Upload
trinhhanh
View
226
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
NO RM L9T21a
NACA
RESEARCH MEMORANDUM EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF
ROOT RESTRAINT ON THE FLUTTER OF A SWEPTBACK,
UNIFORM, CANTILEVER WING WITH A VARIABLY
LOCATED CONCENTRATED MASS
By John E. Tomassoni and Herbert C. Nelson I Langley Aeronautical LabQp4tqry
M FILES Langley Air Force Base, Va. NAT
''MM(T o'-
- AL !) A
k
NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS
WASHINGTON March 31, 1950 I
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19930086124 2018-05-23T19:21:33+00:00Z
NACA RM L9J21a
NATIONAL ADVISORY CONMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS
RESEARCH MEMORANDUM
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF
ROOT RESTRAINT ON THE FLUTTER OF A SWEPTBACK,
Ifl1IFORM, CANTILEVER WING WITH A VARIABLY
LOCATED CONCENTRATED MASS
By John E. Tomassoni and. B:erbert C. Nelson
Data from 129 flutter tests conducted in the Langley 4.5--foot flutter research tunnel have been compiled and are reported. The investigation was carried out to obtain information which would test the validity of the assumption of root restraint used commonly in the flutter analyses of swept wings. This investigation was made with wings of 1450 and 600 angles of sweepback each having two different lengths. Each configuration included a'concentrated mass located at various spanwise positions and at two chordwise positions.
The data obtained provided results which indicate that the assump-tion of root restraint is fairly well Justified, at least for swept wings hating length—to—chord ratios of the order of 4 .5. However, none of the wings tested with the roots perpendicular to the leading edge showed exactly the same flutter trends over a range of spanwise weight positions as those obtained with the corresponding wing having the root parallel to the stream direction.
uuts)iI1siwO)l
The boundary conditions at the root of a sweptback wing make the problem of an exact structural analysis very complicated. In order to circumvent this difficulty, the following simplifying assumptions are sometimes made: that (i) the root is rigidly restrained normal to the elastic axis, and (2) the elastic axis is a straight line. With these assumptions and with the air forces, modified for sweep by the method of reference 1, a flutter analysis of a sweptback wing can be made.
2
NACA RM L9J21a
The purpose of this paper is to present experimental data on the flutter characteristics of weighted sweptback wings clamped, at the root to approximate the conditions of the previously mentioned. assump-tions. The models used in the investigation are similar to the swept models of reference 2 but are modified by root—stiffening plates and change of length. The lengths of the models were measured along the elastic axis which was located at the midchord.
By approximating the simplifying assumptions of theory in regard to root restraint and elastic axis, the data presented provide a means of evaluating the sufficiency of theory regarding structural representation and air—force evaluation.
w weight of wing section, pounds per inch
WW weight of concentrated weight, pounds
'1 length of midchord line, feet
b half chord of wing section measured perpendicular to the ntidchord line, feet
t thickness of wing section, inches
A sweep angle measured from an axis perpendicular to air stream in plane of wing to elastic axis, degrees, positive for sweepback
x distance from elastic axis to center of gravity of wing section, referred to half chord, positive rearward
ew distanbe from elastic axis of wing section to center of gravity of weight, referred to half chord, negative for forward weight location
ICG mass moment of inertia of wing section about its center
of gravity, inch—pound--second2 per inch
I mass moment of inertia of wing section about its elastic
axis, inch—pound—second2 per inch
NACA RM L9J21a 3
IW mass moment of inertia of weight about its center of
gravity, inch-pound--second.2
El bending rigidity of wing section, pound-inch2
(]J torsional rigidity of wing section, pound-inch2
rn mass of wing per unit length, slugs per foot
r. nandimensional radius of gyration of wing section
CEA about its elastic axis I
1
qf dynamic pressure at flutter, pounds per square foot
P air density at flutter, pounds per square foot
Vf stream velocity at flutter, feet per second
wing mass-density ratio at flutter ',t b
gh, g structural damping coefficient in bending and torsional degree of freedom, respectively
APPARATUS
The experimental results presented herein have been obtained in the Langley 4.5-foot flutter research tunnel with air used as the testing medium under atmospheric conditions. In this investigation models B-1 and 3-2 were the same as model B of reference 2 except as modified by the root stiffening plates and change of length. Models C-i and 0-2 were-of as nearly the same dimensions as model C of reference 2 as manufactured 0.090-inch aluminum sheet stock would permit and were
14. NkCA PM L9J21a
also modified by root stiffening plates and change of length. The
accompanying sketch shows how the Inch—thick root stiffening plates
were attached to the models.
