National Center for National Center for Education StatisticsEducation Statistics

IPEDS Data Feedback Report 2006

IPEDSIPEDS

Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System

Purpose of Data Analysis:Purpose of Data Analysis:

Performance EvaluationPerformance Evaluationand Predictionand Prediction

“Predicting is very difficult, especially as it

concerns the future”

Old Chinese Proverb

IPEDS Service

• Participation is required as condition of Title IV eligibility

• Approximately 9900 institutions participate

• Institutional data submitted via Web-based form or file upload

US Department of Education

NCES

State Coordinator

System Coordinator

Institution Keyholder

IPEDS Coordination Tree

Current Annual Education Surveys

• Institutional Characteristics

• Completions

• Fall Enrollment

• Fall Staff

• Finance

• Faculty Salaries

• Graduation Rate

• Student Financial Aid

IPEDS Peer Group

1. Austin Community College (Austin, TX)

2. Brevard Community College (Cocoa, FL)

3. Columbus State Community College (Columbus, OH)

4. Community College of Denver (Denver, OH)

5. Des Moines Area Community College (Ankeny, IA)

6. Houston Community College System (Houston, TX)

7. Metropolitan Community College Area (Omaha, NE)

8. North Harris Montgomery Community College District (The Woodlands, TX)

9. Oklahoma City Community College (Oklahoma City, OK)

10. Owens Community College (Perrysburg, OH)

11. Pima Community College (Tucson, AZ)

12. Portland Community College (Portland, OR)

13. Rose State College (Midwest City, OK)

14. Salt Lake Community College (Salt Lake City, UT)

15. Tarrant County College District (Fort Worth, TX)

16. Valencia Community College (Orlando, FL)

What information is available?

IPEDS Data Feedback Report

Comparisons

• Unduplicated headcount

• Percent enrolled by ethnicity and women

• Tuition and required fees

• Percent receiving financial aid

• Types and average amounts of financial aid

• Graduation rates

Comparisons continued...

• Number of degrees

• Percent distribution of core revenues

• Core expenses per FTE enrollment

• FTE staff by position

• Average faculty salaries

Unduplicated 12-month Headcount, Total FTE Enrollment

TCC

Peer group

What other information is available?

The surveys and the years for which data are available are displayed on the Master Variables List Selection screen.

The surveys and the years for which data are available are displayed on the Master Variables List Selection screen.

Master Variables List SelectionMaster Variables List Selection

Data Availability by Year

Institutional Characteristics

• Number of applications, admissions and enrollees (Enrollment Funnel)

• ACT and SAT scores

• Calendar system and application fees

• Room and board charges

• Price of attendance

• College Affordability Index

Published in-state tuition and fees Published in-state tuition and fees 2004-20052004-2005

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Austin

Des M

oines

Owens

Colum

bus

Salt L

ake

Denve

r

North

Har

ris

Met

roTCC

Tarra

nt C

ounty

Pima

$

College Affordability IndexCollege Affordability Index2004-20052004-2005

-101234567

Austin

Owen

s

Denver

Salt L

ake

Des M

oines

Colum

bus

Met

roPim

aTCC

Tarra

nt County

North H

arris

CAI

Enrollment

• By race/ethnicity, gender, attendance status, and level of student

• Age category, gender, attendance status, and level of student

• Total entering class

• Retention rates

• 12-month unduplicated headcount

12-month Unduplicated Headcount12-month Unduplicated Headcount2003-20042003-2004

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

Tarra

nt C

ounty

North

Har

risPim

a

Austin

Salt L

ake

Colum

bus

Met

roTCC

Owens

Des M

oines

Denve

r

$

Full-timeFull-time Retention Rate Retention Rate2003 Cohort: Fall 20042003 Cohort: Fall 2004

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Pima

Tarra

nt County

Austin

Denver

Des M

oines

North H

arris

Colum

bus

Salt L

akeTCC

Met

ro

Owen

s

%

Part-timePart-time Retention Rate Retention Rate2003 Cohort: Fall 20042003 Cohort: Fall 2004

%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

F-T/P-TF-T/P-T Retention Rate Retention Rate2003 Cohort: Fall 20042003 Cohort: Fall 2004

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Pima

Tarra

nt County

Austin

Denver

Des M

oines

North H

arris

Colum

bus

Salt L

akeTCC

Met

ro

Owen

s

%

Completions

• Total degrees by award level

• Degrees conferred by program (CIP), award level, race/ethnicity, and gender

• Transfer out rate

Graduation Rate by American Indian

1. Pima Community College (29%)

2. Community College of Denver (25%)

3. Tulsa Community College (21%)

4. Des Moines Area Community College (20%)

5. Tarrant County College District (20%)

6. North Harris Montgomery Community College (14%)

7. Owens Community College (10%)

8. Salt Lake Community College (5%)

9. Austin Community College (0%)

10. Metropolitan Community College (0%)

11. Columbus State Community College (0%)

Student Financial Aid

• No. and % receiving financial aid

• No. and % receiving federal grant aid

• No. and % receiving state/local grant aid

• No. and % receiving institutional grant aid

• No. and % receiving student loan aid

Percentage Receiving Any Financial AidPercentage Receiving Any Financial Aid2003-20042003-2004

01020304050607080

Salt L

akeTCC

Colum

bus

Met

roPim

a

Denver

Des M

oines

Owen

s

North H

arris

Tarra

nt County

Austin

%

Finance

• Statement of net assets

• Plant, property, and equipment

• Revenues and other additions

• Summary of changes in net assets

• Expenses and other deductions

• Scholarships and fellowships

• Details on endowment assets

Total Net Assets: Fiscal Year 2004Total Net Assets: Fiscal Year 2004

0

20000000

40000000

60000000

80000000

100000000

120000000

Tarra

nt County

Des M

oines

Colum

bus

North H

arris

Pima

Salt L

ake

Owen

sTCC

Met

ro

Austin

Denver

$

Data Requests

`` “I don't make jokes.  I just watch the government

and report the facts.” - Will Rogers