Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SUMMARY REPORT
THE NEUTRON MONITORING SYSTEM (NMS)
ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT ISOLATION TEST
T.C. McCLE , RESPO S BL NGINEERDATE
.C. BOEHM, PRINCIPAL ENGI EERVERIFIER
DATE ~/IIC.F..C , AGERPLANT ELECTRONIC SERVICES
DATE P7 H
8805050378 880307PDR ADOCN, 050004ioIe PDR
DRF AOO-03209
ABSTRACT
Tests were performed to demonstrate the ability of afuse, resistor — divider network and zener diode toprovide electrical isolation between safety functiontrip signals and non-safety computer and recordersignals. The resistor — divider, fuse and zener diode(on the output of an operational amplifier) met therequirement of providing isolation of the trip signalfrom faults at the computer and recorder connections.The tests performed demonstrate that under all crediblefaults at the connections to the computer or therecorder, there is no adverse affect on the tripsignal.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report is an evaluation and discussion of thetests performed on an interface isolation circuitconfiguration used in the Average Power RangeMonitoring subsystem of the Neutron Monitoring System.
This high resistance — fuse network isolates AveragePower Range Monitor signal voltages to the tripcircuits from the voltages sent to computer and recorderinterfaces. The voltage source is an averagingoperational amplifier that averages the inputs from theLocal Power Range Monitors and produces a voltageproportional to reactor power.
These interface circuits are resistive voltage dividerconfigurations. One circuit provides a 0 — 160millivolt signal to the computer; a second circuitprovides a 0 - 1 volt signal to the recorder.
2.0 BACKGROUND
The Neutron Monitoring System and the Average PowerRange Monitoring System circuits used to isolate thenon-safety functions from the safety trip function hascome under question by the NRC. The NRC questionedthe adequacy of resistors and fuses as isolationdevices, and requested that their performance bedemonstrated by test.This circuit design dates from the Neutron MonitoringSystem design for the BWR/3s in the 1970s. As suchthere are more than 250 reactor-years of operatingexperience in the USA with these circuits withoutreports or evidence of generic faults.The design of these circuits is rational and practical,rather than required by some standard or regulation.The initial design preceded the guidelines andstandards now applied. However the design recognizedthe need for isolation between the output signals fromthe operational amplifier. This design achieved theisolation with an established circuit, ie, the voltagedivider of resistors, the use of a fuse and wherepractical, the use of a zener diode. This design is asimple circuit that was readily analyzed to show it tobe effective in all reasonable failure modes. Thiseffectiveness has been demonstrated under the testsperformed for this report.
3 . 0 RESULTS
The Neutron Monitoring System isolation circuits havebeen tested under a variety of faults to demonstratethat the trip signal is protected per the requirementsof IEEE 384-1977, Criteria for Independence of Class IEEquipment and Circuits.The fuses in the isolation circuits opened promptly(less than 2 milliseconds) under the application offault voltages at the output terminals to the computeror the recorder interfaces.During fuse opening time and for short circuit and lowlevel fault conditions which may not cause the fuses toopen, the high resistance in the voltage dividerprotects the trip signal and the operational amplifier.These resistors are the 10.7K (R7) or the 9K (R9 + R10),as shown in Figure 4.1. This protection isdemonstrated by the small changes in the output of theoperational amplifier (to the trip circuits) when faultsimulations were applied at the output connections tothe computer or the recorder.
I
4.0 THE CIRCUIT
4.1 Neutron Monitoring System Elementary
The circuit tested is,outlined on a typical elementarydiagram, Power Range Neutron Monitoring System,807E163TY, sheet 12, attached. The dc amplifier, Z32,drawing 225A6679BB, is a prepackaged, encapsulatedoperational amplifier, input supply voltage filtercapacitors, and an adjustment resistor. The amplifierspecifications are shown on drawing 174B9091. Itsspecifications include a high gain, high inputimpedance and a low output impedance. The remainingcomponents — input resistor, feedback resistor,voltage divider resistors, zener diode and fuses-are defined by auxiliary unit, Z31, drawing 112D1907,and the averaging card, Z30, 136B2158.
The circuit function is to average the input voltagesfrom 22 (typically) local power range monitors, andprovide an average power range monitor signal to thetrip circuits, computer and recorder. In addition, thecomputer and recorder signals are isolated from thetrip signal by a resistive voltage divider and fusecircuits.
