8/7/2019 NBP H

1/9

HORIZONTAL ANALYSIS:BALANCE SHEET:

2005 to 2006 2006 to 2007 2007 to 2008 2008 to 2009

Assets%AGE

CHANGE

%AGE

CHANGE

%AGE

CHANGE

%AGE

CHANGE

Cash and balance with treasurybanks 10.43 120.66 12.25 -31.48

Balance with other banks 31.02 92.20 2.32 -30.81

Lending to financial institution 41.33 93.27 -20.20 -70.23

Investment -10.85 150.61 -18.95 40.80

Advances 17.58 107.77 21.22 5.45

Operating fixed Assets 2.4 267.74 -6.57 2.72

Deferred tax Assets 0 0 -5.70

Other Assets 13.25 114.31 43.73 27.07

TOTAL ASSETS 9.93 120.00 7.290 5.79

COMMENTS:CASH AND BALANCE WITH TREASURY BANKS

Liquidity position of the bank was strong in previous years but there is 31.48% decrease

in cash in 2009. It is still at sufficient level but more decrease in liquidity main lead bank

to critical situation, management should conceder appropriate level of cash in hand to

fulfill demands of depositors and to meet expenses.

INVESTMENT:

Investments are having fluctuating trend because there is decrease in investments in 2005

to 2006 but on the other hand in next year there is 150% increase in investments and

again in 2008 it is decreased by 18% and than again increased by 40% in 2009. This

fluctuating trend may be due to the political changes in economy or it may be the result

of fluctuating investment opportunities in the economy.

OPERATING FIX ASSETS & OTHER ASSETS:

There is a sudden increase in O.F.A in 2006 because investment in these assets has been

increased by 267% but in later years there is a decreasing trend of investment in

operating assets

TOTAL ASSETS

Management shown good performance from 2006 to 2009 because total assets in 2006

increased by 120% increase and more increase in later year that are shown in table given

above.

8/7/2019 NBP H

2/9

2005 to 2006 2006 to 2007 2007 to 2008 2008 to 2009

LIABILITIES %AGE %AGE %AGE %AGEBorrowings 93.01 271.65 25.03

Deposits and other accounts 8.29 117.93 5.58 4.57

sub-ordinated loans 0 0 0

Liabilities against assets subject tofinance lease -20.41 253.52 -24.61 -2.42

Deferred Tax liabilities net -46.51 213.55 -100 0

Other liabilities 6.49 116.065 28.46 -4.3

TOTAL LIABILITIES 9.89 116.75 10.75 4.77

COMMENTS:

Bill payables of the bank are showing and sudden increase in 2006, 2007, and

2008 and decreasing trend in 2009

Bank has increased its borrowing ratio from 2007 and increasing every year more

increase in borrowing increases the interest expense which may affect the profit of

the bank. Management should reduce its borrowing ratio to earn more profit.

DEFFERED TAX:

Tax payable has decreased in 2006 and increased in later years. Managements should

reduce tax payable burden because it reduces net assets and share holders equity.

TOTAL LIABILITIES:

Total liabilities are also increasing with the increase in total assets but increase in total

liabilities is less than the increase in total assets which is good for the financial health of

bank.

2005 to

20062006 to

20072007 to

20082008 to

2009

SHARE HOLDER`S EQUITY %AGE %AGE %AGE %AGE

Share capital 19.99 115 10 19.99

Reserves 2.53 113.63 26.43 8.68

Unappropriated profit 91.9 141.37 15.68 2.88

TOTAL S.H.E 46.7 130.58 17.46 6.19

COMMENTS:

8/7/2019 NBP H

3/9

There is a surprising change in S.H.E; it is increased by 130% in 2007 and more increase

in later year. This increasing trend is showing good performance of management and it

may help in attracting more investors.

Reserves are increasing every year great change is shown 2007 that is 113% more than

the previous year. These reserves can be used in investing activities than can increase

share holders equity in long run.

HORIZONTAL ANALYSIS:

INCOME STATEMNT:

INETEREST INCOME

2005 to2006

%AGE

2006 to2007

%AGE

2007 to2008

%AGE

2008 to2009

%AGE

Mark-up / return / Interest earned 31.12 14.66 20.51 27.66

Mark-up / return / Interest expensed 35.12 21.45 40.99 65.33

Net mark-up / interest income 29.34 11.52 10.19 3.77

COMMENTS:

There is 1179% increase in interest income of 2009.that is a sign of good performance of

bank but with the increase in income, interest expense also increased by 65% in 2009

which reduced the net interest income. This may be due to the increase in interest rates.

