protected]>Cc: Curt Thalken <[email protected]>, Tory Fletcher <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Hello Mark: Thanks for listening in on the call last week. Below are responses to your questions (in blue) as best as can be answered at this point in the project. I have replied all to your email so everyone from the meet-ing receives this information. Happy to answer any other questions you may have. Sincerely, AdeleADELE FIORILLO 603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: Kern, Mark [mailto:[email protected]]


Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 10:53 AMTo: Drew, Tim; Robert Varney; Kerrie Diers; Adele Fiorillo; ‘Gardella, Mark’; ‘Hamarich, Mark A’; ‘[email protected]’; ‘Letson, Michael A (Mike)’; Mauck, Ridge; ‘Lucas Meyer’; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘[email protected]’; Sommer, Lori; ‘Bonilla, Sergio’Subject: Re: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Thanks Tim,Adele, I had some quick questions.1) Roughly, what % of sites will be looked at in the field vs estimated using remote methods, when you apply for a permit? At this time access agreements are in place for 50% of the landowners along the entire alignment. In New Hampshire we have access to approximately 20%. We cannot predict how much more access we will obtain between now and the end of the field season/filing but our goal will be to complete field surveys in all areas that we have access as long as it is the appropriate season. Therefore it is safe to say that we will have at least 20% access.2) How will you handle vernal pools? a) again, what % will you look in the field vs using remote methods? We will be performing VP surveys this spring for any sites we have access to. The entire alignment will be flown and ground-truthing will occur on the access parcels, including vernal pool assessment. Crews will utilize the NHFG document for Identification and Documentation of Vernal Pools in New Hampshire and the Federal forms US Army Corps of Engineers - New England District Vernal Pool Valuation Score Form, US Army Corps of Engineers - New England District Ver-nal Pool Characterization Form and the recent Federal guidelines Proposed Revision of New England District Compensatory Mitigation Guidance, dated March 3, 2015. b) how well can you id. VPs using remote methods? If results are so-so, how will you estimate VP impacts? We cannot confirm VP�s using remote imagery. Even though we have 5 cm resolution we need 4 pixels to get image detail (this translates to ~100 cm2). Therefore, we will have to assume any potential VP is a VP and asses impacts that way. Federal and state applications will be filed and field-verified/ground-truthed data will be pro-vided with updated permitting implications as that data from no-access parcels is obtained either prior to and/or following FERC Certificate. c) will you do egg mass counts or do you plan to treat them all the same as potential VPs? We will do egg mass counts in the field but not from the imagery. As access is granted or a FERC Certificate is issued, Potential Vernal Pools will be confirmed and verified as Vernal Pools or not using the above referenced characterization and valuation forms and guideline documents. d) what distance from cleared land will you use for your VP survey? The aerial interpretation will cover a survey width of 1500 feet (750 to either side of centerline). Field surveys cover a survey width of 250 when adjacent to powerlines and 400 feet in greenfield areas (not adjacent to powerlines).thanks, MarkPlease consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2015_04_09 RE Thursday (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: ThursdayDate: Thursday, April 9, 2015 3:41 PMFrom: Bubier, Melinda </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BUBIER>To: “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>Conversation: ThursdayQuick update:I spent most of the day pouring through the Keene stuff. It took longer than I hoped, but I dug into the numbers �both budget and fill quantities to get a good handle on things anticipating what the committee might want to know. I also followed up on a few things with Deb. We had a good conversation about this project, the over-


all program, as well as the potential for other projects from them. The write-up is nearly complete but I plan to come in tomorrow, but it will be mid-morning or so, to wrap up everything. I really want to start next week with a clean slate and be ready for EPA Grant and SADES. I see you are at Pease in the morning so maybe we can squeak in a lunch walk to catch up. MindyFrom: Sommer, Lori Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:17 AMTo: Bubier, MelindaSubject: RE: ThursdaySounds great � I guess we are perfecting the art of nudging!Thanks and hopefully you only got a little snow out of this latest storm�From: Bubier, Melinda Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:14 AMTo: Sommer, LoriSubject: RE: ThursdayLori, I will get the documents scanned today and a summary of GZAs request for more funds over to you and hope-fully we can move it to the site selection committee this week. I also had a message from Deb who said my e-mail to the City was a big help to get them moving. Another piece of the puzzle is that they have made an agreement with the Cheshire County F&G Dept to use the fill to build berms for hunter safety courses. As you can imagine all this takes time and not necessarily a priority for everyone so she said it was good to get the extra nudge.Kinder-Morgan will also be coming your way. MindyFrom: Sommer, Lori Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 3:08 PMTo: Bubier, MelindaSubject: ThursdayHi,On Thursday, I�ll be working from home on materials/presentation for Saturday. I submitted the training re-quest and we should know around April 24. I would love it if at least you get to go, I think it would be a good amount of background information and ideas we can possibly think about in the coming years.I left the Harris Center file #2013-2418 on your desk. I�m hoping you might need a mindless task to take on which includes uploading scanned versions of the survey, mgmt./stewardship plan and baseline report. They are sticking out of the file. They can be saved at: S:\WD-LandResources\GrantMgmt\ARM\2013PublicNotice\Contoocook\Green CrowThank you, if I don�t talk to you have a great weekend! I�m going to send you an invite for a walk so we fit at least one in next week J Lori SommerDES Wetland Mitigation CoordinatorWetlands Bureau(603) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ATTENTION: In order to ensure that all permit applications have the required elements for technical re-view, please be certain to use the newest versions of our application forms dated in the footnote as “valid until 7/1/2013”. Going forward, the Land Resources Management Programs plan to update applications every 6 months. The next round of updates will occur on June 1, 2013. Please refer to our website at http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm <https://owa.des.nh.gov/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm> for the current application forms.


===========================================================================2015_04_09 RE Thursday (3).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: ThursdayDate: Thursday, April 9, 2015 10:17 AMFrom: Sommer, Lori </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SOMMER>To: “Bubier, Melinda” <[email protected]>Conversation: ThursdaySounds great � I guess we are perfecting the art of nudging!Thanks and hopefully you only got a little snow out of this latest storm�From: Bubier, Melinda Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:14 AMTo: Sommer, LoriSubject: RE: ThursdayLori, I will get the documents scanned today and a summary of GZAs request for more funds over to you and hope-fully we can move it to the site selection committee this week. I also had a message from Deb who said my e-mail to the City was a big help to get them moving. Another piece of the puzzle is that they have made an agreement with the Cheshire County F&G Dept to use the fill to build berms for hunter safety courses. As you can imagine all this takes time and not necessarily a priority for everyone so she said it was good to get the extra nudge.Kinder-Morgan will also be coming your way. MindyFrom: Sommer, Lori Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 3:08 PMTo: Bubier, MelindaSubject: ThursdayHi,On Thursday, I�ll be working from home on materials/presentation for Saturday. I submitted the training re-quest and we should know around April 24. I would love it if at least you get to go, I think it would be a good amount of background information and ideas we can possibly think about in the coming years.I left the Harris Center file #2013-2418 on your desk. I�m hoping you might need a mindless task to take on which includes uploading scanned versions of the survey, mgmt./stewardship plan and baseline report. They are sticking out of the file. They can be saved at: S:\WD-LandResources\GrantMgmt\ARM\2013PublicNotice\Contoocook\Green CrowThank you, if I don�t talk to you have a great weekend! I�m going to send you an invite for a walk so we fit at least one in next week J Lori SommerDES Wetland Mitigation CoordinatorWetlands Bureau(603) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ATTENTION: In order to ensure that all permit applications have the required elements for technical re-view, please be certain to use the newest versions of our application forms dated in the footnote as “valid until 7/1/2013”. Going forward, the Land Resources Management Programs plan to update applications every 6 months. The next round of updates will occur on June 1, 2013. Please refer to our website at http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm <https://owa.des.nh.gov/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm> for the current application forms.


===========================================================================2015_04_09 RE Thursday (4).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: ThursdayDate: Thursday, April 9, 2015 10:13 AMFrom: Bubier, Melinda </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BUBIER>To: “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>Conversation: ThursdayLori, I will get the documents scanned today and a summary of GZAs request for more funds over to you and hope-fully we can move it to the site selection committee this week. I also had a message from Deb who said my e-mail to the City was a big help to get them moving. Another piece of the puzzle is that they have made an agreement with the Cheshire County F&G Dept to use the fill to build berms for hunter safety courses. As you can imagine all this takes time and not necessarily a priority for everyone so she said it was good to get the extra nudge.Kinder-Morgan will also be coming your way. MindyFrom: Sommer, Lori Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 3:08 PMTo: Bubier, MelindaSubject: ThursdayHi,On Thursday, I�ll be working from home on materials/presentation for Saturday. I submitted the training re-quest and we should know around April 24. I would love it if at least you get to go, I think it would be a good amount of background information and ideas we can possibly think about in the coming years.I left the Harris Center file #2013-2418 on your desk. I�m hoping you might need a mindless task to take on which includes uploading scanned versions of the survey, mgmt./stewardship plan and baseline report. They are sticking out of the file. They can be saved at: S:\WD-LandResources\GrantMgmt\ARM\2013PublicNotice\Contoocook\Green CrowThank you, if I don�t talk to you have a great weekend! I�m going to send you an invite for a walk so we fit at least one in next week J Lori SommerDES Wetland Mitigation CoordinatorWetlands Bureau(603) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ATTENTION: In order to ensure that all permit applications have the required elements for technical re-view, please be certain to use the newest versions of our application forms dated in the footnote as “valid until 7/1/2013”. Going forward, the Land Resources Management Programs plan to update applications every 6 months. The next round of updates will occur on June 1, 2013. Please refer to our website at http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm <https://owa.des.nh.gov/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm> for the current application forms.


===========================================================================Subject: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Date: Friday, April 10, 2015 5:11 PMFrom: Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>


To: “Kern, Mark” <[email protected]>, “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>, Robert Var-ney <[email protected]>, Kerrie Diers <[email protected]>, “’Gardella, Mark’” <[email protected]>, “’Hamarich, Mark A’” <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, “’Letson, Michael A (Mike)’” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, ‘Lucas Meyer’ <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>, “’Tur, Maria’” <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “’Bonilla, Ser-gio’” <[email protected]>Cc: Curt Thalken <[email protected]>, Tory Fletcher <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Hi Mark: Responses to your comments below. Have a good weekend.Sincerely, AdeleADELE FIORILLO 603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: Kern, Mark [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 10:10 AMTo: Adele FiorilloCc: ‘Keddell, David M NAE’; Sommer, LoriSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Thanks Adele. Very helpful.So, would it be fair to say that?:1) You will not have VP info on most of the sites in NH when you apply to FERCWe will not have all the verified VP information when we file. Whether we will have information on most of the sites or, will not have information on most of the sites depends on how many site there are in total. We will have as much field verified vernal pool information and data as access allows, and in order to BEGIN the State and Federal permitting processes, including the FERC filing in September of 2015. Presently, we have ac-cess permission for 20% of the alignment (by property owner, not linear mileage); however, this is expected to increase. All follow up VP field verification information and data collected DURING the amphibian breeding season will be provided as access is granted. Supplements to the initial FERC (and all other Federal and State) application packages will be submitted. 2) You will gather field info on VPs prior to getting any federal wetland permit, so that will be part of any Corps mitigation packageYes, as discussed during the 4/3/15 interagency meeting, TGP does not expect that any State or Federal permits will be issued until such time that all wetland resources, including Potential VPs, are ground-thruthed/field- ver-ified, so that any impacts may be reflected in a mitigation package.3) Most of the VP field work will likely happen outside of egg mass season, so will mostly be dealing with potential VPsFollowing initial Federal and State application package submittals, which may contain several Potential VPs identified through methods discussed during the inter-agency meeting on 4/3/15, as described in the initial e-mail, and as access is granted, field-verified VP verification information and data collected DURING the am-phibian breeding season will be submitted as supplements to the initial Federal and State application packages. We fully anticipate that we will have full access for the spring VP season in 2017.Take care, MarkFrom: Adele Fiorillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 9:52 AMTo: Kern, Mark; Drew, Tim; Robert Varney; Kerrie Diers; ‘Gardella, Mark’; ‘Hamarich, Mark A’; ‘Kasia_


[email protected]’; ‘Letson, Michael A (Mike)’; Mauck, Ridge; ‘Lucas Meyer’; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘[email protected]’; Sommer, Lori; ‘Bonilla, Sergio’Cc: Curt Thalken; Tory FletcherSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Hello Mark: Thanks for listening in on the call last week. Below are responses to your questions (in blue) as best as can be answered at this point in the project. I have replied all to your email so everyone from the meet-ing receives this information. Happy to answer any other questions you may have. Sincerely, AdeleADELE FIORILLO 603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: Kern, Mark [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 10:53 AMTo: Drew, Tim; Robert Varney; Kerrie Diers; Adele Fiorillo; ‘Gardella, Mark’; ‘Hamarich, Mark A’; ‘[email protected]’; ‘Letson, Michael A (Mike)’; Mauck, Ridge; ‘Lucas Meyer’; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘[email protected]’; Sommer, Lori; ‘Bonilla, Sergio’Subject: Re: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Thanks Tim,Adele, I had some quick questions.1) Roughly, what % of sites will be looked at in the field vs estimated using remote methods, when you apply for a permit? At this time access agreements are in place for 50% of the landowners along the entire alignment. In New Hampshire we have access to approximately 20%. We cannot predict how much more access we will obtain between now and the end of the field season/filing but our goal will be to complete field surveys in all areas that we have access as long as it is the appropriate season. Therefore it is safe to say that we will have at least 20% access.2) How will you handle vernal pools? a) again, what % will you look in the field vs using remote methods? We will be performing VP surveys this spring for any sites we have access to. The entire alignment will be flown and ground-truthing will occur on the access parcels, including vernal pool assessment. Crews will utilize the NHFG document for Identification and Documentation of Vernal Pools in New Hampshire and the Federal forms US Army Corps of Engineers - New England District Vernal Pool Valuation Score Form, US Army Corps of Engineers - New England District Ver-nal Pool Characterization Form and the recent Federal guidelines Proposed Revision of New England District Compensatory Mitigation Guidance, dated March 3, 2015. b) how well can you id. VPs using remote methods? If results are so-so, how will you estimate VP impacts? We cannot confirm VP�s using remote imagery. Even though we have 5 cm resolution we need 4 pixels to get image detail (this translates to ~100 cm2). Therefore, we will have to assume any potential VP is a VP and asses impacts that way. Federal and state applications will be filed and field-verified/ground-truthed data will be pro-vided with updated permitting implications as that data from no-access parcels is obtained either prior to and/or following FERC Certificate. c) will you do egg mass counts or do you plan to treat them all the same as potential VPs? We will do egg mass counts in the field but not from the imagery. As access is granted or a FERC Certificate is issued, Potential Vernal Pools will be confirmed and verified as Vernal Pools or not using the above referenced characterization and valuation forms and guideline documents. d) what distance from cleared land will you use for your VP survey? The aerial interpretation will cover a survey width of 1500 feet (750 to either side of centerline). Field surveys cover a survey width of 250 when adjacent to powerlines and 400 feet in greenfield areas (not adjacent to powerlines).thanks, MarkPlease consider the environment before printing this e-mail.


===========================================================================2015_04_10 Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands Wildlife Meeting - 4315.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Date: Friday, April 10, 2015 5:11 PMFrom: Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>To: “Kern, Mark” <[email protected]>, “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>, Robert Var-ney <[email protected]>, Kerrie Diers <[email protected]>, “’Gardella, Mark’” <[email protected]>, “’Hamarich, Mark A’” <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, “’Letson, Michael A (Mike)’” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, ‘Lucas Meyer’ <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>, “’Tur, Maria’” <[email protected]>, “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>, “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “’Bonilla, Ser-gio’” <[email protected]>Cc: Curt Thalken <[email protected]>, Tory Fletcher <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Hi Mark: Responses to your comments below. Have a good weekend.Sincerely, AdeleADELE FIORILLO 603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: Kern, Mark [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 10:10 AMTo: Adele FiorilloCc: ‘Keddell, David M NAE’; Sommer, LoriSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Thanks Adele. Very helpful.So, would it be fair to say that?:1) You will not have VP info on most of the sites in NH when you apply to FERCWe will not have all the verified VP information when we file. Whether we will have information on most of the sites or, will not have information on most of the sites depends on how many site there are in total. We will have as much field verified vernal pool information and data as access allows, and in order to BEGIN the State and Federal permitting processes, including the FERC filing in September of 2015. Presently, we have ac-cess permission for 20% of the alignment (by property owner, not linear mileage); however, this is expected to increase. All follow up VP field verification information and data collected DURING the amphibian breeding season will be provided as access is granted. Supplements to the initial FERC (and all other Federal and State) application packages will be submitted. 2) You will gather field info on VPs prior to getting any federal wetland permit, so that will be part of any Corps mitigation packageYes, as discussed during the 4/3/15 interagency meeting, TGP does not expect that any State or Federal permits will be issued until such time that all wetland resources, including Potential VPs, are ground-thruthed/field- ver-ified, so that any impacts may be reflected in a mitigation package.3) Most of the VP field work will likely happen outside of egg mass season, so will mostly be dealing with potential VPsFollowing initial Federal and State application package submittals, which may contain several Potential VPs identified through methods discussed during the inter-agency meeting on 4/3/15, as described in the initial


e-mail, and as access is granted, field-verified VP verification information and data collected DURING the am-phibian breeding season will be submitted as supplements to the initial Federal and State application packages. We fully anticipate that we will have full access for the spring VP season in 2017.Take care, MarkFrom: Adele Fiorillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 9:52 AMTo: Kern, Mark; Drew, Tim; Robert Varney; Kerrie Diers; ‘Gardella, Mark’; ‘Hamarich, Mark A’; ‘[email protected]’; ‘Letson, Michael A (Mike)’; Mauck, Ridge; ‘Lucas Meyer’; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘[email protected]’; Sommer, Lori; ‘Bonilla, Sergio’Cc: Curt Thalken; Tory FletcherSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Hello Mark: Thanks for listening in on the call last week. Below are responses to your questions (in blue) as best as can be answered at this point in the project. I have replied all to your email so everyone from the meet-ing receives this information. Happy to answer any other questions you may have. Sincerely, AdeleADELE FIORILLO 603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: Kern, Mark [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 10:53 AMTo: Drew, Tim; Robert Varney; Kerrie Diers; Adele Fiorillo; ‘Gardella, Mark’; ‘Hamarich, Mark A’; ‘[email protected]’; ‘Letson, Michael A (Mike)’; Mauck, Ridge; ‘Lucas Meyer’; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘[email protected]’; Sommer, Lori; ‘Bonilla, Sergio’Subject: Re: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Thanks Tim,Adele, I had some quick questions.1) Roughly, what % of sites will be looked at in the field vs estimated using remote methods, when you apply for a permit? At this time access agreements are in place for 50% of the landowners along the entire alignment. In New Hampshire we have access to approximately 20%. We cannot predict how much more access we will obtain between now and the end of the field season/filing but our goal will be to complete field surveys in all areas that we have access as long as it is the appropriate season. Therefore it is safe to say that we will have at least 20% access.2) How will you handle vernal pools? a) again, what % will you look in the field vs using remote methods? We will be performing VP surveys this spring for any sites we have access to. The entire alignment will be flown and ground-truthing will occur on the access parcels, including vernal pool assessment. Crews will utilize the NHFG document for Identification and Documentation of Vernal Pools in New Hampshire and the Federal forms US Army Corps of Engineers - New England District Vernal Pool Valuation Score Form, US Army Corps of Engineers - New England District Ver-nal Pool Characterization Form and the recent Federal guidelines Proposed Revision of New England District Compensatory Mitigation Guidance, dated March 3, 2015. b) how well can you id. VPs using remote methods? If results are so-so, how will you estimate VP impacts? We cannot confirm VP�s using remote imagery. Even though we have 5 cm resolution we need 4 pixels to get image detail (this translates to ~100 cm2). Therefore, we will have to assume any potential VP is a VP and asses impacts that way. Federal and state applications will be filed and field-verified/ground-truthed data will be pro-vided with updated permitting implications as that data from no-access parcels is obtained either prior to and/or following FERC Certificate. c) will you do egg mass counts or do you plan to treat them all the same as potential VPs? We will do egg mass counts in the field but not from the imagery. As access is granted or a FERC Certificate is issued, Potential


Vernal Pools will be confirmed and verified as Vernal Pools or not using the above referenced characterization and valuation forms and guideline documents. d) what distance from cleared land will you use for your VP survey? The aerial interpretation will cover a survey width of 1500 feet (750 to either side of centerline). Field surveys cover a survey width of 250 when adjacent to powerlines and 400 feet in greenfield areas (not adjacent to powerlines).thanks, MarkPlease consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2015_04_10 RE Thursday.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: ThursdayDate: Friday, April 10, 2015 7:59 AMFrom: Sommer, Lori </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SOMMER>To: “Bubier, Melinda” <[email protected]>Conversation: ThursdayGreat, I�m glad the Keene project is coming together. Let�s plan to look it over together and frame an email to the IRT and SSC. I�ll be back from Pease hopefully by noon or so, I may try to get out of my 1:00 this afternoon. Lori From: Bubier, Melinda Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 3:42 PMTo: Sommer, LoriSubject: RE: ThursdayQuick update:I spent most of the day pouring through the Keene stuff. It took longer than I hoped, but I dug into the numbers �both budget and fill quantities to get a good handle on things anticipating what the committee might want to know. I also followed up on a few things with Deb. We had a good conversation about this project, the over-all program, as well as the potential for other projects from them. The write-up is nearly complete but I plan to come in tomorrow, but it will be mid-morning or so, to wrap up everything. I really want to start next week with a clean slate and be ready for EPA Grant and SADES. I see you are at Pease in the morning so maybe we can squeak in a lunch walk to catch up.MindyFrom: Sommer, Lori Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:17 AMTo: Bubier, MelindaSubject: RE: ThursdaySounds great � I guess we are perfecting the art of nudging!Thanks and hopefully you only got a little snow out of this latest storm�From: Bubier, Melinda Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:14 AMTo: Sommer, LoriSubject: RE: ThursdayLori, I will get the documents scanned today and a summary of GZAs request for more funds over to you and hope-fully we can move it to the site selection committee this week. I also had a message from Deb who said my e-mail to the City was a big help to get them moving. Another piece of the puzzle is that they have made an agreement with the Cheshire County F&G Dept to use the fill to build berms for hunter safety courses. As you can imagine all this takes time and not necessarily a priority for everyone so she said it was good to get the extra


nudge.Kinder-Morgan will also be coming your way. MindyFrom: Sommer, Lori Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 3:08 PMTo: Bubier, MelindaSubject: ThursdayHi,On Thursday, I�ll be working from home on materials/presentation for Saturday. I submitted the training re-quest and we should know around April 24. I would love it if at least you get to go, I think it would be a good amount of background information and ideas we can possibly think about in the coming years.I left the Harris Center file #2013-2418 on your desk. I�m hoping you might need a mindless task to take on which includes uploading scanned versions of the survey, mgmt./stewardship plan and baseline report. They are sticking out of the file. They can be saved at: S:\WD-LandResources\GrantMgmt\ARM\2013PublicNotice\Contoocook\Green CrowThank you, if I don�t talk to you have a great weekend! I�m going to send you an invite for a walk so we fit at least one in next week J Lori SommerDES Wetland Mitigation CoordinatorWetlands Bureau(603) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ATTENTION: In order to ensure that all permit applications have the required elements for technical re-view, please be certain to use the newest versions of our application forms dated in the footnote as “valid until 7/1/2013”. Going forward, the Land Resources Management Programs plan to update applications every 6 months. The next round of updates will occur on June 1, 2013. Please refer to our website at http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm <https://owa.des.nh.gov/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm> for the current application forms.

===========================================================================2015_04_30 Re Time to chat about opportunities that may work for both organizations.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_04_30 Re Time to chat about opportunities that may work for both organizations: image001.jpg image002.png image003.png image004.png image010.jpg image011.jpg image012.jpgSubject: Re: Time to chat about opportunities that may work for both organizations?Date: Thursday, April 30, 2015 3:11 PMFrom: Nicholas Coates <[email protected]>To: “Crystall, Sandy” <[email protected]>Cc: Tracy Tarr <[email protected]>, “Tilton, Mary Ann” <[email protected]>, “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “Bubier, Melinda” <[email protected]>Conversation: Time to chat about opportunities that may work for both organizations?Tracy, what time do you prefer? I’m open. I’d be happy to go alone if your daughter isn’t up for listening to all of us geeks. Geeks in the cool way, of course. :)Sandy, I’ll start to look at the RFP.


I’ll say a few things that are blunt. I’ve never been very good a beating around the bush. Sorry.My bias in this is to find ways that can support conservation commissions. I’m hearing growing concerns from conservation commissions that they are being asked to do more more and more work as DES has continued re-ductions in funds and staffing. I’m not in the towns day in and day out so I can’t speak with authority on wheth-er those concerns are legitimate, but it’s what I’m hearing more and more. I know in particular there’s frustra-tion with how it feels like violations (real or perceived) are not being handled by the agency. Again, I don’t say to accuse, but just what I’m hearing, which gets back to my point about finding ways to support conservation commissions. Sorry if this is off topic, but I thought it would be important to highlight. Also, you had mentioned that non-profits are not eligible for funds. Does that also mean that DES wouldn’t be able to subcontract NHACC for some level of work on this project? I am asking because NHACC has to raise about $50,000 this year in grants and/or fundraising. And because I’m currently “part time,” I’m having to pri-oritize my time in areas where we can get the most bang for our buck. For example, we are planning on subcon-tracting with a state agency to do a day a week of outreach for a project, so that’s a high priority for us right now because it’s helping us close the revenue gap. Alternatively, if whatever project(s) is/are selected could provide greater capacity to conservation commissions or to your agency to help them do their work, then I’d certainly support that. I’d be happy to discuss this more in detail offline if you’d prefer.On a very interesting related note, two recent conversations I’ve had might be food for thought. Last week, Rick Van de Poll mentioned in a wetlands impact session he did for our 18 conservation commissions impacted by the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline that culvert improvements and replacements are now eligible for ARM fund mitigation projects. I spoke with Steve Trafton at Trout Unlimited briefly this morning and asked him about the status of the culvert assessment work that they have done and what level of completeness their data is in. I’m waiting to hear back from Colin Lawson on that when he’s back in the office. The idea I have is to start finding ways for conservation commissions to assess the culverts in their towns and to teach them how to make the case for upgrades/replacements at Town Meeting. Related to that, NHACC is just starting the process of gathering information to do a rewrite of our Handbook and we’re planning on talking about CC work through the lens of being prepared for any situation that comes out them (whether it’s climate change, a major gas pipe-line, etc.) In particular, I’d like to talk about climate change through a hazard mitigation focus, which I think lends itself well to culvert assessments and replacements. I haven’t quite connected the dots here, but just trying to put some ideas out there.Thanks for the opportunity to participate in this effort.On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Crystall, Sandy <[email protected]> wrote:Hi Nik and Tracy-I am in tomorrow, and have time in the morning or between 1:45 and 2:45... (intern interviews on both sides of that meeting time...). The EPA wetland program development grants are to help states develop their programs by testing, applying new methods, trying new things towards any of the core elements or items in a wetland program plan. While outreach is a strong component, I am not sure if engaging the students to do wetland or stream assessments qualifies -- although establishing a volunteer program could... I have attached the RFP --if you skim through it you can find where it mentions what work qualifies (pages 4-5) and the regional priority areas (page 11). Climate change, stream crossings, and buffers are mentioned. Non-profits do not qualify to compete for these grants. Additional information on the grant program can be found here: https://www.cfda.gov/index?s=program&mode=form&tab=core&id=252e4f31603d2d727937478b222b14aaLet me know if you want to get together. I am around next week except for Tuesday when I am booked solid. I have copied MaryAnn, Lori and Mindy as they are working on a proposal also --we have often sought two grants.SandySandy Crystall, PWS Water Quality Planning Section


Watershed Management Bureau603-271-2471 <tel:603-271-2471> NH Dept of Environmental ServicesPO Box 9529 Hazen Dr.Concord, NH 03302-0095des.nh.gov <http://des.nh.gov> From: Tracy Tarr [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 2:05 PMTo: Nicholas Coates; Crystall, SandySubject: RE: Time to chat about opportunities that may work for both organizations?Hi Nik and Sandy,I am available in the afternoon tomorrow if you need me. I will have my daughter due to school vacation, but I have dragged her to meetings before.I don�t fully grasp the constraints of the grant, but we have been asked by a variety of potential partners (e.g. New England College) to think about ways of getting college students involved with real-world conservation projects at the town level. It would be wonderful to engage college students in wetland and culvert assessments for towns. For instance, the students could help complete culvert inventories and/or functional assessments for towns. We would need to find funding to cover the basic costs of projects (travel costs, professional overview and quality assurance, etc.) Would the Wetland Program Development Grants be a possible source to fund these synergistic wetland evaluation studies?TracyTracy L. Tarr, CWS, CWB, CESSWIProject ManagerGZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.5 Commerce Park North | Bedford, NH 03110 New Addresso: 603.232.8739 <tel:603.232.8739> | c: 603.235.6992 <tel:603.235.6992> | fax: 603.624.9463 <tel:603.624.9463> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | www.gza.com <http://www.gza.com/> PROACTIVE BY DESIGN.� Our Company Commitment.Follow us on: <https://www.facebook.com/pages/GZA-GeoEnvironmental-Inc/180045518693736?fref=ts> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/37554?trk=tyah&trkInfo=tas:gza,idx:1-1-1> <http://www.youtube.com/user/GZAGeo> \From: Nicholas Coates [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 1:51 PMTo: Crystall, SandyCc: Tracy TarrSubject: Re: Time to chat about opportunities that may work for both organizations?Hi Sandy,How about tomorrow? I am open all day (rare!). I am out of state most of next week, but I am available on Friday after 1pm. The next time I’m available after that is the 14th 10am-4pm and 15th 10am-4pm. I’m CCing Tracy here. I’m not sure she can make it, but I am CCing her here in case she wants to.Thanks!-NikOn Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Crystall, Sandy <[email protected]> wrote:Hi Nik-I had a feeling that you would have some related projects going on!It is a sooner-than later timeframe -- and it would be great to have Tracy involved -- no problem there!Let me know some possible times to meet.Thanks !


SandyFrom: Nicholas Coates [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 11:06 AMTo: Crystall, SandySubject: Re: Time to chat about opportunities that may work for both organizations?Hi Sandy,What a great opportunity. Thanks for thinking of us!I just asked Tracy Tarr from my board to see what ideas she might have for projects. Would it be OK if I invited her to attend a meeting or call with you and me? If that’s OK by you, I’ll ask her for her availability for the next couple of weeks. How tight are the deadlines on this? If you want to get together sooner rather than later, let me know and I can just go ahead and get you some times ASAP.I just started yesterday scoping out ideas for chapters for the updated NHACC handbook and wanted to strengthen the wetland section with a discussion on climate change. I was also thinking about having a series of workshops to go through the chapters with emphasis on wetlands. I’m wondering if there’s some creative things we could do with this grant to achieve those mutual goals. Thanks again,-NikOn Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Crystall, Sandy <[email protected]> wrote:Hi Nik-EPA has issued an RFP for funding for Wetlands Program Development Grants. This is how some of our new products are created -- or new outreach can be done. While the funding cannot go to nonprofits, with your as-sistance we may find that getting some training or information out to conservation commissions would be desir-able (and there might be some match possibilities for us too!).In the past, we sometimes have sought a letter of support from NHACC, but right now we are still forming proj-ects. EPA�s focus is on climate change, stream crossings (also related to climate change), and buffers.I think it would be good to talk about some thoughts you may have had that would work as projects under this RFP. Let me know when it would be a good time to talk.Thanks!SandySandy Crystall, PWS Water Quality Planning SectionWatershed Management Bureau603-271-2471 <tel:603-271-2471> NH Dept of Environmental ServicesPO Box 9529 Hazen Dr.Concord, NH 03302-0095des.nh.gov <http://des.nh.gov> -- ......................................................Nicholas Coates, Executive DirectorNH Association of Conservation Commissions54 Portsmouth StreetConcord, NH 03301603.224.7867 <tel:603.224.7867> [email protected] <http://www.nhacc.org/> <https://www.facebook.com/nhconservationcommissions> <http://instagram.com/nhconservation> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/5238144> <https://twitter.com/nhconscoms>


Check out our 2015 Workshop Offerings! <http://www.nhacc.org/education> Subscribe to our e-Newsletter! <http://nhacc.us8.list-manage2.com/subscribe?u=f8bbe90ad64317a23a57683c4&id=ca4e08d7b1> -- ......................................................Nicholas Coates, Executive DirectorNH Association of Conservation Commissions54 Portsmouth StreetConcord, NH 03301603.224.7867 <tel:603.224.7867> [email protected] <http://www.nhacc.org/> <https://www.facebook.com/nhconservationcommissions> <http://instagram.com/nhconservation> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/5238144> <https://twitter.com/nhconscoms> Check out our 2015 Workshop Offerings! <http://www.nhacc.org/education> Subscribe to our e-Newsletter! <http://nhacc.us8.list-manage2.com/subscribe?u=f8bbe90ad64317a23a57683c4&id=ca4e08d7b1> This electronic message is intended to be viewed only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed and maycontain privileged and/or confidential information intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). If you arenot the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, printing, copying, distribution or use of thisinformation is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately anddestroy this message and its attachments from your system.For information about GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. and its services, please visit our website at www.gza.com <http://www.gza.com/> .-- ......................................................Nicholas Coates, Executive DirectorNH Association of Conservation Commissions54 Portsmouth StreetConcord, NH [email protected] <http://www.nhacc.org/> <https://www.facebook.com/nhconservationcommissions> <http://instagram.com/nhconservation> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/5238144> <https://twitter.com/nhconscoms> Check out our 2015 Workshop Offerings! <http://www.nhacc.org/education> Subscribe to our e-Newsletter! <http://nhacc.us8.list-manage2.com/subscribe?u=f8bbe90ad64317a23a57683c4&id=ca4e08d7b1>

===========================================================================2015_05_18 RE Utility BMP Workgroup.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Utility BMP WorkgroupDate: Monday, May 18, 2015 1:54 PMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Paul, Amanda” <[email protected]>Conversation: Utility BMP WorkgroupOh no, I will add you to the mailing list.


From: Paul, Amanda [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 1:44 PMTo: Adams, CollisSubject: Utility BMP WorkgroupHi Collis!I have replaced Steve Morawski as the Env. Specialist for Tennessee Gas Pipeline in this area. He retired last month.I wanted to reach out to you to provide my contact information (attached), and to let you know that I will be the primary contact from Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas. Am I too late to join the team on this project?Thanks!Amanda PaulEnvironmental SpecialistTennessee Gas Pipeline Company - Division 10 Office8 Anngina DriveEnfield, CT 06082Office (860) 763-6022Cell (952)818-0990

===========================================================================2015_05_18 Utility BMP Workgroup.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Utility BMP WorkgroupDate: Monday, May 18, 2015 1:44 PMFrom: Paul, Amanda <[email protected]>To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>Conversation: Utility BMP WorkgroupHi Collis!I have replaced Steve Morawski as the Env. Specialist for Tennessee Gas Pipeline in this area. He retired last month.I wanted to reach out to you to provide my contact information (attached), and to let you know that I will be the primary contact from Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas. Am I too late to join the team on this project?Thanks!Amanda PaulEnvironmental SpecialistTennessee Gas Pipeline Company - Division 10 Office8 Anngina DriveEnfield, CT 06082Office (860) 763-6022Cell (952)818-0990

===========================================================================2015_05_21 FW Northeast Energy Direct Cumulative Impact Guidance.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: Northeast Energy Direct Cumulative Impact GuidanceDate: Thursday, May 21, 2015 9:50 AMFrom: David, Owen </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DAVID>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>


Cc: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>, “Diers, Ted” <[email protected]>Conversation: Northeast Energy Direct Cumulative Impact GuidanceTim,� Is this something you plan to provide DES comments to FERC on?� Thanks.�� Owen From: Eric Tomasi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 10:17 AMSubject: Northeast Energy Direct Cumulative Impact GuidanceHello,As promised here is the guidance we plan to give Tennessee Gas on the Region of Influence for various resourc-es for the Northeast Energy Direct. Specifically, I would like feedback on the Region of Influence for construc-tion on surface waters, wetlands, groundwater, vegetation, wildlife (and T&E species), fisheries, and soils; but feel free to comment on any of the various resources. I would like to point out that we specifically did not include safety in cumulative impacts. Typically, cumulative safety is typically addressed in areas such as land use, geology, etc. However, I would be interested in opinions on that issue.---1. Consult with land managing agencies, state and local planning agencies, and other appropriate enti-ties to identify past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future in the potential resource Region of Influence that could be affected by the NED Project, as indicated in the table below. The projects should include, but not be limited to: industrial or commercial facilities; mines; FERC jurisdictional projects; intrastate pipelines and com-pression; gathering pipelines; gas processing facilities; gas wells, industrial; infrastructure development (roads, bridges, rail, etc), housing developments, etc.Environmental ResourceRegion of Influence Surface Waters, Wetlands, Groundwater, Vegetation, Wildlife and Fisheries, SoilsHydrologic Unit Code 8/10/12 Watersheds.Cultural ResourcesOverlapping impacts on historic properties.Land Use (including visual and residential)1�2 mile from construction work areas. For other projects that im-pact more than 10 acres of land, use 5 miles.Noise - OperationOther facilities that would impact any noise sensitive area (NSA) that is within 1 mile of a NED compressor station.Noise - Construction1�4 mile from pipeline or aboveground facilities. Horizontal direction drill or direct pipe installation � 1�2 mile.Air Quality - OperationProvide an inventory of proposed and reasonable foreseeable air emission sources within 50 miles of the compressor stations, documenting their location, distance from the proposed project, estimated or permitted emissions for each criteria pollutant in tons per year and identify the potential incremental cumula-tive impacts of the Project. This does not include greenhouse gas emissions.Air Quality - Construction1�4 mile from pipeline or aboveground facilitiesSocioeconomicsAffected counties.Geology1�4 mile from pipeline or aboveground facilitiesInclude a table that identifies: a. the project(s) type/name and county;b. approximate distance and direction of the project(s) from the proposed NED Project facilities;c. a description of the project(s); andd. the current status and schedule of the project(s) (e.g., proposed for October 2016, under construction, completed).Include a description of cumulative and/or overlapping impacts these projects and the planned NED Project would have on each environmental resource. Also include descriptions of the measures that would be imple-mented to minimize these impacts. Lastly, include a map showing the identified projects in relation to the planned NED Project. In addition, this cumulative discussion should include any available information on


regional predictive climate change effects and the resultant cumulative impact on resources and on the planned NED Project.

===========================================================================2015_06_11 Tennessee - NED Compressor Station Info. Deletion of Worcestor and Stamford Laterals.

TXT===========================================================================

2015_06_11 Tennessee - NED Compressor Station Info. Deletion of Worcestor and Stamford Laterals: NED Project_Lateral Deletion Letter.docx NED_COMPRESSOR_STATION_MAPS_rev3_06-01-2015....pdf NED_CSLocations_Update_FERC(June 1 2015).docxSubject: Tennessee - NED Compressor Station Info. & Deletion of Worcestor and Stamford Laterals.Date: Thursday, June 11, 2015 12:49 PMFrom: Eric Tomasi <[email protected]>To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected].


ma.us” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, Nancy Fox-Fernandez <[email protected]>, Amanda Mardiney <[email protected]>, Paul Friedman <[email protected]>, Rafael Montag <[email protected]>, “Howard, Jennifer (DCR)” <[email protected]>, “Muzzey, Elizabeth” <[email protected]>, “Boisvert, Richard A” <[email protected]>, “Hoffer, Melissa (AGO)” <[email protected]>, “Ireland, Matthew (AGO)” <[email protected]>, Peggy Sloan <[email protected]>Cc: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Cairns, Sara” <[email protected]>, “Doig, Rebecca (DEP)” <[email protected]>, “Walsh-Rogalski, William” <[email protected]>, John Kallfelz <[email protected]>, “Diers, Ted” <[email protected]>, “Chandler, Wade B NAB” <[email protected]>, “Fetterman, Marvin F. (DOT)” <[email protected]>, “Feighner, Edna” <[email protected]>, Henry Underwood <[email protected]>, Tim Murphy <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee - NED Compressor Station Info. & Deletion of Worcestor and Stamford Laterals.Hello,Sorry for the delay in sending this out. Tennessee filed its compressor station locations. I have attached the maps and its transmittal letter. In addition Tennessee has deleted the Stamford, CT lateral and Worcester, MA lateral.*************************************Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionOffice: (202) 502-8097Mobile: (202) 297-1391*************************************

===========================================================================2015_07_01 FW July 23rd NECA Environmental Conference.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: July 23rd NECA Environmental ConferenceDate: Wednesday, July 1, 2015 10:39 AMFrom: Wright, Craig </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=WRIGHT>To: “Roberge, Michele” <[email protected]>Conversation: July 23rd NECA Environmental ConferenceOriginal e-mailFrom: Modica, Lysa G [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 2:39 PMTo: Wright, CraigSubject: July 23rd NECA Environmental ConferenceHi Craig:


As I noted in my voice message, the NECA environmental conference will be held July 23rd at the Doubletree in Westborough, MA. The regulatory roundtable will be from 2:45 to 4:30 pm and we would like to invite you (or your designee) to speak at this session. The theme for the conference and the session is future regulatory challenges facing power generation and fuels siting. Do you see any pending regulations that would streamline or complicate new facilities or modifications? Do you have any thoughts on the Clean Power Plan (I know it�s still early for this)? Any lessons learned from boiler and utility MACT? Any �take aways� from the Kinder Morgan process? Please let me know your thoughts on this so we can complete the agenda for the conference.Lysa G. ModicaSenior Project ManagerAMEC Foster Wheeler Environment and Infrastructure271 Mill RoadChelmsford, MA 01824D (978) 392-5351C (978) 303-7126E [email protected] message is the property of Amec Foster Wheeler plc and/or its subsidiaries and/or affiliates and is intended only for the named recipient(s). Its contents (including any attachments) may be confidential, legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure by law. Unauthorised use, copying, distribution or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful and is strictly prohibited. We assume no responsibility to persons other than the intended named recipient(s) and do not accept liability for any errors or omissions which are a result of email transmis-sion. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply email to the sender and confirm that the original message and any attachments and copies have been destroyed and deleted from your system. This disclaimer applies to any and all messages originating from us and set out above. For Canada and the United States: If you believe this is an unsolicited email and do not wish to receive future commercial elec-tronic messages from us, please click [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]?Subject=Unsubscribe> and include �Unsubscribe� in the subject line.Please click http://amecfw.com/email-disclaimer for notices and company information in relation to emails originating in the UK, Italy or France.

===========================================================================2015_07_08 Availability for Meeting with FERC - Northeast Energy Direct Project - July 2930.TXT===========================================================================

2015_07_08 Availability for Meeting with FERC - Northeast Energy Direct Project - July 2930: image001.jpg image002.png image003.png image004.png image005.png image006.pngSubject: Availability for Meeting with FERC - Northeast Energy Direct Project - July 29/30Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 5:34 PMFrom: Jennifer Harris <[email protected]>To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <owen.


[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>Conversation: Availability for Meeting with FERC - Northeast Energy Direct Project - July 29/30Good Afternoon Everyone-As discussed on the Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Bi-weekly call the other week, FERC would like to ar-range a meeting with the New Hampshire State agencies sometime on July 29th or 30th (preferably the 29th if possible) to discuss the project. We have scheduled a scoping meeting on the 29th in Nashua and another scop-ing meeting on the 30th in Milford. We are planning on holding an additional scoping meeting near Winchester sometime the week of the 27th; however, the location and date has not been finalized. Please let me know if 1) you or someone from your agency is interested in participating in a meeting with FERC to discuss the NED project, 2) if the above dates works with your schedule, and 3) if there is a preferred location/date/time for a meeting. Due to the tight schedule for scoping we would like to hold one meeting for all interested NH agency staff to attend. Please let me know if you have any additional questions.Regards-JenniferJennifer Harris PROJECT SCIENTISTNATURAL RESOURCES & HEALTH SCIENCES DIVISIONCARDNODirect (+1) 302-395-1919 Mobile (+1) 703-927-3085 Address P.O. Box 230, Harrisonburg, VA 22803Email [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Web www.cardno.com <http://www.cardno.com> CONNECT WITH CARDNO <http://www.linkedin.com/company/cardno> <https://twitter.com/cardno> <https://www.facebook.com/CardnoGlobal> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChnRtfJ_XrGJkMOgsrD-mqBw> <http://www.cardno.com/en-us/AboutUs/Pages/Company-History.aspx> This email and its attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). All electronically supplied data must be checked against an applicable hardcopy version which shall be the only document which Cardno warrants accuracy. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, distribution or copying of the information contained in this email and its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please email the sender by replying to this message and immediately de-lete and destroy any copies of this email and any attachments. The views or opinions expressed are the author’s own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Cardno.

===========================================================================2015_07_16 Kinder Morgan Gas Pipeline - conversation with Harry Stewart (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder Morgan Gas Pipeline - conversation with Harry StewartDate: Thursday, July 16, 2015 12:13 PMFrom: Comstock, Gregg </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=COMSTOCK>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Cc: “Diers, Ted” <[email protected]>, “David, Owen” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan Gas Pipeline - conversation with Harry StewartConversation on 7/16/15 with Harry Stewart of Normandeau Associates regarding the proposed Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline through the southern part of NH. Harry wanted to get a better understanding of what 401 requirements might be. They hope to submit an application to the SEC this November. 1. I informed Harry I would not be able to attend the 7/29 meeting but that Owen David would attend.


2. I told Harry that everything discussed today is preliminary as we have not seen an application yet.3. Harry�s goal is to get a clear understanding of our 401 needs so that when they file the application in No-vember we can deem it complete per SEC regulations (after we deem it complete we enter into the Tech review phase during which we can request info if needed).4. The pipeline is approximately 30 inches in diameter and will extend approximately 70+ miles through towns in southern NH before entering back into MA.5. NAI is responsible for the permitting but not the engineering.6. Pollutant Loading Analyses (PLAs).a. I explained these are meant for permanent features where land use has been changed. Harry said there will be an approximate 12 acre compressor station and a one meter station. They will plan on conducting PLAs for these.7. Hydrostatic Pressure Testing of Pipesa. They will show withdrawal and discharge points. Discharges will be to contained areas (surrounded by hay bales) to dissipate flow and convert channelized flow to sheet flow prior to entering receiving water. I said we�ll need info on the withdrawal (e.g., volume, flow rate) and the source water (e.g., how much will be left under low flow conditions), distance to receiving water (should be as far as possible), etc. RSA 485-A:12, III may apply (depends on if the withdrawal threshold is reached).8. Harry spoke with Mitch Locher who said they would issue a Temporary Discharge Permit. I said I spoke with Jeff Andrews who advised that the EPA NPDES General Remediation may apply. Harry will look into this.9. Construction Inspection and Turbidity and Mixing Zones. a. They will have an Environmental Monitor on site (this is good).b. They will be submitting erosion control plans and table showing expected construction techniques at each waterbody crossing.c. A 401 requirement will likely be that they need to submit a Turbidity / Mixing Zone request to use for approval (similar to the process we�ve established with DOT for I-93. We always try to minimize the length of mixing zones. I will send Harry a copy of the guidance we use on I-93 with DOT ([email protected]). Not everything in the guidance will apply, but some will. Details will need to be worked out later. d. We will coordinate with Alteration of Terrain as much as possible. e. They will have 3-5 locations of horizontal directional drilling (HDD). I mentioned a concern with frac out of the bentonite clay used to lubricate the shaft. They will address this.10. Chloride � If they aren�t going to use rock salt they should state so, otherwise there will likely be a condi-tion to minimize rock salt by making sure salt applicators are certified under the Green Sno Pro program .11. Herbicides and Pesticides - If they aren�t going to use Herbicides and Pesticides they should state so, oth-erwise there will likely be a condition to follow established regulations (Owen � see Balsams for regulations).12. Fertilizer � We did not discuss these. If they are only going to use fertilizer once for initial application, ok. If there will be additional applications, we will likely add a condition to minimize use to the extent practicable.13. Pre/Post construction monitoring � we didn�t discuss this. I�m not sure one will be needed. It depends. It�s possible the 401 may say that unless otherwise directed by DES, submit a pre and post construction monitoring plan and implement the approved plan. Gregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>


===========================================================================2015_07_16 Kinder Morgan Gas Pipeline - conversation with Harry Stewart.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder Morgan Gas Pipeline - conversation with Harry StewartDate: Thursday, July 16, 2015 12:13 PMFrom: Comstock, Gregg </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=COMSTOCK>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Cc: “Diers, Ted” <[email protected]>, “David, Owen” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan Gas Pipeline - conversation with Harry StewartConversation on 7/16/15 with Harry Stewart of Normandeau Associates regarding the proposed Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline through the southern part of NH. Harry wanted to get a better understanding of what 401 requirements might be. They hope to submit an application to the SEC this November. 1. I informed Harry I would not be able to attend the 7/29 meeting but that Owen David would attend.2. I told Harry that everything discussed today is preliminary as we have not seen an application yet.3. Harry�s goal is to get a clear understanding of our 401 needs so that when they file the application in No-vember we can deem it complete per SEC regulations (after we deem it complete we enter into the Tech review phase during which we can request info if needed).4. The pipeline is approximately 30 inches in diameter and will extend approximately 70+ miles through towns in southern NH before entering back into MA.5. NAI is responsible for the permitting but not the engineering.6. Pollutant Loading Analyses (PLAs).a. I explained these are meant for permanent features where land use has been changed. Harry said there will be an approximate 12 acre compressor station and a one meter station. They will plan on conducting PLAs for these.7. Hydrostatic Pressure Testing of Pipesa. They will show withdrawal and discharge points. Discharges will be to contained areas (surrounded by hay bales) to dissipate flow and convert channelized flow to sheet flow prior to entering receiving water. I said we�ll need info on the withdrawal (e.g., volume, flow rate) and the source water (e.g., how much will be left under low flow conditions), distance to receiving water (should be as far as possible), etc. RSA 485-A:12, III may apply (depends on if the withdrawal threshold is reached).8. Harry spoke with Mitch Locher who said they would issue a Temporary Discharge Permit. I said I spoke with Jeff Andrews who advised that the EPA NPDES General Remediation may apply. Harry will look into this.9. Construction Inspection and Turbidity and Mixing Zones. a. They will have an Environmental Monitor on site (this is good).b. They will be submitting erosion control plans and table showing expected construction techniques at each waterbody crossing.c. A 401 requirement will likely be that they need to submit a Turbidity / Mixing Zone request to use for approval (similar to the process we�ve established with DOT for I-93. We always try to minimize the length of mixing zones. I will send Harry a copy of the guidance we use on I-93 with DOT ([email protected]). Not everything in the guidance will apply, but some will. Details will need to be worked out later. d. We will coordinate with Alteration of Terrain as much as possible. e. They will have 3-5 locations of horizontal directional drilling (HDD). I mentioned a concern with frac out of the bentonite clay used to lubricate the shaft. They will address this.10. Chloride � If they aren�t going to use rock salt they should state so, otherwise there will likely be a condi-tion to minimize rock salt by making sure salt applicators are certified under the Green Sno Pro program .11. Herbicides and Pesticides - If they aren�t going to use Herbicides and Pesticides they should state so, oth-erwise there will likely be a condition to follow established regulations (Owen � see Balsams for regulations).12. Fertilizer � We did not discuss these. If they are only going to use fertilizer once for initial application, ok.


If there will be additional applications, we will likely add a condition to minimize use to the extent practicable.13. Pre/Post construction monitoring � we didn�t discuss this. I�m not sure one will be needed. It depends. It�s possible the 401 may say that unless otherwise directed by DES, submit a pre and post construction monitoring plan and implement the approved plan. Gregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2015_07_17 Gas Pipeline Project - TurbidityMixing Zones guidance and other potential 401 issues (2).

TXT===========================================================================

2015_07_17 Gas Pipeline Project - TurbidityMixing Zones guidance and other potential 401 issues (2): 20130814_FINAL_Unified_Erosion_Control_Guidance_for_DOT pr....pdfSubject: Gas Pipeline Project - TurbidityMixing Zones guidance and other potential 401 issuesDate: Friday, July 17, 2015 10:21 AMFrom: Comstock, Gregg </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=COMSTOCK>To: “Harry Stewart ([email protected])” <[email protected]>Cc: “Diers, Ted” <[email protected]>, “David, Owen” <[email protected]>Conversation: Gas Pipeline Project - TurbidityMixing Zones guidance and other potential 401 issuesHi Harry,Good talking with you yesterday.As requested, a copy of the latest BMP Inspection and Maintenance, Turbidity and Sediment Monitoring guid-ance we developed with the NH DOT for the I-93 expansion project in southern NH is attached. Based on the guidance, DOT provides us with mixing zone/turbidity monitoring requests for review and approval. Not all of the guidance may be needed in all locations of the pipeline project � these are details that I envision would be worked out after SEC approval (which would include 401 conditions) and during our review of mixing zone/turbidity monitoring requests. You may also want to review the conditions in section E of the draft 401 water quality certification (WQC) for the Balsam�s project which is on our website (see http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/sec-tion401/documents/draft-wqc-2014-404p-001.pdf). Condition E-7 requires submittal of a construction storm-water pollution prevention plan (CSWPPP) which references an earlier version of the attached guidance (which is similar in many respects to the most recent version mentioned above). Yesterday we discussed the pollutant loading analyses, hydrostatic pressure testing of pipes (and potential dis-charge/withdrawal issues), construction inspection/ turbidity monitoring /mixing zones, chlorides and herbicides and pesticides. We did not talk about fertilizer or temperature impacts , permanent bmp inspection plans, or pre and post construction monitoring, which might also be necessary for this project. As discussed below, the conditions in the Balsam�s draft certification provide examples of how we�ve addressed these issues on other projects. Condition E-19 in the Balsams draft WQC addresses fertilizers. To determine if the impact of nutrients due to fertilizer application is an issue or not, it would be helpful to know if you will be applying fertilizer only once (for initial turf establishment) or on a more regular (i.e. annual) basis, where it will be applied (general descrip-tion) and the application rate and nitrogen / phosphorus content of the fertilizer (will it comply with the new fertilizer law (see Finding D-19). With regards to potential temperature impacts, see condition E-19 of the Balsam�s draft WQC for the type of


information that helps us determine if clearing and/or stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces will likely have an adverse impact on surface water temperature. If you don�t feel this is an issue, explain why. For your information we will likely require a permanent BMP inspection and maintenance plan (see E-21 for an example condition) and possibly a pre and/or post construction monitoring plan (see E-23 for an example condi-tion) both of which are usually submitted after the certification is issued. Please be reminded that the information above is provided as preliminary guidance for planning purposes as we have not seen any plans or an application. Final conditions for the pipeline project may be different and will depend on our review of the application. Finally, please advise if this will require an individual 404 permit from the Army Corps, or if it will fall under the Programmatic General Permit (PGP).Thank you Harry. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.Regards,Gregg Gregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2015_07_17 Gas Pipeline Project - TurbidityMixing Zones guidance and other potential 401 issues.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_07_17 Gas Pipeline Project - TurbidityMixing Zones guidance and other potential 401 issues: 20130814_FINAL_Unified_Erosion_Control_Guidance_for_DOT pr....pdfSubject: Gas Pipeline Project - TurbidityMixing Zones guidance and other potential 401 issuesDate: Friday, July 17, 2015 10:21 AMFrom: Comstock, Gregg </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=COMSTOCK>To: “Harry Stewart ([email protected])” <[email protected]>Cc: “Diers, Ted” <[email protected]>, “David, Owen” <[email protected]>Conversation: Gas Pipeline Project - TurbidityMixing Zones guidance and other potential 401 issuesHi Harry,Good talking with you yesterday.As requested, a copy of the latest BMP Inspection and Maintenance, Turbidity and Sediment Monitoring guid-ance we developed with the NH DOT for the I-93 expansion project in southern NH is attached. Based on the guidance, DOT provides us with mixing zone/turbidity monitoring requests for review and approval. Not all of the guidance may be needed in all locations of the pipeline project � these are details that I envision would be worked out after SEC approval (which would include 401 conditions) and during our review of mixing zone/turbidity monitoring requests. You may also want to review the conditions in section E of the draft 401 water quality certification (WQC) for the Balsam�s project which is on our website (see http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/sec-tion401/documents/draft-wqc-2014-404p-001.pdf). Condition E-7 requires submittal of a construction storm-water pollution prevention plan (CSWPPP) which references an earlier version of the attached guidance (which is similar in many respects to the most recent version mentioned above). Yesterday we discussed the pollutant loading analyses, hydrostatic pressure testing of pipes (and potential dis-charge/withdrawal issues), construction inspection/ turbidity monitoring /mixing zones, chlorides and herbicides and pesticides. We did not talk about fertilizer or temperature impacts , permanent bmp inspection plans, or pre and post construction monitoring, which might also be necessary for this project. As discussed below, the


conditions in the Balsam�s draft certification provide examples of how we�ve addressed these issues on other projects. Condition E-19 in the Balsams draft WQC addresses fertilizers. To determine if the impact of nutrients due to fertilizer application is an issue or not, it would be helpful to know if you will be applying fertilizer only once (for initial turf establishment) or on a more regular (i.e. annual) basis, where it will be applied (general descrip-tion) and the application rate and nitrogen / phosphorus content of the fertilizer (will it comply with the new fertilizer law (see Finding D-19). With regards to potential temperature impacts, see condition E-19 of the Balsam�s draft WQC for the type of information that helps us determine if clearing and/or stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces will likely have an adverse impact on surface water temperature. If you don�t feel this is an issue, explain why. For your information we will likely require a permanent BMP inspection and maintenance plan (see E-21 for an example condition) and possibly a pre and/or post construction monitoring plan (see E-23 for an example condi-tion) both of which are usually submitted after the certification is issued. Please be reminded that the information above is provided as preliminary guidance for planning purposes as we have not seen any plans or an application. Final conditions for the pipeline project may be different and will depend on our review of the application. Finally, please advise if this will require an individual 404 permit from the Army Corps, or if it will fall under the Programmatic General Permit (PGP).Thank you Harry. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.Regards,Gregg Gregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2015_07_21 RE Kinder Morgan Gas Pipeline - conversation with Harry Stewart.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Kinder Morgan Gas Pipeline - conversation with Harry StewartDate: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 10:37 AMFrom: David, Owen </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DAVID>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Cc: “Diers, Ted” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan Gas Pipeline - conversation with Harry StewartGregg, Is this a meeting with just watershed or multiple bureaus? Who is organizing the meeting I did not get an invite yet? From: Comstock, Gregg Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 12:13 PMTo: Comstock, GreggCc: Diers, Ted; David, OwenSubject: Kinder Morgan Gas Pipeline - conversation with Harry StewartConversation on 7/16/15 with Harry Stewart of Normandeau Associates regarding the proposed Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline through the southern part of NH. Harry wanted to get a better understanding of what 401 requirements might be. They hope to submit an application to the SEC this November.


1. I informed Harry I would not be able to attend the 7/29 meeting but that Owen David would attend.2. I told Harry that everything discussed today is preliminary as we have not seen an application yet.3. Harry�s goal is to get a clear understanding of our 401 needs so that when they file the application in No-vember we can deem it complete per SEC regulations (after we deem it complete we enter into the Tech review phase during which we can request info if needed).4. The pipeline is approximately 30 inches in diameter and will extend approximately 70+ miles through towns in southern NH before entering back into MA.5. NAI is responsible for the permitting but not the engineering.6. Pollutant Loading Analyses (PLAs).a. I explained these are meant for permanent features where land use has been changed. Harry said there will be an approximate 12 acre compressor station and a one meter station. They will plan on conducting PLAs for these.7. Hydrostatic Pressure Testing of Pipesa. They will show withdrawal and discharge points. Discharges will be to contained areas (surrounded by hay bales) to dissipate flow and convert channelized flow to sheet flow prior to entering receiving water. I said we�ll need info on the withdrawal (e.g., volume, flow rate) and the source water (e.g., how much will be left under low flow conditions), distance to receiving water (should be as far as possible), etc. RSA 485-A:12, III may apply (depends on if the withdrawal threshold is reached).8. Harry spoke with Mitch Locher who said they would issue a Temporary Discharge Permit. I said I spoke with Jeff Andrews who advised that the EPA NPDES General Remediation may apply. Harry will look into this.9. Construction Inspection and Turbidity and Mixing Zones. a. They will have an Environmental Monitor on site (this is good).b. They will be submitting erosion control plans and table showing expected construction techniques at each waterbody crossing.c. A 401 requirement will likely be that they need to submit a Turbidity / Mixing Zone request to use for approval (similar to the process we�ve established with DOT for I-93. We always try to minimize the length of mixing zones. I will send Harry a copy of the guidance we use on I-93 with DOT ([email protected]). Not everything in the guidance will apply, but some will. Details will need to be worked out later. d. We will coordinate with Alteration of Terrain as much as possible. e. They will have 3-5 locations of horizontal directional drilling (HDD). I mentioned a concern with frac out of the bentonite clay used to lubricate the shaft. They will address this.10. Chloride � If they aren�t going to use rock salt they should state so, otherwise there will likely be a condi-tion to minimize rock salt by making sure salt applicators are certified under the Green Sno Pro program .11. Herbicides and Pesticides - If they aren�t going to use Herbicides and Pesticides they should state so, oth-erwise there will likely be a condition to follow established regulations (Owen � see Balsams for regulations).12. Fertilizer � We did not discuss these. If they are only going to use fertilizer once for initial application, ok. If there will be additional applications, we will likely add a condition to minimize use to the extent practicable.13. Pre/Post construction monitoring � we didn�t discuss this. I�m not sure one will be needed. It depends. It�s possible the 401 may say that unless otherwise directed by DES, submit a pre and post construction monitoring plan and implement the approved plan. Gregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected]


===========================================================================2015_07_27 FW NED - Meeting with Wetlands and Air 729 (2).TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_07_27 FW NED - Meeting with Wetlands and Air 729 (2): Agenda for July 29 DES meeting Wetlands.docx Agenda for July 29 meeting Air Resources Division.docxSubject: FW: NED - Meeting with Wetlands and Air 7/29Date: Monday, July 27, 2015 2:49 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>, “Forst, Darlene” <[email protected]>, “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>, “Dorfschmidt, Barbara” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Cc: “Dethlefs, Lauren” <[email protected]>, “Hart, Jennifer” <[email protected]>Conversation: NED - Meeting with Wetlands and Air 7/29Good afternoon, Folks. The following list and agenda are for the two Wednesday, July 29 meetings for the Northeast energy Direct Project proposed by Kinder Morgan. TimFrom: Adele Fiorillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 2:35 PMTo: Drew, TimCc: Harry StewartSubject: NED - Meeting with Wetlands and Air 7/29Hello Tim: Attached is an agenda for the Wednesday morning and afternoon meetings. Can you please dis-tribute to those attending from DES? Here is the attendee list from our end for these meetings. Everyone will attend the Wetlands meeting except Brian Stormwind. Everyone plus Brian Stormwind will attend the Air meet-ing. Adele FiorilloTheresa AlbaneseSergio BonillaHarry StewartBarry DuffKasia IngramBrian Stormwind (Air Div meeting only) Let me know if you need anything else. Otherwise, see you Wednesday. Thank you , AdeleADELE FIORILLO Senior Principal ScientistNormandeau Associates, Inc.30 International Drive - Suite 6, Portsmouth, NH 03801603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.normandeau.com <www.normandeau.com> The information contained in this electronic mail transmission and its attachments may be confidential and pro-tected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient (or an individual responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you are strictly prohibited from copying, disseminating or distribut-ing this communication. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all electronic, paper or other versions. The sender does not waive confidentiality in the event of any inadvertent transmission to an unauthorized recipient. No representation is made by the sender that this com-munication is virus-free. The recipient alone is responsible for taking appropriate measures to ensure that the e-mail is virus-free.


Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2015_07_27 FW NED - Meeting with Wetlands and Air 729.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_07_27 FW NED - Meeting with Wetlands and Air 729: Agenda for July 29 DES meeting Wetlands.docx Agenda for July 29 meeting Air Resources Division.docxSubject: FW: NED - Meeting with Wetlands and Air 7/29Date: Monday, July 27, 2015 2:49 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>, “Forst, Darlene” <[email protected]>, “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>, “Dorfschmidt, Barbara” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Cc: “Dethlefs, Lauren” <[email protected]>, “Hart, Jennifer” <[email protected]>Conversation: NED - Meeting with Wetlands and Air 7/29Good afternoon, Folks. The following list and agenda are for the two Wednesday, July 29 meetings for the Northeast energy Direct Project proposed by Kinder Morgan. TimFrom: Adele Fiorillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 2:35 PMTo: Drew, TimCc: Harry StewartSubject: NED - Meeting with Wetlands and Air 7/29Hello Tim: Attached is an agenda for the Wednesday morning and afternoon meetings. Can you please dis-tribute to those attending from DES? Here is the attendee list from our end for these meetings. Everyone will attend the Wetlands meeting except Brian Stormwind. Everyone plus Brian Stormwind will attend the Air meet-ing. Adele FiorilloTheresa AlbaneseSergio BonillaHarry StewartBarry DuffKasia IngramBrian Stormwind (Air Div meeting only) Let me know if you need anything else. Otherwise, see you Wednesday. Thank you , AdeleADELE FIORILLO Senior Principal ScientistNormandeau Associates, Inc.30 International Drive - Suite 6, Portsmouth, NH 03801603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.normandeau.com <www.normandeau.com> The information contained in this electronic mail transmission and its attachments may be confidential and pro-tected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient (or an individual responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you are strictly prohibited from copying, disseminating or distribut-ing this communication. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all electronic, paper or other versions. The sender does not waive confidentiality in the event of any inadvertent transmission to an unauthorized recipient. No representation is made by the sender that this com-


munication is virus-free. The recipient alone is responsible for taking appropriate measures to ensure that the e-mail is virus-free.Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2015_09_02 Kinder Morgan (2).TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_09_02 Kinder Morgan (2): Minutes 6-11-15.docx Minutes 6-25-15.docx Minutes 7-23-15.docx Minutes 7-9-15.docx Minutes 8-20-15.docx Minutes 8-6-15.docxSubject: Kinder MorganDate: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 9:35 AMFrom: Henderson, Carol </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CHENDERSON>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder MorganHere are the last 6 meeting Minutes. Enjoy�Carol

===========================================================================2015_09_02 RE West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15 (10).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 1:11 PMFrom: Gries, Gabriel </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GABRIEL.GRIES>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>, “Henderson, Carol” <[email protected]>Cc: “David, Owen” <[email protected]>Conversation: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15I’m not in office today till after 4And don’t have it with me________________________________________From: Comstock, GreggSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 12:14 PMTo: Gries, Gabriel; Henderson, CarolCc: David, OwenSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15Thanks Gabe,Could you please forward Melissa’s email?ThanksGreggGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095


[email protected] Message-----From: Gries, GabrielSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 12:13 PMTo: Henderson, Carol; Comstock, GreggCc: David, OwenSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15I on planning providing minimal comments. I emailed with Melissa and she is planning on providing comments including some related to the mussels. Carol, will you be able to efile the comments for me.________________________________________From: Henderson, CarolSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 9:09 AMTo: Comstock, Gregg; Gries, GabrielCc: David, OwenSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15Hi Gregg:Typically we refer all comments about DWM to the USFWS since it is federally listed. I am overwhelmed with having to comment on the Kinder Morgan project which is due Friday, so I can�t see fitting this in at this time. I will contact Melissa Grader, who will most likely comment and I can provide a letter of support of the US-WFS letter from the Department at a minimum.I am curious also. Is DES providing comment on the resource reports for the Northeast Direct line project(Kinder Morgan)? We have a bi-weekly meeting with FERC and most of the time, DES is not represent-ed? Just curious about when DES will be participating since it is a federal project. Between this project and Northern Pass, it seems almost impossible to keep up. Please let me know. Thanks, CarolFrom: Comstock, GreggSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 8:31 AMTo: Henderson, Carol; Gries, GabrielCc: David, OwenSubject: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15HI Carol and Gabe,Comments on the PAD and recommendations for studies for the West Street Hydro project on the Ashuelot River in Keene (FERC # 14471) are due 9/7/15. Do you plan to respond?We may recommend a water quality study. Dwarf wedge mussels (DWMs) are also a concern. Any thoughts on additional studies to address the impact of adding 1 foot flashboards on the DWMs?Please let me know today. Give me a call if that�s easier.Thanks very much.GreggGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning Section NH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Manage-ment Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


===========================================================================Subject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15


Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 12:12 PMFrom: Gries, Gabriel </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GABRIEL.GRIES>To: “Henderson, Carol” <[email protected]>, “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Cc: “David, Owen” <[email protected]>Conversation: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15I on planning providing minimal comments. I emailed with Melissa and she is planning on providing comments including some related to the mussels. Carol, will you be able to efile the comments for me. ________________________________________From: Henderson, CarolSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 9:09 AMTo: Comstock, Gregg; Gries, GabrielCc: David, OwenSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15Hi Gregg:Typically we refer all comments about DWM to the USFWS since it is federally listed. I am overwhelmed with having to comment on the Kinder Morgan project which is due Friday, so I can�t see fitting this in at this time. I will contact Melissa Grader, who will most likely comment and I can provide a letter of support of the US-WFS letter from the Department at a minimum.I am curious also. Is DES providing comment on the resource reports for the Northeast Direct line project(Kinder Morgan)? We have a bi-weekly meeting with FERC and most of the time, DES is not represent-ed? Just curious about when DES will be participating since it is a federal project. Between this project and Northern Pass, it seems almost impossible to keep up. Please let me know. Thanks, CarolFrom: Comstock, GreggSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 8:31 AMTo: Henderson, Carol; Gries, GabrielCc: David, OwenSubject: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15HI Carol and Gabe,Comments on the PAD and recommendations for studies for the West Street Hydro project on the Ashuelot River in Keene (FERC # 14471) are due 9/7/15. Do you plan to respond?We may recommend a water quality study. Dwarf wedge mussels (DWMs) are also a concern. Any thoughts on additional studies to address the impact of adding 1 foot flashboards on the DWMs?Please let me know today. Give me a call if that�s easier.Thanks very much.GreggGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


===========================================================================Subject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 9:09 AM


From: Henderson, Carol </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CHENDERSON>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>, “Gries, Gabriel” <[email protected]>Cc: “David, Owen” <[email protected]>Conversation: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15Hi Gregg:Typically we refer all comments about DWM to the USFWS since it is federally listed. I am overwhelmed with having to comment on the Kinder Morgan project which is due Friday, so I can�t see fitting this in at this time. I will contact Melissa Grader, who will most likely comment and I can provide a letter of support of the US-WFS letter from the Department at a minimum. I am curious also. Is DES providing comment on the resource reports for the Northeast Direct line project(Kinder Morgan)? We have a bi-weekly meeting with FERC and most of the time, DES is not represent-ed? Just curious about when DES will be participating since it is a federal project. Between this project and Northern Pass, it seems almost impossible to keep up. Please let me know. Thanks, CarolFrom: Comstock, Gregg Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 8:31 AMTo: Henderson, Carol; Gries, GabrielCc: David, OwenSubject: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15HI Carol and Gabe,Comments on the PAD and recommendations for studies for the West Street Hydro project on the Ashuelot River in Keene (FERC # 14471) are due 9/7/15. Do you plan to respond?We may recommend a water quality study. Dwarf wedge mussels (DWMs) are also a concern. Any thoughts on additional studies to address the impact of adding 1 foot flashboards on the DWMs?Please let me know today. Give me a call if that�s easier.Thanks very much.GreggGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 3:54 PMFrom: Gries, Gabriel </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GABRIEL.GRIES>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Conversation: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15Sorry. She said she would forward me her comments but I have not seen anything from her yet. ________________________________________From: Comstock, GreggSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 2:00 PMTo: Gries, GabrielSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15


Hi Gabe,Perhaps I misunderstood. I thought Melissa sent you an email with her comments. If so, I was requesting a copy of the email she sent to you.GGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected] Message-----From: Gries, GabrielSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 1:55 PMTo: Comstock, GreggSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15This should be [email protected]________________________________________From: Comstock, GreggSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 1:39 PMTo: Gries, GabrielSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15No problem.When you get a chance.Thanks Gabe.GGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning Section NH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Manage-ment Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected] Message-----From: Gries, GabrielSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 1:11 PMTo: Comstock, Gregg; Henderson, CarolCc: David, OwenSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15I’m not in office today till after 4And don’t have it with me________________________________________From: Comstock, GreggSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 12:14 PMTo: Gries, Gabriel; Henderson, CarolCc: David, OwenSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15Thanks Gabe,Could you please forward Melissa’s email?


ThanksGreggGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning Section NH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Manage-ment Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected] Message-----From: Gries, GabrielSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 12:13 PMTo: Henderson, Carol; Comstock, GreggCc: David, OwenSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15I on planning providing minimal comments. I emailed with Melissa and she is planning on providing comments including some related to the mussels. Carol, will you be able to efile the comments for me.________________________________________From: Henderson, CarolSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 9:09 AMTo: Comstock, Gregg; Gries, GabrielCc: David, OwenSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15Hi Gregg:Typically we refer all comments about DWM to the USFWS since it is federally listed. I am overwhelmed with having to comment on the Kinder Morgan project which is due Friday, so I can�t see fitting this in at this time. I will contact Melissa Grader, who will most likely comment and I can provide a letter of support of the US-WFS letter from the Department at a minimum.I am curious also. Is DES providing comment on the resource reports for the Northeast Direct line project(Kinder Morgan)? We have a bi-weekly meeting with FERC and most of the time, DES is not represent-ed? Just curious about when DES will be participating since it is a federal project. Between this project and Northern Pass, it seems almost impossible to keep up. Please let me know. Thanks, CarolFrom: Comstock, GreggSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 8:31 AMTo: Henderson, Carol; Gries, GabrielCc: David, OwenSubject: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15HI Carol and Gabe,Comments on the PAD and recommendations for studies for the West Street Hydro project on the Ashuelot River in Keene (FERC # 14471) are due 9/7/15. Do you plan to respond?We may recommend a water quality study. Dwarf wedge mussels (DWMs) are also a concern. Any thoughts on additional studies to address the impact of adding 1 foot flashboards on the DWMs?Please let me know today. Give me a call if that�s easier.Thanks very much.GreggGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning Section NH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Manage-ment Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095


[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


===========================================================================Subject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 1:54 PMFrom: Gries, Gabriel </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GABRIEL.GRIES>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Conversation: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15This should be [email protected]________________________________________From: Comstock, GreggSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 1:39 PMTo: Gries, GabrielSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15No problem.When you get a chance.Thanks Gabe.GGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected] Message-----From: Gries, GabrielSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 1:11 PMTo: Comstock, Gregg; Henderson, CarolCc: David, OwenSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15I’m not in office today till after 4And don’t have it with me________________________________________From: Comstock, GreggSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 12:14 PMTo: Gries, Gabriel; Henderson, CarolCc: David, OwenSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15Thanks Gabe,Could you please forward Melissa’s email?ThanksGreggGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning Section NH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Manage-


ment Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected] Message-----From: Gries, GabrielSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 12:13 PMTo: Henderson, Carol; Comstock, GreggCc: David, OwenSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15I on planning providing minimal comments. I emailed with Melissa and she is planning on providing comments including some related to the mussels. Carol, will you be able to efile the comments for me.________________________________________From: Henderson, CarolSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 9:09 AMTo: Comstock, Gregg; Gries, GabrielCc: David, OwenSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15Hi Gregg:Typically we refer all comments about DWM to the USFWS since it is federally listed. I am overwhelmed with having to comment on the Kinder Morgan project which is due Friday, so I can�t see fitting this in at this time. I will contact Melissa Grader, who will most likely comment and I can provide a letter of support of the US-WFS letter from the Department at a minimum.I am curious also. Is DES providing comment on the resource reports for the Northeast Direct line project(Kinder Morgan)? We have a bi-weekly meeting with FERC and most of the time, DES is not represent-ed? Just curious about when DES will be participating since it is a federal project. Between this project and Northern Pass, it seems almost impossible to keep up. Please let me know. Thanks, CarolFrom: Comstock, GreggSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 8:31 AMTo: Henderson, Carol; Gries, GabrielCc: David, OwenSubject: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15HI Carol and Gabe,Comments on the PAD and recommendations for studies for the West Street Hydro project on the Ashuelot River in Keene (FERC # 14471) are due 9/7/15. Do you plan to respond?We may recommend a water quality study. Dwarf wedge mussels (DWMs) are also a concern. Any thoughts on additional studies to address the impact of adding 1 foot flashboards on the DWMs?Please let me know today. Give me a call if that�s easier.Thanks very much.GreggGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning Section NH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Manage-ment Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


===========================================================================2015_09_02 RE West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15Date: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 3:56 PMFrom: Gries, Gabriel </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GABRIEL.GRIES>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Conversation: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15In a previous email she said she needed to check with Owen to see if he was requesting a wq survey. ________________________________________From: Comstock, GreggSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 2:00 PMTo: Gries, GabrielSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15Hi Gabe,Perhaps I misunderstood. I thought Melissa sent you an email with her comments. If so, I was requesting a copy of the email she sent to you.GGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected] Message-----From: Gries, GabrielSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 1:55 PMTo: Comstock, GreggSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15This should be [email protected]________________________________________From: Comstock, GreggSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 1:39 PMTo: Gries, GabrielSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15No problem.When you get a chance.Thanks Gabe.GGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning Section NH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Manage-ment Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected] Message-----


From: Gries, GabrielSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 1:11 PMTo: Comstock, Gregg; Henderson, CarolCc: David, OwenSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15I’m not in office today till after 4And don’t have it with me________________________________________From: Comstock, GreggSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 12:14 PMTo: Gries, Gabriel; Henderson, CarolCc: David, OwenSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15Thanks Gabe,Could you please forward Melissa’s email?ThanksGreggGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning Section NH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Manage-ment Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected] Message-----From: Gries, GabrielSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 12:13 PMTo: Henderson, Carol; Comstock, GreggCc: David, OwenSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15I on planning providing minimal comments. I emailed with Melissa and she is planning on providing comments including some related to the mussels. Carol, will you be able to efile the comments for me.________________________________________From: Henderson, CarolSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 9:09 AMTo: Comstock, Gregg; Gries, GabrielCc: David, OwenSubject: RE: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15Hi Gregg:Typically we refer all comments about DWM to the USFWS since it is federally listed. I am overwhelmed with having to comment on the Kinder Morgan project which is due Friday, so I can�t see fitting this in at this time. I will contact Melissa Grader, who will most likely comment and I can provide a letter of support of the US-WFS letter from the Department at a minimum.I am curious also. Is DES providing comment on the resource reports for the Northeast Direct line project(Kinder Morgan)? We have a bi-weekly meeting with FERC and most of the time, DES is not represent-ed? Just curious about when DES will be participating since it is a federal project. Between this project and Northern Pass, it seems almost impossible to keep up. Please let me know. Thanks, CarolFrom: Comstock, GreggSent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 8:31 AMTo: Henderson, Carol; Gries, Gabriel


Cc: David, OwenSubject: West Street Hydro Project - Ashuelot River - Keene - Comments due by 9-7-15HI Carol and Gabe,Comments on the PAD and recommendations for studies for the West Street Hydro project on the Ashuelot River in Keene (FERC # 14471) are due 9/7/15. Do you plan to respond?We may recommend a water quality study. Dwarf wedge mussels (DWMs) are also a concern. Any thoughts on additional studies to address the impact of adding 1 foot flashboards on the DWMs?Please let me know today. Give me a call if that�s easier.Thanks very much.GreggGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning Section NH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Manage-ment Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2015_09_03 Supplemental NOI - Scoping Meetind and extension of comment period NED PF14-22.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_09_03 Supplemental NOI - Scoping Meetind and extension of comment period NED PF14-22: NED PF14-22 Supplement NOI.docxSubject: Supplemental NOI - Scoping Meetind and extension of comment period NED PF14-22Date: Thursday, September 3, 2015 11:59 AMFrom: Eric Tomasi <[email protected]>To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “alison.verkade@noaa.


gov” <[email protected]>, “Timmermann, Timothy ([email protected])” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, Nancy Fox-Fernandez <[email protected]>, Amanda Mardiney <[email protected]>, Paul Friedman <[email protected]>, Rafael Montag <[email protected]>, “Howard, Jennifer (DCR)” <[email protected]>, “Muzzey, Elizabeth” <[email protected]>, “Boisvert, Richard A” <[email protected]>, “Hoffer, Melissa (AGO)” <[email protected]>, “Ireland, Matthew (AGO)” <[email protected]>, Peggy Sloan <[email protected]>, “Strysky, Alexander (ENV)” <[email protected]>, Beverly Woods <[email protected]>Cc: “Martin, Danielle” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Cairns, Sara” <[email protected]>, “Doig, Rebecca (DEP)” <[email protected]>, “Walsh-Rogalski, William” <[email protected]>, John Kall-felz <[email protected]>, “Diers, Ted” <[email protected]>, “Chandler, Wade B NAB” <[email protected]>, “Fetterman, Marvin F. (DOT)” <[email protected]>, “Feigh-ner, Edna” <[email protected]>, Henry Underwood <[email protected]>, Tim Murphy <[email protected]>, Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>, Harry Stewart <[email protected]>, Kerrie Diers <[email protected]>, Richard Radwanski <[email protected]>, “Hintz, Donna (DOT)” <[email protected]>, “Nusca, Cathy (DOT)” <[email protected]>, “Garcia-Smith, Eileen (MISC)” <[email protected]>, “Hatfield, Meredith” <[email protected]>, “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>, “Wyatt, Robert” <[email protected]>, “Lamb, Amy” <[email protected]>Conversation: Supplemental NOI - Scoping Meetind and extension of comment period NED PF14-22Hello,Here is the NOI going out today for the NED Project.New Scoping meeting on September 29th atSeptember 29, 20156:00 PM Franklin Pierce UniversityField House


University DriveRindge, New Hampshire 03461603-899-4000Extension of comment period until October 16th.Let me know if you have any questions.*************************************Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionOffice: (202) 502-8097*************************************

===========================================================================2015_09_10 ARD comments on Northern Pass transmission line EIS and Kinder Morgan pipeline Re-

source Report (2).TXT===========================================================================

Subject: ARD comments on Northern Pass transmission line EIS and Kinder Morgan pipeline Resource ReportDate: Thursday, September 10, 2015 11:29 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Ro-berge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>, “Monroe, Pamela” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: ARD comments on Northern Pass transmission line EIS and Kinder Morgan pipeline Resource ReportDES will be submitting comments on two large energy projects: - Northern Pass electric transmission line: Comments on Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared by Department of Energy (DOE).- Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline: Comments on Resource Report prepared by Kinder Morgan and submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)You, or someone in your group, may have comments on either of these documents. For example, in addition to general references to greenhouse gasses and climate change, the North Pass EIS makes reference to NH�s Climate Action Plan, RGGI, Regional Haze Rules. I will be collating ARD�s comments and providing them to Tim Drew, who will collate all of DES�s comments into one submittal for each project. DEADLINE: Tim Drew is researching timelines and should have deadlines available today/tomorrow. I believe it will work out such that I will need your comments on Northern Pass EIS by ~Oct 19 and the Kinder Morgan Resource Report by ~Oct 6. I will give you an update as soon as I have firm dates.Documents:Tim Drew will be setting up a common directory with the documents on which we will be commenting, and the spreadsheet for entering comments. I�ll forward that info as soon as it is ready. In the meantime, you can ac-cess the EIS and Resource Report as follows:Northern Pass draft EIShttp://www.northernpasseis.us/library/draft-eis Kinder Morgan Resource ReportThe FERC website is a little cumbersome. A local interest ground has posted the documents at: http://nhpipelineawareness.org/ned-draft-environmental-report-der/ I�ll forward more info regarding comment format and schedule as soon as I have it. Please see me if you have any questions.Todd A. Moore


New Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_09_10 ARD comments on Northern Pass transmission line EIS and Kinder Morgan pipeline Re-

source Report.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: ARD comments on Northern Pass transmission line EIS and Kinder Morgan pipeline Resource ReportDate: Thursday, September 10, 2015 11:29 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Ro-berge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>, “Monroeold, Pamela” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: ARD comments on Northern Pass transmission line EIS and Kinder Morgan pipeline Resource ReportDES will be submitting comments on two large energy projects: - Northern Pass electric transmission line: Comments on Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared by Department of Energy (DOE).- Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline: Comments on Resource Report prepared by Kinder Morgan and submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)You, or someone in your group, may have comments on either of these documents. For example, in addition to general references to greenhouse gasses and climate change, the North Pass EIS makes reference to NH�s Climate Action Plan, RGGI, Regional Haze Rules. I will be collating ARD�s comments and providing them to Tim Drew, who will collate all of DES�s comments into one submittal for each project. DEADLINE: Tim Drew is researching timelines and should have deadlines available today/tomorrow. I believe it will work out such that I will need your comments on Northern Pass EIS by ~Oct 19 and the Kinder Morgan Resource Report by ~Oct 6. I will give you an update as soon as I have firm dates.Documents:Tim Drew will be setting up a common directory with the documents on which we will be commenting, and the spreadsheet for entering comments. I�ll forward that info as soon as it is ready. In the meantime, you can ac-cess the EIS and Resource Report as follows:Northern Pass draft EIShttp://www.northernpasseis.us/library/draft-eis Kinder Morgan Resource ReportThe FERC website is a little cumbersome. A local interest ground has posted the documents at: http://nhpipelineawareness.org/ned-draft-environmental-report-der/ I�ll forward more info regarding comment format and schedule as soon as I have it. Please see me if you have any questions.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798


===========================================================================2015_09_11 FW Update NPass EIS Comment procedure deadlines.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: Update: NPass EIS Comment procedure & deadlinesDate: Friday, September 11, 2015 3:31 PMFrom: Roberge, Michele </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ROBERGE>To: “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>Conversation: NPass EIS Comment procedure & deadlinesFYI � Are you expecting the SIP group to review this application?From: Ohler, Becky Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 3:29 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Underhill, Jeff; Roberge, Michele; Pinski, Dennis; Monroe, PamelaCc: Milbury, GarySubject: RE: Update: NPass EIS Comment procedure & deadlinesTodd and allIt would be useful to confirm who intends to review what sections. I plan to look at sections related to traffic and transportation, general conformity requirements, and will also search and review references to greenhouse gases and climate change, NH�s Climate Action Plan, and RGGI. I�m assuming someone else will be looking at general air quality impacts and health and safety. If anyone wants/plans to look at any of the areas I said I thought were on my plate please feel free, just let me know.BeckyFrom: Moore, Todd Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 2:59 PMTo: Ohler, Becky; Underhill, Jeff; Roberge, Michele; Pinski, Dennis; Monroe, PamelaCc: Milbury, GarySubject: Update: NPass EIS Comment procedure & deadlinesTim Drew has provided some guidance regarding format and timing for our comments on the Northern Pass Environmental Impact Statement (see attached email).FormatPlease input comments directly into the spreadsheet provided by Tim. If this is too awkward, you can provide comments directly to me and I will organize them. Where possible, please include a direct section & page # reference to which the comment applies.TimingThe deadline for providing our comments to Tim is Monday October 19th. Please input your comments by end of day Tuesday October 13. I will organize them an give them to Craig for his review Wednesday a.m. This will give Craig chance to review/comment prior to submitting them to Tim on Monday Oct 19th. Tim Drew is working on a format and schedule for the Kinder Morgan Resource Report comments. I will give you an update as soon as I know the plan.Please see me if you (or staff you assign) have any questions. Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_09_11 RE Update NPass EIS Comment procedure deadlines (3).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Update: NPass EIS Comment procedure & deadlines


Date: Friday, September 11, 2015 3:29 PMFrom: Ohler, Becky </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=OHLER>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Roberge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>, “Monroeold, Pa-mela” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Update: NPass EIS Comment procedure & deadlinesTodd and allIt would be useful to confirm who intends to review what sections. I plan to look at sections related to traffic and transportation, general conformity requirements, and will also search and review references to greenhouse gases and climate change, NH�s Climate Action Plan, and RGGI. I�m assuming someone else will be looking at general air quality impacts and health and safety. If anyone wants/plans to look at any of the areas I said I thought were on my plate please feel free, just let me know.BeckyFrom: Moore, Todd Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 2:59 PMTo: Ohler, Becky; Underhill, Jeff; Roberge, Michele; Pinski, Dennis; Monroe, PamelaCc: Milbury, GarySubject: Update: NPass EIS Comment procedure & deadlinesTim Drew has provided some guidance regarding format and timing for our comments on the Northern Pass Environmental Impact Statement (see attached email).FormatPlease input comments directly into the spreadsheet provided by Tim. If this is too awkward, you can provide comments directly to me and I will organize them. Where possible, please include a direct section & page # reference to which the comment applies.TimingThe deadline for providing our comments to Tim is Monday October 19th. Please input your comments by end of day Tuesday October 13. I will organize them an give them to Craig for his review Wednesday a.m. This will give Craig chance to review/comment prior to submitting them to Tim on Monday Oct 19th. Tim Drew is working on a format and schedule for the Kinder Morgan Resource Report comments. I will give you an update as soon as I know the plan.Please see me if you (or staff you assign) have any questions. Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_09_11 RE Update NPass EIS Comment procedure deadlines.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Update: NPass EIS Comment procedure & deadlinesDate: Friday, September 11, 2015 4:07 PMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Ro-berge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>, “Monroeold, Pamela” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>


Conversation: Update: NPass EIS Comment procedure & deadlinesIt may be that some people will not have comments at all. I sent it to you-all to make sure all the bases were covered. I will set up a brief meeting where we can discuss the project together.-Todd From: Ohler, Becky Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 3:29 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Underhill, Jeff; Roberge, Michele; Pinski, Dennis; Monroe, PamelaCc: Milbury, GarySubject: RE: Update: NPass EIS Comment procedure & deadlinesTodd and allIt would be useful to confirm who intends to review what sections. I plan to look at sections related to traffic and transportation, general conformity requirements, and will also search and review references to greenhouse gases and climate change, NH�s Climate Action Plan, and RGGI. I�m assuming someone else will be looking at general air quality impacts and health and safety. If anyone wants/plans to look at any of the areas I said I thought were on my plate please feel free, just let me know.BeckyFrom: Moore, Todd Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 2:59 PMTo: Ohler, Becky; Underhill, Jeff; Roberge, Michele; Pinski, Dennis; Monroe, PamelaCc: Milbury, GarySubject: Update: NPass EIS Comment procedure & deadlinesTim Drew has provided some guidance regarding format and timing for our comments on the Northern Pass Environmental Impact Statement (see attached email).FormatPlease input comments directly into the spreadsheet provided by Tim. If this is too awkward, you can provide comments directly to me and I will organize them. Where possible, please include a direct section & page # reference to which the comment applies.TimingThe deadline for providing our comments to Tim is Monday October 19th. Please input your comments by end of day Tuesday October 13. I will organize them an give them to Craig for his review Wednesday a.m. This will give Craig chance to review/comment prior to submitting them to Tim on Monday Oct 19th. Tim Drew is working on a format and schedule for the Kinder Morgan Resource Report comments. I will give you an update as soon as I know the plan.Please see me if you (or staff you assign) have any questions. Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_09_11 Update NPass EIS Comment procedure deadlines.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_09_11 Update NPass EIS Comment procedure deadlines: RE- Proposed Northern Pass Transmission Project - Draft Environmental Impact Statement - NH DES Review-Comments.emlSubject: Update: NPass EIS Comment procedure & deadlinesDate: Friday, September 11, 2015 2:59 PMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>


To: “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Ro-berge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>, “Monroeold, Pamela” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Update: NPass EIS Comment procedure & deadlinesTim Drew has provided some guidance regarding format and timing for our comments on the Northern Pass Environmental Impact Statement (see attached email).FormatPlease input comments directly into the spreadsheet provided by Tim. If this is too awkward, you can provide comments directly to me and I will organize them. Where possible, please include a direct section & page # reference to which the comment applies.TimingThe deadline for providing our comments to Tim is Monday October 19th. Please input your comments by end of day Tuesday October 13. I will organize them an give them to Craig for his review Wednesday a.m. This will give Craig chance to review/comment prior to submitting them to Tim on Monday Oct 19th. Tim Drew is working on a format and schedule for the Kinder Morgan Resource Report comments. I will give you an update as soon as I know the plan.Please see me if you (or staff you assign) have any questions. Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_09_14 Accepted NPass Kinder Morgan reviewcomments (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Accepted: NPass & Kinder Morgan review/commentsDate: Monday, September 14, 2015 9:42 AMFrom: Roberge, Michele </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ROBERGE>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Conversation: NPass & Kinder Morgan review/comments

===========================================================================2015_09_14 RE Tennessee Gas Pipeline LLC Protocol Review Comments (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Protocol Review CommentsDate: Monday, September 14, 2015 12:57 PMFrom: Planchet, Claude </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PLANCHET>To: “White, Matthew” <[email protected]>, “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Protocol Review CommentsHere are my comments.1. Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from up-stream and downstream flow disturbances.2. Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratifica-tion test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to include a 12 point (minimum) stratification check.


3. Page 8 � protocol definition of system bias is to calculated by using the direct calibration reading. Method 7E +/- 5% allowance for system bias in is based on calibration span. Please modify protocol to correspond to Method 7E system bias definition.4. Please identify the specific process data (engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.5. Page 10 fuel gas analysis-please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:a. how the sample will be collectedb. at what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.c. which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample;ClaudeFrom: White, Matthew Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 10:39 AMTo: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Protocol Review CommentsI have the following comments on the Tennessee Pipeline Test Protocol:� Will you be performing a cyclonic flow check?� Why have you proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.� Pg 6 � Stratification check � 40CFR60.4400(a)(3)(ii)(B) � please be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.� Pg 10 � Compliance Test Runs - Are we okay with testing at: Testing may be performed at the highest achievable load point, if at least 75% of peak load cannot be achieved�.� Pg 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify. � Pg 10 � Fuel Gas Analysis � will fuel be sampled for sulfur as well?Matthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]

===========================================================================2015_09_14 RE Tennessee Gas Pipeline LLC Protocol Review Comments.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Protocol Review CommentsDate: Monday, September 14, 2015 12:57 PMFrom: Planchet, Claude </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PLANCHET>To: “White, Matthew” <[email protected]>, “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Protocol Review CommentsHere are my comments.1. Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from up-stream and downstream flow disturbances.2. Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratifica-


tion test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to include a 12 point (minimum) stratification check.3. Page 8 � protocol definition of system bias is to calculated by using the direct calibration reading. Method 7E +/- 5% allowance for system bias in is based on calibration span. Please modify protocol to correspond to Method 7E system bias definition.4. Please identify the specific process data (engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.5. Page 10 fuel gas analysis-please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:a. how the sample will be collectedb. at what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.c. which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample;ClaudeFrom: White, Matthew Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 10:39 AMTo: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Protocol Review CommentsI have the following comments on the Tennessee Pipeline Test Protocol:� Will you be performing a cyclonic flow check?� Why have you proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.� Pg 6 � Stratification check � 40CFR60.4400(a)(3)(ii)(B) � please be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.� Pg 10 � Compliance Test Runs - Are we okay with testing at: Testing may be performed at the highest achievable load point, if at least 75% of peak load cannot be achieved�.� Pg 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify. � Pg 10 � Fuel Gas Analysis � will fuel be sampled for sulfur as well?Matthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]

===========================================================================2015_09_14 Tennessee Gas Pipeline LLC Protocol Review Comments (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Protocol Review CommentsDate: Monday, September 14, 2015 10:38 AMFrom: White, Matthew </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=WHITE>To: “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>, “Planchet, Claude” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Protocol Review CommentsI have the following comments on the Tennessee Pipeline Test Protocol:� Will you be performing a cyclonic flow check?� Why have you proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3


or 3A.� Pg 6 � Stratification check � 40CFR60.4400(a)(3)(ii)(B) � please be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.� Pg 10 � Compliance Test Runs - Are we okay with testing at: Testing may be performed at the highest achievable load point, if at least 75% of peak load cannot be achieved�.� Pg 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify. � Pg 10 � Fuel Gas Analysis � will fuel be sampled for sulfur as well?Matthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]

===========================================================================2015_09_14 Tennessee Gas Pipeline LLC Protocol Review Comments.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Protocol Review CommentsDate: Monday, September 14, 2015 10:38 AMFrom: White, Matthew </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=WHITE>To: “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>, “Planchet, Claude” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Protocol Review CommentsI have the following comments on the Tennessee Pipeline Test Protocol:� Will you be performing a cyclonic flow check?� Why have you proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.� Pg 6 � Stratification check � 40CFR60.4400(a)(3)(ii)(B) � please be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.� Pg 10 � Compliance Test Runs - Are we okay with testing at: Testing may be performed at the highest achievable load point, if at least 75% of peak load cannot be achieved�.� Pg 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify. � Pg 10 � Fuel Gas Analysis � will fuel be sampled for sulfur as well?Matthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================2015_09_15 Accepted NPass Kinder Morgan reviewcomments.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Accepted: NPass & Kinder Morgan review/commentsDate: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 9:35 AMFrom: Roberge, Michele </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ROBERGE>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Conversation: NPass & Kinder Morgan review/comments

===========================================================================2015_09_15 Kinder Morgan comment formattiming (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder Morgan comment format/timingDate: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 3:56 PMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Cc: “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Ro-berge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>, “Monroe, Pamela” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan comment format/timingTim,I will be out of the office until Friday the 18th. If you send out an update regarding the Kinder Morgan (or Northern Pass) project before then, please cc the ARD staff cc�d on this email.ARD folks,For those who didn�t make the meeting today, I will try to connect with you Friday to answer any questions regarding the Northern Pass EIS and Kinder Morgan Resource Report comments.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_09_15 Kinder Morgan comment formattiming.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder Morgan comment format/timingDate: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 3:56 PMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Cc: “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Ro-berge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>, “Monroeold, Pamela” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan comment format/timingTim,I will be out of the office until Friday the 18th. If you send out an update regarding the Kinder Morgan (or Northern Pass) project before then, please cc the ARD staff cc�d on this email.ARD folks,


For those who didn�t make the meeting today, I will try to connect with you Friday to answer any questions regarding the Northern Pass EIS and Kinder Morgan Resource Report comments.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_09_18 Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline

Company.TXT===========================================================================

2015_09_18 Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipe-line Company: image003.jpg image005.jpgSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyDate: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>Cc: “DuBois, H. Keith” <[email protected]>, “Burack, Thomas” <[email protected]>, “Forbes, Eugene” <[email protected]>, “Wimsatt, Mike” <[email protected]>, “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:


Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_09_18 Tenn. Gas .TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Tenn. Gas Date: Friday, September 18, 2015 3:10 PMFrom: O’Brien, Mike </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=O’BRIEN>To: “White, Matthew” <[email protected]>, “Planchet, Claude” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tenn. Gas Hi Matt, Below are some comments from EPA regarding the source. My additional comments are as follow:1. No diagram of the stack with sample port locations. Please provide.2. Not a lot of detail about the turbine, what is the max rate of the unit, fuel flow, etc.3. For the test proved the target values to be observed and recorded as part of the test program. Process data.


4. Process data will be collected. Matt check the past reports to see what was collected.5. Page 8 the footer states acetaldehyde was used for formaldehyde during spiking. Will they spike with acetaldehyde during this test and please note was should be will be.6. Think about asking that they introduce CO2 into the CEM sampling system.7. Check previous stack test run duration. They state that testing will be 20 minutes but DES likes 30-min test runs.8. They need to explain how they show compliance with 60.4415. Mike Mike O�Brien Testing and Monitoring SupervisorNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095(603) 271-6546 (phone)(603) 271-7053 (fax)Michael.O’[email protected] <mailto:Michael.O’[email protected]> (email)From: [email protected]: Monday, October 17, 2011 2:32 PMTo: Bernauer, JacobCc: O’Brien, Mike; [email protected]: Tennessee Gas, Pelham, NH facilityJacob, It was good talking with you earlier. I have read through the El Paso / TGP protocol for the proposed test at Sta-tion #270 in Pelham, NH. They had submitted a similar protocol in 2009 for a performance test. That protocol was rejected and resubmitted after addressing issues that I had with the protocol. The following is a list of deficiencies from the 2009 protocol: Upon initial review of the protocol that you have submitted to EPA, dated October 30, 2009, the following defi-ciencies need to be addressed and approved before testing of the gas turbine at TGP Compressor Station #270 in Pelham, NH can commence. 1) Applicable permit information should be summarized and stated in the protocol. A detailed test plan ma-trix with applicable emission parameters, limits and test methods with descriptions should be included in table form. 2) Stack sample locations, diagrams and descriptions are required. Stack diameter and sample port loca-tion, relative to any flow disturbances should be included. 3) Site and sample location access and safety needs to be addressed. 4) A detailed source description is required: � When was the unit installed? � What is the unit�s power rating? � What is the maximum exhaust flow rate and at what it the exhaust temperature? � What is the maximum fuel firing rate and maximum heat input? 5) An engineering cut sheet for the turbine to be tested. 6) A site plan of the facility. 7) The protocol needs to state that the turbine will maintain loading of at least 75% of maximum load while testing, as stated by 40 CFR 60 Subpart KKKK and also how this data will be measured and recorded. 8) Protocol should contain table with proposed test schedule. (e.g., day 1-setup, day 2-test, day 3-contingi-ency) 9) Expected pollutant concentrations and calibration gas ranges should be documented in the protocol. 10) The determination of stratification procedure outlined on page one of the protocol is insufficient. EPA guideline documentation is provided in this email to address this.


11) Sample calibration documentation and sample field data worksheets should be included. 12) The protocol needs state how the facility will meet the emission limits for SO2 as stated in 40 CFR 60 Subpart KKKK. The goal of addressing these issues is to ensure that a complete and representative stack test is conducted, to minimize potential problems during the test, to avoid potential errors in the final report, and to prevent a retest. An updated protocol addressing these issues needs to be submitted and approved. Please note that our office will not schedule testing until we have an EPA approved protocol. If you have additional comments I can include them in a new email to El Paso /TGP to get us an acceptable protocol. Let me know. Mike Michael Looney, Environmental EngineerUS EPA New EnglandOEME, Investigations and Analysis Unit11 Technology DriveN. Chelmsford, MA 01863T: 617-918-8665F: 617-918-8565

===========================================================================2015_09_18 Tennessee Gas Pipeline LLC Protocol (15).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Friday, September 18, 2015 3:46 PMFrom: White, Matthew </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=WHITE>To: “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Afternoon Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol (�the Protocol�). Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 8 � The Protocol definition of system bias is to calculate by using the direct calibration reading. Method 7E +/- 5% allowance for system bias is based on calibration span. Please modify the Protocol to correspond to Method 7E system bias definition.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be. Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream


and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:how the sample will be collectedat what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]

===========================================================================2015_09_21 FW NED.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: NEDDate: Monday, September 21, 2015 3:30 PMFrom: Henderson, Carol </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=CHENDERSON>To: “David, Owen” <[email protected]>, “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Conversation: NEDFYI..Answers to some questions I had to FERC involving the NED project. Thanks, CarolFrom: Eric Tomasi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 3:21 PMTo: Henderson, CarolSubject: Re: NEDYes, an intervenor cannot be a cooperator and vice versaA participant can be an intervenor. An agency (or member of the public) has a limited time after the application to file to be an intervenor.If a cooperating agency is not satisfied? I will have to look into that. ---Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerOffice (202) 502-8097Mobile (202) 297-1391Thank you for the information. However, I believe you explained this on the conference call, but what happens if an agency chooses to be a Cooperator, they are not allowed to be an Intervenor, correct? Can a Participator become an Intervenor if they choose to? What happens if an agency becomes a Cooperator but still is not satis-fied with the findings of FERC in the EIS relative to their responsibilities or expertise? Please advise. Thank you, Carol Henderson


From: Eric Tomasi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 2:54 PMTo: Henderson, CarolSubject: Re: NEDHello Carol.There are 3 different ways an agency an be involved. Here is the difference between participant and cooperator.1. Participant: You can be involved in agency meetings and calls during the pre-filing process. As with any member of the public you can file formal comments. After the application, you would not be on any agency calls (those are for cooperating agencies), but as before you could file formal comments.2. Cooperator. As participant, but can be on agency calls after the application. You also will assist us in writing the specific sections of the environmental impact statement (EIS) that relate to your agencies permit responsi-bilities or expertise. In practice, we will send the draft EIS and final EIS to the agency prior to issuance so that we can cooperatively work together to address the agency’s concerns.The commissioner will not be doing the interview until next week. As for the weekly notes, I was not sending those to the group, as they were very general. If you want to make it easier to find, click the box labelled issu-ance when you search in elibrary..---Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerOffice (202) 502-8097Mobile (202) 297-1391From: Henderson, Carol <[email protected]>Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 2:20 PMTo: Eric TomasiSubject: NED Hi Eric:What is the difference between an agency getting involved in the FERC review process as a Participator or as a Cooperator? This question came to me following our meeting on Thursday, September 17th. . Please advise. Also, you had mentioned that a FERC Commissioner was going to be participating in an article in the Boston Globe. Would you have a copy of the article. Also, I am not receiving the minutes of the meetings by email. I think you had mentioned that they could be forwarded to the conference call participants rather than having to look on the FERC website. I would appreciate all important FERC correspondence in this manner, if possible. Thank you, Carol Henderson, NH Fish and Game Department, Environmental Review Coordinator

===========================================================================2015_09_21 Kinder MorganNPass comment update.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder Morgan/NPass comment updateDate: Monday, September 21, 2015 11:24 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Ro-berge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan/NPass comment updateI�m available to answer question on the pipeline & transmission line report review/comment project.Michele and Dennis � I don�t have anything to add beyond this morning�s email update & what we talked about last Tuesday.�If you can�t make this meeting, feel free to stop by (you or whoever you assign) anytime if you have questions.-Todd


===========================================================================2015_09_21 NPass and Kinder Morgan comment update (2).TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_09_21 NPass and Kinder Morgan comment update (2): image003.jpg image005.jpg Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company.eml RE- Proposed Northern Pass Transmission Project - Draft Environmental Impact Statement - NH DES Review-Comments.emlSubject: NPass and Kinder Morgan comment updateDate: Monday, September 21, 2015 11:15 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Ro-berge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: NPass and Kinder Morgan comment updateWe now have the format and timing for preparing comments on draft documents for both Northern Pass trans-mission line and Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline.The documents (Resource Report and EIS) are intended to include overall environmental impact issues. The reports are not organized in a manner such that we can divide sections up among ARD programs. I suggest that each program review the report for its particular concerns. Examples:Tech Services (Becky): Low carbon electricity supply (NPass EIS page 1-5,6), GHG & climate change (NPass EIS p 3-44, 5-24), 2009 DES Climate Change Action Plan cited as a reference in NPass EIS.Atmospheric (Jeff): Regional emissions. For example, the KM natural gas pipeline includes a compressor sta-tion to be located in NH. This individual compressor station will not be a major NA-NSR stationary source with (<50 tpy NOx). However, it is only one of nine such stations located along the pipeline that runs through PA, NY, MA & NH.SIP Planning (Michele): Regional Haze Rule (NPass EIS page 3-44)Env Health (Dennis): EMFs from electric transmission lines.These are only examples that I picked up using keyword searches. You will know better than I whether the EIS or Resource Report contain statements for which it is appropriate to prepare comments on behalf of your programs. I suggest that you (or the staff you assign) search for and prepare comments on any topics that are pertinent to your program.Additional guidance from Tim Drew is available in the attached emails.Resource ReportPrepared by Kinder Morgan (KM)/Tennessee GasNortheast Energy DirectNatural Gas PipelineKM has prepared a Resource Report for submittal to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). FERC will use the resource report in its preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the project. Comments provided now will help ensure that DES�s concerns are considered in the EIS for the project. We also will have an opportunity to comment on the draft EIS once it is prepared by FERC (likely sometime in 2016).FormatPlease input comments directly into the spreadsheet provided by Tim Drew: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Envi-ronmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-


KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> . If this is too awkward, you can provide comments directly to me and I will organize them. Please include a direct section & page # reference to which the comment applies.TimingThe deadline for providing our comments to Tim is Friday October 9th. Please input your comments by end of day Tuesday October 6. I will organize them an give them to Craig for his review Wednesday a.m. This will give Craig chance to review/comment prior to submitting them to Tim on Friday Oct 9th.Draft Environmental Impact StatementPrepared by US Department of Energy (USDOE) Eversource/Northern PassElectricity transmission lineUSDOE has prepared a draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the project. Comments provided now will be considered by USDOE in finalizing the EIS.FormatPlease input comments directly into the spreadsheet provided by Tim Drew: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Envi-ronmental Impact Statements\NorthernPassTransmissionSystemNHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx <file:///\\gran-ite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\NorthernPassTransmis-sionSystemNHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> . If this is too awkward, you can provide comments directly to me and I will organize them. Please include a direct section & page # reference to which the comment applies.TimingThe deadline for providing our comments to Tim is Monday October 19th. Please input your comments by end of day Tuesday October 13. I will organize them an give them to Craig for his review Wednesday a.m. This will give Craig chance to review/comment prior to submitting them to Tim on Monday Oct 19th. Please let me know if you have any questions.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_09_21 NPass and Kinder Morgan comment update.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_09_21 NPass and Kinder Morgan comment update: image003.jpg image005.jpg Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company.eml RE- Proposed Northern Pass Transmission Project - Draft Environmental Impact Statement - NH DES Review-Comments.emlSubject: NPass and Kinder Morgan comment updateDate: Monday, September 21, 2015 11:15 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Ro-berge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: NPass and Kinder Morgan comment updateWe now have the format and timing for preparing comments on draft documents for both Northern Pass trans-mission line and Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline.The documents (Resource Report and EIS) are intended to include overall environmental impact issues. The


reports are not organized in a manner such that we can divide sections up among ARD programs. I suggest that each program review the report for its particular concerns. Examples:Tech Services (Becky): Low carbon electricity supply (NPass EIS page 1-5,6), GHG & climate change (NPass EIS p 3-44, 5-24), 2009 DES Climate Change Action Plan cited as a reference in NPass EIS.Atmospheric (Jeff): Regional emissions. For example, the KM natural gas pipeline includes a compressor sta-tion to be located in NH. This individual compressor station will not be a major NA-NSR stationary source with (<50 tpy NOx). However, it is only one of nine such stations located along the pipeline that runs through PA, NY, MA & NH.SIP Planning (Michele): Regional Haze Rule (NPass EIS page 3-44)Env Health (Dennis): EMFs from electric transmission lines.These are only examples that I picked up using keyword searches. You will know better than I whether the EIS or Resource Report contain statements for which it is appropriate to prepare comments on behalf of your programs. I suggest that you (or the staff you assign) search for and prepare comments on any topics that are pertinent to your program.Additional guidance from Tim Drew is available in the attached emails.Resource ReportPrepared by Kinder Morgan (KM)/Tennessee GasNortheast Energy DirectNatural Gas PipelineKM has prepared a Resource Report for submittal to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). FERC will use the resource report in its preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the project. Comments provided now will help ensure that DES�s concerns are considered in the EIS for the project. We also will have an opportunity to comment on the draft EIS once it is prepared by FERC (likely sometime in 2016).FormatPlease input comments directly into the spreadsheet provided by Tim Drew: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Envi-ronmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> . If this is too awkward, you can provide comments directly to me and I will organize them. Please include a direct section & page # reference to which the comment applies.TimingThe deadline for providing our comments to Tim is Friday October 9th. Please input your comments by end of day Tuesday October 6. I will organize them an give them to Craig for his review Wednesday a.m. This will give Craig chance to review/comment prior to submitting them to Tim on Friday Oct 9th.Draft Environmental Impact StatementPrepared by US Department of Energy (USDOE) Eversource/Northern PassElectricity transmission lineUSDOE has prepared a draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the project. Comments provided now will be considered by USDOE in finalizing the EIS.FormatPlease input comments directly into the spreadsheet provided by Tim Drew: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Envi-ronmental Impact Statements\NorthernPassTransmissionSystemNHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx <file:///\\gran-ite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\NorthernPassTransmis-sionSystemNHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> . If this is too awkward, you can provide comments directly to me and I will organize them. Please include a direct section & page # reference to which the comment applies.TimingThe deadline for providing our comments to Tim is Monday October 19th. Please input your comments by end of day Tuesday October 13. I will organize them an give them to Craig for his review Wednesday a.m. This will give Craig chance to review/comment prior to submitting them to Tim on Monday Oct 19th.


Please let me know if you have any questions.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_09_21 RE Tennessee Gas Pipeline LLC Protocol (12).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Monday, September 21, 2015 12:29 PMFrom: White, Matthew </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=WHITE>To: “McCain, Zackary R” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolHi Zackary,Thank you for your prompt response. I did not see the test date of October 15th in the protocol (I just saw the week of October 12th), but that will still work with our schedule. Take care,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 12:05 PMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,I working on getting this for you. I should have it back by tomorrow. Is this going to delay the testing date or are we still good for 10/15/2015?From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:31 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RCc: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol. Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please


clarify how long each test run will be. 5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the device is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:How the sample will be collectedAt what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Please provide all calculations in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8, per 7E 13.2 and 7E 13.3.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Monday, September 21, 2015 12:04 PMFrom: McCain, Zackary R <[email protected]>To: “’White, Matthew’” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,I working on getting this for you. I should have it back by tomorrow. Is this going to delay the testing date or are we still good for 10/15/2015?From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:31 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RCc: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility.


DES has reviewed the Protocol. Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be. 5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the device is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:How the sample will be collectedAt what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Please provide all calculations in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8, per 7E 13.2 and 7E 13.3.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:05 AMFrom: O’Brien, Mike </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=O’BRIEN>To: “White, Matthew” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolHi Matt, I made a few comments which are below. Please let me know if you have any questions.


Thanks,MikeMike O�Brien Testing and Monitoring SupervisorNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095(603) 271-6546 (phone)(603) 271-7053 (fax)Michael.O’[email protected] <mailto:Michael.O’[email protected]> (email)From: O’Brien, Mike Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:04 AMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMike O�Brien Testing and Monitoring SupervisorNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095(603) 271-6546 (phone)(603) 271-7053 (fax)Michael.O’[email protected] <mailto:Michael.O’[email protected]> (email)From: White, Matthew Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 3:47 PMTo: O’Brien, MikeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Afternoon Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol (�the Protocol�). Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 8 � The Protocol definition of system bias is to calculate by using the direct calibration reading. Method 7E +/- 5% allowance for system bias is based on calibration span. Please modify the Protocol to correspond to Method 7E system bias definition.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be.


Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:Hhow the sample will be collectedAat what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Wwhich method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Matt, you may want to add that they include all calculation in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8 , per 7E 13.2 and per 7E 13.3. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]

===========================================================================2015_09_21 Tennessee Gas Pipeline LLC Protocol (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:30 AMFrom: White, Matthew </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=WHITE>To: “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>Cc: “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>, “Planchet, Claude” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol. Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.


Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be. 5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the device is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:How the sample will be collectedAt what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Please provide all calculations in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8, per 7E 13.2 and 7E 13.3.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]

===========================================================================2015_09_21 Tennessee Gas Pipeline LLC Protocol.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Monday, September 21, 2015 10:30 AMFrom: White, Matthew </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=WHITE>To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>Cc: “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>, “Planchet, Claude” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol. Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies


Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be. 5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the device is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:How the sample will be collectedAt what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Please provide all calculations in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8, per 7E 13.2 and 7E 13.3.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]

===========================================================================2015_09_21 Tentative Kinder MorganNPass comment update.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Tentative: Kinder Morgan/NPass comment updateDate: Monday, September 21, 2015 11:26 AMFrom: Roberge, Michele </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ROBERGE>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan/NPass comment update


===========================================================================2015_09_22 FW Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas

Pipeline Company (18).TXT===========================================================================

2015_09_22 FW Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (18): image003.jpg image005.jpgSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:32 AMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>Cc: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>, “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-frames for the DEIS reviews is short so we may be able to allow reviews of applications to slide yet still stay within statutory review times.Frank � I know that you had volunteered to take some of Bill�s files while he works on the Northern Pass DEIS. I will look for ways to redirect those file. Will you be in Concord soon so that we all can get together as a group and make sure that we have adequate time dedicated to the combined work?These reviews are your priority. Thanks and let�s keep in touch so that we don�t end up with a last minute crisis.CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.


Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>





2015_09_22 FW Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (19): image003.jpg image005.jpgSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:18 AMFrom: DuBois, H. Keith </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DUBOIS>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>Cc: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel


chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.




2015_09_22 FW Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (2): image003.jpg image005.jpgSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:32 AMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>Cc: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>, “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-frames for the DEIS reviews is short so we may be able to allow reviews of applications to slide yet still stay within statutory review times.Frank � I know that you had volunteered to take some of Bill�s files while he works on the Northern Pass DEIS. I will look for ways to redirect those file. Will you be in Concord soon so that we all can get together as a group and make sure that we have adequate time dedicated to the combined work?These reviews are your priority. Thanks and let�s keep in touch so that we don�t end up with a last minute crisis.CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.


Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>





2015_09_22 FW Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (3): image001.jpg image002.jpgSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 11:55 AMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>Cc: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyFYI � confirmation of dates.From: Drew, Tim Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 11:52 AMTo: DuBois, H. Keith; Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-panyGood morning, Folks,� The deadline for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct (Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-pany) gas pipeline project is actually Friday, October 9.� The deadline for the proposed Northern Pass Transmission System (Eversource/HydroQuebec) review is due on Monday, October 19.Sorry for any confusion this has caused. You have my sincere appreciation for escorting these reviews through your divisions. Let me know if I can help in any way.TimFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015.


Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.Tim


Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.



2015_09_22 FW Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (5): image003.jpg image005.jpgSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:32 AMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>Cc: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>, “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-frames for the DEIS reviews is short so we may be able to allow reviews of applications to slide yet still stay within statutory review times.Frank � I know that you had volunteered to take some of Bill�s files while he works on the Northern Pass DEIS. I will look for ways to redirect those file. Will you be in Concord soon so that we all can get together as a group and make sure that we have adequate time dedicated to the combined work?These reviews are your priority. Thanks and let�s keep in touch so that we don�t end up with a last minute crisis.CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AM


To: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive


upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.


Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadline (13).TXT===========================================================================

2015_09_22 FW Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadline (13): image001.jpg image002.jpgSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:27 AMFrom: Tilton, Mary Ann </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TILTON>To: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Cc: “Lewis, Eben” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineCollis:I talked to Eben and he is reviewing Frank�s list to see if there are any he can get started on right away.He will follow up with me once he has had a chance to assess the workload.Thank youMary Ann


From: Tilton, Mary Ann Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:23 AMTo: Richardson, FrankCc: Adams, Collis; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineImportance: HighFrank:Please see management requirement for Kinder Morgan pipeline EIS review by October 9.Please assess and reassign all of your permitting files due by October 9 as soon as possible.Until Oct 9 and completion of the Kinder Morgan EIS, your priority and work will focus on review of the Kinder Morgan pipeline.Please call me as soon as you receive this email, so that we can discuss work shifts and review of thisImportant document.Thank youMary AnnFrom: Adams, Collis Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Drew, Tim; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-frames for the DEIS reviews is short so we may be able to allow reviews of applications to slide yet still stay within statutory review times.Frank � I know that you had volunteered to take some of Bill�s files while he works on the Northern Pass DEIS. I will look for ways to redirect those file. Will you be in Concord soon so that we all can get together as a group and make sure that we have adequate time dedicated to the combined work?These reviews are your priority. Thanks and let�s keep in touch so that we don�t end up with a last minute crisis.CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]


From: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 95


29 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.


Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadline (14).TXT===========================================================================

2015_09_22 FW Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadline (14): image001.jpg image002.jpgSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:23 AMFrom: Tilton, Mary Ann </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TILTON>To: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>Cc: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineFrank:Please see management requirement for Kinder Morgan pipeline EIS review by October 9.Please assess and reassign all of your permitting files due by October 9 as soon as possible.Until Oct 9 and completion of the Kinder Morgan EIS, your priority and work will focus on review of the Kinder Morgan pipeline.Please call me as soon as you receive this email, so that we can discuss work shifts and review of thisImportant document.Thank youMary AnnFrom: Adams, Collis Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Drew, Tim; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-


frames for the DEIS reviews is short so we may be able to allow reviews of applications to slide yet still stay within statutory review times.Frank � I know that you had volunteered to take some of Bill�s files while he works on the Northern Pass DEIS. I will look for ways to redirect those file. Will you be in Concord soon so that we all can get together as a group and make sure that we have adequate time dedicated to the combined work?These reviews are your priority. Thanks and let�s keep in touch so that we don�t end up with a last minute crisis.CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact


files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_09_22 RE Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipe-

line Company (15).TXT===========================================================================

2015_09_22 RE Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (15): image001.jpg image002.jpgSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-panyDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:51 AMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP


FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Cc: “Tilton, Mary Ann” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyYes, I get that.We also have the MVRP and SRP coming on board soon. I have asked Mary Ann to set up a meeting so that we can all be properly informed and engaged.From: Thomas, William Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:44 AMTo: Adams, CollisSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-panyCollis:Frank has too many files to help me so Karl is going to take one and Mary Ann is going to have Dave look at the other. Maybe Eben can handle some of Frank�s files so he can focus on the Pipeline- Karl is pretty busy for his current level of experience and I think the Pipeline is above his current review level. BillFrom: Adams, Collis Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Drew, Tim; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-frames for the DEIS reviews is short so we may be able to allow reviews of applications to slide yet still stay within statutory review times.Frank � I know that you had volunteered to take some of Bill�s files while he works on the Northern Pass DEIS. I will look for ways to redirect those file. Will you be in Concord soon so that we all can get together as a group and make sure that we have adequate time dedicated to the combined work?These reviews are your priority. Thanks and let�s keep in touch so that we don�t end up with a last minute crisis.CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806


e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental Services


P.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.


line Company (16).TXT===========================================================================

2015_09_22 RE Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (16): image001.jpg image002.jpgSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-panyDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:44 AMFrom: Thomas, William </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=THOMAS>To: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyCollis:Frank has too many files to help me so Karl is going to take one and Mary Ann is going to have Dave look at the other. Maybe Eben can handle some of Frank�s files so he can focus on the Pipeline- Karl is pretty busy for his current level of experience and I think the Pipeline is above his current review level. BillFrom: Adams, Collis Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Drew, Tim; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-frames for the DEIS reviews is short so we may be able to allow reviews of applications to slide yet still stay within statutory review times.Frank � I know that you had volunteered to take some of Bill�s files while he works on the Northern Pass DEIS. I will look for ways to redirect those file. Will you be in Concord soon so that we all can get together as a group and make sure that we have adequate time dedicated to the combined work?


These reviews are your priority. Thanks and let�s keep in touch so that we don�t end up with a last minute crisis.CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� button


After you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.


line Company (17).TXT===========================================================================

2015_09_22 RE Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (17): image001.jpg image002.jpgSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-panyDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:33 AMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “DuBois, H. Keith” <[email protected]>Cc: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company


I am on it. CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).


Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.


line Company (8).TXT===========================================================================

2015_09_22 RE Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (8): image001.jpg image002.jpgSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-panyDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 11:54 AMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>Cc: “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyFolks, The deadline for comments on the NED project is Friday, October 9. I just sent a correction to Keith


DuBois� earlier email. TimFrom: Adams, Collis Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Drew, Tim; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-frames for the DEIS reviews is short so we may be able to allow reviews of applications to slide yet still stay within statutory review times.Frank � I know that you had volunteered to take some of Bill�s files while he works on the Northern Pass DEIS. I will look for ways to redirect those file. Will you be in Concord soon so that we all can get together as a group and make sure that we have adequate time dedicated to the combined work?These reviews are your priority. Thanks and let�s keep in touch so that we don�t end up with a last minute crisis.CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel


chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.



line Company (9).TXT===========================================================================

2015_09_22 RE Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (9): image001.jpg image002.jpgSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-panyDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 11:52 AMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “DuBois, H. Keith” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood morning, Folks,� The deadline for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct (Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-pany) gas pipeline project is actually Friday, October 9.� The deadline for the proposed Northern Pass Transmission System (Eversource/HydroQuebec) review is due on Monday, October 19.Sorry for any confusion this has caused. You have my sincere appreciation for escorting these reviews through your divisions. Let me know if I can help in any way.TimFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have


distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons


to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.


line Company- OCT 9 deadline (10).TXT===========================================================================

2015_09_22 RE Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadline (10): image002.jpg image006.jpg image007.jpg image008.jpgSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-pany- OCT 9 deadlineDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:59 AMFrom: Lewis, Eben </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=LEWIS>To: “Tilton, Mary Ann” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Cc: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineI�ll handle that one as well as the decision date falls on the weekend.~EbenFrom: Tilton, Mary Ann Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:54 AMTo: Lewis, Eben; Adams, CollisCc: Richardson, FrankSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-pany- OCT 9 deadlineEben:Thank you for getting back to me. The 5th file is cut off below// are you handling that also?Mary AnnFrom: Lewis, Eben Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:46 AMTo: Tilton, Mary Ann; Adams, CollisCc: Richardson, FrankSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-pany- OCT 9 deadlineHi, Mary Ann,I took a look at Frank�s list and will tackle the following files until Oct 9th:~EbenFrom: Tilton, Mary Ann Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:28 AMTo: Adams, CollisCc: Lewis, EbenSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline


Company- OCT 9 deadlineImportance: HighCollis:I talked to Eben and he is reviewing Frank�s list to see if there are any he can get started on right away.He will follow up with me once he has had a chance to assess the workload.Thank youMary Ann From: Tilton, Mary Ann Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:23 AMTo: Richardson, FrankCc: Adams, Collis; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineImportance: HighFrank:Please see management requirement for Kinder Morgan pipeline EIS review by October 9.Please assess and reassign all of your permitting files due by October 9 as soon as possible.Until Oct 9 and completion of the Kinder Morgan EIS, your priority and work will focus on review of the Kinder Morgan pipeline.Please call me as soon as you receive this email, so that we can discuss work shifts and review of thisImportant document.Thank youMary AnnFrom: Adams, Collis Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Drew, Tim; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-frames for the DEIS reviews is short so we may be able to allow reviews of applications to slide yet still stay within statutory review times.Frank � I know that you had volunteered to take some of Bill�s files while he works on the Northern Pass DEIS. I will look for ways to redirect those file. Will you be in Concord soon so that we all can get together as a group and make sure that we have adequate time dedicated to the combined work?These reviews are your priority. Thanks and let�s keep in touch so that we don�t end up with a last minute crisis.CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the


common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.


TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.



2015_09_22 RE Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadline (11): image001.jpg image002.jpg image003.jpgSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-pany- OCT 9 deadlineDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:54 AMFrom: Tilton, Mary Ann </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TILTON>To: “Lewis, Eben” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Cc: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineEben:Thank you for getting back to me. The 5th file is cut off below// are you handling that also?Mary AnnFrom: Lewis, Eben Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:46 AMTo: Tilton, Mary Ann; Adams, CollisCc: Richardson, FrankSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-pany- OCT 9 deadlineHi, Mary Ann,I took a look at Frank�s list and will tackle the following files until Oct 9th:


~EbenFrom: Tilton, Mary Ann Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:28 AMTo: Adams, CollisCc: Lewis, EbenSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineImportance: HighCollis:I talked to Eben and he is reviewing Frank�s list to see if there are any he can get started on right away.He will follow up with me once he has had a chance to assess the workload.Thank youMary Ann From: Tilton, Mary Ann Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:23 AMTo: Richardson, FrankCc: Adams, Collis; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineImportance: HighFrank:Please see management requirement for Kinder Morgan pipeline EIS review by October 9.Please assess and reassign all of your permitting files due by October 9 as soon as possible.Until Oct 9 and completion of the Kinder Morgan EIS, your priority and work will focus on review of the Kinder Morgan pipeline.Please call me as soon as you receive this email, so that we can discuss work shifts and review of thisImportant document.Thank youMary AnnFrom: Adams, Collis Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Drew, Tim; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-frames for the DEIS reviews is short so we may be able to allow reviews of applications to slide yet still stay within statutory review times.Frank � I know that you had volunteered to take some of Bill�s files while he works on the Northern Pass DEIS. I will look for ways to redirect those file. Will you be in Concord soon so that we all can get together as a group and make sure that we have adequate time dedicated to the combined work?These reviews are your priority. Thanks and let�s keep in touch so that we don�t end up with a last minute crisis.CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, Rick


Cc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-


hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.



2015_09_22 RE Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadline (12): image001.jpg image005.jpg image006.jpgSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-pany- OCT 9 deadlineDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:46 AMFrom: Lewis, Eben </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=LEWIS>To: “Tilton, Mary Ann” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Cc: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineHi, Mary Ann,I took a look at Frank�s list and will tackle the following files until Oct 9th:~EbenFrom: Tilton, Mary Ann Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:28 AM


To: Adams, CollisCc: Lewis, EbenSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineImportance: HighCollis:I talked to Eben and he is reviewing Frank�s list to see if there are any he can get started on right away.He will follow up with me once he has had a chance to assess the workload.Thank youMary Ann From: Tilton, Mary Ann Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:23 AMTo: Richardson, FrankCc: Adams, Collis; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineImportance: HighFrank:Please see management requirement for Kinder Morgan pipeline EIS review by October 9.Please assess and reassign all of your permitting files due by October 9 as soon as possible.Until Oct 9 and completion of the Kinder Morgan EIS, your priority and work will focus on review of the Kinder Morgan pipeline.Please call me as soon as you receive this email, so that we can discuss work shifts and review of thisImportant document.Thank youMary AnnFrom: Adams, Collis Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Drew, Tim; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-frames for the DEIS reviews is short so we may be able to allow reviews of applications to slide yet still stay within statutory review times.Frank � I know that you had volunteered to take some of Bill�s files while he works on the Northern Pass DEIS. I will look for ways to redirect those file. Will you be in Concord soon so that we all can get together as a group and make sure that we have adequate time dedicated to the combined work?These reviews are your priority. Thanks and let�s keep in touch so that we don�t end up with a last minute crisis.CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company


Importance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a


Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.


line Company.TXT===========================================================================

2015_09_22 RE Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company: image001.jpg image002.jpgSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-panyDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 11:54 AMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>Cc: “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyFolks, The deadline for comments on the NED project is Friday, October 9. I just sent a correction to Keith DuBois� earlier email. TimFrom: Adams, Collis Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Drew, Tim; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company


Importance: HighFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-frames for the DEIS reviews is short so we may be able to allow reviews of applications to slide yet still stay within statutory review times.Frank � I know that you had volunteered to take some of Bill�s files while he works on the Northern Pass DEIS. I will look for ways to redirect those file. Will you be in Concord soon so that we all can get together as a group and make sure that we have adequate time dedicated to the combined work?These reviews are your priority. Thanks and let�s keep in touch so that we don�t end up with a last minute crisis.CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.


If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.


=========================================================================== 2015_09_22 RE Tennessee Gas Pipeline LLC Protocol (10): NH Env-A 800.pdfSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:42 AMFrom: White, Matthew </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP


FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=WHITE>To: “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>, “Planchet, Claude” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolZachary,I have attached our NH Code of Administrative Rules Chapter Part Env-A 802 Testing and Monitoring Proce-dures. Included in this Chapter is Part Env-A 802.02 Stack Testing Requirements, which specifies the operating conditions be between 90 and 100% of rated capacity. With that said, we will take the fuel delivery limitations you may have into consideration, and ask that you recirculate gas to get as close to 90% rated capacity as pos-sible. I spoke with Claude Planche who observed the testing in 2013 and he thought with the recirculation you were able to achieve greater than 75%.Thanks,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:19 AMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,Number 5 on your list you ask for the load to be between 90% to 100%. This unit is a KKKK unit and for a KKKK unit it calls for the turbine to be tested within 25% of 100% load. Let me know if this works for you if not we can make the change you requested. In 2013 we did the 25% of 100% load.5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the de-vice is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Per 40CFR Part 60 Subpart KKKK, the turbine must be tested within 25% of 100% load,From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:31 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RCc: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol. Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be. 5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the device is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.


Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:How the sample will be collectedAt what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Please provide all calculations in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8, per 7E 13.2 and 7E 13.3.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:19 AMFrom: McCain, Zackary R <[email protected]>To: “’White, Matthew’” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,Number 5 on your list you ask for the load to be between 90% to 100%. This unit is a KKKK unit and for a KKKK unit it calls for the turbine to be tested within 25% of 100% load. Let me know if this works for you if not we can make the change you requested. In 2013 we did the 25% of 100% load.5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the de-vice is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Per 40CFR Part 60 Subpart KKKK, the turbine must be tested within 25% of 100% load,From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:31 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RCc: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol. Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:


Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be. 5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the device is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:How the sample will be collectedAt what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Please provide all calculations in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8, per 7E 13.2 and 7E 13.3.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]


=========================================================================== 2015_09_22 RE Tennessee Gas Pipeline LLC Protocol (15): NH Env-A 800.pdfSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:42 AMFrom: White, Matthew </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=WHITE>To: “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>, “Planchet, Claude” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolZachary,


I have attached our NH Code of Administrative Rules Chapter Part Env-A 802 Testing and Monitoring Proce-dures. Included in this Chapter is Part Env-A 802.02 Stack Testing Requirements, which specifies the operating conditions be between 90 and 100% of rated capacity. With that said, we will take the fuel delivery limitations you may have into consideration, and ask that you recirculate gas to get as close to 90% rated capacity as pos-sible. I spoke with Claude Planche who observed the testing in 2013 and he thought with the recirculation you were able to achieve greater than 75%.Thanks,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:19 AMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,Number 5 on your list you ask for the load to be between 90% to 100%. This unit is a KKKK unit and for a KKKK unit it calls for the turbine to be tested within 25% of 100% load. Let me know if this works for you if not we can make the change you requested. In 2013 we did the 25% of 100% load.5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the de-vice is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Per 40CFR Part 60 Subpart KKKK, the turbine must be tested within 25% of 100% load,From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:31 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RCc: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol. Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be. 5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the device is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:


How the sample will be collectedAt what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Please provide all calculations in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8, per 7E 13.2 and 7E 13.3.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 11:39 AMFrom: O’Brien, Mike </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=O’BRIEN>To: “White, Matthew” <[email protected]>, “Planchet, Claude” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolHi Matt, looks ok but let�s make sure that the load was >75% in 2013 and in previous years testing. Also, check the permit to see if there is language requiring testing to be done between 90 � 100% of the rated capac-ity. Looking at the summary reports it appears that the natural gas flow rate was ~45,000 to 50,000 scfh with horse power up around 4,500 to 5,000.Please let me know if you have any questions.Thanks,MikeMike O�Brien Testing and Monitoring SupervisorNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095(603) 271-6546 (phone)(603) 271-7053 (fax)Michael.O’[email protected] <mailto:Michael.O’[email protected]> (email)From: White, Matthew Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:42 AMTo: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolZachary,I have attached our NH Code of Administrative Rules Chapter Part Env-A 802 Testing and Monitoring Pro-


cedures. (ds) Included in this Chapter is Part Env-A 802.02 Stack Testing Requirements, which specifies the operating conditions be between 90 and 100% of rated capacity. (ds) With that said, we will take the fuel deliv-ery limitations you may have into consideration, and ask that you recirculate gas to get as close to 90% rated capacity as possible. (ds) I spoke with Claude Planche who observed the testing in 2013 and he thought with the recirculation you were able to achieve greater than 75%.Thanks,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:19 AMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,Number 5 on your list you ask for the load to be between 90% to 100%. This unit is a KKKK unit and for a KKKK unit it calls for the turbine to be tested within 25% of 100% load. Let me know if this works for you if not we can make the change you requested. In 2013 we did the 25% of 100% load.5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the de-vice is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Per 40CFR Part 60 Subpart KKKK, the turbine must be tested within 25% of 100% load,From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:31 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RCc: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol. Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be. 5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the device is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:How the sample will be collected


At what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Please provide all calculations in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8, per 7E 13.2 and 7E 13.3.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 3:41 PMFrom: McCain, Zackary R <[email protected]>To: “’White, Matthew’” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,I was informed that we have a current valid tariff to cover sulfur content.Table 4 - Monitoring and Testing Requirements Item # Parameter Method of Compliance Frequency Applicable Unit Regulatory Basis 1 To Be Determined When conditions warrant, the Division may require the Owner or Operator to conduct stack testing in accordance with USEPA or other Division approved methods. Upon request by the Division Facility Wide RSA 125- C:6 XI 2 Sulfur Content of Gaseous Fuels Demonstrate compliance with sulfur content in grains of sulfur per 100 cubic feet of gaseous fuels by: a. conducting testing in accordance with appropriate ASTM test methods, or; b. maintaining a current, valid purchase contract or tariff sheet for the natural gas, specifying that the maximum total sulfur content for the fuel is in compliance with the sulfur content limitation provisions found in Table 3, Item 6. Once Annually Facility Wide 40 CFR 60.4360 and 40 CFR 60.4365 (Subpart KKKK) From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 1:47 PMTo: McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolHi Zackary,Here is the air permit for the TGP Pelham facility. Section V. Table 4 Item 2 specifies sampling options for sul-fur content of gaseous fuels on an annual basis.Thanks,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:19 AMTo: White, Matthew


Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,Number 5 on your list you ask for the load to be between 90% to 100%. This unit is a KKKK unit and for a KKKK unit it calls for the turbine to be tested within 25% of 100% load. Let me know if this works for you if not we can make the change you requested. In 2013 we did the 25% of 100% load.5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the de-vice is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Per 40CFR Part 60 Subpart KKKK, the turbine must be tested within 25% of 100% load,From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:31 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RCc: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol. Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be. 5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the device is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:How the sample will be collectedAt what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Please provide all calculations in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8, per 7E 13.2 and 7E 13.3.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. White


CEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]


=========================================================================== 2015_09_22 RE Tennessee Gas Pipeline LLC Protocol (7): TPG Pelham Permit.pdfSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 2:47 PMFrom: White, Matthew </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=WHITE>To: “McCain, Zackary R” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolHi Zackary,Here is the air permit for the TGP Pelham facility. Section V. Table 4 Item 2 specifies sampling options for sul-fur content of gaseous fuels on an annual basis.Thanks,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:19 AMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,Number 5 on your list you ask for the load to be between 90% to 100%. This unit is a KKKK unit and for a KKKK unit it calls for the turbine to be tested within 25% of 100% load. Let me know if this works for you if not we can make the change you requested. In 2013 we did the 25% of 100% load.5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the de-vice is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Per 40CFR Part 60 Subpart KKKK, the turbine must be tested within 25% of 100% load,From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:31 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RCc: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol. Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies


Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be. 5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the device is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:How the sample will be collectedAt what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Please provide all calculations in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8, per 7E 13.2 and 7E 13.3.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]


=========================================================================== 2015_09_22 RE Tennessee Gas Pipeline LLC Protocol (8): NH Env-A 800.pdfSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 12:09 PMFrom: White, Matthew </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=WHITE>To: “McCain, Zackary R” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolZachary,I have attached our NH Code of Administrative Rules Chapter Part Env-A 802 Testing and Monitoring Proce-dures. Included in this Chapter is Part Env-A 802.02 Stack Testing Requirements, which specifies the operating conditions be between 90 and 100% of rated capacity. With that said, we will take the fuel delivery limita-


tions you may have (and safety) into consideration, and ask that you recirculate gas to get as close to 90% rated capacity as possible. I reviewed your report from 2013 and I believe your average for the 3 runs was ~69% of rated capacity.Thanks,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:19 AMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,Number 5 on your list you ask for the load to be between 90% to 100%. This unit is a KKKK unit and for a KKKK unit it calls for the turbine to be tested within 25% of 100% load. Let me know if this works for you if not we can make the change you requested. In 2013 we did the 25% of 100% load.5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the de-vice is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Per 40CFR Part 60 Subpart KKKK, the turbine must be tested within 25% of 100% load,From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:31 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RCc: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol. Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be. 5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the device is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:How the sample will be collectedAt what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.


How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Please provide all calculations in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8, per 7E 13.2 and 7E 13.3.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 11:39 AMFrom: O’Brien, Mike </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=O’BRIEN>To: “White, Matthew” <[email protected]>, “Planchet, Claude” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolHi Matt, looks ok but let�s make sure that the load was >75% in 2013 and in previous years testing. Also, check the permit to see if there is language requiring testing to be done between 90 � 100% of the rated capac-ity. Looking at the summary reports it appears that the natural gas flow rate was ~45,000 to 50,000 scfh with horse power up around 4,500 to 5,000.Please let me know if you have any questions.Thanks,MikeMike O�Brien Testing and Monitoring SupervisorNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095(603) 271-6546 (phone)(603) 271-7053 (fax)Michael.O’[email protected] <mailto:Michael.O’[email protected]> (email)From: White, Matthew Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:42 AMTo: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolZachary,I have attached our NH Code of Administrative Rules Chapter Part Env-A 802 Testing and Monitoring Pro-cedures. (ds) Included in this Chapter is Part Env-A 802.02 Stack Testing Requirements, which specifies the operating conditions be between 90 and 100% of rated capacity. (ds) With that said, we will take the fuel deliv-ery limitations you may have into consideration, and ask that you recirculate gas to get as close to 90% rated


capacity as possible. (ds) I spoke with Claude Planche who observed the testing in 2013 and he thought with the recirculation you were able to achieve greater than 75%.Thanks,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:19 AMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,Number 5 on your list you ask for the load to be between 90% to 100%. This unit is a KKKK unit and for a KKKK unit it calls for the turbine to be tested within 25% of 100% load. Let me know if this works for you if not we can make the change you requested. In 2013 we did the 25% of 100% load.5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the de-vice is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Per 40CFR Part 60 Subpart KKKK, the turbine must be tested within 25% of 100% load,From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:31 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RCc: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol. Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be. 5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the device is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:How the sample will be collectedAt what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?


Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Please provide all calculations in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8, per 7E 13.2 and 7E 13.3.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]

===========================================================================2015_09_23 Kinder Morgan Northern Pass comment review (2).TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_09_23 Kinder Morgan Northern Pass comment review (2): =?UTF-8?Q?NPass=20and=20Kinder=20Morg?= =?UTF-8?Q?an=20comment=20update?=.eml image003.jpg image005.jpg Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company.eml RE- Proposed Northern Pass Transmission Project - Draft Environmental Impact Statement - NH DES Review-Comments.emlSubject: Kinder Morgan & Northern Pass comment reviewDate: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 10:21 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>Cc: “Fitzgerald, Mike” <[email protected]>, “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Roberge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Pin-ski, Dennis” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan & Northern Pass comment reviewCraig,Could you please be prepared to spend some time reviewing ARD comments on the Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline & Env. Impact Statement for the Northern Pass electric transmission line as follows:Kinder Morgan: Comments ready for your review Wednesday morning Oct 6. Your comments to me by end of day Thursday Oct 8.Northern Pass: Comments ready for your review Wednesday morning Oct 14. Your comments to me by end of day Friday Oct 16.ARD�s comments will not likely be extensive. Becky Ohler, Jeff Underhill, Michele Roberge and Dennis Pin-ski are reviewing the projects to see whether/on what ARD will comment. More detail regarding the project is provided in the attached email. Let me know if you have any questions.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798


===========================================================================2015_09_23 Kinder Morgan Northern Pass comment review.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_09_23 Kinder Morgan Northern Pass comment review: =?UTF-8?Q?NPass=20and=20Kinder=20Morg?= =?UTF-8?Q?an=20comment=20update?=.eml image003.jpg image005.jpg Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company.eml RE- Proposed Northern Pass Transmission Project - Draft Environmental Impact Statement - NH DES Review-Comments.emlSubject: Kinder Morgan & Northern Pass comment reviewDate: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 10:21 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>Cc: “Fitzgerald, Mike” <[email protected]>, “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Roberge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Pin-ski, Dennis” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan & Northern Pass comment reviewCraig,Could you please be prepared to spend some time reviewing ARD comments on the Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline & Env. Impact Statement for the Northern Pass electric transmission line as follows:Kinder Morgan: Comments ready for your review Wednesday morning Oct 6. Your comments to me by end of day Thursday Oct 8.Northern Pass: Comments ready for your review Wednesday morning Oct 14. Your comments to me by end of day Friday Oct 16.ARD�s comments will not likely be extensive. Becky Ohler, Jeff Underhill, Michele Roberge and Dennis Pin-ski are reviewing the projects to see whether/on what ARD will comment. More detail regarding the project is provided in the attached email. Let me know if you have any questions.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_09_23 Kinder Morgan.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder MorganDate: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 2:52 PMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder MorganHi Frank �I got your VM. Please plan on coming up tomorrow before the Town Meeting. We can discuss the process and get you a hard copy of the DEIS.See you tomorrow.


CollisCollis G. Adams, CWS, CPESCNH Department of Environmental ServicesLand Resources ManagementWetlands Bureau Administrator29 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302(603) 271- [email protected] DES Land Resources Management for helpful tools and information!

===========================================================================2015_09_23 Northern Pass Kinder Morgan comment due dates (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Northern Pass & Kinder Morgan comment due datesDate: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 7:42 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Ro-berge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Northern Pass & Kinder Morgan comment due datesWhen we met the other day, I noted that it would be OK to have a placeholder (e.g., I will prepare a comment) in place of your actual comment if you couldn�t get it completed by the due dates.Based on the gentle reminder I received from Keith DuBois yesterday, it is clear that they (SLT) want all com-ments input/finalized by the deadlines. Please make sure you have your comments input by the following deadlines:Kinder Morgan: end of day October 6. Northern Pass: end of day October 13.Please let me know ASAP if you�ll have trouble meeting those deadlines & I�ll see what I can do.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_09_23 Northern Pass Kinder Morgan comment due dates.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Northern Pass & Kinder Morgan comment due datesDate: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 7:42 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Ro-berge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Northern Pass & Kinder Morgan comment due datesWhen we met the other day, I noted that it would be OK to have a placeholder (e.g., I will prepare a comment) in place of your actual comment if you couldn�t get it completed by the due dates.Based on the gentle reminder I received from Keith DuBois yesterday, it is clear that they (SLT) want all com-


ments input/finalized by the deadlines. Please make sure you have your comments input by the following deadlines:Kinder Morgan: end of day October 6. Northern Pass: end of day October 13.Please let me know ASAP if you�ll have trouble meeting those deadlines & I�ll see what I can do.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798



2015_09_24 FW Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (1): image003.jpg image005.jpgSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyDate: Thursday, September 24, 2015 3:09 PMFrom: Benedict, Karl </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BENEDICT>To: “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyFrom: Adams, Collis Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Drew, Tim; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-frames for the DEIS reviews is short so we may be able to allow reviews of applications to slide yet still stay within statutory review times.Frank � I know that you had volunteered to take some of Bill�s files while he works on the Northern Pass DEIS. I will look for ways to redirect those file. Will you be in Concord soon so that we all can get together as a group and make sure that we have adequate time dedicated to the combined work?These reviews are your priority. Thanks and let�s keep in touch so that we don�t end up with a last minute crisis.CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline


CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed


comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.


line Company (2).TXT===========================================================================

2015_09_24 RE Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (2): image001.jpg image002.jpgSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-panyDate: Thursday, September 24, 2015 4:20 PMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyI am just considering Karl in the event he could provide some very specific, limited support.From: Thomas, William Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 3:54 PMTo: Adams, CollisSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-panyCollis:My understanding is that Eben is taking all of Frank�s files so he can do the entire review. I don�t think Karl is not ready to comment on a project of this magnitude and has files he needs to review. I am not sure what any


of the reviews actually entail or what is expected at this point but I suspect he could provide some support of needed. Thank you, Bill William A. Thomas, CWSWetlands Permitting SupervisorNHDES Wetlands Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302Phone: (603) 271-4197Fax: (603) 271-6588E-mail: [email protected] email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-4197 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any ac-companying attachments or printed copies.From: Adams, Collis Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Drew, Tim; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-frames for the DEIS reviews is short so we may be able to allow reviews of applications to slide yet still stay within statutory review times.Frank � I know that you had volunteered to take some of Bill�s files while he works on the Northern Pass DEIS. I will look for ways to redirect those file. Will you be in Concord soon so that we all can get together as a group and make sure that we have adequate time dedicated to the combined work?These reviews are your priority. Thanks and let�s keep in touch so that we don�t end up with a last minute crisis.CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]


From: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 95


29 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.


line Company (7).TXT===========================================================================

2015_09_24 RE Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (7): image001.jpg image002.jpgSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-panyDate: Thursday, September 24, 2015 3:54 PMFrom: Thomas, William </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=THOMAS>To: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyCollis:My understanding is that Eben is taking all of Frank�s files so he can do the entire review. I don�t think Karl is not ready to comment on a project of this magnitude and has files he needs to review. I am not sure what any of the reviews actually entail or what is expected at this point but I suspect he could provide some support of needed. Thank you, Bill William A. Thomas, CWSWetlands Permitting SupervisorNHDES Wetlands Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302Phone: (603) 271-4197Fax: (603) 271-6588E-mail: [email protected] email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-4197 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any ac-companying attachments or printed copies.From: Adams, Collis


Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Drew, Tim; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-frames for the DEIS reviews is short so we may be able to allow reviews of applications to slide yet still stay within statutory review times.Frank � I know that you had volunteered to take some of Bill�s files while he works on the Northern Pass DEIS. I will look for ways to redirect those file. Will you be in Concord soon so that we all can get together as a group and make sure that we have adequate time dedicated to the combined work?These reviews are your priority. Thanks and let�s keep in touch so that we don�t end up with a last minute crisis.CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-


Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.



===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Thursday, September 24, 2015 11:30 AMFrom: McCain, Zackary R <[email protected]>To: “White, Matthew” <[email protected]>, “Zeilstra, Michael” <[email protected]>Cc: “Cooper, Justin N” <[email protected]>, “Johnston, Johndunn B” <[email protected]>, “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,The date on the protocol is correct. The plan is to test on test on 10/14/2015 with a contingency day on 10/15/2015.Thank you,Zackary McCainKinder Morgan / Technical Services-EmissionsO:713-420-7434C:409-443-4537From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 10:01 AMTo: McCain, Zackary R; Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Cooper, Justin N; Johnston, Johndunn B; O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a revised pre-test protocol for the TGP facility located in Pelham, NH. We will review it today, and provide you with additional comments, if any.The protocol has a proposed test date of October 14th, is this correct? I only ask because in a previous email you had the 15th for a proposed test date. Take care,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 7:22 AMTo: White, Matthew; Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Cooper, Justin N; Johnston, Johndunn B; McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,Attached is the Finalized Emissions Test Protocol for TGP 270B (Pelham). This protocol covers unit A1 to be tested the week of 10/12/2015.Zackary McCainKinder Morgan / Technical Services-EmissionsO:713-420-7434C:409-443-4537From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 11:29 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolHi Zackary,Thank you for your prompt response. I did not see the test date of October 15th in the protocol (I just saw the week of October 12th), but that will still work with our schedule.


Take care,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 12:05 PMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,I�m working on getting this for you. I should have it back by tomorrow. Is this going to delay the testing date or are we still good for 10/15/2015?From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:31 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RCc: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol. Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be. 5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the device is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:How the sample will be collectedAt what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Please provide all calculations in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8, per 7E 13.2 and 7E 13.3.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,Matt


Matthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]


=========================================================================== 2015_09_24 RE Tennessee Gas Pipeline LLC Protocol (5): 2015-08-12 TGP Station 270 Protocol_New Format.pdfSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Thursday, September 24, 2015 7:21 AMFrom: McCain, Zackary R <[email protected]>To: “’White, Matthew’” <[email protected]>, “Zeilstra, Michael” <[email protected]>Cc: “Cooper, Justin N” <[email protected]>, “Johnston, Johndunn B” <[email protected]>, “McCain, Zackary R” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,Attached is the Finalized Emissions Test Protocol for TGP 270B (Pelham). This protocol covers unit A1 to be tested the week of 10/12/2015.Zackary McCainKinder Morgan / Technical Services-EmissionsO:713-420-7434C:409-443-4537From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 11:29 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolHi Zackary,Thank you for your prompt response. I did not see the test date of October 15th in the protocol (I just saw the week of October 12th), but that will still work with our schedule. Take care,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 12:05 PMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,I�m working on getting this for you. I should have it back by tomorrow. Is this going to delay the testing date or are we still good for 10/15/2015?From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:31 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RCc: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Protocol


Good Morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol. Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be. 5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the device is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:How the sample will be collectedAt what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Please provide all calculations in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8, per 7E 13.2 and 7E 13.3.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]




2015_09_25 FW Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (4): image001.jpg image002.jpgSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyDate: Friday, September 25, 2015 8:39 AMFrom: Thomas, William </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=THOMAS>To: “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyFrom: Adams, Collis Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 4:20 PMTo: Thomas, WilliamSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-panyI am just considering Karl in the event he could provide some very specific, limited support.From: Thomas, William Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 3:54 PMTo: Adams, CollisSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-panyCollis:My understanding is that Eben is taking all of Frank�s files so he can do the entire review. I don�t think Karl is not ready to comment on a project of this magnitude and has files he needs to review. I am not sure what any of the reviews actually entail or what is expected at this point but I suspect he could provide some support of needed. Thank you, Bill William A. Thomas, CWSWetlands Permitting SupervisorNHDES Wetlands Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302Phone: (603) 271-4197Fax: (603) 271-6588E-mail: [email protected] email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-4197 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any ac-companying attachments or printed copies.From: Adams, Collis Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Drew, Tim; Thomas, William


Subject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-frames for the DEIS reviews is short so we may be able to allow reviews of applications to slide yet still stay within statutory review times.Frank � I know that you had volunteered to take some of Bill�s files while he works on the Northern Pass DEIS. I will look for ways to redirect those file. Will you be in Concord soon so that we all can get together as a group and make sure that we have adequate time dedicated to the combined work?These reviews are your priority. Thanks and let�s keep in touch so that we don�t end up with a last minute crisis.CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the


SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.


Pipeline Company.TXT===========================================================================

2015_09_25 FW Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company:


image001.jpg image002.jpgSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyDate: Friday, September 25, 2015 8:39 AMFrom: Thomas, William </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=THOMAS>To: “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyFrom: Adams, Collis Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 4:20 PMTo: Thomas, WilliamSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-panyI am just considering Karl in the event he could provide some very specific, limited support.From: Thomas, William Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 3:54 PMTo: Adams, CollisSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-panyCollis:My understanding is that Eben is taking all of Frank�s files so he can do the entire review. I don�t think Karl is not ready to comment on a project of this magnitude and has files he needs to review. I am not sure what any of the reviews actually entail or what is expected at this point but I suspect he could provide some support of needed. Thank you, Bill William A. Thomas, CWSWetlands Permitting SupervisorNHDES Wetlands Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302Phone: (603) 271-4197Fax: (603) 271-6588E-mail: [email protected] email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-4197 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any ac-companying attachments or printed copies.From: Adams, Collis Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Drew, Tim; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-






===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Friday, September 25, 2015 10:12 AMFrom: McCain, Zackary R <[email protected]>To: “’White, Matthew’” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,I will start working on it and let you know.From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 9:02 AM


To: McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolZackary,I have availability anytime on October 5th, 6th, or 9th. Will you be able to coordinate with the station supervi-sor?Thanks,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 9:26 AMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,I will be out of town next week on another test with limited phone access. I will be in the following week if that works for you. Zackary McCainKinder Morgan / Technical Services-EmissionsO:713-420-7434C:409-443-4537From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 8:04 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolZackary,Thanks you for your responses. I provided some quick responses below. If there are any changes to the test schedule, please let us know so that DES can plan accordingly. Also, it would be a good idea for us to have a pre-test conference call with the station supervisor to go over logistics during the day of the test. Is there a time next week that might work for you?Thanks,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 8:25 AMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,Answers to your questions below.1. We are not allowed to give out our copy of ASTM D6348-12. I will be able to bring a copy of ASTM D6348-12 for you to look over but I can�t let you keep it. It is available to buy on line if you would like to buy one if not I can find out if we can buy you a copy. That�ll be great, I was only asking to review it onsite, and do understand the restrictions ASTM places on their documents. Us state folks don�t have the budget to purchase all the ASTM methods.2. On page 23 we are just showing water & CO2 because they are the two main target analytes we are look-ing for with the FTIR on this test. We are using separate analyzers for NOx, CO, and O2. OK.3. Yes we are still using acetaldehyde for the spike. We will do the spike once before we start the test. OK thanks. I was just looking for consistency with previous tests.From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 2:48 PMTo: McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolZackary,The protocol looks good. Just a few very minor comments we can probably take care of via email:


1. Will you be able to provide a copy of ASTM D6348-12 onsite, just for review purposes?2. P.23 � Target Analytes � why has this list been reduced down to just water & CO2?3. Will you still be using an acetaldehyde spike? It looks like one was used for the last testing.Thanks,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 11:31 AMTo: White, Matthew; Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Cooper, Justin N; Johnston, Johndunn B; O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,The date on the protocol is correct. The plan is to test on test on 10/14/2015 with a contingency day on 10/15/2015.Thank you,Zackary McCainKinder Morgan / Technical Services-EmissionsO:713-420-7434C:409-443-4537From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 10:01 AMTo: McCain, Zackary R; Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Cooper, Justin N; Johnston, Johndunn B; O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a revised pre-test protocol for the TGP facility located in Pelham, NH. We will review it today, and provide you with additional comments, if any.The protocol has a proposed test date of October 14th, is this correct? I only ask because in a previous email you had the 15th for a proposed test date. Take care,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 7:22 AMTo: White, Matthew; Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Cooper, Justin N; Johnston, Johndunn B; McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,Attached is the Finalized Emissions Test Protocol for TGP 270B (Pelham). This protocol covers unit A1 to be tested the week of 10/12/2015.Zackary McCainKinder Morgan / Technical Services-EmissionsO:713-420-7434C:409-443-4537From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 11:29 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolHi Zackary,Thank you for your prompt response. I did not see the test date of October 15th in the protocol (I just saw the week of October 12th), but that will still work with our schedule. Take care,


MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 12:05 PMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,I�m working on getting this for you. I should have it back by tomorrow. Is this going to delay the testing date or are we still good for 10/15/2015?From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:31 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RCc: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol. Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be. 5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the device is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:How the sample will be collectedAt what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Please provide all calculations in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8, per 7E 13.2 and 7E 13.3.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. White


CEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Friday, September 25, 2015 9:26 AMFrom: McCain, Zackary R <[email protected]>To: “’White, Matthew’” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,I will be out of town next week on another test with limited phone access. I will be in the following week if that works for you. Zackary McCainKinder Morgan / Technical Services-EmissionsO:713-420-7434C:409-443-4537From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 8:04 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolZackary,Thanks you for your responses. I provided some quick responses below. If there are any changes to the test schedule, please let us know so that DES can plan accordingly. Also, it would be a good idea for us to have a pre-test conference call with the station supervisor to go over logistics during the day of the test. Is there a time next week that might work for you?Thanks,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 8:25 AMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,Answers to your questions below.1. We are not allowed to give out our copy of ASTM D6348-12. I will be able to bring a copy of ASTM D6348-12 for you to look over but I can�t let you keep it. It is available to buy on line if you would like to buy one if not I can find out if we can buy you a copy. That�ll be great, I was only asking to review it onsite, and do understand the restrictions ASTM places on their documents. Us state folks don�t have the budget to purchase all the ASTM methods.2. On page 23 we are just showing water & CO2 because they are the two main target analytes we are look-ing for with the FTIR on this test. We are using separate analyzers for NOx, CO, and O2. OK.3. Yes we are still using acetaldehyde for the spike. We will do the spike once before we start the test. OK thanks. I was just looking for consistency with previous tests.From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]]


Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 2:48 PMTo: McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolZackary,The protocol looks good. Just a few very minor comments we can probably take care of via email:1. Will you be able to provide a copy of ASTM D6348-12 onsite, just for review purposes?2. P.23 � Target Analytes � why has this list been reduced down to just water & CO2?3. Will you still be using an acetaldehyde spike? It looks like one was used for the last testing.Thanks,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 11:31 AMTo: White, Matthew; Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Cooper, Justin N; Johnston, Johndunn B; O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,The date on the protocol is correct. The plan is to test on test on 10/14/2015 with a contingency day on 10/15/2015.Thank you,Zackary McCainKinder Morgan / Technical Services-EmissionsO:713-420-7434C:409-443-4537From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 10:01 AMTo: McCain, Zackary R; Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Cooper, Justin N; Johnston, Johndunn B; O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a revised pre-test protocol for the TGP facility located in Pelham, NH. We will review it today, and provide you with additional comments, if any.The protocol has a proposed test date of October 14th, is this correct? I only ask because in a previous email you had the 15th for a proposed test date. Take care,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 7:22 AMTo: White, Matthew; Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Cooper, Justin N; Johnston, Johndunn B; McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,Attached is the Finalized Emissions Test Protocol for TGP 270B (Pelham). This protocol covers unit A1 to be tested the week of 10/12/2015.Zackary McCainKinder Morgan / Technical Services-EmissionsO:713-420-7434C:409-443-4537From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 11:29 AMTo: McCain, Zackary R


Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolHi Zackary,Thank you for your prompt response. I did not see the test date of October 15th in the protocol (I just saw the week of October 12th), but that will still work with our schedule. Take care,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 12:05 PMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,I�m working on getting this for you. I should have it back by tomorrow. Is this going to delay the testing date or are we still good for 10/15/2015?From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:31 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RCc: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol. Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be. 5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the device is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:How the sample will be collectedAt what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Please provide all calculations in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8, per 7E 13.2 and


7E 13.3.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Friday, September 25, 2015 8:25 AMFrom: McCain, Zackary R <[email protected]>To: “’White, Matthew’” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,Answers to your questions below.1. We are not allowed to give out our copy of ASTM D6348-12. I will be able to bring a copy of ASTM D6348-12 for you to look over but I can�t let you keep it. It is available to buy on line if you would like to buy one if not I can find out if we can buy you a copy.2. On page 23 we are just showing water & CO2 because they are the two main target analytes we are look-ing for with the FTIR on this test. We are using separate analyzers for NOx, CO, and O2.3. Yes we are still using acetaldehyde for the spike. We will do the spike once before we start the test.From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 2:48 PMTo: McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolZackary,The protocol looks good. Just a few very minor comments we can probably take care of via email:1. Will you be able to provide a copy of ASTM D6348-12 onsite, just for review purposes?2. P.23 � Target Analytes � why has this list been reduced down to just water & CO2?3. Will you still be using an acetaldehyde spike? It looks like one was used for the last testing.Thanks,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 11:31 AMTo: White, Matthew; Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Cooper, Justin N; Johnston, Johndunn B; O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,The date on the protocol is correct. The plan is to test on test on 10/14/2015 with a contingency day on 10/15/2015.Thank you,Zackary McCain


Kinder Morgan / Technical Services-EmissionsO:713-420-7434C:409-443-4537From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 10:01 AMTo: McCain, Zackary R; Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Cooper, Justin N; Johnston, Johndunn B; O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a revised pre-test protocol for the TGP facility located in Pelham, NH. We will review it today, and provide you with additional comments, if any.The protocol has a proposed test date of October 14th, is this correct? I only ask because in a previous email you had the 15th for a proposed test date. Take care,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 7:22 AMTo: White, Matthew; Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Cooper, Justin N; Johnston, Johndunn B; McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,Attached is the Finalized Emissions Test Protocol for TGP 270B (Pelham). This protocol covers unit A1 to be tested the week of 10/12/2015.Zackary McCainKinder Morgan / Technical Services-EmissionsO:713-420-7434C:409-443-4537From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 11:29 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolHi Zackary,Thank you for your prompt response. I did not see the test date of October 15th in the protocol (I just saw the week of October 12th), but that will still work with our schedule. Take care,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 12:05 PMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,I�m working on getting this for you. I should have it back by tomorrow. Is this going to delay the testing date or are we still good for 10/15/2015?From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:31 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RCc: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-


col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol. Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be. 5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the device is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:How the sample will be collectedAt what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Please provide all calculations in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8, per 7E 13.2 and 7E 13.3.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]

===========================================================================2015_09_28 FW Northern Pass Transmission system - Call for Supplemental Draft Environmental Im-

pact Statement (SDEIS).TXT===========================================================================

2015_09_28 FW Northern Pass Transmission system - Call for Supplemental Draft Environmental Im-pact Statement (SDEIS): Public Notice NP Draft EIS_09_22_2015.pdf


Subject: FW: Northern Pass Transmission system - Call for Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact State-ment (SDEIS)Date: Monday, September 28, 2015 2:07 PMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>Conversation: Northern Pass Transmission system - Call for Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact State-ment (SDEIS)FYI � forge ahead.From: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 2:00 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Adams, Collis; Regan, John; Chormann, RickCc: Fitzgerald, Mike; Pelletier, Rene; DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Hatfield, Meredith; ‘Aslin, Christo-pher’; Connors, MollySubject: Northern Pass Transmission system - Call for Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS)Good afternoon, Folks,As you�ve no doubt already heard, the U.S. DOE is requiring that Northern Pass Transmission System offi-cials (Eversource/HydroQuebec) prepare a Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS) for the project due to the significant changes in environmental impact that could result from 60 miles of the trans-mission line being buried, rather than the original eight miles. There could also be more extensive landscape impacts caused by burial (and perhaps some realignment) of the cable�s centerline, when compared with the overhead option. This request by the U.S. DOE is not that unusual under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), particularly when significant changes have been made to the project�s original DEIS. In fact, NEPA requires this type of flexibility enroute to the preparation of a Final EIS for the project. This change will certainly influence the comments being generated by your reviewers. Therefore, I am asking for all comments regarding the project and its changes be completed by Friday, December 11, 2015 to provide enough time for the Senior Leadership Team to review them before formal sub-mittal to the U.S. DOE. That date will also allow for extra time that may be needed to complete our response as we head into the busy holiday season. Finally, this date attempts to take into account when the SDEIS will be made available for our review (uncertain at this time). Thank you so much for the work that you have already dedicated to this review and that of the Kinder Morgan Northeast Energy Direct project�s Resource Reports (BTW: That internal due date remains October 9). Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help or to make these reviews more efficient. I will be writing a Standard Operating Procedure in January 2016 partially based on how well this system works; in-corporating any needed modifications as a result of our work. Please send to me any suggestions or areas for needed improvements as you encounter them.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>


DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_09_28 Northern Pass EIS Comment period Extension.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_09_28 Northern Pass EIS Comment period Extension: Public Notice NP Draft EIS_09_22_2015.pdfSubject: Northern Pass EIS Comment period ExtensionDate: Monday, September 28, 2015 2:24 PMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Ro-berge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>Conversation: Northern Pass EIS Comment period ExtensionThe deadline for comments on Northern Pass EIS has been extended by DOE because of the addition of a new route/build alternative. Please input your comments on the Northern Pass draft EIS by end of day Monday De-cember 7th (formerly October 13th). This will provide Craig a couple days to review before we submit them to Tim Drew on Friday Dec 11. DOE will be publishing a supplement to the Draft EIS that includes the new alternative. I�ll let you know as soon as I hear when the supplement will be ready. I doubt the supplement will have much impact on issues of concern to ARD � I don�t suggest waiting for the supplement to perform your review. Let me know if you have any questions,-ToddP.S. The deadline for the Kinder Morgan pipeline project has not changed. I would still like ARD comments in the Kinder Morgan Resource Report input by October 6.P.P.S. Thank you Becky for already completing your Northern Pass comments!From: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 2:00 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Adams, Collis; Regan, John; Chormann, RickCc: Fitzgerald, Mike; Pelletier, Rene; DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Hatfield, Meredith; ‘Aslin, Christo-pher’; Connors, MollySubject: Northern Pass Transmission system - Call for Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS)Good afternoon, Folks,As you�ve no doubt already heard, the U.S. DOE is requiring that Northern Pass Transmission System offi-cials (Eversource/HydroQuebec) prepare a Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS) for the project due to the significant changes in environmental impact that could result from 60 miles of the trans-mission line being buried, rather than the original eight miles. There could also be more extensive landscape impacts caused by burial (and perhaps some realignment) of the cable�s centerline, when compared with the overhead option. This request by the U.S. DOE is not that unusual under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), particularly when significant changes have been made to the project�s original DEIS. In fact, NEPA requires this type of flexibility enroute to the preparation of a Final EIS for the project. This change will certainly influence the comments being generated by your reviewers. Therefore, I am asking for all comments regarding the project and its changes be completed by Friday,


December 11, 2015 to provide enough time for the Senior Leadership Team to review them before formal sub-mittal to the U.S. DOE. That date will also allow for extra time that may be needed to complete our response as we head into the busy holiday season. Finally, this date attempts to take into account when the SDEIS will be made available for our review (uncertain at this time). Thank you so much for the work that you have already dedicated to this review and that of the Kinder Morgan Northeast Energy Direct project�s Resource Reports (BTW: That internal due date remains October 9). Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help or to make these reviews more efficient. I will be writing a Standard Operating Procedure in January 2016 partially based on how well this system works; in-corporating any needed modifications as a result of our work. Please send to me any suggestions or areas for needed improvements as you encounter them.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_09_28 Northern Pass Transmission system - Call for Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact

Statement (SDEIS).TXT===========================================================================

2015_09_28 Northern Pass Transmission system - Call for Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS): Public Notice NP Draft EIS_09_22_2015.pdfSubject: Northern Pass Transmission system - Call for Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS)Date: Monday, September 28, 2015 1:59 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>Cc: “Fitzgerald, Mike” <[email protected]>, “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>, “DuBois, H. Keith” <[email protected]>, “Burack, Thomas” <[email protected]>, “Hat-field, Meredith” <[email protected]>, “’Aslin, Christopher’” <[email protected]>, “Con-nors, Molly” <[email protected]>Conversation: Northern Pass Transmission system - Call for Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact State-ment (SDEIS)


Good afternoon, Folks,As you�ve no doubt already heard, the U.S. DOE is requiring that Northern Pass Transmission System offi-cials (Eversource/HydroQuebec) prepare a Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS) for the project due to the significant changes in environmental impact that could result from 60 miles of the trans-mission line being buried, rather than the original eight miles. There could also be more extensive landscape impacts caused by burial (and perhaps some realignment) of the cable�s centerline, when compared with the overhead option. This request by the U.S. DOE is not that unusual under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), particularly when significant changes have been made to the project�s original DEIS. In fact, NEPA requires this type of flexibility enroute to the preparation of a Final EIS for the project. This change will certainly influence the comments being generated by your reviewers. Therefore, I am asking for all comments regarding the project and its changes be completed by Friday, December 11, 2015 to provide enough time for the Senior Leadership Team to review them before formal sub-mittal to the U.S. DOE. That date will also allow for extra time that may be needed to complete our response as we head into the busy holiday season. Finally, this date attempts to take into account when the SDEIS will be made available for our review (uncertain at this time). Thank you so much for the work that you have already dedicated to this review and that of the Kinder Morgan Northeast Energy Direct project�s Resource Reports (BTW: That internal due date remains October 9). Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help or to make these reviews more efficient. I will be writing a Standard Operating Procedure in January 2016 partially based on how well this system works; in-corporating any needed modifications as a result of our work. Please send to me any suggestions or areas for needed improvements as you encounter them.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_09_28 RE FERC Scoping Meeting - Kinder Morgan.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: FERC Scoping Meeting - Kinder MorganDate: Monday, September 28, 2015 9:29 AMFrom: Milbury, Gary </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MILBURY>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>


Cc: “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>Conversation: FERC Scoping Meeting - Kinder MorganThanks Todd, I think that�s great idea.From: Moore, Todd Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 3:28 PMTo: Milbury, GaryCc: McCutcheon, JohnSubject: FERC Scoping Meeting - Kinder MorganGary,John and I are planning on attending the FERC Scoping Meeting on the Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline. I think it will be helpful in preparing for our air hearing.It is in the evening in Rindge next Tuesday Sep 29.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798


Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadline.TXT===========================================================================

2015_09_30 FW Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadline: image002.jpg image006.jpg image007.jpg image008.jpgSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineDate: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 9:50 AMFrom: Tilton, Mary Ann </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TILTON>To: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>Cc: “Lewis, Eben” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineFrank:Just to follow up on your voice mail message about feeling overwhelmed & wanting someone to look at your list.I hope you will have a chance to see that we had already done this and Eben is on top of it even before you ar-rivedBack from vacation. He has taken over assignment of all files that are due during the Kinder Morgan review period.Mary AnnFrom: Lewis, Eben Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 11:00 AMTo: Tilton, Mary Ann; Adams, CollisCc: Richardson, FrankSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-


pany- OCT 9 deadlineI�ll handle that one as well as the decision date falls on the weekend.~EbenFrom: Tilton, Mary Ann Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:54 AMTo: Lewis, Eben; Adams, CollisCc: Richardson, FrankSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-pany- OCT 9 deadlineEben:Thank you for getting back to me. The 5th file is cut off below// are you handling that also?Mary AnnFrom: Lewis, Eben Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:46 AMTo: Tilton, Mary Ann; Adams, CollisCc: Richardson, FrankSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-pany- OCT 9 deadlineHi, Mary Ann,I took a look at Frank�s list and will tackle the following files until Oct 9th:~EbenFrom: Tilton, Mary Ann Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:28 AMTo: Adams, CollisCc: Lewis, EbenSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineImportance: HighCollis:I talked to Eben and he is reviewing Frank�s list to see if there are any he can get started on right away.He will follow up with me once he has had a chance to assess the workload.Thank youMary Ann From: Tilton, Mary Ann Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:23 AMTo: Richardson, FrankCc: Adams, Collis; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineImportance: HighFrank:Please see management requirement for Kinder Morgan pipeline EIS review by October 9.Please assess and reassign all of your permitting files due by October 9 as soon as possible.Until Oct 9 and completion of the Kinder Morgan EIS, your priority and work will focus on review of the Kinder Morgan pipeline.Please call me as soon as you receive this email, so that we can discuss work shifts and review of thisImportant document.Thank youMary AnnFrom: Adams, Collis


Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Drew, Tim; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-frames for the DEIS reviews is short so we may be able to allow reviews of applications to slide yet still stay within statutory review times.Frank � I know that you had volunteered to take some of Bill�s files while he works on the Northern Pass DEIS. I will look for ways to redirect those file. Will you be in Concord soon so that we all can get together as a group and make sure that we have adequate time dedicated to the combined work?These reviews are your priority. Thanks and let�s keep in touch so that we don�t end up with a last minute crisis.CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesTel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-


Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.


===========================================================================2015_10_01 FW Internal Strategy Meeting - Northern Pass and Kinder Morgan Gas Pipeline Projects.

TXT===========================================================================

Subject: FW: Internal Strategy Meeting - Northern Pass and Kinder Morgan Gas Pipeline ProjectsDate: Thursday, October 1, 2015 3:30 PMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>Cc: “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>, “Roberge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Internal Strategy Meeting - Northern Pass and Kinder Morgan Gas Pipeline ProjectsTim Drew is holding a meeting to provide some guidance on the Kinder Morgan & Northern Pass review/com-ment projects.� Please let me know if you would like to attend.-Todd-----Original Appointment-----From: Drew, Tim Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 2:55 PMTo: Drew, Tim; Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Chormann, RickSubject: Internal Strategy Meeting - Northern Pass and Kinder Morgan Gas Pipeline ProjectsWhen: Monday, October 05, 2015 9:30 AM-10:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).Where: Commissioner’s Office Conference RoomFolks,This meeting is being called so that we can discuss the roles, status, steps, timing, etc. that we are expected to meet with our reviews of the proposed Northern Pass Transmission System (NPTS) and the Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project.� Topics of discussion may include the review of the NPTS Draft Environmental Impact Statement (and the creation of the Supplemental Draft EIS), our role, the role of the NH Site Evaluation Committee, due dates, use of the Excel spreadsheets and fu-ture actions.Please bring those on your staff who may need to hear and add to the conversation.� However, the C/O confer-ence will only hold about a dozen people comfortably.� Thanks.� Tim_______________(P.S. � Keep your fingers crossed that ol� Hurricane Joaquin will go out to sea and miss us.� Otherwise, we may have to re-schedule this meeting.)

===========================================================================2015_10_01 Northern Pass and Northeast Energy Direct Excel Spreadsheets.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Northern Pass and Northeast Energy Direct Excel SpreadsheetsDate: Thursday, October 1, 2015 10:46 AMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>Cc: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Forst, Darlene” <[email protected]>Conversation: Northern Pass and Northeast Energy Direct Excel SpreadsheetsAs requested. S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements> Karl, Will you let me know if you are able to download the Kinder Morgan files to this folder? Tim




line Company- OCT 9 deadline.TXT===========================================================================

2015_10_01 RE Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadline: image001.jpg image002.jpg image003.jpg image004.jpgSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-pany- OCT 9 deadlineDate: Thursday, October 1, 2015 11:42 AMFrom: Richardson, Frank </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RICHARDSON>To: “Tilton, Mary Ann” <[email protected]>Cc: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Lewis, Eben” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineMary Ann,Eben has been out on sick leave since Monday including again today. The only application reviewed on the list below is #2015-02295 a minimum impact expedited application he has sent an RFMI on.All others are still pending or overdue. As I said in an earlier email to you all, I will complete #2015-01426 NH Port Authority for the Hampton Jetty Repairs since I have been working on this project and with the parties involved since the pre-application stage.I am heading back to Pease from Concord now and will see if I can get the overdue applications completed in the interim before I receive the Kinder Morgan Northeast Energy Direct Project review copies from Norman-deau Assoc. Adele has been sent a list of the sections I need hard copies of and Collis has been in touch with Normandeau as well.Frank


From: Tilton, Mary Ann Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 9:50 AMTo: Richardson, FrankCc: Lewis, Eben; Adams, CollisSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineFrank:Just to follow up on your voice mail message about feeling overwhelmed & wanting someone to look at your list.I hope you will have a chance to see that we had already done this and Eben is on top of it even before you ar-rivedBack from vacation. He has taken over assignment of all files that are due during the Kinder Morgan review period.Mary AnnFrom: Lewis, Eben Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 11:00 AMTo: Tilton, Mary Ann; Adams, CollisCc: Richardson, FrankSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-pany- OCT 9 deadlineI�ll handle that one as well as the decision date falls on the weekend.~EbenFrom: Tilton, Mary Ann Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:54 AMTo: Lewis, Eben; Adams, CollisCc: Richardson, FrankSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-pany- OCT 9 deadlineEben:Thank you for getting back to me. The 5th file is cut off below// are you handling that also?Mary AnnFrom: Lewis, Eben Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:46 AMTo: Tilton, Mary Ann; Adams, CollisCc: Richardson, FrankSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-pany- OCT 9 deadlineHi, Mary Ann,I took a look at Frank�s list and will tackle the following files until Oct 9th:~EbenFrom: Tilton, Mary Ann Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:28 AMTo: Adams, CollisCc: Lewis, EbenSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineImportance: HighCollis:I talked to Eben and he is reviewing Frank�s list to see if there are any he can get started on right away.He will follow up with me once he has had a chance to assess the workload.


Thank youMary Ann From: Tilton, Mary Ann Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:23 AMTo: Richardson, FrankCc: Adams, Collis; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company- OCT 9 deadlineImportance: HighFrank:Please see management requirement for Kinder Morgan pipeline EIS review by October 9.Please assess and reassign all of your permitting files due by October 9 as soon as possible.Until Oct 9 and completion of the Kinder Morgan EIS, your priority and work will focus on review of the Kinder Morgan pipeline.Please call me as soon as you receive this email, so that we can discuss work shifts and review of thisImportant document.Thank youMary AnnFrom: Adams, Collis Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Drew, Tim; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-frames for the DEIS reviews is short so we may be able to allow reviews of applications to slide yet still stay within statutory review times.Frank � I know that you had volunteered to take some of Bill�s files while he works on the Northern Pass DEIS. I will look for ways to redirect those file. Will you be in Concord soon so that we all can get together as a group and make sure that we have adequate time dedicated to the combined work?These reviews are your priority. Thanks and let�s keep in touch so that we don�t end up with a last minute crisis.CollisFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:19 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighTodd, John, Collis, and Rick:Please make sure your division/work unit (as the case may be) reviews and provides necessary comments in the common workbook created by Tim before the close of business on October 19, 2015. Sincerely,H. Keith DuBois, P.G.Acting Assistant CommissionerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental Services


Tel: (603) 271-8806e-mail: [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:33 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, Thomas; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, CraigSubject: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyGood afternoon, Folks.Following three work days of poring through the 6,000-page Environmental Resource Reports (and their Ap-pendices 1 through 13) for the subject project, filed by Kinder Morgan with FERC on July 24, 2015, I have distilled only what DES needs to review for this project. My intent was to review the documents and determine which parts of DES should comment on them and which are of no interest to the agency. To the extent I could do so, I have eliminated any documents related to the Pennsylvania, New York and Massachusetts portions of the pipeline covered by these reports, maps, and plans. What is left is my attempt to reduce workload for all of you and sift out only areas of interest to DES.As with the Northern Pass project Excel chart, each of you have been chosen by the Senior Leadership Team to set up a network of reviewers in your individual divisions to gather the comments using the linked Excel chart as a common collection tool. It is intentionally placed in the S/COMMON drive for all to access (S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESComments-Sept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> ). Once the information and data have been entered into the chart by your group, please let me know and I will run the completed version by the SLT for a final review before transmittal to FERC. Comments for the NED Project are to back to me by Friday, October 9.If I could offer a single piece of advice to your reviewers, it is PATIENCE, PATIENCE, PATIENCE. Some of these documents are huge, in some cases exceeding 45 MB, and contain maps, charts, etc. that really take some time to open in our system. Once you�re in, you can readily review the documents and their contents. I pack-aged it by DES Division using tabs/topics by environmental medium and then provided direct links to the exact files of interest to DES from the FERC NED eLibrary.Instructions:Clink on link of interestDepending on the size of the document, the �file opening� box (see below) may take some time to appearOnce it does, Click on �OK� buttonAfter you click �OK,� the second box you will see is the following. As these are large files, the download may take some time (a few minutes).Once done, Click on �Open� If there are questions, or you encounter difficulties, please let me know. Finally, I just want say that I know that everyone is laboring under a severe and sustained workload. I have tried to complete extensive upfront measures to reduce your engagement time and effort with these projects. However, the more compre-hensively we can distill our comments using this process, the more significantly we will be able to reduce future work that we will be asked to complete as these projects move forward. For example, as a result of detailed comments on these projects now, we will only have to do a cursory review with upcoming documents like a Draft Environmental Impact Statement to confirm that our changes were addressed � perhaps a simple letter noting only those changes. These projects represent, by their very nature, a significant impact to the state of New Hampshire. Thank you for helping with this task.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the Commissioner


NH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_05 FW Geology Shape Files - Proposed Kinder Morgan NED Centerline in NH.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_10_05 FW Geology Shape Files - Proposed Kinder Morgan NED Centerline in NH: 2015_10_05_Centerline_to_NH.ZIPSubject: FW: Geology Shape Files - Proposed Kinder Morgan NED Centerline in NHDate: Monday, October 5, 2015 12:49 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Conversation: Geology Shape Files - Proposed Kinder Morgan NED Centerline in NHShape files for your use reviewing the Kinder Morgan gas pipeline Resource Reports and Appendices. TimFrom: Vankruiningen, Alyssa [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 12:47 PMTo: Drew, TimCc: Gardella, Mark; [email protected]: FW: Geology Shape Files - Proposed Kinder Morgan NED Centerline in NHHi Tim:My colleague, Lori Ferry asked me to address your request below. Attached please find the most current center-line route for New Hampshire.Should you have any further questions or requests, please feel free to reach out to me.Thank you.Alyssa Van KruiningenProject [email protected] Orms StreetSuite 405Providence, RI 02904Direct Dial: 401-854-2822C: 860.338.4924401.274.5685 ext. 1102822Fax: 401-521-2730


From: Drew, Tim [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 10:21 AMTo: Ferry, LoriSubject: Geology Shape Files - Proposed Kinder Morgan NED Centerline in NHGood morning, Lori, As part of our review of the Kinder Morgan proposal, the State Geologist is making the following request. Could you provide us with the shape files noted below? Thank you.________________________A shape file delineating the proposed centerline would provide a helpful reference to enable a somewhat de-tailed view of geologic and other issues related to construction and potential impacts. Data in NH State plane coordinate system would be preferred but I can transform data from other coordinate systems if necessary. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks.RickRick Chormann, State Geologist and DirectorNH Geological Survey29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095(603) [email protected]__________________________TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_06 Kinder Morgan Resource Report Review (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder Morgan Resource Report ReviewDate: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 9:34 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Roberge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>, “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>


Conversation: Kinder Morgan Resource Report ReviewToday is the day for inputting any comments on the Resource Report for the Kinder Morgan pipeline. Please input your comments into the spreadsheet by the end of the day today.Tim Drew emailed some examples of similar reviews/resulting DES comments on previous projects. I hope this helps you determine the scope/level of detail of these reviews. The examples are located in: S:\ARD-Administration\Projects\NEPA Review <file:///\\granite\shared\des\ARD-Administration\Projects\NEPA%20Review> Let me know if you have any questions.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_10_06 Kinder Morgan Resource Report Review.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder Morgan Resource Report ReviewDate: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 9:34 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Roberge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>, “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan Resource Report ReviewToday is the day for inputting any comments on the Resource Report for the Kinder Morgan pipeline. Please input your comments into the spreadsheet by the end of the day today.Tim Drew emailed some examples of similar reviews/resulting DES comments on previous projects. I hope this helps you determine the scope/level of detail of these reviews. The examples are located in: S:\ARD-Administration\Projects\NEPA Review <file:///\\granite\shared\des\ARD-Administration\Projects\NEPA%20Review> Let me know if you have any questions.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_10_06 Kinder Morgan Summary Article - Monadnock Ledger.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder Morgan Summary Article - Monadnock LedgerDate: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 1:57 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan Summary Article - Monadnock LedgerThis is a very well written and comprehensive summary of the KM proposal as it exists today. Thought you might like to read it.


http://www.ledgertranscript.com/news/townbytown/temple/18706563-95/story.html TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_06 UL Article on Kinder Morgan Pipeline - PUC Decision.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: UL Article on Kinder Morgan Pipeline - PUC DecisionDate: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 1:00 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>Conversation: UL Article on Kinder Morgan Pipeline - PUC DecisionThought you might be interested in this article:http://www.unionleader.com/PUC-backs-Liberty-Kinder-Morgan-pipeline-deal TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may


be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_08 Kinder Morgan Comments.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder Morgan CommentsDate: Thursday, October 8, 2015 11:25 AMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan CommentsGood morning, Folks, I just looked at the Excel spreadsheet for the KM project and, other than the ARD comments, it is blank for the other divisions. I�m getting nervous, since the Senior Leadership Team will get these charts for review in Monday. TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_08 MItigation review on KM line.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_10_08 MItigation review on KM line: KM_Pipeline Review.docx KM_Pipeline_Mar2015.pdfSubject: MItigation review on KM lineDate: Thursday, October 8, 2015 3:16 PMFrom: Sommer, Lori </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SOMMER>


To: “Tilton, Mary Ann” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Cc: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>Conversation: MItigation review on KM lineMindy and I attended a meeting on the Kinder Morgan pipeline back in March and were tasked to determine if there were any DES easements within the route or near the route. The attached pdf is the line we reviewed at the time of our review and the memo contains the results of that review. I need to know if this is something that should be included in the comment letter being assembled. Thanks, Lori SommerDES Wetland Mitigation CoordinatorWetlands Bureau(603) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ATTENTION: In order to ensure that all permit applications have the required elements for technical re-view, please be certain to use the newest versions of our application forms dated in the footnote as “valid until 7/1/2013”. Going forward, the Land Resources Management Programs plan to update applications every 6 months. The next round of updates will occur on June 1, 2013. Please refer to our website at http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm <https://owa.des.nh.gov/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm> for the current application forms.

===========================================================================2015_10_08 RE Kinder Morgan Comments (3).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Kinder Morgan CommentsDate: Thursday, October 8, 2015 1:01 PMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan CommentsI received a VM from Frank this AM. He has made great progress and was overall very impressed with the qual-ity of the submittal.I do not anticipate any issues with completing the wetlands review in a timely manner.CollisFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 11:26 AMTo: Regan, John; Moore, Todd; Chormann, Rick; Adams, CollisSubject: Kinder Morgan CommentsGood morning, Folks, I just looked at the Excel spreadsheet for the KM project and, other than the ARD comments, it is blank for the other divisions. I�m getting nervous, since the Senior Leadership Team will get these charts for review in Monday. TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095


Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_08 RE Kinder Morgan Comments.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Kinder Morgan CommentsDate: Thursday, October 8, 2015 4:17 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan CommentsGreat. Thanks Collis.From: Adams, Collis Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 1:01 PMTo: Drew, Tim; Regan, John; Moore, Todd; Chormann, RickSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan CommentsI received a VM from Frank this AM. He has made great progress and was overall very impressed with the qual-ity of the submittal.I do not anticipate any issues with completing the wetlands review in a timely manner.CollisFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 11:26 AMTo: Regan, John; Moore, Todd; Chormann, Rick; Adams, CollisSubject: Kinder Morgan CommentsGood morning, Folks, I just looked at the Excel spreadsheet for the KM project and, other than the ARD comments, it is blank for the other divisions. I�m getting nervous, since the Senior Leadership Team will get these charts for review in Monday. TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>



===========================================================================2015_10_08 RE Tennessee Gas Pipeline LLC Protocol.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolDate: Thursday, October 8, 2015 1:40 PMFrom: White, Matthew </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=WHITE>To: “McCain, Zackary R” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolHey Zackary,I got your voicemail and I apologize for not emailing my cell number sooner. If you need to reach me after 4:00pm you can call 603-545-9793.Thanks,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 10:13 AMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,I will start working on it and let you know.From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 9:02 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolZackary,I have availability anytime on October 5th, 6th, or 9th. Will you be able to coordinate with the station supervi-sor?Thanks,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 9:26 AMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,I will be out of town next week on another test with limited phone access. I will be in the following week if that works for you. Zackary McCainKinder Morgan / Technical Services-EmissionsO:713-420-7434C:409-443-4537From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 8:04 AMTo: McCain, Zackary R


Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolZackary,Thanks you for your responses. I provided some quick responses below. If there are any changes to the test schedule, please let us know so that DES can plan accordingly. Also, it would be a good idea for us to have a pre-test conference call with the station supervisor to go over logistics during the day of the test. Is there a time next week that might work for you?Thanks,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 8:25 AMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,Answers to your questions below.1. We are not allowed to give out our copy of ASTM D6348-12. I will be able to bring a copy of ASTM D6348-12 for you to look over but I can�t let you keep it. It is available to buy on line if you would like to buy one if not I can find out if we can buy you a copy. That�ll be great, I was only asking to review it onsite, and do understand the restrictions ASTM places on their documents. Us state folks don�t have the budget to purchase all the ASTM methods.2. On page 23 we are just showing water & CO2 because they are the two main target analytes we are look-ing for with the FTIR on this test. We are using separate analyzers for NOx, CO, and O2. OK.3. Yes we are still using acetaldehyde for the spike. We will do the spike once before we start the test. OK thanks. I was just looking for consistency with previous tests.From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 2:48 PMTo: McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolZackary,The protocol looks good. Just a few very minor comments we can probably take care of via email:1. Will you be able to provide a copy of ASTM D6348-12 onsite, just for review purposes?2. P.23 � Target Analytes � why has this list been reduced down to just water & CO2?3. Will you still be using an acetaldehyde spike? It looks like one was used for the last testing.Thanks,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 11:31 AMTo: White, Matthew; Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Cooper, Justin N; Johnston, Johndunn B; O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,The date on the protocol is correct. The plan is to test on test on 10/14/2015 with a contingency day on 10/15/2015.Thank you,Zackary McCainKinder Morgan / Technical Services-EmissionsO:713-420-7434C:409-443-4537From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 10:01 AMTo: McCain, Zackary R; Zeilstra, Michael


Cc: Cooper, Justin N; Johnston, Johndunn B; O’Brien, MikeSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a revised pre-test protocol for the TGP facility located in Pelham, NH. We will review it today, and provide you with additional comments, if any.The protocol has a proposed test date of October 14th, is this correct? I only ask because in a previous email you had the 15th for a proposed test date. Take care,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 7:22 AMTo: White, Matthew; Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Cooper, Justin N; Johnston, Johndunn B; McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,Attached is the Finalized Emissions Test Protocol for TGP 270B (Pelham). This protocol covers unit A1 to be tested the week of 10/12/2015.Zackary McCainKinder Morgan / Technical Services-EmissionsO:713-420-7434C:409-443-4537From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 11:29 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolHi Zackary,Thank you for your prompt response. I did not see the test date of October 15th in the protocol (I just saw the week of October 12th), but that will still work with our schedule. Take care,MattFrom: McCain, Zackary R [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 12:05 PMTo: White, MatthewSubject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolMatthew,I�m working on getting this for you. I should have it back by tomorrow. Is this going to delay the testing date or are we still good for 10/15/2015?From: White, Matthew [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 9:31 AMTo: McCain, Zackary RCc: O’Brien, Mike; Planchet, ClaudeSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC ProtocolGood Morning Zackary,Thank you for providing DES with a copy of the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC Stack Test Protocol (�the Proto-col�), for testing at the Pelham, NH facility. DES is available the week of October 12th to witness testing, but our schedule is filling in quickly, so I will tentatively put a placeholder down for testing on the 13th (14th as a contingency day) if that works for you. Prior to testing, arrangements will be made to schedule a pretest meet-ing to be held either via conference call or at the facility. DES has reviewed the Protocol. Overall it looks good, but we do have some comments which are as follows:Please provide detailed specifications on the Solar Centaur 50-6200LS, including but not limited to power rat-


ing, max exhaust flow rate/temperature, max fuel firing rate, max heat input). Please explain why you have proposed using ASTM D6348-12 (FTIR) to analyze CO2? The Permit specifies Method 3 or 3A.Page 6 - Determination of Stratification - Subpart KKKK invokes the requirements of sections 6.5.6.1 a through e of Part 75 for the stratification test, which requires minimum of 12 points. A 12 point stratification test coinciding with run 1 was accomplished during the test in November, 2013. Please modify protocol to in-clude a 12 point (minimum) stratification check. Please also be advised �5% or 0.5ppm� only refers to NOx.Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs - states �three (3) individual one (20) minute test runs�, and under Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Data Quality Objectives Test Runs (Pg 8) states: �Three test runs, 60 minutes each�. Please clarify how long each test run will be. 5. Page 10 � Compliance Test Runs � Env-A 802.10(a) requires that testing be conducted while the device is operated between 90% and 100% of rated capacity.Please include a stack diagram including stack diameter and distances from the testing locations from upstream and downstream flow disturbances.Please identify the specific process data (including but not limited to: engine/system operating parameters) that will be collected during the test.Page 10 fuel gas analysis � please advise if an actual physical sample of fuel gas will be collected during the test; If so, identify the following:How the sample will be collectedAt what point during the test runs, and what type of container will be used to collect the sample.Which method(s) will be used to analyze the gas sample.How do you plan to comply with 40CFR60.4415?Please include copies of field data sheets to be used during testing.Please provide all calculations in the protocol appendices, such as those referenced on Page 8, per 7E 13.2 and 7E 13.3.Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at the number below.Take care,MattMatthew A. WhiteCEM/Stack Test EngineerNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095Office: (603) 271-0694 Fax: (603) [email protected]

===========================================================================2015_10_09 FW FERC 108 Comment letter on Tennessee Gas’ NED draft resource reports.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_10_09 FW FERC 108 Comment letter on Tennessee Gas’ NED draft resource reports: NED Draft Resource Report Comments_PF14-22_100815.docxSubject: FW: FERC 10/8 Comment letter on Tennessee Gas’ NED draft resource reportsDate: Friday, October 9, 2015 9:00 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Ro-berge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>Conversation: FERC 10/8 Comment letter on Tennessee Gas’ NED draft resource reports


FYI:FERC has provided its own comments to Kinder Morgan on the Resource Report. (see comments regarding Resource Report 9: Air and Noise Quality, starting on page 25). I don�t think we need to amend any of the comments you prepared in light of FERC�s comments. I�m happy to see FERC has some of the same concerns and is firmly requiring Kinder Morgan to evaluate air quality is-sues.-ToddFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 4:38 PMTo: Adams, Collis; Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Chormann, RickSubject: FW: FERC 10/8 Comment letter on Tennessee Gas’ NED draft resource reportsHi Folks, I just received this from Eric today and wanted to share it with you and your team. Please share this with the team members in your division. BTW, I was correct about these �Resource Reports� being a precur-sor to the Draft EIS for the KM/Tennessee Gas project (see Eric�s cover letter). Our comments will address these reports for now and they will be answered by Tennessee Gas before FERC develops its Draft EIS for the project. At that time, we will have another opportunity to comment during the NEPA scoping sessions. Thought I would clarify where we are in the project train. Thank you for all of your help. I know this is a mas-sive �extra� duty for your staff, but the impacts from this project are also potentially massive. TimFrom: Eric Tomasi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 4:06 PMTo: Elaine P. Baum; S. Xiah Kragie; [email protected]; Nancy Fox-Fernandez; Beverly Woods; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Hender-son, Carol; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Naylor, Mark; Drew, Tim; David, Owen; Adams, Collis; Mauck, Ridge; Colburn, Jacquie; Cairns, Sara; Merrill, Lorraine; [email protected]; [email protected]; St.Louis, Christina; Aman-da Mardiney; Paul Friedman; Rafael Montag; Howard, Jennifer (DCR); Muzzey, Elizabeth; Boisvert, Richard A; Hoffer, Melissa (AGO); Ireland, Matthew (AGO); Peggy Sloan; Strysky, Alexander (ENV); Wendy Juchnev-ics-Freeman ([email protected])Cc: Doig, Rebecca (DEP); [email protected]; Cairns, Sara; Walsh-Rogalski, William; John Kallfelz; Diers, Ted; Chandler, Wade B NAB; Fetterman, Marvin F. (DOT); Feighner, Edna; McCartney, Debi; Henry Underwood; ‘Tim Murphy’; Richard Radwanski; Hintz, Donna (DOT); Nusca, Cathy (DOT); Garcia-Smith, Eileen (MISC); Hatfield, Meredith; Comstock, Gregg; Wyatt, Robert; Kumin, Enid (DPU)


Subject: FERC 10/8 Comment letter on Tennessee Gas’ NED draft resource reportsHello, This was issued today. I am sure we will be issuing additional data requests if we feel that Tennessee Gas did not answer all of our questions, or public comments in the application. If you feel they did not appropriately answer/address your agency�s concerns, we can always send additional questions on your behalf. *************************************Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionOffice: (202) 502-8097*************************************

===========================================================================2015_10_09 Kinder Morgan - Dams 401 WQC.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder Morgan - Dams & 401 WQCDate: Friday, October 9, 2015 12:32 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan - Dams & 401 WQCHi Collis, Did you check on these two programs for comments to the KM Resource Reports? Just wondering. TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_09 Kinder Morgan - UL Article for the Town of Merrimack.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder Morgan - UL Article for the Town of MerrimackDate: Friday, October 9, 2015 1:08 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>


To: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan - UL Article for the Town of Merrimackhttp://www.unionleader.com/Kinder-Morgan-mulls-pipeline-route-change Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_09 Kinder-Morgan Pipeline - review of Resource Reports.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder-Morgan Pipeline - review of Resource ReportsDate: Friday, October 9, 2015 12:43 PMFrom: Comstock, Gregg </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=COMSTOCK>To: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Cc: “David, Owen” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder-Morgan Pipeline - review of Resource ReportsHi Collis,Tim Drew just stopped by. He said you are coordinating the review of the Resource Reports (precursor to the draft EIS) for the Kinder-Morgan pipeline project and that you have a spreadsheet to fill out. Could you please send Owen and I a link to the report and spreadsheet? When are comments due? Thanks very much Collis.GreggGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>


===========================================================================2015_10_09 KM informationresponse.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_10_09 KM informationresponse: KM_Pipeline Review.docx KM_Pipeline_Mar2015.pdfSubject: KM information/responseDate: Friday, October 9, 2015 12:39 PMFrom: Sommer, Lori </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SOMMER>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: KM information/responseHi Tim,Can you remind me where you want us to put comments on the Kinder Morgan pipeline? Please find the two attached documents relative to the route and existing DES mitigation easements. Thanks, Lori SommerDES Wetland Mitigation CoordinatorWetlands Bureau(603) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ATTENTION: In order to ensure that all permit applications have the required elements for technical re-view, please be certain to use the newest versions of our application forms dated in the footnote as “valid until 7/1/2013”. Going forward, the Land Resources Management Programs plan to update applications every 6 months. The next round of updates will occur on June 1, 2013. Please refer to our website at http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm <https://owa.des.nh.gov/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm> for the current application forms.

===========================================================================2015_10_09 Proposed Kinder MorganTennessee Gas Pipeline Company Project (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Proposed Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company ProjectDate: Friday, October 9, 2015 2:37 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Cc: “David, Owen” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company ProjectHi Gregg, The following shared Excel chart is located at: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NH-DESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> The response date was today, but obviously, you and Owen can take more time into next week to review the documents. These documents are intended to gather sufficient data from Kinder Morgan to enable FERC to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement according to the National Environmental Policy Act guidelines (http://www.kindermorgan.com/business/gas_pipelines/east/neenergydirect/).I apologize for this late notice, but if three is anything I can do to help you, including a more in-depth discussion of this activity, please feel free to let me know. Many thanks.Tim Timothy W. Drew


AdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.


===========================================================================Subject: Proposed Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company ProjectDate: Friday, October 9, 2015 2:37 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Cc: “David, Owen” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company ProjectHi Gregg, The following shared Excel chart is located at: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NH-DESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> The response date was today, but obviously, you and Owen can take more time into next week to review the documents. These documents are intended to gather sufficient data from Kinder Morgan to enable FERC to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement according to the National Environmental Policy Act guidelines (http://www.kindermorgan.com/business/gas_pipelines/east/neenergydirect/).I apologize for this late notice, but if three is anything I can do to help you, including a more in-depth discussion of this activity, please feel free to let me know. Many thanks.Tim Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306


Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.


===========================================================================Subject: Proposed Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company ProjectDate: Friday, October 9, 2015 2:37 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Cc: “David, Owen” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company ProjectHi Gregg, The following shared Excel chart is located at: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NH-DESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> The response date was today, but obviously, you and Owen can take more time into next week to review the documents. These documents are intended to gather sufficient data from Kinder Morgan to enable FERC to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement according to the National Environmental Policy Act guidelines (http://www.kindermorgan.com/business/gas_pipelines/east/neenergydirect/).I apologize for this late notice, but if three is anything I can do to help you, including a more in-depth discussion of this activity, please feel free to let me know. Many thanks.Tim Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this


email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_09 Proposed Kinder MorganTennessee Gas Pipeline Company Project.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Proposed Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company ProjectDate: Friday, October 9, 2015 2:37 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Cc: “David, Owen” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company ProjectHi Gregg, The following shared Excel chart is located at: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NH-DESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> The response date was today, but obviously, you and Owen can take more time into next week to review the documents. These documents are intended to gather sufficient data from Kinder Morgan to enable FERC to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement according to the National Environmental Policy Act guidelines (http://www.kindermorgan.com/business/gas_pipelines/east/neenergydirect/).I apologize for this late notice, but if three is anything I can do to help you, including a more in-depth discussion of this activity, please feel free to let me know. Many thanks.Tim Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_09 RE Kinder-Morgan Pipeline - review of Resource Reports (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Kinder-Morgan Pipeline - review of Resource ReportsDate: Friday, October 9, 2015 12:48 PM


From: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Cc: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder-Morgan Pipeline - review of Resource ReportsTim �I am heading into an important re-org meeting for the afternoon. Please send Gregg the links. Thank you!From: Comstock, Gregg Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 12:44 PMTo: Adams, CollisCc: David, OwenSubject: Kinder-Morgan Pipeline - review of Resource ReportsHi Collis,Tim Drew just stopped by. He said you are coordinating the review of the Resource Reports (precursor to the draft EIS) for the Kinder-Morgan pipeline project and that you have a spreadsheet to fill out. Could you please send Owen and I a link to the report and spreadsheet? When are comments due? Thanks very much Collis.GreggGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected]

===========================================================================2015_10_09 RE Kinder-Morgan Pipeline - review of Resource Reports.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Kinder-Morgan Pipeline - review of Resource ReportsDate: Friday, October 9, 2015 12:48 PMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Cc: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder-Morgan Pipeline - review of Resource ReportsTim �I am heading into an important re-org meeting for the afternoon. Please send Gregg the links. Thank you!From: Comstock, Gregg Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 12:44 PMTo: Adams, CollisCc: David, OwenSubject: Kinder-Morgan Pipeline - review of Resource ReportsHi Collis,Tim Drew just stopped by. He said you are coordinating the review of the Resource Reports (precursor to the draft EIS) for the Kinder-Morgan pipeline project and that you have a spreadsheet to fill out. Could you please send Owen and I a link to the report and spreadsheet? When are comments due? Thanks very much Collis.GreggGregg Comstock, P.E.


Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected]

===========================================================================2015_10_09 RE MItigation review on KM line.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: MItigation review on KM lineDate: Friday, October 9, 2015 10:05 AMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “Tilton, Mary Ann” <[email protected]>Cc: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>Conversation: MItigation review on KM lineMost definitely. Thanks.From: Sommer, Lori Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 3:16 PMTo: Tilton, Mary Ann; Adams, CollisCc: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlSubject: MItigation review on KM lineMindy and I attended a meeting on the Kinder Morgan pipeline back in March and were tasked to determine if there were any DES easements within the route or near the route. The attached pdf is the line we reviewed at the time of our review and the memo contains the results of that review. I need to know if this is something that should be included in the comment letter being assembled. Thanks, Lori SommerDES Wetland Mitigation CoordinatorWetlands Bureau(603) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ATTENTION: In order to ensure that all permit applications have the required elements for technical re-view, please be certain to use the newest versions of our application forms dated in the footnote as “valid until 7/1/2013”. Going forward, the Land Resources Management Programs plan to update applications every 6 months. The next round of updates will occur on June 1, 2013. Please refer to our website at http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm <https://owa.des.nh.gov/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm> for the current application forms.

===========================================================================2015_10_12 Kinder Morgan Comment Chart.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder Morgan Comment ChartDate: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:32 AMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>Cc: “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>, “Fitzgerald, Mike” <[email protected]>, “DuBois, H. Keith” <[email protected]>


Conversation: Kinder Morgan Comment ChartGood morning, Folks. I have noted that your comments have been added to the Excel spreadsheet for your division. I will be out of the office until late in the day for the next three days (through October 15). Therefore, please have your division director/assistant director review your comments first and let me know of any changes to be made. I will prepare a cover letter today and post it in draft form in the same NEPA folder on the S-drive. My plan is to forward out final set of comments to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company LLC on either Wednesday or Thursday to meet the October 16 deadline.This is the direct link to the Excel spread sheet for each division: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NH-DESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_12 Kinder Morgan Instructions.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder Morgan InstructionsDate: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:46 AMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>Cc: “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan InstructionsDid I ever send you this request and guidance?______________________Good afternoon, John, Todd, Owen and Collis,You have been chosen by the SLT to collect the comments and concerns, identify resources and suggest all technical changes that are warranted (from DES�s perspective) for the Draft Environmental Impacts Statement (DEIS) for the proposed Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline project across the southern tier of New Hamp-shire. The following Excel spreadsheet has been created to facilitate that collection effort:


This is the direct link to the Excel spread sheet for each division: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NH-DESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> The chart can be changed as needed by adding or deleting columns, rows, cells, etc. and each field/box will expand and wrap to fit the extent of comments. I have dedicated a customized page to each of your divisions for ease in sorting the comments. The DEIS chart�s ordinate matches the Resource Report listing, mirroring the format within the Resource Documents plus 13 appendices, and the abscissa of the chart has been populated with my list of various jurisdictions for DES that may be triggered. If you see another topic that I have missed, please add it to the chart. Be sure to have your reviewers cite the page number, section number, etc. when pos-sible so that the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) officials can easily located the focus of our comments, concerns or suggested corrections. I have also created a section for �General comments� that don�t tie directly to any specific page or section for the sake of completeness.Very important: The due date for all DES comments to be returned to me is Friday, October 9. The following link takes you to the online version of the Resource Reports and its appendices: (KM Link, FERC Docket #14-22-00).http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/file_list.asp?accession_num=20150724-506 Finally, this is only the second time this process has been used for such a major project review. Please make notes of corrections or improvements that you feel are needed so that I can incorporate them into an upcoming Standard Operating Procedure to guide future such National Environmental Policy Act reviews.My thanks to all of you for shouldering such a complex task in addition to your �normal� work!TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_13 FW NED Pipeline threatens critically endangered species.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: NED Pipeline threatens critically endangered species.Date: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 10:56 AMFrom: Boone, Kimberly </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MAHON>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>


Cc: “Minicucci, Bob” <[email protected]>, “Zych, Melissa” <[email protected]>Conversation: NED Pipeline threatens critically endangered species.Hi Tim,It is my understanding that you are dealing with environmental issues regarding the proposed Kinder Morgan project.Thanks, KimKimberly Boone Administrator III Department of Environmental Services Phone: (603) 271-3288 Email: [email protected] From: Emily Chetkowski [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 9:04 PMTo: Boone, KimberlyCc: Minicucci, Bob; Zych, MelissaSubject: NED Pipeline threatens critically endangered species.Hello, Our 501c3 non-profit sanctuary for a critically endangered landrace pony breed is located one mile from the proposed Kinder Morgan compressor station in New Ipswich, NH. This pony is the last indigenous pony on this continent that remains as nature created it, an unimproved landrace, through and through. There are only 250 breeding age ponies left in the world, 34 in the USA, and we provide permanent safe haven for 10 of those ponies. We also have almost one entire critically important bloodline here. We have done due diligence to stop this, to find protection for these provincially protected ponies but our con-cerns are NOT being addressed. In the event of an evacuation is it physically impossible for us to evacuate the herd, including a very very rare stallion who has a broken femur and needs special transportation. It has been scientifically proven that compressor stations emit pollutants the cause infertility, sterility and DEATH to livestock within a 5 mile radius, predominantly in the 1 to 2 mile range, in which our �safe haven� sits. This is completely unacceptable and we are appealing to you to please take notice and step forth to protect our herd, that numbers 5% of the ponies left on this planet. We have spoken to Kinder Morgan face to face. They initially presented total mistruths which we corrected with facts. We asked if they could guarantee that these precious animals would be safe from their pipeline. They admitted they could not. Their written response to our concerns was to blatantly lie that the pipeline is safe. I�m sorry but we cannot risk this. No amount of money can repair or purchase genetics. To lose ANY of these animals will deal a devastating blow to the breeds future and in turn to the future of equines themselves, to lose such a genetically important landrace. On top of that, we are a public charity. This abomination will utterly destroy us, our efforts and our progress. We are appealing to you, who represent environmental concerns for this state and all the living things who dwell here, to step forward and help us right a VERY grave wrong. FERC has said our concerns will be included in the environmental study but we all know that FERC is nothing but a rubber stamp agency. We see the writing on the wall quite clearly. This is a total outrage. Emily Chetkowski, PresidentVilli Poni Farm, Newfoundland Pony SanctuaryPO Box 371New Ipswich, NH 03071 Sanctuary: 603-291-0424 [email protected]�Preserving the future, one Newfoundland Pony at a time.� What is a Newfoundland Pony? Why is it critically endangered? What can you do to help?


Visit our Website <http://www.villiponifarm.org/> . <http://www.villiponifarm.org/> Visit <http://www.vil-liponifarm.org/contact-us.html> our ponies <http://www.villiponifarm.org/contact-us.html> . Find us on Face-book <https://www.facebook.com/Newfoundlandponysanctuary?ref=hl> . See us on YouTube <http://youtu.be/qBNe_QN5e8c> . Get our Newsletter <http://villiponifarm.us9.list-manage.com/subscribe/post?u=0dc6380de9fccacb9ee915089&id=e422f4db01> . Better yet, Donate <https://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_flow&SESSION=thwLdf1WoFaab-782cVHYVh61UCN9EB7bEOhsoQeooOMfM_ggdTCSaQWfz4&dispatch=5885d80a13c0db1f8e263663d3faee8d66f31424b43e9a70645c907a6cbd8fb4> today.