tunnel wall
.root stiffening plate
midchord and
elastic axis L)-root torsion gage - -root bending gage 3-tip torsion gage - -tip bending gage
Small changes in the wing length were included to determine if a single effective length could be found which would give the seine flutter speeds as the corresponding model of reference 2. The following table lists the models with their respective lengths and sweep angles:
NACA EM L9J21a 5
Model2
(ft)A
(deg)
B (reference 2) 3.00 1 B-i 2.75 45 B-2 2.83 j
C (reference 2) 3.00 1 C-i 2.75 60 0-2 3.00 J
The section properties of the wings are as follows:
Chord, 2b, feet ....................... 0.667 Airfoil section ......... Flat plate
nondimensional ...... 0.01 (approx.)
nondimensional . ............. 0.005 (approx.) t, inches ......................... . 0.090 W, pounds per inch ...... . . . . 0.076 'CG' inch-pound--eecond2 per inch ..............0.000995
I, inch-pound--second2 per inch .............. 0.000995
El, pound-inch2 ...................o.005o6 x 106 GJ, pound-inch2 ...................o.008 x 106 ICcL, nond.imension.a.].. ............... 0.0
r,2, nondimension.a.]_ ........ . ......... . 0.3314
i/ic, (standard air density, no concentrated weight) . . . 314.1
Two weights which were essentially the seine were used in the tests. One was attached at various positions along the leading edge and the other along the inidchord line of each model. The weight properties are:
Item Leading-edge weight
Midchord weight
Ww, lb 3.12 3.12
.ew -1.0 0
I., in.-m--eec2 0.010 0.0098
6 NACA PM L9J21a
Strain gages cemented on the wings used in conjunction with a recording osciUo'aph provided a means for obtaining the frequencies and phase relationships of the torsional and bending strains at the gage locations. The positions at which the strain gages were attached to the models are shown in the preceding sketch. The gage traces on each of the oscilloaph records in figure 1 are numbered from left to right and represent the response of the root-torsion, root-bending, tip-torsion, and tip-bending gages, respectively. The fifth trace on the records is an imposed calibration frequency. The apparatus section of reference 2 gives a complete description of the method used to obtain the phase angles listed in table I.
The attenuation marked on each gage trace is a scale number obtained by electrical multiplication where the value of the attenua-tion is inversely proportional to the magnification of response. The amplitudes of the traces combine with the attenuation to give relative stresses, torques, or moments. These relative values are obtained in the following manner, the first two traces of a record being used as an example:
Stress (1) - (Attenuation (l)'1(Anrplitude (i) Stress (2) \Attenuation (2)JAmplitude (2)
TEST PROCB2JURE
An investigation at zero airspeed was conducted before each series of tests to obtain the first three natural frequencies for each span-wise weight position. Several spanwise positions of the concentrated weight for a constant chordwise station constituted a series for one model. During each test the airspeed in the tunnel was increased slowly. At the critical flutter speed the tunnel conditions were observed, and an osciflograph record of the model vibrations was taken. The tunnel airspeed was then reduced iniediately after the critical flutter speed was attained in order to prevent the model from being destroyed. The models were tested initially without any weight and each of the series of tests was accomplished by moving the weight progressively spanwise to the tip. After a series of tests was com-pleted the model was retested without the weight to provide knowledge of any possible damage which may have occurred. No difference was fouid to exist.
NACA RM L9J21a 7
PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
This paper presents the experimental data obtained from flutter testing 450 and 600 sweptback wings with the roots modified by stiffening plates. In all plots the test results are presented as functions of the wing length 2.
The experimental results are compiled in table I. The dynamic pressure, flutter speed, Mach number, and the first three natural fre-quencies for each weight position and the corresponding flutter fre-quencies are listed. Also the phase relationships of the torsional and bending stresses at the gage locations for the second and third natural and flutter frequencies are given. The Reynolds number for each series of tests is given and the chord length used in its deter-mination was the length parallel to the air stream. A sketch of each model tested is included in table I with its corresponding data.
The oscillograph records taken at flutter for the various cases tested are shown in figure 1. The four traces on the records in the top row only, which represent the vibratory motions of the model, are numbered, but these numbers pertain in the same order to all records. Each is marked with its appropriate attenuation. The unusual type of flutter involving two frequencies simultaneously, as reported in reference 2, also occurred in a few cases during the present tests.
