19
12/3/2020 1 ©2020 MFMER | slide-1 ©2020 MFMER | slide-1 New Therapies for Hemophilia: Options and Assays Rajiv K. Pruthi, M.B.B.S. Consultant I Associate Professor of Medicine Director, Mayo Comprehensive Hemophilia Center Co-Director, Special Coagulation and Molecular Hematopathology Laboratories, Chair, Coagulation Diseases Oriented Group (Hematology) Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN A Case-based Workshop: Clinical and Laboratory Aspects of Hemophilia and Thrombosis Dec 4 th , 2020 [email protected] ©2020 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research | slide-1 ©2020 MFMER | slide-2 ©2020 MFMER | slide-2 Relevant Financial Relationship(s) Consulting honoraria (advisory boards): CSL Behring; Genentech Inc; Bayer Healthcare AG; HEMA biologics; Instrumentation Laboratories. Off Label Usage: Most products mentioned are FDA approved. Selected ones are not FDA approved. DISCLOSURES

New Therapies for Hemophilia: Options and Assays...Factor VIII Activity at 14 Days in the Two Dose Groups. 40 20 10 5 3 1 100 10 1 rFVIII Mean Plasma FVIII:C BIVV001 (IU/dl) Percent

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 12/3/2020

    1

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-1©2020 MFMER | slide-1

    New Therapies for Hemophilia: Options and AssaysRajiv K. Pruthi, M.B.B.S.Consultant I Associate Professor of MedicineDirector, Mayo Comprehensive Hemophilia Center Co-Director, Special Coagulation and Molecular Hematopathology Laboratories, Chair, Coagulation Diseases Oriented Group (Hematology)Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

    A Case-based Workshop: Clinical and Laboratory Aspects of Hemophilia and Thrombosis Dec 4th, [email protected]

    ©2020 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research | slide-1

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-2©2020 MFMER | slide-2

    Relevant Financial Relationship(s)

    • Consulting honoraria (advisory boards): • CSL Behring; Genentech Inc; Bayer Healthcare

    AG; HEMA biologics; Instrumentation Laboratories.

    Off Label Usage:

    • Most products mentioned are FDA approved.

    • Selected ones are not FDA approved.

    DISCLOSURES

  • 12/3/2020

    2

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-3©2020 MFMER | slide-3

    LEARNING OBJECTIVE

    Overview of evolution of options for therapy for bleeding disorders

    Currently available options for management of hemophilia

    Impact on hemophilia centers and coagulation laboratories

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-4

    Illustrative case• A 12 month old male was evaluated for prolonged epistaxis

    • Family history: no known bleeding disorders

    • Laboratory data:• Complete blood count: normal (normal platelet count)• PT: normal• aPTT: prolonged (corrects on 1:1 mixing study with normal pooled

    plasma)• Factor assays: FVIII:C:

  • 12/3/2020

    3

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-5

    • 1900 to 1940s: Whole blood

    • 1950-60s: Plasma

    • Mid-1960s: cryoprecipitate

    • Late 1960s: plasma derived (pd) factor VIII

    • Mid 1980s: purified/viral inactivation process

    • 1990s: recombinant FVIII & FIX

    • Early 2000s: pdVWF and Initial (ongoing) gene

    • therapy trials

    • 2014: extended half life (t ½ ) factors

    • 2015: recombinant VWF

    • 2017: Non-factor therapeutic options• FDA approved:emicizumab• Clinical trials:

    • Fitusiran, concizumab, • BAY 1093884, PF-06741086

    Laboratory Assays:FVIII/FIX:One stage assay (OSA)VWF functional assay:Ristocetin cofactor assay

    Advances: • Chromogenic factor assays

    • Alternate VWF functional assays

    Evolution of Therapies for Hemophilia

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-6

    Goals in management of bleeding disorders

    • Prophylaxis:• Reduction in annualized bleeding rate (ABR)

    • Preservation of joints over long term• Reduce frequency of infusion

    • Treatment of bleeds:• Effective with minimal infusions• Reduction of recurrent bleeds

    • Individualized pharmacokinetics• Reliable factor assays

    • Options: factor concentrates, non-factor concentrates, Gene therapy

  • 12/3/2020

    4

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-7

    Major advance: extended half life concentrates

    • Fusion of factor VIII and IX molecule with linkers that extend half-life

    • Fc Fusion• Fragment crystallizable (Fc) domain of human immunoglobulin

    • Pegylation• Polyethylene glycol (PEG) polymers • Variable pegylation and location on molecule

