67
New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies Robert W. Lightfoot, Jr., MD

New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

New Perspectives on New

(and Old)

Rheumatology Serologies

Robert W. Lightfoot, Jr., MD

Page 2: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Topics for Today’s Talk

1. The Old ANA

- What are the upper limits of normal for the ANA?

2. The New ANA (The Bead Assays)

- The problem of the false negative ANA

- The problem of the false positive ANA

3. The “ANA Profile” and Its Problems

4. The anti- CCP in Arthritis Diagnosis

Page 3: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Case #2

A 33 yr. old woman comes by the booth of the local lupus society at a health fair in your local shopping mall to be screened for SLE.

A 33 yr. old woman is referred

to you with 4 mos. of sustained

pain, stiffness and swelling in

the knuckles of the hand, the

wrists and the knees.

PE corroborates same and is

otherwise negative.

She is Normal Rheumatoid Arthritis

Case #1

Her ANA is + at 1:160Her ANA is + at 1:160

The most likely diagnosis is: The most likely diagnosis is:

Page 4: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

What are the upper limits of

normal for the ANA?

Page 5: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

The Bell Curve

2 S.D. 2 S.D.1 S.D. 1 S.D.

68% 2.5% 2.5%

Page 6: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

The ANA

Hospital personnel, medical students 1%

Blood donors 3%

Elderly 10-15%

Miscellaneous diseases 6%

Arthritis, excluding RA, SLE 14%

Hospitalized, non-rheumatic 17%

Conn. Tissue diseases, not SLE 24%

Rheumatoid arthritis 30-40%

Relatives of SLE patients 33%

SLE 95%

Page 7: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

uu uuuu1:20 1:40 1:80 1:160 1:320 1:640 1:1280

u

Page 8: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

INDIRECT IF(IIF) ASSAY

HEP-2 CELL

PATIENT

SERUM

Fluorescein-tagged

anti-IgG, -IgA or -

IGM

Page 9: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

ANA’S

Page 10: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

There are between 100- 150

different antigens in the nucleus

that can be detected in the IIF ANA.

We only know what about 8 of those

antigens are.

Page 11: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

What does an ANA of 1:160 tell

you?

Page 12: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Disease Present Disease Absent

Test Sensitivity & Specificity

SLE Present SLE Absent

ANA

95%+

97%Neg.

Page 13: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

The ANA in Normals

ANA 1:40 positive

ANA 1:80 positive

ANA 1:160 positive

ANA 1:320 positive

Tan, EM, et al. Arthritis Rheum, 1997. 40:1601-1611.

Specificity

68.3%

86.7%

95%

96.7%

31.7%

13.3%

5%

3.3%

Page 14: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

The Problem Is...

Lupus occurs in only 0.05% of the

general population

Ergo, 99.95% do not have lupus

Page 15: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

SLE Present General Population

ANA Sensitivity & Specificity

97% Neg.

Page 16: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

So...

Of the 0.05% of people who have SLE, 95% have a + ANA, or

0.0475% of people

Of the 99.95% of non-SLE, 3% have a + ANA, or

2.999% of people

2.999 / 0.0475 = 63/1

A ratio of 63:1:: Normal:SLE, i.e.,

98% of ANA positives do NOT have SLE

Page 17: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

NOW…

Rheumatoid arthritis is

present in 1.5% of the

population

Page 18: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

And, So...

Of the 1.5% of people who have RA, 30% are ANA + , or 0.45% of people,

Therefore,

The ratio of RA to SLE with positive ANA’s is:

0.45/0.0475, or >9 ANA + RA patients for every 1 ANA + SLE patient

Page 19: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

And…

We could do similar calculations

for any pre-test percentage

likelihood a given patient has

lupus

Page 20: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

SLE Present General Population

ANA Sensitivity & Specificity

97% Neg.

Page 21: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

SLE Present General Population

ANA Sensitivity & Specificity

97% Neg.

Page 22: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

SLE Present General Population

ANA Sensitivity & Specificity

97% Neg.

Page 23: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

SLE Present General Population

ANA Sensitivity & Specificity

97% Neg.

Page 24: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Test Sensitivity & Specificity

SLE Present SLE Absent

ANA

95%+

97%Neg.

