21
Parallel Session 5 – Early Markets 2 Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project Keith Wipke, Sam Sprik, Jennifer Kurtz, Todd Ramsden, Chris Ramsden, Chris Ainscough, Genevieve Saur Fb 16 2011 February 16, 2011 Fuel Cell & Hydrogen Energy Conference Washington, DC NREL/PR-5600-50842 This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. v8

Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Parallel Session 5 ndash Early Markets 2

Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project

Keith Wipke Sam Sprik Jennifer Kurtz Todd Ramsden Chris

j

Ramsden Chris Ainscough Genevieve Saur

F b 16 2011February 16 2011

Fuel Cell amp Hydrogen Energy ConferencegyWashington DC

NRELPR-5600-50842

This presentation does not contain any proprietary confidential or otherwise restricted information

NREL is a national laboratory of the US Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy LLC

v8

Outline

bull Project GoalsV hi l d H St ti D l t St tbull Vehicle and H2 Station Deployment Status

bull Critical Performance Compared to Targetsbull Highlights of Latest Vehicle and Infrastructurebull Highlights of Latest Vehicle and Infrastructure

Analysis Results and Progressbull Learning Demo Next Stepsbull Highlights of Partner Activities bull Summary

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Project Objectives Relevance and Targetsj j gbull Objectives

ndash Validate H2 FC Vehicles and Infrastructure in Parallel2

ndash Identify Current Status and Evolution of the Technologybull Relevance

ndash Objectively Assess Progress Toward Technology Readiness ndash Provide Feedback to H2 Research and Development

Performance Measure 2009 2015

F l C ll St k D bilit 2000 hours 5000 hours

Key Targets

Fuel Cell Stack Durability 2000 hours 5000 hours

Vehicle Range 250+ miles 300+ miles

Hydrogen Cost at Station $3gge $2-3gge

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 3 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Burbank CA station Photo NREL

Note Project extended 2 years through 2011

Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuing through 2011g g

FordBP and ChevronHyundai-Kia Concluded in 2009

Gen 1 amp 2Gen 1 Gen 2

Daimler GM and Air Products Continue to DemonstrateVehiclesStations within Project through 2011

G 1

Gen 1

j g

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 4 Innovation for Our Energy Future

(CHIP)

Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingy g

160

ed1

Vehicle Deployment by On-Board Hydrogen Storage Type

700 b d152

22 vehicles on road130 retired

+3

43

22

120

140

oyed

Ret

ire 700 bar on-road350 bar on-roadLiquid H2 on-road700 bar retired350 bar retired

60

80

100

icle

s D

eplo Liquid H2 retired

83

20

40

60

ulat

ive

Veh

4-Cum

u

(2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 5 Innovation for Our Energy Future

(1) Retired vehicles have left DOE fleet and are no longer providing data to NREL(2) Two project teams concluded in FallWinter 2009Created Sep-07-2010 843 AM

NREL CDP25 Total of ~40 project vehicles expected on road in 2011for total of ~170 deployed

Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen

10

Learning Demonstration Hydrogen Stations By Type

7

8

9

10

4

5

6

7

tatio

ns Operating Outside of ProjectOperating Within ProjectHistorical 2005-2009

1

2

3

4

of

St Historical 2005 2009

0

1

Delivered Compressed H2

Natural Gas On-Site Reforming

On-Site Electrolysis Delivered Liquid H2

St ti T

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 6 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Station TypeNREL CDP32

Created Aug-24-10 405pm Some project teams concluded FallWinter 2009 Markers show the cumulative stations operated during the 2005‐2009 period

Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)

SF Bay Area Detroit Area

10

20

25

ons

Cumulative Stations

Continuing Outside of ProjectRetired StationsCurrent Project Stations 10

55

9

0

5

10

15

Num

ber o

f Sta

tio

9

5

3

C

Reporting PeriodNREL CDP31Created Aug-24-10 405pm

5656

DC to New YorkLos Angeles Area

6Legend

C t P j t

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 7 Innovation for Our Energy FutureFeb-3-2011

615 Current ProjectContinuing OutsideOther

Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analysis Used for Cost Evaluationy

Vehicle Performance Metrics Gen 1 Vehicle Gen 2 Vehicle 2009 Target

Fuel Cell Stack Durability 2000 hours

Max Team Projected Hours to 10 Voltage Degradation 1807 hours 2521 hours

Average Fuel Cell Durability Projection 821 hours 1062 hoursMax Hours of Operation 2375 h 1261 hp

by a Single FC Stack to Date 2375 hours 1261 hours

Driving Range 103-190 miles 196-254 miles 250 miles

Fuel Economy (Window Sticker) 42 ndash 57 mikg 43 ndash 58 mikg no target

Fuel Cell Efficiency at frac14 Power 51 - 58 53 - 59 60

Fuel Cell Efficiency at Full Power 30 - 54 42 - 53 50

Infrastructure Performance Metrics 2009 Targetg

H2 Cost at Station (early market)On-site natural gas

reformation$770 - $1030

On-site Electrolysis

$1000 - $1290$3gge

Average H Fueling Rate 0 77 kgmin 1 0 kgmin

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 8 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Average H2 Fueling Rate 077 kgmin 10 kgmin

Outside of this project DOE independent panels concluded at 500 replicate stationsyearDistributed natural gas reformation at 1500 kgday $275-$350kg (2006)

Distributed electrolysis at 1500kgday $490-$570 (2009)

Outside reviewpanel

What are the Most Recent Project ResultsDifferences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPsp g

80 Spring 2010 Results

bull Most comprehensive set we ever publishedbull Includes durability range fuel economy etc

16 Fall 2010 Results

bull No ldquonewrdquo CDPs but we updated 16 previously published CDPs with data from last 6 monthsbull Includes durability range fuel economy etc

bull Covers data from all 4 Learning Demo teams + CHIP project over 5 year period

bull Majority of these will now stay static serving as a historical record of Gen 1 amp Gen 2

published CDPs with data from last 6 monthsbull Results on most recent durability range fuel

economy not yet possible to publish until more data accumulated (in 2011)

bull Covers data from 2 Learning Demo OEMs + CHIP

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 9 Innovation for Our Energy Future

as a historical record of Gen 1 amp Gen 2 comparisons

gproject

bull Emphasized changes observed in last 6 months through use of gray (old) and colors (new)

Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14

1800

Histogram of Fueling RatesVehicle and Infrastructure

2006 MYPP Tech Val Milestone 2012 MYPP Tech Val MilestoneTh h 2009Q4

1200

1400

1600

ts 5 kg in

Through 2009Q4 After 2009Q4

Result of average H per

800

1000

1200

of F

uelin

g Ev

ent 5 kg in

5 minutes

25464 EventsAverage = 077 kgmin

23 gt1 kgmin

Result of average H2 per fill increasing 24 but average fueling time also increasing 28

25464 fills

400

600

800

Num

ber o

5 kg in3 minutes

1730 EventsAverage = 066 kgmin

3 gt1 kgmin

1730 fills

0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 1 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 20

200

400

g

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 10 Innovation for Our Energy Future

0 02 04 06 08 1 12 14 16 18 2Avg Fuel Rate (kgmin)NREL cdp_fcev_18

Created Sep-15-10 934 AM

Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses

Distance Driven Between Refuelings All OEMs

Gen1Gen2 Gen1

10

elin

gs

Gen2After 2009Q4 Refuelings1 = 18941

Median distance between refuelings = 56 Miles Gen2 Refuelings1 = 6870 Median distance between refuelings = 81 Miles +45 improvement

enta

ge o

f Ref

ue

Refuelings after 2009Q41 = 3185 Median distance between refuelings = 91 Miles

+63 improvement

5

Perc

e

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

Distance between refuelings [Miles]2

ldquowindow-stickerrdquo range

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 11 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_80

1 Some refueling events are not detectedreported due to data noise or incompleteness2 Distance driven between refuelings is indicative of driver behavior and does not represent the full range of the vehicle

Created Sep-07-10 916 AM

gfrom adjusted dyno

tests is 196-254 miles

Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles

Cumulative Vehicle Miles All OEMs Gen 1 and Gen 2Through 2010 Q2

2872533

2 000 0002250000 2500000 2750000 3000000

eled

1 000 0001250000 1500000 1750000 2000000

le M

iles

Trav

250000 500000 750000

1000000

Vehi

cl

-

NREL CDP24

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 12 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Created Sep-07-10 1010 AMNREL CDP24

Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed

Tank Levels DOE Fleet

Through 2009Q4

Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 42 Total refuelings1 = 27113Total refuelings1 = 3196Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 48

After 2009Q414 13

FE

1 Some refueling events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness2 The outer arc is set at 20 total refuelings

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 13 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_40

g3 If tank level at fill was not available a complete fill up was assumed

Created Sep-02-10 1247 PM

Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Average

Driving by Time of Day

12Total Driving3 Events = 295222 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 853

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 77 1

g

9

12 of NHTS trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 815

Through 2009Q4

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 771

39

After 2009Q4NHTS

7

61 Driving trips between 6 AM amp 6 PM

2 The outer arc is set at 12 total Driving

3 Some events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness

AM PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day trips ASCII S htt ht l d l d ht l2001

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 14 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_44Created Sep-02-10 1248 PM

ASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg

25Driving by Day of Week

Through 2009Q4After 2009Q4NHTS

g

20

NHTS

15

Trip

s in

a D

ay

10

o

f T

S M T W d Th F i S t0

5

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Sun Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri SatDayNREL cdp_fcev_45

Created Sep-01-10 152 PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day tripsASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

Learning Demo Next Steps

C tl l i J l D b 2010 d tbull Currently analyzing July ndash December 2010 databull Spring 2011 CDPs published in March presented at DOE AMR in

Maybull Publish one or two more Learning Demo CDP sets after thatbull Begin receiving fueling data from Burbank station and others

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

Gen 1

Gen 2(CHIP)

bull Partners scheduled to provide data through September 2011

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 16 Innovation for Our Energy Future

bull Participating in many other demonstration and pre-commercial activities outside of this project

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesGM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiativey g

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 17 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesDaimler ndash F-CELL World Drive

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 18 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 2: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Outline

bull Project GoalsV hi l d H St ti D l t St tbull Vehicle and H2 Station Deployment Status

bull Critical Performance Compared to Targetsbull Highlights of Latest Vehicle and Infrastructurebull Highlights of Latest Vehicle and Infrastructure

Analysis Results and Progressbull Learning Demo Next Stepsbull Highlights of Partner Activities bull Summary

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Project Objectives Relevance and Targetsj j gbull Objectives

ndash Validate H2 FC Vehicles and Infrastructure in Parallel2

ndash Identify Current Status and Evolution of the Technologybull Relevance

ndash Objectively Assess Progress Toward Technology Readiness ndash Provide Feedback to H2 Research and Development

