NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    1/25

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    2/25

    Contents

    1 Executive summary 3

    2 Product idea 52.1 Opportunity definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.2 Customer Benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52.3 Product visualisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62.4 Development progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

    3 Management team 7

    3.1 The start-up team . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73.2 Additional personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

    4 Marketing 8

    4.1 Market segments and market size . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84.2 Unique selling proposition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84.3 Target market and customers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94.4 Competitors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104.5 Market size and growth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114.6 Marketing Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114.7 Pricing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124.8 Place . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124.9 Promotion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

    5 Business system and organization 13

    5.1 Business activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135.2 Organizational arrangement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135.3 Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145.4 Patent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

    6 Realisation schedule 15

    6.1 Starting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156.2 Preparing research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156.3 Research and Marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166.4 Testing and Marketing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

    6.5 Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

    7 Risks 17

    1

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    3/25

    8 Financing 18

    8.1 Cost Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188.2 Pricing Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

    8.3 Revenue Assumption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208.4 Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228.5 Ownership and Stock Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228.6 Worst to Best Scenario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258.7 Exit Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258.8 Realization Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

    Authors

    Martijn Bakker s1340921Maaike Rump s1368761Chris Wouters s1354620Simon Pietersen s1381911Adi Abyoga s1232991

    2

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    4/25

    1 Executive summary

    What?

    Following Moores Law, the trend is that electronics gets faster and faster. At themoment this holds for processors and memory but not for the receptional sensitivity ofcommunication devices, like mobile phones and laptops. Furthermore, the trend is alsothat the requirement for access to different frequency bands ever increases. A mobilephone in the past only had access to the GSM network, now it also needs to access GPS,Wifi, 3G, 4G, HSDPA and Bluetooth. Many of these protocols operate at different fre-quencies and in order to keep the receptional quality high, it is necessary to includeseveral different antennas in the mobile device, which are all filling valuable physicalspace inside the device. The solution is straightforward and arises from physics. In-stead of the receiving the electric field, you can measure the magnetic field, which isinterchangable in the reception of electromagnetic radiation. There are several advan-

    tages related to this. Firstly, one magnetic sensor is capable of receiving all signals forwhich there used to be an array of different antennas, saving space. Secondly, using anewly developed SQUID (Superconducting Quantum Interference Device) -sensor it ispossible to detect signals with a lower intensity than possible using regular antennasthat are used currently by the consumer electronics industry.

    How?

    The SQUID-sensor that will be used in our design is a result of a PhD thesis by MatthiasSchmeltz. We are going to acquire a license for the patent, currently owned by IPHTJena, for which he performed his doctoral research. As IPHT Jena is not in the samemarket segment as we are, it will be an easy negotiation for a license. We get touse their technology and they get additional income from another market segment withminimal work involved. Concurrently with acquiring the license we are going to start theresearch on the integration of the sensor in a single chip including all required supportingcircuitry. Secondly, the research will focus on implementing a cooling solution for thesensor, for which we found promising technology from the group of M. ter Brake at theUniversity of Twente. After a year of research by master students and experts in thefield, we will outlicense our product, including the license from IPHT Jena, to consumerelectronics manufacturers, as they already have the scale capabilities for high-volumeproduction of integrated circuits. As we start generating revenue and profits, we willkeep up the R&D in order to remain ahead of possible competitors. This allows us to

    sustain our position in the market in order to keep improving our product and branchingout to other applications: sensors in scientific devices or the optimization of multiplesensor to serve as a 3D position detector.

    3

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    5/25

    Where?

    The market for magnetic sensors consists of two main segments, consumer electronicsand the automotive industry. The demands for accuracy and sensitivity in the automo-

    tive segment are low, the sensor has to work and has to be cheap. For this reason wechose to focus on the consumer electronics market. This market demands high accuracysensors for a variety of purposes: compasses, position sensing and, using our SQUIDsensor, the reception of radio waves for communication purposes.

    Who?

    Our management team consists of 5 people. The CEO of the company is MartijnBakker. He knows most about all the different aspects of our technology and worksin a structured and organized manner so it is easy to understand by others. As COOwe have Maaike Rump. She is responsible for the short term planning of the companyand making sure that the communications with suppliers and researchers are running

    smoothly. Her skills in planning, organizing and practical thinking help immensely andfurthermore she is very dedicated to everything she does. In the marketing managementwe have Chris Wouters and Simon Pietersen. This combo is very good at spottingtrends, anticipating and coming up with a proper reaction. Next to their analyticalskills they are also very good at improvising when things do not go exactly as planned.Together they fulfill the position of CMO. Lastly, in charge of the financial part of ourcompany, we have our CFO Adi Abyoga. He is very experienced with bookkeeping andunderstands the importance of maximizing financial efficiency like no other.

    Financing

    We realize that since our business model will be using a high technology based, we willneed a lot of initial investment. We estimated around 1,000,000 euros will be needed inthe first year, this consists of 600,000 euros that is funded by us, and we are going tofind investors to cover up the rest of initial investment. In total, the shares is dividedalmost evenly, with 60 % for us and 40% for the investors with a total of 1,000,000shares. We believe that this will result in a very profitable since in the third year, weassumed that we will have a net income of 1,709,698 Euros with 1.7 euros earnings pershare, and 0.4 dividends per share.

