35
NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

  • Upload
    eron

  • View
    55

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin. Active NADP Monitoring Sites in Wisconsin. Trout Lake (WI36). Popple River (WI09). Spooner (WI37). Potawatomi (WI10). Perkistown (WI35). Suring (WI25). Lake Dubay (WI28). Wildcat Mountain (WI98). Horicon Marsh (WI07). Devil’s Lake (WI31). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

NADP Data UseState of Wisconsin

Page 2: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

Spooner (WI37)

Perkistown (WI35)

Trout Lake (WI36)Popple River (WI09)

Potawatomi (WI10)

Suring (WI25)

Lake Dubay (WI28)

Horicon Marsh (WI07)

Active NADP Monitoring Sites in Wisconsin

Lake Geneva (WI99)

Devil’s Lake (WI31)Milwaukee (WI22)

Wildcat Mountain (WI98)

Page 3: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

Sulfate Ion Wet Deposition Trends

3-year runningannual average(1985 – 2010)

Page 4: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin
Page 5: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin
Page 6: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

Nitrate Ion Wet Deposition Trends

3-year runningannual average(1985 – 2010)

Page 7: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin
Page 8: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin
Page 9: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

Ammonium Ion Wet Deposition Trends

3-year runningannual average(1985 – 2010)

Page 10: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin
Page 11: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin
Page 12: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

Ammonia Monitoring Network (AMoN)Average Ammonia Concentration, 2012

Page 13: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

Mercury Deposition Network (MDN)2012 Average Mercury Concentration in Precipitation

Page 14: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

Data Requests by Site(2010 – 2012)

NADP Site 2010 2011 2012 TotalWI08 11 9 44 64WI09 30 34 32 96WI10 31 36 21 88WI22 18 11 9 38WI25 11 10 10 31WI28 22 15 18 55WI31 16 10 44 70WI32 28 14 5 47WI35 5 6 4 15WI36 41 24 70 135WI37 5 11 19 35WI97 3 2 2 7WI98 25 23 16 64WI99 266 206 133 605

Multiple WI Sites 126 133 116 375Total 638 544 543 1725

Page 15: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

Education: College/University; 285; 21%

Education: K-12; 540; 40%

Individuals; 13; 1%

Atmospheric Deposition; 294; 22%

Ecosystem Processes; 37;

3%

Watershed Stud-ies; 86; 6%

Aquatic effects; 50; 4%Terrestrial Effects; 2; 0% Materials Effects; 30; 2% Data Use Descriptions for

Wisconsin NADP Sites(2010 – 2012)

Page 16: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

Graphic generated at www.wordle.net

How Do Individuals use Data from

Wisconsin NADP Sites?

• Graphic represents aggregate of responses from 452 individuals who provided free-text description at time of data download.

• The size of each word is proportional to its frequency of appearance in the response.

Page 17: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

NTN Bromide in Precipitation

Fall 2011 NAPD Joint Sub-Committee Report, Slide ‹#›

• Now a routine analyte of both NTN and AIRMoN

• Maps produced for 2012

• Included in the 2012 Map Summary

Page 18: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

othNew With MDN

Great Lakes Atmospheric Mercury Network9 new MDN sites (2 continuous funding)

Page 19: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

Journal Articles & Reports Using NADP Data

– 88 journal articles in 2007– 125 journal articles in 2008– 147 journal articles/reports in 2009– 148 journal articles/reports in 2010– 172 journal articles/reports in 2011

– 166 journal articles/reports in 2012!

Fall 2011 NAPD State of the Network

Page 20: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

NADP Publications Featuring Wisconsin Data

Page 21: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

Other Publications Featuring Wisconsin NADP Data

Page 22: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin
Page 23: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin
Page 24: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin
Page 25: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin
Page 26: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin
Page 27: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin
Page 28: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

Other NADP Studies Utilizing Wisconsin Sites

Page 29: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

Active NADP/NTN Sites during the April 1986Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Explosion

Page 30: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

Response of the NADPto the Fukushima Dai-ichi Disaster:

Value of Long-Term Monitoring forPost-Disaster Assessments

Christopher LehmannNational Atmospheric Deposition Program

Greg Wetherbee U.S. Geological Survey

Page 31: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

137Cs

Page 32: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

NOAA HYSPLIT Back Trajectories from 35 NADP sites at 5,000 meter altitude March 22-April 5, 2011.

JAPANN. AMERICA

Page 33: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

ES&T, March 6, 2012

Page 34: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

USGS Open-FileReport 2011-1277 http://bqs.usgs.gov/Fukushima/

Page 35: NADP Data Use State of Wisconsin

For more information, seehttp://nadp.isws.illinois.edu

or email [email protected]