Performance Measure 2009 2015

F l C ll St k D bilit 2000 hours 5000 hours

Key Targets

Fuel Cell Stack Durability 2000 hours 5000 hours

Vehicle Range 250+ miles 300+ miles

Hydrogen Cost at Station $3gge $2-3gge

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 3 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Burbank CA station Photo NREL

Note Project extended 2 years through 2011

Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuing through 2011g g

FordBP and ChevronHyundai-Kia Concluded in 2009

Gen 1 amp 2Gen 1 Gen 2

Daimler GM and Air Products Continue to DemonstrateVehiclesStations within Project through 2011

G 1

Gen 1

j g

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 4 Innovation for Our Energy Future

(CHIP)

Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingy g

160

ed1

Vehicle Deployment by On-Board Hydrogen Storage Type

700 b d152

22 vehicles on road130 retired

+3

43

22

120

140

oyed

Ret

ire 700 bar on-road350 bar on-roadLiquid H2 on-road700 bar retired350 bar retired

60

80

100

icle

s D

eplo Liquid H2 retired

83

20

40

60

ulat

ive

Veh

4-Cum

u

(2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 5 Innovation for Our Energy Future

(1) Retired vehicles have left DOE fleet and are no longer providing data to NREL(2) Two project teams concluded in FallWinter 2009Created Sep-07-2010 843 AM

NREL CDP25 Total of ~40 project vehicles expected on road in 2011for total of ~170 deployed

Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen

10

Learning Demonstration Hydrogen Stations By Type

7

8

9

10

4

5

6

7

tatio

ns Operating Outside of ProjectOperating Within ProjectHistorical 2005-2009

1

2

3

4

of

St Historical 2005 2009

0

1

Delivered Compressed H2

Natural Gas On-Site Reforming

On-Site Electrolysis Delivered Liquid H2

St ti T

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 6 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Station TypeNREL CDP32

Created Aug-24-10 405pm Some project teams concluded FallWinter 2009 Markers show the cumulative stations operated during the 2005‐2009 period

Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)

SF Bay Area Detroit Area

10

20

25

ons

Cumulative Stations

Continuing Outside of ProjectRetired StationsCurrent Project Stations 10

55

9

0

5

10

15

Num

ber o

f Sta

tio

9

5

3

C

Reporting PeriodNREL CDP31Created Aug-24-10 405pm

5656

DC to New YorkLos Angeles Area

6Legend

C t P j t

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 7 Innovation for Our Energy FutureFeb-3-2011

615 Current ProjectContinuing OutsideOther

Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analysis Used for Cost Evaluationy

Vehicle Performance Metrics Gen 1 Vehicle Gen 2 Vehicle 2009 Target

Fuel Cell Stack Durability 2000 hours

Max Team Projected Hours to 10 Voltage Degradation 1807 hours 2521 hours

Average Fuel Cell Durability Projection 821 hours 1062 hoursMax Hours of Operation 2375 h 1261 hp

by a Single FC Stack to Date 2375 hours 1261 hours

Driving Range 103-190 miles 196-254 miles 250 miles

Fuel Economy (Window Sticker) 42 ndash 57 mikg 43 ndash 58 mikg no target

Fuel Cell Efficiency at frac14 Power 51 - 58 53 - 59 60

Fuel Cell Efficiency at Full Power 30 - 54 42 - 53 50

Infrastructure Performance Metrics 2009 Targetg

H2 Cost at Station (early market)On-site natural gas

reformation$770 - $1030

On-site Electrolysis

$1000 - $1290$3gge

Average H Fueling Rate 0 77 kgmin 1 0 kgmin

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 8 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Average H2 Fueling Rate 077 kgmin 10 kgmin

Outside of this project DOE independent panels concluded at 500 replicate stationsyearDistributed natural gas reformation at 1500 kgday $275-$350kg (2006)

Distributed electrolysis at 1500kgday $490-$570 (2009)

Outside reviewpanel

What are the Most Recent Project ResultsDifferences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPsp g

80 Spring 2010 Results

bull Most comprehensive set we ever publishedbull Includes durability range fuel economy etc

16 Fall 2010 Results

bull No ldquonewrdquo CDPs but we updated 16 previously published CDPs with data from last 6 monthsbull Includes durability range fuel economy etc

bull Covers data from all 4 Learning Demo teams + CHIP project over 5 year period

bull Majority of these will now stay static serving as a historical record of Gen 1 amp Gen 2

published CDPs with data from last 6 monthsbull Results on most recent durability range fuel

economy not yet possible to publish until more data accumulated (in 2011)

bull Covers data from 2 Learning Demo OEMs + CHIP

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 9 Innovation for Our Energy Future

as a historical record of Gen 1 amp Gen 2 comparisons

gproject

bull Emphasized changes observed in last 6 months through use of gray (old) and colors (new)

Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14

1800

Histogram of Fueling RatesVehicle and Infrastructure

2006 MYPP Tech Val Milestone 2012 MYPP Tech Val MilestoneTh h 2009Q4

1200

1400

1600

ts 5 kg in

Through 2009Q4 After 2009Q4

Result of average H per

800

1000

1200

of F

uelin

g Ev

ent 5 kg in

5 minutes

25464 EventsAverage = 077 kgmin

23 gt1 kgmin

Result of average H2 per fill increasing 24 but average fueling time also increasing 28

25464 fills

400

600

800

Num

ber o

5 kg in3 minutes

1730 EventsAverage = 066 kgmin

3 gt1 kgmin

1730 fills

0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 1 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 20

200

400

g

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 10 Innovation for Our Energy Future

0 02 04 06 08 1 12 14 16 18 2Avg Fuel Rate (kgmin)NREL cdp_fcev_18

Created Sep-15-10 934 AM

Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses

Distance Driven Between Refuelings All OEMs

Gen1Gen2 Gen1

10

elin

gs

Gen2After 2009Q4 Refuelings1 = 18941

Median distance between refuelings = 56 Miles Gen2 Refuelings1 = 6870 Median distance between refuelings = 81 Miles +45 improvement

enta

ge o

f Ref

ue

Refuelings after 2009Q41 = 3185 Median distance between refuelings = 91 Miles

+63 improvement

5

Perc

e

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

Distance between refuelings [Miles]2

ldquowindow-stickerrdquo range

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 11 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_80

1 Some refueling events are not detectedreported due to data noise or incompleteness2 Distance driven between refuelings is indicative of driver behavior and does not represent the full range of the vehicle

Created Sep-07-10 916 AM

gfrom adjusted dyno

tests is 196-254 miles

Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles

Cumulative Vehicle Miles All OEMs Gen 1 and Gen 2Through 2010 Q2

2872533

2 000 0002250000 2500000 2750000 3000000

eled

1 000 0001250000 1500000 1750000 2000000

le M

iles

Trav

250000 500000 750000

1000000

Vehi

cl

-

NREL CDP24

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 12 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Created Sep-07-10 1010 AMNREL CDP24

Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed

Tank Levels DOE Fleet

Through 2009Q4

Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 42 Total refuelings1 = 27113Total refuelings1 = 3196Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 48

After 2009Q414 13

FE

1 Some refueling events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness2 The outer arc is set at 20 total refuelings

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 13 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_40

g3 If tank level at fill was not available a complete fill up was assumed

Created Sep-02-10 1247 PM

Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Average

Driving by Time of Day

12Total Driving3 Events = 295222 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 853

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 77 1

g

9

12 of NHTS trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 815

Through 2009Q4

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 771

39

After 2009Q4NHTS

7

61 Driving trips between 6 AM amp 6 PM

2 The outer arc is set at 12 total Driving

3 Some events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness

AM PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day trips ASCII S htt ht l d l d ht l2001

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 14 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_44Created Sep-02-10 1248 PM

ASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg

25Driving by Day of Week

Through 2009Q4After 2009Q4NHTS

g

20

NHTS

15

Trip

s in

a D

ay

10

o

f T

S M T W d Th F i S t0

5

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Sun Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri SatDayNREL cdp_fcev_45

Created Sep-01-10 152 PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day tripsASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

Learning Demo Next Steps

C tl l i J l D b 2010 d tbull Currently analyzing July ndash December 2010 databull Spring 2011 CDPs published in March presented at DOE AMR in

Maybull Publish one or two more Learning Demo CDP sets after thatbull Begin receiving fueling data from Burbank station and others

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

Gen 1

Gen 2(CHIP)

bull Partners scheduled to provide data through September 2011

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 16 Innovation for Our Energy Future

bull Participating in many other demonstration and pre-commercial activities outside of this project

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesGM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiativey g

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 17 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesDaimler ndash F-CELL World Drive

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 18 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 3: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Project Objectives Relevance and Targetsj j gbull Objectives

ndash Validate H2 FC Vehicles and Infrastructure in Parallel2

ndash Identify Current Status and Evolution of the Technologybull Relevance

ndash Objectively Assess Progress Toward Technology Readiness ndash Provide Feedback to H2 Research and Development

Performance Measure 2009 2015

F l C ll St k D bilit 2000 hours 5000 hours

Key Targets

Fuel Cell Stack Durability 2000 hours 5000 hours

Vehicle Range 250+ miles 300+ miles

Hydrogen Cost at Station $3gge $2-3gge

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 3 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Burbank CA station Photo NREL

Note Project extended 2 years through 2011

Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuing through 2011g g

FordBP and ChevronHyundai-Kia Concluded in 2009

Gen 1 amp 2Gen 1 Gen 2

Daimler GM and Air Products Continue to DemonstrateVehiclesStations within Project through 2011

G 1

Gen 1

j g

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 4 Innovation for Our Energy Future

(CHIP)

Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingy g

160

ed1

Vehicle Deployment by On-Board Hydrogen Storage Type

700 b d152

22 vehicles on road130 retired

+3

43

22

120

140

oyed

Ret

ire 700 bar on-road350 bar on-roadLiquid H2 on-road700 bar retired350 bar retired

60

80

100

icle

s D

eplo Liquid H2 retired

83

20

40

60

ulat

ive

Veh

4-Cum

u

(2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 5 Innovation for Our Energy Future

(1) Retired vehicles have left DOE fleet and are no longer providing data to NREL(2) Two project teams concluded in FallWinter 2009Created Sep-07-2010 843 AM

NREL CDP25 Total of ~40 project vehicles expected on road in 2011for total of ~170 deployed

Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen

10

Learning Demonstration Hydrogen Stations By Type

7

8

9

10

4

5

6

7

tatio

ns Operating Outside of ProjectOperating Within ProjectHistorical 2005-2009

1

2

3

4

of

St Historical 2005 2009

0

1

Delivered Compressed H2

Natural Gas On-Site Reforming

On-Site Electrolysis Delivered Liquid H2

St ti T

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 6 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Station TypeNREL CDP32

