Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
New chemotherapy to overcome platinum resistance
Laura Cortesi Laura Cortesi
Dipartimento di Oncologia ed Ematologia
Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Modena
Selection of chemotherapy:defining platinum-resistant
1 Blackledge et al, Br J Canc, 19892 Gore et al., Gynec Oncol, 19903 Marckman et al., JCO 1991
Refractory
PRI
MAR
0 3 6 12 18 24
Months
Ovarian Cancer at First RelapseDefinition of Sensitivity
RY
TREATMENT
Resistant
Partial Sensitive
“Very Sensitive”
Defined as measurable recurrence, not biochemical (CA-125) recurrence
Treatment choices in platinum-resistantrelapse
Treatment choices in platinum-resistantrelapse
Enrollment
• Recurrent epithelialovarian cancer
• 474 patients
RAN
Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase III study of Peglyated Liposomal Doxorubicin versus Topotecan
Gordon AN, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2001
• 474 patients
• 104 US and internationalsites
Endpoints
• Primary
– Time to progression
• Secondary
– Overall survival
– Response rate
– Toxicity
Topotecan 1.5 mg/m2/day for5 consecutive days, q 21 d
Liposomal doxorubicin
50 mg/m2 q 28 d
NDOMIZATION
ECCO 2003: 5-yr follow up
Liposomal doxorubicin > Topotecan
35%
24%
ALL CASES
Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Compared With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin inProgressive or Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
Gabriella Ferrandina et al. JCO 2008;26:890-896
©2008 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Flow-chart treatment in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer
New Targeted Therapies
• Bevacizumab
• Cediranib
• Nintedanib• Nintedanib
• Pazopanib
• Tivozanib
• Sorafenib
• Sunitinib
Targeting Angiogenesisby targeting VEGFR and PDGFR
↑ VEGF ↑ PDGF
VEGFR PDGFRVEGFVEGF PDGFPDGF
Bevacizumab
Inhibition of progression
Vascularpermeability
Cell survival, proliferation
Vascularformation, maturation
Vascular Endothelial CellPericyte/Fibroblast/
Vascular Smooth Muscle
Pazopanib
Sorafenib
Sunitinib
Axitinib
New Cancer Targets
• Cancer Cell Resistance to treatment – Platinum sensitive versus Platinum Resistance
• Cellular immunity pathways• Checkpoint Inhibitors
• Stromal Interaction with cancer Stromal Interaction with cancer
• Enhance Anti-Cancer Immune Systems
• Vaccines –– FANG individualized vaccine against the original ovarian
cancer cells.
• Monoclonal Antibodies
• Testing drugs that have been approved for other types of cancer (melanoma, breast)
Ovarian Cancer:Why the Anti-Angiogenesis ?
• Tumor angiogenesis is associated with malignantbehavior in ovarian cancer 1,2
• BEV as single-agent showed promising activity inrecurrent ovarian cancer in phase II studies3,4
• BEV combined with chemotherapy showed• BEV combined with chemotherapy showedpositive results in phase III randomized clinicaltrials in both platinum sensitive (OCEANS)5 aswell as platinum resistant ovarian cancer(AURELIA)6
1 Hollingsworth et al. Am J Pathol 1995;147:33–412 Burger et al. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:2902–83 Burger et al. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:5165–714 Cannistra et al. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:5180–65 C Aghajanian, et al. ASCO 20116 Pujade-Lauraine et al. ASCO 2012
Angiogenesis as a Target in Ovarian Cancer: Anti-VEGF-VEGFR Pathway
• Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapyimproves progression-free survival (PFS)
• GOG 218* Front-line: BevacizumabHR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.63–0.821
• ICON 7* Front-line: BevacizumabHR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70–0.942
• AGO-OVAR12 Front-line: NintedanibHR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72, 0.983HR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72, 0.983
• AGO-OVAR16 Maintenance: PazopanibHR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64–0.914
• AURELIA** Platinum-resistant, recurrent / 1 or 2 prior regimens: BevacizumabHR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.38–0.605
• OCEANS* Platinum-sensitive, recurrent / 1 prior regimen: Bevacizumab HR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.41–0.706
