Upload
sade-bullock
View
230
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
NDIA SLAAD FORCEnet Innovation and Experimentation Brief
CAPT (sel) Rick Simon “Simo”Deputy FORCEnet NETWARCOM
29 April 2004
FORCEnet
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetAgendaAgenda
• FORCEnet Organization and Alignment• FORCEnet Experimentation• Trident Warrior• FORCEnet FY05/FY06 Sea Trial Priorities• FORCEnet Engagement Packs
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetForce Development DirectorateForce Development Directorate
Deputy/Technical DirectorGS-2210-14P. JacksonBSC 80110
Admin Asst.GS-318-07
VacantBSC 80400
Concept and Technology Discovery DivisionO-6/1800
CAPT(sel) C. Abbott
Experimentation DivisionO-5/1050
CAPT(sel) R. SimonBSC 80020
Operational Architectures DivisionGS-1550-14
D. MillerBSC 60080
Readiness Sys Innov & Integration DivisionGS-2210-14
S. TysorBSC 66030(F)
Enterprise W eb Services DivisionGS-15/O-6
CAPT S. Hiser
FORCE TransformationO-6/1000
CAPT ZalaskusBSC 80310
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetFORCEnet Experimentation DivisionFORCEnet Experimentation Division
DAA/ N etw o rksC TR
Do ug PistonN 6 / SPAW AR LNO
I OC DR Foster
N 91B
T echnical PilotC TR
Bruce BurkettFn21BB
C 4 I SystemsC TR
C liff BusseyFn21CB
T echnical AdvisorC TR
M errill W itzelFn21MW
KM Co nceptsC TR
Steve BanusFn21SB
I nnovatio n Co ncepts04/ 05/ 80090
LC DR McM ahonFn21
Plans/ J N T C D&EC TR
Dave Sum m erFn22DS
Plans C oo rdinatorC TR
G il Sho rttFn22GS
J N T C oo rdinatorC TR
R o n AdamoFn22RA
O ps C onceptsC TR
Steve W o odFn22SW
I nnovation Analysis D irC TR
Shelley G allupFn22SG
O p Thread AnalysisC TR
B ill K im pleFn22BK
Analysis System Develo perC TR
R andy M auleFn22RM
Data Base M anagerC TR
Vacant
Sea T rial/ Analysis/ J N T C O OR D/ I nterop04/ 05
LC DR BilsonFn22
I M Co nceptsC TR
M ark SteersFn23MS
Do ctrine/ Co nops/ T TPC TR
Brad Po eltlerFn23BP
I ntegratio n T eam Lead03
LC DR LaborFn231
Deputy04
LC DR L isow skiFn23D
C urrent O ps05
C DR J araFn23
Deputy04 / 05/ GS14
VacantFn2D
Branch H eadC APT (S) Abbo tt
Fn2
LEGEND
1 – Gov GS
15 – Contractor
7 – military
FORCEnet Execution CenterSan Diego
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetFORCEnet Alignment
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetFORCEnet Organization & Process FORCEnet Organization & Process
Fleet Modernization
Plan
Assessments
Campaign Analysis
Modeling
PPBSOperational Views
System Views
Technical Views
Architecture
Fleet
Experimentation Concept Development
Science & Technology
Innovation
Sea Trial
RequirementsNear term
Far Term
Mid Term
Assessment
FORCEnet Experimentation
CAPT (sel) Rick Simon “Simo”Deputy FORCEnet NETWARCOM
29 April 2004
FORCEnet
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnet
FORCEnet FORCEnet CD&ECD&EPathPath
Mid and Far Mid and Far TermTerm
FORCEnet FORCEnet Prototype PathPrototype Path
Near TermNear Term
FORCEnet Campaign Plan: Two Path Strategy
FY 03 FY 04 FY 05
FY 03 FY 04 FY 05
Block 0 Block 1
FORCEnet Trident Warrior
1. Field FORCEnet Block capabilities to the Fleet including the enabling organization and processes.
2. Pursue rapid prototyping of FORCEnet capabilities to improve joint warfighting now.
1. Provide actionable recommendations from experimentation results to Navy PPBS process.
Feeding Concepts to prototyping
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetFORCEnet Concept DevelopmentFORCEnet Concept Development
• Develop a draft functional-level concept for FORCEnet which describes how future joint and combined network-centric capabilities may be used to facilitate and enhance naval operations in the 2015-2020 timeframe.
• Supports: – FORCEnet transformational requirements development process,
– FORCEnet operational architecture development
– Concept development & experimentation
• Guided by the FORCEnet Vision• FORCEnet concept will serve as a coherent unifying concept that
enables Sea Strike, Sea Shield, and Sea Basing, as well as a range of supporting concepts.
Foundation for FORCEnet Requirements, Architecture and CD&E
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnet
FORCEnet FORCEnet CD&ECD&EPathPath
Mid and Far Mid and Far TermTerm
FORCEnet FORCEnet Prototype PathPrototype Path
Near TermNear Term
FORCEnet Campaign Plan: Two Path Strategy
FY 03 FY 04 FY 05
FY 03 FY 04 FY 05
Block 0 Block 1
FORCEnet Trident Warrior
1. Field FORCEnet Block capabilities to the Fleet including the enabling organization and processes.
2. Pursue rapid prototyping of FORCEnet capabilities to improve joint warfighting now.
1. Provide actionable recommendations from experimentation results to Navy PPBS process.
Feeding Concepts to prototyping
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetWhat is a Trident Warrior?What is a Trident Warrior?
• Trident Warrior is:• The Major FORCEnet Sea Trial Experiment
• Annual
• NETWARCOM sponsored
• Trident Warrior Experiment Intent• Provide a rapid fielding of improved warfighting capability to the Fleet, with full
supportability and maintainability.
• Develop supporting Tactics/Techniques/Procedures (TTP) and Concept of Operations (CONOPS) on how best to use this new capability to optimize the execution of Naval operations.
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetFORCEnet Trident Warrior
Process ContributorsFORCEnet Trident Warrior
Process Contributors
• NETWARCOM – Navy’s Operational Agent for FORCEnetTrident Warrior lead
• SPAWAR – FORCEnet Chief EngineerTrident Warrior CHENG
• Naval Postgraduate School – Analysis Lead for TW
• Naval War College – TW Wargame lead
• Navy Warfare Development Command – Sea Trial CoordinatorWarfare Centers of Excellence develop CONOPS / TTPS
• Fleet Forces Command (FFC) – Sea Trial LeadApproval and oversight for all resources and ship installs
• OPNAV N61 – Resource SponsorFORCEnet PE Line
Integrate experiment results into POM assessment process
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetTrident Warrior ApproachTrident Warrior Approach
Inte
gra
tionProgram of Record Ship Alts
Program of Record Temp Alts
In Theater Prototypes
New Prototypes
Fleet Driven
TTP and Conops Results in an early delivery of FORCEnet capability with a subset of supportable leave behind capability
Tailored to meet Fleet / COCOM requirements
Leverage Fleet / Joint exercises
and experiments
NewCONOPS
NewTech.