Created Aug-24-10 405pm Some project teams concluded FallWinter 2009 Markers show the cumulative stations operated during the 2005‐2009 period

Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)

SF Bay Area Detroit Area

10

20

25

ons

Cumulative Stations

Continuing Outside of ProjectRetired StationsCurrent Project Stations 10

55

9

0

5

10

15

Num

ber o

f Sta

tio

9

5

3

C

Reporting PeriodNREL CDP31Created Aug-24-10 405pm

5656

DC to New YorkLos Angeles Area

6Legend

C t P j t

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 7 Innovation for Our Energy FutureFeb-3-2011

615 Current ProjectContinuing OutsideOther

Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analysis Used for Cost Evaluationy

Vehicle Performance Metrics Gen 1 Vehicle Gen 2 Vehicle 2009 Target

Fuel Cell Stack Durability 2000 hours

Max Team Projected Hours to 10 Voltage Degradation 1807 hours 2521 hours

Average Fuel Cell Durability Projection 821 hours 1062 hoursMax Hours of Operation 2375 h 1261 hp

by a Single FC Stack to Date 2375 hours 1261 hours

Driving Range 103-190 miles 196-254 miles 250 miles

Fuel Economy (Window Sticker) 42 ndash 57 mikg 43 ndash 58 mikg no target

Fuel Cell Efficiency at frac14 Power 51 - 58 53 - 59 60

Fuel Cell Efficiency at Full Power 30 - 54 42 - 53 50

Infrastructure Performance Metrics 2009 Targetg

H2 Cost at Station (early market)On-site natural gas

reformation$770 - $1030

On-site Electrolysis

$1000 - $1290$3gge

Average H Fueling Rate 0 77 kgmin 1 0 kgmin

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 8 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Average H2 Fueling Rate 077 kgmin 10 kgmin

Outside of this project DOE independent panels concluded at 500 replicate stationsyearDistributed natural gas reformation at 1500 kgday $275-$350kg (2006)

Distributed electrolysis at 1500kgday $490-$570 (2009)

Outside reviewpanel

What are the Most Recent Project ResultsDifferences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPsp g

80 Spring 2010 Results

bull Most comprehensive set we ever publishedbull Includes durability range fuel economy etc

16 Fall 2010 Results

bull No ldquonewrdquo CDPs but we updated 16 previously published CDPs with data from last 6 monthsbull Includes durability range fuel economy etc

bull Covers data from all 4 Learning Demo teams + CHIP project over 5 year period

bull Majority of these will now stay static serving as a historical record of Gen 1 amp Gen 2

published CDPs with data from last 6 monthsbull Results on most recent durability range fuel

economy not yet possible to publish until more data accumulated (in 2011)

bull Covers data from 2 Learning Demo OEMs + CHIP

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 9 Innovation for Our Energy Future

as a historical record of Gen 1 amp Gen 2 comparisons

gproject

bull Emphasized changes observed in last 6 months through use of gray (old) and colors (new)

Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14

1800

Histogram of Fueling RatesVehicle and Infrastructure

2006 MYPP Tech Val Milestone 2012 MYPP Tech Val MilestoneTh h 2009Q4

1200

1400

1600

ts 5 kg in

Through 2009Q4 After 2009Q4

Result of average H per

800

1000

1200

of F

uelin

g Ev

ent 5 kg in

5 minutes

25464 EventsAverage = 077 kgmin

23 gt1 kgmin

Result of average H2 per fill increasing 24 but average fueling time also increasing 28

25464 fills

400

600

800

Num

ber o

5 kg in3 minutes

1730 EventsAverage = 066 kgmin

3 gt1 kgmin

1730 fills

0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 1 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 20

200

400

g

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 10 Innovation for Our Energy Future

0 02 04 06 08 1 12 14 16 18 2Avg Fuel Rate (kgmin)NREL cdp_fcev_18

Created Sep-15-10 934 AM

Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses

Distance Driven Between Refuelings All OEMs

Gen1Gen2 Gen1

10

elin

gs

Gen2After 2009Q4 Refuelings1 = 18941

Median distance between refuelings = 56 Miles Gen2 Refuelings1 = 6870 Median distance between refuelings = 81 Miles +45 improvement

enta

ge o

f Ref

ue

Refuelings after 2009Q41 = 3185 Median distance between refuelings = 91 Miles

+63 improvement

5

Perc

e

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

Distance between refuelings [Miles]2

ldquowindow-stickerrdquo range

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 11 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_80

1 Some refueling events are not detectedreported due to data noise or incompleteness2 Distance driven between refuelings is indicative of driver behavior and does not represent the full range of the vehicle

Created Sep-07-10 916 AM

gfrom adjusted dyno

tests is 196-254 miles

Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles

Cumulative Vehicle Miles All OEMs Gen 1 and Gen 2Through 2010 Q2

2872533

2 000 0002250000 2500000 2750000 3000000

eled

1 000 0001250000 1500000 1750000 2000000

le M

iles

Trav

250000 500000 750000

1000000

Vehi

cl

-

NREL CDP24

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 12 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Created Sep-07-10 1010 AMNREL CDP24

Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed

Tank Levels DOE Fleet

Through 2009Q4

Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 42 Total refuelings1 = 27113Total refuelings1 = 3196Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 48

After 2009Q414 13

FE

1 Some refueling events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness2 The outer arc is set at 20 total refuelings

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 13 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_40

g3 If tank level at fill was not available a complete fill up was assumed

Created Sep-02-10 1247 PM

Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Average

Driving by Time of Day

12Total Driving3 Events = 295222 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 853

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 77 1

g

9

12 of NHTS trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 815

Through 2009Q4

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 771

39

After 2009Q4NHTS

7

61 Driving trips between 6 AM amp 6 PM

2 The outer arc is set at 12 total Driving

3 Some events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness

AM PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day trips ASCII S htt ht l d l d ht l2001

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 14 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_44Created Sep-02-10 1248 PM

ASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg

25Driving by Day of Week

Through 2009Q4After 2009Q4NHTS

g

20

NHTS

15

Trip

s in

a D

ay

10

o

f T

S M T W d Th F i S t0

5

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Sun Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri SatDayNREL cdp_fcev_45

Created Sep-01-10 152 PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day tripsASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

Learning Demo Next Steps

C tl l i J l D b 2010 d tbull Currently analyzing July ndash December 2010 databull Spring 2011 CDPs published in March presented at DOE AMR in

Maybull Publish one or two more Learning Demo CDP sets after thatbull Begin receiving fueling data from Burbank station and others

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

Gen 1

Gen 2(CHIP)

bull Partners scheduled to provide data through September 2011

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 16 Innovation for Our Energy Future

bull Participating in many other demonstration and pre-commercial activities outside of this project

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesGM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiativey g

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 17 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesDaimler ndash F-CELL World Drive

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 18 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 4: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuing through 2011g g

FordBP and ChevronHyundai-Kia Concluded in 2009

Gen 1 amp 2Gen 1 Gen 2

Daimler GM and Air Products Continue to DemonstrateVehiclesStations within Project through 2011

G 1

Gen 1

j g

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 4 Innovation for Our Energy Future

(CHIP)

Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingy g

160

ed1

Vehicle Deployment by On-Board Hydrogen Storage Type

700 b d152

22 vehicles on road130 retired

+3

43

22

120

140

oyed

Ret

ire 700 bar on-road350 bar on-roadLiquid H2 on-road700 bar retired350 bar retired

60

80

100

icle

s D

eplo Liquid H2 retired

83

20

40

60

ulat

ive

Veh

4-Cum

u

(2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 5 Innovation for Our Energy Future

(1) Retired vehicles have left DOE fleet and are no longer providing data to NREL(2) Two project teams concluded in FallWinter 2009Created Sep-07-2010 843 AM

NREL CDP25 Total of ~40 project vehicles expected on road in 2011for total of ~170 deployed

Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen

10

Learning Demonstration Hydrogen Stations By Type

7

8

9

10

4

5

6

7

tatio

ns Operating Outside of ProjectOperating Within ProjectHistorical 2005-2009

1

2

3

4

of

St Historical 2005 2009

0

1

Delivered Compressed H2

Natural Gas On-Site Reforming

On-Site Electrolysis Delivered Liquid H2

St ti T

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 6 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Station TypeNREL CDP32

Created Aug-24-10 405pm Some project teams concluded FallWinter 2009 Markers show the cumulative stations operated during the 2005‐2009 period

Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)

SF Bay Area Detroit Area

10

20

25

ons

Cumulative Stations

Continuing Outside of ProjectRetired StationsCurrent Project Stations 10

55

9

0

5

10

15

Num

ber o

f Sta

tio

9

5

3

C

Reporting PeriodNREL CDP31Created Aug-24-10 405pm

5656

DC to New YorkLos Angeles Area

6Legend

C t P j t

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 7 Innovation for Our Energy FutureFeb-3-2011

615 Current ProjectContinuing OutsideOther

Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analysis Used for Cost Evaluationy

Vehicle Performance Metrics Gen 1 Vehicle Gen 2 Vehicle 2009 Target

Fuel Cell Stack Durability 2000 hours

Max Team Projected Hours to 10 Voltage Degradation 1807 hours 2521 hours

Average Fuel Cell Durability Projection 821 hours 1062 hoursMax Hours of Operation 2375 h 1261 hp

by a Single FC Stack to Date 2375 hours 1261 hours

Driving Range 103-190 miles 196-254 miles 250 miles

Fuel Economy (Window Sticker) 42 ndash 57 mikg 43 ndash 58 mikg no target

Fuel Cell Efficiency at frac14 Power 51 - 58 53 - 59 60

Fuel Cell Efficiency at Full Power 30 - 54 42 - 53 50

Infrastructure Performance Metrics 2009 Targetg

H2 Cost at Station (early market)On-site natural gas

reformation$770 - $1030

On-site Electrolysis

$1000 - $1290$3gge

Average H Fueling Rate 0 77 kgmin 1 0 kgmin

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 8 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Average H2 Fueling Rate 077 kgmin 10 kgmin

Outside of this project DOE independent panels concluded at 500 replicate stationsyearDistributed natural gas reformation at 1500 kgday $275-$350kg (2006)

Distributed electrolysis at 1500kgday $490-$570 (2009)

Outside reviewpanel

What are the Most Recent Project ResultsDifferences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPsp g

80 Spring 2010 Results

bull Most comprehensive set we ever publishedbull Includes durability range fuel economy etc

16 Fall 2010 Results

bull No ldquonewrdquo CDPs but we updated 16 previously published CDPs with data from last 6 monthsbull Includes durability range fuel economy etc

bull Covers data from all 4 Learning Demo teams + CHIP project over 5 year period

bull Majority of these will now stay static serving as a historical record of Gen 1 amp Gen 2

published CDPs with data from last 6 monthsbull Results on most recent durability range fuel

economy not yet possible to publish until more data accumulated (in 2011)

bull Covers data from 2 Learning Demo OEMs + CHIP

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 9 Innovation for Our Energy Future

as a historical record of Gen 1 amp Gen 2 comparisons

gproject

bull Emphasized changes observed in last 6 months through use of gray (old) and colors (new)

Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14

1800

Histogram of Fueling RatesVehicle and Infrastructure

2006 MYPP Tech Val Milestone 2012 MYPP Tech Val MilestoneTh h 2009Q4

1200

1400

1600

ts 5 kg in

Through 2009Q4 After 2009Q4

Result of average H per

800

1000

1200

of F

uelin

g Ev

ent 5 kg in

5 minutes

25464 EventsAverage = 077 kgmin

23 gt1 kgmin

Result of average H2 per fill increasing 24 but average fueling time also increasing 28

25464 fills

400

600

800

Num

ber o

5 kg in3 minutes

1730 EventsAverage = 066 kgmin

3 gt1 kgmin

1730 fills

0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 1 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 20

200

400

g

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 10 Innovation for Our Energy Future

0 02 04 06 08 1 12 14 16 18 2Avg Fuel Rate (kgmin)NREL cdp_fcev_18

Created Sep-15-10 934 AM

Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses

Distance Driven Between Refuelings All OEMs

Gen1Gen2 Gen1

10

elin

gs

Gen2After 2009Q4 Refuelings1 = 18941

Median distance between refuelings = 56 Miles Gen2 Refuelings1 = 6870 Median distance between refuelings = 81 Miles +45 improvement

enta

ge o

f Ref

ue

Refuelings after 2009Q41 = 3185 Median distance between refuelings = 91 Miles

+63 improvement

5

Perc

e

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

Distance between refuelings [Miles]2

ldquowindow-stickerrdquo range

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 11 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_80

1 Some refueling events are not detectedreported due to data noise or incompleteness2 Distance driven between refuelings is indicative of driver behavior and does not represent the full range of the vehicle

Created Sep-07-10 916 AM

gfrom adjusted dyno

tests is 196-254 miles

Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles

Cumulative Vehicle Miles All OEMs Gen 1 and Gen 2Through 2010 Q2

2872533

2 000 0002250000 2500000 2750000 3000000

eled

1 000 0001250000 1500000 1750000 2000000

le M

iles

Trav

250000 500000 750000

1000000

Vehi

cl

-

NREL CDP24

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 12 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Created Sep-07-10 1010 AMNREL CDP24

Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed

Tank Levels DOE Fleet

Through 2009Q4

Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 42 Total refuelings1 = 27113Total refuelings1 = 3196Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 48

After 2009Q414 13

FE

1 Some refueling events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness2 The outer arc is set at 20 total refuelings

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 13 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_40

g3 If tank level at fill was not available a complete fill up was assumed

Created Sep-02-10 1247 PM

Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Average

Driving by Time of Day

12Total Driving3 Events = 295222 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 853

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 77 1

g

9

12 of NHTS trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 815

Through 2009Q4

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 771

39

After 2009Q4NHTS

7

61 Driving trips between 6 AM amp 6 PM

2 The outer arc is set at 12 total Driving

3 Some events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness

AM PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day trips ASCII S htt ht l d l d ht l2001

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 14 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_44Created Sep-02-10 1248 PM

ASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg

25Driving by Day of Week

Through 2009Q4After 2009Q4NHTS

g

20

NHTS

15

Trip

s in

a D

ay

10

o

f T

S M T W d Th F i S t0

5

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Sun Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri SatDayNREL cdp_fcev_45

Created Sep-01-10 152 PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day tripsASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

Learning Demo Next Steps

C tl l i J l D b 2010 d tbull Currently analyzing July ndash December 2010 databull Spring 2011 CDPs published in March presented at DOE AMR in

Maybull Publish one or two more Learning Demo CDP sets after thatbull Begin receiving fueling data from Burbank station and others

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

Gen 1

Gen 2(CHIP)

bull Partners scheduled to provide data through September 2011

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 16 Innovation for Our Energy Future

bull Participating in many other demonstration and pre-commercial activities outside of this project

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesGM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiativey g

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 17 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesDaimler ndash F-CELL World Drive

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 18 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 5: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingy g

160

ed1

Vehicle Deployment by On-Board Hydrogen Storage Type

700 b d152

22 vehicles on road130 retired

+3

43

22

120

140

oyed

Ret

ire 700 bar on-road350 bar on-roadLiquid H2 on-road700 bar retired350 bar retired

60

80

100

icle

s D

eplo Liquid H2 retired

83

20

40

60

ulat

ive

Veh

4-Cum

u

(2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 5 Innovation for Our Energy Future

(1) Retired vehicles have left DOE fleet and are no longer providing data to NREL(2) Two project teams concluded in FallWinter 2009Created Sep-07-2010 843 AM

NREL CDP25 Total of ~40 project vehicles expected on road in 2011for total of ~170 deployed

Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen

10

Learning Demonstration Hydrogen Stations By Type

7

8

9

10

4

5

6

7

tatio

ns Operating Outside of ProjectOperating Within ProjectHistorical 2005-2009

1

2

3

4

of

St Historical 2005 2009

0

1

Delivered Compressed H2

Natural Gas On-Site Reforming

On-Site Electrolysis Delivered Liquid H2

St ti T

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 6 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Station TypeNREL CDP32

Created Aug-24-10 405pm Some project teams concluded FallWinter 2009 Markers show the cumulative stations operated during the 2005‐2009 period

Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)

SF Bay Area Detroit Area

10

20

25

ons

Cumulative Stations

Continuing Outside of ProjectRetired StationsCurrent Project Stations 10

55

9

0

5

10

15

Num

ber o

f Sta

tio

9

5

3

C

Reporting PeriodNREL CDP31Created Aug-24-10 405pm

5656

DC to New YorkLos Angeles Area

6Legend

C t P j t

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 7 Innovation for Our Energy FutureFeb-3-2011

615 Current ProjectContinuing OutsideOther

Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analysis Used for Cost Evaluationy

Vehicle Performance Metrics Gen 1 Vehicle Gen 2 Vehicle 2009 Target

Fuel Cell Stack Durability 2000 hours

Max Team Projected Hours to 10 Voltage Degradation 1807 hours 2521 hours

Average Fuel Cell Durability Projection 821 hours 1062 hoursMax Hours of Operation 2375 h 1261 hp

by a Single FC Stack to Date 2375 hours 1261 hours

Driving Range 103-190 miles 196-254 miles 250 miles

Fuel Economy (Window Sticker) 42 ndash 57 mikg 43 ndash 58 mikg no target

Fuel Cell Efficiency at frac14 Power 51 - 58 53 - 59 60

Fuel Cell Efficiency at Full Power 30 - 54 42 - 53 50

Infrastructure Performance Metrics 2009 Targetg

H2 Cost at Station (early market)On-site natural gas

reformation$770 - $1030

On-site Electrolysis

$1000 - $1290$3gge

Average H Fueling Rate 0 77 kgmin 1 0 kgmin

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 8 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Average H2 Fueling Rate 077 kgmin 10 kgmin

Outside of this project DOE independent panels concluded at 500 replicate stationsyearDistributed natural gas reformation at 1500 kgday $275-$350kg (2006)

Distributed electrolysis at 1500kgday $490-$570 (2009)

Outside reviewpanel

What are the Most Recent Project ResultsDifferences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPsp g

80 Spring 2010 Results

bull Most comprehensive set we ever publishedbull Includes durability range fuel economy etc

16 Fall 2010 Results

bull No ldquonewrdquo CDPs but we updated 16 previously published CDPs with data from last 6 monthsbull Includes durability range fuel economy etc

bull Covers data from all 4 Learning Demo teams + CHIP project over 5 year period

bull Majority of these will now stay static serving as a historical record of Gen 1 amp Gen 2

published CDPs with data from last 6 monthsbull Results on most recent durability range fuel

economy not yet possible to publish until more data accumulated (in 2011)

bull Covers data from 2 Learning Demo OEMs + CHIP

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 9 Innovation for Our Energy Future

as a historical record of Gen 1 amp Gen 2 comparisons

gproject

bull Emphasized changes observed in last 6 months through use of gray (old) and colors (new)

Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14

1800

Histogram of Fueling RatesVehicle and Infrastructure

2006 MYPP Tech Val Milestone 2012 MYPP Tech Val MilestoneTh h 2009Q4

1200

1400

1600

ts 5 kg in

Through 2009Q4 After 2009Q4

Result of average H per

800

1000

1200

of F

uelin

g Ev

ent 5 kg in

5 minutes

25464 EventsAverage = 077 kgmin

23 gt1 kgmin

Result of average H2 per fill increasing 24 but average fueling time also increasing 28

25464 fills

400

600

800

Num

ber o

5 kg in3 minutes

1730 EventsAverage = 066 kgmin

3 gt1 kgmin

1730 fills

0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 1 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 20

200

400

g

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 10 Innovation for Our Energy Future

0 02 04 06 08 1 12 14 16 18 2Avg Fuel Rate (kgmin)NREL cdp_fcev_18

Created Sep-15-10 934 AM

Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses

Distance Driven Between Refuelings All OEMs

Gen1Gen2 Gen1

10

elin

gs

Gen2After 2009Q4 Refuelings1 = 18941

Median distance between refuelings = 56 Miles Gen2 Refuelings1 = 6870 Median distance between refuelings = 81 Miles +45 improvement

enta

ge o

f Ref

ue

Refuelings after 2009Q41 = 3185 Median distance between refuelings = 91 Miles

+63 improvement

5

Perc

e

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

Distance between refuelings [Miles]2

ldquowindow-stickerrdquo range

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 11 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_80

1 Some refueling events are not detectedreported due to data noise or incompleteness2 Distance driven between refuelings is indicative of driver behavior and does not represent the full range of the vehicle

Created Sep-07-10 916 AM

gfrom adjusted dyno

tests is 196-254 miles

Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles

Cumulative Vehicle Miles All OEMs Gen 1 and Gen 2Through 2010 Q2

2872533

2 000 0002250000 2500000 2750000 3000000

eled

1 000 0001250000 1500000 1750000 2000000

le M

iles

Trav

250000 500000 750000

1000000

Vehi

cl

-

NREL CDP24

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 12 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Created Sep-07-10 1010 AMNREL CDP24

Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed

Tank Levels DOE Fleet

Through 2009Q4

Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 42 Total refuelings1 = 27113Total refuelings1 = 3196Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 48

After 2009Q414 13

FE

1 Some refueling events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness2 The outer arc is set at 20 total refuelings

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 13 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_40

g3 If tank level at fill was not available a complete fill up was assumed

Created Sep-02-10 1247 PM

Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Average

Driving by Time of Day

12Total Driving3 Events = 295222 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 853