===========================================================================2015_10_13 RE Kinder Morgan Comment Chart.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Kinder Morgan Comment ChartDate: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 8:12 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan Comment ChartTim,Are you sure the comments are submitted to Kinder Morgan? I thought they would be submitted to FERC.From: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:33 AMTo: Adams, Collis; Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Chormann, RickCc: Pelletier, Rene; Fitzgerald, Mike; DuBois, H. KeithSubject: Kinder Morgan Comment ChartGood morning, Folks. I have noted that your comments have been added to the Excel spreadsheet for your division. I will be out of the office until late in the day for the next three days (through October 15). Therefore, please have your division director/assistant director review your comments first and let me know of any changes to be made. I will prepare a cover letter today and post it in draft form in the same NEPA folder on the S-drive. My plan is to forward out final set of comments to Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company LLC on either Wednesday or Thursday to meet the October 16 deadline.This is the direct link to the Excel spread sheet for each division: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NH-DESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may


be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_13 RE Kinder Morgan Instructions (38).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Kinder Morgan InstructionsDate: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 11:52 AMFrom: Perelli, Vince </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PERELLI>To: “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan InstructionsGuys,Is this better? Excel has a 250 word visual maximum even though you can type in more than that. It�s just a limitation to the program as it really isn�t designed for lots of text. I got it down to a small font that fit roughly within the confines of the Appendix M rows. Work for you?See: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\NorthernPassTransmissionSystemNH-DESCommentsSept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\NorthernPassTransmissionSystemNHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> Hmmmm. One problem I just noticed. I used the file dated most recently. It says September vs. October, however. Tim -- You will have to gain control of the situation and make sure that there is only ONE master copy of the document. Please advise.VFrom: Regan, John Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 2:10 PMTo: Drew, TimCc: Perelli, VinceSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan InstructionsI fixed some of the wrap around. But there was a spacing problem for comments to Appendix M: Every new comment went into the next row and not within the row for Appendix M.Sorry for any confusion.From: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 12:59 PMTo: Regan, JohnCc: Perelli, VinceSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan InstructionsThanks John. I will ask Vince Perelli to take a look at the �wrapping� function in the chart�s fields to see if he can fix the appearance of the comments. TimFrom: Regan, John Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 12:52 PMTo: Drew, TimSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan InstructionsTim,I added my comments to the table but the formatting is a bit funky when I cut and pasted my comments. I will take another look to see I make it more presentable.From: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:46 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Adams, Collis; Regan, John; Chormann, Rick


Cc: Pelletier, ReneSubject: Kinder Morgan InstructionsDid I ever send you this request and guidance?______________________Good afternoon, John, Todd, Owen and Collis,You have been chosen by the SLT to collect the comments and concerns, identify resources and suggest all technical changes that are warranted (from DES�s perspective) for the Draft Environmental Impacts Statement (DEIS) for the proposed Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline project across the southern tier of New Hamp-shire. The following Excel spreadsheet has been created to facilitate that collection effort:This is the direct link to the Excel spread sheet for each division: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NH-DESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> The chart can be changed as needed by adding or deleting columns, rows, cells, etc. and each field/box will expand and wrap to fit the extent of comments. I have dedicated a customized page to each of your divisions for ease in sorting the comments. The DEIS chart�s ordinate matches the Resource Report listing, mirroring the format within the Resource Documents plus 13 appendices, and the abscissa of the chart has been populated with my list of various jurisdictions for DES that may be triggered. If you see another topic that I have missed, please add it to the chart. Be sure to have your reviewers cite the page number, section number, etc. when pos-sible so that the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) officials can easily located the focus of our comments, concerns or suggested corrections. I have also created a section for �General comments� that don�t tie directly to any specific page or section for the sake of completeness.Very important: The due date for all DES comments to be returned to me is Friday, October 9. The following link takes you to the online version of the Resource Reports and its appendices: (KM Link, FERC Docket #14-22-00).http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/file_list.asp?accession_num=20150724-506 Finally, this is only the second time this process has been used for such a major project review. Please make notes of corrections or improvements that you feel are needed so that I can incorporate them into an upcoming Standard Operating Procedure to guide future such National Environmental Policy Act reviews.My thanks to all of you for shouldering such a complex task in addition to your �normal� work!TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.


===========================================================================2015_10_14 Friday Meeting.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Friday MeetingDate: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 3:13 PMFrom: Boisvert, Tracey </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=TRACEY.L.BOISVERT>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Friday MeetingHi Tim,I just wanted to make sure that you knew that I was planning on attending the State agency meeting regarding Kinder Morgan project since I wasn�t on the initial invite list. Thanks,TraceyTracey Boisvert, Program DirectorConservation Land Stewardship ProgramNH Office of Energy and Planning107 Pleasant Street, Johnson Hall, 3rd FloorConcord NH 03301Phone: (603) 271-6809

===========================================================================2015_10_14 FW Proposed Kinder MorganTennessee Gas Pipeline Project Southern Tier of NH - Critical

Infrastructure.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: FW: Proposed Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Project, Southern Tier of NH - Critical Infra-structure?Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 3:02 PMFrom: Harper, Jennifer </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JENNIFERHARPER>To: “’Drew, Tim’” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Project, Southern Tier of NH - Critical Infra-structure?Hi Tim � Joe Villers from the IAC will be attending this meeting; he�s familiar with the CIKR program.JennJennifer L. Harper, Assistant DirectorNH Homeland Security and Emergency Management603/223-3615 Office603/419-9179 Cell From: Drew, TimSent: Friday, October 09, 2015 2:27:54 PMTo: Harper, JenniferSubject: Proposed Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Project, Southern Tier of NH - Critical Infrastruc-ture?Good afternoon, Jen, Based on a request from Kerry Holmes, I am have arranged a State agency-only meeting on Friday, October 16 from 1:00 � 2:30 PM here at DES to discuss the latest status of the proposed Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline project for the southern tier of New Hampshire. All comments to the FERC project manager, Eric Tomasi, are also due that day. Someone from Randy Knepper�s office will attend, among many others (e.g., DOT, F&G, OEP, AG�s Office, etc.), but I also thought of you and the CI/KR potential of this project, should it


be built. Kerry has suggested the following agenda:-Department updates-State land/easement impacts-Coordination moving forward-Open discussion Should someone from HSEM attend as well? If so, if you can point to that person, I will send the meeting arrangements to him/her immediately. Thank you.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_14 RE DWGB comments on Kinder-Morgan Draft Resource Reports.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: DWGB comments on Kinder-Morgan Draft Resource ReportsDate: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 9:17 AMFrom: Susca, Paul </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SUSCA>To: “Kernen, Brandon” <[email protected]>, “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>, “Pelle-tier, Rene” <[email protected]>Conversation: DWGB comments on Kinder-Morgan Draft Resource ReportsI would just add one note to the comments on 2.1.1.4.1 Aquifers: �As noted in the overall comments on Section 2.0, potential sources of public drinking water should also be included in the analysis. NHDES�s Drinking Wa-ter Source Protection Program has mapped �favorable gravel well areas� and this information could be used in such an analysis.Paul SuscaSupervisor - Planning, Protection & AssistanceDrinking Water and Groundwater BureauNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesPO Box 95Concord, New Hampshire 03302-0095(603) 271-7061Announcing the NHDES Be Well Informed Private Well App - An interactive web application for private well owners to interpret water quality test results and identify appropriate water treatment options. Visit http://xml2.


des.state.nh.us/DWITool/From: Kernen, Brandon Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 2:06 PMTo: Drew, Tim; Pelletier, ReneCc: Susca, PaulSubject: RE: DWGB comments on Kinder-Morgan Draft Resource ReportsPaul�s and my initial comments are below. Thank you.Overall Document Comment � The Kinder-Morgan project documents focusses on the construction of an un-derground natural gas pipeline. In New Hampshire, some utility easements allow for the conversion of a natural gas pipeline to a liquid oil pipeline. If this the case with the proposed Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline, all aspects of the Environmental Report should be updated to assess this pipeline use scenario. Section 2.0 � Overall CommentThis section needs to be update to discuss:1) The location of the pipeline relative to potential groundwater sources of drinking water required to meet future water needs.2) The impact of constructing an extensive pipeline across the state of New Hampshire on water systems that need to install or replace water mains that cross through or are located in close proximity to the pipeline.3) Methods to manage vegetation once the pipeline is constructed and impacts on groundwater and drinking water quality.2.1.1.4.1 AquifersThis section states, �Figures 2.1-1a and 2.1-1b in Attachment 2a to this Resource Report depict the bedrock aquifers and surficial aquifers crossed by the proposed Project in New Hampshire.� This is not correct; map-sheets 13-15 and 17-18, which depict the New Hampshire portion of the proposed route, do not depict surfi-cial aquifers. DES suggests that the maps also depict wellhead protection areas (WHPAs) on maps included in this report. WHPAs were clearly considered in the preparation of the draft resource report, since they are mentioned, but the term is also inappropriately applied to the watersheds of Canobie Lake and Arlington Mill Pond, both public water supply sources. Also, the discussion in this section focuses on major stratified-drift aquifers and then on WHPAs for the wells in those aquifers, so it is not clear whether the scope of the discussion has been narrowed down based on the location of major aquifers. The discussion should include all WHPAs: groundwater classified GB, GA1, and GAA; and water supply watersheds.2.1.1.4.3 Groundwater QualityCorrection: the groundwater quality classifications referred to are actually groundwater protection classifica-tions. They refer to different levels of protection. This section discusses groundwater protection under the NH Groundwater Protection Act (RSA 485-C). Equally important is groundwater protection implemented on the lo-cal level through land user ordinances, such as aquifer protection ordinances, adopted and implemented by mu-nicipalities as authorized by state land use statutes. This section references the groundwater protection BMPs adopted by NHDES under the RSA 485-C; it should be noted that some aspects of the proposed project are subject to those BMPs. The draft RR states, �The Project is not anticipated to have impacts on any aquifers or public and private water supplies.� With respect to potential impacts to groundwater quality in general and to water supply sources in particular, the EIS should report on any incidents of groundwater or water supply con-taminations associated with Tennessee Gas Pipeline�s facilities similar to those associated with the proposed project. The rationale for this request is not that Tennessee�s record is at issue, but that it would be informative with respect to potential impacts associated with these types of facilities.Section 2.1.5 & Table 2.1-2The document references a using data from NH Granit to identify wells within 200 feet of the proposed pipe-line. Wells within 2000 feet not 200 feet need to be identified. Table 2.1-2 indicates that wells were identified using data from NH Granite and it is unknown if the wells identified or public or private. NHDES has GIS coverages that specifically identifies the location of all sources of water for public water systems. Additionally, NHDES has developed methods to identify if a private well is present on a given lot for all areas of New Hampshire. The most current dataset for identifying the location of


sources of water for public water systems needs to be utilized. Additionally, revisions to this document should utilize information from NHDES that identifies lots within 2000 feet of the pipeline with private wells. 2.1.5.1.4 � The document states that it is awaiting a response to an December 2014 request to NHDES regard-ing the location of public water systems. NHDES has responded to multiple requests for data from consultants working on this project. Additionally, this data can be obtained on the internet from NHDES� OneStop. 2.4.2.3 � Despite the implementation of rock blasting best management practices to avoid the contamination of groundwater, rock blasting has contaminated groundwater sampled from drinking water supply wells up to 2000 feet away in New HampshireSection 6.2 � Blasting & Appendix M (Attachment M8 Blasting Management Plan)The provisions to protect groundwater and public and private water supply wells from becoming contaminated by activities and materials associated with rock blasting are not adequate. In New Hampshire, rock blasting has contaminated groundwater obtained from drinking water wells with nitrate, nitrite and volatile organic com-pounds. The document needs to be revised to include provisions to:1) Always utilize blasting best management practices to prevent the contamination of groundwater;2) Identify wells within 2000 feet, opposed to 200 feet where blasting will occur. Monitor the water quality (nitrate, nitrite and volatile organic compounds) in representative wells before , during and after rock blasting;3) Identify methods that will be employed to identify private and public water supply wells4) Identify methods that will be employed to address increased turbidity in wells due to excavating bedrock using mechanical or rock blasting methods.The provisions proposed in the document do not meet the following standard requirements for NHDES� Al-teration of Terrain Applications:1) [If more than 5000 cubic yards are blasted] Identify drinking water wells located within 2000 feet of the proposed blasting activities. Develop a groundwater quality sampling program to monitor for nitrate and nitrite either in the drinking water supply wells or in other wells that are representative of the drinking water sup-ply wells in the area. The plan must include pre and post blast water quality monitoring and be approved by NHDES prior to initiating blasting. The groundwater sampling program must be implemented once approved by NHDES.2) [Applies to all Blasting] The following Best Management Procedures for blasting shall be complied with:(1) Loading practices. The following blasthole loading practices to minimize environmental effects shall be fol-lowed: (a) Drilling logs shall be maintained by the driller and communicated directly to the blaster. The logs shall indi-cate depths and lengths of voids, cavities, and fault zones or other weak zones encountered as well as ground-water conditions. (b) Explosive products shall be managed on-site so that they are either used in the borehole, returned to the delivery vehicle, or placed in secure containers for off-site disposal. (c) Spillage around the borehole shall either be placed in the borehole or cleaned up and returned to an appropri-ate vehicle for handling or placement in secured containers for off-site disposal.Lastly, the document should include provisions to address the potential for rock blasting resulting in the indoor air of nearby structures being contaminated with carbon monoxide. NHGS has commented (In Tim�s spreadsheet, Commissioner�s Office tab, cell c51) with reference to http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/common/OpenNat.asp?fileID=13939516:I question whether the stated 200 foot blast radius is sufficient to identify wells at risk from impacts of blasting on water quality and quantity. A 1000 foot buffer may be more reasonable to establish ambient groundwater conditions in wells prior to blasting and safeguard well owners.Waste Division has commented:1. Resource Report 2, 2.2.5 Contaminated Sediments, page 2-41. The report mentions that Figure 2.1-3 (sheets 14-18 of 28) depicts the location of known state and federal hazardous waste sites. It appears that it also includes other contaminated sites such as landfills, leaking underground storage tanks and sites listed as �re-mediation sites� on DES� One Stop web page. The report does not evaluate in detail whether the anticipated construction may encounter contamination (soil, groundwater or wastes) associated with the sites. In some


instances where the planned construction is near known contamination sites, pre-construction sampling and as-sessment may be prudent to determine if contaminated materials will be encountered and to develop to specific plans to manage the contaminated materials. There are numerous asbestos disposal sites in the Nashua-Hudson are that historically received wastes from the former Johns-Manville when it operated. DES suggests you add asbestos sites to Figure 2.1-3 to anticipate where asbestos may be encountered and require management during construction.2. Resource Report 2, 2.1.1.4.3 Groundwater Quality, page 2-11. In the discussion of the Groundwater Protection Act RSA 485-C the reference to the Department of Safety �NHDOS� is not correct and should be deleted.3. Resource Report 2, 2.1.1.4 Groundwater Hazards, page 2-12. DES recommends that Figure 2.1-3 and Table M7-A-1 include the location of known asbestos sites that may be near the proposed project. There are a number of asbestos disposal sites in the Nashua and Hudson area that received asbestos waste from the former Johns-Manville manufacturing plant. 1. Appendix M, Environmental Construction Plan for New Hampshirea. Page M-27, Section 4.3 Spill Prevention and Response Plan and Attachment M3 Spill Prevention And Response Plan i. DES has a fact sheet on notification for spills and the discovery of contamination http://des.nh.gov/organization/commissioner/pip/factsheets/rem/documents/rem-13.pdf . The report should be updated to include the information in the fact sheet relative to reporting spills. ii. Please provide a list of materials and quantities expected to be used during the construction of the pipeline such as fuels used for construction vehicles, hazardous wastes, hazardous substances and other chemicals. iii. In the event of the spill/discharge of oil and/or hazardous wastes or substances the investigation and remediation must be conducted in compliance with Env-Or 600 Contaminated Site Management Rules. These rules contain soil and groundwater clean-up standards and the procedures to be followed to investigate and remediate contamination resulting from a spill or discharge of oil, hazardous waste/substances or other regulated release of contamination. iv. Section 3.0 of Attachment 3. If any of the locations are a federal small quantity generator or large quantity generator of hazardous waste, New Hampshire law requires compli-ance with 40 CFR 265.50, Contingency Planning.b. Page M-28, Section 4.4 Waste Management Plan and Attachment M4 i. Please clarify whether this plan is intended to address wastes pro-duced from the actual activities associated with construction of the pipeline and appurtenances. Attachment M7 addresses unanticipated discovery of contamination from buried wastes, contaminated soil and contaminated groundwater and DES provided additional comments to that section. ii. DES requests a more detailed description of the wastes that are anticipated to be generated based on construction of other pipeline projects. For example what types and quantities of hazardous wastes (pipeline sludge, spent pig wastes, sandblast abrasives, paint thinner and sol-vents), asbestos, PCB wastes and non-hazardous wastes (oily rock/soil, oily rags, sandblast abrasive and general trash/garbage) are generated during construction? The information would be helpful to DES in order to better understand the scope of wastes to be generated during the pipeline construction in New Hampshire. With that additional information DES may be able to provide more specific guidance. iii. PCBs wastes are subject to the federal Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) program administered by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Please describe how PCBs wastes are generated during pipeline construction and the expected quantities to be generated during construc-tion in New Hampshire. iv. Page M4-2 Section 3.1 HAZARDOUS WASTE.1. A variety of waste streams would be generated during construction and operation of the pipeline, and under the New Hampshire Hazardous Waste Rules, generators of waste are required to determine if that waste is a hazardous waste (see Env-Hw 502.01). The waste management plan (WMP) does a decent job of describing


how that will be done in section 2.2. These determinations are the responsibility of the generator.2. If and when it is determined, that hazardous waste will be generated, please notify DES to obtain an EPA ID number by calling the Reporting and Information Management Section (Maria Michel) at 603-271-2921.3. The WMP uses the term �Large Quantity Generator� where in New Hampshire a generator is either a Full Quantity Generator (basically generates greater than 100 kilograms in any single month), or a Small Quan-tity Generator (basically generates less than 100 kilograms in each and every month). New Hampshire has certification programs for each of these classifications of generators which will need to be complied with.4. New Hampshire also regulates Used Oil as a state hazardous waste, although when it is a �used oil for recycle� it is subject to less stringent standards than a hazardous waste.5. New Hampshire has specific requirements for the outside storage of hazardous waste which can be found in Env-Hw 507.01(e) which includes set-back requirements, and Env-Hw 509.02(c) which includes a fence, means to control access, and a sign.6. During construction and operation of the pipeline, any wastes that is generated needs to be managed prop-erly (i.e., not dumped along the pipeline), and if the waste is hazardous waste, the waste needs to be delivered to a facility authorized to accept the waste. Depending on the circumstances, it may be possible to self-transport the hazardous waste but DES recommends it be discussed further either by contacting the Hazardous Waste Compliance Section or at a future meeting.7. The following is the link to the DES Hazardous Waste Compliance Section webpage which has informa-tion on the Hazardous Waste Rules, including Fact Sheets., http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/waste/hwcb/hwcs/index.htm .8. There are different provisions for storing hazardous waste at the site of generation (on-site) and off-site (must be delivered to a permitted TSD facility). Please clarify to what constitutes �on-site� and what consti-tutes �off-site�. Additionally, specify who is the generator (Morgan Kinder? Contractor? Property Owner?) and the generator�s responsibilities to under New Hampshire Hazardous Waste Rules, including those aspects of the rules that are more stringent than federal requirements, including small quantity generator requirements, and hazardous waste coordinator requirements. v. Page M4-3 SECTION 3.2, NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE: Last bul-let should read �Non-hazardous waste can only be transported to and disposed of at approved facilities�, i.e. it can�t be hauled to any place that is not properly permitted to receive it. Once it leaves the site of generation, in NH, and with few exceptions, it must go to a permitted transfer station, processing/treatment, or final disposal facility. vi. Page M4-4 Section 3.3.1, Asbestos/ACM:1. It is not clear how the asbestos waste might likely be generated, it is difficult to assess the adequacy of the plan. If the asbestos waste is the result of abatement (i.e., the removal of asbestos from structures and roads) the work must be done by a New Hampshire licensed asbestos abatement contractor, in accordance with RSA 141-E and Env-A 1800.2. First tier Bullet #2:� Subbullet #2�revise to read: �Gloves and other non-hazardous solid can be added before sealing.�� Subbullet #4 regarding storage of containers should be moved to be first tier bullet #4, for logic purposes;� Subbullet #5�for better grammar and clarity, DES suggests revising to read: �For accumulation con-tainers, each item placed therein must be individually wrapped and placed in the drum.3. First tier bullet #3�revise to read: �Mark of label the outer most container with the following informa-tion:�4. First tier bullet #4---the �company-approved disposal facility� must be properly permitted to receive the asbestos. Additionally, in NH, prior to shipping asbestos waste to a landfill, the landfill must be notified of the pending delivery.5. First tier bullet #5, allowing asbestos pipe to be sold or transported to scrap dealers or individual buyers---this is not allowed in New Hampshire. Env-Sw 901.05 prohibits reuse of asbestos waste.6. First tier bullet #6, subbullet #4, referencing use of a �manifest�---a manifest is not required. The cor-rect term is �asbestos shipping papers�.


7. Transportation vehicles must be placarded. vii. Page M- 28 Section 4.7 Unanticipated Discovery of Contamination Plan and Attachment M7. 1. The plan deals with management of contamination that is discovered during excavation activities for the pipeline and not contaminated wastes/materials generated by the actual construction of the pipelines and appur-tenances.2. The report states that known hazardous waste sites within 0.25 miles of the project were identified (Table M7-A-1 and Figure 2.1-3, sheet 14 of 28 thru sheet 18-28). The sites identified are from DES Site Remedia-tion and Groundwater Hazardous Inventory and include a wide range of sites that are known to currently have contamination or had contamination in the past. DES recommends that table and figure also include known asbestos disposal sites, particularly prevalent in the Nashua and Hudson area where there are numerous waste asbestos disposal sites associated with the former Johns Manville manufacturing plant. 3. Several sites were identified relatively close to the pipeline. DES recommends a more detailed analysis of the proposed construction (e.g., depth of construction, need to dewater) near those sites and consideration be given to performing some pre-construction environmental assessment to better analyze whether any contami-nated materials (wastes, soil or groundwater) would likely be encountered during the construction activities. And this would apply to the Nashua and Hudson area, where there are numerous asbestos disposal sites and it is common to encounter asbestos wastes during construction4. As mentioned in a comment above DES included link to a fact sheet outlining the requirements for report-ing contamination (oil and hazardous waste).5. DES request more detailed information on the field screening procedures that will be used. Soil and groundwater with odors or discoloration should be sampled. Liquids other than water should be sampled. The field screening methods (such as photoionization detector (PID)) should be specified. DES also requests a list/table of analytes (e.g. VOC, SVOCs, RCRA metals, TPH, PCBs, pesticides etc.), with their respective analytical methods, that will be sampled should unanticipated/unknown contamination be discovered. DES recommends that the qualified professional doing the assessment and sampling of materials suspected of being contaminated be a professional engineer or professional geologist licensed in New Hampshire.6. If soil or groundwater contamination is detected above the standards contained in Env-Or 600 Contami-nated Site Management Rules, the requirements of those rules shall apply to the investigation and remediation of the contamination.7. DES recommends the preparation of a materials management plan to deal with different categories of contaminated materials:� Materials that must be managed as a hazardous waste.� Contaminated groundwater (exceeds Ambient Groundwater Quality Standards (AGQS) encountered during pipeline construction. The options are off-site disposal at an approved facility, temporary groundwater discharge permit, USEPA remediation general permit, treatment under an approved remedial action plan, and discharge to a wastewater treatment plant if allowed.� Non-hazardous contaminated soil.� Miscellaneous solid waste such as trash, mattresses, demolition debris.� Mildly contaminated soil/urban fill such as soil that typically contains low concentrations of contami-nants (e.g., metals and polyaromatic hydrocarbons) and meets the definition of �background� per Env-Or 602.03.� TSCA regulated materials (PCBs).Paul SuscaSupervisor - Planning, Protection & AssistanceDrinking Water and Groundwater BureauNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesPO Box 95Concord, New Hampshire 03302-0095(603) 271-7061


Announcing the NHDES Be Well Informed Private Well App - An interactive web application for private well owners to interpret water quality test results and identify appropriate water treatment options. Visit http://xml2.des.state.nh.us/DWITool/

===========================================================================2015_10_15 FW Kinder Morgan State Agency Meeting.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: Kinder Morgan State Agency MeetingDate: Thursday, October 15, 2015 3:42 PMFrom: Wyatt, Robert </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BWYATT>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan State Agency MeetingHi Tim,Randy Knepper asked me to represent the PUC Safety Division at this meeting between Kinder Morgan and various State Agencies. I have been to at least two of these meetings hosted by DES during the past year. If you could let me know if there is anything I should know, or be prepared for in advance of this meeting, I would greatly appreciate a head�s up.Thanks,Bob WyattRobert J. WyattAssistant Director of Safety & SecuritySafety DivisionNew Hampshire Public Utilities CommissionTele.: (603) 271-2434Cell: (603) [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 2:14 PMTo: Stiles, CarolynSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan State Agency MeetingThank you, Carolyn. Kerry Holmes asked for the meeting without specifically stating its purpose. I have an email request in to her now and will share her response with everyone by updating the Outlook meeting notice. I have not received a reply from her yet. TimFrom: Stiles, Carolyn Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 11:26 AMTo: Drew, TimSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan State Agency MeetingHi Tim,I spoke with my Division Director, Randy Knepper, and Randy has asked that I let you know someone from the Safety Division will attend the DES Meeting on Kinder Morgan with Governor Office Staff on Friday, October 16 from 1:00 � 2:30 PM in Conference Room 208-C at DES on Hazen Drive. Are there specific questions that I can present to Randy in the meantime? This would certainly be beneficial in preparing if we have some handle on what kind of information they are looking for.Thank you,Sincerely,Carolyn A. StilesProgram Specialist I NH Public Utilities CommissionSafety Division


21 South Fruit Street, Suite 10Concord, N.H. 03301-2429Tel: 603.271.6022 Fax: 603.271.6048e-mail: [email protected] Notice: This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential and proprietary information. If you are not the intendedrecipient, please be informed that you have received this message in error. Please notify the sender immediately via the contact information listed above, anddelete the message and all attachments from your system. Any unauthorized disclosure, reproduction, use or dissemination (either whole or in part) is prohibited.Thank you for your cooperation.From: Drew, Tim Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 4:28 PMTo: Stiles, CarolynSubject: Kinder Morgan State Agency MeetingHi Carolyn, Kerry Holmes from the Governor�s Office asked that I set up a follow up meeting to the one I ar-ranged in July to help her answer some questions facing her office. This is what she sent me via email:__________________�A few questions have recently come up on the Kinder Morgan NED Project. I thought it might be beneficial to coordinate a meeting to follow-up on the one you put together back in July with a number of state agencies.Would you be able to coordinate a follow-up meeting with the state agency attendees who participated in the July meeting? I would also be happy to coordinate something if you have a list of those who attended.�Kerry__________________I typically like to include background materials beforehand to help meeting attendees prepare, but (if I was to guess) I think Kerry is seeking our direct input on various technical issues that may have come her way related to the Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline project, titled �Northeast Energy Direct.� Although she didn�t specify, I feel that your division of pipeline safety should be represented at that meeting as well.I have tentatively scheduled Friday, October 16 from 1:00 � 2:30 PM in Conference Room 208-C here at DES on Hazen Drive for the meeting. It appears from the Outlook database that most can make it to the meeting on that day. This also coincides with the due date for comments to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on the project, so I hope it works. I will send you the meeting arrangements and then you can determine if some-one from your staff should attend. Thank you for your help with this.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may



===========================================================================2015_10_15 RE Kinder Morgan Instructions.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Kinder Morgan InstructionsDate: Thursday, October 15, 2015 3:26 PMFrom: Perelli, Vince </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PERELLI>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan InstructionsHi Tim,Did you check first to see if unique information had been entered by someone? I made my changes to the most updated version (by the modify date) and that one said September. I fear that the edits I made where in this file and may have been lost. Let�s chat tomorrow to confirm where things stand.VFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 3:14 PMTo: Perelli, VinceSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan Instructions�Oct2015� is the only master copy for the NED project. I got rid of the others. TimFrom: Perelli, Vince Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 11:52 AMTo: Regan, John; Drew, TimSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan InstructionsGuys,Is this better? Excel has a 250 word visual maximum even though you can type in more than that. It�s just a limitation to the program as it really isn�t designed for lots of text. I got it down to a small font that fit roughly within the confines of the Appendix M rows. Work for you?See: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\NorthernPassTransmissionSystemNH-DESCommentsSept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\NorthernPassTransmissionSystemNHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> Hmmmm. One problem I just noticed. I used the file dated most recently. It says September vs. October, however. Tim -- You will have to gain control of the situation and make sure that there is only ONE master copy of the document. Please advise.VFrom: Regan, John Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 2:10 PMTo: Drew, TimCc: Perelli, VinceSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan InstructionsI fixed some of the wrap around. But there was a spacing problem for comments to Appendix M: Every new comment went into the next row and not within the row for Appendix M.Sorry for any confusion.From: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 12:59 PMTo: Regan, John


Cc: Perelli, VinceSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan InstructionsThanks John. I will ask Vince Perelli to take a look at the �wrapping� function in the chart�s fields to see if he can fix the appearance of the comments. TimFrom: Regan, John Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 12:52 PMTo: Drew, TimSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan InstructionsTim,I added my comments to the table but the formatting is a bit funky when I cut and pasted my comments. I will take another look to see I make it more presentable.From: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:46 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Adams, Collis; Regan, John; Chormann, RickCc: Pelletier, ReneSubject: Kinder Morgan InstructionsDid I ever send you this request and guidance?______________________Good afternoon, John, Todd, Owen and Collis,You have been chosen by the SLT to collect the comments and concerns, identify resources and suggest all technical changes that are warranted (from DES�s perspective) for the Draft Environmental Impacts Statement (DEIS) for the proposed Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline project across the southern tier of New Hamp-shire. The following Excel spreadsheet has been created to facilitate that collection effort:This is the direct link to the Excel spread sheet for each division: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NH-DESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> The chart can be changed as needed by adding or deleting columns, rows, cells, etc. and each field/box will expand and wrap to fit the extent of comments. I have dedicated a customized page to each of your divisions for ease in sorting the comments. The DEIS chart�s ordinate matches the Resource Report listing, mirroring the format within the Resource Documents plus 13 appendices, and the abscissa of the chart has been populated with my list of various jurisdictions for DES that may be triggered. If you see another topic that I have missed, please add it to the chart. Be sure to have your reviewers cite the page number, section number, etc. when pos-sible so that the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) officials can easily located the focus of our comments, concerns or suggested corrections. I have also created a section for �General comments� that don�t tie directly to any specific page or section for the sake of completeness.Very important: The due date for all DES comments to be returned to me is Friday, October 9. The following link takes you to the online version of the Resource Reports and its appendices: (KM Link, FERC Docket #14-22-00).http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/file_list.asp?accession_num=20150724-506 Finally, this is only the second time this process has been used for such a major project review. Please make notes of corrections or improvements that you feel are needed so that I can incorporate them into an upcoming Standard Operating Procedure to guide future such National Environmental Policy Act reviews.My thanks to all of you for shouldering such a complex task in addition to your �normal� work!TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental Services


P.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_15 RE KM informationresponse (32).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: KM information/responseDate: Thursday, October 15, 2015 2:36 PMFrom: Sommer, Lori </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SOMMER>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: KM information/responseThat is the date that we prepared the memo and it corresponds with the original route. I was thinking these comments would go into the body of the letter, not a separate letter. As it is, Collis is out of the office until next week. Thanks,Lori From: Drew, Tim Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 2:25 PMTo: Sommer, LoriSubject: RE: KM information/responseThanks Lori. But the easement comments are dated �March 31, 2015.� Is there a newer copy? Also, should we place this on letterhead and have Collis sign it? TimFrom: Sommer, Lori Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 2:06 PMTo: Drew, TimSubject: RE: KM information/responseThe document that we produced does not fit neatly into that table so I saved it in the folder you pointed me to below. Thanks,Lori From: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:41 AMTo: Sommer, LoriSubject: RE: KM information/responseHi Lori, I added a new column titled �Wetland Mitigation� to the Water Division�s sheet on the Excel chart. Please place your comments in that column. Thank you. TimThis is the direct link to the Excel spread sheet for each division: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NH-DESCommentsSept2015.xlsx>


From: Sommer, Lori Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 12:39 PMTo: Drew, TimSubject: KM information/responseHi Tim,Can you remind me where you want us to put comments on the Kinder Morgan pipeline? Please find the two attached documents relative to the route and existing DES mitigation easements. Thanks, Lori SommerDES Wetland Mitigation CoordinatorWetlands Bureau(603) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ATTENTION: In order to ensure that all permit applications have the required elements for technical re-view, please be certain to use the newest versions of our application forms dated in the footnote as “valid until 7/1/2013”. Going forward, the Land Resources Management Programs plan to update applications every 6 months. The next round of updates will occur on June 1, 2013. Please refer to our website at http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm <https://owa.des.nh.gov/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm> for the current application forms.

===========================================================================2015_10_15 RE KM informationresponse (33).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: KM information/responseDate: Thursday, October 15, 2015 2:05 PMFrom: Sommer, Lori </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SOMMER>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: KM information/responseThe document that we produced does not fit neatly into that table so I saved it in the folder you pointed me to below. Thanks,Lori From: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:41 AMTo: Sommer, LoriSubject: RE: KM information/responseHi Lori, I added a new column titled �Wetland Mitigation� to the Water Division�s sheet on the Excel chart. Please place your comments in that column. Thank you. TimThis is the direct link to the Excel spread sheet for each division: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-KM-NH-DESCommentsSept2015.xlsx> From: Sommer, Lori Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 12:39 PMTo: Drew, TimSubject: KM information/responseHi Tim,Can you remind me where you want us to put comments on the Kinder Morgan pipeline? Please find the two attached documents relative to the route and existing DES mitigation easements. Thanks, Lori SommerDES Wetland Mitigation Coordinator


Wetlands Bureau(603) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ATTENTION: In order to ensure that all permit applications have the required elements for technical re-view, please be certain to use the newest versions of our application forms dated in the footnote as “valid until 7/1/2013”. Going forward, the Land Resources Management Programs plan to update applications every 6 months. The next round of updates will occur on June 1, 2013. Please refer to our website at http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm <https://owa.des.nh.gov/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm> for the current application forms.

===========================================================================2015_10_15 RE NED Pipeline threatens critically endangered species.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: NED Pipeline threatens critically endangered species.Date: Thursday, October 15, 2015 3:06 PMFrom: Boone, Kimberly </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MAHON>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: NED Pipeline threatens critically endangered species.Great, thanks!Kimberly Boone Administrator III Department of Environmental Services Phone: (603) 271-3288 Email: [email protected] From: Drew, Tim Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 3:06 PMTo: Boone, KimberlySubject: RE: NED Pipeline threatens critically endangered species.Correct. I will take care of it. TimFrom: Boone, Kimberly Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 10:56 AMTo: Drew, TimCc: Minicucci, Bob; Zych, MelissaSubject: FW: NED Pipeline threatens critically endangered species.Hi Tim,It is my understanding that you are dealing with environmental issues regarding the proposed Kinder Morgan project.Thanks, KimKimberly Boone Administrator III Department of Environmental Services Phone: (603) 271-3288 Email: [email protected] From: Emily Chetkowski [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 9:04 PMTo: Boone, KimberlyCc: Minicucci, Bob; Zych, MelissaSubject: NED Pipeline threatens critically endangered species.Hello,


Our 501c3 non-profit sanctuary for a critically endangered landrace pony breed is located one mile from the proposed Kinder Morgan compressor station in New Ipswich, NH. This pony is the last indigenous pony on this continent that remains as nature created it, an unimproved landrace, through and through. There are only 250 breeding age ponies left in the world, 34 in the USA, and we provide permanent safe haven for 10 of those ponies. We also have almost one entire critically important bloodline here. We have done due diligence to stop this, to find protection for these provincially protected ponies but our con-cerns are NOT being addressed. In the event of an evacuation is it physically impossible for us to evacuate the herd, including a very very rare stallion who has a broken femur and needs special transportation. It has been scientifically proven that compressor stations emit pollutants the cause infertility, sterility and DEATH to livestock within a 5 mile radius, predominantly in the 1 to 2 mile range, in which our �safe haven� sits. This is completely unacceptable and we are appealing to you to please take notice and step forth to protect our herd, that numbers 5% of the ponies left on this planet. We have spoken to Kinder Morgan face to face. They initially presented total mistruths which we corrected with facts. We asked if they could guarantee that these precious animals would be safe from their pipeline. They admitted they could not. Their written response to our concerns was to blatantly lie that the pipeline is safe. I�m sorry but we cannot risk this. No amount of money can repair or purchase genetics. To lose ANY of these animals will deal a devastating blow to the breeds future and in turn to the future of equines themselves, to lose such a genetically important landrace. On top of that, we are a public charity. This abomination will utterly destroy us, our efforts and our progress. We are appealing to you, who represent environmental concerns for this state and all the living things who dwell here, to step forward and help us right a VERY grave wrong. FERC has said our concerns will be included in the environmental study but we all know that FERC is nothing but a rubber stamp agency. We see the writing on the wall quite clearly. This is a total outrage. Emily Chetkowski, PresidentVilli Poni Farm, Newfoundland Pony SanctuaryPO Box 371New Ipswich, NH 03071 Sanctuary: 603-291-0424 [email protected]�Preserving the future, one Newfoundland Pony at a time.� What is a Newfoundland Pony? Why is it critically endangered? What can you do to help? Visit our Website <http://www.villiponifarm.org/> . <http://www.villiponifarm.org/> Visit <http://www.vil-liponifarm.org/contact-us.html> our ponies <http://www.villiponifarm.org/contact-us.html> . Find us on Face-book <https://www.facebook.com/Newfoundlandponysanctuary?ref=hl> . See us on YouTube <http://youtu.be/qBNe_QN5e8c> . Get our Newsletter <http://villiponifarm.us9.list-manage.com/subscribe/post?u=0dc6380de9fccacb9ee915089&id=e422f4db01> . Better yet, Donate <https://www.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_flow&SESSION=thwLdf1WoFaab-782cVHYVh61UCN9EB7bEOhsoQeooOMfM_ggdTCSaQWfz4&dispatch=5885d80a13c0db1f8e263663d3faee8d66f31424b43e9a70645c907a6cbd8fb4> today.

===========================================================================2015_10_15 RE TGP email to submit comments (29).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: TGP email to submit comments?Date: Thursday, October 15, 2015 4:34 PMFrom: Eric Tomasi <[email protected]>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: TGP email to submit comments?Tim,


That�s not the appropriate way we receive comments. I wont be in the office and will not have email access. You can file comments via our ecomment/efiling system here:http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asphttp://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp*************************************Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionOffice: (202) 502-8097************************************* From: Drew, Tim [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 4:31 PMTo: Eric TomasiSubject: RE: TGP email to submit comments?Eric, Thank you. I will send you the comments. I was mistaken on who should receive the comments. I now understand that it is to you at FERC. I plan to send the documents to you via email tomorrow afternoon using your email address. TimFrom: Eric Tomasi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 2:57 PMTo: Drew, TimSubject: RE: TGP email to submit comments?The Tennessee contact is listed below. If you also want comments on the record (which we recommend), please email them to me as well.Thank youTennessee contact:Jacquelyne M. RocanAssistant General CounselKinder Morgan Inc.1001 Louisiana StreetHouston, TX 77002Telephone: (713) 420-4544 Facsimile: (713) [email protected]: Drew, Tim [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 2:16 PMTo: Eric TomasiSubject: TGP email to submit comments?Good afternoon, Eric,Is there an email address that I could send our comments to at the Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company? I would like to submit them electronically. They consist of a cover letter, an Excel chart and comment sets that wouldn�t fit into the Excel chart. Ideally, I would like to send them today to satisfy the October 16 deadline. Any help you can provide me would be most appreciated. Thank you.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen Drive


Concord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_15 RE TGP email to submit comments (31).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: TGP email to submit comments?Date: Thursday, October 15, 2015 2:57 PMFrom: Eric Tomasi <[email protected]>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: TGP email to submit comments?The Tennessee contact is listed below. If you also want comments on the record (which we recommend), please email them to me as well.Thank youTennessee contact:Jacquelyne M. RocanAssistant General CounselKinder Morgan Inc.1001 Louisiana StreetHouston, TX 77002Telephone: (713) 420-4544 Facsimile: (713) [email protected]: Drew, Tim [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 2:16 PMTo: Eric TomasiSubject: TGP email to submit comments?Good afternoon, Eric,Is there an email address that I could send our comments to at the Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company? I would like to submit them electronically. They consist of a cover letter, an Excel chart and comment sets that wouldn�t fit into the Excel chart. Ideally, I would like to send them today to satisfy the October 16 deadline. Any help you can provide me would be most appreciated. Thank you.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095


Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_15 TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE ANNOUNCES DATE FOR FERC 7(C) CERTIFICATE AP-

PLICATION FILING.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE ANNOUNCES DATE FOR FERC 7(C) CERTIFICATE APPLICA-TION FILINGDate: Thursday, October 15, 2015 11:22 AMFrom: NEDINFO <[email protected]>To: NEDINFO <[email protected]>Conversation: TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE ANNOUNCES DATE FOR FERC 7(C) CERTIFICATE APPLI-CATION FILINGTENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE ANNOUNCES DATE FOR FERC 7(C) CERTIFICATE APPLICATION FILINGTennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (TGP), a Kinder Morgan company, announced that it will file the Northeast Energy Direct (NED) FERC 7(c) certificate application on Nov. 20, 2015. Increased interest on the NED Supply portion of the project warrants a request to certificate 1.2 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) of ca-pacity, an increase from 1.0 Bcf/d as submitted in earlier pre-filing documents. Additionally, TGP will incorpo-rate several modifications to the route on both the mainline and several delivery laterals resulting from contin-ued dialogue with local community stakeholders. The anticipated in-service date for the NED project remains the same, Nov. 1, 2018. Kinder Morgan, Inc. (NYSE: KMI) is the largest energy infrastructure company in North America. It owns an interest in or operates approximately 84,000 miles of pipelines and 165 terminals. The company�s pipelines transport natural gas, gasoline, crude oil, CO2 and other products, and its terminals store petroleum products and chemicals, and handle bulk materials like coal and petroleum coke. Kinder Morgan is the largest midstream and third largest energy company in North America with an enterprise value of approximately $110 billion. For more information please visit www.kindermorgan.com <http://www.kindermorgan.com/> .

===========================================================================2015_10_16 RE Kinder Morgan State Agency Meeting.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Kinder Morgan State Agency MeetingDate: Friday, October 16, 2015 8:22 AMFrom: Wyatt, Robert </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BWYATT>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan State Agency MeetingThanks Tim.From: Drew, Tim Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 4:52 PM


To: Wyatt, RobertSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan State Agency MeetingHi Bob, I will send the meeting notice to you directly. On it, Kerry provided me with some bullets for an agenda. She simply said that she needs an update on the project from State agencies and that she would like to discuss future actions. I wish I could be more specific, but she called the meeting. I�m guessing, but I think she needs to hear what each of our agencies is doing in fulfilling its role for reviewing the proposed project. For example, I know that your division evaluates the safety, capacity, and reliability of these energy supply projects. That may be valuable for her to know. Look forward to seeing you again tomorrow afternoon. TimFrom: Wyatt, Robert Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 3:43 PMTo: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Kinder Morgan State Agency MeetingImportance: HighHi Tim,Randy Knepper asked me to represent the PUC Safety Division at this meeting between Kinder Morgan and various State Agencies. I have been to at least two of these meetings hosted by DES during the past year. If you could let me know if there is anything I should know, or be prepared for in advance of this meeting, I would greatly appreciate a head�s up.Thanks,Bob WyattRobert J. WyattAssistant Director of Safety & SecuritySafety DivisionNew Hampshire Public Utilities CommissionTele.: (603) 271-2434Cell: (603) [email protected]: Drew, Tim Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 2:14 PMTo: Stiles, CarolynSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan State Agency MeetingThank you, Carolyn. Kerry Holmes asked for the meeting without specifically stating its purpose. I have an email request in to her now and will share her response with everyone by updating the Outlook meeting notice. I have not received a reply from her yet. TimFrom: Stiles, Carolyn Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2015 11:26 AMTo: Drew, TimSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan State Agency MeetingHi Tim,I spoke with my Division Director, Randy Knepper, and Randy has asked that I let you know someone from the Safety Division will attend the DES Meeting on Kinder Morgan with Governor Office Staff on Friday, October 16 from 1:00 � 2:30 PM in Conference Room 208-C at DES on Hazen Drive. Are there specific questions that I can present to Randy in the meantime? This would certainly be beneficial in preparing if we have some handle on what kind of information they are looking for.Thank you,Sincerely,Carolyn A. StilesProgram Specialist I NH Public Utilities CommissionSafety Division


21 South Fruit Street, Suite 10Concord, N.H. 03301-2429Tel: 603.271.6022 Fax: 603.271.6048e-mail: [email protected] Notice: This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential and proprietary information. If you are not the intendedrecipient, please be informed that you have received this message in error. Please notify the sender immediately via the contact information listed above, anddelete the message and all attachments from your system. Any unauthorized disclosure, reproduction, use or dissemination (either whole or in part) is prohibited.Thank you for your cooperation.From: Drew, Tim Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 4:28 PMTo: Stiles, CarolynSubject: Kinder Morgan State Agency MeetingHi Carolyn, Kerry Holmes from the Governor�s Office asked that I set up a follow up meeting to the one I ar-ranged in July to help her answer some questions facing her office. This is what she sent me via email:__________________�A few questions have recently come up on the Kinder Morgan NED Project. I thought it might be beneficial to coordinate a meeting to follow-up on the one you put together back in July with a number of state agencies.Would you be able to coordinate a follow-up meeting with the state agency attendees who participated in the July meeting? I would also be happy to coordinate something if you have a list of those who attended.�Kerry__________________I typically like to include background materials beforehand to help meeting attendees prepare, but (if I was to guess) I think Kerry is seeking our direct input on various technical issues that may have come her way related to the Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline project, titled �Northeast Energy Direct.� Although she didn�t specify, I feel that your division of pipeline safety should be represented at that meeting as well.I have tentatively scheduled Friday, October 16 from 1:00 � 2:30 PM in Conference Room 208-C here at DES on Hazen Drive for the meeting. It appears from the Outlook database that most can make it to the meeting on that day. This also coincides with the due date for comments to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on the project, so I hope it works. I will send you the meeting arrangements and then you can determine if some-one from your staff should attend. Thank you for your help with this.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may



===========================================================================2015_10_16 RE KM informationresponse.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_10_16 RE KM informationresponse: KMP_Easement_review.xlsxSubject: RE: KM information/responseDate: Friday, October 16, 2015 3:15 PMFrom: Sommer, Lori </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SOMMER>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: KM information/responseRight, sorry. Here it is � have a good weekend!Lori From: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 3:09 PMTo: Sommer, LoriSubject: RE: KM information/responseHi Lori. I couldn�t find �Table 1� in the document. TimFrom: Sommer, Lori Sent: Friday, October 09, 2015 12:39 PMTo: Drew, TimSubject: KM information/responseHi Tim,Can you remind me where you want us to put comments on the Kinder Morgan pipeline? Please find the two attached documents relative to the route and existing DES mitigation easements. Thanks, Lori SommerDES Wetland Mitigation CoordinatorWetlands Bureau(603) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ATTENTION: In order to ensure that all permit applications have the required elements for technical re-view, please be certain to use the newest versions of our application forms dated in the footnote as “valid until 7/1/2013”. Going forward, the Land Resources Management Programs plan to update applications every 6 months. The next round of updates will occur on June 1, 2013. Please refer to our website at http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm <https://owa.des.nh.gov/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/summary.htm> for the current application forms.

===========================================================================2015_10_16 RE Meeting Attendees List - Kinder Morgan - State Agencies only.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Meeting Attendees List - Kinder Morgan - State Agencies onlyDate: Friday, October 16, 2015 12:34 PMFrom: Martel, Laura </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MARTEL>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Meeting Attendees List - Kinder Morgan - State Agencies only


Thank you Tim. I printed it and I will be here to sign them in if Lauren isn�t.From: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 12:30 PMTo: Martel, LauraSubject: Meeting Attendees List - Kinder Morgan - State Agencies onlyHere it is. Laura. Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_16 RE TGP email to submit comments.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: TGP email to submit comments?Date: Friday, October 16, 2015 8:33 AMFrom: Perelli, Vince </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PERELLI>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: TGP email to submit comments?We�ll have to poke around the site to see. Good question. We�ll catch up later today. I have a 9-12 and 1-2. We�ll talk in between. We�ll figure this out somehow.VFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 5:03 PMTo: Perelli, VinceSubject: FW: TGP email to submit comments?Hi Vince, Can we meet those standards with our documents? TFrom: Eric Tomasi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 4:34 PMTo: Drew, TimSubject: RE: TGP email to submit comments?Tim, That�s not the appropriate way we receive comments. I wont be in the office and will not have email access. You can file comments via our ecomment/efiling system here:http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp


http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp*************************************Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionOffice: (202) 502-8097************************************* From: Drew, Tim [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 4:31 PMTo: Eric TomasiSubject: RE: TGP email to submit comments?Eric, Thank you. I will send you the comments. I was mistaken on who should receive the comments. I now understand that it is to you at FERC. I plan to send the documents to you via email tomorrow afternoon using your email address. TimFrom: Eric Tomasi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 2:57 PMTo: Drew, TimSubject: RE: TGP email to submit comments?The Tennessee contact is listed below. If you also want comments on the record (which we recommend), please email them to me as well.Thank youTennessee contact:Jacquelyne M. RocanAssistant General CounselKinder Morgan Inc.1001 Louisiana StreetHouston, TX 77002Telephone: (713) 420-4544 Facsimile: (713) [email protected]: Drew, Tim [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 2:16 PMTo: Eric TomasiSubject: TGP email to submit comments?Good afternoon, Eric,Is there an email address that I could send our comments to at the Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company? I would like to submit them electronically. They consist of a cover letter, an Excel chart and comment sets that wouldn�t fit into the Excel chart. Ideally, I would like to send them today to satisfy the October 16 deadline. Any help you can provide me would be most appreciated. Thank you.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867


Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_19 FW Tennessee Gas PipelineKinder Morgan Comments - Resource Reports 13 Appendices

- Submitted 101615 to FERC (2).TXT===========================================================================

Subject: FW: Tennessee Gas Pipeline/Kinder Morgan Comments - Resource Reports & 13 Appendices - Sub-mitted 10/16/15 to FERCDate: Monday, October 19, 2015 1:10 PMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>, “David, Owen” <[email protected]>, “Forst, Darlene” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline/Kinder Morgan Comments - Resource Reports & 13 Appendices - Sub-mitted 10/16/15 to FERCFyi � for the portions that you are responsible for reviewing.Thanks, CollisFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 12:06 PMTo: Regan, John; Chormann, Rick; Moore, Todd; Adams, CollisCc: Pelletier, ReneSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline/Kinder Morgan Comments - Resource Reports & 13 Appendices - Submitted 10/16/15 to FERCThe following file paths are provided to you so that you can keep a record of them and share them with your network in the divisions:Cover Letter: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\TennesseeGasResourceReportsCvr-Letter10-16-2015.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\TennesseeGasResourceReportsCvrLetter10-16-2015.docx> Comments: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-NHDES Comments 10-16-2015.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-NHDES%20Comments%2010-16-2015.docx> Wetland Mitigation Easement Map: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Wetland Easement Review_.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Wetland%20Easement%20Review_.docx> My thanks go to all of you for helping with this effort. The next step is to review and comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the project. I do not have a date certain for that release. Stay tuned!TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 95


29 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.



Subject: FW: Tennessee Gas Pipeline/Kinder Morgan Comments - Resource Reports & 13 Appendices - Sub-mitted 10/16/15 to FERCDate: Monday, October 19, 2015 1:10 PMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>, “David, Owen” <[email protected]>, “Forst, Darlene” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline/Kinder Morgan Comments - Resource Reports & 13 Appendices - Sub-mitted 10/16/15 to FERCFyi � for the portions that you are responsible for reviewing.Thanks, CollisFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 12:06 PMTo: Regan, John; Chormann, Rick; Moore, Todd; Adams, CollisCc: Pelletier, ReneSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline/Kinder Morgan Comments - Resource Reports & 13 Appendices - Submitted 10/16/15 to FERCThe following file paths are provided to you so that you can keep a record of them and share them with your network in the divisions:Cover Letter: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\TennesseeGasResourceReportsCvr-Letter10-16-2015.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\TennesseeGasResourceReportsCvrLetter10-16-2015.docx> Comments: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-NHDES Comments 10-16-2015.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-NHDES%20Comments%2010-16-2015.docx> Wetland Mitigation Easement Map: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Wetland Easement Review_.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Wetland%20Easement%20Review_.docx> My thanks go to all of you for helping with this effort. The next step is to review and comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the project. I do not have a date certain for that release. Stay tuned!TimTimothy W. DrewAdministrator


Public Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.



Subject: FW: Tennessee Gas Pipeline/Kinder Morgan Comments - Resource Reports & 13 Appendices - Sub-mitted 10/16/15 to FERCDate: Monday, October 19, 2015 1:10 PMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>, “David, Owen” <[email protected]>, “Forst, Darlene” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline/Kinder Morgan Comments - Resource Reports & 13 Appendices - Sub-mitted 10/16/15 to FERCFyi � for the portions that you are responsible for reviewing.Thanks, CollisFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 12:06 PMTo: Regan, John; Chormann, Rick; Moore, Todd; Adams, CollisCc: Pelletier, ReneSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline/Kinder Morgan Comments - Resource Reports & 13 Appendices - Submitted 10/16/15 to FERCThe following file paths are provided to you so that you can keep a record of them and share them with your network in the divisions:Cover Letter: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\TennesseeGasResourceReportsCvr-Letter10-16-2015.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\TennesseeGasResourceReportsCvrLetter10-16-2015.docx> Comments: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-NHDES Comments 10-16-2015.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-NHDES%20Comments%2010-16-2015.docx> Wetland Mitigation Easement Map: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Wetland Easement Review_.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Wetland%20Easement%20Review_.docx> My thanks go to all of you for helping with this effort. The next step is to review and comment on the Draft


Environmental Impact Statement for the project. I do not have a date certain for that release. Stay tuned!TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.


- Submitted 101615 to FERC.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: FW: Tennessee Gas Pipeline/Kinder Morgan Comments - Resource Reports & 13 Appendices - Sub-mitted 10/16/15 to FERCDate: Monday, October 19, 2015 1:10 PMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>, “David, Owen” <[email protected]>, “Forst, Darlene” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline/Kinder Morgan Comments - Resource Reports & 13 Appendices - Sub-mitted 10/16/15 to FERCFyi � for the portions that you are responsible for reviewing.Thanks, CollisFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 12:06 PMTo: Regan, John; Chormann, Rick; Moore, Todd; Adams, CollisCc: Pelletier, ReneSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline/Kinder Morgan Comments - Resource Reports & 13 Appendices - Submitted 10/16/15 to FERCThe following file paths are provided to you so that you can keep a record of them and share them with your network in the divisions:Cover Letter: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\TennesseeGasResourceReportsCvr-Letter10-16-2015.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\TennesseeGasResourceReportsCvrLetter10-16-2015.docx> Comments: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-NHDES Comments 10-16-2015.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-NHDES%20Comments%2010-16-2015.docx>


Wetland Mitigation Easement Map: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Wetland Easement Review_.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Wetland%20Easement%20Review_.docx> My thanks go to all of you for helping with this effort. The next step is to review and comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the project. I do not have a date certain for that release. Stay tuned!TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_19 Proposed Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company LLCKinder Morgan Natural Gas Pipeline - NH

DES Comments - Resource Reports 13 Ap~1.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: Proposed Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC/Kinder Morgan Natural Gas Pipeline - NH DES Comments - Resource Reports & 13 AppendicesDate: Monday, October 19, 2015 3:18 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Freise, Clark” <[email protected]>Cc: “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Col-lis” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>, “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>, “Wimsatt, Mike” <[email protected]>, “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>, “Forbes, Eugene” <[email protected]>, “Burack, Thomas” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC/Kinder Morgan Natural Gas Pipeline - NH DES Comments - Resource Reports & 13 AppendicesGood afternoon, Clark, As requested, the following file paths will lead you to the subject documents e-filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on Friday, October 16, 2015:Cover Letter: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\TennesseeGasResourceReportsCvr-Letter10-16-2015.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\TennesseeGasResourceReportsCvrLetter10-16-2015.docx> Comments: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-NHDES Comments 10-16-2015.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact


%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-NHDES%20Comments%2010-16-2015.docx> Wetland Mitigation/Known Easements Map: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\KM_Pipeline_Mar2015_Easement Review.pdf <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\KM_Pipeline_Mar2015_Easement%20Review.pdf> __________________TGPC Source Documents: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast Energy Direct Draft Environmental Reports <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20Energy%20Direct%20Draft%20Environmental%20Reports> __________________Warning: All told, the subject reports and the 13 appendices comprise over 6,500 pages. The key date that our comments address is the TGPC submittal to FERC on July 24, 2015. That is the set of documents we are evalu-ating for this exercise and their sheer volume is why we are trying to conduct all of our work electronically. However, the DES Wetlands Bureau requested (and has received) two hard copies of the proposal in case you want to view them (4-foot high stack of documents!). Note; TGLC titles the documents �Draft Environmental Reports.� It is not a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS); rather, it is a precursor (a data gatherer, if you will) to the DEIS. This new process being used by FERC for this project has confused many people in many states (e.g., PA, MA, NY, NH, etc.) regarding the terminology and the significance to the review of the July 24 documents. Our comments will be addressed by FERC over the coming weeks and be included in the upcoming DEIS for the proposed pipeline project.The next step is the preparation by FERC of a DEIS in accordance with the requirements of federal National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (http://www2.epa.gov/nepa). Perhaps at our first one-on-one meeting, I can answer any questions you may have about where we are in the process and the significance of our comments to date.Welcome to DES!TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.




Subject: Proposed Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC/Kinder Morgan Natural Gas Pipeline - NH DES Comments - Resource Reports & 13 AppendicesDate: Monday, October 19, 2015 3:18 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Freise, Clark” <[email protected]>Cc: “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Col-lis” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>, “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>, “Wimsatt, Mike” <[email protected]>, “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>, “Forbes, Eugene” <[email protected]>, “Burack, Thomas” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC/Kinder Morgan Natural Gas Pipeline - NH DES Comments - Resource Reports & 13 AppendicesGood afternoon, Clark, As requested, the following file paths will lead you to the subject documents e-filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on Friday, October 16, 2015:Cover Letter: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\TennesseeGasResourceReportsCvr-Letter10-16-2015.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\TennesseeGasResourceReportsCvrLetter10-16-2015.docx> Comments: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-NHDES Comments 10-16-2015.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-NHDES%20Comments%2010-16-2015.docx> Wetland Mitigation/Known Easements Map: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\KM_Pipeline_Mar2015_Easement Review.pdf <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\KM_Pipeline_Mar2015_Easement%20Review.pdf> __________________TGPC Source Documents: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast Energy Direct Draft Environmental Reports <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20Energy%20Direct%20Draft%20Environmental%20Reports> __________________Warning: All told, the subject reports and the 13 appendices comprise over 6,500 pages. The key date that our comments address is the TGPC submittal to FERC on July 24, 2015. That is the set of documents we are evalu-ating for this exercise and their sheer volume is why we are trying to conduct all of our work electronically. However, the DES Wetlands Bureau requested (and has received) two hard copies of the proposal in case you want to view them (4-foot high stack of documents!). Note; TGLC titles the documents �Draft Environmental Reports.� It is not a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS); rather, it is a precursor (a data gatherer, if you will) to the DEIS. This new process being used by FERC for this project has confused many people in many states (e.g., PA, MA, NY, NH, etc.) regarding the terminology and the significance to the review of the July 24 documents. Our comments will be addressed by FERC over the coming weeks and be included in the upcoming DEIS for the proposed pipeline project.The next step is the preparation by FERC of a DEIS in accordance with the requirements of federal National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (http://www2.epa.gov/nepa). Perhaps at our first one-on-one meeting, I can answer any questions you may have about where we are in the process and the significance of our comments to date.Welcome to DES!Tim



===========================================================================2015_10_19 Proposed Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company LLCKinder Morgan Natural Gas Pipeline - NH DES Comments - Resource Reports 13 Ap~3.TXT===========================================================================Subject: Proposed Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC/Kinder Morgan Natural Gas Pipeline - NH DES Comments - Resource Reports & 13 AppendicesDate: Monday, October 19, 2015 3:18 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Freise, Clark” <[email protected]>Cc: “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Col-lis” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>, “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>, “Wimsatt, Mike” <[email protected]>, “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>, “Forbes, Eugene” <[email protected]>, “Burack, Thomas” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC/Kinder Morgan Natural Gas Pipeline - NH DES Comments - Resource Reports & 13 AppendicesGood afternoon, Clark, As requested, the following file paths will lead you to the subject documents e-filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on Friday, October 16, 2015:Cover Letter: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\TennesseeGasResourceReportsCvr-Letter10-16-2015.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\TennesseeGasResourceReportsCvrLetter10-16-2015.docx> Comments: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-NHDES Comments 10-16-2015.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-NHDES%20Comments%2010-16-2015.docx> Wetland Mitigation/Known Easements Map: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\KM_Pipeline_Mar2015_Easement Review.pdf <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\KM_Pipeline_Mar2015_Easement%20Review.pdf> __________________


TGPC Source Documents: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast Energy Direct Draft Environmental Reports <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20Energy%20Direct%20Draft%20Environmental%20Reports> __________________Warning: All told, the subject reports and the 13 appendices comprise over 6,500 pages. The key date that our comments address is the TGPC submittal to FERC on July 24, 2015. That is the set of documents we are evalu-ating for this exercise and their sheer volume is why we are trying to conduct all of our work electronically. However, the DES Wetlands Bureau requested (and has received) two hard copies of the proposal in case you want to view them (4-foot high stack of documents!). Note; TGLC titles the documents �Draft Environmental Reports.� It is not a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS); rather, it is a precursor (a data gatherer, if you will) to the DEIS. This new process being used by FERC for this project has confused many people in many states (e.g., PA, MA, NY, NH, etc.) regarding the terminology and the significance to the review of the July 24 documents. Our comments will be addressed by FERC over the coming weeks and be included in the upcoming DEIS for the proposed pipeline project.The next step is the preparation by FERC of a DEIS in accordance with the requirements of federal National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (http://www2.epa.gov/nepa). Perhaps at our first one-on-one meeting, I can answer any questions you may have about where we are in the process and the significance of our comments to date.Welcome to DES!TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.



Subject: Proposed Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC/Kinder Morgan Natural Gas Pipeline - NH DES Comments - Resource Reports & 13 AppendicesDate: Monday, October 19, 2015 3:18 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Freise, Clark” <[email protected]>


Cc: “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Col-lis” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>, “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>, “Wimsatt, Mike” <[email protected]>, “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>, “Forbes, Eugene” <[email protected]>, “Burack, Thomas” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC/Kinder Morgan Natural Gas Pipeline - NH DES Comments - Resource Reports & 13 AppendicesGood afternoon, Clark, As requested, the following file paths will lead you to the subject documents e-filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on Friday, October 16, 2015:Cover Letter: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\TennesseeGasResourceReportsCvr-Letter10-16-2015.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\TennesseeGasResourceReportsCvrLetter10-16-2015.docx> Comments: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-NHDES Comments 10-16-2015.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-NHDES%20Comments%2010-16-2015.docx> Wetland Mitigation/Known Easements Map: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\KM_Pipeline_Mar2015_Easement Review.pdf <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\KM_Pipeline_Mar2015_Easement%20Review.pdf> __________________TGPC Source Documents: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast Energy Direct Draft Environmental Reports <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20Energy%20Direct%20Draft%20Environmental%20Reports> __________________Warning: All told, the subject reports and the 13 appendices comprise over 6,500 pages. The key date that our comments address is the TGPC submittal to FERC on July 24, 2015. That is the set of documents we are evalu-ating for this exercise and their sheer volume is why we are trying to conduct all of our work electronically. However, the DES Wetlands Bureau requested (and has received) two hard copies of the proposal in case you want to view them (4-foot high stack of documents!). Note; TGLC titles the documents �Draft Environmental Reports.� It is not a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS); rather, it is a precursor (a data gatherer, if you will) to the DEIS. This new process being used by FERC for this project has confused many people in many states (e.g., PA, MA, NY, NH, etc.) regarding the terminology and the significance to the review of the July 24 documents. Our comments will be addressed by FERC over the coming weeks and be included in the upcoming DEIS for the proposed pipeline project.The next step is the preparation by FERC of a DEIS in accordance with the requirements of federal National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (http://www2.epa.gov/nepa). Perhaps at our first one-on-one meeting, I can answer any questions you may have about where we are in the process and the significance of our comments to date.Welcome to DES!TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867


Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_10_19 Tennessee Gas PipelineKinder Morgan Comments - Resource Reports 13 Appendices - Sub-

mitted 101615 to FERC.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline/Kinder Morgan Comments - Resource Reports & 13 Appendices - Submitted 10/16/15 to FERCDate: Monday, October 19, 2015 12:06 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Cc: “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline/Kinder Morgan Comments - Resource Reports & 13 Appendices - Sub-mitted 10/16/15 to FERCThe following file paths are provided to you so that you can keep a record of them and share them with your network in the divisions:Cover Letter: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\TennesseeGasResourceReportsCvr-Letter10-16-2015.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\TennesseeGasResourceReportsCvrLetter10-16-2015.docx> Comments: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-NHDES Comments 10-16-2015.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-NHDES%20Comments%2010-16-2015.docx> Wetland Mitigation Easement Map: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Wetland Easement Review_.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Wetland%20Easement%20Review_.docx> My thanks go to all of you for helping with this effort. The next step is to review and comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the project. I do not have a date certain for that release. Stay tuned!TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>



===========================================================================2015_10_20 FERC Agency Meeting - Northeast Energy Direct Bi-weekly Conference Call (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FERC Agency Meeting - Northeast Energy Direct Bi-weekly Conference CallDate: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 1:08 PMFrom: Eric Tomasi <[email protected]>To: “Elaine P. Baum” <[email protected]>, “S. Xiah Kragie” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “andrew.


[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, Nancy Fox-Fernandez <[email protected]>, Amanda Mardiney <[email protected]>, Paul Friedman <[email protected]>, Rafael Montag <[email protected]>, “Howard, Jennifer (DCR)” <[email protected]>, “Muzzey, Elizabeth” <[email protected]>, “Boisvert, Richard A” <[email protected]>, “Hoffer, Melissa (AGO)” <[email protected]>, “Ireland, Matthew (AGO)” <[email protected]>, Peggy Sloan <[email protected]>, “Strysky, Alexander (ENV)” <[email protected]>, Beverly Woods <[email protected]>Cc: “Martin, Danielle” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Cairns, Sara” <[email protected]>, “Doig, Rebecca (DEP)” <[email protected]>, “Walsh-Rogalski, William” <[email protected]>, John Kall-felz <[email protected]>, “Diers, Ted” <[email protected]>, “Chandler, Wade B NAB” <[email protected]>, “Fetterman, Marvin F. (DOT)” <[email protected]>, “Feighner, Edna” <[email protected]>, “McCartney, Debi” <[email protected]>, Henry Underwood <[email protected]>, Tim Murphy <[email protected]>, Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>, Harry Stewart <[email protected]>, Kerrie Diers <[email protected]>, Richard Radwanski <[email protected]>, “Nowak, Matthew” <[email protected]>, “Hintz, Donna (DOT)” <[email protected]>, “Nusca, Cathy (DOT)” <[email protected]>, “Garcia-Smith, Eileen (MISC)” <[email protected]>, “Hatfield, Meredith” <[email protected]>, “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>, “Wy-att, Robert” <[email protected]>, “Dunk, Dwight” <[email protected]>, “Kumin, Enid (DPU)” <[email protected]>Conversation: FERC Agency Meeting - Northeast Energy Direct Bi-weekly Conference CallHello,�This is the invitation for the FERC-sponsored agency meeting for Tennessee Gas�s Northwest Energy Direct Pipeline.� This will be for all states for which the pipeline is planned to cross.� This meeting will repeat every 2 weeks until Tennessee files its application with FERC.�


�The call information is listed below.��Call in Number: (877) 228-3100 � Passcode: 745828#��If there are any questions, please call or email me.�*************************************Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionOffice: (202) [email protected]*************************************

===========================================================================2015_10_20 FERC Agency Meeting - Northeast Energy Direct Bi-weekly Conference Call.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FERC Agency Meeting - Northeast Energy Direct Bi-weekly Conference CallDate: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 1:08 PMFrom: Eric Tomasi <[email protected]>To: “Elaine P. Baum” <[email protected]>, “S. Xiah Kragie” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “stephen.