4.2 Test CircuitThe equivalent circuit tested is shown on Figure 4.1,Test Specimen Schematic Diagram. This circuit is thefunctional equivalent of the partial circuit high-lighted on the elementary diagram, 807E163TY, Sheet 12.The key portions of the circuits performing theisolation function are shown in Figure 4.2 and Figure4 '
'.3Circuit Operation
Figure 4.2 is a voltage divider of resistors and a1/32 ampere fuse providing a 0 to -160 mvolt signal tothe computer. The fuse is designed to open in 5seconds at 200% of its rated current (drawing209A5156P005). The 174 ohm resistor to common requires10.875 Vdc to conduct this 2004 current. Thiselectrical path to common, having the lowest resistancewill be the route of any overcurrent faulted condition.The fuse opening time decreases with increasedovercurrent.
Figure 4.3 is a voltage divider of resistors, a zenerdiode across the low resistor (1K) and a 1/32 amperefuse providing a 0 to -1 volt signal to the recorder.The fuse characteristic is the same as for the fuseused in Figure 4.2. The zener diode conducts most ofthe .current in order to .allow the fuse to open whenrequired. In Figure 4.2, the 174 ohm resistor allowssufficient current to flow to open the fuse whenrequired. In the circuit represented on Figure 4.3,the resistors are higher values, so a zener was usedin the design to allow the fuse clearing current toflow when external voltage faults occur. A smallpositive voltage across the zener diode will causeforward conduction current to flow until the fuseblows. Approximately -11 volts across the zener diodewill cause maximum rated current to flow through thezener (approximately 90 mA) which will be sufficient toblow the fuse.
4.4 Circuit Faults
An open circuit in the high resistor (10.7K or 9K) hasno effect on the output of the operational amplifiertrip signal.A short circuit to common in the output of theoperational amplifier will cause a downscale trip.This short circuit would have no effect on the inputsignals because of the high resistance path through thefeedback resistor (1 megohm) and the high inputresistance (499K + 499K). This is demonstrated by thetests in Section 5.0 on the 10 Kohm voltage dividerwhich provided isolation. Two megohms (1M + 0.499M +0.499M) provides even greater isolation.The operational amplifier design includes internalshort circuit protection. The output merely clamps tozero and returns to normal when the fault is removed.
An open circuit between the voltage divider ofresistors has no effect on the trip signal, althoughthe signal to the computer or recorder would be lost.A short circuit to common between the voltage dividerof resistors also has no effect on the trip signalbecause of the high resistance path provided by the10.7K or 9K resistors. The signal to the computer orrecorder would be lost.
1
Protection against the misapplication of voltages tothe computer or the recorder connections is providedby the voltage divider and fuse circuits as discussedin 5.0, THE TESTS. The maximum credible voltage thatcould be applied is 120 Vac, RMS, which has peak valuesof +170 V, -170 V.
5.0 THE TESTS
5.1 Baseline Functional Test
An initial functional test on the NMS isolation circuitwas performed to adjust and measure the amplifieroffset (balance), to adjust and measure the amplifiergain, and to measure the outputs to the trip circuits,the computer and the recorder. The zero offset and thegain were slightly out-of-tolerance, but these werejudged to be acceptable for this test of the isolationfunction.
5.2 Acceptance CriteriaFor all simulated faults the acceptance criteria are:
The fuse opens prior to damage or failure of theoperational amplifier. The trip output signal is notaffected or returns to normal after the fuse opens.
The output signal is degraded sufficiently to causethe safety action (a trip or alarm).
Failure or permanent damage to the operationalamplifier without causing the fuses to open isunacceptable.
5.3 170 Volt Transient Tests
Refer to Figure 4.1.
An 8 microfarad capacitor charged to +170 Vdc and to-170Vdc was used to provide the transient signal intotest point 1 (signal output to the computer) and intotest point 2 (signal output to the recorder). This170 Vdc simulates the peak value of 120 Vacinadvertently and transiently applied at the non-safetyrelated interfaces to the computer and recorder. Atransient recorder was used to record the plus/minus 15Vdc supply voltage, the 2.5 Vdc input voltage and thethree output voltages (trip, computer, recorder).