Page 25: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

ANA PREDICTIVE VALUE FOR SLE

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Pre-Test Probability

Po

st-T

est

Pro

ba

bil

ity

ANA +

ANA -

Sensitivity 95%, Specificity 97%

Page 26: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

How can the ANA be

made more useful?

Page 27: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

ANA PREDICTIVE VALUE

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Pre-Test Probability

Po

st-T

est

Pro

ba

bil

ity

ANA +

ANA -

Sensitivity 95%, Specificity 97%

Page 28: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Every historical feature, every

physical finding (or lack

thereof) has its own sensitivity

and specificity for a given

illness.

Page 29: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

At the end of the history and

physical exam, 98% of the

diagnostic testing has been

done.

Of the remainder, 98% of the

talent and wisdom required

is for differential diagnosis.

Page 30: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

THE BEAD ASSAYS*

*ANA Choice

ANA Direct

Page 31: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Polystyrene microparticles of uniform size are used

as the solid phase.

Page 32: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

SOLID-PHASE IMMUNOASSAYS

HISTONE SSA“n-DNA”

SSB SCL-70 RNP

SMITH

Page 33: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Unique bead sets can be conjugated with various, unique target

molecules of interest.

RNPSSBSSA Scl70

Page 34: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Thousands of each bead set are combined to form a

multiplex bead suspension.

The bead suspension is added to the wells of the microplate.

Page 35: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

If present, antibody from the test sera will bind to the

antigen-coated bead.

Anti-human Ig reporter “tags” bound antibody.

AtheNA Multi-Lyte System

RNPSSBSSA Scl70

Page 36: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

If the patient possesses antibody to more than one bead set, all the

relevant beads will be labeled with antibody and then conjugate.

AtheNA Multi-Lyte System

RNPSSBSSA Scl70

Page 37: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Beads flow through the flow cell, one bead at a time.

Page 38: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

• Beads flow through the flow cell and light scatter will determine

color of each bead and if it fluoresces.

• The other determines the amount of classification dyes…the color

of the bead set (i.e., the antigen)

• One laser identifies the amount of fluorescence on the surface.

Page 39: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

This flow analysis of the beads occurs at a rate of up to 20,000

beads/per second.

Page 40: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

THE BEAD ASSAY AND

FALSE POSITIVES

Page 41: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Risks of “Panel” Testing*

No. of tests Percent of Times One is

Abnormal

1 5%

2 10%

4 19%

6 26%

10 40%

20 64%

*Galen & Gambino- “Beyond Normality”, Wiley & Sons 1975

Page 42: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

“The more tests performed

on a healthy subject, the

more likely is the discovery

of an abnormal result.”

Beyond Normality- Galen, RS,& Gambino R, Wiley, 1975

Page 43: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

In some labs, if a single “bead

antigen” assay is positive, the ANA is

reported as “positive”

Clues are-

There is no “ANA titer”

There are no “ANA units”

Page 44: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

THE BEAD ASSAY AND

FALSE NEGATIVE ANA’s

Page 45: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

OTHER SOLID-PHASE IMMUNOASSAYS

HISTONE SSA“n-DNA”

SSB SCL-70 RNP

SMITH? ?

Page 46: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Lab Report

ANA PositivenDNA Negative

SSA Positive

SSB Negative

Scl-70 Negative

Smith Negative

RNP Negative

Page 47: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Lab Report

ANA NegativenDNA Negative

SSA Negative

SSB Negative

Scl-70 Negative

Smith Negative

RNP Negative

Page 48: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Lab Report

ANA (IIF) PositivenDNA Negative

SSA Positive

SSB Negative

Scl-70 Negative

Smith Negative

RNP Negative

Page 49: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

THE BEAD ASSAY AND FALSE

POSITIVE ANTI-nDNA

Page 50: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

THE BEAD ANTI-“nDNA” ASSAY

Page 51: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Anti- nDNA

• The biggest problem with all anti-nDNA

assays is contamination of the antigen

with single-stranded portions.

• Antibodies to single-stranded DNA are

less specific than the ESR.

Page 52: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

F-Anti-IgGSLE Serum

+ +

Crithidia luciliae Tube Dilution anti-nDNA Assay

Kinetochore

Nucleus

Page 53: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies
Page 54: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

1. Any ANA screening test should include an

indirect immunofluorescent ANA screen.