• ICON6 Platinum-sensitive, recurrent / 1 prior regimen: CediranibHR = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44–0.747
HR = hazard ratio; 95% CI = confidence interval
1. Burger RA et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2473‒2483.2. Perren TJ et al . N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2484‒2496.3. du Bois A et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(18suppl):LBA5503.4. du Bois A et al. LBA ESGO 2013 Liverpool, UK5. Pujade-Lauraine E et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(18suppl):LBA5002.6. Aghajanian C et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2039‒2045.7. Ledermann JA et al . Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(suppl):LBA
*EMA Approved
*FDA Approved
AURELIA trial design
Platinum-resistant OCa
• ≤2 prior anticancer regimens
• No history of bowel obstruction/abdominal fistula, or clinical/ radiological evidence of
Treat to PD/toxicity
Treat to PD/toxicity
Investigator’s choice
Optional BEV monotherapyc
BEV 15 mg/kg q3wb
+ chemotherapy
Chemotherapy
R
1:1
Stratification factors:
• Chemotherapy selected
• Prior anti-angiogenic therapy
• Treatment-free interval (<3 vs 3‒6 months from previous platinum to subsequent PD)
radiological evidence of rectosigmoid involvement
PD/toxicitychoice
(without BEV)+ chemotherapy
Chemotherapy options (investigator’s choice):
• Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15, & 22 q4w
• Topotecan 4 mg/m2 days 1, 8, & 15 q4w (or 1.25 mg/m2, days 1–5 q3w)
• PLD 40 mg/m2 day 1 q4w
Pujade-Lauraine et al ASCO 2012
AURELIA PHASE III STUDY:PFS
Eric Pujade-Lauraine et al. JCO 2014;32:1302-1308
©2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
AURELIA PHASE III STUDY:OS
Eric Pujade-Lauraine et al. JCO 2014;32:1302-1308
©2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Bevacizumab, in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel is indicated for the front-line treatment of advanced (FIGO stages III B, III C and IV) epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer
Bevacizumab is administered in addition to carboplatin Bevacizumab is administered in addition to carboplatin and paclitaxel for up to 6 cycles of treatment followed by continued use of Bevacizumab as single agent until disease progression or for a maximum of 15 months or until unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurs earlier
The recommended dose of Bevacizumab is 15 mg/kg of body weight given once every 3 weeks as an intravenous infusion
Cediranib
• Angiogenesis Inhibitor
– a potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases
• Oral• Oral
• Similar Side Effects of Olaparib
– Fatigue, Nausea, diarrhea, hypertension
Cediranib, an Oral Inhibitor of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Kinases,Is an Active Drug in Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Cancer
Ursula A. Matulonis et al. JCO 2009;27:5601-5606
Cediranib, an Oral Inhibitor of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Kinases,Is an Active Drug in Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Cancer
Ursula A. Matulonis et al. JCO 2009;27:5601-5606
©2009 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Combination of Olaparib and Cediranib
Based on Phase II Study
• Combined treatment vs monotherapy
– Tumors shrank more dramatically
– Greater delayed progression (compared to standard chemotherapy)chemotherapy)
– More complete remission with combination • (5 women in combination group and 2 women in monotherapy group)
Cediranib: Tirosin Kinase Inhbitor of VEGFR1,2,3
ICON 6Cediranib with Platinum-based Chemotherapy in platinum-
sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer
Arm A
Relapse > 6 months after completion of first line
platinum-based chemotherapy
Randomise2 : 3 : 3
N=456 pts
6 Cycles platinum-basedChemotherapy Carboplatin/paclitaxel Carboplatin/Gemcitabine Single agent platinum
Maintenance phase
Treatment continued to 18 months or until progression (>18 for patients continuing to benefit
Continueplacebo
Switch toplacebo
Maintenance cediranib
Chemotherapy + cediranibChemotherapy + placebo
Arm A(Chemo only)
Arm B (Concurrent) Arm C (Maintenance)
Chemotherapy + cediranib