    • Albumin fusion

    • Disadvantage of FVIII extended half-life products• Relies on FVIII binding to VWF

    • Emerging FVIII molecule: BIVV001 (rFVIIIFc-VWF-XTEN• rFVIII fused to dimeric Fc, D’D3 domain of VWF, two XTEN polypeptides • ‘Uncouples’ FVIII reliance on VWF half life

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-8

    100

    0Time (hours)

    10

    1

    rFVIIIrFVIIIFc

    FVIII

    :C (I

    U/d

    L)

    3%

    1%20 40 60 80 100 120

    Mahlangu et al Blood 2014

    Extended t ½ FVIII and FIX

    rFIXrFIXFc

    0Time (hours)

    FIX:

    C(IU

    /dL)

    3%

    1%

    100

    10

    060 120 180 240 300

    Powell et al NEJM 2014

  • 12/3/2020

    5

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-9

    Critical review of long t ½ FVIII products

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

    0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

    AUC ratio (mean and 90% CI)

    AUC ratio (mean and 95% CI)

    rFVIII product/Study

    BAX 855/ NCT01736475BAY 94-9027/NCT01184820, high dose

    BAY 81-8973/NCT01029340

    rFVIII-SingleChain/NCT01486927

    Human-cl rhFVIII/NCT00989196

    rFVIIIFc/NCT01181128

    N8-GP/NCT01205724

    2.17

    1.44

    1.19

    1.35

    0.98

    1.69

    1.49

    Reproduced from Mahalangu et al Haemophilia 2018; 24:348

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-10

    Factor VIII Activity at 14 Days in the Two Dose Groups.

    40

    20

    10

    5

    3

    1

    100

    10

    1

    rFVIII

    BIVV001

    Mea

    n Pl

    asm

    a FV

    III:C

    (IU/d

    l)

    Perc

    ent P

    lasm

    a FV

    III:C

    Act

    ivity

    Days after infusion

    Dose: 65 IU/kg

    Reproduced from Konkle BA et al. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1018-1027

    1412107543210

  • 12/3/2020

    6

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-11

    Illustrative case

    •A 12 month old severe hemophila:•Subcutaneous port placed•Started regular IV dosing of extended half life•One year later, port had to be removed due to infection

    •Parents are asking about alternatives•Poor peripheral IV access•Are there subcutaneous medications options

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-12©2020 MFMER | slide-12

    EmicizumabBispecific antibodyAdministered subcutaneously (once weekly, once every two weeks or once a month)

  • 12/3/2020

    7

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-13Oldenberg J et al. NEJM 2017; 377(9):809-18

    FVIII inhibitor

    Thrombingeneration

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-14

    Emicizumab in hemophila A patients without inhibitors

    05

    101520253035404550

    Annualized Bleeding Rates

    Emicizumab weeklyEmicizumab q2 weeksNo prophylaxis

    2.41.6 – 3.9

    2.61.6 – 4.3

    47.628.5 – 79.6

    Mahlangu, J et al N Engl J Med 2018; 379:811-822

  • 12/3/2020

    8

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-15

    Study Study population Dosing Efficacy SafetyHAVEN1 HA with inhibitors

    (n=109)LD: 3 mg/kg/wkk x 4 MD: 1.5 mg/kg/wk

    Prophy vs no prophy87% reduction in ABR

    TMA:3Thromb: 2

    HAVEN2 Pediatric HA with inhibitors (n=60)

    LD: 3 mg/kg/wk x 4 MD: 1.5 mg/kg/wk; 3 mg/kg every 2wk; 6 mg/kg every 4wk

    Prophy vs no prophy99% reduction in ABR

    No thromb

    HAVEN3 HA without inhibitors(n=152)

    LD: 3 mg/kg/wk x 4 MD: 1.5 mg/kg/wk; 3 mg/kg every 2wk;

    Episodic therapy vs Prophy96 & 97% reduction in ABR

    No major safety issues

    HAVEN4 HA without inhibitors(n=48)

