Upload
exaxe-ltd
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The 2015 June print edition of TechLife is now available online. TechLife is published every quarter and is filled with news, opinion pieces, white papers and information on legislative changes within the life and pensions industry in the UK and abroad.
Citation preview
TechLifeA L i f e & Pe n s i o n s I n d u s t r y
N e w s l e t t e r.
J u n e 2 0 1 5intelligent solutions for life & pensions
1www.exaxe.com
Exaxe, the specialist solutions provider for the life and
pensions industry, has announced that UK based Police
Mutual Assurance Society has selected Exaxe’s Admin
Plus and Illustrate Plus solutions as its new policy
administration platform. The renewable �ve year
licence agreement marks the fourth licence sale for
Exaxe over the past twelve months and is further
evidence of the growing demand for its software
solutions.
The multi-million pound agreement will allow Police
Mutual, to consolidate multiple lines of business on a
single modern technology. Admin Plus and Illustrate
Plus will enable Police Mutual to improve service levels,
accelerate business innovation and reduce the lead
time for introducing new products. The solutions will
support all aspects of the policy lifecycle from new
business, policy servicing, and right through to claim
processing. Admin Plus will also allow Police Mutual to
tailor products for di�erent a�nity groups and achieve
industry-leading levels of self-su�ciency.
Illustrate Plus will allow Police Mutual to provide
web-enabled quotations and illustrations direct to
consumers on a self-service basis. The Product
Development Application, within Illustrate Plus, will
Police Mutual Assurance Society selects Exaxe’s Admin Plus and Illustrate Plus solutions as its policy administration platform
give Police Mutual the self-su�ciency that its
competitors aspire to achieve.
David Loughenbury, CIO of Police Mutual commented,
“Police Mutual continues to invest in new solutions to
better bene�t our members. We chose Exaxe for the
quality of its technology, together with its business
expertise. We do not have any shareholders, and this
allows us to focus purely on what our members want,
such as using a ‘digital by default’ frame of mind when
servicing their needs. By implementing Admin Plus and
Illustrate Plus, we can provide a higher quality service to
our members through tailored products and quicker
response times. We look forward to working with the
Exaxe team”.
Philip Naughton, Exaxe’s Executive Business Develop-
ment Director added, “We are delighted to sign this deal
with a customer focused business like Police Mutual
Assurance Society. Admin Plus and Illustrate Plus will
allow Police Mutual to launch its new products quickly
and e�ciently giving it a distinct advantage over its
competitors. The new modern platform will also position
Police Mutual to meet the challenges of a rapidly
changing market, both in terms of �nancial services and
the means of delivery.”
IN THIS ISSUE
Police Mutual Assurance Society selects Exaxe’s solutions as its policy administration platform
2015 UK Budget expands pension freedom strategy
Technological transformation in the protection world
AXA Life Invest goes live with second Exaxe software solution Channel Plus
Exaxe appoints Head of Operations
Whose data is it anyway?
What lies ahead – The UK life and pensions landscape in 2020
2015 UK Budget expands pension freedom strategy // John Keegan – Head of Proposition Delivery – Exaxe
It’s di�cult to understand what the current
government’s policy to deal with the ageing UK
population is supposed to be. For most of the nineties
and the noughties, international bodies were warning
all governments that the increasing longevity of the
population in the developed world was going to create
a huge problem for OECD countries by the middle of
the 21st century. Governments were warned that their
economies would not be able to withstand the
pressure of coping with an ever-increasing proportion
of their populations being retirees. In response, all
sides of the political spectrum in the UK recognised the
severity of the issue and began to focus on how to
manage the problem.
Increasing the state retirement age and re-organising
the basic state pension were obvious changes and
have been pushed through. However, these were only
partial solutions to the problem and there was general
agreement amongst all parties that, if a crisis was to be
avoided, then the onus must be put on workers
themselves to provide more for their own retirement.