Impact onprocesses &organization
Sea Trial and FORCEnet Priorities
CAPT (sel) Rick Simon “Simo”Deputy FORCEnet NETWARCOM
29 April 2004
FORCEnet
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnet
Conventional Strike(Include SOF) Theater Air & Missile
Defense
CNO
Sea Strike Sea Shield Sea Basing FORCEnet
C2F/5F C3F/7F C2F/6F NETWARCOM
NWDC
Sea Strike Sea Basing FORCEnet
NSAWC
SUW
Deploy and Employ
Sea Trial Organization
STOM
C2F
N702
N701
N704
N703
Sea Shield
CFFC
Sea Trial ESG
Integrated JT LogAT / FP
COP / CTP
Comms & Data Networks ISR
Undersea Warfare
Strategic Deterrence
CSF
SWDG
NFS
SWDG
CPF N00ASW
SWDG
FFC N9 C2F FFC N41
C2F
Comm & Data Netwks.Team Lead: NETWARCOMCPF, CNE, CSF, CNSF,CNAF, NWDC, NNSOCConsulting Members:OPNAV N61, ONR, COTFSPAWAR, MCCDC
NETWARCOM
NETWARCOM FFC N2
Intel. Surv. & Reccon.Team Lead: FFC N2CPF, CNE, CSF,CNSF, CNAF, NWDC,NNWC, NSAWC, NNSOCConsulting Members:OPNAV N61, ONRCOTF, ONI,SPAWARMCCDC
Comm. Op. & Tac Pict.Team Lead:NETWARCOMCPF, CNE, CSF, CNSF,CNAF, NWDC, NSAWCCUSConsulting Members:OPNAV N61, ONR, COTFSPAWAR, MCCDC
PrePo JT Assets Afloat
ST ESG: All OA, N7, CNR, NWDC, MCCDC ST ESG: All OA, N7, CNR, NWDC, MCCDC
Executive Agent for SEA TRIAL
SEA TRIALCoordinatorOperational Agents
Fleet CollaborativeTeams
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetCommander’s IntentCommander’s Intent
• Guidance for FORCENet FCT’s to be used to develop the FY 05/06 FORCEnet Sea Trial Execution Plan
• Specifics:50% of experimental initiatives will address NCDP gaps
• Highest priority is network visualization and instrumentation
50% of experimental initiatives will address Numbered Fleet Priorities• Top 10 IT priorities• Sea Strike, Sea Shield, Sea Basing FORCEnet enabling capabilities
FY 05 main Effort• TW 05, theme is coalition / MN interoperability partnership with C2F, East
Coast, ESG or CSG• Covers the full spectrum of experimentation
– Prototyping, concept development, non leave behind initiatives
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetCommander’s IntentCommander’s Intent
• Top Priority, NLT Jul 2004– Develop a FORCEnet Functional / Enabling Concept based on the NOC
– Foundation for concept based experimentation in the future
– Basis for FORCEnet requirements and architectures
• End State– FORCEnet two-year Execution Plan will directly impact PR 07 and POM 08
and have immediate and tangible results which address Fleet priorities for SP 21
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetNETWARCOM FY 05 PrioritiesNETWARCOM FY 05 Priorities
COMMS AND NETWORK DATABASES
1. INSUFFICIENT BANDWIDTH (BW) FOR SMALL SHIPS
2. 360 DEGREE SATCOM RECEPTION
3. MONITORING AND CONTROLLING BW USAGE
4. GLOBAL NETWORK VISUALIZTION – NETOPS COP
5. ENTERPRISE-WIDE INFORMATION ASSURANCE
6. AUTOMATED NETWORK SOFTWARE-CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT
7. UNUSED BW TO SHIPS
8. MLS IN SUPPORT OF COALITION OPERATIONS
9. DISTRIBUTED ISR FROM JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER (JSF ISR)
COMMON OPERATIONAL-TACTICAL PICTURE
1. BLUE FORCE TRACKER AND SITUATIONAL AWARENESS
2. UNDERSEA COMMON OPERATIONAL-TACTICAL PICTURE
3. IMPROVED MARITIME COTP
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetNETWARCOM FY 05 PrioritiesNETWARCOM FY 05 Priorities
INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE AND RECONNAISSANCE 1. ISR Management2. ISR sensors INFORMATION OPERATIONS1. COMPUTER NETWORKD DEFENSE-IN-DEPTH2. CENTRALIZED IO MISSION PLANNING CAPABILITY3. DEPLOYABLE MULTI-MEDIA NAVAL PSYOP CAPABILITY4. COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRONIC ATTACK CAPABILITY5. ENHANCED SPECIFIC EMITTER IDENTIFICATION (SEI) CAPABILITY6. NEXT GENERATION SURFACE EW SYSTEM7. SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT TOOL8. SHIP-BORNE COUNTER SPACE CAPABILITY9. TACTICAL-OPERATIONAL COMPUTER NETWORK ATTACK10. DATA LINK DECEPTION CAPABILITY
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetNETWARCOM FY 06 PrioritiesNETWARCOM FY 06 Priorities
• COMMS and Networks– GIG-Compliant Network Monitoring & Control experimentation– On-the Move Naval Networking experimentation– Coalition information sharing (comms, COP, CIE and CDS)– Information Assurance / Computer Network Defense-in-Depth– Information Management/Knowledge Management
• COTP – BFT and Situational awareness – Coordinated Real-time Execution experimentation– Improved Maritime COTP and Decision Making experimentation– COP correlation and fusion– XTCF (Extensible Tactical C4I Framework)– Battle management and synchronization– USW CUP
• ISR– On-Demand ISR experimentation– Improved Imagery Experimentation– Horizontal fusion
FORCEnet Engagement Packs
CAPT (sel) Rick Simon “Simo”Deputy FORCEnet NETWARCOM
29 April 2004
FORCEnet
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetFORCEnet Engagement Pack (FnEP)
DefinitionFORCEnet Engagement Pack (FnEP)
Definition
FORCEnet Engagement Packs are small scale system ensembles which demonstrate the engagement enabling power of FORCEnet by integrating Joint sensors, platforms, weapons, warriors, networks, and command & control systems with requirements to perform cross-mission enabled Network-centric Combat Reach Capabilities
Combat Reach Capabilities:• Integrated Fire Control• Automated Battle Management Aids• Composite Tracking• Composite Combat Identification• Common/Single Integrated Pictures
FnEP Attributes:• Joint e.g. Naval, AF, Army• Engagement-oriented • Adaptive e.g., Strike and MD• Field near-term e.g., w/in 5 Years• Capability Based
POC: LCDR Joe McMahon, NETWARCOM, [email protected]
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnet
Experimentation
Pack Development
FY2006 FY2007 FY2008FY2004 FY2005 FY2009
Document requirementsCommon Reference Scenarios, Choose systems
Align Combat Reach technology and acquisition efforts
Initiate Pathfinder
Effort
JFCOM BMC2 Oversight
OrganizationOrganization
ONR NIFC Demo
MD/Strike Pack Factor Integration
IOC Packs
SUW/USW/MCMPack Development
Experimentation
M&S/HWIL JDEP Field Exercises/Sea TrialTech Demos
Pack Development
Fn Pathfinder: FnEPFn Pathfinder: FnEP
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetQuestions?Questions?
