View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
NAVAL POSTGRADUATE
SCHOOL
MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
MBA PROFESSIONAL REPORT
Process Improvement at the Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Detachment (AIMD) at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island
By: Eric Jafar,
Terence Noel C. Mejos, and Chieh Yang
December 2006
Advisors: Keebom Kang
Uday Apte
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
i
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank)
2. REPORT DATE December 2006
3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED MBA Professional Report
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: Process Improvement at the Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Detachment (AIMD) at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island 6. AUTHOR(S) Eric Jafar, Terence Noel C. Mejos, and Chieh Yang
5. FUNDING NUMBERS
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, CA 93943-5000
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER
9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) N/A
10. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER
11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this report are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. 12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE A
13. ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words) This project focuses on the J52-P408 engine repair process and the implementation of the “AIRSpeed”
program at the Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Department (AIMD) at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island (NASWI), WA. The project was conducted with the sponsorship and assistance of Program Executive Office Ships (PEO SHIPS) and Program Executive Office Integrated Warfare Systems (PEO IWS). The goal of this project is to analyze how the leadership of AIMD incorporated Theory of Constraints (TOC), Just in Time (JIT), Lean, Six-Sigma, and Lean-Six-Sigma methodologies in the engine repair process, and examine the effects of its application in relation to repair cycle time and overall readiness level. This report will describe and compare the earlier and the current AIRSpeed engine removal and repair processes, starting from the flight line to the ready for issue (RFI) pool at AIMD. Using simulation modeling tools and private industry production and inventory management philosophies, we will make recommendations for further improvement in the repair process. We will examine how the application of AIRSpeed processes contributes to the mission readiness of the United States Navy and Marine Corps’ fleet of EA-6B Prowler aircraft, while reducing operation and maintenance cost.
15. NUMBER OF PAGES
123
14. SUBJECT TERMS AIRSpeed, Lean, Six-Sigma, Engine Repair Process, Repair Cycle Time, Value Stream Mapping, Process Improvement and Arena Simulation.
16. PRICE CODE
17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF REPORT
Unclassified
18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE
Unclassified
19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT
Unclassified
20. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT
UL
ii
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
iii
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited
PROCESS IMPROVEMENT AT THE INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE DETACHMENT (AIMD) AT NAVAL AIR STATION WHIDBEY ISLAND
Eric Jafar, Lieutenant Commander, United States Navy Terence Noel C. Mejos, Lieutenant, United States Navy
Chieh Yang, Lieutenant, United States Navy
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
from the
NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL
December 2006
Authors: _____________________________________
Eric Jafar _____________________________________
Terence Noel C. Mejos _____________________________________
Chieh Yang Approved by: _____________________________________
Keebom Kang, Lead Advisor _____________________________________ Uday Apte, Co-Lead Advisor _____________________________________ Robert N. Beck, Dean
Graduate School of Business and Public Policy
iv
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
v
ABSTRACT
This project focuses on the J52-P408 engine repair process and the
implementation of the “AIRSpeed” program at the Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance
Department (AIMD) at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island (NASWI), WA. The project
was conducted with the sponsorship and assistance of Program Executive Office Ships
(PEO SHIPS) and Program Executive Office Integrated Warfare Systems (PEO IWS).
The goal of this project is to analyze how the leadership of AIMD incorporated Theory of
Constraints (TOC), Just in Time (JIT), Lean, Six-Sigma, and Lean Six-Sigma
methodologies in the engine repair process, and examine the effects of its application in
relation to repair cycle time and overall readiness level. This report will describe and
compare the earlier and the current AIRSpeed engine removal and repair processes,
starting from the flight line to the ready for issue (RFI) pool at AIMD. Using simulation
modeling tools and private industry production and inventory management philosophies,
we will make recommendations for further improvement in the repair process. We will
examine how the application of AIRSpeed processes contributes to the mission readiness
of the United States Navy and Marine Corps’ fleet of EA-6B Prowler aircraft, while
reducing operation and maintenance cost.
vi
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 A. BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................1 B. PURPOSE.........................................................................................................4 C. RESEARCH QUESTION ...............................................................................4
II. BACKGROUND ..........................................................................................................7 A. NAVAL AVIATION MAINTENANCE PROGRAM ..................................7
1. Objective ...............................................................................................7 2. Levels of Maintenance .........................................................................7
a. Organizational-Level Maintenance..........................................8 b. Intermediate-Level Maintenance .............................................9 c. Depot-Level Maintenance.........................................................9
3. AIRSpeed............................................................................................10 B. NAVAL AIR STATION WHIDBEY ISLAND ...........................................11
1. Aircraft Intermediate Maintenance Detachment (AIMD).............11 2. Aviation Support Division (ASD) .....................................................12 3. Aviation Squadrons ...........................................................................13
III. LITERATURE REVIEW .........................................................................................15 A. THEORY OF CONSTRAINTS (TOC) .......................................................15
1. Tenets of TOC ....................................................................................15 2. Operational Elements of TOC ..........................................................17
B. JUST-IN-TIME (JIT) SYSTEM...................................................................17 1. Advantages..........................................................................................18 2. Disadvantages.....................................................................................19 3. Strategy ...............................................................................................20
C. LEAN PRODUCTION ..................................................................................24 D. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT (TQM) ...........................................27
1. TQM Applications .............................................................................28 E. SIX-SIGMA....................................................................................................28
1. Methodolo