2. For any bead assay positive for anti- “n-

DNA”, a better assay (? Crithidiae) should

be performed.

3. Any patient with an antibody to a single

“bead” antigen (e.g., anti-SSA), should

probably see a specialist.

(IIF)

Page 55: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

THE ANTI-CCP ASSAY

Page 56: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

peptidyl

arginine

deiminase

(PAD)

Ca++

+ H20+ NH3

+ H+

Arginine

NH2

C=NH2+

NH

CH2

CH2

CH2

O

CN

H

C

Citrulline

NH2

NH

C=O

CH2

CH2

CH2

O

CN

H

C

Page 57: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Known Citrullinated Proteins

• Myelin basic protein

• Filaggrin

• Keratin

• Histones

• Vimentin

• Fibrinogens/fibrins

• Type I Collagen in synovium

Page 58: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

CCP Peptides

SHQESTRGRSRGRSGRSGS (306-324)

SHQESTXGRSRGRSGRSGS ( “ - “ )

SHQESTRGXSRGRSGRSGS ( “ - “ )

SHQESTRGRSXGRSGRSGS ( “ - “ )

SHQESTXGRSXGRSGRSGS ( “ - “ )

Page 59: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Lee & SchurRF+

RF-

From, Lee, DM and Schur, PH, Ann Rheum Dis 2003 62:870.

Page 60: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

False Positive anti-CCP TestsPsoriatic arthritis 8.6%

-Psoriasis sans arthritis 0.7-17%

SLE 7.8%

Sjogren’s 5.7%

Spondyloarthropathy 2.3%

Scleroderma 6.8%

Hep C Cryoglobulinemia 3.5%

Osteoarthritis 2.2%

Juvenile polyarthritis 7.7%

Fibromyalgia 2.7%

Tuberculosis 34.3%

Arthritis Rheum 61 (11): 1472, 2009

Page 61: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Anti-CCP Specificity and PPV

TEST

Pos.

Likelihood

Ratio

Neg.

Likelihood

Ratio

Sens. Spec.

RF 4.9 0.38 69% 85%

Anti-CCP 12.5 0.36 67% 95%

Page 62: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Prognostic Value of a-CCP’s

• Of 936 patients seen in an Early (<2yrs.)

Arthritis Clinic (EAC), 590 (63%) could

be readily diagnosed, and 205 (21.9%)

had RA.

• 346 (37%) had undifferentiated arthritis

(UA).

• They were followed for 3 years.

Van Gaalen, et al., A&R 50:709, 2004

Page 63: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Prognostic Value of a-CCP

Criterion ACR Criteria ACR & a-CCP

AM stiffness > 1hr. 2.9 ns

Arthritis of > 3 jts. 5.8 5.0

Symmetric arthritis 2.6 6.1

IgM RF positivity 9.8 ns

Erosions on x-ray 7.6 8.7

Anti-CCP positive N/A 38.6

(Odds Ratios in Multivariate Analysis)

Van Gaalen, et al.,A&R, 2004

Page 64: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

RF > 50IU

RF < 50IU

Ero

sion

Sco

re

0 2 yrs1 yr 3 yrs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Nell, et al., Ann Rheum Dis 2005

Page 65: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

A-CCP +

A-CCP -

Ero

sion

Sco

re

0 2 yrs1 yr 3 yrs

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Nell, et al., Ann Rheum Dis 2005

Page 66: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

ANA

RF

a-CCP

I

N

T

E

R

P

R

E

T

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

?SLE

M

O

R

E

T

E

S

T

S

RA

?SLE

M

O

R

E

T

E

S

T

S

?RAOther

?SLE

M

O

R

E

T

E

S

T

S

RA

?SLE

RA RA RARA

Page 67: New Perspectives on New (and Old) Rheumatology Serologies

Summary

• If your ANA Panel shows a negative

ANA, make sure an IIF ANA is done.

• If your ANA is “positive” without a titer,

make sure an IIF ANA is done.

• If your ANA is positive at a titer of

<1:320, more history and/or a panel may

be indicated.

• A positive anti-nDNA usually isn’t.

• A positive anti-CCP is strong evidence

for RA