Upload
dinhdan
View
222
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
STATE GOAL FOR SERVICES
FOR GIFTED STUDENTS
Students who participate in services designed for gifted students will demonstrate in Self-directed learning
Thinking
Research, and
Communication
As evidenced by The development of innovative products
The development of performances
These innovative products/performances reflect individuality and creativity and
are advanced in relation to students of similar age, experience and environment
STATE GOAL FOR
SERVICES FOR
GIFTED STUDENTS
STATE GOAL FOR SERVICES
FOR GIFTED STUDENTS
High school graduates who have participated in services for gifted students will have produced products and performance ofprofessional quality as part of their program service.
NBISD DEFINITION
“Gifted and talented student” means a child or youth who performs at or shows the potential for performing at a remarkably high level of accomplishment when compared to others of the same age, experience, or environment and who exhibits high performance capability in an intellectual, creative, or artistic area, possesses an unusual capacity for leadership, or excels in a specific academic field.
Education Code 29.121
SCREENING/ASSESSMENT
Qualitative Measures: Drawing Starts
Parent Input KOI
Quantitative Measures: NNAT3
Non-verbal
Cognitive
Terra Nova/Supera Achievement
State tests or other standardized tests (as needed)
QUALITATIVE: KOI
observations of gifted potential within classroom
Display multiple facets of students’ talents and potentials.
Provide opportunities for ALL students to exhibit advanced potential--so no one slips through the cracks.
Focus on areas of:
Advanced language
Analytical thinking
Meaning motivation
Perspective
Sense of humor
Sensitivity
Accelerated learning.
QUALITATIVE: DRAWING STARTS
Students have an opportunity to complete two to four incomplete figures in order to demonstrate: Creativity
Perspective
Analytical Thinking
Advanced Language
QUALITATIVE: DRAWING STARTS
Students have an opportunity to complete two to four incomplete figures in order to demonstrate: Creativity
Perspective
Analytical Thinking
Advanced Language
QUANTITATIVE MEASURES
NNAT3 Standardized ability test
Nationally normed
Terra Nova/Supera Standardized achievement test
Nationally normed
NNAT3 NAGLIERI NONVERBAL TEST
The NNAT3 is very similar to questions asked on the CoGAT, OLSAT, Stanford-Binetand WPPSI.
Designed to rank children according to ability
Complete 39 multiple choice questions in 30 minutes
Parts of the test consist of: Pattern Completion
Reasoning by Analogy
Serial Reasoning
Spatial Visualization
DEFINING GIFTEDNESS
INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT
General Labels for IQ scores:
85-99 Lower Normal
100-114 Upper Normal
115-129 Bright
130-144 Gifted
145-159 Highly Gifted
160+ Profoundly Gifted
TERRA NOVA/SUPERA
ACHIEVEMENT TEST
Designed to measure concepts, processes, and skills taught in elementary and secondary schools throughout the nation.
Designed to sample the many varied skills represented in the core content areas.
A LOOK AT THE MATRIX—6-11
2 6
Table 3: NNAT3—This
student demonstrated a
Naglieri Ability Index score
of 116. This earned the
student 2 points on the
matrix below.
Table 1: KOI--This student’s
teacher noted at least 13
instances of GT potential in
the 2 week observation
window
4 4
1 1
Table 2: PIF—This parent
provided information in 2
sections and the examples
were typical of age,
environment and experience
Tables 4a-e: : Terra Nova/Supera—Reading,
Language, Math , Science, Social Studies
This student correctly answered 91% of the questions on
the reading test, 93% on the language test, 89% on the
math test, 96% on the science test, and 100% on the social
studies test . Each score has a multiplier of 1 for the total.
This student’s drawing
was typical for the age
and did not demonstrate
creativity or authentic
ideas
1 1
2 2
21
3 3
4 4
NNAT3
WHAT TO DO NEXT
Now that you understand how the matrix points are calculated, you can contact your campus counselor for specific testing results…..
Remember…..“0” points in an area mean your child is not “smart”, “bright”, or even “above average”….. that he/she did not demonstrate the level of giftedness or potential giftedness to garner enough points in an area to be identified in the top 8-10% of his/her peers at this time……