    LD: 3 mg/kg/wk x 4 MD: 6 mg/kg every 4wk

    Similar to HAVEN 1,2,3

    No major safety issues

    |3146613-15

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-16

    Non-factor therapies: FDA approval

    Drug Hemophilia A with inhibitors

    Hemophilia A with NO inhibitor

    Potential diseasetarget

    Enhancing Procoagulant cascadeEmcizumab Yes Yes Hemophilia ASuppressing anticoagulant cascadeConcizumab No No Hemophilia A&BFitusiran No No Hemophilia A&B

  • 12/3/2020

    9

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-17CP1106730-1

    Factor IXa

    Thrombin (IIa)

    Factor IX

    Ca2+

    Factor XCa2+ PL

    Factor VIIIFactor Xa

    Factor XIaFactor XI

    Surface

    Thrombin

    Intrinsic Pathway

    Factor VIIaTissue factor

    Ca2+

    Ca2+

    Factor IX

    Factor VIITissue factor

    Factor XaThrombinFactor VIIaFactor IXa

    Extrinsic Pathway

    Vascular injury

    Tissue factor

    Factor VII

    Factor X

    Factor Xa

    Factor V

    Fibrinogen Fibrin

    Fibrin (cross-linked)

    Factor XIII

    Factor XIIIa

    Ca2+Fibrin

    Actions of Protein C, S and Antithrombin

    Ca2+ PL

    Factor Va

    Protein CProtein S

    Factor VIIIaCa2+ PL

    Antithrombin

    Prothrombin (II)

    Tissue factorPathway inhibitor

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-18

    Role of TFPI: prevent generation of Xa

    TFPI

    TFPI: tissue factor pathway inhibitor

    VIIa X

    TF

    Phospholipd

    VIIa XTF

  • 12/3/2020

    10

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-19

    Concizumab: mechanism of action

    TFPI

    TFPI: tissue factor pathway inhibitor; TF: tissue factor

    anti-TFPI (concizumab)VIIa X

    TF Xa

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-20

    Concizumab: Phase I study

    3146613-20Eicher, H et al JTH 2018; 16: 2184

    First dose Last dose

    1000

    100

    10

    10 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

    0.8 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg0.25 mg/kg

    Con

    cizu

    mab

    in p

    lasm

    a(n

    g/m

    L

    Time (days)

    Placebo-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

    020406080

    100120

    Time (days)

    First dose Last dose

    Unb

    ound

    TFP

    I(n

    g/m

    L

    Placebo0.25 mg/kg 0.5 mg/kg

    0.8 mg/kgConcizumab dose

  • 12/3/2020

    11

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-21

    RNA translation to protein: action of fitusiran

    3146613-21

    fitusiran

    tRNA

    tRNAtRNA

    tRNA

    aminoacid

    aminoacid

    aminoacid

    aminoacid

    mRNAribosome

    tRNA bound to amino acidEmpty tRNA

    Growing peptide chain

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-22

    Relationship between Antithrombin Level and Thrombin Generation.

    Pasi KJ et al. N Engl J Med ;377:819-828

    Peak

    thro

    mbi

    n le

    vel (

    nM)

    Antithrombin level (%)0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

    250

    200

    150

    100

    50

    0

    Hemophilia AHemophilia BNormal

    Pasi KJ et al. N Engl J Med ;377:819-828

  • 12/3/2020

    12

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-23

    Assays to monitor emerging agents

    •Fitusiran: measurement of antithrombin levels•TFPI inhibitors: TFPI levels•Emerging assays:

    •Global assays •thrombin generation•thromboelastography

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-24Reproduced from: Pasi KJ et al. N Engl J Med 2020;382:29-40

    FVIII

    act

    ivity

    IU/d

    LO

    ne s

    tage

    FVI

    IIC

    Median Factor VIII

    Levels:Yr 1: 88.6%Yr 2: 45.7%Yr 3: 29.8%

    Annu

    aliz

    ed

    Ble

    edin

    gRat

    e(e

    piso

    des/

    yr)

    Before infusion

    1 year 2 year 3 year

    After infusion

    Median16.5

    Mean 16.3

    15

    20

    5

    10

    00.9

    00.2

    0 00.7

    96% reduction in mean ABRNo of participants: 6

    360

    320

    280

    240

    200

    160

    120

    80

    40

    00 8 16 24 32 40 48 52 65 78 91 104

    7 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7Number of participants

    117 130 143 156

    Week

    AAV5-hFVIII-SQ Gene therapy for hemophilia A

  • 12/3/2020

    13

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-25

    Factor IX Activity after One Peripheral Infusion of SPK-9001 in the Participants Who Did Not Have an Adeno-Associated Viral Capsid-Directed Immune Response.

