National Security and Human Rights

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 National Security and Human Rights

    1/7

    Programme Module

    Topic Balancing National Security and Human Rights

    Number of Participants 20 30

    Participant Level Superior Court Judges or other relevant judicial officers

    Teaching Level A high level so that the judges are

    Sensitized to the complex issues of national security and

    human rights principles at stae

    given the tools to allo! them to "alance those issues in

    their decision#maing$

    Leader/Panel A high profile presenter% a Superior Court Judge% an expert on

    &nternational 'a!

    b!ectives" At the end of this session( participants !ill "e a"le to)

    *$ +efine !hat is encompassed "y ,ational Security

    2$ 'ist and explore !ays in !hich ne! ,ational security legislation nd government

    policy affect existing constitutional- statutory- common la! .uman /ights

    3$ &dentify the principles of &nternational 'a! and list the !ays in !hich nationalsecurity measures may infringe "asic human rights

    $ &dentify and apply the principles of &nternational 'a! !hich are relevant indomestic cases involving ,ational Security

    1$ &dentify the role of the judge and the factors relevant to "alancing ,ational

    Security and .uman /ights generally !ith particular reference to)# aseparation of po!ers " judicial activism c scope of remedies$

    4easura"le Self 5valuation 6orm)

    7lease use a num"er "et!een * and 1 to rate the extent to !hich this o"jective !as met

    1 5xcellent% 8ery 9ood% 3 9ood% 2 Average% * 7oor

  • 8/12/2019 National Security and Human Rights

    2/7

    :eaching 7lan :iming for one day

    Time Session #ontent

    ;$00# ;$*1 &ntroduction to the session &ce"reaer and &ntroduction

    ;$*1 ;$1 :he /ole of a Supreme Courtin a +emocracy and the 6ight

    against :errorism

    6eature interactive lecture "y apresenter such as hat is the domestic la! onnational security?

    +omestic la! to "e su"stantiallyelicited from the group "ysuperior court judge$

    Content to cover

    ne! legislation%

    current la! Constitution(

    existing legislation(

    common la! human

    rights and

    government policy on

    ,ational Security$

    &n particular to)

    &dentify the national

    security issues covered "ythe ne! legislation

    2

  • 8/12/2019 National Security and Human Rights

    3/7

    list of the effects of the

    ne! legislation onstaeholders

    identify !hether there is

    any conflict( uncertainty(

    am"iguity arising from thene! legislation

    6acilitator to use flip charts

    **$1 *2$1 >hat are the internationalinstruments and norms relevant

    to national security?

    7resentation "y 6acilitator-5xpertin &nternational 'a! for *1

    minutes( using po!erpoint

    Content to cover the 6undamental6reedoms such as)

    6reedom of Speech 6reedom of Association

    /ight to 'ife and Security

    /ight to 7rivacy

    /ight to a 6air and

    5xpeditious :rial

    4inimum Standards of

    7risoner /ights

    +ue 7rocess of 'a!

    6ollo!ed "y a half an hour groupdiscussion !ith t!o hypothetical

    cases !hich raises the application

    of

  • 8/12/2019 National Security and Human Rights

    4/7

    arrest

    interrogation

    extended custody !ithout

    charge Bpreventative

    detention

    no la!yer

    no communication !ith

    family

    su"se=uently charged "ut

    2 years later still no trial

    2$00 2$30 9roup discussion +iscussion a"out the content of

    the film in order to

    identify the human rights

    issues involved

    and list them !ithreference to theinternational instruments

    2$30 # 2$1 7lenary discussion :he 9roups reports "ac !ithfacilitation of the judge

    2$1 3$30 7lenary Session Additional discussion on thehypothetical film !ith facilitation

    "y the judge to elicit responses onthe follo!ing

    to !hat extent should the

    judiciary "e involved in

    the issues raised judicial

    activism

    ho! can the judge

    "alance the rights of

    staeholders

    !hat is the scope of the

    remedies

    se of flip charts3$30 3$1

  • 8/12/2019 National Security and Human Rights

    5/7

    3$1 $30 >rap#p .as the program covered

    the named o"jectives?

    .as the program covered

    your individual

    o"jectives?

    5valuation sheets

    Teaching Tools

    &ce"reaer 6lip Chart

    9roup discussions 6ilm of hypothetical procedure'ecture .ypotheticals for group discussion

    Short lecturette Short film

    6acilitated general discussion

    Bac$ground Material

    ,ational 'egislation eg

    Constitution

    ,e! 'egislation on ,ational Security

    5xisting 'egislation related to ,ational Security

    &nternational &nstruments

    :he +eclaration on 6undamental .uman /ights

    :he &nternational Covenant on Civil and 7olitical /ights

    :he &nternational Covenant on 5conomic( Social( and Cultural /ights

    :he Convention on the 5limination of all forms of racial +iscrimination :he 8ienna Convention on the 'a!s of :reatiesArticles 2D and 2E

    ayne 4acGay ,ational Journal of Constitutional 'a!

    June 200D$

    $alancing State Security and !rotection of Constitutional and Human Rights

    .on$ Justice J$,$ 4ulenga /emars from CJ5&

  • 8/12/2019 National Security and Human Rights

    6/7

    January( 200D

    Canada&s Supreme Court Rules on Human Rights "' Security

    Samuel 9$ 4c:yre &mmigration ,e!sJanuary( 2002

    Security An (n"entory of Agency Considerations ) *+ecuti"e Summary

    Canadian .uman /ights CommissionJune( 200F

    Terrorists, Human Rights and the -nited #ations."y Arundhati 9hose

    Can a terrorist get a fair trial?.B@ndelette Sunday August 2( 200; 1)1; pm

    Human Rights, Terrorism and Counter/terrorism."y @ffice of the nited ,ations(.igh Commissioner for .uman /ights mainly

    The Right to Fair Trial and A0mal 1asab."y ,andita .asar$

    (s it really necessary to sacrifice fair trial standards to prosecute terrorism2. "y

    +avid >eiss"rodt 7rofessor of 'a!( niversity of 4innesota

    A 3egal Frame4or% for Detaining Terrorists *nact a 3a4 to *nd the Clash o"er

    Rights."y ittes and 4ar 9itenstein$

    Terrorism !re/Charge Detention Comparati"e 3a4 Study."y Jago /ussell

  • 8/12/2019 National Security and Human Rights

    7/7

    %TT%#HM&NT

    B'BL'(R%PH) * #%S&S

    National Security #ases

    !eople&s -nion of Ci"il 3iberties 5!-C36 "s' -nion of (ndia 5-7(6 and Anr'

    A&/*;;ESC1DF( +ecem"er *F( 200D

    Canada5!rime 8inister6 "s' 1hadr

    20*0 SCC 3( January 2;( 20*0

    !ermanent Secretary 8inistry of Fine Affairs, !atric% 8anning, !rime 8inister

    of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago "s' Fero9a Ram0ohn

    Civil Appeal ,o$ E* of 200E /epu"lic of :rinidad and :o"ago Court of Appeal

    July F( 200;

    1artar Singh "' State of !un0ab*;; 3 SCC 1D;

    State of 8aharashtra "' $harat Shanti 3al Saha : ors' 200F A&/ SC> D3*

    Atif #asir 8ullah "' State of 8aharashtra200D *0F