“Speed to Capability”
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnet“FORCEnet will enable the naval service to employ a fully netted force, engage with widely distributed
combat forces, and command with increased awareness and speed as an integral part of the
joint team.”
We’ve started to FORCEnet … appreciate the reason why, get to know the language and
join up!
- Admiral Vern Clark- Admiral Vern Clark
25
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnet
BackupsBackups
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnet
USN CONCEPT
HIERARCHY
USMC CONCEPT
HIERARCHY
JOINT CAPSTONE CONCEPT
NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY
NATIONAL MILITARY STRATEGY
JOINT VISION 2020
NAVAL POWER 21
NAVAL TRANSFORMATION
ROADMAP
NAVAL OPERATING CONCEPT
SEA POWER 21
MARINE CORPS STRATEGY 21
Naval Strategy
Operational Concepts =Sea ShieldSea StrikeSea Basing
Operational Concepts =Ship to Objective Maneuver,Exp ManueverWarfare
Functional Concepts = Intel, Log, MCM, …
Functional Concepts = FORCEnet
The how to achieve Naval transformation
Naval Vision
Naval CapstoneConcept to achieveGlobal CONOPS
Joint Operating Concept
National Guidance
Joint Guidance
Transformation Drivers for Sea Power 21
Transformation Drivers for Sea Power 21
TRANSFORMATION PLANNING GUIDANCE
Under development
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetFORCEnet Taxonomy: The basis for The Concept
Development & Experimentation PathFORCEnet Taxonomy: The basis for The Concept
Development & Experimentation Path
4.1.1 - Large Numbers (>10000)
4.1.2 - Low cost
4.1.3 - Distributed
4.1.4 - Autonomous
4.1.5 - Multiple Phenomena
4.1.6 - Continuous coverage4.1.6.1 – Subsurface4.1.6.2 – Surface4.1.6.3 – Air4.1.6.4 - Cyber space
4.1.7 - Standards based output
4.1.8 – Connected
4.1.9 – Remotely Operated …..
4.2.1 - Node adressable network architecture
4.2.2Universal access4.2.2.1-Tactical (LTNs)4.2.2.2-Operational (LANs)4.2.2.3-Strategic (Enterprise)
4.2.3 - Fault Tolerant
4.2.4 - LPD/LPI Comms
4.2.5 - Quality of Service
4.2.6 - Multiple, redundant comm paths
4.2.7 -Mobile/Expeditionary
4.2.8 - Scalable
4.2.9 - Trusted
4.2.10 – Highly available
4.2.11 - Standards based protocol
4.2.12 - Next generation internet like
4.2.13 – Adaptable to C2 needs
4.2.14 – Self organizing
4.2.15 – Self healing
4.2.16 – Common geo/temporal reference…..
4.3.1 – Information Management4.3.1.1- Data mining4.3.1.2 - Filtering4.3.1.3 - Association4.3.1.4 - Analysis4.3.1.5 - Alert4.3.1.6 - Prediction4.3.1.7 - Decision support4.3.1.8 – Assimilation4.3.1.9 – Fusion4.3.1.10 - Trust/Pedigree
4.3.2 - Common, intuitive user interface
4.3.3 - Common, intuitive info representation
4.3.4 - Real time processing
4.3.5 - Reach back
4.3.6 - Semantic data markup
4.3.7 – Agent based computing….
4.4.1 - Distributed commanders
4.4.2 - Well understood ROE
4.4.3 - Well understood commanders intent4.4.4 - Situation specific training4.4.4.1 - Adversary’s Region4.4.4.2 - Adversary’s Culture
4.4.5 - Robust team rehearsal
4.4.6 - Collaborative planning (Naval, Joint, Coalition)
4.4.7 - Access to information (Naval, Joint, Coalition)
4.4.7.1 - Based on need vice comms/computers
4.4.8 - Reduce reaction time4.4.9 - Cognition4.4.9.1 – Presentation4.4.9.2 – Representation…..