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 77 1

g

9

12 of NHTS trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 815

Through 2009Q4

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 771

39

After 2009Q4NHTS

7

61 Driving trips between 6 AM amp 6 PM

2 The outer arc is set at 12 total Driving

3 Some events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness

AM PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day trips ASCII S htt ht l d l d ht l2001

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 14 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_44Created Sep-02-10 1248 PM

ASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg

25Driving by Day of Week

Through 2009Q4After 2009Q4NHTS

g

20

NHTS

15

Trip

s in

a D

ay

10

o

f T

S M T W d Th F i S t0

5

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Sun Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri SatDayNREL cdp_fcev_45

Created Sep-01-10 152 PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day tripsASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

Learning Demo Next Steps

C tl l i J l D b 2010 d tbull Currently analyzing July ndash December 2010 databull Spring 2011 CDPs published in March presented at DOE AMR in

Maybull Publish one or two more Learning Demo CDP sets after thatbull Begin receiving fueling data from Burbank station and others

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

Gen 1

Gen 2(CHIP)

bull Partners scheduled to provide data through September 2011

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 16 Innovation for Our Energy Future

bull Participating in many other demonstration and pre-commercial activities outside of this project

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesGM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiativey g

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 17 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesDaimler ndash F-CELL World Drive

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 18 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 6: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen

10

Learning Demonstration Hydrogen Stations By Type

7

8

9

10

4

5

6

7

tatio

ns Operating Outside of ProjectOperating Within ProjectHistorical 2005-2009

1

2

3

4

of

St Historical 2005 2009

0

1

Delivered Compressed H2

Natural Gas On-Site Reforming

On-Site Electrolysis Delivered Liquid H2

St ti T

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 6 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Station TypeNREL CDP32

Created Aug-24-10 405pm Some project teams concluded FallWinter 2009 Markers show the cumulative stations operated during the 2005‐2009 period

Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)

SF Bay Area Detroit Area

10

20

25

ons

Cumulative Stations

Continuing Outside of ProjectRetired StationsCurrent Project Stations 10

55

9

0

5

10

15

Num

ber o

f Sta

tio

9

5

3

C

Reporting PeriodNREL CDP31Created Aug-24-10 405pm

5656

DC to New YorkLos Angeles Area

6Legend

C t P j t

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 7 Innovation for Our Energy FutureFeb-3-2011

615 Current ProjectContinuing OutsideOther

Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analysis Used for Cost Evaluationy

Vehicle Performance Metrics Gen 1 Vehicle Gen 2 Vehicle 2009 Target

Fuel Cell Stack Durability 2000 hours

Max Team Projected Hours to 10 Voltage Degradation 1807 hours 2521 hours

Average Fuel Cell Durability Projection 821 hours 1062 hoursMax Hours of Operation 2375 h 1261 hp

by a Single FC Stack to Date 2375 hours 1261 hours

Driving Range 103-190 miles 196-254 miles 250 miles

Fuel Economy (Window Sticker) 42 ndash 57 mikg 43 ndash 58 mikg no target

Fuel Cell Efficiency at frac14 Power 51 - 58 53 - 59 60

Fuel Cell Efficiency at Full Power 30 - 54 42 - 53 50

Infrastructure Performance Metrics 2009 Targetg

H2 Cost at Station (early market)On-site natural gas

reformation$770 - $1030

On-site Electrolysis

$1000 - $1290$3gge

Average H Fueling Rate 0 77 kgmin 1 0 kgmin

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 8 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Average H2 Fueling Rate 077 kgmin 10 kgmin

Outside of this project DOE independent panels concluded at 500 replicate stationsyearDistributed natural gas reformation at 1500 kgday $275-$350kg (2006)

Distributed electrolysis at 1500kgday $490-$570 (2009)

Outside reviewpanel

What are the Most Recent Project ResultsDifferences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPsp g

80 Spring 2010 Results

bull Most comprehensive set we ever publishedbull Includes durability range fuel economy etc

16 Fall 2010 Results

bull No ldquonewrdquo CDPs but we updated 16 previously published CDPs with data from last 6 monthsbull Includes durability range fuel economy etc

bull Covers data from all 4 Learning Demo teams + CHIP project over 5 year period

bull Majority of these will now stay static serving as a historical record of Gen 1 amp Gen 2

published CDPs with data from last 6 monthsbull Results on most recent durability range fuel

economy not yet possible to publish until more data accumulated (in 2011)

bull Covers data from 2 Learning Demo OEMs + CHIP

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 9 Innovation for Our Energy Future

as a historical record of Gen 1 amp Gen 2 comparisons

gproject

bull Emphasized changes observed in last 6 months through use of gray (old) and colors (new)

Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14

1800

Histogram of Fueling RatesVehicle and Infrastructure

2006 MYPP Tech Val Milestone 2012 MYPP Tech Val MilestoneTh h 2009Q4

1200

1400

1600

ts 5 kg in

Through 2009Q4 After 2009Q4

Result of average H per

800

1000

1200

of F

uelin

g Ev

ent 5 kg in

5 minutes

25464 EventsAverage = 077 kgmin

23 gt1 kgmin

Result of average H2 per fill increasing 24 but average fueling time also increasing 28

25464 fills

400

600

800

Num

ber o

5 kg in3 minutes

1730 EventsAverage = 066 kgmin

3 gt1 kgmin

1730 fills

0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 1 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 20

200

400

g

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 10 Innovation for Our Energy Future

0 02 04 06 08 1 12 14 16 18 2Avg Fuel Rate (kgmin)NREL cdp_fcev_18

Created Sep-15-10 934 AM

Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses

Distance Driven Between Refuelings All OEMs

Gen1Gen2 Gen1

10

elin

gs

Gen2After 2009Q4 Refuelings1 = 18941

Median distance between refuelings = 56 Miles Gen2 Refuelings1 = 6870 Median distance between refuelings = 81 Miles +45 improvement

enta

ge o

f Ref

ue

Refuelings after 2009Q41 = 3185 Median distance between refuelings = 91 Miles

+63 improvement

5

Perc

e

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

Distance between refuelings [Miles]2

ldquowindow-stickerrdquo range

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 11 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_80

1 Some refueling events are not detectedreported due to data noise or incompleteness2 Distance driven between refuelings is indicative of driver behavior and does not represent the full range of the vehicle

Created Sep-07-10 916 AM

gfrom adjusted dyno

tests is 196-254 miles

Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles

Cumulative Vehicle Miles All OEMs Gen 1 and Gen 2Through 2010 Q2

2872533

2 000 0002250000 2500000 2750000 3000000

eled

1 000 0001250000 1500000 1750000 2000000

le M

iles

Trav

250000 500000 750000

1000000

Vehi

cl

-

NREL CDP24

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 12 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Created Sep-07-10 1010 AMNREL CDP24

Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed

Tank Levels DOE Fleet

Through 2009Q4

Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 42 Total refuelings1 = 27113Total refuelings1 = 3196Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 48

After 2009Q414 13

FE

1 Some refueling events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness2 The outer arc is set at 20 total refuelings

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 13 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_40

g3 If tank level at fill was not available a complete fill up was assumed

Created Sep-02-10 1247 PM

Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Average

Driving by Time of Day

12Total Driving3 Events = 295222 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 853

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 77 1

g

9

12 of NHTS trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 815

Through 2009Q4

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 771

39

After 2009Q4NHTS

7

61 Driving trips between 6 AM amp 6 PM

2 The outer arc is set at 12 total Driving

3 Some events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness

AM PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day trips ASCII S htt ht l d l d ht l2001

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 14 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_44Created Sep-02-10 1248 PM

ASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg

25Driving by Day of Week

Through 2009Q4After 2009Q4NHTS

g

20

NHTS

15

Trip

s in

a D

ay

10

o

f T

S M T W d Th F i S t0

5

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Sun Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri SatDayNREL cdp_fcev_45

Created Sep-01-10 152 PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day tripsASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

Learning Demo Next Steps

C tl l i J l D b 2010 d tbull Currently analyzing July ndash December 2010 databull Spring 2011 CDPs published in March presented at DOE AMR in

Maybull Publish one or two more Learning Demo CDP sets after thatbull Begin receiving fueling data from Burbank station and others

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

Gen 1

Gen 2(CHIP)

bull Partners scheduled to provide data through September 2011

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 16 Innovation for Our Energy Future

bull Participating in many other demonstration and pre-commercial activities outside of this project

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesGM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiativey g

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 17 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesDaimler ndash F-CELL World Drive

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 18 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 7: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)

SF Bay Area Detroit Area

10

20

25

ons

Cumulative Stations

Continuing Outside of ProjectRetired StationsCurrent Project Stations 10

55

9

0

5

10

15

Num

ber o

f Sta

tio

9

5

3

C

Reporting PeriodNREL CDP31Created Aug-24-10 405pm

5656

DC to New YorkLos Angeles Area

6Legend

C t P j t

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 7 Innovation for Our Energy FutureFeb-3-2011

615 Current ProjectContinuing OutsideOther

Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analysis Used for Cost Evaluationy

Vehicle Performance Metrics Gen 1 Vehicle Gen 2 Vehicle 2009 Target

Fuel Cell Stack Durability 2000 hours

Max Team Projected Hours to 10 Voltage Degradation 1807 hours 2521 hours

Average Fuel Cell Durability Projection 821 hours 1062 hoursMax Hours of Operation 2375 h 1261 hp

by a Single FC Stack to Date 2375 hours 1261 hours

Driving Range 103-190 miles 196-254 miles 250 miles

Fuel Economy (Window Sticker) 42 ndash 57 mikg 43 ndash 58 mikg no target

Fuel Cell Efficiency at frac14 Power 51 - 58 53 - 59 60

Fuel Cell Efficiency at Full Power 30 - 54 42 - 53 50

Infrastructure Performance Metrics 2009 Targetg

H2 Cost at Station (early market)On-site natural gas

reformation$770 - $1030

On-site Electrolysis

$1000 - $1290$3gge

Average H Fueling Rate 0 77 kgmin 1 0 kgmin

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 8 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Average H2 Fueling Rate 077 kgmin 10 kgmin

Outside of this project DOE independent panels concluded at 500 replicate stationsyearDistributed natural gas reformation at 1500 kgday $275-$350kg (2006)

Distributed electrolysis at 1500kgday $490-$570 (2009)

Outside reviewpanel

What are the Most Recent Project ResultsDifferences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPsp g

80 Spring 2010 Results

bull Most comprehensive set we ever publishedbull Includes durability range fuel economy etc

