Upload
dinhtuyen
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Page 4 Trip to San Diego
MV HOS Dominator docked approximately The return of MV C Tractor 7 at 10:15 AM.
where USNS Henry J. Kaiser was.
MV C Tractor 7 and USNS Yukon and
USS Ronald Reagan at 10:17 AM. MV C Tractor 9 at 10:19 AM.
MV C Tractor 7 and The Japanese destroyer JDS Ashigara
USS Ronald Reagan at 10:19 AM. at 10:21 AM.
JDS Ashigara https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JDS_Ashigara https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atago-class_destroyer
The previous Ashigara was a World War II cruiser. http://www.combinedfleet.com/ships/myoko
http://ww2db.com/ship_spec.php?ship_id=C472 http://www.combinedfleet.com/ashigara_t.htm
http://ww2db.com/ship_spec.php?ship_id=269 Like us, the Japanese like to reuse ship names.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Japan_Maritime_Self-Defense_Force_ships
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Destroyers_of_the_Japan_Maritime_Self-Defense_Force
http://www.combinedfleet.com/kaigun.htm
JDS Ashigara at 10:23 AM. JDS Ashigara, USS George Washington,
USS Ronald Reagan, and USS Carl Vinson at 10:23 AM.
JDS Ashigara passing MV C Tractor 9 arriving
USS Carl Vinson at 10:26 AM on the scene at 10:36 AM.
In talking with several people on the Broadway Pier it was mentioned that while two tugs can undock a ship
such as USNS Henry J. Kaiser, it takes three to undock an aircraft carrier.
MV C Tractor 9 at the bow and MV C Tractor 7 at the stern MV C Tractor 9 at the bow and MV C Tractor 7
of USS Ronald Reagan at 10:36 AM. at the stern of USS Ronald Reagan at 10:38 AM.
These tugs would later trade places. Note the gate boats near MV C Tractor 9.
MV C Tractor 6 arriving on the scene at 10:38 AM. The gate being opened at 10:39 AM.
MV C-Tractor 6 http://www.tugboatinformation.com/tug.cfm?id=2757
http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/details/ships/shipid:30612/mmsi:8875413/imo:8875413/vessel:C_TRACTOR_6
The bow of USS Midway, Japanese helicopter JDS Hyuga at 10:41 AM.
carrier JDS Hyuga, and
USS George Washington at 10:40 AM.
JDS Hyuga http://www.militaryfactory.com/ships/detail.asp?ship_id=CVH-Hyuga-DDH181
This ship, which in no way looks like a destroyer, is called a “helicopter destroyer”.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hy%C5%ABga-class_helicopter_destroyer
These are destroyers:
http://www.navsource.org/archives/05idx.htm http://www.combinedfleet.com/dd.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatsuyuki-class_destroyer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asagiri-class_destroyer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murasame-class_destroyer_(1994) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takanami-class_destroyer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haruna-class_destroyer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirane-class_destroyer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akizuki-class_destroyer_(2010) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatakaze-class_destroyer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kong%C5%8D-class_destroyer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atago-class_destroyer
Calling an aircraft carrier type ship a “destroyer” by the Japanese Bullshit FUBAR artists is like the FUBARS committed by the Beltway Bullshit
FUBAR artists. The Hyuga class ships are aircraft carriers, helicopter carriers, seacontrol ships, or amphibious assault ships (the Royal Navy
aircraft carriers HMS Illustrious and HMS Ark Royal both served as amphibious assault ships). All the Hyuga class aircraft carriers need are
some Lightning IIs. The deal for France to build two amphibious assault ships for Russia fell through.
http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/naval/ships/2015/08/09/mistral-dispute-russia-settled-france-eyes-exports/31278439/
Japan and Canada have a history of operating aircraft carriers.
http://www.combinedfleet.com/cv.htm http://www.hazegray.org/navhist/canada/
http://www.hazegray.org/navhist/canada/ww2/ http://www.hazegray.org/navhist/canada/postwar/
Note that wastrels threw away HMCS Bonaventure shortly after an overhaul. Why not sell both to Japan or Canada, or one to each?
Japan now has four helicopter carriers, and the newest has a proper aircraft carrier name.
http://news.usni.org/2015/08/27/japan-launches-second-helicopter-carrier
The original Kaga was laid down as a battleship, but like our Lexington class was converted to an aircraft carrier.
http://www.combinedfleet.com/ijnnames.htm http://www.combinedfleet.com/ships/kaga
Hyuga is yet another name which was used before. http://www.combinedfleet.com/ships/ise
http://ww2db.com/ship_spec.php?ship_id=B29
Another potential buyer would be Australia, another country with a history of operating aircraft carriers, which now has two amphibious assault
ships nearing completion. It is the practice of navies to have only a third of a type of ship on deployment, a third undertaking shakedown and
training, and a third undergoing overhaul.
http://www.navy.gov.au/fleet/ships-boats-craft/lhd
http://www.hazegray.org/navhist/carriers/uk_light.htm#inv-cl
http://www.thisiswesternmorningnews.co.uk/news/Navy-turns-civilians-resources-run-dry/article-529219-detail/article.html
http://www.thisisdevon.co.uk/Navy-turns-civilians-resources-run-dry/story-11406800-detail/story.html
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htamph/articles/20121008.aspx
A third amphibious assault ship would be advantageous to Australia. The Brits made a mistake of only building two aircraft carriers. India
will have at least three, and it looks like China will build at least two more to go with Liaoning.
http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/the-equipment/ships/future-ships/aircraft-carrier
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Indian_Navy_ships#Aircraft_carriers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikrant-class_aircraft_carrier
http://news.yahoo.com/china-building-two-aircraft-carriers-taiwan-defense-ministry-075031992.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_aircraft_carrier_Liaoning
It was a mistake for France to build amphibious assault ships for Russia, since these ships could be easily turned into seacontrol ships with
short takeoff aircraft (the Russian version of the Harrier) and ASW helicopters. If Russia became an enemy, these ships if they were Russian
these ships could easily sink French submarines.