4.5.1 - Defensive IO4.5.1.1 - Strong computer network defense
•Hardware•Software•Processes•Procedures
4.5.1.2 -Intrusion detection
4.5.2 Quality of Service……
4. IKA
4.3 Adaptive / Automated decision aids and human centric engineering
4.4 Distributed, collaborative C2 and human centric engineering
4.5 Information Assurance
4.1 Expeditionary, multi tiered sensor and weapons grids
4.2 Dynamic multi-path and survivable
networks
4.2 Dynamic multi-path and survivable networks
4.1 Expeditionary, multi tiered sensor and weapons grids
4.3 Adaptive / Automated decision aids and human centric engineering
4.4 Distributed, collaborative C2
and human centric engineering
4.5 Information Assurance
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnet
Assistant Secretary of the NavyResearch, Development, Acquisition
Acquisition
NAVSEA
NAVAIR
Chief of Naval Operations
Operations & Requirements
CFFC
CommanderFleet Forces Command
NETWARCOM
Naval NetworkWarfare Command
SPAWAR as SPAWAR as FORCEnetFORCEnet
Chief EngineerChief Engineer
Additional
Duty
AdditionalDuty
AdditionalDuty
SPAWAR
SPAWAR as SPAWAR as FORCEnet FORCEnet
Chief AssessorChief Assessor
FORCEnet AlignmentFORCEnet Alignment
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetStatus of FORCEnet Requirements/ Architectures/ Standards Implementation
Status of FORCEnet Requirements/ Architectures/ Standards Implementation
FORCEnetCompliance
Checklist
ArchitecturesStandards &Assessments
FORCEnetRequirements
GenerationComptroller
Guidance RequirementsReview &Validation
S&T/FNC
Planning
OPNAVSponsorPlanning
OSD/Agency
Coordination
RequirementsGuidance
NETWARCOM, MCCDC.& Fleet OAG CNO (N61)
SPAWAR
CNO (N70)
DoN CIO
Services,JCS, JFCOM
In Place
Legend
In Process
In Review
ISR/DCGS Planning
AcquisitionPlanning &Execution
AcquisitionGuidance
NTWSInteroperabilityRequirements
& Certification
CNO (N75, N76, N77, N78)
ONRNCTSI
JointCoordination
OSD (AT&L,NII), TCO,DoD CIO
CNO (N8)
ASN (FM&C)
POM/Investment
StrategyCNO (N70)
CNO (N20)
IT Policy &Requirements
PEOs, PMs,SYSCOMs
USMCImplementation
(EFDS)
Allies/Friends/Coalition
Coordination
AUSCANNZUKUSSingapore
ASN (RD&A)
Industry
CongressBAMS
DDXCVN21
LCS
CLIP
L i n k 4 / 1 1 / 1 6 / 2 2C E C / V o i c e / D a t aJ T R S / I B G W N
L o c a l P l a t f o r mN e t w o r k s
J F M C C
H u m a n - S y s t e m s
C E N T R I X
I n t e r f a c e
L i n k 4 / 1 1 / 1 6 / 2 2C E C / V o i c e / D a t aJ T R S / I B G W N
L o c a l P l a t f o r mN e t w o r k s
J F M C C
H u m a n - S y s t e m s
C E N T R I X
I n t e r f a c e
CNO and ASN(RD&A)Endorsed FORCEnet
Pilot Programs
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnet
6
FORCEnet Capabilities-Based Requirements Process
Definition of Enterprise FORCEnet Requirements/Architectures/Standards
Definition of Enterprise FORCEnet Requirements/Architectures/Standards
31
Establishment of Top-Level FO RCEnet Capabilities
C ollect, Process
a nd Distr ibut eO rg anic se nsor a ndw eap on Inf orma tion
C ollect, Processa nd Distr ibut e
N on -o rg an ic S enso rInfo rma tion
P ro vid e e xped itio na rym ulti-tie re d se nsor
an d w ea po ninf orma tion
C ond uct B attle
M ana gem e nt / C 2am on g N ava l
fo rces
C ond uct B attleM ana gem e nt / C 2
w ith Jo in tfo rces
C ond uct B attleM ana gem e nt / C 2
with C oalitionfo rces
C ollect, Fuse and
D isse mina teOpe ra tiona lInt ellig ence
Provide au tom ate d,tim ely a ccess a nd
excha ng e o f da ta withjo int a nd coalition forces
Assess, ch aracte r izeand dissem ina te
e nviro nm en talin form ation
C ollabo ra te withcivil /
law e nfo rce me ntag encies
Co ndu ctd istr ibu ted ,
collabo ra tiveco mm an d & con trol
M ana ge in fo rm atio n
tran sfer a mo ngNa valforces
M ana ge in fo rm atio ntransf er w it h
na tiona l net wo rks
M ana ge in fo rm atio ntransf er w it hJoint forces
M ana ge in fo rm atio n
transf er w it hcoa lit io n fo rce s
P rot ect frie ndlyinfo rma tio n
n etw orks
Provide D yn am ic,mu lti-pa th an d
su rvivab lenet wo rks
C o ndu ct
ope ra tiona land ta ct ica l
Plan ning
Co ndu ct n ett ed,p ro gn ostic
lo gistics
O rg anize, synch ro nizeand inte grate firesand m ane uve r t o
ena ble ma sse d effe cts
D yn am ica lly
allocate an dcon trol sen sors an d
se nsor p la tfo rm s
Provide Ad apt ive /au tom at ed
de cisio naids
Provide
R ea l-tim e a dap tab leMa n-m achine
System s
ProvideMu lti- l in ear
C og nitive p ro ce ssin gw arriors
Prote ct F r ie nd lyIn form ationOut sid e t he
N e two rk
ProvideH um an -ce ntr ic
inte gration
De ny, D e grade
a nd DisruptA dversary In form ation
In fluen ceA dversary
Percept io n
Pro vid e Info rm at io nWe apo ns
FORCE NET
C ollect, Process
a nd Distr ibut eO rg anic se nsor a ndw eap on Inf orma tion
C ollect, Processa nd Distr ibut e
N on -o rg an ic S enso rInfo rma tion
P ro vid e e xped itio na rym ulti-tie re d se nsor
an d w ea po ninf orma tion
C ond uct B attle
M ana gem e nt / C 2am on g N ava l
fo rces
C ond uct B attleM ana gem e nt / C 2
w ith Jo in tfo rces
C ond uct B attleM ana gem e nt / C 2
with C oalitionfo rces
C ollect, Fuse and
D isse mina teOpe ra tiona lInt ellig ence
Provide au tom ate d,tim ely a ccess a nd
excha ng e o f da ta withjo int a nd coalition forces
Assess, ch aracte r izeand dissem ina te
e nviro nm en talin form ation
C ollabo ra te withcivil /
law e nfo rce me ntag encies
Co ndu ctd istr ibu ted ,
collabo ra tiveco mm an d & con trol
M ana ge in fo rm atio n
tran sfer a mo ngNa valforces
M ana ge in fo rm atio ntransf er w it h
na tiona l net wo rks
M ana ge in fo rm atio ntransf er w it hJoint forces
M ana ge in fo rm atio n
transf er w it hcoa lit io n fo rce s
P rot ect frie ndlyinfo rma tio n
n etw orks
Provide D yn am ic,mu lti-pa th an d
su rvivab lenet wo rks
C o ndu ct
ope ra tiona land ta ct ica l
Plan ning
Co ndu ct n ett ed,p ro gn ostic
lo gistics
O rg anize, synch ro nizeand inte grate firesand m ane uve r t o
ena ble ma sse d effe cts
D yn am ica lly
allocate an dcon trol sen sors an d
se nsor p la tfo rm s
Provide Ad apt ive /au tom at ed
de cisio naids
Provide
R ea l-tim e a dap tab leMa n-m achine
System s
ProvideMu lti- l in ear
C og nitive p ro ce ssin gw arriors
Prote ct F r ie nd lyIn form ationOut sid e t he
N e two rk
ProvideH um an -ce ntr ic
inte gration
De ny, D e grade
a nd DisruptA dversary In form ation
In fluen ceA dversary
Percept io n
Pro vid e Info rm at io nWe apo ns
FORCE NET
33
Degree to which currency matches what is needed (0 = no match, 1 = high degree of matching between currency level needed and available)
Timeliness
Error and confidence level for time and position information compared to a standard reference
Precision
Percentage of ground truth relevant and necessary for ongoing taskCompleteness
Degree of lack of ambiguity with previous informationConsistency
Correspondence with ground truth-correlation coefficient (0= no correspondence with ground truth, 1= full correspondence with ground truth). Data matrix comprised of relevant information items estimates (for instance: detection, ID, velocity, location, heading, etc.)