The 1/32 ampere fuse protected the operationalamplifier. It opened without damaging or failing thethe operational amplifier. The change at the tripoutput was an approximate -0.05 volt spike. The effectof this spike on the trip output depends on the tripsetpoints and signal level at the time of thetransient. It could cause a trip if the input signalwas already sufficiently close to the trip point.The input signal and plus/minus 15 Vdc supply voltagewere unaffected.
Thus the fuses, resistors and zener diode isolated thecomputer and the recorder, and protected the safety-related trip signal.
5.4 120 Vac Tests
Refer to Figure 4.1.
These tests simulate the inadvertent application of120 Vac to the computer output or the recorder output.The 120 Vac was supplied from a variac through amercury switch to the test point.When the voltage was connected to the computer output,the fuse opened immediately. The input signal, outputsignal and 15 Vdc supply voltage were unaffected.
When the voltage was connected to the recorder output,the fuse opened promptly, and the zener diode (VR1)short circuited. All of the monitored test points,except the computer output, varied during the fuseclearing period and then returned to normal. The inputsignal changed about +0.2 volts, and the output signalchanged about -1 volt. These changes would cause atrip if the signal was already sufficiently close tothe trip point. The shorted zener diode did not affectthe output signal because the remaining resistance of9K (R9 + R10) does not load the operational amplifiersufficiently to cause signal degradation.
Thus the fuses, resistors and zener diode isolated thecomputer and the recorder, and protected the output tripsignal.
5.5 Special Tests
These tests were performed to show the effects on theoperational amplifier output signal as follows:
a) during the fuse clearing period,
b) the degree of isolation provided by theresistor R7, 10.7K, when the fuse does notclear,
c) when the low resistance path to common(R8 or VR1 & R11) fails to an open condition.
Testing was performed with the test circuit conditionedthe same as for the previous tests. The tests (onFigure 4.1) consisted of the following:
o 5 Vac applied at test point E (computer output),o -20 volt step at test point 1 (computer output),o +20 volt step ato -15 -volt step at
test point 1,
test point 2 (recorder output),o -20 volt step at test point 2,
o +300 Vdc at testo -300 Vdc at test
point E with R8 open .to common,
point E with R8 open to common.
The low resistance path of VR1 and R11 at test point F isdemonstrated by similarity to the circuit with test point E.
The lower voltages (5 Vac, +20, -20, -15) were selectedto monitor circuit performance without stressing thecomponents, to demonstrate fuse clearing time at thesevoltage levels, and to demonstrate the low outputimpedance of the operational amplifier. The 300 Vdcwas selected to demonstrate isolation and protection ofthe operational amplifier output by the 9K or 10.7Kresistors alone.
The 5 Vac signal at test point E (computer output)yielded a very small change (0.2 mVac) in .the outputtrip signal. Similarly the step voltages yielded nochanges at the output trip signal. This indicates thatthe effective output impedance of the operationalamplifier is very low, as expected.
For the -20 volt step at the computer output the fuseopened in 1.8 milliseconds; for the +20 volt step thefuse opened in 1.6 milliseconds. The fuse overloadcurrent was approximately 3704 for both cases. For-the -15 volt step and -20 volt step at the recorderoutput, the fuse opened in 1.5 milliseconds. Thisindicates, at a reduced voltage, the ability of the1/32 ampere fuse, resistor divider and zener diode toprovide isolation and protection for the trip output.
For the +300 Vdc and -300 Vdc applied at test point E(computer output) with R8 open to common, the inputsignal and the 15 Vdc supply voltage were unaffected.
The trip output changed by less than +5 mvolts for +300Vdc and -300 Vdc. The relatively small changesdemonstrate the capability of the circuit to withstanda fuse fault and open circuit in the low resistancepath to common in the voltage divider. These smallchanges also demonstrate the very low dynamic outputimpedance of the operational amplifier and theassociated feedback circuit.
5.6 Final Baseline Functional Test
The results of the final functional test were the sameas the initial functional test. This indicates thatthe test circuit was not adversely affecte4-by thefault signal simulations.
10
6.0 REFERENCES
Letter R. Artigas to Ashok C. Thadani, Subject:"Meeting Results — NRC and GE Review of the NeutronMonitoring System Interface Isolation", September 21,1987.
NED0-10139, Compliance of Protection Systems toIndustry Criteria, June 1970.