    4

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    6/25

    2 Product idea

    2.1 Opportunity definition

    In many fields there is a need for accurate sensing of electromagnetic radiation forwireless communications: remote controls, mobile phones and wifi-receivers. Currently,these communications devices are housing a multitude of antennas necessary for cap-turing all incoming transmission frequencies, which all take up physical space in thedevice. However, using a single antenna results in an undesirable decrease in sensitivity.From physics we know that magnetic fields cause electric fields and vice versa. As such,it suffices to measure the magnetic signals instead of the electric signals captured by theantenna in order to receive the data for the communications device. That is where ouropportunity comes in. Communication device manufacturers are trying to add moreand more ways of receiving data: GPS, Bluetooth, WiFi, 3G, 4G, HSDPA and other

    protocols. Using our new magnetic sensor chip, we can capture all these signals, usingone antenna and with a higher sensitivity than currently possible with a standard arrayof different antennas.

    2.2 Customer Benefit

    Our product uses a new generation of SQUID sensor (Superconducting Quantum Inter-ference Device). This new development allows us to replace the high frequency receivingpart of a communication device by a single chip, saving the space of the antenna arrayand improving the sensitivity. This allows for two things. Either the device becomessmaller with the same capabilities or the device becomes more powerful or valuable if

    the saved space is used for other purposes, like a battery of larger capacity, more mem-ory or a faster processor. Space is very limited in mobile devices and as such very small,yet very high quality components are paramount. Furthermore, due to the increasedsensitivity the reception range of the device will increase, again contributing to a highervalue of the final product.

    Figure 1: Would you want your phone to look like this?

    5

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    7/25

    2.3 Product visualisation

    (a) Sensor core (b) Chip package (c) Main market

    Figure 2: The product as seen from different levels

    The figures show the three main views on our product. First, figure 2a shows apicture, made by an electron microscope of the technology responsible for the actualdetection. As we zoom out (figure 2b), we see our final product: a chip with the sensorcore from figure 2a and all supporting electronics integrated. Next, in figure 2c you cansee our main market: consumer electronics and then especially communication deviceslike smartphones and laptops.

    2.4 Development progress

    The feasibility of the SQUID sensor as magnetic sensor has been shown in the PhDthesis of M. Schmeltz. In the thesis he developed a sensor on the microscale and he

    then used the sensor to measure the conductivity of the ground for the detection ofminerals and other disturbances in the soil. There is one main area on which we needto focus in our R&D period. The sensor used in the thesis was cooled to 4 Kelvin usingliquid helium in order to work properly. As mentioned by J. Flokstra, the sensor is alsocapable of working at higher temperatures (77K, liquid nitrogen). However, this raisesthe first problem. We need to do on-chip cooling because it is not feasible to repeatedlypour liquid nitrogen over the sensing chip. There have been promising developments atthe group of M. ter Brake at the University of Twente which will allow us to cool ourSQUID sensor without an external application of liquid nitrogen or helium.

    6

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    8/25

    3 Management team

    3.1 The start-up team

    Figure 3: Organizational chart

    The CEO of the company is Martijn Bakker. He knows most about all the differentaspects of our technology and works in a structured and organized manner so it is easyto understand by others.Maaike Rump is responsible for all the operations of the company, hence COO. Her

    expertise is planning and organizing which makes her cut for the job.Marketing research is done by Chris Wouters and Simon Pietersen. This duo has excessto analytic skills, work fast and neat and can improvise when necessary. These traitsare well combined as they are team players.Our CFO is Adi Abyoga. He has experience with bookkeeping and always looks forwardto learning new things that improve his work.

    3.2 Additional personnel

    In addition to our workforce we are going to hire master students to research and designthe cooling mechanism. They can do their master project with us, which also gives usa financial advantage. For them it is an attractive opportunity because it will be amultidisciplinary project which combines electronics, thermodynamics and mechanics.The design team will have the challenge to create a working chip which is easiest andcheapest to produce.

    7

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    9/25

    4 Marketing

    4.1 Market segments and market size

    The market for highly sensitive single-chip magnetometers can be divided in the fol-lowing segments.

    40%

    45%

    5%

    10%

    Automotive industry

    Consumer electronicsHealthcareHomeland security and defense

    Figure 4: Estimation of the market size of the different segments in the magnetic sensormarket. Based on market research from Markets and Markets (2011)

    The market segment for consumer electronics is one of the main segments in themarket for magnetometers, next to the automotive industry. The consumer electronics

    segment mainly consists of smartphones, home electronics and computing applications.The automotive segment the magnetic sensors improve drivers safety and engine effi-ciency. The automotive applications do not require sensors with a very high sensitivity,which is something our product does offer. For this reason we decide to focus on theconsumer electronics market as we do not want to waste the potential and strength ofour technology. Alongside this, the total market is growing fast (as seen in figure 5).Furthermore, from table 1, we deduce that the main increase in the market is comingfrom our target segment, the manufacturers of consumer electronics which are in needof magnetic sensing (smartphones, laptops etc.). This allows us to expand and increaserevenues very quickly.

    4.2 Unique selling proposition

    There are a lot of devices with a multitude of receiving elements. However, all of thesesensors have not yet been combined into a single chip which reduces the use of spaceinside the device. Our chip can receive every frequency up to the gigahertz range.