NON MARK-UP/INTEREST INCOME

2005 to 20062006 to2007

2007 to2008

2008 to2009

%AGE %AGE %AGE %AGE

Fee, commission and brokerageincome 24.723 10.36 16.86 12.68

Dividend income 68.27 12.84 -11.77 -33.29

Income from dealing in foreigncurrencies 10.63 -21.81 280.6 -23.7

Gain on sale of investments 100.22 -83.11 106.24

Unrealized gain/loss on revaluationinvestment 616.03 -105.34 37.96

Other income -60.12 -76.52 745.1 -55.65

Total non-markup / interest income 29.05 11.36 21.19 15.89

COMMENTS:

8/7/2019 NBP H

4/9

Non mark up income is increased every year, fee commission are increased 24%,

10%, 16% and 12% in 2005 to 2009 respectively.

Dividend income is decreased in 2008 and 2009 by 11% and 33% respectively.

That is reducing net non interest income in respective years.

There is significant increase in income from dealing in foreign currencies in 2008

but it is reduced by 23% in 2009.

There is significant gain on sale of investment in 2009 that is 106% more as

compared to the previous years.

NON MARK-UP/ INTERESTEXPENSES

2005 to 20062006 to2007

2007 to2008

2008 to2009

%AGE %AGE %AGE %AGE

Administrative expenses 20.08 5.67 27.91 24.21

Other provisions / write offs -108.71 -1072.2 344.88 -16.95

Other charges 229.6 -91.77 3303.3 -44.86

Total non-markup / interestexpenses 19 5.549 35.51 20.57

NET NON MARK-UP INCOME 38.06 6.65 -18.03 -3.04

COMMENTS:

Admin expenses of bank are increasing every year that is not favorable for the

bank management should reduce ratio of admin expenses.

Other charges are increasing critically. In 2008 these expenses are 3303% greater

than expenses made in 2007.

PROFIT BEFORE& AFTERTAXATION

2005 to 20062006 to2007

2007 to2008

2008 to2009

%AGE %AGE %AGE %AGE

PROFIT BEFORE TAXATION 38.06 6.65 -18.03 -3.04

Taxation - current 21.54 -4.41 41.52 -21.6

Prior years -148.29 -26.22 -100 0

Deferred -78.72 422.3 -403.62 -76.3

46.35 -2.81 -16.44 -45.79

PROFIT AFTER TAXATION 33.93 11.81 -18.78 17.81

COMMENTS:

8/7/2019 NBP H

5/9

Profit before tax is decreased by 18% and 3% in 2008 and 2009 respectively. This may

be due to the huge increase in other charges and increase in admin expenses.

Management should control and check the expenses made to perform operations.

Tax expense in 2008 is increased by 40% and burden of deferred tax cost is 1403% as

compared to the 2007. And tax expense in 2009 is decreased by 21% and the burden of

deferred tax cost is decreased by 76%. Tax is reducing profit of the bank.

Profit after tax has been decreased by 18% in 2008 but later in 2009 it is increased by

17% still the profit in 2009 is less than the profit in 2007. The reason behind decreasing

profit ratio is the excess burden of other charges and admin expenses in 2008 and 2009.

VERTICAL ANALYSIS:

BALANCE SHEET

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Assets %AGE %AGE %AGE %AGE %AGE

Cash and balance withtreasury banks 12.32 12.37 12.44 13.02 8.43

Balance with other banks 5.36 6.39 4.91 4.68 3.066

Lending to financial institution 2.81 3.62 2.81 2.09 0.58Investment 27.17 22.03 27.65 20.88 27.8

Advances 46.53 49.77 44.69 50.5 50.33

Operating fixed Assets 1.63 1.524 3.4 2.96 2.87

Deferred tax Assets 0 0 0 0.39 0.34

Other Assets 4.14 4.26 4.06 5.44 6.54

TOTAL ASSETS 100 100 100 100 100

COMMENTS:

CASH AND BALANCES WITH TREASURY BANKS:

Cash and balances ratios from 2005 to 2009 are 12.32%, 12.37%, 12.44%, 13.02%, and

8.43 respectively. In year 2008 ratio is increased by 13% and decreased in 2009 by

8.43%. That is showing the decrease in liquidity of bank. It should be maintained at

sufficient level to fulfill the cash demands of depositors.

8/7/2019 NBP H

6/9

LENDING TO FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS:

Lending to financial institution has decreased in 2009. It was 2.09% in 2008. The mark

up rates are not so better and that is why lending to financial institutions is not showing a

better position In balance sheet.

INVESTMENTS AND ADVANCES:

Investments and advances are approximately at same level every year. Bank has

maintained a certain percentage of investments and advances. Ups and down in

investment depends on the opportunity available in the economy secondly it depends on

the management policy that how much investment of total assets should be made every

year.

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009LIABILITIES %AGE %AGE %AGE %AGE %AGE

Borrowings 1.51 1.84 1.42 4.94 5.84

Deposits and otheraccounts 80.21 79.01 77.65 76.42 75.53

sub-ordinated loans

Liabilities against assetssubject to finance lease 0 0.002 0.004 0.003 0

Deferred Tax liabilities -net 0.77 0.37 0.66 0 0

Other liabilities 4.32 4.18 4.05 4.84 4.38

TOTAL LIABILITIES 87.13 87.09 84.73 87.47 86.63

COMMENTS:

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

Bank is focusing to maintain bill payables at minimum possible level that is why

bill payables are less than 2.0% of total assets from 2005 to 2009.increase in

current liabilities may decrease the liquidity of bank .so it is good decision of

management to maintain it at possible minimum level.