16 Fall 2010 Results

bull No ldquonewrdquo CDPs but we updated 16 previously published CDPs with data from last 6 monthsbull Includes durability range fuel economy etc

bull Covers data from all 4 Learning Demo teams + CHIP project over 5 year period

bull Majority of these will now stay static serving as a historical record of Gen 1 amp Gen 2

published CDPs with data from last 6 monthsbull Results on most recent durability range fuel

economy not yet possible to publish until more data accumulated (in 2011)

bull Covers data from 2 Learning Demo OEMs + CHIP

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 9 Innovation for Our Energy Future

as a historical record of Gen 1 amp Gen 2 comparisons

gproject

bull Emphasized changes observed in last 6 months through use of gray (old) and colors (new)

Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14

1800

Histogram of Fueling RatesVehicle and Infrastructure

2006 MYPP Tech Val Milestone 2012 MYPP Tech Val MilestoneTh h 2009Q4

1200

1400

1600

ts 5 kg in

Through 2009Q4 After 2009Q4

Result of average H per

800

1000

1200

of F

uelin

g Ev

ent 5 kg in

5 minutes

25464 EventsAverage = 077 kgmin

23 gt1 kgmin

Result of average H2 per fill increasing 24 but average fueling time also increasing 28

25464 fills

400

600

800

Num

ber o

5 kg in3 minutes

1730 EventsAverage = 066 kgmin

3 gt1 kgmin

1730 fills

0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 1 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 20

200

400

g

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 10 Innovation for Our Energy Future

0 02 04 06 08 1 12 14 16 18 2Avg Fuel Rate (kgmin)NREL cdp_fcev_18

Created Sep-15-10 934 AM

Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses

Distance Driven Between Refuelings All OEMs

Gen1Gen2 Gen1

10

elin

gs

Gen2After 2009Q4 Refuelings1 = 18941

Median distance between refuelings = 56 Miles Gen2 Refuelings1 = 6870 Median distance between refuelings = 81 Miles +45 improvement

enta

ge o

f Ref

ue

Refuelings after 2009Q41 = 3185 Median distance between refuelings = 91 Miles

+63 improvement

5

Perc

e

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

Distance between refuelings [Miles]2

ldquowindow-stickerrdquo range

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 11 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_80

1 Some refueling events are not detectedreported due to data noise or incompleteness2 Distance driven between refuelings is indicative of driver behavior and does not represent the full range of the vehicle

Created Sep-07-10 916 AM

gfrom adjusted dyno

tests is 196-254 miles

Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles

Cumulative Vehicle Miles All OEMs Gen 1 and Gen 2Through 2010 Q2

2872533

2 000 0002250000 2500000 2750000 3000000

eled

1 000 0001250000 1500000 1750000 2000000

le M

iles

Trav

250000 500000 750000

1000000

Vehi

cl

-

NREL CDP24

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 12 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Created Sep-07-10 1010 AMNREL CDP24

Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed

Tank Levels DOE Fleet

Through 2009Q4

Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 42 Total refuelings1 = 27113Total refuelings1 = 3196Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 48

After 2009Q414 13

FE

1 Some refueling events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness2 The outer arc is set at 20 total refuelings

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 13 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_40

g3 If tank level at fill was not available a complete fill up was assumed

Created Sep-02-10 1247 PM

Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Average

Driving by Time of Day

12Total Driving3 Events = 295222 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 853

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 77 1

g

9

12 of NHTS trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 815

Through 2009Q4

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 771

39

After 2009Q4NHTS

7

61 Driving trips between 6 AM amp 6 PM

2 The outer arc is set at 12 total Driving

3 Some events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness

AM PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day trips ASCII S htt ht l d l d ht l2001

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 14 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_44Created Sep-02-10 1248 PM

ASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg

25Driving by Day of Week

Through 2009Q4After 2009Q4NHTS

g

20

NHTS

15

Trip

s in

a D

ay

10

o

f T

S M T W d Th F i S t0

5

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Sun Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri SatDayNREL cdp_fcev_45

Created Sep-01-10 152 PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day tripsASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

Learning Demo Next Steps

C tl l i J l D b 2010 d tbull Currently analyzing July ndash December 2010 databull Spring 2011 CDPs published in March presented at DOE AMR in

Maybull Publish one or two more Learning Demo CDP sets after thatbull Begin receiving fueling data from Burbank station and others

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

Gen 1

Gen 2(CHIP)

bull Partners scheduled to provide data through September 2011

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 16 Innovation for Our Energy Future

bull Participating in many other demonstration and pre-commercial activities outside of this project

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesGM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiativey g

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 17 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesDaimler ndash F-CELL World Drive

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 18 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 8: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analysis Used for Cost Evaluationy

Vehicle Performance Metrics Gen 1 Vehicle Gen 2 Vehicle 2009 Target

Fuel Cell Stack Durability 2000 hours

Max Team Projected Hours to 10 Voltage Degradation 1807 hours 2521 hours

Average Fuel Cell Durability Projection 821 hours 1062 hoursMax Hours of Operation 2375 h 1261 hp

by a Single FC Stack to Date 2375 hours 1261 hours

Driving Range 103-190 miles 196-254 miles 250 miles

Fuel Economy (Window Sticker) 42 ndash 57 mikg 43 ndash 58 mikg no target

Fuel Cell Efficiency at frac14 Power 51 - 58 53 - 59 60

Fuel Cell Efficiency at Full Power 30 - 54 42 - 53 50

Infrastructure Performance Metrics 2009 Targetg

H2 Cost at Station (early market)On-site natural gas

reformation$770 - $1030

On-site Electrolysis

$1000 - $1290$3gge

Average H Fueling Rate 0 77 kgmin 1 0 kgmin

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 8 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Average H2 Fueling Rate 077 kgmin 10 kgmin

Outside of this project DOE independent panels concluded at 500 replicate stationsyearDistributed natural gas reformation at 1500 kgday $275-$350kg (2006)

Distributed electrolysis at 1500kgday $490-$570 (2009)

Outside reviewpanel

What are the Most Recent Project ResultsDifferences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPsp g

80 Spring 2010 Results

bull Most comprehensive set we ever publishedbull Includes durability range fuel economy etc

16 Fall 2010 Results

bull No ldquonewrdquo CDPs but we updated 16 previously published CDPs with data from last 6 monthsbull Includes durability range fuel economy etc

bull Covers data from all 4 Learning Demo teams + CHIP project over 5 year period

bull Majority of these will now stay static serving as a historical record of Gen 1 amp Gen 2

published CDPs with data from last 6 monthsbull Results on most recent durability range fuel

economy not yet possible to publish until more data accumulated (in 2011)

bull Covers data from 2 Learning Demo OEMs + CHIP

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 9 Innovation for Our Energy Future

as a historical record of Gen 1 amp Gen 2 comparisons

gproject

bull Emphasized changes observed in last 6 months through use of gray (old) and colors (new)

Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14

1800

Histogram of Fueling RatesVehicle and Infrastructure

2006 MYPP Tech Val Milestone 2012 MYPP Tech Val MilestoneTh h 2009Q4

1200

1400

1600

ts 5 kg in

Through 2009Q4 After 2009Q4

Result of average H per

800

1000

1200

of F

uelin

g Ev

ent 5 kg in

5 minutes

25464 EventsAverage = 077 kgmin

23 gt1 kgmin

Result of average H2 per fill increasing 24 but average fueling time also increasing 28

25464 fills

400

600

800

Num

ber o

5 kg in3 minutes

1730 EventsAverage = 066 kgmin

3 gt1 kgmin

1730 fills

0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 1 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 20

200

400

g

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 10 Innovation for Our Energy Future

0 02 04 06 08 1 12 14 16 18 2Avg Fuel Rate (kgmin)NREL cdp_fcev_18

Created Sep-15-10 934 AM

Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses

Distance Driven Between Refuelings All OEMs

Gen1Gen2 Gen1

10

elin

gs

Gen2After 2009Q4 Refuelings1 = 18941

Median distance between refuelings = 56 Miles Gen2 Refuelings1 = 6870 Median distance between refuelings = 81 Miles +45 improvement

enta

ge o

f Ref

ue

Refuelings after 2009Q41 = 3185 Median distance between refuelings = 91 Miles

+63 improvement

5

Perc

e

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

Distance between refuelings [Miles]2

ldquowindow-stickerrdquo range

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 11 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_80

1 Some refueling events are not detectedreported due to data noise or incompleteness2 Distance driven between refuelings is indicative of driver behavior and does not represent the full range of the vehicle

Created Sep-07-10 916 AM

gfrom adjusted dyno

tests is 196-254 miles

Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles

Cumulative Vehicle Miles All OEMs Gen 1 and Gen 2Through 2010 Q2

2872533

2 000 0002250000 2500000 2750000 3000000

eled

1 000 0001250000 1500000 1750000 2000000

le M

iles

Trav

250000 500000 750000

1000000

Vehi

cl

-

NREL CDP24

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 12 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Created Sep-07-10 1010 AMNREL CDP24

Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed

Tank Levels DOE Fleet

Through 2009Q4

Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 42 Total refuelings1 = 27113Total refuelings1 = 3196Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 48

After 2009Q414 13

FE

1 Some refueling events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness2 The outer arc is set at 20 total refuelings

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 13 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_40

g3 If tank level at fill was not available a complete fill up was assumed

Created Sep-02-10 1247 PM

Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Average

Driving by Time of Day

12Total Driving3 Events = 295222 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 853

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 77 1

g

9

12 of NHTS trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 815

Through 2009Q4

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 771

39

After 2009Q4NHTS

7

61 Driving trips between 6 AM amp 6 PM

2 The outer arc is set at 12 total Driving

3 Some events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness

AM PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day trips ASCII S htt ht l d l d ht l2001

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 14 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_44Created Sep-02-10 1248 PM

ASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg

25Driving by Day of Week

Through 2009Q4After 2009Q4NHTS

g

20

NHTS

15

Trip

s in

a D

ay

10

o

f T

S M T W d Th F i S t0

5

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Sun Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri SatDayNREL cdp_fcev_45

Created Sep-01-10 152 PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day tripsASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

Learning Demo Next Steps

C tl l i J l D b 2010 d tbull Currently analyzing July ndash December 2010 databull Spring 2011 CDPs published in March presented at DOE AMR in

Maybull Publish one or two more Learning Demo CDP sets after thatbull Begin receiving fueling data from Burbank station and others

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

Gen 1

Gen 2(CHIP)

bull Partners scheduled to provide data through September 2011

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 16 Innovation for Our Energy Future

bull Participating in many other demonstration and pre-commercial activities outside of this project

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesGM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiativey g

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 17 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesDaimler ndash F-CELL World Drive

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 18 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 9: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

What are the Most Recent Project ResultsDifferences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPsp g

80 Spring 2010 Results

bull Most comprehensive set we ever publishedbull Includes durability range fuel economy etc