Hence the introduction of auto-enrolment, defaulting
employees into pension schemes so that the vast
majority of the workers in the country would have
private savings to supplement their state pension. The
primary aims of introducing fairness, simplicity and
above all, personal responsibility were covered by the
new reforms.
Since then, the Coalition has embarked on a series of
changes in the long-term savings and investments area
which seem to contradict the previous strategy. Faced
with a lot of complaints about the poor value of
annuities, the Coalition decided against reforming the
market and instead opted to abolish the need for
people to purchase them at all, thereby removing the
very ‘insurance against longevity’ that was needed to
ensure the strain put on public �nances by an ageing
population would not become over-whelming. Thus,
driven by a populist approach predicated on the
principle that people know best how to manage their
own money, the at-retirement market was opened up
to allow people full access to their pension savings.
They ignored the commensurate risk that retirees
would squander those savings in the early years of
their retirement and revert to dependence upon the
state in their later years, the very years when earning
would become di�cult if not impossible for health
reasons.
That was the big surprise in the 2014 budget, primed
with its e�ect due to come into force just six weeks
before the next general election. Now in 2015, the
government has carried out another couple of
manoeuvres which appear to operate directly against
the overall policy of ensuring that people take more
responsibility for providing for their own old-age.
The �rst move is to allow existing annuitants to trade in
their annuities for a lump sum to a third party,
essentially creating a market of second-hand annuities.
The need to see how exactly this market emerges has
restricted comment from the media and industry on
the approach but it is certain that there is a big risk for
annuitants who decide to realise their current income
as a lump sum. Given increasing longevity the decision
whether to surrender one’s annuity for a cash lump
sum is obviously a di�cult one and one which most
individuals are not particularly well equipped to make.
Obviously, the would-be purchaser will not buy the
annuity without a reasonable estimation that the
annuitant will live for long enough for the money
outlaid to be recouped and to make a su�cient margin
on it. As such, that means that from the original pot, a
slice has been taken by the original life provider that
manufactured the product as well as possibly an
adviser who advised on the deal. Now that identical
pot will naturally have a further slice taken from it by
the second hand annuity purchaser and possibly a slice
will also go to an adviser, if one was used to e�ect the
arrangement. It’s hard to see how the annuitant can
ultimately be the winner in all of this, except in those
rare tragic cases where the need for a lump sum is so
overwhelming that it trumps all other needs. However
the lure of instant cash lump sums may trump
long-sightedness, especially with the general
anti-annuity prejudice that is prevalent throughout the
�nancial press.
The other big move in this year’s budget, that was a bit
lost behind the headline-grabbing abolition of tax on
savings interest, was the lowering of the Life Time
Allowance (LTA) for pensions; the LTA being the total
amount that one is allowed accumulate across one’s
lifetime for pension purposes. Of course, some limit is
needed to prevent pensions being misused by the
ultra-high net worth individuals. But a limit of £1million
is far too low to allow people to provide themselves
with a decent income in retirement, given that the
average pensioner can expect to live for 20 years after
�nishing work.
The motivation behind this was hard to fathom. When
LTA’s were originally introduced in 2006, the limit was
£1.5 million and we were assured that it would rise over
the next 5 years to a limit of £2 million. The idea was to
encourage saving by allowing people to amass
signi�cant savings for their old age, without allowing
the system to be abused by the super-rich. As such, it
was reasonable for people to defer current pleasures in
the knowledge that they were building a comfortable
future for themselves.
Unfortunately, when people took the government at
their word, the result was a savings pile that has
appeared too lucrative for the politicians to resist
tapping into when they are struggling to balance their
budget. As a result, the lowering of the Life Time
Allowance has become a regular budget event. It is a
speci�cally bad move for those saving in De�ned
Contribution schemes as an LTA of £1million would
penalise anyone trying to save for a pension of over
£25,000 per annum – a relatively modest sum.
Continued on page 3...