Accuracy
Notional MeasureAttribute
Capability: provide expeditionary, multi-tiered sensor and weapon information
Development of FORCEnet Metrics
SECNAV Report toCongress on FORCEnet
•FY 2003 Appropriations Conference Report (107-732): “While a solid organizational structure for the development of FORCEnet requirements has been established … conferees direct that the Secretary of the Navy submit, by May 1, 2003, a detailed report on the FORCEnet program …define requirements.”
FORCEnet Campaign Plan
•Requirements
•Architectures
•Standards
•Policies
•FY 2004 Senate Appropriations Committee Report (108-87): “ The Committee is supportive of the goals of this integration program. … The Committee directs that the FORCEnet program establish these requirements, test them within the Navy Warfighting Experiments and Demonstration line, and release the approved requirements to those affected programs as quickly as possible in FY 2004.”
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnet
Operational Implementation,Refinement, and Update:•FORCEnet Innovation Continuum
•Trident Warrior “Speed to Capability”
Operational Implementation,Refinement, and Update:•FORCEnet Innovation Continuum
•Trident Warrior “Speed to Capability”
Acquisition Implementation,Refinement, and Update:•JRAE•FIOP/JBMC2/Other•FORCEnet Pilot Programs
Acquisition Implementation,Refinement, and Update:•JRAE•FIOP/JBMC2/Other•FORCEnet Pilot Programs
Enterprise Instantiation:• FORCEnet Compliance
Process/ Checklist
Enterprise Instantiation:• FORCEnet Compliance
Process/ Checklist
Working Baseline FORCEnet Requirements: 2003 FORCEnet Campaign Plan
Spiral Development and Implementation of FORCEnet Requirements/Architecture/ Standards
SECNAV Report to Congress
on FORCEnet
Congressional Direction FY2003/2004
Operational Requirements
System/Tech Requirements
Support/Policy Requirements
Implementation Requirements
FY03
FY04Updated FORCEnet Requirements:
2004 FORCEnet Campaign Plan
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetJoint / Allied Interoperability
2
HLS ScenarioHLS Scenario• USNORTHCOM• FEMA• DHS (TBD)• NGB• USCG• FBI (TBD)• Mexico (TBD)• Canada-Office of Critical Infrastructure
Protection and Emergency Preparedness (TBD)
Coalition ScenarioCoalition Scenario• USEUCOM
• CCEB nations: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom, United States
• NATO nations: Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Norway, Poland, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, Czech Republic, Hungary, The Netherlands, Greece, Lithuania, Romania
• PACRIM nations: Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Thailand (invited by USPACOM)
• Multinational Groups:– Multinational Naval Task Group
(MNTG – formerly AUSCANNZUKUS Navies)
Support to both scenariosSupport to both scenarios
• USA, USN, USMC, USAF
• USJFCOM
• DISA, NIMA, NSA, JITC
• Industry
Enhancing Allied/Coalition Interoperability- Joint Warfighter Interoperability Demonstration 2004/5 -
JFCOM JBMC2 Systems Engineering
Other Picture Efforts(TBD)
SIMPSISPSIGPSIAP
Blue Force Tracking – Army as Lead Service
Red Force Tracking – Precision Strike and TST
Targeting & Other Functions w/ Appropriate Ld Svc
FIOP
JFCOM(Oversight and Directive Authority)
Common C2/C4ISRT data/infrastructure services
Definition/coordinationof “picture efforts”*
Definition/coordinationof “functional/domain
efforts”
Imagery
COP
METOC
MTI
CEDGCCS-M
GCCS-ATBMCS
AFATDSASAS
MCSGCCS-AF
MSBLJSTARS
TESADSI
Aegis
GCCS
Coordination of FIOP SE processes and products with
POR systems andinfrastructure that implement
and field the capability
Service/Agency Programs
& Systems
JBMC2FIOPJBFSAWEEMC
JFCOM JBMC2 Systems Engineering
Other Picture Efforts(TBD)
SIMPSISPSIGPSIAP
Blue Force Tracking – Army as Lead Service
Red Force Tracking – Precision Strike and TST
Targeting & Other Functions w/ Appropriate Ld Svc
FIOP
JFCOM(Oversight and Directive Authority)
Common C2/C4ISRT data/infrastructure services
Definition/coordinationof “picture efforts”*
Definition/coordinationof “functional/domain
efforts”
Imagery
COP
METOC
MTI
CEDGCCS-M
GCCS-ATBMCS
AFATDSASAS
MCSGCCS-AF
MSBLJSTARS
TESADSI
Aegis
GCCS
Coordination of FIOP SE processes and products with
POR systems andinfrastructure that implement
and field the capability
Service/Agency Programs
& Systems
JBMC2FIOPJBFSAWEEMC
TSVTSVTSVTSVTSV
TBMCS
NCESAWACS AWACS AWACS
SmallUnmanned
Ground Vehicle
MedicalVehicle
Mounted CombatSystem
InfantryCarrierVehicle
NLOS Cannon
NLOS Mortar
Mule
IntelligentMunitions System
NLOS LaunchSystem
MaintVehicle UAV
Class IV
UnattendedGround
Sensors
UAVClass III
UAVClass I
UAVClass II
Soldier
HIMARS
TSVBlackhawk
Chinook