The flutter data of figure 2 show the validity of the commonly used assumptions regarding root restraint for the models tested. In general, -the differences between the data from a given unmodified wing and that from the corresponding wing having a modified root are small, indicating that the assumptions are fairly well justified.
The differences in the flutter speed when the concentrated weight was on the wing leading edge were small. This indicates that as the length of the wing with the modified root was increased (B—i to B-2 or C—i to 0-2) the flutter speed approached that of the unmodified wing (B or C, respectively) for the range of spanwise weight loca-tions 0 to 11-5 percent 1. From the 65 to about 100 percent spanwise weight range an opposite trend is noted. In the range from 45 to 65 per-cent 1 an irregular variation exists.
The data for the weight at the midchord line indicate that as the length of the wing was increased the flutter speed approached that of the unmodified wing over both the 0 to 45 percent and the 65 to 100 per-- cent spa.nwise weight ranges while the range from 45 to 65 percent was irregular.
8
NACA RM L9J21a
In figure 3 the first three natural and the flutter frequencies are plotted against spanwise weight position for each of the series of tests. These plots show the relation between the flutter frequency and the first three natural frequencies for each of the configurations tested.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
The structural assumptions usually made in the flutter analysis of swept wings, that the root is rigidly restrained and the elastic axis is a straight line at least for the uniform type of wing tested, appear to be fairly well Justified. Exceptions are noted for critical ranges of concentrated weight positions where small changes in the position of the weight produce relatively large changes in the experi-mentally determined flutter speed.
Langley Aeronautical Laboratory National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics
Langley Air Force Base, Va.
1. Barmby, J. G., Cunningham, H. J., and Garrick, I. E.: Investi-gation of the Effects of Sweep on the Flutter of Cantilever Wings. NACA PM L81130, 198.
2. Nelson, Herbert C., and Tomassoni, John E.: Experimental Investi-gation of the Effects of Sweepback on the Flutter of a Uniform Cantilever Wing with a Variably Located Concentrated Mass. NACA PM L9P2, 1949.
NACA RM L9J21a
.H: , 0 0
H COCO CU
0' CU
N- (U
0 0 P. .3
N- N-
0 a) 0) -4
0 cc
0 N N-
CO H C.)
.3 P.
0' CO
0' C'J -0 .P CU Os 0'. .3 (U a) P. '.0
o 1 01 :1 o •e-. - .-i 0----- iIitI1Ii11I CO 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
41 4. P P CU a) a) 00'-. 0-P0 H i - H H H H
Ha4,
SI
.-4 4) 0 4) 4) 4) 0 0 0 0
---
0 4) 0 4) 0 4) 0
-
0 0 P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. )
.40 OD
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -co
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0
P P H 4) 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 4) 0 0 4) 0 9-. 0 4-. 0 9-. 4)
0) s U 01 0101 P.01 01 P. P.0101 010101 01 P. P.
4U' 0 CO cc H .4 '-0 .3 H 0'. N-W OH0'SC'.HHO'.'.oCOH C-ccCO '.0 0 0 N- 0'. 0 0a) 0 SC'. 0
-
CO H CO H P. H r-S
H0'. co N- SC'.
HSC'. H N- H
CO .3 H
CO'.0 H '.0 H '.0 H H CO
.*H0 C.'. .3H .4 H
Os Ha) 'T tt'SH 0 Ha) ¼000C'.'.O coo a-. so•••
CO.
p'. g ' HP. , . o
P.- H P.
01 H cc H co H cc H cc H C- H N- H N- H'.0 H
'.0 H '.0 H '.0 H U\ H U'. H
irs -1 SC'. H 0'. Os a) P. co P. CU C.'. s N- CO .9 '.0 0
P. P. P. P. P. P. P. a) cu P. H H H H H. H H 4,4..'.
g -U 4.
CO 0
05 0
SC'.H H P.
N- P.
CO C.)
os C.'.
If'. -9
H SC'. N- If'.
4V'. '-0
0'. '.0
SC'. N-
H cc
N- cc
C. a-
0 irs
p H 0 4) 0 4.
0 C.'. 0'. If'. H H P.
N- P.
CO CO
0'. CO
Irs -
H IA N- SC'.
CO '.0
ON '.0
IA N-
Hcc
t.- co
CO 0'. 4.4)
P. 04.0.
4) .0 0 o aIf'. C.) A
IA \ID IA0
- IAIrs .4 .3
.9 P. CO
0 Os C.)
0C- N-
0 t-- .3
0 '.0 SC'.