“We chose Exaxe for the quality of its technology, together with its business expertise.”
David Loughenbury, CIO, Police Mutual
Now in 2015, the government has carried out another couple of manoeuvres which appear to operate directly against the overall policy of ensuring that
people take more responsibility for providing for their own old-age.
intelligent solutions for life & pensions
2
This article was originally commissioned and
published in the February 2015 edition of the
Investment Life & Pensions Moneyfacts
publication.
Tom Murray explores the impact of emerging
technologies on the protection market.
I have been working my way through the TV series
‘House’ over the last few months, courtesy of Net�ix,
and I have been struck by the similarity between the
di�culties faced by the diagnostic team in the
programme and those faced by underwriting teams in
the life assurance industry.
“Everybody lies” is one of the catch-phrases of Hugh
Laurie playing the misanthropic Dr. House; as a head
of the department of Diagnostic Medicine in the
series, his primary di�culty in getting to the true
diagnosis of the patient’s condition is the inability to
get the patient to tell the truth. In order to get the key
facts to make the diagnosis, one of his key rules is to
meet or talk to the patient as rarely as possible, as the
patient’s lies are liable to drive the diagnostic process
down the wrong track. Instead, his team breaks into
the patient’s apartment or workplace, or hacks
computer records to �nd out the patient’s lifestyle and
family medical history, which they need to work out
what is wrong with the patient.
The exact same issue is one of the key di�culties
faced in the protection world. Getting disclosure from
the applicant for a protection policy, in order to
underwrite it correctly, has always been problematic.
The truth is out there, but it can be hard to get it from
applicants at proposal stage.
I don’t mean by this that fraud is rampant among
customers of protection products. Far from it! Many
of those who fail to disclose matters material to an
assessment of their health believe themselves to be
completely honest; it’s just that they either don’t know
enough accurate family medical history, or else they
are essentially blocking bad news from their own
minds. Overlooking or oversimplifying of medical
conditions is an inherent human trait to avoid
depressing news and focus only on the positive. Thus,
frequently unbeknownst to themselves, the customer
gives an overly positive view of their health and that
of their ancestors.
This situation has got somewhat worse over the last
30 years. Increasing labour force mobility means that
more people are migrating from country to country,
and therefore have a great deal less knowledge about
their extended family than heretofore.
As a result, life companies have had to price their
products against the fact that full disclosures are not
always made and the incomplete nature of the
disclosure is not always discovered in time to prevent
a pay-out. Curiously enough, incomplete disclosure is
always on the negative side - practically nobody fails
to disclose positive news that will reduce the cost of
their insurance. Although medical examinations are
routinely carried out, they don’t necessarily give the
complete picture as many medical issues rely on the
symptoms and facts as described by the customer.
The only safe approach for life companies is to build a
margin of safety into the rates, an ‘optimism factor’ if
you like, which ultimately increases the cost that the
customer has to pay.
Advances in DNA Science
In a better world, we would have accurate medical
information for underwriting departments to base
their assessments upon. This would be fairer to both
life companies and their clients. And this is where the
huge advances in science, and in particular in
technology, is set to transform the whole underwrit-
ing area.
Incredible leaps forward have been made in the
science of DNA over recent decades. Access to this
information would dramatically improve the ability of
underwriters to individually underwrite to a new,
hitherto unforeseen, level. Genetic disorders are a
signi�cant factor in assessing the likelihood of an
individual acquiring a life-expectancy altering
condition later in life. Currently the industry is
primarily reliant on family histories answered by the
client, but access to DNA testing would signi�cantly
improve the life company’s ‘hard’ knowledge of the
customer without having to rely on the customer
themselves. The trouble is that DNA testing has, up to
recently, been a highly specialised and expensive
process.