General Electric drawings:
209A5156209A6112225A6679BB136B2158112D1907807E163TY174B9091
Design Record File A00-03209, NMS Isolation Circuits
11
R5I MEG
CW
3R2
Re
INPuTIO TO 5V
A
ZKGAI N
2 Ai3~
R3.0033UF 750
17<B909 IPOO I
OAI +
R9IK
CW
RS8.87 K
R8l74F I I/32A
TP I IIITEP.~ A-„c
IO TO .I66rV)
I0.7 KR7
OUTPUT TO
QUAD TRIP
IO TC .IOVI
I5 VDC
15VCOMMON
-I5 VDC
CIIOUF
C2IOUF
Rl50 K
BAL ADJ
VRI
IOVZ
R IOl30
IK F
RECORDERTP2 INTER''pCE
(0 TO -IVI
INSTRUMENTATIONAND MONITORS
(TYP I CAL)
FIGUR ETEST SPECIMEN SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM
OA 0 TO -IOV
I0.7 K
l74
Fl
I/'3ZA
0 TO -l60 mVCOMPUTER
OUTPUT
F I GUR E R.Z
OA 0 TO - IOV
IOVZ I K
F2
0 TO -IVRECORDER
I/32A OUTPUT
e
4
6ENEEAL ELlj61C 209A5156
5CV +J209A5156
TITLE CONT ON ENECT 'P
FUSE, SUBMINIATURE (PLUG IN FOR PCB)
CONT ON 5NEET F 5N NO. FIRST HADE FOR
REVISIC
.29 .17~.025 VIAQEIDS//
4,io
SPECIFI CATIONS:IC EN HARACTERIETICA: IIIIIIININ AITI PER
MIL-STD-105, INSPEC. LEVEL I IBLOWING CHARACTERISTICS:
PEKEN OF R TING
lOOX2005
VOLTAGE RATING: 125V
FUSE HOLDERS (IF REQUIRED):
BLOW TIME
4 HR. MIN.5 SEC. MAX.
FRONT PANEL: CAT NO. 282001 (LITTELFUSE)REAR PNEL: CAT NO. 282002 (LITTELFUSE)
PART NO AMP RATINGVENDOR
~ CAT NO
1/32
1/16
. 2.72.03)
272.%2
0
2
AS MANUFACTURED BY: LITTELFUSE INC.OR ENGINEERING APPROVED EQUIV. PRINTS T
4 ) I
~/I Aug Irl-4,g
ST~5 WF lXWII
CAvoA~8-7-48
QE.BOSAN JOSE, CALIF.
Ir LCTn-u4LCONT ON 5NECT
209A5156
5N NO. 2COOC ICE>> N
t
P
EII'R IDENT: DIOOE~ 6 ~
lip
209K&i I Z
6KNKRRl KLKCTRIC PQ9+gl IPTITIE PURCHASED PART
D~aD.E, ZENFR,, I~A~, ~%FIRST HADE FOR STANDAP.DS
CLAgg 2 FSC y%I-C3 8 RFVISION
DIA~FOLARITYMARK(CATHODE)
——OIA.OZO.034
SPEC IFICATI ONS
I IO MIN~ gpss I IOMII4~ ~
JEOEC NOPf NO JEDEC NO Vgr PT NO Vy I>T + 'T
POWER PATE: I WATT (DERATK 6.47M W/'t ABOVE 50 C)JU~ION AND STORPGE, TE,MP: -$5'C TO+ZOO CTEMP COEFF ICIENT .09'Vo / C MAXPACII'AGE: "SVRMFTIC"SlVLK 5ILICONK FOLYMEfc 'THFRMOSETTIHa
PLASTIC OA GCass.TOLERANCE ' 5'7s
fg MARKIMQ5:MEET NIL-STO-202C METHOb 2IS R'~DISTANCE TO $0LVKNT5~ NOTED > Fjk5II,ICklK ARO TEST ~ Mig, QTO '750 B) OETHOO l03B ~
QR
S..I-y
0'X
l4 IN4729A 3.&V&RMAIO rLI 5 IN47MA 39 IKK4 9
303I
IQ$745AIN47KIkA
Im747 A
l6 V
20
II hII4 l@~I4 MA 20IZ.5 Z2.
KKK
4.7
II44735A 5.I 49 7I 9 IN4734A 5.b 5 520 I M4735A 6.2 4l 2.
