NavCad PWD Module NA Jul-Aug 14

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 NavCad PWD Module NA Jul-Aug 14

    1/1

    48

    The prediction o ship resistance

    can be accomplished in a variety

    o ways, rom statistical parametric

    algorithms to computational CFD methods

    to model testing. Te choice o which is

    best to use or a particular task depends on

    the nature o the task and the benefit-to-

    cost measure o the method.

    Parametric methods are the technique

    o choice or analysis o entire physical

    systems, but their data set does not ully

    describe the shape o the hull. Model

    testing and CFD rely on ull hull surace

    geometry, o course, but at significantly

    higher inancial cost with specialised

    computational and man-power resources.

    his cost is without question justiied

    or many projects, but or some tasks,

    computational methods using longitudinal

    distributions o hull data can offer very

    high benefit-to-cost and be successully

    used or the prediction o ship resistance.

    Tese techniques can take many orms and

    go by different names, such as thin-ship

    theory or linear wave-making, but all aresome orm o wave theory analysis.

    Familiar names such as Havelock, Mauro

    and Michell are associated with these

    techniques. HydroComp has developed

    its latest resistance prediction code based

    on comparable wave theory analysis but,

    with a unique twist the company says.

    Unlike other methods, HydroComps

    Prismatic Wave Drag uses distribution o

    the sectional area (leading to the name

    prismatic) rather than waterline cuts o

    the hull surace. In other words, it treats

    the distribution o the immersed volume

    rather than the wetted surace. According

    to Donald MacPherson, HydroComps

    technical director, using immersed volume

    as the basis or this new code is appropriate

    or two reasons.

    We eel that definition o the hull by

    surace points is not in keeping with the

    order o a problem that can be reliably

    solved with these types o wave theory

    analyses. Small changes in the surace do

    not dependably show a corresponding

    eect in resistance except on a macro

    scale. Further, one o the important

    characteristics with all o our products

    is consistent behaviour, and analysis by

    sectional area gives users that expected

    HydroComp usability.Te detailed hull description that comes

    with surace offsets is cancelled by the

    practical matter o how irregular changes

    in offsets, or things like tunnel thrusters

    or propeller pockets, cause signiicant

    inaccuracies in the calculations. Te only

    response available is to alter the geometry

    so that the data or the calculation is no

    longer the real geometric representation

    o the hull.

    MacPherson also explained that

    prediction o wave-making drag alone is

    insufficient or a complete ship resistance

    prediction. Accurate prediction o

    wave-making drag is significant only as

    a component o the correct prediction

    o total resistance. We have engaged in

    extensive in-house R&D or the viscous

    components o rictional drag and orm

    actor, and also into the correlation

    unctions that are needed to make our

    Prismatic Wave Drag analysis reliable or

    a very broad range o non-planing vessels.

    We are very pleased with the results o our

    validation studies, and are excited about

    putting this new capability in the hands o

    our customers.

    A variety o code-specific correlation

    unctions have been developed, including

    consideration o the influence o viscouseffects (such as an effective body length

    to better model flow line convergence),

    boundary layer thickness, transom

    immersion, dynamic trim, and low-speed

    pressure drag. A proprietary algorithm

    was developed to estimate the proper

    suppression o transverse wave amplitude.

    he underlying viscous prediction

    employs the Grigson CF riction line

    with Reynolds number based on effective

    viscous length. Form actor is predicted

    using a proprietary algorithm that is

    specific to the Grigson CF oundation.

    Enabling the correlation unctions is by

    selecting a HydroComp-defined Standard

    set or individually as a Custom definition.

    he Prismatic Wave Drag module is

    one o a collection o latest modules that

    will be available as part o HydroComps

    new Premium license. Upgrading to the

    Premium license will allow users to access

    scripting capability so the Prismatic Wave

    Drag calculation, which can be shelled as

    a solver rom third-party sofware such as

    CFD or simulation tools. NA

    Feature 1 |CFD & HYDRODYNAMICS

    The Naval Architect July/August 2014

    HydroComp has developed its latest Prismatic Wave Drag module or the

    prediction o ship resistance

    Cutting the drag

    The Prismatic Wave Drag module will allow users to have detailed hull descriptions for

    tunnel thrusters and propeller pockets