IA 0 Os
SC'. cc P.
0 as H
0 0 '.00 N- P.
0 Irs It'.
IA H
-
H H H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - a)C.'.'OOsHN-P.H.4HU'.a)OsOsN- cc .
4.. SC'. 0'. '.0 N-
I1\ '.0
0 IA
0' IA
CO 0
CO co
CO 05
CO C.'. Os a) H
C.'. '.0
0 a)
.9 CO
.3 N- - - H H H H H H P. P. P. CO .4-9.9 P. H H
4.
H IA 0 0'. H 0 H IAa)N-\0a).3N-.3N-IAHP.H a) 0'. 0
\O0 0 0 N- SC'. 0 Os CO
.3 CO
IA CO
.3 CO
0 C.')
IAP.
CO P.
IA .3
N- co
CO Os
(Ifs IA .3 '-0 C.') a)
N--9 N-
IA CO
0'. H
'.0 H 9 H
HP.C.3IA\0N-a)O0 00.4 . IA'0 N-a)
r-I cu
all
xx 'i
X
IL? 's
V
10
NACA RM L9J21a.
• - H 0 0 0 0 H 01
0 0 Ci
cm01
0 04
$ I I I 0
In co Ci
o o o o o a u- H o o Os 0 0 0 0
— o Ci
(51 Cs
'C irs
Cl Ci In 0 0 0 H
0 0 0 H 01 0 0 'C Ci -p - 4.
H H 0 0 0 Ci W, Ci
In o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0000 I I I I I
—
I I I I I I I I I
-----
-
0+10 0H 4-. 4-. 4.. 4. 4-. '4 4. 4-. 4-I 4-I 4-I.
-4-I 4-I 4-1
- 4-.
0 0 co co CD
---
I
.cu _
-- -- -v- -- -- m
H- -- -- -- -- -- -- ±
05 cm 0 \D N Cl CD 4 N '-0 H 1- H CD H 4-C'J.O5 Cs III 01 0 0 In 'C
- -
In H
111 H
In H H H 0 H 4 H -H 4 H 4 H
01 H
05 - co co- N 4
o Its 0 (-R II H 50 0 0 l\ i 01 Ci
0 OP. HP1 0 ('4 H ('4 H Cl H Cl 0 (51 05 H Os H CD H CD H N H N H 'C H
50 H 'C H ' H
j -- -. - t.- .-j= -- -- -- 14
-s- cu
-a-- H
11 H 14 H
o 0 01 '
k 00 o .o11 ('4 Its
(5 ('1 ItsIfS Ci its
(5 ('4 .r0 'C Its
4 Cs 'C
0 CD 'C
0 01 'C
Its 0 'C
0 CS Its
0 -
0 irs as
0 H as0 I-.
CD
0
H H H H H H H H H H '4 H H H H 0 0 0 0 d 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 0 'C H -H Ci 01 05 01 'C CD Cl 01 0 01 9
'8 ' ? 0H H H H H H H H H -4 (Ii Ci Cli H +1
N 0 0 4 0 'C 0
In 'C
'C 05 05 Ci. 05 a)
4 N 01 N Its Ci In
9
CD 0
-05
0 In
0 I4 In 4 - Its H 4 H 4 C) Ill N 05 4 0
'CIll 1(5 In Its 0 Its 0 -*
0 Os 0 Cl H Cl (Ii Cllfl Cl 4 Cl itS Cl 'C
CiN Cl a) CII Cs Cl 0 01 H 01 04 01 01
01
lii
Pl -
141
V
NACA RM L9J21a
11
0
-
0 co ..10CO '-4
0 CO H
0 CO H
U\ CO .-1
0 Cu Cu
C'l N- Cu
a) -cu-4 C\ cu
0 0 Cfl
Os Cu Cfl
Os rfl fn
0 - cu 0 H0 50 -1 0
CuCO H H
H 0 0 0 0 I I a, cu So H C'l I mlH O
CflCu N- 0 0 N- 5 C)
--H CO cu CO
H H Cu ' —
ID -p Cu CO a) CO a) CO 0 N- 000 oo CO Os
ml 0 -I CO - CO
. -0 Cfl
-1CO Os - H H H H H Cu cu H H Cu H H -I cu OJH
H -- I I 0 9 000 0000000 0
-
--co
d 0 0 0 0 0 ---
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000
b 'd o -p Cu
. 0 CO
0 CO
0 a)0
CO0
CO0 CO
0 CO C9
04, a --44_ H 11
dd -d H 4-. 0 4- 0 4- 0 4-. 0-0 4-. 4-. 0 4-. 0 4-. 0 4-. 0 4-. 0 4-. 0 4-. 0 4-. 0 4-. 0 4-. 4-. 4-. 4-4Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu
0 Cu
0 Cu
0 1 Cu
0 Cu
0 0 Cu 0 -0
CO H0
CO H0
CO .40
CO H0
CO H0
CO H0
CO H0
CO H0
CO H CO H 0.0
CO H a) H0
CO H0
CO H0
CO H0
CO H0 0
H .04.