Land Warrior III
ATACMS
Comanche
AerialCommonSensor
JSTARS
Prophet
Multi-MissionRadar
Global Hawk
IBS
Rivet Joint
NSANGICCIA
HomelandDefense
DOE DIA
NIMA
National Databases
NetworkedBattle
Command
Armed RoboticVehicle
Network
Recon &Surv Vehicle
C2Vehicle
APACHE
WIN-TAccess
A2C2S
DCGS
Integrating USN and USA Efforts
Maneuver
ISR
C2
Sustainment
Networked Fires
Patriot
MEADS
MLRS
FBCB2
MCS
FCS UE Complementary SystemsFCS UA Core/CP Systems
Joint Systems/Multi-national
JLENS
GMLRS
UAH
DCGS-AASAS
AFATDS
CSSCS
NFCS
Version 3/31/03
IAS
TES
C2 Constellation
DTSS
Profiler
IMETS
AMDWSFAADC2ADSI
JTAGSSentinel
TAIS
ADOCS
Paladin
BATES
Firefinder
ADLER
JSOF C2
MCTIS
JWARN
SECOMP-I
JMPS
DCTS
IMS
TBMCS
FORCEnet
GCSS-A
OneSAFWARSIM
CATT
CCTT
TSV
Yellow Text = Increment 2 interface
CA&PsyopVehicle
TESSDLS
AWACS
GES
GCCS-A JC2
C2
JNMS
TCO
SIMACET
C2PC
SJFHQ
LLAP/FAST
DCGS-A
GBS
GSTAMIDS
ASTAMIDS
MTS
TC-AIMS-II
F/A-22
BFT
WIN-T ACCESS (UA)
IDM AKMS DSN EKMS EPLRS SINCGARSWIN-T JTRSFASTLANE STEP/TeleportBVTC PPS-5SIPRNET NIPRNET
GMF SATCOMDRSNSMART-T STAR-T (Phoenix)
LFC2ISAMPS
GBS
SICFSIR
HEROS-2/1
ATacCS
ComBAT
WIN-T ACCESS (UE)
WIN-T Access WIN-T ACCESS (JIM)
WIN-T ACCESS
AWACS
ATIA
CTIA
MC4ADA
MFCS LAMPAM
NFCS
MIP
= indirect
interoperability
DJC2
SIGP NCES
SISP
SIAP
FTTS
FMTV
GCCS-J
FORCENET
NFCS
JC2
Present Info
FORCEnetFORCEnet C2 CONSTELLATIONC2 CONSTELLATIONOpen Architecture Sensor Net
Generate Info
Transport Info
USN - USAF Comm Integration
FIOP
E-2
AOC
Aegis
C2 Ship
EP-3
Shooters
Shooters
Satellite
CEC
U2
E-3Precision Targeting
Post/Process
Converging USN-USAF C4ISR Architectures
TSVTSVTSVTSVTSV
TBMCS
NCESAWACS AWACS AWACS
SmallUnmanned
Ground Vehicle
MedicalVehicle
Mounted CombatSystem
InfantryCarrierVehicle
NLOS Cannon
NLOS Mortar
Mule
IntelligentMunitions System
NLOS LaunchSystem
MaintVehicle UAV
Class IV
UnattendedGround
Sensors
UAVClass III
UAVClass I
UAVClass II
Soldier
HIMARS
TSVBlackhawk
Chinook
Land Warrior III
ATACMS
Comanche
AerialCommonSensor
JSTARS
Prophet
Multi-MissionRadar
Global Hawk
IBS
Rivet Joint
NSANGICCIA
HomelandDefense
DOE DIA
NIMA
National Databases
NetworkedBattle
Command
Armed RoboticVehicle
Network
Recon &Surv Vehicle
C2Vehicle
APACHE
WIN-TAccess
A2C2S
DCGS
Integrating USN and USA Efforts
Maneuver
ISR
C2
Sustainment
Networked Fires
Patriot
MEADS
MLRS
FBCB2
MCS
FCS UE Complementary SystemsFCS UA Core/CP Systems
Joint Systems/Multi-national
JLENS
GMLRS
UAH
DCGS-AASAS
AFATDS
CSSCS
NFCS
Version 3/31/03
IAS
TES
C2 Constellation
DTSS
Profiler
IMETS
AMDWSFAADC2ADSI
JTAGSSentinel
TAIS
ADOCS
Paladin
BATES
Firefinder
ADLER
JSOF C2
MCTIS
JWARN
SECOMP-I
JMPS
DCTS
IMS
TBMCS
FORCEnet
GCSS-A
OneSAFWARSIM
CATT
CCTT
TSV
Yellow Text = Increment 2 interface
CA&PsyopVehicle
TESSDLS
AWACS
GES
GCCS-A JC2
C2
JNMS
TCO
SIMACET
C2PC
SJFHQ
LLAP/FAST
DCGS-A
GBS
GSTAMIDS
ASTAMIDS
MTS
TC-AIMS-II
F/A-22
BFT
WIN-T ACCESS (UA)
IDM AKMS DSN EKMS EPLRS SINCGARSWIN-T JTRSFASTLANE STEP/TeleportBVTC PPS-5SIPRNET NIPRNET
GMF SATCOMDRSNSMART-T STAR-T (Phoenix)
LFC2ISAMPS
GBS
SICFSIR
HEROS-2/1
ATacCS
ComBAT
WIN-T ACCESS (UE)
WIN-T Access WIN-T ACCESS (JIM)
WIN-T ACCESS
AWACS
ATIA
CTIA
MC4ADA
MFCS LAMPAM
NFCS
MIP
= indirect
interoperability
DJC2
SIGP NCES
SISP
SIAP
FTTS
FMTV
GCCS-J
FORCENET
NFCS
JC2
Present Info
FORCEnetFORCEnet C2 CONSTELLATIONC2 CONSTELLATIONOpen Architecture Sensor Net
Generate Info
Transport Info
USN - USAF Comm Integration
FIOP
E-2
AOC
Aegis
C2 Ship
EP-3
Shooters
Shooters
Satellite
CEC
U2
E-3Precision Targeting
Post/Process
Converging USN-USAF C4ISR Architectures
14
GIG Transformation Experiment (Sept 04)-Service participation in GIG Test Bed
-Service interoperability while transitioning to
GIG architecture (e.g. IPV6 service architectures)
TST Inter-Service Interoperability Experiment (Sep 04)-Realistic Time Sensitive Targeting / Precision Engagement
Simulation Experiment with multi-service labs and operators
-Examine concept/systems for Joint Networked Targeting
-Examine Interoperability and TT&P issues
Joint Rapid Architecture Experimentation
Army FCS/AEA
USAF Airborne C2 Constellation
NSA/IC NetworkTestbeds
DISA TeleportTest Locations
Navy FORCEnetTSAT Testbed (MIT/LL)• Optical Comm Testbed• RF Testbed• Network Testbed
DISA TerrestrialGIG-BE Test Segments
GIG Testbed•Optical Core (NRL)•ATD Net•BOSSnet
Enterprise Services Interoperability (Mar 04)-Joint Service Open Architecture Software Development-Publish and Subscribe
FORCEnet/FCS Interoperability (May/June 04)-Sharing Blue Force Tracking-Joint Tactical Digital Fires- Distributed Command and Control
JEFX Air Force/Army Experiment (July 04)-Close Air Support
-Blue Force Tracking
JTRS Testbeds(SSC, NRL, JTEL)
