Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
12/3/2020
1
©2020 MFMER | slide-1©2020 MFMER | slide-1
New Therapies for Hemophilia: Options and AssaysRajiv K. Pruthi, M.B.B.S.Consultant I Associate Professor of MedicineDirector, Mayo Comprehensive Hemophilia Center Co-Director, Special Coagulation and Molecular Hematopathology Laboratories, Chair, Coagulation Diseases Oriented Group (Hematology)Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
A Case-based Workshop: Clinical and Laboratory Aspects of Hemophilia and Thrombosis Dec 4th, [email protected]
©2020 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research | slide-1
©2020 MFMER | slide-2©2020 MFMER | slide-2
Relevant Financial Relationship(s)
• Consulting honoraria (advisory boards): • CSL Behring; Genentech Inc; Bayer Healthcare
AG; HEMA biologics; Instrumentation Laboratories.
Off Label Usage:
• Most products mentioned are FDA approved.
• Selected ones are not FDA approved.
DISCLOSURES
12/3/2020
2
©2020 MFMER | slide-3©2020 MFMER | slide-3
LEARNING OBJECTIVE
Overview of evolution of options for therapy for bleeding disorders
Currently available options for management of hemophilia
Impact on hemophilia centers and coagulation laboratories
©2020 MFMER | slide-4
Illustrative case• A 12 month old male was evaluated for prolonged epistaxis
• Family history: no known bleeding disorders
• Laboratory data:• Complete blood count: normal (normal platelet count)• PT: normal• aPTT: prolonged (corrects on 1:1 mixing study with normal pooled
plasma)• Factor assays: FVIII:C:
12/3/2020
3
©2020 MFMER | slide-5
• 1900 to 1940s: Whole blood
• 1950-60s: Plasma
• Mid-1960s: cryoprecipitate
• Late 1960s: plasma derived (pd) factor VIII
• Mid 1980s: purified/viral inactivation process
• 1990s: recombinant FVIII & FIX
• Early 2000s: pdVWF and Initial (ongoing) gene
• therapy trials
• 2014: extended half life (t ½ ) factors
• 2015: recombinant VWF
• 2017: Non-factor therapeutic options• FDA approved:emicizumab• Clinical trials:
• Fitusiran, concizumab, • BAY 1093884, PF-06741086
Laboratory Assays:FVIII/FIX:One stage assay (OSA)VWF functional assay:Ristocetin cofactor assay
Advances: • Chromogenic factor assays
• Alternate VWF functional assays
Evolution of Therapies for Hemophilia
©2020 MFMER | slide-6
Goals in management of bleeding disorders
• Prophylaxis:• Reduction in annualized bleeding rate (ABR)
• Preservation of joints over long term• Reduce frequency of infusion
• Treatment of bleeds:• Effective with minimal infusions• Reduction of recurrent bleeds
• Individualized pharmacokinetics• Reliable factor assays
• Options: factor concentrates, non-factor concentrates, Gene therapy
12/3/2020
4
©2020 MFMER | slide-7
Major advance: extended half life concentrates
• Fusion of factor VIII and IX molecule with linkers that extend half-life
• Fc Fusion• Fragment crystallizable (Fc) domain of human immunoglobulin
• Pegylation• Polyethylene glycol (PEG) polymers • Variable pegylation and location on molecule
• Albumin fusion
• Disadvantage of FVIII extended half-life products• Relies on FVIII binding to VWF
• Emerging FVIII molecule: BIVV001 (rFVIIIFc-VWF-XTEN• rFVIII fused to dimeric Fc, D’D3 domain of VWF, two XTEN polypeptides • ‘Uncouples’ FVIII reliance on VWF half life
©2020 MFMER | slide-8
100
0Time (hours)
10
1
rFVIIIrFVIIIFc
FVIII
:C (I
U/d
L)
3%
1%20 40 60 80 100 120
Mahlangu et al Blood 2014
Extended t ½ FVIII and FIX
rFIXrFIXFc
0Time (hours)
FIX:
C(IU
/dL)
3%
1%
100
10
060 120 180 240 300
Powell et al NEJM 2014
12/3/2020
5
©2020 MFMER | slide-9
Critical review of long t ½ FVIII products
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
AUC ratio (mean and 90% CI)
AUC ratio (mean and 95% CI)
rFVIII product/Study
BAX 855/ NCT01736475BAY 94-9027/NCT01184820, high dose
BAY 81-8973/NCT01029340
rFVIII-SingleChain/NCT01486927
Human-cl rhFVIII/NCT00989196
rFVIIIFc/NCT01181128
N8-GP/NCT01205724
2.17
1.44
1.19
1.35
0.98
1.69
1.49
Reproduced from Mahalangu et al Haemophilia 2018; 24:348
©2020 MFMER | slide-10
Factor VIII Activity at 14 Days in the Two Dose Groups.