U U 1
0
0 0 0 0 0
cv C9w
C9m cs 12 U
-d . H I 414141414141414141414441 4-. 44...
44 0 0 m 05 0 rO tC\ H W H N-5O\OO50CuN-CuOsC'HHHU,QCuH C') H 0 0 Cu 00 CO 50 0 -O
— H Cu H Cu H H H 0 H -
CO N-
-
50 IC) H IC) H 50 H Cu - 0 C') Os H It) H C') 0 H.d 1) (75 HC') 4') H C) .1 -; _i - s - -& — -i:: - -j:: — -- —s--
p
en
0 -p 0) 50 IC) C') 0 0)N-\0u)-*CuH0OsCON- OsCO
50 .d Cu H Os N- trs C')
..Cu
Cu HU) C')
t) O4-.P
0tc—I 19 Cod E8
fi d ddóddd
Tjfflij-
d d d dd 6 0 d d d -- HOsN-05HSOHU50*50¼0 0 CO OsN-- - ::i H H H H H .4 Cu Cu Cu C'S . CC) 04 H H H H
0 0 0 CuCON-C')00s50 I') H C') C') -* SD (flCO \o C')C')0
N- C') Os
C') CO
Cu IrsC') 0 0 Cu
C'Cu Co .
CuIrS Cu
-tCu
0) Cu
H Irs 05 N-
H Os
H H '-0 Cu
Cu 0 CO IC) -1 '.0 N- Cu
50 H CC) H H Cu Cu H Cl - IC) C') 50 C') N-
C')CO C')
Os C')
0 H 04 CC) -* It . '.0 N- a) 0) .0 - -1
Si -
X U-\cn
Old C9
dii
V
12 NACA RM L9J21a
L°
. . . .... L. L. I . . g IiiTiiii[
4 4 4 4
ilj I1t11t r) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
ID
cu
---i--
Is I
-------4: 4: 4: 4: 4 4: 4: 4: 4:
1 0
- I I I I I I I
0 cm 0 1.0 0 ID O\ H 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 I(\ 0 4 0 14 r ' ir 0 fl Cu 0 a rI rn In n In o CO I- '0 4
k 1TTTTTTTTTTTTr
41
a
0 U 0 In
0 O 0 0 \
0 '
0 It'S It\ O OS IfS In Irs 0
H .-I H H H H ,1 H H H .. H o d d 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 a do a a Os cu I- 1- I- I- 4 CO - CD OS ( Cu -4 - H In