    8

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    10/25

    Table 1: Consumer Electronics Company Shares in the Netherlands 2007-2011

    Company 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

    Apple Computer Benelux BV 3.0 4.4 5.1 7.1 11.0

    Nokia Nederland BV 9.3 9.5 9.0 12.6 9.5Sony Nederland BV 8.7 9.6 10.0 9.7 8.8Samsung Electronics Nederland BV 5.9 4.4 4.4 4.9 8.6Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV 7.4 7.4 7.1 7.2 7.0Panasonic BV 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.1Hewlett-Packard Nederland BV 5.7 5.5 5.6 4.7 4.1HTC Nederland BV 0.1 0.2 0.8 1.6 4.0Research in Motion Ltd 0.0 0.2 0.7 1.5 2.3Acer Computer BV 1.7 2.2 2.4 2.2 1.7LG Electronics Benelux NV 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.6

    Dell BV 1.3 1.4 1.8 1.3 1.2Packard Bell BV 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.2Toshiba Benelux BV 1.4 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.8AsusTek Computer Inc 1.0 1.1 1.2 0.7 0.7Microsoft Nederland BV 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5Others 46.6 45.2 39.2 40.9 33.1Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

    Furthermore, by using multiple magnetic sensors it is possible to accurately determinepositions from the magnetic field strength, for example coming from a magnetic stylus.

    This allows for three dimensional input for electronic devices.After we entered the market, our main concern in marketing is that we stay aheadof our competitors. We need to keep an eye on what our competitors are working on,and of course that our R&D and accomplishments has that cutting edge which providesus that unique selling proposition. In order to keep having this opportunity, we alwayshave a large team working on research and development. After we have entered themarket, we also have to start looking out for even newer companies entering, as it couldbe expected that new companies can take our technology as example. We need to haveour patents strong, and our technology fresh.

    4.3 Target market and customers

    We are aiming for larger companies, that produce laptops/PCs at a large scale. Thatmeans that our company will be a business to business company. The businesses arepurchasing a significant amount of licenses for the production of sensors, as they producea large number of devices.

    9

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    11/25

    2010 2012 2014 2016

    4

    5

    6

    7

    109

    Year

    Units

    Figure 5: Demand in units: Market growth of magnetic field sensors as estimated in aresearch from Markets and Markets (2011)

    We consider the following companies high-end laptop and smartphone manufacturers(in other words, our target customers): Apple Computer, Sony, Samsung Electronics,HTC and LG Electronics. However, large companies have a tendency to distrust tech-nology not originating from their own research facilities. For this reason, as a start, wefocus on smaller companies.

    4.4 Competitors

    The company Honeywell has a Magnetic Sensor division. They sell sensors in all thosedifferent segments. Therefore this is one of our competitors. We have an advantageover this company since their 3-axis magnetometers have larger dimensions (approx. 70cm3), compared to our product (approx. 0.5 cm3 or smaller), which is more practicalfor example when implemented in a smartphone. Another competitor is Memsic. Thismanufacturers products have a lot of noise and therefore not suitable for implementa-tion in smartphones or laptops. Moreover, none of these sensors use a SQUID, whichis much more accurate and have a much larger bandwidth than the magnetoresistivemeasurement technique used by the existing sensors. This makes it have new appli-cations, compared to the existing sensors. Due to the accuracy, it can be used as aposition sensor of the stylus of a touchscreen, making 3D detection possible. Thereare other companies developing magnetic sensors, but they are in different areas. For

    example Infineon, they are mostly selling magnetic sensors for automotive applications,and only components of similar products.

    10

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    12/25

    4.5 Market size and growth

    The market we are aiming at involves large companies as mentioned. We are primarilyaiming at laptop-companies, our chip can be used for. For example, the Wi-Fi receiver

    on the laptop, and other appliances. We are not aiming at smartphones as of yet,because we think the technology is a long way before we can implement such a smallcooling device, capable of cooling our chip. This is because a cooling system is moredifficult to produce when it is smaller, this is because a very low temperature is needed.We do want to get into the market for smartphones after we have bloomed in the laptop-market. The market size of the market we are aiming at can be easily estimated, since itis very clear how many companies there are on the laptop market. After some researchwe found that there around 20-25 large laptop/PC companies. We estimate that thereshould be around 20 more that are not large enough to find globally. That means thatwe estimate there to be around 40 potential customers, at any time. The time-factoris important because these companies will keep releasing new laptops, and we wantthem to buy our product for every model they release. This means that we need toachieve a good reputation. As mentioned, the market keeps evolving and renewing, thisis positive because whenever we are exceeded by a competitor we will get a new chance.Breaking into the market is, however, difficult. It is also important that after we havebroken in to the markets, we stay there as the go-to company for our customers. Wehave to make sure that we have good relations with our customers. Our predictionsaccording to the market growth are based on different levels. On micro-scale, we expectthat our product is a valuable addition to consumer electronics. We expect that themarket will keep growing, as this innovation has broad applications, in which our R&Dwill maintain a big player. On meso-scale, we can already see that this market is vastly

    growing, as its potential is being discovered by different companies, and the need for,for example wi-fi receivers, is growing. On a macro-level this market is not as muchimpacted. This is because it is a component of a larger electronic device. We do howevertake into account that this technology can be used for different applications. As a broadinnovation as ours can be implemented in a lot of technologies.