Borrowings are increased rate is increased by 4.94% in 2008 and more increase is

shown by 5.84% in 2009.while borrowings in 2007 are 1.42% of total assets.

DEPOSITES AND OTHER ACCOUNTS:

8/7/2019 NBP H

7/9

IT Show a mix trend these are highest in the year 2005 and then decrease it means that

banks management is trying to compete with their competitors well by offering the new

attractions to the general public customers and corporate sector customers, so the deposits

are increasing every year and it is helpful for business volume of the bank.

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

SHARE HOLDER`SEQUITY %AGE %AGE %AGE %AGE %AGE

Share capital 1.02 1.11 1.06 1.09 1.24

Reserves 2.34 2.18 2.06 2.43 2.5

TOTAL S.H.E 6.25 8.35 9.08 9.95 9.98

COMMENTS:

SHARE CAPITAL:

IT shows both increase and decrease but it is showing an overall increase in it. It is most

high in 2005 where the percentage part of share capital is 1.24% in the year 2009.

RESERVES:

Reserves are also maintained approximately at constant level in all the years but reserves

are at highest level in 2009 at 2.50%. Reserves are used to invest further. Investments can

increase share holders equity in long run.

VERTICAL ANALYSIS:

INCOME STATEMENT

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

MARK-UP INCOME %AGE %AGE %AGE %AGE %AGE

Mark-up / return / Interest earned 100 100 100 100 100

Mark-up / return / Interestexpensed 30.68 31.62 33.49 39.19 50.64

Net mark-up / interest income 69.31 68.37 66.5 60.8 49.35

COMMENTS:

Interest expense has been gradually increasing form 30.68% in 2005 to 33.49% in 2007

and than jumped to 39% in 2008 and 50% in 2009 .interest expense is showing increasing

trend which reduces the profit margin of bank and directly effecting net interest income

8/7/2019 NBP H

8/9

because net inertest income is decreasing every year. This increasing trend of interest

expense is not suitable for the performance of bank and share holders equity.

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

NON MARK-UP/INTERESTINCOME %AGE %AGE %AGE %AGE %AGE

Fee, commission and brokerageincome 14.64 13.93 13.41 13 11.45

Dividend income 5.1 6.55 6.45 4.72 2.46

Income from dealing in foreigncurrencies 3.58 3.02 2.06 6.51 3.88

Gain on sale of investments 0 2.65 4.63 0.64 5.88

Unrealized gain/loss onrevaluation investment 0 -0.01 -0.06 0.002 0.003

Other income 4.67 1.42 0.29 2.043 0.7

Total non-markup / interestincome 90.72 90.57 83.94 69.74 58.75

COMMENTS:

Fee commission and brokerage income is generated through providing different services

on commission. This ratio is showing inefficiency of bank every year. Because it is

decreasing every year gradually and minimum decrease of 11% is seen in 2009 that isunfavorable for the performance of bank.

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

NON MARK-UP/INTERESTEXPENSES %AGE %AGE %AGE %AGE %AGE

Administrative expenses 33.28 30.48 28.09 29.81 28.94

Other provisions / write offs 0.58 -0.039 0.332 1.22 0.79

Other charges 0.18 0.47 0.033 0.95 0.41

Total non-markup / interestexpenses 34.06 30.91 28.45 32 30.15

COMMENTS:

Admin expenses are showing favorable position in the income statement because

these are decreasing every year that is favorable for the performance for bank.

8/7/2019 NBP H

9/9

Total non mark up expenses are also showing decreasing trend that is favorable

for the bank.

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

PROFIT BEFORE & AFTERTAXATION %AGE %AGE %AGE %AGE %AGE

PROFIT BEFORE TAXATION 56.65 59.65 55.48 37.74 28.59

Taxation - current 21.27 19.71 16.43 19.3 11.82

Prior years -3.26 1.2 0.77 0 -5.3

Deferred 0.86 0.14 0.64 -6.92 -1.28

18.86 21.06 17.85 12.37 5.243

PROFIT AFTER TAXATION 37.78 38.59 37.63 25.36 23.35

COMMENTS:

Profit before tax is decreasing critically. It was highest in 2006 at 59% and than start

decreasing gradually this decreasing trend is due to increasing direct and indirect

expenses. Management of bank should control and check all the expenses made to

generate revenue.

Tax expense is decreasing every year that is favorable for the profitability of bank.

Decrease in deferred tax cost is also shown.

Profit after tax is moving toward the critical situation because above given chart is

clearly indicating that the profit of the bank is decreasing every year. It was highest in

2008 at 38% and lowest in 2009 at 25%.