[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, Nancy Fox-Fernandez <[email protected]>, Amanda Mardiney <[email protected]>, Paul Friedman <[email protected]>, Rafael Montag <[email protected]>, “Howard, Jennifer (DCR)” <[email protected]>, “Muzzey, Elizabeth” <[email protected]>, “Boisvert, Richard A” <[email protected]>, “Hoffer, Melissa (AGO)” <[email protected]>, “Ireland, Matthew (AGO)” <[email protected]>, Peggy Sloan <[email protected]>, “Strysky, Alexander (ENV)” <[email protected]>, Beverly Woods <[email protected]>Cc: “Martin, Danielle” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Cairns, Sara” <[email protected]>, “Doig, Rebecca (DEP)” <[email protected]>, “Walsh-Rogalski, William” <[email protected]>, John Kall-felz <[email protected]>, “Diers, Ted” <[email protected]>, “Chandler, Wade B NAB” <[email protected]>, “Fetterman, Marvin F. (DOT)” <[email protected]>, “Feighner, Edna” <[email protected]>, “McCartney, Debi” <[email protected]>, Henry Underwood <[email protected]>, Tim Murphy <[email protected]>, Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>, Harry Stewart <[email protected]>, Kerrie Diers <[email protected]>, Richard Radwanski <[email protected]>, “Nowak, Matthew” <[email protected]>, “Hintz, Donna (DOT)” <[email protected]>, “Nusca, Cathy (DOT)” <[email protected]>, “Garcia-Smith, Eileen (MISC)” <[email protected]>, “Hatfield, Meredith” <[email protected]>, “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>, “Wy-att, Robert” <[email protected]>, “Dunk, Dwight” <[email protected]>, “Kumin, Enid


(DPU)” <[email protected]>Conversation: FERC Agency Meeting - Northeast Energy Direct Bi-weekly Conference CallHello,This is the invitation for the FERC-sponsored agency meeting for Tennessee Gas�s Northwest Energy Direct Pipeline.� This will be for all states for which the pipeline is planned to cross.� This meeting will repeat every 2 weeks until Tennessee files its application with FERC.�The call information is listed below.�Call in Number: (877) 228-3100 � Passcode: 745828# If there are any questions, please call or email me.*************************************Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionOffice: (202) [email protected]*************************************

===========================================================================2015_10_20 Notes from TGP NED Conference Call .TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Notes from TGP NED Conference Call Date: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 7:40 AMFrom: David, Owen </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DAVID>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Conversation: Notes from TGP NED Conference Call October 15, 2015 Notes from Northeast Energy Direct project FERC and Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (TGP) Agency Conference Call TGP plans to file with FERC on 11/20/2015. TGP is working on resource reports and scoping reports and will consult with FERC on this. TGP has received permission to survey on Eversource right of waysTGP plans to have all surveys on lands where they have access permission to be completed by 12/1/2015FERC informed the group that it does not feel that TGP�s current schedule to begin construction of the project in February of 2016 is realistic due to the lack of access to land that needs to be surveyed. The comments that are being submitted on this project by the public and agencies will be addressed by FERC in the draft EIS. Comments will be addressed generally not individually. Next call 10/29/2015Owen DavidNew Hampshire Dept. of Environmental Services Water Quality Certification Program(603) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Water Quality Certification Web Page http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/section401/index.htm <http://des.nh.gov/organization/divi-sions/water/wmb/section401/index.htm>

===========================================================================2015_10_20 RE Notes from TGP NED Conference Call .TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Notes from TGP NED Conference Call


Date: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 8:08 AMFrom: David, Owen </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DAVID>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Conversation: Notes from TGP NED Conference Call Yes this is Kinder Morgan Tennessee Gas Pipeline Northeast Energy Direct Project. I believe they are filing an application for a certificate to start the project but will check on that as the process is different from the hydro process. FERC will be issuing the draft EIS. From: Comstock, Gregg Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 8:05 AMTo: David, OwenSubject: RE: Notes from TGP NED Conference Call Thanks Owen,This is the KinderMorgan project � correct?What are they filing with FERC? A draft EIS?ThanksGGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected]: David, Owen Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 7:41 AMTo: Comstock, GreggSubject: Notes from TGP NED Conference Call October 15, 2015 Notes from Northeast Energy Direct project FERC and Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (TGP) Agency Conference Call TGP plans to file with FERC on 11/20/2015. TGP is working on resource reports and scoping reports and will consult with FERC on this. TGP has received permission to survey on Eversource right of waysTGP plans to have all surveys on lands where they have access permission to be completed by 12/1/2015FERC informed the group that it does not feel that TGP�s current schedule to begin construction of the project in February of 2016 is realistic due to the lack of access to land that needs to be surveyed. The comments that are being submitted on this project by the public and agencies will be addressed by FERC in the draft EIS. Comments will be addressed generally not individually. Next call 10/29/2015Owen DavidNew Hampshire Dept. of Environmental Services Water Quality Certification Program(603) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Water Quality Certification Web Page http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/section401/index.htm <http://des.nh.gov/organization/divi-sions/water/wmb/section401/index.htm>


===========================================================================2015_10_20 RE Question from NHDES.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Question from NHDESDate: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 10:27 AMFrom: Eric Tomasi <[email protected]>To: “David, Owen” <[email protected]>Conversation: Question from NHDESDavid:They plan to file the application on that Nov. 20 date. I want to point out that the application is just the start of our formal process. NOT the end. The PF is an iterative process and each resource report filing should be better than the last. The point is to get an complete application which will allow us to start our analysis.At this point there is no schedule because technically there is no formal project as yet. Based upon their PF request letter, they want to have approval by the Commission by the end of 2016 and start construction in early 2017. I am skeptical that is possible. As for survey access, if landowners do not grant survey access, the com-pany should to use the best available data, including possible overflights to identify resource information. There is no lower bound by which the commission would not approve a project because of limited survey access. Having said that, if the commission does grant a certificate, the Company would be required to do surveys prior to FERC allowing construction.-Eric Tomasi202-502-8097 From: David, Owen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 8:12 AMTo: Eric TomasiSubject: Question from NHDESHi Eric, On the conference call last week for the NED project TGP stated that they plan to file with FERC on 11/20/2015. What exactly are they filing? Are they filing an application? If so how can they file an application when so much information is not complete and when they do not have survey access for the project at many locations. Is there a FERC process schedule for this project that we can have? Thanks. Owen DavidNew Hampshire Dept. of Environmental Services Water Quality Certification Program(603) [email protected] Quality Certification Web Page http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/section401/index.htm

===========================================================================2015_10_20 RE Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company LLCKinder Morgan - NHDES Comments - Resource

Reports 13 Appendices.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC/Kinder Morgan - NHDES Comments - Resource Reports & 13 AppendicesDate: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 12:02 PMFrom: Holmes, Kerry </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KERRY.A.MCHUGH>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>


Conversation: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC/Kinder Morgan - NHDES Comments - Resource Reports & 13 AppendicesThanks, Tim!Kerry A. HolmesPolicy AdvisorOffice of Governor Maggie HassanState House107 North Main StreetConcord, NH 03301(603) 271-2121From: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 3:36 PMTo: Holmes, KerryCc: Hatfield, MeredithSubject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC/Kinder Morgan - NHDES Comments - Resource Reports & 13 AppendicesGood afternoon, Kerry and Meredith,o As requested, the attached documents were e-filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on Friday, October 16, 2015. Let me know if you have questions.o I am in the process of contacting Eric Tomasi to determine his availability for an upcoming meet before the end of October.o I have attached the signed attendance sheet for our State agency meeting last Friday.o We are now waiting for the Draft EIS to be prepared by FERC. TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_11_03 FW Thank you from New Ipswich (25).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: Thank you from New IpswichDate: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 3:35 PMFrom: Martin, James </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MARTIN>


To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Thank you from New IpswichFor youFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 2:34 PMTo: [email protected]: Martin, James; Dave McTigueSubject: Thank you from New IpswichDear Pam,We attended last night�s meeting in Temple, NH, to discuss issues associated with the Kinder-Morgan pipeline and proposed compressor station. As local (New Ipswich) residents, we are of course keenly interested in the concerns of our friends and neighbors. On behalf of all of last night�s attendees, we want to thank you and your colleagues for listening.The purpose of this note is to express our appreciation for sharing your collective experience with the issues under discussion, for your patience in addressing questions from the audience, and for the extreme professional-ism you brought to an emotionally charged interaction. We were thoroughly impressed with each of you, and wanted to express our thanks. Please forward this to your colleagues Gary, Todd, and Jim(?). My apologies if I am naming them incorrectly; you distinguished yourself not only by being impressively knowledgeable about the compliance and site evaluation processes, but also by being the only woman on the panel (to which I can relate). You all did an excellent job of addressing the questions in a calm, respectful, and thoroughly articulate manner. It is our hope that our fellow citizens came away with greater knowledge of what NH DES can and will do for us as we work through these issues.We are technical professionals who have worked in the environmental field (most recently, as contractors to the US EPA) for decades. We are thoroughly familiar with many of the issues under discussion last night, e.g. air quality monitoring, environmental sampling, possible contaminants, human health risk assessment, compliance requirements, etc. Please don�t hesitate to contact us if you see ways in which we might further this dialogue with local residents, or if there are other ways we can support you.Many thanks for your participation,Carol & DaveNote: if I do not have the correct email addresses, I hope the recipient(s) will be gracious enough to forward to the appropriate individuals. Thank you.Carol L. Stein, PhD(geochemist)David F. McTigue, PhD(hydrogeologist)15 Willard RoadNew Ipswich, NH 03071(603) 878-4056

===========================================================================2015_11_03 Natural gas federal law exemptions.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_11_03 Natural gas federal law exemptions: Gas Federal Law Exemptions.pdfSubject: Natural gas federal law exemptionsDate: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 9:09 PMFrom: [email protected] <[email protected]>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Natural gas federal law exemptionsDear Mr. Drew,


Thank you so much again for coming out to Temple last night with your colleagues to talk with us about the permitting process. It was very helpful and I know we really put you on the spot! During our discussion after the meeting you mentioned you were unaware of the federal law exemptions granted to natural gas companies so I am attaching this explanation. I and many others appreciate all that you and your departments do to keep NH the beautiful place we love, so thank you. I look forward to following your participation in the Kinder Morgan pipeline process, with all hopes that this project will be defeated. Sincerely,Peg Viglione

===========================================================================2015_11_03 RE Thank you from New Ipswich.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Thank you from New IpswichDate: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 6:57 PMFrom: Burack, Thomas </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BURACK>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>, “Freise, Clark” <[email protected]>Conversation: Thank you from New IpswichTim � Thank you.� Please provide me with the full list of DES participants so we can be sure that they are recognized through the kudos and R&R processes.� -- TomFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 2:59 PMTo: Freise, ClarkCc: Burack, ThomasSubject: FW: Thank you from New IpswichFYI. Results from last night. TimFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 2:34 PMTo: [email protected]: Martin, James; Dave McTigueSubject: Thank you from New IpswichDear Pam,We attended last night�s meeting in Temple, NH, to discuss issues associated with the Kinder-Morgan pipeline and proposed compressor station. As local (New Ipswich) residents, we are of course keenly interested in the concerns of our friends and neighbors. On behalf of all of last night�s attendees, we want to thank you and your colleagues for listening.The purpose of this note is to express our appreciation for sharing your collective experience with the issues under discussion, for your patience in addressing questions from the audience, and for the extreme professional-ism you brought to an emotionally charged interaction. We were thoroughly impressed with each of you, and wanted to express our thanks. Please forward this to your colleagues Gary, Todd, and Jim(?). My apologies if I am naming them incorrectly; you distinguished yourself not only by being impressively knowledgeable about the compliance and site evaluation processes, but also by being the only woman on the panel (to which I can relate). You all did an excellent job of addressing the questions in a calm, respectful, and thoroughly articulate manner. It is our hope that our fellow citizens came away with greater knowledge of what NH DES can and will do for us as we work through these issues.We are technical professionals who have worked in the environmental field (most recently, as contractors to the US EPA) for decades. We are thoroughly familiar with many of the issues under discussion last night, e.g. air quality monitoring, environmental sampling, possible contaminants, human health risk assessment, compliance requirements, etc. Please don�t hesitate to contact us if you see ways in which we might further this dialogue with local residents, or if there are other ways we can support you.


Many thanks for your participation,Carol & DaveNote: if I do not have the correct email addresses, I hope the recipient(s) will be gracious enough to forward to the appropriate individuals. Thank you.Carol L. Stein, PhD(geochemist)David F. McTigue, PhD(hydrogeologist)15 Willard RoadNew Ipswich, NH 03071(603) 878-4056

===========================================================================2015_11_04 FW Thank you from New Ipswich.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: Thank you from New IpswichDate: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 3:50 PMFrom: Burack, Thomas </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BURACK>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Cc: “Lang, Sue” <[email protected]>, “Sopczyk, Pamela” <[email protected]>, “Freise, Clark” <[email protected]>Conversation: Thank you from New IpswichTim, Todd and Gary -- thank you! You have all provided a very valuable public service here and demonstrated DES’s commitment to following the science and the law, being transparent, and working collaboratively with the SEC and other agencies. You did DES proud. - TomSent with Good (www.good.com)-----Original Message-----From: Drew, TimSent: Wednesday, November 04, 2015 02:40 PM Eastern Standard TimeTo: Burack, ThomasSubject: RE: Thank you from New IpswichThe following were the attendees from DES: Todd Moore, Gary Milbury, and me; from the SEC: Pam Mon-roe. From the outset, we had an attentive audience of about 150 people who were very respectful of us and, as a result, an excellent exchange of information and guidance ensued. I moderated our discussions for more than three hours in the rising heat of a beautiful old town hall. I complimented the audience members for their re-straint and respect shown to us throughout the evening and afterwards in informal discussions. They completely understood our adherence to impartiality as a regulatory agency and didn�t push the issue.I just spoke with the Chairwoman of the Temple Board of Selectmen (Gail Cromwell) and she said she was just so pleased that we actually took the time and made the effort to come to Temple to discuss how DES protects and environment and public health of its citizens. Apparently, they have been unable to achieve that kind of direct contact from other sources (i.e., legislative delegation, Congressmen and women, FERC, etc.) They just feel isolated and that nobody cares enough to keep them in the loop. All in all, a win for everyone involved.TimFrom: Burack, ThomasSent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 5:57 PMTo: Drew, Tim; Freise, ClarkSubject: RE: Thank you from New IpswichTim � Thank you. Please provide me with the full list of DES participants so we can be sure that they are rec-


ognized through the kudos and R&R processes. -- TomFrom: Drew, TimSent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 2:59 PMTo: Freise, ClarkCc: Burack, ThomasSubject: FW: Thank you from New IpswichFYI. Results from last night. TimFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 2:34 PMTo: [email protected]: Martin, James; Dave McTigueSubject: Thank you from New IpswichDear Pam,We attended last night�s meeting in Temple, NH, to discuss issues associated with the Kinder-Morgan pipeline and proposed compressor station. As local (New Ipswich) residents, we are of course keenly interested in the concerns of our friends and neighbors. On behalf of all of last night�s attendees, we want to thank you and your colleagues for listening.The purpose of this note is to express our appreciation for sharing your collective experience with the issues under discussion, for your patience in addressing questions from the audience, and for the extreme professional-ism you brought to an emotionally charged interaction. We were thoroughly impressed with each of you, and wanted to express our thanks. Please forward this to your colleagues Gary, Todd, and Jim(?). My apologies if I am naming them incorrectly; you distinguished yourself not only by being impressively knowledgeable about the compliance and site evaluation processes, but also by being the only woman on the panel (to which I can relate). You all did an excellent job of addressing the questions in a calm, respectful, and thoroughly articulate manner. It is our hope that our fellow citizens came away with greater knowledge of what NH DES can and will do for us as we work through these issues.We are technical professionals who have worked in the environmental field (most recently, as contractors to the US EPA) for decades. We are thoroughly familiar with many of the issues under discussion last night, e.g. air quality monitoring, environmental sampling, possible contaminants, human health risk assessment, compliance requirements, etc. Please don�t hesitate to contact us if you see ways in which we might further this dialogue with local residents, or if there are other ways we can support you.Many thanks for your participation,Carol & DaveNote: if I do not have the correct email addresses, I hope the recipient(s) will be gracious enough to forward to the appropriate individuals. Thank you.Carol L. Stein, PhD(geochemist)David F. McTigue, PhD(hydrogeologist)15 Willard RoadNew Ipswich, NH 03071(603) 878-4056

===========================================================================2015_11_05 FW Morgan Kinder Rock Blasting Meeting.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: Morgan Kinder Rock Blasting MeetingDate: Thursday, November 5, 2015 9:53 AMFrom: Kernen, Brandon </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KERNEN>


Cc: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Morgan Kinder Rock Blasting Meeting-----Original Appointment-----From: Kernen, Brandon Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 9:56 AMTo: Kernen, BrandonCc: Susca, Paul; Roy, Stephen; Mauck, Ridge; Pelletier, Rene; Krystle PelhamSubject: Morgan Kinder Rock Blasting MeetingWhen: Thursday, November 05, 2015 9:00 AM-10:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).Where: Room 313Room is 313

===========================================================================2015_11_06 FW Natural gas federal law exemptions.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_11_06 FW Natural gas federal law exemptions: Gas Federal Law Exemptions.pdfSubject: FW: Natural gas federal law exemptionsDate: Friday, November 6, 2015 5:46 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Cc: “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>Conversation: Natural gas federal law exemptionsMore compliments for you guys!� TimFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 8:09 PMTo: Drew, TimSubject: Natural gas federal law exemptionsDear Mr. Drew,Thank you so much again for coming out to Temple last night with your colleagues to talk with us about the permitting process. It was very helpful and I know we really put you on the spot! During our discussion after the meeting you mentioned you were unaware of the federal law exemptions granted to natural gas companies so I am attaching this explanation. I and many others appreciate all that you and your departments do to keep NH the beautiful place we love, so thank you. I look forward to following your participation in the Kinder Morgan pipeline process, with all hopes that this project will be defeated. Sincerely,Peg Viglione

===========================================================================2015_11_09 RE Natural gas federal law exemptions.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Natural gas federal law exemptionsDate: Monday, November 9, 2015 10:18 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Natural gas federal law exemptionsGary,The document that Ms Viglione forwarded states that �the CAA exempts oil and gas wells, and in some in-


stances pipeline compressors and pump stations, from aggregation�.� I think it would be worth sending an email to her noting that EPA is proposing rules to clarify the definition of source in the oil& gas industry.� Let me know what you think about this draft reply:Ms. Viglione,One of the issues noted in the document you forwarded relates to aggregation of facilities for definition of source relative to air pollution control requirements.�� USEPA recently (Sept 2015) proposed rules to clarify the criteria used in defining the �source� for the oil &gas industry.� Comments on USEPA�s proposed rule are due December 4th.�� Please see http://www3.epa.gov/airquality/oilandgas/actions.html for more de-tails.�� Please forward this email to anyone you feel may be interested in reviewing/commenting on USEPAs proposed rule.From: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, November 06, 2015 4:46 PMTo: Milbury, Gary; Moore, ToddCc: Wright, CraigSubject: FW: Natural gas federal law exemptionsMore compliments for you guys! TimFrom: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2015 8:09 PMTo: Drew, TimSubject: Natural gas federal law exemptionsDear Mr. Drew,Thank you so much again for coming out to Temple last night with your colleagues to talk with us about the permitting process. It was very helpful and I know we really put you on the spot! During our discussion after the meeting you mentioned you were unaware of the federal law exemptions granted to natural gas companies so I am attaching this explanation. I and many others appreciate all that you and your departments do to keep NH the beautiful place we love, so thank you. I look forward to following your participation in the Kinder Morgan pipeline process, with all hopes that this project will be defeated. Sincerely,Peg Viglione

===========================================================================2015_11_10 Temple inquiry re ambient air monitoring.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Temple inquiry re: ambient air monitoringDate: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 5:15 PMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “Perkins, Kendall” <[email protected]>, “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>, “Stumpo, Lara” <[email protected]>Conversation: Temple inquiry re: ambient air monitoringTim,I met with Kendall Perkins, Gary Milbury, and Mike O�Brien of Air Resources Division to see what informa-tion we may have to assist the Town of Temple in evaluating options for ambient air monitoring. While the field of ambient air monitoring is very broad, the ARD staff came up with some resources which may help the town get started (see notes/links below). We would also make ourselves available for a conference call if someone from the Town would like to speak to us directly. A link to a United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) website: Air Sensor Toolbox for Citizen Scientists. It contains many links that may be helpful for communities that are interested in air quality monitor-ing projects.


http://www2.epa.gov/air-research/air-sensor-toolbox-citizen-scientistsA link to a quite extensive toxics study conducted in the Boulder CO area. At least some of this study con-cerned natural gas exploration activities. While it may not be germane to NG compressor pumping station activities, the scope and breadth of the study could shed some light on toxics studies in general.http://www3.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/20052006csatam/BCPHAirToxicsReportEPA.pdfThere is a professor at Keene State College who has been working on air quality monitoring projects. Please let us know if you would like us to forward the Temple inquiry to her.VendorsThe NH Department of Environmental Services, Air Resources Division maintains a list of air emission testing vendors. While this list is derived from vendors who have performed �stack� tests (direct tests of emissions emitted from individual devices), some of them may also be able to assist with ambient air monitoring. The list is available at: http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/air/cb/cmdps/tms/documents/stack_testing_list.pdf Please pass this information/forward this email to the person from the Town of Temple who made the inquiry. You (or they) can coordinate contact me if they have any further questions.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_11_13 RE SEC - 401 water quality (7).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: SEC - 401 water quality Date: Friday, November 13, 2015 9:38 AMFrom: Demas, Peter </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DEMAS>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Cc: “David, Owen” <[email protected]>Conversation: SEC - 401 water quality Let�s take a few minutes sometime today to talk about this.From: Comstock, Gregg Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 7:10 AMTo: Demas, PeterCc: David, OwenSubject: SEC - 401 water quality Hi Pete,Please see below. This is for the Kinder Morgan pipeline project which, according to Harry, they will file an application with the SEC in January. It sounds like they want to send a draft 401 cert application to us before that. Should I tell him that they should submit the 401 cert app when they file with the SEC?Thanks Pete,GGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected]: Harry Stewart [mailto:[email protected]]


Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 3:20 PMTo: Comstock, GreggCc: Rachel MardenSubject: 401 water quality Greg, Sometime very soon you will receive a draft Section 401 Water Quality Certificate application that is connected to the Federal 404 permit and FERC application. The NED Project intends to provide you with a paper copy of the 401 application and a CD with the 404 permit application materials.The New Hampshire Environmental Construction plan can be provided on the CD or as a hard copy, whichever you prefer. The default is CD.I�m checking to see if this scenario is acceptable to you: 404 on CD and ECP on CD, with a paper copy of the 401 application. Is this OK?Please note that it is anticipated that there will be a filing to the SEC in January that will include all the state permit applications. This next filing will be a complete application under the SEC requirements.Let us know! Hope all is well.Thanks,HarryHarry T. Stewart, P.E.Senior AssociateNormandeau Associates, Inc.25 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110603-472-5191 Ext 154 (direct) 603-213-0391 (cell)[email protected] www.normandeau.com <http://www.normandeau.com/> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2015_11_13 RE SEC - 401 water quality .TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: SEC - 401 water quality Date: Friday, November 13, 2015 10:09 AMFrom: Demas, Peter </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DEMAS>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Conversation: SEC - 401 water quality Sure. C�mon over.From: Comstock, Gregg Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 9:09 AMTo: Demas, PeterSubject: RE: SEC - 401 water quality Are you available now?Gregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095603-271-2983


[email protected]: Demas, Peter Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 8:38 AMTo: Comstock, GreggCc: David, OwenSubject: RE: SEC - 401 water quality Let�s take a few minutes sometime today to talk about this.From: Comstock, Gregg Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 7:10 AMTo: Demas, PeterCc: David, OwenSubject: SEC - 401 water quality Hi Pete,Please see below. This is for the Kinder Morgan pipeline project which, according to Harry, they will file an application with the SEC in January. It sounds like they want to send a draft 401 cert application to us before that. Should I tell him that they should submit the 401 cert app when they file with the SEC?Thanks Pete,GGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected]: Harry Stewart [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 3:20 PMTo: Comstock, GreggCc: Rachel MardenSubject: 401 water quality Greg, Sometime very soon you will receive a draft Section 401 Water Quality Certificate application that is connected to the Federal 404 permit and FERC application. The NED Project intends to provide you with a paper copy of the 401 application and a CD with the 404 permit application materials.The New Hampshire Environmental Construction plan can be provided on the CD or as a hard copy, whichever you prefer. The default is CD.I�m checking to see if this scenario is acceptable to you: 404 on CD and ECP on CD, with a paper copy of the 401 application. Is this OK?Please note that it is anticipated that there will be a filing to the SEC in January that will include all the state permit applications. This next filing will be a complete application under the SEC requirements.Let us know! Hope all is well.Thanks,HarryHarry T. Stewart, P.E.Senior AssociateNormandeau Associates, Inc.25 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110


603-472-5191 Ext 154 (direct) 603-213-0391 (cell)[email protected] www.normandeau.com <http://www.normandeau.com/> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2015_11_13 Release of the Proposed Northern Pass Transmission System’s Draft and Supplement to the

Draft EIS.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: Release of the Proposed Northern Pass Transmission System’s Draft, and Supplement to the Draft, EISDate: Friday, November 13, 2015 5:46 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>Cc: “Burack, Thomas” <[email protected]>, “Freise, Clark” <[email protected]>, “Forbes, Eugene” <[email protected]>, “Wimsatt, Mike” <[email protected]>, “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>, “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>, “Fitzgerald, Mike” <[email protected]>, “DuBois, H. Keith” <[email protected]>Conversation: Release of the Proposed Northern Pass Transmission System’s Draft, and Supplement to the Draft, EISGood afternoon, Folks, The U.S. EPA announced yesterday that the DEIS and SDEIS for the proposed NPTS project were released for comment yesterday (November 12, 2015). We now have less than 45 days from yesterday (i.e., De-cember 27, a Sunday) to submit our comments to the U.S. Department of Energy. This is a link to those docu-ments: http://www.northernpasseis.us/library/draft-eis/ Let�s shoot for all comments to be submitted to me by COB on Friday, December 11 to allow sufficient time for review by the Senior Leadership Team before submittal to the U.S. DOE. Important: I would like you to prepare your comments in Word format and send them to me via email so that I can copy and paste your responses into a single, formal document as we did with the Resource Reports for the Kinder Morgan gas pipeline project. I have attached the file path to that document for reference: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-NHDES Comments 10-16-2015.pdf <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-NHDES%20Comments%2010-16-2015.pdf> . As always, thank you and your team for producing such high-quality comments for these major energy projects. Your meticulous work, among all of the other assignments you have, is especially appreciated by me. You make my job easy. Let�s have at it.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>



===========================================================================2015_11_17 ARD Review Draft EIS for Northern Pass (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: ARD Review: Draft EIS for Northern PassDate: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 9:01 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Ro-berge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “Fitzgerald, Mike” <[email protected]>Conversation: ARD Review: Draft EIS for Northern PassThe US Dept of Energy has released its supplement to the draft Environmental Impact Statement for the North-ern Pass electricity transmission line project. USDOE is now accepting public comments on the full draft EIS. Tim Drew is coordinating DES comments overall and I will be coordinating ARD�s comments (similar to our recent review of the Resource Report for the Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline).Procedure:Please place your comments in: S:\ARD-Administration\Projects\NEPA Review\Northern Pass Draft EIS\Air Resources Division Comments.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\ARD-Administration\Projects\NEPA%20Review\Northern%20Pass%20Draft%20EIS\Air%20Resources%20Division%20Comments.docx> Please try to include direct references to the sections upon which you are commenting. Don�t worry about formatting. I have not yet reviewed the draft EIS and do not have suggestions for sections for you to review. I think we could all help each other by inserting notes in the draft comment file. If, during our review, we notice some-thing on which I think we think someone else might want to comment, please put a note in the draft comment file. -Schedule:Please enter your comments by Friday December 4. I will clean them up and present them to Mike Fitzgerald for review. We (ARD and other DES Divisions) will submit our comments to Tim Drew by Friday December 11. He will organize and present them to SLT for final approval in time to submit them to USDOE by the pub-lic comment deadline of December 27.Please let me know if you have any questions on the scope or process.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_11_17 ARD Review Draft EIS for Northern Pass.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: ARD Review: Draft EIS for Northern PassDate: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 9:01 AM


From: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Ohler, Becky” <[email protected]>, “Underhill, Jeff” <[email protected]>, “Ro-berge, Michele” <[email protected]>, “Pinski, Dennis” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “Fitzgerald, Mike” <[email protected]>Conversation: ARD Review: Draft EIS for Northern PassThe US Dept of Energy has released its supplement to the draft Environmental Impact Statement for the North-ern Pass electricity transmission line project. USDOE is now accepting public comments on the full draft EIS. Tim Drew is coordinating DES comments overall and I will be coordinating ARD�s comments (similar to our recent review of the Resource Report for the Kinder Morgan natural gas pipeline).Procedure:Please place your comments in: S:\ARD-Administration\Projects\NEPA Review\Northern Pass Draft EIS\Air Resources Division Comments.docx <file:///\\granite\shared\des\ARD-Administration\Projects\NEPA%20Review\Northern%20Pass%20Draft%20EIS\Air%20Resources%20Division%20Comments.docx> Please try to include direct references to the sections upon which you are commenting. Don�t worry about formatting. I have not yet reviewed the draft EIS and do not have suggestions for sections for you to review. I think we could all help each other by inserting notes in the draft comment file. If, during our review, we notice some-thing on which I think we think someone else might want to comment, please put a note in the draft comment file. -Schedule:Please enter your comments by Friday December 4. I will clean them up and present them to Mike Fitzgerald for review. We (ARD and other DES Divisions) will submit our comments to Tim Drew by Friday December 11. He will organize and present them to SLT for final approval in time to submit them to USDOE by the pub-lic comment deadline of December 27.Please let me know if you have any questions on the scope or process.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_11_17 FERC Agency Meeting - Northeast Energy Direct Post Application Conference Call.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: FERC Agency Meeting - Northeast Energy Direct Post Application Conference CallDate: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 5:36 PMFrom: Eric Tomasi <[email protected]>To: “Elaine P. Baum” <[email protected]>, “S. Xiah Kragie” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]”


<[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Martin, Danielle” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Cairns, Sara” <[email protected]>, “Doig, Rebecca (DEP)” <[email protected]>, “Walsh-


Rogalski, William” <[email protected]>, John Kallfelz <[email protected]>, “Diers, Ted” <[email protected]>, “Chandler, Wade B NAB” <[email protected]>, “Fetterman, Marvin F. (DOT)” <[email protected]>, Nancy Fox-Fernandez <[email protected]>, Amanda Mardiney <[email protected]>, Paul Friedman <[email protected]>, Rafael Montag <[email protected]>, “Howard, Jennifer (DCR)” <[email protected]>, “Feigh-ner, Edna” <[email protected]>, “Muzzey, Elizabeth” <[email protected]>, “Bois-vert, Richard A” <[email protected]>, “McCartney, Debi” <[email protected]>, “Hoffer, Melissa (AGO)” <[email protected]>, “Ireland, Matthew (AGO)” <[email protected]>, Henry Underwood <[email protected]>, ‘Tim Murphy’ <[email protected]>, Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>, Harry Stewart <[email protected]>, Peggy Sloan <[email protected]>, Kerrie Diers <[email protected]>, Richard Radwanski <[email protected]>, “Nowak, Matthew” <[email protected]>, “Hintz, Donna (DOT)” <[email protected]>, “Nusca, Cathy (DOT)” <[email protected]>, “Garcia-Smith, Eileen (MISC)” <[email protected]>, “Hatfield, Meredith” <[email protected]>, “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>, “Strysky, Alexander (ENV)” <[email protected]>, Beverly Woods <[email protected]>, “Wyatt, Robert” <[email protected]>, “Dunk, Dwight” <[email protected]>, “Kumin, Enid (DPU)” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>Conversation: FERC Agency Meeting - Northeast Energy Direct Post Application Conference CallThis is the invitation for the last pre-filing FERC-sponsored agency meeting for Tennessee Gas�s Northwest Energy Direct Pipeline. �I have booked this for longer than for our typical meeting as people may have a lot of questions. The Applica-tion for NED will be filed on November 20, so this should give a few days to look through specific sections.Please note that FERC will have until December 7 to notice the application should we deem that it meets our minimum filing requirements.The call information is listed below.�Call in Number: (877) 228-3100 � Passcode: 745828# If there are any questions, please call or email me.*************************************Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionOffice: (202) [email protected]

===========================================================================2015_11_17 RE Air Quality Materials.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_11_17 RE Air Quality Materials: =?UTF-8?Q?Temple=20inquiry=20re=3A=20am?= =?UTF-8?Q?bient=20air=20monitoring?=.emlSubject: RE: Air Quality MaterialsDate: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 2:13 PMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Air Quality MaterialsNot that one. I thought you were going to forward the attached information to whoever in Temple requested it.-----Original Message-----From: Drew, Tim


Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 11:54 AMTo: Moore, ToddSubject: FW: Air Quality MaterialsThis email?-----Original Message-----From: Drew, Tim Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 5:20 PMTo: ‘Gail P.Cromwell’Subject: RE: Air Quality MaterialsGood afternoon, Ms. Cromwell. As a follow up to the NH DES presentation and question/answer event held on Monday, November 2, 2015 in Temple, I thought you might want to see our October 16, 2015 submittal to FERC for the proposed Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LCC “Northeast Energy Direct” project. These comments were prepared by NH DES as a result of its review of the project’s Resource Reports & 13 Appendices, submitted to FERC on July 24, 2015. It is much easier than trying to navigate through the FERC project e-library in Washington. Feel free to share as you wish. TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH� 03302-0095�Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email:� [email protected] Website:� http://des.nh.gov/�This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use�by the person or persons to whom�they�are addressed.� The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule.� Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with�any accompanying�attachments or printed copies.-----Original Message-----From: Gail P.Cromwell [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 1:35 PMTo: Drew, TimSubject: Air Quality MaterialsDear Tim, Yes , thank you, please send the materials to me, at the following address:Gail CromwellPO Box 98Temple NH 03084I will pass it on the correct committee. We are grateful for your help and again let me say how much we ap-preciated the visit by you and your team last week. Gail PS. We signed and mailed the attached letter to DES just yesterday. Here is an advance copy for you!


===========================================================================2015_11_18 RE FERC Agency Meeting - Northeast Energy Direct Post Application Conference Call.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: FERC Agency Meeting - Northeast Energy Direct Post Application Conference CallDate: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 9:33 AMFrom: David, Owen </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DAVID>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Conversation: FERC Agency Meeting - Northeast Energy Direct Post Application Conference CallI think that if Kinder Morgan files for a certificate with FERC on 11/20/15 as they plan to only cooperating par-ties can be on these calls.� I will check with FERC to find out.�-----Original Appointment-----From: Comstock, Gregg On Behalf Of Eric TomasiSent: Wednesday, November 18, 2015 7:04 AMTo: David, OwenSubject: FW: FERC Agency Meeting - Northeast Energy Direct Post Application Conference CallWhen: Thursday, December 03, 2015 2:00 PM-3:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).Where: Call in Number: (877) 228-3100 Passcode: 745828#Hi Owen,Are you listening in?ThanksGregg-----Original Appointment-----From: Eric Tomasi [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 4:36 PMTo: Eric Tomasi; Elaine P. Baum; S. Xiah Kragie; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ;


[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mail-to:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mail-to:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; Henderson, Carol; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; Naylor, Mark; Drew, Tim; David, Owen; Adams, Collis; Mauck, Ridge; Colburn, Jacquie; Cairns, Sara; Merrill, Lorraine; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; St.Louis, Christina; Martin, Danielle; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; Doig, Rebecca (DEP); Walsh-Rogalski, William; John Kallfelz; Diers, Ted; Chandler, Wade B NAB; Fetterman, Marvin F. (DOT); Nancy Fox-Fernandez; Amanda Mardiney; Paul Friedman; Rafael Montag; Howard, Jennifer (DCR); Feighner, Edna; Muzzey, Elizabeth; Boisvert, Richard A; McCartney, Debi; Hoffer, Melissa (AGO); Ireland, Matthew (AGO); Henry Underwood; ‘Tim Murphy’; Adele Fiorillo; Harry Stewart; Peggy Sloan; Kerrie Diers; Richard Rad-wanski; Nowak, Matthew; Hintz, Donna (DOT); Nusca, Cathy (DOT); Garcia-Smith, Eileen (MISC); Hatfield, Meredith; Comstock, Gregg; Strysky, Alexander (ENV); Beverly Woods; Wyatt, Robert; Dunk, Dwight; Kumin, Enid (DPU); [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: FERC Agency Meeting - Northeast Energy Direct Post Application Conference CallWhen: Thursday, December 03, 2015 2:00 PM-3:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).Where: Call in Number: (877) 228-3100 Passcode: 745828#This is the invitation for the last pre-filing FERC-sponsored agency meeting for Tennessee Gas�s Northwest Energy Direct Pipeline. �I have booked this for longer than for our typical meeting as people may have a lot of questions. The Applica-tion for NED will be filed on November 20, so this should give a few days to look through specific sections.


Please note that FERC will have until December 7 to notice the application should we deem that it meets our minimum filing requirements.The call information is listed below.�Call in Number: (877) 228-3100 � Passcode: 745828# If there are any questions, please call or email me.*************************************Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionOffice: (202) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2015_11_20 FW Kinder MorganTennessee Gas Pipeline Company LLC - Filed with FERC today.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: FW: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC - Filed with FERC todayDate: Friday, November 20, 2015 3:38 PMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC - Filed with FERC todayFYI � Kinder Morgan filed their FERC application today.From: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 2:34 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Freise, Clark; Pelletier, Rene; Fitzgerald, Mike; DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, ThomasSubject: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC - Filed with FERC todayThe latest development in the KM/TGP project:http://www.unionleader.com/article/20151120/NEWS05/151129925 Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.


===========================================================================2015_11_20 FW Release of the Proposed Northern Pass Transmission System’s Draft and Supplement to

the Draft EIS.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: FW: Release of the Proposed Northern Pass Transmission System’s Draft, and Supplement to the Draft, EISDate: Friday, November 20, 2015 2:28 PMFrom: Pelletier, Rene </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PELLETIER>To: “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, “Diers, Ted” <[email protected]>, “Pillsbury, Sarah” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Thomas, William” <[email protected]>, “Forst, Darlene” <[email protected]>Conversation: Release of the Proposed Northern Pass Transmission System’s Draft, and Supplement to the Draft, EISLet�s make sure we get this done by the 11th. ThanksFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 4:47 PMTo: Regan, John; Moore, Todd; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Burack, Thomas; Freise, Clark; Forbes, Eugene; Wimsatt, Mike; Wright, Craig; Pelletier, Rene; Fitzgerald, Mike; DuBois, H. KeithSubject: Release of the Proposed Northern Pass Transmission System’s Draft, and Supplement to the Draft, EISGood afternoon, Folks, The U.S. EPA announced yesterday that the DEIS and SDEIS for the proposed NPTS project were released for comment yesterday (November 12, 2015). We now have less than 45 days from yesterday (i.e., De-cember 27, a Sunday) to submit our comments to the U.S. Department of Energy. This is a link to those docu-ments: http://www.northernpasseis.us/library/draft-eis/ Let�s shoot for all comments to be submitted to me by COB on Friday, December 11 to allow sufficient time for review by the Senior Leadership Team before submittal to the U.S. DOE. Important: I would like you to prepare your comments in Word format and send them to me via email so that I can copy and paste your responses into a single, formal document as we did with the Resource Reports for the Kinder Morgan gas pipeline project. I have attached the file path to that document for reference: S:\DES-COMMON\NEPA Environmental Impact Statements\Northeast EnergyDirect-NHDES Comments 10-16-2015.pdf <file:///\\granite\shared\des\DES-COMMON\NEPA%20Environmental%20Impact%20Statements\Northeast%20EnergyDirect-NHDES%20Comments%2010-16-2015.pdf> . As always, thank you and your team for producing such high-quality comments for these major energy projects. Your meticulous work, among all of the other assignments you have, is especially appreciated by me. You make my job easy. Let�s have at it.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>



===========================================================================2015_11_20 Kinder MorganTennessee Gas Pipeline Company LLC - Filed with FERC today (2).TXT===========================================================================

Subject: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC - Filed with FERC todayDate: Friday, November 20, 2015 3:33 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>Cc: “Freise, Clark” <[email protected]>, “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>, “Fitzgerald, Mike” <[email protected]>, “DuBois, H. Keith” <[email protected]>, “Burack, Thom-as” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC - Filed with FERC todayThe latest development in the KM/TGP project:http://www.unionleader.com/article/20151120/NEWS05/151129925 Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.


Subject: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC - Filed with FERC todayDate: Friday, November 20, 2015 3:33 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis”


<[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>Cc: “Freise, Clark” <[email protected]>, “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>, “Fitzgerald, Mike” <[email protected]>, “DuBois, H. Keith” <[email protected]>, “Burack, Thom-as” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC - Filed with FERC todayThe latest development in the KM/TGP project:http://www.unionleader.com/article/20151120/NEWS05/151129925 Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.


Subject: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC - Filed with FERC todayDate: Friday, November 20, 2015 3:33 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>Cc: “Freise, Clark” <[email protected]>, “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>, “Fitzgerald, Mike” <[email protected]>, “DuBois, H. Keith” <[email protected]>, “Burack, Thom-as” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC - Filed with FERC todayThe latest development in the KM/TGP project:http://www.unionleader.com/article/20151120/NEWS05/151129925 Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095


Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.







Subject: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC - Filed with FERC todayDate: Friday, November 20, 2015 3:33 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>Cc: “Freise, Clark” <[email protected]>, “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>, “Fitzgerald, Mike” <[email protected]>, “DuBois, H. Keith” <[email protected]>, “Burack, Thom-as” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC - Filed with FERC todayThe latest development in the KM/TGP project:http://www.unionleader.com/article/20151120/NEWS05/151129925



===========================================================================2015_11_20 Kinder MorganTennessee Gas Pipeline Company LLC - Filed with FERC today.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC - Filed with FERC todayDate: Friday, November 20, 2015 3:33 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>Cc: “Freise, Clark” <[email protected]>, “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>, “Fitzgerald, Mike” <[email protected]>, “DuBois, H. Keith” <[email protected]>, “Burack, Thom-as” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC - Filed with FERC todayThe latest development in the KM/TGP project:http://www.unionleader.com/article/20151120/NEWS05/151129925 Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/ <http://des.nh.gov/> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may


be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and delete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accom-panying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_11_20 Northeast Energy Direct Application Information - Docket CP16-21 (3).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Northeast Energy Direct Application Information - Docket CP16-21Date: Friday, November 20, 2015 8:11 PMFrom: Eric Tomasi <[email protected]>To: “Elaine P. Baum” <[email protected]>, “S. Xiah Kragie” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <Martin.Suuberg@State.


MA.US>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Martin, Danielle” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Cairns, Sara” <[email protected]>, “Doig, Rebecca (DEP)” <[email protected]>, “Walsh-Rogalski, William” <[email protected]>, John Kallfelz <[email protected]>, “Diers, Ted” <[email protected]>, “Chandler, Wade B NAB” <[email protected]>, “Fetterman, Marvin F. (DOT)” <[email protected]>, Nancy Fox-Fernandez <[email protected]>, Amanda Mardiney <[email protected]>, Paul Friedman <[email protected]>, Rafael Montag <[email protected]>, “Howard, Jennifer (DCR)” <[email protected]>, “Feigh-ner, Edna” <[email protected]>, “Muzzey, Elizabeth” <[email protected]>, “Boisvert, Richard A” <[email protected]>, “McCartney, Debi” <[email protected]>, “Hoffer, Melissa (AGO)” <[email protected]>, “Ireland, Matthew (AGO)” <[email protected]>, Henry Underwood <[email protected]>, ‘Tim Murphy’ <[email protected]>, Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>, Harry Stewart <[email protected]>, Peggy Sloan <[email protected]>, Kerrie Diers <[email protected]>, Richard Radwanski <[email protected]>, “Nowak, Matthew” <[email protected]>, “Hintz, Donna (DOT)” <[email protected]>, “Nus-ca, Cathy (DOT)” <[email protected]>, “Garcia-Smith, Eileen (MISC)” <[email protected]>, “Hatfield, Meredith” <[email protected]>, “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>, “Strysky, Alexander (ENV)” <[email protected]>, Beverly Woods <[email protected]>, “Wyatt, Robert” <[email protected]>, “Dunk, Dwight” <[email protected]>, “Ku-min, Enid (DPU)” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Gegas, Vasilios (Bill)” <[email protected]>, “Feldbaum, Eric” <[email protected]>, Paul Friedman <[email protected]>, Rafael Montag <[email protected]>, Amanda Mardiney <[email protected]>, Nancy Fox-Fernandez <[email protected]>, Jennifer Zielinski <[email protected]>, “Kelley A. Munoz” <[email protected]>, Olubukola Pope <[email protected]>Conversation: Northeast Energy Direct Application Information - Docket CP16-21Hello,As you are probably aware, Tennessee Gas filed its application for the Northeast Energy Direct Project today. The new Docket number is CP16-21-000. The pre-filing docket number (PF14-22) is still associated with the application, so you can still find it that way. Here is a link to the application files:


http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/Doc_Family.asp?document_id=14401049We have 10 business days to notice the application. In addition, you should have received the meeting request for 2pm on December 3rd. I, as well as other FERC and Cardno (FERC’s 3rd party contractor) staff, will be available to discuss the application, with the understanding that we may not have time to read every single part of the application and we still cannot discuss the merits. ---Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerOffice (202) 502-8097From: Eric TomasiSent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 4:36 PMTo: Eric Tomasi; Elaine P. Baum; S. Xiah Kragie; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Martin, Danielle; [email protected]; Cairns, Sara; Doig, Rebecca (DEP); Walsh-Rogalski, William; John Kallfelz; Diers, Ted; Chandler, Wade B NAB; Fetterman, Marvin F. (DOT); Nancy Fox-Fernandez; Amanda Mardiney; Paul Friedman; Rafael Montag; Howard, Jennifer (DCR); Feighner, Edna; Muzzey, Elizabeth; Boisvert, Richard A; McCartney, Debi; Hoffer, Melissa (AGO); Ireland, Matthew (AGO); Henry Underwood; ‘Tim Murphy’; Adele Fiorillo; Harry Stewart; Peggy Sloan; Kerrie Diers; Richard Radwanski; Nowak, Matthew; Hintz, Donna (DOT); Nusca, Cathy (DOT); Garcia-Smith, Eileen (MISC); Hat-field, Meredith; Comstock, Gregg; Strysky, Alexander (ENV); Beverly Woods; Wyatt, Robert; Dunk, Dwight; Kumin, Enid (DPU); [email protected]; Gegas, Vasilios (Bill); Feldbaum, EricSubject: FERC Agency Meeting - Northeast Energy Direct Post Application Conference CallWhen: Thursday, December 3, 2015 2:00 PM-3:30 PM.Where: Call in Number: (877) 228-3100 Passcode: 745828# This is the invitation for the last pre-filing FERC-sponsored agency meeting for Tennessee Gas�s Northwest


Energy Direct Pipeline. I have booked this for longer than for our typical meeting as people may have a lot of questions. The Applica-tion for NED will be filed on November 20, so this should give a few days to look through specific sections.Please note that FERC will have until December 7 to notice the application should we deem that it meets our minimum filing requirements.The call information is listed below. Call in Number: (877) 228-3100 Passcode: 745828# If there are any questions, please call or email me.*************************************Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionOffice: (202) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2015_11_20 Northeast Energy Direct Application Information - Docket CP16-21.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Northeast Energy Direct Application Information - Docket CP16-21Date: Friday, November 20, 2015 8:11 PMFrom: Eric Tomasi <[email protected]>To: “Elaine P. Baum” <[email protected]>, “S. Xiah Kragie” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Tom.


[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Martin, Danielle” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Cairns, Sara” <[email protected]>, “Doig, Rebecca (DEP)” <[email protected]>, “Walsh-Rogalski, William” <[email protected]>, John Kallfelz <[email protected]>, “Diers, Ted” <[email protected]>, “Chandler, Wade B NAB” <[email protected]>, “Fetterman, Marvin F. (DOT)” <[email protected]>, Nancy Fox-Fernandez <[email protected]>, Amanda Mardiney <[email protected]>, Paul Friedman <[email protected]>, Rafael Montag <[email protected]>, “Howard, Jennifer (DCR)” <[email protected]>, “Feigh-ner, Edna” <[email protected]>, “Muzzey, Elizabeth” <[email protected]>, “Boisvert, Richard A” <[email protected]>, “McCartney, Debi” <[email protected]>, “Hoffer, Melissa (AGO)” <[email protected]>, “Ireland, Matthew (AGO)” <[email protected]>, Henry Underwood <[email protected]>, ‘Tim Murphy’ <[email protected]>, Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>, Harry Stewart <[email protected]>, Peggy Sloan <[email protected]>, Kerrie Diers <[email protected]>, Richard Radwanski <[email protected]>, “Nowak, Matthew” <[email protected]>, “Hintz, Donna (DOT)” <[email protected]>, “Nus-ca, Cathy (DOT)” <[email protected]>, “Garcia-Smith, Eileen (MISC)” <[email protected]>, “Hatfield, Meredith” <[email protected]>, “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>, “Strysky, Alexander (ENV)” <[email protected]>, Beverly Woods <[email protected]>, “Wyatt, Robert” <[email protected]>, “Dunk, Dwight” <[email protected]>, “Ku-min, Enid (DPU)” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Gegas, Vasilios (Bill)” <[email protected]>, “Feldbaum, Eric” <[email protected]>,


Paul Friedman <[email protected]>, Rafael Montag <[email protected]>, Amanda Mardiney <[email protected]>, Nancy Fox-Fernandez <[email protected]>, Jennifer Zielinski <[email protected]>, “Kelley A. Munoz” <[email protected]>, Olubukola Pope <[email protected]>Conversation: Northeast Energy Direct Application Information - Docket CP16-21Hello,As you are probably aware, Tennessee Gas filed its application for the Northeast Energy Direct Project today. The new Docket number is CP16-21-000. The pre-filing docket number (PF14-22) is still associated with the application, so you can still find it that way. Here is a link to the application files:http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/Doc_Family.asp?document_id=14401049We have 10 business days to notice the application. In addition, you should have received the meeting request for 2pm on December 3rd. I, as well as other FERC and Cardno (FERC’s 3rd party contractor) staff, will be available to discuss the application, with the understanding that we may not have time to read every single part of the application and we still cannot discuss the merits. ---Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerOffice (202) 502-8097From: Eric TomasiSent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 4:36 PMTo: Eric Tomasi; Elaine P. Baum; S. Xiah Kragie; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Martin, Danielle; [email protected]; Cairns, Sara; Doig, Rebecca (DEP); Walsh-Rogalski, William; John Kallfelz; Diers, Ted; Chandler, Wade B NAB; Fetterman, Marvin F. (DOT);


Nancy Fox-Fernandez; Amanda Mardiney; Paul Friedman; Rafael Montag; Howard, Jennifer (DCR); Feighner, Edna; Muzzey, Elizabeth; Boisvert, Richard A; McCartney, Debi; Hoffer, Melissa (AGO); Ireland, Matthew (AGO); Henry Underwood; ‘Tim Murphy’; Adele Fiorillo; Harry Stewart; Peggy Sloan; Kerrie Diers; Richard Radwanski; Nowak, Matthew; Hintz, Donna (DOT); Nusca, Cathy (DOT); Garcia-Smith, Eileen (MISC); Hat-field, Meredith; Comstock, Gregg; Strysky, Alexander (ENV); Beverly Woods; Wyatt, Robert; Dunk, Dwight; Kumin, Enid (DPU); [email protected]; Gegas, Vasilios (Bill); Feldbaum, EricSubject: FERC Agency Meeting - Northeast Energy Direct Post Application Conference CallWhen: Thursday, December 3, 2015 2:00 PM-3:30 PM.Where: Call in Number: (877) 228-3100 Passcode: 745828# This is the invitation for the last pre-filing FERC-sponsored agency meeting for Tennessee Gas�s Northwest Energy Direct Pipeline. I have booked this for longer than for our typical meeting as people may have a lot of questions. The Applica-tion for NED will be filed on November 20, so this should give a few days to look through specific sections.Please note that FERC will have until December 7 to notice the application should we deem that it meets our minimum filing requirements.The call information is listed below. Call in Number: (877) 228-3100 Passcode: 745828# If there are any questions, please call or email me.*************************************Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionOffice: (202) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2015_11_20 RE Kinder MorganTennessee Gas Pipeline Company LLC - Filed with FERC today.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: RE: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC - Filed with FERC todayDate: Friday, November 20, 2015 3:45 PMFrom: Milbury, Gary </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MILBURY>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC - Filed with FERC todayThanks, was going to mention to you that I saw it on one of the newspaper websites at lunch� it apparently took 6 hours to upload everything to the FERC website�From: Moore, Todd Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 2:39 PMTo: Milbury, GarySubject: FW: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC - Filed with FERC todayFYI � Kinder Morgan filed their FERC application today.From: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 2:34 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Adams, Collis; Chormann, RickCc: Freise, Clark; Pelletier, Rene; Fitzgerald, Mike; DuBois, H. Keith; Burack, ThomasSubject: Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, LLC - Filed with FERC todayThe latest development in the KM/TGP project:http://www.unionleader.com/article/20151120/NEWS05/151129925 Timothy W. DrewAdministrator


Public Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_11_20 TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE FILES CERTIFICATE APPLICATION FOR ITS PRO-

POSED NORTHEAST ENERGY DIRECT PROJECT.TXT===========================================================================

2015_11_20 TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE FILES CERTIFICATE APPLICATION FOR ITS PRO-POSED NORTHEAST ENERGY DIRECT PROJECT: 112015- NED FERC Cert Application.pdfSubject: TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE FILES CERTIFICATE APPLICATION FOR ITS PROPOSED NORTHEAST ENERGY DIRECT PROJECTDate: Friday, November 20, 2015 6:06 PMFrom: NEDINFO <[email protected]>To: NEDINFO <[email protected]>Cc: “Fore, Allen” <[email protected]>Conversation: TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE FILES CERTIFICATE APPLICATION FOR ITS PROPOSED NORTHEAST ENERGY DIRECT PROJECTI wanted to let you know that we filed a certificate application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commis-sion for the Northeast Energy Direct Project. This application was assigned Docket No. CP16-21-00. You can access this filing through the FERC�s website at http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/file_list.asp?accession_num=20151120-5227. Attached and below is our press release with more information about today�s filing.TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE FILES CERTIFICATE APPLICATION FOR ITS PROPOSED NORTHEAST ENERGY DIRECT PROJECTTransformative NED Project Aimed at Easing Natural Gas Capacity Constraints;Project Expected to Provide Lower Natural Gas and Electricity Prices to Energy Consumers in the Region Nov. 20, 2015 � Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (TGP), a Kinder Morgan company, today filed a cer-tificate application under Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for its proposed Northeast Energy Direct Project (NED). �The NED Project is a transformative project for the northeast United States,� said Kinder Morgan East Re-gion Natural Gas Pipelines President Kimberly S. Watson. �Despite being just a few hundred miles from the most abundant and low-cost natural gas production area in the country, consumers in the Northeast pay some of the highest natural gas and electricity rates in the continental United States. These higher prices are due, in large part, to natural gas pipeline infrastructure that is insufficient to meet the winter heating demand of local distribution companies (LDCs) and electric generators.�The approximately $5 billion NED Project will expand TGP�s existing, extensive pipeline system in Pennsyl-


vania, New York and New England, connecting low-cost natural gas supplies from northern Pennsylvania to New York and New England markets.On July 16, 2015, KMI announced that its board of directors authorized TGP to proceed with the NED Project Market Path component and a $3.3 billion investment. A determination has yet to be made by the board on ap-proving the Supply Path component and associated capital.Market Need�Adding the NED Project capacity to transport incremental natural gas supplies will ease natural gas capac-ity constraints and stands to provide significant benefits to energy consumers in the region in the form of lower natural gas and electricity prices in coming years,� Watson said.Watson added, �In order to meet demand during the past two winters, New England�s electric generators have had to rely on high-priced natural gas, expensive imported LNG and costly fuel oil purchased on the spot mar-ket. In short, New England has insufficient natural gas pipeline capacity serving the region.�One study finds that the 2013-14 �Polar Vortex� winter resulted in both record high and exceptionally vola-tile gas prices, which had a direct impact on wholesale power prices. �The study concludes that, had the NED Project been in service during the winter of 2013-14, the additional pipeline capacity would have eliminated gas and electric price spikes on 86 days during the 2013-14 winter and reduced wholesale electricity expenditures by New England�s business and residents by $3.7 billion,� said Watson. Over 15 years, New England has steadily increased its reliance on natural gas-fired electricity generation. In 2000, approximately 15 percent of New England�s power came from gas-fired generation; today the total stands at almost 50 percent.�As natural gas has become the baseload fuel for electricity generation in New England, the interstate pipeline system in New England has not been significantly expanded to supply this load,� she said. �The NED Project is the solution.� Project FacilitiesTGP has been providing New York and New England homes, businesses, industry and electric generators with natural gas for over 60 years. With the proposed NED Project, TGP will continue to help both regions meet their natural gas demand now and in the future.The NED Project comprises two components, the Supply Path and the Market Path: The Supply Path com-ponent will have a maximum design capacity of 1.2 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) and consists of approxi-mately 133 miles of 30-inch diameter pipeline extending from TGP�s existing 300 Line system in northern Pennsylvania to an interconnection with TGP�s 200 Line system and Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. at Wright, New York; and approximately 41 miles of 36-inch diameter looping pipeline along TGP�s 300 Line in Bradford and Susquehanna counties in Pennsylvania. The Supply Path component also will include the construction and operation of one modified and three new compressor stations, and two new meter stations. The Market Path component will have a maximum design capacity of 1.3 Bcf/d and consists of ap-proximately 188 miles of 30-inch pipeline extending from Wright, New York, to Dracut, Massachusetts, five delivery laterals in Massachusetts and New Hampshire, and one pipeline loop in Connecticut. The Market Path component also will include the construction and operation of six new compressor stations and 27 new and modified meter and regulator stations.The Market Path component facilities will be owned by Northeast Expansion, LLC. Northeast Expansion, LLC is a joint venture between Kinder Morgan Operating Limited Partnership A, Liberty Utilities (Pipeline & Trans-mission) Corp., and UIL Holdings Corporation. TGP will construct the Market Path component facilities on behalf of the Northeast Expansion, LLC.Capacity CommitmentsThe NED Project has significant market support as evidenced by the executed precedent agreements to date with various project shippers for transportation service on both the Market Path and Supply Path components. Currently, TGP has executed precedent agreements with seven New England LDCs and other market partici-pants for firm transportation service on the Market Path component facilities for 552,262 Dth/d day of the total Market Path component capacity. The Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities and New Hampshire Pub-


lic Utilities Commission recently approved TGP�s precedent agreements with the LDCs in these states.For the Supply Path component, TGP has also executed precedent agreements with various market participants, including four New England LDCs that have subscribed on the Market Path component facilities, as well as two natural gas producers, one municipal light department and a power generator for a total of 751,650 Dth/d of firm transportation capacity.Taken all together, these precedent agreements demonstrate the strong market demand for the NED Project pipeline capacity. TGP is confident it will secure additional contractual commitments as a result of the initiatives un-derway with five of the six states in New England to facilitate the ability of electric distribution companies to contract for pipeline capacity and recover the costs in their rates. TGP is in ongoing negotiations with other additional potential project shippers and, as additional precedent agreements are executed, TGP will supplement information for the FERC record.Proposed ScheduleTo ensure timely construction of the NED Project, and in order to complete land acquisition and environmental and cultural resource surveys, TGP requested that the FERC issue requested certificate and abandonment autho-rizations during the fourth quarter of 2016. Subject to regulatory approvals, TGP proposes to commence certain construction activities in January of 2017, in anticipation of placing the project facilities in-service on Nov. 1, 2018. The proposed schedule is consistent with the terms and conditions of the precedent agreements executed to date with various project shippers. Additionally, the schedule will assist in beginning to relieve the extraordi-narily high energy costs which now burden the citizens and businesses in the region. Certain minor pipeline looping facilities located in the state of Connecticut are expected to be placed in service by Nov. 1, 2019, based on the in-service date requested by project shippers. TGP is proposing this construction timeline in order to accommodate narrow construction windows due to seasonal weather and anticipated environmental and seasonal constraints on tree felling and clearing, as well as to minimize outages and maintain adequate levels of service to meet its existing commitments to its shippers during the construction and installation of the project facilities. The proposed schedule also allows TGP to complete acquisition of property for the pipeline and compressor station locations, environmental and cultural resource surveys, federal and state permitting activities, materials procurement and construction.NORTHEAST ENERGY DIRECT PROJECTROUTE FACTSNovember 20, 2015 FERC Certificate FilingSUMMARY OF PROJECT:v Total Project = 419.66 miles ; 85% co-locationv Market Path Component = 211.4 miles of 246.17 miles co-located; 86% co-location*v Supply Path Component = 145.42 miles of 173.55 miles co-located; 84% co-locationv Pennsylvania to Wright Mainline = 132.55 miles ; 79% co-locationv 300-Line Looping = 41 miles ; 100% co-locationv Wright to Dracut Mainline = 187.78 miles; 91% co-locationo The 9% not co-located is due to deviations from the power line or pipeline in relatively short lengths to mini-mize impacts versus staying on the power line or pipeline. v Market Path Component Laterals and Loops = 58.39 miles; 68% co-location*Market Path co-location includes laterals.MARKET PATH COMPONENT BY STATE:NEW YORK 30-inch Wright to Dracut Mainline = 53.61 miles 51.72 of 53.61 miles co-located = 96% co-located with existing TGP 200 Line and existing utility corridor 1 New Meter Station2 New Compressor Stations MASSACHUSETTS 30-inch Wright to Dracut Mainline = 63.72 miles


62.93 of 63.72 miles co-located = 99% co-located with existing utility corridors36.47 miles of Market Path Component Laterals 22.96 of 36.47 miles co-located = 63% co-located with existing utility corridors and existing pipelines21 meter station and regulation modifications/additions 3 New Compressor stationsNEW HAMPSHIRE 30-inch Wright to Dracut Mainline = 70.45 miles 56.95 of 70.45 miles co-located = 81 % co-located with existing utility corridors7.12 miles of Market Path Component Laterals 2.04 of 7.12 miles co-located = 29% co-located with existing TGP pipeline2 New Meter StationsOne New Compressor Station CONNECTICUT 14.80 miles of Market Path Component Looping 14.80 of 14.80 miles co-located = 100% co-located with existing utility corridors and TGP 300 Line3 meter station modifications/additionsSUPPLY PATH COMPONENT BY STATE:PENNSYLVANIA 30-inch Pennsylvania to Wright Mainline = 37.48 miles 23.00 of 37.48 miles co-located = 61% co-located with Constitution40.94 miles of 36-inch Looping on TGP 300-Line40.94 of 40.94 miles co-located = 100% co-located with existing TGPOne New Compressor StationModifications to Existing TGP Compressor Station 319NEW YORK 30-inch Pennsylvania to Wright Mainline = 95.07 miles 81.48 of 95.07 miles co-located = 86% co-located with Constitution and existing TGP 200-Line2 New Meter Stations2 New Compressor StationsSincerely,Allen ForeVice President, Public AffairsKinder Morgan, Inc.8 Anngina Dr.Enfield, CT 06082860.763.6032 (office)[email protected] (email)www.kindermorgan.com <http://www.kindermorgan.com> (website)

===========================================================================2015_11_22 RE Temple inquiry re ambient air monitoring.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Temple inquiry re: ambient air monitoringDate: Sunday, November 22, 2015 7:13 PMFrom: Bev Edwards <[email protected]>To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>Cc: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Michael.O’[email protected]” <michael.o’[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>Conversation: Temple inquiry re: ambient air monitoring


Hello Todd,Thank you so very much for your thoughtful and helpful response to my inquiry. I would definitely appreciate having you put me in touch with the professor from Keene State who has been working on air quality monitor-ing.And we will be utilizing the referrals and links you’ve included. Again, thank you for taking the time to offer us this help.Best,BevBev EdwardsChair, Temple Energy [email protected] From: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Date: November 10, 2015 4:15:18 PM ESTTo: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “Perkins, Kendall” <[email protected]>, “O’Brien, Mike” <Michael.O’[email protected]>, “Stumpo, Lara” <[email protected]>Subject: Temple inquiry re: ambient air monitoringTim,I met with Kendall Perkins, Gary Milbury, and Mike O�Brien of Air Resources Division to see what informa-tion we may have to assist the Town of Temple in evaluating options for ambient air monitoring. While the field of ambient air monitoring is very broad, the ARD staff came up with some resources which may help the town get started (see notes/links below). We would also make ourselves available for a conference call if someone from the Town would like to speak to us directly. A link to a United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) website: Air Sensor Toolbox for Citizen Scientists. It contains many links that may be helpful for communities that are interested in air quality monitor-ing projects.http://www2.epa.gov/air-research/air-sensor-toolbox-citizen-scientistsA link to a quite extensive toxics study conducted in the Boulder CO area. At least some of this study con-cerned natural gas exploration activities. While it may not be germane to NG compressor pumping station activities, the scope and breadth of the study could shed some light on toxics studies in general.http://www3.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/20052006csatam/BCPHAirToxicsReportEPA.pdfThere is a professor at Keene State College who has been working on air quality monitoring projects. Please let us know if you would like us to forward the Temple inquiry to her.VendorsThe NH Department of Environmental Services, Air Resources Division maintains a list of air emission testing vendors. While this list is derived from vendors who have performed �stack� tests (direct tests of emissions emitted from individual devices), some of them may also be able to assist with ambient air monitoring. The list is available at: http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/air/cb/cmdps/tms/documents/stack_testing_list.pdfPlease pass this information/forward this email to the person from the Town of Temple who made the inquiry. You (or they) can coordinate contact me if they have any further questions.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798


===========================================================================2015_11_23 FW TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE FILES CERTIFICATE APPLICATION FOR ITS PRO-

POSED NORTHEAST ENERGY DIRECT PROJECT.TXT===========================================================================

2015_11_23 FW TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE FILES CERTIFICATE APPLICATION FOR ITS PRO-POSED NORTHEAST ENERGY DIRECT PROJECT: 112015- NED FERC Cert Application.pdfSubject: FW: TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE FILES CERTIFICATE APPLICATION FOR ITS PROPOSED NORTHEAST ENERGY DIRECT PROJECTDate: Monday, November 23, 2015 9:56 AMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Chormann, Rick” <[email protected]>, “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Cc: “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>, “Fitzgerald, Mike” <[email protected]>, “DuBois, H. Keith” <[email protected]>Conversation: TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE FILES CERTIFICATE APPLICATION FOR ITS PROPOSED NORTHEAST ENERGY DIRECT PROJECTKinder Morgan filed its final application with the FERC. FYI. TimFrom: NEDINFO [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 5:07 PMTo: NEDINFOCc: Fore, AllenSubject: TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE FILES CERTIFICATE APPLICATION FOR ITS PROPOSED NORTHEAST ENERGY DIRECT PROJECTI wanted to let you know that we filed a certificate application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commis-sion for the Northeast Energy Direct Project. This application was assigned Docket No. CP16-21-00. You can access this filing through the FERC�s website at http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/file_list.asp?accession_num=20151120-5227. Attached and below is our press release with more information about today�s filing.TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE FILES CERTIFICATE APPLICATION FOR ITS PROPOSED NORTHEAST ENERGY DIRECT PROJECTTransformative NED Project Aimed at Easing Natural Gas Capacity Constraints;Project Expected to Provide Lower Natural Gas and Electricity Prices to Energy Consumers in the Region Nov. 20, 2015 � Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (TGP), a Kinder Morgan company, today filed a cer-tificate application under Section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for its proposed Northeast Energy Direct Project (NED). �The NED Project is a transformative project for the northeast United States,� said Kinder Morgan East Re-gion Natural Gas Pipelines President Kimberly S. Watson. �Despite being just a few hundred miles from the most abundant and low-cost natural gas production area in the country, consumers in the Northeast pay some of the highest natural gas and electricity rates in the continental United States. These higher prices are due, in large part, to natural gas pipeline infrastructure that is insufficient to meet the winter heating demand of local distribution companies (LDCs) and electric generators.�The approximately $5 billion NED Project will expand TGP�s existing, extensive pipeline system in Pennsyl-vania, New York and New England, connecting low-cost natural gas supplies from northern Pennsylvania to New York and New England markets.On July 16, 2015, KMI announced that its board of directors authorized TGP to proceed with the NED Project Market Path component and a $3.3 billion investment. A determination has yet to be made by the board on ap-proving the Supply Path component and associated capital.Market Need�Adding the NED Project capacity to transport incremental natural gas supplies will ease natural gas capac-


ity constraints and stands to provide significant benefits to energy consumers in the region in the form of lower natural gas and electricity prices in coming years,� Watson said.Watson added, �In order to meet demand during the past two winters, New England�s electric generators have had to rely on high-priced natural gas, expensive imported LNG and costly fuel oil purchased on the spot mar-ket. In short, New England has insufficient natural gas pipeline capacity serving the region.�One study finds that the 2013-14 �Polar Vortex� winter resulted in both record high and exceptionally vola-tile gas prices, which had a direct impact on wholesale power prices. �The study concludes that, had the NED Project been in service during the winter of 2013-14, the additional pipeline capacity would have eliminated gas and electric price spikes on 86 days during the 2013-14 winter and reduced wholesale electricity expenditures by New England�s business and residents by $3.7 billion,� said Watson. Over 15 years, New England has steadily increased its reliance on natural gas-fired electricity generation. In 2000, approximately 15 percent of New England�s power came from gas-fired generation; today the total stands at almost 50 percent.�As natural gas has become the baseload fuel for electricity generation in New England, the interstate pipeline system in New England has not been significantly expanded to supply this load,� she said. �The NED Project is the solution.� Project FacilitiesTGP has been providing New York and New England homes, businesses, industry and electric generators with natural gas for over 60 years. With the proposed NED Project, TGP will continue to help both regions meet their natural gas demand now and in the future.The NED Project comprises two components, the Supply Path and the Market Path: The Supply Path com-ponent will have a maximum design capacity of 1.2 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) and consists of approxi-mately 133 miles of 30-inch diameter pipeline extending from TGP�s existing 300 Line system in northern Pennsylvania to an interconnection with TGP�s 200 Line system and Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. at Wright, New York; and approximately 41 miles of 36-inch diameter looping pipeline along TGP�s 300 Line in Bradford and Susquehanna counties in Pennsylvania. The Supply Path component also will include the construction and operation of one modified and three new compressor stations, and two new meter stations. The Market Path component will have a maximum design capacity of 1.3 Bcf/d and consists of ap-proximately 188 miles of 30-inch pipeline extending from Wright, New York, to Dracut, Massachusetts, five delivery laterals in Massachusetts and New Hampshire, and one pipeline loop in Connecticut. The Market Path component also will include the construction and operation of six new compressor stations and 27 new and modified meter and regulator stations.The Market Path component facilities will be owned by Northeast Expansion, LLC. Northeast Expansion, LLC is a joint venture between Kinder Morgan Operating Limited Partnership A, Liberty Utilities (Pipeline & Trans-mission) Corp., and UIL Holdings Corporation. TGP will construct the Market Path component facilities on behalf of the Northeast Expansion, LLC.Capacity CommitmentsThe NED Project has significant market support as evidenced by the executed precedent agreements to date with various project shippers for transportation service on both the Market Path and Supply Path components. Currently, TGP has executed precedent agreements with seven New England LDCs and other market partici-pants for firm transportation service on the Market Path component facilities for 552,262 Dth/d day of the total Market Path component capacity. The Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities and New Hampshire Pub-lic Utilities Commission recently approved TGP�s precedent agreements with the LDCs in these states.For the Supply Path component, TGP has also executed precedent agreements with various market participants, including four New England LDCs that have subscribed on the Market Path component facilities, as well as two natural gas producers, one municipal light department and a power generator for a total of 751,650 Dth/d of firm transportation capacity.Taken all together, these precedent agreements demonstrate the strong market demand for the NED Project pipeline capacity.


TGP is confident it will secure additional contractual commitments as a result of the initiatives un-derway with five of the six states in New England to facilitate the ability of electric distribution companies to contract for pipeline capacity and recover the costs in their rates. TGP is in ongoing negotiations with other additional potential project shippers and, as additional precedent agreements are executed, TGP will supplement information for the FERC record.Proposed ScheduleTo ensure timely construction of the NED Project, and in order to complete land acquisition and environmental and cultural resource surveys, TGP requested that the FERC issue requested certificate and abandonment autho-rizations during the fourth quarter of 2016. Subject to regulatory approvals, TGP proposes to commence certain construction activities in January of 2017, in anticipation of placing the project facilities in-service on Nov. 1, 2018. The proposed schedule is consistent with the terms and conditions of the precedent agreements executed to date with various project shippers. Additionally, the schedule will assist in beginning to relieve the extraordi-narily high energy costs which now burden the citizens and businesses in the region. Certain minor pipeline looping facilities located in the state of Connecticut are expected to be placed in service by Nov. 1, 2019, based on the in-service date requested by project shippers. TGP is proposing this construction timeline in order to accommodate narrow construction windows due to seasonal weather and anticipated environmental and seasonal constraints on tree felling and clearing, as well as to minimize outages and maintain adequate levels of service to meet its existing commitments to its shippers during the construction and installation of the project facilities. The proposed schedule also allows TGP to complete acquisition of property for the pipeline and compressor station locations, environmental and cultural resource surveys, federal and state permitting activities, materials procurement and construction.NORTHEAST ENERGY DIRECT PROJECTROUTE FACTSNovember 20, 2015 FERC Certificate FilingSUMMARY OF PROJECT:v Total Project = 419.66 miles ; 85% co-locationv Market Path Component = 211.4 miles of 246.17 miles co-located; 86% co-location*v Supply Path Component = 145.42 miles of 173.55 miles co-located; 84% co-locationv Pennsylvania to Wright Mainline = 132.55 miles ; 79% co-locationv 300-Line Looping = 41 miles ; 100% co-locationv Wright to Dracut Mainline = 187.78 miles; 91% co-locationo The 9% not co-located is due to deviations from the power line or pipeline in relatively short lengths to mini-mize impacts versus staying on the power line or pipeline. v Market Path Component Laterals and Loops = 58.39 miles; 68% co-location*Market Path co-location includes laterals.MARKET PATH COMPONENT BY STATE:NEW YORK 30-inch Wright to Dracut Mainline = 53.61 miles 51.72 of 53.61 miles co-located = 96% co-located with existing TGP 200 Line and existing utility corridor 1 New Meter Station2 New Compressor Stations MASSACHUSETTS 30-inch Wright to Dracut Mainline = 63.72 miles 62.93 of 63.72 miles co-located = 99% co-located with existing utility corridors36.47 miles of Market Path Component Laterals 22.96 of 36.47 miles co-located = 63% co-located with existing utility corridors and existing pipelines21 meter station and regulation modifications/additions 3 New Compressor stationsNEW HAMPSHIRE 30-inch Wright to Dracut Mainline = 70.45 miles


56.95 of 70.45 miles co-located = 81 % co-located with existing utility corridors7.12 miles of Market Path Component Laterals 2.04 of 7.12 miles co-located = 29% co-located with existing TGP pipeline2 New Meter StationsOne New Compressor Station CONNECTICUT 14.80 miles of Market Path Component Looping 14.80 of 14.80 miles co-located = 100% co-located with existing utility corridors and TGP 300 Line3 meter station modifications/additionsSUPPLY PATH COMPONENT BY STATE:PENNSYLVANIA 30-inch Pennsylvania to Wright Mainline = 37.48 miles 23.00 of 37.48 miles co-located = 61% co-located with Constitution40.94 miles of 36-inch Looping on TGP 300-Line40.94 of 40.94 miles co-located = 100% co-located with existing TGPOne New Compressor StationModifications to Existing TGP Compressor Station 319NEW YORK 30-inch Pennsylvania to Wright Mainline = 95.07 miles 81.48 of 95.07 miles co-located = 86% co-located with Constitution and existing TGP 200-Line2 New Meter Stations2 New Compressor StationsSincerely,Allen ForeVice President, Public AffairsKinder Morgan, Inc.8 Anngina Dr.Enfield, CT 06082860.763.6032 (office)[email protected] (email)www.kindermorgan.com <http://www.kindermorgan.com> (website)

===========================================================================2015_12_09 Bob Boynton.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Bob BoyntonDate: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 1:46 PMFrom: Bubier, Melinda </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=BUBIER>To: “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>Conversation: Bob BoyntonHe has a question about the timing of providing a list of potential mitigation projects to Kinder Morgan. If you have a chance to call me I can give you the details. I am going to get a sandwich from the cafeteria but will be back soon.MindyMelinda BubierDES Wetland Mitigation Program SpecialistWetlands Bureau(603) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>


===========================================================================2015_12_10 RE Tennessee Gas Pipeline.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Tennessee Gas PipelineDate: Thursday, December 10, 2015 4:22 PMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas PipelineCollis, Could you send me a copy and I will try to determine if anyone else should see it (e.g., Clark). TimFrom: Adams, Collis Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 11:42 AMTo: Drew, TimSubject: Tennessee Gas PipelineTim �I have received correspondence directly to me with no cc�s. How should I handle it?CollisCollis G. Adams, CWS, CPESCNH Department of Environmental ServicesLand Resources ManagementWetlands Bureau Administrator29 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302(603) 271- [email protected] DES Land Resources Management for helpful tools and information!