    4.6 Marketing Strategy

    It is important that our product is safe, and easy to assemble. In order to stay aheadof the competition we need to keep developing and improving our product. The marketwe are trying to enter is a fast changing market with fierce competition. Based on the

    knowledge of our competitors we can determine a good price, and have a strong uniqueselling point. We want to sell the license, and leave production to the company. Therehas to be a reason for the consumer to decide on our product. The market segment thatwe are aiming for already has this kind of products, which means that our promotionneeds to be strong. A potential customer is not going to look for our product, we

    11

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    13/25

    have to bring it to them. Since we are aiming on large laptop/PC companies, weneed to stand out at trade fairs and customer visits. This type of advertising is moreexpensive than for example advertisement on television, but this is the only way for us

    to obtain a good reputation and become known. That means that we have to obtaingood customer relations, and personal connections to potential customers, and this canonly be obtained face-to-face. And as is the standard in the current economy, we needa good clear website for potential customers.

    4.7 Pricing

    The price we ask for the license we offer is based on multiple factors. First of all, wehave a price for our technology license that comes from the cost expenditures, the totalof costs expenditure per month is around 79,000 euros, so well take the 25 % of it,then the price for our technology license becomes 20,000 euros. Second, we have also

    royalties, for the sake of pro forma, we decided to have a 0.5 euros or 50 cents perproduct. Based on the volume of the market of consumer electronics, the sales are verylarge, and if every end products use our chip, 50 cents of royalties are good.

    A company is not going to switch to our product if it does not offer a significantbenefit. More exact information about the pricing of our product can be found under8.2.

    4.8 Place

    The internet is our distribution channel. We need to be easy to reach. Our websiteis automatically our businesscard. After we have promoted at fairs or companies, the

    first thing that potential customer will do is visit our website. Our website stays up-to-date informing visitors about our new accomplishments and goals. This includes ourR&D goals, so potential customers know what we are working on. This is of courselimited, since we do not want to expose our projects to full extend, keeping potentialcompetitors in mind.

    4.9 Promotion

    To promote our product, we are going to attend trade fairs, exhibitions and customervisits. A good first impression attracts potential costumers. In order to make a good

    impression, we have a strong presentation of our product. Our website makes us ap-proachable online.

    12

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    14/25

    5 Business system and organization

    5.1 Business activities

    Figure 6: Our business system

    Our company focuses on developing a cooling system for SQUIDS on a chip. Then welicense the technology to companies who want to use our technology in their product,

    which will be our source of income. The total business system is shown in figure 6The first step is to do research in the field of cooling on small scale. The NanoLab

    at the university of Twente provides the cleanroom and other equipment to do theresearch.

    Companies that want to use our technology will pay a license fee to gain access tothe design and also a royalty on every chip that uses the licensed design. This royaltyis agreed upon in the license contract.

    The distribution of our technology is different from distributing a real product. Theproduct is a design, which we license to another party. As soon as the contract is signedthe easiest way (and cheapest) to get the technology to the partner company is digitally.

    5.2 Organizational arrangement

    The organization is arranged as can be seen in figure 3, section 3. Collaborate workis important and so the communication is informal and the leadership is participative,everyones input is valued in making decisions. Also performance will to be praised to

    13

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    15/25

    achieve our goals, but also to create a challenging environment where people can growin their area of specialty. This all to establish a company that is successful and whereemployees enjoy their work.

    5.3 Location

    The company is based at the Kennispark of Enschede, Hengelosestraat 705. It is closeto the University of Twente where the NanoLab of MESA+ is located. Furthermoreour legal form is bv because being not liable for the companies finances personally ismore important than choosing the cheapest legal form.

    5.4 Patent

    In the development of our new technology, we focus on the patent of our product. Our

    company makes profit with licensing the technology, so it is fundamental to protect theintellectual property we are working on.

    Before we file for a patent, we are going to sign a contract with IPHT Jena. Theyhold the patent for the SQUID magnetometer (WO 2004015436 A1) that is still validand contains the technology we want to use.

    Subsequently we are going to research and develop the cooling system for a SQUIDdevice on a chip. When the research has reached a certain point (see section 7) we willbe working together with the University of Twente on the patent application. Theywill provide attorneys to help with the legal formation of the patent. In return they are

    the owners of the patent until we have financial stability or when we need the patentthey would want a compensation in equity. As soon as we have financial stability (seesection 9), we buy the patent rights from the University of Twente.

    The filing for a patent takes longer then a year. Therefore, all employees have tosing a confidentiality agreement (NDA) to prevent any publicity of our technology anddesigns before the patent is granted.

    14

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    16/25

    6 Realisation schedule

    Our venture consists of 5 stages, starting the company, preparing the research, doingthe research and the marketing, testing the product and marketing and lastly the mostimportant stage of any company, generating revenue and finally becoming profitable.

    Figure 7: Our path to revenue.

    6.1 Starting

    We start with arranging the required space for our company and make sure all the legalmatters are in order, for instance claiming our company name and registering ourself as

    a BV. Moreover, during the starting phase we will establish contacts to the universityof Twente in order to facilitate our upcoming research and researcher candidates. Thisphase will last three months.

    6.2 Preparing research

    After the initial three months have passed, we will focus on the preparation of theresearch. This involves getting permissions from the Mesa+ institute to do our researchthere and more importantly, getting Masters students who are willing to do their finalproject as a research project whilst getting paid for doing so. Furthermore, we willarrange the materials required to do the research and set up the contracts with the

    researchers who will be employed by our company. The length of this phase is variable,as it depends on recruiting people. However, we expect that this phase will also lastapproximately three months. If this planning comes true, we will be able to start theactual research in september 2014, at the beginning of the new academic year 2014-2015.