'.0 H50 50 I H
CD 50 HCD '-0 -I
CO - HCO N- H
OS N- Hr-4 N- H
50 '0 H
'0 '0 H
4 H cu50 0 C'.
In 0 Cu H H
CD H H ,-
CO0
CD 0
In
1
'0 0
In IS H IOS 0 H H C'. H '.0H n '0 50 50 Cu Cu 0
Cu In In
In In
In In
CD In
CO C) In
IfS In
In In
In In
4 IfS
0 IfS
CO 4 IA 4 '0 In
CU Ifs In irs Ifs
Ifsso IfS
1'-IfS
05 IfS
0 0
H '.0
Cu 50
In '0
Its 50 50 50
i
\\\\
4-
9to
N1
V
NACA EM L9J21a
13
H 0 0 H
0 -CII
Co 'CI
0 0 0 - 0 0
-Q w 0 C 0 0
±ifli HH!IniHi I 0 4.. H 0 0 0 4) 4) 0 4)1 CI 4) 4) 0 4) CI CI CI
O 4) 4)0 Co 0
a)0 a) 0
a)0 CI) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CI I 'CI - .-4 .-I r1 .-4 '-I a) a) a) H '-4 1 a) .-I co -1
a) H
(0 H
a) H In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 : 0 0 0
.;; ----------0000004- 0
H3 3 - - 3 - - ±iEi!ii
00000
CI HI
CI CI CI CI CI 01
--
CI CI CI 01 01 III
CI 01
CI 01
4) 01
CI 010110
0 CI 0 40
CI 40
.01 .01 (0 0
CI) C-
cu U) In Co
In 0 0 0 In
0 In
0 0
It' In '.0 0 In 0 C- CII It' It' 0 .01 01 '.0 SO
H H H H In In .01 .01 It'. 01 H -1 H H H
a) CII CII In C) H H U) It'. 0 50 H OS In 0' 0 OS
CIPI dc OJ CII 04
ndd ('4 (II
d 04 d CII H H H ocda H H H H H H -4 • It' 0 C- H H 0 0 '.0 0 -01 In H Cli co(0 In coa) 0 CI \CInC
( \OOSU) co co Cr\
4'. 4)
.0 50 CoCoCoCoCo
'.0 .01 Cli .01 In 0 Cli N'.D
'.0 H It' a) CO '.0 H UInH 0(0 • It' In04
('4 01 0'4 01 C) (U (U H H -1 -4 H
11 14 cu g
C. .0 CI U .4)In In 0
0 0 00 4-- C-
In co
0 H co
0 In 0
In 0 0 '.0 - In
It' '.0
0 In
0 C-
0 CU
0 .01
4- (II
05 H 0 ?H C'JCIIHHCU 05 H In OS H
CJ InIn*It\.01InOJHHH H 0 H 50 .01
CI 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 d
inI
C) .01
0 '-0
4-- In
05 It'
-I CU
- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IC'. 50 50 05 0
CII H .01 0 It' .01 It' OS OS -I Co 50
H m cu 14
H
4. 00
'h CD 'CI 100 OJ
44)1
III
V
14 NACA RN L9J21a
UUNUULIIILI
rninmmnrmnnnniiri
•H5flflflflflflflflflflflflfl nmnumunnnnnii
gUflEflUHUH0000gEB NEHHHHHHIIHHHHHHH HEIHHHHHHHHHHHHHH •H iIII
EF:IUEDNNEUENEDNU i1111uuhIIIunuuuhIu IIotI-I1—ooIIIIohI
iuuuuouguu
I1iiI
'I
NACA RM L9J21a
15
lEo 00 0In cu 'CO -n 0- IAH0NUI
UI 4 CU 0 0 0 0 CU In In4. In U0UI0\0), NO'. 0'. IA In 0H 0 . 0
0000
d In 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11-P cu - . 0) a) co a) 0UI- H a- -- H H H H H H
H 4-. 4-. 4-. 4II 4.. 4-. 4-. 4-. 4-. 4-. ------
4-. 4-. 4-. 4-. ---
4-. 4.. 4-. --
4-. ----- 3__
-----CU 444. 4 (II UI 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
H
0 0 0 0 .. H 0)0)0)0)IA'0InInInCUInCUHIAIn0 0 IA 0 0 0 0 * a) In -* H 0 - .0 CII H CU H H H 0'. 0) N N H IA In In In -1 0 0 '.0 . In In In In IA CU H H H H H H
II 0 0 m m -t ^D InInCUO'...*O'.IA0'0(UIn'0 1.4 E.- w 0
UI UIPI -JH CU 0 CU N .-f N H N H N .-( N N '.0 .-I H H
I ol
'-0 H IA H IA H H H H H H H H 0 In co
co , CU 0'. N - In 0 '.0 0 In
-th 0 4' InC.
(0 0 IA H N CU N In 0IAH'0CUNIna)0IAH( 0'. - 0 '.0 H N CU p H o UI 0 k
(I A 04-.0 (0 In H ON H IA CU 0 In '.0 H N In .. -* CU IA CO IA In
'.00, '0 IA N 0 CO '.0 0) H 0'. N 0'.