===========================================================================2015_12_10 Tennessee Gas Pipeline.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Tennessee Gas Pipeline

Date: Thursday, December 10, 2015 12:42 PMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Tennessee Gas PipelineTim �I have received correspondence directly to me with no cc�s. How should I handle it?CollisCollis G. Adams, CWS, CPESCNH Department of Environmental ServicesLand Resources ManagementWetlands Bureau Administrator29 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302(603) 271- [email protected] DES Land Resources Management for helpful tools and information!


===========================================================================2015_12_11 FW RI Compressor Station Permits.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: RI Compressor Station PermitsDate: Friday, December 11, 2015 9:47 AMFrom: Milbury, Gary </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MILBURY>To: “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>Conversation: RI Compressor Station PermitsHi John,Craig went to the NESCAUM Air Director�s Meeting this week and spoke with some other states about their experiences with permitting compressor stations. Below are a couple of RI permits that he thought would be helpful to see. Also, it sounds like we�ll have an opportunity to visit one of the larger compressor stations in the near future, either in RI or NY. I�ll keep you posted on the site visit once I know a little more.GaryFrom: Wright, Craig Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 9:46 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RI Compressor Station Permitshttp://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/air/opperms/algonq.pdfhttp://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/air/preperms/app2289.pdf

===========================================================================2015_12_11 Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervenercooperator process - Gov Hassan Pam Walsh (2).

TXT===========================================================================

2015_12_11 Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervenercooperator process - Gov Hassan Pam Walsh (2): 2015_12_11 Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervenercooperator process - Gov Hassan Pam Walsh.TXT RE- Meeting request.emlSubject: Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervener/cooperator process - Gov Hassan & Pam WalshDate: Friday, December 11, 2015 5:08 PMFrom: Hubbard, Elise </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=HUBBARD>To: “Freise, Clark” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervener/cooperator process - Gov Hassan & Pam Walsh�

===========================================================================2015_12_11 Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervenercooperator process - Gov Hassan Pam Walsh.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_12_11 Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervenercooperator process - Gov Hassan Pam Walsh: 2015_12_11 Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervenercooperator process - Gov Hassan Pam Walsh.TXT RE- Meeting request.emlSubject: Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervener/cooperator process - Gov Hassan & Pam WalshDate: Friday, December 11, 2015 5:08 PMFrom: Hubbard, Elise </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=HUBBARD>To: “Freise, Clark” <[email protected]>


Conversation: Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervener/cooperator process - Gov Hassan & Pam Walsh�

===========================================================================2015_12_11 RE ARC Meeting - Permitting Update .TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: ARC Meeting - Permitting Update Date: Friday, December 11, 2015 10:28 AMFrom: Milbury, Gary </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MILBURY>To: “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>Cc: “Fitzgerald, Mike” <[email protected]>Conversation: ARC Meeting - Permitting Update Here are a few things for Monday�s meeting:� On November 19th, we received a permit application for a natural gas compressor station proposed to be located in New Ipswich, adjacent to the border with the Town of Temple (approximately 1�4 mile from Temple Elementary School).� This is part of the Northeast Direct (NED) Pipeline project being proposed by Kinder Morgan.The key emission devices include 2 natural gas fired turbines, each rated at approximately 20,900 HP, and a gas fired emergency generator engine rated at approximately 2,000 HP.� The applicant proposes to install an oxidation catalyst on the turbines, which they estimate will reduce CO emissions by 90% and VOC emissions by 40%.� The proposed emergency generator engine is required to meet the requirements of the New Source Performance Standards for spark ignition emergency engines.Our understanding is that as of December 11th, the overall application has not been filed with the NH Site Evaluation Committee, only the air permit application has been submitted.� � Schiller Station Title V Petition � we have been working to respond to the EPA Order regarding the petition of the Title V Permit for Schiller Station.� In the Order, EPA directed DES to evaluate whether SO2 impacts from Schiller Station interfere with measures taken in Maine to prevent significant deterioration of air quality and attainment of the SO2 NAAQS.� On November 13th, DES sent EPA a proposed modeling protocol to evaluate these SO2 impacts.� On Decem-ber 8th, EPA provided their comments to DES.� We are evaluating the comments and once DES and EPA agree on the protocol we will proceed with the review.� Based on the schedule DES provided to EPA, we expect to complete the modeling analysis in January, and have a revised record (with potentially new permit conditions) out for EPA and public comment in late February.� DES notes that while EPA granted the petition on one issue, the Title V Operating Permit is still in effect.� We recently promoted John McCutcheon to the position of Senior Title V Permit Engineer.� John has been in the air permitting group since he came to DES about 4 years ago after spending approximately 20 years performing consulting work.Gary MilburyPermitting and Environmental Health Bureau AdministratorNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Divisionphone: (603) 271-2630fax: (603) 271-1381email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2015_12_11 RE RI Compressor Station Permits.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: RI Compressor Station Permits


Date: Friday, December 11, 2015 10:39 AMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: RI Compressor Station PermitsThanks, Gary.From: Milbury, Gary Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 8:48 AMTo: McCutcheon, JohnSubject: FW: RI Compressor Station PermitsHi John,Craig went to the NESCAUM Air Director�s Meeting this week and spoke with some other states about their experiences with permitting compressor stations. Below are a couple of RI permits that he thought would be helpful to see. Also, it sounds like we�ll have an opportunity to visit one of the larger compressor stations in the near future, either in RI or NY. I�ll keep you posted on the site visit once I know a little more.GaryFrom: Wright, Craig Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 9:46 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RI Compressor Station Permitshttp://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/air/opperms/algonq.pdfhttp://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/air/preperms/app2289.pdf

===========================================================================2015_12_11 RE Similar compressor stations.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Similar compressor stationsDate: Friday, December 11, 2015 3:44 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Similar compressor stationsSure � will do.One detail from the meeting I attended in Windham last week that I forgot to pass along to you � the proposed compressor station for Dracut is all electric � no combustion turbine. It only came up as an attendee from Dra-cut thought it was the proper forum for her questions on air quality for that facility.John From: Moore, Todd Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 2:07 PMTo: McCutcheon, JohnCc: Milbury, GarySubject: Similar compressor stationsJohn,We may try to get a site visit to a compressor station in another state. Could you look at these permits and rank them in order of most-least similar to the compressor station proposed for New Ipswich?These are from RI and NY. If you know of better/closer examples in MA or CT, we could consider them.Thanks,Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning Manager


Permitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_12_11 Solar Turbine info.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Solar Turbine infoDate: Friday, December 11, 2015 2:23 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Solar Turbine infoCraig,This link provides the array of Solar turbines used in compressor service:https://mysolar.cat.com/en_US/products/oil-and-gas/gas-turbine-packages/compressor-sets.index.htmlNote that the Pelham compressor station has a single Centaur 50, much smaller than the two Titan 130�s pro-posed for New Ipswich.Let me know if you need anything else.John John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2015_12_13 Similar compressor stations.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_12_13 Similar compressor stations: Burrillville algonq.pdf Burrillville app2289.pdf Croghan 623200002600007_r1.pdf Empire 818380002600001.pdf Hinsdale 904460008600001.pdf Wright 443500000800011.pdfSubject: Similar compressor stationsDate: Friday, December 11, 2015 3:07 PMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Similar compressor stationsJohn,


We may try to get a site visit to a compressor station in another state. Could you look at these permits and rank them in order of most-least similar to the compressor station proposed for New Ipswich?These are from RI and NY. If you know of better/closer examples in MA or CT, we could consider them.Thanks,Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_12_15 RE air permit renewal application - Compressor Station 270B1 - Pelham NH.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_12_15 RE air permit renewal application - Compressor Station 270B1 - Pelham NH: Permit Review.pdfSubject: RE: air permit renewal application - Compressor Station 270B1 - Pelham, NHDate: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 5:19 PMFrom: Zeilstra, Michael <[email protected]>To: “’McCutcheon, John’” <[email protected]>Conversation: air permit renewal application - Compressor Station 270B1 - Pelham, NHJohn, Thanks for taking my call. Here is a permit review concerning JJJJ and further down in it ZZZZ. Please ignore the sulfur text and reference the current permit (after a subsequent administrated amendment) which raised the sulfur limit back up to 20 grains/100 scf (which is satisfied by a tariff), as the state law had changed. Thanks, Michael From: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 3:07 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelSubject: air permit renewal application - Compressor Station 270B1 - Pelham, NHMichael,I have been assigned the air permit renewal application for TGP�s Pelham compressor station and have a few preliminary questions as I start my review. � Can you provide me with documentation as to the �manufacture date� of the Waukesha emergency generator engine so I can identify/confirm the applicable regulations? Please see the underlined portion of the excerpt below.60.4230(a) The provisions of this subpart are applicable to manufacturers, owners, and operators of stationary spark ignition (SI) internal combustion engines (ICE) as specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (6) of this sec-tion. For the purposes of this subpart, the date that construction commences is the date the engine is ordered by the owner or operator.� The NSPS for natural gas-fired engines allows for use of propane for up to 100 hours per year during emergency operations (40 CFR 60.4243(e)). If the emergency engine is subject to NSPS, does TGP have any plans to use propane in this engine?� It appears that the station address is 39 Tennessee Drive. Previous permits listed Mammoth Road. Is there any reason that I shouldn�t use the new address going forward?Thanks for your assistance with the above.JohnJohn McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division


29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2015_12_20 Northeast Energy Direct Application Information - Docket CP16-21 (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Northeast Energy Direct Application Information - Docket CP16-21Date: Friday, November 20, 2015 8:11 PMFrom: Eric Tomasi <[email protected]>To: “Elaine P. Baum” <[email protected]>, “S. Xiah Kragie” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “lavery.


[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Martin, Danielle” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Cairns, Sara” <[email protected]>, “Doig, Rebecca (DEP)” <[email protected]>, “Walsh-Rogalski, William” <[email protected]>, John Kallfelz <[email protected]>, “Diers, Ted” <[email protected]>, “Chandler, Wade B NAB” <[email protected]>, “Fetterman, Marvin F. (DOT)” <[email protected]>, Nancy Fox-Fernandez <[email protected]>, Amanda Mardiney <[email protected]>, Paul Friedman <[email protected]>, Rafael Montag <[email protected]>, “Howard, Jennifer (DCR)” <[email protected]>, “Feigh-ner, Edna” <[email protected]>, “Muzzey, Elizabeth” <[email protected]>, “Boisvert, Richard A” <[email protected]>, “McCartney, Debi” <[email protected]>, “Hoffer, Melissa (AGO)” <[email protected]>, “Ireland, Matthew (AGO)” <[email protected]>, Henry Underwood <[email protected]>, ‘Tim Murphy’ <[email protected]>, Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>, Harry Stewart <[email protected]>, Peggy Sloan <[email protected]>, Kerrie Diers <[email protected]>, Richard Radwanski <[email protected]>, “Nowak, Matthew” <[email protected]>, “Hintz, Donna (DOT)” <[email protected]>, “Nus-ca, Cathy (DOT)” <[email protected]>, “Garcia-Smith, Eileen (MISC)” <[email protected]>, “Hatfield, Meredith” <[email protected]>, “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>, “Strysky, Alexander (ENV)” <[email protected]>, Beverly Woods <[email protected]>, “Wyatt, Robert” <[email protected]>, “Dunk, Dwight” <[email protected]>, “Ku-min, Enid (DPU)” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “Gegas, Vasilios (Bill)” <[email protected]>, “Feldbaum, Eric” <[email protected]>, Paul Friedman <[email protected]>, Rafael Montag <[email protected]>, Amanda Mardiney <[email protected]>, Nancy Fox-Fernandez <[email protected]>, Jennifer Zielinski <[email protected]>, “Kelley A. Munoz” <[email protected]>, Olubukola Pope <[email protected]>Conversation: Northeast Energy Direct Application Information - Docket CP16-21Hello,As you are probably aware, Tennessee Gas filed its application for the Northeast Energy Direct Project today. The new Docket number is CP16-21-000. The pre-filing docket number (PF14-22) is still associated with the


application, so you can still find it that way. Here is a link to the application files:http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/Doc_Family.asp?document_id=14401049We have 10 business days to notice the application. In addition, you should have received the meeting request for 2pm on December 3rd. I, as well as other FERC and Cardno (FERC’s 3rd party contractor) staff, will be available to discuss the application, with the understanding that we may not have time to read every single part of the application and we still cannot discuss the merits. ---Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerOffice (202) 502-8097From: Eric TomasiSent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 4:36 PMTo: Eric Tomasi; Elaine P. Baum; S. Xiah Kragie; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Martin, Danielle; [email protected]; Cairns, Sara; Doig, Rebecca (DEP); Walsh-Rogalski, William; John Kallfelz; Diers, Ted; Chandler, Wade B NAB; Fetterman, Marvin F. (DOT); Nancy Fox-Fernandez; Amanda Mardiney; Paul Friedman; Rafael Montag; Howard, Jennifer (DCR); Feighner, Edna; Muzzey, Elizabeth; Boisvert, Richard A; McCartney, Debi; Hoffer, Melissa (AGO); Ireland, Matthew (AGO); Henry Underwood; ‘Tim Murphy’; Adele Fiorillo; Harry Stewart; Peggy Sloan; Kerrie Diers; Richard Radwanski; Nowak, Matthew; Hintz, Donna (DOT); Nusca, Cathy (DOT); Garcia-Smith, Eileen (MISC); Hat-field, Meredith; Comstock, Gregg; Strysky, Alexander (ENV); Beverly Woods; Wyatt, Robert; Dunk, Dwight; Kumin, Enid (DPU); [email protected]; Gegas, Vasilios (Bill); Feldbaum, EricSubject: FERC Agency Meeting - Northeast Energy Direct Post Application Conference CallWhen: Thursday, December 3, 2015 2:00 PM-3:30 PM.


Where: Call in Number: (877) 228-3100 Passcode: 745828# This is the invitation for the last pre-filing FERC-sponsored agency meeting for Tennessee Gas�s Northwest Energy Direct Pipeline. I have booked this for longer than for our typical meeting as people may have a lot of questions. The Applica-tion for NED will be filed on November 20, so this should give a few days to look through specific sections.Please note that FERC will have until December 7 to notice the application should we deem that it meets our minimum filing requirements.The call information is listed below. Call in Number: (877) 228-3100 Passcode: 745828# If there are any questions, please call or email me.*************************************Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionOffice: (202) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2015_12_21 NED Application Status.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: NED Application StatusDate: Monday, December 21, 2015 3:57 PMFrom: Harry Stewart <[email protected]>To: “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>Cc: Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>, Kerrie Diers <[email protected]>, Rachel Marden <[email protected]>Conversation: NED Application StatusRidge and Greg,We are in the early phase of trying to schedule meetings with DES to discuss application status as we approach finalization of the applications.Our goal is to make sure that all the administrative and technical details that you need are included in the appli-cation and that we have the benefit of any suggestions for improvement to facilitate your reviews as we finalize the applications.As you may recall, Kinder Morgan staff from outside of New England will generally attend these meetings (and this takes some prior planning to fly in, etc.).On a preliminary basis, it looks like we are trying for meetings around January 13 (plus or minus a day)- based on another meeting that appears to be taking shape for around then.I�m also thinking that it might be most effective to meet with AOT and 401 program staff in the same meeting. In this context, I�m checking to see if this is possible for you and on your general availability to meet with us around this time frame (especially any predictable constraints that might preclude meeting that we can work around).Please let me know what you think.Thanks,Harry Harry T. Stewart, P.E.Senior AssociateNormandeau Associates, Inc.25 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110603-472-5191 Ext 154 (direct) 603-213-0391 (cell)


[email protected] www.normandeau.com <http://www.normandeau.com/> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2015_12_22 FW Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervenercooperator process - Gov Hassan Pam Walsh

(2).TXT===========================================================================

2015_12_22 FW Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervenercooperator process - Gov Hassan Pam Walsh (2): RE- Meeting request.emlSubject: FW: Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervener/cooperator process - Gov Hassan & Pam WalshDate: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 9:26 AMFrom: Freise, Clark </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=FREISE>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervener/cooperator process - Gov Hassan & Pam WalshSent with Good (www.good.com)All times listed are in the following time zone:(UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) From: Burack, ThomasSent: Friday, December 11, 2015 4:07:09 PMTo: Burack, Thomas; Freise, ClarkSubject: Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervener/cooperator process - Gov Hassan & Pam WalshWhen: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 4:00 PM-5:00 PM.Where: Gov. Hassan Office

===========================================================================2015_12_22 FW Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervenercooperator process - Gov Hassan Pam Walsh.

TXT===========================================================================

2015_12_22 FW Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervenercooperator process - Gov Hassan Pam Walsh: RE- Meeting request.emlSubject: FW: Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervener/cooperator process - Gov Hassan & Pam WalshDate: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 9:26 AMFrom: Freise, Clark </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=FREISE>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervener/cooperator process - Gov Hassan & Pam WalshSent with Good (www.good.com)All times listed are in the following time zone:(UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) From: Burack, ThomasSent: Friday, December 11, 2015 4:07:09 PMTo: Burack, Thomas; Freise, ClarkSubject: Kinder Morgan pipeline and intervener/cooperator process - Gov Hassan & Pam WalshWhen: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 4:00 PM-5:00 PM.Where: Gov. Hassan Office


===========================================================================2015_12_22 Nat gas compressor station site visit (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Nat gas compressor station site visitDate: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 12:06 PMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: MADEP Marc Wolman <[email protected]>, MADEP Marc Simpson <[email protected]>, MADEP Rose Stanley <[email protected]>Cc: “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>Conversation: Nat gas compressor station site visitMarc, Marc & Rose,One of the compressor stations for the Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Market Path pipeline is proposed to be located in New Ipswich, NH. We have received and started to review the air permit application for the com-pressor station (two 20,000 Hp Solar turbines � similar to other compressor stations proposed on the pipeline). We would like to visit an existing compressor station to familiarize ourselves with that type of facility. We have one existing compressor station in NH, but it is much smaller than the proposed new station. It appears Massachusetts has a good sized stations in Agawam (Tennessee Gas Pipeline Station 261 @ 1615 Suffield St.) and Mendon (Tennessee Gas Pipeline Station 266A, 54 Thayer Rd). We would like to visit one of these stations and talk to the MADEP air permitting staff about their experience with review of the air permit application. Please let John McCutcheon, Sr. Title V Permit Engineer, (603) 271-0886 or me know if you can help us ar-range a site visit to either of these facilities.Thanks,Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_12_22 Nat gas compressor station site visit.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Nat gas compressor station site visitDate: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 12:06 PMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: MADEP Marc Wolman <[email protected]>, MADEP Marc Simpson <[email protected]>, MADEP Rose Stanley <[email protected]>Cc: “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>Conversation: Nat gas compressor station site visitMarc, Marc & Rose,One of the compressor stations for the Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Market Path pipeline is proposed to be located in New Ipswich, NH. We have received and started to review the air permit application for the com-pressor station (two 20,000 Hp Solar turbines � similar to other compressor stations proposed on the pipeline). We would like to visit an existing compressor station to familiarize ourselves with that type of facility. We have one existing compressor station in NH, but it is much smaller than the proposed new station. It appears Massachusetts has a good sized stations in Agawam (Tennessee Gas Pipeline Station 261 @ 1615 Suffield St.) and Mendon (Tennessee Gas Pipeline Station 266A, 54 Thayer Rd). We would like to visit one of these stations and talk to the MADEP air permitting staff about their experience with review of the air permit


application. Please let John McCutcheon, Sr. Title V Permit Engineer, (603) 271-0886 or me know if you can help us ar-range a site visit to either of these facilities.Thanks,Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_12_22 Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visit (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visitDate: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 5:05 PMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: RIDEM Ruth Gold <[email protected]>Cc: “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>Conversation: Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visitRuth,Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas has proposed to build a new natural gas pipeline, a portion of which, including a compressor station, is proposed to be located in NH. We have received and started to review the air permit application for the compressor station (two 20,000 Hp Solar turbines � similar to other compressor stations proposed on the pipeline). We would like to visit an existing compressor station to familiarize ourselves with that type of facility. We have one existing compressor station in NH, but it is much smaller than the proposed new station. It appears that Rhode Island has a good sized station in Burrillville (http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/air/opperms/algonq.pdf). We may want to visit this station and talk to the RIDEM air permitting staff (was that you?) about their experience with review of the air permit application. I think our Director Craig Wright talked to Doug McVay about this last week at a Directors. Please let John McCutcheon, Sr. Title V Permit Engineer, (603) 271-0886 or me know if you can help us arrange a site visit to this facility.I�ve also sent a similar request to Massachusetts. Thanks & Merry Christmas!Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_12_22 Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visit.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visitDate: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 5:05 PMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: RIDEM Ruth Gold <[email protected]>Cc: “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>


Conversation: Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visitRuth,Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas has proposed to build a new natural gas pipeline, a portion of which, including a compressor station, is proposed to be located in NH. We have received and started to review the air permit application for the compressor station (two 20,000 Hp Solar turbines � similar to other compressor stations proposed on the pipeline). We would like to visit an existing compressor station to familiarize ourselves with that type of facility. We have one existing compressor station in NH, but it is much smaller than the proposed new station. It appears that Rhode Island has a good sized station in Burrillville (http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/air/opperms/algonq.pdf). We may want to visit this station and talk to the RIDEM air permitting staff (was that you?) about their experience with review of the air permit application. I think our Director Craig Wright talked to Doug McVay about this last week at a Directors. Please let John McCutcheon, Sr. Title V Permit Engineer, (603) 271-0886 or me know if you can help us arrange a site visit to this facility.I�ve also sent a similar request to Massachusetts. Thanks & Merry Christmas!Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_12_22 RE Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visit (1).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visitDate: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 5:14 PMFrom: Gold, Ruth (DEM) <[email protected]>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Cc: “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>Conversation: Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visitHi Todd,Yes, it�s me that you should contact. For that site we permitted a 15,900 hp Solar turbine in June of this year (http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/air/preperms/app2289.pdf). I will see what I can arrange. What time period are you looking at? Ruth A. GoldSupervising Air Quality SpecialistOffice of Air ResourcesRI Dept. of Environmental Management235 Promenade StreetProvidence, RI 02908Tel: 401-222-2808, Ext. 7110Fax: 401-222-2017E-Mail: [email protected]: http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/air/index.htmFrom: Moore, Todd [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 4:05 PMTo: Gold, Ruth (DEM) <[email protected]>Cc: McCutcheon, John <[email protected]>Subject: Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visit


Ruth,Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas has proposed to build a new natural gas pipeline, a portion of which, including a compressor station, is proposed to be located in NH. We have received and started to review the air permit application for the compressor station (two 20,000 Hp Solar turbines � similar to other compressor stations proposed on the pipeline). We would like to visit an existing compressor station to familiarize ourselves with that type of facility. We have one existing compressor station in NH, but it is much smaller than the proposed new station. It appears that Rhode Island has a good sized station in Burrillville (http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/air/opperms/algonq.pdf). We may want to visit this station and talk to the RIDEM air permitting staff (was that you?) about their experience with review of the air permit application. I think our Director Craig Wright talked to Doug McVay about this last week at a Directors. Please let John McCutcheon, Sr. Title V Permit Engineer, (603) 271-0886 or me know if you can help us arrange a site visit to this facility.I�ve also sent a similar request to Massachusetts. Thanks & Merry Christmas!Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_12_22 RE NED Application Status (6).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: NED Application StatusDate: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 8:21 AMFrom: Mauck, Ridge </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MAUCK>To: ‘Harry Stewart’ <[email protected]>, “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Cc: Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>, Kerrie Diers <[email protected]>, Rachel Marden <[email protected]>Conversation: NED Application StatusHarry,At this point my calendar is generally open January 12-14. I have Tuesday morning (1/12) tentatively blocked off for another proposed meeting but will probably know more at by the end of the week. Merry Christmas to all.-RidgeRidgely Mauck, P.E.NHDESAlteration of Terrain BureauPO Box 95, 29 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302(603)271-2303Visit DES Land Resources Management <http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/index.htm> for helpful tools and information!From: Harry Stewart [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 2:58 PMTo: Mauck, Ridge; Comstock, GreggCc: Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel MardenSubject: NED Application Status


Ridge and Greg,We are in the early phase of trying to schedule meetings with DES to discuss application status as we approach finalization of the applications.Our goal is to make sure that all the administrative and technical details that you need are included in the appli-cation and that we have the benefit of any suggestions for improvement to facilitate your reviews as we finalize the applications.As you may recall, Kinder Morgan staff from outside of New England will generally attend these meetings (and this takes some prior planning to fly in, etc.).On a preliminary basis, it looks like we are trying for meetings around January 13 (plus or minus a day)- based on another meeting that appears to be taking shape for around then.I�m also thinking that it might be most effective to meet with AOT and 401 program staff in the same meeting. In this context, I�m checking to see if this is possible for you and on your general availability to meet with us around this time frame (especially any predictable constraints that might preclude meeting that we can work around).Please let me know what you think.Thanks,Harry Harry T. Stewart, P.E.Senior AssociateNormandeau Associates, Inc.25 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110603-472-5191 Ext 154 (direct) 603-213-0391 (cell)[email protected] www.normandeau.com <http://www.normandeau.com/> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2015_12_22 RE SRP meeting.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: SRP meetingDate: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 1:53 PMFrom: David, Owen </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DAVID>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Conversation: SRP meetingYes I will go no problem. From: Comstock, Gregg Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 12:53 PMTo: David, OwenSubject: FW: SRP meetingHI Owen,Can you attend? I probably won�t attend as there may be a meeting on the same day for the Kinder Morgan project � plus I may need time to prep for the WQSAC that week. Please let me know.ThanksGGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95


Concord, NH [email protected]: Sarah Allen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 12:47 PMTo: [email protected]; [email protected]; Patterson, Cheri; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Lamb, Amy; Mike R Johnson - NOAA Federal ([email protected]); Kristoff, Richard C NAE ([email protected]); Mauck, Ridge; David, Owen; Wiggin, Dori; Sommer, Lori; [email protected]; Forst, Darlene; Comstock, Gregg; [email protected]: Ann PembrokeSubject: RE: SRP meetingHello All,We have gotten responses from most of you at this point for the pre-application meeting. Tues Jan 12 from 9:00 to 10:30 AM is the one date you can all attend. I would like to reserve that time and date before it gets taken by other demands, and hopefully those who have not yet signed up can join us. Please note that the meeting loca-tion is at the DES Pease office.Thank you and have a happy holiday.SarahSARAH ALLEN, Sr. Principal Wetland ScientistNormandeau Associates, Inc.25 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110603-637-1158 (direct), 603-714-3085 (cell)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.normandeau.com <http://www.norman-deau.com/> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2015_12_23 call from Steve Majkut MADEP (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: call from Steve Majkut, MADEPDate: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:59 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: call from Steve Majkut, MADEPTodd,Steve Majkut (phonetically �my cut�) from MADEP (formerly of RIDEM) called about arranging a compres-sor station visit in response to your email. Steve inspected the TGP compressor station in Mendon, MA in 2014 and also wrote the recent permit renewal. He stated there was interest from others at MADEP who may join us for such a visit. Steve dealt with Mike Zeilstra of Kinder Morgan on the Mendon permit renewal and will call Mike to sound him out on a group visit. Steve asked if we had a time period in mind for the visit, and I wasn�t sure what to tell him.Steve can be reached at (508) 767 2773 or at [email protected] McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division


29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2015_12_23 call from Steve Majkut MADEP.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: call from Steve Majkut, MADEP

Date: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:59 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: call from Steve Majkut, MADEPTodd,Steve Majkut (phonetically �my cut�) from MADEP (formerly of RIDEM) called about arranging a compres-sor station visit in response to your email. Steve inspected the TGP compressor station in Mendon, MA in 2014 and also wrote the recent permit renewal. He stated there was interest from others at MADEP who may join us for such a visit. Steve dealt with Mike Zeilstra of Kinder Morgan on the Mendon permit renewal and will call Mike to sound him out on a group visit. Steve asked if we had a time period in mind for the visit, and I wasn�t sure what to tell him.Steve can be reached at (508) 767 2773 or at [email protected] McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2015_12_23 compressor station visit (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: compressor station visit Date: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 4:10 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: compressor station visit Todd,Steve Majkut (pronounced �my cut�) from MADEP (formerly of RIDEM) called about arranging a compres-sor station visit in response to your email. Steve inspected the TGP compressor station in Mendon, MA in 2014 and also wrote the recent permit renewal. He stated there was interest from others at MADEP who may join us


for such a visit. Steve dealt with Mike Zeilstra of Kinder Morgan on the Mendon permit renewal and will call Mike to sound him out on a possible group visit. Steve asked if we had a time period in mind for the visit, and I wasn�t sure what to tell him.Steve can be reached at (508) 767 2773 or at [email protected] McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2015_12_23 compressor station visit .TXT

===========================================================================Subject: compressor station visit Date: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 4:10 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: compressor station visit Todd,Steve Majkut (pronounced �my cut�) from MADEP (formerly of RIDEM) called about arranging a compres-sor station visit in response to your email. Steve inspected the TGP compressor station in Mendon, MA in 2014 and also wrote the recent permit renewal. He stated there was interest from others at MADEP who may join us for such a visit. Steve dealt with Mike Zeilstra of Kinder Morgan on the Mendon permit renewal and will call Mike to sound him out on a possible group visit. Steve asked if we had a time period in mind for the visit, and I wasn�t sure what to tell him.Steve can be reached at (508) 767 2773 or at [email protected] McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>


===========================================================================2015_12_23 FW compressor station visit .TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: compressor station visit Date: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 4:35 PMFrom: Milbury, Gary </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MILBURY>To: “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>Conversation: compressor station visit Craig - John spoke with Steve Majkut at MA DEP, who wrote the permit and did the inspection for the compres-sor station in Mendon, about an hour and a half from Concord. Apparently other MA DEP staff may join us, so coordination may be a bit of a challenge. Looking at calendars, I�m thinking either Thursday January 7th (you had 1 hour down as �tentative�, oth-erwise clear for John, Todd, and I) or Friday January 8th. I will be out on the 8th but both Todd and John are available (Todd and I didn�t think both of us necessarily had to go anyway).ThanksGaryFrom: McCutcheon, John Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:11 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: compressor station visit Todd,Steve Majkut (pronounced �my cut�) from MADEP (formerly of RIDEM) called about arranging a compres-sor station visit in response to your email. Steve inspected the TGP compressor station in Mendon, MA in 2014 and also wrote the recent permit renewal. He stated there was interest from others at MADEP who may join us for such a visit. Steve dealt with Mike Zeilstra of Kinder Morgan on the Mendon permit renewal and will call Mike to sound him out on a possible group visit. Steve asked if we had a time period in mind for the visit, and I wasn�t sure what to tell him.Steve can be reached at (508) 767 2773 or at [email protected] McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]

===========================================================================2015_12_23 FW DES-owned Land.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: DES-owned LandDate: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 2:48 PMFrom: DuBois, H. Keith </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DUBOIS>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>


Cc: “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “Wimsatt, Mike” <[email protected]>Conversation: DES-owned LandTim:Please see the table provided below in response to your inquiry regarding state owned property in the southern tier of the state.From: Mongeon, Robin Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 1:44 PMTo: DuBois, H. Keith; Regan, JohnSubject: RE: DES-owned LandKeith and John,We own a few lots associated with Superfund sites see info below.Mottolo Pig FarmBlueberry Hill RoadRaymond, NH 03077500State of New HampshireBK 5097 PG 0204StateOttati & Goss (O&G)/Great lakes Container Corp.(GLCC)Route 125Kingston, NH 038481 (O&G)6 (GLCC)35 total0Abandoned/State of New HampshireBK 3521 PG1105EPA/StateNew Hampshire Plating Co.20 Wright Ave.Merrimack, NH 03054130Site � Abandoned (Grassy Pond - State of NH BK5931 PG0099, 50 Acres, and BK6001 PG 0230-0231, 57.7 acres)EPA/StateSavage Municipal Water SupplyOK ToolElm Street, Milford235 7.61Lots 13-4, 13-3235 Multiple Parties State of New HampshireBK 5824 PG 0074-0077State (OU-1)PRPs (OU-2)EPA/State (OU-3)SylvesterGilson Road, Nashua 28~2City of NashuaBK 8023 PG 2153State of New HampshireBK 2887 PG 550BK 5135 PG 263StateFrom: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 7:56 AMTo: Regan, John; YuhasKirn, Sarah; Lynn, Gary; Mongeon, RobinSubject: FW: DES-owned LandJohn, Sarah, Gary, and Robin:Please see Tim�s e-mail below and let me know if we own any property in the southern tier of the state. I am not aware of any but my corporate memory does not go back as far as yours.From: Drew, Tim Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 5:32 PMTo: Wimsatt, MikeCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Stevens, MarkSubject: DES-owned LandHi Mike.With reference to the proposed Kinder Morgan gas pipeline, does your division own or otherwise control any properties along the southern tier of New Hampshire? Clark and I just attended a meeting with Pam Walsh, Allen Brooks, and others at the Governor�s Office and I didn�t offer any examples of this for your division be-cause I wasn�t sure. (I was thinking of the Superfund mitigation site on Grassy Pond that was finalized several years ago as an example when Bob Varney was here). I did point out that the DES Dam Bureau does own and manage several properties in that general area and I did offer that for consideration by the group. I have asked Mark Stevens if we have his properties mapped in any way (e.g., GIS). I look forward to your thoughts on this as we are preparing, as a state entity, to participate in the FERC certification and NEPA processes for the Kinder Morgan project. Thanks Mike.TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen Drive


Concord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_12_23 Northeast Energy Direct - CP16-21 Supplemental filing Dec 8 data request.TXT

=========================================================================== 2015_12_23 Northeast Energy Direct - CP16-21 Supplemental filing Dec 8 data request: NED EIR No. 1_CP16-21_120815.docSubject: Northeast Energy Direct - CP16-21 Supplemental filing & Dec 8 data requestDate: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 12:08 PMFrom: Eric Tomasi <[email protected]>To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]”


<[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]’” <[email protected]’>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>Conversation: Northeast Energy Direct - CP16-21 Supplemental filing & Dec 8 data requestHello,You may have noticed that Tennessee filed supplemental information on Monday, Dec 21. There is a link to the information below. http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/Doc_Family.asp?document_id=14411102Also, we also anticipate that Tennessee will respond to our December 8, 2015 data request regarding alterna-tives on December 28. I have attached that data request for your information.*************************************Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionOffice: (202) 502-8097*************************************

===========================================================================2015_12_23 RE compressor station visit (18).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: compressor station visit


Date: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 4:19 PMFrom: Milbury, Gary </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MILBURY>To: “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Conversation: compressor station visit Thanks John. I recognized Steve�s name when Todd and I were reviewing the MA DEP staff list yesterday but was confused, as my recollection was that he worked for RI DEM. In any event, sounds like we contacted the right person with him having written the air permit.I�ll touch base with Craig on potential dates, as I know he wanted to go with us.Gary MilburyPermitting and Environmental Health Bureau AdministratorNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Divisionphone: (603) 271-2630fax: (603) 271-1381email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: McCutcheon, John Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:11 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: compressor station visit Todd,Steve Majkut (pronounced �my cut�) from MADEP (formerly of RIDEM) called about arranging a compres-sor station visit in response to your email. Steve inspected the TGP compressor station in Mendon, MA in 2014 and also wrote the recent permit renewal. He stated there was interest from others at MADEP who may join us for such a visit. Steve dealt with Mike Zeilstra of Kinder Morgan on the Mendon permit renewal and will call Mike to sound him out on a possible group visit. Steve asked if we had a time period in mind for the visit, and I wasn�t sure what to tell him.Steve can be reached at (508) 767 2773 or at [email protected] McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: compressor station visit Date: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 4:19 PMFrom: Milbury, Gary </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MILBURY>To: “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Conversation: compressor station visit


Thanks John. I recognized Steve�s name when Todd and I were reviewing the MA DEP staff list yesterday but was confused, as my recollection was that he worked for RI DEM. In any event, sounds like we contacted the right person with him having written the air permit.I�ll touch base with Craig on potential dates, as I know he wanted to go with us.Gary MilburyPermitting and Environmental Health Bureau AdministratorNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Divisionphone: (603) 271-2630fax: (603) 271-1381email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: McCutcheon, John Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:11 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: compressor station visit Todd,Steve Majkut (pronounced �my cut�) from MADEP (formerly of RIDEM) called about arranging a compres-sor station visit in response to your email. Steve inspected the TGP compressor station in Mendon, MA in 2014 and also wrote the recent permit renewal. He stated there was interest from others at MADEP who may join us for such a visit. Steve dealt with Mike Zeilstra of Kinder Morgan on the Mendon permit renewal and will call Mike to sound him out on a possible group visit. Steve asked if we had a time period in mind for the visit, and I wasn�t sure what to tell him.Steve can be reached at (508) 767 2773 or at [email protected] McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]

===========================================================================2015_12_23 RE NED Application Status (4).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: NED Application StatusDate: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 10:45 AMFrom: Mauck, Ridge </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MAUCK>To: ‘Harry Stewart’ <[email protected]>, “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Cc: Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>, Kerrie Diers <[email protected]>, Rachel Marden <[email protected]>, “David, Owen” <[email protected]>Conversation: NED Application StatusThanks Harry. I agree with your approach, if it works for all.Merry Christmas!-Ridge


Ridgely Mauck, P.E.NHDESAlteration of Terrain BureauPO Box 95, 29 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302(603)271-2303Visit DES Land Resources Management <http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/index.htm> for helpful tools and information!From: Harry Stewart [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 9:28 AMTo: Comstock, GreggCc: Mauck, Ridge; Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel Marden; David, OwenSubject: Re: NED Application StatusRidge and Gregg,Thanks for your responsiveness (as always).We will get back to you with exact proposed times (consistent with Gregg’s availability) as soon as possible given the holidays. Our preliminary thought is that we should do 401 and AOT at the same time (I.e, separate from wetlands, wetlands mitigation, et. al.) for sake of efficiency (for you).Happy Holidays!Thanks,HarrySent from my iPadOn Dec 22, 2015, at 7:43 AM, Comstock, Gregg <[email protected]> wrote:Hi Harry, My availability is below.I would prefer the afternoon of January 12th as I would like to reserve January 13th to prepare for meetings I have on January 14th. That being said, if others can only meet on the 13th, I can be there. Happy Holidays,GreggJanuary 12th - available from 1 pm to 4 pm (PREFERRED)January 13th � available (AM would be better)January 14th � Not available.Gregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected]: Mauck, Ridge Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 7:22 AMTo: ‘Harry Stewart’; Comstock, GreggCc: Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel MardenSubject: RE: NED Application StatusHarry,At this point my calendar is generally open January 12-14. I have Tuesday morning (1/12) tentatively blocked off for another proposed meeting but will probably know more at by the end of the week. Merry Christmas to all.-RidgeRidgely Mauck, P.E.


NHDESAlteration of Terrain BureauPO Box 95, 29 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302(603)271-2303Visit DES Land Resources Management <http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/index.htm> for helpful tools and information!From: Harry Stewart [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 2:58 PMTo: Mauck, Ridge; Comstock, GreggCc: Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel MardenSubject: NED Application StatusRidge and Greg,We are in the early phase of trying to schedule meetings with DES to discuss application status as we approach finalization of the applications.Our goal is to make sure that all the administrative and technical details that you need are included in the appli-cation and that we have the benefit of any suggestions for improvement to facilitate your reviews as we finalize the applications.As you may recall, Kinder Morgan staff from outside of New England will generally attend these meetings (and this takes some prior planning to fly in, etc.).On a preliminary basis, it looks like we are trying for meetings around January 13 (plus or minus a day)- based on another meeting that appears to be taking shape for around then.I�m also thinking that it might be most effective to meet with AOT and 401 program staff in the same meeting. In this context, I�m checking to see if this is possible for you and on your general availability to meet with us around this time frame (especially any predictable constraints that might preclude meeting that we can work around).Please let me know what you think.Thanks,Harry Harry T. Stewart, P.E.Senior AssociateNormandeau Associates, Inc.25 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110603-472-5191 Ext 154 (direct) 603-213-0391 (cell)[email protected] www.normandeau.com <http://www.normandeau.com/> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2015_12_23 Re NED Application Status (5).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Re: NED Application StatusDate: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 10:28 AMFrom: Harry Stewart <[email protected]>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Cc: “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>, Kerrie Diers <[email protected]>, Rachel Marden <[email protected]>, “David, Owen” <[email protected]>Conversation: NED Application StatusRidge and Gregg,


Thanks for your responsiveness (as always).We will get back to you with exact proposed times (consistent with Gregg’s availability) as soon as possible given the holidays. Our preliminary thought is that we should do 401 and AOT at the same time (I.e, separate from wetlands, wetlands mitigation, et. al.) for sake of efficiency (for you).Happy Holidays!Thanks,HarrySent from my iPadOn Dec 22, 2015, at 7:43 AM, Comstock, Gregg <[email protected]> wrote:Hi Harry, My availability is below.I would prefer the afternoon of January 12th as I would like to reserve January 13th to prepare for meetings I have on January 14th. That being said, if others can only meet on the 13th, I can be there. Happy Holidays,GreggJanuary 12th - available from 1 pm to 4 pm (PREFERRED)January 13th � available (AM would be better)January 14th � Not available.Gregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected]: Mauck, Ridge Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 7:22 AMTo: ‘Harry Stewart’; Comstock, GreggCc: Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel MardenSubject: RE: NED Application StatusHarry,At this point my calendar is generally open January 12-14. I have Tuesday morning (1/12) tentatively blocked off for another proposed meeting but will probably know more at by the end of the week. Merry Christmas to all.-RidgeRidgely Mauck, P.E.NHDESAlteration of Terrain BureauPO Box 95, 29 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302(603)271-2303Visit DES Land Resources Management <http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/index.htm> for helpful tools and information!From: Harry Stewart [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 2:58 PMTo: Mauck, Ridge; Comstock, GreggCc: Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel MardenSubject: NED Application StatusRidge and Greg,We are in the early phase of trying to schedule meetings with DES to discuss application status as we approach


finalization of the applications.Our goal is to make sure that all the administrative and technical details that you need are included in the appli-cation and that we have the benefit of any suggestions for improvement to facilitate your reviews as we finalize the applications.As you may recall, Kinder Morgan staff from outside of New England will generally attend these meetings (and this takes some prior planning to fly in, etc.).On a preliminary basis, it looks like we are trying for meetings around January 13 (plus or minus a day)- based on another meeting that appears to be taking shape for around then.I�m also thinking that it might be most effective to meet with AOT and 401 program staff in the same meeting. In this context, I�m checking to see if this is possible for you and on your general availability to meet with us around this time frame (especially any predictable constraints that might preclude meeting that we can work around).Please let me know what you think.Thanks,Harry Harry T. Stewart, P.E.Senior AssociateNormandeau Associates, Inc.25 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110603-472-5191 Ext 154 (direct) 603-213-0391 (cell)[email protected] www.normandeau.com <http://www.normandeau.com/> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2015_12_23 RE Northeast Energy Direct - CP16-21 Supplemental filing Dec 8 data request.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Northeast Energy Direct - CP16-21 Supplemental filing & Dec 8 data requestDate: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 2:40 PMFrom: Eric Tomasi <[email protected]>To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]”


<[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>, “[email protected]” <[email protected]>Conversation: Northeast Energy Direct - CP16-21 Supplemental filing & Dec 8 data requestHere is the full set of links to the Dec 21st filing by Tennessee Gas. Update to Mailing List (public) https://elibrary.ferc.gov/IDMWS/common/OpenNat.asp?fileID=14080082Response to scoping commentshttps://elibrary.ferc.gov/IDMWS/common/opennat.asp?fileID=14080103From: Eric Tomasi Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 11:08 AM


Subject: Northeast Energy Direct - CP16-21 Supplemental filing & Dec 8 data requestHello,You may have noticed that Tennessee filed supplemental information on Monday, Dec 21. There is a link to the information below. http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/Doc_Family.asp?document_id=14411102Also, we also anticipate that Tennessee will respond to our December 8, 2015 data request regarding alterna-tives on December 28. I have attached that data request for your information.*************************************Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionOffice: (202) 502-8097*************************************

===========================================================================2015_12_23 your call today.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: your call todayDate: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 4:03 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>Conversation: your call todaySteve,Thanks for the call regarding a possible compressor station visit in Massachusetts, possibly at the TGP Mendon site. My understanding is that you will reach out to Mike Zeilstra of Kinder Morgan to discuss a visit. I wasn�t able to talk to Todd today before having to leave (last minute shopping!), but one of us will be in touch with you next week.Enjoy the holiday.John John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2015_12_24 NH visit to MA NG compressor station (15).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: NH visit to MA NG compressor stationDate: Thursday, December 24, 2015 11:07 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>Cc: “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>


Conversation: NH visit to MA NG compressor stationSteve,Thank you for getting back to us regarding a site visit to a compressor station. Dates that work for us are:#1 Thu Jan 7#2 Fri Jan 8#3 Mon Jan 18It would be great to have other MADEP staff along to share ideas. We would likely have John McCutcheon- Sr. Title V Permit engineer, Gary Milbury - Permitting & Env. Health Bureau Administrator and Craig Wright - Air Resources Division Director and myself.We are also working with Mike Zeilstra on the proposed NH compressor station, so he should understand the reason for NH�s request to visit a MA facility.We also have a similar request in to Ruth Gold in RI - in case we cannot coordinate our schedule�s for a MA visit. You can John McCutcheon (603) 271-0886 or me with any questions.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_12_24 NH visit to MA NG compressor station.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: NH visit to MA NG compressor stationDate: Thursday, December 24, 2015 11:17 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: MADEP Steve Majkut <[email protected]>Cc: “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>Conversation: NH visit to MA NG compressor stationSteve,Thank you for getting back to us regarding a site visit to a compressor station. Dates that work for us are:#1 Thu Jan 7#2 Fri Jan 8#3 Mon Jan 18It would be great to have other MADEP staff along to share ideas. We would likely have me and:John McCutcheon- Sr. Title V Permit EngineerGary Milbury - Permitting & Env. Health Bureau AdministratorCraig Wright - Air Resources Division DirectorWe are also working with Mike Zeilstra on the proposed NH compressor station, so he should understand the reason for NH�s request to visit a MA facility.We also have a similar request in to Ruth Gold in RI - in case we cannot coordinate our schedule�s for a MA visit. You can John McCutcheon (603) 271-0886 or me with any questions.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798



===========================================================================Subject: RE: compressor station visit Date: Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:02 AMFrom: Milbury, Gary </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MILBURY>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>Conversation: compressor station visit I suggested Thurs 1/7 or Friday 1/8 to Craig based on his calendar. Just waiting to see if those might work or if he prefers another date.Gary MilburyPermitting and Environmental Health Bureau AdministratorNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Divisionphone: (603) 271-2630fax: (603) 271-1381email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: Moore, Todd Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 8:38 AMTo: Milbury, Gary; McCutcheon, JohnSubject: RE: compressor station visit Ruth Gold of RIDEM also responded that she may be able to arrange a visit to the Burrillville station. Craig�s wishes/schedule may help us decide which one to pursue.From: Milbury, Gary Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:19 PMTo: McCutcheon, John; Moore, ToddSubject: RE: compressor station visit Thanks John. I recognized Steve�s name when Todd and I were reviewing the MA DEP staff list yesterday but was confused, as my recollection was that he worked for RI DEM. In any event, sounds like we contacted the right person with him having written the air permit.I�ll touch base with Craig on potential dates, as I know he wanted to go with us.Gary MilburyPermitting and Environmental Health Bureau AdministratorNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Divisionphone: (603) 271-2630fax: (603) 271-1381email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: McCutcheon, John Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:11 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: compressor station visit Todd,Steve Majkut (pronounced �my cut�) from MADEP (formerly of RIDEM) called about arranging a compres-sor station visit in response to your email. Steve inspected the TGP compressor station in Mendon, MA in 2014 and also wrote the recent permit renewal. He stated there was interest from others at MADEP who may join us for such a visit. Steve dealt with Mike Zeilstra of Kinder Morgan on the Mendon permit renewal and will call Mike to sound him out on a possible group visit. Steve asked if we had a time period in mind for the visit, and I wasn�t sure what to tell him.


Steve can be reached at (508) 767 2773 or at [email protected] McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: compressor station visit Date: Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:02 AMFrom: Milbury, Gary </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MILBURY>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>Conversation: compressor station visit I suggested Thurs 1/7 or Friday 1/8 to Craig based on his calendar. Just waiting to see if those might work or if he prefers another date.Gary MilburyPermitting and Environmental Health Bureau AdministratorNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Divisionphone: (603) 271-2630fax: (603) 271-1381email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: Moore, Todd Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 8:38 AMTo: Milbury, Gary; McCutcheon, JohnSubject: RE: compressor station visit Ruth Gold of RIDEM also responded that she may be able to arrange a visit to the Burrillville station. Craig�s wishes/schedule may help us decide which one to pursue.From: Milbury, Gary Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:19 PMTo: McCutcheon, John; Moore, ToddSubject: RE: compressor station visit Thanks John. I recognized Steve�s name when Todd and I were reviewing the MA DEP staff list yesterday but was confused, as my recollection was that he worked for RI DEM. In any event, sounds like we contacted the right person with him having written the air permit.I�ll touch base with Craig on potential dates, as I know he wanted to go with us.Gary MilburyPermitting and Environmental Health Bureau AdministratorNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division


phone: (603) 271-2630fax: (603) 271-1381email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: McCutcheon, John Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:11 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: compressor station visit Todd,Steve Majkut (pronounced �my cut�) from MADEP (formerly of RIDEM) called about arranging a compres-sor station visit in response to your email. Steve inspected the TGP compressor station in Mendon, MA in 2014 and also wrote the recent permit renewal. He stated there was interest from others at MADEP who may join us for such a visit. Steve dealt with Mike Zeilstra of Kinder Morgan on the Mendon permit renewal and will call Mike to sound him out on a possible group visit. Steve asked if we had a time period in mind for the visit, and I wasn�t sure what to tell him.Steve can be reached at (508) 767 2773 or at [email protected] McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: compressor station visit Date: Thursday, December 24, 2015 9:37 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>Conversation: compressor station visit Ruth Gold of RIDEM also responded that she may be able to arrange a visit to the Burrillville station. Craig�s wishes/schedule may help us decide which one to pursue.From: Milbury, Gary Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:19 PMTo: McCutcheon, John; Moore, ToddSubject: RE: compressor station visit Thanks John. I recognized Steve�s name when Todd and I were reviewing the MA DEP staff list yesterday but was confused, as my recollection was that he worked for RI DEM. In any event, sounds like we contacted the right person with him having written the air permit.I�ll touch base with Craig on potential dates, as I know he wanted to go with us.Gary MilburyPermitting and Environmental Health Bureau AdministratorNH Department of Environmental Services


Air Resources Divisionphone: (603) 271-2630fax: (603) 271-1381email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: McCutcheon, John Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:11 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: compressor station visit Todd,Steve Majkut (pronounced �my cut�) from MADEP (formerly of RIDEM) called about arranging a compres-sor station visit in response to your email. Steve inspected the TGP compressor station in Mendon, MA in 2014 and also wrote the recent permit renewal. He stated there was interest from others at MADEP who may join us for such a visit. Steve dealt with Mike Zeilstra of Kinder Morgan on the Mendon permit renewal and will call Mike to sound him out on a possible group visit. Steve asked if we had a time period in mind for the visit, and I wasn�t sure what to tell him.Steve can be reached at (508) 767 2773 or at [email protected] McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: compressor station visit Date: Thursday, December 24, 2015 9:37 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>Conversation: compressor station visit Ruth Gold of RIDEM also responded that she may be able to arrange a visit to the Burrillville station. Craig�s wishes/schedule may help us decide which one to pursue.From: Milbury, Gary Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:19 PMTo: McCutcheon, John; Moore, ToddSubject: RE: compressor station visit Thanks John. I recognized Steve�s name when Todd and I were reviewing the MA DEP staff list yesterday but was confused, as my recollection was that he worked for RI DEM. In any event, sounds like we contacted the right person with him having written the air permit.I�ll touch base with Craig on potential dates, as I know he wanted to go with us.Gary MilburyPermitting and Environmental Health Bureau Administrator


NH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Divisionphone: (603) 271-2630fax: (603) 271-1381email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: McCutcheon, John Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:11 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: compressor station visit Todd,Steve Majkut (pronounced �my cut�) from MADEP (formerly of RIDEM) called about arranging a compres-sor station visit in response to your email. Steve inspected the TGP compressor station in Mendon, MA in 2014 and also wrote the recent permit renewal. He stated there was interest from others at MADEP who may join us for such a visit. Steve dealt with Mike Zeilstra of Kinder Morgan on the Mendon permit renewal and will call Mike to sound him out on a possible group visit. Steve asked if we had a time period in mind for the visit, and I wasn�t sure what to tell him.Steve can be reached at (508) 767 2773 or at [email protected] McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]

===========================================================================2015_12_24 RE Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visit (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visitDate: Thursday, December 24, 2015 11:27 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “’Gold, Ruth (DEM)’” <[email protected]>Cc: “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>Conversation: Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visitRuth,Thank you for getting back to us regarding a site visit to a compressor station. Dates that work for us are:#1 Thu Jan 7#2 Fri Jan 8#3 Mon Jan 18We would likely have me and:John McCutcheon- Sr. Title V Permit EngineerGary Milbury - Permitting & Env. Health Bureau AdministratorCraig Wright - Air Resources Division DirectorWe are also working on a visit to a Massachusetts facility. The MA facility might be preferred because it is


owned by the same company that is proposing a facility in NH. However, I would still like to check into a RI visit in case we cannot secure a visit to the MA facility. You can John McCutcheon (603) 271-0886 or me with any questions.Thanks for your time!Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798From: Gold, Ruth (DEM) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 4:14 PMTo: Moore, ToddCc: McCutcheon, JohnSubject: RE: Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visitHi Todd,Yes, it�s me that you should contact. For that site we permitted a 15,900 hp Solar turbine in June of this year (http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/air/preperms/app2289.pdf). I will see what I can arrange. What time period are you looking at? Ruth A. GoldSupervising Air Quality SpecialistOffice of Air ResourcesRI Dept. of Environmental Management235 Promenade StreetProvidence, RI 02908Tel: 401-222-2808, Ext. 7110Fax: 401-222-2017E-Mail: [email protected]: http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/air/index.htmFrom: Moore, Todd [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 4:05 PMTo: Gold, Ruth (DEM) <[email protected]>Cc: McCutcheon, John <[email protected]>Subject: Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visitRuth,Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas has proposed to build a new natural gas pipeline, a portion of which, including a compressor station, is proposed to be located in NH. We have received and started to review the air permit application for the compressor station (two 20,000 Hp Solar turbines � similar to other compressor stations proposed on the pipeline). We would like to visit an existing compressor station to familiarize ourselves with that type of facility. We have one existing compressor station in NH, but it is much smaller than the proposed new station. It appears that Rhode Island has a good sized station in Burrillville (http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/air/opperms/algonq.pdf). We may want to visit this station and talk to the RIDEM air permitting staff (was that you?) about their experience with review of the air permit application. I think our Director Craig Wright talked to Doug McVay about this last week at a Directors. Please let John McCutcheon, Sr. Title V Permit Engineer, (603) 271-0886 or me know if you can help us arrange a site visit to this facility.I�ve also sent a similar request to Massachusetts. Thanks & Merry Christmas!Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning Manager


Permitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_12_24 RE Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visit.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visitDate: Thursday, December 24, 2015 11:27 AMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “’Gold, Ruth (DEM)’” <[email protected]>Cc: “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>Conversation: Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visitRuth,Thank you for getting back to us regarding a site visit to a compressor station. Dates that work for us are:#1 Thu Jan 7#2 Fri Jan 8#3 Mon Jan 18We would likely have me and:John McCutcheon- Sr. Title V Permit EngineerGary Milbury - Permitting & Env. Health Bureau AdministratorCraig Wright - Air Resources Division DirectorWe are also working on a visit to a Massachusetts facility. The MA facility might be preferred because it is owned by the same company that is proposing a facility in NH. However, I would still like to check into a RI visit in case we cannot secure a visit to the MA facility. You can John McCutcheon (603) 271-0886 or me with any questions.Thanks for your time!Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798From: Gold, Ruth (DEM) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 4:14 PMTo: Moore, ToddCc: McCutcheon, JohnSubject: RE: Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visitHi Todd,Yes, it�s me that you should contact. For that site we permitted a 15,900 hp Solar turbine in June of this year (http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/air/preperms/app2289.pdf). I will see what I can arrange. What time period are you looking at? Ruth A. GoldSupervising Air Quality SpecialistOffice of Air ResourcesRI Dept. of Environmental Management235 Promenade StreetProvidence, RI 02908Tel: 401-222-2808, Ext. 7110Fax: 401-222-2017


E-Mail: [email protected]: http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/air/index.htmFrom: Moore, Todd [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 4:05 PMTo: Gold, Ruth (DEM) <[email protected]>Cc: McCutcheon, John <[email protected]>Subject: Nat gas pipeline compressor station site visitRuth,Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas has proposed to build a new natural gas pipeline, a portion of which, including a compressor station, is proposed to be located in NH. We have received and started to review the air permit application for the compressor station (two 20,000 Hp Solar turbines � similar to other compressor stations proposed on the pipeline). We would like to visit an existing compressor station to familiarize ourselves with that type of facility. We have one existing compressor station in NH, but it is much smaller than the proposed new station. It appears that Rhode Island has a good sized station in Burrillville (http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/benviron/air/opperms/algonq.pdf). We may want to visit this station and talk to the RIDEM air permitting staff (was that you?) about their experience with review of the air permit application. I think our Director Craig Wright talked to Doug McVay about this last week at a Directors. Please let John McCutcheon, Sr. Title V Permit Engineer, (603) 271-0886 or me know if you can help us arrange a site visit to this facility.I�ve also sent a similar request to Massachusetts. Thanks & Merry Christmas!Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798

===========================================================================2015_12_24 Re NED Application Status.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Re: NED Application StatusDate: Thursday, December 24, 2015 8:50 AMFrom: Harry Stewart <[email protected]>To: “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>Cc: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>, Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>, Ker-rie Diers <[email protected]>, Rachel Marden <[email protected]>, “David, Owen” <[email protected]>Conversation: NED Application StatusHow about 1:30 PM on January 12? Thanks,HarrySent from my iPadOn Dec 23, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Mauck, Ridge <[email protected]> wrote:Thanks Harry. I agree with your approach, if it works for all.Merry Christmas!-RidgeRidgely Mauck, P.E.NHDESAlteration of Terrain Bureau


PO Box 95, 29 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302(603)271-2303Visit DES Land Resources Management <http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/index.htm> for helpful tools and information!From: Harry Stewart [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 9:28 AMTo: Comstock, GreggCc: Mauck, Ridge; Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel Marden; David, OwenSubject: Re: NED Application StatusRidge and Gregg,Thanks for your responsiveness (as always).We will get back to you with exact proposed times (consistent with Gregg’s availability) as soon as possible given the holidays. Our preliminary thought is that we should do 401 and AOT at the same time (I.e, separate from wetlands, wetlands mitigation, et. al.) for sake of efficiency (for you).Happy Holidays!Thanks,HarrySent from my iPadOn Dec 22, 2015, at 7:43 AM, Comstock, Gregg <[email protected]> wrote:Hi Harry, My availability is below.I would prefer the afternoon of January 12th as I would like to reserve January 13th to prepare for meetings I have on January 14th. That being said, if others can only meet on the 13th, I can be there. Happy Holidays,GreggJanuary 12th - available from 1 pm to 4 pm (PREFERRED)January 13th � available (AM would be better)January 14th � Not available.Gregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected]: Mauck, Ridge Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 7:22 AMTo: ‘Harry Stewart’; Comstock, GreggCc: Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel MardenSubject: RE: NED Application StatusHarry,At this point my calendar is generally open January 12-14. I have Tuesday morning (1/12) tentatively blocked off for another proposed meeting but will probably know more at by the end of the week. Merry Christmas to all.-RidgeRidgely Mauck, P.E.NHDESAlteration of Terrain BureauPO Box 95, 29 Hazen Drive


Concord, NH 03302(603)271-2303Visit DES Land Resources Management <http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/index.htm> for helpful tools and information!From: Harry Stewart [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 2:58 PMTo: Mauck, Ridge; Comstock, GreggCc: Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel MardenSubject: NED Application StatusRidge and Greg,We are in the early phase of trying to schedule meetings with DES to discuss application status as we approach finalization of the applications.Our goal is to make sure that all the administrative and technical details that you need are included in the appli-cation and that we have the benefit of any suggestions for improvement to facilitate your reviews as we finalize the applications.As you may recall, Kinder Morgan staff from outside of New England will generally attend these meetings (and this takes some prior planning to fly in, etc.).On a preliminary basis, it looks like we are trying for meetings around January 13 (plus or minus a day)- based on another meeting that appears to be taking shape for around then.I�m also thinking that it might be most effective to meet with AOT and 401 program staff in the same meeting. In this context, I�m checking to see if this is possible for you and on your general availability to meet with us around this time frame (especially any predictable constraints that might preclude meeting that we can work around).Please let me know what you think.Thanks,Harry Harry T. Stewart, P.E.Senior AssociateNormandeau Associates, Inc.25 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110603-472-5191 Ext 154 (direct) 603-213-0391 (cell)[email protected] www.normandeau.com <http://www.normandeau.com/> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2015_12_28 Accepted Site Visit Compressor station (13).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Accepted: Site Visit: Compressor stationDate: Monday, December 28, 2015 7:51 AMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Conversation: Site Visit: Compressor station

===========================================================================2015_12_28 Accepted Site visit Compressor station (14).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Accepted: Site visit: Compressor stationDate: Monday, December 28, 2015 7:51 AM


From: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Conversation: Site visit: Compressor station

===========================================================================2015_12_28 Accepted Site Visit Compressor station.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Accepted: Site Visit: Compressor stationDate: Monday, December 28, 2015 7:51 AMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Conversation: Site Visit: Compressor station

===========================================================================2015_12_28 RE Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meeting (1).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meetingDate: Monday, December 28, 2015 9:32 AMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>Cc: “Bonilla, Sergio” <[email protected]>, Harry Stewart <[email protected]>Conversation: Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meetingI can do anytime the 12th before 2:00, the 13th any time before 1:00, and any time on the 14th.CollisFrom: Adele Fiorillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 2:10 PMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; Adams, CollisCc: Bonilla, Sergio; Harry StewartSubject: RE: Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meetingThank you Frank � I will follow up with everyone when Collis returns and Happy Holidays to you too!ADELE FIORILLO Senior Principal Scientist/Group ManagerNormandeau Associates, Inc.30 International Drive - Suite 6, Portsmouth, NH 03801603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.normandeau.com <www.normandeau.com> From: Richardson, Frank [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 1:38 PMTo: Adele Fiorillo; Benedict, Karl; Adams, CollisCc: Bonilla, Sergio; Harry StewartSubject: RE: Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meetingHello Adele,My schedule for the week of January 11, 2016 is pretty much open at this point. Collis is out this week and is expected to be back on Monday December 28th. Let�s see what best fits his schedule for the week of 1/11/16 and go from there.HAPPY HOLIDAYS,


FrankFrank D. Richardson, Ph.D.Senior Wetlands InspectorSoutheast Region SupervisorNH DES Wetlands BureauPease Field Office222 International Drive, Suite 175Portsmouth, NH 03801Tel. (603) 559-1513Fax (603) 559-1510From: Adele Fiorillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2015 11:06 PMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; Adams, CollisCc: Bonilla, Sergio; Harry StewartSubject: Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meetingHello Collis, Frank and Karl: We are beginning to compile our wetland permit for the Kinder Morgan pipeline and would like to meet to provide you with an update, review in depth what we intend to include in the appli-cation, show you examples of the plans being developed, review our assessment methodologies and basically make sure we are providing you with everything you need for application acceptance. I also have a request in to Lori Sommer (along with Mark Kern and Dave Keddell) to meet with them to discuss mitigation but I thought it best to focus on mitigation with them and application content with you. Is there a day/time the week of January 11 that works best for you? Please let me know.Thank you and Merry Christmas!AdeleADELE FIORILLO Senior Principal Scientist/Group ManagerNormandeau Associates, Inc.30 International Drive - Suite 6, Portsmouth, NH 03801603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.normandeau.com <www.normandeau.com> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2015_12_28 RE Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meeting.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meetingDate: Monday, December 28, 2015 10:31 AMFrom: Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>To: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>Cc: “Bonilla, Sergio” <[email protected]>, Harry Stewart <[email protected]>Conversation: Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meetingThank you Collis. I hope you all had a wonderful Christmas Holiday. Since many of us will already be in Concord on 1/13 for a mitigation meeting at 11:00 how about 9:30am to 10:30am? If that works I will send out a calendar invite. ADELE FIORILLO Senior Principal Scientist/Group ManagerNormandeau Associates, Inc.30 International Drive - Suite 6, Portsmouth, NH 03801603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.normandeau.com <www.normandeau.


com> From: Adams, Collis [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 28, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Adele Fiorillo; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Bonilla, Sergio; Harry StewartSubject: RE: Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meetingI can do anytime the 12th before 2:00, the 13th any time before 1:00, and any time on the 14th.CollisFrom: Adele Fiorillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 2:10 PMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; Adams, CollisCc: Bonilla, Sergio; Harry StewartSubject: RE: Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meetingThank you Frank � I will follow up with everyone when Collis returns and Happy Holidays to you too!ADELE FIORILLO Senior Principal Scientist/Group ManagerNormandeau Associates, Inc.30 International Drive - Suite 6, Portsmouth, NH 03801603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.normandeau.com <www.normandeau.com> From: Richardson, Frank [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 1:38 PMTo: Adele Fiorillo; Benedict, Karl; Adams, CollisCc: Bonilla, Sergio; Harry StewartSubject: RE: Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meetingHello Adele,My schedule for the week of January 11, 2016 is pretty much open at this point. Collis is out this week and is expected to be back on Monday December 28th. Let�s see what best fits his schedule for the week of 1/11/16 and go from there.HAPPY HOLIDAYS,FrankFrank D. Richardson, Ph.D.Senior Wetlands InspectorSoutheast Region SupervisorNH DES Wetlands BureauPease Field Office222 International Drive, Suite 175Portsmouth, NH 03801Tel. (603) 559-1513Fax (603) 559-1510From: Adele Fiorillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2015 11:06 PMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; Adams, CollisCc: Bonilla, Sergio; Harry StewartSubject: Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meetingHello Collis, Frank and Karl: We are beginning to compile our wetland permit for the Kinder Morgan pipeline and would like to meet to provide you with an update, review in depth what we intend to include in the appli-cation, show you examples of the plans being developed, review our assessment methodologies and basically make sure we are providing you with everything you need for application acceptance. I also have a request in to Lori Sommer (along with Mark Kern and Dave Keddell) to meet with them to discuss mitigation but I thought it


best to focus on mitigation with them and application content with you. Is there a day/time the week of January 11 that works best for you? Please let me know.Thank you and Merry Christmas!AdeleADELE FIORILLO Senior Principal Scientist/Group ManagerNormandeau Associates, Inc.30 International Drive - Suite 6, Portsmouth, NH 03801603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.normandeau.com <www.normandeau.com> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2015_12_29 BlastingKinder Morgan (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Blasting/Kinder MorganDate: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 10:29 AMFrom: Kernen, Brandon </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KERNEN>To: “Freise, Clark” <[email protected]>Cc: “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>Conversation: Blasting/Kinder MorganClarkI understand you had questions about rock blasting relative to the Kinder Morgan project. Since NHDES� ini-tial comments were issued on the subject, we have had two meetings with representatives of Kinder Morgan on this issue. I can update you on this if you would like.RegardsBrandonBrandon Kernen, PG| NHDES | 603 271 0660 NHDES Be Well Informed Private Well App <http://xml2.des.state.nh.us/DWITool/> - An interactive web ap-plication for private well owners to interpret water quality test results and identify appropriate water treatment options

===========================================================================2015_12_29 BlastingKinder Morgan.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Blasting/Kinder MorganDate: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 10:29 AMFrom: Kernen, Brandon </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KERNEN>To: “Freise, Clark” <[email protected]>Cc: “Pelletier, Rene” <[email protected]>Conversation: Blasting/Kinder MorganClarkI understand you had questions about rock blasting relative to the Kinder Morgan project. Since NHDES� ini-tial comments were issued on the subject, we have had two meetings with representatives of Kinder Morgan on this issue. I can update you on this if you would like.RegardsBrandonBrandon Kernen, PG| NHDES | 603 271 0660


NHDES Be Well Informed Private Well App <http://xml2.des.state.nh.us/DWITool/> - An interactive web ap-plication for private well owners to interpret water quality test results and identify appropriate water treatment options

===========================================================================2015_12_30 Accepted Kinder Morgan Pipeline Meeting.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Accepted: Kinder Morgan Pipeline MeetingDate: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 1:23 PMFrom: Mauck, Ridge </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MAUCK>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan Pipeline Meeting

===========================================================================2015_12_30 NED AOT and 401 Application Status Meeting on Tuesday January 12 at 130 PM NHDES

offices.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: NED AOT and 401 Application Status: Meeting on Tuesday January 12 at 1:30 PM, NHDES officesDate: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 12:35 PMFrom: Harry Stewart <[email protected]>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>, “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>Cc: Adele Fiorillo <[email protected]>, Kerrie Diers <[email protected]>, Rachel Marden <[email protected]>, “David, Owen” <[email protected]>Conversation: NED AOT and 401 Application Status: Meeting on Tuesday January 12 at 1:30 PM, NHDES officesGreg, Ridge and Owen,I just sent out the meeting invitation within our Project Team confirming our 1:30 meeting on 1/12.Let me know if something changes on your end.On Gregg’s question: The group will be 5 or 6 (most likely). Next week, I’ll confirm and also send names and affiliations for the name tags once invitations have been accepted or declined. Several people are off the end of this week so confirmation will occur next week. Happy New Year!Thanks,HarryHarry T. Stewart, P.E.Senior AssociateNormandeau Associates, Inc.25 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110603-472-5191 Ext 154 (direct) 603-213-0391 (cell)[email protected] www.normandeau.com-----Original Message-----From: Comstock, Gregg [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 1:29 PMTo: Harry Stewart; Mauck, RidgeCc: Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel Marden; David, OwenSubject: RE: NED Application StatusI can make it.Thank you Harry.