    15

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    17/25

    6.3 Research and Marketing

    During this stage, our researchers prepare an on-chip cooling method. Another areaof research will be the practical capabilities of the SQUID sensors included in a chip,

    which are still cooled externally. This allows us to focus both on the improvement ofthe product whilst still developing one of the parts of the product. Of course, as soonas we have any improvement over the current SQUID system, we patent it.

    During the research phase, alongside the task of guiding the research, the boardprepares the market. We already have the working specs of the sensors cooled exter-nally (by liquid nitrogen or helium) and because of this we can start contacting therelevant companies which are going to be our customers (companies producing con-sumer electronics, like Samsung, Lenovo and Apple). We are going to show them ourprogress (protected by our patents of course) and ask them whether they see possibleimprovements which would be useful in their specific case of business, which would onlyimprove our product further and eventually, it would improve their products as well ifthey start producing the chips under our license.

    As research is inherently uncertain, it is impossible to state a fixed length of theresearch peroid, the only option we have is to carefully monitor the research progressand if the progress in the research is not enough, we can opt for more researchers tospeed up the process. We aim to have the main research stage last 12 months, up toSeptember 2015.

    6.4 Testing and Marketing

    Afterwards, when we have a working on-chip cooler, we are going to conduct further

    research into the exact specifications of the chip which has been designed in the previousstage. Again, this information (after being patented) is corresponded to the potentialcustomers to allow them to provide feedback which both improves our product as wellas the product they are going to receive. This phase will last three months, up toDecember 2015.

    6.5 Revenue

    Lastly, when we have a fully functional chip of which all specifications are known weare going to license out the construction process to the customers with whom we havebeen in contact with already. If the schedule so far comes true, we will be able to start

    getting revenues in January 2016.

    16

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    18/25

    7 Risks

    Insufficient starting capital

    As a starting company, you do not have the financial strength yet to support all theresearch and the setting up of the legal form. If the funding is not enough (see section9) to start the company, we are going to look for partner companies who develop theproduct with us or we are going to cooperate with the University of Twente to becomea spin-off company. Partner companies are preferred because of their knowledge supplythat comes with the partnership. Being a spin-off company means losing shares to theUniversity of Twente, so those can not be offered to potential employees or investorsanymore.

    Research does not find an applicable solution

    The problem that we are going to solve is the cooling mechanism. When finding asolution to a problem there is always the risk of not finding the preferable solution orthe time needed to find the desired solution is longer (than predicted in section 7). Ifthe master students have not been able to find a solution that is applicable, we aregoing to hire a PhD student. We do it this way because master students can solvethis problem, only they have less experience in lab work than PhD students and aretherefore cheaper to hire. To prevent that our idea reaches competing companies beforewe have the patent, we work with NDAs (see section 5.4). Every month the researchis extended is going to cost what is calculated in Table 3 plus an additional paymentof approx. 1500.- for the PhD student because they are more expensive than masterstudents.

    Insufficient interest in our market segment

    The profit of the company is completely based on the licensing procedure. When laptopmanufacturers are not interested we are going to focus on another market segment (othersegments are in section 4). This is the same procedure as when suddenly a competitorenters with a cheaper (alternative) product.

    Research location unavailable

    There is a risk in cost and availability of the NanoLab at the University of Twente.

    We are dependent on the equipment and cleanrooms available there to do our research.However, there are more cleanrooms in the Netherlands.

    17

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    19/25

    8 Financing

    In this section, the financing analysis is explained, for a further use of decision makingof our company. A good analysis will lead to a sustainable growth of our company. Thesection is divided into several subsections: profitability, revenue assumption and salesprojection, cost statement, subsidies, financing, realization strategy, and appendicesthat include the balance sheet, income statement and others.

    8.1 Cost Expenditures

    Salary is based on the website we found, http://www.iamexpat.nl/career/main/environment,which is 2500 euro a month, 1770 euro including taxis. For the working hours, accord-ing to Dutch law, you should not work more than eight hours per day or 40 hours perweek.

    Depending on the industry, a maximum of nine hours per day and 45 hours perweek could be the case, but no one is allowed to work more than 2.080 hours a year.Consequently, the average working week in the Netherlands is approximately 40 hours.

    Facilities are divided into three parts. One is the office, which costs around 300euro. This office is located at the Hengelosstraat. Another one is the NanoLab, whichcosts around 26280. Lastly the supplies for R&D which we estimated to be around10,000 euro. The price is unpredictable and we know that the research instruments inthe NanoLab are expensive to be rented. This is of course also including the materials.

    We divided the additional costs into several factors. First of all, traveling costs areput at 1,000 euros. It is mainly the result of renting cars and gas, taxi, or train. Second,insurances are based on website of https://www.undutchables.nl/working-en-living-in-

    the-netherlands/working-for-undutchables/health-insurance, For the basic insurance,you pay a premium to the insurance company. This is known as the nominal premium.This nominal premium generally costs about 1,100 euro per annum [year] per person.For children under the age of 18, the standard insurance (basisverzekering) is free ofcharge. We have 9 people, in 12 months, so 1 month will only incur 825 euro.

    The licensing is around 10,000 euro since we dont know the price of license that weare going to buy from IPHT Jena. We assume that we have different kinds of paymentafter we have negotiated. We either have to pay royalties each month based on sales,starting from 1 to 5% and decreasing to 0.5%, or a lump sump payment. Both resultsin a total of 10,000 euro.

