Needle stick Injury in Jr Doctors

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/26/2019 Needle stick Injury in Jr Doctors

    1/5

    152 APRIL 2013Indian Medical Gazette

    In Practice

    Address for correspondence: Dr. H. Sanayaima Devi, Associate Professor, Wangkhel Lourembam Leikai, Near Durga Puja Lampak,

    Imphal East 795 004. E-mail : [email protected]

    Needle Stick Injuries among Junior Doctors

    Sh. Praveen,Associate Proessor, Microbiology,

    H. Sanayaima Devi,Associate Professor, Community Medicine,

    Ebenezer Phesao, PGT, Community Medicine,

    N. Shugeta Devi, PGT, Community Medicine

    Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Lamphelpat, Imphal, Manipur.

    Th. Netajini Devi,Assistant Professor,

    Dept. of Obs & Gyne, JNIMS, Porompat, Imphal West, Manipur.

    Abstract

    Objective:To determine the prevalence of needle stick

    injuries (NSIs) among junior doctors of RIMSand to assess

    the measures undertaken by the respondents after the NSI.

    Methods:A cross sectional study was conducted in RIMS,

    Imphal, Manipur among internees, house officers and post

    graduate trainees from Sept to Oct 2011. Self-administered

    questionnaire was used to collect data.Descriptive statistics

    like mean, percentage and standard deviation were used.

    Analysis was done using Chi square test. And P-value of

  • 7/26/2019 Needle stick Injury in Jr Doctors

    2/5

    APRIL 2013 153Indian Medical Gazette

    Needlestick injuries are a common event in the healthcareenvironment. When drawing blood, administering an

    intramuscular or intravenous drug, or performing other

    procedures involving sharps, the needle can slip and injure

    the healthcare worker. This sets the stage to transmit

    viruses from the source person to the recipient. Needlestick

    injuries may occur not only with freshly contaminated

    sharps, but also, after some time, with needles that carry

    dry blood. While the infectiousness of HIV and HCV

    decrease within a couple of hours, HBV remains stable

    during desiccation and infectious for more than a week3.

    Hepatitis B carries the greatest risk of transmission, with37 to 62% of exposed workers eventually showing

    seroconversion and 22 to 31% showing clinical Hepatitis B

    infection. The hepatitis C transmission rate has been reported

    at 1.8%4, but newer, larger surveys have shown only a

    0.5% transmission rate5. The overall risk of HIV infection

    after percutaneous exposure to HIV-infected material in the

    health care setting is 0.3%6.

    Junior doctors have the greatest risk of exposure to

    blood-borne pathogens, given their numerous encounters

    involving the use of sharp instruments on patients and the

    increased propensity for injury while learning new technical

    skill sets. The hazard of injury is further compounded by

    the high prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus

    (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV)

    among hospitalized patients. Therefore this study was

    conducted to determine the prevalence of needle stick

    injuries among junior doctors and to assess the measures

    undertaken by the respondents after the needle stick injuries.

    Material and Methods

    A cross sectional study was conducted in Regional

    Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Imphal, Manipur

    among all junior doctors from Sept to Oct 2011. The total

    number of junior doctors were 382 which included 92

    Internees, 245 PGs and 45 House Officers. Data were

    collected using a pre-tested and pre-designed self-

    administered questionnaire that consisted questions eliciting

    the particulars of respondent, number of needlestick injuries

    during last one year and an expanded set of questions about

    the recent needlestick event. For those who had more than

    one NSI, information for the most recent NSI was taken.

    After taking an informed verbal consent from the

    respondents, the questionnaires were distributed during the

    day in the hospital and during the night at the hostels. Thecompletely filled questionnaires were collected on the same

    day or the next day. PGs in Community medicine,

    Physiology, Forensic medicine, Pharmacology and Anatomy

    were not included in the study. Ethical approval was sought

    from Institutional Ethics Committee, RIMS, Imphal.

    Confidentiality of the respondents was maintained.

    Statistical analysis

    Descriptive statistics like mean, percentage and standard

    deviation were used. Analysis was done using Chi square

    test. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 11. And P-value of

  • 7/26/2019 Needle stick Injury in Jr Doctors

    3/5

    154 APRIL 2013Indian Medical Gazette

    Discussion

    Needle stick injuries pose a significant occupational risk

    for health care providers. In our study we found that nearly

    40% of the junior doctors had needlestick injury during the

    last one year. Different prevalence rates (30% to 71.1%)

    were reported from many studies conducted among

    different study populations7,8,9,10,11. A higher prevalence

    (83%) was recorded in a study done among postgraduate

    trainees in United States and it was reported that the

    frequency of injury was higher among surgical trainees

    than among all medical trainees12. Our study revealed that

    50.9% of NSI occurred by open bored needles. A higher

  • 7/26/2019 Needle stick Injury in Jr Doctors

    4/5

    APRIL 2013 155Indian Medical Gazette

    percentages (60% to 76%) were reported by otherworkers7,13. Drawing blood for laboratory test and during

    suturing were the main activities when junior doctors got

    NSI in the present study. In other studies8,12, suturing was

    the most common accident situation (45%-52%) followed

    by blood drawing (24%), whereas another study reported

    that recapping of a needle after use and drawing blood

    were the common reasons of injury14. In our study recapping

    was not practiced by majority of the respondents, this might

    be because 63% of the doctors had attended workshop or

    seminars related to it. Similar findings were reported by

    other workers10,12. Of the injured doctors, 62 (54.4%) were

    not using gloves which is consistent with other reports8.

