16
Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007 Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007 Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007 Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

Page 2: Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007 Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

Overview• Goals WP4 – Deployment Report• WP4 Tasks• WP4 Approach – Our View• WP4 Overall Planning• WP4 Expected Results• Interdependencies between WP4 and other

WPs• Short Term Planning: Next Four Months• Some Final Remarks• Questions & Discussion

Page 3: Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007 Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

Goals WP4 – Deployment Report (1/2)

• Overall project goal– Feasibility investigation: deployment of a

prototype myofeedback teletreatment (i.e. MyoTel) service.

• Myotel enables subjects with neck shoulder complaints to receive personalised adjusted remotely supervised treatment during their daily activities.

Page 4: Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007 Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

Goals WP4 – Deployment Report (2/2)

• Goals from WP4 Perspective– Investigating market acceptability in two different health

care markets (in different countries)• Patients with work related neck shoulder problems

(occupational health care system)

• Patients with a chronic whiplash (rehabilitation care system)

– Analyzing effectiveness for all key actors in the value network from an economic point of view

• How does MyoTel create value for all stakeholders– Customer value– Monetary value– …

Page 5: Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007 Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

WP4 Tasks• 4.1 [T0] Scenario Development – First Opinion on

Attractiveness, Value, and Risks [650 hr]– Analysis of current way of care provisioning– Initial market / business model / value network analysis

• 4.2 [T5] Service Qualification – Draft Business Plan/Case [1050 hr]– With active involvement of stakeholders as defined in T4.1

• 4.3 [T9] Service Deployment Report – Business Plan/Case [508 hr]– With active involvement of stakeholders as defined in T4.1

Page 6: Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007 Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

Approach• First focussing on developing alternative (high level) scenarios

and related business models and competitive strategies– Business model as a logical prerequisite for business

process modeling / business case• Scenarios

– Alternatives: one (commercial) service provider, several (non commercial) providers using a technology platform, license models, Myotel as a product or a service, … → implications for business model → implications for business case

• Business models– Value proposition– Value network (e.g. government organizations, insurance companies,

professionals, patients, employers, telecom operators, hardware providers)– Financial model (sharing revenues and cost)– Technology (type of infrastructure, who owns the infrastructure, …)

• Building (alternative) business case(s) (quantification)– From a high level to a more specific business case– Commercial (micro economic) or broader (macro economic) view?

Page 7: Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007 Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

WP4 Overall Planning• Planning: tight schedule in first four months

– Tasks and deliverabes• T4.1 Scenario development (T0-T3/4)

– T0+2: D4.01 Description of service/deployment strategy– T0+4: D4.02 Market analysis– T0+3: D4.04 Trans European dimension

• T4.2 Service qualification (T5-T17)– T0+9: D4.05 Harmonization, interoperability and standard– T0+9: D4.03 Draft business and deployment strategy

• T4.3 Service deployment plan (T9-T17)– T0+17: D4.03 Final business and deployment strategy

Page 8: Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007 Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

WP4 Expected Results• Deployment report – Business Plan/Case

– Market research– Scenarios– Competitive strategy

• Sustainability of the service, competitors, competitive products, …

– Business model• Value proposition (Service definition, User population, …)• Value network (Service costs and benefits for value network actors, …)• Financial model (Financing requirements, …)• Technology (Platforms, communication technologies, …)

– Business case (quantification)– Management and management control systems necessary to roll out the service– Timing for initial and full deployment– …

• Material for dissemination to industrial and medical communities (WP5)

Page 9: Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007 Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

Interdependencies between WP4 and other WPs (excl. WP1/5)

• Four CoEs: RRD, Ugent, RUB, OGOT• Contributing to early identification and

involvement of key actors in countries concerned

• Contributing to aspects of legal and financial organisation and market characteristics of national health care systems

Page 10: Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007 Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

Interdependencies between WP4 and other WPs (excl. WP1/5)

WP 2

2.1Techn. needs assessment

2.2 Organisational

needs assessment

2.3 Infrastructure

adaptions

WP 4

4.1Scenario

development

4.2Service

qualification

4.3Service

deployment

WP 3

3.2Trial

monitoring

3.3/3.4Work related

neck shoulder/Wiplash

3.5Data analysis

Page 11: Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007 Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

Short Term Planning: Next Four Months (1/4)

• M1-4: – T4.1 Scenario development

• Deliverables T0-4:– D4.01 High level description of service/deployment

strategy (T0+2)

– D4.04 Trans European Dimension (T0+3)

– D4.02 Market analysis (T0+4)

Page 12: Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007 Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

Short Term Planning: Next Four Months (2/4)

• M1-4: T4.1 Scenario development– D4.01 High level description of service/deployment

strategy (T0+2)• M0: Stakeholder identification (together with CoEs)

– Development of first alternative competitive strategies, business models and value network structures

• M1: Service item identification and assessment (together with CoEs, patients and professionals)

– Idea registration (survey)

• M1: Evaluation stakeholder/service item identification, with a focus on aspects like attractiveness, feasability, value, and risks

Page 13: Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007 Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

Short Term Planning: Next Four Months (3/4)

• M1-4: T4.1 Scenario development– D4.04 Trans European Dimension (T0+3)

• Basis: D4.01 High level description of service/deployment strategy (T0+2)

• Focus needs to be crystalized– Differences and similarities w.r.t. regulation, health care

organisation, culture, customer preferences, …

Page 14: Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007 Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

Short Term Planning: Next Four Months (4/4)

• M1-4: T4.1 Scenario development– D4.02 Market analysis (T0+4), focus on

• M0-3: Customer groups, segments, size of markets, etc.• M0-3: Technology

– Technological developments

• M0-3: (Changes in) regulation• M3-4: Business model (implications)

– Service, Technology, Organisation, Finance

Page 15: Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007 Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

Some Final Remarks• Planning: tight schedule in first months

– First focusing on high level business model / value network research

• Scientific contribution needs to be crystalized• Focus D4.04 (T0+3) Trans European dimension and D4.05

(T0+9) Harmonisation, interoperability and standard need to be crystalized

Page 16: Myotel Kick Off – WP4 – September 2007 Jos van Hillegersberg, Bart Nieuwenhuis, Björn Kijl

Questions & Discussion• Information from D4.02 Market analysis (T0+4) and D2.01

Technological and Organisatiol Needs Assessment (T0+4) useful for / part of D4.01 Service/deployment strategy (T0+2)?– Depending of aim of D4.01

• Relation between D4.01 and D4.03 Draft/Final Business and Deployment Strategy (T0+9/T0+17)– D4.01 as draft of draft version of D4.03?

• How to ‘proof’ / test real life feasibility?– Venturing (entrepreneurship / venture capital approach)

• Vision, Alpha Offering, Beta Offering, Market Calibration & Expansion