    Marketing is also put around 10,000 euro, since its not only the advertisementand promotion, but also renting tools for marketing, which are variable costs. This isalready doubled from our first estimation because marketing always escalates beyondexpectations. So in total we will have costs of expenditures in 1 month of 79605 euro.Another thing that we have to take into account is patenting our technology. We are

    18

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    20/25

    going to have university to patent our technology, and let them have shares of 10%, butthen the fund is completely funded by university. University focuses on the protectingthe idea.

    Monthly CostsAssumption

    TechnologyLicense

    (in euro)

    Year 1 Year 2 Year 3Facility costs 36580 37311.6 38057.8R&D, License, Patent 10000 10000 10000Total salaries(including taxes)

    21200 26200 31200

    Marketing (includingonline presence)

    10000 10000 10000

    Other (utilities,

    communication, travel,taxes) 1825 1825 1825

    Total expenses 79605 85336.6 91082.8

    Table 2: Monthly Costs Assumption

    8.2 Pricing Policy

    Pricing of the product is determined by two factors, the added value of end product(chip) and also the costs expenditures we made. Looking to our competitors which

    has similar product but different technology, the chip costs around 635 euros, then weassume that our customers will sell the chip less than that, for example 50 cents, thenit will have an added value of 634.5 euros. This is further explained in the marketingsection in the pricing section. Furthermore we also have a fix price of our license costsof 20,000 euros, or 25 % of the costs expenditures, and its because we have now twostreams of revenue, so putting a fixed price of the license, will also be covered up bythe royalties.

    Our term of contract for the license ranges from 1 year term to 5 year term. Everyterm start on the effective date of the order and shall continue for that period that hasbeen agreed on.

    If your Program License does not specify a term, the Program license is perpetualand shall continue unless terminated as otherwise provided in the Agreement.

    19

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    21/25

    Costs Expenditures per Month (in Euros) NanoSQUID

    Personal Number of PersonnelAdministrative and Finances 4000 2

    Sales and Marketing 7200 3R&D and Production 10000 4

    FacilitiesRent(Bureau) 300

    R&D Supplies 10000Rent(NanoLab for research) 26280

    AdditionalTravel 1000

    Insurances 825Licensing 10000

    Marketing 10000Total without Production Costs 79605

    License Costs 79605

    Table 3: Cost of all the expenditures needed to develop the technology

    8.3 Revenue Assumption

    Theoretically, our companys revenue will be zero at the beginning since we focusedon the R&D in the first year. Hence, we mainly get our revenue from the investmentof investors such as business angels. After we successfully make a patent out of thetechnology, our product will be sell to several companies that has lower shares first inorder to position our company in the market share. Our next revenue stream will comefrom the royalties based on how many sales our consumers generated which is alreadyexplained in the pricing policy section. Continually, the number of sales will grow witha growth of 10 % a month. Based on the profit and loss statement, we will have breakeven point in the middle of the third year.

    8.4 Ownership and Stock Option

    Based on the income statement, we analyze that our company is going to be profitable

    since it will earned 1,709,698 euro over 3 years ended 17 June, 2016 Our initial invest-ments will have a 60 % shares while investors will have 40 %, with the dividend paidin the third year 0.4 euro per shares.

    20

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    22/25

    ProfitandLossStatementforthegrowthrateof5percentpermonth

    Year1

    TotalExpenses

    7

    9605

    79605

    79605

    796

    05

    79605

    79605

    79605

    79605

    79605

    79605

    79605

    79605

    955260

    Revenues

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    Profit

    -7

    9605

    -79605

    -79605

    -796

    05

    -79605

    -79605

    -79605

    -79605

    -79605

    -79605

    -79605

    -79605

    -955260

    Income

    taxes(credit)

    -23881.5

    -23881.5

    -23881.5

    -23881.5

    -23881.5

    -23881.5

    -23881.5

    -23881.5

    -23881.5

    -23881.5

    -23881.5

    -23881.5

    -286578

    Netprofit

    -55723.5

    -55723.5

    -55723.5

    -55723.5

    -55723.5

    -55723.5

    -55723.5

    -55723.5

    -55723.5

    -55723.5

    -55723.5

    -55723.5

    -668682

    (Accumulated

    profit)

    -55723.5

    -111447

    -167170.5

    -2228

    94

    -278617.5

    -334341

    -390064.5

    -445788

    -501511.5

    -557235

    -612958.5

    -668682

    Technology

    License

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    Priceof

    Technology

    License

    20,000.00

    20000

    20000

    200

    00

    20000

    20000

    20000

    20000

    20000

    20000

    20000

    20000

    240000

    SalesofEnd

    Product

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    2400000

    Royalties

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    TotalExpenses

    85336.6

    85336.6

    85336.6

    85336.6

    85336.6

    85336.6

    85336.6

    85336.6

    85336.6

    85336.6

    85336.6

    85336.6

    1024039.2

    Revenues

    6

    0000

    66143

    72787

    800

    47

    88033

    96861.6

    106524.66

    117198.03

    128890.33

    141795.86

    156032.55

    171640

    1285953.03

    Profit

    -25336.6

    -19193.6

    -12549.6

    -5289.6

    2696.4

    11525

    21188.06

    31861.426

    43553.729

    56459.261

    70695.948

    86303.402

    261913.826

    Income

    taxes(credit)