    Reproduced from George LA et al. N Engl J Med ;377:2215-2227

    0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 70 78

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    Week after vector infusion

    4 43

    12

    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    10

    32

    2

    48

    Participant number1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    60

    40

    20

    0

    1 yr pre-infusion Post-infusion

    Participants (n=10)

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-26

    Coagulation factor assays

    •One stage•Most commonly used

    •Chromogenic assays•Less used but increasingly common

  • 12/3/2020

    14

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-27

    Factors influencing one stage factor assays: contact activators, phospholipid & calibrators

    Activator Phospholipid (PL) Calibrators Instrumentation

    Ellagic acid basedSynthetic

    Plasma derived standards

    Mechanical methods

    Ellagic acid

    Polyphenolic acid (ellagicacid like) CephalinSilica based

    Colloidal silica SoyaChromogenic standards

    Optical methodsMicronized silica Vegetable/PlantSilica dioxide Bovine

    Concentrate specificstandardsSulfatides and silica Rabbit brain

    Kaolin Porcine and chicken

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-28

    3146613-28

  • 12/3/2020

    15

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-29

    Acceptable activators for EHL concentratesProduct OSA:silica OSA:ellagic CSA

    BAX 855 (Adynovate) √1 √ √rFVIII:Fc (Elocatate) √ √ √rFVIII:SC (Afstyla) √2 X √rFVIII;(N8-GP) √1 √ √rFVIII; (BAY 94-9027) √3 √ √rFIXFc (Alprolix)* √ √ √1r-FIX-FP (Idelvion)* √ X1 XN9-GP(Rebinyn)* X √ √1

    3146613-29

    1, exceptions; 2, multiply OSA result by 2; 3, unknown; * avoid kaolin based reagents; X, unacceptable

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-30

    Intrinsic Extrinsic

    VIIXII

    XIIX

    VIII

    XVII

    Fibrinogen

    aPTT PT

    Contact activator:+Ca +Phospholipid

    One stage FVIII assay

    Fibrin clotPatient plasma + FVIII deficient plasma

  • 12/3/2020

    16

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-31

    FVIII assay: role of the calibrator (native factor vs concentrate)

    3146613-31

    200

    100

    60

    40

    20

    5 10 20 30 50 100

    Calibrator

    FVIII Activity

    Clo

    tting

    tim

    e (s

    )

    Patient plasma

    Kitchen et al Quality in Lab Hemost & Thromb 2009

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-32

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    0 1 3 10 30 100

    300

    1000 1 10 10

    0

    APTT

    (s)

    Human FVIII deficient plasmaWith FVIII inhibitorsWithout FVIII inhibitors

    ACE910 (nM) rhFVIII U/dL

    Muto A. et al JTH 2014; 12:206

  • 12/3/2020

    17

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-33

    1000

    1200

    0 20 40 60 80 100 1200

    200

    400

    600

    800

    Emicizumab ug/mL

    One stage assay

    FVIII activity

    120

    100

    80

    60

    40

    20

    00 50 100 150 200

    Emicizumab ug/mL

    Chromogenic assay

    Human X & IXa

    Bovine X & IXa

    FVIII activity

    One stage assay and chromogenic assay with human substrate: false FVIII result in presence of emicizumab

    One stage assay and chromogenic assay with human substrateResults in a false FVIII result in presence of emicizumab

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-34

    Currently available options for management of hemophilia: Ever expanding

    •Standard half-life factor concentrates

    •Extended half-life concentrates•Non-factor based therapies•Modified factor concentrates and non-factor options impact laboratory testing

  • 12/3/2020

    18

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-35

    Impact on hemophilia centers and coagulation laboratories•HTCs: Knowing which reagents laboratories utilize•Laboratories: Knowing which product patient is on

    •There are acceptable and non-acceptable reagents for each product

    •Strategy to understand performance characteristics of reagents:

    •Field studies•Package inserts

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-36

    Implications for FVIII inhibitor Bethesda assay

    •Using one stage assays and chromogenic assays with human substrate

    •False negative or lower estimates of Bethesda titers•Performance of Bethesda assay using chromogenic FVIII assays with bovine substrates is required

    3146613-36

  • 12/3/2020

    19

    ©2020 MFMER | slide-37

    [email protected]