UI 0 Q-IA 0)
IA In coIA 0 N
IA CU '0
0 0 IAIA 0 a)
0 0 0 '-0 '0 '.0 In 0'. CU0'. IA N
IA CO .*0'. .In
0 '.0 0IA -H
.0) IAIA '.0 CU
0 0 CU0 In In H H H H -4 H CU CU In In .* - In CU H H H -1
oo c od o dd6d
- InIAOHCUInCOInNNOO'.0)CU'.0\OCU(0 4-. P. 4- 4-. N C) IA 0 H 0'. CU 0) CO N CU
0.4 CU N '1) '.0
.4 CU
N 0
.4 0'. CI) .4 In .4 0'. N In .4 '.0 In 0 IA CU CU -1 H H CU CU In In .4 IA .4 In CU H -1 H H N H
CUCU
IA '0
IA N
'.0 0
CI) IA
0'. 0 0 CU 0'. N
0 CO
0 IA
0 CO
0 N
'0
10
(0 '.0
H '.0
.4 CU
0 0
IA In In UI H
- - .9 CI) CU .4-4 -1 0'. -1 '.0 CU
IA CU
In H
'.0 In CU CU CU
00 0
H
4-
ID 0
H -
Fol 0
4I
V
16 NACA RM L9J21a
o o 0 - 0 0 ø N —
fl -i;-- H -;- Cu
-s- H0 -s- -- 0 ,-4 cu Cu H
- C\l Cu
N m 0 ol 0i0 cu 10 H H H C •'
A ___ Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu Cu - —
A Tf 0+1
MC . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o -o
--
cu
---
NO
Cq
H ri H H H H H -
H - - -
C C -
0 IC\- 0 Cu H N 0 Q O H * IA 0
Cu 0 N
C DI ,1
II H cu H CU 0 CU 0' H O\ H QD H N H H N H C— H '0 H '0 H '0H 10 H
' °
04 R
cu cu cli cu cu m cu cli cu cu
I
cu
_E!_l 1 _______
0
o
H o
S
PIV 0
• ffI
Js 41 1/
18 NACA RM L9J21a
I!1IllhiIIiIINIIIPIIII 111111 EIODINE 1101,1111111 1111111 k III1IPJ1IIIGI
!!!1ll' IIp!qR
'IIO'O I! k
(b) Model B-1; A = 45° e = Puns /9-33.
Figure 1.— Continued.
50 130 20 20 - : : 50 3C
•1
20 NACA RM L9J21a
2 34 1 ? 3 4 50 50 20 20 : : r 50 50 20 20 : : 50 50 X 30 :
r
30 30
1. 20 20 I I 505O 30 : : 50 30 20 20
55
•1I-I 1 11111
( Model B-2 A45 eO Puns 52-66.
Figure 1.— Continued.
S 0 S 'S
4 I I!'
Lll
ill
21
/ 2 50 50
50 50
72
3030
30 30
30 30
34
NACA EM L9J21a
S
I
S
I5
4'0
r1 p Ibid
IRi
IOU, I
30 30 30 30 30 50 '30 30
76 ( '77
20 130 20 20 20130-, I 2020
J-,
791/ H a0
50 50 30 30 30 30 2020
L 82H!( IHHHiI liHi H 83 11W IHV!
(e) Mod/ C-I; A = 60*i 0., = - 1 Pur,s 67-83.
Figure 1.— Continued.
22
NACA EM L9J21a
1 2 3 4 1 2 34 1 2 34 50'f30 3030' 30 30 0 ; 0 30 30 2020
84 8"5 'fli 1 11 11
IftiIII1AII130 3020 1 20 30 3020 2011 30 I 30 20 20
0 IN 1 11
50 30 20 20 - 50 30 2020 5O 30 301 III
193 94
50 30 30 50 : :50 3030 50 II III (1) Model C1; A 60 eO
Runs- 8497.
Figure 1.— Continued.
/ 2 34
il
20 20
114
1)1
NACA RM L9J21a
23
/ 2 34
20 20 20 20
11311 p Hi
1llil 1fl1 fll V
20 t20 20
20 20 20
H
H I
1/2
115NA (9) Model C2; A = 60 0: e, = Puns 98-1/5.
Figure 1.— Continued.
2
NACA RN L9J21a
I1111'III 30 30 30 30 : : 30 30 30. 30 :
[L120 I
30 30 120 20 : 30 20 20- :
.fl30
I 30- 30 20 -20 50t 30 30 - 30 - - -30 30 30
L• /•
30 30 30 50- 30 '30 20 20 -
(h Model C-2,- A 600,- e = 0; Puns 116129.
Figure 1.— Concluded.
I .<
i
II
' \\
\
\ \
Ii
II
Model
B (reference 2) 3.00 -€
----- B-1 2.75
-------B-2 2.83
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Distance of weight from root, percent £
520
490
400
360
, 320
- 280
-4 0 0 -4
20
'a
200
160
120
80
40
0 -20
NACA RM L9J21a 25
(a) A=14.5°, e=—l.
Figure 2.— Variation of the flutter speeds with weight position for each of the models tested.
26
NACA RN L9J21a
320
280
214.0
200 4.4
43 • 160 0 H
4-3 120 4) H r.
80
LLO
IL.!