How many from your team will be attending?Gregg________________________________From: Harry Stewart [[email protected]]Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 7:50 AMTo: Mauck, RidgeCc: Comstock, Gregg; Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel Marden; David, OwenSubject: Re: NED Application StatusHow about 1:30 PM on January 12?Thanks,HarrySent from my iPadOn Dec 23, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Mauck, Ridge <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:Thanks Harry. I agree with your approach, if it works for all.Merry Christmas!-RidgeRidgely Mauck, P.E.NHDESAlteration of Terrain BureauPO Box 95, 29 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302(603)271-2303Visit DES Land Resources Management<http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/index.htm> for helpful tools and information!From: Harry Stewart [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 9:28 AMTo: Comstock, GreggCc: Mauck, Ridge; Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel Marden; David, OwenSubject: Re: NED Application StatusRidge and Gregg,Thanks for your responsiveness (as always).We will get back to you with exact proposed times (consistent with Gregg’s availability) as soon as possible given the holidays. Our preliminary thought is that we should do 401 and AOT at the same time (I.e, separate from wetlands, wetlands mitigation, et. al.) for sake of efficiency (for you).Happy Holidays!Thanks,HarrySent from my iPadOn Dec 22, 2015, at 7:43 AM, Comstock, Gregg <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:Hi Harry,My availability is below.I would prefer the afternoon of January 12th as I would like to reserve January 13th to prepare for meetings I have on January 14th. That being said, if others can only meet on the 13th, I can be there.Happy Holidays,GreggJanuary 12th - available from 1 pm to 4 pm (PREFERRED) January 13th - available (AM would be better) January 14th - Not available.Gregg Comstock, P.E.


Supervisor, Water Quality Planning Section NH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Manage-ment Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>From: Mauck, RidgeSent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 7:22 AMTo: ‘Harry Stewart’; Comstock, GreggCc: Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel MardenSubject: RE: NED Application StatusHarry,At this point my calendar is generally open January 12-14. I have Tuesday morning (1/12) tentatively blocked off for another proposed meeting but will probably know more at by the end of the week.Merry Christmas to all.-RidgeRidgely Mauck, P.E.NHDESAlteration of Terrain BureauPO Box 95, 29 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302(603)271-2303Visit DES Land Resources Management<http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/index.htm> for helpful tools and information!From: Harry Stewart [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 2:58 PMTo: Mauck, Ridge; Comstock, GreggCc: Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel MardenSubject: NED Application StatusRidge and Greg,We are in the early phase of trying to schedule meetings with DES to discuss application status as we approach finalization of the applications.Our goal is to make sure that all the administrative and technical details that you need are included in the appli-cation and that we have the benefit of any suggestions for improvement to facilitate your reviews as we finalize the applications.As you may recall, Kinder Morgan staff from outside of New England will generally attend these meetings (and this takes some prior planning to fly in, etc.).On a preliminary basis, it looks like we are trying for meetings around January 13 (plus or minus a day)- based on another meeting that appears to be taking shape for around then.I’m also thinking that it might be most effective to meet with AOT and 401 program staff in the same meeting.In this context, I’m checking to see if this is possible for you and on your general availability to meet with us around this time frame (especially any predictable constraints that might preclude meeting that we can work around).Please let me know what you think.Thanks,HarryHarry T. Stewart, P.E.Senior AssociateNormandeau Associates, Inc.25 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110


603-472-5191 Ext 154 (direct) 603-213-0391 (cell) [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>www.normandeau.com<http://www.normandeau.com/>________________________________Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2015_12_30 RE Kinder Morgan Pipeline Meeting.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Kinder Morgan Pipeline MeetingDate: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 3:06 PMFrom: David, Owen </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DAVID>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan Pipeline MeetingOK I will coordinate with Ridge.�_____________________________________________From: Comstock, Gregg Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 12:51 PMTo: David, OwenSubject: FW: Kinder Morgan Pipeline MeetingHi Owen,I know you have a meeting in Portsmouth that morning but if you can attend the PM meeting with KM that would be great.�I think Ridge is going to attend both meetings.� Perhaps you can carpool with him.Let me know.ThanksGGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected]�-----Original Appointment-----From: Mauck, Ridge Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 12:24 PMTo: Comstock, GreggSubject: Accepted: Kinder Morgan Pipeline MeetingWhen: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 1:30 PM-4:00 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).Where: RES: DES-Room 114

===========================================================================2015_12_30 Re NED AOT and 401 Application Status Meeting on Tuesday January 12 at 130 PM

NHDES offices (1).TXT===========================================================================

Subject: Re: NED AOT and 401 Application Status: Meeting on Tuesday January 12 at 1:30 PM, NHDES of-fices


Date: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 7:39 PMFrom: Harry Stewart <[email protected]>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Cc: “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, “David, Owen” <[email protected]>Conversation: NED AOT and 401 Application Status: Meeting on Tuesday January 12 at 1:30 PM, NHDES officesThanks! Ridge was available all day (last I heard) but I also recognize that this could have changed.Sent from my iPad> On Dec 30, 2015, at 12:06 PM, Comstock, Gregg <[email protected]> wrote:> > Hi Harry,> I can make it. I reserved room 114.> > I’ll let Ridge respond as to his availability. > > Happy New Year to you too.> Gregg> > Gregg Comstock, P.E.> Supervisor, Water Quality Planning Section> NH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau> 29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95> Concord, NH 03302-0095> 603-271-2983> [email protected]> > > -----Original Message-----> From: Harry Stewart [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 11:35 AM> To: Comstock, Gregg; Mauck, Ridge> Cc: Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel Marden; David, Owen> Subject: NED AOT and 401 Application Status: Meeting on Tuesday January 12 at 1:30 PM, NHDES offices> > Greg, Ridge and Owen,> > I just sent out the meeting invitation within our Project Team confirming our 1:30 meeting on 1/12.> Let me know if something changes on your end.> > On Gregg’s question: The group will be 5 or 6 (most likely). Next week, I’ll confirm and also send names and affiliations for the name tags once invitations have been accepted or declined. Several people are off the end of this week so confirmation will occur next week. > > Happy New Year!> > Thanks,> Harry> >


> Harry T. Stewart, P.E.> Senior Associate> Normandeau Associates, Inc.> 25 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110> 603-472-5191 Ext 154 (direct) 603-213-0391 (cell) [email protected] www.normandeau.com> > -----Original Message-----> From: Comstock, Gregg [mailto:[email protected]]> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 1:29 PM> To: Harry Stewart; Mauck, Ridge> Cc: Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel Marden; David, Owen> Subject: RE: NED Application Status> > I can make it.> > Thank you Harry.> > How many from your team will be attending?> > Gregg> > ________________________________> From: Harry Stewart [[email protected]]> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 7:50 AM> To: Mauck, Ridge> Cc: Comstock, Gregg; Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel Marden; David, Owen> Subject: Re: NED Application Status> > How about 1:30 PM on January 12?> > Thanks,> Harry> > Sent from my iPad> > On Dec 23, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Mauck, Ridge <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:> > Thanks Harry. I agree with your approach, if it works for all.> > Merry Christmas!> > -Ridge> > Ridgely Mauck, P.E.> NHDES> Alteration of Terrain Bureau> PO Box 95, 29 Hazen Drive> Concord, NH 03302> (603)271-2303


> Visit DES Land Resources Management<http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/index.htm> for helpful tools and information!> > From: Harry Stewart [mailto:[email protected]]> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 9:28 AM> To: Comstock, Gregg> Cc: Mauck, Ridge; Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel Marden; David, Owen> Subject: Re: NED Application Status> > Ridge and Gregg,> > Thanks for your responsiveness (as always).> We will get back to you with exact proposed times (consistent with Gregg’s availability) as soon as possible given the holidays. Our preliminary thought is that we should do 401 and AOT at the same time (I.e, separate from wetlands, wetlands mitigation, et. al.) for sake of efficiency (for you).> > Happy Holidays!> > Thanks,> Harry> > > Sent from my iPad> > On Dec 22, 2015, at 7:43 AM, Comstock, Gregg <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:> Hi Harry,> My availability is below.> I would prefer the afternoon of January 12th as I would like to reserve January 13th to prepare for meetings I have on January 14th. That being said, if others can only meet on the 13th, I can be there.> > Happy Holidays,> Gregg> > January 12th - available from 1 pm to 4 pm (PREFERRED) January 13th - available (AM would be better) January 14th - Not available.> > Gregg Comstock, P.E.> Supervisor, Water Quality Planning Section NH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Manage-ment Bureau> 29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95> Concord, NH 03302-0095> 603-271-2983> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > From: Mauck, Ridge> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 7:22 AM> To: ‘Harry Stewart’; Comstock, Gregg> Cc: Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel Marden


> Subject: RE: NED Application Status> > Harry,> At this point my calendar is generally open January 12-14. I have Tuesday morning (1/12) tentatively blocked off for another proposed meeting but will probably know more at by the end of the week.> > Merry Christmas to all.> > -Ridge> > Ridgely Mauck, P.E.> NHDES> Alteration of Terrain Bureau> PO Box 95, 29 Hazen Drive> Concord, NH 03302> (603)271-2303> Visit DES Land Resources Management<http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/index.htm> for helpful tools and information!> > From: Harry Stewart [mailto:[email protected]]> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 2:58 PM> To: Mauck, Ridge; Comstock, Gregg> Cc: Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel Marden> Subject: NED Application Status> > > Ridge and Greg,> > We are in the early phase of trying to schedule meetings with DES to discuss application status as we ap-proach finalization of the applications.> Our goal is to make sure that all the administrative and technical details that you need are included in the application and that we have the benefit of any suggestions for improvement to facilitate your reviews as we finalize the applications.> As you may recall, Kinder Morgan staff from outside of New England will generally attend these meetings (and this takes some prior planning to fly in, etc.).> On a preliminary basis, it looks like we are trying for meetings around January 13 (plus or minus a day)- based on another meeting that appears to be taking shape for around then.> I’m also thinking that it might be most effective to meet with AOT and 401 program staff in the same meet-ing.> > In this context, I’m checking to see if this is possible for you and on your general availability to meet with us around this time frame (especially any predictable constraints that might preclude meeting that we can work around).> Please let me know what you think.> > Thanks,> Harry> > > Harry T. Stewart, P.E.


> Senior Associate> Normandeau Associates, Inc.> 25 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110> 603-472-5191 Ext 154 (direct) 603-213-0391 (cell) [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> www.normandeau.com<http://www.normandeau.com/>> > > ________________________________> > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2015_12_31 RE NH visit to MA NG compressor station.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: NH visit to MA NG compressor stationDate: Thursday, December 31, 2015 11:04 AMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Cc: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: NH visit to MA NG compressor stationTodd, Steve Majkut from MADEP just called. He approached Mike Zeilstra of TGP about a joint NHARD/MADEP air agency visit, and Mike would prefer not to have personnel from both agencies on a visit.Steve said that Mike would be calling NHARD after the holidays to make arrangements for our visit.JohnFrom: Moore, Todd Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:08 AMTo: ‘[email protected]’Cc: McCutcheon, JohnSubject: NH visit to MA NG compressor stationSteve,Thank you for getting back to us regarding a site visit to a compressor station. Dates that work for us are:#1 Thu Jan 7#2 Fri Jan 8#3 Mon Jan 18It would be great to have other MADEP staff along to share ideas. We would likely have John McCutcheon- Sr. Title V Permit engineer, Gary Milbury - Permitting & Env. Health Bureau Administrator and Craig Wright - Air Resources Division Director and myself.We are also working with Mike Zeilstra on the proposed NH compressor station, so he should understand the reason for NH�s request to visit a MA facility.We also have a similar request in to Ruth Gold in RI - in case we cannot coordinate our schedule�s for a MA visit. You can John McCutcheon (603) 271-0886 or me with any questions.Todd A. MooreNew Construction & Planning ManagerPermitting & Environmental Health BureauAir Resources Division(603) 271-6798


===========================================================================2015_12_31 RE Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan Project (10).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan ProjectDate: Thursday, December 31, 2015 4:18 PMFrom: DuBois, H. Keith </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DUBOIS>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Cc: “Hoyt-Denison, Pamela” <[email protected]>, “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “YuhasKirn, Sarah” <[email protected]>Conversation: Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan ProjectTim:I think this is more appropriately a question for John Regan (he oversees the Superfund Projects as part of his bureau in along with Robin Mongeon) and Sarah YuhasKirn who I believe is on the GIS work group. Sarah will not be back until Monday.KeithFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 3:13 PMTo: Hoyt-Denison, PamelaCc: DuBois, H. KeithSubject: Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan ProjectHi Pam. I didn�t know with whom to check on a request from Ken Gallagher at OEP. He asked if he could obtain a shape file for the Superfund sites in the vicinity of the Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline project in southern NH. Do you know if there is such a data layer and if so, how Ken could receive a copy? Thank you. TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2015_12_31 RE Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan Project (9).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan ProjectDate: Thursday, December 31, 2015 4:39 PM


From: Regan, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=REGAN>To: “DuBois, H. Keith” <[email protected]>, “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Cc: “Hoyt-Denison, Pamela” <[email protected]>, “YuhasKirn, Sarah” <[email protected]>Conversation: Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan ProjectI spoke directly with Ken Gallagher on what info he is interested (he is really looking for info re all contami-nated sites w/I some predetermined buffer of the proposed pipeline�s center line). That info was in one of the resource reports for the project. And he can also get it (not easily) from One Stop.From: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 3:19 PMTo: Drew, TimCc: Hoyt-Denison, Pamela; Regan, John; YuhasKirn, SarahSubject: RE: Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan ProjectTim:I think this is more appropriately a question for John Regan (he oversees the Superfund Projects as part of his bureau in along with Robin Mongeon) and Sarah YuhasKirn who I believe is on the GIS work group. Sarah will not be back until Monday.KeithFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 3:13 PMTo: Hoyt-Denison, PamelaCc: DuBois, H. KeithSubject: Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan ProjectHi Pam. I didn�t know with whom to check on a request from Ken Gallagher at OEP. He asked if he could obtain a shape file for the Superfund sites in the vicinity of the Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline project in southern NH. Do you know if there is such a data layer and if so, how Ken could receive a copy? Thank you. TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.


===========================================================================2016_01_04 Automatic Reply.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Automatic ReplyDate: Monday, January 4, 2016 5:05 PMFrom: Zeilstra, Michael <[email protected]>To: “’[email protected]’” <[email protected]>Conversation: Automatic ReplyI am out of town on vacation between December 22nd and January 4th. I am available on cell phone (281-726-9946) except when transporting to and from location and will periodically check emails throughout the day. Thanks, Michael

===========================================================================2016_01_04 FW Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan Project.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan ProjectDate: Monday, January 4, 2016 10:47 AMFrom: YuhasKirn, Sarah </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=YUHASKIRN>To: “Dunbar, Christopher” <[email protected]>Cc: “Regan, John” <[email protected]>, “DuBois, H. Keith” <[email protected]>, “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>, “Hoyt-Denison, Pamela” <[email protected]>Conversation: Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan ProjectHi Chris,Would you be able to help Mr. Gallagher of OEP obtain the contaminated sites GIS layer, in a format that he can easily download and use?Thanks,SarahFrom: Regan, John Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 3:40 PMTo: DuBois, H. Keith; Drew, TimCc: Hoyt-Denison, Pamela; YuhasKirn, SarahSubject: RE: Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan ProjectI spoke directly with Ken Gallagher on what info he is interested (he is really looking for info re all contami-nated sites w/I some predetermined buffer of the proposed pipeline�s center line). That info was in one of the resource reports for the project. And he can also get it (not easily) from One Stop.From: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 3:19 PMTo: Drew, TimCc: Hoyt-Denison, Pamela; Regan, John; YuhasKirn, SarahSubject: RE: Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan ProjectTim:I think this is more appropriately a question for John Regan (he oversees the Superfund Projects as part of his bureau in along with Robin Mongeon) and Sarah YuhasKirn who I believe is on the GIS work group. Sarah will not be back until Monday.KeithFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 3:13 PMTo: Hoyt-Denison, PamelaCc: DuBois, H. Keith


Subject: Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan ProjectHi Pam. I didn�t know with whom to check on a request from Ken Gallagher at OEP. He asked if he could obtain a shape file for the Superfund sites in the vicinity of the Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline project in southern NH. Do you know if there is such a data layer and if so, how Ken could receive a copy? Thank you. TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2016_01_04 RE Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan Project.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan ProjectDate: Monday, January 4, 2016 9:14 AMFrom: Regan, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=REGAN>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan ProjectTim,Thanks. Hoppy 2016 to you as well. Another year and we will continue to look younger.Do you know how to access the Resource Reports for KM? The link provided in earlier emails doesn�t work. I am pretty sure there was information on all the contaminated sites that were located within the buffer zone of the proposed pipeline. No sense in reinventing the wheel if the data layer already exists.JohnFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 3:56 PMTo: Regan, JohnSubject: RE: Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan ProjectThank you, John. Happy 2016! TimFrom: Regan, John Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 3:40 PMTo: DuBois, H. Keith; Drew, TimCc: Hoyt-Denison, Pamela; YuhasKirn, SarahSubject: RE: Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan ProjectI spoke directly with Ken Gallagher on what info he is interested (he is really looking for info re all contami-


nated sites w/I some predetermined buffer of the proposed pipeline�s center line). That info was in one of the resource reports for the project. And he can also get it (not easily) from One Stop.From: DuBois, H. Keith Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 3:19 PMTo: Drew, TimCc: Hoyt-Denison, Pamela; Regan, John; YuhasKirn, SarahSubject: RE: Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan ProjectTim:I think this is more appropriately a question for John Regan (he oversees the Superfund Projects as part of his bureau in along with Robin Mongeon) and Sarah YuhasKirn who I believe is on the GIS work group. Sarah will not be back until Monday.KeithFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 3:13 PMTo: Hoyt-Denison, PamelaCc: DuBois, H. KeithSubject: Shape file for Superfund Sites - Kinder Morgan ProjectHi Pam. I didn�t know with whom to check on a request from Ken Gallagher at OEP. He asked if he could obtain a shape file for the Superfund sites in the vicinity of the Kinder Morgan/Tennessee Gas Pipeline project in southern NH. Do you know if there is such a data layer and if so, how Ken could receive a copy? Thank you. TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2016_01_04 RE TGP compressor station visit (12).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitDate: Monday, January 4, 2016 5:16 PMFrom: Zeilstra, Michael <[email protected]>To: “’McCutcheon, John’” <[email protected]>Cc: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: TGP compressor station visitJohn,


Thanks for your help. Hopefully Hopkinton or Mendon will be operating because of increased demand due to cold weather. Thanks, Michael From: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 3:05 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: TGP compressor station visitMike,Thanks for your time this morning to discuss ARD�s request to visit to a compressor station. I did inform Todd of your pending trip to Massachusetts in the 3rd or 4th weeks of January, and hopefully working our tour into that trip.In talking to Todd, our preference would be to see a compressor station in operation, if possible, even if it means a longer drive for us. Thanks again.John John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]

===========================================================================2016_01_04 TGP compressor station visit.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: TGP compressor station visitDate: Monday, January 4, 2016 5:05 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Michael D. Zeilstra ([email protected])” <[email protected]>Cc: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: TGP compressor station visitMike,Thanks for your time this morning to discuss ARD�s request to visit to a compressor station. I did inform Todd of your pending trip to Massachusetts in the 3rd or 4th weeks of January, and hopefully working our tour into that trip.In talking to Todd, our preference would be to see a compressor station in operation, if possible, even if it means a longer drive for us. Thanks again.John John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive


PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2016_01_05 Canceled Site visit Compressor station (10).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Canceled: Site visit: Compressor stationDate: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 4:29 PMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “McCutch-eon, John” <[email protected]>Conversation: Site visit: Compressor stationThis notice is to tentatively reserve 3 dates for a site visit to a Rhode Island or Massachusetts NH pipeline com-pressor station.� Dates we are pursuing (based on our collective availability) are Jan 7, Jan 8, and Jan 18.John McCutcheon or I will let you know as soon as the date is finalized.

===========================================================================2016_01_05 Canceled Site Visit Compressor station (11).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Canceled: Site Visit: Compressor stationDate: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 4:29 PMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “McCutch-eon, John” <[email protected]>Conversation: Site Visit: Compressor stationThis notice is to tentatively reserve 3 dates for a site visit to a Rhode Island or Massachusetts NH pipeline com-pressor station.� Dates we are pursuing (based on our collective availability) are Jan 7, Jan 8, and Jan 18.John McCutcheon or I will let you know as soon as the date is finalized.


===========================================================================Subject: RE: compressor station visit Date: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 4:53 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: compressor station visit Todd,Ruth Gold of RIDEM called and asked me to pass along to you that Doug McVeigh would like to be the lead for any ARD visit to a RI compressor station. She apologized for the slow response time but apparently Doug was out of the office all of last week. She also indicated that it would take some time to coordinate such a visit.Ruth said that a power plant has been proposed in the vicinity of a RI compressor station and it is drawing a lot of attention.I told her that either you or I will contact her if ARD wants to proceed with a visit to RI.


Thanks.JohnFrom: Moore, Todd Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 8:38 AMTo: Milbury, Gary; McCutcheon, JohnSubject: RE: compressor station visit Ruth Gold of RIDEM also responded that she may be able to arrange a visit to the Burrillville station. Craig�s wishes/schedule may help us decide which one to pursue.From: Milbury, Gary Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:19 PMTo: McCutcheon, John; Moore, ToddSubject: RE: compressor station visit Thanks John. I recognized Steve�s name when Todd and I were reviewing the MA DEP staff list yesterday but was confused, as my recollection was that he worked for RI DEM. In any event, sounds like we contacted the right person with him having written the air permit.I�ll touch base with Craig on potential dates, as I know he wanted to go with us.Gary MilburyPermitting and Environmental Health Bureau AdministratorNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Divisionphone: (603) 271-2630fax: (603) 271-1381email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: McCutcheon, John Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:11 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: compressor station visit Todd,Steve Majkut (pronounced �my cut�) from MADEP (formerly of RIDEM) called about arranging a compres-sor station visit in response to your email. Steve inspected the TGP compressor station in Mendon, MA in 2014 and also wrote the recent permit renewal. He stated there was interest from others at MADEP who may join us for such a visit. Steve dealt with Mike Zeilstra of Kinder Morgan on the Mendon permit renewal and will call Mike to sound him out on a possible group visit. Steve asked if we had a time period in mind for the visit, and I wasn�t sure what to tell him.Steve can be reached at (508) 767 2773 or at [email protected] McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]


===========================================================================2016_01_05 RE compressor station visit .TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: compressor station visit Date: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 4:53 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: compressor station visit Todd,Ruth Gold of RIDEM called and asked me to pass along to you that Doug McVeigh would like to be the lead for any ARD visit to a RI compressor station. She apologized for the slow response time but apparently Doug was out of the office all of last week. She also indicated that it would take some time to coordinate such a visit.Ruth said that a power plant has been proposed in the vicinity of a RI compressor station and it is drawing a lot of attention.I told her that either you or I will contact her if ARD wants to proceed with a visit to RI.Thanks.JohnFrom: Moore, Todd Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 8:38 AMTo: Milbury, Gary; McCutcheon, JohnSubject: RE: compressor station visit Ruth Gold of RIDEM also responded that she may be able to arrange a visit to the Burrillville station. Craig�s wishes/schedule may help us decide which one to pursue.From: Milbury, Gary Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:19 PMTo: McCutcheon, John; Moore, ToddSubject: RE: compressor station visit Thanks John. I recognized Steve�s name when Todd and I were reviewing the MA DEP staff list yesterday but was confused, as my recollection was that he worked for RI DEM. In any event, sounds like we contacted the right person with him having written the air permit.I�ll touch base with Craig on potential dates, as I know he wanted to go with us.Gary MilburyPermitting and Environmental Health Bureau AdministratorNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Divisionphone: (603) 271-2630fax: (603) 271-1381email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: McCutcheon, John Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 3:11 PMTo: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: compressor station visit Todd,Steve Majkut (pronounced �my cut�) from MADEP (formerly of RIDEM) called about arranging a compres-sor station visit in response to your email. Steve inspected the TGP compressor station in Mendon, MA in 2014 and also wrote the recent permit renewal. He stated there was interest from others at MADEP who may join us for such a visit. Steve dealt with Mike Zeilstra of Kinder Morgan on the Mendon permit renewal and will call Mike to sound him out on a possible group visit. Steve asked if we had a time period in mind for the visit, and I wasn�t sure what to tell him.


Steve can be reached at (508) 767 2773 or at [email protected] McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]

===========================================================================2016_01_06 Accepted Compressor Station site visit.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Accepted: Compressor Station site visitDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 12:17 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Conversation: Compressor Station site visit

===========================================================================2016_01_06 Compressor Station site visit.TXT

=========================================================================== 2016_01_06 Compressor Station site visit: lpa-tenngas264.pdfSubject: Compressor Station site visitDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 3:30 PMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>, “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>Conversation: Compressor Station site visitJohn has confirmed Jan 21 as the day for our visit to an existing compressor station in Massachusetts.� We�ll get more exact travel details soon. �John also obtained the air permit of the facility we will be visiting.��Thank you John for your work setting this up.

===========================================================================2016_01_06 compressor station visit.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: compressor station visitDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 2:30 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>


Conversation: compressor station visitMichael called to say he could do the Charlton site visit at 2:00 or 2:30 on the 21st.He has to coordinate with the operations manager for Charlton who apparently is also in charge of, and based at, the Agawam site.I said that we would get back to him.John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2016_01_06 FW Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4 3 15 (1).TXT

=========================================================================== 2016_01_06 FW Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4 3 15 (1): DOC_20150404154718.pdfSubject: FW: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Date: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 2:38 PMFrom: Richardson, Frank </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RICHARDSON>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15From: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, April 03, 2015 4:41 PMTo: ‘Robert Varney’; ‘[email protected]’; ‘Adele Fiorillo’; ‘Gardella, Mark’; ‘Hamarich, Mark A’; ‘[email protected]’; ‘Kern, Mark’; ‘Letson, Michael A (Mike)’; Mauck, Ridge; ‘Lucas Meyer’; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘[email protected]’; Sommer, Lori; ‘Bonilla, Sergio’Subject: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Good afternoon, Everyone, As promised, please find attached the list of attendees for today�s meeting here at DES. The only email addresses that weren�t supplied by the roster were those for Theresa Albanese and Doug Gibbons from HMM. If someone could forward the attachment to them, it will fulfill the list of participants. Best wishes to you all.Tim Drew Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867


Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2016_01_06 FW Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4 3 15 (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Date: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 2:28 PMFrom: Richardson, Frank </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RICHARDSON>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15From: Adele Fiorillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 5:12 PMTo: Kern, Mark; Drew, Tim; Robert Varney; Kerrie Diers; ‘Gardella, Mark’; ‘Hamarich, Mark A’; ‘[email protected]’; ‘Letson, Michael A (Mike)’; Mauck, Ridge; ‘Lucas Meyer’; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘[email protected]’; Sommer, Lori; ‘Bonilla, Sergio’Cc: Curt Thalken; Tory FletcherSubject: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Hi Mark: Responses to your comments below. Have a good weekend.Sincerely, AdeleADELE FIORILLO 603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: Kern, Mark [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 10:10 AMTo: Adele FiorilloCc: ‘Keddell, David M NAE’; Sommer, LoriSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Thanks Adele. Very helpful.So, would it be fair to say that?:1) You will not have VP info on most of the sites in NH when you apply to FERCWe will not have all the verified VP information when we file. Whether we will have information on most of the sites or, will not have information on most of the sites depends on how many site there are in total. We will have as much field verified vernal pool information and data as access allows, and in order to BEGIN the State and Federal permitting processes, including the FERC filing in September of 2015. Presently, we have ac-cess permission for 20% of the alignment (by property owner, not linear mileage); however, this is expected to increase. All follow up VP field verification information and data collected DURING the amphibian breeding season will be provided as access is granted. Supplements to the initial FERC (and all other Federal and State) application packages will be submitted. 2) You will gather field info on VPs prior to getting any federal wetland permit, so that will be part of any Corps mitigation package


Yes, as discussed during the 4/3/15 interagency meeting, TGP does not expect that any State or Federal permits will be issued until such time that all wetland resources, including Potential VPs, are ground-thruthed/field- ver-ified, so that any impacts may be reflected in a mitigation package.3) Most of the VP field work will likely happen outside of egg mass season, so will mostly be dealing with potential VPsFollowing initial Federal and State application package submittals, which may contain several Potential VPs identified through methods discussed during the inter-agency meeting on 4/3/15, as described in the initial e-mail, and as access is granted, field-verified VP verification information and data collected DURING the am-phibian breeding season will be submitted as supplements to the initial Federal and State application packages. We fully anticipate that we will have full access for the spring VP season in 2017.Take care, MarkFrom: Adele Fiorillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 9:52 AMTo: Kern, Mark; Drew, Tim; Robert Varney; Kerrie Diers; ‘Gardella, Mark’; ‘Hamarich, Mark A’; ‘[email protected]’; ‘Letson, Michael A (Mike)’; Mauck, Ridge; ‘Lucas Meyer’; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘[email protected]’; Sommer, Lori; ‘Bonilla, Sergio’Cc: Curt Thalken; Tory FletcherSubject: RE: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Hello Mark: Thanks for listening in on the call last week. Below are responses to your questions (in blue) as best as can be answered at this point in the project. I have replied all to your email so everyone from the meet-ing receives this information. Happy to answer any other questions you may have. Sincerely, AdeleADELE FIORILLO 603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: Kern, Mark [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 10:53 AMTo: Drew, Tim; Robert Varney; Kerrie Diers; Adele Fiorillo; ‘Gardella, Mark’; ‘Hamarich, Mark A’; ‘[email protected]’; ‘Letson, Michael A (Mike)’; Mauck, Ridge; ‘Lucas Meyer’; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘[email protected]’; Sommer, Lori; ‘Bonilla, Sergio’Subject: Re: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Thanks Tim,Adele, I had some quick questions.1) Roughly, what % of sites will be looked at in the field vs estimated using remote methods, when you apply for a permit? At this time access agreements are in place for 50% of the landowners along the entire alignment. In New Hampshire we have access to approximately 20%. We cannot predict how much more access we will obtain between now and the end of the field season/filing but our goal will be to complete field surveys in all areas that we have access as long as it is the appropriate season. Therefore it is safe to say that we will have at least 20% access.2) How will you handle vernal pools? a) again, what % will you look in the field vs using remote methods? We will be performing VP surveys this spring for any sites we have access to. The entire alignment will be flown and ground-truthing will occur on the access parcels, including vernal pool assessment. Crews will utilize the NHFG document for Identification and Documentation of Vernal Pools in New Hampshire and the Federal forms US Army Corps of Engineers - New England District Vernal Pool Valuation Score Form, US Army Corps of Engineers - New England District Ver-nal Pool Characterization Form and the recent Federal guidelines Proposed Revision of New England District Compensatory Mitigation Guidance, dated March 3, 2015. b) how well can you id. VPs using remote methods? If results are so-so, how will you estimate VP impacts?


We cannot confirm VP�s using remote imagery. Even though we have 5 cm resolution we need 4 pixels to get image detail (this translates to ~100 cm2). Therefore, we will have to assume any potential VP is a VP and asses impacts that way. Federal and state applications will be filed and field-verified/ground-truthed data will be pro-vided with updated permitting implications as that data from no-access parcels is obtained either prior to and/or following FERC Certificate. c) will you do egg mass counts or do you plan to treat them all the same as potential VPs? We will do egg mass counts in the field but not from the imagery. As access is granted or a FERC Certificate is issued, Potential Vernal Pools will be confirmed and verified as Vernal Pools or not using the above referenced characterization and valuation forms and guideline documents. d) what distance from cleared land will you use for your VP survey? The aerial interpretation will cover a survey width of 1500 feet (750 to either side of centerline). Field surveys cover a survey width of 250 when adjacent to powerlines and 400 feet in greenfield areas (not adjacent to powerlines).thanks, MarkPlease consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2016_01_06 FW Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4 3 15.TXT

=========================================================================== 2016_01_06 FW Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4 3 15: DOC_20150404154718.pdfSubject: FW: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Date: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 2:38 PMFrom: Richardson, Frank </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RICHARDSON>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15From: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, April 03, 2015 4:41 PMTo: ‘Robert Varney’; ‘[email protected]’; ‘Adele Fiorillo’; ‘Gardella, Mark’; ‘Hamarich, Mark A’; ‘[email protected]’; ‘Kern, Mark’; ‘Letson, Michael A (Mike)’; Mauck, Ridge; ‘Lucas Meyer’; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘[email protected]’; Sommer, Lori; ‘Bonilla, Sergio’Subject: Kinder Morgan - Technical Wetlands & Wildlife Meeting - 4/3/15Good afternoon, Everyone, As promised, please find attached the list of attendees for today�s meeting here at DES. The only email addresses that weren�t supplied by the roster were those for Theresa Albanese and Doug Gibbons from HMM. If someone could forward the attachment to them, it will fulfill the list of participants. Best wishes to you all.Tim Drew Timothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123


Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2016_01_06 FW NED - Meeting with Wetlands and Air 7 29.TXT

=========================================================================== 2016_01_06 FW NED - Meeting with Wetlands and Air 7 29: Agenda for July 29 DES meeting Wetlands.docx Agenda for July 29 meeting Air Resources Division.docxSubject: FW: NED - Meeting with Wetlands and Air 7/29Date: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 2:37 PMFrom: Richardson, Frank </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RICHARDSON>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: NED - Meeting with Wetlands and Air 7/29From: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 2:50 PMTo: Adams, Collis; Richardson, Frank; Sommer, Lori; Benedict, Karl; Forst, Darlene; Comstock, Gregg; Dorf-schmidt, Barbara; Moore, ToddCc: Dethlefs, Lauren; Hart, JenniferSubject: FW: NED - Meeting with Wetlands and Air 7/29Good afternoon, Folks. The following list and agenda are for the two Wednesday, July 29 meetings for the Northeast energy Direct Project proposed by Kinder Morgan. TimFrom: Adele Fiorillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 2:35 PMTo: Drew, TimCc: Harry StewartSubject: NED - Meeting with Wetlands and Air 7/29Hello Tim: Attached is an agenda for the Wednesday morning and afternoon meetings. Can you please dis-tribute to those attending from DES? Here is the attendee list from our end for these meetings. Everyone will attend the Wetlands meeting except Brian Stormwind. Everyone plus Brian Stormwind will attend the Air meet-ing. Adele FiorilloTheresa AlbaneseSergio BonillaHarry StewartBarry DuffKasia IngramBrian Stormwind (Air Div meeting only) Let me know if you need anything else. Otherwise, see you Wednesday. Thank you , AdeleADELE FIORILLO Senior Principal ScientistNormandeau Associates, Inc.30 International Drive - Suite 6, Portsmouth, NH 03801603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)


[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.normandeau.com <www.normandeau.com> The information contained in this electronic mail transmission and its attachments may be confidential and pro-tected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient (or an individual responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you are strictly prohibited from copying, disseminating or distribut-ing this communication. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all electronic, paper or other versions. The sender does not waive confidentiality in the event of any inadvertent transmission to an unauthorized recipient. No representation is made by the sender that this com-munication is virus-free. The recipient alone is responsible for taking appropriate measures to ensure that the e-mail is virus-free.Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2016_01_06 FW NED - request for permitting input (1).TXT

=========================================================================== 2016_01_06 FW NED - request for permitting input (1): CS-38 Market Mid Sta. 4 - Geotech Proposal 2015-09-25.pdf image001.jpgSubject: FW: NED - request for permitting inputDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 2:28 PMFrom: Richardson, Frank </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RICHARDSON>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: NED - request for permitting inputFrom: Adele Fiorillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 4:37 PMTo: Richardson, FrankCc: Bonilla, Sergio ([email protected]); Harry StewartSubject: NED - request for permitting inputHello Frank: We want to ensure that we proceed appropriately and ask that you review the attached and let us know if a permit or department notification would be required to perform geotechnical borings at this site. We have not had to do this in the past for investigative work on projects but want to be sure given this particular situation. The attached PDF shows the locations of all proposed borings (all in upland). Access to the proposed building pad for boring locations can be obtained by accessing the existing woods road under the utility corridor (see �access here� note on PDF) . The screen shot below from Google earth shows clearly the dirt road under the existing utility lines that would be used to access the borings (yellow pins). The wetland boundaries do connect across the road which show clearly as dark (wet) spots in the road. BMPs as outlined in the Utility BMP manu-al will be employed. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks in advance for you input. Sincerely, AdeleADELE FIORILLO Senior Principal Scientist/Senior Project ManagerNormandeau Associates, Inc.30 International Drive - Suite 6, Portsmouth, NH 03801603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.normandeau.com <www.normandeau.com> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.



=========================================================================== 2016_01_06 FW NED - request for permitting input (2): image001.jpg prime-wetland-new-ipswich.pdfSubject: FW: NED - request for permitting inputDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 2:27 PMFrom: Richardson, Frank </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RICHARDSON>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: NED - request for permitting inputFrom: Adele Fiorillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 5:21 PMTo: Richardson, FrankCc: Bonilla, Sergio ([email protected]); Harry StewartSubject: RE: NED - request for permitting inputHi Frank � per our discussion here is the compressor station site location on the New Ipswich Prime wetlands map. As you can see the Prime wetlands are on the opposite end of town. ADELE FIORILLO Senior Principal Scientist/Senior Project ManagerNormandeau Associates, Inc.30 International Drive - Suite 6, Portsmouth, NH 03801603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.normandeau.com <www.normandeau.com> From: Adele Fiorillo Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 4:37 PMTo: Richardson, Frank ([email protected])Cc: Bonilla, Sergio ([email protected]); Harry StewartSubject: NED - request for permitting inputHello Frank: We want to ensure that we proceed appropriately and ask that you review the attached and let us know if a permit or department notification would be required to perform geotechnical borings at this site. We have not had to do this in the past for investigative work on projects but want to be sure given this particular situation. The attached PDF shows the locations of all proposed borings (all in upland). Access to the proposed building pad for boring locations can be obtained by accessing the existing woods road under the utility corridor (see �access here� note on PDF) . The screen shot below from Google earth shows clearly the dirt road under the existing utility lines that would be used to access the borings (yellow pins). The wetland boundaries do connect across the road which show clearly as dark (wet) spots in the road. BMPs as outlined in the Utility BMP manu-al will be employed. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks in advance for you input. Sincerely, AdeleADELE FIORILLO Senior Principal Scientist/Senior Project ManagerNormandeau Associates, Inc.30 International Drive - Suite 6, Portsmouth, NH 03801603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.normandeau.com <www.normandeau.com> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.



=========================================================================== 2016_01_06 FW NED - request for permitting input (3): image001.jpg prime-wetland-new-ipswich.pdfSubject: FW: NED - request for permitting inputDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 2:24 PMFrom: Richardson, Frank </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RICHARDSON>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: NED - request for permitting inputFrom: Adele Fiorillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 5:21 PMTo: Richardson, FrankCc: Bonilla, Sergio ([email protected]); Harry StewartSubject: RE: NED - request for permitting inputHi Frank � per our discussion here is the compressor station site location on the New Ipswich Prime wetlands map. As you can see the Prime wetlands are on the opposite end of town. ADELE FIORILLO Senior Principal Scientist/Senior Project ManagerNormandeau Associates, Inc.30 International Drive - Suite 6, Portsmouth, NH 03801603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.normandeau.com <www.normandeau.com> From: Adele Fiorillo Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 4:37 PMTo: Richardson, Frank ([email protected])Cc: Bonilla, Sergio ([email protected]); Harry StewartSubject: NED - request for permitting inputHello Frank: We want to ensure that we proceed appropriately and ask that you review the attached and let us know if a permit or department notification would be required to perform geotechnical borings at this site. We have not had to do this in the past for investigative work on projects but want to be sure given this particular situation. The attached PDF shows the locations of all proposed borings (all in upland). Access to the proposed building pad for boring locations can be obtained by accessing the existing woods road under the utility corridor (see �access here� note on PDF) . The screen shot below from Google earth shows clearly the dirt road under the existing utility lines that would be used to access the borings (yellow pins). The wetland boundaries do connect across the road which show clearly as dark (wet) spots in the road. BMPs as outlined in the Utility BMP manu-al will be employed. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks in advance for you input. Sincerely, AdeleADELE FIORILLO Senior Principal Scientist/Senior Project ManagerNormandeau Associates, Inc.30 International Drive - Suite 6, Portsmouth, NH 03801603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.normandeau.com <www.normandeau.com> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.


===========================================================================2016_01_06 FW NED - request for permitting input.TXT

=========================================================================== 2016_01_06 FW NED - request for permitting input: CS-38 Market Mid Sta. 4 - Geotech Proposal 2015-09-25.pdf image001.jpgSubject: FW: NED - request for permitting inputDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 2:28 PMFrom: Richardson, Frank </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RICHARDSON>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: NED - request for permitting inputFrom: Adele Fiorillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 4:37 PMTo: Richardson, FrankCc: Bonilla, Sergio ([email protected]); Harry StewartSubject: NED - request for permitting inputHello Frank: We want to ensure that we proceed appropriately and ask that you review the attached and let us know if a permit or department notification would be required to perform geotechnical borings at this site. We have not had to do this in the past for investigative work on projects but want to be sure given this particular situation. The attached PDF shows the locations of all proposed borings (all in upland). Access to the proposed building pad for boring locations can be obtained by accessing the existing woods road under the utility corridor (see �access here� note on PDF) . The screen shot below from Google earth shows clearly the dirt road under the existing utility lines that would be used to access the borings (yellow pins). The wetland boundaries do connect across the road which show clearly as dark (wet) spots in the road. BMPs as outlined in the Utility BMP manu-al will be employed. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks in advance for you input. Sincerely, AdeleADELE FIORILLO Senior Principal Scientist/Senior Project ManagerNormandeau Associates, Inc.30 International Drive - Suite 6, Portsmouth, NH 03801603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.normandeau.com <www.normandeau.com> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2016_01_06 FW NED Projecct Excel Spreadsheet.TXT

=========================================================================== 2016_01_06 FW NED Projecct Excel Spreadsheet: Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsxSubject: FW: NED Projecct Excel SpreadsheetDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 2:35 PMFrom: Richardson, Frank </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RICHARDSON>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: NED Projecct Excel SpreadsheetFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 12:02 PM


To: Benedict, Karl; Richardson, FrankSubject: NED Projecct Excel SpreadsheetFor your use in commenting. TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2016_01_06 FW Northeast Energy Direct - Meeting & update - Eastern Agencies.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: Northeast Energy Direct - Meeting & update - Eastern AgenciesDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 2:39 PMFrom: Richardson, Frank </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RICHARDSON>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: Northeast Energy Direct - Meeting & update - Eastern AgenciesFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, April 03, 2015 12:14 PMTo: Adams, Collis; Pelletier, Rene; Richardson, Frank; Mauck, RidgeSubject: FW: Northeast Energy Direct - Meeting & update - Eastern AgenciesPlease see below. Distribute to others at DES who should also participate or listen. TimFrom: Henderson, Carol Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 2:47 PMTo: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Northeast Energy Direct - Meeting & update - Eastern AgenciesHi Tim:Here is the contact for getting in on the bi-monthly conference calls regarding the TN pipeline. Please let all those that may be interested know. Thanks, CarolFrom: Eric Tomasi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 12:56 PMTo: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Hender-son, Carol; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];


[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Elaine P. Baum; S. Xiah Kragie; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]: Howard, Margaret (DPU); Ferrer, Ashley M (DPU); Dan MaraSubject: Re: Northeast Energy Direct - Meeting & update - Eastern AgenciesAgenda for today’s Northeast Energy Direct Agency Conference Call.� 2:00 PM ET, Thursday, April 2 � Call in Number: (877)228-3100 Passcode: 745828#� Introduction� Resource Report review status� Meetingso Open houseso Scoping meetingso Agency/tribal meetings� Tennessee Gas updateo Agency coordinationo Landowner coordinationo Survey status� Schedule for next call� Questions---Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerOffice (202) 502-8097From: Eric TomasiSent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 2:23 PMTo: Eric Tomasi; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Elaine P. Baum; S. Xiah Kragie; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]: Howard, Margaret (DPU); Ferrer, Ashley M (DPU); Dan MaraSubject: Northeast Energy Direct - Meeting & update - Eastern AgenciesWhen: Thursday, April 2, 2015 2:00 PM-3:00 PM.Where: Call in Number: (877)228-3100 Passcode: 745828# Hello,We are postponing this weeks Northeast Energy Direct Agency meeting until next week, April 2nd. Reminder, this is for the Eastern Portion of the pipeline (CT, MA, NH, RI).


Tennessee filed the draft resource reports on March 13, 2015. Link here: http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/Doc_Family.asp?document_id=14312347 <http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/Doc_Family.asp?document_id=14312347> Therefore the next meeting will be:� 2:00 PM ET, Thursday, April 2 � Call in Number: (877)228-3100 Passcode: 745828#Please email me if you have any specific question(s) you want to discuss. I hope to talk to you then.*************************************Eric TomasiEnvironmental EngineerFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionOffice: (202) 502-8097*************************************

===========================================================================2016_01_06 FW Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meeting.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meetingDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 2:23 PMFrom: Richardson, Frank </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RICHARDSON>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meetingPete,I�ve only got a few emails pertaining to Kinder-Morgan/Tennessee Pipeline/Northeast Energy Direct and most have to do with meeting notices, but I will send you what I have.Good Luck & Happy New YearFrankFrank D. Richardson, Ph.D.Senior Wetlands InspectorSoutheast Region SupervisorNH DES Wetlands BureauPease Field Office222 International Drive, Suite 175Portsmouth, NH 03801Tel. (603) 559-1513Fax (603) 559-1510From: Adele Fiorillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 28, 2015 9:32 AMTo: Adams, Collis; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Bonilla, Sergio; Harry StewartSubject: RE: Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meetingThank you Collis. I hope you all had a wonderful Christmas Holiday. Since many of us will already be in Concord on 1/13 for a mitigation meeting at 11:00 how about 9:30am to 10:30am? If that works I will send out a calendar invite. ADELE FIORILLO Senior Principal Scientist/Group ManagerNormandeau Associates, Inc.30 International Drive - Suite 6, Portsmouth, NH 03801603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.normandeau.com <www.normandeau.com>


From: Adams, Collis [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 28, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Adele Fiorillo; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Bonilla, Sergio; Harry StewartSubject: RE: Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meetingI can do anytime the 12th before 2:00, the 13th any time before 1:00, and any time on the 14th.CollisFrom: Adele Fiorillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 2:10 PMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; Adams, CollisCc: Bonilla, Sergio; Harry StewartSubject: RE: Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meetingThank you Frank � I will follow up with everyone when Collis returns and Happy Holidays to you too!ADELE FIORILLO Senior Principal Scientist/Group ManagerNormandeau Associates, Inc.30 International Drive - Suite 6, Portsmouth, NH 03801603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.normandeau.com <www.normandeau.com> From: Richardson, Frank [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 1:38 PMTo: Adele Fiorillo; Benedict, Karl; Adams, CollisCc: Bonilla, Sergio; Harry StewartSubject: RE: Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meetingHello Adele,My schedule for the week of January 11, 2016 is pretty much open at this point. Collis is out this week and is expected to be back on Monday December 28th. Let�s see what best fits his schedule for the week of 1/11/16 and go from there.HAPPY HOLIDAYS,FrankFrank D. Richardson, Ph.D.Senior Wetlands InspectorSoutheast Region SupervisorNH DES Wetlands BureauPease Field Office222 International Drive, Suite 175Portsmouth, NH 03801Tel. (603) 559-1513Fax (603) 559-1510From: Adele Fiorillo [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2015 11:06 PMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; Adams, CollisCc: Bonilla, Sergio; Harry StewartSubject: Northeast Energy Direct - permit pre- application meetingHello Collis, Frank and Karl: We are beginning to compile our wetland permit for the Kinder Morgan pipeline and would like to meet to provide you with an update, review in depth what we intend to include in the appli-cation, show you examples of the plans being developed, review our assessment methodologies and basically make sure we are providing you with everything you need for application acceptance. I also have a request in to Lori Sommer (along with Mark Kern and Dave Keddell) to meet with them to discuss mitigation but I thought it best to focus on mitigation with them and application content with you. Is there a day/time the week of January


11 that works best for you? Please let me know.Thank you and Merry Christmas!AdeleADELE FIORILLO Senior Principal Scientist/Group ManagerNormandeau Associates, Inc.30 International Drive - Suite 6, Portsmouth, NH 03801603-319-5303 (direct) 603-494-8931 (mobile)[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.normandeau.com <www.normandeau.com> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2016_01_06 FW Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical Discussion (1).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 2:45 PMFrom: Richardson, Frank </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RICHARDSON>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical Discussion_____________________________________________From: Richardson, Frank Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 3:41 PMTo: Drew, TimCc: Thomas, WilliamSubject: RE: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionI�ll be there on Friday April 3rd.� I had a medical appointment scheduled then, but I�m sure my driving up to Concord for this meeting is far more important.BTW ~� I�ve already rescheduled my appointment.Frank-----Original Appointment-----From: Thomas, William On Behalf Of Drew, TimSent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 11:14 AMTo: Richardson, FrankSubject: FW: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionWhen: Friday, April 03, 2015 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).Where: Conference Room 111, DES Headquarters, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NHFrank:I am not sure if this will be SEC project/permit but it covers two permit regions and with Karl being new I as-sume you will be the Wetlands Permit contact.� Bill-----Original Appointment-----From: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 3:28 PMTo: Drew, Tim; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; Adams, Collis; Sommer, Lori; Mauck, Ridge; ‘Henderson, Carol’; ‘Kern, Mark’; ‘Keddell, David M NAE’; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘Robert Varney’; ‘Adele Fiorillo’Subject: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionWhen: Friday, April 03, 2015 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).Where: Conference Room 111, DES Headquarters, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NHFrom Adele Fiorillo, Normandeau Associates:� �We are particularly interested in agency input relative to our approach for surveys where we do not have full access to properties along the pipeline route.� The alternative is


to use remote sensing using high resolution aerial photography with ground trothing and actual ground surveys where we do have access.� As we discussed, attached is a tear sheet that outlines the remote sensing capabili-ties.��<< File: Aerial High Resolution Imaging Services.pdf >>�

===========================================================================2016_01_06 FW Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical Discussion (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 2:43 PMFrom: Richardson, Frank </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RICHARDSON>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical Discussion-----Original Appointment-----From: Richardson, Frank Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 3:31 PMTo: Drew, TimSubject: Accepted: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionWhen: Friday, April 03, 2015 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).Where: Conference Room 111, DES Headquarters, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH

===========================================================================2016_01_06 FW Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical Discussion.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: FW: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 2:45 PMFrom: Richardson, Frank </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RICHARDSON>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical Discussion_____________________________________________From: Richardson, Frank Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 3:41 PMTo: Drew, TimCc: Thomas, WilliamSubject: RE: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionI�ll be there on Friday April 3rd.� I had a medical appointment scheduled then, but I�m sure my driving up to Concord for this meeting is far more important.BTW ~� I�ve already rescheduled my appointment.Frank-----Original Appointment-----From: Thomas, William On Behalf Of Drew, TimSent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 11:14 AMTo: Richardson, FrankSubject: FW: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionWhen: Friday, April 03, 2015 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).Where: Conference Room 111, DES Headquarters, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NHFrank:I am not sure if this will be SEC project/permit but it covers two permit regions and with Karl being new I as-


sume you will be the Wetlands Permit contact.� Bill-----Original Appointment-----From: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 3:28 PMTo: Drew, Tim; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, Karl; Adams, Collis; Sommer, Lori; Mauck, Ridge; ‘Henderson, Carol’; ‘Kern, Mark’; ‘Keddell, David M NAE’; ‘Tur, Maria’; ‘Robert Varney’; ‘Adele Fiorillo’Subject: Proposed Kinder Morgan Pipeline - Wetlands & Wildlife Technical DiscussionWhen: Friday, April 03, 2015 10:00 AM-11:00 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).Where: Conference Room 111, DES Headquarters, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NHFrom Adele Fiorillo, Normandeau Associates:� �We are particularly interested in agency input relative to our approach for surveys where we do not have full access to properties along the pipeline route.� The alternative is to use remote sensing using high resolution aerial photography with ground trothing and actual ground surveys where we do have access.� As we discussed, attached is a tear sheet that outlines the remote sensing capabili-ties.��<< File: Aerial High Resolution Imaging Services.pdf >>�


Pipeline Company.TXT===========================================================================

2016_01_06 FW Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company: image001.jpg image002.jpgSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 2:36 PMFrom: Richardson, Frank </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RICHARDSON>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyFrom: Drew, Tim Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 11:54 AMTo: Adams, Collis; Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Thomas, WilliamSubject: RE: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline Com-panyFolks, The deadline for comments on the NED project is Friday, October 9. I just sent a correction to Keith DuBois� earlier email. TimFrom: Adams, Collis Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 8:33 AMTo: Richardson, Frank; Benedict, KarlCc: Drew, Tim; Thomas, WilliamSubject: FW: Proposed Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Project - Kinder Morgan - Tennessee Gas Pipeline CompanyImportance: HighFrank and Karl �Please see the attached and note the 10/19 deadline for getting comments to Tim Drew. If you need assistance with relief from your customary file review let me know ASAP so that I can get you some assistance. The time-





===========================================================================2016_01_06 FW UL Article about KM changing the centerline and adding a metering station for the pro-

posed pipeline in Amherst and Me~1.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: FW: UL Article about KM changing the centerline and adding a metering station for the proposed pipe-line in Amherst and MerrimackDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 2:34 PMFrom: Richardson, Frank </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RICHARDSON>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: UL Article about KM changing the centerline and adding a metering station for the proposed pipeline in Amherst and Merrimack


From: Drew, Tim Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 10:16 AMTo: Adams, Collis; Moore, Todd; Regan, John; Chormann, RickCc: DuBois, H. Keith; Richardson, Frank; Forst, Darlene; Thomas, William; Mauck, Ridge; Sommer, LoriSubject: UL Article about KM changing the centerline and adding a metering station for the proposed pipeline in Amherst and Merrimackhttp://www.unionleader.com/article/20151002/NEWS05/151009833 Thought you might be interested in this article. Please distribute as needed. TimTimothy W. DrewAdministratorPublic Information and PermittingOffice of the CommissionerNH Department of Environmental ServicesP.O. Box 9529 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095Tel. (603) 271-3306Fax. (603) 271-2867Cell. (603) 419-0123Email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> DES Website: http://des.nh.gov/This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely and exclusively for use by the person or persons to whom they are addressed. The information contained in this electronic message and any attached files may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected by law or rule. Please notify me at (603) 271-3306 or by email at [email protected] if you believe you have received this email accidentally or in error, and de-lete or destroy all copies of this electronic message along with any accompanying attachments or printed copies.

===========================================================================2016_01_06 FW compressor station visit.TXT

=========================================================================== 2016_01_06 FW compressor station visit: lpa-tenngas264.pdfSubject: FW: compressor station visitDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 3:22 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Conversation: compressor station visitFYI � travel time to Charlton from Concord is 2 hrsAttached is the air permit for the site.From: McCutcheon, John Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 1:30 PMTo: Moore, ToddSubject: compressor station visitMichael called to say he could do the Charlton site visit at 2:00 or 2:30 on the 21st.He has to coordinate with the operations manager for Charlton who apparently is also in charge of, and based at, the Agawam site.I said that we would get back to him.John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit Engineer


New Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 5:34 PMFrom: Zeilstra, Michael <[email protected]>To: “’McCutcheon, John’” <[email protected]>Cc: “’Moore, Todd’” <[email protected]>, “’Milbury, Gary’” <[email protected]>, “Perkins, Donald W (Don)” <[email protected]>Conversation: TGP compressor station visitAll, If you don�t have FRCs, Operations can bring FRC lab coats for you to wear. Thanks, Michael From: Zeilstra, Michael Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 3:12 PMTo: ‘McCutcheon, John’Cc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, Gary; Perkins, Donald W (Don); Garcia III, Alfonso M (Al)Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitJohn, Thanks. Also please bring FRCs if you have them. The address is 194 Carpenter Hill Road in Charlton MA. Here is a link to the Google Map directions to the site if you need it:https://www.google.com/maps/dir/29+Hazen+Drive,+Concord,+NH/194+Carpenter+Hill+Rd,+Charlton,+MA+01507/@42.6703791,-72.1583658,9z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m13!4m12!1m5!1m1!1s0x89e26a52583a36d5:0x7845b481fb52f1b9!2m2!1d-71.5154307!2d43.2194356!1m5!1m1!1s0x89e6a12a02d03ac7:0x28350c35566feedd!2m2!1d-72.0000634!2d42.1220345Please let me know if you have any other questions. I look forward to meeting with you all on Thursday at 2:00 PM. Thanks, Michael From: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 2:53 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitMichael,Per our phone call this morning, we are planning to meet you at the TGP compressor station in Charlton at 2:00 on Thursday, January 21st. It appears that the access to the site is from US Route 20. There will be four of us making the trip and we all have picture IDs, hard hats, safety glasses and steel toe boots. Is there anything else that we may need to bring? One last item - Would you mind sending me a confirming email? Thanks for your assistance in making these arrangements.


JohnJohn McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]: McCutcheon, John Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:25 AMTo: ‘Zeilstra, Michael’Cc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitMichael,Per your VM message, please note that Thursday January 21st works best for the group of 4 from ARD for a compressor station site visit to Charlton. We are available all day. Please let us know if that will work for you.Thanks.John From: Zeilstra, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 4:16 PMTo: McCutcheon, JohnCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitJohn, Thanks for your help. Hopefully Hopkinton or Mendon will be operating because of increased demand due to cold weather. Thanks, Michael From: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 3:05 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: TGP compressor station visitMike,Thanks for your time this morning to discuss ARD�s request to visit to a compressor station. I did inform Todd of your pending trip to Massachusetts in the 3rd or 4th weeks of January, and hopefully working our tour into that trip.In talking to Todd, our preference would be to see a compressor station in operation, if possible, even if it means a longer drive for us. Thanks again.John John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095


phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 5:11 PMFrom: Zeilstra, Michael <[email protected]>To: “’McCutcheon, John’” <[email protected]>Cc: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “Perkins, Donald W (Don)” <[email protected]>, “Garcia III, Alfonso M (Al)” <[email protected]>Conversation: TGP compressor station visitJohn, Thanks. Also please bring FRCs if you have them. The address is 194 Carpenter Hill Road in Charlton MA. Here is a link to the Google Map directions to the site if you need it:https://www.google.com/maps/dir/29+Hazen+Drive,+Concord,+NH/194+Carpenter+Hill+Rd,+Charlton,+MA+01507/@42.6703791,-72.1583658,9z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m13!4m12!1m5!1m1!1s0x89e26a52583a36d5:0x7845b481fb52f1b9!2m2!1d-71.5154307!2d43.2194356!1m5!1m1!1s0x89e6a12a02d03ac7:0x28350c35566feedd!2m2!1d-72.0000634!2d42.1220345Please let me know if you have any other questions. I look forward to meeting with you all on Thursday at 2:00 PM. Thanks, Michael From: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 2:53 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitMichael,Per our phone call this morning, we are planning to meet you at the TGP compressor station in Charlton at 2:00 on Thursday, January 21st. It appears that the access to the site is from US Route 20. There will be four of us making the trip and we all have picture IDs, hard hats, safety glasses and steel toe boots. Is there anything else that we may need to bring? One last item - Would you mind sending me a confirming email? Thanks for your assistance in making these arrangements.JohnJohn McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]: McCutcheon, John


Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:25 AMTo: ‘Zeilstra, Michael’Cc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitMichael,Per your VM message, please note that Thursday January 21st works best for the group of 4 from ARD for a compressor station site visit to Charlton. We are available all day. Please let us know if that will work for you.Thanks.John From: Zeilstra, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 4:16 PMTo: McCutcheon, JohnCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitJohn, Thanks for your help. Hopefully Hopkinton or Mendon will be operating because of increased demand due to cold weather. Thanks, Michael From: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 3:05 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: TGP compressor station visitMike,Thanks for your time this morning to discuss ARD�s request to visit to a compressor station. I did inform Todd of your pending trip to Massachusetts in the 3rd or 4th weeks of January, and hopefully working our tour into that trip.In talking to Todd, our preference would be to see a compressor station in operation, if possible, even if it means a longer drive for us. Thanks again.John John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 12:24 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Zeilstra, Michael” <[email protected]>


Cc: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: TGP compressor station visitMichael,Per your VM message, please note that Thursday January 21st works best for the group of 4 from ARD for a compressor station site visit to Charlton. We are available all day. Please let us know if that will work for you.Thanks.John From: Zeilstra, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 4:16 PMTo: McCutcheon, JohnCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitJohn, Thanks for your help. Hopefully Hopkinton or Mendon will be operating because of increased demand due to cold weather. Thanks, Michael From: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 3:05 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: TGP compressor station visitMike,Thanks for your time this morning to discuss ARD�s request to visit to a compressor station. I did inform Todd of your pending trip to Massachusetts in the 3rd or 4th weeks of January, and hopefully working our tour into that trip.In talking to Todd, our preference would be to see a compressor station in operation, if possible, even if it means a longer drive for us. Thanks again.John John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]

===========================================================================2016_01_06 zRE TGP compressor station visit (8).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitDate: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 4:52 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Zeilstra, Michael” <[email protected]>Cc: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: TGP compressor station visit


Michael,Per our phone call this morning, we are planning to meet you at the TGP compressor station in Charlton at 2:00 on Thursday, January 21st. It appears that the access to the site is from US Route 20. There will be four of us making the trip and we all have picture IDs, hard hats, safety glasses and steel toe boots. Is there anything else that we may need to bring? One last item - Would you mind sending me a confirming email? Thanks for your assistance in making these arrangements.JohnJohn McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]: McCutcheon, John Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:25 AMTo: ‘Zeilstra, Michael’Cc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitMichael,Per your VM message, please note that Thursday January 21st works best for the group of 4 from ARD for a compressor station site visit to Charlton. We are available all day. Please let us know if that will work for you.Thanks.John From: Zeilstra, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 4:16 PMTo: McCutcheon, JohnCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitJohn, Thanks for your help. Hopefully Hopkinton or Mendon will be operating because of increased demand due to cold weather. Thanks, Michael From: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 3:05 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: TGP compressor station visitMike,Thanks for your time this morning to discuss ARD�s request to visit to a compressor station. I did inform Todd of your pending trip to Massachusetts in the 3rd or 4th weeks of January, and hopefully working our tour into that trip.In talking to Todd, our preference would be to see a compressor station in operation, if possible, even if it means a longer drive for us. Thanks again.


John John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]

===========================================================================2016_01_07 Charlton compressor station.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Charlton compressor stationDate: Thursday, January 7, 2016 12:42 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Charlton compressor stationAttached is a view of the Charlton compressor station from the town road along with the link for streetview.I will ask Michael to arrange for the FRC (fire retardant clothing) lab coats for us.Thanks.John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2016_01_07 Re TGP compressor station visit (3).TXT

=========================================================================== 2016_01_07 Re TGP compressor station visit (3): 2016_01_07 Re TGP compressor station visit (3).TXT image001.jpg image002.jpgSubject: Re: TGP compressor station visitDate: Thursday, January 7, 2016 2:31 PMFrom: Zeilstra, Michael <[email protected]>To: “Eveson, Joseph” <[email protected]>Cc: “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Mil-bury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “Perkins, Donald W (Don)” <[email protected]>Conversation: TGP compressor station visitJoe,


Thanks. 4 of them are coming.ThanksSent from my iPhoneOn Jan 7, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Eveson, Joseph <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:John/Michael, That is not a problem. How many will be needed?JOSEPH EVESONOPERATIONS SUPERVISOR<image001.jpg>PH: (413)821-2023FX: (413)786-2922CL: (413)313-2634<image002.jpg><javascript:ClickThumbnail(15)>From: Zeilstra, MichaelSent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 12:58 PMTo: ‘McCutcheon, John’Cc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, Gary; Perkins, Donald W (Don); Eveson, JosephSubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitJohn,Operations can bring the FRC lab coats if they are not already at the station. They are one size fits all from my experience. Thanks, MichaelFrom: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 11:23 AMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, Gary; Perkins, Donald W (Don)Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitMichael,We would appreciate it if you could bring the FRC lab coats for us to the site visit.Are they �one-size-fits-all� design, or shall I get size information for you?Thanks.JohnFrom: Zeilstra, Michael [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 4:34 PMTo: McCutcheon, JohnCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, Gary; Perkins, Donald W (Don)Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitAll,If you don�t have FRCs, Operations can bring FRC lab coats for you to wear. Thanks, MichaelFrom: Zeilstra, MichaelSent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 3:12 PMTo: ‘McCutcheon, John’Cc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, Gary; Perkins, Donald W (Don); Garcia III, Alfonso M (Al)Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitJohn,Thanks. Also please bring FRCs if you have them. The address is 194 Carpenter Hill Road in Charlton MA. Here is a link to the Google Map directions to the site if you need it:https://www.google.com/maps/dir/29+Hazen+Drive,+Concord,+NH/


194+Carpenter+Hill+Rd,+Charlton,+MA+01507/@42.6703791,-72.1583658,9z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m13!4m12!1m5!1m1!1s0x89e26a52583a36d5:0x7845b481fb52f1b9!2m2!1d-71.5154307!2d43.2194356!1m5!1m1!1s0x89e6a12a02d03ac7:0x28350c35566feedd!2m2!1d-72.0000634!2d42.1220345Please let me know if you have any other questions. I look forward to meeting with you all on Thursday at 2:00 PM. Thanks, MichaelFrom: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 2:53 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitMichael,Per our phone call this morning, we are planning to meet you at the TGP compressor station in Charlton at 2:00 on Thursday, January 21st.It appears that the access to the site is from US Route 20.There will be four of us making the trip and we all have picture IDs, hard hats, safety glasses and steel toe boots. Is there anything else that we may need to bring?One last item - Would you mind sending me a confirming email?Thanks for your assistance in making these arrangements.JohnJohn McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>From: McCutcheon, JohnSent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:25 AMTo: ‘Zeilstra, Michael’Cc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitMichael,Per your VM message, please note that Thursday January 21st works best for the group of 4 from ARD for a compressor station site visit to Charlton. We are available all day. Please let us know if that will work for you.Thanks.JohnFrom: Zeilstra, Michael [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 4:16 PMTo: McCutcheon, JohnCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitJohn,Thanks for your help. Hopefully Hopkinton or Mendon will be operating because of increased demand due to cold weather. Thanks, MichaelFrom: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]]


Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 3:05 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: TGP compressor station visitMike,Thanks for your time this morning to discuss ARD�s request to visit to a compressor station. I did inform Todd of your pending trip to Massachusetts in the 3rd or 4th weeks of January, and hopefully working our tour into that trip.In talking to Todd, our preference would be to see a compressor station in operation, if possible, even if it means a longer drive for us.Thanks again.JohnJohn McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


===========================================================================Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitDate: Thursday, January 7, 2016 1:57 PMFrom: Zeilstra, Michael <[email protected]>To: “’McCutcheon, John’” <[email protected]>Cc: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “Perkins, Donald W (Don)” <[email protected]>, “Eveson, Joseph” <[email protected]>Conversation: TGP compressor station visitJohn, Operations can bring the FRC lab coats if they are not already at the station. They are one size fits all from my experience. Thanks, Michael From: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 11:23 AMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, Gary; Perkins, Donald W (Don)Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitMichael,We would appreciate it if you could bring the FRC lab coats for us to the site visit.Are they �one-size-fits-all� design, or shall I get size information for you?Thanks.JohnFrom: Zeilstra, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 4:34 PM


To: McCutcheon, JohnCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, Gary; Perkins, Donald W (Don)Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitAll, If you don�t have FRCs, Operations can bring FRC lab coats for you to wear. Thanks, Michael From: Zeilstra, Michael Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 3:12 PMTo: ‘McCutcheon, John’Cc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, Gary; Perkins, Donald W (Don); Garcia III, Alfonso M (Al)Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitJohn, Thanks. Also please bring FRCs if you have them. The address is 194 Carpenter Hill Road in Charlton MA. Here is a link to the Google Map directions to the site if you need it:https://www.google.com/maps/dir/29+Hazen+Drive,+Concord,+NH/194+Carpenter+Hill+Rd,+Charlton,+MA+01507/@42.6703791,-72.1583658,9z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m13!4m12!1m5!1m1!1s0x89e26a52583a36d5:0x7845b481fb52f1b9!2m2!1d-71.5154307!2d43.2194356!1m5!1m1!1s0x89e6a12a02d03ac7:0x28350c35566feedd!2m2!1d-72.0000634!2d42.1220345Please let me know if you have any other questions. I look forward to meeting with you all on Thursday at 2:00 PM. Thanks, Michael From: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 2:53 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitMichael,Per our phone call this morning, we are planning to meet you at the TGP compressor station in Charlton at 2:00 on Thursday, January 21st. It appears that the access to the site is from US Route 20. There will be four of us making the trip and we all have picture IDs, hard hats, safety glasses and steel toe boots. Is there anything else that we may need to bring? One last item - Would you mind sending me a confirming email? Thanks for your assistance in making these arrangements.JohnJohn McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]: McCutcheon, John Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:25 AMTo: ‘Zeilstra, Michael’Cc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visit


Michael,Per your VM message, please note that Thursday January 21st works best for the group of 4 from ARD for a compressor station site visit to Charlton. We are available all day. Please let us know if that will work for you.Thanks.John From: Zeilstra, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 4:16 PMTo: McCutcheon, JohnCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitJohn, Thanks for your help. Hopefully Hopkinton or Mendon will be operating because of increased demand due to cold weather. Thanks, Michael From: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 3:05 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: TGP compressor station visitMike,Thanks for your time this morning to discuss ARD�s request to visit to a compressor station. I did inform Todd of your pending trip to Massachusetts in the 3rd or 4th weeks of January, and hopefully working our tour into that trip.In talking to Todd, our preference would be to see a compressor station in operation, if possible, even if it means a longer drive for us. Thanks again.John John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]


===========================================================================Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitDate: Thursday, January 7, 2016 1:22 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Zeilstra, Michael” <[email protected]>Cc: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “Perkins, Donald W (Don)” <[email protected]>Conversation: TGP compressor station visitMichael,


We would appreciate it if you could bring the FRC lab coats for us to the site visit.Are they �one-size-fits-all� design, or shall I get size information for you?Thanks.JohnFrom: Zeilstra, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 4:34 PMTo: McCutcheon, JohnCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, Gary; Perkins, Donald W (Don)Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitAll, If you don�t have FRCs, Operations can bring FRC lab coats for you to wear. Thanks, Michael From: Zeilstra, Michael Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 3:12 PMTo: ‘McCutcheon, John’Cc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, Gary; Perkins, Donald W (Don); Garcia III, Alfonso M (Al)Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitJohn, Thanks. Also please bring FRCs if you have them. The address is 194 Carpenter Hill Road in Charlton MA. Here is a link to the Google Map directions to the site if you need it:https://www.google.com/maps/dir/29+Hazen+Drive,+Concord,+NH/194+Carpenter+Hill+Rd,+Charlton,+MA+01507/@42.6703791,-72.1583658,9z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m13!4m12!1m5!1m1!1s0x89e26a52583a36d5:0x7845b481fb52f1b9!2m2!1d-71.5154307!2d43.2194356!1m5!1m1!1s0x89e6a12a02d03ac7:0x28350c35566feedd!2m2!1d-72.0000634!2d42.1220345Please let me know if you have any other questions. I look forward to meeting with you all on Thursday at 2:00 PM. Thanks, Michael From: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 2:53 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitMichael,Per our phone call this morning, we are planning to meet you at the TGP compressor station in Charlton at 2:00 on Thursday, January 21st. It appears that the access to the site is from US Route 20. There will be four of us making the trip and we all have picture IDs, hard hats, safety glasses and steel toe boots. Is there anything else that we may need to bring? One last item - Would you mind sending me a confirming email? Thanks for your assistance in making these arrangements.JohnJohn McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053


email: [email protected]: McCutcheon, John Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:25 AMTo: ‘Zeilstra, Michael’Cc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitMichael,Per your VM message, please note that Thursday January 21st works best for the group of 4 from ARD for a compressor station site visit to Charlton. We are available all day. Please let us know if that will work for you.Thanks.John From: Zeilstra, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 4:16 PMTo: McCutcheon, JohnCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitJohn, Thanks for your help. Hopefully Hopkinton or Mendon will be operating because of increased demand due to cold weather. Thanks, Michael From: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 3:05 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: TGP compressor station visitMike,Thanks for your time this morning to discuss ARD�s request to visit to a compressor station. I did inform Todd of your pending trip to Massachusetts in the 3rd or 4th weeks of January, and hopefully working our tour into that trip.In talking to Todd, our preference would be to see a compressor station in operation, if possible, even if it means a longer drive for us. Thanks again.John John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]

===========================================================================2016_01_08 Canceled Site Visit Compressor station.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Canceled: Site Visit: Compressor stationDate: Friday, January 8, 2016 12:06 PMFrom: Moore, Todd </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP


FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MOORE>To: “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “McCutch-eon, John” <[email protected]>Conversation: Site Visit: Compressor stationThis notice is to tentatively reserve 3 dates for a site visit to a Rhode Island or Massachusetts NH pipeline com-pressor station.� Dates we are pursuing (based on our collective availability) are Jan 7, Jan 8, and Jan 18.John McCutcheon or I will let you know as soon as the date is finalized.