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetProcess for Iterative TransformationProcess for Iterative Transformation
Experimentation & Assessment ImplementationConcept DevelopmentCFFC, Fleets, NETWARCOM, OPNAV, ONR, NWDC, MCCDC, COEs, NPS
Fleets, NETWARCOM, CFFC, NWC, NWDC, MCCDC, TYCOMs, SYSCOMs, COEs, JFCOM, ONR
CFFC, OPNAV, NETWARCOM,SYSCOMs
DoctrineExp &Assess
Strategy/ Warfare
Challenges
Concept Generation
Enabling Technologies
OperationalArchitecture
Capability Increment
Concept Development
Basic Research
Exp &Assess
Exp &Assess
Exp &Assess
Capability Increment
Organization
Training
Material
Leadership
Personnel
Facilities
Fast Track - Sea Enterprise
Wargaming
CONOPS
DoD
Joint
SSG
Fleet
CCI
Liaison w/ Sea Warrior
S&T
POM
Input to OPNAV assessment
Disciplined Speed to Capability
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnet
Requirements
Current
Future
Joint
Fleet
Acquisitionand
SYSCOMS
ONRDARPADOD
IndustryPrivateSector
AcademiaService LABS
Fleet
NWDC
COEs
Architectures
“AS IS”
“TO BE
AnalysisAnd
Assessments Experimentation
ExperimentVenues
ExerciseVenues
PrototypeEvaluations
Technologyand
Concepts
Gaps/Required Warfighting Capabilities
TechnologyConcepts
Capabilities
Immediate Needs and Issues
POR Fit & Shortfalls
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetFORCEnet FY 04 / FY 05 Experiment Plan
FY 2004J F M A M J J A S O N D
FY 2005J F M A M J J A S O N D O N D
FY 2003 A M J J A S
Joint/Service CD&E
Wargaming
PI 03
JFCOM MN LOE 3
Silent Hammer
Trident Warrior 04/Sea Viking 04
Fleet LOEs
Fn LOE 03-1
Fn LOE 03-3
Fn LOE 04-2 Prototype Path
JFMCC WG
UC 04 Title 10WG
JFTI RAP 1 / WARNET Demo (CG04)
FBE K Spiral 4 /Sea Viking AWE Part 2Fleet Battle
Experiments
Trident Warrior 05
Fn LOE 04-1
Fn LOE 05-2
Fn LOE 05-1
Spiral 2
ESG LOE WG
Fn Title X WG
Trident Warrior 04 WG
Trident Warrior 05 WG
Spiral 3
JFTI / JNTC RAP 2
Global Engagement VII
JFCOM JCD WG
JEFX 04
APTX 05
ATEX 05CIE LOE
(Trident Warrior 03)
FORCEnet Enabling
FORCEnet Sea Trial
JCD&E
FORGER LOE
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetFnEP ConceptFnEP Concept
FORCEnet EngagementPack Relationships
Aut
o. B
att.
Man
. Aid
sA
uto.
Bat
t. M
an. A
ids
Inte
grat
ed F
ire C
ontr
olIn
tegr
ated
Fire
Con
trol
Com
posi
te T
rack
ing
Com
posi
te T
rack
ing
Com
posi
te C
om
bat
ID
Com
posi
te C
om
bat
ID
Sin
gle/
Com
mon
Pic
sS
ingl
e/C
omm
on P
ics
FORCEnet Engagement “Pack”Engage “On Demand”Engage “On Demand”
WarriorsWarriors SensorsSensors NetworksNetworks Comm &Control
Comm &Control PlatformsPlatforms WeaponsWeapons
FORCEnet FactorsFORCEnet Factors
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetFnEP StrategyAligning Programs Using the Fn Services and Contribution to Capability
FnEP StrategyAligning Programs Using the Fn Services and Contribution to Capability
4. Analysis• Gap / Overlap
Analysis • Dynamic Models
1.Establish the Architecture (FORCEnet)
FO
RC
En
et
Ser
vic
es
2. Group Systems & Solutions
5. Portfolio of Solutions & Requirements
System Programs
$$$$$
Integrated Joint /
FORCEnet
$$
3. Decompose into SF/IE categories
Transformation Process
GEMINII & Associated Tools
Sensor
CT
CCID
CTP
ABMA
IFC
WPN
COP
MP
PNT
Fn IG
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetWhat You should Know about Fn
Engagement PacksWhat You should Know about Fn
Engagement Packs
• ForceNet is Network Centric Warfighting– FnEP Focuses on Engagement Capabilities, Consists of Operational Activities and CRC’s desired
to yield Engagement Capability– FnEP Requirements:
• Adaptable – Multi-mision focus (e.g. TAMD/STRIKE)• Compose-able Distributed Sensor- Weapon Target Pairing (no longer platform constrained)
– CRC’s Defined:• Composite Tracking – “Sensor Management and Control”
– Distributed sensors – access to multiple sensor data• Composite Combat Identification (CCID) – ID Management and Control
– Common Shared Combat ID (red, blue, and orange) • Common Picture – Track Control
– Tactical level Common shared Management and Track Level Operational Pictures w/ Integrated Track Management
• Automated Battle Management Aids (ABMA) – Battle Space Management– Composeable, Adaptable, Redundant, Distributed Command & Control
• Integrated Fire Control – Weapons Management and Control– Distributed Weapons management & Control – Compose weapon – C2 combinations
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnetPOM Process FunctionsPOM Process Functions
Warfighting(Campaign)
Analysis
N6/N7 SPP
Transformation Roadmap
ISCP• Investment Priorities• Capability Balance
4NCP
StrategicGuidance
S & TAssessment
Force Structure & Munitions (NNOR)
Analyses
ForceCapabilit
yMetrics
ProgramGuidance
• Phase I, II, I II BDA• MEA• Target nominations• Special Studies