Advances in technology are making it far easier to test
for these disorders and it won’t be long before the
majority of tests can be carried out on simple
machines in doctor’s surgeries and clinics, rather than
in high-tech specialist labs. This will mean that it will
be far easier to get a full and accurate report on the
likelihood of genetic diseases manifesting themselves
from a source that can’t lie – the customer’s own body.
As the cost of these tests is reduced by technology, it
will become cost e�cient to carry them out on all
applicants, rather than just on those who are applying
for extremely large insurance amounts.
This increased knowledge will make it easier to re�ne
the pool and therefore to provide cheaper underwrit-
ing to the healthy clients, and to load those who are
genetically pre-disposed to the type of conditions
that will a�ect their mortality. We can expect the
ever-increasing pace of DNA research to reveal a lot
more as time goes on, and technology will make this
information available to life companies.
Lifestyle choices
Another key factor in underwriting individuals is their
lifestyle choices. Given the increasing obesity issues
being experienced by most developed countries, the
underwriter is likely to need a good deal of speci�c
information regarding the lifestyle of the applicant.
Information gathered on this subject is either via a
questionnaire or through questioning by the doctor
Technological transformation in the protection world // Tom Murray – Head of Product Strategy – Exaxe
during a medical examination, and therefore, the
accuracy of the information is completely dependent
upon the accuracy of the descriptions given by the
individual. The trouble here, of course, is that we all
tend to fool ourselves about how much we eat, how
much exercise we take, how much sleep we get etc.
And here again technology can provide the answer.
The advent of wearable technology at an a�ordable
level means that it is possible to gather and monitor
information about the prospective customer’s activity
levels, including their sleeping patterns, pupil dilation,
blood-pressure, and heart rate during their day to day
activities. This constant monitoring of vital signs will
give the level of accuracy that will allow near-perfect
assessment of the individual’s state of health, which
will bring the life companies’ ability to �ne-tune and
personalise risk pro�les to a level previously
unimagined.
Wearable technologies allow far more accurate
assessments of an individual’s health and, in particular,
their lifestyle. Apps are available that allow people to
record their diet during the day, giving de�nitive
answers to the questions, and probably quite a shock
to many individuals. Remember, an iPhone 5 has a
CPU that is 1,270 times faster than the Apollo 11
guidance computer than landed the spacecraft on the
moon. Technology such as Google Glass (version 2.0 is
now being worked on) will almost certainly increase
the amount of personal information that can be
gathered by apps without requiring signi�cant e�ort
by the person wearing them.
Analyse this!
Of course the volume of data that can now be
gathered will also play a big part in increasing the
accuracy of underwriting if it is possible to analyse it
correctly. This is where recent advances in technology
will also help. The ability to churn through ‘Big Data,’
as it is referred to, has made huge strides. The
increasing power of technology now makes it feasible
to quickly process vast volumes of data, establishing
patterns that could never be discovered by more
manual means.
This makes it possible and cost e�ective to get highly
�nessed views on the e�ects of people’s lifestyles and
genetic disposition on the longevity of the individuals
concerned, and on their likelihood to contract certain
diseases and conditions, a key factor for the
assessment of critical illness policies, for example. In
other consumer markets, use of technology is
providing consumers with highly individualised
experiences, and the ability to rapidly crunch big data
and to get highly detailed information on the
customer is going to become a key factor for life
assurance companies as, they try to provide the same
level of personalised customer experience in their
market.
Safety �rst
There is one area that could cause this to become a
problem, however. The perennial issue for life
companies is the amount of highly-personalised data
they hold. Given the previously discussed approach of
using wearable technology to get even more
information about the customer, you can see why
there would be fears that the information would be
leaked. After all, some of this information the
customer was even hiding from him or herself, and
certainly he or she would want assurance that the
information will not become widely available.
Therefore a key concern is the ability of companies to
keep this volume of highly personalised data secure.
To get people to give this kind of information, it is
necessary to be able to assure them that the data is
safe and will not be leaked or misused. Here
technological advances in data protection will make it
easier, as huge amounts of money are currently being
ploughed into the area of data security. The fact that
it is a key issue for governments as well is reassuring
as this means that funds will constantly be made
available for research in this area.