===========================================================================2016_01_11 FW Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct project (1).TXT

=========================================================================== 2016_01_11 FW Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct project (1): DESintervenor.docSubject: FW: Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct projectDate: Monday, January 11, 2016 12:55 PMFrom: Perelli, Vince </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PERELLI>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct projectSorry � Here�s the e-mail you were looking for: [email protected] luck,VFrom: Douglas Whitbeck [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 9:39 AMTo: Burack, Thomas; Freise, Clark; Wright, Craig; Forbes, Eugene; Perelli, Vince; DES: NHPPPCc: Douglas WhitbeckSubject: Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct project756 Brookline RoadMason, NH 03048January 11, 2016Reference:Filing as intervenor for Tennessee Natural Gas/Kinder Morgan Northeast Energy Direct projectTo:Mr. Thomas S. Burack, CommissionerMr. Clark Freise, Assistant Commissioner Mr. Craig A. Wright, Director Air Resources Division Mr. Eugene J. Forbes, Director Water DivisionGentlemen:To my knowledge, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services has yet file a motion to intervene in the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission process regarding the Northeast Energy Direct pipeline project. The deadline for filing to intervene is now January 15, 2016. Filing to intervene does not require the Department to take a stand for or against the project itself at this time, but becoming an intervenor will enable you to enter the discussion should you deem it appropriate at some time in the future.Given that this project will involve the taking of over 1,000 acres of New Hampshire private and conservation land, andGiven that this project has the potential to affect several municipal water supplies and countless private wells, andGiven that the cost of this project will be upon the ratepayers of the State of New Hampshire for decades to come, the New Hampshire Municipal Pipeline Coalition having warned that the proposed Kinder Morgan gas


pipeline will add significant costs to tens of thousands of New Hampshire residents and businesses, andGiven that a reputable physician has stated that the increase in healthcare costs due to the emissions of one compressor station, based on rates of exposure calculated using Kinder Morgan’s own published data, could be in the area of $2 million, andGiven that the proposed project will have a long-lasting affect New Hampshire’s energy policy, and by making us even more dependent on one energy source would violate the New Hampshire 10-year Energy Strategy ac-cepted by our governor just over a year ago, andGiven that the mission of the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services is �to help sustain a high quality of life for all citizens by protecting and restoring the environment and public health in New Hampshire� and includes regulating the emissions of air pollutants and water quality, I believe it is the DUTY of the Depart-ment of Enviromental Services to at least reserve a place in the discussion regarding a project with such exten-sive impact on the citizens of the State of New Hampshire. Please join similar agencies from other impacted states and file a motion to intervene.Thank you for your consideration.Douglas Whitbeck

===========================================================================2016_01_11 FW Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct project (3).TXT

=========================================================================== 2016_01_11 FW Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct project (3): DESintervenor.docSubject: FW: Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct projectDate: Monday, January 11, 2016 10:43 AMFrom: Perelli, Vince </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PERELLI>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct projectFYI,VinceVincent R. Perelli, AdministratorNH Dept. of Environmental Services Office of the CommissionerPlanning, Prevention & Assistance Unit29 Hazen Drive/P.O. Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095E: [email protected]: (603) 271-8989C: (603) 419-0978F: (603) 271-2867W: www.des.nh.govSent with Good (www.good.com)From: Douglas WhitbeckSent: Monday, January 11, 2016 9:38:59 AMTo: Burack, Thomas; Freise, Clark; Wright, Craig; Forbes, Eugene; Perelli, Vince; DES: NHPPPCc: Douglas WhitbeckSubject: Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct project756 Brookline RoadMason, NH 03048January 11, 2016Reference:


Filing as intervenor for Tennessee Natural Gas/Kinder Morgan Northeast Energy Direct projectTo:Mr. Thomas S. Burack, CommissionerMr. Clark Freise, Assistant Commissioner Mr. Craig A. Wright, Director Air Resources Division Mr. Eugene J. Forbes, Director Water DivisionGentlemen:To my knowledge, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services has yet file a motion to intervene in the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission process regarding the Northeast Energy Direct pipeline project. The deadline for filing to intervene is now January 15, 2016. Filing to intervene does not require the Department to take a stand for or against the project itself at this time, but becoming an intervenor will enable you to enter the discussion should you deem it appropriate at some time in the future.Given that this project will involve the taking of over 1,000 acres of New Hampshire private and conservation land, andGiven that this project has the potential to affect several municipal water supplies and countless private wells, andGiven that the cost of this project will be upon the ratepayers of the State of New Hampshire for decades to come, the New Hampshire Municipal Pipeline Coalition having warned that the proposed Kinder Morgan gas pipeline will add significant costs to tens of thousands of New Hampshire residents and businesses, andGiven that a reputable physician has stated that the increase in healthcare costs due to the emissions of one compressor station, based on rates of exposure calculated using Kinder Morgan’s own published data, could be in the area of $2 million, andGiven that the proposed project will have a long-lasting affect New Hampshire’s energy policy, and by making us even more dependent on one energy source would violate the New Hampshire 10-year Energy Strategy ac-cepted by our governor just over a year ago, andGiven that the mission of the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services is �to help sustain a high quality of life for all citizens by protecting and restoring the environment and public health in New Hampshire� and includes regulating the emissions of air pollutants and water quality, I believe it is the DUTY of the Depart-ment of Enviromental Services to at least reserve a place in the discussion regarding a project with such exten-sive impact on the citizens of the State of New Hampshire. Please join similar agencies from other impacted states and file a motion to intervene.Thank you for your consideration.Douglas Whitbeck

===========================================================================2016_01_11 RE Filing as an intervener for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct project (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Filing as an intervener for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct projectDate: Monday, January 11, 2016 11:54 AMFrom: Monroe, Pamela </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MONROE>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Filing as an intervener for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct projectTim-What is his e-mail address?Thanks,PamPamela G. MonroeAdministrator


New Hampshire Site Evaluation Committee21 South Fruit Street, Suite 10Concord, NH 03301-2429Phone: 603-271-2435Fax: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> http://www.nhsec.nh.gov/ <http://www.nhsec.nh.gov/> From: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 10:47 AMTo: Monroe, PamelaSubject: FW: Filing as an intervener for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct projectHi Pam. For the Kinder Morgan file. TimFrom: Perelli, Vince Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 9:44 AMTo: Drew, TimSubject: FW: Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct projectFYI,VinceVincent R. Perelli, AdministratorNH Dept. of Environmental Services Office of the CommissionerPlanning, Prevention & Assistance Unit29 Hazen Drive/P.O. Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095E: [email protected]: (603) 271-8989C: (603) 419-0978F: (603) 271-2867W: www.des.nh.gov <http://www.des.nh.gov> Sent with Good (www.good.com <http://www.good.com> )From: Douglas WhitbeckSent: Monday, January 11, 2016 9:38:59 AMTo: Burack, Thomas; Freise, Clark; Wright, Craig; Forbes, Eugene; Perelli, Vince; DES: NHPPPCc: Douglas WhitbeckSubject: Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct project756 Brookline RoadMason, NH 03048January 11, 2016Reference:Filing as intervenor for Tennessee Natural Gas/Kinder Morgan Northeast Energy Direct projectTo:Mr. Thomas S. Burack, CommissionerMr. Clark Freise, Assistant Commissioner Mr. Craig A. Wright, Director Air Resources Division Mr. Eugene J. Forbes, Director Water DivisionGentlemen:To my knowledge, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services has yet file a motion to intervene in the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission process regarding the Northeast Energy Direct pipeline project. The deadline for filing to intervene is now January 15, 2016. Filing to intervene does not require the Department to take a stand for or against the project itself at this time,


but becoming an intervenor will enable you to enter the discussion should you deem it appropriate at some time in the future.Given that this project will involve the taking of over 1,000 acres of New Hampshire private and conservation land, andGiven that this project has the potential to affect several municipal water supplies and countless private wells, andGiven that the cost of this project will be upon the ratepayers of the State of New Hampshire for decades to come, the New Hampshire Municipal Pipeline Coalition having warned that the proposed Kinder Morgan gas pipeline will add significant costs to tens of thousands of New Hampshire residents and businesses, andGiven that a reputable physician has stated that the increase in healthcare costs due to the emissions of one compressor station, based on rates of exposure calculated using Kinder Morgan’s own published data, could be in the area of $2 million, andGiven that the proposed project will have a long-lasting affect New Hampshire’s energy policy, and by making us even more dependent on one energy source would violate the New Hampshire 10-year Energy Strategy ac-cepted by our governor just over a year ago, andGiven that the mission of the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services is �to help sustain a high quality of life for all citizens by protecting and restoring the environment and public health in New Hampshire� and includes regulating the emissions of air pollutants and water quality, I believe it is the DUTY of the Depart-ment of Enviromental Services to at least reserve a place in the discussion regarding a project with such exten-sive impact on the citizens of the State of New Hampshire. Please join similar agencies from other impacted states and file a motion to intervene.Thank you for your consideration.Douglas Whitbeck

===========================================================================2016_01_11 RE Filing as an intervener for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct project.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Filing as an intervener for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct projectDate: Monday, January 11, 2016 4:17 PMFrom: Monroe, Pamela </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MONROE>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Filing as an intervener for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct projectThank you.Pamela G. MonroeAdministratorNew Hampshire Site Evaluation Committee21 South Fruit Street, Suite 10Concord, NH 03301-2429Phone: 603-271-2435Fax: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> http://www.nhsec.nh.gov/ <http://www.nhsec.nh.gov/> From: Drew, Tim Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 2:56 PMTo: Monroe, PamelaSubject: FW: Filing as an intervener for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct projectHI Pam. This is Mr. Whitbeck�s email address: [email protected] TimFrom: Douglas Whitbeck [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 9:39 AM


To: Burack, Thomas; Freise, Clark; Wright, Craig; Forbes, Eugene; Perelli, Vince; DES: NHPPPCc: Douglas WhitbeckSubject: Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct project756 Brookline RoadMason, NH 03048January 11, 2016Reference:Filing as intervenor for Tennessee Natural Gas/Kinder Morgan Northeast Energy Direct projectTo:Mr. Thomas S. Burack, CommissionerMr. Clark Freise, Assistant Commissioner Mr. Craig A. Wright, Director Air Resources Division Mr. Eugene J. Forbes, Director Water DivisionGentlemen:To my knowledge, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services has yet file a motion to intervene in the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission process regarding the Northeast Energy Direct pipeline project. The deadline for filing to intervene is now January 15, 2016. Filing to intervene does not require the Department to take a stand for or against the project itself at this time, but becoming an intervenor will enable you to enter the discussion should you deem it appropriate at some time in the future.Given that this project will involve the taking of over 1,000 acres of New Hampshire private and conservation land, andGiven that this project has the potential to affect several municipal water supplies and countless private wells, andGiven that the cost of this project will be upon the ratepayers of the State of New Hampshire for decades to come, the New Hampshire Municipal Pipeline Coalition having warned that the proposed Kinder Morgan gas pipeline will add significant costs to tens of thousands of New Hampshire residents and businesses, andGiven that a reputable physician has stated that the increase in healthcare costs due to the emissions of one compressor station, based on rates of exposure calculated using Kinder Morgan’s own published data, could be in the area of $2 million, andGiven that the proposed project will have a long-lasting affect New Hampshire’s energy policy, and by making us even more dependent on one energy source would violate the New Hampshire 10-year Energy Strategy ac-cepted by our governor just over a year ago, andGiven that the mission of the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services is �to help sustain a high quality of life for all citizens by protecting and restoring the environment and public health in New Hampshire� and includes regulating the emissions of air pollutants and water quality, I believe it is the DUTY of the Depart-ment of Enviromental Services to at least reserve a place in the discussion regarding a project with such exten-sive impact on the citizens of the State of New Hampshire. Please join similar agencies from other impacted states and file a motion to intervene.Thank you for your consideration.Douglas Whitbeck

===========================================================================2016_01_11 RE NED AOT and 401 Application Status Meeting on Tuesday January 12 at 130 PM

NHDES offices.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: RE: NED AOT and 401 Application Status: Meeting on Tuesday January 12 at 1:30 PM, NHDES of-ficesDate: Monday, January 11, 2016 4:00 PMFrom: Harry Stewart <[email protected]>


To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Cc: “Mauck, Ridge” <[email protected]>, “David, Owen” <[email protected]>Conversation: NED AOT and 401 Application Status: Meeting on Tuesday January 12 at 1:30 PM, NHDES officesGentlemen,For the front desk, attendance for tomorrow afternoon’s meeting is likely to be: Kasia Ingram, Kinder Morgan Tabatha Pellerin, Kinder Morgan Theresa Albanese, Hatch Mott MacDonald Sergio Bonilla, AECOM Rachel Marden, Normandeau Harry Stewart, Normandeau Bob Varney, Normandeau (Note: Bob may attend part of the meeting)Thanks,HarryHarry T. Stewart, P.E.Senior AssociateNormandeau Associates, Inc.25 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110603-472-5191 Ext 154 (direct) 603-213-0391 (cell)[email protected] www.normandeau.com-----Original Message-----From: Harry Stewart Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 6:39 PMTo: Comstock, GreggCc: Mauck, Ridge; David, OwenSubject: Re: NED AOT and 401 Application Status: Meeting on Tuesday January 12 at 1:30 PM, NHDES of-ficesThanks! Ridge was available all day (last I heard) but I also recognize that this could have changed.Sent from my iPad> On Dec 30, 2015, at 12:06 PM, Comstock, Gregg <[email protected]> wrote:> > Hi Harry,> I can make it. I reserved room 114.> > I’ll let Ridge respond as to his availability. > > Happy New Year to you too.> Gregg> > Gregg Comstock, P.E.> Supervisor, Water Quality Planning Section NH Department of > Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau> 29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95> Concord, NH 03302-0095> 603-271-2983> [email protected]


> > > -----Original Message-----> From: Harry Stewart [mailto:[email protected]]> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 11:35 AM> To: Comstock, Gregg; Mauck, Ridge> Cc: Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel Marden; David, Owen> Subject: NED AOT and 401 Application Status: Meeting on Tuesday > January 12 at 1:30 PM, NHDES offices> > Greg, Ridge and Owen,> > I just sent out the meeting invitation within our Project Team confirming our 1:30 meeting on 1/12.> Let me know if something changes on your end.> > On Gregg’s question: The group will be 5 or 6 (most likely). Next week, I’ll confirm and also send names and affiliations for the name tags once invitations have been accepted or declined. Several people are off the end of this week so confirmation will occur next week. > > Happy New Year!> > Thanks,> Harry> > > Harry T. Stewart, P.E.> Senior Associate> Normandeau Associates, Inc.> 25 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110> 603-472-5191 Ext 154 (direct) 603-213-0391 (cell) > [email protected] www.normandeau.com> > -----Original Message-----> From: Comstock, Gregg [mailto:[email protected]]> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 1:29 PM> To: Harry Stewart; Mauck, Ridge> Cc: Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel Marden; David, Owen> Subject: RE: NED Application Status> > I can make it.> > Thank you Harry.> > How many from your team will be attending?> > Gregg> > ________________________________> From: Harry Stewart [[email protected]]> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 7:50 AM


> To: Mauck, Ridge> Cc: Comstock, Gregg; Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel Marden; > David, Owen> Subject: Re: NED Application Status> > How about 1:30 PM on January 12?> > Thanks,> Harry> > Sent from my iPad> > On Dec 23, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Mauck, Ridge <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:> > Thanks Harry. I agree with your approach, if it works for all.> > Merry Christmas!> > -Ridge> > Ridgely Mauck, P.E.> NHDES> Alteration of Terrain Bureau> PO Box 95, 29 Hazen Drive> Concord, NH 03302> (603)271-2303> Visit DES Land Resources Management<http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/index.htm> for helpful tools and information!> > From: Harry Stewart [mailto:[email protected]]> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 9:28 AM> To: Comstock, Gregg> Cc: Mauck, Ridge; Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel Marden; David, > Owen> Subject: Re: NED Application Status> > Ridge and Gregg,> > Thanks for your responsiveness (as always).> We will get back to you with exact proposed times (consistent with Gregg’s availability) as soon as possible given the holidays. Our preliminary thought is that we should do 401 and AOT at the same time (I.e, separate from wetlands, wetlands mitigation, et. al.) for sake of efficiency (for you).> > Happy Holidays!> > Thanks,> Harry> >


> Sent from my iPad> > On Dec 22, 2015, at 7:43 AM, Comstock, Gregg <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:> Hi Harry,> My availability is below.> I would prefer the afternoon of January 12th as I would like to reserve January 13th to prepare for meetings I have on January 14th. That being said, if others can only meet on the 13th, I can be there.> > Happy Holidays,> Gregg> > January 12th - available from 1 pm to 4 pm (PREFERRED) January 13th - available (AM would be better) January 14th - Not available.> > Gregg Comstock, P.E.> Supervisor, Water Quality Planning Section NH Department of > Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau> 29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95> Concord, NH 03302-0095> 603-271-2983> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > > From: Mauck, Ridge> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 7:22 AM> To: ‘Harry Stewart’; Comstock, Gregg> Cc: Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel Marden> Subject: RE: NED Application Status> > Harry,> At this point my calendar is generally open January 12-14. I have Tuesday morning (1/12) tentatively blocked off for another proposed meeting but will probably know more at by the end of the week.> > Merry Christmas to all.> > -Ridge> > Ridgely Mauck, P.E.> NHDES> Alteration of Terrain Bureau> PO Box 95, 29 Hazen Drive> Concord, NH 03302> (603)271-2303> Visit DES Land Resources Management<http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/lrm/index.htm> for helpful tools and information!> > From: Harry Stewart [mailto:[email protected]]> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 2:58 PM> To: Mauck, Ridge; Comstock, Gregg


> Cc: Adele Fiorillo; Kerrie Diers; Rachel Marden> Subject: NED Application Status> > > Ridge and Greg,> > We are in the early phase of trying to schedule meetings with DES to discuss application status as we ap-proach finalization of the applications.> Our goal is to make sure that all the administrative and technical details that you need are included in the application and that we have the benefit of any suggestions for improvement to facilitate your reviews as we finalize the applications.> As you may recall, Kinder Morgan staff from outside of New England will generally attend these meetings (and this takes some prior planning to fly in, etc.).> On a preliminary basis, it looks like we are trying for meetings around January 13 (plus or minus a day)- based on another meeting that appears to be taking shape for around then.> I’m also thinking that it might be most effective to meet with AOT and 401 program staff in the same meet-ing.> > In this context, I’m checking to see if this is possible for you and on your general availability to meet with us around this time frame (especially any predictable constraints that might preclude meeting that we can work around).> Please let me know what you think.> > Thanks,> Harry> > > Harry T. Stewart, P.E.> Senior Associate> Normandeau Associates, Inc.> 25 Nashua Road, Bedford, NH 03110> 603-472-5191 Ext 154 (direct) 603-213-0391 (cell) > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> www.normandeau.com<http://www.normandeau.com/>> > > ________________________________> > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

===========================================================================2016_01_12 Charlton site visit.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Charlton site visitDate: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 2:11 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Michael D. Zeilstra ([email protected])” <[email protected]>Cc: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Conversation: Charlton site visit


Michael,Thanks for letting me know about the change of date for your MADEP meeting and the resulting changes to your travel plans.After talking with my three colleagues, we would like to keep the site visit on Thursday January 21st, if possi-ble. And while you and I had initially discussed an afternoon meeting before your schedule changed, we could arrive at the Charlton site any time after 10:30.Please let me know the preferred time.Thanks.John John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2016_01_12 Kinder Morgan WMP .TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Kinder Morgan WMP Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 1:13 PMFrom: Ives, Wayne </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=IVES>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Cc: “Diers, Ted” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan WMP http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/instream/souhegan/water_management_plan.htm#task12See appendix B Water Use Plans in particular.C. Wayne Ives, P.G., HydrogeologistInstream Flow SpecialistWatershed Management BureauNH Department of Environmental ServicesPO Box 95 - 29 Hazen DriveConcord, NH 03302-0095603-271-3548Email [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/instream/index.htm <http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/instream/index.htm>

===========================================================================2016_01_12 RE Charlton site visit (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Charlton site visitDate: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 2:27 PMFrom: Zeilstra, Michael <[email protected]>


To: “’McCutcheon, John’” <[email protected]>Cc: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Perkins, Donald W (Don)” <[email protected]>, “Eveson, Joseph” <[email protected]>Conversation: Charlton site visitJohn, Thanks. It has been rescheduled per your request for 10:30 AM on Thursday 21st. Thanks, Michael Michael Zeilstra | Environmental Engineer | Air Permitting and ComplianceKINDER~MORGAN | Natural Gas Pipelines1001 Louisiana St, Suite 1000 | Houston, TX 77002 Office: 713-420-4333 |Cell: 281-726-9946 [email protected]: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 12:11 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, ToddSubject: Charlton site visitMichael,Thanks for letting me know about the change of date for your MADEP meeting and the resulting changes to your travel plans.After talking with my three colleagues, we would like to keep the site visit on Thursday January 21st, if possi-ble. And while you and I had initially discussed an afternoon meeting before your schedule changed, we could arrive at the Charlton site any time after 10:30.Please let me know the preferred time.Thanks.John John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2016_01_13 FW Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct project.TXT

=========================================================================== 2016_01_13 FW Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct project: NHDES Notice of Intervention (2).pdfSubject: FW: Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct projectDate: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 2:31 PMFrom: Freise, Clark </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=FREISE>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Conversation: Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct projectFrom: Freise, Clark Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 12:40 PM


To: ‘Douglas Whitbeck’; Burack, Thomas; Wright, Craig; Forbes, EugeneSubject: RE: Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct projectMr. Whitbeck,Please find attached a copy of our application.Best regards,Clark FreiseFrom: Douglas Whitbeck [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 9:39 AMTo: Burack, Thomas; Freise, Clark; Wright, Craig; Forbes, Eugene; Perelli, Vince; DES: NHPPPCc: Douglas WhitbeckSubject: Filing as an intervenor for the proposed Northeast Energy Direct project756 Brookline RoadMason, NH 03048January 11, 2016Reference:Filing as intervenor for Tennessee Natural Gas/Kinder Morgan Northeast Energy Direct projectTo:Mr. Thomas S. Burack, CommissionerMr. Clark Freise, Assistant Commissioner Mr. Craig A. Wright, Director Air Resources Division Mr. Eugene J. Forbes, Director Water DivisionGentlemen:To my knowledge, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services has yet file a motion to intervene in the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission process regarding the Northeast Energy Direct pipeline project. The deadline for filing to intervene is now January 15, 2016. Filing to intervene does not require the Department to take a stand for or against the project itself at this time, but becoming an intervenor will enable you to enter the discussion should you deem it appropriate at some time in the future.Given that this project will involve the taking of over 1,000 acres of New Hampshire private and conservation land, andGiven that this project has the potential to affect several municipal water supplies and countless private wells, andGiven that the cost of this project will be upon the ratepayers of the State of New Hampshire for decades to come, the New Hampshire Municipal Pipeline Coalition having warned that the proposed Kinder Morgan gas pipeline will add significant costs to tens of thousands of New Hampshire residents and businesses, andGiven that a reputable physician has stated that the increase in healthcare costs due to the emissions of one compressor station, based on rates of exposure calculated using Kinder Morgan’s own published data, could be in the area of $2 million, andGiven that the proposed project will have a long-lasting affect New Hampshire’s energy policy, and by making us even more dependent on one energy source would violate the New Hampshire 10-year Energy Strategy ac-cepted by our governor just over a year ago, andGiven that the mission of the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services is �to help sustain a high quality of life for all citizens by protecting and restoring the environment and public health in New Hampshire� and includes regulating the emissions of air pollutants and water quality, I believe it is the DUTY of the Depart-ment of Enviromental Services to at least reserve a place in the discussion regarding a project with such exten-sive impact on the citizens of the State of New Hampshire. Please join similar agencies from other impacted states and file a motion to intervene.Thank you for your consideration.Douglas Whitbeck


===========================================================================2016_01_13 FW Members of DES to Attend Next Coalition Meeting - January 19th at 1200.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: FW: Members of DES to Attend Next Coalition Meeting - January 19th at 12:00Date: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 12:59 PMFrom: Pelletier, Rene </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PELLETIER>To: “Drew, Tim” <[email protected]>Cc: “Adams, Collis” <[email protected]>Conversation: Members of DES to Attend Next Coalition Meeting - January 19th at 12:00Des has no 15 date deadline. Have her call Bob on the New Ipswich ConCom. He understands the issueSent with Good (www.good.com)From: Pelletier, ReneSent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 4:27:11 PMTo: Sommer, LoriCc: Forbes, EugeneSubject: FW: Members of DES to Attend Next Coalition Meeting - January 19th at 12:00FYIFrom: Tad Putney [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 3:03 PMTo: ‘Carol Jameson’; [email protected]; ‘John And Janet Boccalini’; [email protected]; [email protected]; ‘Marianne Salcetti’; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; ‘Jane Pitt’; [email protected]; ‘Charles V. Moser’; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; ‘Ma-ria Szmauz’; ‘Jean Tandy’; ‘Wendy Juchnevics-Freeman’; [email protected]; [email protected]; ‘Dennis Gauvin’; ‘Richard A. Kanoff’; ‘Christopher Steadman’; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; ‘James M. O’Mara , Jr.’; ‘Eileen Ca-banel’Cc: Pelletier, Rene; ‘Cindy Lou Dougherty’; ‘Kristen Austin’; ‘Drew Kellner’; ‘Jay Chrystal’; ‘tomrogers1’; ‘bdenehy’; ‘Jordan Bailey’Subject: Members of DES to Attend Next Coalition Meeting - January 19th at 12:00All:Two individuals from DES will be attending the next Coalition meeting to provide information on the wetlands mitigation process. As you are all aware, Kinder Morgan has been approaching town conservation commissions and pushing to discuss wetlands mitigation.The meeting will be held at the Brookline Fire Station meeting room � 4 Bond Street � beginning at Noon on Tuesday, January 19th. Access to the meeting room is up a long ramp on the back side of the fire station from the parking lot.The purpose of next Tuesday�s session is to provide any of the potentially impacted towns with information on the mitigation process directly from DES. DES will provide a brief presentation and then there will be a ques-tion and answer session. I expect this portion of our meeting will be about 30-40 minutes in length.Members of your conservation commission are invited to attend, but I ask that attendance be limited to two con-servation commission members per town (in addition to Coalition members) given some space limitations.For logistics, please let me know how many people will be attending from your town by the end of this week.Following this portion of the meeting, the Coalition will continue with other business. I expect some members will be headed to Concord by 12:45pm to attend the hearing on HB 1101 - prohibiting charges to New Hamp-shire residents for the construction of high pressure gas pipelines.Should you or any of your colleagues have any questions, please let me know. Thank you.Tad PutneyTown Administrator


P.O. Box 360Brookline, NH 03033Phone: (603) 673-8855 x213Fax: (603) 673-8136Email: [email protected]

===========================================================================2016_01_13 Kinder Morgan gives Rindge 30-day deadline on project proposal New Hampshire.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: Kinder Morgan gives Rindge 30-day deadline on project proposal | New HampshireDate: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 2:32 PMFrom: Adams, Collis </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ADAMS>To: “Sommer, Lori” <[email protected]>, “Richardson, Frank” <[email protected]>, “Benedict, Karl” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder Morgan gives Rindge 30-day deadline on project proposal | New Hampshirehttp://www.unionleader.com/article/20160113/NEWS05/160119716In case you have not seen this article.Collis

===========================================================================2016_01_14 New Mexico is 1st to issue plans to sue EPA over mine spill.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: New Mexico is 1st to issue plans to sue EPA over mine spillDate: Thursday, January 14, 2016 6:10 PMFrom: EnergyGuardian <[email protected]>Reply-To: EnergyGuardian <[email protected]>To: “[email protected]” <[email protected]>Conversation: New Mexico is 1st to issue plans to sue EPA over mine spill Advertise <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/twwpwbgmjtskhppbkbhsvkjwcbkmhcwrtrzctzhvlzvzc_ibgn-hzgnz.html?a=16940> | Contact <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/gmmmwkhlnfsdgmmkdkgsrdnwtk-dlgtwpfpytfygrcyryl_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=16940> Energy and environment headlines for the afternoon of Thursday, January 14, 2016 <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/vymyrktjmcdnpyyknkpdhnmrgknjpgrzczvgcvphfvhvm_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=16940> Information <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/zfwfzbtwdcvkpffbkbpvskdzlbkwplzqcqmlcmpsrmsmf_ib-gnhzgnz.html?a=16940> <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/cjcmhgnjqsvfpmmgfgpvcfqhlgfjplhzszdlsdpctdcph_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=timothy.drew%2540des.nh.gov&b=16940&c=16940> <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/cjgmhgnjqsvfpmmgfgpvcfqhlgfjplhzszdlsdpctdcpt_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=timothy.drew%2540des.nh.gov&b=16940&c=16940> <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/wnvjfw-ynzhkbvjjwbwvkgbzfswbnvsfmhmlshlvgdlgvl_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=timothy.drew%2540des.nh.gov&b=16940&c=16940> New Mexico is 1st to issue plans to sue EPA over mine spill By Russell Contreras and Susan Montoya BryanALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) � New Mexico plans to sue the federal government and the owners of two Colorado mines that were the source of a massive spill last year that contaminated rivers in three Western states, officials said Thursday.The New Mexico Environment Department said it filed a notice of its intention to sue the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency over the spill, becoming the first to do so. The lawsuit also would target the state of Colorado


and the owners of the Gold King and Sunnyside Mines.An EPA cleanup crew accidentally unleashed millions of gallons of contaminated wastewater in August at the inactive Gold King Mine near Silverton, Colorado. It fouled rivers in Colorado, Utah and New Mexico with contaminants including arsenic and lead, temporarily shutting down drinking-water supplies and raising con-cerns about long-term effects to agriculture.The spill sent a yellow plume through the Animas Valley and into New Mexico and the San Juan River, forcing farmers and municipalities to shut off their taps. Farmers and ranchers on the Navajo Nation were left without a key water source for their crops and livestock for weeks.The New Mexico regulators said they will sue if the EPA does not begin to take meaningful measures to clean up the affected areas and agree to a long-term plan that will research and monitor the effects of the spill.“From the very beginning, the EPA failed to hold itself accountable in the same way that it would a private busi-ness,” said Ryan Flynn, state Environment Department cabinet secretary.The federal agency is reviewing New Mexico’s plans to sue, spokeswoman Christie St. Clair said.“EPA is working closely with the states to develop a long-term monitoring plan to evaluate potential environ-mental impacts from the spill and will be meeting with representatives in early February,” St. Clair said. “EPA is also reimbursing state and local agencies for response-related costs associated with the spill.”Roger Hudson, a spokesman for the Colorado attorney general, said the office has not yet seen the notice and had no comment. Hudson did not say if Colorado also planned to sue the EPA.Flynn said Colorado balked when New Mexico asked for information about the spill’s effects on the Animas River watershed that the two states share. In fact, Colorado asked New Mexico to pay about $20,000 for a pub-lic record’s request, he said.The Navajo Nation has said it may consider legal action against the EPA but nothing formal has been filed.The spill occurred when workers for the agency and its contractor, Environmental Restoration LLC, started excavation work intended to allow them to safely drain the mine.Some criticized the EPA for failing to take adequate precautions despite warnings that a blowout could occur. But Interior Secretary Sally Jewell said a review by her agency showed the spill was “clearly unintentional.”People who live near the idled and leaking Gold King Mine say local authorities and mining companies have spent decades spurning federal help to clean up the site.The owners of the two mines have been disputing the source of the wastewater buildup for years. Colorado-based San Juan Corp., which owns the Gold King Mine, claims it stems from a project in the 1990s to plug a segment of the Sunnyside Mine. They say the plug caused the wastewater to build up and get pushed into sur-rounding mines, including Gold King.Canada’s Kinross Corp., which owns Sunnyside, disputes those claims.In 2011, Kinross offered $6.5 million to help clean mining waste from the upper Animas River while vowing to “vigorously contest” any effort to make Sunnyside liable for Superfund-related cleanup costs.The mine has yet to spend the money but supports a “collaborative approach” among various parties, Sunnyside reclamation director Kevin Roach said.Quick Links Utility may have understated health threat from gas leak <#0> Volkswagen chief understands ‘impatience’ on emissions fix <#1> Montana approves relocation of sage grouse to Canada <#2> Iran says it has removed core of reactor, key to nuke deal <#3> Chamber of Commerce sees many risks for 2016 <#4> Renault shares plunge after anti-fraud raids over emissions <#5> Rare January hurricane forms in Atlantic, threatens Azores <#6> Oregon county: Refuge occupiers can’t meet at fairgrounds <#7> Trinidad faces downturn as energy prices collapse <#8> Brazil federal police indict mining executives for burst dam <#9> Upcoming Events <#10> <#>


Utility may have understated health threat from gas leak <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/cjd-mhgnjqsvfpmmgfgpvcfqhlgfjplhzszdlsdpctdcpp_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=16940> By Brian Melley and Ellen KnickmeyerLOS ANGELES (AP) � The utility whose leaking natural gas well has driven thousands of Los Angeles resi-dents from their homes has publicly understated the number of times airborne levels of the cancer-causing chemical benzene have spiked over the past three months, the company’s own data suggests.In trying to reassure the public there’s no long-term health risk from the leak, Southern California Gas Co. has said in news releases and FAQs on its website that since the crisis began, just two air samples briefly showed elevated concentrations of the substance.But a closer look at the online data by The Associated Press and outside experts actually shows that a dozen samples from the Porter Ranch community contained at least twice the amount of benzene that Southern Cali-fornia air regulators consider the normal background level.The possible reason for the discrepancy: SoCalGas apparently uses a different background level.The company was given repeated opportunities to explain its conclusions but couldn’t.“I don’t know what would explain it,” spokeswoman Melissa Bailey said.More <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/glcmwkhlnfsdgmmkdkgsrdnwtkdlgtwpfpytfygrcyrgk_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=16940> <#> Volkswagen chief understands ‘impatience’ on emissions fix By Erik SchelzigCHATTANOOGA, Tenn. (AP) � Volkswagen CEO Matthias Mueller says he has agreed with U.S. environ-mental officials not to publicly discuss the next steps in addressing the German automaker’s emissions cheating scandal.Mueller told The Associated Press after a speech to workers at Volkswagen’s lone U.S. plant in Chattanooga on Thursday that he understands frustration in the pace of finding a fix.In Mueller’s words: “I am impatient, too. I’d also like a faster solution. But we have to proceed with care.”Mueller met Wednesday with Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy.Volkswagen was forced to admit last year that about 600,000 vehicles nationwide were sold with illegal soft-ware designed to trick government emissions tests. Those controls deactivated during real-world driving, caus-ing the cars to emit up to 40 times more pollution than allowed. <#> Montana approves relocation of sage grouse to Canada <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/xjgc-gpmjsykthccptphkrtsgbptjhbgqyqvbyvhrdvrhr_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=16940> By Matt VolzHELENA, Mont. (AP) � Montana will send dozens of sage grouse to the Canadian province of Alberta in a plan approved Thursday that faces opposition from some lawmakers who say the state should first look to bol-ster its own fragile population of the bird.The Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission voted 3-1 to relocate 40 greater sage grouse hens this year across the border to Alberta, where an estimated 100 to 120 of the birds are left. The sage grouse in Alberta and Mon-tana make up a transboundary population, and the program should result in healthier numbers on both sides of the border, officials said.“We have worked hard with Alberta to get this to fruition,” Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission Chairman Dan Vermillion said. “It seems to be working up there, and Montana has a lot to benefit.”However, the commission stopped short of authorizing the relocation of all 120 birds requested by Alberta of-ficials over five years. After hearing opposition from members of the state’s Environmental Quality Council, the wildlife commission approved only the first year’s relocation and promised to evaluate the program before authorizing the others.Federal officials announced restrictions last year on 67 million acres of public lands in 11 states, including Mon-tana, to protect the bird’s habitat and prevent it from becoming a threatened or endangered species. Montana is taking its own measures to protect sage grouse habitat on state lands and to give incentives to keep landowners


from damaging the bird’s habitat.Several Montana lawmakers oppose the relocation plan because of the politics that have surrounded protecting the bird at the expense of economic development. The Environmental Quality Council on Thursday sent a letter to the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks agency requesting a three-year block on moving the birds out of the country.More <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/jmnnstdqfpcwjnntwtjcvwfsmtwqjmskpkrmprjvbrvjm_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=16940> <#> Iran says it has removed core of reactor, key to nuke deal <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/ehpqdtkzpcjfyqqtftyjbfpdhtfzyhdwcwshcsybrsbyz_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=16940> By Nasser KarimiTEHRAN, Iran (AP) � Nuclear technicians have finished removing the core of the Iran’s only nuclear heavy water reactor as part of Tehran’s obligations under its nuclear deal with world powers, Iranian state television reported Thursday.The removal of the core of the nearly completed Arak reactor is a key step before crippling international sanc-tions on Iran are lifted. The work must still be verified by outside experts.Under the deal reached last summer, the heavy-water reactor is to be re-engineered so that it produces only min-ute amounts of plutonium, like enriched uranium a potential pathway to nuclear arms. That involves exchanging the core and other major modifications.The spokesman for Iran’s atomic department, Behrouz Kamalvandi, announced the completion of the work on the Arak reactor on Thursday.“About an hour age, our job was finished,” he said. State TV reported that the holes left after the core was re-moved have been filled with concrete.International inspectors will now verify the job and will send their report to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Kamalvandi said.More <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/ehzqdtkzpcjfyqqtftyjbfpdhtfzyhdwcwshcsybrsbyp_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=16940> <#> Chamber of Commerce sees many risks for 2016 <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/lnnhzdywql-srghhdrdgsjrqzndrwgnzclcknlkgjmkjgh_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=16940> By Kevin FrekingWASHINGTON (AP) � American businesses are facing few numerous risks and few upsides as they enter 2016, with political uncertainties, greater regulation and cyber theft among their top concerns, says the leader of the nation’s most influential business lobby.Thomas Donohue, president and chief executive of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said Thursday he’s not forecasting a recession but that the coming year looks a lot like the past six with what he described as tepid growth. He said he’s seeing a lot of negatives globally with many key trading partners struggling.“When you add it all up, the state of American businesses in 2016 is filled with uncertainty, risks and chal-lenge,” Donohue said.Donohue said the presidential primaries are also a concern. On the Democratic side, he said, candidates are call-ing for more spending and taxes while on the Republican side, “sometimes loud voices” are walling off the U.S. from talent and attacking whole groups based on ethnicity or religion.“This is morally wrong and politically stupid,” Donohue said.The Chamber of Commerce is a huge player on the national and state political scene, able to tap millions of dol-lars to influence the outcome of elections. Donohue said his group will play an active role in the coming elec-tions with the main focus being on electing candidates who understand that it’s the private sector that creates jobs and prosperity.More <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/sccpjcdslgwtvppctcvwmtljkctsvkjhghrkgrvmbrmcj_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=16940> <#>


Renault shares plunge after anti-fraud raids over emissions <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/etyqdtkzpcjfyqqtftyjbfpdhtfzyhdwcwshcsybrsbtr_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=16940> By Angela CharltonPARIS (AP) � Shares in Renault dived Thursday after French anti-fraud units conducted searches at the car-makers’ facilities, prompted by the Volkswagen emissions scandal. They then recovered somewhat after the company said tests had not found any emissions-cheating software.French media reports said the CGT Renault union released a tract Thursday describing raids on multiple sites focusing on engine monitoring. Soon afterward, the Renault share price sank 22 percent.An official with the French Finance Ministry’s anti-fraud unit said it had conducted raids on Renault last week but would not elaborate on why. The official was not authorized to be publicly named.Renault issued a statement saying the raids were linked to random tests of 100 cars that French authorities are carrying out to see if they are equipped with software of the kind found in Volkswagen cars last year. In Volk-swagen’s case, the software helped the cars cheat on diesel emissions tests in the U.S.Renault said no such devices have been found on the four Renault vehicles checked so far, calling that “good news” for the company as it tries to further reduce emissions from its vehicles.More <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/xpvcgpmjsykthccptphkrtsgbptjhbgqyqvbyvhrdvrpv_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=16940> <#> Rare January hurricane forms in Atlantic, threatens Azores <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/yfsvmfzbcwynqvvfnfqykncmgfnbqgmtwtlgwlqkslkfq_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=16940> By The Associated PressMIAMI (AP) � A rare January hurricane formed far out in the Atlantic on Thursday, and U.S. officials said it was the first hurricane to form in the month of January since 1938.Hurricane Alex’s maximum sustained winds were near 85 mph (140 kph). A hurricane warning was issued for Portugal’s mid-Atlantic Azores Islands, where the Civil Protection Service issued a weather red alert, the highest of four warnings that indicates extreme risk, for five of the archipelago’s nine islands. It said residents should expect waves up to 18 meters (60 feet) high and wind gusts up to 160 kph (100 mph).The U.S. National Hurricane Center in Miami said in a Facebook post that there hasn’t been a hurricane present during the month of January since 1955, when Alice formed in late December 1954 and carried over into the next month.The hurricane was centered about 415 miles (670 kilometers) south of Faial Island in the central Azores and was moving north-northeast near 20 mph (31 kph). Alex was expected to move near or over parts of the Azores on Friday, the U.S. National Hurricane Center said.The Azores government on Thursday advised kindergartens to stay closed and told residents to ensure drainage systems aren’t blocked.The archipelago, which has a population of around 250,000, has been threatened by hurricanes before, but they usually lose their strength as they move into colder northern water.More <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/mtwpwtkbsjmlypptltymnlswdtlbydwvjvqdjqyncqntt_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=16940> <#> Oregon county: Refuge occupiers can’t meet at fairgrounds <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/thppwbgmjtskhppbkbhsvkjwcbkmhcwrtrzctzhvlzvbv_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=16940> By Keith RidlerBURNS, Ore. (AP) � The leader of an armed group occupying a national wildlife refuge said Thursday that they may not have a meeting with local residents because the group can’t find a place for the gathering.The group protesting federal land policies had planned to hold a meeting Friday evening in Burns to explain themselves and tell residents when they will leave.Leader Ammon Bundy told reporters the meeting is now in doubt because Harney County officials won’t let them use the fairgrounds, as they had hoped.“It’s still in limbo,” Bundy said. “We’re still going to have it. It’s just a matter of when and where.”


Officials in Burns, about 30 miles from the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, said the meeting can’t be held at the Harney County fairgrounds or any other county facility.On Wednesday, the county fire chief � a sympathizer of the armed group � resigned over the county’s refusal to host the meeting.More <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/xhscgpmjsykthccptphkrtsgbptjhbgqyqvbyvhrdvrpb_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=16940> <#> Trinidad faces downturn as energy prices collapse <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/gglmwkhl-nfsdgmmkdkgsrdnwtkdlgtwpfpytfygrcyrkl_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=16940> By David McFaddenPORT-OF-SPAIN, Trinidad (AP) � During the good times, earnings from natural gas and oil exports made the tiny Caribbean nation of Trinidad and Tobago one of the richest countries in the Western Hemisphere. The col-lapse in world oil prices now has it facing the threat of a punishing and prolonged downturn.After two decades of nearly uninterrupted prosperity, the government is being forced to scale back spending by 7 percent, siphon some $1.5 billion from a stabilization fund over the next couple of years and warn its 1.3 mil-lion people that they will have to make do with less.“We must all appreciate that the circumstances we now face as a nation require sacrifice and managed adjust-ment in our living standards,” Prime Minister Keith Rowley cautioned in a recent speech.Those standards include American-style shopping malls, cheap electricity, subsidized gasoline and so many families with multiple cars that highways weaving past abandoned cane fields are often clogged with traffic jams in both directions.Things have been going so well for so many years that locals repeat the mantra “God is a Trini,” meaning the twin-island republic, known for high spirits and rollicking Carnival celebrations, is so blessed that things will always turn out well. But the specter of tough economic times is starting to prompt a glum self-examination.“You can see it coming: Times will be getting hard. Previous governments have spent too lavishly and now it’s time we have to pay the piper,” said Adrian Lashley, a father of five who runs a small clothing shop in down-town Port-of-Spain, the capital.More <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/yqgvmfzbcwynqvvfnfqykncmgfnbqgmtwtlgwlqkslkfc_ibgn-hzgnz.html?a=16940> <#> Brazil federal police indict mining executives for burst dam By The Associated PressSAO PAULO (AP) � Brazil’s federal police have indicted mining companies Samarco, Vale and VogBR and seven of their executives for a dam burst that caused Latin America’s biggest environmental tragedy on record.They are accused of negligence that started a mudflow of 850 kilometers (530 miles) in waterways of two Bra-zilian states.Samarco is a joint-venture of mining giants Vale and BHP Billiton.Among those indicted are Samarco’s CEO, geology experts and an engineer who issued a document in July of 2015 saying that the dam was stable.In a statement released Wednesday night, Samarco disagrees with the decision saying there is no conclusion on what caused the burst on Nov. 5. <#> Upcoming EventsTrouble seeing this email? Click here. <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/cpcmhgnjqsvfpmmgfgpvcfqhlg-fjplhzszdlsdpctdcgm_ibgnhzgnz.html?a=16940> Information <http://click1.email.energyguardian.net/mcypwtkbsjmlypptltymnlswdtlbydwvjvqdjqyncqnnw_ib-gnhzgnz.html?a=16940> To ensure you receive uninterrupted delivery, please add the address [email protected] to your email address book.This email was sent to [email protected] by [email protected] <mailto:energy@washin


gtongguardian.net> To unsubscribe from this newsletter please Click Here <http://www.email.energyguardian.net/Unsub.do?a=u&e=timothy.drew%40des.nh.gov&mid=16940&sid=904F78EB-3994-43B5-8064-7360CEC26E23&rid=728078&lid=22> � 2016, The Associated Press <http://www.ap.org> , all rights reserved | 450 W. 33rd street | New York, NY 10001Privacy Policy <http://www.ap.org/company/privacy>

===========================================================================2016_01_15 Emailing DWGB_Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015 xlsx.TXT

=========================================================================== 2016_01_15 Emailing DWGB_Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015 xlsx: DWGB_Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsxSubject: Emailing: DWGB_Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsxDate: Friday, January 15, 2016 11:10 AMFrom: Drew, Tim </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DREW>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: Emailing: DWGB_Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsxYour message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:DWGB_Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsxNote: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled.

===========================================================================2016_01_19 FW NED AOT and 401 Application Status Meeting on Tuesday January 12 at 130 PM

NHDES offices.TXT===========================================================================

Subject: FW: NED AOT and 401 Application Status: Meeting on Tuesday January 12 at 1:30 PM, NHDES of-ficesDate: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 12:36 PMFrom: Ives, Wayne </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=IVES>To: “Comstock, Gregg” <[email protected]>Conversation: NED AOT and 401 Application Status: Meeting on Tuesday January 12 at 1:30 PM, NHDES officesGregg,I left off the requirement for a Water Conservation Plan under the ISF rules b/c you said that had been dismissed already, but technically this would apply. I discussed WMPs with Ted regarding this project and we are consid-ering ways to avoid having to write WMPs for short duration withdrawals. But technically Water Use Plans and Conservation Plans would apply to Kinder Morgan under the ISF rules.Wayne____________________________________________ C. Wayne Ives, P.G., Hydrogeologist Instream Flow Specialist http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/instream/index.htm ___________________________________________ From: Ives, Wayne Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 11:04 AMTo: Comstock, Gregg


Subject: RE: NED AOT and 401 Application Status: Meeting on Tuesday January 12 at 1:30 PM, NHDES of-ficesHi Harry,Good to see you last week. Thanks to you and your team for meeting with us.As discussed, links to the 2010 guidance document concerning instream flow protection in and the Souhegan River watershed Water Management Plan are provided below. If not provided as part of the application, and to address surface water withdrawals for pipe testing, the 401 Water Quality Certification will likely include a condition to provide a plan (for NHDES approval) to ensure adequate flow is left in the surface waters to main-tain designated uses such as aquatic life. In the Souhegan River watershed, the plan must also comply with the Souhegan River�s established protected instream flow criteria. A Water Management Plan under the Instream Flow Program may also be required, however, since this is a temporary withdrawal, NHDES may waive this requirement. Methods for Estimating Instream Flow Requirements for Protection of Aquatic Life. NHDES. November 16, 2010. WD-11-3.http://des.nh.gov/organization/commissioner/pip/publications/wd/documents/wd-11-3.pdfEstablished Protected Instream Flows for the Souhegan Designated RiverCommissioner�s Declaration <http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/instream/souhegan/documents/pisf_signed.pdf> http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/instream/souhegan/doc-uments/pisf_signed.pdf Table 1 � Souhegan Protected Instream Flows <http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/in-stream/souhegan/documents/pisf_table1.pdf> http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/in-stream/souhegan/documents/pisf_table1.pdf Table 1 Attachment � Definitions <http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/instream/souhe-gan/documents/pisf_table1att.pdf> http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/instream/souhe-gan/documents/pisf_table1att.pdf Instream Flow Pilot Ruleshttp://des.nh.gov/organization/commissioner/legal/rules/documents/env-wq1900.pdfSouhegan River Water Management Plan. NHDES. August 30, 2013. NHDES-R-WD-11-15.http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/instream/souhegan/water_management_plan.htmBest regards,GreggGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning Section NH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Manage-ment Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected]____________________________________________ C. Wayne Ives, P.G., Hydrogeologist Instream Flow Specialist http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/instream/index.htm ___________________________________________ -----Original Message-----From: Comstock, Gregg Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 8:51 AMTo: Ives, WayneSubject: RE: NED AOT and 401 Application Status: Meeting on Tuesday January 12 at 1:30 PM, NHDES of-ficesHi Wayne,


Please review.ThanksGHi Harry,Good to see you last week. Thanks to you and your team for meeting with us.As discussed, links to the 2010 guidance document concerning instream flow and the Souhegan River Water Management Plan are provided below. If not provided as part of the application, and to address surface water withdrawals for pipe testing, the 401 Water Quality Certification will likely include a condition to provide a plan (for NHDES approval) to ensure adequate flow is left in the surface waters to maintain designated uses such as aquatic life. In the Souhegan River, the plan must comply with the Souhegan River Water Management Plan. Methods for Estimating Instream Flow Requirements for Protection of Aquatic Life. NHDES. November 16, 2010. WD-11-3.http://des.nh.gov/organization/commissioner/pip/publications/wd/documents/wd-11-3.pdf <http://des.nh.gov/or-ganization/commissioner/pip/publications/wd/documents/wd-11-3.pdf> Souhegan River Water Management Plan. NHDES. August 30, 2013. NHDES-R-WD-11-15.http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/instream/souhegan/water_management_plan.htm <http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/instream/souhegan/water_management_plan.htm> Best regards,GreggGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning Section NH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Manage-ment Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2016_01_19 NED - Pipe Testing - Links to Instream flow guidance and regulations.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: NED - Pipe Testing - Links to Instream flow guidance and regulationsDate: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 1:51 PMFrom: Comstock, Gregg </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=COMSTOCK>To: Harry Stewart <[email protected]>Cc: “David, Owen” <[email protected]>, “Ives, Wayne” <[email protected]>Conversation: NED - Pipe Testing - Links to Instream flow guidance and regulationsHi Harry,Good to see you last week. Thanks to you and your team for meeting with us.As discussed, a link to the 2010 guidance concerning instream flow for protection of aquatic life is provided below. Links are also provided regarding instream flow requirements in the Souhegan River watershed. If not provided as part of the application, and to address surface water withdrawals for pipe testing, the 401 Water Quality Certification will likely include a condition to provide a plan (for NHDES approval) to ensure adequate flow is left in the surface waters to maintain designated uses (such as aquatic life). In the Souhegan River wa-tershed, the plan must also comply with the Souhegan River�s established protected instream flow criteria. A Water Management Plan under the Instream Flow Program may also be required for surface water withdrawals in the Souhegan River watershed. Methods for Estimating Instream Flow Requirements for Protection of Aquatic Life. NHDES. November 16, 2010. WD-11-3.http://des.nh.gov/organization/commissioner/pip/publications/wd/documents/wd-11-3.pdf


Established Protected Instream Flows for the Souhegan Designated RiverCommissioner�s Declaration http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/instream/souhegan/documents/pisf_signed.pdfTable 1 � Souhegan Protected Instream Flows http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/in-stream/souhegan/documents/pisf_table1.pdfTable 1 Attachment � Definitions http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/instream/souhe-gan/documents/pisf_table1att.pdfInstream Flow Pilot Ruleshttp://des.nh.gov/organization/commissioner/legal/rules/documents/env-wq1900.pdfSouhegan River Water Management Plan. NHDES. August 30, 2013. NHDES-R-WD-11-15.http://des.nh.gov/organization/divisions/water/wmb/rivers/instream/souhegan/water_management_plan.htmOnce you’ve had a chance to digest this information and to form some ideas regarding how to ensure adequate flow is left in the surface waters during pipe testing, it may be advisable to meet with us and the NH Fish and Game Department to make sure you’re on the right track.Let us know if you have any questions. Thank you Harry. Regards,GreggGregg Comstock, P.E.Supervisor, Water Quality Planning SectionNH Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau29 Hazen Drive, PO Box 95Concord, NH [email protected]�

===========================================================================2016_01_19 RE TGP compressor station visit.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitDate: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 3:45 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Zeilstra, Michael” <[email protected]>, “Eveson, Joseph” <[email protected]>Cc: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “Perkins, Donald W (Don)” <[email protected]>Conversation: TGP compressor station visitJoe,I look forward to meeting with you at the site visit Thursday in Charlton.Should you need to reach us during our travel that morning, you may call Gary Millbury (cell: (603) 369-1589) or me (cell: (978) 270-1124).Thanks.JohnJohn McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen Drive


PO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] Message-----From: Zeilstra, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 1:31 PMTo: Eveson, JosephCc: McCutcheon, John; Moore, Todd; Milbury, Gary; Perkins, Donald W (Don)Subject: Re: TGP compressor station visitJoe,Thanks. 4 of them are coming.ThanksSent from my iPhoneOn Jan 7, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Eveson, Joseph <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:John/Michael, That is not a problem. How many will be needed?JOSEPH EVESONOPERATIONS SUPERVISOR<image001.jpg>PH: (413)821-2023FX: (413)786-2922CL: (413)313-2634<image002.jpg><javascript:ClickThumbnail(15)>From: Zeilstra, MichaelSent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 12:58 PMTo: ‘McCutcheon, John’Cc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, Gary; Perkins, Donald W (Don); Eveson, JosephSubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitJohn,Operations can bring the FRC lab coats if they are not already at the station. They are one size fits all from my experience. Thanks, MichaelFrom: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 11:23 AMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, Gary; Perkins, Donald W (Don)Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitMichael,We would appreciate it if you could bring the FRC lab coats for us to the site visit.Are they �one-size-fits-all� design, or shall I get size information for you?Thanks.JohnFrom: Zeilstra, Michael [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 4:34 PMTo: McCutcheon, JohnCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, Gary; Perkins, Donald W (Don)Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visit


All,If you don�t have FRCs, Operations can bring FRC lab coats for you to wear. Thanks, MichaelFrom: Zeilstra, MichaelSent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 3:12 PMTo: ‘McCutcheon, John’Cc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, Gary; Perkins, Donald W (Don); Garcia III, Alfonso M (Al)Subject: RE: TGP compressor station visitJohn,Thanks. Also please bring FRCs if you have them. The address is 194 Carpenter Hill Road in Charlton MA. Here is a link to the Google Map directions to the site if you need it:https://www.google.com/maps/dir/29+Hazen+Drive,+Concord,+NH/194+Carpenter+Hill+Rd,+Charlton,+MA+01507/@42.6703791,-72.1583658,9z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m13!4m12!1m5!1m1!1s0x89e26a52583a36d5:0x7845b481fb52f1b9!2m2!1d-71.5154307!2d43.2194356!1m5!1m1!1s0x89e6a12a02d03ac7:0x28350c35566feedd!2m2!1d-72.0000634!2d42.1220345Please let me know if you have any other questions. I look forward to meeting with you all on Thursday at 2:00 PM. Thanks, MichaelFrom: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 2:53 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitMichael,Per our phone call this morning, we are planning to meet you at the TGP compressor station in Charlton at 2:00 on Thursday, January 21st.It appears that the access to the site is from US Route 20.There will be four of us making the trip and we all have picture IDs, hard hats, safety glasses and steel toe boots. Is there anything else that we may need to bring?One last item - Would you mind sending me a confirming email?Thanks for your assistance in making these arrangements.JohnJohn McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Air Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>From: McCutcheon, JohnSent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:25 AMTo: ‘Zeilstra, Michael’Cc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitMichael,Per your VM message, please note that Thursday January 21st works best for the group of 4 from ARD for a compressor station site visit to Charlton. We are available all day. Please let us know if that will work for you.Thanks.


JohnFrom: Zeilstra, Michael [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 4:16 PMTo: McCutcheon, JohnCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: RE: TGP compressor station visitJohn,Thanks for your help. Hopefully Hopkinton or Mendon will be operating because of increased demand due to cold weather. Thanks, MichaelFrom: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 3:05 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: TGP compressor station visitMike,Thanks for your time this morning to discuss ARD�s request to visit to a compressor station. I did inform Todd of your pending trip to Massachusetts in the 3rd or 4th weeks of January, and hopefully working our tour into that trip.In talking to Todd, our preference would be to see a compressor station in operation, if possible, even if it means a longer drive for us.Thanks again.JohnJohn McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Air Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2016_01_19 RE Thursday’s site visit (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Thursday’s site visitDate: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 11:57 AMFrom: Milbury, Gary </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MILBURY>To: “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Conversation: Thursday’s site visitSounds good John. My cell is (603) 369-1589 if you�d like to give them mine.From: McCutcheon, John Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 10:55 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: Thursday’s site visitTodd & Gary,Looks like a car has been signed out for our visit. I thought we should offer one (or more?) cell phone numbers to the Kinder Morgan/TGP employees who will


meet us at the Charlton site since both parties are all traveling to the site.I will relay them to Michael Zeilstra and request for same from their end.Thanks.JohnJohn McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]

===========================================================================2016_01_19 RE Thursday’s site visit.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Thursday’s site visitDate: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 11:57 AMFrom: Milbury, Gary </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MILBURY>To: “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Conversation: Thursday’s site visitSounds good John. My cell is (603) 369-1589 if you�d like to give them mine.From: McCutcheon, John Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 10:55 AMTo: Moore, Todd; Milbury, GarySubject: Thursday’s site visitTodd & Gary,Looks like a car has been signed out for our visit. I thought we should offer one (or more?) cell phone numbers to the Kinder Morgan/TGP employees who will meet us at the Charlton site since both parties are all traveling to the site.I will relay them to Michael Zeilstra and request for same from their end.Thanks.JohnJohn McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected]


===========================================================================2016_01_19 Thursday’s site visit (2).TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Thursday’s site visitDate: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 11:55 AMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Thursday’s site visitTodd & Gary,Looks like a car has been signed out for our visit. I thought we should offer one (or more?) cell phone numbers to the Kinder Morgan/TGP employees who will meet us at the Charlton site since both parties are all traveling to the site.I will relay them to Michael Zeilstra and request for same from their end.Thanks.JohnJohn McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2016_01_19 Thursday’s site visit.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Thursday’s site visitDate: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 11:55 AMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>Conversation: Thursday’s site visitTodd & Gary,Looks like a car has been signed out for our visit. I thought we should offer one (or more?) cell phone numbers to the Kinder Morgan/TGP employees who will meet us at the Charlton site since both parties are all traveling to the site.I will relay them to Michael Zeilstra and request for same from their end.Thanks.JohnJohn McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095


phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2016_01_20 Thursday schedule.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: Thursday scheduleDate: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 3:20 PMFrom: Milbury, Gary </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MILBURY>To: “Bailey, Anne” <[email protected]>, “Baru, Padmaja” <[email protected]>, “Beahm, Catherine” <[email protected]>, “David, Valerie” <[email protected]>, “Landry, Lisa” <[email protected]>, “North, Pat” <[email protected]>Cc: “McCutcheon, John” <[email protected]>, “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Conversation: Thursday scheduleJust FYI that John, Todd, Craig and I will be out of the office on a site visit tomorrow, we should be back around 3:00 p.m. Barbara should be in the office tomorrow afternoon if you need to catch up with her on anything.ThanksGary

===========================================================================2016_01_21 FW Don Perkins - Kinder MorganTGP Michael Zeilstra.TXT

=========================================================================== 2016_01_21 FW Don Perkins - Kinder MorganTGP Michael Zeilstra: =?UTF-8?Q?Don=20Perkins=20=2D=20Kinder=20?= =?UTF-8?Q?Morgan=2FTGP?=.eml =?UTF-8?Q?Michael=20D=2E=20Zeilstra=20=2D?= =?UTF-8?Q?=20Kinder=20Morgan?=.emlSubject: FW: Don Perkins - Kinder Morgan/TGP & Michael ZeilstraDate: Thursday, January 21, 2016 4:18 PMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>Conversation: Don Perkins - Kinder Morgan/TGP & Michael ZeilstraContact information from today�s site visit.Michael arranged today�s site visit and is my contact person for the Pelham compressor station air permit ap-plication.John


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Charlton site visitDate: Thursday, January 21, 2016 7:04 PMFrom: Zeilstra, Michael <[email protected]>To: “’McCutcheon, John’” <[email protected]>Cc: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>Conversation: Charlton site visitJohn, How did you like the Station 264 tour go today? Please let me or Don Perkins know if you have any questions.


Thanks, Michael Michael Zeilstra | Pipeline Engineer | Air Permitting and ComplianceKINDER~MORGAN | Natural Gas Pipelines1001 Louisiana St, Suite 1000 | Houston, TX 77002 Office: 713-420-4333 |Cell: 281-726-9946 [email protected]: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 12:11 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, ToddSubject: Charlton site visitMichael,Thanks for letting me know about the change of date for your MADEP meeting and the resulting changes to your travel plans.After talking with my three colleagues, we would like to keep the site visit on Thursday January 21st, if possi-ble. And while you and I had initially discussed an afternoon meeting before your schedule changed, we could arrive at the Charlton site any time after 10:30.Please let me know the preferred time.Thanks.John John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Charlton site visitDate: Friday, January 22, 2016 8:31 AMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Zeilstra, Michael” <[email protected]>Cc: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>Conversation: Charlton site visitMichael,Don and Tim were great hosts. Todd was unable to attend, but Craig (ARD director), Gary and I thought it was very informative and impressive.Thanks for your efforts in making the arrangements.JohnFrom: Zeilstra, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 6:05 PMTo: McCutcheon, John


Cc: Moore, ToddSubject: RE: Charlton site visitJohn, How did you like the Station 264 tour go today? Please let me or Don Perkins know if you have any questions. Thanks, Michael Michael Zeilstra | Pipeline Engineer | Air Permitting and ComplianceKINDER~MORGAN | Natural Gas Pipelines1001 Louisiana St, Suite 1000 | Houston, TX 77002 Office: 713-420-4333 |Cell: 281-726-9946 [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 12:11 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, ToddSubject: Charlton site visitMichael,Thanks for letting me know about the change of date for your MADEP meeting and the resulting changes to your travel plans.After talking with my three colleagues, we would like to keep the site visit on Thursday January 21st, if possi-ble. And while you and I had initially discussed an afternoon meeting before your schedule changed, we could arrive at the Charlton site any time after 10:30.Please let me know the preferred time.Thanks.John John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>


===========================================================================Subject: RE: Charlton site visitDate: Friday, January 22, 2016 8:31 AMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “’Zeilstra, Michael’” <[email protected]>Cc: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>Conversation: Charlton site visitMichael,Don and Tim were great hosts. Todd was unable to attend, but Craig (ARD director), Gary and I thought it was very informative and impressive.Thanks for your efforts in making the arrangements.


JohnFrom: Zeilstra, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 6:05 PMTo: McCutcheon, JohnCc: Moore, ToddSubject: RE: Charlton site visitJohn, How did you like the Station 264 tour go today? Please let me or Don Perkins know if you have any questions. Thanks, Michael Michael Zeilstra | Pipeline Engineer | Air Permitting and ComplianceKINDER~MORGAN | Natural Gas Pipelines1001 Louisiana St, Suite 1000 | Houston, TX 77002 Office: 713-420-4333 |Cell: 281-726-9946 [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 12:11 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, ToddSubject: Charlton site visitMichael,Thanks for letting me know about the change of date for your MADEP meeting and the resulting changes to your travel plans.After talking with my three colleagues, we would like to keep the site visit on Thursday January 21st, if possi-ble. And while you and I had initially discussed an afternoon meeting before your schedule changed, we could arrive at the Charlton site any time after 10:30.Please let me know the preferred time.Thanks.John John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2016_01_22 RE Charlton site visit.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Charlton site visitDate: Friday, January 22, 2016 8:31 AMFrom: McCutcheon, John </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MCCUTCHEON>To: “Zeilstra, Michael” <[email protected]>Cc: “Moore, Todd” <[email protected]>, “Milbury, Gary” <[email protected]>, “Wright, Craig” <[email protected]>Conversation: Charlton site visit


Michael,Don and Tim were great hosts. Todd was unable to attend, but Craig (ARD director), Gary and I thought it was very informative and impressive.Thanks for your efforts in making the arrangements.JohnFrom: Zeilstra, Michael [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 6:05 PMTo: McCutcheon, JohnCc: Moore, ToddSubject: RE: Charlton site visitJohn, How did you like the Station 264 tour go today? Please let me or Don Perkins know if you have any questions. Thanks, Michael Michael Zeilstra | Pipeline Engineer | Air Permitting and ComplianceKINDER~MORGAN | Natural Gas Pipelines1001 Louisiana St, Suite 1000 | Houston, TX 77002 Office: 713-420-4333 |Cell: 281-726-9946 [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: McCutcheon, John [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 12:11 PMTo: Zeilstra, MichaelCc: Moore, ToddSubject: Charlton site visitMichael,Thanks for letting me know about the change of date for your MADEP meeting and the resulting changes to your travel plans.After talking with my three colleagues, we would like to keep the site visit on Thursday January 21st, if possi-ble. And while you and I had initially discussed an afternoon meeting before your schedule changed, we could arrive at the Charlton site any time after 10:30.Please let me know the preferred time.Thanks.John John McCutcheonSenior Title V Permit EngineerNew Hampshire Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Division29 Hazen DrivePO Box 95Concord, NH 03302-0095phone: (603) 271-0886fax: (603) 271 -7053email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

===========================================================================2016_01_25 Kinder Morgan (3).TXT

=========================================================================== 2016_01_25 Kinder Morgan (3): Meeting Sign In Sheet.pdfSubject: Kinder MorganDate: Monday, January 25, 2016 2:51 PM


From: Comstock, Gregg </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=COMSTOCK>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder MorganYour message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:Meeting Sign In Sheet.pdfNote: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled.

===========================================================================2016_01_25 Kinder-Morgan.TXT

=========================================================================== 2016_01_25 Kinder-Morgan: 2015-08_2015-12-28_nixon_ltr_sec_water_quality_certificate.pdfSubject: Kinder-MorganDate: Monday, January 25, 2016 2:52 PMFrom: Comstock, Gregg </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=COMSTOCK>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder-MorganYour message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:2015-08_2015-12-28_nixon_ltr_sec_water_quality_certificate.pdfNote: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled.

===========================================================================2016_01_28 FW Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015 xlsx.TXT

=========================================================================== 2016_01_28 FW Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015 xlsx: Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsxSubject: FW: Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsxDate: Thursday, January 28, 2016 4:16 PMFrom: Underhill, Jeff </O=STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP FYDIBOHF23SPDLT/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=UNDERHILL>To: “Paplaskas, Peter” <[email protected]>Conversation: Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsxFrom: Underhill, Jeff Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 12:42 PMTo: Moore, ToddSubject: Northeast EnergyDirect-KM-NHDESCommentsSept2015.xlsxSome KM comments

===========================================================================2016_02_29 RE Kinder-Morgan Right to Know Request.TXT

===========================================================================Subject: RE: Kinder-Morgan Right to Know RequestDate: Monday, February 29, 2016 2:56 PMTo: “Brady, Jennifer” <[email protected]>Conversation: Kinder-Morgan Right to Know RequestHi Jennifer,


John McCutcheon, Todd Moore, and I have had contact with Kinder Morgan to some extent. To be safe, I would send it to the whole DivisionGary MilburyPermitting and Environmental Health Bureau AdministratorNH Department of Environmental ServicesAir Resources Divisionphone: (603) 271-2630fax: (603) 271-1381email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> From: Brady, Jennifer Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 8:57 AMTo: Milbury, GarySubject: Kinder-Morgan Right to Know RequestGood Morning Gary,I spoke with Pete Demas yesterday and he mentioned you might know who within Air Resources would have information on Kinder-Morgan? I have a Right to Know request that pertains to �any and all information that Kinder Morgan has submitted to the Department.� I attached this request above. I am planning on sending out the collection email to the Air Resources division email list; however if you know specific names that I should include I would greatly appreciate it.Thank you,JenniferJennifer BradyProgram Assistant, File ReviewPublic Information & PermittingNH Department of Environmental Services(603) [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>