-0--)---*-.. -'- ---- ,.
- —<s,— - - -ø -0-- - 0-
Model 7,
-O -------B (reference 2) 3.00 2.75
--0--B-2 2.83
10 20 - 30 40 50 60 70 80
Distance of weight from root, percent 1
90 100
(b) A 1f5°, e=O.
Figure 2.— Continued.
NACA RN L9J21a 21
600
560
520
zgo
400
320 > .4 C, 0
280 C.
c.. 2
200
160
120
80
40
0 -20
m 360
'(L \\ 1iI \\
-4 y
/ I \ \
I \
"I .1, \ - —&
- --1j___".( I \ S
/
I-
Model -o-----C (reference 2) 5.00
2.75 --0--C-2 3.00
-10 0 10 20 30 ko 50 60 70 80 90 100
Distance of weight from root, percent 1
(c) A = 6°, e = —1.
Figure 2.— Continued.
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Distance of weight from root, percent 1
Ioo
280
320
go
00
•r
—0----
Model 1. --------o------C (reference 2) 3.00 -
C-1 2.75 --G--C-2 5.00
—go 90 100
240
200 '-I 0 0 -4 0
0
-4
160
120
28
NACA RM L9J21a
(d) A=60°, e=O.
Figure 2.— Concluded.
NACA RM L9J21a 29
14.0
36
32
16
12
—0--Natural frequency --a-Flutter frequency
I rd
-- ----
fl\0-
at
-----. -
00.
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 so 90 100
Distance of weight from root, percent 1
28
0
a 24
0 0
20
(a) Model B—i, A 4.50 , ew = —1.
Figure 3.- Variation of the first three natural frequencies and flutter frequency with weight position.
30
NACA P.M L9J21a
—e-Natural frequency --a-Flutter frequency
—o---.-
-----
----0
. -
10 20 30 kO 50 60 70 so 90 100
Distance of weight from root, percent 1
(b) Model B—i, A = 450, e = 0.
Figure 3.- 3.- ContInued.
32
2
2
20
0
o 16
a.
12
8
NACA RN L9J21a 31
—0--Natural frequency --fl--Flutter frequency
rd
0
------ N -- ---
—0---0--
-0— 0—
IV 4U JU fU U bu (06 0 90 100
Distance of weight from root, percent 1
(c) Model B-2, A = 450, e = —1.
FIgure 3.- Continued.
11-g
mo
36
32
28 m P. U
U 0
Sk U
20
16
12
00
32
2
2
20
16 w 0. 0
0 c 12 0 CS 0 0
ri..
32
NACA RM L9J21a
-e--Natural frequency --a-Flutter frequency
3rd
a--
nd -a-- ----o.--E .
—0-- -O
18t
0- >---
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 SO 90 100
Distance of weight from root, percent 1
(d) Model B-2, A = 45 0 , ew = 0.
Figure 3.- Continued.
00
NACA RN L9J21a 33
-0-Natural frequency I ---F1utter frequency
rd
—0---.
- —0-- —O-- - B - - -
—a-- —0---—o-- .
Lu eu 50 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Distance of weight from root, percent
(e) Model C—i, A = 600, ew
Figure 3.- Continued.
60
56
52
36
o 32
0
I, r..
24
20
16
12
00
314 NACA RN L9J21a
ri
28
2
32
20
11-
00
3rd
-0-Natural frequency --0--Flutter frequency
- t- -- -
/•
- 1et
_0—
-
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Distance of weight from root, percent 1
(r) Model C—i, A = 600, ey = 0.
Figure 3.— 3.— Continued..
16
A U
0 12
0•
r.8
NACA RM L9J21a 35
—0--Natural frequency --El--Flutter frequency
rd
N 2nd --- o-_
lot-
-0-----, —0---. - - - 130 50 60 70 80 90 100
Distance of weight from root, percent 1
(g) Model C-2, A = 600, e = —1.
Figure 3.- Continued.
56
52
11.8
11.0
36
32 0. 0
>. 0
0)
0• a)
24
20
16
12
8
00
10 20 30 ko 50 60 70 do 90 100
32
2
24
g
00
—0— Natural frequency --n--Flutter frequency
-3rd
-- _1-_ —e-
T ------- 2nd -0- -
N
-- --
U--.
lot N̂ACA
20
p. C)
36
NACA RM L9J21a
Distance of weight from root, percent 1
(h) Model C-2, A =600, e = 0.
Figure 3.- Concluded.
NACA-Langley - 2-10-54 -75