16 Fall 2010 Results

bull No ldquonewrdquo CDPs but we updated 16 previously published CDPs with data from last 6 monthsbull Includes durability range fuel economy etc

bull Covers data from all 4 Learning Demo teams + CHIP project over 5 year period

bull Majority of these will now stay static serving as a historical record of Gen 1 amp Gen 2

published CDPs with data from last 6 monthsbull Results on most recent durability range fuel

economy not yet possible to publish until more data accumulated (in 2011)

bull Covers data from 2 Learning Demo OEMs + CHIP

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 9 Innovation for Our Energy Future

as a historical record of Gen 1 amp Gen 2 comparisons

gproject

bull Emphasized changes observed in last 6 months through use of gray (old) and colors (new)

Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14

1800

Histogram of Fueling RatesVehicle and Infrastructure

2006 MYPP Tech Val Milestone 2012 MYPP Tech Val MilestoneTh h 2009Q4

1200

1400

1600

ts 5 kg in

Through 2009Q4 After 2009Q4

Result of average H per

800

1000

1200

of F

uelin

g Ev

ent 5 kg in

5 minutes

25464 EventsAverage = 077 kgmin

23 gt1 kgmin

Result of average H2 per fill increasing 24 but average fueling time also increasing 28

25464 fills

400

600

800

Num

ber o

5 kg in3 minutes

1730 EventsAverage = 066 kgmin

3 gt1 kgmin

1730 fills

0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 1 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 20

200

400

g

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 10 Innovation for Our Energy Future

0 02 04 06 08 1 12 14 16 18 2Avg Fuel Rate (kgmin)NREL cdp_fcev_18

Created Sep-15-10 934 AM

Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses

Distance Driven Between Refuelings All OEMs

Gen1Gen2 Gen1

10

elin

gs

Gen2After 2009Q4 Refuelings1 = 18941

Median distance between refuelings = 56 Miles Gen2 Refuelings1 = 6870 Median distance between refuelings = 81 Miles +45 improvement

enta

ge o

f Ref

ue

Refuelings after 2009Q41 = 3185 Median distance between refuelings = 91 Miles

+63 improvement

5

Perc

e

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

Distance between refuelings [Miles]2

ldquowindow-stickerrdquo range

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 11 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_80

1 Some refueling events are not detectedreported due to data noise or incompleteness2 Distance driven between refuelings is indicative of driver behavior and does not represent the full range of the vehicle

Created Sep-07-10 916 AM

gfrom adjusted dyno

tests is 196-254 miles

Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles

Cumulative Vehicle Miles All OEMs Gen 1 and Gen 2Through 2010 Q2

2872533

2 000 0002250000 2500000 2750000 3000000

eled

1 000 0001250000 1500000 1750000 2000000

le M

iles

Trav

250000 500000 750000

1000000

Vehi

cl

-

NREL CDP24

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 12 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Created Sep-07-10 1010 AMNREL CDP24

Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed

Tank Levels DOE Fleet

Through 2009Q4

Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 42 Total refuelings1 = 27113Total refuelings1 = 3196Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 48

After 2009Q414 13

FE

1 Some refueling events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness2 The outer arc is set at 20 total refuelings

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 13 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_40

g3 If tank level at fill was not available a complete fill up was assumed

Created Sep-02-10 1247 PM

Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Average

Driving by Time of Day

12Total Driving3 Events = 295222 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 853

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 77 1

g

9

12 of NHTS trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 815

Through 2009Q4

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 771

39

After 2009Q4NHTS

7

61 Driving trips between 6 AM amp 6 PM

2 The outer arc is set at 12 total Driving

3 Some events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness

AM PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day trips ASCII S htt ht l d l d ht l2001

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 14 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_44Created Sep-02-10 1248 PM

ASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg

25Driving by Day of Week

Through 2009Q4After 2009Q4NHTS

g

20

NHTS

15

Trip

s in

a D

ay

10

o

f T

S M T W d Th F i S t0

5

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Sun Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri SatDayNREL cdp_fcev_45

Created Sep-01-10 152 PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day tripsASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

Learning Demo Next Steps

C tl l i J l D b 2010 d tbull Currently analyzing July ndash December 2010 databull Spring 2011 CDPs published in March presented at DOE AMR in

Maybull Publish one or two more Learning Demo CDP sets after thatbull Begin receiving fueling data from Burbank station and others

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

Gen 1

Gen 2(CHIP)

bull Partners scheduled to provide data through September 2011

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 16 Innovation for Our Energy Future

bull Participating in many other demonstration and pre-commercial activities outside of this project

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesGM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiativey g

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 17 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesDaimler ndash F-CELL World Drive

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 18 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 10: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14

1800

Histogram of Fueling RatesVehicle and Infrastructure

2006 MYPP Tech Val Milestone 2012 MYPP Tech Val MilestoneTh h 2009Q4

1200

1400

1600

ts 5 kg in

Through 2009Q4 After 2009Q4

Result of average H per

800

1000

1200

of F

uelin

g Ev

ent 5 kg in

5 minutes

25464 EventsAverage = 077 kgmin

23 gt1 kgmin

Result of average H2 per fill increasing 24 but average fueling time also increasing 28

25464 fills

400

600

800

Num

ber o

5 kg in3 minutes

1730 EventsAverage = 066 kgmin

3 gt1 kgmin

1730 fills

0 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 1 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 20

200

400

g

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 10 Innovation for Our Energy Future

0 02 04 06 08 1 12 14 16 18 2Avg Fuel Rate (kgmin)NREL cdp_fcev_18

Created Sep-15-10 934 AM

Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses

Distance Driven Between Refuelings All OEMs

Gen1Gen2 Gen1

10

elin

gs

Gen2After 2009Q4 Refuelings1 = 18941

Median distance between refuelings = 56 Miles Gen2 Refuelings1 = 6870 Median distance between refuelings = 81 Miles +45 improvement

enta

ge o

f Ref

ue

Refuelings after 2009Q41 = 3185 Median distance between refuelings = 91 Miles

+63 improvement

5

Perc

e

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

Distance between refuelings [Miles]2

ldquowindow-stickerrdquo range

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 11 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_80

1 Some refueling events are not detectedreported due to data noise or incompleteness2 Distance driven between refuelings is indicative of driver behavior and does not represent the full range of the vehicle

Created Sep-07-10 916 AM

gfrom adjusted dyno

tests is 196-254 miles

Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles

Cumulative Vehicle Miles All OEMs Gen 1 and Gen 2Through 2010 Q2

2872533

2 000 0002250000 2500000 2750000 3000000

eled

1 000 0001250000 1500000 1750000 2000000

le M

iles

Trav

250000 500000 750000

1000000

Vehi

cl

-

NREL CDP24

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 12 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Created Sep-07-10 1010 AMNREL CDP24

Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed

Tank Levels DOE Fleet

Through 2009Q4

Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 42 Total refuelings1 = 27113Total refuelings1 = 3196Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 48

After 2009Q414 13

FE

1 Some refueling events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness2 The outer arc is set at 20 total refuelings

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 13 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_40

g3 If tank level at fill was not available a complete fill up was assumed

Created Sep-02-10 1247 PM

Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Average

Driving by Time of Day

12Total Driving3 Events = 295222 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 853

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 77 1

g

9

12 of NHTS trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 815

Through 2009Q4

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 771

39

After 2009Q4NHTS

7

61 Driving trips between 6 AM amp 6 PM

2 The outer arc is set at 12 total Driving

3 Some events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness

AM PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day trips ASCII S htt ht l d l d ht l2001

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 14 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_44Created Sep-02-10 1248 PM

ASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg

25Driving by Day of Week

Through 2009Q4After 2009Q4NHTS

g

20

NHTS

15

Trip

s in

a D

ay

10

o

f T

S M T W d Th F i S t0

5

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Sun Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri SatDayNREL cdp_fcev_45

Created Sep-01-10 152 PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day tripsASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

Learning Demo Next Steps

C tl l i J l D b 2010 d tbull Currently analyzing July ndash December 2010 databull Spring 2011 CDPs published in March presented at DOE AMR in

Maybull Publish one or two more Learning Demo CDP sets after thatbull Begin receiving fueling data from Burbank station and others

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

Gen 1

Gen 2(CHIP)

bull Partners scheduled to provide data through September 2011

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 16 Innovation for Our Energy Future

bull Participating in many other demonstration and pre-commercial activities outside of this project

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesGM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiativey g

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 17 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesDaimler ndash F-CELL World Drive

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 18 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 11: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses

Distance Driven Between Refuelings All OEMs

Gen1Gen2 Gen1

10

elin

gs

Gen2After 2009Q4 Refuelings1 = 18941

Median distance between refuelings = 56 Miles Gen2 Refuelings1 = 6870 Median distance between refuelings = 81 Miles +45 improvement

enta

ge o

f Ref

ue

Refuelings after 2009Q41 = 3185 Median distance between refuelings = 91 Miles

+63 improvement

5

Perc

e

0 50 100 150 200 250 3000

Distance between refuelings [Miles]2

ldquowindow-stickerrdquo range

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 11 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_80

1 Some refueling events are not detectedreported due to data noise or incompleteness2 Distance driven between refuelings is indicative of driver behavior and does not represent the full range of the vehicle

Created Sep-07-10 916 AM

gfrom adjusted dyno

tests is 196-254 miles

Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles

Cumulative Vehicle Miles All OEMs Gen 1 and Gen 2Through 2010 Q2

2872533

2 000 0002250000 2500000 2750000 3000000

eled

1 000 0001250000 1500000 1750000 2000000

le M

iles

Trav

250000 500000 750000

1000000

Vehi

cl

-

NREL CDP24

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 12 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Created Sep-07-10 1010 AMNREL CDP24

Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed

Tank Levels DOE Fleet

Through 2009Q4

Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 42 Total refuelings1 = 27113Total refuelings1 = 3196Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 48

After 2009Q414 13

FE

1 Some refueling events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness2 The outer arc is set at 20 total refuelings

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 13 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_40

g3 If tank level at fill was not available a complete fill up was assumed

Created Sep-02-10 1247 PM

Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Average

Driving by Time of Day

12Total Driving3 Events = 295222 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 853

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 77 1

g

9

12 of NHTS trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 815

Through 2009Q4

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 771

39

After 2009Q4NHTS

7

61 Driving trips between 6 AM amp 6 PM

2 The outer arc is set at 12 total Driving

3 Some events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness

AM PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day trips ASCII S htt ht l d l d ht l2001

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 14 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_44Created Sep-02-10 1248 PM

ASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg

25Driving by Day of Week

Through 2009Q4After 2009Q4NHTS

g

20

NHTS

15

Trip

s in

a D

ay

10

o

f T

S M T W d Th F i S t0

5

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Sun Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri SatDayNREL cdp_fcev_45

Created Sep-01-10 152 PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day tripsASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