2 I IN4756A 8 57 3 57.5
25 IH47MA S.R,
Za IN47S9A W RS S.O
Z5 IN4740A IO R5 7.O
27 IN474ZA IKR 2I 9
33
35
37
I|4474 6AIN4749AIQ47sOAIN47S IAIN47SZA
Z4
27
33
II.5 23JO.'5 2595 35
7.S'5
'LK 0
"3~ 'Q ~a3Q
vQC)
CG
4J
G.L2.5
OlbAOdl
WO IN4755A 43 m 7047
4Z I@4 7 51 5.0IItIh 95 fLb
6KK
IN476Jh ei V 2.8MA2 0
29 IN4744A I'5 V IT MA l4 SlqaCT CORI'yelreoOE. Gee SeÃICO
AS MFG BY SARKS >AAZIAIIJ ~+44~ )MOTOROLA,SI~<NS6IN75RNATIONHLMQlHD. R ENOioel.WHO APukO>EO EGWV. PRINTS TO
"R R'c'l OCT48 q~j,„gpoO-PI-Cf SAN JCISE, .
.art ~ . ASK~OIVTKD IN V. ~ .A.
I"—HV-P Q9 'CQy~j~ gsAq gI(cr
jcj
CENECAE ELECTRIC
TITLE yl g g QlggD. C. AViPLIFIER.
PIRST ECaOE POR GEhl USE,
Z2.5%6479 g p,~ Oe ~ET
p-~ iSSBSlO7 BB EVISI ON 5
E
OCD
c
%0CP
g OI
z KJI
r Q
0I-OQ.I 0Dl—0 0
CV
I
0
Ll ~
6"
v4423'2 t2Aztas
PRINTS TO
~P Os/ wa 'f~%WACO lS V LA CCC( iOI ee ~
r
c c
~ IIOCCIISS OCCCIPCCCSI SrIOCr CIO uCC ICCI 105c OCCCCCC
ANPL I Fl F Rrcrsr ccrOI rod STANDARDS
lrrSclo rrc IcoIS Surrrcl5 ~cc ~ c c ~ c ccc ~ N c
I l48909l~ cw I ccc ccC
ccrc
J + + (+
PURCHASED PART
E I 5 IDENT I At(PL II'ER GE)IERAL|K)ELEQTIIIC l74 B~70!? I
CLASS 2
1.135 HAX8~ 40 TY
'fd
.20TYP RsC
e()See@54 32.
7 /cc
8 IIIc
10 AEF
BOTTOM VIEW
.25INXRKP
40 AKF 1.12 PAXCFh
.80 hft
041 DIA(NAX)RP
IN
~IN Q—
.43NAXRfr
5 +15 V
4 CON
15 r—O anI
dAL
fLKCTNICAL5tECIFICATIOISI
alTPUT VOLTACK AND CIXIEHT
SUPPLY VOLTACE AND FULL LOAD CUhhfNTS
INtUT DIAS CUAAKNT (EIINEN TEANIVALI
INccUT VOLTACE OFFSET AND DALAN K.
DVEALOAD AESPONSK:
VOLTACE CAIN (OPEN LOOt):
FAEOUENCY AEStONSE (UNITY CAIN).STADILITYl
CacccOH NODE VCLTACEI
fNVIAONNDnl
SLESc NATE:
uOTrSII.DELETED
1~5 2. DELr.TED1 D I.EYED
FSC 5820 COrd
-IOV 8 20 NATIKV 8 C NA !NIN)
-15V 8 30 l% (NAX)
50 cch (NAX) T 25OC+r (c cvl ~ cSINr ~ ccc\ dp+cNc'r
ANILIFIEh OUTPUT SHALL NOT EXNldl1'OaIINCcNAAAETEAIsTlcs (180o hEvfhsAL IN Pcchsf)NHEN 508JECTfD TO Atl INPUT TNANSlrNT c'!5 V
NAX AND I NS TINE CONSTANY SUPEAllcPOSED UPON
SIO VDC DIFFEAENTIAL INPUTS.
85 cN
I Idld (TYP)
20 CS/DECADE NAP ROLL OFF SLOPE TO AY LEAST
Q~ UNITcc OAIH +REOUENCY.