• Maritime CTL• Phase I, II BDA
• Propose targets• Track JFLCC Targets• Phase I, II BDA• MEA
• Target study• Point mensuration• No strike lists• Target materials• Phase I, II, I II BDA
• Phase II BDA;Combat Assessment
• CDL, JNFL, Pre-planned JTL
• Target materials• Target nomination
• Phase I , II BDA; MEA• Tgt. Folders;weaponeering• ATO, JTl
J FC(J OC/ J I C)
J FLCC(ACE)
WOCMAW
J FMCC
F2C2
DCCC
DIA
NMJ IC
J FSOCC
J FACC(AOC)
• Phase I BDA
• Phase I BDA
• Coalition Coordination
Caveats:• Extract fromUSCENTCOM Objective Architecture Concerning Targeting – November 1997 Draft• Nodes; info. exchanges; functions shown do not represent a complete set
MIDBChanges
TargetNominations
BDA Reports(imagery/text)
• BDA Reports (imagery/text)
• Collection Requirements
• BDA Reports (imagery/text)
• Target materials/analysis• BDA Reports (imagery/text)
CollectionRequirements
• Weapon System Video• MISREPs• Combat Reports• Munitions Effects• Target nominations• Target material requests
• Target materials/analysis• BDA Reports (imagery/text)
• BDA Reports (imagery/text)
• Enemy Force Effectiveness• Collection Requirements• Target Nominations • BDA Reports
(imagery/text)
• Weapon System Video• MISREPs• Combat Reports• Munitions Effects• Target nominations• Target material requests• Collection Requirements
A1 A2 A3
A1.2 A3.1 A3.2A1.1
A3.2.1 A3.2.2
A0
ActivityHierarchy
ActivityDiagram
A1
A2
A3
EVENTS/TIME
NODES
NODE 1 NODE 2 NODE 3
EVENT 1
EVENT 2
EVENT 3
EVENT 4 EVENT 5
EVENT 6
EVENT 7 EVENT 8
time 1
time 2
time 3
time 3'
{formula relatingtime 3 to time 3'}
time n
{formula relatingtime 1 to time 2}SATCOM Interface
NODE A
NODE B
NODE C
SYSTEM
2
SYSTEM1
SYSTEM1
SYSTEM3
SYSTEM
4
EXTERNALCONNECTION
SYSTEM1
SYSTEM
2
COMMS Interface
F/A-18A/BF/A-18A/B
Navy Tankers4
E-2CE-2C
F-14DF-14D
F-14A, BF-14A, B
Tactical SurveilP-3C S-3BSH-60 UAVsetc.
Tactical SurveilP-3C S-3BSH-60 UAVsetc.
EA-6BEA-6B
ARC
C2WC3
ASUWC
ASWC
F/A-18 C/D, E/F
JFACCJFACCJFMCCJFMCC
JFLCC JFSOCCJFSOCCNATO Allies
Coalition Allies
JFCJOCJIC
JFCJOCJIC
CWCCWC ACAACAAADCAADC
SWC
A JMA JM
Joint ElementsNational Theater
DSP SOF OTHR HFDF ASW ArraysFOSICs/FOSIFsetc
E-31 U-2RRC-
135V2 EP-3ES-3AUAVsTankers4
Ships6
Subs6 etc
Joint ElementsNational Theater
DSP SOF OTHR HFDF ASW ArraysFOSICs/FOSIFsetc
E-31 U-2RRC-
135V2 EP-3ES-3AUAVsTankers4
Ships6
Subs6 etc
AAWC
AEGIS Cruiser: CG-47 Class*(Alternate, CV)
CICAAWC
AEGIS Cruiser: CG-47 Class*(Alternate, CV)
CIC
A J NM
Z
A C M
A J N M Z
A J NM
Z
A C M
A J N M Z
USAFControlE-31 CRCCRE
WeaponsF-15 F-16
ForceAOC
USAFControlE-31 CRCCRE
WeaponsF-15 F-16
ForceAOC
ControlE-31 CRCCRE
WeaponsF-15 F-16
ForceAOC
AEGISDestroyers
DDG-51
AEGISCruisers
CG-47
AircraftCarriers
CV
Other AAWShips
CGN-36/38, DDG-993
Other AAWShipsFFG-7
OtherShips
AEGISDestroyers
DDG-51
AEGISCruisers
CG-47
AircraftCarriers
CV
Other AAWShips
CGN-36/38, DDG-993
Other AAWShipsFFG-7
OtherShips
ForceAAMDC FPTOC
Control WeaponsArmy
ForceAAMDC FPTOC
Control WeaponsForceAAMDC FPTOC
Control WeaponsArmy
USMCForceTACC
ControlTAOC / SAAWC /
EWC
WeaponsF/A-18AV-8BHAWK TMDD
USMCForceTACC
ControlTAOC / SAAWC /
EWC
WeaponsF/A-18AV-8BHAWK TMDD
Near Term Operations as of 2003 -- Major Regional Conflict -- Theater Air and Missile Defense functions Sources: Ref J6, J13, J62, J84, J94, J97, N3, N10, N11, N14, N1 6, N27, F1, B17, R8, R16, S11, S14-S24 Notes for Navy Charts1 AWACS 2 RIVET JOINT3 Formerly EWC 4 Aerial Refueling Aircraft 5 May be indirect via Fleet gatew ay6 “Ships” & “Subs” refers to vessels, which although not an integral part of the Joint Force, are tasked to provide surveillance
Unclassified
InvestmentStrategy
SYSCOMAssessments
MCPMCPMission Area
Analysis
SEA ENTERPRISE
FORCEnetConcept &
OperationalArchitecture
MissionMission PeoplPeoplee
CapabilityCapability
FORCEnet
Framework&
Principals
ArchitectureVision
(Viewpoint)Capability
Metrics
ReferenceImplementation
ArchitectureAssessments
PortfolioOf Solutions
MigrationStrategy
ImplementationGovernance
Requirements
ArchitectureMaintenance
Capability Metrics, Illustrating Issues
Architecture views(OV’s. SV’s. TV’s)• Dependencies
Static: Functionality / InteroperabilityDynamic: Capability MetricsCosts / Value/Benefit/Utility/ETE Functionality
Bundles/ Engagement Packs, and Portfolios of Systems in To-Be architectureFnEP Solution Sets• # consumers, Program Viability, Volatility
Prioritization, Sequencing of systemDeployment (CED?)• How Much And When?
Planning, Procurement,Acquisition, and Deployment Governance
Timeframe, Scope,Boundary, and Context
FnEP Definition & Development Process: GEMINIIFnEP Definition & Development Process: GEMINIIWARFARE
DEVELOPMENT
Tech push
Capabilities pull
S&T
PPBS