Upload
studydatadownload
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 National Security and Human Rights
1/7
Programme Module
Topic Balancing National Security and Human Rights
Number of Participants 20 30
Participant Level Superior Court Judges or other relevant judicial officers
Teaching Level A high level so that the judges are
Sensitized to the complex issues of national security and
human rights principles at stae
given the tools to allo! them to "alance those issues in
their decision#maing$
Leader/Panel A high profile presenter% a Superior Court Judge% an expert on
&nternational 'a!
b!ectives" At the end of this session( participants !ill "e a"le to)
*$ +efine !hat is encompassed "y ,ational Security
2$ 'ist and explore !ays in !hich ne! ,ational security legislation nd government
policy affect existing constitutional- statutory- common la! .uman /ights
3$ &dentify the principles of &nternational 'a! and list the !ays in !hich nationalsecurity measures may infringe "asic human rights
$ &dentify and apply the principles of &nternational 'a! !hich are relevant indomestic cases involving ,ational Security
1$ &dentify the role of the judge and the factors relevant to "alancing ,ational
Security and .uman /ights generally !ith particular reference to)# aseparation of po!ers " judicial activism c scope of remedies$
4easura"le Self 5valuation 6orm)
7lease use a num"er "et!een * and 1 to rate the extent to !hich this o"jective !as met
1 5xcellent% 8ery 9ood% 3 9ood% 2 Average% * 7oor
8/12/2019 National Security and Human Rights
2/7
:eaching 7lan :iming for one day
Time Session #ontent
;$00# ;$*1 &ntroduction to the session &ce"reaer and &ntroduction
;$*1 ;$1 :he /ole of a Supreme Courtin a +emocracy and the 6ight
against :errorism
6eature interactive lecture "y apresenter such as hat is the domestic la! onnational security?
+omestic la! to "e su"stantiallyelicited from the group "ysuperior court judge$
Content to cover
ne! legislation%
current la! Constitution(
existing legislation(
common la! human
rights and
government policy on
,ational Security$
&n particular to)
&dentify the national
security issues covered "ythe ne! legislation
2
8/12/2019 National Security and Human Rights
3/7
list of the effects of the
ne! legislation onstaeholders
identify !hether there is
any conflict( uncertainty(
am"iguity arising from thene! legislation
6acilitator to use flip charts
**$1 *2$1 >hat are the internationalinstruments and norms relevant
to national security?
7resentation "y 6acilitator-5xpertin &nternational 'a! for *1
minutes( using po!erpoint
Content to cover the 6undamental6reedoms such as)
6reedom of Speech 6reedom of Association
/ight to 'ife and Security
/ight to 7rivacy
/ight to a 6air and
5xpeditious :rial
4inimum Standards of
7risoner /ights
+ue 7rocess of 'a!
6ollo!ed "y a half an hour groupdiscussion !ith t!o hypothetical
cases !hich raises the application
of
8/12/2019 National Security and Human Rights
4/7
arrest
interrogation
extended custody !ithout
charge Bpreventative
detention
no la!yer
no communication !ith
family
su"se=uently charged "ut
2 years later still no trial
2$00 2$30 9roup discussion +iscussion a"out the content of
the film in order to
identify the human rights
issues involved
and list them !ithreference to theinternational instruments
2$30 # 2$1 7lenary discussion :he 9roups reports "ac !ithfacilitation of the judge
2$1 3$30 7lenary Session Additional discussion on thehypothetical film !ith facilitation
"y the judge to elicit responses onthe follo!ing
to !hat extent should the
judiciary "e involved in
the issues raised judicial
activism
ho! can the judge
"alance the rights of
staeholders
!hat is the scope of the
remedies
se of flip charts3$30 3$1
8/12/2019 National Security and Human Rights
5/7
3$1 $30 >rap#p .as the program covered
the named o"jectives?
.as the program covered
your individual
o"jectives?
5valuation sheets
Teaching Tools
&ce"reaer 6lip Chart
9roup discussions 6ilm of hypothetical procedure'ecture .ypotheticals for group discussion
Short lecturette Short film
6acilitated general discussion
Bac$ground Material
,ational 'egislation eg
Constitution
,e! 'egislation on ,ational Security
5xisting 'egislation related to ,ational Security
&nternational &nstruments
:he +eclaration on 6undamental .uman /ights
:he &nternational Covenant on Civil and 7olitical /ights
:he &nternational Covenant on 5conomic( Social( and Cultural /ights
:he Convention on the 5limination of all forms of racial +iscrimination :he 8ienna Convention on the 'a!s of :reatiesArticles 2D and 2E
ayne 4acGay ,ational Journal of Constitutional 'a!
June 200D$
$alancing State Security and !rotection of Constitutional and Human Rights
.on$ Justice J$,$ 4ulenga /emars from CJ5&
8/12/2019 National Security and Human Rights
6/7
January( 200D
Canada&s Supreme Court Rules on Human Rights "' Security
Samuel 9$ 4c:yre &mmigration ,e!sJanuary( 2002
Security An (n"entory of Agency Considerations ) *+ecuti"e Summary
Canadian .uman /ights CommissionJune( 200F
Terrorists, Human Rights and the -nited #ations."y Arundhati 9hose
Can a terrorist get a fair trial?.B@ndelette Sunday August 2( 200; 1)1; pm
Human Rights, Terrorism and Counter/terrorism."y @ffice of the nited ,ations(.igh Commissioner for .uman /ights mainly
The Right to Fair Trial and A0mal 1asab."y ,andita .asar$
(s it really necessary to sacrifice fair trial standards to prosecute terrorism2. "y
+avid >eiss"rodt 7rofessor of 'a!( niversity of 4innesota
A 3egal Frame4or% for Detaining Terrorists *nact a 3a4 to *nd the Clash o"er
Rights."y ittes and 4ar 9itenstein$
Terrorism !re/Charge Detention Comparati"e 3a4 Study."y Jago /ussell
8/12/2019 National Security and Human Rights
7/7
%TT%#HM&NT
B'BL'(R%PH) * #%S&S
National Security #ases
!eople&s -nion of Ci"il 3iberties 5!-C36 "s' -nion of (ndia 5-7(6 and Anr'
A&/*;;ESC1DF( +ecem"er *F( 200D
Canada5!rime 8inister6 "s' 1hadr
20*0 SCC 3( January 2;( 20*0
!ermanent Secretary 8inistry of Fine Affairs, !atric% 8anning, !rime 8inister
of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago "s' Fero9a Ram0ohn
Civil Appeal ,o$ E* of 200E /epu"lic of :rinidad and :o"ago Court of Appeal
July F( 200;
1artar Singh "' State of !un0ab*;; 3 SCC 1D;
State of 8aharashtra "' $harat Shanti 3al Saha : ors' 200F A&/ SC> D3*
Atif #asir 8ullah "' State of 8aharashtra200D *0F