Despite the media trumpeting of occasional security
failures, trust is nevertheless growing rapidly in data
security. Just a decade ago, most people were
extremely wary about using their own credit card
details online, and yet now a huge proportion of the
world uses the internet to shop and are quite
comfortable using their �nancial information online in
order to do so. According to Statista.Com, the
amount of shopping carried out online in the USA for
Christmas 2014 was 45% of the total holiday spend.
This makes it easier to see a future where people will
not be wary of sharing that level of personal medical
information with life companies, giving us a protec-
tion market that is better value and more customis-
able than ever before.
Technology is changing our tomorrow
It is possible for people to be wrong. Even the
incredibly astute and clever Dr House can get it
wrong; “it’s not lupus – it’s never lupus” …until it
actually was lupus in the eighth episode of the fourth
series. However, the availability of such a huge
amount of detailed and personalised data, and the
ability to process it rapidly, means that far more
accurate predictions of future health and longevity are
possible for underwriters, which will usher in a new
era of heightened accuracy and personalisation in the
protection market.
T: +353 (0) 1 2999100 E: [email protected] W: www.exaxe.com : @ExaxeTransform your businessand contact us today!
government �nds it too di�cult to resist tweaking
pension and long term savings regulations to please
the public then perhaps it could be an area reserved
for the Upper House, in any future constitutional
changes.
Given that the House of Lords is generally less partisan
than the House of Commons and is immune from the
pressures that arise from the need to get re-elected,
taking the long-term savings policies out of the remit
of the day-to-day policy making of the government
would give the opportunity for a more far-sighted and
consistent policy to be put in place. This policy could
be cross-party and therefore less vulnerable to the
changing winds that blow across the political arena
when elections are in the o�ng and a policy that
would therefore provide the stability that people need
when it comes to long-term planning.
Without a solution, the contradictions inherent in our
approach will completely undermine our response to
the longevity issue raised by the OECD, and govern-
ments in the mid-century will wonder why we
squandered such an opportunity to provide a
sustainable solution to the good ‘problem’ we have of
people living longer.
intelligent solutions for life & pensions
3www.exaxe.com
Further to the recent announcement that AXA Life
Invest has successfully gone live with Exaxe’s Illustrate
Plus solution, Exaxe is delighted to announce that AXA
Life Invest has now successfully gone live with
Channel Plus, Exaxe’s agency managed, commissions
calculation and payment solution.
Channel Plus is a web-based, automated solution that
supports agency and compensation management for
the life, pensions and wealth management sectors
across all distribution channels. The implementation
of Channel Plus will enable AXA Life Invest to unify its
entire agency and �nancial advisers’ administration
services onto a single platform, yielding operational
e�ciencies and providing an improved service to all
its distributors.
Philip Naughton, Executive Director Business
Development at Exaxe, commented “As a worldwide
leader in innovative guaranteed unit linked products,
AXA Life Invest needed a best of breed approach. Today, it has been able to leverage Exaxe’s capability
and expertise into the core of its systems, and
therefore keep it at the forefront of the market”.
Tom Lane, Head of IT at AXA Life Invest, commented
“AXA Life Invest experienced some challenges with
respect to the management of commissions and fees
paid to its partners and approached Exaxe to provide
an enterprise solution for the management of fees
and commission going forward. In a few short months
our relationship with Exaxe has developed and we are
pleased to have taken this next step with them.”
“Exaxe is delighted that both Channel Plus and
Illustrate Plus software solutions have gone live with
AXA Life Invest. Our solutions allow our customers to
respond to a dynamic market place with the speed
and e�ciency necessary to become market leaders.”
Philip Naughton continued.
“We are delighted to have signed this second contract
with AXA Life Invest. It highlights our long term vision
we share and is representative of the strong
relationship we have built.”