IOV
OPEAATIH< 0 6tft TDll AND 0 902 AEL NISIIOITY$TDAAcfl 554c TO +100oc TKlctINPUT DIAS CUhhf IT VS. TENPS Irch/OCINPUT DIAS CUhhrNT VS FIICKl 20ccA/30 DAYS
OFrSSET VOLTACE YS. TENtl 50 uv/oCOFFSET VO'ACf 'I'. YINfl 100uv/30 DAYS
IV/u SEC (KIN)
vKNC)0%
VI A INC 0IA&AN
IEXTKANALDIAS tOTENTICNKTEA SUM.IKE SY USfh)
~ EcclcOccS rucuIS .0CAT. NQ
A~bB5E":L I ACM44c1
'id''TMHE=-l <c.X
040":I24I K~ r.GARCIA5 i~c cl cc
2(2 B IOISA//- A/o.Z ~se~.-.:.I~>~.~rO~,.> ~./JAP 7/p>~ cr .'O p.CuOOVr~Sr.rrScrcCC ~ >
) Q.Id~A+ O'C+
4 ld~ -ct F+ ulcer N- 4c)312,ZICYCS CAY CccCC„ t. CcCCr I
~~ ccu,
ADD=D SH.2NJ&9~6IS«.~CHK.BY:K.REDOICK
04IG ~/429F 4299
427A430A
jtg IiliIYIIJ
~ilu/y/ SAN JOSE ccc w cc ~ orner 2 ~
rI >DDV32885 . CI /.'.&
V
~
'anuary
28, 1988
DOCKET NO(S) . 50-410DISTRIBUTION w/0 encl~/PDI-1 Rdg.CVoganMHaughey
SUBJECT: NIAGARA YiOHAWK POWER CORPORATIONNine Nile Point Nuclear Station, Unit 2
~I
The following documents concerning our review of the subject facility are transmitted foryour information.
Notice of Receipt of Application, dated
Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated ~ gr g
Notice of Availability of Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated
Safety Evaluation Report, or Supplement No. dated
Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact, dated
Q Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License or Amendment toFacility Operating License, dated
Q Bi-Weekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Operating Licenses Involving No
Significant Hazards Considerations, dated [see page(s) ]Exemption, dated
Construction Permit No. CPPR- , Amendment No. dated
+ Facility Operating License No. , Amendment No. dated
Order Extending Construction Completion Date, dated
Monthly Operating Report for transmitted by letter dated
Annual/Semi-Annual Report-transmitted by letter dated
XOTHER: Bi-veekly Notice covering period through January 13, 1988. Expiration datefor hearing requests and comments; February 12, 1988.
Enclosures:As stated
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
CC:
PDI-1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
CVogan~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 08 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1/28/88
OFFICE/
SURNAME/
DATE)
NRC FORM 318 110/80) NRCM 0240 OFF I CIA L 8 EGO R D COPY
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
4
U
dli
Y
P
September 2, 1987
DOCKET NO(S). 50"410
See Attached List of'ddressees
DISTRIBUTION w/o enclDocket File w/enclPDI-1 Rdg.CVoganMHaughey
SUBJECT: NIAGARA MOHAMK POMER CORPORATIONNine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit No. 2
The following documents concerning our review of the subject facility are transmitted foryour information.
+ Noti ce of Receipt of Appl icati on, dated
Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated
Notice of Availability of Draft/Final Environmental Statement, dated
Safety Evaluation Report, or Supplement No. dated
Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact, dated
Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Facility Operating License .or Amendment toFaci1 i ty Operating License, dated
Q Bi-Meekly Notice; Applications and Amendments to Operating Licenses Involving No
Si gni ficant Hazards Cons iderati ons, dated tsee page(s) ]Exemption, dated
Construction Permit No. CPPR- , Amendment No. dated
Facility Operating License No. , Amendment No. dated
Order Extending Construction Completion Date, dated
Monthly Operating Report for transmitted by letter dated
Q Annual/Semi-Annual Report-transmitted by letter dated
X OTHER: Bi-Meekly notice covering period through Aggust 26, 1987. Expiration datefor hearing requests and comments; September 25, 1987.
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:As stated
cc: See next page
OFFICE/
SURNAME)
0AVE1
.....J?QI;.1.RlCVogan
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
9/y,/87~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
NRC FORM 3IS IIO/80I NRCM 0240 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
'I
l
I
I
E. rA V