Ledermann et al ECCO2013
Combination Treatment better than Olaparib Alone by 7 months
Combination Treatment increased progression free survival 3 months in women with BRCA mutation
10 months in women without BRCA mutation
Randomized Phase II Placebo-Controlled Trial of Maintenance Therapy Using the Oral Triple Angiokinase Inhibitor BIBF 1120 After Chemotherapy for Relapsed Ovarian Cancer
Jonathan A. Ledermann et al. JCO 2011;29:3798-3804
©2011 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Weekly Paclitaxel vs weekly Paclitaxeland Pazopanib in patients with
resistant/refractory ovarian cancer: resistant/refractory ovarian cancer:
Phase II randomized multicenter trial
MITO - 11
Trial design
• Aim of the trial is to compare the PFS of weekly paclitaxel vs weekly paclitaxel and pazopanib
RANDOM
Pazopanib 800 mg/dayPaclitaxel 80 mg/mq
day 1,8 15 - every 28days
Paclitaxel 80 mg/mq
day 1, 8, 15 - every 28 days
Results
Pignata S., Lancet Oncol 2015
Activity of sorafenib in recurrent ovarian cancer and primary peritoneal carcinomatosis: a
gynecologic oncology group trial
Matei D., JCO 2011
Matei D., JCO 2011
Post-treatment phosphorylated ERK (pERK) levels and survival. Post-treatment pERKlevels and survival. Higher levels of post-treatment pERK were notably associated
with (A) longer progression-free survival (PF) but not (B) overall survival
Matei D., JCO 2011
A phase II trial (AGO 2.11) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: a randomized multicenter trial with sunitinib (SU11248) to evaluate dosage, schedule, tolerability, toxicity and
effectiveness of a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy
K. H. Baumann et al. Ann Oncol 2012;23:2265-2271
© The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: [email protected].
AMG386
Recurrent EOC
•≤ 3 prior anticancer regimens
Treat to PD/toxicity
Weekly Paclitaxel+
Stratification factors
•Platinum-free interval (PFI) (≤ 6 vs. > 6 months)•Measurable disease (Yes/No)•Region (North America, Western Europe/Australia, Rest of World)
regimens
•Evaluable or measurable disease
•GOG Performance Status of 0 or 1
•PFI < 12 months
Treat to PD/toxicity
PD/toxicity
Weekly Paclitaxel+
Trebananib
Placebo
R
1:1
46% of patients w ILP>6Months
25% 3 previous lines of therapy.
Lancet Oncol, 2014 Jul;15(8), 799-808
TRINOVA- 1 : Progression-free Survival
Pac + Placebo (n = 458)
Pac + Trebananib (n = 461)
Events, n (%) 361 (79) 310 (67)
Median PFS, months 5.4 7.2
HR = 0.66 (95% CI, 0.57–0.77)P (stratified log rank) < 0.001
Eve
nt-
free
Pro
ba
bili
ty
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Eve
nt-
free
Pro
ba
bili
ty
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Study Month0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 22
Patients at risk:
461458
356310
176132
10568
5024
2210
142
30
10
Monk BJ et al; Lancet Oncol, 2014 Jul;15(8), 799-808
TRINOVA-1: Overall Survival(Interim Analysis)
Pac + Placebo(n = 458)
Pac + Trebananib (n = 461)
Events, n (%) 163 (36) 150 (33)
Median OS, months 17.3 19.0
HR = 0.86 (95% CI, 0.69–1.08)P (stratified log rank) = 0.19
Eve
nt-
free P
rob
ab
ility
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Eve
nt-
free P
rob
ab
ility
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Study Month0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27
Patients at risk:
461458
430434
342346
242234
163160
10899
6546
2818
63
Monk BJ et al; Lancet Oncol, 2014 Jul;15(8), 799-808
Vanucizumab: RO5520985: A2V CrossMab
(Anti-human VEGF-A &Anti-human/murine Ang-2)
Molecular characteristics
VEGF-A
Anti-VEGF-A
Bevacizumab
Anti-Ang-2
LC06
Ang-2
VL
VH
VL
VH
Knobs- into- Holes
VL
CL
CH1
CH2
CH3
VL
Crossmab technology allows dual binding capabilities
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT01688206
VINTAFOLIDE
PRECEDENT:A RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY
R. Wendel Naumann et al. JCO 2013;31:4400-4406
©2013 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Platinum
TRAB
Trabectedin induces DNA damage recognized by NER forming a DNA-trabectedin-protein repair complex
Replication (S-phase)
NER
repair complex(S-phase)
DNA DSB
CELLDEATH
Calgranulin as prognostic marker in advanced OC
Cortesi L. et al., Electrophoresis 2011