AXA Life Invest goes live with second Exaxe software solution Channel Plus // Sharon McGuire – Marketing Manager – Exaxe
Continued from page 1...
Some of these changes are arguably positive moves
for a subset of retirees. But the cumulative e�ect of so
many changes is undeniably bad. It has meant that
the pension policy area has been one of the most
unstable policy areas over the lifetime of this
government and this instability is anathema to good
long-term �nancial planning.
Whilst the government was formed with a policy of
‘nudging’ to encourage people to do the right thing,
the nudges are now positively contradictory. On the
one-hand, auto-enrolment is pushing people into the
idea of saving and making them consider the need to
provide for themselves in their old age. On the other
hand, the constant trumpeting of the new ‘freedoms’
to take your money as a lump sum at retirement is
nudging people towards rewarding themselves with
big spending at the end of their working career and
stopping them from thinking about the need to
husband their resources over a much longer period.
The result is becoming chaotic. The public are being
told that they are being ripped o� by the �nancial
services sector by government, regulators and the
�nancial press. Without planning it, this is
encouraging a more consumerist outlook on �nances
than was hitherto imagined. For all the failings of the
annuity providers, they did provide the security
against longevity that is so treasured by the relatively
silent group of consumers who have outlived the
average lifetime of their peers.
Even �nancial advisers are �nding it di�cult to decide
what to advise people to do when the landscape
keeps changing so dramatically; today’s good advice
is rapidly becoming tomorrow’s poor advice with the
attendant risk of being perceived as having coerced
people into doing the wrong thing with their money.
Every move by the government to ‘free’ people from
the chains of �nancial products that pay out for the
duration of their lifespan directly undermines the
goals of making them take responsibility for their own
future by auto-enrolling them into �nancial savings
products.
We have ended up with a contradictory mess; a
pantomime in which the life and pension providers
are being cast as the bad guys whom the pensioner
needs to be protected from. The end result of this can
only be to encourage more and more people to realise
their savings as a lump sum, despite the tax penalties
in doing so. As a result, a lot more people will have run
“In a few short months our relationship with Exaxe has developed and we are pleased to have taken this next step with them.”
Tom Lane, Head of IT, AXA Life Invest
2015 UK Budget expands pension freedom strategy // John Keegan – Head of Proposition Delivery – Exaxe
through their savings at quite an early stage in their
retirement; this e�ect will be compounded by the fact
that survey after survey shows that the average
person consistently and substantially underestimates
their own individual longevity.
If the government keeps tweaking the rules and
regulations around taxation, savings and investments
then it supports an idea of short-term thinking when
it comes to �nances. This is the very last thing we
should be giving the increasing lifespan of the
population and the shrinking workforce, which will be
left trying to support them. Perhaps this is just a
temporary move given that the last two budgets were
focused on the election and the nudging of people to
save across their working life and to use those savings
to provide for themselves throughout their retirement
will resume. Unfortunately, even if that is the case, it
would mean that a new raft of rules and regulations
are planned for early in the new government’s term
which would destabilise the ability to plan even
further.
What is needed is a return to a more bi-partisan
approach to pensions and long-term savings and to
take the area completely out of the political arena,
which by is nature is ‘short-termist’. If the
Exaxe appoints Ian Dornan as Head of Operations // Sharon McGuire – Marketing Manager – Exaxe
Exaxe is delighted to announce the appointment of
Ian Dornan as its new head of operations. The move
coincides with the company’s recent announcements
of new long-term contracts signed with Police Mutual
and AXA Life Invest. Ian has been brought on board to
continue driving this growth by further developing
the company’s software development and client
delivery capabilities.
Norman Carroll, chief executive o�cer at Exaxe says:
“Ian joins us with over 18 years’ experience in a variety
of IT operational management roles, 14 of those years
speci�cally within the �nancial services sector with
extensive experience in software development,
hardware and communications.”