    -7600.98

    -5758.08

    -3764.88

    -1586.88

    808.92

    3457.5

    6356.418

    9558.4278

    13066.119

    16937.778

    21208.784

    25891.021

    78574.1478

    Netprofit

    -17735.62

    -13435.52

    -8784.72

    -3702.72

    1887.48

    8067.5

    14831.642

    22302.998

    30487.61

    39521.483

    49487.163

    60412.382

    183339.678

    (Accumulated

    profit)

    -686417.6

    -699853.1

    -708637.9

    -712340.6

    -710453.1

    -702385.6

    -687554

    -665251

    -634763.3

    -595241.9

    -545754.7

    -485342.3

    Technology

    License

    3

    3

    4

    4

    4

    5

    5

    6

    6

    7

    8

    9

    64

    Priceof

    Technology

    License

    2

    0000

    20000

    20000

    200

    00

    20000

    20000

    20000

    20000

    20000

    20000

    20000

    20000

    240000

    SalesofEnd

    Product

    0

    286

    374

    3

    74

    374

    462

    462

    550

    550

    638

    816

    906

    2403207.64

    Royalties

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    Year3

    25

    26

    27

    28

    29

    30

    31

    32

    33

    34

    35

    36

    TotalExpenses

    9

    1083

    91083

    91083

    910

    83

    91083

    91083

    91083

    91083

    91083

    91083

    91083

    91083

    1092996

    Revenues

    205953.9

    226551.34

    249279.53

    274398.88

    301904.87

    332156.06

    365425.86

    402244.55

    442953.95

    487874.5

    538019.5

    593303.3

    4420066.22

    Profit

    114870.9

    135468.34

    158196.53

    183315.88

    210821.87

    241073.06

    274342.86

    311161.55

    351870.95

    396791.5

    446936.5

    502220.3

    3327070.22

    Income

    taxes(credit)

    34461.271

    40640.503

    47458.958

    54994.7

    64

    63246.56

    72321.917

    82302.858

    93348.464

    105561.29

    119037.45

    134080.95

    150666.09

    998121.067

    Netprofit

    80409.632

    94827.84

    110737.57

    128321.12

    147575.31

    168751.14

    192040

    217813.08

    246309.67

    277754.05

    312855.55

    351554.21

    1977394.95

    (Accumulated

    profit)

    -404932.7

    -310104.8

    -199367.3

    -71046.16

    76529.143

    245280.28

    437320.28

    655133.37

    901443.03

    1179197.1

    1492052.6

    1843606.8

    Technology

    License

    10

    11

    12

    14

    15

    17

    18

    20

    22

    24

    27

    29

    220

    Priceof

    Technology

    License

    2

    0000

    20000

    20000

    200

    00

    20000

    20000

    20000

    20000

    20000

    20000

    20000

    20000

    240000

    SalesofEnd

    Product

    1059

    1169

    1432

    19

    58

    2286

    2636

    3008

    3861

    5217

    6989

    10403

    14407

    284

    Royalties

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    0.5

    720000

    2 6 5 2 3 9 7 8 9

    Table 4: Profit and Loss Statement and Sales Forecast21

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    23/25

    8.5 Funding

    The following pictures of calculations and predictions of expenses and revenues, incomestatement and balance sheet are pro forma in accounting term and based on the per-

    centage of growth we predict to be. During the expected time frame we expect highinvestment in facilities (we would increase more facilities, and that would means extrarental cost) , equipment, and employees especially if we are planning to expand andgrow our company.

    For initial investment, we will have 2 stages. The first and second quarter needsto be covered by our initial investment from several investors, for example businessangels. The first stages is 500,000 euro, 400,000 euro covered by investors, and 100,000will come from us. Second stages will also need another 500,000 which will be coveredby several banks. Because we know that bank wont invest in high risk company, soif we divided into several banks, each of them will only have to invest 100,000 euro to150,000 euros instead of 500,000 which has more solvability for each bank.

    End of month

    1 of Year 1 End of Year 1 End of Year 2 End of Year 3

    Assets

    Cash and/or AccountPayables

    450000 32740 242459 2858410

    Total assets 450000 32740 242459 2858410Liabilities

    Loan payable 500000 525000 551250 578812Equity

    Owners contributions 50000 100000 100000 100000Business Angels 200000 200000 200000 200000Investors 200000 200000 200000 200000Retainedearnings(deficit)

    0.00 32740 242459 2858410

    Total owners equity 50000 132740 342459 2958410Total liabilities andowners equity