    However, in another study only 28% of the nursing care

    workers in Iran did not use any personal protective

    equipment10. In the present study, respondents indicated

    that being in a hurry was the leading cause of their injury

    which is consistent with other findings12. In other studies,

    it has been shown that lack of experience in many

    procedures, insufficient training, work overload and fatigue

    leads to occupational sharp injuries15.

    Furthermore, in this study out of the doctors who got

    NSI, majority of them (91.8%) did not take post exposure

    prophylaxis. Similar findings were reported by other

    researchers7,11. A more recent survey of all types of providers

    from Iowa medical organization found that 34% reported

    their exposure to an employee health service16. The risk of

    under reporting and thus delaying or foregoing treatment is

    significant. HIV, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C being highly

    prevalent in the state of Manipur, the chances of being

    infected by these diseases are high as our study indicates

    that most needle pricks went unreported and untreated by

    PEP. Our study found out that majority of the respondents

    had not done HIV, HBV and HCV testing after the injury.

    Reporting the injury to an authorized centre enablescounseling regarding the risk of exposure and prevention

    to secondary transmission, including possible transmission

    to patients.

    We assessed only junior doctors because they are at

    higher risk for needle stick injury. It might not be

    representative of the RIMS doctors as a whole but still our

    study could give some important information regarding NSI.

    In our knowledge probably, this is the first survey of needle

    stick injuries in Manipur and particularly in RIMS.

    Information was self reporting and there is a possibility of

    misclassification, although anonymous nature of the survey

    would be expected to facilitate accurate reporting.

    Conclusion

    Needle stick injuries among junior doctors are common

    and often not reported and majority of them did not take

    post exposure prophylaxis. These findings warranted the

    need for ongoing attention to strategies to reduce such

    injuries in a systematic way and to improve reporting system

    so that appropriate medical care can be delivered.

    References

    1. Needlestick injury. Available at URL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Needlestick_injury. Accessed on

    27th Sept. 2011.

    2. Occupational health. Available at URL: http://

    www.who.int/occupational_health/topics/neelinjuries/

    en/index.html. Accessed on 27th Sept 2011.

    3. Sarrazin U., Brodt H.R., Sarrazin C., Zeuzem S.

    Prophylaxis against HBV, HCV and HIV after

    occupational exposure.Dtsch Arztebl.102(33):2234

    2239, 2005.

    4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Updated

    US Public Health Service guidelines for the

    management of occupational exposures to HBV, HCV,

    and HIV and recommendations for post exposure

    prophylaxis.

    5. Jagger J., Puro V. DeCarli G. Occupational

    transmission of hepatitis C virus. JAMA. 288(12):

    1469-1471, 2002.

    6. CDC Cooperative Needlestick Surveillance Group R.

    Marcus, Surveillance of health care workers exposed

    to blood from patients infected with the humanimmunodeficiency virus.N Engl J Med.319:1118

    1123, 1988.

    7. Ghofranipour F., Asadpour M., Ardebili H.E., Niknami

    S., Hajizadeh E. Needle Sticks / Sharps Injuries

    and Determinants in Nursing Care Workers. EJSS.

    1(2):191-197, 2009.

    8. Meunier O., Almeida N., Hernandez C., Bientz M.

    Blood exposure accidents among medical students.

    Med Mal Infect. 31:537-543, 2004.

  • 7/26/2019 Needle stick Injury in Jr Doctors

    5/5

    156 APRIL 2013Indian Medical Gazette

    9. Patterson J.M., Novak C.B., Mackinnon S.E., EllisR.A. Needlestick injuries among medical students.

    Am J Infect Control. 31:226-230, 2003.

    10. Askarian M., Malekmakan L. The prevalence of

    needle stick injuries in medical, dental, nursing and

    midwifery students at the university teaching hospitals

    of Shiraz, Iran. Indianjmedsci. 60(6):227-232, 2006.

    11. Shiao J.S., Mclaws M.L., Huang K.Y., Guo Y.L.

    Student nurses in Taiwan at high risk for needlestick

    injuries.Ann Epidemiol, 12:197-201, 2002.

    12. Makary M.A., Al-Attar A., Holzmueller C.G., SextonB.J., Syin D., Gilson M.M., Sulkowski, Pronovost

    P.J. Needlestick Injuries among Surgeons in

    Training.N Engl J Med. 356:26-39, 2007.

    13. Moghimi M., Marashi S.A., Kabir A., Taghipour H.R.,

    Faghihi-Kashani A.H., Ghoddoosi I., Alavian S.M..

    Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of IranianSurgeons About Blood-Borne Diseases. J Surg

    Res.151(1):80-84, 2009.

    14. Azap A., Ergnl O., Memikolu K.O., Yeilkaya A.,

    Altunsoy A., Bozkurt G., Tekeli E. Occupational

    exposure to blood and body fluids among health care

    workers in Ankara, Turkey.AJIC. 33(1):48-52, 2005.

    15. Rogers B., Goodno L. Evaluation of interventions

    to prevent needlestick injuries in health care

    occupations.Am J Prev Med.18(4):90-98, 2000.

    16. Doebbeling B.N., Vaughn T.E., McCoy K.D.,

    Beekmann S.E., Woolson R.F., Ferguson K.J., Torner

    J.C. Percutaneous injury, blood exposure, and

    adherence to standard precautions: are hospital- based

    health care providers still at risk? Clin Infect Dis.

    37(8):1006-1013, 2003.