“Ian joined Exaxe in January 2015 with his main
objectives to assist the Board with general business
operations and to assume responsibility for internal
product development, client implementation and
post implementation support as the business
continues to grow and expand.”
Norman Carroll continues:
“Our appointment of Ian coincides nicely with our
recent client wins. We are particularly delighted with
this growth in sales and the opportunity to create new
jobs in the current economic climate. It proves that
there is always an appetite for innovative business
solutions especially where they have a proven track
record of being cost e�ective and delivering
signi�cant business e�ciencies. We are also currently
hiring business analysts, .Net developers and software
test engineers.”
Ian Dornan, Head of Operations at Exaxe, commented:
“I am happy to have joined Exaxe at such an exciting
time for the company. It has given me a great
opportunity to hit the ground running. I look forward
to building relationships with Exaxe’s new and existing
clients and to working with the Exaxe team.” Ian Dornan, Head of Operations at Exaxe.
intelligent solutions for life & pensions
by the one who merely stores it.
Perhaps the problem stems from the sidelining of data
during the system purchase process. The purchasing
decision always seems to focus on the business
processes of selling or administering the policies
involved and never about the need to have full,
unrestricted access to all the data about one’s own
customers. And yet, without this freedom of access,
full analysis of the information is almost impossible.
No matter how �exible the interface appears to be,
the fact that the database information, and how it is
stored, is kept a secret by many systems providers
inhibits the freedom of thought and action that is the
key driver of discovery for those who are tasked with
assessing trends of past and current consumption and
who need to predict the future.
Big data is not just a current fad. It is the future of
retailing and predicting future needs and all industries
require the ability to utilise the data they have to
ensure they stay competitive in the rapidly changing
markets in which they are operating. Life and pension
companies are no exception to this rule.
Future purchases of information technology solutions
should weigh very heavily on the ability to access the
company’s own data. It does not belong to the
solution provider so the fact that so many of them
retain control of access to this information is
completely unacceptable and is likely to hobble the
life company performance in the market. To be able
to service your customers properly, you should
purchase from technology providers who allow full
access to the customer data and the rules under which
it is held. It’s your data; make sure that no one else is
blocking your access to it.
There is a lot of talk about the e�ect of big data on
the world of product retailing and how it is going to
transform the whole sector. Mass retailers, such as
supermarkets, are to the forefront of this charge
expending massive amounts of time and money to
analyse the data of their customers; tracking their
purchases via loyalty schemes in an e�ort to get and
retain customers and to make them spend more. Even
smaller businesses are working hard to understand
and track the spending habits of their customers in
order to �nesse their o�ering to them.
The same e�ort is required in the �nancial services
sector. Unlike many businesses, the nature of the life
and pensions industry means that we are in posses-
sion of a huge amount of data about our customers;
perhaps not as much as the big supermarkets but a
substantial amount nonetheless. This gives us the
opportunity to mine that data to understand our
customers better.
The nature of the consumer market for �nancial
products is changing swiftly; increasing longevity is
leading to huge changes in the pensions sector, but it
is also dramatically altering the needs of consumers in
the life sector. Protection, critical illness, long-term
care, equity release; these are all areas that are seeing
signi�cant transformation as the nature of people’s
working and retirement lives change. With the needs
of the public altering so rapidly, it is vital for the
industry to respond just as rapidly if it is to be in a
position to ful�l those needs.
As the supermarkets and the online industries have
shown, monitoring the movements in the buying
habits of their consumer base is key to understanding
the needs of their customers and to predicting what
those needs will be in the future. In the past,
customer-driven product development has not been
the area where the life and pensions sector has
particularly sparkled, but it is certainly where it needs
to be focusing in the future if it is not to lose market
share to new entrants with a more customer-focused
ethos. Trying to remain relevant to the customer in a
market that is being opened up by deregulation is
di�cult enough, not to mention being in a market
where the growth in lifespan is completely changing
the requirements of the end-consumer.