40
20
10
5
3
1
100
10
1
rFVIII
BIVV001
Mea
n Pl
asm
a FV
III:C
(IU/d
l)
Perc
ent P
lasm
a FV
III:C
Act
ivity
Days after infusion
Dose: 65 IU/kg
Reproduced from Konkle BA et al. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1018-1027
1412107543210
12/3/2020
6
©2020 MFMER | slide-11
Illustrative case
•A 12 month old severe hemophila:•Subcutaneous port placed•Started regular IV dosing of extended half life•One year later, port had to be removed due to infection
•Parents are asking about alternatives•Poor peripheral IV access•Are there subcutaneous medications options
©2020 MFMER | slide-12©2020 MFMER | slide-12
EmicizumabBispecific antibodyAdministered subcutaneously (once weekly, once every two weeks or once a month)
12/3/2020
7
©2020 MFMER | slide-13Oldenberg J et al. NEJM 2017; 377(9):809-18
FVIII inhibitor
Thrombingeneration
©2020 MFMER | slide-14
Emicizumab in hemophila A patients without inhibitors
05
101520253035404550
Annualized Bleeding Rates
Emicizumab weeklyEmicizumab q2 weeksNo prophylaxis
2.41.6 – 3.9
2.61.6 – 4.3
47.628.5 – 79.6
Mahlangu, J et al N Engl J Med 2018; 379:811-822
12/3/2020
8
©2020 MFMER | slide-15
Study Study population Dosing Efficacy SafetyHAVEN1 HA with inhibitors
(n=109)LD: 3 mg/kg/wkk x 4 MD: 1.5 mg/kg/wk
Prophy vs no prophy87% reduction in ABR
TMA:3Thromb: 2
HAVEN2 Pediatric HA with inhibitors (n=60)
LD: 3 mg/kg/wk x 4 MD: 1.5 mg/kg/wk; 3 mg/kg every 2wk; 6 mg/kg every 4wk
Prophy vs no prophy99% reduction in ABR
No thromb
HAVEN3 HA without inhibitors(n=152)
LD: 3 mg/kg/wk x 4 MD: 1.5 mg/kg/wk; 3 mg/kg every 2wk;
Episodic therapy vs Prophy96 & 97% reduction in ABR
No major safety issues
HAVEN4 HA without inhibitors(n=48)
LD: 3 mg/kg/wk x 4 MD: 6 mg/kg every 4wk
Similar to HAVEN 1,2,3
No major safety issues
|3146613-15
©2020 MFMER | slide-16
Non-factor therapies: FDA approval
Drug Hemophilia A with inhibitors
Hemophilia A with NO inhibitor
Potential diseasetarget
Enhancing Procoagulant cascadeEmcizumab Yes Yes Hemophilia ASuppressing anticoagulant cascadeConcizumab No No Hemophilia A&BFitusiran No No Hemophilia A&B
12/3/2020
9
©2020 MFMER | slide-17CP1106730-1
Factor IXa
Thrombin (IIa)
Factor IX
Ca2+
Factor XCa2+ PL
Factor VIIIFactor Xa
Factor XIaFactor XI
Surface
Thrombin
Intrinsic Pathway
Factor VIIaTissue factor
Ca2+
Ca2+
Factor IX
Factor VIITissue factor
Factor XaThrombinFactor VIIaFactor IXa
Extrinsic Pathway
Vascular injury
Tissue factor
Factor VII
Factor X
Factor Xa
Factor V
Fibrinogen Fibrin
Fibrin (cross-linked)
Factor XIII
Factor XIIIa