Learning Demo Next Steps

C tl l i J l D b 2010 d tbull Currently analyzing July ndash December 2010 databull Spring 2011 CDPs published in March presented at DOE AMR in

Maybull Publish one or two more Learning Demo CDP sets after thatbull Begin receiving fueling data from Burbank station and others

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

Gen 1

Gen 2(CHIP)

bull Partners scheduled to provide data through September 2011

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 16 Innovation for Our Energy Future

bull Participating in many other demonstration and pre-commercial activities outside of this project

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesGM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiativey g

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 17 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesDaimler ndash F-CELL World Drive

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 18 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 12: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles

Cumulative Vehicle Miles All OEMs Gen 1 and Gen 2Through 2010 Q2

2872533

2 000 0002250000 2500000 2750000 3000000

eled

1 000 0001250000 1500000 1750000 2000000

le M

iles

Trav

250000 500000 750000

1000000

Vehi

cl

-

NREL CDP24

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 12 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Created Sep-07-10 1010 AMNREL CDP24

Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed

Tank Levels DOE Fleet

Through 2009Q4

Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 42 Total refuelings1 = 27113Total refuelings1 = 3196Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 48

After 2009Q414 13

FE

1 Some refueling events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness2 The outer arc is set at 20 total refuelings

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 13 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_40

g3 If tank level at fill was not available a complete fill up was assumed

Created Sep-02-10 1247 PM

Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Average

Driving by Time of Day

12Total Driving3 Events = 295222 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 853

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 77 1

g

9

12 of NHTS trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 815

Through 2009Q4

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 771

39

After 2009Q4NHTS

7

61 Driving trips between 6 AM amp 6 PM

2 The outer arc is set at 12 total Driving

3 Some events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness

AM PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day trips ASCII S htt ht l d l d ht l2001

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 14 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_44Created Sep-02-10 1248 PM

ASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg

25Driving by Day of Week

Through 2009Q4After 2009Q4NHTS

g

20

NHTS

15

Trip

s in

a D

ay

10

o

f T

S M T W d Th F i S t0

5

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Sun Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri SatDayNREL cdp_fcev_45

Created Sep-01-10 152 PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day tripsASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

Learning Demo Next Steps

C tl l i J l D b 2010 d tbull Currently analyzing July ndash December 2010 databull Spring 2011 CDPs published in March presented at DOE AMR in

Maybull Publish one or two more Learning Demo CDP sets after thatbull Begin receiving fueling data from Burbank station and others

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

Gen 1

Gen 2(CHIP)

bull Partners scheduled to provide data through September 2011

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 16 Innovation for Our Energy Future

bull Participating in many other demonstration and pre-commercial activities outside of this project

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesGM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiativey g

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 17 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesDaimler ndash F-CELL World Drive

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 18 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 13: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed

Tank Levels DOE Fleet

Through 2009Q4

Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 42 Total refuelings1 = 27113Total refuelings1 = 3196Median Tank Level (At Fill) = 48

After 2009Q414 13

FE

1 Some refueling events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness2 The outer arc is set at 20 total refuelings

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 13 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_40

g3 If tank level at fill was not available a complete fill up was assumed

Created Sep-02-10 1247 PM

Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Average

Driving by Time of Day

12Total Driving3 Events = 295222 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 853

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 77 1

g

9

12 of NHTS trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 815

Through 2009Q4

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 771

39

After 2009Q4NHTS

7

61 Driving trips between 6 AM amp 6 PM

2 The outer arc is set at 12 total Driving

3 Some events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness

AM PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day trips ASCII S htt ht l d l d ht l2001

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 14 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_44Created Sep-02-10 1248 PM

ASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg

25Driving by Day of Week

Through 2009Q4After 2009Q4NHTS

g

20

NHTS

15

Trip

s in

a D

ay

10

o

f T

S M T W d Th F i S t0

5

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Sun Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri SatDayNREL cdp_fcev_45

Created Sep-01-10 152 PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day tripsASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

Learning Demo Next Steps

C tl l i J l D b 2010 d tbull Currently analyzing July ndash December 2010 databull Spring 2011 CDPs published in March presented at DOE AMR in

Maybull Publish one or two more Learning Demo CDP sets after thatbull Begin receiving fueling data from Burbank station and others

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

Gen 1

Gen 2(CHIP)

bull Partners scheduled to provide data through September 2011

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 16 Innovation for Our Energy Future

bull Participating in many other demonstration and pre-commercial activities outside of this project

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesGM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiativey g

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 17 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesDaimler ndash F-CELL World Drive

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 18 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 14: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Average

Driving by Time of Day

12Total Driving3 Events = 295222 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 853

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 77 1

g

9

12 of NHTS trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 815

Through 2009Q4

Total Drive3 Events = 10646 of driving trips bt 6 AM amp 6 PM 771

39

After 2009Q4NHTS

7

61 Driving trips between 6 AM amp 6 PM

2 The outer arc is set at 12 total Driving

3 Some events not recordeddetected due to data noise or incompleteness

AM PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day trips ASCII S htt ht l d l d ht l2001

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 14 Innovation for Our Energy Future

NREL cdp_fcev_44Created Sep-02-10 1248 PM

ASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg

25Driving by Day of Week

Through 2009Q4After 2009Q4NHTS

g

20

NHTS

15

Trip

s in

a D

ay

10

o

f T

S M T W d Th F i S t0

5

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Sun Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri SatDayNREL cdp_fcev_45

Created Sep-01-10 152 PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day tripsASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

Learning Demo Next Steps

C tl l i J l D b 2010 d tbull Currently analyzing July ndash December 2010 databull Spring 2011 CDPs published in March presented at DOE AMR in

Maybull Publish one or two more Learning Demo CDP sets after thatbull Begin receiving fueling data from Burbank station and others

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

Gen 1

Gen 2(CHIP)

bull Partners scheduled to provide data through September 2011

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 16 Innovation for Our Energy Future

bull Participating in many other demonstration and pre-commercial activities outside of this project

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesGM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiativey g

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 17 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesDaimler ndash F-CELL World Drive

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 18 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 15: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg

25Driving by Day of Week

Through 2009Q4After 2009Q4NHTS

g

20

NHTS

15

Trip

s in

a D

ay

10

o

f T

S M T W d Th F i S t0

5

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 15 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Sun Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri SatDayNREL cdp_fcev_45

Created Sep-01-10 152 PM

2001 NHTS Data Includes Car Truck Van amp SUV day tripsASCIIcsv Source httpnhtsornlgovdownloadshtml2001

Learning Demo Next Steps

C tl l i J l D b 2010 d tbull Currently analyzing July ndash December 2010 databull Spring 2011 CDPs published in March presented at DOE AMR in

Maybull Publish one or two more Learning Demo CDP sets after thatbull Begin receiving fueling data from Burbank station and others

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

Gen 1

Gen 2(CHIP)

bull Partners scheduled to provide data through September 2011

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 16 Innovation for Our Energy Future

bull Participating in many other demonstration and pre-commercial activities outside of this project

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesGM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiativey g

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 17 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesDaimler ndash F-CELL World Drive

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 18 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 16: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Learning Demo Next Steps

C tl l i J l D b 2010 d tbull Currently analyzing July ndash December 2010 databull Spring 2011 CDPs published in March presented at DOE AMR in

Maybull Publish one or two more Learning Demo CDP sets after thatbull Begin receiving fueling data from Burbank station and others

Gen 1

Gen 2Gen 2

Gen 1

Gen 2(CHIP)

bull Partners scheduled to provide data through September 2011

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 16 Innovation for Our Energy Future

bull Participating in many other demonstration and pre-commercial activities outside of this project

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesGM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiativey g

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 17 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesDaimler ndash F-CELL World Drive

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 18 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 17: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesGM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiativey g

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 17 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesDaimler ndash F-CELL World Drive

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 18 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 18: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesDaimler ndash F-CELL World Drive

Gen 1

Gen 2

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 18 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 19: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Update on Continuing Partner ActivitiesAir Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CAg

bull 11 H2 station awards announced by CEC in Oct 8 new stations 3 upgrades

(CHIP)

Air Products planning 8 stations 7 new 1 upgrade ndash all in Southern CA

Linde planning 3 stations 1 new 2 upgrades( )

Southern CA (9) Northern CA (2)

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 19 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Data from APCUCI from bothStations to come to NREL

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 20: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Summary

bull Project has completed ~6 years of validationbull Vehicle operation 114 000 hours 2 87 million milesVehicle operation 114000 hours 287 million miles

436000 tripsbull H2 station operation 134000 kg produced or dispensed

27000 fuelingsbull DOE Key Technical Targets Met FC Durability and Rangebull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainderbull Data reporting and analysis continues through remainder

of this yearbull New CA fueling stations planned for inclusion in future g p

NREL infrastructure analysis as they come online and provide data

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 20 Innovation for Our Energy Future

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion
Page 21: Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project · Some refueling events are not detected/reported due to data noise or incompleteness. 2. ... • Participating in many other

Questions and Discussion

P j t C t t K ith Wi k N ti l R bl E L bProject Contact Keith Wipke National Renewable Energy Lab3032754451 keithwipke nrelgov

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available

National Renewable Energy Laboratory 21 Innovation for Our Energy Future

All public Learning Demo papers and presentations are available online at httpwwwnrelgovhydrogenproj_tech_validationhtml

  • Next Steps for the FCEV Learning Demonstration Project
  • Outline
  • Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Learning Demo Projject Objjectives Relevance and Targgets
  • Two Teams Concluded Their Projects in 2009 Three are Continuingg through 2011
  • Vehicle Status All 350 bar Vehicles Retired Only 700 bar Vehicles Continuingg
  • Fueling Station Status Stations that Continue to Operate are Mostly Delivered Compressed Hydrogen
  • Out of 24 Project Stations 15 Are Still Operational (23 outside of DOE project)
  • Project Achieved Both Technical Goals Outside Analyysis Used for Cost Evaluation
  • What are the Most Recent Project Results Differences Between Spring amp Fall 2010 CDPs
  • Changes in Refueling Rate Trends Average Refueling Rate Decreased 14
  • Real-World Driving Range Between Refuelings Continues to Improve as Demonstration Progresses
  • Rate of Mileage Accumulation Has Decreased in the Last Year But Vehicles Still Added 550000 Miles
  • Based on Limited Number of Fuelings in Last 6 Months Higher Level of Tank at Refueling Observed
  • Driving Behavior (Timing) in Last 6 Months Much More Similar to National Averagge
  • More Weekend Driving Observed in Last Six Months ndash Still Much Less than National Avg
  • Learning Demo Next Steps
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities GM ndash LOU for Hawaii Hydrogen Initiative
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Daimler ndash F-CELL World Drive
  • Update on Continuing Partner Activities Air Products ndash 8 Stations through CEC in CA
  • Summary
  • Questions and Discussion