    450000 32740 242459 2858410

    Table 5: Balance Sheet

    22

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    24/25

    CashFlow

    forStandardV

    ersion

    NanoSQUID

    Year1

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    AnnualTotal

    OperatingActivities

    OperatingActivities

    NetProfit

    -79605

    -79605

    -79605

    -7

    9605

    -79605

    -79605

    -79605

    -79605

    -79605

    -79605

    -79605

    -79605

    -955260

    Depreciation

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -12000

    CashFlow

    from

    Operations

    -80605

    -80605

    -80605

    -8

    0605

    -80605

    -80605

    -80605

    -80605

    -80605

    -80605

    -80605

    -80605

    -967260

    FinancingActivities

    Investmentfrom

    Investors

    200000

    200000

    BusinessAngels

    200000

    200000

    BankLoan

    500000

    500000

    OwnersCash

    Contribution

    50000

    50000

    100000

    IncreaseinCash

    369395

    -80605

    -80605

    -8

    0605

    -80605

    -80605

    469395

    -80605

    -80605

    -80605

    -80605

    -80605

    BeginningCash

    Balance

    0

    369395

    288790

    20

    8185

    127580

    46975

    -33630

    435765

    355160

    274555

    193950

    113345

    EndingCash

    Balance

    369395

    288790

    208185

    12

    7580

    46975

    -33630

    435765

    355160

    274555

    193950

    113345

    32740

    Year2/Month

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    AnnualTotal

    OperatingActivities

    OperatingActivities

    NetProfit

    -17735.6

    -13435.5

    -8784.72

    -3702.72

    1887.48

    8067.5

    14831.64

    22303

    30487.61

    39521.48

    494

    87.16

    60412.38

    183339.7

    Depreciation

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -12000

    CashFlow

    from

    Operations

    -18735.6

    -14435.5

    -9784.72

    -4702.72

    887.48

    7067.5

    13831.64

    21303

    29487.61

    38521.48

    484

    87.16

    59412.38

    171339.7

    FinancingActivities

    BankLoan

    OwnersCash

    Contribution

    IncreaseinCash

    -18735.6

    -14435.5

    -9784.72

    -4702.72

    887.48

    7067.5

    13831.64

    21303

    29487.61

    38521.48

    484

    87.16

    59412.38

    171339.7

    BeginningCash

    Balance

    71120

    52384.38

    37948.86

    28164.14

    23461.42

    24348.9

    31416.4

    45248.04

    66551.04

    96038.65

    134

    560.1

    183047.3

    EndingCash

    Balance

    52384.38

    37948.86

    28164.14

    23461.42

    24348.9

    31416.4

    45248.04

    66551.04

    96038.65

    134560.1

    183

    047.3

    242459.7

    Year3/Month

    25

    26

    27

    28

    29

    30

    31

    32

    33

    34

    35

    36

    AnnualTotal

    OperatingActivities

    OperatingActivities

    NetProfit

    80409.63

    94827.84

    110737.6

    128321.1

    147575.3

    168751.1

    192040

    217813.1

    246309.7

    277754

    312

    855.5

    351554.2

    2328949

    Depreciation

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -1000

    -12000

    CashFlow

    from

    Operations

    79409.63

    93827.84

    109737.6

    127321.1

    146575.3

    167751.1

    191040

    216813.1

    245309.7

    276754

    311

    855.5

    350554.2

    2316949

    FinancingActivities

    BankLoan

    OwnersCash

    Contribution

    IncreaseinCash

    79409.63

    93827.84

    109737.6

    127321.1

    146575.3

    167751.1

    191040

    216813.1

    245309.7

    276754

    311

    855.5

    350554.2

    2316949

    BeginningCash

    Balance

    541460.6

    620870.2

    714698.1

    824435.6

    951756.8

    1098332

    1266083

    1457123

    1673936

    1919246

    2196000

    2507856

    EndingCash

    Balance

    620870.2

    714698.1

    824435.6

    951756.8

    1098332

    1266083

    1457123

    1673936

    1919246

    2196000

    2507856

    2858410

    Total

    2858410

    InterestExpense

    2279598

    C

    t

    T

    5 6 9 8 9 9 4

    Table 6: Cash Flow and Income Statement

  • 7/22/2019 NanoSQUID 11 Apr. 2014

    25/25

    8.6 Worst to Best Scenario

    Three scenarios were made for NanoSQUID. These are all based on the sales and mar-keting strategy for our company. We have set the margin factor to 10 percent profit of

    the total costs to develop this technology. The standard scenario is already discussedabove as it is the most realistic for our venture.

    In the pessimistic case, first of all, this holds under the assumption that we havetrouble of getting the development of the product, then we would need more time. 2ndassumption is that we also have trouble of getting this patent, and since we also have togive early adoption product to several small companies, we would not have big profit inthe 2nd quarter of the 2nd year. Growth rate for all goods stay at 5 percent and afterthe 2nd year, the growth rate for technology license will stay constant at 1 percent.It is estimated to reach break even point at the beginning of 2nd quarter at year 5.The liability reaches bottom at the end of the 4rd year. In this worst case scenario, wewould need a lot more investment.

    In the optimistic scenario, technology license is expected to have a constant growth,with the beginning of 5 % and 10 % in the first year, and increase to 10 % and 20% in the 2nd year. In the 3rd year, it will drop to a constant growth rate of 1 % fortechnology license, and named user plus will drop to 10 %. In this case, our total netprofits exceed two million euros after 3 years. We will reach break even point at the lastquarter of 2nd year, which results in our liability becoming positive from the beginningof 3rd year.

    8.7 Exit Strategy

    This exit strategy solely depends on the current assumption that we made. First ofall, if the company has grow into massive multinational company, we are going tonegotiate with our investors whether they are still going to invest on our company ornot. Many investors wanted their money to get paid soon enough, and that is why, afternegotiating, they can decide whether they are still going to continue the investment, orwe can buy the whole sales as a founders. We expect, if investors decided to stop theirinvestment, to return the investments in 5 years, this goes under the case of standardand optimistic case. As a founder, we can also decide later and negotiate whether weare still going to run this company or instead selling the whole shares to investors ifthey want.

    8.8 Realization Strategy

    The realization schedule can be found in section 6. NanoSQUID will get involved in allthe market based on the marketing section, but for further growth and development,we will get involved in every market we believe to be profitable.