Ca2+Fibrin
Actions of Protein C, S and Antithrombin
Ca2+ PL
Factor Va
Protein CProtein S
Factor VIIIaCa2+ PL
Antithrombin
Prothrombin (II)
Tissue factorPathway inhibitor
©2020 MFMER | slide-18
Role of TFPI: prevent generation of Xa
TFPI
TFPI: tissue factor pathway inhibitor
VIIa X
TF
Phospholipd
VIIa XTF
12/3/2020
10
©2020 MFMER | slide-19
Concizumab: mechanism of action
TFPI
TFPI: tissue factor pathway inhibitor; TF: tissue factor
anti-TFPI (concizumab)VIIa X
TF Xa
©2020 MFMER | slide-20
Concizumab: Phase I study
3146613-20Eicher, H et al JTH 2018; 16: 2184
First dose Last dose
1000
100
10
10 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
0.8 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg0.25 mg/kg
Con
cizu
mab
in p
lasm
a(n
g/m
L
Time (days)
Placebo-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
020406080
100120
Time (days)
First dose Last dose
Unb
ound
TFP
I(n
g/m
L
Placebo0.25 mg/kg 0.5 mg/kg
0.8 mg/kgConcizumab dose
12/3/2020
11
©2020 MFMER | slide-21
RNA translation to protein: action of fitusiran
3146613-21
fitusiran
tRNA
tRNAtRNA
tRNA
aminoacid
aminoacid
aminoacid
aminoacid
mRNAribosome
tRNA bound to amino acidEmpty tRNA
Growing peptide chain
©2020 MFMER | slide-22
Relationship between Antithrombin Level and Thrombin Generation.
Pasi KJ et al. N Engl J Med ;377:819-828
Peak
thro
mbi
n le
vel (
nM)
Antithrombin level (%)0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
250
200
150
100
50
0
Hemophilia AHemophilia BNormal
Pasi KJ et al. N Engl J Med ;377:819-828
12/3/2020
12
©2020 MFMER | slide-23
Assays to monitor emerging agents
•Fitusiran: measurement of antithrombin levels•TFPI inhibitors: TFPI levels•Emerging assays:
•Global assays •thrombin generation•thromboelastography
©2020 MFMER | slide-24Reproduced from: Pasi KJ et al. N Engl J Med 2020;382:29-40
FVIII
act
ivity
IU/d
LO
ne s
tage
FVI
IIC
Median Factor VIII
Levels:Yr 1: 88.6%Yr 2: 45.7%Yr 3: 29.8%
Annu
aliz
ed
Ble
edin
gRat
e(e
piso
des/
yr)
Before infusion
1 year 2 year 3 year
After infusion
Median16.5
Mean 16.3
15
20
5
10
00.9
00.2
0 00.7
96% reduction in mean ABRNo of participants: 6
360
320
280
240
200
160
120
80
40
00 8 16 24 32 40 48 52 65 78 91 104
7 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7Number of participants
117 130 143 156
Week
AAV5-hFVIII-SQ Gene therapy for hemophilia A
12/3/2020
13
©2020 MFMER | slide-25
Factor IX Activity after One Peripheral Infusion of SPK-9001 in the Participants Who Did Not Have an Adeno-Associated Viral Capsid-Directed Immune Response.