It is, therefore, vital to be in a position to access all of
your data and to mine and manipulate it in many ways
to try to derive information, patterns and theories
from it. A key part of being in a position to do so is
having access to the data itself. Yet here we can
frequently come up against a major problem. For
many life and pension companies, the process of
accessing their own information is through
management information and business information
provided by their systems supplier, which frequently
have an extremely limited interface.
Some technology providers can feel that the
underlying data structure is part of their IP, and are
reluctant to allow the purchasing life and pension
companies to have a full understanding of it, for fear
that they may replicate the system by building their
own version. Some even retain control by
providing a black box solution where there is no
access to anything other than pre-de�ned GUIs and
Interfaces. This is very limiting for the life and pension
company who purchases the system, as it e�ectively
means that their own data on their customers is being
fed out to them in a manner de�ned by the solution
provider. This is truly a case of the cart leading the
horse, as the owner of the data is being constrained
Whose data is it anyway? // Tom Murray – Head of Product Strategy – Exaxe
www.exaxe.com
Future purchases of information technology solutions should weigh very heavily on the ability to access the company’s own data.
4 T: +353 (0) 1 2999100 E: [email protected] W: www.exaxe.com : @ExaxeTransform your businessand contact us today!
What lies ahead – The UK life and pensions landscape in 2020 // Norman Carroll – Chief Executive Officer – Exaxe
While I don’t claim to have 20/20 vision, I do have a
view of what the UK’s life and pensions landscape will
be like in 2020, and it is one that will be hugely
di�erent from the one we see today.
The changes introduced in recent years have
transformed the game completely. They will take some
time to bed in but their e�ects will be dramatic,
particularly the e�ects of the Retail Distribution
Review, the reforms in the at-retirement space and the
introduction of auto-enrolment. For instance,
auto-enrolment will introduce millions of people to the
use of �nancial products for saving and will thereby
provide great opportunities for cross-selling of other
�nancial products.
We are living in a highly brand conscious age and this
expanded consumer market will be looking for the
type of protection that can only be provided by big
brands. Meanwhile, the deregulation of pensions will
lead to the demand for niche products for the more
�nancially savvy investor. In response, I expect new
entrants will appear from other markets; big brands
that have the trust and engagement to market
e�ectively to brand conscious consumers, and niche
players that will seek to capitalise on the sophisticated
investor’s new freedoms for at-retirement investment. I
predict many joint-ventures between these new
entrants and existing market players, to provide the
product knowledge and management needed for
white-labelling by the brand leaders, and also to
provide the day to day product administration needed
by the niche entrants.
I also foresee that consumers will expect the kind of
multi-platform service that is becoming prevalent
today in so many other industries. An ability to allow
consumers to manage their own investments and carry
out transactions from smartphones and tablets will be
a sine qua non of life and pension services in the next
decade and existing providers are ideally placed to
provide these interfaces to the customer, enabling
the consumers to see their complete �nancial portfolio
– income, investments and protection – in one
place.
Holistic views will become more important as
customers demand individual views of their own
�nancial situation, as they seek to plan for their
retirement, long-term care and estate planning needs.
This will require a level of individual underwriting that
life and pension providers can provide using the
smarter technologies that are emerging, including
wearable technologies. The ability to underwrite at an
individual level due to advances in the science of DNA
will come to the fore in a world where medical science
is increasing the lifespan of the population at a rate
that would have been seen as unbelievable just two
decades ago.
The life and pensions organisation looking to thrive in
the customer-centric market of 2020 needs to increase
its use of technology to provide individualised product
matching to individual customer needs. Life and
pension companies have been through a lot of change
over the past 5 years, and this rate of change is only
going to accelerate. It is an exciting time for the
industry and for all of us involved in it.
Life and pension companies have been through a lot of change over the past 5 years, and this rate of change is only going to accelerate.