Reproduced from George LA et al. N Engl J Med ;377:2215-2227
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 70 78
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Week after vector infusion
4 43
12
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10
32
2
48
Participant number1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
60
40
20
0
1 yr pre-infusion Post-infusion
Participants (n=10)
©2020 MFMER | slide-26
Coagulation factor assays
•One stage•Most commonly used
•Chromogenic assays•Less used but increasingly common
12/3/2020
14
©2020 MFMER | slide-27
Factors influencing one stage factor assays: contact activators, phospholipid & calibrators
Activator Phospholipid (PL) Calibrators Instrumentation
Ellagic acid basedSynthetic
Plasma derived standards
Mechanical methods
Ellagic acid
Polyphenolic acid (ellagicacid like) CephalinSilica based
Colloidal silica SoyaChromogenic standards
Optical methodsMicronized silica Vegetable/PlantSilica dioxide Bovine
Concentrate specificstandardsSulfatides and silica Rabbit brain
Kaolin Porcine and chicken
©2020 MFMER | slide-28
3146613-28
12/3/2020
15
©2020 MFMER | slide-29
Acceptable activators for EHL concentratesProduct OSA:silica OSA:ellagic CSA
BAX 855 (Adynovate) √1 √ √rFVIII:Fc (Elocatate) √ √ √rFVIII:SC (Afstyla) √2 X √rFVIII;(N8-GP) √1 √ √rFVIII; (BAY 94-9027) √3 √ √rFIXFc (Alprolix)* √ √ √1r-FIX-FP (Idelvion)* √ X1 XN9-GP(Rebinyn)* X √ √1
3146613-29
1, exceptions; 2, multiply OSA result by 2; 3, unknown; * avoid kaolin based reagents; X, unacceptable
©2020 MFMER | slide-30
Intrinsic Extrinsic
VIIXII
XIIX
VIII
XVII
Fibrinogen
aPTT PT
Contact activator:+Ca +Phospholipid
One stage FVIII assay
Fibrin clotPatient plasma + FVIII deficient plasma
12/3/2020
16
©2020 MFMER | slide-31
FVIII assay: role of the calibrator (native factor vs concentrate)
3146613-31
200
100
60
40
20
5 10 20 30 50 100
Calibrator
FVIII Activity
Clo
tting
tim
e (s
)
Patient plasma
Kitchen et al Quality in Lab Hemost & Thromb 2009
©2020 MFMER | slide-32
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 1 3 10 30 100
300
1000 1 10 10
0
APTT
(s)
Human FVIII deficient plasmaWith FVIII inhibitorsWithout FVIII inhibitors
ACE910 (nM) rhFVIII U/dL
Muto A. et al JTH 2014; 12:206
12/3/2020
17
©2020 MFMER | slide-33
1000
1200
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
200
400
600
800
Emicizumab ug/mL
One stage assay
FVIII activity
120
100
80
60
40
20
00 50 100 150 200
Emicizumab ug/mL
Chromogenic assay
Human X & IXa
Bovine X & IXa
FVIII activity
One stage assay and chromogenic assay with human substrate: false FVIII result in presence of emicizumab
One stage assay and chromogenic assay with human substrateResults in a false FVIII result in presence of emicizumab
©2020 MFMER | slide-34
Currently available options for management of hemophilia: Ever expanding
•Standard half-life factor concentrates
•Extended half-life concentrates•Non-factor based therapies•Modified factor concentrates and non-factor options impact laboratory testing
12/3/2020
18
©2020 MFMER | slide-35
Impact on hemophilia centers and coagulation laboratories•HTCs: Knowing which reagents laboratories utilize•Laboratories: Knowing which product patient is on
•There are acceptable and non-acceptable reagents for each product
•Strategy to understand performance characteristics of reagents:
•Field studies•Package inserts
©2020 MFMER | slide-36
Implications for FVIII inhibitor Bethesda assay
•Using one stage assays and chromogenic assays with human substrate
•False negative or lower estimates of Bethesda titers•Performance of Bethesda assay using chromogenic FVIII assays with bovine substrates is required
3146613-36
12/3/2020
19
©2020 MFMER | slide-37